wikikg-fact-phd / src /analysis /error_analysis.py
minhy112's picture
Add files using upload-large-folder tool
715cc5a verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
10.5 kB
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
from src.analysis.compare_predictions import load_prediction_map, row_id
from src.data.io_utils import read_jsonl, write_csv
SPECS = {
"vifactcheck": {
"label": "ViFactCheck",
"split": "test",
"baseline_pred": Path("outputs/baselines/vifactcheck/encoder_verifier/xlm-roberta-large/seed_13/predictions_test.jsonl"),
"wikikg_pred": Path("outputs/verifier/vifactcheck/wikikg_fact/xlm-roberta-large_wikikg_text_only_diag_top5/seed_13/predictions_test.jsonl"),
"retrieval_topk": Path("outputs/retrieval/vifactcheck/wikikg_topk_test.jsonl"),
"verified_subgraphs": Path("outputs/kg/vifactcheck/verified_claim_subgraphs_test.jsonl"),
"unsupported_triples": Path("outputs/kg/vifactcheck/unsupported_triples_test.jsonl"),
},
"averitec": {
"label": "AVeriTeC",
"split": "local_test",
"baseline_pred": Path("outputs/llm_baselines/averitec/gemma4_31b_q4/local_test_predictions.jsonl"),
"wikikg_pred": Path("outputs/llm_baselines/averitec/gemma4_31b_q4_qa_wikikg_paths_only_top10_kg5/local_test_predictions.jsonl"),
"retrieval_topk": Path("outputs/retrieval/averitec/wikikg_topk_local_test.jsonl"),
"verified_subgraphs": Path("outputs/kg/averitec/verified_claim_subgraphs_local_test.jsonl"),
"unsupported_triples": Path("outputs/kg/averitec/unsupported_triples_local_test.jsonl"),
},
"healthver": {
"label": "HealthVer",
"split": "test",
"baseline_pred": Path("outputs/baselines/healthver/encoder_verifier/microsoft__BiomedNLP-BiomedBERT-base-uncased-abstract-fulltext/seed_13/predictions_test.jsonl"),
"wikikg_pred": Path("outputs/verifier/healthver/wikikg_fact/microsoft__BiomedNLP-BiomedBERT-base-uncased-abstract-fulltext_wikikg_top5/seed_13/predictions_test.jsonl"),
"retrieval_topk": Path("outputs/retrieval/healthver/wikikg_topk_test.jsonl"),
"verified_subgraphs": Path("outputs/kg/healthver/verified_claim_subgraphs_test.jsonl"),
"unsupported_triples": Path("outputs/kg/healthver/unsupported_triples_test.jsonl"),
},
}
BIOMEDICAL_RELATIONS = {"TREATS", "PREVENTS", "CAUSES", "INCREASES_RISK", "DECREASES_RISK"}
def load_map(path: Path) -> dict[str, dict[str, Any]]:
return {row_id(row): row for row in read_jsonl(path)}
def group_rows(path: Path) -> dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]]:
grouped: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] = {}
for row in read_jsonl(path):
grouped.setdefault(str(row.get("claim_id", "")), []).append(row)
return grouped
def is_wrong_relation(row: dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
flags = set(row.get("removal_reasons") or []) | set(row.get("rule_notes") or [])
return "relation_demoted_to_associated" in flags or bool(row.get("relation_original")) or row.get("nli_label") == "entailment"
def build_claim_rows(dataset: str) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
spec = SPECS[dataset]
baseline = load_prediction_map(spec["baseline_pred"])
wikikg = load_prediction_map(spec["wikikg_pred"])
topk = load_map(spec["retrieval_topk"])
subgraphs = load_map(spec["verified_subgraphs"])
unsupported = group_rows(spec["unsupported_triples"])
rows: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
for claim_id in sorted(wikikg):
pred = wikikg[claim_id]
base = baseline.get(claim_id, {})
subgraph = subgraphs.get(claim_id, {})
metrics = (topk.get(claim_id) or {}).get("metrics", {})
unsupported_rows = unsupported.get(claim_id, [])
correct = str(pred.get("prediction")) == str(pred.get("gold"))
retrieval_miss = False
if dataset == "healthver":
retrieval_miss = (not correct) and int(subgraph.get("num_triples") or 0) == 0 and int(subgraph.get("num_facts") or 0) == 0
else:
retrieval_miss = (not correct) and not bool(metrics.get("gold_at_10"))
wrong_relation = (not correct) and any(is_wrong_relation(row) for row in unsupported_rows)
overclaim_biomedical = (not correct) and dataset == "healthver" and any(
row.get("relation") in BIOMEDICAL_RELATIONS
or row.get("relation_original") in BIOMEDICAL_RELATIONS
or "relation_demoted_to_associated" in set(row.get("removal_reasons") or []) | set(row.get("rule_notes") or [])
for row in unsupported_rows
)
gold = str(pred.get("gold", ""))
prediction = str(pred.get("prediction", ""))
nei_confusion = (not correct) and ("NEI" in {gold, prediction})
conflicting_confusion = dataset == "averitec" and (not correct) and ("CONFLICTING" in {gold, prediction})
weak_explanation = correct and int(subgraph.get("num_triples") or 0) == 0 and int(subgraph.get("num_facts") or 0) == 0
