{"example_id": "V/2008/page_17.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average payment volume per transaction for american express?\n\nPre-table text:\nlargest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks the largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks are visa , mastercard , american express , discover , jcb and diners club .\nwith the exception of discover , which primarily operates in the united states , all of the other network operators can be considered multi- national or global providers of payments network services .\nbased on payments volume , total volume , number of transactions and number of cards in circulation , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world .\nthe following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors for calendar year 2007 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 2457 $ 3822 50.3 1592 .\n\nTable:\ncompany\tpayments volume ( billions )\ttotal volume ( billions )\ttotal transactions ( billions )\tcards ( millions )\nvisa inc. ( 1 )\t$ 2457\t$ 3822\t50.3\t1592\nmastercard\t1697\t2276\t27.0\t916\namerican express\t637\t647\t5.0\t86\ndiscover\t102\t119\t1.6\t57\njcb\t55\t61\t0.6\t58\ndiners club\t29\t30\t0.2\t7\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) visa inc .\nfigures as reported previously in our filings .\nsource : the nilson report , issue 902 ( may 2008 ) and issue 903 ( may 2008 ) .\nnote : visa inc .\nfigures exclude visa europe .\nfigures for competitors include their respective european operations .\nvisa figures include visa , visa electron , and interlink brands .\nvisa cards include plus proprietary cards , but proprietary plus cash volume is not included .\ndomestic china figures are excluded .\nmastercard figures include pin-based debit card figures on mastercard cards , but not maestro or cirrus figures .\nchina commercial funds transfers are excluded .\namerican express and discover include business from third-party issuers .\njcb figures are for april 2006 through march 2007 , but cards and outlets are as of september 2007 .\njcb total transaction figures are estimates .\nour primary operations we generate revenue from the transaction processing services we offer to our customers .\nour customers deliver visa products and payment services to consumers and merchants based on the product platforms we define and manage .\npayments network management is a core part of our operations , as it ensures that our payments system provides a safe , efficient , consistent , and interoperable service to cardholders , merchants , and financial institutions worldwide .\ntransaction processing services core processing services our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization , clearing and settlement of transactions between visa issuers , which are the financial institutions that issue visa cards to cardholders , and acquirers , which are the financial institutions that offer visa network connectivity and payments acceptance services to merchants .\nin addition , we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers 2019 visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the visa payments network .\nauthorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed .\nclearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder 2019s account , the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction , and the conversion of transaction amounts to the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "637", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "127.4"}
{"example_id": "C/2017/page_328.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .\nthe graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .\ncomparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .\n\nTable:\ndate\tciti\ts&p 500\ts&p financials\n31-dec-2012\t100.0\t100.0\t100.0\n31-dec-2013\t131.8\t132.4\t135.6\n31-dec-2014\t137.0\t150.5\t156.2\n31-dec-2015\t131.4\t152.6\t153.9\n31-dec-2016\t152.3\t170.8\t188.9\n31-dec-2017\t193.5\t208.1\t230.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "193.5", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.935"}
{"example_id": "DVN/2007/page_58.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total oil and gas mmboe comes from canada?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 .\nwe will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no .\n141 ( r ) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter .\nin december 2007 , the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no .\n160 , noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no .\n51 .\na noncontrolling interest , sometimes called a minority interest , is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable , directly or indirectly , to a parent .\nstatement no .\n160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary .\nunder statement no .\n160 , noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity .\nadditionally , the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement .\nstatement no .\n160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited .\nwe do not expect the adoption of statement no .\n160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures .\n2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information that was used to prepare the december 31 , 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties .\nthese forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007 , unless otherwise noted .\nwe make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report .\namounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s .\ndollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $ 0.98 u.s .\ndollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar .\nin january 2007 , we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa , including equatorial guinea , cote d 2019ivoire , gabon and other countries in the region .\nin november 2007 , we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $ 205.5 million .\nwe are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package .\nwe are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008 .\nall west african related revenues , expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements .\naccordingly , all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa , unless otherwise noted .\nthough we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven .\nthus , the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008 , except for west africa as previously discussed .\noil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2008 .\nwe estimate that our combined 2008 oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe .\nof this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2007 .\nthe following estimates for oil , gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production .\noil gas ngls total ( mmbbls ) ( bcf ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) .\n\nTable:\n\toil ( mmbbls )\tgas ( bcf )\tngls ( mmbbls )\ttotal ( mmboe )\nu.s . onshore\t12\t626\t23\t140\nu.s . offshore\t8\t68\t1\t20\ncanada\t23\t198\t4\t60\ninternational\t23\t2\t2014\t23\ntotal\t66\t894\t28\t243\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "60", "243", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "24.69136"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_341.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2010 what was the net change in net revenue in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy mississippi , inc .\nmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2009 net revenue\t$ 536.7\nvolume/weather\t18.9\nother\t-0.3 ( 0.3 )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 555.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .\nfuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .\nother income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .\nthe decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .\ntaxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .\ndepreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .\ninterest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "18.9", "0.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "19.2"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2004/page_213.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of the increase in fuel cost recovery revenues?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .\nthe increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .\nfuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .\nother regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .\n2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .\n\nTable:\n\t( in millions )\n2002 net revenue\t$ 922.9\ndeferred fuel cost revisions\t59.1\nasset retirement obligation\t8.2\nvolume\t-16.2 ( 16.2 )\nvidalia settlement\t-9.2 ( 9.2 )\nother\t8.9\n2003 net revenue\t$ 973.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .\nthe asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , \"accounting for asset retirement obligations\" adopted in january 2003 .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" for more details on sfas 143 .\nthe increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .\nthe volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .\nbilled usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "59.1", "98.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.60306"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_38.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of operating income from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nnet revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .\nthese net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .\nexcluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .\nin some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .\nin 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .\nexcise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .\nour cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , $\t% (  % )\ncost of sales\t$ 10432\t$ 9391\t$ 1041\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nmarketing administration and research costs\t6725\t6405\t320\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\noperating income\t11503\t10815\t688\t6.4% ( 6.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ncost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .\nmarketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .\noperating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .\ninterest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .\nour effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .\nthe 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 11 .\nincome taxes to our consolidated financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .\nbased upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .\nwe are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .\nit is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .\nan estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .\nnet earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .\nthis decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .\ndiluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .\nexcluding .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "11503", "10815", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "688"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2008/page_85.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was jpmorgan chase & co's common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) ratio in 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .\ncredit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nunexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .\nthe capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .\ncredit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .\nactual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nstatistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .\nmarket risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .\ndaily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .\nthe firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .\nsee market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .\noperational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .\nthe operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .\nthe firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .\nprivate equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .\nin addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .\nthe capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .\nregulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .\nthe office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .\nthe federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .\nthe amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .\nthe occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .\nsimilar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .\njpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .\nfor more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .\nrisk-based capital components and assets .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in millions )\t2008\t2007\ntotal tier 1capital ( a )\t$ 136104\t$ 88746\ntotal tier 2 capital\t48616\t43496\ntotal capital\t$ 184720\t$ 132242\nrisk-weighted assets\t$ 1244659\t$ 1051879\ntotal adjusted average assets\t1966895\t1473541\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .\nbased on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .\nthe ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "136104", "1244659", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10935"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2013/page_207.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat the end of 2014 , the notional value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap was what percent of the fair value?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 17 financial derivatives we use derivative financial instruments ( derivatives ) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate , market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income , fair value of assets and liabilities , and cash flows .\nwe also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities .\nderivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract .\nderivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount , but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet .\nthe notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract .\nthe underlying is a referenced interest rate ( commonly libor ) , security price , credit spread or other index .\nresidential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments .\nthe following table presents the notional amounts and gross fair values of all derivative assets and liabilities held by pnc : table 127 : total gross derivatives .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 31 2013 notional/contractamount\tdecember 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )\tdecember 31 2013 liabilityfairvalue ( b )\tdecember 31 2013 notional/contractamount\tdecember 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )\tliabilityfairvalue ( b )\nderivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap\t$ 36197\t$ 1189\t$ 364\t$ 29270\t$ 1872\t$ 152\nderivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap\t345059\t3604\t3570\t337086\t6696\t6458\ntotal gross derivatives\t$ 381256\t$ 4793\t$ 3934\t$ 366356\t$ 8568\t$ 6610\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet .\n( b ) included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nall derivatives are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value .\nderivative balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties .\nfurther discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the offsetting , counterparty credit risk , and contingent features section below .\nour exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the credit derivatives section below .\nany nonperformance risk , including credit risk , is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives .\nfurther discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in note 1 accounting policies .\nderivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under gaap .\nderivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges , derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges , and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges .\ndesignating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives , to the extent effective , to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings .\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 189 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "36197", "1189", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "30.44323"}
{"example_id": "CME/2017/page_97.pdf-5", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the increase in class a common stock issued and outstanding between years , in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\n14 .\ncapital stock shares outstanding .\nthe following table presents information regarding capital stock: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nclass a common stock authorized\t1000000\t1000000\nclass a common stock issued and outstanding\t339235\t338240\nclass b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.6\t0.6\nclass b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.8\t0.8\nclass b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t1.3\t1.3\nclass b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.4\t0.4\n\nPost-table text:\ncme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .\nassociated trading rights .\nmembers of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .\na cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .\nthe class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .\ntrading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .\nmembers of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .\ncore rights .\nholders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .\nthese core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .\nvotes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .\neach class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .\nthe approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .\nholders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .\nvoting rights .\nwith the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .\nin these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .\ntransfer restrictions .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .\nthese transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .\nelection of directors .\nthe cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .\nholders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .\nthe remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "339235", "338240", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "995"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2013/page_62.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions what was total residential mortgages balance for 2013 and 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nconditions and changes to regulatory capital requirements under basel iii capital standards .\nbeginning in 2014 , other comprehensive income related to available for sale securities ( as well as pension and other post-retirement plans ) are included in pnc 2019s regulatory capital ( subject to a phase-in schedule ) and , therefore will affect pnc 2019s regulatory capital ratios .\nfor additional information , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 2013 business and the capital portion of the balance sheet review section in this item 7 of this report .\nthe duration of investment securities was 2.9 years at december 31 , 2013 .\nwe estimate that , at december 31 , 2013 , the effective duration of investment securities was 3.0 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.8 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates .\ncomparable amounts at december 31 , 2012 were 2.3 years and 2.2 years , respectively .\nwe conduct a quarterly comprehensive security-level impairment assessment on all securities .\nfor securities in an unrealized loss position , we determine whether the loss represents otti .\nfor debt securities that we neither intend to sell nor believe we will be required to sell prior to expected recovery , we recognize the credit portion of otti charges in current earnings and include the noncredit portion of otti in net unrealized gains ( losses ) on otti securities on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income and net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) on our consolidated balance sheet .\nduring 2013 and 2012 we recognized otti credit losses of $ 16 million and $ 111 million , respectively .\nsubstantially all of the credit losses related to residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by non-agency residential loans .\nif current housing and economic conditions were to deteriorate from current levels , and if market volatility and illiquidity were to deteriorate from current levels , or if market interest rates were to increase or credit spreads were to widen appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .\nadditional information regarding our investment securities is included in note 8 investment securities and note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .\nloans held for sale table 15 : loans held for sale in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 312013\tdecember 312012\ncommercial mortgages at fair value\t$ 586\t$ 772\ncommercial mortgages at lower of cost or fair value\t281\t620\ntotal commercial mortgages\t867\t1392\nresidential mortgages at fair value\t1315\t2096\nresidential mortgages at lower of cost or fair value\t41\t124\ntotal residential mortgages\t1356\t2220\nother\t32\t81\ntotal\t$ 2255\t$ 3693\n\nPost-table text:\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale designated at fair value , we stopped originating these and continue to pursue opportunities to reduce these positions .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the balance relating to these loans was $ 586 million compared to $ 772 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale carried at lower of cost or fair value , we sold $ 2.8 billion in 2013 compared to $ 2.2 billion in 2012 .\nall of these loan sales were to government agencies .\ntotal gains of $ 79 million were recognized on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , in 2013 , and $ 41 million in 2012 .\nresidential mortgage loan origination volume was $ 15.1 billion in 2013 compared to $ 15.2 billion in 2012 .\nsubstantially all such loans were originated under agency or federal housing administration ( fha ) standards .\nwe sold $ 14.7 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 568 million in 2013 .\nthe comparable amounts for 2012 were $ 13.8 billion and $ 747 million , respectively .\ninterest income on loans held for sale was $ 157 million in 2013 and $ 168 million in 2012 .\nthese amounts are included in other interest income on our consolidated income statement .\nadditional information regarding our loan sale and servicing activities is included in note 3 loan sales and servicing activities and variable interest entities and note 9 fair value in our notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $ 11.3 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 10.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 .\nthe increase of $ .4 billion was primarily due to additions to and changes in value of mortgage and other loan servicing rights .\nsee additional information regarding our goodwill and intangible assets in note 10 goodwill and other intangible assets included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\n44 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1356", "2220", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3576"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2004/page_36.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the gross margin decline in fiscal 2004 from 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nnet sales of the retail segment grew to $ 1.185 billion during 2004 from $ 621 million and $ 283 million , in 2003 and 2002 , respectively .\nthe increases in net sales during both 2004 and 2003 reflect the impact of new store openings for each fiscal year , including the opening of 21 new stores in 2004 and 25 new stores in 2003 .\nan increase in average revenue per store also contributed to the segment 2019s strong sales in fiscal 2004 .\nwith an average of 76 stores open during 2004 , the retail segment achieved annualized revenue per store of approximately $ 15.6 million , as compared to $ 11.5 million in 2003 with a 54 store average and $ 10.2 million in 2002 with a 28 store average .\nas measured by the company 2019s operating segment reporting , the retail segment reported profit of $ 39 million during fiscal 2004 as compared to losses of $ 5 million and $ 22 million during 2003 and 2002 , respectively .\nthis improvement is primarily attributable to the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in average quarterly revenue per store , the impact of opening new stores , and the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in net sales , which resulted in higher leverage on occupancy , depreciation and other fixed costs .\nexpansion of the retail segment has required and will continue to require a substantial investment in fixed assets and related infrastructure , operating lease commitments , personnel , and other operating expenses .\ncapital expenditures associated with the retail segment were $ 104 million in fiscal 2004 , bringing the total capital expenditures since inception of the retail segment to approximately $ 394 million .\nas of september 25 , 2004 , the retail segment had approximately 2100 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of approximately $ 436 million .\nthe company would incur substantial costs should it choose to terminate its retail segment or close individual stores .\nsuch costs could adversely affect the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition .\ngross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 25 , 2004 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2004\t2003\t2002\nnet sales\t$ 8279\t$ 6207\t$ 5742\ncost of sales\t6020\t4499\t4139\ngross margin\t$ 2259\t$ 1708\t$ 1603\ngross margin percentage\t27.3% ( 27.3 % )\t27.5% ( 27.5 % )\t27.9% ( 27.9 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ngross margin declined in fiscal 2004 to 27.3% ( 27.3 % ) of net sales from 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) of net sales in 2003 .\nthe company 2019s gross margin during fiscal 2004 declined due to an increase in mix towards lower margin ipod and ibook sales , pricing actions on certain power macintosh g5 models that were transitioned during the beginning of 2004 , higher warranty costs on certain portable macintosh products , and higher freight and duty costs during fiscal 2004 .\nthese unfavorable factors were partially offset by an increase in direct sales and a 39% ( 39 % ) year-over-year increase in higher margin software sales .\nthe company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer and consumer electronics industries will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2005 in light of price competition , especially for the ipod product line .\nthe company also expects to continue to incur air freight charges , which negatively impact gross margins on the imac and other products during the first quarter of 2005 and possibly beyond .\nthe foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin during 2005 , general demand for personal computers , anticipated air freight charges , and future economic conditions are forward- looking .\nthere can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained or targeted gross margin levels will be achieved .\nin general , gross margins and margins on individual products , including ipods , will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "27.5", "27.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.2"}
{"example_id": "PKG/2009/page_65.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total purchase commitments are due after 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices .\ntotal purchase commitments are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\n2010\t$ 6951\n2011\t5942\n2012\t3659\n2013\t1486\n2014\t1486\nthereafter\t25048\ntotal\t$ 44572\n\nPost-table text:\nthese purchase agreements are not marked to market .\nthe company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .\nlitigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business .\nthese legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows .\nenvironmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies .\nfrom 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects .\nliabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions .\nbecause of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows .\nin connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill .\n13 .\nasset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs .\npca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills .\nin accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "25048", "44572", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.56197"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2013/page_74.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2012 to 2013 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .\nthe november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .\ngovernment spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .\nupon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .\nduring 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .\nin addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .\nthe accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .\nwe expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .\ngovernment and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .\n2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .\nduring 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .\nthe workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .\nduring 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .\nnote 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t320.9\t323.7\t335.9\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t5.6\t4.7\t4.0\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t326.5\t328.4\t339.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "326.5", "328.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1.9"}
{"example_id": "STT/2011/page_83.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2011 what was the amount of tax related to the unrealized losses reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax,\n\nPre-table text:\nimpairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2011\t2010\nfair value\t$ 99832\t$ 81881\namortized cost\t100013\t82329\nnet unrealized loss pre-tax\t$ -181 ( 181 )\t$ -448 ( 448 )\nnet unrealized loss after-tax\t$ -113 ( 113 )\t$ -270 ( 270 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .\nthese unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .\nrefer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .\nthe decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .\nwe conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .\nto the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .\nthe credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .\nour assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .\nsuch factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .\nto the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .\ngiven the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .\nhousing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .\nas such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .\ngenerally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .\nas of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .\noverall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .\nthe performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .\nin addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .\nthe combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .\nour investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .\nultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .\nin addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .\nresidential mortgage-backed portfolio .\nwe estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .\nthis sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .\nto the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .\nexcluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "303", "189", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "114"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2007/page_149.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif current development costs increased in 2008 as much as in 2007 , what would the 2008 total be , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nsupplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2007\t2006\t2005\nsales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs\t$ -4887 ( 4887 )\t$ -5312 ( 5312 )\t$ -3754 ( 3754 )\nnet changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production\t12845\t-1342 ( 1342 )\t6648\nextensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs\t1816\t1290\t700\ndevelopment costs incurred during the period\t1654\t1251\t1030\nchanges in estimated future development costs\t-1727 ( 1727 )\t-527 ( 527 )\t-552 ( 552 )\nrevisions of previous quantity estimates\t290\t1319\t820\nnet changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place\t23\t30\t4557\naccretion of discount\t1726\t1882\t1124\nnet change in income taxes\t-6751 ( 6751 )\t-660 ( 660 )\t-6694 ( 6694 )\ntiming and other\t-12 ( 12 )\t-14 ( 14 )\t307\nnet change for the year\t4977\t-2083 ( 2083 )\t4186\nbeginning of year\t8518\t10601\t6415\nend of year\t$ 13495\t$ 8518\t$ 10601\nnet change for the year from discontinued operations\t$ 2013\t$ -216 ( 216 )\t$ 162\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1654", "1251", ")", "add(", "#0", "1654", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2057"}
{"example_id": "AOS/2004/page_11.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total aggregate contractual obligations is due to purchase obligationst?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents item 7 2013 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources we recorded net earnings of $ 35.4 million or $ 1.18 per share in 2004 , compared with $ 52.2 million or $ 1.76 per share recorded in 2003 and $ 51.3 million or $ 1.86 per share in 2002 .\nnet earnings recorded in 2004 were negatively impacted by cost increases to steel and freight , as well as manufacturing inefficiencies during the first nine months of the year in our ashland city plant and higher selling , general and administrative expense ( sg&a ) .\nwhile net earnings were flat in 2003 compared with 2002 , the lower earnings per share amount in 2003 as compared with 2002 reflected the full-year impact of our stock offering in may 2002 .\nour individual segment performance will be discussed later in this section .\nour working capital , excluding short-term debt , was $ 339.8 million at december 31 , 2004 , compared with $ 305.9 million and $ 225.1 million at december 31 , 2003 , and december 31 , 2002 , respectively .\nthe $ 33.9 million increase in 2004 reflects $ 44.9 million higher receivable balances due to longer payment terms experienced by both of our businesses as well as higher sales levels in the fourth quarter .\noffsetting the increase in receivable balances were $ 13.5 million lower inventory levels split about equally between water systems and electrical products and $ 14.3 million higher accounts payable balances .\nthe $ 80.8 million increase in 2003 reflects $ 46.6 million higher inventory balances due primarily to extensive manufacturing repositioning in our electric motor business and several new product introductions and manufacturing consolidation in our water systems business .\nadditionally , receivable balances were $ 21.2 million higher due to price increases associated with new product introductions in our water systems business and an increase in international sales , which tend to have longer payment terms .\nfinally , a $ 13.1 million increase in accounts payable balances was largely offset by $ 9.4 million in restructuring expenses paid out in 2003 .\nreducing working capital is one of our major initiatives in 2005 .\ncash provided by operating activities during 2004 was $ 67.2 million compared with $ 29.0 million during 2003 and $ 116.0 million during 2002 .\ndespite lower earnings in 2004 , a smaller investment in working capital explains the majority of the improvement in cash flow compared with 2003 .\nthe higher investment in working capital in 2003 ( as discussed above ) , explains the majority of the difference between 2003 and our capital expenditures were $ 48.5 million in 2004 , essentially the same as in 2003 and approximately $ 2.2 million higher than in 2002 .\nthe increase in 2003 was associated with new product launches in our water systems business .\nwe are projecting 2005 capital expenditures to be approximately $ 55 million , essentially the same as our projected 2005 depreciation expense .\nwe believe that our present facilities and planned capital expenditures are sufficient to provide adequate capacity for our operations in 2005 .\nin june 2004 , we completed a $ 265 million , five-year revolving credit facility with a group of eight banks .\nthe new facility expires on june 10 , 2009 , and it replaced a $ 250 million credit facility which expired on august 2 , 2004 , and was terminated on june 10 , 2004 .\nthe new facility backs up commercial paper and credit line borrowings .\nas a result of the long-term nature of this facility , the commercial paper and credit line borrowings are now classified as long-term debt .\nat december 31 , 2004 , we had available borrowing capacity of $ 153.9 million under this facility .\nwe believe that the combination of available borrowing capacity and operating cash flow will provide sufficient funds to finance our existing operations for the foreseeable future .\nto take advantage of historically low long-term borrowing rates , we issued $ 50.0 million in senior notes with two insurance companies in june 2003 .\nthe notes range in maturity between 2013 and 2016 and carry a weighted average interest rate of slightly less than 4.5 percent .\nthe proceeds of the notes were used to repay commercial paper and borrowing under the credit facility .\nour leverage , as measured by the ratio of total debt to total capitalization , was 32 percent at the end of 2004 and the end of 2003 .\naggregate contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2004 , is as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions ) contractual obligation\t( dollars in millions ) total\t( dollars in millions ) less than 1 year\t( dollars in millions ) 1 - 3 years\t( dollars in millions ) 3 - 5 years\tmore than 5 years\nlong-term debt\t$ 275.1\t$ 8.6\t$ 13.8\t$ 138.2\t$ 114.5\ncapital leases\t6.0\t2014\t2014\t6.0\t2014\noperating leases\t62.9\t14.4\t20.7\t11.6\t16.2\npurchase obligations\t177.3\t176.6\t0.7\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t$ 521.3\t$ 199.6\t$ 35.2\t$ 155.8\t$ 130.7\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "177.3", "521.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34011"}
{"example_id": "C/2010/page_223.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2010 what was the percentage change of the carrying amount of loan receivable net of the allowance\n\nPre-table text:\nincluded in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .\nin accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .\naccordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .\nin addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .\nhowever , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .\nwhere the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .\nthe carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .\nthe changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\taccretable yield\tcarrying amount of loan receivable\tallowance\nbeginning balance\t$ 27\t$ 920\t$ 95\npurchases ( 1 )\t1\t130\t2014\ndisposals/payments received\t-11 ( 11 )\t-594 ( 594 )\t2014\naccretion\t-44 ( 44 )\t44\t2014\nbuilds ( reductions ) to the allowance\t128\t2014\t-18 ( 18 )\nincrease to expected cash flows\t-2 ( 2 )\t19\t2014\nfx/other\t17\t-50 ( 50 )\t2014\nbalance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )\t$ 116\t$ 469\t$ 77\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .\nthese balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .\nthe related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .\n( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "920", "95", ")", "subtract(", "469", "77", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#0", ")", "divide(", "#2", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.52485"}
{"example_id": "MSI/2006/page_61.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the total long-term debt obligations that was due after 2011\n\nPre-table text:\n53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .\nthe company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .\nthe company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .\nutilization of the non-u.s .\ncredit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .\ncontractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .\npayments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) total\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2007\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2008\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2009\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2010\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2011\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter\nlong-term debt obligations\t$ 4134\t$ 1340\t$ 198\t$ 4\t$ 534\t$ 607\t$ 1451\nlease obligations\t2328\t351\t281\t209\t178\t158\t1151\npurchase obligations\t1035\t326\t120\t26\t12\t12\t539\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 7497\t$ 2017\t$ 599\t$ 239\t$ 724\t$ 777\t$ 3141\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .\ndebt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .\na table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , \"\"debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .\nlease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .\nat december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .\nrental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .\npurchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .\nthe longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .\ntotal payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .\ncommitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .\nmost of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .\nhowever , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .\nif the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .\nthe company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than \"\"cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .\nthe majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .\nif these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .\nthe company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .\nsubsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .\nthe company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .\nthe company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .\nthese contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .\nthe total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1451", "4134", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.35099"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2006/page_75.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the decline from current future minimum lease payments and the following years expected obligation?\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .\nthe company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .\nin december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2007\t1703\n2008\t1371\n2009\t1035\n2010\t710\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4819\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .\non may 15 , 2006 richard a .\nnazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1703", "1371", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1703", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19495"}
{"example_id": "AMAT/2013/page_18.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the applied 2019s net sales in 2018 , ( in billions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .\nbacklog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .\nbacklog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t\t( in millions except percentages )\nsilicon systems group\t$ 1295\t55% ( 55 % )\t$ 705\t44% ( 44 % )\napplied global services\t591\t25% ( 25 % )\t580\t36% ( 36 % )\ndisplay\t361\t15% ( 15 % )\t206\t13% ( 13 % )\nenergy and environmental solutions\t125\t5% ( 5 % )\t115\t7% ( 7 % )\ntotal\t$ 2372\t100% ( 100 % )\t$ 1606\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\napplied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .\ncustomers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .\ndelays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .\nmanufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .\napplied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .\napplied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .\nalthough applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .\naccordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .\napplied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .\nresearch , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products .\nthe company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .\napplied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .\nproduct development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .\nin addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india .\nprocess support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .\napplied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 .\napplied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .\nin addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "18", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "1.3", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "7.22222"}
{"example_id": "DVN/2014/page_85.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average amortization amount , in millions , from 2015-2019?\n\nPre-table text:\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .\nimpairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .\nas a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .\nthis conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .\nconsequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .\nother intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .\nthe weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .\namortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .\nother intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .\nyear amortization amount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamortization amount ( in millions )\n2015\t$ 45\n2016\t$ 45\n2017\t$ 45\n2018\t$ 45\n2019\t$ 44\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "45", "const_4", ")", "add(", "#0", "44", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "44.8"}
