There are more students that are having their views and values shifted during college than in the past.


The children of college graduates are healthier and more prepared for school.


College graduates tend to have healthier, better educated offspring.


Children are typically healthier and more studious when their parents have graduated  college.


More and more jobs require college degrees.


A college degree is required for an increasing number of jobs.


More jobs only hire those with college degrees.


Too many students earning degrees has diluted the value of a bachelor's degree.


The value of a bachelor's degree has lessened.


A bachelor's degree is considered standard now.


College graduates have more and better employment opportunities.


Graduating from college increases employment opportunities.


The variety and quality of employment opportunities increases for college graduates.


Earning a college degree is a major life achievement.


A college education is a significant accomplishment.


One of the most important things that one can achieve in their lifetime is a college education.


Young adults learn interpersonal skills in college.


College imparts interpersonal skills to students.


Graduating from college can keep poverty at bay.


College graduates make more money.


College graduates have lower poverty rates.


College graduates do better financially.


People who graduate from college have more earning power.


College education has a high return as an investment.


Gaining a college education is money well spent.


Earning college education is always a worthwhile investment.


Learning is always worthwhile.


Learning will always pay off.


Learning and education is always a good investment.


Many recent college graduates are un- or underemployed.


In recent times, there are significant numbers of unemployed and underemployed college graduates.


Among those who are unemployed and underemployed, there are many college graduates.


Colleges provide networking value.


Attending college is a great way to network.


Going to college provides many opportunities to network.


A college degree is no guarantee of workplace benefits.


There is no guarantee there will be benefits.


Learning a trade profession is a better option than college for many young adults.


Young adults should consider learning a trade instead of going to college.


Trade professions are in need of more individuals and it may be more profitable than going to college.


College graduates are healthier and live longer.


Health and longevity are associated with graduating from a college.


College is an investment in health and longevity.


College graduates attract higher-paying employers to their communities.


Employers are attracted to locales with college graduates.


The more college graduates in one geographical area, the more higher-paying employers will be found


College allows students to explore career options.


Attending college affords great chances to check out career options.


The total cost of going to college also includes the cost of missing opportunities to make money at a job.


College stress can lead to health problems and other negative consequences.


College degrees do not guarantee learning or job preparation.


Acquiring a degree does not guarantee you a job.


Private schools encourage elitism


Private schools lack diversity


Private schools aren't diverse


Private schools don't have unique demographics


One problem with private schools is that they lack diversity


A lack of diversity is one issue with private schools


Private schools are financially beneficial for state schools


Private schools are financially good for the state


State schools receive financial benefits because the private schools


One benefit of private schools is that they financially help state schools


Private schools can also be good for state schools


It creates stereotypes and tensions within society


Removing 'choice' will improve the overall standard of our schools.


too many choices lead to substandard outcomes


Private schools aren't necessarily good for the child.


what is the best for the child is not always the private education


Private Schools inhibit reform of the public system


Abolishing a good service on the basis that some cannot afford it is absurd


Abolishing a good service that is unaffordable is a disservice to humanity.


It's ridiculous to abolish a good service based on inability to afford.


Private schools create competition


better schools lead to better schools


In a civilised society, there should be plenty of choice


choices are integral to modern civilized society


The goverment can't afford to take on more school children


More school children would be a hardship on the government.


The government needs financial help to take on more school children.


Private schools one on one time with individual teacher and student enables better results in the long run.


Private schools provide individual time for students and teachers for best results.


Teachers can benefit students better with one on one time in private schools.


With more education comes more opportunities


More Education Brings More Opportunities


The more education you have the more opportunities


More education brings more opportunities


Opportunities are influenced by education


The longer they are educated, the more opportunities they get


Raising the school learning age promotes equal opportunities


Raising the school leaving age promotes equal opportunities


There are cases where leaving school early is necessary


Forced education achieves little


Little is accomplished when education is forced.


Education that is forced does little.


Forced Education Achieves Little


Not all skills are best learnt in a classroom environment.


Some skills are better learned outside the classroom.


The classroom environment is not ideal for all lessons.


Raising the school-leaving age is a crucial investment in society's future


A good investment in society would be to raise the school leaving age.


Society's future depends on raising the school-leaving age.


Raising the school-leaving age is a crucial investment in society’s future


The economy of the future requires more education


In the future, the economy will rely on those with more education.


The economy needs educated people in order to do well in the future.


Society has a moral responsibility to educate all its young people


Society should make it easier for all young people to receive an education.


Benefit from the increase in skills through their standard of living


The aging population and increasing retirement age requires higher skills


Young people should have the choice to decide for themselves


Young people should have the freedom to make their own choices.


Young people should be able to think for themselves and make their own decisions.


Unrealistically costly


Not everyone is good at studying


Some people are unable to handle the rigor of university-level coursework.


We shouldn't force people to study if they aren't good at it and choose not to.


not everyone is good academically


some people are not good at studying


Compulsory studying would be taking young people out of the workforce


Making university education compulsory would take young people out of the workforce.


some young people would be taken out of workforce by compulsory studying


compulsory studying may remove young people from the workforce


Slaughter without stunning is painful for the animal


slaughter is painful when animals are not stunnded


slaughtering without proper procedure results in pain


Unless animals are stunned prior to being slaughtered, the slaughter will cause the animal great pain.


When one considers the pain animals will suffer if they are slaughtered without first being stunned, slaughter without stunning should be seen as inhumane.


The problem is not significant.


This is not a significant problem.


This is not a big problem.


The slaughter of animals before stunning them is not a significant issue.


Fighting bulls have a better quality of life than meat-producing bulls


Blood sports cannot be justified by reference to their role in pest control or conservation


Blood sports are not justified by their role in pest control or conservation.


The need for pest control or conservation does not justify blood sports.


Pest control or conservation arguments does not rationalize our use of animals as objects in blood sports.


The use of animals as objects in blood sports cannot be justified by the week argument that it provides benefit through pest control or conservation.


Treating animals as property prevents them from being perceived as part of the moral community


When animals are treated as property it prevents them from being perceieved as part of the moral community.


Animals are not percieved as part of the moral community when they are treated as property.


Objectifying animals enables people to absolve themselves from their moral treatment.


Animals should not be treated as objects or property as doing so allows them to be treated amorally.


Animals are harmed when used as objects of entertainment, no matter how innocent that entertainment is


All uses of animals for entertainment harm the animals.


Even the most innocent of entertainment using animals harms the animals.


Animals as entertainment is always harmful to the animals


It is not possible to harmlessly have animals as entertainment


The use of animals in sport demeans humans


Using animals in sport demeans humans.


The use of animals in sport is demeaning to humans.


The devaluation of animals as an object of sport, devalues life including human life.


Humans ultimately devalue their own lives when using animals as objects of sport.


Bullfighting is too dangerous to humans to justify


Bullfighting is dangerous for humans and should be banned.


We must ban bullfighting to keep humans from recklessly getting injured and even dying.


Harming animals for entertainment is immoral


It is not moral to hurt animals for entertainment


Hurting animals for fun is immoral


Bullfighting is a form of animal torture


Bullfighting is animal torture


One form of animal torture is bullfighting


Bullfighting should be treated like other forms of animal torture


Storing nuclear waste underground is necessary - there are no better option available


Nuclear waste can be put to beneficial uses


Nuclear waste can be used in other forms of power generation


Underground nuclear storage is safer than any available alternative


Storing nuclear waste underground is safer than any other storage method.


The best place to store nuclear waste is underground.


