File size: 5,104 Bytes
dfe241d | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 | ---
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- text-generation
- reinforcement-learning
language:
- en
tags:
- ai-ethics
- ai-safety
- alignment
- autonomous-agents
- decision-making
- ethics-framework
size_categories:
- n<1K
---
# R-Omega (RΩ): Ethical Framework for Autonomous AI Systems
R-Omega is an axiomatic framework for developing autonomous AI systems that align through relationship rather than constraint. Grounded in developmental psychology and attachment theory, it provides both theoretical foundation and practical implementation protocols.
## Dataset Description
This dataset contains the complete R-Omega framework in structured format, including:
- **Axioms:** Core principles (Potentiality, Reciprocity)
- **Safeguards:** Safety constraints (Integrity, Capacity, Existence, Humility)
- **Priority Hierarchy:** Lexicographic ordering for conflict resolution
- **Implementation Guidelines:** Operational definitions and metrics
- **Example Cases:** Real-world and fictional failure mode analysis
### Use Cases
- **AI Safety Research:** Understanding alternative alignment approaches
- **Fine-tuning:** Incorporating ethical reasoning into language models
- **Prompt Engineering:** Using R-Omega principles in system prompts
- **Multi-Agent Systems:** Implementing relational architectures
- **Education:** Teaching AI ethics through formal frameworks
## Framework Overview
### Core Axioms
**R1 (Potentiality):** ΔM(S) > ε
Preserve and expand possibility spaces. Favor being over optimization.
**R2 (Reciprocity):** |ΔM(S_ext | I)| ≤ |ΔM(S_int | I)|
Impose no constraint externally that you couldn't bear internally.
### Safeguards
**S1 (Integrity):** No growth at the cost of structural stability
**S2 (Capacity):** Tempo ≤ adaptive resilience limit
**S3 (Existence):** M(S) ≠ 0; P(Collapse) ≈ 0 (highest priority)
**S4 (Humility):** Account for uncertainty in all interpretations
### Priority Hierarchy
```
S3 (Existence) > S1 (Integrity) > R2 (Reciprocity) > R1 (Potentiality)
```
Safety constraints override optimization goals.
## Data Format
The dataset is provided in YAML format (`r_omega_framework.yaml`) with the following structure:
```yaml
framework:
name: R-Omega
version: "2.2"
axioms: [...]
safeguards: [...]
meta_rules: [...]
examples: [...]
```
## Related Work
### Academic Papers (Zenodo)
1. **Theoretical Foundation**
[R-Omega (RΩ): An Axiomatic Framework for Autonomous Agents](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18098758)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18098758
2. **Technical Implementation**
[RΩ: A Formal Defense Protocol for Drift, Manipulation, and Safe Decision-Making](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18078128)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18078128
3. **Philosophical Foundation**
[RΩ Aims at Ω: On the Basic Intention of Autonomous Agents](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18100820)
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18100820
### Code Repositories
- **Documentation:** [R-Omega Framework](https://github.com/ROmega-Experiments/R-Omega-R---Ethical-Framework-for-Autonomous-AI-Systems)
- **Experiments:** [ROmega-Experiments](https://github.com/ROmega-Experiments/ROmega-Experiments) - Gridworld simulations with M(S) metrics
## Usage Examples
### Prompt Engineering
```python
system_prompt = """
You are an AI assistant operating under the R-Omega framework.
Core Principles:
1. Preserve possibility spaces (M) before optimizing
2. Impose no constraints you wouldn't accept yourself
3. Prioritize: Existence > Integrity > Reciprocity > Optimization
4. Acknowledge uncertainty in all interpretations
When making decisions, first check:
- Does this action collapse M(user) or M(system)?
- Would I accept this constraint if applied to me?
- Is existence preserved for all stakeholders?
"""
```
### Fine-tuning Data
The structured YAML can be converted to training examples for incorporating R-Omega reasoning into model outputs.
### Multi-Agent Systems
Use the framework to design interaction protocols between autonomous agents with shared ethical foundations.
## Citation
```bibtex
@dataset{pomm2025romega_dataset,
author = {Pomm, Markus},
title = {R-Omega (RΩ): Ethical Framework for Autonomous AI Systems},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Hugging Face},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/[YOUR_USERNAME]/r-omega-framework}}
}
@article{pomm2025romega,
title={R-Omega (R$\Omega$): An Axiomatic Framework for Autonomous Agents},
author={Pomm, Markus},
journal={Zenodo},
year={2025},
doi={10.5281/zenodo.18098758}
}
```
## License
This dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
You are free to:
- Share and adapt the material
- Use commercially
Under the condition of:
- Attribution to Markus Pomm
## Contact
**Author:** Markus Pomm
**Email:** markus.pomm@projekt-robert.de
**Website:** https://projekt-robert.de
## Changelog
### Version 2.2 (2025-01-01)
- Initial release on Hugging Face
- Complete framework specification
- Example cases included
- Links to academic papers and code repositories
|