{"example_id": "SPGI/2018/page_74.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the pension trust assets for 2017 to 2018\n\nPre-table text:\n72 s&p global 2018 annual report .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tlevel 3\nbalance as of december 31 2017\t$ 39\npurchases\t2014\ndistributions\t-2 ( 2 )\ngain ( loss )\t2\nbalance as of december 31 2018\t$ 39\n\nPost-table text:\nfor securities that are quoted in active markets , the trustee/ custodian determines fair value by applying securities 2019 prices obtained from its pricing vendors .\nfor commingled funds that are not actively traded , the trustee applies pricing information provided by investment management firms to the unit quantities of such funds .\ninvestment management firms employ their own pricing vendors to value the securities underlying each commingled fund .\nunderlying securities that are not actively traded derive their prices from investment managers , which in turn , employ vendors that use pricing models ( e.g. , discounted cash flow , comparables ) .\nthe domestic defined benefit plans have no investment in our stock , except through the s&p 500 commingled trust index fund .\nthe trustee obtains estimated prices from vendors for securities that are not easily quotable and they are categorized accordingly as level 3 .\nthe following table details further information on our plan assets where we have used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) : pension trusts 2019 asset allocations there are two pension trusts , one in the u.s .\nand one in the u.k .\n2022 the u.s .\npension trust had assets of $ 1572 million and $ 1739 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 respectively , and the target allocations in 2018 include 75% ( 75 % ) fixed income , 16% ( 16 % ) domestic equities and 9% ( 9 % ) international equities .\n2022 the u.k .\npension trust had assets of $ 415 million and $ 480 million as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and the target allocations in 2018 include 40% ( 40 % ) fixed income , 30% ( 30 % ) diversified growth funds , 20% ( 20 % ) equities and 10% ( 10 % ) real estate .\nthe pension assets are invested with the goal of producing a combination of capital growth , income and a liability hedge .\nthe mix of assets is established after consideration of the long- term performance and risk characteristics of asset classes .\ninvestments are selected based on their potential to enhance returns , preserve capital and reduce overall volatility .\nholdings are diversified within each asset class .\nthe portfolios employ a mix of index and actively managed equity strategies by market capitalization , style , geographic regions and economic sectors .\nthe fixed income strategies include u.s .\nlong duration securities , opportunistic fixed income securities and u.k .\ndebt instruments .\nthe short-term portfolio , whose primary goal is capital preservation for liquidity purposes , is composed of government and government-agency securities , uninvested cash , receivables and payables .\nthe portfolios do not employ any financial leverage .\nu.s .\ndefined contribution plan assets of the defined contribution plan in the u.s .\nconsist primarily of investment options , which include actively managed equity , indexed equity , actively managed equity/bond funds , target date funds , s&p global inc .\ncommon stock , stable value and money market strategies .\nthere is also a self-directed mutual fund investment option .\nthe plan purchased 193051 shares and sold 205798 shares of s&p global inc .\ncommon stock in 2018 and purchased 228248 shares and sold 297750 shares of s&p global inc .\ncommon stock in 2017 .\nthe plan held approximately 1.5 million shares of s&p global inc .\ncommon stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with market values of $ 251 million and $ 255 million , respectively .\nthe plan received dividends on s&p global inc .\ncommon stock of $ 3 million during both the years ended december 31 , 2018 and december 31 , 2017 .\n8 .\nstock-based compensation we issue stock-based incentive awards to our eligible employees and directors under the 2002 employee stock incentive plan and a director deferred stock ownership plan .\n2022 2002 employee stock incentive plan ( the 201c2002 plan 201d ) 2013 the 2002 plan permits the granting of nonqualified stock options , stock appreciation rights , performance stock , restricted stock and other stock-based awards .\nin 2018 , we made a one-time issuance of incentive stock options under the 2002 plan to replace kensho employees 2019 stock options that were assumed in connection with our acquisition of kensho in april of 2018 .\n2022 director deferred stock ownership plan 2013 under this plan , common stock reserved may be credited to deferred stock accounts for eligible directors .\nin general , the plan requires that 50% ( 50 % ) of eligible directors 2019 annual compensation plus dividend equivalents be credited to deferred stock accounts .\neach director may also elect to defer all or a portion of the remaining compensation and have an equivalent number of shares credited to the deferred stock account .\nrecipients under this plan are not required to provide consideration to us other than rendering service .\nshares will be delivered as of the date a recipient ceases to be a member of the board of directors or within five years thereafter , if so elected .\nthe plan will remain in effect until terminated by the board of directors or until no shares of stock remain available under the plan. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "480", "415", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.15663"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2003/page_58.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of inventory is ready for liquidation ( sale ) in 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .\na n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .\nan impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .\nfederal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .\noperating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .\nperiod and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .\nthe unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .\nrespective years or of future results .\nthe new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .\nperiods benefited , typically five years .\nfor approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .\nthe company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .\nshare .\nthe cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .\nnew capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .\nthe pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .\n( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .\neach the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .\nreceive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .\ninventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .\nthe net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .\n\nTable:\n\t2003\t2002\nfinished goods\t$ 384.3\t$ 206.7\nraw materials and work in progress\t90.8\t50.9\ninventory step-up\t52.6\t2013\ninventories net\t$ 527.7\t$ 257.6\n\nPost-table text:\nmade by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .\nthe acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .\ninventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .\nchange in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .\nprovisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .\neffective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nrecognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .\nundeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .\ninstruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nfield are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nfollowing the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .\nthis change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .\nin accordance with sfas no .\n144 , the quarter .\ncompany reviews instruments for impairment whenever .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "384.3", "527.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.72825"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_105.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total value of net operating loss carryforwards?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively .\nif not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\tfederal\tstate\n2006 to 2010\t$ 5248\t$ 469747\n2011 to 2015\t10012\t272662\n2016 to 2020\t397691\t777707\n2021 to 2025\t1744552\t897896\ntotal\t$ 2157503\t$ 2418012\n\nPost-table text:\nsfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards .\napproximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date .\nthe balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets .\nthe company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .\nthe company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses .\nin june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million .\nbased on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 .\nthere can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund .\nthe recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations .\nthe projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense .\naccordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .\nbased on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .\nthe realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .\nif the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity .\nfrom time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations .\nthe company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations .\nduring the year ended .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "2157503", "2418012", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4575515"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2015/page_131.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .\n( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 109 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 35 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2016\t$ 204079\n2017\t$ 766451\n2018\t$ 822690\n2019\t$ 768588\n2020\t$ 1631181\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nas part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .\nwith the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "766451", "204079", ")", "divide(", "#0", "204079", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.75566"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_46.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nshare of total securities rated bbb/baa or below changed by how many percentage point between 2008 and 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2009\tdecember 312008\naaa/aaa\t14% ( 14 % )\t19% ( 19 % )\naa/aa\t50\t6\na/a\t34\t72\nbbb/baa\t2\t3\ntotal\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .\nall facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .\nwe evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .\nbased on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nwe considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .\nwe reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .\ntax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .\nthe purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .\nthe primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .\ngenerally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .\nwe typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .\nalso , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .\nin these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .\nthe purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .\ngeneral partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .\nwe evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .\nthe primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .\nthe primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .\nwe have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .\nthe assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .\nneither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .\nthe consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .\nwe also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .\nthese investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .\nthe table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .\nour maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .\nwe use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .\nin addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .\nthese liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\ncredit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .\nin november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .\nthe spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .\nin exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .\nthe spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .\nwe were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .\naccordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2", "3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_38.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase in interest expense?\n\nPre-table text:\nnet revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .\nthese net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .\nexcluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .\nin some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .\nin 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .\nexcise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .\nour cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , $\t% (  % )\ncost of sales\t$ 10432\t$ 9391\t$ 1041\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nmarketing administration and research costs\t6725\t6405\t320\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\noperating income\t11503\t10815\t688\t6.4% ( 6.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ncost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .\nmarketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .\noperating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .\ninterest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .\nour effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .\nthe 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 11 .\nincome taxes to our consolidated financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .\nbased upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .\nwe are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .\nit is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .\nan estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .\nnet earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .\nthis decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .\ndiluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .\nexcluding .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "914", "23", ")", "divide(", "23", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.02581"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2015/page_98.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the expected growth rate in amortization expense from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents the estimated amortization expense at september 26 , 2015 for each of the five succeeding fiscal years was as follows: .\n\nTable:\nfiscal 2016\t$ 377.0\nfiscal 2017\t$ 365.6\nfiscal 2018\t$ 355.1\nfiscal 2019\t$ 343.5\nfiscal 2020\t$ 332.3\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill in accordance with asc 350 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( asc 350 ) , the company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value .\nevents that could indicate impairment and trigger an interim impairment assessment include , but are not limited to , current economic and market conditions , including a decline in market capitalization , a significant adverse change in legal factors , business climate , operational performance of the business or key personnel , and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator .\nin performing the impairment test , the company utilizes the two-step approach prescribed under asc 350 .\nthe first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of each reporting unit to its estimated fair value .\nto estimate the fair value of its reporting units for step 1 , the company primarily utilizes the income approach .\nthe income approach is based on a dcf analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate .\nassumptions used in the dcf require significant judgment , including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal values , growth rates , and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows .\nthe forecasted cash flows are based on the company 2019s most recent budget and strategic plan and for years beyond this period , the company 2019s estimates are based on assumed growth rates expected as of the measurement date .\nthe company believes its assumptions are consistent with the plans and estimates used to manage the underlying businesses .\nthe discount rates used are intended to reflect the risks inherent in future cash flow projections and are based on estimates of the weighted-average cost of capital ( 201cwacc 201d ) of market participants relative to each respective reporting unit .\nthe market approach considers comparable market data based on multiples of revenue or earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) and is primarily used as a corroborative analysis to the results of the dcf analysis .\nthe company believes its assumptions used to determine the fair value of its reporting units are reasonable .\nif different assumptions were used , particularly with respect to forecasted cash flows , terminal values , waccs , or market multiples , different estimates of fair value may result and there could be the potential that an impairment charge could result .\nactual operating results and the related cash flows of the reporting units could differ from the estimated operating results and related cash flows .\nif the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value , the company is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss , if any .\nthe second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit 2019s goodwill to its carrying value .\nthe implied fair value of goodwill is derived by performing a hypothetical purchase price allocation for each reporting unit as of the measurement date and allocating the reporting unit 2019s estimated fair value to its assets and liabilities .\nthe residual amount from performing this allocation represents the implied fair value of goodwill .\nto the extent this amount is below the carrying value of goodwill , an impairment charge is recorded .\nthe company conducted its fiscal 2015 impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 28 , 2015 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .\nthe company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as of the measurement date .\nas a result of completing step 1 , all of the company's reporting units had fair values exceeding their carrying values , and as such , step 2 of the impairment test was not required .\nfor illustrative purposes , had the fair value of each of the reporting units that passed step 1 been lower than 10% ( 10 % ) , all of the reporting units would still have passed step 1 of the goodwill impairment test .\nat september 26 , 2015 , the company believes that each reporting unit , with goodwill aggregating 2.81 billion , was not at risk of failing step 1 of the goodwill impairment test based on the current forecasts .\nthe company conducted its fiscal 2014 annual impairment test on the first day of the fourth quarter , and as noted above used dcf and market approaches to estimate the fair value of its reporting units as of june 29 , 2014 , and ultimately used the fair value determined by the dcf approach in making its impairment test conclusions .\nthe company believes it used reasonable estimates and assumptions about future revenue , cost projections , cash flows , market multiples and discount rates as source : hologic inc , 10-k , november 19 , 2015 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .\nthe user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .\npast financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "365.6", "377.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "377.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03024"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_114.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the payments for entergy arkansas as a percentage of payments for entergy louisiana?\n\nPre-table text:\npayments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tpayments ( receipts ) ( in millions )\nentergy arkansas\t$ 2\nentergy louisiana\t$ 6\nentergy mississippi\t( $ 4 )\nentergy new orleans\t( $ 1 )\nentergy texas\t( $ 3 )\n\nPost-table text:\nin september 2016 the ferc accepted the february 2016 compliance filing subject to a further compliance filing made in november 2016 .\nthe further compliance filing was required as a result of an order issued in september 2016 ruling on the january 2016 rehearing requests filed by the lpsc , the apsc , and entergy .\nin the order addressing the rehearing requests , the ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request and directed that interest be calculated on the payment/receipt amounts .\nthe ferc also granted the apsc 2019s and entergy 2019s rehearing request and ordered the removal of both securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation .\nin november 2016 , entergy submitted its compliance filing in response to the ferc 2019s order on rehearing .\nthe compliance filing included a revised refund calculation of the true-up payments and receipts based on 2009 test year data and interest calculations .\nthe lpsc protested the interest calculations .\nin november 2017 the ferc issued an order rejecting the november 2016 compliance filing .\nthe ferc determined that the payments detailed in the november 2016 compliance filing did not include adequate interest for the payments from entergy arkansas to entergy louisiana because it did not include interest on the principal portion of the payment that was made in february 2016 .\nin december 2017 , entergy recalculated the interest pursuant to the november 2017 order .\nas a result of the recalculations , entergy arkansas owed very minor payments to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans .\n2011 rate filing based on calendar year 2010 production costs in may 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2011 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in july a02011 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a01 , a02011 , a0subject to refund .\nafter an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2011 rate filing with the 2012 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .\nsee discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .\n2012 rate filing based on calendar year 2011 production costs in may 2012 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2012 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in august 2012 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a02012 , a0subject to refund .\nafter an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2012 rate filing with the 2011 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .\nsee discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .\n2013 rate filing based on calendar year 2012 production costs in may 2013 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2013 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding .\nseveral parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest .\nthe city council intervened and filed comments related to including the outcome of a related ferc proceeding in the 2013 cost equalization calculation .\nin august 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the 2013 rates , effective june 1 , 2013 , subject to refund .\nafter an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2013 rate filing with the 2011 , 2012 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2", "6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.33333"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_77.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2008 what was the percent of the total accounts payable and other liabilities that was accrued wages and vacation\n\nPre-table text:\nwhen we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .\nhowever , many of our assets are self-constructed .\na large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .\napproximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .\ncosts that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .\ndirect costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .\nindirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .\nthese costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\nthe capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .\n67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .\ngeneral and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .\nnormal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n10 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\tdec . 31 2008\tdec . 31 2007\naccounts payable\t$ 629\t$ 732\naccrued wages and vacation\t367\t394\naccrued casualty costs\t390\t371\nincome and other taxes\t207\t343\ndividends and interest\t328\t284\nequipment rents payable\t93\t103\nother\t546\t675\ntotal accounts payable and other current liabilities\t$ 2560\t$ 2902\n\nPost-table text:\n11 .\nfair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .\n157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .\nfas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .\nthe adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .\nfas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .\nthis enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .\nthe statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .\nlevel 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .\nlevel 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "367", "2560", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.14336"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_191.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the period ending in 2016 , what was the average amount of settlements , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\t2014\nbalance at january 1\t$ 373\t$ 394\t$ 392\nadditions for current year tax positions\t8\t7\t7\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t1\t12\t14\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-7 ( 7 )\t-2 ( 2 )\neffects of foreign currency translation\t2\t-7 ( 7 )\t-3 ( 3 )\nsettlements\t-13 ( 13 )\t-19 ( 19 )\t-2 ( 2 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-1 ( 1 )\t-7 ( 7 )\t-12 ( 12 )\nbalance at december 31\t$ 369\t$ 373\t$ 394\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .\nthe company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .\nwhile it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .\nhowever , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .\nit is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .\nour effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .\n22 .\ndiscontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .\nthe disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .\nin december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .\naes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .\nthe company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .\nwe have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .\nupon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .\nprior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .\nhowever , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .\non october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .\nupon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .\nthe cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .\nthis includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .\nsul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .\nsul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .\nprior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .\nas discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .\n2014-08 .\ndiscontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .\n2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .\nwind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "settlements", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-11.33333"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2007/page_126.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future principal payments of corporate debt are due after 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nbefore the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no .\n128 , earnings per share .\nunder this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement .\ntherefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 .\nsenior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility .\nas a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed .\ncorporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants .\nas of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants .\nearly extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption .\nthe company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs .\nthe company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 .\nother corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions .\nthese loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet .\nsee note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings .\nfuture maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 2014\n2009\t2014\n2010\t2014\n2011\t453815\n2012\t2014\nthereafter\t2996337\ntotal future principal payments of corporate debt\t3450152\nunamortized discount net\t-427454 ( 427454 )\ntotal corporate debt\t$ 3022698\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2996337", "3450152", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.86847"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2012/page_70.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in total net goodwill between 2010 and 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .\n\nTable:\n\tgross goodwill at december 31 2010\taccumulated impairment losses\tnet goodwill at december 31 2010\tadditions ( a )\tdiscontinued operations ( b )\tpre-tax impairment charge\tother ( c )\tnet goodwill at december 31 2011\ncabinets and related products\t$ 587\t$ -364 ( 364 )\t$ 223\t$ 2014\t$ 2014\t$ -44 ( 44 )\t$ 2\t$ 181\nplumbing products\t536\t-340 ( 340 )\t196\t9\t2014\t2014\t-4 ( 4 )\t201\ninstallation and other services\t1819\t-762 ( 762 )\t1057\t2014\t-13 ( 13 )\t2014\t2014\t1044\ndecorative architectural products\t294\t2014\t294\t2014\t2014\t-75 ( 75 )\t2014\t219\nother specialty products\t980\t-367 ( 367 )\t613\t2014\t2014\t-367 ( 367 )\t2014\t246\ntotal\t$ 4216\t$ -1833 ( 1833 )\t$ 2383\t$ 9\t$ -13 ( 13 )\t$ -486 ( 486 )\t$ -2 ( 2 )\t$ 1891\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) additions include acquisitions .\n( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .\nsubsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .\n( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .\nin the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .\nthe impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .\nthe impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .\nthe company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .\nin 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .\nthe pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .\nthe pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .\nthe company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .\nother indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .\nin 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .\nthe company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nin 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1891", "2383", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2383", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.20646"}
{"example_id": "AON/2010/page_28.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfrom the data given , how many square feet have an expiry date in 2020?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance and revenue growth depends , in part , on the reliability and functionality of this infrastructure as a means of delivering human resources services .\nthe internet is a key mechanism for delivering our human resources services to our hr solutions clients efficiently and cost effectively .\nour clients may not be receptive to human resource services delivered over the internet due to concerns regarding transaction security , user privacy , the reliability and quality of internet service and other reasons .\nour clients 2019 concerns may be heightened by the fact we use the internet to transmit extremely confidential information about our clients and their employees , such as compensation , medical information and other personally identifiable information .\nin order to maintain the level of security , service and reliability that our clients require , we may be required to make significant investments in our online methods of delivering human resources services .\nin addition , websites and proprietary online services have experienced service interruptions and other delays occurring throughout their infrastructure .\nthe adoption of additional laws or regulations with respect to the internet may impede the efficiency of the internet as a medium of exchange of information and decrease the demand for our services .\nif we cannot use the internet effectively to deliver our services , our revenue growth and results of operation may be impaired .\nwe may lose client data as a result of major catastrophes and other similar problems that may materially adversely impact our operations .\nwe have multiple processing centers around the world that use various commercial methods for disaster recovery capabilities .\nour main data processing center is located near the aon hewitt headquarters in lincolnshire , illinois .\nin the event of a disaster , our business continuity may not be sufficient , and the data recovered may not be sufficient for the administration of our clients 2019 human resources programs and processes .\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments .\nitem 2 .\nproperties .\nwe have offices in various locations throughout the world .\nsubstantially all of our offices are located in leased premises .\nwe maintain our corporate headquarters at 200 e .\nrandolph street in chicago , illinois , where we occupy approximately 327000 square feet of space under an operating lease agreement that expires in 2013 .\nthere are two five-year renewal options at current market rates .\nwe own one building at pallbergweg 2-4 , amsterdam , the netherlands ( 150000 square feet ) .\nthe following are additional significant leased properties , along with the occupied square footage and expiration. .\n\nTable:\nproperty:\toccupied square footage\tlease expiration dates\n4 overlook point and other locations lincolnshire illinois\t1279000\t2014 - 2019\n2601 research forest drive the woodlands texas\t414000\t2020\n2300 discovery drive orlando florida\t364000\t2020\ndevonshire square and other locations london uk\t339000\t2018 - 2028\n199 water street new york new york\t337000\t2018\n1000 n . milwaukee avenue glenview illinois\t233000\t2017\n7201 hewitt associates drive charlotte north carolina\t218000\t2015\n\nPost-table text:\n7201 hewitt associates drive , charlotte , north carolina .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n218000 2015 the locations in lincolnshire , illinois , the woodlands , texas , orlando , florida , and charlotte north carolina , each of which were acquired as part of the hewitt acquisition , are primarily dedicated to our hr solutions business .\nthe other locations listed above house personnel from each of our business segments. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "414000", "364000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "778000"}
{"example_id": "AES/2002/page_46.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the fourth quarter of 2002?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .\nthe common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .\nprice range of common stock .\n\nTable:\n2002 first quarter\thigh $ 17.84\tlow $ 4.11\t2001 first quarter\thigh $ 60.15\tlow $ 41.30\nsecond quarter\t9.17\t3.55\tsecond quarter\t52.25\t39.95\nthird quarter\t4.61\t1.56\tthird quarter\t44.50\t12.00\nfourth quarter\t3.57\t0.95\tfourth quarter\t17.80\t11.60\n\nPost-table text:\nholders .\nas of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .\ndividends .\nunder the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .\nin addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .\nthe ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .\nsee the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3.57", "0.95", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.62"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_200.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2010 what was the ratio of the statutory capital and surplus to the statutory net income\n\nPre-table text:\nn o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively .\n19 .\nrelated party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda .\nthe trustees are principally comprised of ace management .\nthe company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers .\nthe borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities .\naccordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties .\n20 .\nstatutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate .\nthese regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities .\nthere are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries .\nthe company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators .\nstatutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items .\nthe statutory capital and surplus of the u.s .\nsubsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 .\nthe amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million .\nthe following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s .\nsubsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions of u.s . dollars )\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\tbermuda subsidiaries 2008\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\t2008\nstatutory capital and surplus\t$ 11798\t$ 9164\t$ 6205\t$ 6266\t$ 5885\t$ 5368\nstatutory net income\t$ 2430\t$ 2369\t$ 2196\t$ 1047\t$ 904\t$ 818\n\nPost-table text:\nas permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively .\nthe company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations .\nsome jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements .\nin some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business .\nthese licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests .\njurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "11798", "2430", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4.85514"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_85.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in total debt from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 750\t3.375% ( 3.375 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2025\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "28.5", "29.5", ")", "divide(", "#0", "29.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.0339"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2014/page_26.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total return percentage for e*trade financial corporation for the five years ended 12/14?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( \"s&p\" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/09\t12/10\t12/11\t12/12\t12/13\t12/14\ne*trade financial corporation\t100.00\t90.91\t45.23\t50.85\t111.59\t137.81\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.49\t136.30\t180.44\t205.14\ndow jones us financials index\t100.00\t112.72\t98.24\t124.62\t167.26\t191.67\n\nPost-table text:\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "137.81", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.3781"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2003/page_40.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales between 2001 and 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .\na n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k the following table sets forth the operating profit margin by cost of products sold .\nincluded in cost of product sold are segment for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , losses on foreign exchange hedge contracts , which increased 2002 and 2001 : in 2003 relative to 2002 .\nin the fourth quarter , the company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales of percent of net sales 47.1 percent for asia pacific. .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31,\t2003\t2002\t2001\namericas\t51.2% ( 51.2 % )\t48.3% ( 48.3 % )\t47.4% ( 47.4 % )\neurope\t26.3\t24.4\t19.5\nasia pacific\t45.3\t46.1\t45.4\n\nPost-table text:\noperating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales increased to 48.3 percent in 2002 from 47.4 percent in year ended december 31 , 2003 2001 , reflecting improved gross profit margins due to higher compared to year ended december 31 , 2002 average selling prices and increased sales of higher margin operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net products , and lower selling expenses as a percent of sales sales increased due to improved gross margins driven by due to lower costs associated with the u.s .\ndistributor higher average selling prices and increased sales of higher network .\nthe americas continued to invest in strategic margin products , leveraged operating expenses and the initiatives such as mis technologies , field sales personnel , favorable impact of the change in accounting principle for medical education programs and new product launches .\ninstruments .\nthe change in accounting principle for operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of net instruments increased operating profit by 1.7 percentage sales increased to 46.1 percent in 2002 from 45.4 percent points .\nwith respect to sales growth , increased zimmer in 2001 .\nthis increase reflects lower selling , general and standalone average selling prices of 4 percent in 2003 and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in japan as favorable effects of volume and mix , 15 percent increase in a result of a sales force and dealer reorganization , partially 2003 , represent the most significant factors in improved offset by lower gross profit margins as a result of lower yen operating profit in the americas .\nas reconstructive implant hedge gains compared to 2001 .\nsales grow at a higher rate than trauma and orthopaedic operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales surgical products , operating profit margins generally tend to increased to 24.4 percent in 2002 from 19.5 percent in 2001 , improve since reconstructive product sales generally earn due to improved gross profit margins as a result of higher higher gross margins .\nthis was the case in 2003 , with zimmer average selling prices and favorable product and country mix , standalone reconstructive implant sales growth of 22 percent the leveraging of sales growth in europe on controlled as compared with total zimmer standalone sales growth of increases in operating expenses and improved efficiency 19 percent .\nin the fourth quarter , the company reported in the utilization of instruments ( more frequent use of operating profit as a percent of net sales of 50.4 percent for instruments resulted in fewer placements and less expense ) .\nthe americas .\noperating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales liquidity and capital resources increased due to improved gross profit margins driven by cash flows provided by operations were $ 494.8 million higher zimmer standalone average selling prices and in 2003 , compared with $ 220.2 million in 2002 .\nthe principal favorable product and country mix , leveraged operating source of cash was net earnings before cumulative effect of expenses and the favorable impact of the change in change in accounting principle of $ 291.2 million .\nnon-cash accounting principle for instruments .\nthe change in expenses for the period included depreciation and accounting for instruments increased operating profit by amortization expense of $ 103.3 million , centerpulse inventory 1.4 percentage points .\nincreases in zimmer standalone step-up of $ 42.7 million and centerpulse in-process research average selling prices in europe of 2 percent in 2003 and the and development write-offs of $ 11.2 million .\nworking capital effect of volume and mix , 19 percent increase in 2003 , were management , together with the collection of $ 20.0 million of the key factors in improved operating profit .\nalso cash related to centerpulse tax loss carryforwards , contributing to the improvement was significantly lower contributed $ 80.4 million to operating cash flow .\ngrowth in operating expenses .\nin the fourth quarter , the working capital continues to be a key management focus .\ncompany reported operating profit as a percent of net sales at december 31 , 2003 , the company had 62 days of sales of 24.7 percent for europe .\noutstanding in accounts receivable , unfavorable to the prior operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of year by 10 days .\nacquired centerpulse businesses had a net sales decreased primarily due to less favorable rates on negative impact of 10 days , due to centerpulse 2019s business hedge contracts during the year compared to the prior year , mix which has a greater proportion of european revenue with partially offset by increased zimmer standalone average payment terms generally longer than those in the u.s .\nat selling prices and leveraged operating expenses .\nthe change december 31 , 2003 , the company had 232 days of inventory in accounting for instruments had an immaterial effect on on hand compared to 247 days reported at the end of 2002 .\noperating profit for asia pacific .\nincreases in zimmer the reduction was principally due to improved inventory standalone average selling prices in asia pacific of 1 percent management and the acquired dental and spinal businesses and volume and mix improvements of 4 percent in 2003 carrying fewer days of inventory .\ncontributed modest improvement but was offset by higher .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "51.2", "47.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.8"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2014/page_38.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in amount of long term debt between 2014 and 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 27 , 2014 , september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .\nto provide additional flexibility in managing liquidity , the company began accessing the commercial paper markets in the third quarter of 2014 .\nthe company currently anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s .\noperating activities and from borrowings .\nas of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .\ndollar-denominated holdings .\namounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s .\nincome taxation on repatriation to the u.s .\nthe company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer .\nthe policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss .\nduring 2014 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 59.7 billion was a result of $ 39.5 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 13.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 7.0 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 22.6 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 9.0 billion ; cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 9.6 billion ; and cash paid for business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 3.8 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 37.5 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 45.0 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 11.1 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper of $ 12.0 billion and $ 6.3 billion , respectively .\nduring 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 16.4 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion .\napple inc .\n| 2014 form 10-k | 35 .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash cash equivalents and marketable securities\t$ 155239\t$ 146761\t$ 121251\nproperty plant and equipment net\t$ 20624\t$ 16597\t$ 15452\nlong-term debt\t$ 28987\t$ 16960\t$ 0\nworking capital\t$ 5083\t$ 29628\t$ 19111\ncash generated by operating activities\t$ 59713\t$ 53666\t$ 50856\ncash used in investing activities\t$ -22579 ( 22579 )\t$ -33774 ( 33774 )\t$ -48227 ( 48227 )\ncash used in financing activities\t$ -37549 ( 37549 )\t$ -16379 ( 16379 )\t$ -1698 ( 1698 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "28987", "0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "28987"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2003/page_84.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat amount of long-term debt due in the next 36 months as of december 31 , 2003 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .\n( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed .\n( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 .\nentergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time .\nentergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds .\n( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .\ncharles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .\n( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .\n( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .\nit is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\n2004\t$ 503215\n2005\t$ 462420\n2006\t$ 75896\n2007\t$ 624539\n2008\t$ 941625\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above .\nin july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\ncovenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .\nif entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "503215", "462420", ")", "add(", "#0", "75896", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_1000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1041.531"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2012/page_47.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\n2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .\nmst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .\nbacklog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .\noperating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .\noperating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .\ngovernment , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\nnet sales\t$ 8347\t$ 8161\t$ 8268\noperating profit\t1083\t1063\t1030\noperating margins\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t12.5% ( 12.5 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t18100\t16000\t17800\n\nPost-table text:\n2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .\npartially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1063", "1030", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1030", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03204"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2018/page_35.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth in the operating profit as reported from 2017 to 2018\n\nPre-table text:\ndivestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by two percent .\nnet sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware .\nnet sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products .\nnet sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products .\nour gross profit margins were 32.2 percent , 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nthe 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler , an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs and salaries ) and unfavorable sales mix .\nthese negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices , the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives , and increased sales volume .\nthe 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives .\nselling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016 .\nthe decrease in selling , general and administrative expenses , as a percentage of sales , was driven by leverage of fixed expenses , due primarily to increased sales volume , and improved cost control .\nthe following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\t2016\noperating profit as reported\t$ 1211\t$ 1194\t$ 1087\nrationalization charges\t14\t4\t22\nkichler inventory step up adjustment\t40\t2014\t2014\noperating profit as adjusted\t$ 1265\t$ 1198\t$ 1109\noperating profit margins as reported\t14.5% ( 14.5 % )\t15.6% ( 15.6 % )\t14.8% ( 14.8 % )\noperating profit margins as adjusted\t15.1% ( 15.1 % )\t15.7% ( 15.7 % )\t15.1% ( 15.1 % )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs , salaries and erp costs ) .\nthese negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices , benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume .\noperating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs .\noperating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count .\ndue to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china , and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019 , we could be exposed to approximately $ 150 million of potential annual direct cost increases .\nwe will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases , supplier negotiations , supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures .\nother income ( expense ) , net other , net , for 2018 included $ 14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $ 8 million of realized foreign currency losses .\nthese expenses were partially offset by $ 3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $ 1 million related to distributions from private equity funds .\nother , net , for 2017 included $ 26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs , $ 13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $ 2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund , partially offset by $ 3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $ 1 million of earnings related to equity method investments. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1211", "1194", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1194", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01424"}
