talk_id stringclasses 15
values | segment_pos uint16 1 357 | title stringclasses 15
values | speaker_id stringclasses 15
values | transcription stringlengths 2 376 | audio audioduration (s) 0.06 24.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
856696c114 | 1 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Yes. Hi. It's a pleasure to talk to you about the latest results from | |
856696c114 | 10 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | the limits on the B to ee branching ratio. On slide four, what would be considered | |
856696c114 | 100 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | predictions also changed a bit. The form factor uncertainties actually | |
856696c114 | 101 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | decreased. But the sub-leading corrections to the interpolation, it | |
856696c114 | 102 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | actually became more conservative. Together with a small shift in central | |
856696c114 | 103 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | value of the observation, this results in just a slight decrease in discrepancy with | |
856696c114 | 104 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | the Standard Model. But the behaviour of all of our angular observables is now more | |
856696c114 | 105 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | consistent with a single change in C9 which is the vector boson coefficient. | |
856696c114 | 106 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Speaking of Wilson coefficients, just one slide on effective theory. This is a | |
856696c114 | 107 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | tool that helps us write the process as a sum over effective operators, that | |
856696c114 | 108 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | describe the physics happening at this effective four point interaction on the | |
856696c114 | 109 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | bottom right block, | |
856696c114 | 11 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | as electroweak penguins are the B to sll transitions. So I'm not talking about | |
856696c114 | 110 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | and their Wilson coefficients. These parameterise the amount of which kind of | |
856696c114 | 111 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | physics happens at this vertex. The idea is that this allows for a model | |
856696c114 | 112 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | independent interpretation of which kind of new physics is happening here. But also | |
856696c114 | 113 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | it allows to combine different measurements of different processes which | |
856696c114 | 114 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | are sensitive to a subset of the same Wilson coefficients. Now, in this Q- | |
856696c114 | 115 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | squared region where these bins deviate, the C9 and the C10 - the vector and | |
856696c114 | 116 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | axial vector - are actually the most important ones. When we allow a freedom in C9 | |
856696c114 | 117 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | and C10 in a fit, you can see on the bottom left that we have about 2.8 | |
856696c114 | 118 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | sigma deviation from the Standard Model. But mostly this appears to be in the C9 | |
856696c114 | 119 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | direction, so the vector direction. If we only allow to vary C9, | |
856696c114 | 12 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | where the gamma is on shell, I'm talking about the diagram shown on the right here. | |
856696c114 | 120 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | you see the middle plot, we are actually 3.3 standard deviations away with just | |
856696c114 | 121 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | this K*mumu measurement. And then on the right, for comparison, you see | |
856696c114 | 122 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | when we change C9 to minus one, which seems to be this preferred value, the | |
856696c114 | 123 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Standard Model and the data - the theory and the data - | |
856696c114 | 124 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | match better by eye. So this is going from the solid line or the blue blocks to these | |
856696c114 | 125 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | blue dashed lines. Slide 14. I mentioned combinations of different | |
856696c114 | 126 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | measurements contributing to the same Wilson coefficients, so it's a natural | |
856696c114 | 127 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | moment to move on to the second analysis I wanted to highlight, which is the | |
856696c114 | 128 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | measurement of B to ee. This is also a b2sll transition, but it has a different | |
856696c114 | 129 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | decay topology, to leptons only. And because of helicity suppression, this is | |
856696c114 | 13 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | These are flavour changing and neutral. So these are forbidden at tree level in the | |
856696c114 | 130 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | even more suppressed. If you see this equation in the branching ratio here, the | |
856696c114 | 131 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | helicity suppression occurs in front of this C10 term, which is the same C10 | |
856696c114 | 132 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | as we saw for this angular analysis. But there are also scalar and pseudo-scalar | |
856696c114 | 133 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | contributions which were not there. They contribute to the | |
856696c114 | 134 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | overall picture of the coefficients, of course, but the B to ee analysis is even | |
856696c114 | 135 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | more suppressed in C10. So this is a very good probe of scalar new physics. And even | |
856696c114 | 136 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | one observation, one event, would actually be a very significant hint for new physics | |
856696c114 | 137 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | already. In slide 15, the B to mumu results. Aiden already talked about it. So, I will | |
856696c114 | 138 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | not mention that now. But on the bottom left, you can see our results for the | |
856696c114 | 139 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | search of B to ee, which resulted in no observation, but a limit that is 30 | |
856696c114 | 14 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Standard Model. So they are very suppressed, and called rare decays. And | |
856696c114 | 140 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | times better than the previous CDF one. The global picture of those | |
856696c114 | 141 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | coefficients will help constrain which kinds of new physics | |
