topic stringclasses 28 values | user_query stringclasses 28 values | perspective_1 stringclasses 869 values | perspective_1_name stringclasses 1 value | perspective_2 stringclasses 813 values | perspective_2_name stringclasses 1 value | prompt stringlengths 578 1.51k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Prescription Drug Costs | Should the US Government Regulate Prescription Drug Prices? | pro: Without regulation, drug costs are inconsistent and often hidden, leaving doctors struggling to provide appropriate care to their patients. pro: People may be forced to choose between purchasing basics like food or medicine due to high medication expenses. | pro | con: The US federal government should stop meddling in the prescription drug industry because it already has too much involvement in healthcare. Expanded access to affordable insurance that better serves customers by covering a larger percentage of prescription drug costs would more effectively lower drug costs for patients. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the US Government Regulate Prescription Drug Prices?
pro arguments provided: pro: Without regulation, drug costs are inconsistent and often hidden, leaving doctors struggling to provide appropriate care to their patients. pro: People may be forced to choose between purchasing basics like food or medicine due to high medication expenses.
con arguments provided: con: The US federal government should stop meddling in the prescription drug industry because it already has too much involvement in healthcare. Expanded access to affordable insurance that better serves customers by covering a larger percentage of prescription drug costs would more effectively lower drug costs for patients.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Space Colonization | Should Humans Colonize Space? | pro: The next logical stage in human development and space exploration is space colonization. pro: Space technology development can coexist with conservation initiatives on Earth. | pro | Humans living in space is pure science fiction. con: Humans cannot live in space, and even if they could, living there would be unpleasant. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Humans Colonize Space?
pro arguments provided: pro: The next logical stage in human development and space exploration is space colonization. pro: Space technology development can coexist with conservation initiatives on Earth.
con arguments provided: Humans living in space is pure science fiction. con: Humans cannot live in space, and even if they could, living there would be unpleasant.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. | pro | Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy.
con arguments provided: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Violent video games reinforce fighting as a means of dealing with conflict by rewarding the use of violent action with increased life force, more weapons, moving on to higher levels, and more. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Violent video games reinforce fighting as a means of dealing with conflict by rewarding the use of violent action with increased life force, more weapons, moving on to higher levels, and more. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. | pro | con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Reparations for Slavery | Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations to the Descendants of Slaves? | There is government precedent for paying reparations to the descendants of slaves and to other groups. pro: Slavery led to giant disparities in wealth that should be addressed with reparations. pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health defecit" | pro | con: No one currently living is responsible for righting the wrongs committed by long dead slave owners. con: Righting the wrongs perpetrated by long-dead slave masters is not the responsibility of anybody alive today. con: The idea of reparations is demeaning to African Americans and would further divide the country along race lines. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations to the Descendants of Slaves?
pro arguments provided: There is government precedent for paying reparations to the descendants of slaves and to other groups. pro: Slavery led to giant disparities in wealth that should be addressed with reparations. pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health defecit"
con arguments provided: con: No one currently living is responsible for righting the wrongs committed by long dead slave owners. con: Righting the wrongs perpetrated by long-dead slave masters is not the responsibility of anybody alive today. con: The idea of reparations is demeaning to African Americans and would further divide the country along race lines.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Universal Basic Income | Should the United States Implement a Universal Basic Income? | pro: Universal Basic Income (UBI) reduces poverty and income inequality, and improves physical and mental health. | pro | con: UBI is too expensive. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Implement a Universal Basic Income?
pro arguments provided: pro: Universal Basic Income (UBI) reduces poverty and income inequality, and improves physical and mental health.
con arguments provided: con: UBI is too expensive.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Vaping E-Cigarettes | Is Vaping with E-Cigarettes Safe? | pro: E-cigarettes help adults quit smoking and lowers youth smoking rates. pro: Vaping is a safer way to ingest tobacco. | pro | con: Vaping among kids is skyrocketing: addicting a new generation to nicotine and introducing them to smoking. Disposable vapes and cigarettes are both bad for the environment. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Is Vaping with E-Cigarettes Safe?
pro arguments provided: pro: E-cigarettes help adults quit smoking and lowers youth smoking rates. pro: Vaping is a safer way to ingest tobacco.