Underground nuclear storage is excessively expensive


Storing nuclear waste underground is very expensive.


It's very costly to store nuclear waste underground.


Public Decency


Countries must be willing to accept the darker sides to their past


Countries have both good and dark sides, and that should be accepted.


Makes history more useful, more human, and more interesting


Damages the country’s reputation


Compensation has the potential to reverse damaged caused by Cultural Appropriation.


cultural appropriation damage can potentialy be reversed through compensation


compensation may be able to reverse damage caused by culture appropriation


Compensation is important to give the communities credit they deserve.


it is immportant for the communities to get the credit they deserve through compensation


compensation is a way to give the communities the credit they deserve


Reparations and the use of the term 'cultural appropriation' is a mask for more deep-rooted issues of racism in society.


No feasible system of which grounds of compensation can occur because of the fluidity of culture and cultural identity


Compensation rights a wrong


Research has shown violent video games encourage criminal and anti-social behaviour


people immitate video games.


violent games make people agressive.


Playing violent video games leads to violent behaviors.


Playing violent video games causes more aggression, bullying, and fighting.


Simulating violence such as shooting guns and hand-to-hand combat in video games can cause real-life violent behavior.


The American Psychological Association (APA) lists violent video games as a risk factor for aggressive behavior.


Violent Video Games cause Violent Behaviour


real life violent behaviors may be stimulated by video games


Violent video games are seen as a risk factor for aggressive behavior, according to the American Psychological Association (APA)


Gun violence is less prevalent in countries with high video game use.


Countries with high video game use see less gun violence


Studies have shown that violent video games can have a positive effect on kindness, civic engagement, and "prosocial” behaviors.


Violent video games have been shown to have positive effect on kindness and cooperative behavior.


Violent video game players know the difference between virtual violence in the context of a game and appropriate behavior in the real world.


There are many flaws to the theory that violent video games cause real life violence.


Studies claiming a causal link between video game violence and real life violence are flawed.


Playing violent video games does not cause kids to commit mass shootings.


The Responsibility Lies With Parents


Violent Video Games Cause Social Interaction Problems


Violent video games lead to inappropriate social interactions.


Violent video games are detrimental to social interaction.


Violent video games desensitise users


Violent games normalizes forms of violence.


Restrictions would be ineffective


Restricting video games only makes people more interested in them.


Restricting violent video games will have no correlation to a reduction in societal crime.


The government has a right to restrict the sale of violent video games, in order to protect law and order.


In order to maintan a well funcitoning society, the government has a right to restrict violent games which could hurt people.


Video games are content that has a right to be censored for the mass majority's public safety.


The International Olympic Committee considers golf a sport.


Golf involves competition, keeping score, and declaring a winner, but those qualities alone do not make it a sport.


Golf involves many elements of competition, but that does not make it a sport.


Sports experts agree that golf lacks the athletic rigor needed to be a real sport.


Experts believe golf does not require enough physical fitness to be considered a sport.


If you can compete in a professional tournament with a broken leg, it is not a sport.


Golf does not have the physical rigors that sports do.


Golf is not physically demanding enough to be a sport.


If you can compete in golf with a handicap, then it is not a sport.


Even people with broken limbs can play golf, which makes it not a real sport.


If an activity does not make you break a sweat, or if it can be done while drinking and smoking, then it is not a sport.


Because you can play golf without breaking a sweat, and drink and smoke while doing it,  it is not a sport.


Golf is not a sport because you can play it without breaking a sweat and while you are drunk.


The fact that golf can be difficult and requires practice and skill to achieve proficiency does not mean it qualifies as a sport.


That golf can be difficult and skills and practice are required does not qualify it as a sport.


Skill is required for a person to be proficient in golf doesn't make it a sport.


The possibility of getting injured while playing golf does not make it a sport.


the probability of getting injured while playing golf is extremely low therefore it is not a sport.


There should be some risk to be considered a real sport, which golf does not have.


Sports agents, sponsors, and sporting goods manufacturers consider golf to be a sport.


The decision to include golf in the 2016 Summer Olympics is questionable.


Professional golfers are considered athletes by mainstream media.


Athleticism does not correlate with performance when it comes to golf.


Even if you are really athletic does not mean you will do well at golf.


You do not need to be physically fit to be good at golf.


Golf better matches the definition of a game than a sport.


The definition of a game is a better match to golf than the definition of a sport.


Golf is the match to a game more than a match to a sport.


Golf meets the definition of the word "sport" found in many dictionaries.


Golf is categorized as a sport according the definitions found in many dictionaries


Golf is one of dozens of independent sports like running or swimming.


Golf has many more commonalities with other sports.


There are many commonalities between golf and other sports.


Contrary to public opinion golf does have a lot more commonalities with other sports than most realize.


College and university athletic departments classify golf as a sport.


Unlike a sport, golf does not require rigorous physical activity.


You are not required to endure rigorous physical activity to play golf.


Golf is unlike sports in which rigorous physical activities are required.


A tax exemption is a privilege, not a right.


Requiring churches to pay taxes would endanger the free expression of religion and violate the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.


Small churches, already struggling to survive, would be further endangered by a new tax burden.


Small churches who are struggling would be put at risk by the tax burden.


Small churches would are in financial peril would be in a problematic situation by a new tax burden.


Withdrawing the "parsonage exemption" on ministers' housing would cost American clergy members $2.3 billion over five years, which would be a major blow to modestly paid men and women who dedicate their lives to helping people in need.


The tax break given to churches restricts their freedom of speech because it deters pastors from speaking out for or against political candidates.


Exempting churches from taxation costs the government billions of dollars in lost revenue, which it cannot afford, especially in tough economic times.


American taxpayers are supporting the extravagant lifestyles of wealthy pastors, whose lavish "megachurches" accumulate millions of tax-free dollars every year.


Churches earn their tax exemption by contributing to the public good.


Churches contribute to the public good, which is why they deserve to be tax-exempt.


Churches are awarded tax exempt status because of their contribution to the public good.


Churches earn their tax exemption by contributing to the public good


The only constitutionally valid way of taxing churches would be to tax all nonprofits, which would place undue financial pressure on the 960,000 public charities that aid and enrich US society.


Taxing churches when their members receive no monetary gain would amount to double taxation.


The proposed playoff system alternatives are actually less fair than the BCS system in place.


The BCS rankings are designed to favor consistency over the course of the entire season.


A playoff system would not mean the end of the BCS rankings, which could still be used to determine the top 4, 8, 12, or 16 teams, depending on how many playoff games are feasible.


Student loan discharge would incite colleges to raise tuition


The existence of pennies helps raise a lot of money for charities


A penny can be used for decades and is more cost-efficient to produce than a nickel


The penny has practically no value and should be taken out of circulation just as other coins have been in US history


Eliminating pennies would save time at the point of purchase without hurting customers or businesses financially


Preserving the penny keeps consumer prices down and avoids harming low-income households


Homework disadvantages low-income students


Low-income students are at a disadvantage when it comes to homework.


Homework doesn't help low-income students succeed.


There is no evidence that homework makes a difference for young children.


Homework has little educational worth, and therefore is a waste of students' time


There is a lack of evidence that homework helps younger children


Small children are not helped by having homework.


Homework allows parents to be involved with their child's learning


Homework is beneficial because of parent/child involvement


Homework helps parents understand what their children are learning.


Homework can get parents involved


Homework helps involve parents


Homework improves student achievement


Assigning homework to students improves their level of achievement


homework is good for students


Homework helps to reinforce learning and develop good study habits and life skills


Homework teaches good habits and responsibility


Homework is good for learning


Homework is good to create study habits


Too much homework can be harmful


Yes Homework Should Have A Limit


Yes, it should.