{"example_id": "SYY/2019/page_9.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2018 to 2019?\n\nPre-table text:\nsysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: .\n\nTable:\ntype of customer\t2019\t2018\t2017\nrestaurants\t62% ( 62 % )\t62% ( 62 % )\t61% ( 61 % )\neducation government\t9\t8\t9\ntravel leisure retail\t9\t8\t9\nhealthcare\t8\t9\t9\nother ( 1 )\t12\t13\t12\ntotals\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) other includes cafeterias that are not stand-alone restaurants , bakeries , caterers , churches , civic and fraternal organizations , vending distributors , other distributors and international exports .\nnone of these types of customers , as a group , exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented .\nsources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers , both domestic and international , none of which individually accounts for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our purchases .\nthese suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise , as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers .\nwe also provide specialty and seasonal products from small to mid-sized producers to meet a growing demand for locally sourced products .\nour locally sourced products , including produce , meats , cheese and other products , help differentiate our customers 2019 offerings , satisfy demands for new products , and support local communities .\npurchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs , domestically and internationally , and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies .\nwe administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products .\nthe program covers the purchasing and marketing of branded merchandise , as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers , encompassing substantially all product lines .\nsome of our products are purchased internationally within global procurement centers in order to build strategic relationships with international suppliers and to optimize our supply chain network .\nsysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers , although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs .\nwe also focus on increasing profitability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels , which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies , while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers .\nworking capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash flow from operations , commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings .\nsee the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity , financial position and sources and uses of funds .\nwe extend credit terms to our customers that can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness .\nwe monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary .\na majority of our sales orders are filled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed .\nwe generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand .\nthe level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life , supplier order fulfillment lead times and customer demand .\nwe also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities .\nwe take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 45 days or more .\ncorporate headquarters and shared services center our corporate staff makes available a number of services to our operating companies and our shared services center performs support services for employees , suppliers and customers .\nmembers of these groups possess experience and expertise in , among other areas , customer and vendor contract administration , accounting and finance , treasury , legal , information technology , payroll and employee benefits , risk management and insurance , sales and marketing , merchandising , inbound logistics , human resources , strategy and tax compliance services .\nthe corporate office also makes available supply chain expertise , such as in warehousing and distribution services , which provide assistance in operational best practices , including space utilization , energy conservation , fleet management and work flow. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "62%", "62%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_86.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the annual other sinking fund requirements as a percentage of annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .\n( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .\ncharles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .\n( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .\n( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .\nit is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2003\t$ 1150786\n2004\t$ 925005\n2005\t$ 540372\n2006\t$ 139952\n2007\t$ 475288\n\nPost-table text:\nnot included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .\nin december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .\nin november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\ncovenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .\nif entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .\nin january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "30.2", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "475288", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06354"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2003/page_58.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent increase did inventories receive between 2002 and 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .\na n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .\nan impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .\nfederal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .\noperating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .\nperiod and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .\nthe unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .\nrespective years or of future results .\nthe new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .\nperiods benefited , typically five years .\nfor approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .\nthe company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .\nshare .\nthe cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .\nnew capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .\nthe pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .\n( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .\neach the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .\nreceive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .\ninventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .\nthe net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .\n\nTable:\n\t2003\t2002\nfinished goods\t$ 384.3\t$ 206.7\nraw materials and work in progress\t90.8\t50.9\ninventory step-up\t52.6\t2013\ninventories net\t$ 527.7\t$ 257.6\n\nPost-table text:\nmade by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .\nthe acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .\ninventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .\nchange in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .\nprovisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .\neffective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nrecognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .\nundeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .\ninstruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nfield are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nfollowing the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .\nthis change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .\nin accordance with sfas no .\n144 , the quarter .\ncompany reviews instruments for impairment whenever .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "527.7", "257.6", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.04852"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2010/page_34.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\non february 112011 what was the market capitalization\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .\n\nTable:\n2010\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 44.61\t$ 40.10\nquarter ended june 30\t45.33\t38.86\nquarter ended september 30\t52.11\t43.70\nquarter ended december 31\t53.14\t49.61\n2009\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 32.53\t$ 25.45\nquarter ended june 30\t34.52\t27.93\nquarter ended september 30\t37.71\t29.89\nquarter ended december 31\t43.84\t35.03\n\nPost-table text:\non february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders .\ndividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock .\npayment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status .\nin addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "397612895", "56.73", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "22556579533.35"}
{"example_id": "PM/2014/page_67.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total of euro notes issued in 2014 , in millions of dollars approximately?\n\nPre-table text:\nour debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .\n( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .\n( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( e ) u.s .\ndollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .\nguarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .\nthere is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .\nat december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value ( e )\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\neuro notes\t( a )\t20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )\t1.875% ( 1.875 % )\tmarch 2014\tmarch 2021\neuro notes\t( a )\t20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )\t2.875% ( 2.875 % )\tmarch 2014\tmarch 2026\neuro notes\t( b )\t20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )\t2.875% ( 2.875 % )\tmay 2014\tmay 2029\nswiss franc notes\t( c )\tchf275 ( approximately $ 311 )\t0.750% ( 0.750 % )\tmay 2014\tdecember 2019\nswiss franc notes\t( b )\tchf250 ( approximately $ 283 )\t1.625% ( 1.625 % )\tmay 2014\tmay 2024\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 750\t3.250% ( 3.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2024\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 750\t4.250% ( 4.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2044\n\nPost-table text:\nour debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .\n( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .\n( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( e ) u.s .\ndollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .\nguarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .\nthere is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .\nat december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1029", "1372", ")", "add(", "#0", "697", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3098"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_24.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the increase in non-utility nuclear earnings in 2002\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .\nthe decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .\nthe refund was made in december 2001 .\n2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .\nutility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .\nnon-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .\nthe increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .\nfollowing are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .\n\nTable:\n\t2002\t2001\t2000\nnet mw in operation at december 31\t3955\t3445\t2475\ngeneration in gwh for the year\t29953\t22614\t7171\ncapacity factor for the year\t93% ( 93 % )\t93% ( 93 % )\t94% ( 94 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "201", "128", ")", "divide(", "#0", "128", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.57031"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_127.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average currency translation adjustments from 2013 to 2015 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 17 .\naccumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( losses ) earnings ( in millions )\t( losses ) earnings 2015\t( losses ) earnings 2014\t2013\ncurrency translation adjustments\t$ -6129 ( 6129 )\t$ -3929 ( 3929 )\t$ -2207 ( 2207 )\npension and other benefits\t-3332 ( 3332 )\t-3020 ( 3020 )\t-2046 ( 2046 )\nderivatives accounted for as hedges\t59\t123\t63\ntotal accumulated other comprehensive losses\t$ -9402 ( 9402 )\t$ -6826 ( 6826 )\t$ -4190 ( 4190 )\n\nPost-table text:\nreclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .\nthe movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business .\nin addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .\nfor additional information , see note 13 .\nbenefit plans and note 15 .\nfinancial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments .\nnote 18 .\ncolombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products .\nthe investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco .\nas a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 .\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement .\nthese discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 .\nnote 19 .\nrbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc .\n( \"rothmans\" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc .\n( \"rbh\" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand .\nthe settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period .\nrothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh .\nthe remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "currency translation adjustments", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-4088.33333"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2016/page_144.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the gallons hedged in 2017 to 2018\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .\nfinancial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .\nthese swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .\nthe following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .\n\nTable:\nyear\tgallons hedged\tweighted average contractprice per gallon\n2017\t12000000\t$ 2.92\n2018\t3000000\t2.61\n\nPost-table text:\nif the national u.s .\non-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .\nif the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .\nthe fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .\nthe aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .\nthe ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .\ntotal gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .\nwe classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows .\nrecycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint .\nfrom time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .\nduring 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales .\nthe agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) .\nwe entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ .\nthe agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price .\nthe puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration .\nthe contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars .\nunder these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged .\nif the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged .\nthe objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "12000000", "3000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4"}
{"example_id": "SNPS/2006/page_69.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total purchase price is represented by goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nsoftware and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .\nintegrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .\npurchase price .\nthe company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .\nin addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .\nthe total purchase consideration consisted of: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\ncash paid\t$ 11001\nprior investment in hpl\t1872\nacquisition-related costs\t2831\ntotal purchase price\t$ 15704\n\nPost-table text:\nacquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .\nas of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .\nthe $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .\nassets acquired .\nthe company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .\napproximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .\naccordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .\nadditionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .\ngoodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .\ngoodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .\nother .\nduring the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .\nthis acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .\nfiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .\nreasons for the acquisition .\nthe company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .\npurchase price .\nthe company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .\nin addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "3.4", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "15704", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21651"}
{"example_id": "GIS/2019/page_37.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change of our accrued trade liabilities in 2019 compared to 2018\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year 2020\tpayments due by fiscal year 2021 -22\tpayments due by fiscal year 2023 -24\tpayments due by fiscal year 2025 and thereafter\nlong-term debt ( a )\t$ 13093.0\t$ 1396.3\t$ 3338.4\t$ 2810.2\t$ 5548.1\naccrued interest\t92.6\t92.6\t-\t-\t-\noperating leases ( b )\t482.6\t120.0\t186.7\t112.9\t63.0\ncapital leases\t0.3\t0.2\t0.1\t-\t-\npurchase obligations ( c )\t2961.8\t2605.1\t321.9\t27.6\t7.2\ntotal contractual obligations\t16630.3\t4214.2\t3847.1\t2950.7\t5618.3\nother long-term obligations ( d )\t1302.4\t-\t-\t-\t-\ntotal long-term obligations\t$ 17932.7\t$ 4214.2\t$ 3847.1\t$ 2950.7\t$ 5618.3\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.3 million for capital leases or $ 72.0 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments .\n( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases .\n( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands .\nfor purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction .\nmost arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) .\nany amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above .\n( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 17.3 million as of may 26 , 2019 , based on fair market values as of that date .\nfuture changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future .\nother long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities .\nwe expect to pay approximately $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and approximately $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2020 .\nwe are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2020 .\nas of may 26 , 2019 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 165.1 million .\nsignificant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\nour significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations .\nthese estimates include our accounting for promotional expenditures , valuation of long-lived assets , intangible assets , redeemable interest , stock-based compensation , income taxes , and defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans .\nrevenue recognition our revenues are reported net of variable consideration and consideration payable to our customers , including trade promotion , consumer coupon redemption and other costs , including estimated allowances for returns , unsalable product , and prompt pay discounts .\ntrade promotions are recorded using significant judgment of estimated participation and performance levels for offered programs at the time of sale .\ndifferences between estimated expenses and actual costs are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period .\nour accrued trade liabilities were $ 484 million as of may 26 , 2019 , and $ 500 million as of may 27 , 2018 .\nbecause these amounts are significant , if our estimates are inaccurate we would have to make adjustments in subsequent periods that could have a significant effect on our results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "484", "500", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-16"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2018/page_110.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the net change in ending available for sale investment securities from 2017 to 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nTable:\nas of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2018\t2017\t2016\ninvestment securities gains/ ( losses )\t$ -395 ( 395 )\t$ -78 ( 78 )\t$ 132\navailable-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t203449\t219345\t226892\nheld-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t31747\t47927\t51358\ninvestment securities portfolio ( average )\t235197\t267272\t278250\nafs investment securities ( period-end )\t228681\t200247\t236670\nhtm investment securities ( period-end )\t31434\t47733\t50168\ninvestment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )\t260115\t247980\t286838\n\nPost-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "228681", "200247", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "28434"}
{"example_id": "STT/2008/page_83.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent higher is the average var for foreign exchange products than that of interest rate products?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table presents var with respect to our trading activities , as measured by our var methodology for the periods indicated : value-at-risk .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31 ( inmillions )\t2008 annual average\t2008 maximum\t2008 minimum\t2008 annual average\t2008 maximum\tminimum\nforeign exchange products\t$ 1.8\t$ 4.7\t$ .3\t$ 1.8\t$ 4.0\t$ .7\ninterest-rate products\t1.1\t2.4\t.6\t1.4\t3.7\t.1\n\nPost-table text:\nwe back-test the estimated one-day var on a daily basis .\nthis information is reviewed and used to confirm that all relevant trading positions are properly modeled .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we did not experience any actual trading losses in excess of our end-of-day var estimate .\nasset and liability management activities the primary objective of asset and liability management is to provide sustainable and growing net interest revenue , or nir , under varying economic environments , while protecting the economic values of our balance sheet assets and liabilities from the adverse effects of changes in interest rates .\nmost of our nir is earned from the investment of deposits generated by our core investment servicing and investment management businesses .\nwe structure our balance sheet assets to generally conform to the characteristics of our balance sheet liabilities , but we manage our overall interest-rate risk position in the context of current and anticipated market conditions and within internally-approved risk guidelines .\nour overall interest-rate risk position is maintained within a series of policies approved by the board and guidelines established and monitored by alco .\nour global treasury group has responsibility for managing state street 2019s day-to-day interest-rate risk .\nto effectively manage the consolidated balance sheet and related nir , global treasury has the authority to take a limited amount of interest-rate risk based on market conditions and its views about the direction of global interest rates over both short-term and long-term time horizons .\nglobal treasury manages our exposure to changes in interest rates on a consolidated basis organized into three regional treasury units , north america , europe and asia/pacific , to reflect the growing , global nature of our exposures and to capture the impact of change in regional market environments on our total risk position .\nour investment activities and our use of derivative financial instruments are the primary tools used in managing interest-rate risk .\nwe invest in financial instruments with currency , repricing , and maturity characteristics we consider appropriate to manage our overall interest-rate risk position .\nin addition to on-balance sheet assets , we use certain derivatives , primarily interest-rate swaps , to alter the interest-rate characteristics of specific balance sheet assets or liabilities .\nthe use of derivatives is subject to alco-approved guidelines .\nadditional information about our use of derivatives is in note 17 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k under item 8 .\nas a result of growth in our non-u.s .\noperations , non-u.s .\ndollar denominated customer liabilities are a significant portion of our consolidated balance sheet .\nthis growth results in exposure to changes in the shape and level of non-u.s .\ndollar yield curves , which we include in our consolidated interest-rate risk management process .\nbecause no one individual measure can accurately assess all of our exposures to changes in interest rates , we use several quantitative measures in our assessment of current and potential future exposures to changes in interest rates and their impact on net interest revenue and balance sheet values .\nnet interest revenue simulation is the primary tool used in our evaluation of the potential range of possible net interest revenue results that could occur under a variety of interest-rate environments .\nwe also use market valuation and duration analysis to assess changes in the economic value of balance sheet assets and liabilities caused by assumed changes in interest rates .\nfinally , gap analysis 2014the difference between the amount of balance sheet assets and liabilities re-pricing within a specified time period 2014is used as a measurement of our interest-rate risk position. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1.1", "1.4", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.25"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_185.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of total redeemable stock of subsidiaries from 2015 to 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\nipalco common stock\t$ 618\t$ 460\ncolon quotas ( 1 )\t100\t2014\nipl preferred stock\t60\t60\nother common stock\t4\t2014\ndpl preferred stock\t2014\t18\ntotal redeemable stock of subsidiaries\t$ 782\t$ 538\n\nPost-table text:\n_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .\ncolon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .\nipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .\nthe total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .\ncertain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .\nholders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .\ndpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .\nthe dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .\nin addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .\nin september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .\nas such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .\nin october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .\nupon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .\nipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .\nin april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .\nas a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nno gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .\nin march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nin june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "782", "538", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "244"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2012/page_30.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nstockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .\nall rights reserved. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/29/2007\t1/3/2009\t1/2/2010\t1/1/2011\t12/31/2011\t12/29/2012\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t22.55\t35.17\t48.50\t61.07\t78.92\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t59.03\t82.25\t97.32\t98.63\t110.78\ns&p 400 information technology\t100.00\t54.60\t82.76\t108.11\t95.48\t109.88\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "59.03", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.04097"}
{"example_id": "AMAT/2014/page_35.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of warehouse locations are in north america?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s principal properties at october 26 , 2014 is set forth below : location type principal use square footage ownership santa clara , ca .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 1358000 164000 leased austin , tx .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing 1676000 145000 leased rehovot , israel .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 381000 leased singapore .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 408000 11000 leased gloucester , ma .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 315000 125000 leased tainan , taiwan .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 320000 owned because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country .\nproducts in the silicon systems group are manufactured in austin , texas ; singapore ; gloucester , massachusetts ; and rehovot , israel .\nremanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas .\nproducts in the display segment are manufactured in tainan , taiwan and santa clara , california .\nproducts in the energy and environmental solutions segment are primarily manufactured in alzenau , germany ; treviso , italy ; and cheseaux , switzerland .\nin addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan .\nthese facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and/or customer support .\napplied also owns a total of approximately 150 acres of buildable land in texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .\napplied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements .\napplied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .\n\nTable:\nlocation\ttype\tprincipal use\tsquarefootage\townership\nsanta clara ca\toffice plant & warehouse\theadquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research developmentengineering ; customer support\t1358000164000\townedleased\naustin tx\toffice plant & warehouse\tmanufacturing\t1676000145000\townedleased\nrehovot israel\toffice plant & warehouse\tmanufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support\t3810005400\townedleased\nsingapore\toffice plant & warehouse\tmanufacturing andcustomer support\t40800011000\townedleased\ngloucester ma\toffice plant & warehouse\tmanufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support\t315000125000\townedleased\ntainan taiwan\toffice plant & warehouse\tmanufacturing andcustomer support\t320000\towned\n\nPost-table text:\nitem 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s principal properties at october 26 , 2014 is set forth below : location type principal use square footage ownership santa clara , ca .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 1358000 164000 leased austin , tx .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing 1676000 145000 leased rehovot , israel .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 381000 leased singapore .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 408000 11000 leased gloucester , ma .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 315000 125000 leased tainan , taiwan .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\noffice , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 320000 owned because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country .\nproducts in the silicon systems group are manufactured in austin , texas ; singapore ; gloucester , massachusetts ; and rehovot , israel .\nremanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas .\nproducts in the display segment are manufactured in tainan , taiwan and santa clara , california .\nproducts in the energy and environmental solutions segment are primarily manufactured in alzenau , germany ; treviso , italy ; and cheseaux , switzerland .\nin addition to the above properties , applied also owns and leases offices , plants and/or warehouse locations in 75 locations throughout the world : 16 in europe , 20 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 3 in india , 7 in korea , 3 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan .\nthese facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and/or customer support .\napplied also owns a total of approximately 150 acres of buildable land in texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .\napplied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements .\napplied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "16", "75", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21333"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2006/page_90.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2006 what was the ratio of the expected future pension benefits after 2012 compared to 2008\n\nPre-table text:\nthe defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .\nin 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .\nthe following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpensionbenefits\totherbenefits\n2007\t$ 1440\t$ 260\n2008\t1490\t260\n2009\t1540\t270\n2010\t1600\t270\n2011\t1660\t270\nyears 2012 2013 2016\t9530\t1260\n\nPost-table text:\nas noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .\nthe aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .\nthe expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .\nwe also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .\nthe liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nnote 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .\ncertain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .\ngovernment under short-term or cancelable arrangements .\nnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .\nwe believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .\nwe cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .\nthese matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .\nthe subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .\nwe are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .\non february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .\nwe submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .\nthe contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .\nair force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .\non august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .\nour appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .\non august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .\nnatural resources defense council , et al v .\nlockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .\njohn d .\ntillson v .\nlockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .\nthe doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "9530", "1490", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6.39597"}
{"example_id": "MO/2012/page_44.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the cost reduction initiatives as a percentage of the operating companies income increase?\n\nPre-table text:\nmiddleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains .\nin the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture .\nmarlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) .\nin january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally .\nmarlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family .\npm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount .\nthese gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands .\nin the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points .\nthe brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies .\nin december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 .\nthe following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 .\nnet revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments .\noperating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) .\nfor 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories .\nafter adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day .\npm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) .\nmarlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 .\nin the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) .\npm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 .\nmiddleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 .\nfor 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro .\nmarlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points .\nin 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels .\nmiddleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 .\nfor 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 .\nblack & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine .\nthis new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties .\nduring the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas .\nmiddleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically .\nsmokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management .\nthe following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( cans and packs in millions )\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010\ncopenhagen\t392.5\t354.2\t327.5\nskoal\t288.4\t286.8\t274.4\ncopenhagenandskoal\t680.9\t641.0\t601.9\nother\t82.4\t93.6\t122.5\ntotal smokeless products\t763.3\t734.6\t724.4\n\nPost-table text:\nvolume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment .\nother includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products .\nnew types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "198", "119", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.66387"}
{"example_id": "GS/2017/page_106.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was change in millions for the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads on derivatives ( including hedges ) between 2017 and 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .\nother sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .\n10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .\nthe table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tas of december 2017\tas of december 2016\tas of december 2015\nequity\t$ 2096\t$ 2085\t$ 2157\ndebt\t1606\t1702\t1479\ntotal\t$ 3702\t$ 3787\t$ 3636\n\nPost-table text:\nin the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .\n2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .\n2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .\n2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .\n2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .\ncredit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .\nvar excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .\nthe estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nin addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nhowever , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .\ninterest rate sensitivity .\nloans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .\nas of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .\nother market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .\nsee note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .\nin addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .\nwe also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .\ndirect investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nsee note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .\ngoldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3", "2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_79.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total cash purchase price net of cash acquired was represented by ipr&d?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\nacquisitions ( continued ) was recorded to goodwill .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 28.1\nproperty and equipment net\t0.2\ngoodwill\t258.9\nipr&d\t190.0\ncurrent liabilities assumed\t-32.9 ( 32.9 )\ndeferred income taxes\t-66.0 ( 66.0 )\ncontingent consideration\t-30.3 ( 30.3 )\ntotal cash purchase price\t348.0\nless : cash acquired\t-27.9 ( 27.9 )\ntotal cash purchase price net of cash acquired\t$ 320.1\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .\ngoodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .\nipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .\nthe fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .\nthis approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .\nthe discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) .\ncompletion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .\nthe risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .\nthe valuation assumed $ 97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction , and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program .\nthe company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018 , if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval .\nupon completion of development , the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .\nthe company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve .\nthis testing has been completed and , in collaboration with clinical investigators , the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials .\nthe results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .\npro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .\n8 .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets on july 3 , 2015 , the company acquired cardiaq ( see note 7 ) .\nthis transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $ 258.9 million and ipr&d of $ 190.0 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "190.0", "320.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.59356"}
{"example_id": "SLB/2012/page_44.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby how much did the average price per share increase from 2010 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nduring the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) .\nduring the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) .\n0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 .\non july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 .\nschlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 .\nthe following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal cost of shares purchased\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share\n2012\t$ 971883\t14087.8\t$ 68.99\n2011\t$ 2997688\t36940.4\t$ 81.15\n2010\t$ 1716675\t26624.8\t$ 64.48\n\nPost-table text:\n0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 .\nin recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there .\nschlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries .\nat december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) .\n0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively .\non january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 .\non january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 .\non january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 .\n0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 .\ncapital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 .\n0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans .\nthe us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions .\n0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 .\nduring 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "81.15", "64.48", ")", "divide(", "#0", "64.48", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.25853"}
{"example_id": "GIS/2012/page_64.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total notes payable comes from u.s . commercial paper?\n\nPre-table text:\n62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax .\nthese deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions .\nunrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax .\nthe net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense .\ncredit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies .\nif our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions .\nthe aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million .\nwe have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts .\nif the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties .\nconcentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc .\nand its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s .\nretail segment .\nno other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales .\nwal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment .\nas of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s .\nretail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables .\nthe five largest customers in our u.s .\nretail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales .\nwe enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties .\nwe continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party .\nthese transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss .\nwe also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges .\nthe amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral .\nunder the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk .\ncollateral assets are either cash or u.s .\ntreasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults .\nnote 8 .\ndebt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tmay 27 2012 notes payable\tmay 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate\tmay 27 2012 notespayable\tweighted-averageinterest rate\nu.s . commercial paper\t$ 412.0\t0.2% ( 0.2 % )\t$ 192.5\t0.2% ( 0.2 % )\nfinancial institutions\t114.5\t10.0\t118.8\t11.5\ntotal\t$ 526.5\t2.4% ( 2.4 % )\t$ 311.3\t4.5% ( 4.5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nto ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings .\ncommercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing .\nwe have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe .\nin april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "412.0", "526.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.78253"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_99.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate of the net earnings attributable to pmi?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .\nthis cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .\npmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .\nearnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .\nbasic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2015\nnet earnings attributable to pmi\t$ 6035\t$ 6967\t$ 6873\nless distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards\t14\t19\t24\nnet earnings for basic and diluted eps\t$ 6021\t$ 6948\t$ 6849\nweighted-average shares for basic eps\t1552\t1551\t1549\nplus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )\t1\t2014\t2014\nweighted-average shares for diluted eps\t1553\t1551\t1549\n\nPost-table text:\nfor the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6035", "6967", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6967", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.13377"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_75.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were due to purchase obligations for the year of 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nsettlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments .\nwhile the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision .\nthe provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s .\nfederal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\ninternational paper has non-u.s .\nnet operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million .\ninterna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million .\ninternational paper also has federal , non-u.s .\nand state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million .\nfurther , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million .\ndeferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .\nsubsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested .\ncomputation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable .\nnote 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments .\nunconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) .\nat december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2008\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 136\t$ 116\t$ 101\t$ 84\t$ 67\t$ 92\npurchase obligations ( a )\t1953\t294\t261\t235\t212\t1480\ntotal\t$ 2089\t$ 410\t$ 362\t$ 319\t$ 279\t$ 1572\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales .\nrent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\ninternational paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer .\nin the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations .\nthe company has no future obligations under this agreement. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1953", "2089", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.9349"}