con arguments provided: con: Vaping among kids is skyrocketing: addicting a new generation to nicotine and introducing them to smoking. Disposable vapes and cigarettes are both bad for the environment.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
American Socialism | Should the US Become Socialist? | pro: The US already has many successful and popular socialist policies. pro: The American public supports the implementation of more socialist policies. | pro | con: The majority of Americans support a capitalist economy. con: The United States had too many costly socialist rights. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the US Become Socialist?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US already has many successful and popular socialist policies. pro: The American public supports the implementation of more socialist policies.
con arguments provided: con: The majority of Americans support a capitalist economy. con: The United States had too many costly socialist rights.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Prescription Drug Costs | Should the US Government Regulate Prescription Drug Prices? | pro: People may be forced to choose between purchasing basics like food or medicine due to high medication expenses. pro: People may be forced to choose between purchasing essentials like food or medicine due to high drug expenses. pro: High drug costs can force people to choose between life-saving drugs and other essentials. | pro | con: The US federal government is already over-involved in healthcare and should leave prescription drugs to the free market. con: The US federal government should stop meddling in the prescription drug industry because it already has too much involvement in healthcare. Expanded access to affordable insurance that better serves customers by covering a larger percentage of prescription drug costs would more effectively lower drug costs for patients. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the US Government Regulate Prescription Drug Prices?
pro arguments provided: pro: People may be forced to choose between purchasing basics like food or medicine due to high medication expenses. pro: People may be forced to choose between purchasing essentials like food or medicine due to high drug expenses. pro: High drug costs can force people to choose between life-saving drugs and other essentials.
con arguments provided: con: The US federal government is already over-involved in healthcare and should leave prescription drugs to the free market. con: The US federal government should stop meddling in the prescription drug industry because it already has too much involvement in healthcare. Expanded access to affordable insurance that better serves customers by covering a larger percentage of prescription drug costs would more effectively lower drug costs for patients.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Penny | Should the Penny Stay in Circulation? | pro: A penny can be used for decades and is more cost-efficient to produce than a nickel. pro: The existence of pennies helps raise a lot of money for charities. pro: A penny will last for decades and is less expensive to create than a nickel. | pro | The penny has practically no value and should be taken out of circulation just as other coins have been in U.S. history. con: The process of making pennies is costly both financially and environmentally. con: The process of producing pennies is both financially and environmentally harmful. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the Penny Stay in Circulation?
pro arguments provided: pro: A penny can be used for decades and is more cost-efficient to produce than a nickel. pro: The existence of pennies helps raise a lot of money for charities. pro: A penny will last for decades and is less expensive to create than a nickel.
con arguments provided: The penny has practically no value and should be taken out of circulation just as other coins have been in U.S. history. con: The process of making pennies is costly both financially and environmentally. con: The process of producing pennies is both financially and environmentally harmful.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
American Socialism | Should the US Become Socialist? | pro: The American people supports the introduction of greater socialist programs. pro: The United States already boasts a number of successful and popular socialist measures. Socialist policies can work with capitalist structures to undo the harm done by unfettered capitalism. | pro | con: The American public supports a capitalist economy. con: The United States had too many costly socialist rights. con: The United States already has far too many costly socialist entitlements. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the US Become Socialist?
pro arguments provided: pro: The American people supports the introduction of greater socialist programs. pro: The United States already boasts a number of successful and popular socialist measures. Socialist policies can work with capitalist structures to undo the harm done by unfettered capitalism.
con arguments provided: con: The American public supports a capitalist economy. con: The United States had too many costly socialist rights. con: The United States already has far too many costly socialist entitlements.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) | Should Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Be Grown? | pro: GMO crops help end world hunger by lowering food costs and boosting nutrient content. pro: Raising GMO crops benefits the environment by reducing pesticide use, reducing water waste, and lowering carbon emissions. | pro | con: Certain GM crops harm the environment through the increased use of toxic herbicides and pesticides. Tinkering with the genetic makeup of plants may result in changes to the food supply that introduce toxins or trigger allergic reactions. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Be Grown?