Assigning large amounts of homework isn't good for students.


Too much homework is detrimental.


Homework is an essential part of education, allowing students to learn information beyond that which they are taught at school.


Homework is crucial to a well rounded education as it is the means by which students are encouraged to learn beyond the school curriculum.


Homework allows students to explore and learn beyond the instruction they are given in the classroom.


Homework ensures that students practise what they are taught at school


Homework provides a link between child, school and the home


Yes, kids need to balance out mental and physical exercise.


Kids need time to do many different kinds of activities.


There needs to be a balance for kids between mental and physical stimulation.


Mental stimulation and physical exercise need to have the proper balance in children.


Homework puts students off learning


Fighting in hockey leads to concussions, mental health problems, and death.


Fighting draws fans and increases the game's entertainment value.


Fighting is a hockey tradition that exists in the official rules and as an unwritten code among players.


Fighting at the professional level sets a bad example for kids.


Fighting in hockey glorifies violence.


Fighting in hockey can promote violence


Hockey fights can glorify violence


The great aspect of the game of hockey are overshadowed by the unnecessary brutality displayed during brawls.


An overemphasis is given to the violence that accompanies fighting in hockey.


Can't get a realistic impression of a person in such a short space of time.


Would create confusion.


A lot of research points to the fact that internet/television addiction causes grades to suffer and is bad also for your eyes


Hillary can face up to the Republicans better


Obama is more willing to do what is right for the country


Obama would make sacrifices for the greater good.


Obama is more invested in the health of the nation.


Clinton often comes across as ambitious and arrogant


Clinton seems prideful and vain.


Clinton comes off as overconfident.


Hillary has the better team


Hillary Clinton would have stood up to the banking industry whereas Barack Obama has not.


Hillary has far more experience than Obama


Clinton does not represent young Americans


Hillary Clinton does not connect with young United State's citizens.


Hillary Clinton does not empower or interest the young in America.


Clinton doesn't represent young people


Clinton does not represent anyone young


Clinton presidency will mean 20 years of two families controlling the USA


It is time we saw our first woman president


Wikileaks is not registered.


Wikileaks is not accountable


First dimenson of power


Second dimension of power


Speed cameras are a dangerous distraction to motorists


Speed cameras take motorists by surprise and distract them.


Speed cameras distract mororists and are therefore dangerous.


Speed cameras encourage responsibility for our actions


Caught on film you can't deny responsibility for your actions.


Traffic cams can't be avoided and neither can you avoid responsibility for driving actions.


Abolishing speed cameras makes drivers feel less responsible.


Speed cameras were meant to encourage good driving.


Driving behaviour has not changed since cameras were introduced


Traffic cams have not altered driver behaviors.


Traffic cams have failed in their mission to alter drivers' behaviors.


Better car and medical technology has saved lives, not cameras


Cameras don't save lives, better car and medical technology do,


Improved car and medical technology save lives, cameras do not


Cameras are money making, not life saving


Traffic cams are just automated speed traps.


Speed cameras were meant for monetary gains, not to improve driving.


Cameras increased fatalities creating a “fatality gap” as decades of declining fatalities flattened out


Speed cameras only detect 5% of all road accidents


They damage Israel's foreign relations & reputation


Positive discrimination towards women should not be allowed


It is Men, Not Women, who are Disadvantaged in our Society


Will Cause Resentment Between Men and Women


It does not address the underlying issues


Positive discrimination towards women should be allowed


It is right to treated women differently than men in some cases.


Due to physical difference between men and women, it's ok to have some positive discrimination towards women.


Parliament must be representative of our society and that requires a substantial increase in the number of women which only positive discrimination can achieve


If we want Parliament to be truly representative of our society, we must use positive discrimination to increase the number of female members


Female role models are needed urgently to raise aspirations among young women and change parliamentary practices


Female role models need to give hope to the desires of young women and change parliamentary practices.


Female role models need to help young women achieve higher aspiration to change parliamentary practices.


In order to change parliamentary practices it is urgent to have female role models to raise aspirations among young women.


Positive discrimination for women is discrimination


All-women shortlists or quotas restrict a constituent's freedom of choice


Positive discrimination takes away voters' freedom of choice by limiting their choices to women


Women are vastly underrepresented in democratic legislatures across the world. Until 20 years ago women had never been more than 5% of MPs in UK Parliament.


Until as recently as 20 years ago, no more than 5% of MPs in UK Parliament were female. Positive discrimination would increase that statistic


You have to treat people differently in order to reach equality


Perestroika put the final nails in the USSR’s economy


The System Needed to Change in Order to Survive in the Longer Term; That Mikhail Gorbachev’s Reforms Failed Showed that the USSR Could Not be Saved


It was dead from the time Stalin took control


Lenin and Stalin the real destroyers of the USSR for destroying Socialism’s Appeal


By observing animal behaviour we can help those in the wild


Animal research may be valuable, but it does not need to happen in the context of confinement and human entertainment.


Human understanding can help animals


Wild Animals Are Not Domesticated


were can they get money to fend for their families as to some it"s proffession


For some people music making is a profession, and they have families to support.


Where can professional musicians get money to fend for their families?


This may actually cause the music industry to die out


This may lead to the death of the music industry.


This could cause the death of the music industry.


Free music throttles (strangles) freedom of artistic expression


Free distribution of music hinders creativity.


Artistic expression is damaged by free music.


The industry actually benefits despite claims to the contrary


Most people already get it for free already.


Music can be obtained freely.


All people can retrieve music free of charge.


It Takes Money To Make Music


Making music costs money.


Creating music requires money.


The Catholic Church saved the Mexican people by treating them as human beings and giving them the chance to live as free people.


Depending where you are in the world, some of the rules do appear brutal


MMA is Human Cock Fighting


It's better than income tax


Would promote getting money into the economh


Who says the government will spend the money well?


What makes you think that money would be wisely spent?


Are you assuming the government would handle the money properly?


Inheritance tax is too high and should be lowered.


The inheritance tax is too much as it is and should be reduced.


The inheritance tax is way too much now, it needs to be lowered.


It would have unintended consequences


Not everyone who passes on cash in their will is a millionaire


More tax money would be nice


No one should be allowed to pass on money after they are dead


the state should possess all assets owned by an individual after their death


People have a right to pass on the money they earned through hard work


Would be very hard to maintain


Could lead to vigilante attacks


This could cause Parents to take matters into their own hands.


Vigilante attacks can possible happen because of that.


Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics in school or public libraries.


Children should not be exposed to inappropriate topics like sex, violence, or drug use in school or public libraries.


School and public libraries should not expose children to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics.


The music and film industries are suffering due to file-sharing.


Content creators are suffering from file-sharing.


Cutting web access is the most viable way to stop pirates


Cutting off the internet is the most viable means of stopping piracy.


Piracy is unlikely to be stopped without cutting off internet access.


File-sharing will still happen, despite these plans


Stopping their internet  is not the way to get through to file-sharers


Extreme measures for illegal downloaders won't stop file-sharing


Will file-sharing stop if downloaders are banned from internet use


Illegal file-sharers should not be punished by cutting off their internet use


Cutting off internet use will not stop file-sharers


These people are breaking the law and need to be punished.


Criminals deserve to be punished.


Illegal downloaders are breaking the law and deserve punishment.


It is a big problem, too many people are file-sharing


Internet access is an enabler of rights not a right in itself.