{"example_id": "GS/2017/page_143.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in net comodities from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above : 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting , and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure .\n2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels .\nwhere the counterparty netting is across levels , the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting .\n2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .\nsignificant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets ( liabilities ) , and ranges , averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .\nlevel 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december $ in millions 2017 2016 .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tlevel 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2017\tlevel 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2016\ninterest rates net\t$ -410 ( 410 )\t$ -381 ( 381 )\ncorrelation\t( 10 ) % (  % ) to 95% ( 95 % ) ( 71%/79% ( 71%/79 % ) )\t( 10 ) % (  % ) to 86% ( 86 % ) ( 56%/60% ( 56%/60 % ) )\nvolatility ( bps )\t31 to 150 ( 84/78 )\t31 to 151 ( 84/57 )\ncredit net\t$ 1505\t$ 2504\ncorrelation\t28% ( 28 % ) to 84% ( 84 % ) ( 61%/60% ( 61%/60 % ) )\t35% ( 35 % ) to 91% ( 91 % ) ( 65%/68% ( 65%/68 % ) )\ncredit spreads ( bps )\t1 to 633 ( 69/42 )\t1 to 993 ( 122/73 )\nupfront credit points\t0 to 97 ( 42/38 )\t0 to 100 ( 43/35 )\nrecovery rates\t22% ( 22 % ) to 73% ( 73 % ) ( 68%/73% ( 68%/73 % ) )\t1% ( 1 % ) to 97% ( 97 % ) ( 58%/70% ( 58%/70 % ) )\ncurrencies net\t$ -181 ( 181 )\t$ 3\ncorrelation\t49% ( 49 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 61%/62% ( 61%/62 % ) )\t25% ( 25 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) ( 50%/55% ( 50%/55 % ) )\ncommodities net\t$ 47\t$ 73\nvolatility\t9% ( 9 % ) to 79% ( 79 % ) ( 24%/24% ( 24%/24 % ) )\t13% ( 13 % ) to 68% ( 68 % ) ( 33%/33% ( 33%/33 % ) )\nnatural gas spread\t$ ( 2.38 ) to $ 3.34 ( $ ( 0.22 ) /$ ( 0.12 ) )\t$ ( 1.81 ) to $ 4.33 ( $ ( 0.14 ) /$ ( 0.05 ) )\noil spread\t$ ( 2.86 ) to $ 23.61 ( $ 6.47/$ 2.35 )\t$ ( 19.72 ) to $ 64.92 ( $ 25.30/$ 16.43 )\nequities net\t$ -1249 ( 1249 )\t$ -3416 ( 3416 )\ncorrelation\t( 36 ) % (  % ) to 94% ( 94 % ) ( 50%/52% ( 50%/52 % ) )\t( 39 ) % (  % ) to 88% ( 88 % ) ( 41%/41% ( 41%/41 % ) )\nvolatility\t4% ( 4 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/22% ( 24%/22 % ) )\t5% ( 5 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/23% ( 24%/23 % ) )\n\nPost-table text:\nin the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .\n2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .\n2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .\nan average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .\nfor example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .\n2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .\nfor example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .\naccordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .\n2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .\n2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .\nfor example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .\ntherefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .\n2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .\n2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .\n2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .\nrange of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .\nranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .\ngenerally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .\n2030 volatility .\nranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .\nfor example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .\n2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .\nthe ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .\nthe broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .\n130 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "47", "73", ")", "divide(", "#0", "73", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.35616"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2009/page_85.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat the percentage increase defined contribution plans for foreign countries and contribution from 2007 to 2008\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .\na significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .\npension plan .\nadditionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .\npension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .\nas a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .\nduring 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .\nthe following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .\ndomestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .\n\nTable:\nyears\tdomestic pension plans\tforeign pension plans\tpostretirement benefit plans\n2010\t$ 17.2\t$ 23.5\t$ 5.8\n2011\t11.1\t24.7\t5.7\n2012\t10.8\t26.4\t5.7\n2013\t10.5\t28.2\t5.6\n2014\t10.5\t32.4\t5.5\n2015 2013 2019\t48.5\t175.3\t24.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .\nfederal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .\nsavings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .\nthe savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .\nwe match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .\namounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .\nexpense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\ndeferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .\nthe arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .\nas of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .\namounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .\nwe have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .\nthe deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\namounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .\nwe have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .\nas of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .\nin addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .\nthese investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "28.7", "26.7", ")", "divide(", "#0", "26.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07491"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_88.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the total contingent payments relating to impella?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no .\n48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no .\n109 ( 201cfin no .\n48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no .\n109 , accounting for income taxes .\nfin no .\n48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return .\nfin no .\n48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized .\nas a result of its adoption of fin no .\n48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 .\nthis adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 .\nthe company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 .\nthe company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations .\nas of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 .\nas such , the company had no fin no .\n48 liability at march 31 , 2009 .\non a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest .\nit is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position .\na reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: .\n\nTable:\nbalance at march 31 2008\t$ 168\nreductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations\t-168 ( 168 )\nbalance at march 31 2009\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions .\nthe company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 .\nall tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts .\nhowever , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized .\nnote 15 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 .\nthe two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 .\nin april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device .\nin may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "5583334", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "16750002"}
{"example_id": "IP/2006/page_32.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2006 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?\n\nPre-table text:\nearnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .\ncontainerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .\nsales volumes for u.s .\nconverted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .\naverage sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .\nan additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .\ncosts for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .\nmanufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .\neuro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .\noperating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .\ncompared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2005\t2004\nsales\t$ 2455\t$ 2245\t$ 2295\noperating profit\t$ 131\t$ 121\t$ 155\n\nPost-table text:\ncoated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .\nsales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .\nin 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .\naverage sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .\noperating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .\nthe impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .\nfoodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .\nsales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .\noperating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .\nraw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .\nshorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .\nsales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .\naverage sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .\noperating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .\nentering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .\nit is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .\nfoodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .\nhowever , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .\nshorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .\ndistribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "396", "2455", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1613"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2018/page_31.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the rate of return of an investment in nasdaq from 2017 to 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii .\nitem 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .\nas of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .\nstockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 29 .\ncopyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .\nall rights reserved .\nnasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .\ns&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .\n\nTable:\n\t12/28/2013\t1/3/2015\t1/2/2016\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\t12/29/2018\ncadence design systems inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 135.18\t$ 149.39\t$ 181.05\t$ 300.22\t$ 311.13\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t112.60\t113.64\t133.19\t172.11\t165.84\ns&p 500\t100.00\t110.28\t109.54\t129.05\t157.22\t150.33\ns&p 500 information technology\t100.00\t115.49\t121.08\t144.85\t201.10\t200.52\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "165.84", "172.11", ")", "divide(", "#0", "172.11", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03643"}
{"example_id": "L/2015/page_59.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage reduction in the loews common stock from 2013 to 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\t2015\nloews common stock\t100.0\t97.37\t106.04\t126.23\t110.59\t101.72\ns&p 500 index\t100.0\t102.11\t118.45\t156.82\t178.29\t180.75\nloews peer group ( a )\t100.0\t101.59\t115.19\t145.12\t152.84\t144.70\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .\nberkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .\n( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .\nand the travelers companies , inc .\ndividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .\nregular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "110.59", "126.23", ")", "divide(", "#0", "126.23", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.1239"}
{"example_id": "ILMN/2007/page_78.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased on the investment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 what was the price per share in the transaction in dollars\n\nPre-table text:\ngoodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .\nthe company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .\nthe combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .\nthe company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .\nthe company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .\nthe company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\n2022 operating efficiencies .\nthe combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .\nthe company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .\nthe following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tyear ended december 30 2007\tyear ended december 31 2006\nrevenue\t$ 366854\t$ 187103\nnet income ( loss )\t$ 17388\t$ -38957 ( 38957 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share basic\t$ 0.32\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share diluted\t$ 0.29\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .\nthe pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\ninvestment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .\nthis investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .\nthis investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .\nillumina , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "50", "5154639", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.00001"}
{"example_id": "ADI/2011/page_81.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total investment is allocated to mutual funds in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million .\nthe contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 .\nthe company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach .\nchanges in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change .\nas of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million .\nthe company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities .\nthe goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric .\nfuture technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nin addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million .\nroyalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods .\nas of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made .\nthe company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 .\nthese costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income .\nthe company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis .\nthe company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition .\n7 .\ndeferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc .\ndeferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading .\nthe components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2011\t2010\nmoney market funds\t$ 17187\t$ 1840\nmutual funds\t9223\t6850\ntotal deferred compensation plan investments\t$ 26410\t$ 8690\n\nPost-table text:\nthe fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively .\nadjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses .\ngross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 .\nthe company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) .\nthese investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan .\nhowever , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors .\n8 .\nother investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments .\ninvestments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate .\nadjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "17187", "26410", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.65078"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2006/page_33.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased on a 365 day year and the average sales price per barrel listed above , what was the total refined product sales revenue for 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nin 2006 , our board of directors approved a projected $ 3.2 billion expansion of our garyville , louisiana refinery by 180 mbpd to 425 mbpd , which will increase our total refining capacity to 1.154 million barrels per day ( 2018 2018mmbpd 2019 2019 ) .\nwe recently received air permit approval from the louisiana department of environmental quality for this project and construction is expected to begin in mid-2007 , with startup planned for the fourth quarter of 2009 .\nwe have also commenced front-end engineering and design ( 2018 2018feed 2019 2019 ) for a potential heavy oil upgrading project at our detroit refinery , which would allow us to process increased volumes of canadian oil sands production , and are undertaking a feasibility study for a similar upgrading project at our catlettsburg refinery .\nmarketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .\nin 2006 , our refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 21.5 billion gallons , or 1.401 mmbpd .\nthe average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 77.76 per barrel for 2006 .\nthe following table sets forth our refined product sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years .\nrefined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\n( thousands of barrels per day )\t2006\t2005\t2004\ngasoline\t804\t836\t807\ndistillates\t375\t385\t373\npropane\t23\t22\t22\nfeedstocks and special products\t106\t96\t92\nheavy fuel oil\t26\t29\t27\nasphalt\t91\t87\t79\ntotal ( a )\t1425\t1455\t1400\naverage sales price ( $ per barrel )\t$ 77.76\t$ 66.42\t$ 49.53\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd , 77 mbpd and 71 mbpd in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .\non april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard .\nthis change resulted in lower refined product sales volumes for the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under the previous accounting practices .\nsee note 2 to the consolidated financial statements .\nthe wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 71 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nwe sold 52 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis .\nhalf of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers .\npropylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry .\nbase lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide .\nwe market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .\nour customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .\nwe blended 35 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2006 .\nin 2005 and 2004 , we blended 35 mbpd and 30 mbpd of ethanol .\nthe expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations .\nwe sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4200 marathon branded retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois .\nbranded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , minnesota , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , virginia , north carolina , pennsylvania , alabama and south carolina .\nsales to marathon brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 14 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .\nsales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.7 billion in 2006 , compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2005 .\nprofit levels from the sale .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1425", "77.76", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "365", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "40444920"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2012/page_125.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the mtn deal , what was the total post closing adjustments , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 15.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 19.8 million .\nthe customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years .\n( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes .\nthe goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment .\nuganda acquisition 2014on december 8 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group to establish a joint venture in uganda .\nthe joint venture is controlled by a holding company of which a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( the 201catc uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 51% ( 51 % ) interest and a wholly owned subsidiary of mtn group ( the 201cmtn uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 49% ( 49 % ) interest .\nthe joint venture is managed and controlled by the company and owns a tower operations company in uganda .\npursuant to the agreement , the joint venture agreed to purchase a total of up to 1000 existing communications sites from mtn group 2019s operating subsidiary in uganda , subject to customary closing conditions .\non june 29 , 2012 , the joint venture acquired 962 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 171.5 million , subject to post-closing adjustments .\nthe aggregate purchase price was subsequently increased to $ 173.2 million , subject to future post-closing adjustments .\nunder the terms of the purchase agreement , legal title to certain of these communications sites will be transferred upon fulfillment of certain conditions by mtn group .\nprior to the fulfillment of these conditions , the company will operate and maintain control of these communications sites , and accordingly , reflect these sites in the allocation of purchase price and the consolidated operating results .\nthe following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .\n\nTable:\n\tpreliminary purchase price allocation\nnon-current assets\t$ 2258\nproperty and equipment\t102366\nintangible assets ( 1 )\t63500\nother non-current liabilities\t-7528 ( 7528 )\nfair value of net assets acquired\t$ 160596\ngoodwill ( 2 )\t12564\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 36.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 27.0 million .\nthe customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years .\n( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be not be deductible for tax purposes .\nthe goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment .\ngermany acquisition 2014on november 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase communications sites from e-plus mobilfunk gmbh & co .\nkg .\non december 4 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 2031 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 525.7 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "173.2", "171.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.7"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2004/page_213.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy louisiana , inc.?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .\nthe increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .\nfuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .\nother regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .\n2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .\n\nTable:\n\t( in millions )\n2002 net revenue\t$ 922.9\ndeferred fuel cost revisions\t59.1\nasset retirement obligation\t8.2\nvolume\t-16.2 ( 16.2 )\nvidalia settlement\t-9.2 ( 9.2 )\nother\t8.9\n2003 net revenue\t$ 973.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .\nthe asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , \"accounting for asset retirement obligations\" adopted in january 2003 .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" for more details on sfas 143 .\nthe increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .\nthe volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .\nbilled usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "973.7", "922.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "922.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05504"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_31.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ntissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia .\naverage sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp .\noperating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 .\nthe benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly .\nhowever , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages .\nindustrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix .\nindustrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings .\nbene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) .\nin addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard .\nthe segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related .\nindustrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2007\t2006\t2005\nsales\t$ 5245\t$ 4925\t$ 4625\noperating profit\t$ 501\t$ 399\t$ 219\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 .\ncontainerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 .\nmargins improved reflecting stronger export demand .\nmanu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages .\nraw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly .\noperating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine .\nu.s .\nconverting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand .\nearnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 .\nfavorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs .\nlooking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 .\nhowever , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy .\nmanufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter .\neuropean industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .\nsales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 .\nsales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes .\nconversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues .\nprofit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1.1", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "5245", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.20972"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_54.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2005 is related to tower cash flow?\n\nPre-table text:\nwith apb no .\n25 .\ninstead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .\nsfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .\nwe have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .\n25 2019s intrinsic value method .\nas such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .\nwe will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .\ntax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .\ntax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .\nwe estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .\nthis amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .\nsfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .\nwe cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .\ndue to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .\nin march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .\n107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .\nthis interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .\nthe interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .\nwe will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .\n107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .\ninformation presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .\nthe information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .\nthe following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\ntower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005\t$ 139590\nconsolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t$ 498266\nless : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t-524804 ( 524804 )\nplus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005\t558360\nadjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t$ 531822\nnon-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t$ -30584 ( 30584 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "558360", "531822", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.0499"}
{"example_id": "FBHS/2017/page_23.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth in sales of cabinets from 2016 to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nsouth america .\napproximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .\nthis segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .\nin aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .\nthis segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .\ndoors .\nour doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .\nthis segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .\ntherma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .\nand canada .\nthis segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .\nin aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .\nthis segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .\nsecurity .\nour security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .\nthis segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .\napproximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .\nthis segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .\nin addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .\nin aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .\nmaster lock competes with abus , w.h .\nbrady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .\nannual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2017\t2016\t2015\ncabinets\t$ 2467.1\t$ 2397.8\t$ 2173.4\nplumbing\t1720.8\t1534.4\t1414.5\ndoors\t502.9\t473.0\t439.1\nsecurity\t592.5\t579.7\t552.4\ntotal\t$ 5283.3\t$ 4984.9\t$ 4579.4\n\nPost-table text:\nfor additional financial information for each of our business segments , refer to note 18 , 201cinformation on business segments , 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials .\nthe table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments .\nthese materials are available from a number of sources .\nvolatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2467.1", "2397.8", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2397.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0289"}
{"example_id": "MSI/2009/page_65.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the segment net sales in 2008 to 2009\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations indemnification provisions : in addition , the company may provide indemnifications for losses that result from the breach of general warranties contained in certain commercial , intellectual property and divestiture agreements .\nhistorically , the company has not made significant payments under these agreements , nor have there been significant claims asserted against the company .\nhowever , there is an increasing risk in relation to intellectual property indemnities given the current legal climate .\nin indemnification cases , payment by the company is conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract , which procedures typically allow the company to challenge the other party 2019s claims .\nfurther , the company 2019s obligations under these agreements for indemnification based on breach of representations and warranties are generally limited in terms of duration , typically not more than 24 months , and for amounts not in excess of the contract value , and in some instances the company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by the company .\nlegal matters : the company is a defendant in various lawsuits , claims and actions , which arise in the normal course of business .\nin the opinion of management , the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .\nsegment information the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the financial results of each operating business segment as detailed in note 12 , 2018 2018information by segment and geographic region , 2019 2019 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nnet sales and operating results for the company 2019s three operating business segments for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 are presented below .\nmobile devices segment the mobile devices segment designs , manufactures , sells and services wireless handsets , including smartphones , with integrated software and accessory products , and licenses intellectual property .\nin 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 32% ( 32 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 40% ( 40 % ) in 2008 and 52% ( 52 % ) in 2007. .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions )\tyears ended december 31 2009\tyears ended december 31 2008\tyears ended december 31 2007\tyears ended december 31 2009 20142008\t2008 20142007\nsegment net sales\t$ 7146\t$ 12099\t$ 18988\t( 41 ) % (  % )\t( 36 ) % (  % )\noperating earnings ( loss )\t-1077 ( 1077 )\t-2199 ( 2199 )\t-1201 ( 1201 )\t( 51 ) % (  % )\t83% ( 83 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nsegment results 20142009 compared to 2008 in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales were $ 7.1 billion , a decrease of 41% ( 41 % ) compared to net sales of $ 12.1 billion in 2008 .\nthe 41% ( 41 % ) decrease in net sales was primarily driven by a 45% ( 45 % ) decrease in unit shipments , partially offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in average selling price ( 2018 2018asp 2019 2019 ) .\nthe segment 2019s net sales were negatively impacted by reduced product offerings in large market segments , particularly 3g products , including smartphones , and the segment 2019s limited product offerings in very low-tier products .\non a product technology basis , net sales decreased substantially for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by an increase in net sales for iden technology .\non a geographic basis , net sales decreased substantially in latin america , the europe , middle east and african region ( 2018 2018emea 2019 2019 ) and asia and , to a lesser extent , decreased in north america .\nthe segment incurred an operating loss of $ 1.1 billion in 2009 , an improvement of 51% ( 51 % ) compared to an operating loss of $ 2.2 billion in 2008 .\nthe decrease in the operating loss was primarily due to decreases in : ( i ) selling , general and administrative ( 2018 2018sg&a 2019 2019 ) expenses , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , ( ii ) research and development ( 2018 2018r&d 2019 2019 ) expenditures , reflecting savings from cost-reduction initiatives , ( iii ) lower excess inventory and other related charges in 2009 than in 2008 , when the charges included a $ 370 million charge due to a decision to consolidate software and silicon platforms , and ( iv ) the absence in 2009 of a comparable $ 150 million charge in 2008 related to settlement of a purchase commitment , partially offset by a decrease in gross margin , driven by the 41% ( 41 % ) decrease in net sales .\nas a percentage of net sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 , gross margin and r&d expenditures increased and sg&a expenses decreased .\nthe segment 2019s industry typically experiences short life cycles for new products .\ntherefore , it is vital to the segment 2019s success that new , compelling products are continually introduced .\naccordingly , a strong commitment to .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "12099", "7146", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.69312"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_38.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in the weighted-average discount rate for u.s . pension plans from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee .\nthe following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured .\nfor our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers .\ntitle transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction .\nthe company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial .\n2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .\nwe perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year .\nwhile the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .\nthe impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .\nif the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .\nto determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .\nat december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .\nthe estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 .\nto determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .\nwe concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment .\nthese discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .\nmanagement considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .\nsince the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .\n2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .\nthe costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .\ngaap .\nrecognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .\nfor volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .\nfor other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .\nchanges in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .\nwe have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years .\n2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .\nbenefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .\nwe record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .\ngaap .\nthese calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .\nwe review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .\nas permitted by u.s .\ngaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .\nwe believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .\nweighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\nu.s . pension plans\t4.30% ( 4.30 % )\t3.95% ( 3.95 % )\nnon-u.s . pension plans\t1.68% ( 1.68 % )\t1.92% ( 1.92 % )\npostretirement plans\t4.45% ( 4.45 % )\t4.20% ( 4.20 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s .\nand non- u.s .\npension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "4.30", "3.95", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3.95", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08861"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_48.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2009 , what is the percentage of the segment's operating income among the total operating income?\n\nPre-table text:\nof exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets .\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation .\norganic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .\nin 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 .\ncontributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives .\nthese items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation .\nconsulting .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 1267\t$ 1356\t$ 1345\nsegment operating income\t203\t208\t180\nsegment operating income margin\t16.0% ( 16.0 % )\t15.3% ( 15.3 % )\t13.4% ( 13.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 .\nhealth and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees .\nbenefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services .\n2 .\nretirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n3 .\ncompensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n4 .\nstrategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\noutsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services .\nbeginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nthe prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "203", "900", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.22556"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2006/page_30.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock for the period ended december 30 , 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .\nall rights reserved .\nwww.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 29 2001\tdecember 28 2002\tjanuary 3 2004\tjanuary 1 2005\tdecember 31 2005\tdecember 30 2006\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t54.38\t81.52\t61.65\t75.54\t79.96\ns & p 500\t100.00\t77.90\t100.24\t111.15\t116.61\t135.03\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t71.97\t107.18\t117.07\t120.50\t137.02\ns & p information technology\t100.00\t62.59\t92.14\t94.50\t95.44\t103.47\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "79.96", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.2004"}
{"example_id": "ALXN/2007/page_104.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in minimum annual rental payment between 2010 and 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nalexion pharmaceuticals , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 4935\n2009\t3144\n2010\t3160\n2011\t3200\n2012\t2768\nthereafter\t9934\n\nPost-table text:\n9 .\ncommitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s .\ndistrict court for the district of delaware .\npdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris .\npdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees .\nalexion has denied pdl's claims .\nin addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s .\npatents held by pdl .\nalexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .\non february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc .\nfiled a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california .\nsb2 , inc .\nclaims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc .\npatents due to sales of soliris .\nsb2 , inc .\nseeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees .\nalexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .\nthe results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages .\nhowever , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) .\nproduct supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 .\nwe amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 .\nsuch commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3200", "3160", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3160", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01266"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_191.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2015 to 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\t2014\nbalance at january 1\t$ 373\t$ 394\t$ 392\nadditions for current year tax positions\t8\t7\t7\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t1\t12\t14\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-7 ( 7 )\t-2 ( 2 )\neffects of foreign currency translation\t2\t-7 ( 7 )\t-3 ( 3 )\nsettlements\t-13 ( 13 )\t-19 ( 19 )\t-2 ( 2 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-1 ( 1 )\t-7 ( 7 )\t-12 ( 12 )\nbalance at december 31\t$ 369\t$ 373\t$ 394\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .\nthe company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .\nwhile it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .\nhowever , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .\nit is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .\nour effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .\n22 .\ndiscontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .\nthe disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .\nin december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .\naes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .\nthe company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .\nwe have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .\nupon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .\nprior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .\nhowever , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .\non october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .\nupon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .\nthe cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .\nthis includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .\nsul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .\nsul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .\nprior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .\nas discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .\n2014-08 .\ndiscontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .\n2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .\nwind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "369", "373", ")", "divide(", "#0", "373", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.01072"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_200.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average potential anti-dilutive share conversions from 2008 to 2010\n\nPre-table text:\nn o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively .\n19 .\nrelated party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda .\nthe trustees are principally comprised of ace management .\nthe company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers .\nthe borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities .\naccordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties .\n20 .\nstatutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate .\nthese regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities .\nthere are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries .\nthe company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators .\nstatutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items .\nthe statutory capital and surplus of the u.s .\nsubsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 .\nthe amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million .\nthe following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s .\nsubsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions of u.s . dollars )\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\tbermuda subsidiaries 2008\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\t2008\nstatutory capital and surplus\t$ 11798\t$ 9164\t$ 6205\t$ 6266\t$ 5885\t$ 5368\nstatutory net income\t$ 2430\t$ 2369\t$ 2196\t$ 1047\t$ 904\t$ 818\n\nPost-table text:\nas permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively .\nthe company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations .\nsome jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements .\nin some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business .\nthese licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests .\njurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "256868", "1230881", ")", "add(", "638401", "#0", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1063076.5"}
{"example_id": "IP/2012/page_93.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in rent expenses between 2011 and 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2013\t2014\t2015\t2016\t2017\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 198\t$ 136\t$ 106\t$ 70\t$ 50\t$ 141\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3213\t828\t722\t620\t808\t2654\ntotal\t$ 3411\t$ 964\t$ 828\t$ 690\t$ 858\t$ 2795\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .\nrent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .\nguarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .\nwhere liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .\nenvironmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .\nmany of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .\nwhile joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .\nremedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .\ninternational paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .\none of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .\nduring 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .\nin june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .\nthe overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .\nin october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .\nin the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .\nin october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .\nit is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .\nin addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nother than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .\nthe company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .\nthe epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .\nregis .\nthe company is a successor in interest to st .\nregis .\ninternational paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .\naccordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .\nalso in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .\nthe suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .\nthe suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .\nregis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .\nalso named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .\nin mid-2011 , the suit was .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "231", "205", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "26"}
{"example_id": "GS/2017/page_143.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in credit net from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in the tables above : 2030 the gross fair values exclude the effects of both counterparty netting and collateral netting , and therefore are not representative of the firm 2019s exposure .\n2030 counterparty netting is reflected in each level to the extent that receivable and payable balances are netted within the same level and is included in counterparty netting in levels .\nwhere the counterparty netting is across levels , the netting is included in cross-level counterparty netting .\n2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .\nsignificant unobservable inputs the table below presents the amount of level 3 assets ( liabilities ) , and ranges , averages and medians of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .\nlevel 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december $ in millions 2017 2016 .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tlevel 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2017\tlevel 3 assets ( liabilities ) and range of significant unobservable inputs ( average/median ) as of december 2016\ninterest rates net\t$ -410 ( 410 )\t$ -381 ( 381 )\ncorrelation\t( 10 ) % (  % ) to 95% ( 95 % ) ( 71%/79% ( 71%/79 % ) )\t( 10 ) % (  % ) to 86% ( 86 % ) ( 56%/60% ( 56%/60 % ) )\nvolatility ( bps )\t31 to 150 ( 84/78 )\t31 to 151 ( 84/57 )\ncredit net\t$ 1505\t$ 2504\ncorrelation\t28% ( 28 % ) to 84% ( 84 % ) ( 61%/60% ( 61%/60 % ) )\t35% ( 35 % ) to 91% ( 91 % ) ( 65%/68% ( 65%/68 % ) )\ncredit spreads ( bps )\t1 to 633 ( 69/42 )\t1 to 993 ( 122/73 )\nupfront credit points\t0 to 97 ( 42/38 )\t0 to 100 ( 43/35 )\nrecovery rates\t22% ( 22 % ) to 73% ( 73 % ) ( 68%/73% ( 68%/73 % ) )\t1% ( 1 % ) to 97% ( 97 % ) ( 58%/70% ( 58%/70 % ) )\ncurrencies net\t$ -181 ( 181 )\t$ 3\ncorrelation\t49% ( 49 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 61%/62% ( 61%/62 % ) )\t25% ( 25 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) ( 50%/55% ( 50%/55 % ) )\ncommodities net\t$ 47\t$ 73\nvolatility\t9% ( 9 % ) to 79% ( 79 % ) ( 24%/24% ( 24%/24 % ) )\t13% ( 13 % ) to 68% ( 68 % ) ( 33%/33% ( 33%/33 % ) )\nnatural gas spread\t$ ( 2.38 ) to $ 3.34 ( $ ( 0.22 ) /$ ( 0.12 ) )\t$ ( 1.81 ) to $ 4.33 ( $ ( 0.14 ) /$ ( 0.05 ) )\noil spread\t$ ( 2.86 ) to $ 23.61 ( $ 6.47/$ 2.35 )\t$ ( 19.72 ) to $ 64.92 ( $ 25.30/$ 16.43 )\nequities net\t$ -1249 ( 1249 )\t$ -3416 ( 3416 )\ncorrelation\t( 36 ) % (  % ) to 94% ( 94 % ) ( 50%/52% ( 50%/52 % ) )\t( 39 ) % (  % ) to 88% ( 88 % ) ( 41%/41% ( 41%/41 % ) )\nvolatility\t4% ( 4 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/22% ( 24%/22 % ) )\t5% ( 5 % ) to 72% ( 72 % ) ( 24%/23% ( 24%/23 % ) )\n\nPost-table text:\nin the table above : 2030 derivative assets are shown as positive amounts and derivative liabilities are shown as negative amounts .\n2030 ranges represent the significant unobservable inputs that were used in the valuation of each type of derivative .\n2030 averages represent the arithmetic average of the inputs and are not weighted by the relative fair value or notional of the respective financial instruments .\nan average greater than the median indicates that the majority of inputs are below the average .\nfor example , the difference between the average and the median for credit spreads and oil spread inputs indicates that the majority of the inputs fall in the lower end of the range .\n2030 the ranges , averages and medians of these inputs are not representative of the appropriate inputs to use when calculating the fair value of any one derivative .\nfor example , the highest correlation for interest rate derivatives is appropriate for valuing a specific interest rate derivative but may not be appropriate for valuing any other interest rate derivative .\naccordingly , the ranges of inputs do not represent uncertainty in , or possible ranges of , fair value measurements of the firm 2019s level 3 derivatives .\n2030 interest rates , currencies and equities derivatives are valued using option pricing models , credit derivatives are valued using option pricing , correlation and discounted cash flow models , and commodities derivatives are valued using option pricing and discounted cash flow models .\n2030 the fair value of any one instrument may be determined using multiple valuation techniques .\nfor example , option pricing models and discounted cash flows models are typically used together to determine fair value .\ntherefore , the level 3 balance encompasses both of these techniques .\n2030 correlation within currencies and equities includes cross- product type correlation .\n2030 natural gas spread represents the spread per million british thermal units of natural gas .\n2030 oil spread represents the spread per barrel of oil and refined products .\nrange of significant unobservable inputs the following is information about the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the firm 2019s level 3 derivative instruments : 2030 correlation .\nranges for correlation cover a variety of underliers both within one product type ( e.g. , equity index and equity single stock names ) and across product types ( e.g. , correlation of an interest rate and a currency ) , as well as across regions .\ngenerally , cross-product type correlation inputs are used to value more complex instruments and are lower than correlation inputs on assets within the same derivative product type .\n2030 volatility .\nranges for volatility cover numerous underliers across a variety of markets , maturities and strike prices .\nfor example , volatility of equity indices is generally lower than volatility of single stocks .\n2030 credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates .\nthe ranges for credit spreads , upfront credit points and recovery rates cover a variety of underliers ( index and single names ) , regions , sectors , maturities and credit qualities ( high-yield and investment-grade ) .\nthe broad range of this population gives rise to the width of the ranges of significant unobservable inputs .\n130 goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1505", "2504", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2504", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.39896"}