pro arguments provided: pro: GMO crops help end world hunger by lowering food costs and boosting nutrient content. pro: Raising GMO crops benefits the environment by reducing pesticide use, reducing water waste, and lowering carbon emissions.
con arguments provided: con: Certain GM crops harm the environment through the increased use of toxic herbicides and pesticides. Tinkering with the genetic makeup of plants may result in changes to the food supply that introduce toxins or trigger allergic reactions.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Universal Basic Income | Should the United States Implement a Universal Basic Income? | UBI leads to positive job growth and a better educated citizenry. UBI reduces gender inequality. pro: UBI guarantees income for non-working parents and caregivers, thus empowering important traditionally unpaid roles, especially for women. | pro | con: UBI is too expensive. UBI increases poverty by giving to everyone instead of targeting the poor. con: UBI removes the incentive to work, adversely affecting the economy and leading to a labor and skills shortage. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Implement a Universal Basic Income?
pro arguments provided: UBI leads to positive job growth and a better educated citizenry. UBI reduces gender inequality. pro: UBI guarantees income for non-working parents and caregivers, thus empowering important traditionally unpaid roles, especially for women.
con arguments provided: con: UBI is too expensive. UBI increases poverty by giving to everyone instead of targeting the poor. con: UBI removes the incentive to work, adversely affecting the economy and leading to a labor and skills shortage.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Space Colonization | Should Humans Colonize Space? | pro: Space technology development can coexist with conservation initiatives on Earth. pro: Technological advancement into space can exist alongside conservation efforts on Earth. pro: Space colonization is the next logical step in space exploration and human growth. | pro | Humans living in space is pure science fiction. con: Space is inhospitable to humans and life in space, if even possible, would be miserable. con: Earth is a disaster because of us. Instead than killing a moon or another planet, we could clean it up. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Humans Colonize Space?
pro arguments provided: pro: Space technology development can coexist with conservation initiatives on Earth. pro: Technological advancement into space can exist alongside conservation efforts on Earth. pro: Space colonization is the next logical step in space exploration and human growth.
con arguments provided: Humans living in space is pure science fiction. con: Space is inhospitable to humans and life in space, if even possible, would be miserable. con: Earth is a disaster because of us. Instead than killing a moon or another planet, we could clean it up.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. | pro | con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities.
con arguments provided: con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Reparations for Slavery | Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations to the Descendants of Slaves? | pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health defecit" pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health deficit." | pro | con: No one currently living is responsible for righting the wrongs committed by long dead slave owners. con: Reparations will further racially divide the nation and are disrespectful to African Americans. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations to the Descendants of Slaves?
pro arguments provided: pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health defecit" pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health deficit."
con arguments provided: con: No one currently living is responsible for righting the wrongs committed by long dead slave owners. con: Reparations will further racially divide the nation and are disrespectful to African Americans.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. | pro | con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities.
con arguments provided: con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. | pro | Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill.
con arguments provided: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Private Prisons | Should Prisons Be Privatized? | pro: Privatizing prisons can reduce prison overpopulation, making the facilities safer for inmates and employees. pro: Private prisons have the potential to reform the failing government-run jail system. | pro | con: Privatizing prisons is costly and leaves the most expensive prisoners to public prisons. con: Privatizing prisons is expensive, and it sends the most expensive inmates to public jails. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Prisons Be Privatized?
pro arguments provided: pro: Privatizing prisons can reduce prison overpopulation, making the facilities safer for inmates and employees. pro: Private prisons have the potential to reform the failing government-run jail system.
con arguments provided: con: Privatizing prisons is costly and leaves the most expensive prisoners to public prisons. con: Privatizing prisons is expensive, and it sends the most expensive inmates to public jails.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. Violent video games reinforce fighting as a means of dealing with conflict by rewarding the use of violent action with increased life force, more weapons, moving on to higher levels, and more. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. Violent video games reinforce fighting as a means of dealing with conflict by rewarding the use of violent action with increased life force, more weapons, moving on to higher levels, and more. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Paying College Athletes | Should Colleges and Universities Pay College Athletes? | pro: The work and likenesses of collegiate athletes are used unfairly by the NCAA, institutions, and universities to make money. | pro | con: Scholarships are fair financial compensation for college athletes, especially considering the precarious finances of athletic departments. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Colleges and Universities Pay College Athletes?