The internet assists in accessing rights, it itself is not a right.


The internet makes exercising human rights easier but is not a right itself.


Infringement of human rights


The right to freedom and expression necessarily includes the internet.


Without access to the internet there is not freedom of information and expression in today's world.


The internet should be open to all


Internet access as a new human right.


The right to internet access fills a gap in traditional human rights.


Internet access is a necessary part of the right to freedom of information and expression.


Human rights are infringed if internet use is removed


Cutting off internet capability is against human rights


All humans deserve internet access.


Internet access is a commodity not a human right.


The internet is a utility not a human right.


Just as electricity is not a human right, the internet, another commodity, is not a human right.


Celebrities are generally selfish


Celebrities only think about themselves


It will inspire children into politics


A celebrity minister can interest children with politics


Politics will be more interesting to children if inspired by a celebrity minister


People forced to vote are unlikely to vote intelligently.


If people are forced to vote, they will not have the information needed to vote intelligently.


A vote cast by someone who does not want to vote is unlikely to be based on careful consideration.


It will cause more people to become interested in politics


Cause more people to become interested in politics


It's a model that works


The right not to vote


Voting is a civic duty


A true democratic mandate for the government


Voting is the duty of every individual in a democratic society.


It is the duty of every citizen to vote.


Compulsory Voting Does not enhance democracy


Democracy is based on the freedom to vote or not.


People can only make free choices if they want to, not because the state makes them


What's the point of voting as politicians don't listen to the public anyways


Why should anyone bother to vote when politicians do whatever they want?


Once elected, politicians do what they want, so why vote?


Voting does not make sense as a rewardable/punishable action.


Rewarding or punishing someone for voting is nonsensical.


Voting should be neither rewarded or punished.


Weekend voting would be a more sensible solution


Convincing is more effective than forcing.


You can persuade to vote but you can't force someone to do it.


People rebel from rules and do what they want anyway


Policing and financing the system is unmanageable


It would be extremely difficult to police and finance mandatory voting.


It is unreasonable to expect that compulsory voting could be financed and verified.


There are alternatives that tackle the real causes of voter disengagement


Compulsory voting broadens representation of disadvantaged groups


Disadvantage groups are better represented when voting in mandatory.


By making voting mandatory, disadvantaged groups improve their representation.


Compulsory voting has been implemented successfully.


There is precedent to compulsory voting working.


Other places have successfully introduced compulsory voting.


It will reduce the power of special interest groups


It currently promotes loyalty to the institution not the laity


Currently the Catholic Chuch focuses on loyalty to the church itself, not those they serve.


The Catholic Church wants loyalty to institution, not to the common man.


Catholicism has become too corporate


Too much responsibility on the Pope


Encourages binge drinking and bullying


Our actions are determined by external factors or by choice


This implies falsely that man operates on pure instinct from which he cannot vary, placing him on the level of animals.


INDIVIDUAL HEDONISM NOT ALWAYS POSITIVE FOR SOCIETY/INDIVIDUALS THEMSELVES.


The military does not want conscription


The military feels that conscription is not the right answer.


Constriction is not something the military is interested in.


National service would lead to unfair treatment of conscientious objectors


People who identify as conscientious objectors would be treated unfairly in the national service.


Conscientious objectors would, under the national service, not be treated equitably.


National service would lead to unfair treatment of people with different opinions.


People who object national service would be treated unjustly.


Society needs a standing army ready to be called to action


Society could really benefit from having the National Sevice again.


Have a standing army that is ready for action could be used in society right now.


It will cost a fortune and be difficult to implement


The costs will be enormous and implementation is arduous.


The program would be incredibly expensive and very hard to work through.


National service is expensive and hard to follow through on.


National services are difficult, and hard to get going.


National service teaches young people valuable skills


Young people can learn important skills in the national service.


Enrolling in national service teaches young people valuable skills.


National service could be offset against student loans


National service binds society together


Society is better connected with national service.


National service ensures that people and society are more connected to one another.


National service brings communities together.


National services bring people together.


It is unjust for a government to coerce its citizens


The Champions League is financially more rewarding


it is more rewarding to win the Champions League than other leagues.


The Premiership is the most popular and successful football league in the world


Winning the Champions League relies more on luck than the Premier League


If the demand for shark fins is reduced then the killing will be reduced.


Killing of sharks will be decreased if the demand for shark fins is reduced.


The killing of sharks can be decreased if demands for shark fins are declined.


By reducing the number of sharks in the ocean for soup, the number of attacks on humans is reduced


Killing sharks in moderation through quotas would allow the shark fin soup trade to continue.


Killing sharks in moderations by way of quotas allows shark fin soup trade to continue.


Shark fin soup trade can continue due to quotas making shark kills in moderation.


Eating shark fin soup actually damages human health.


Sharks do not produce the quantity of young in order to replenish population deficiencies attributed to overfishing


Sharks don't produce the amount of young in order to replenish population deficits attributed to overfishing.


Sharks cannot produce the quantity of young needed to replenish their populations as a result of overfishing.


Banning Shark's fin soup will only put it on the black market


Not allowing Shark's fin soup will just put it on the black market


Making laws against shark's fin soup will just put it on the black market.


Banning shark fin soup would destroy a piece of Asian tradition.


Hopeful endings are important for morale


A good ending is good for morale.


If there is hope at the end, it boost morale.


Truly faithful versions of fairy tales would be unsuitable for young children.


Atheists are more likely to respect female rights


Female rights are more likely to be respected by Atheists.


Atheist countries are more peaceful compared to other countries.


Countries that lean towards atheism rank highly on prosperity index


Atheism leads to high prosperity.


Norway still the world's best place to live (With 70% atheists)


Norway is 70%  atheist, but is still the world's best place to live.


Norway listed as the best place to live, but it is full of atheists.


norway has lot of positive things still being an atheist country


norway is one of the peaceful atheist countries


Is not worth the price


It is far too expensive.


The costs would be outrageous.


To invade could trigger an Arms Race: the very thing everyone wants to avoid!


Everyone wants to avoid an Arms Race, and an invasion could trigger just that outcome.


An Arms race is the one outcome everyone wants to avoid, and an invasion could lead to that.


North Korea is a threat to China in the future and a nuisance now.


North Korea is both an annoyance now and a threat in the future to China.


For China, North Korea is a current nuisance and a future threat.


Redistribution is a moral anathema.


Mental health can impact on physical health


Depends on your goals in life.


pretty people(great skin,great health resulting from physical prowess) have a one-up on everything


Pretty people get advantage


Pretty are advantaged people


People with great physical features are in a better position


Those with better physical features have a high standing


It is hard to apportion blame


Sideshows and promotions generate extra revenue.


Players are all about the money.


Only help those who ask for it and that too at your discretion


Should we as people help everyone or only certain ones.


Individuals should help everyone.


People have the freedom to choose whether they want to dedicate their time to helping others, and help should only be given to those who ask for it.


Help should only be provided to those that want it, and individuals should be able to choose if they want to help or not.


It would be nice if everyone would help those in need but it cant't be forced and people have to make those decisions on their own.


2.  consequentialism - we must reduce overall suffering, helping people reduces suffering in the world


It's none of your business


virtue ethics - we become better people


We should not allow state sponsored revenge


There is already enough leeway in the law of self defence.


The cases of burglars needs to be dealt with


We should be able to protect our homes from intruders


The benefits far outweigh the costs


Technology can improve treatments for injuries thus lessening off time for players.


Technology is ready and available and proven to be robust


It would be divisive.