{"example_id": "HWM/2017/page_41.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the reverse stock split , what was the percentual reduction of the common stock outstanding shares?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .\nthe company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .\nprior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .\nas a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .\nthe reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .\nthe company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .\non november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .\nthe separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .\nthe company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .\nthe company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .\nsee disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k .\nthe following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .\nthe prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc .\nprior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. .\n\nTable:\nquarter\t2017 high\t2017 low\t2017 dividend\t2017 high\t2017 low\tdividend\nfirst\t$ 30.69\t$ 18.64\t$ 0.06\t$ 30.66\t$ 18.42\t$ 0.09\nsecond\t28.65\t21.76\t0.06\t34.50\t26.34\t0.09\nthird\t26.84\t22.67\t0.06\t32.91\t27.09\t0.09\nfourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )\t27.85\t22.74\t0.06\t32.10\t16.75\t0.09\nyear\t$ 30.69\t$ 18.64\t$ 0.24\t$ 34.50\t$ 16.75\t$ 0.36\n\nPost-table text:\nthe number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "0.4", "1.3", ")", "subtract(", "const_1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.69231"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2009/page_100.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 312019 what was the percentage of restricted cash that was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds\n\nPre-table text:\nin our primary disbursement accounts which were reclassified as accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nconcentration of credit risk financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents , trade accounts receivable and derivative instruments .\nwe place our cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions .\nsuch balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits .\nin order to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits .\nconcentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas .\nwe provide services to commercial , industrial , municipal and residential customers in the united states and puerto rico .\nwe perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but do not require collateral to support customer receivables .\nwe establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information .\nno customer exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of our outstanding accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2009 or 2008 .\naccounts receivable , net of allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal and other services .\nour receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash .\nthe carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , represents their estimated net realizable value .\nprovisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions .\nwe also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis .\nin general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of ninety days old .\npast due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccess- ful in collecting amounts due .\nthe following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2008\t2007\nbalance at beginning of year\t$ 65.7\t$ 14.7\t$ 18.8\nadditions charged to expense\t27.3\t36.5\t3.9\naccounts written-off\t-37.8 ( 37.8 )\t-12.7 ( 12.7 )\t-7.8 ( 7.8 )\nacquisitions\t-\t27.2\t-0.2 ( 0.2 )\nbalance at end of year\t$ 55.2\t$ 65.7\t$ 14.7\n\nPost-table text:\nsubsequent to our acquisition of allied , we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $ 14.2 million to adjust the allowance acquired from allied to conform to republic 2019s accounting policies .\nwe also recorded $ 5.4 million to provide for specific bankruptcy exposures in 2008 .\nin 2007 , we recorded a $ 4.3 million reduction in our allowance for doubtful accounts as a result of refining our estimate of the allowance based on our historical collection experience .\nrestricted cash as of december 31 , 2009 , we had $ 236.6 million of restricted cash , of which $ 93.1 million was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings and will be used to fund capital republic services , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "93.1", "236.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.39349"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_124.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the carrying value of notes due by 2017 ? in millions $ .\n\nPre-table text:\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 1029\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t750\t2014\t750\t759\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-2 ( 2 )\t698\t812\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1140\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t799\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t745\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -11 ( 11 )\t$ 4939\t$ 5284\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2013 and 2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .\nduring the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .\n2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthese notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2017 notes .\nin september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .\na portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .\nthe 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1000", "750", ")", "add(", "#0", "698", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2448"}
{"example_id": "AAP/2011/page_28.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of an investment in s&p500 index from 2006 to january 3 , 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .\nthe comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .\ncomparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .\n\nTable:\ncompany/index\tdecember 30 2006\tdecember 29 2007\tjanuary 3 2009\tjanuary 2 2010\tjanuary 1 2011\tdecember 31 2011\nadvance auto parts\t$ 100.00\t$ 108.00\t$ 97.26\t$ 116.01\t$ 190.41\t$ 201.18\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t104.24\t65.70\t78.62\t88.67\t88.67\ns&p retail index\t100.00\t82.15\t58.29\t82.36\t101.84\t104.81\n\nPost-table text:\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .\nthe comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .\ncomparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "65.70", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.343"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2007/page_129.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the fair value of hologic common stock used to acquire suros?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operation .\nthere have no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 .\nas part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued .\nit was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values .\ncustomer relationship represents r2 2019s strong active customer base , dominant market position and strong partnership with several large companies .\ntrade name represents the r2 product names that the company intends to continue to use .\norder backlog consists of customer orders for which revenue has not yet been recognized .\ndeveloped technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .\nthe estimated $ 10200 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to r2 2019s digital cad products .\nthe projects added direct digital algorithm capabilities as well as a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .\nthe projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .\nthe deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nacquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\non july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\n( suros ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .\nthe results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .\nsuros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .\nthe initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 2300 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .\nthe company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .\n99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .\nthe components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006\t$ 11800\nin-process research and development\t4900\ndeveloped technology and know how\t46000\ncustomer relationship\t17900\ntrade name\t5800\ndeferred income taxes\t-21300 ( 21300 )\ngoodwill\t202000\nestimated purchase price\t$ 267100\n\nPost-table text:\nthe acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .\nthe earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "106500", "2300", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "46.30435"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2010/page_84.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2008 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t$ 62465\n2012\t54236\n2013\t47860\n2014\t37660\n2015\t28622\nthereafter\t79800\nfuture minimum lease payments\t$ 310643\n\nPost-table text:\nrental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nin connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .\ntypical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .\nwe also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .\nlease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nwe guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .\nthe residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .\nin the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .\nsimilarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .\nhad we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .\nwe have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .\nlitigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .\ninfringed on ford design patents .\nthe parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .\npursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .\nof aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .\ndesign patent .\nwe have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .\nthe amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .\nwe also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .\nwe currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "57.2", "49.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "49.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.16735"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2008/page_78.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 6 2014shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) the following table summarizes activity in other comprehensive income related to derivatives , net of taxes , held by the company during the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2008 ( in millions ) : the tax effect related to the changes in fair value of derivatives was $ ( 5 ) million , $ 1 million , and $ ( 8 ) million for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively .\nthe tax effect related to derivative gains/losses reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income was $ ( 9 ) million , $ 2 million , and $ 8 million for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , respectively .\nemployee benefit plans 2003 employee stock plan the 2003 employee stock plan ( the 201c2003 plan 201d ) is a shareholder approved plan that provides for broad-based grants to employees , including executive officers .\nbased on the terms of individual option grants , options granted under the 2003 plan generally expire 7 to 10 years after the grant date and generally become exercisable over a period of four years , based on continued employment , with either annual or quarterly vesting .\nthe 2003 plan permits the granting of incentive stock options , nonstatutory stock options , rsus , stock appreciation rights , stock purchase rights and performance-based awards .\nas of september 27 , 2008 , approximately 50.3 million shares were reserved for future issuance under the 2003 1997 employee stock option plan in august 1997 , the company 2019s board of directors approved the 1997 employee stock option plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , a non-shareholder approved plan for grants of stock options to employees who are not officers of the company .\nbased on the terms of individual option grants , options granted under the 1997 plan generally expire 7 to 10 years after the grant date and generally become exercisable over a period of four years , based on continued employment , with either annual or quarterly vesting .\nin october 2003 , the company terminated the 1997 plan and no new options can be granted from this plan .\n1997 director stock option plan in august 1997 , the company 2019s board of directors adopted a director stock option plan ( the 201cdirector plan 201d ) for non-employee directors of the company , which was approved by shareholders in 1998 .\npursuant to the director plan , the company 2019s non-employee directors are granted an option to acquire 30000 shares of common stock upon their initial election to the board ( 201cinitial options 201d ) .\nthe initial options vest and become exercisable in three equal annual installments on each of the first through third anniversaries of the grant date .\non the fourth anniversary of a non-employee director 2019s initial election to the board and on each subsequent anniversary thereafter , the director will be entitled to receive an option to acquire 10000 shares of common stock ( 201cannual options 201d ) .\nannual options are fully vested and immediately exercisable on their date of grant .\noptions granted under the director plan expire 10 years after the grant date .\nas of september 27 , 2008 , approximately 290000 shares were reserved for future issuance under the director plan .\nrule 10b5-1 trading plans the following executive officers , timothy d .\ncook , peter oppenheimer , philip w .\nschiller , and bertrand serlet , have entered into trading plans pursuant to rule 10b5-1 ( c ) ( 1 ) of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) , as of november 1 , 2008 .\na trading plan is a written document that .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2007\t2006\nchanges in fair value of derivatives\t$ 7\t$ -1 ( 1 )\t$ 11\nadjustment for net gains/ ( losses ) realized and included in net income\t12\t-2 ( 2 )\t-12 ( 12 )\nchange in unrealized gains on derivative instruments\t$ 19\t$ -3 ( 3 )\t$ -1 ( 1 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "change in unrealized gains on derivative instruments", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5"}
{"example_id": "GS/2013/page_152.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions between 2012 and 2013 in currency hedges?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements net investment hedges the firm seeks to reduce the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on its net investment in certain non- u.s .\noperations through the use of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt .\nfor foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges , the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on the overall changes in the fair value of the forward contracts ( i.e. , based on changes in forward rates ) .\nfor foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a hedge , the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on changes in spot rates .\nfor qualifying net investment hedges , the gains or losses on the hedging instruments , to the extent effective , are included in 201ccurrency translation 201d within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income .\nthe table below presents the gains/ ( losses ) from net investment hedging. .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tyear ended december 2013\tyear ended december 2012\tyear ended december 2011\ncurrency hedges\t$ 150\t$ -233 ( 233 )\t$ 160\nforeign currency-denominated debt hedges\t470\t347\t-147 ( 147 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe gain/ ( loss ) related to ineffectiveness was not material for 2013 , 2012 or 2011 .\nthe loss reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income was not material for 2013 or 2012 , and was $ 186 million for 2011 .\nas of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had designated $ 1.97 billion and $ 2.77 billion , respectively , of foreign currency-denominated debt , included in 201cunsecured long-term borrowings 201d and 201cunsecured short- term borrowings , 201d as hedges of net investments in non- u.s .\nsubsidiaries .\ncash flow hedges beginning in the third quarter of 2013 , the firm designated certain commodities-related swap and forward contracts as cash flow hedges .\nthese swap and forward contracts hedge the firm 2019s exposure to the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sales of certain energy commodities by one of the firm 2019s consolidated investments .\nthe firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing hedge effectiveness .\na cash flow hedge is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in forecasted cash flows attributable to the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% ( 80 % ) or greater and a slope between 80% ( 80 % ) and 125% ( 125 % ) .\nfor qualifying cash flow hedges , the gains or losses on derivatives , to the extent effective , are included in 201ccash flow hedges 201d within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income .\ngains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness are included in 201cother principal transactions 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings .\nthe effective portion of the gains , before taxes , recognized on these cash flow hedges was $ 14 million for 2013 .\nthe gain/ ( loss ) related to hedge ineffectiveness was not material for 2013 .\nthere were no gains/ ( losses ) excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income during 2013 .\nthe amounts recorded in 201ccash flow hedges 201d will be reclassified to 201cother principal transactions 201d in the same periods as the corresponding gain or loss on the sale of the hedged energy commodities , which is also recorded in 201cother principal transactions . 201d the firm expects to reclassify $ 5 million of gains , net of taxes , related to cash flow hedges from 201ccash flow hedges 201d to earnings within the next twelve months .\nthe length of time over which the firm is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions is approximately two years .\n150 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "150", "-233", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "383"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2009/page_70.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total assets acquired is composed of goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos .\ncontractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 .\nsuch sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows .\nwe do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale .\nproceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities .\nother 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a .\nand euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain .\nlfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america .\nthe purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations .\nduring fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states .\nthe purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering .\nthe following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal\ngoodwill\t$ 13536\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t4091\ncontract-based intangible assets\t1031\nproperty and equipment\t267\nother current assets\t502\ntotal assets acquired\t19427\ncurrent liabilities\t-2347 ( 2347 )\nminority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )\t-486 ( 486 )\nnet assets acquired\t$ 16594\n\nPost-table text:\nthe customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .\nthe contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years .\nthese business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions .\nin addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million .\nthe value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately .\nthe remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years .\nfiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific .\nthis business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region .\nthe .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "13536", "19427", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.69676"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_102.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in billions in total capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 ) from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nmandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 .\nin 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities .\nthe frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards .\nunder the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability .\nthe amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions .\nat december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit .\nthe company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 .\nthe frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability .\nat december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit .\nthe frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions .\nthese may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets .\ncapital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines .\nto be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels .\nat december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a .\ncomponents of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin billions of dollars at year end\t2008\t2007\ntier 1 capital\t$ 71.0\t$ 82.0\ntotal capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )\t108.4\t121.6\ntier 1 capital ratio\t9.94% ( 9.94 % )\t8.98% ( 8.98 % )\ntotal capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )\t15.18\t13.33\nleverage ratio ( 1 )\t5.82\t6.65\n\nPost-table text:\nleverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets .\ncitibank , n.a .\nhad a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion .\nduring 2008 , citibank , n.a .\nreceived contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion .\ncitibank , n.a .\ndid not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 .\ntotal subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc .\nthat were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion .\ncitibank , n.a .\nreceived an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 .\nthe impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above .\nthe substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "108.4", "121.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-13.2"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2006/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased bought in october\n\nPre-table text:\nissuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2006 .\nperiod total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal number ofshares purchased\taverage pricepaid pershare\ttotal number of sharespurchased as part ofpublicly announcedprogram ( 1 )\tmaximum number ofshares that may yet bepurchased under theprogram ( 2 )\noctober\t447700\t$ 86.92\t447700\t36108688\nnovember\t849200\t86.79\t849200\t35259488\ndecember\t929400\t90.74\t929400\t34330088\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) we repurchased a total of 2226300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2006 .\n( 2 ) in october 2002 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 23 million shares of our common stock .\nsince the program 2019s inception , an additional 85 million shares have been authorized for repurchase under the program .\nmanagement has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation , under the program .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , we had repurchased a total of 73669912 shares under the program .\nin 2006 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "447700", "929400", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.48171"}
{"example_id": "AES/2015/page_117.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2014 and 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nproportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .\nthe proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .\nupon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .\nsee note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .\nbeginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nthe proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .\nwe also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .\nan example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .\nsee item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .\nthe gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .\nwe believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .\nfactors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .\nthe presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .\nproportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .\nproportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .\nour definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .\n\nTable:\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\t2015/2014 change\t2014/2013 change\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 2134\t$ 1791\t$ 2715\t$ 343\t$ -924 ( 924 )\nadd : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )\t165\t2014\t2014\t165\t2014\nadjusted operating cash flow\t2299\t1791\t2715\t508\t-924 ( 924 )\nless : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )\t-558 ( 558 )\t-359 ( 359 )\t-834 ( 834 )\t-199 ( 199 )\t475\nproportional adjusted operating cash flow\t1741\t1432\t1881\t309\t-449 ( 449 )\nless : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )\t-449 ( 449 )\t-485 ( 485 )\t-535 ( 535 )\t36\t50\nless : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )\t-51 ( 51 )\t-56 ( 56 )\t-75 ( 75 )\t5\t19\nproportional free cash flow\t$ 1241\t$ 891\t$ 1271\t$ 350\t$ -380 ( 380 )\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .\n( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .\nfor example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .\nthus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .\nassuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .\nthe company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .\nthe proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .\n( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .\n( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "350", "891", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.39282"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_85.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the increase in long-term debt between 2004 and 2005 in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement .\nshould tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election .\nthe company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally .\nthe company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) .\nthe capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement .\non a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca .\nas of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required .\nan executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 .\nas of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 11.1 million and $ 11.2 million , respectively .\n7 .\nfinancing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2005\t2004\namerican tower credit facility\t$ 793000\t$ 698000\nspectrasite credit facility\t700000\t\nsenior subordinated notes\t400000\t400000\nsenior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation\t160252\t303755\nsenior notes net of discount and premium\t726754\t1001817\nconvertible notes net of discount\t773058\t830056\nnotes payable and capital leases\t60365\t59986\ntotal\t3613429\t3293614\nless current portion of other long-term obligations\t-162153 ( 162153 )\t-138386 ( 138386 )\nlong-term debt\t$ 3451276\t$ 3155228\n\nPost-table text:\nnew credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries .\nthe company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility .\nas a result of the repayment of the previous credit facilities , the company recorded a net loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $ 9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3451276", "3155228", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "296048"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_56.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the total contractual commitments , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchases of short-term marketable securities , net of sales of short-term marketable securities during the quarter .\nadditionally , we incurred $ 3.8 million related to cash expenditures for property and equipment primarily on computer software projects and manufacturing equipment related to our expansion in ireland .\nour financing activities during the year ended march 31 , 2009 provided cash of $ 46.2 million as compared to $ 2.1 million during the same period in the prior year .\ncash provided by financing activities for the year ended march 31 , 2009 was primarily comprised of $ 42.0 million in net proceeds related to our august 2008 public offering and $ 5.0 million attributable to the exercise of stock options and proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan .\ncapital expenditures for fiscal 2010 are estimated to be $ 2.5 to $ 3.0 million , which relate primarily to our planned manufacturing capacity increases for impella in germany , our expansion in ireland , and software development projects .\nour liquidity is influenced by our ability to sell our products in a competitive industry and our customers 2019 ability to pay for our products .\nfactors that may affect liquidity include our ability to penetrate the market for our products , maintain or reduce the length of the selling cycle , and collect cash from clients after our products are sold .\nexclusive of activities involving any future acquisitions of products or companies that complement or augment our existing line of products , we believe that current available funds and cash generated from operations will provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements for the foreseeable future .\nwe believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital , and other cash requirements at least through the next 12 months .\nwe continue to review our long-term cash needs on a regular basis .\ncurrently , we have no debt outstanding .\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2009 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods .\npayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) contractual obligations total than 1 than 5 .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) total\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) more than 5 years\noperating lease commitments\t$ 10690\t$ 2313\t$ 4267\t$ 2592\t$ 1518\ncontractual obligations ( 1 )\t9457\t4619\t4838\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 20147\t$ 6932\t$ 9105\t$ 2592\t$ 1518\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and expected liabilities under agreements with third parties for clinical trials .\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or other material commitments for open purchase orders and clinical trial agreements at march 31 , 2009 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding contingent payments , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nat the time of the transaction , we agreed to make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to product sales and fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 16.8 million .\nin january 2007 upon the sale of 1000 impella units , we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .\nin june 2008 we received 510 ( k ) clearance of our impella 2.5 , and we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .\nin april 2009 , we received 501 ( k ) clearance of our impella 5.0 , triggering an obligation to make the final$ 5.6 million milestone payment .\non may 15 , 2009 , we paid $ 1.75 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of our common stock .\nthis contingent payment will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nin june 2008 , we amended the lease for our facility in danvers , massachusetts .\nthe amendment extended the lease from february 28 , 2010 to february 28 , 2016 .\nthe lease continues to be accounted for as an operating lease .\nthe amendment changed the rent payments under the lease from $ 64350 per month to the following schedule : 2022 the base rent for july 2008 through october 2008 was $ 0 per month ; 2022 the base rent for november 2008 through june 2010 is $ 40000 per month ; 2022 the base rent for july 2010 through february 2014 will be $ 64350 per month ; and 2022 the base rent for march 2014 through february 2016 will be $ 66000 per month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_sum(", "total obligations", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "40294"}
{"example_id": "DISH/2013/page_138.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\ndish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9 .\nacquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2 , 2012 , the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us .\non march 9 , 2012 , we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction , pursuant to which we acquired , among other things , certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar .\nin addition , during the fourth quarter 2011 , we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement ( the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d ) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint , including , but not limited to , issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar .\nthe total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $ 2.860 billion .\nthis amount includes $ 1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction , $ 1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction , and the net payment of $ 114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement .\nsee note 16 for further information .\nas a result of these acquisitions , we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date , including $ 102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue , distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsubsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 .\n10 .\ndiscontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased all material operations .\naccordingly , our consolidated balance sheets , consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations , unless otherwise noted .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively .\n201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively .\nin addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tas of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )\ncurrent assets from discontinued operations\t$ 68239\nnoncurrent assets from discontinued operations\t9965\ncurrent liabilities from discontinued operations\t-49471 ( 49471 )\nlong-term liabilities from discontinued operations\t-19804 ( 19804 )\nnet assets from discontinued operations\t$ 8929\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "54", "47", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "7"}
{"example_id": "PM/2018/page_24.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage return for pmi common stock compared to the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .\nthe graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .\ndate pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .\n\nTable:\ndate\tpmi\tpmi peer group ( 1 )\ts&p 500 index\ndecember 31 2013\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\ndecember 31 2014\t$ 97.90\t$ 107.80\t$ 113.70\ndecember 31 2015\t$ 111.00\t$ 116.80\t$ 115.30\ndecember 31 2016\t$ 120.50\t$ 118.40\t$ 129.00\ndecember 31 2017\t$ 144.50\t$ 140.50\t$ 157.20\ndecember 31 2018\t$ 96.50\t$ 127.70\t$ 150.30\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .\nthe pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .\nthe review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .\nas a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .\nnote : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "96.50", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "150.30", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#3", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.538"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2003/page_58.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in inventories net in millions between 2002 and 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .\na n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .\nan impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .\nfederal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .\noperating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .\nperiod and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .\nthe unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .\nrespective years or of future results .\nthe new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .\nperiods benefited , typically five years .\nfor approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .\nthe company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .\nshare .\nthe cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .\nnew capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .\nthe pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .\n( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .\neach the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .\nreceive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .\ninventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .\nthe net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .\n\nTable:\n\t2003\t2002\nfinished goods\t$ 384.3\t$ 206.7\nraw materials and work in progress\t90.8\t50.9\ninventory step-up\t52.6\t2013\ninventories net\t$ 527.7\t$ 257.6\n\nPost-table text:\nmade by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .\nthe acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .\ninventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .\nchange in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .\nprovisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .\neffective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nrecognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .\nundeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .\ninstruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nfield are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nfollowing the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .\nthis change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .\nin accordance with sfas no .\n144 , the quarter .\ncompany reviews instruments for impairment whenever .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "527.7", "257.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "270.1"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2013/page_74.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average number of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2013\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .\nthe november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .\ngovernment spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .\nupon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .\nduring 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .\nin addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .\nthe accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .\nwe expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .\ngovernment and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .\n2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .\nduring 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .\nthe workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .\nduring 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .\nnote 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t320.9\t323.7\t335.9\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t5.6\t4.7\t4.0\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t326.5\t328.4\t339.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "326.5", "328.4", ")", "add(", "#0", "339.9", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "498.9"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2003/page_84.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat amount of long-term debt due in the next 24 months as of december 31 , 2003 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , certain series of which are secured by non-interest bearing first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .\n( c ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on september 1 , 2004 and can then be remarketed .\n( d ) the bonds had a mandatory tender date of october 1 , 2003 .\nentergy louisiana purchased the bonds from the holders , pursuant to the mandatory tender provision , and has not remarketed the bonds at this time .\nentergy louisiana used a combination of cash on hand and short-term borrowing to buy-in the bonds .\n( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .\ncharles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .\n( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and can then be remarketed .\n( g ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy's nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( h ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .\nit is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2003 , for the next five years are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\n2004\t$ 503215\n2005\t$ 462420\n2006\t$ 75896\n2007\t$ 624539\n2008\t$ 941625\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 , and is included in the note payable to nypa balance above .\nin july 2003 , a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the domestic utility companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\ncovenants in the entergy corporation notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .\nif entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other indebtedness or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the notes' maturity dates may occur. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "503215", "462420", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "965.635"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2008/page_32.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the quarter ended march 312008 what was the percent of the change from the highest to the lowest of the company per share sale prices of common stock\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .\n\nTable:\n2008\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 42.72\t$ 32.10\nquarter ended june 30\t46.10\t38.53\nquarter ended september 30\t43.43\t31.89\nquarter ended december 31\t37.28\t19.35\n2007\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 41.31\t$ 36.63\nquarter ended june 30\t43.84\t37.64\nquarter ended september 30\t45.45\t36.34\nquarter ended december 31\t46.53\t40.08\n\nPost-table text:\non february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .\ndividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .\nwe anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .\nthe indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .\nthe loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nin addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "42.72", "32.10", ")", "divide(", "#0", "32.10", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.33084"}
{"example_id": "TROW/2010/page_22.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average price of shares repurchased in 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\ninvestment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .\naverage assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .\nother investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .\nnet inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .\nadministrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .\nthis change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .\nchanges in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .\nour largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .\nthe largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .\nreductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .\naverage headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .\nadvertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .\ndepreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .\nother operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .\nour cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .\nour non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .\nthe improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .\nthe following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2009\tchange\nother than temporary impairments recognized\t$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )\t$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )\t$ 55.2\ncapital gain distributions received\t5.6\t2.0\t-3.6 ( 3.6 )\nnet gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions\t-4.5 ( 4.5 )\t7.4\t11.9\nnet loss recognized on fund holdings\t$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )\t$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )\t$ 63.5\n\nPost-table text:\nlower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .\nthe 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .\nour 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .\nc a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .\nduring 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .\nwe repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .\ntangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .\ngiven the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .\nt .\nrowe price group annual report 2010 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "240.0", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "48"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_27.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2008 what was the percent of the total operating revenues that was associated with other revenues\n\nPre-table text:\nwill continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and expand our fuel conservation efforts .\n2022 capital plan 2013 in 2009 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 2.8 billion ( which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments ) .\nsee further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan .\n2022 financial expectations 2013 we are cautious about the economic environment ; however , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities , network improvement , and increased productivity in 2009 .\nresults of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 % (  % ) change 2007 v 2006 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2008\t2007\t2006\t% (  % ) change 2008 v 2007\t% (  % ) change 2007 v 2006\nfreight revenues\t$ 17118\t$ 15486\t$ 14791\t11% ( 11 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\nother revenues\t852\t797\t787\t7\t1\ntotal\t$ 17970\t$ 16283\t$ 15578\t10% ( 10 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nfreight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .\nfreight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .\narc is driven by changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges .\nas a result of contractual obligations with some of our customers , we have provided incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .\nwe recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of- completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination .\nwe allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .\nother revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .\nwe recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .\nfreight revenues from five of the six commodity groups increased during 2008 , with particularly strong growth from agricultural and energy shipments .\nwhile revenues generated from chemical and industrial products shipments grew in 2008 compared to 2007 , hurricanes gustav and ike reduced shipments of these commodities .\nrevenues generated from automotive shipments declined versus 2007 .\ngreater fuel cost recoveries and core pricing improvement combined to increase arc during 2008 .\nfuel cost recoveries include fuel surcharge revenue and the impact of resetting the base fuel price for certain traffic , as described below in more detail .\nthe severe economic downturn during the fourth quarter compounded already declining volumes experienced during the first nine months of 2008 due to ongoing weakness in certain market sectors .\nas a result , we moved fewer intermodal , automotive , industrial products , and chemical shipments , which more than offset volume growth from agricultural and energy shipments .\nour fuel surcharge programs ( excluding index-based contract escalators that contain some provision for fuel ) generated $ 2.3 billion in freight revenues during 2008 .\nfuel surcharge revenue is not comparable to prior periods due to the implementation of new mileage-based fuel surcharge programs beginning in april 2007 for regulated traffic .\nas previously disclosed in our 2006 annual report on form 10-k , the stb .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "852", "17970", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04741"}