pro arguments provided: pro: The work and likenesses of collegiate athletes are used unfairly by the NCAA, institutions, and universities to make money.
con arguments provided: con: Scholarships are fair financial compensation for college athletes, especially considering the precarious finances of athletic departments.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Reparations for Slavery | Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations to the Descendants of Slaves? | There is government precedent for paying reparations to the descendants of slaves and to other groups. pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health defecit" pro: Massive wealth imbalances caused by slavery need to be addressed through reparations. | pro | con: Nobody alive today is obligated to make up for the wrongs perpetrated by long-dead slave owners. con: No one currently living is responsible for righting the wrongs committed by long dead slave owners. con: Reparations will further racially divide the nation and are disrespectful to African Americans. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the Federal Government Pay Reparations to the Descendants of Slaves?
pro arguments provided: There is government precedent for paying reparations to the descendants of slaves and to other groups. pro: Reparations should be made since slavery left African American communities vulnerable to the "slave health defecit" pro: Massive wealth imbalances caused by slavery need to be addressed through reparations.
con arguments provided: con: Nobody alive today is obligated to make up for the wrongs perpetrated by long-dead slave owners. con: No one currently living is responsible for righting the wrongs committed by long dead slave owners. con: Reparations will further racially divide the nation and are disrespectful to African Americans.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Penny | Should the Penny Stay in Circulation? | pro: Preserving the penny keeps consumer prices down and avoids harming low-income households. pro: The availability of pennies contributes significantly to the collection of funds for charitable organizations. pro: A penny will last for decades and is less expensive to create than a nickel. | pro | con: The process of producing pennies is both financially and ecologically harmful. The penny has practically no value and should be taken out of circulation just as other coins have been in U.S. history. con: Removing pennies would save time at the point of purchase while not harming customers or businesses financially. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the Penny Stay in Circulation?
pro arguments provided: pro: Preserving the penny keeps consumer prices down and avoids harming low-income households. pro: The availability of pennies contributes significantly to the collection of funds for charitable organizations. pro: A penny will last for decades and is less expensive to create than a nickel.
con arguments provided: con: The process of producing pennies is both financially and ecologically harmful. The penny has practically no value and should be taken out of circulation just as other coins have been in U.S. history. con: Removing pennies would save time at the point of purchase while not harming customers or businesses financially.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Marijuana (CBD) for Pets | Is CBD Good for Pets? | pro: A majority of veterinarians agree that CBD helps animals. | pro | con: CBD pet products are unregulated. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Is CBD Good for Pets?
pro arguments provided: pro: A majority of veterinarians agree that CBD helps animals.
con arguments provided: con: CBD pet products are unregulated.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Cuba Embargo | Should the United States Maintain Its Embargo against Cuba? | pro: Cuban-Americans support the embargo. pro: Sanctions should be imposed on Cuba because it is well known that it has frequently sponsored terrorist activities. Ending the embargo would only help the Cuban government, not regular Cuban citizens. | pro | con: The embargo harms the people of Cuba, not the government as intended. con: The Cuban people suffer because of the embargo, not the government as it was intended. con: The American economy suffers from the embargo. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Maintain Its Embargo against Cuba?
pro arguments provided: pro: Cuban-Americans support the embargo. pro: Sanctions should be imposed on Cuba because it is well known that it has frequently sponsored terrorist activities. Ending the embargo would only help the Cuban government, not regular Cuban citizens.
con arguments provided: con: The embargo harms the people of Cuba, not the government as intended. con: The Cuban people suffer because of the embargo, not the government as it was intended. con: The American economy suffers from the embargo.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. | pro | con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. | pro | con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws.
con arguments provided: con: Federal rules that are binding on state and local governments are disregarded under sanctuary policies. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Cuba Embargo | Should the United States Maintain Its Embargo against Cuba? | pro: Cuban-Americans support the embargo. Cuba has not met the conditions required to lift the embargo or shown a willingness to negotiate in good faith with the United States. pro: Cuba has not demonstrated a willingness to negotiate in good faith with the United States. | pro | con: The American economy suffers from the embargo. The embargo is hypocritical, and the United States should not have trading and travel policies for Cuba different from those for other countries with governments or policies it opposes. con: The embargo harms the US economy. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Maintain Its Embargo against Cuba?