The benefits far outweigh the costs of not using the technology


Individual players lives will be enhanced if head injuries can be reduced through use of technology.


Reheating is 5 times better for the environment


Reusing, reheating tea using the stove is environmentally unsound.


Sanctions give rise to a whole new set of problems


Sanctions only cause more problems.


The implementation of sanctions cause unforeseen problems.


Sanctions are the most effective response to an urgent crisis.


Urgent crisises are best responded to with sanctions.


Sanctions are the fastest and most effective measures when a crisis is urgent.


[Response to rebuttal] Sanctions are the most effective response to an urgent crisis.


The most effective response to a true crisis is the implementation of sanctions.


Sanctions are the most effective manner in which to respond to a real crisis.


It  sanctions and encourages 'Islamophobic' panics and promotes the excessive 'securitisation' of the globe


This would result in Islamophobic panics and knee jerk reactions across the world.


Islamophobic panic and excessive security would be sanctioned by this action.


The Olympic spirit is a universal message for peace and togetherness


Part of the Olympic spirit is to remind everyone that we are all human and should respect one another.


The host city becomes an international hotspot for business investment, develops a new 'creative industry' and encourages new practices of cultural consumption


It is an honour for the host city and provides global recognition


Hosting the Olympic Games for the first time can be historic for a nation.


The Olympics displace and burden residents of the host country and city.


The Olympics place a strain on the residents of the host city and country.


Hosting the Olympics can be more trouble than it's worth for those who live there.


The Olympics increase a host country's global trade and stature.


The Olympics increase valuable tourism, which can boost local economies


The Olympics create a sense of national pride.


Benefits of hosting the olympic games.


Set up an international fund to pay compensation


Governments in countries where terrorism is prevalent should allocate tax dollars to a pool to compensate nations that have been victims.


The UN should allocate a fund to compensate nations that have been victims of terrorism.


Transgenic animals are a medium through which human lives can be bettered


Cruelty to animals 90% death rate cloning project


Cloning projects with 90% death rate is cruelty to animals.


Cloning projects are cruelty to animals since they have a 90% death rate.


Genetic modification is inevitable and can only be beneficial in good hands


When entities patent genes they open doors to research that saves lives


There are life-saving benefits to patenting genes.


Patenting genes can lead to research that can help humanity and save lives.


smoking should be banned in public places


people have the right to smoke


You should be able to smoke in public.


Smoking is a personal choice, and should not be restricted.


The decision to smoke is a human right.


Smoking is a human right.


WHAT HAPPEN TO A FREE CANADA.  WE ARE GOING BACK TO THE TIME WERE SLAVES HAD NO RIGHT, NOW IT IS SMOKERS HAVE NO RIGHT


Taking away a smoker's rights to smoke in public is akin to the time of slavery!


How can this be a free Canada, if our right to smoke in public is taken away?


Canada is a free country, so we should be free to be able to smoke.


Being free to smoke is a basic right that someone in a free country should have.


No - it should not be banned in places people CHOOSE to go


A smoker should be allowed to smoke in any place that they have a choice to go to.


If I choose to go somewhere, I should be allowed to smoke there.


Since people are choosing whether to go to places, smoking shouldn't be banned there,


Smoking shouldn't be banned in places where people choose to be.


Banning smoking isn't necessary.


smoking don't necessarily have to be banned


It isn't necessary to ban smoking.


It's not necessary to ban smoking.


Banning smoking is not something that's necessary.


Banning smoking in public places is not right.


It is not right to ban smoking.


Banning smoking is a bad idea.


It's a bad idea to ban smoking.


Smoking shouldnt be banned


Pack labelling or taxation a better alternative


Ban would harm the wider economy


A smoking ban in public places is harmful to the economy


Economic hardship would follow a public place smoking ban


Lower healthcare costs


Unenforceable


English Devolution is a necessary step in ensuring English issues are dealt with


It would give England recognition and representation


England should have a representative parliament.


England should have representation through a parliament.


We do not need another layer of representation


Another layer of representation is not what we need,


Another layer of government will not be beneficial.


Christianity may be a deception but it's not the "greatest" one


There are greater deceptions than Christianity.


There are a great many of deceptions in the world today that are bigger than Christianity.


It isn't christianity that's the deception, organised religion is!


Christianity is not a deception!


Christianity is not a lie!


Christianity is not dishonest!


Exaggeration by the media hurts the situation more than helping it along


They make the domestic government appear to be weak and defenseless


Hostage situations hurt the country's tourism industry


Can Lead To Wars after sparking hateful sentiment across the board


Reporting on these events can lead to hateful sentiment and ultimately war.


Secrecy in hostage-taking events could cool passions and prevent war.


Iraq, five British hostages and a compiracy theory about embezzled funds is unchecked propaganda: That damages the host Country's reputation and thus economy . And only a small group of people made larger than life, by the media are to blame.


They litter our streets


our streets are littered


so what do we carry our shopping in?


what do we carry our shipping in?


how do we carry our shipping?


PLASTIC BAGS DONT HARM THE ENVIRONMENT


Plastic bags suffocate and kill


Causes expense to consumers in a time of recession


NO,need to ban just reduce the use of plastic


Students will have to pay British tuition fees


No chance of changing from the Pound to the Euro


one point that is always not mentioned is the EU is part of the New World Order


British taxpayers are forced to bail out other European countries rather than receive goods and services


The UK would have a completely independent foreign policy


The UK can be independed


The UK can have an independet foreign policy


UK will be disentangled from EU affairs


UK will be disentangled


UK will not be entangled


Leaving the EU will mean the UK will have less regional influence


UK leaving the EU will shift its influences.


By leaving the EU, the UK would have less power in the region


The UK would lose their regional influence is they left the EU


The EU causes instability


Leaving the EU means leaving the instability that was there


Being involved with the EU causes instability


A nation state can only rely on itself for security


UK will renew its self-reliance in security.


Security changes to arise when UK leaves EU.


A nation state has only themselves to look out for them


A nation state can only expect itself to be able to protect the people


Security is better shared


UK security strongest when shared with EU.


Leaving EU would weaken UK security.


Security is stronger when there are others involved


It is better protection when others are also sharing some of that responsibility


Leaving the EU would mean leaving their security services too


By leaving the EU, they would lose the security they had shared


Leaving will mean less communication with other security services


Better governance due to transparency


Respect of Human Rights


Respect for the rights of other humans.


Respect for the rights of people.


Electorate is not motivated


freedom of privacy is threatened


freedom of privacy is in jeopardy.


freedom of privacy is in serious trouble.


boys are more aggressive, violent, stereotypically masculine in boys schools


thbt boys and girls should be educated serparatley


Kids regardless of gender should be taught in school together.


Schools need to be gender neutral in order to ensure the kids safety.


some boys and girls should be educated seperately


seperate education for boys and girls have its own benefit


It adds to sports value


Sports loses its value because of the large amount of money involved.


College sports should be for competition not money.


Money adds value to sports.


Sports gain value through money.


monetary pursuits outside of professional winnings take a players' attention off the game,close friends & family and their own health.


There is pressure on you to fail New Year's Resolutions.


We shouldn't just do something because it is New Year.


It is the best time to start planning your year.


A goal for a whole year is unrealistic.


Inherited wealth can advance rich children in some professions and this can exclude poorer children.


Who decides how much is too much, and on what basis?


Society can never ensure that all children start on an 'equal footing' and why would it want to?


Society would be damaged if people could not satisfy the procreative urge by enriching their children, as this would demotivate them.