{"example_id": "APD/2016/page_57.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2015-2016 , what is the decrease observed in the cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans?\n\nPre-table text:\npension expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\npension expense\t$ 68.1\t$ 135.6\t$ 135.9\nspecial terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )\t7.3\t35.2\t5.8\nweighted average discount rate ( a )\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\t4.0% ( 4.0 % )\t4.6% ( 4.6 % )\nweighted average expected rate of return on plan assets\t7.5% ( 7.5 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\t7.7% ( 7.7 % )\nweighted average expected rate of compensation increase\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.9% ( 3.9 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) effective in 2016 , the company began to measure the service cost and interest cost components of pension expense by applying spot rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows , as we believe this provides a better measurement of these costs .\nthe company has accounted for this as a change in accounting estimate and , accordingly has accounted for it on a prospective basis .\nthis change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligation .\n2016 vs .\n2015 pension expense , excluding special items , decreased from the prior year due to the adoption of the spot rate approach which reduced service cost and interest cost , the impact from expected return on assets and demographic gains , partially offset by the impact of the adoption of new mortality tables for our major plans .\nspecial items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 .\nthese resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions .\n2015 vs .\n2014 the decrease in pension expense , excluding special items , was due to the impact from expected return on assets , a 40 bp reduction in the weighted average compensation increase assumption , and lower service cost and interest cost .\nthe decrease was partially offset by the impact of higher amortization of actuarial losses , which resulted primarily from a 60 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate .\nspecial items of $ 35.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 21.2 , special termination benefits of $ 8.7 , and curtailment losses of $ 5.3 .\nthese resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions .\n2017 outlook in 2017 , pension expense , excluding special items , is estimated to be approximately $ 70 to $ 75 , an increase of $ 10 to $ 15 from 2016 , resulting primarily from a decrease in discount rates , offset by favorable asset experience , effects of the versum spin-off and the adoption of new mortality tables .\npension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 15 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements .\nin 2017 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 164 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 121 in 2016 .\nnet actuarial losses of $ 484 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2016 , primarily attributable to lower discount rates and improved mortality projections .\nactuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses .\nfuture changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2017 .\nduring the first quarter of 2017 , the company expects to record a curtailment loss estimated to be $ 5 to $ 10 related to employees transferring to versum .\nthe loss will be reflected in the results from discontinued operations on the consolidated income statements .\nwe continue to evaluate opportunities to manage the liabilities associated with our pension plans .\npension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans .\nwith respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses .\nin addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions .\nwith the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions .\nduring 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively .\nfor 2017 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 65 to $ 85 .\nthe estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "79.3", "137.5", ")", "divide(", "#0", "137.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.42327"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_114.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the difference in payments between entergy arkansas and entergy louisiana , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\npayments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tpayments ( receipts ) ( in millions )\nentergy arkansas\t$ 2\nentergy louisiana\t$ 6\nentergy mississippi\t( $ 4 )\nentergy new orleans\t( $ 1 )\nentergy texas\t( $ 3 )\n\nPost-table text:\nin september 2016 the ferc accepted the february 2016 compliance filing subject to a further compliance filing made in november 2016 .\nthe further compliance filing was required as a result of an order issued in september 2016 ruling on the january 2016 rehearing requests filed by the lpsc , the apsc , and entergy .\nin the order addressing the rehearing requests , the ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request and directed that interest be calculated on the payment/receipt amounts .\nthe ferc also granted the apsc 2019s and entergy 2019s rehearing request and ordered the removal of both securitized asset accumulated deferred income taxes and contra-securitization accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation .\nin november 2016 , entergy submitted its compliance filing in response to the ferc 2019s order on rehearing .\nthe compliance filing included a revised refund calculation of the true-up payments and receipts based on 2009 test year data and interest calculations .\nthe lpsc protested the interest calculations .\nin november 2017 the ferc issued an order rejecting the november 2016 compliance filing .\nthe ferc determined that the payments detailed in the november 2016 compliance filing did not include adequate interest for the payments from entergy arkansas to entergy louisiana because it did not include interest on the principal portion of the payment that was made in february 2016 .\nin december 2017 , entergy recalculated the interest pursuant to the november 2017 order .\nas a result of the recalculations , entergy arkansas owed very minor payments to entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans .\n2011 rate filing based on calendar year 2010 production costs in may 2011 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2011 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in july a02011 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a01 , a02011 , a0subject to refund .\nafter an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2011 rate filing with the 2012 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .\nsee discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .\n2012 rate filing based on calendar year 2011 production costs in may 2012 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2012 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding . a0 a0several parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest . a0 a0in august 2012 the ferc a0accepted entergy 2019s proposed rates for filing , a0effective june a02012 , a0subject to refund .\nafter an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2012 rate filing with the 2011 , 2013 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .\nsee discussion below regarding the consolidated settlement and hearing procedures in connection with this proceeding .\n2013 rate filing based on calendar year 2012 production costs in may 2013 , entergy filed with the ferc the 2013 rates in accordance with the ferc 2019s orders in the system agreement proceeding .\nseveral parties intervened in the proceeding at the ferc , including the lpsc , which also filed a protest .\nthe city council intervened and filed comments related to including the outcome of a related ferc proceeding in the 2013 cost equalization calculation .\nin august 2013 the ferc issued an order accepting the 2013 rates , effective june 1 , 2013 , subject to refund .\nafter an abeyance of the proceeding schedule , in december 2014 the ferc consolidated the 2013 rate filing with the 2011 , 2012 , and 2014 rate filings for settlement and hearing procedures .\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6", "2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4"}
{"example_id": "GIS/2012/page_64.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total interest expense for the year ending on may 27 , 2012 , ( in millions )\n\nPre-table text:\n62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax .\nthese deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions .\nunrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax .\nthe net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense .\ncredit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies .\nif our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions .\nthe aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million .\nwe have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts .\nif the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties .\nconcentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc .\nand its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s .\nretail segment .\nno other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales .\nwal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment .\nas of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s .\nretail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables .\nthe five largest customers in our u.s .\nretail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales .\nwe enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties .\nwe continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party .\nthese transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss .\nwe also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges .\nthe amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral .\nunder the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk .\ncollateral assets are either cash or u.s .\ntreasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults .\nnote 8 .\ndebt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tmay 27 2012 notes payable\tmay 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate\tmay 27 2012 notespayable\tweighted-averageinterest rate\nu.s . commercial paper\t$ 412.0\t0.2% ( 0.2 % )\t$ 192.5\t0.2% ( 0.2 % )\nfinancial institutions\t114.5\t10.0\t118.8\t11.5\ntotal\t$ 526.5\t2.4% ( 2.4 % )\t$ 311.3\t4.5% ( 4.5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nto ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings .\ncommercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing .\nwe have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe .\nin april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "526.5", "2.4%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "12.636"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2009/page_85.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of amounts expensed in 2009 came from discretionary company contributions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .\na significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .\npension plan .\nadditionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .\npension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .\nas a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .\nduring 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .\nthe following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .\ndomestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .\n\nTable:\nyears\tdomestic pension plans\tforeign pension plans\tpostretirement benefit plans\n2010\t$ 17.2\t$ 23.5\t$ 5.8\n2011\t11.1\t24.7\t5.7\n2012\t10.8\t26.4\t5.7\n2013\t10.5\t28.2\t5.6\n2014\t10.5\t32.4\t5.5\n2015 2013 2019\t48.5\t175.3\t24.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .\nfederal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .\nsavings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .\nthe savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .\nwe match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .\namounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .\nexpense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\ndeferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .\nthe arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .\nas of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .\namounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .\nwe have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .\nthe deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\namounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .\nwe have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .\nas of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .\nin addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .\nthese investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3.8", "35.1", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "10.82621"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_29.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments not applicable .\nitem 2 .\nproperties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .\n\nTable:\n( square feet in millions )\tunitedstates\tothercountries\ttotal\nowned facilities1\t29.9\t16.7\t46.6\nleased facilities2\t2.3\t6.0\t8.3\ntotal facilities\t32.2\t22.7\t54.9\n\nPost-table text:\n1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .\n2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .\nour principal executive offices are located in the u.s .\nand a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .\nin addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .\nwe expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .\nwe also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .\nwe recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .\noutside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .\nour fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .\nour assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .\nin addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .\nwe believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .\nwe do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .\nfor information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures not applicable .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "16.7", "46.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.35837"}
{"example_id": "ADBE/2018/page_86.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2017 to 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents adobe inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .\nthe deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .\nwe provide u.s .\nincome taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .\nto the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .\ntax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .\nincome taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .\nthe unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .\nwe also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .\nthe state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .\nfor fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .\naccounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 172945\t$ 178413\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t16191\t3680\ngross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t-4000 ( 4000 )\t-30166 ( 30166 )\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions\t60721\t24927\nsettlements with taxing authorities\t2014\t-3876 ( 3876 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-45922 ( 45922 )\t-8819 ( 8819 )\nforeign exchange gains and losses\t-3783 ( 3783 )\t8786\nending balance\t$ 196152\t$ 172945\n\nPost-table text:\nthe combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nthese amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .\nwe file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .\nstate and foreign jurisdictions .\nwe are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .\nour major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .\nfor ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .\nwe regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .\nwe believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .\nthe timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .\nthese events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .\nwe believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .\ngiven the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "196152", "172945", ")", "divide(", "#0", "172945", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13419"}
{"example_id": "APD/2019/page_48.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2018 , what is the cash flow result?\n\nPre-table text:\nliquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout fiscal year 2019 .\nas of 30 september 2019 , our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .\nwe continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future .\nas of 30 september 2019 , we had $ 971.5 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .\nas a result of the tax act , we do not expect that a significant portion of our foreign subsidiaries' and affiliates' earnings will be subject to u.s .\nincome tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states .\nthe repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside .\nhowever , because we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s .\nrefer to note 23 , income taxes , for additional information .\nthe table below summarizes our cash flows from operating activities , investing activities , and financing activities from continuing operations as reflected on the consolidated statements of cash flows: .\n\nTable:\ncash provided by ( used for )\t2019\t2018\noperating activities\t$ 2969.9\t$ 2547.2\ninvesting activities\t-2113.4 ( 2113.4 )\t-1641.6 ( 1641.6 )\nfinancing activities\t-1370.5 ( 1370.5 )\t-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2019 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2969.9 .\nincome from continuing operations of $ 1760.0 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , a charge for the facility closure of one of our customers , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , gain on sale of assets and investments , share-based compensation , noncurrent capital lease receivables , and certain other adjustments .\nthe caption \"gain on sale of assets and investments\" includes a gain of $ 14.1 recognized on the disposition of our interest in high-tech gases ( beijing ) co. , ltd. , a previously held equity investment in our industrial gases 2013 asia segment .\nrefer to note 7 , acquisitions , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nthe working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 25.3 , primarily driven by $ 69.0 from trade receivables and $ 41.8 from payables and accrued liabilities , partially offset by $ 79.8 from other receivables .\nthe use of cash within \"payables and accrued liabilities\" was primarily driven by a $ 48.9 decrease in accrued utilities and a $ 30.3 decrease in accrued interest , partially offset by a $ 51.6 increase in customer advances primarily related to sale of equipment activity .\nthe decrease in accrued utilities was primarily driven by a contract modification to a tolling arrangement in india and lower utility costs in the industrial gases 2013 americas segment .\nthe source of cash from other receivables of $ 79.8 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures and the collection of value added taxes .\nfor the fiscal year ended 30 september 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2547.2 , including income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 .\nother adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions .\nthe related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities .\nin addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 .\nthe working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables .\nthe use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures .\nthe use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules .\nin addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s .\ninventories from lifo to fifo .\nthe source of cash from other receivables of $ 128.3 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2547.2", "1641.6", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "1359.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-454.2"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2015/page_24.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the free cash flow to the cash provided by operating activities in 2015\n\nPre-table text:\nto , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .\nthe following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2015\t2014\t2013\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7344\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\ncash used in investing activities\t-4476 ( 4476 )\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\ndividends paid\t-2344 ( 2344 )\t-1632 ( 1632 )\t-1333 ( 1333 )\nfree cash flow\t$ 524\t$ 1504\t$ 2085\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .\nwe will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .\nwe will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .\nwe will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .\nf0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .\nf0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .\nwe again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .\ndomestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .\nas prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .\ncontinuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .\nalternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .\nf0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .\nthe capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .\n( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .\nwe expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .\nthe strong u.s .\ndollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .\none of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .\nin the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .\nover the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .\neconomy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "524", "7344", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07135"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_355.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the change between net revenue in 2007 and 2008 was due to rider revenue?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy new orleans , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 231.0\nvolume/weather\t15.5\nnet gas revenue\t6.6\nrider revenue\t3.9\nbase revenue\t-11.3 ( 11.3 )\nother\t7.0\n2008 net revenue\t$ 252.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .\nentergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .\nbilled retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .\nthe net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .\nthe rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .\nthe approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .\nthe settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\nthe base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .\nthe base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\ngross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .\nfuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "252.7", "231.0", ")", "divide(", "3.9", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.17972"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_62.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in the balance of liability for all restructuring from 2006 to 2008 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .\n\nTable:\n\t2007 program\t2003 program\t2001 program\ttotal\nliability at december 31 2006\t$ 2014\t$ 12.6\t$ 19.2\t$ 31.8\nnet charges ( reversals ) and adjustments\t19.1\t-0.5 ( 0.5 )\t-5.2 ( 5.2 )\t13.4\npayments and other1\t-7.2 ( 7.2 )\t-3.1 ( 3.1 )\t-5.3 ( 5.3 )\t-15.6 ( 15.6 )\nliability at december 31 2007\t$ 11.9\t$ 9.0\t$ 8.7\t$ 29.6\nnet charges and adjustments\t4.3\t0.8\t0.7\t5.8\npayments and other1\t-15.0 ( 15.0 )\t-4.1 ( 4.1 )\t-3.5 ( 3.5 )\t-22.6 ( 22.6 )\nliability at december 31 2008\t$ 1.2\t$ 5.7\t$ 5.9\t$ 12.8\n\nPost-table text:\n1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nother reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .\ncharges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .\nwe expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .\ncharges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .\nthe charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "12.8", "31.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-19"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_157.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage was eurasia sbu of total revenue in 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 .\nstock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 .\nthe cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program .\nthe common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method .\na total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nrestricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock .\nthe company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 .\n15 .\nsegments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business .\nduring the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu .\nthe management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus .\nthe company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus .\nall prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure .\nin february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity .\nthe company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure .\ncorporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in \"corporate and other.\" also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation .\nthe company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure .\nadjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation .\nadjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities .\nthe company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments .\nadditionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results .\nrevenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable .\nall intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment .\ninter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results .\nthe following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31,\ttotal revenue 2017\ttotal revenue 2016\ttotal revenue 2015\nus sbu\t$ 3229\t$ 3429\t$ 3593\nandes sbu\t2710\t2506\t2489\nbrazil sbu\t542\t450\t962\nmcac sbu\t2448\t2172\t2353\neurasia sbu\t1590\t1670\t1875\ncorporate and other\t35\t77\t31\neliminations\t-24 ( 24 )\t-23 ( 23 )\t-43 ( 43 )\ntotal revenue\t$ 10530\t$ 10281\t$ 11260\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1590", "10530", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.151"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2005/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2005 what was the percent of the investment banking as part of the total segments operations\n\nPre-table text:\nsegment results 2013 operating basis ( a ) ( b ) ( table continued from previous page ) year ended december 31 , operating earnings return on common equity 2013 goodwill ( c ) .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )\tyear ended december 31 , 2005\tyear ended december 31 , 2004\tyear ended december 31 , change\t2005\t2004\ninvestment bank\t$ 3658\t$ 2948\t24% ( 24 % )\t18% ( 18 % )\t17% ( 17 % )\nretail financial services\t3427\t2199\t56\t26\t24\ncard services\t1907\t1274\t50\t16\t17\ncommercial banking\t1007\t608\t66\t30\t29\ntreasury & securities services\t1037\t440\t136\t55\t17\nasset & wealth management\t1216\t681\t79\t51\t17\ncorporate\t-1731 ( 1731 )\t61\tnm\tnm\tnm\ntotal\t$ 10521\t$ 8211\t28% ( 28 % )\t17% ( 17 % )\t16% ( 16 % )\n\nPost-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2005 annual report 35 and are retained in corporate .\nthese retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments .\nduring 2005 , the firm refined cost allocation methodologies related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations expenses in order to improve transparency , consistency and accountability with regard to costs allocated across business segments .\nprior periods have not been revised to reflect these new cost allocation methodologies .\ncapital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements .\nthe amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity .\nat the time of the merger , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , was allocated solely to corporate .\neffective january 2006 , the firm expects to refine its methodology for allocating capital to the business segments to include any goodwill associated with line of business-directed acquisitions since the merger .\nu.s .\ngaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see critical accounting estimates used by the firm and note 15 on pages 81 2013 83 and 114 2013116 , respectively , of this annual report ) .\nsee the capital management section on page 56 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework .\ncredit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share .\nat the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based upon pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures .\nprior to the merger , the credit reimbursement was based upon pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients .\ntax-equivalent adjustments segment and firm results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes .\nrefer to explanation and reconciliation of the firm 2019s non-gaap financial measures on page 31 of this annual report for additional details .\ndescription of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business .\nthe management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies .\neffective with the merger on july 1 , 2004 , several of the allocation methodologies were revised , as noted below .\nas prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods beginning with the third quarter of 2004 .\nfurther , the firm continues to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and further refinements may be implemented in future periods .\nrevenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions .\nthese revenue-sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of business .\nfunds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and expense to each business and transfer the primary interest rate risk exposures to corporate .\nthe allocation process is unique to each business and considers the interest rate risk , liquidity risk and regulatory requirements of its stand- alone peers .\nbusiness segments may retain certain interest rate exposures , subject to management approval , that would be expected in the normal operation of a similar peer business .\nin the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms .\nexpense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments .\nthose expenses are allocated based upon their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided .\neffective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments .\nin addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3658", "10521", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34769"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2014/page_119.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent higher is fair value than carrying value?\n\nPre-table text:\ncredit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 .\nin march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 .\nthe amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 .\nthe 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\non october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion .\nblackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 .\nin april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion .\nthe cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t$ 750\t$ 2014\t$ 750\t$ 753\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-1 ( 1 )\t699\t785\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1134\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t825\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t783\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1029\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -12 ( 12 )\t$ 4938\t$ 5309\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5309", "4938", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07513"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_377.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the net change in revenue between 2006 and 2007 was due to transmission revenue?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .\nthe recovery became effective july 2007 .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .\n2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2006 net revenue\t$ 403.3\npurchased power capacity\t13.1\nsecuritization transition charge\t9.9\nvolume/weather\t9.7\ntransmission revenue\t6.1\nbase revenue\t2.6\nother\t-2.4 ( 2.4 )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 442.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .\nthe securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .\nas discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .\nthe volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .\nthe increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .\nretail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .\nthe transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .\nthe base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .\nthe decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .\nthe receipt of such payments is being .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "442.3", "403.3", ")", "divide(", "6.1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15641"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_26.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\namortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .\nthe increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .\nthe louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .\nthe tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .\nsee note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .\nincluded in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .\nentergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 1666\nnuclear realized price changes\t-149 ( 149 )\nrhode island state energy center\t-44 ( 44 )\nnuclear volume\t-36 ( 36 )\nfitzpatrick reimbursement agreement\t41\nnuclear fuel expenses\t68\nother\t-4 ( 4 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1542\n\nPost-table text:\nas shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .\nthe effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .\nsee 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1542", "1666", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1666", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.07443"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_46.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average percentage for aaa rated facilities in 2008 and 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2009\tdecember 312008\naaa/aaa\t14% ( 14 % )\t19% ( 19 % )\naa/aa\t50\t6\na/a\t34\t72\nbbb/baa\t2\t3\ntotal\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .\nall facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .\nwe evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .\nbased on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nwe considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .\nwe reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .\ntax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .\nthe purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .\nthe primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .\ngenerally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .\nwe typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .\nalso , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .\nin these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .\nthe purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .\ngeneral partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .\nwe evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .\nthe primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .\nthe primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .\nwe have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .\nthe assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .\nneither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .\nthe consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .\nwe also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .\nthese investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .\nthe table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .\nour maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .\nwe use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .\nin addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .\nthese liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\ncredit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .\nin november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .\nthe spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .\nin exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .\nthe spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .\nwe were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .\naccordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "14", "19", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "16.5"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2017/page_53.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the company's net earnings as a percent of net sales in 2015 ? ( net profit margin )\n\nPre-table text:\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc .\nand subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) year ended december 31 , 2017 compared to what it would have been under the previous accounting rules .\nin may 2014 , the fasb issued asu 2014-09 2013 revenue from contracts with customers ( topic 606 ) .\nthis asu provides a five-step model for revenue recognition that all industries will apply to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control of a good or service .\nthis asu will be effective for us beginning january 1 , 2018 .\nentities are permitted to apply the standard and related amendments either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the asu recognized at the date of initial application .\nwe have completed our assessment of this asu .\nbased upon our assessment , there will not be a material change to the timing of our revenue recognition .\nhowever , we will be required to reclassify certain immaterial costs from selling , general and administrative ( 201csg&a 201d ) expense to net sales , which will result in a reduction of net sales , but have no impact on operating profit .\nwe will adopt this new standard using the retrospective method , which will result in us restating prior reporting periods presented .\nin march 2017 , the fasb issued asu 2017-07 2013 improving the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost .\nthis asu requires us to report the service cost component of pensions in the same location as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period .\nwe will be required to report the other components of net benefit costs in other income ( expense ) in the statement of earnings .\nthis asu will be effective for us beginning january 1 , 2018 .\nthe asu must be applied retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost in the statement of earnings and prospectively , on and after the effective date , for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic pension cost in assets .\nsee note 14 for further information on the components of our net benefit cost .\nin february 2016 , the fasb issued asu 2016-02 2013 leases .\nthis asu requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet .\nthis asu will be effective for us beginning january 1 , 2019 .\nearly adoption is permitted .\nbased on current guidance , this asu must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach at the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the consolidated financial statements .\nwe own most of our manufacturing facilities , but lease various office space and other less significant assets throughout the world .\nwe have formed our project team and have begun a process to collect the necessary information to implement this asu .\nwe will continue evaluating our leases and the related impact this asu will have on our consolidated financial statements throughout 2018 .\nin august 2017 , the fasb issued asu 2017-12 2013 targeted improvements to accounting for hedging activities .\nthis asu amends the hedge accounting guidance to simplify the application of hedge accounting , makes more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies eligible for hedge accounting treatment , changes how companies assess effectiveness and updates presentation and disclosure requirements .\nwe are currently evaluating the impact this asu will have on our consolidated financial statements ; however , based on our current hedging portfolio , we do not anticipate that this asu will have a significant impact on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .\nthis asu will be effective for us january 1 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted .\nafter adoption , we may explore new hedging opportunities that are eligible for hedge accounting treatment under the new standard .\nthere are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows .\n3 .\nbusiness combinations biomet merger we completed our merger with lvb , the parent company of biomet , on june 24 , 2015 .\nwe paid $ 12030.3 million in cash and stock and assumed biomet 2019s senior notes .\nthe total amount of merger consideration utilized for the acquisition method of accounting , as reduced by the merger consideration paid to holders of unvested lvb stock options and lvb stock- based awards of $ 90.4 million , was $ 11939.9 million .\nthe following table sets forth unaudited pro forma financial information derived from ( i ) the audited financial statements of zimmer for the year ended december 31 , 2015 ; and ( ii ) the unaudited financial statements of lvb for the period january 1 , 2015 to june 23 , 2015 .\nthe pro forma financial information has been adjusted to give effect to the merger as if it had occurred on january 1 , 2014 .\npro forma financial information ( unaudited ) year ended december 31 , 2015 ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tyear ended december 31 2015 ( in millions )\nnet sales\t$ 7517.8\nnet earnings\t$ 330.2\n\nPost-table text:\nthese unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include adjustments such as inventory step-up , amortization of acquired intangible assets and interest expense on debt incurred to finance the merger .\nmaterial , nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the biomet merger include : 2022 the $ 90.4 million of merger compensation expense for unvested lvb stock options and lvb stock-based awards was removed from net earnings for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and recognized as an expense in the year ended december 31 , 2014 .\n2022 the $ 73.0 million of retention plan expense was removed from net earnings for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "330.2", "7517.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04392"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2004/page_36.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were total heavy fuel oil sales in tbd for the three year period?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe catlettsburg refinery multi-year improvement project was completed during early 2004 .\nat a cost of approximately $ 440 million , the project improves product yields and lowers overall refinery costs while making gasoline with less than 30 parts per million of sulfur , which allows map to meet tier ii gasoline regulations which became effective on january 1 , 2004 .\nmap is constructing approximately $ 300 million in new capital projects for its 74000 bpd detroit , michigan refinery .\none of the projects , a $ 110 million expansion project , is expected to raise the crude oil capacity at the refinery by 35 percent to 100000 bpd .\nother projects are expected to enable the refinery to produce new clean fuels and further control regulated air emissions .\ncompletion of the projects is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2005 .\nmarketing in 2004 map 2019s refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 20.4 billion gallons ( 1329000 bpd ) .\nthe wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers , primarily located in the midwest , the upper great plains and the southeast , and sales in the spot market , accounted for approximately 70 percent of map 2019s refined product sales volumes in 2004 , excluding sales related to matching buy/sell transactions .\napproximately 52 percent of map 2019s gasoline sales volumes and 92 percent of its distillate sales volumes were sold on a wholesale or spot market basis to independent unbranded customers or other wholesalers in 2004 .\napproximately 55 percent of map 2019s propane is sold into the home heating markets and industrial consumers purchase the balance .\npropylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are marketed to customers in the chemical industry .\nbase lube oils and slack wax are sold throughout the united states .\npitch is also sold domestically , but approximately 16 percent of pitch products are exported into growing markets in canada , mexico , india and south america .\nmap markets asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and the southeast .\nthe map customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .\nthe following table sets forth the volume of map 2019s consolidated refined product sales by product group for each of the last three years : refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2004 2003 2002 .\n\nTable:\n( thousands of barrels per day )\t2004\t2003\t2002\ngasoline\t807\t776\t773\ndistillates\t373\t365\t346\npropane\t22\t21\t22\nfeedstocks and special products\t92\t97\t82\nheavy fuel oil\t27\t24\t20\nasphalt\t79\t74\t75\ntotal\t1400\t1357\t1318\nmatching buy/sell volumes included in above\t71\t64\t71\n\nPost-table text:\nmap sells reformulated gasoline in parts of its marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin .\nmap also sells low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , map supplied petroleum products to about 3900 marathon and ashland branded retail outlets located primarily in michigan , ohio , indiana , kentucky and illinois .\nbranded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , minnesota , virginia , pennsylvania , north carolina , alabama , and south carolina .\nssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , ssa had 1669 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.3 billion in 2004 , compared with $ 2.2 billion in 2003 .\nprofit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel .\npilot travel centers llc ( 2018 2018ptc 2019 2019 ) , a joint venture with pilot corporation ( 2018 2018pilot 2019 2019 ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with approximately 250 locations in 35 states at december 31 , 2004 .\nthe travel centers .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_sum(", "heavy fuel oil", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "71"}