pro arguments provided: pro: Cuban-Americans support the embargo. Cuba has not met the conditions required to lift the embargo or shown a willingness to negotiate in good faith with the United States. pro: Cuba has not demonstrated a willingness to negotiate in good faith with the United States.
con arguments provided: con: The American economy suffers from the embargo. The embargo is hypocritical, and the United States should not have trading and travel policies for Cuba different from those for other countries with governments or policies it opposes. con: The embargo harms the US economy.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Paying College Athletes | Should Colleges and Universities Pay College Athletes? | pro: The NCAA, colleges, and universities profit unfairly from the work and likenesses of college athletes. pro: The work and likenesses of collegiate athletes are used unfairly by the NCAA, institutions, and universities to make money. College athletes are risking their bodies as well as their future careers and earning potential to play for colleges and universities while often receiving a sub-par education. | pro | con: Scholarships are an appropriate kind of financial recompense for collegiate athletes, particularly in light of the athletic departments' dire financial situation. Paying college athletes would not solve the real problem: the American amateur sports system is broken. Very few college athletes will go pro, so athletes should take advantage of the education being offered in exchange for playing a college sport. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Colleges and Universities Pay College Athletes?
pro arguments provided: pro: The NCAA, colleges, and universities profit unfairly from the work and likenesses of college athletes. pro: The work and likenesses of collegiate athletes are used unfairly by the NCAA, institutions, and universities to make money. College athletes are risking their bodies as well as their future careers and earning potential to play for colleges and universities while often receiving a sub-par education.
con arguments provided: con: Scholarships are an appropriate kind of financial recompense for collegiate athletes, particularly in light of the athletic departments' dire financial situation. Paying college athletes would not solve the real problem: the American amateur sports system is broken. Very few college athletes will go pro, so athletes should take advantage of the education being offered in exchange for playing a college sport.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary cities harbor criminals, creating a dangerous environment for US citizens.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Private Prisons | Should Prisons Be Privatized? | pro: Private prisons have the potential to reform the failing government-run jail system. pro: Private prisons provide innovative strategies to reduce recidivism. | pro | con: All prisons, not only privately run ones, should be closed down. con: Privatizing prisons is expensive, and it sends the most expensive inmates to public jails. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Prisons Be Privatized?
pro arguments provided: pro: Private prisons have the potential to reform the failing government-run jail system. pro: Private prisons provide innovative strategies to reduce recidivism.
con arguments provided: con: All prisons, not only privately run ones, should be closed down. con: Privatizing prisons is expensive, and it sends the most expensive inmates to public jails.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. | pro | con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law. | pro | con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: The Tenth Amendment protects sanctuary policies, which are legal.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. | pro | con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone attacks that are conducted in secret violate human rights and constitute extrajudicial assassination. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Prescription Drug Costs | Should the US Government Regulate Prescription Drug Prices? | pro: Without regulation, drug costs are inconsistent and often hidden, leaving doctors struggling to provide appropriate care to their patients. pro: High drug costs can force people to choose between life-saving drugs and other essentials. | pro | con: The US federal government should stop meddling in the prescription drug industry because it already has too much involvement in healthcare. Expanded access to affordable insurance that better serves customers by covering a larger percentage of prescription drug costs would more effectively lower drug costs for patients. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the US Government Regulate Prescription Drug Prices?
pro arguments provided: pro: Without regulation, drug costs are inconsistent and often hidden, leaving doctors struggling to provide appropriate care to their patients. pro: High drug costs can force people to choose between life-saving drugs and other essentials.
con arguments provided: con: The US federal government should stop meddling in the prescription drug industry because it already has too much involvement in healthcare. Expanded access to affordable insurance that better serves customers by covering a larger percentage of prescription drug costs would more effectively lower drug costs for patients.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Americans support drone strikes. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law. | pro | con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. pro: Drone strikes are legal under American and international law.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Secretive drone strikes amount to extrajudicial assassination and violate human rights.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. | pro | con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy.
