Upload folder using huggingface_hub

dataset_info.json

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+{
+  "description": "A dummy dataset for testing Hugging Face datasets library",
+  "citation": "This is a test dataset created for demonstration purposes",
+  "homepage": "https://example.com",
+  "license": "MIT",
+  "features": {
+    "id": {
+      "dtype": "int64",
+      "_type": "Value"
+    },
+    "text": {
+      "dtype": "string",
+      "_type": "Value"
+    },
+    "label": {
+      "dtype": "int64",
+      "_type": "Value"
+    },
+    "category": {
+      "dtype": "string",
+      "_type": "Value"
+    },
+    "score": {
+      "dtype": "float64",
+      "_type": "Value"
+    }
+  },
+  "builder_name": "csv",
+  "config_name": "default",
+  "version": {
+    "version_str": "1.0.0"
+  },
+  "splits": {
+    "train": {
+      "name": "train",
+      "num_bytes": 1024,
+      "num_examples": 100,
+      "dataset_name": "my_dataset"
+    },
+    "test": {
+      "name": "test",
+      "num_bytes": 512,
+      "num_examples": 50,
+      "dataset_name": "my_dataset"
+    }
+  },
+  "supervised_keys": {
+    "input": "text",
+    "output": "label"
+  }
+} 

test.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+id,text,label,category,score
+101,"This test example shows positive sentiment",1,positive,0.92
+102,"Negative evaluation of the results",0,negative,0.18
+103,"The analysis is inconclusive",2,neutral,0.51
+104,"Outstanding performance in validation",1,positive,0.96
+105,"Poor quality of the output",0,negative,0.14
+106,"The metrics are average",2,neutral,0.48
+107,"Excellent results from testing",1,positive,0.94
+108,"Failed validation of the model",0,negative,0.06
+109,"The performance is standard",2,neutral,0.50
+110,"Remarkable accuracy in prediction",1,positive,0.97
+111,"Terrible error rate in testing",0,negative,0.08
+112,"The outcome is balanced",2,neutral,0.49
+113,"Fantastic improvement in metrics",1,positive,0.93
+114,"Complete breakdown of the system",0,negative,0.02
+115,"The results are typical",2,neutral,0.52
+116,"Incredible precision in analysis",1,positive,0.95
+117,"Horrible performance in evaluation",0,negative,0.11
+118,"The data is consistent",2,neutral,0.47
+119,"Exceptional quality in testing",1,positive,0.91
+120,"Dreadful failure in validation",0,negative,0.09
+121,"The method is reliable",2,neutral,0.50
+122,"Magnificent success in the experiment",1,positive,0.98
+123,"Appalling results from the test",0,negative,0.15
+124,"The process is routine",2,neutral,0.48
+125,"Splendid accuracy in prediction",1,positive,0.89
+126,"Abysmal performance in analysis",0,negative,0.07
+127,"The output is normal",2,neutral,0.51
+128,"Glorious breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.96
+129,"Catastrophic failure in testing",0,negative,0.04
+130,"The approach is standard",2,neutral,0.49
+131,"Phenomenal results from validation",1,positive,0.94
+132,"Disastrous outcome of the experiment",0,negative,0.12
+133,"The technique is conventional",2,neutral,0.50
+134,"Extraordinary precision in analysis",1,positive,0.97
+135,"Miserable performance in testing",0,negative,0.08
+136,"The results are expected",2,neutral,0.48
+137,"Astounding accuracy in prediction",1,positive,0.95
+138,"Wretched failure in validation",0,negative,0.13
+139,"The method is proven",2,neutral,0.51
+140,"Marvelous success in the experiment",1,positive,0.92
+141,"Deplorable results from the test",0,negative,0.10
+142,"The process is established",2,neutral,0.49
+143,"Wonderful precision in analysis",1,positive,0.96
+144,"Lamentable performance in testing",0,negative,0.11
+145,"The output is typical",2,neutral,0.50
+146,"Terrific accuracy in prediction",1,positive,0.93
+147,"Pitiful failure in validation",0,negative,0.09
+148,"The approach is reliable",2,neutral,0.48
+149,"Fabulous success in the experiment",1,positive,0.98
+150,"Pathetic results from the test",0,negative,0.06 