{"example_id": "AON/2014/page_47.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the variation between the average and the highest operating margin?\n\nPre-table text:\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .\nin 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .\noperating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .\nhr solutions .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2014\t2013\t2012\nrevenue\t$ 4264\t$ 4057\t$ 3925\noperating income\t485\t318\t289\noperating margin\t11.4% ( 11.4 % )\t7.8% ( 7.8 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\n2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .\n2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .\nour model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .\n2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .\n2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .\ndisruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nweak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "operating margin", "none", ")", "table_max(", "operating margin", "none", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.02533"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2018/page_60.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the revised purchase price of kichler is dedicated to goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) c .\nacquisitions on march 9 , 2018 , we acquired substantially all of the net assets of the l.d .\nkichler co .\n( \"kichler\" ) , a leader in decorative residential and light commercial lighting products , ceiling fans and led lighting systems .\nthis business expands our product offerings to our customers .\nthe results of this acquisition for the period from the acquisition date are included in the consolidated financial statements and are reported in the decorative architectural products segment .\nwe recorded $ 346 million of net sales as a result of this acquisition during 2018 .\nthe purchase price , net of $ 2 million cash acquired , consisted of $ 549 million paid with cash on hand .\nsince the acquisition , we have revised the allocation of the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities based on analysis of information as of the acquisition date that has been made available through december 31 , 2018 .\nthe allocation will continue to be updated through the measurement period , if necessary .\nthe preliminary allocation of the fair value of the acquisition of kichler is summarized in the following table , in millions. .\n\nTable:\n\tinitial\trevised\nreceivables\t$ 101\t$ 100\ninventories\t173\t166\nprepaid expenses and other\t5\t5\nproperty and equipment\t33\t33\ngoodwill\t46\t64\nother intangible assets\t243\t240\naccounts payable\t-24 ( 24 )\t-24 ( 24 )\naccrued liabilities\t-25 ( 25 )\t-30 ( 30 )\nother liabilities\t-4 ( 4 )\t-5 ( 5 )\ntotal\t$ 548\t$ 549\n\nPost-table text:\nthe goodwill acquired , which is generally tax deductible , is related primarily to the operational and financial synergies we expect to derive from combining kichler's operations into our business , as well as the assembled workforce .\nthe other intangible assets acquired consist of $ 59 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets , which is related to trademarks , and $ 181 million of definite-lived intangible assets .\nthe definite-lived intangible assets consist of $ 145 million related to customer relationships , which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years , and $ 36 million of other definite-lived intangible assets , which is being amortized over a weighted average amortization period of three years .\nin the fourth quarter of 2017 , we acquired mercury plastics , inc. , a plastics processor and manufacturer of water handling systems for appliance and faucet applications , for approximately $ 89 million in cash .\nthis business is included in the plumbing products segment .\nthis acquisition enhances our ability to develop faucet technology and provides continuity of supply of quality faucet components .\nin connection with this acquisition , we recognized $ 38 million of goodwill , which is tax deductible , and is related primarily to the expected synergies from combining the operations into our business. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "64", "549", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11658"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2007/page_134.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were total tax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 in excess of the stock-based compensation expense for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .\nmarathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .\nthrough 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .\nin general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .\nno stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nsimilar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .\nunder the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .\nin general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .\nno stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nbeginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .\nall stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .\nas a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .\nrestricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .\nin 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .\nthe restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nmarathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .\nthe restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nprior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .\nthe non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .\ncommon stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .\nall non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .\nwhen dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .\nstock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\nthe total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .\nin 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .\ntax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .\ncash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .\nstock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .\nthe weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2007\t2006\t2005\nweighted average exercise price per share\t$ 60.94\t$ 37.84\t$ 25.14\nexpected annual dividends per share\t$ 0.96\t$ 0.80\t$ 0.66\nexpected life in years\t5.0\t5.1\t5.5\nexpected volatility\t27% ( 27 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\nrisk-free interest rate\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\t3.8% ( 3.8 % )\nweighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted\t$ 17.24\t$ 10.19\t$ 6.15\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "30", "36", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "66"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_316.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2016 what was the ratio of the net income increased to the net revenues\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy arkansas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income .\n2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\nnet revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1520.5\nretail electric price\t33.8\nopportunity sales\t5.6\nasset retirement obligation\t-14.8 ( 14.8 )\nvolume/weather\t-29.0 ( 29.0 )\nother\t6.5\n2017 net revenue\t$ 1522.6\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .\na significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 .\nthe increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase .\nthe opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "92.9", "1520.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0611"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2017/page_80.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nof prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .\nwe adopted the requirements of asu no .\n2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .\nwe expect the adoption of asu no .\n2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .\nwe do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .\n2017-07 .\nintangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .\n2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .\nthe new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .\nwewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .\nunder the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .\nthe new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .\nwe elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .\nthe impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .\nderivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .\n2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .\nthe guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .\nwe do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .\nwe plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .\nleases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .\n2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .\nthe new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .\nthe new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .\nwe plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .\nnote 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\t2016\t2015\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t287.8\t299.3\t310.3\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t2.8\t3.8\t4.4\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t290.6\t303.1\t314.7\n\nPost-table text:\nwe compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .\nour calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .\nthere were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .\nnote 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .\nthe purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .\nas a result of the acquisition .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "290.6", "303.1", ")", "add(", "#0", "314.7", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "302.8"}
{"example_id": "GS/2012/page_165.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total other assets in 2011 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements note 12 .\nother assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets .\nthe table below presents other assets by type. .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tas of december 2012\tas of december 2011\nproperty leasehold improvements andequipment1\t$ 8217\t$ 8697\ngoodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2\t5099\t5468\nincome tax-related assets3\t5620\t5017\nequity-method investments4\t453\t664\nmiscellaneous receivables and other5\t20234\t3306\ntotal\t$ 39623\t$ 23152\n\nPost-table text:\n1 .\nnet of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively .\n2 .\nincludes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale .\nsee note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .\n3 .\nsee note 24 for further information about income taxes .\n4 .\nexcludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available .\n5 .\nincludes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 .\nassets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale .\nassets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value .\nthe firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale .\nupon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business .\nproperty , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations .\nthe remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm .\nsubstantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset .\nleasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter .\ncertain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software .\nproperty , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable .\nthe firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives .\nsee note 13 for further information .\ngoldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5468", "23152", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.23618"}
{"example_id": "CME/2017/page_97.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow many total votes can the class b-3 provide in 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\n14 .\ncapital stock shares outstanding .\nthe following table presents information regarding capital stock: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nclass a common stock authorized\t1000000\t1000000\nclass a common stock issued and outstanding\t339235\t338240\nclass b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.6\t0.6\nclass b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.8\t0.8\nclass b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t1.3\t1.3\nclass b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.4\t0.4\n\nPost-table text:\ncme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .\nassociated trading rights .\nmembers of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .\na cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .\nthe class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .\ntrading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .\nmembers of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .\ncore rights .\nholders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .\nthese core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .\nvotes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .\neach class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .\nthe approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .\nholders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .\nvoting rights .\nwith the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .\nin these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .\ntransfer restrictions .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .\nthese transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .\nelection of directors .\nthe cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .\nholders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .\nthe remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "const_1000", "1.3", ")", "multiply(", "const_1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1300"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2018/page_110.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the estimated percentual decrease observed in the htm investment securities from 2017 to 2018 ? .\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nTable:\nas of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2018\t2017\t2016\ninvestment securities gains/ ( losses )\t$ -395 ( 395 )\t$ -78 ( 78 )\t$ 132\navailable-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t203449\t219345\t226892\nheld-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t31747\t47927\t51358\ninvestment securities portfolio ( average )\t235197\t267272\t278250\nafs investment securities ( period-end )\t228681\t200247\t236670\nhtm investment securities ( period-end )\t31434\t47733\t50168\ninvestment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )\t260115\t247980\t286838\n\nPost-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "47733", "31434", ")", "divide(", "#0", "47733", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34146"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2015/page_18.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2018 , what percentage of undeveloped acres were located in the u.s?\n\nPre-table text:\nin the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .\nif production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .\nwe plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .\nthe kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .\nnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018\nu.s .\t68\t89\t128\ne.g .\t2014\t92\t36\nother africa\t189\t4352\t854\ntotal africa\t189\t4444\t890\nother international\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t257\t4533\t1018\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "128", "1018", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.12574"}
{"example_id": "AMAT/2014/page_18.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the total sales reported in 2012 , ( in billion ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .\nbacklog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .\nbacklog by reportable segment as of october 26 , 2014 and october 27 , 2013 was as follows : 2014 2013 ( in millions , except percentages ) .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t\t( in millions except percentages )\nsilicon systems group\t$ 1400\t48% ( 48 % )\t$ 1295\t55% ( 55 % )\napplied global services\t775\t27% ( 27 % )\t591\t25% ( 25 % )\ndisplay\t593\t20% ( 20 % )\t361\t15% ( 15 % )\nenergy and environmental solutions\t149\t5% ( 5 % )\t125\t5% ( 5 % )\ntotal\t$ 2917\t100% ( 100 % )\t$ 2372\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\napplied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .\ncustomers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .\ndelays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .\nmanufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .\napplied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .\napplied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .\nalthough applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .\naccordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .\napplied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .\nresearch , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products , including products that enable expansion into new markets .\nthe company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .\napplied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .\nproduct development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .\nin addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india and singapore .\nprocess support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .\napplied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.4 billion ( 16 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2014 , $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , and $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 .\napplied has spent an average of 13 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .\nin addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.2", "14", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08571"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_62.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average liability for all three programs , as of december 31 , 2008 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .\n\nTable:\n\t2007 program\t2003 program\t2001 program\ttotal\nliability at december 31 2006\t$ 2014\t$ 12.6\t$ 19.2\t$ 31.8\nnet charges ( reversals ) and adjustments\t19.1\t-0.5 ( 0.5 )\t-5.2 ( 5.2 )\t13.4\npayments and other1\t-7.2 ( 7.2 )\t-3.1 ( 3.1 )\t-5.3 ( 5.3 )\t-15.6 ( 15.6 )\nliability at december 31 2007\t$ 11.9\t$ 9.0\t$ 8.7\t$ 29.6\nnet charges and adjustments\t4.3\t0.8\t0.7\t5.8\npayments and other1\t-15.0 ( 15.0 )\t-4.1 ( 4.1 )\t-3.5 ( 3.5 )\t-22.6 ( 22.6 )\nliability at december 31 2008\t$ 1.2\t$ 5.7\t$ 5.9\t$ 12.8\n\nPost-table text:\n1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nother reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .\ncharges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .\nwe expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .\ncharges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .\nthe charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1.2", "5.7", ")", "add(", "#0", "5.9", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4.26667"}
{"example_id": "APD/2013/page_36.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?\n\nPre-table text:\nequipment and energy .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nsales\t$ 451.1\t$ 420.1\t$ 400.6\noperating income\t65.5\t44.6\t62.8\n\nPost-table text:\n2013 vs .\n2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .\noperating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 .\nit is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 .\n2012 vs .\n2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity .\noperating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 .\nother operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .\nalso included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .\nother also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .\n2013 vs .\n2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .\nthe current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .\nthe prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 .\n2012 vs .\n2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "451.1", "65.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6.88702"}
{"example_id": "HIG/2011/page_188.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2010 what was the percentage change in the deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits\n\nPre-table text:\nthe hartford financial services group , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\ndeferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2011\t2010\t2009\nbalance january 1\t$ 9857\t$ 10686\t$ 13248\ndeferred costs\t2608\t2648\t2853\namortization 2014 dac\t-2920 ( 2920 )\t-2665 ( 2665 )\t-3247 ( 3247 )\namortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations\t2014\t-17 ( 17 )\t-10 ( 10 )\namortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]\t-507 ( 507 )\t138\t-1010 ( 1010 )\nadjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]\t-377 ( 377 )\t-1159 ( 1159 )\t-1031 ( 1031 )\neffect of currency translation\t83\t215\t-39 ( 39 )\ncumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]\t2014\t11\t-78 ( 78 )\nbalance december 31\t$ 8744\t$ 9857\t$ 10686\n\nPost-table text:\n[1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s .\nvariable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return .\nthe most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return .\nalso included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates .\nthe most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 .\n[2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci .\nother includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 .\n[3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit .\nin addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge .\nin addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "9857", "10686", ")", "divide(", "#0", "10686", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.07758"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2015/page_159.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor 2015 and 2014 , what was the average in millions for provision recapture for purchased impaired loans?\n\nPre-table text:\nduring 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 .\ncharge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively .\nthe decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy .\nfor purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively .\nindividual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes .\nthe cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans .\nactivity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2015\t2014\njanuary 1\t$ 1558\t$ 2055\naccretion ( including excess cash recoveries )\t-466 ( 466 )\t-587 ( 587 )\nnet reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable\t226\t208\ndisposals\t-68 ( 68 )\t-118 ( 118 )\ndecember 31\t$ 1250\t$ 1558\n\nPost-table text:\nnote 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date .\nwe use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies .\na rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows .\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 141 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "82", "91", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "86.5"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2017/page_111.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was purchases of reserves in place in 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nsupplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .\n2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .\n2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .\nresource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .\ntechnical revisions .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .\n2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .\n2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .\nresource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .\nresource plays .\n2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .\nconventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .\nchanges in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .\nthe following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .\n\nTable:\nbeginning of year\t552\nrevisions of previous estimates\t5\nimproved recovery\t2014\npurchases of reserves in place\t15\nextensions discoveries and other additions\t57\ndispositions\t2014\ntransfers to proved developed\t-83 ( 83 )\nend of year\t546\n\nPost-table text:\nrevisions of prior estimates .\nrevisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .\nextensions , discoveries and other additions .\nincreased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15", "28", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-13"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_46.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ndid the share of securities rated aaa/aaa increase between 2008 and 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2009\tdecember 312008\naaa/aaa\t14% ( 14 % )\t19% ( 19 % )\naa/aa\t50\t6\na/a\t34\t72\nbbb/baa\t2\t3\ntotal\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .\nall facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .\nwe evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .\nbased on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nwe considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .\nwe reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .\ntax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .\nthe purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .\nthe primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .\ngenerally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .\nwe typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .\nalso , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .\nin these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .\nthe purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .\ngeneral partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .\nwe evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .\nthe primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .\nthe primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .\nwe have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .\nthe assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .\nneither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .\nthe consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .\nwe also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .\nthese investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .\nthe table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .\nour maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .\nwe use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .\nin addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .\nthese liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\ncredit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .\nin november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .\nthe spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .\nin exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .\nthe spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .\nwe were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .\naccordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "14", "19", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_35.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2009 and 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obli- gations at december 31 , 2005 , were as follows : in millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2007\t2008\t2009\t2010\tthereafter\ntotal debt\t$ 1181\t$ 570\t$ 308\t$ 2330\t$ 1534\t$ 6281\nlease obligations\t172\t144\t119\t76\t63\t138\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3264\t393\t280\t240\t204\t1238\ntotal\t$ 4617\t$ 1107\t$ 707\t$ 2646\t$ 1801\t$ 7657\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the 2006 amount includes $ 2.4 billion for contracts made in the ordinary course of business to purchase pulpwood , logs and wood chips .\nthe majority of our other purchase obligations are take-or-pay or purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business related to raw material purchases and energy contracts .\nother significant items include purchase obligations related to contracted services .\ntransformation plan in july 2005 , the company announced a plan to focus its business portfolio on two key global platform businesses : uncoated papers ( including distribution ) and packaging .\nthe plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses , additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses , includ- ing possible sale or spin-off .\nin connection with this process , in the third quarter of 2005 , the company completed the sale of its 50.5% ( 50.5 % ) interest in carter holt harvey limited .\nother businesses currently under re- view include : 2022 the coated and supercalendered papers busi- ness , including the coated groundwood mill and associated assets in brazil , 2022 the beverage packaging business , including the pine bluff , arkansas mill , 2022 the kraft papers business , including the roa- noke rapids , north carolina mill , 2022 arizona chemical , 2022 the wood products business , and 2022 segments or potentially all of the company 2019s 6.5 million acres of u.s .\nforestlands .\nconsistent with this evaluation process , the com- pany has distributed bid package information for some of these businesses .\nthe exact timing of this evaluation process will vary by business ; however , it is anticipated that decisions will be made for some of these businesses during 2006 .\nwhile the exact use of any proceeds from potential future sales is dependent upon various factors affecting future cash flows , such as the amount of any proceeds received and changes in market conditions , input costs and capital spending , the company remains committed to using its free cash flow in 2006 to pay down debt , to return value to shareholders , and for se- lective high-return investments .\ncritical accounting policies the preparation of financial statements in con- formity with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states requires international paper to estab- lish accounting policies and to make estimates that af- fect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses .\nsome of these estimates require judgments about matters that are in- herently uncertain .\naccounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of international paper , and that can require judgments by management that affect their application , include sfas no .\n5 , 201caccounting for contingencies , 201d sfas no .\n144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d sfas no .\n142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets , 201d sfas no .\n87 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for pensions , 201d sfas no .\n106 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions , 201d as amended by sfas nos .\n132 and 132r , 201cemployers 2019 disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefits , 201d and sfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes . 201d the following is a discussion of the impact of these accounting policies on international paper : contingent liabilities .\naccruals for contingent li- abilities , including legal and environmental matters , are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated .\nliabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel .\nadditionally , as dis- cussed in note 10 of the notes to consolidated finan- cial statements in item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data , reserves for projected future claims settlements relating to exterior siding and roofing prod- ucts previously manufactured by masonite require judgments regarding projections of future claims rates and amounts .\ninternational paper utilizes an in- dependent third party consultant to assist in developing these estimates .\nliabilities for environmental matters require evaluations of relevant environmental regu- lations and estimates of future remediation alternatives and costs .\ninternational paper determines these esti- mates after a detailed evaluation of each site .\nimpairment of long-lived assets and goodwill .\nan impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the asset 2019s carrying amount exceeds its fair value , and is recorded when the carrying amount is not recoverable through future operations .\na goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value .\nassessments of possible impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill are made when events or changes in cir- cumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2330", "308", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2022"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_56.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was average net sales for space systems in millions from 2013 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\n2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales decreased $ 305 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nnet sales decreased by approximately $ 305 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain c4isr programs ( primarily ptds ) ; about $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) .\nthe decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) .\nmst 2019s operating profit decreased $ 129 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; approximately $ 55 million due to the reasons described above for lower c4isr program sales , as well as performance matters on an international program ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs .\nthe decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 85 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the addition of sikorsky backlog , as well as higher orders on new program starts ( such as australian defence force pilot training system ) .\nbacklog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-double digit percentage range compared to 2015 net sales due to the inclusion of sikorsky programs for a full year , partially offset by a decline in volume due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs .\noperating profit is expected to be equivalent to 2015 on higher volume , and operating margin is expected to decline due to costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition , including the impact of purchase accounting adjustments , integration costs and inherited restructuring costs associated with actions committed to by sikorsky prior to acquisition .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems and space transportation systems .\nspace systems provides network-enabled situational awareness and integrates complex global systems to help our customers gather , analyze , and securely distribute critical intelligence data .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile ( fbm ) , orion , space based infrared system ( sbirs ) , aehf , gps-iii , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , and muos .\noperating profit for our space systems business segment includes our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s .\ngovernment .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nnet sales\t$ 9105\t$ 9202\t$ 9288\noperating profit\t1171\t1187\t1198\noperating margins\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t$ 17400\t$ 20300\t$ 21400\n\nPost-table text:\n2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "net sales", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9198.33333"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2010/page_28.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the five year total return on ball stock?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .\nit assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .\nthe dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .\ntotal return analysis .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\t12/31/07\t12/31/08\t12/31/09\t12/31/10\nball corporation\t$ 100.00\t$ 110.86\t$ 115.36\t$ 107.58\t$ 134.96\t$ 178.93\ndj containers & packaging index\t$ 100.00\t$ 112.09\t$ 119.63\t$ 75.00\t$ 105.34\t$ 123.56\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 115.80\t$ 122.16\t$ 76.96\t$ 97.33\t$ 111.99\ncopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\ncopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "134.96", "100.00", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "34.96"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2015/page_37.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the cash flow statement effect of the change in cash used for working capital from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .\n\nTable:\ncash flow data\tyears ended december 31 , 2015\tyears ended december 31 , 2014\tyears ended december 31 , 2013\nnet income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1\t$ 848.2\t$ 831.2\t$ 598.4\nnet cash used in working capital2\t-117.5 ( 117.5 )\t-131.1 ( 131.1 )\t-9.6 ( 9.6 )\nchanges in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash\t-56.7 ( 56.7 )\t-30.6 ( 30.6 )\t4.1\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 674.0\t$ 669.5\t$ 592.9\nnet cash used in investing activities\t-202.8 ( 202.8 )\t-200.8 ( 200.8 )\t-224.5 ( 224.5 )\nnet cash used in financing activities\t-472.8 ( 472.8 )\t-343.9 ( 343.9 )\t-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )\n\nPost-table text:\n1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .\n2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .\ndue to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .\nour net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .\nnet cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .\nour net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .\nthe timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .\nin most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .\nto the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .\nthe amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .\nour assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .\nour accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .\nfor example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .\ninvesting activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .\nnet cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .\ncapital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .\nwe made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "9.6", "131.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-121.5"}
{"example_id": "KHC/2016/page_23.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the company owned facilities are located in the rest of the world?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments .\nitem 2 .\nproperties .\nour corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .\nour co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .\nbusiness units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .\nwe maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .\nwe manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .\nas of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .\nwe own 83 and lease four of these facilities .\nour manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .\n\nTable:\n\towned\tleased\nunited states\t43\t2\ncanada\t3\t2014\neurope\t11\t2014\nrest of world\t26\t2\n\nPost-table text:\nwe maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .\nwe also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .\nin the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .\nwe have reflected this change in the table above .\nsee note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nseveral of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .\nsee note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings .\nwe are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .\non april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .\ndistrict court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .\nthe complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .\nas previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .\nthe separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .\nwe do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .\nwhile we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures .\nnot applicable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "26", "83", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.31325"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_46.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the lowest segment operating income?\n\nPre-table text:\nrisk and insurance brokerage services .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 6305\t$ 6197\t$ 5918\nsegment operating income\t900\t846\t954\nsegment operating income margin\t14.3% ( 14.3 % )\t13.7% ( 13.7 % )\t16.1% ( 16.1 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 we continued to see a soft market , which began in 2007 , in our retail brokerage product line .\nin 2007 , we experienced a soft market in many business lines and in many geographic areas .\nin a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity .\nchanges in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds .\nprices fell throughout 2007 , with the greatest declines seen in large and middle-market accounts .\nprices continued to decline during 2008 , although the rate of decline slowed toward the end of the year .\nin our reinsurance brokerage product line , pricing overall during 2009 was also down , although during a portion of the year it was flat to up slightly .\nadditionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets .\ncontinued volatility and further deterioration in the credit markets have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products , which have negatively hurt our operational results .\nin addition , overall capacity in the industry could decrease if a significant insurer either fails or withdraws from writing insurance coverages that we offer our clients .\nthis failure could reduce our revenues and profitability , since we would no longer have access to certain lines and types of insurance .\nrisk and insurance brokerage services generated approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 .\nrevenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients .\nour revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates .\nwe operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage .\nspecifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , healthcare providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability income , and personal lines for individuals , associations , and businesses ; provide reinsurance services to insurance and reinsurance companies and other risk assumption entities by acting as brokers or intermediaries on all classes of reinsurance ; provide investment banking products and services , including mergers and acquisitions and other financial advisory services , capital raising , contingent capital financing , insurance-linked securitizations and derivative applications ; provide managing underwriting to independent agents and brokers as well as corporate clients ; provide actuarial , loss prevention , and administrative services to businesses and consumers ; and manage captive insurance companies .\nin november 2008 we expanded our product offerings through the merger with benfield , a leading independent reinsurance intermediary .\nbenfield products have been integrated with our existing reinsurance products in 2009 .\nin february 2009 , we completed the sale of the u.s .\noperations of cananwill , our premium finance business .\nin june and july of 2009 , we entered into agreements with third parties with respect to our .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_min(", "segment operating income", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "846"}
{"example_id": "GS/2014/page_136.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , what was the greatest amount of hedged borrowings and bank deposits?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements hedge accounting the firm applies hedge accounting for ( i ) certain interest rate swaps used to manage the interest rate exposure of certain fixed-rate unsecured long-term and short-term borrowings and certain fixed-rate certificates of deposit , ( ii ) certain foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt used to manage foreign currency exposures on the firm 2019s net investment in certain non-u.s .\noperations and ( iii ) certain commodities-related swap and forward contracts used to manage the exposure to the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sales of certain energy commodities by one of the firm 2019s consolidated investments .\nto qualify for hedge accounting , the derivative hedge must be highly effective at reducing the risk from the exposure being hedged .\nadditionally , the firm must formally document the hedging relationship at inception and test the hedging relationship at least on a quarterly basis to ensure the derivative hedge continues to be highly effective over the life of the hedging relationship .\nfair value hedges the firm designates certain interest rate swaps as fair value hedges .\nthese interest rate swaps hedge changes in fair value attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate ( e.g. , london interbank offered rate ( libor ) or ois ) , effectively converting a substantial portion of fixed-rate obligations into floating-rate obligations .\nthe firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing the effectiveness of its fair value hedging relationships in achieving offsetting changes in the fair values of the hedging instrument and the risk being hedged ( i.e. , interest rate risk ) .\nan interest rate swap is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% ( 80 % ) or greater and a slope between 80% ( 80 % ) and 125% ( 125 % ) .\nfor qualifying fair value hedges , gains or losses on derivatives are included in 201cinterest expense . 201d the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is reported as an adjustment to its carrying value and is subsequently amortized into interest expense over its remaining life .\ngains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness are included in 201cinterest expense . 201d when a derivative is no longer designated as a hedge , any remaining difference between the carrying value and par value of the hedged item is amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged item using the effective interest method .\nsee note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense .\nthe table below presents the gains/ ( losses ) from interest rate derivatives accounted for as hedges , the related hedged borrowings and bank deposits , and the hedge ineffectiveness on these derivatives , which primarily consists of amortization of prepaid credit spreads resulting from the passage of time. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2014\tyear ended december 2013\tyear ended december 2012\ninterest rate hedges\t$ 1936\t$ -8683 ( 8683 )\t$ -2383 ( 2383 )\nhedged borrowings and bank deposits\t-2451 ( 2451 )\t6999\t665\nhedge ineffectiveness\t$ -515 ( 515 )\t$ -1684 ( 1684 )\t$ -1718 ( 1718 )\n\nPost-table text:\n134 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "hedged borrowings and bank deposits", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6999"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2015/page_142.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage growth of the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedge for 2014 to 2015\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .\nfinancial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .\nthese swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .\nthe following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .\n\nTable:\nyear\tgallons hedged\tweighted average contractprice per gallon\n2016\t27000000\t$ 3.57\n2017\t12000000\t2.92\n\nPost-table text:\nif the national u.s .\non-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .\nif the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .\nthe fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .\nthe aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .\nthe ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .\ntotal ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .\nrecycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper .\nfrom time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .\nwe had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 .\nno amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .\ntotal gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .\nno amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 .\nfair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .\nwe also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "37.8", "34.4", ")", "divide(", "#0", "34.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09884"}
{"example_id": "MMM/2005/page_95.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2005 what was the ratio of the breast implant receivables to the breast implant liabilities\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table shows the major categories of ongoing claims for which the company has been able to estimate its probable liability and for which the company has taken reserves and the related insurance receivables : at december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2005\t2004\t2003\nbreast implant liabilities\t$ 7\t$ 11\t$ 13\nbreast implant receivables\t130\t278\t338\nrespirator mask/asbestos liabilities\t210\t248\t289\nrespirator mask/asbestos receivables\t447\t464\t448\nenvironmental remediation liabilities\t30\t39\t41\nenvironmental remediation receivables\t15\t16\t16\n\nPost-table text:\nfor those significant pending legal proceedings that do not appear in the table and that are not the subject of pending settlement agreements , the company has determined that liability is not probable or the amount of the liability is not estimable , or both , and the company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss at this time .\nthe amounts in the preceding table with respect to breast implant and environmental remediation represent the company 2019s best estimate of the respective liabilities .\nthe company has recorded liabilities with respect to the two pending transparent tape antitrust class action settlements .\nbreast implant insurance receivables : as of december 31 , 2005 , the company had receivables for insurance recoveries related to the breast implant matter of $ 130 million , representing amounts covered by the minnesota supreme court 2019s ruling of august 2003 but yet to be received and other amounts that have been claimed from various reinsurers , the minnesota insurance guaranty association , and the estates of certain insolvent insurance carriers .\nthe company received about $ 92 million in the fourth quarter of 2005 ( bringing total recoveries in 2005 to $ 148 million ) , offsetting a portion of the previously recorded receivable , pursuant to settlements with seven insurers and one reinsurer that were consistent with the company 2019s overall expectation of recovery as a result of the minnesota supreme court ruling .\nwith these recent settlements and the previously disclosed settlements , 17 of the 29 insurers have withdrawn from the pending proceedings and have settled the company 2019s claims under the minnesota supreme court decision .\nvarious factors could affect the timing and amount of recovery of the balance of the company 2019s insurance receivables , including ( i ) additional delays in or avoidance of payment by insurers ; ( ii ) the extent to which insurers may become insolvent in the future , and ( iii ) the outcome of the pending legal proceedings involving the insurers .\nrespirator mask/asbestos liabilities and insurance receivables : the company estimates its respirator mask/asbestos liabilities , including the cost to resolve the claim and defense costs , by examining : ( i ) the company 2019s experience in resolving claims , ( ii ) apparent trends , ( iii ) the apparent quality of claims ( e.g. , the company believes many of the claims have been asserted on behalf of asymptomatic claimants ) , ( iv ) changes in the nature and mix of claims ( e.g. , the proportion of claims asserting usage of the company 2019s mask or respirator products and alleging exposure to each of asbestos , silica or other occupational dusts , and claims pleading use of asbestos-containing products allegedly manufactured by the company ) , ( v ) the number of current claims and a projection of the number of future asbestos and other claims that may be filed against the company , ( vi ) the cost to resolve recently settled claims , and ( vii ) an estimate of the cost to resolve and defend against current and future claims .\nbecause of the inherent difficulty in projecting the number of claims that have not yet been asserted , particularly with respect to the company's respiratory products that themselves did not contain any harmful materials ( which makes the various published studies that purport to project future asbestos claims substantially removed from the company's principal experience and which themselves vary widely ) , the company does not believe that there is any single best estimate of this liability , nor that it can reliably estimate the amount or range of amounts by which the liability may exceed the reserve the company has established .\nno liability has been recorded regarding the pending action brought by the west virginia attorney general previously described .\ndevelopments may occur that could affect the company 2019s estimate of its liabilities .\nthese developments include , but are not limited to , significant changes in ( i ) the number of future claims , ( ii ) the average cost of resolving claims , ( iii ) the legal costs of defending these claims and in maintaining trial readiness , ( iv ) changes in the mix and nature of claims received , ( v ) trial and appellate outcomes , ( vi ) changes in the law and procedure applicable to these claims , and ( vii ) the financial viability of other co-defendants and insurers .\ncongress is currently considering legislation that would terminate essentially all litigation related to asbestos ( but not other occupational dusts ) in exchange for substantial annual payments by the defendant companies and their insurers and , accordingly , such legislation , if enacted , would bring considerable certainty to the assessment of the company's future asbestos-related liability ; the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "130", "7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "18.57143"}
