Upload folder using huggingface_hub

README.md

@@ -1,35 +1,94 @@
-# Hugging Face Dataset Draft
+---
+pretty_name: Aether Build Protocol Examples
+license: mit
+language:
+  - en
+tags:
+  - manufacturing
+  - fabrication
+  - cad
+  - rfq
+  - mcp
+  - openapi
+  - ai-agents
+  - machine-to-machine
+  - design-to-manufacturing
+  - physical-ai
+  - json-schema
+  - digital-thread
+  - human-in-the-loop
+task_categories:
+  - text-generation
+  - question-answering
+size_categories:
+  - n<1K
+---
 
-## Title
+# Aether Build Protocol Examples
 
-Aether Build Protocol: Machine-to-Machine Print Transaction Sandbox Examples
+Aether Build Protocol Examples is a small public dataset of machine-readable physical build intent artifacts.
 
-## Summary
+It is designed for AI developers, agent-framework builders, CAD/design workflows, fabrication review systems, and researchers studying machine-to-machine physical transaction protocols.
 
-This draft dataset contains example machine-readable artifacts demonstrating a bounded local-only print transaction simulation.
+## What is included
 
-## Included Examples
+This dataset contains example artifacts from Aether Build Protocol:
 
 - Build Packet example
+- Quote Request example
+- Quote Response example, if present
 - Human Approval Event example
 - Machine Response Envelope example
 - Agent Readiness Report example
-- M2M transaction summary example
+- M2M Print Transaction Summary example
+
+## Why this exists
+
+AI agents cannot safely coordinate physical work from ambiguous PDFs, screenshots, email threads, and loose CAD notes.
+
+They need structured data contracts, permission boundaries, deterministic response envelopes, and human approval gates.
+
+Aether provides example artifacts for the emerging layer between design intent and physical execution.
+
+## Primary use cases
+
+- machine-readable physical build intent research
+- RFQ normalization experiments
+- quote-response validation
+- agent-safe manufacturing workflow design
+- human-gated design-to-fabrication coordination
+- MCP/OpenAPI manufacturing protocol exploration
+- digital-thread and provenance research
 
 ## Guardrails
 
-- synthetic examples only
-- local-only sandbox
-- sandbox only
-- example artifacts only
-- no real manufacturing event
-- no real shop contacted
-- no quote routed
-- no print approved
-- no fabrication approval
-- no engineering approval
-- no real vendor communication
-- no payment approval
-- no load certification
-- no delivery authorization
-- human approval required for any external interpretation
+These are synthetic examples only.
+
+No real shop was contacted.
+No quote was routed.
+No print was approved.
+No fabrication was approved.
+No engineering approval was granted.
+No payment was approved.
+No load certification was granted.
+No delivery authorization was granted.
+
+Human approval is required before any external interpretation or real-world action.
+
+## Related project
+
+GitHub:
+https://github.com/chevy155/Aether-build-protocol
+
+Space:
+https://huggingface.co/spaces/lonestar155/aether-cad-to-agent-sandbox
+
+## Feedback requested
+
+Useful feedback includes:
+
+- What fields are missing for real fabrication review?
+- What would a shop need before quoting?
+- Which schema fields are unclear?
+- What additional artifacts would help designers and fabricators?
+- What should an AI agent never be allowed to do in this workflow?