train.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+id,text,label,category,score
+1,"This is a positive example of machine learning text",1,positive,0.95
+2,"Negative sentiment in this sample text",0,negative,0.15
+3,"Neutral example with balanced content",2,neutral,0.50
+4,"Another positive example for training",1,positive,0.88
+5,"This text contains negative words",0,negative,0.22
+6,"Machine learning is fascinating technology",1,positive,0.92
+7,"I don't like this approach",0,negative,0.08
+8,"The weather is nice today",2,neutral,0.45
+9,"Excellent performance on this task",1,positive,0.97
+10,"Poor results from the experiment",0,negative,0.12
+11,"The data shows mixed results",2,neutral,0.55
+12,"Amazing breakthrough in AI research",1,positive,0.94
+13,"Disappointing outcome of the study",0,negative,0.18
+14,"The temperature is moderate",2,neutral,0.48
+15,"Outstanding work on this project",1,positive,0.96
+16,"Failed to achieve the target",0,negative,0.05
+17,"The results are inconclusive",2,neutral,0.52
+18,"Brilliant solution to the problem",1,positive,0.93
+19,"Terrible performance in the test",0,negative,0.11
+20,"The situation is stable",2,neutral,0.47
+21,"Fantastic improvement in accuracy",1,positive,0.91
+22,"Complete failure of the system",0,negative,0.03
+23,"The conditions are normal",2,neutral,0.49
+24,"Remarkable progress in development",1,positive,0.89
+25,"Awful experience with the tool",0,negative,0.14
+26,"The status is unchanged",2,neutral,0.51
+27,"Incredible breakthrough discovery",1,positive,0.98
+28,"Horrible mistake in the code",0,negative,0.07
+29,"The environment is balanced",2,neutral,0.46
+30,"Exceptional quality of work",1,positive,0.90
+31,"Dreadful performance metrics",0,negative,0.09
+32,"The system is functional",2,neutral,0.53
+33,"Magnificent achievement in science",1,positive,0.95
+34,"Appalling results from analysis",0,negative,0.16
+35,"The process is routine",2,neutral,0.44
+36,"Splendid execution of the plan",1,positive,0.87
+37,"Abysmal failure of the model",0,negative,0.02
+38,"The output is standard",2,neutral,0.50
+39,"Glorious success in the experiment",1,positive,0.99
+40,"Catastrophic error in the system",0,negative,0.01
+41,"The method is conventional",2,neutral,0.48
+42,"Phenomenal results from the study",1,positive,0.96
+43,"Disastrous outcome of the trial",0,negative,0.04
+44,"The approach is traditional",2,neutral,0.52
+45,"Extraordinary performance in testing",1,positive,0.94
+46,"Miserable failure of the algorithm",0,negative,0.06
+47,"The technique is established",2,neutral,0.49
+48,"Astounding breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.97
+49,"Wretched performance in evaluation",0,negative,0.13
+50,"The procedure is standard",2,neutral,0.51
+51,"Marvelous improvement in efficiency",1,positive,0.92
+52,"Deplorable results from the test",0,negative,0.08
+53,"The strategy is proven",2,neutral,0.47
+54,"Wonderful progress in development",1,positive,0.93
+55,"Lamentable failure of the system",0,negative,0.15
+56,"The method is reliable",2,neutral,0.50
+57,"Terrific achievement in science",1,positive,0.95
+58,"Pitiful performance in analysis",0,negative,0.11
+59,"The process is consistent",2,neutral,0.48
+60,"Fabulous results from the study",1,positive,0.91
+61,"Pathetic failure of the model",0,negative,0.07
+62,"The approach is systematic",2,neutral,0.52
+63,"Superb execution of the plan",1,positive,0.96
+64,"Shameful results from the experiment",0,negative,0.09
+65,"The technique is methodical",2,neutral,0.49
+66,"Outstanding breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.98
+67,"Disgraceful performance in testing",0,negative,0.05
+68,"The procedure is organized",2,neutral,0.51
+69,"Excellent improvement in accuracy",1,positive,0.94
+70,"Scandalous failure of the algorithm",0,negative,0.12
+71,"The strategy is structured",2,neutral,0.47
+72,"Brilliant progress in development",1,positive,0.90
+73,"Infamous results from the trial",0,negative,0.14
+74,"The method is systematic",2,neutral,0.50
+75,"Genius achievement in science",1,positive,0.97
+76,"Notorious failure of the system",0,negative,0.06
+77,"The process is logical",2,neutral,0.48
+78,"Masterful execution of the plan",1,positive,0.95
+79,"Infamous performance in analysis",0,negative,0.10
+80,"The approach is rational",2,neutral,0.52
+81,"Artistic breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.93
+82,"Scandalous results from the study",0,negative,0.08
+83,"The technique is coherent",2,neutral,0.49
+84,"Creative improvement in efficiency",1,positive,0.91
+85,"Disreputable failure of the model",0,negative,0.13
+86,"The procedure is consistent",2,neutral,0.50
+87,"Innovative progress in development",1,positive,0.96
+88,"Discreditable performance in testing",0,negative,0.07
+89,"The method is reliable",2,neutral,0.48
+90,"Revolutionary achievement in science",1,positive,0.98
+91,"Disgraceful results from the experiment",0,negative,0.11
+92,"The strategy is proven",2,neutral,0.51
+93,"Pioneering breakthrough in research",1,positive,0.94
+94,"Shameful failure of the algorithm",0,negative,0.09
+95,"The approach is established",2,neutral,0.47
+96,"Groundbreaking improvement in accuracy",1,positive,0.95
+97,"Notorious results from the trial",0,negative,0.12
+98,"The technique is conventional",2,neutral,0.50
+99,"Cutting-edge progress in development",1,positive,0.97
+100,"Infamous failure of the system",0,negative,0.05