good_kg_path_wrong_verdict = (not correct) and (
int(subgraph.get("num_triples") or 0) > 0 or int(subgraph.get("num_facts") or 0) > 0
)
rows.append(
{
"dataset": dataset,
"split": spec["split"],
"claim_id": claim_id,
"gold": gold,
"baseline_prediction": base.get("prediction", ""),
"wikikg_prediction": prediction,
"baseline_correct": str(base.get("prediction", "")) == gold if base else "",
"wikikg_correct": correct,
"retrieval_miss": int(retrieval_miss),
"wrong_kg_relation": int(wrong_relation),
"overclaim_biomedical_relation": int(overclaim_biomedical),
"nei_confusion": int(nei_confusion),
"conflicting_confusion": int(conflicting_confusion),
"correct_label_weak_explanation": int(weak_explanation),
"good_kg_path_wrong_verdict": int(good_kg_path_wrong_verdict),
"num_verified_facts": int(subgraph.get("num_facts") or 0),
"num_verified_triples": int(subgraph.get("num_triples") or 0),
"num_unsupported_triples": len(unsupported_rows),
}
)
return rows
def first_example(rows: list[dict[str, Any]], field: str) -> str:
for row in rows:
if int(row[field]) == 1:
return row["claim_id"]
return ""
def summarize(rows: list[dict[str, Any]]) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
by_dataset: dict[str, list[dict[str, Any]]] = {}
for row in rows:
by_dataset.setdefault(row["dataset"], []).append(row)
def count(dataset: str, field: str) -> int:
return sum(int(row[field]) for row in by_dataset.get(dataset, []))
def example(field: str, note: str) -> str:
ids = []
for dataset in ("vifactcheck", "averitec", "healthver"):
claim_id = first_example(by_dataset.get(dataset, []), field)
if claim_id:
ids.append(f"{SPECS[dataset]['label']}:{claim_id}")
suffix = "; ".join(ids[:2])
return note if not suffix else f"{note}; e.g. {suffix}"
return [
{
"Error type": "Retrieval miss",
"ViFactCheck": count("vifactcheck", "retrieval_miss"),
"AVeriTeC": count("averitec", "retrieval_miss"),
"HealthVer": count("healthver", "retrieval_miss"),
"Example / interpretation": example("retrieval_miss", "evidence absent or still ranked too low"),
},
{
"Error type": "Wrong KG relation",
"ViFactCheck": count("vifactcheck", "wrong_kg_relation"),
"AVeriTeC": count("averitec", "wrong_kg_relation"),
"HealthVer": count("healthver", "wrong_kg_relation"),
"Example / interpretation": example("wrong_kg_relation", "relation semantics remain too strong or misaligned"),
},
{
"Error type": "Overclaim biomedical relation",
"ViFactCheck": "n/a",
"AVeriTeC": "n/a",
"HealthVer": count("healthver", "overclaim_biomedical_relation"),
"Example / interpretation": example("overclaim_biomedical_relation", "biomedical claims still risk over-strong causal wording"),
},
{
"Error type": "NEI confusion",
"ViFactCheck": count("vifactcheck", "nei_confusion"),
"AVeriTeC": count("averitec", "nei_confusion"),
"HealthVer": count("healthver", "nei_confusion"),
"Example / interpretation": example("nei_confusion", "insufficient evidence still flips into support or refute"),
},
{
"Error type": "CONFLICTING confusion",
"ViFactCheck": "n/a",
"AVeriTeC": count("averitec", "conflicting_confusion"),
"HealthVer": "n/a",
"Example / interpretation": example("conflicting_confusion", "cherry-picking cases remain the hardest label"),
},
{
"Error type": "Correct label, weak explanation",
"ViFactCheck": count("vifactcheck", "correct_label_weak_explanation"),
"AVeriTeC": count("averitec", "correct_label_weak_explanation"),
"HealthVer": count("healthver", "correct_label_weak_explanation"),
"Example / interpretation": example("correct_label_weak_explanation", "prediction correct despite little retained KG support"),
},
{
"Error type": "Good KG path, wrong verdict",
"ViFactCheck": count("vifactcheck", "good_kg_path_wrong_verdict"),
"AVeriTeC": count("averitec", "good_kg_path_wrong_verdict"),
"HealthVer": count("healthver", "good_kg_path_wrong_verdict"),
"Example / interpretation": example("good_kg_path_wrong_verdict", "useful path exists but the verifier still misclassifies"),
},
]
def main() -> None:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--analysis-output", type=Path, default=Path("outputs/analysis/error_analysis.csv"))
parser.add_argument("--table-output", type=Path, default=Path("outputs/tables/T15_error_analysis.csv"))
args = parser.parse_args()
rows: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
for dataset in ("vifactcheck", "averitec", "healthver"):
rows.extend(build_claim_rows(dataset))
write_csv(args.analysis_output, rows)
write_csv(args.table_output, summarize(rows))
print(f"Wrote {len(rows)} per-claim error rows to {args.analysis_output}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()