ZTWHHH commited on
Commit
8f66b28
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 0cbc1b0

Add manifest (metadata.json)

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. metadata.json +26 -21
metadata.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
  {
2
  "name": "MathVision",
3
- "release_date": "2024-02-01",
4
  "subsets": {
5
  "main": {
6
  "language": [
@@ -9,19 +9,25 @@
9
  "modalities": [
10
  "single_image_start"
11
  ],
12
- "task_type": "vqa",
13
  "score_type": "rule",
14
  "score_protocol": {
15
  "reference": "official mathllm/MATH-V@evaluation/evaluate.py — purely rule-based: boxed/'the answer is' extraction, find_math_answer, is_equal (latex2sympy symbolic compare), no LLM call; identical logic vendored at lmms-eval@lmms_eval/tasks/mathvision/utils.py:79-137 (mathvision_standard_eval) + eval_utils.py.",
16
- "note": "Official is_equal does latex2sympy symbolic equivalence and also accepts the option TEXT for MCQ rows (gt letter or option value); the scorer's exact/template chain reproduces letter/number matches but not symbolic LaTeX equivalence. VLMEvalKit disagrees with the official protocol (utils/mathv.py:116-160: rule prefetch then GPT answer extraction = llm_extract); official rule protocol preferred. The published prompt is the lmms-eval boxed-CoT prompt, so boxed template extraction applies."
 
 
 
 
 
 
17
  },
18
- "prompt_template": "Please first solve the problem step by step, then put your final answer or a single letter (if it is a multiple choice question) in one \"\\boxed{}\". \n<image>{{ question }}",
19
  "mapping_from_source": {
20
- "media": {
21
- "from": "image",
22
- "type": "list",
23
- "min_items": 1,
24
- "max_items": 1
 
25
  },
26
  "id": {
27
  "from": "id"
@@ -29,10 +35,21 @@
29
  "question": {
30
  "from": "question"
31
  },
 
 
 
 
 
32
  "answer": {
33
  "from": "answer",
34
  "optional": true
35
  },
 
 
 
 
 
 
36
  "extra": {
37
  "level": {
38
  "from": "level"
@@ -40,19 +57,7 @@
40
  "subject": {
41
  "from": "subject"
42
  }
43
- },
44
- "source": {
45
- "format": "huggingface",
46
- "url": {
47
- "test": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/MathLLMs/MathVision",
48
- "testmini": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/MathLLMs/MathVision"
49
- }
50
  }
51
- },
52
- "prompt_template_source": {
53
- "origin": "official",
54
- "reference": "https://github.com/EvolvingLMMs-Lab/lmms-eval/blob/main/lmms_eval/tasks/mathvision/utils.py#L29-L42 (default mathvision query_prompt='Please first solve the problem step by step, then put your final answer or a single letter (if it is a multiple choice question) in one \\\\boxed{}.')",
55
- "notes": "Tier 4: lmms-eval MathVision canonical eval prompt with chain-of-thought structure and boxed-answer formatting."
56
  }
57
  }
58
  }
 
1
  {
2
  "name": "MathVision",
3
+ "release_date": "2026-07-07",
4
  "subsets": {
5
  "main": {
6
  "language": [
 
9
  "modalities": [
10
  "single_image_start"
11
  ],
12
+ "task_type": "multiple_choice",
13
  "score_type": "rule",
14
  "score_protocol": {
15
  "reference": "official mathllm/MATH-V@evaluation/evaluate.py — purely rule-based: boxed/'the answer is' extraction, find_math_answer, is_equal (latex2sympy symbolic compare), no LLM call; identical logic vendored at lmms-eval@lmms_eval/tasks/mathvision/utils.py:79-137 (mathvision_standard_eval) + eval_utils.py.",
16
+ "note": "Official is_equal does latex2sympy symbolic equivalence and also accepts the option TEXT for MCQ rows (gt letter or option value); the scorer's exact/template chain reproduces letter/number matches but not symbolic LaTeX equivalence. VLMEvalKit disagrees with the official protocol (utils/mathv.py:116-160: rule prefetch then GPT answer extraction = llm_extract); official rule protocol preferred. The prompt is the official MATH-V boxed prompt (models/GPT4V.py process_example_mergedimg), so boxed template extraction applies. Rows whose options are the placeholder list ['A','B','C','D','E'] have the option contents printed inside the image; the official prompt suppresses the options block for them and the options dict {A:'A',...,E:'E'} is carried verbatim from the source."
17
+ },
18
+ "prompt_template": "Please solve the problem and put your answer in one \"\\boxed{}\". If it is a multiple choice question, only one letter is allowed in the \"\\boxed{}\".\n<image>{{ question }}\n{% if options and options.values()|join('') != 'ABCDE' %}{% for k, v in options.items() %}({{ k }}) {{ v }}\n{% endfor %}{% endif %}",
19
+ "prompt_template_source": {
20
+ "origin": "official",
21
+ "reference": "https://github.com/mathllm/MATH-V/blob/main/models/GPT4V.py#L109-L117 (process_example_mergedimg, the __main__ inference path: boxed instruction + question + '(A) ...' options block only when options are non-empty and not the in-image placeholder list ABCDE; same suppression in geninput L22-L30)",
22
+ "notes": "Tier 1: official MATH-V inference code. Byte-identical to the official prompt except a single <image> placeholder inserted before the question (the HF dataset ships one merged image per row; the official code attaches it separately). lmms-eval (lmms_eval/tasks/mathvision/utils.py L33-L48) equivalently emits a 'Choices:' block only when options are present."
23
  },
 
24
  "mapping_from_source": {
25
+ "source": {
26
+ "format": "huggingface",
27
+ "url": {
28
+ "test": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/MathLLMs/MathVision",
29
+ "testmini": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/MathLLMs/MathVision"
30
+ }
31
  },
32
  "id": {
33
  "from": "id"
 
35
  "question": {
36
  "from": "question"
37
  },
38
+ "options": {
39
+ "from": "options",
40
+ "optional": true,
41
+ "note": "list source values are normalized to {A,B,...} dict; empty list stays {}. 384/3040 test (73/304 testmini) MCQ rows carry the placeholder list ['A','B','C','D','E'] meaning the option contents are printed inside the image; the prompt template suppresses the options block for exactly those rows, mirroring official handling."
42
+ },
43
  "answer": {
44
  "from": "answer",
45
  "optional": true
46
  },
47
+ "media": {
48
+ "from": "decoded_image",
49
+ "type": "list",
50
+ "min_items": 1,
51
+ "max_items": 1
52
+ },
53
  "extra": {
54
  "level": {
55
  "from": "level"
 
57
  "subject": {
58
  "from": "subject"
59
  }
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
60
  }
 
 
 
 
 
61
  }
62
  }
63
  }