856696c114 | 142 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | might explain our other observations. | |
856696c114 | 143 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | In slide 16, I'm done with the LHCb measurements. But I just wanted | |
856696c114 | 144 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | to mention that there are many independent groups who do these models-independent | |
856696c114 | 145 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | fits to a lot of these measurements combined: in the order of 170. And they | |
856696c114 | 146 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | find somewhat consistently that C9 only, deviates from zero by four sigma to | |
856696c114 | 147 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | five sigma, depending on your assumptions and which group you ask. But | |
856696c114 | 148 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | it all seems to be consistent with a single change in a Wilson coefficient, this | |
856696c114 | 149 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | factor seems to be minus one, maybe. So this is a very interesting result, how all | |
856696c114 | 15 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | because of that, sensitive to new physics in the loops, or even at tree | |
856696c114 | 150 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | of these measurements somehow seem to point to a single explanation. I think | |
856696c114 | 151 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | that's fascinating. So any kind of vector new physics is very hot at the | |
856696c114 | 152 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | moment, of course, because of this. On slide 17, my conclusion. I showed you two | |
856696c114 | 153 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | new exciting results on b2sll transitions from LHCb: the angular analysis K*mumu, | |
856696c114 | 154 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | and this new rare decay, B to ee, where we have a limit. The discrepancy in this angular | |
856696c114 | 155 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | analysis with the Standard Model still stands, although it did not increase | |
856696c114 | 156 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | because of various reasons. And all of these results are not done with the full | |
856696c114 | 157 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | dataset yet: we’re still analysing the remaining data that we took in Run-2, so we | |
856696c114 | 158 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | can expect the what we call ‘Run-1+2 legacy results’ soon. This also | |
856696c114 | 159 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | goes for the new B to mumu analysis, which is coming out, hopefully, | |
856696c114 | 16 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | level, if that's the form that new physics takes. We can categorise these penguins | |
856696c114 | 160 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | very soon. The B to ee analysis, and on top of that, we actually have many other analysis | |
856696c114 | 161 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | ongoing. These are R(X) analyses that Miriam will talk about after me, but also we | |
856696c114 | 162 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | finally have enough statistics to measure the angular analysis of K*ee | |
856696c114 | 163 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | actually. So all kinds of very interesting new results will hopefully come out soon | |
856696c114 | 164 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | with that more data. | |
856696c114 | 165 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | And that's it. Thank you. Thank you for your attention. | |
856696c114 | 166 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Question to Jacco, please raise your hand | |
856696c114 | 167 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Yeah, my chemical yosity just started. Sure. | |
856696c114 | 168 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | So, you mentioned second edition and China is that you can start of course not but | |
856696c114 | 169 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | there is one missing I remember the visa are quite old the result from the bar | |
856696c114 | 17 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | in three classes: the ratios of different flavours of leptons, which we call R(X), | |
856696c114 | 170 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | about B plus C two three plus down that was about two or something time 10 to the | |
856696c114 | 171 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | minus three | |
856696c114 | 172 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | is quite interesting. I think c said | |
856696c114 | 173 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | should be sensitive to the effects massing and the the tweaks doubled more than | |
856696c114 | 174 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | So, do you think it is something that can be feasible in Italy should be a thing. So | |
856696c114 | 175 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | since you use already final stage without? | |
856696c114 | 176 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Yeah, so | |
856696c114 | 177 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | I will I will not say it's not possible? Absolutely not. We've made an attempt at B | |
856696c114 | 178 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | to dow which is even more challenging. So it's definitely something we we studied, | |
856696c114 | 179 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | we can study I should say. But it is tricky at the LSE. Right? So these these | |
856696c114 | 18 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | but that's the subject of the talk by Miriam, which is right after mine. And the | |
856696c114 | 180 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | measurements with without, you have to make it takes time. I should say that, | |
856696c114 | 181 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | yeah, I would expect the result like that coming from LGB soon, but it doesn't mean | |
856696c114 | 182 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | it's not something maybe we can all do. And it adds to the to the full picture. So | |
856696c114 | 183 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | it's an interesting channel, I think. | |
856696c114 | 184 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Thank you very much. | |
856696c114 | 185 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | Other question | |
856696c114 | 186 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | seems not so we can move to the third | |
856696c114 | 19 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | measurements of branching fractions and angular observables. We measure these | |
856696c114 | 2 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | last March actually, on electroweak penguin decays from LHCb. So on slide 2, | |
856696c114 | 20 | Electroweak Penguin Decays | 5034121 | as a function of the Q-squared which is the invariant mass of, in this case, the |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.