Add files using upload-large-folder tool
Browse filesThis view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes. See raw diff
- defects4j-0002/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0003/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0004/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0005/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0032/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0034/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0035/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0050/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0057/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0059/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0061/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0066/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0068/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0092/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0095/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0140/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0147/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0178/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0200/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0201/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0206/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0207/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0208/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0209/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0230/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0231/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0236/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0237/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0238/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0239/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0253/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0254/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0262/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0265/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0291/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0296/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0298/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0372/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0375/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0381/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0386/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0388/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0402/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0405/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0433/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0434/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0450/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0451/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0456/instruction.md +1 -13
- defects4j-0457/instruction.md +1 -13
defects4j-0002/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-864.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-864.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0003/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-873.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-873.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0004/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-851.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-851.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0005/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-635.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-635.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0032/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-700.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-700.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0034/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-669.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-669.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0035/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-668.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-668.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0050/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-582.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-582.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0057/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-528.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-528.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0059/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-504.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-504.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0061/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-487.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-487.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0066/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-477.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-477.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0068/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-433.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-433.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0092/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-66.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-66.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0095/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-174.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-174.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0140/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-139.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-139.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0147/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-61.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-archive/v2/code.google.com/closure-compiler/issues/issue-61.json
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0178/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-87
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-87
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0200/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-278
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-278
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0201/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-279
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-279
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0206/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-316
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-316
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0207/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-321
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-321
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0208/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-335
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-335
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0209/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-348
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-348
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0230/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/207
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/207
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0231/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/216
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/216
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0236/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/296
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/296
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0237/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/307
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/307
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0238/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/315
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/315
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0239/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/317
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/317
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0253/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/592
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/592
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0254/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/667
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/667
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0262/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/771
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/771
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0265/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/810
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/810
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0291/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/1155
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/1155
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0296/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/1261
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/1261
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0298/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/999
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/999
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0372/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/google/gson/pull/1128
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/google/gson/pull/1128
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0375/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-xml/issues/180
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-xml/issues/180
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0381/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-65
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-65
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0386/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-101
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-101
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0388/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-105
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-105
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0402/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: UNKNOWN
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: UNKNOWN
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0405/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: UNKNOWN
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: UNKNOWN
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0433/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-156
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-156
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0434/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-1
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-1
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0450/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-182
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-182
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0451/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-201
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-201
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0456/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-207
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-207
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
defects4j-0457/instruction.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -19,19 +19,7 @@
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-215
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
1. **Bug Understanding**: Use the revision IDs to examine the buggy and fixed versions of the code
|
| 25 |
-
2. **Root Cause Analysis**: Identify what caused this bug and why it occurred
|
| 26 |
-
3. **Fix Analysis**: Understand how the bug was fixed and evaluate the solution
|
| 27 |
-
4. **Prevention**: Suggest practices that could have prevented this bug
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
### Analysis Questions:
|
| 30 |
-
- What is the specific nature of this bug (logic error, null pointer, etc.)?
|
| 31 |
-
- Which classes and methods are affected?
|
| 32 |
-
- How does the fix address the root cause?
|
| 33 |
-
- What testing strategies could have caught this bug earlier?
|
| 34 |
-
- Are there any potential side effects of the fix?
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
### Repository Access
|
| 37 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
Issue URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-215
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
## Task
|
| 22 |
+
Fix the bug in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
### Repository Access
|
| 25 |
You can access the project repository and examine the buggy revision:
|