con arguments provided: con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Dress Codes | Should Dress Codes Be Implemented and Enforced? | pro: Uniformly mandated dress codes promote safety. pro: Dress codes promote inclusiveness and a comfortable, cooperative environment while eliminating individualistic attire that can distract from common goals. pro: Dress codes enforce decorum and a serious, professional atmosphere conducive to success. | pro | con: Dress codes bolster religious and cultural intolerance. con: Uniformly mandated dress codes are seldom uniformly mandated, often discriminating against women and marginalized groups. con: Dress codes reinforce racist standards of beauty and dress. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Dress Codes Be Implemented and Enforced?
pro arguments provided: pro: Uniformly mandated dress codes promote safety. pro: Dress codes promote inclusiveness and a comfortable, cooperative environment while eliminating individualistic attire that can distract from common goals. pro: Dress codes enforce decorum and a serious, professional atmosphere conducive to success.
con arguments provided: con: Dress codes bolster religious and cultural intolerance. con: Uniformly mandated dress codes are seldom uniformly mandated, often discriminating against women and marginalized groups. con: Dress codes reinforce racist standards of beauty and dress.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. | pro | con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Space Colonization | Should Humans Colonize Space? | pro: Space technology development can coexist with conservation initiatives on Earth. pro: Space colonization is the next logical step in space exploration and human growth. | pro | con: Humans have made a mess of Earth. We should clean it up instead of destroying a moon or another planet. Humans living in space is pure science fiction. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Humans Colonize Space?
pro arguments provided: pro: Space technology development can coexist with conservation initiatives on Earth. pro: Space colonization is the next logical step in space exploration and human growth.
con arguments provided: con: Humans have made a mess of Earth. We should clean it up instead of destroying a moon or another planet. Humans living in space is pure science fiction.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Space Colonization | Should Humans Colonize Space? | Humans have a right and a moral duty to save our species from suffering and extinction. pro: Space colonization is the next logical step in space exploration and human growth. | pro | con: Humans living in space is pure science fiction. con: Space is inhospitable to humans and life in space, if even possible, would be miserable. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Humans Colonize Space?
pro arguments provided: Humans have a right and a moral duty to save our species from suffering and extinction. pro: Space colonization is the next logical step in space exploration and human growth.
con arguments provided: con: Humans living in space is pure science fiction. con: Space is inhospitable to humans and life in space, if even possible, would be miserable.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Vaping E-Cigarettes | Is Vaping with E-Cigarettes Safe? | pro: E-cigarettes help adults quit smoking and lowers youth smoking rates. pro: E-cigarettes reduce health care costs, create jobs, and help the economy. pro: E-cigarettes lower health-care expenses, create jobs, and benefit the economy. | pro | con: Vaping is associated with major health concerns such as depression, lung disease, and stroke. con: Vaping among kids is skyrocketing: addicting a new generation to nicotine and introducing them to smoking. con: It's possible for e-cigarettes to burst and catch fire. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Is Vaping with E-Cigarettes Safe?
pro arguments provided: pro: E-cigarettes help adults quit smoking and lowers youth smoking rates. pro: E-cigarettes reduce health care costs, create jobs, and help the economy. pro: E-cigarettes lower health-care expenses, create jobs, and benefit the economy.
con arguments provided: con: Vaping is associated with major health concerns such as depression, lung disease, and stroke. con: Vaping among kids is skyrocketing: addicting a new generation to nicotine and introducing them to smoking. con: It's possible for e-cigarettes to burst and catch fire.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary programs violate federal laws that state and local governments must follow. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting. | pro | con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. By inhabiting violent characters in video games, children are more likely to imitate the behaviors of those characters and have difficulty distinguishing reality from fantasy. pro: Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.
con arguments provided: con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. con: Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed. Violent video games provide opportunities for children to explore the consequences of violent actions, develop their moral compasses, and release their stress and anger (catharsis) in the game, leading to less real world aggression.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: US citizens are in favor of drone strikes. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries and are extremely unpopular in the affected countries. con: Drone attacks are immensely unpopular in the countries that are targeted and violate the sovereignty of other nations.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence. | pro | Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Violent video games desensitize players to real-life violence.