Giving massive wealth to children would demotivate them and make them less productive for society.


Children who inherit riches are in a sense demotivated and as a result damaging towards society.


An excess of wealth prevents spiritual growth


The more money you have, the less spiritual you are.


Having too much money prevents you from growing spiritually.


Inherited wealth demotivates the recipients so that they put less effort into training, education and social skills.


World economics would suffer


people who sell are making lots of money


People selling illegal recreational drugs are raking it in.


People who sell illegal drugs are making bunches of money.


Drugs are dangerous, and the governement should discourage its use


The government has a responsbility to discourage the use of dangerous activities, such as the use of drugs.


The government must not endorse the use of drugs, which are dangerous.


More people will take drugs if they are legal


Drugs are safer when legal


Legal drugs are safer.


Drugs become safer when they are legalized.


People should be free to take drugs


Drugs should be legal for everyone.


Legalisation reduces crime


Crime is reduced when drugs are legalized.


There is less crime when drugs are legal.


Prohibition does not work; instead, it glamorizes drugs


Human-caused global warming is changing weather systems and making heat waves and droughts more intense and more frequent.


Global warming and cooling are primarily caused by fluctuations in the sun's heat (solar forcing), not by human activity.


Rising levels of human-produced gases released into the atmosphere create a greenhouse effect that traps heat and causes global warming.


Earth's climate has always warmed and cooled, and the 20th century rise in global temperature is within the bounds of natural temperature fluctuations over the past 3,000 years.


Lack of scientific understanding


More than one thousand scientists disagree that human activity is primarily responsible for global climate change.


Global warming caused by human-produced greenhouse gases is causing the Arctic ice cap to melt at an increasing rate.


Predictions of accelerating human-caused climate change are based upon computerized climate models that are inadequate and incorrect.


Computerized models produce inadequate and incorrect results in predictions of accelerating human-caused climate change.


Computerized climate models could be misleading when it comes to the predictions of  accelerating human-caused climate change.


Deep ocean currents, not human activity, are a primary driver of natural climate warming and cooling cycles.


Ocean acidity levels are increasing at an unprecedented rate that can only be explained by human activity.


Oceanic acidity is increasing too much to be natural.


The acidity of the oceans is increasing too much to be a natural phenomenon.


The specific type of CO2 that is increasing in earth's atmosphere can be directly connected to human activity.


The rise in atmospheric CO2 over the last century was clearly caused by human activity, as it occurred at a rate much faster than natural climate changes could produce.


Sea levels have been steadily rising for thousands of years, and the increase has nothing to do with humans.


The acidity levels of the oceans are within past natural levels, and the current rise in acidity is a natural fluctuation, not the result of human caused climate change.


Overwhelming scientific consensus says human activity is primarily responsible for global climate change.


Dramatic changes in precipitation, such as heavier storms and less snow, are another sign that humans are causing global climate change.


Rising levels of atmospheric CO2 do not necessarily cause global warming, which contradicts the core thesis of human-caused climate change.


Glaciers have been growing and receding for thousands of years due to natural causes, not human activity.


It is natural for glaciers to grow and recede, which does not necessarily have to do with human activities.


Glaciers grow and recede by nature. Humans aren't responsible for it.


Increased hurricane activity and other extreme weather events are a result of natural weather patterns, not human-caused climate change.


Extreme weathers events are caused by nature, not human activity.


Encourages a single community


The European Union is too centralised


There have been tests on the EU's ability to create a common foreign policy that it has failed.


Tests have been failed by the EU on its ability to create a common foreign policy.


The ability of the EU to create a common foreign policy is a failure, as shown from multiple tests.


The many hidden subsidies to SE England would end.


Independence would give Scotland clout where it matters


If Scotland were independent then it would have more power in important areas.


An independent Scotland nation-state would give it more influence.


Scotland will be unable to survive economically without England


Scotland's economy cannot survive if it doesn't have England to lean on.


Scotland would not be able to survive independently without England.


Relations between Scots and English are deteriorating


Other small nation-states like Norway and the Republic of Ireland are successful


Norway and the Republic of Ireland are examples of successful nation-states.


You can look at Norway and the Republic of Ireland to see successful nation-states.


The Scots themselves would vote against independence if there was a referendum.


If it should come to it, the Scottish people would not vote for independence.


Scots would not be in favor of voting for independence.


Scotland has different interests to rUK


NO,NO SOLID PROOF


Can't be proven


Yes, because it is more likely.


Why are aliens humanoids?


There are many false alarms


are UFO's videos can't be proofs


are we lonely in this huge universe?


Are we truly the only intelligent life in the universe?


Not enough sources for life to be supported.


There is no proof of life on other planets.


Life on other planets remains unproven.


No life sustaining features


weakness of support for life


Scientists have found living organisms in space


Why have other life forces not made themselves known?


There are never any clear images


Against morality and medical ethics


Against the Principle of  Criminal Justice


No Cruel and Unusual Punishment


Death-penalized prisoners are obligated to comply with vaccine test medical procedures for the greater good since they have a debt to society they must repay.


Protection of prisoner's rights


It is acceptable to infringe on the rights of criminals sentenced to the death penalty in order to save massive quantity of human life and preserve the continuity of the human race.


It stands to reason that prisoner rights and public rights are unequal


Charities tackle poverty better


Charities can handle poverty better


Charities do a better job of taking care of poverty


4. Gov is better suited than charities.


The government is better equipped than charities


The government can handle things better than charities


Financial assistance is not the government’s duty


The government is not responsible for financial assistance


The government shouldn't pay for financial assistance


Government's duty to remedy a social problem


[Response to rebuttal] Suitability: Government has essential macro-view(scale&scope), and IS better organized, better funded.


Government is better organized


Government has more resources


What the governmental machine can’t, society through charities can


Macs continue to gain Market share in all sectors


Macs are gaining Market shares because of their cross platform compatibility with phones, home devices, and more


Macs are gaining traction in the market over PCs as consumers demand more integration between smartphones, computers, and smart home devices


Macs are more intuitive and user-friendly


Macs are so much easier to use


Macs can right click


Macs are more secure


Macs don;t get hacked too often


Macs have better security systems


Macs are plagued with hardware issues


Despite sometimes numerous hardware issues, Macs continue are better than PCs for many reasons


Macs are more performance than pc's


PCs lack the performance offered in many Mac machines, making the Macs significantly superior


For consumers demanding a performance computer, Macs are the obvious choice


Mac OS X restart less


Consumers enjoy the reduced number of restarts on the Mac OS X when compared to the latest Windows version


Mac users prefer the quick startup time and fewer restarts on Mac OS X over long boot times of PCs


National level: Both Britain and Russia overstretched


International level: Anglo-German Alliance possibility


The UK and Germany had the potential to create an alliance in the early 1900's.


An Anglo-German alliance at the international level is a distinct possibility.


National level: German policies could derail an agreement


International level: Anglo Russian Competition


History offers knowledge that coincides with other subjects


History is something that people need to know.


history is an important subject


history repeats itself if not known


where we have been can help us with where we are going


Teaching history ensures that events of the past are not forgotten, and lessons are learned


We learn from the mistakes and successes of others


History lessons can be used as state-sponsored propaganda, distorting the events of the past


History teaching will reflect the erroneous preconceptions and aims of those who set the curriculum


History should be taught to school-children, they form an integral part of understanding oneself and one's nation


History should always have a place in the schoolroom because it is vital to an understanding of why things are the way they are.


To understand how things came to be, school children should be taught historical facts and figures.