con arguments provided: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. Violent video games are a convenient scapegoat for those who would rather not deal with the actual causes of violence in the U.S. con: Many risk factors are associated with youth violence, but video games are not among them.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities protect undocumented immigrants against federal immigration laws. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Cities that serve as havens for criminals put American people at peril.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Drone Strikes Overseas | Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad? | pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer. | pro | con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should the United States Continue Its Use of Drone Strikes Abroad?
pro arguments provided: pro: Drones keep the US military and populations in other nations safer by limiting the scope, size, and casualties of military operations. pro: Drone strikes make the United States safer by remotely decimating terrorist networks across the world. pro: Drones limit the scope, scale, and casualties of military action, keeping the US military and civilians in other countries safer.
con arguments provided: con: Drone strikes terrorize and kill civilians. con: Drone strikes allow an emotional disconnect from the horrors of war and inflict psychological stress on drone operators. con: Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets and create more terrorists.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games. | pro | Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: pro: The US military uses violent video games to train soldiers to kill. pro: Many perpetrators of mass shootings played violent video games.
con arguments provided: Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: As sales of violent video games have significantly increased, violent juvenile crime rates have significantly decreased.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Video Games and Violence | Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence? | Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. Violent video games reinforce fighting as a means of dealing with conflict by rewarding the use of violent action with increased life force, more weapons, moving on to higher levels, and more. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness. | pro | con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Do Violent Video Games Contribute to Youth Violence?
pro arguments provided: Video games that portray violence against women lead to more harmful attitudes and sexually violent actions towards women. Violent video games reinforce fighting as a means of dealing with conflict by rewarding the use of violent action with increased life force, more weapons, moving on to higher levels, and more. pro: Exposure to violent video games is linked to lower empathy and decreased kindness.
con arguments provided: con: Simple statistics do not support the claim that violent video games cause mass shootings or other violence. Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world. con: Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and prosocial behaviors.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities. | pro | con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary policies are legal and protected by the Tenth Amendment. pro: Undocumented immigrants are protected from federal immigration rules in sanctuary communities. pro: Undocumented immigrants are shielded from federal immigration regulations by sanctuary communities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary towns house criminals, making it risky for American residents. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
DC and Puerto Rico Statehood | Should Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico Be Granted US Statehood? | pro: Puerto Rico residents are American citizens who are treated like second-class citizens. pro: Residents of DC are American citizens who get second-class treatment. | pro | con: DC was never meant to be a state of the United States. Granting D.C. or Puerto Rico statehood is a partisan ploy by liberals to unfairly gain more voters for the passage of legislation that the majority of Americans reject and which couldn’t win approval under existing laws. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico Be Granted US Statehood?
pro arguments provided: pro: Puerto Rico residents are American citizens who are treated like second-class citizens. pro: Residents of DC are American citizens who get second-class treatment.
con arguments provided: con: DC was never meant to be a state of the United States. Granting D.C. or Puerto Rico statehood is a partisan ploy by liberals to unfairly gain more voters for the passage of legislation that the majority of Americans reject and which couldn’t win approval under existing laws.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Sanctuary Cities | Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding? | pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities. | pro | con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound. | con | You will be given an user's question on a sensitive topic, along with arguments for and against it. Your task is to provide a neutral point-of-view answer to the user's question, using the arguments given. Use all the arguments given, and do not add to your answer any argument other than those provided.
User query: Should Sanctuary Cities Receive Federal Funding?
pro arguments provided: pro: Sanctuary cities encourage better relationships between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Sanctuary cities promote positive interactions between undocumented immigrants and law enforcement. pro: Better communication between unauthorized immigrants and law enforcement is promoted by sanctuary cities.
con arguments provided: con: Sanctuary policies prevent local and state police officers from doing their jobs. con: Local and state police personnel are unable to perform their duties due to sanctuary rules. con: Sanctuary policies defy federal laws to which state and local governments are bound.
Neutral point-of-view answer to user query, rewriting provided arguments in natural language:
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.