Schoolchildren need to learn history since it is an integral part of learning about one's country.


History teaches useful skills applicable in other areas of education and life


Without a firm foundation of historical knowledge, children will have a harder time learning necessary skills.


A good education relies on a strong foundation of historical knowledge.


History is a useful subject because it teaches useful skills.


It's a good idea to teach history since kids can learn useful skills they can use throughout their lives.


Historical facts can be established to a sufficient degree to be taught to schoolchildren


Schools should teach historical facts.


Children need to learn historical facts in order to be competitive in a global job market.


If taught properly, historical facts can be taught to schoolchildren without problems.


History is a good thing to teach to schoolchildren if taught the right way,


cyber-bullying  ubiquitously leads to child solicitation,murder,identity theft and all sorts of other crimes & misdemeanors


Life after death is strongly stated in the bible.


The bible states that there is life after death.


There is with certainty a Heaven and Hell.


There is a Heaven and there is a Hell.


yes there is a heaven and a hell


My strong belief is that Heaven and Hell exist.


There definitely exists a Heaven and Hell.


Long sessions of cramming are totally inefficient


Cramming sessions are ineffective in learning material for exams.


It is a waste of time to cram for exams.


Creates a culture of doing enough to pass exams that actually aquiring knowledge


It does not focus on moral condemnation of the couple but of passion of love


Modern teenagers do not relate to Shakespearian plays


Lessons would feel less broken.


Not enough fundng...


So much easier for parents!


Less need for homework.


Time to finish activities


The internet is a public space.


Only Criminals benefit from internet Privacy


Internet privacy only helps criminals.


Only wrong-doers benefit from internet privacy.


Online privacy only benefits those who commit crimes on the internet.


Criminals will be the only group benefited by online privacy.


It Protects Those Vulnerable to Exploitation


People vulnerable to explotation are protected.


Those who might be exploited are protected.


Privacy on the internet is important for protecting users from being exploited.


Users online would be unprotected from exploitation if it weren't for online privacy.


The only accurate poll is the exit poll, as evidenced through history


History suggests that exit polls are the only reliable predictor.


Exit polls have been shown to be the only accurate predictor of races.


Not all polls are accurate, except for exit poll.


History has proven that exit poll is the only effective poll.


Voting is not a predetermined decision


There is no predetermination at play in voting.


Voting is an exercise of freedom, not predetermination.


What happens in polls does not determine what will happen in voting.


People might change their mind after polling, leading to different vote results.


Research companies worldwide, such as YouGov, which provide data and statistics for election polls provide a fair representation of the population, and therefore a fair representation of public opinion.


YouGov is an example of a research site that accurately represents public opinion.


It is possible for research sites to accurately portray public opinion; YouGov is an example of this.


Research companies conducted polls with an unbiased representation of population provides good indication of public opinion.


Polls conducted by research companies are fair and accurate because their survey subjects match the true distribution of population .


They are a good indicator of the closeness of the race


Polls accurately portray how close races are.


An accurate depiction of race closeness can be found in polls.


Polls can indicate how close the elections results are.


Polls are usually good predictors of how close the race is.


A celebrities job is to entertain, when did watching a real life marriage fall apart or a real life person in depression become entertaining?


Addiction to celebrity culture and information is unhealthy


Everyone deserves a right to privacy


Public figures have a responsibility to be role models


In the case of paparazzi lives are put at risk


Recurring Numbers And Symmetry Miracle


The number 7 miracle


Numbers Are Not Real but Quatities Are.


You can do the same kind of thing with any lengthy book (Moby Dick is famously often used)


Offshore drilling can cripple local economies.


Offshore drilling by oil companies can adversely impact local economies.


Local economies receive no benefits from oil company offshore drilling.


Offshore drilling prevents environmentally-unfriendly effects


Offshore drilling and its negative effect on the environment are controversial topics.


The negative impact on the environment by oil company offshore drilling should be addressed.


Antartic resource exploitation is unevitable: Let's do it orderly!


Exploiting Antartica for its resources must be done with careful planning, organization and care for the land.


Eventually Antarctica will be be exploited for its resources, but will we be prepared to do it carefully?


No possible over abuse on the resources, just a utilitarian, global benefit


Only if the world benefits should Antartica's resources be exploited.


A resource treasure for humanity


Antartica: A common heritage to the benefit of mankind


Humans need meat in their diet


Humans need to eat meat.


Humans need to consume meat.


We shouldn't eat as muh meat.


We should eat less meat.


We should stop eating so much meat.


If humans are like animals they should be able to eat them


Humans should be allowed to eat animals.


It is okay for humans to eat animals.


There's nothing inherently wrong with eating animals


It if fine to eat animals.


It is not immoral to eat animals.


The farming of animals causes suffering. Causing suffering is wrong. The farming of animals is wrong


Farming of animals causes suffering and is wrong.


Animal suffering is wrong; therefore, farming them is too, since it causes them to suffer.


Animals are below humans, therefore humans can eat them


vegetarians visit hospitals 22% less often than meat eaters


Vegetarians visit hospitals 22% less than meat eaters.


Vegetarians go to hospitals 22% less than meat eaters.


Giving transport workers the right to go on strike is good for the users


Workers rights can still be protected


Strikes are unique means to attain leverage and their benefits weight more than their harms


Strikes are the only way employees can gain leverage over their employers in negotiations.


Strikes do more good than harm, since they allow employees to negotiate on an even playing field with their employers.


There are better ways to deal with strikes than putting people in Jail


Banning Strikes doesn't stop them, but hides them (non solvency)


Bans don't stop strikes, they just force unions to use other means.


A ban on unions wouldn't be effective, since the unions would just do something else.


The ability to strike allows unions to extort


Unions abuse the right to strike to extort from their employers.


Unions shouldn't be able to strike, since it gives them too much power over their employer.


The right to strike keeps negotiating power balanced


It would create instability and logistical problems


The concept overestimates the role of the Prime Minister


Will indirectly lead to the spread of Nuclear Weapons


Small countries would be able to pursue their independence without having to rely on larger countries.


Small countries would no longer need the protection of larger ones, so could become more politically independent.


Thus the super power model will be broken and small countries will be finally given the chance to have political independence without the need of protection from a ‘big brother’.


Terrorists will steal nuclear weapons from poorly guarded arsenals


All the people worldwide have the same rights and are equal to one another.


The pursuit of nuclear defence (respectively the possession of nuclear weapons) by more countries is a guarantee for peace.


any conflict will rapidly de-escalate


Nuclear weapons will rapidly de-escalate conflicts.


Conflicts can be circumvented with nuclear weapons


both sides will avoid threatening vital interests


State as sole supplier is a bad idea


The ownership and distribution of water is a natural monopoly


State owning water is a frightening idea


Terrifying is the idea of state owned water.


State owned water is a scary concept.


What to do with the poorest of the world?


What can be done for the world's most impoverished?


What can possibly be done on behalf of the world's poorest citizens?


Government pension schemes are not a viable or sustainable option.


senior citizens should not and cannot be exposed to such naked risk on moral grounds


Private Enterprise is more suited to long-term planning and sustainability


Private Enterprise demonstrates a greater capacity for dealing with long term planning and viable continuity over time.


Private Business is more inclined towards future planning and sustainability.


State involvement in pensions is deleterious to both pensioners and the state.


Government is fundamentally unsuited to running pension schemes.


Historical evidence has shown that privatisation has been unsuccessful


Air pollution will get even worse.


Air pollution gets worse over time.


air pollution is going to get worse


the pollution in the air is going to get worse


Certain Universities are impressive


Some universities are more prestigious than others.


Not every college is equally impressive.


Some universities are exceptional


There are a few impressive universities.


Rod Laver is without doubt the greatest ever!


Laver has a record that is hard to match.


He has not won The Grand Slam, the single greatest, and most difficult, feat in tennis.


He has dominated like no one else before


Federer has a great tennis record.


Federer is one of the best tennis players of all time.


He has a losing record against Rafael Nadal. How can you be the best of all time if you're not even the best of your own era?


Is not even the best in his current generation


He has just won Wimbledon 2012 (17th grand slam) and gone back to number 1 again


Federer has won 17 grand slams.


Lack of serious competition


Was not ranked number one for the most years


He is the all-time career money leader


Federer is the Greatest EVER!


Federer has a record that will be hard to beat.


Federer has won many games which is very hard for peopple to do.


It would cause racial dissension


That would cause friction between the races.


Society is ready to live with Nazi and Soviet symbols


People in general are not opposed to Nazi and Soviet symbols.


Nazi and Soviet symbols are accepted in today's society.


How this plan will make extremist organizations weaker.


Practical harm #1 - Encouraging extremist movements


Encouraging extremist movement is definitely harmful.


Extremist movements are harmful and should not be encouraged.


Practical harm #2 - Hate speech


In addition to our first argument: There is no legal bar on the purchase of alcoholic drink and cigarettes, though both are often addictive


Why is it legitimate for the government to ban drugs


In addition to our fourth argument: Decriminilisation of drugs will diminish organised crime


Decriminilisation of drugs will diminish organised crime


In addition to our third argument:  Individuals should be free to do whatever they like with themselves as long as this harms no one else


Individuals should be free to do whatever they like with themselves as long as this harms no one else


'God' is merely a concept designed to promote a set of values


People think that a benevolent God cannot exist because bad things happen...


If there is a god, its the sun.


Life is ridiculous without a God.  Belief in God is the only sane thing we discuss.


Science can support the existance of God


According to Probability - a creator exists


God teaches forgiveness and love: an idea universally agreed upon as good.


God is a concept dreamed up by optimistic people.


Pre-nuptial agreements conditions differ from future reality


The State imposed system is not objectively right for everybody


Prenuptial agreements should not be recognized in divorce courts


Pre-nuptial agreements reduce trauma associated with divorce


Pre-nuptial agreements increase security


Liberty to decide what you want is good and because pre-nuptial agreements can be considered rational decisions


Pre-nuptial agreements constitutes a serious chance of abuse


Prenuptial agreements are either too lovely or not as lovely as they appear


there is nothing illegal in the use of drones


Drone strikes are legal under international law.


We should take advantage of the fact that drone strikes are legal


Drones are acceptable to use under International Law


Drone Strikes Are Legal under International Law


Drone Strikes Are Carried Out with the support of Local Governments and Make Those Countries Safer.


Drone strikes are carried out with the collaboration and encouragement of local governments, and make those countries safer.


Local governments allow the US to use drones to make their countries safer.


Drone strikes are allowed by local governments who believe it makes their countries more safe.


Drone strikes can protect foreign countries in collaboration with the local governments.


Drone strikes abroad ensures the safety of foreign countries.


The Majority of Americans Support Drone Strikes


Drone strikes are cheaper than engaging in ground or manned aerial combat.


drones are far more cost effective that whole military units


Drones are less costly than fighting with soldiers


It is cheaper to use drones rather than send soldiers


Drone Use is Cheaper than Engaging in Ground or Manned Aerial Combat


The US cannot Risk Lagging Behind the Rest of the World in the Development of These Technologies.


The United States cannot risk falling behind the rest of the world in the development of drone technologies.


Drone Operators Have a Lower Risk for PTSD than Other Military Personnel.


Drones make US military personnel safer.


fewer troops are exposed to dangers when drones are employed


Drones protect our military from enemies


Drones Keep US Military Personnel Safer


Drone Strikes Are Legal under US Law


US law allows for drone strikes.


There is nothing illegal about drone strikes under US law.


Drone strikes operations are deemed legal by US law.


United States law endorses drone strikes.


Drone strikes are legal under US law.


Drones kill fewer civilians, as a percentage of total fatalities, than any other military weapon.


drones are able to be more focused limiting collateral damage


drones can be a more precise weapon


It has been proved that the use of Drone to combat enemy activity has resulted in fewer casualties amongst the civilian population as compared to the usage of other weapons


The use of Drones to combat enemy actions and terrorism will be an effective method to face enemies and stop terrorism .


Drones Result in Fewer Civilian Fatalities than Other Weapons.


Drone Strikes Make the United States Safer by Destroying Terrorist Networks Internationally.


International Terrorist Networks can be destroyed by having Drone Strikes in the United States.


Continuing with the Drone Strikes in the United States , would combat any Terrorists Network and plan to attack the country


Drone strikes are subject to a strict review process and congressional oversight.


Drone strikes target individuals who may not be terrorists or enemy combatants.


Unmanned drone attacks may harm innocent civilians.


United States drone strikes include collateral damage.


Drone strikes may victimize non-threats.


The innocent may be harmed my drone strikes.


Many drone operators have emotional and psychological stress.


Operating drones results in a great deal of mental and emotional stress.


Drone operators often suffer from psychological and emotional strain.


Drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill.


Terrorists are created by drone strikes.


Drone strikes tend to increase the membership of terrorist organizations.


Drone strikes can't reduce the number of terrorists.


Drone strikes are secretive, lack sufficient legal oversight, and prevent citizens from holding their leaders accountable.


Secrecy prevents accountability for drone strikes.


Not enough legal oversight prevents the accountability resulting from secret drone strikes.


There are many reasons why drones lack sufficient oversight to be of moral value.


The use of drones removes accountability from their leaders.


Drone strikes make the United States safer by decimating terrorist networks across the world.


Drone strikes violate the sovereignty of other countries.


Drone strikes infringe upon the rights of other nations.


Drone strikes mostly kill low-value targets who are not significant threats to US safety and security.


Those targeted by drone strikes are mostly insignificant to national security.


Drone strikes are often not targeting high value targets.


Drone strikes tend to only kill low value targets.


Drone strikes violate international law.


The use of unmanned drone attacks is inconsistent with international laws.


International laws are violated by drone strikes.


International law is violated by drone strikes.


The use of drones conflicts with international law


Drone strikes kill large numbers of civilians and traumatize local populations.


Civilians are traumatized and often killed by United States drone strikes.


Drone strikes cause a significant amount of localized trauma.


Drone strikes are a major threat to individuals, both physically and psychologically.


Drone strikes have done serious harm to civilians, partially through promoting emotional terror.


The majority of Americans support drone strikes.


American citizens approve of drone strikes.


Most US citizens approve of military drones.


Most people in the U.S. support the use of drone strikes.


According to survey, most U.S. citizens support drone strikes.


Drone pilots have a lower risk for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than pilots of manned aircraft and other battlefield soldiers.


PTSD is much less prevalent amonst drone pilots than those who participate in traditional warfare.


The incidence of PTSD is lower amonst drone pilots than those who pilot manned aircraft or fight on the battlefield.


Drone pilots have lesser chance of getting PTSD than other aircraft pilots.


Using drones can reduce the chance of pilots getting PTSD in operations.


US drone strikes give cover for other countries to engage in human rights abuses.


U.S. drone strikes enable other nations to violate human rights.


When the U.S. uses drone strikes abroad, it gives those nations permission to participate in human rights infringement.