{"example_id": "GS/2017/page_106.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .\nother sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .\n10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .\nthe table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tas of december 2017\tas of december 2016\tas of december 2015\nequity\t$ 2096\t$ 2085\t$ 2157\ndebt\t1606\t1702\t1479\ntotal\t$ 3702\t$ 3787\t$ 3636\n\nPost-table text:\nin the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .\n2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .\n2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .\n2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .\n2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .\ncredit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .\nvar excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .\nthe estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nin addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nhowever , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .\ninterest rate sensitivity .\nloans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .\nas of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .\nother market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .\nsee note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .\nin addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .\nwe also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .\ndirect investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nsee note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .\ngoldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2096", "3702", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.56618"}
{"example_id": "UAA/2016/page_52.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of total operating income was asia-pacific in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .\noperating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tyear ended december 31 , 2015\tyear ended december 31 , 2014\tyear ended december 31 , $ change\tyear ended december 31 , % (  % ) change\nnorth america\t$ 460961\t$ 372347\t$ 88614\t23.8% ( 23.8 % )\nemea\t3122\t-11763 ( 11763 )\t14885\t126.5\nasia-pacific\t36358\t21858\t14500\t66.3\nlatin america\t-30593 ( 30593 )\t-15423 ( 15423 )\t-15170 ( 15170 )\t-98.4 ( 98.4 )\nconnected fitness\t-61301 ( 61301 )\t-13064 ( 13064 )\t-48237 ( 48237 )\t-369.2 ( 369.2 )\ntotal operating income\t$ 408547\t$ 353955\t$ 54592\t15.4% ( 15.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .\nthis increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .\n2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .\nthese acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .\nseasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .\nseasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .\nthe level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .\nwe generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "36358", "408547", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08899"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_56.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average backlog at year-end from 2013 to 2015\n\nPre-table text:\n2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales decreased $ 305 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nnet sales decreased by approximately $ 305 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain c4isr programs ( primarily ptds ) ; about $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) .\nthe decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) .\nmst 2019s operating profit decreased $ 129 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; approximately $ 55 million due to the reasons described above for lower c4isr program sales , as well as performance matters on an international program ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs .\nthe decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 85 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the addition of sikorsky backlog , as well as higher orders on new program starts ( such as australian defence force pilot training system ) .\nbacklog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-double digit percentage range compared to 2015 net sales due to the inclusion of sikorsky programs for a full year , partially offset by a decline in volume due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs .\noperating profit is expected to be equivalent to 2015 on higher volume , and operating margin is expected to decline due to costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition , including the impact of purchase accounting adjustments , integration costs and inherited restructuring costs associated with actions committed to by sikorsky prior to acquisition .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems and space transportation systems .\nspace systems provides network-enabled situational awareness and integrates complex global systems to help our customers gather , analyze , and securely distribute critical intelligence data .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile ( fbm ) , orion , space based infrared system ( sbirs ) , aehf , gps-iii , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , and muos .\noperating profit for our space systems business segment includes our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s .\ngovernment .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nnet sales\t$ 9105\t$ 9202\t$ 9288\noperating profit\t1171\t1187\t1198\noperating margins\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t$ 17400\t$ 20300\t$ 21400\n\nPost-table text:\n2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "17400", "20300", ")", "add(", "#0", "21400", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "19700"}
{"example_id": "DVN/2007/page_58.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total oil and gas mmboe comes from canada?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 .\nwe will evaluate how the new requirements of statement no .\n141 ( r ) would impact any business combinations completed in 2009 or thereafter .\nin december 2007 , the fasb also issued statement of financial accounting standards no .\n160 , noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements 2014an amendment of accounting research bulletin no .\n51 .\na noncontrolling interest , sometimes called a minority interest , is the portion of equity in a subsidiary not attributable , directly or indirectly , to a parent .\nstatement no .\n160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary .\nunder statement no .\n160 , noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary must be reported as a component of consolidated equity separate from the parent 2019s equity .\nadditionally , the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be reported separately on the face of the income statement .\nstatement no .\n160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after december 15 , 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited .\nwe do not expect the adoption of statement no .\n160 to have a material impact on our financial statements and related disclosures .\n2008 estimates the forward-looking statements provided in this discussion are based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information that was used to prepare the december 31 , 2007 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties .\nthese forward-looking statements were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , natural gas and ngls during 2008 will be substantially similar to those of 2007 , unless otherwise noted .\nwe make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report .\namounts related to canadian operations have been converted to u.s .\ndollars using a projected average 2008 exchange rate of $ 0.98 u.s .\ndollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar .\nin january 2007 , we announced our intent to divest our west african oil and gas assets and terminate our operations in west africa , including equatorial guinea , cote d 2019ivoire , gabon and other countries in the region .\nin november 2007 , we announced an agreement to sell our operations in gabon for $ 205.5 million .\nwe are finalizing purchase and sales agreements and obtaining the necessary partner and government approvals for the remaining properties in this divestiture package .\nwe are optimistic we can complete these sales during the first half of 2008 .\nall west african related revenues , expenses and capital will be reported as discontinued operations in our 2008 financial statements .\naccordingly , all forward-looking estimates in the following discussion exclude amounts related to our operations in west africa , unless otherwise noted .\nthough we have completed several major property acquisitions and dispositions in recent years , these transactions are opportunity driven .\nthus , the following forward-looking estimates do not include any financial and operating effects of potential property acquisitions or divestitures that may occur during 2008 , except for west africa as previously discussed .\noil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2008 .\nwe estimate that our combined 2008 oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 240 to 247 mmboe .\nof this total , approximately 92% ( 92 % ) is estimated to be produced from reserves classified as 201cproved 201d at december 31 , 2007 .\nthe following estimates for oil , gas and ngl production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for total production .\noil gas ngls total ( mmbbls ) ( bcf ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) .\n\nTable:\n\toil ( mmbbls )\tgas ( bcf )\tngls ( mmbbls )\ttotal ( mmboe )\nu.s . onshore\t12\t626\t23\t140\nu.s . offshore\t8\t68\t1\t20\ncanada\t23\t198\t4\t60\ninternational\t23\t2\t2014\t23\ntotal\t66\t894\t28\t243\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "60", "243", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "24.69136"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_33.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the impairment charges to the net revenue in 2013\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows .\nmd&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview .\ndiscussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a .\n2022 critical accounting estimates .\naccounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts .\n2022 results of operations .\nan analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources .\nan analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity .\n2022 fair value of financial instruments .\ndiscussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments .\n2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements .\noverview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule .\nthe various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties .\nwords such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements .\nin addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements .\nsuch statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k .\nour actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 .\noverview our results of operations for each period were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions except per share amounts )\tthree months ended dec . 282013\tthree months ended sept . 282013\tthree months ended change\tthree months ended dec . 282013\tthree months ended dec . 292012\tchange\nnet revenue\t$ 13834\t$ 13483\t$ 351\t$ 52708\t$ 53341\t$ -633 ( 633 )\ngross margin\t$ 8571\t$ 8414\t$ 157\t$ 31521\t$ 33151\t$ -1630 ( 1630 )\ngross margin percentage\t62.0% ( 62.0 % )\t62.4% ( 62.4 % )\t( 0.4 ) % (  % )\t59.8% ( 59.8 % )\t62.1% ( 62.1 % )\t( 2.3 ) % (  % )\noperating income\t$ 3549\t$ 3504\t$ 45\t$ 12291\t$ 14638\t$ -2347 ( 2347 )\nnet income\t$ 2625\t$ 2950\t$ -325 ( 325 )\t$ 9620\t$ 11005\t$ -1385 ( 1385 )\ndiluted earnings per common share\t$ 0.51\t$ 0.58\t$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )\t$ 1.89\t$ 2.13\t$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )\n\nPost-table text:\nrevenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 .\npccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization .\ndcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year .\nhigher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 .\nin response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities .\nthese actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "240", "52708", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.00455"}
{"example_id": "OKE/2008/page_86.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding at between 2007 and 2008 in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\noneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions .\noneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil .\noneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million .\nthe above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes .\nfor example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated .\noneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk .\noneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations .\noneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities .\nin addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided .\nwhen the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk .\nat december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business .\ndistribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas .\ngains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism .\nenergy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations .\nwe minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges .\nwe are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments .\nboth the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value .\nfair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .\n\nTable:\n\t( thousands of dollars )\nnet fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007\t$ 25171\nderivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period\t-55874 ( 55874 )\nfair value of new derivatives entered into during the period\t236772\nother changes in fair value\t52731\nnet fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )\t$ 258800\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy .\nthe maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 .\nfair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "258800", "25171", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "233629"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_316.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy arkansas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income .\n2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\nnet revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1520.5\nretail electric price\t33.8\nopportunity sales\t5.6\nasset retirement obligation\t-14.8 ( 14.8 )\nvolume/weather\t-29.0 ( 29.0 )\nother\t6.5\n2017 net revenue\t$ 1522.6\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .\na significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 .\nthe increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase .\nthe opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1520.5", "1522.6", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1521.55"}
{"example_id": "OKE/2008/page_86.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding at between 2007 and 2008 in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\noneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions .\noneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil .\noneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million .\nthe above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes .\nfor example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated .\noneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk .\noneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations .\noneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities .\nin addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided .\nwhen the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk .\nat december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business .\ndistribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas .\ngains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism .\nenergy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations .\nwe minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges .\nwe are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments .\nboth the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value .\nfair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. .\n\nTable:\n\t( thousands of dollars )\nnet fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007\t$ 25171\nderivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period\t-55874 ( 55874 )\nfair value of new derivatives entered into during the period\t236772\nother changes in fair value\t52731\nnet fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )\t$ 258800\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy .\nthe maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 .\nfair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "258800", "25171", ")", "divide(", "#0", "25171", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9.28167"}
{"example_id": "FRT/2005/page_117.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth of the additions in comparison with the growth of the deductions during 2003 and 2004?\n\nPre-table text:\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .\n\nTable:\nbalance december 31 2002\t$ 450697000\nadditions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense\t68125000\ndeductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property\t-4645000 ( 4645000 )\nbalance december 31 2003\t514177000\nadditions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense\t82551000\ndeductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property\t-1390000 ( 1390000 )\nbalance december 31 2004\t595338000\nadditions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense\t83656000\ndeductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property\t-15244000 ( 15244000 )\nbalance december 31 2005\t$ 663750000\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "82551000", "68125000", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "divide(", "1390000", "4645000", ")", "subtract(", "#2", "const_1", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.91251"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2007/page_149.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\n5 development costs incurred during the period 1654 1251 1030\n\nPre-table text:\nsupplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2007\t2006\t2005\nsales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs\t$ -4887 ( 4887 )\t$ -5312 ( 5312 )\t$ -3754 ( 3754 )\nnet changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production\t12845\t-1342 ( 1342 )\t6648\nextensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs\t1816\t1290\t700\ndevelopment costs incurred during the period\t1654\t1251\t1030\nchanges in estimated future development costs\t-1727 ( 1727 )\t-527 ( 527 )\t-552 ( 552 )\nrevisions of previous quantity estimates\t290\t1319\t820\nnet changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place\t23\t30\t4557\naccretion of discount\t1726\t1882\t1124\nnet change in income taxes\t-6751 ( 6751 )\t-660 ( 660 )\t-6694 ( 6694 )\ntiming and other\t-12 ( 12 )\t-14 ( 14 )\t307\nnet change for the year\t4977\t-2083 ( 2083 )\t4186\nbeginning of year\t8518\t10601\t6415\nend of year\t$ 13495\t$ 8518\t$ 10601\nnet change for the year from discontinued operations\t$ 2013\t$ -216 ( 216 )\t$ 162\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "development costs incurred during the period", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1311.66667"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_191.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\t2014\nbalance at january 1\t$ 373\t$ 394\t$ 392\nadditions for current year tax positions\t8\t7\t7\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t1\t12\t14\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-7 ( 7 )\t-2 ( 2 )\neffects of foreign currency translation\t2\t-7 ( 7 )\t-3 ( 3 )\nsettlements\t-13 ( 13 )\t-19 ( 19 )\t-2 ( 2 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-1 ( 1 )\t-7 ( 7 )\t-12 ( 12 )\nbalance at december 31\t$ 369\t$ 373\t$ 394\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under examination by the relevant taxing authorities for various tax years .\nthe company regularly assesses the potential outcome of these examinations in each of the taxing jurisdictions when determining the adequacy of the amount of unrecognized tax benefit recorded .\nwhile it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position , we believe we have appropriately accrued for our uncertain tax benefits .\nhowever , audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements and future events that would impact our previously recorded unrecognized tax benefits and the range of anticipated increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits are subject to significant uncertainty .\nit is possible that the ultimate outcome of current or future examinations may exceed our provision for current unrecognized tax benefits in amounts that could be material , but cannot be estimated as of december 31 , 2016 .\nour effective tax rate and net income in any given future period could therefore be materially impacted .\n22 .\ndiscontinued operations brazil distribution 2014 due to a portfolio evaluation in the first half of 2016 , management has decided to pursue a strategic shift of its distribution companies in brazil , aes sul and eletropaulo .\nthe disposal of sul was completed in october 2016 .\nin december 2016 , eletropaulo underwent a corporate restructuring which is expected to , among other things , provide more liquidity of its shares .\naes is continuing to pursue strategic options for eletropaulo in order to complete its strategic shift to reduce aes 2019 exposure to the brazilian distribution business , including preparation for listing its shares into the novo mercado , which is a listing segment of the brazilian stock exchange with the highest standards of corporate governance .\nthe company executed an agreement for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary aes sul in june 2016 .\nwe have reported the results of operations and financial position of aes sul as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented .\nupon meeting the held-for-sale criteria , the company recognized an after tax loss of $ 382 million comprised of a pretax impairment charge of $ 783 million , offset by a tax benefit of $ 266 million related to the impairment of the sul long lived assets and a tax benefit of $ 135 million for deferred taxes related to the investment in aes sul .\nprior to the impairment charge in the second quarter , the carrying value of the aes sul asset group of $ 1.6 billion was greater than its approximate fair value less costs to sell .\nhowever , the impairment charge was limited to the carrying value of the long lived assets of the aes sul disposal group .\non october 31 , 2016 , the company completed the sale of aes sul and received final proceeds less costs to sell of $ 484 million , excluding contingent consideration .\nupon disposal of aes sul , we incurred an additional after- tax loss on sale of $ 737 million .\nthe cumulative impact to earnings of the impairment and loss on sale was $ 1.1 billion .\nthis includes the reclassification of approximately $ 1 billion of cumulative translation losses , resulting in a net reduction to the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity of $ 92 million .\nsul 2019s pretax loss attributable to aes for the years ended december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 32 million , respectively .\nsul 2019s pretax gain attributable to aes for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 133 million .\nprior to its classification as discontinued operations , sul was reported in the brazil sbu reportable segment .\nas discussed in note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies , effective july 1 , 2014 , the company prospectively adopted asu no .\n2014-08 .\ndiscontinued operations prior to adoption of asu no .\n2014-08 include the results of cameroon , saurashtra and various u.s .\nwind projects which were each sold in the first half of cameroon 2014 in september 2013 , the company executed agreements for the sale of its 56% ( 56 % ) equity interests in businesses in cameroon : sonel , an integrated utility , kribi , a gas and light fuel oil plant , and dibamba , a heavy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "373", "394", ")", "divide(", "#0", "394", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.0533"}
{"example_id": "STZ/2006/page_68.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were the remaining mondovi net assets acquired following the sale of certain excess assets from the deal , in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\nc o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .\nbaroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .\nopus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .\nthe acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .\nthe company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .\nthe vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .\nthe company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .\nthe company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .\nin particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .\ntotal con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .\nadditionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .\nthe purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .\nin accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .\nthe results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 513782\nproperty plant and equipment\t438140\nother assets\t124450\ntrademarks\t138000\ngoodwill\t634203\ntotal assets acquired\t1848575\ncurrent liabilities\t310919\nlong-term liabilities\t494995\ntotal liabilities assumed\t805914\nnet assets acquired\t$ 1042661\n\nPost-table text:\nthe trademarks are not subject to amortization .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nfollowing the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .\nthe company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .\namounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .\nno gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .\nhardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .\nas a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .\nthe acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .\nin october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .\ntotal consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .\nadditionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .\nthe acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .\nthe company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .\nthis charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .\nthe cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .\naddi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .\nthe company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .\nthe hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1042661", "170.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1042490.2"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_29.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of major facilities by square footage are owned as of december 28 , 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments not applicable .\nitem 2 .\nproperties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .\n\nTable:\n( square feet in millions )\tunitedstates\tothercountries\ttotal\nowned facilities1\t29.9\t16.7\t46.6\nleased facilities2\t2.3\t6.0\t8.3\ntotal facilities\t32.2\t22.7\t54.9\n\nPost-table text:\n1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .\n2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .\nour principal executive offices are located in the u.s .\nand a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .\nin addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .\nwe expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .\nwe also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .\nwe recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .\noutside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .\nour fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .\nour assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .\nin addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .\nwe believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .\nwe do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .\nfor information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures not applicable .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "46.6", "54.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.84882"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2012/page_30.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the five years ended 12/29/2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nstockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .\nall rights reserved. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/29/2007\t1/3/2009\t1/2/2010\t1/1/2011\t12/31/2011\t12/29/2012\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t22.55\t35.17\t48.50\t61.07\t78.92\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t59.03\t82.25\t97.32\t98.63\t110.78\ns&p 400 information technology\t100.00\t54.60\t82.76\t108.11\t95.48\t109.88\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "78.92", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.2108"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2017/page_77.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the total amount of net tangible assets obtained through the acquisition?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\ncash\t$ 45826\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t42721\nacquired technology\t27954\ntrade name\t2901\nother assets\t2337\ndeferred income tax assets ( liabilities )\t-9788 ( 9788 )\nother liabilities\t-49797 ( 49797 )\ntotal identifiable net assets\t62154\ngoodwill\t203828\ntotal purchase consideration\t$ 265982\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .\ngoodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes .\nthe customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .\nnote 3 2014 settlement processing assets and obligations funds settlement refers to the process of transferring funds for sales and credits between card issuers and merchants .\nfor transactions processed on our systems , we use our internal network to provide funding instructions to financial institutions that in turn fund the merchants .\nwe process funds settlement under two models , a sponsorship model and a direct membership model .\nunder the sponsorship model , we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa , which means that member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsor us and require our adherence to the standards of the payment networks .\nin certain markets , we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements with financial institution sponsors .\nthese agreements allow us to route transactions under the members 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa .\nin this model , the standards of the payment networks restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing merchant settlement funds , and , instead , require that these funds be in the possession of the member until the merchant is funded .\nunder the direct membership model , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship .\nin this model , we route and clear transactions directly through the card brand 2019s network and are not restricted from performing funds settlement .\notherwise , we process these transactions similarly to how we process transactions in the sponsorship model .\nwe are required to adhere to the standards of the payment networks in which we are direct members .\nwe maintain relationships with financial institutions , which may also serve as our member sponsors for other card brands or in other markets , to assist with funds settlement .\ntiming differences , interchange fees , merchant reserves and exception items cause differences between the amount received from the payment networks and the amount funded to the merchants .\nthese intermediary balances arising in our settlement process for direct merchants are reflected as settlement processing assets and obligations on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsettlement processing assets and obligations include the components outlined below : 2022 interchange reimbursement .\nour receivable from merchants for the portion of the discount fee related to reimbursement of the interchange fee .\nglobal payments inc .\n| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 77 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "265982", "203828", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "62154"}
{"example_id": "STT/2009/page_73.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the amortized cost in 2009\n\nPre-table text:\nimpairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\nfair value\t$ 72699\t$ 54163\namortized cost\t74843\t60786\nnet unrealized loss pre-tax\t$ -2144 ( 2144 )\t$ -6623 ( 6623 )\nnet unrealized loss after-tax\t$ -1316 ( 1316 )\t$ -4057 ( 4057 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .\nthese after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .\nthe decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .\nwe conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .\nto the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .\nthe credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .\nthe assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .\nsuch factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .\nto the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .\nnational housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .\nmanagement currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .\nas an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .\nexcluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .\nadditional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "74843", "60786", ")", "divide(", "#0", "60786", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.23125"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the long-term retail/hnw in emea as a percentage of the total long-term retail/hnw?\n\nPre-table text:\nretail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tamericas\temea\tasia-pacific\ttotal\nequity\t$ 94805\t$ 53140\t$ 16803\t$ 164748\nfixed income\t121640\t11444\t5341\t138425\nmulti-asset class\t76714\t9538\t4374\t90626\nalternatives\t4865\t3577\t1243\t9685\nlong-term retail/hnw\t$ 298024\t$ 77699\t$ 27761\t$ 403484\n\nPost-table text:\nblackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds .\nat december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 .\nduring the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion .\nretail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors .\nclients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts .\nthe product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives .\nthe vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors .\nthe client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 .\n2022 u.s .\nretail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s .\nsector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity .\nin 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets .\nu.s .\nretail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 .\nthe year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 .\nwe are the leading u.s .\nmanager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 .\n2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion .\ninvestor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking .\nequity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets .\nour international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom .\nbgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 .\nover 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p .\nin 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 .\nin the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income .\nglobal clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements .\n2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "77699", "403484", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19257"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_104.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the 2017 total long term debt to 2016\n\nPre-table text:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nother state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .\n14 .\ndebt long-term debt consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2017\tdecember 31 2016\nsenior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t2014\t600\nsenior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t600\t600\nsenior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )\t600\t2014\nmississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )\t84\t84\ngulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )\t21\t21\nless unamortized debt issuance costs\t-26 ( 26 )\t-27 ( 27 )\ntotal long-term debt\t1279\t1278\n\nPost-table text:\ncredit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the \"credit facility\" ) with third-party lenders .\nthe credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .\nthe revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .\nthe revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( \"libor\" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .\nthe revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .\nthe commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .\nthe credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .\neach of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .\nin july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nsenior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .\nin november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .\ninterest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .\nthe terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1279", "1278", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.00078"}
{"example_id": "SWKS/2006/page_81.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in in the pension liability balance from 2004 to 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) on historical trends and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation .\nactual results may differ substantially from these assumptions .\nthese differences may significantly impact future pension or retiree medical expenses .\nannual pension and retiree medical expense is principally the sum of three components : 1 ) increase in liability from interest ; less 2 ) expected return on plan assets ; and 3 ) other gains and losses as described below .\nthe expected return on plan assets is calculated by applying an assumed long-term rate of return to the fair value of plan assets .\nin any given year , actual returns can differ significantly from the expected return .\ndifferences between the actual and expected return on plan assets are combined with gains or losses resulting from the revaluation of plan liabilities .\nplan liabilities are revalued annually , based on updated assumptions and infor- mation about the individuals covered by the plan .\nthe combined gain or loss is generally expensed evenly over the remaining years that employees are expected to work .\ncomprehensive income ( loss ) the company accounts for comprehensive income ( loss ) in accordance with the provisions of sfas no .\n130 , 201creporting comprehensive income 201d ( 201csfas no .\n130 201d ) .\nsfas no .\n130 is a financial statement presentation standard that requires the company to disclose non-owner changes included in equity but not included in net income or loss .\nother items of comprehensive income ( loss ) presented in the financial statements consists of adjustments to the company 2019s minimum pension liability as follows ( in thousands ) : pension adjustments accumulated comprehensive .\n\nTable:\n\tpension adjustments\taccumulated other comprehensive loss\nbalance as of october 1 2004\t$ -786 ( 786 )\t$ -786 ( 786 )\nchange in period\t-351 ( 351 )\t-351 ( 351 )\nbalance as of september 30 2005\t-1137 ( 1137 )\t-1137 ( 1137 )\nchange in period\t538\t538\nbalance as of september 29 2006\t$ -599 ( 599 )\t$ -599 ( 599 )\n\nPost-table text:\nrecently issued accounting pronouncements in november 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .\n151 , 201cinventory costs 2014 an amendment to apb no .\n23 , chapter 4 201d ( 201csfas no .\n151 201d ) .\nthe amendments made by sfas no .\n151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense , freight , handling costs and wasted materials ( spoilage ) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities .\nthe guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after june 15 , 2005 .\nthe company adopted sfas no .\n151 on october 1 , 2005 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements in fiscal 2006 .\nin december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .\n153 , 201cexchanges of nonmonetary assets 2014 an amend- ment of apb opinion no .\n29 201d ( 201csfas no .\n153 201d ) .\nthe guidance in apb opinion no .\n29 , 201caccounting for nonmonetary transactions 201d ( 201capb no .\n29 201d ) is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged .\nthe guidance in apb no .\n29 , however , included certain exceptions to that principle .\nsfas no .\n153 amends apb no .\n29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance .\nsfas no .\n153 is effective for such exchange transactions occurring in fiscal periods beginning after june 15 , 2005 .\nthe company adopted sfas no .\n153 on october 1 , 2005 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements in fiscal 2006 .\nin may 2005 , the fasb issued sfas no .\n154 , 201caccounting changes and error corrections 2014 a replacement of apb opinion no .\n20 and fasb statement no .\n3 201d ( 201csfas no .\n154 201d ) .\nthis statement replaces apb opinion no .\n20 , 201caccounting changes 201d and fasb statement no .\n3 , 201creporting accounting changes in interim financial statements 2014 an amendment of apb opinion no .\n28 , 201d and also changes the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "351", "786", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.44656"}
{"example_id": "FBHS/2017/page_23.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2017 what was amount net sales applicable to international market in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nsouth america .\napproximately 26% ( 26 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .\nthis segment sells directly through its own sales force and indirectly through independent manufacturers 2019 representatives , primarily to wholesalers , home centers , mass merchandisers and industrial distributors .\nin aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 23% ( 23 % ) of net sales of the plumbing segment in 2017 .\nthis segment 2019s chief competitors include delta ( owned by masco ) , kohler , pfister ( owned by spectrum brands ) , american standard ( owned by lixil group ) , insinkerator ( owned by emerson electronic company ) and imported private-label brands .\ndoors .\nour doors segment manufactures and sells fiberglass and steel entry door systems under the therma-tru brand and urethane millwork product lines under the fypon brand .\nthis segment benefits from the long-term trend away from traditional materials , such as wood , steel and aluminum , toward more energy-efficient and durable synthetic materials .\ntherma-tru products include fiberglass and steel residential entry door and patio door systems , primarily for sale in the u.s .\nand canada .\nthis segment 2019s principal customers are home centers , millwork building products and wholesale distributors , and specialty dealers that provide products to the residential new construction market , as well as to the remodeling and renovation markets .\nin aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 14% ( 14 % ) of net sales of the doors segment in 2017 .\nthis segment 2019s competitors include masonite , jeld-wen , plastpro and pella .\nsecurity .\nour security segment 2019s products consist of locks , safety and security devices , and electronic security products manufactured , sourced and distributed primarily under the master lock brand and fire resistant safes , security containers and commercial cabinets manufactured , sourced and distributed under the sentrysafe brand .\nthis segment sells products principally in the u.s. , canada , europe , central america , japan and australia .\napproximately 25% ( 25 % ) of 2017 net sales were to international markets .\nthis segment manufactures and sells key-controlled and combination padlocks , bicycle and cable locks , built-in locker locks , door hardware , automotive , trailer and towing locks , electronic access control solutions , and other specialty safety and security devices for consumer use to hardware , home center and other retail outlets .\nin addition , the segment sells lock systems and fire resistant safes to locksmiths , industrial and institutional users , and original equipment manufacturers .\nin aggregate , sales to the home depot and lowe 2019s comprised approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of the net sales of the security segment in 2017 .\nmaster lock competes with abus , w.h .\nbrady , hampton , kwikset ( owned by spectrum brands ) , schlage ( owned by allegion ) , assa abloy and various imports , and sentrysafe competes with first alert , magnum , fortress , stack-on and fire king .\nannual net sales for each of the last three fiscal years for each of our business segments were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2017\t2016\t2015\ncabinets\t$ 2467.1\t$ 2397.8\t$ 2173.4\nplumbing\t1720.8\t1534.4\t1414.5\ndoors\t502.9\t473.0\t439.1\nsecurity\t592.5\t579.7\t552.4\ntotal\t$ 5283.3\t$ 4984.9\t$ 4579.4\n\nPost-table text:\nfor additional financial information for each of our business segments , refer to note 18 , 201cinformation on business segments , 201d to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this annual report on form other information raw materials .\nthe table below indicates the principal raw materials used by each of our segments .\nthese materials are available from a number of sources .\nvolatility in the prices of commodities and energy used in making and distributing our products impacts the cost of manufacturing our products. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "25%", "5283.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1320.825"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2008/page_84.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total contractual obligations are due within the next 12 months?\n\nPre-table text:\nas a result of our acquisition of third wave on july 24 , 2008 , we assumed certain operating leases , the most significant of which is related to their corporate facility in madison , wisconsin , which is effective through september 2014 .\nfuture lease payments on these operating leases were approximately $ 5.8 million as of september 27 , 2008 .\nadditionally , we assumed several license agreements for certain patent rights .\nthese payments will be made through 2011 and future payments under these license agreements are approximately $ 7.0 million as of september 27 , 2008 .\ncontractual obligations .\nthe following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of september 27 , 2008: .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by period less than 1 year\tpayments due by period 1-3 years\tpayments due by period 3-5 years\tpayments due by period more than 5 years\tpayments due by period total\nlong-term debt obligations\t$ 38480\t$ 109436\t$ 327400\t$ 1725584\t$ 2200900\ninterest on long-term debt obligations\t58734\t110973\t90433\t7484\t267624\noperating leases\t18528\t33162\t27199\t63616\t142505\npurchase obligations ( 1 )\t33176\t15703\t2014\t2014\t48879\nfinancing leases\t2408\t5035\t5333\t15008\t27784\nlong-term supply contracts ( 2 )\t3371\t6000\t3750\t2014\t13121\nprivate equity investment ( 3 )\t1874\t2014\t2014\t2014\t1874\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 156571\t$ 280309\t$ 454115\t$ 1811692\t$ 2702687\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) approximately $ 6.4 million of the purchase obligations relates to an exclusive distribution and service agreement in the united states under which we will sell and service a line of extremity mri systems .\npursuant to the terms of this contract , we have certain minimum inventory purchase obligations for the initial term of eighteen months .\nthereafter the purchase obligations are subject to renegotiation in the event of any unforeseen changes in the market dynamics .\n( 2 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed on a consolidated basis certain non-cancelable supply contracts .\nfor reasons of quality assurance , sole source availability or cost effectiveness , certain key components and raw materials are available only from a sole supplier .\nto assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability , long-term supply contracts have been executed with these suppliers .\nin certain of these contracts , a minimum purchase commitment has been established .\n( 3 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed a private equity investment commitment with a limited liability partnership , which could be paid over the succeeding three years .\nthe amounts above do not include any amount that may be payable to biolucent and adiana for earn-outs .\nwe are working on several projects and we expect to continue to review and evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses , products or technologies , and strategic alliances that we believe will complement our current or future business .\nsubject to the risk factors set forth in part i , item 1a of this report and the general disclaimers set forth in our special note regarding forward-looking statements at the outset of this report , we believe that cash flow from operations and cash available from our amended credit agreement will provide us with sufficient funds in order to fund our expected operations over the next twelve months .\nour longer-term liquidity is contingent upon future operating performance and our ability to continue to meet financial covenants under our amended credit agreement .\nwe may also require additional capital in the future to fund capital expenditures , acquisitions or other investments , or to repay our convertible notes .\nthe holders of the convertible notes may require us to repurchase the notes on december 13 of 2013 , and on each of december 15 , 2017 , 2022 , 2027 and 2032 at a repurchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of their accreted principal amount .\nthese capital requirements could be substantial .\nour operating performance may also be affected by matters discussed under the above-referenced risk factors as elsewhere in this report .\nthese risks , trends and uncertainties may also adversely affect our long- term liquidity. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "156571", "2702687", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05793"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2015/page_18.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was total net undeveloped acres expiring for the three year period , in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\nin the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .\nif production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .\nwe plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .\nthe kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .\nnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018\nu.s .\t68\t89\t128\ne.g .\t2014\t92\t36\nother africa\t189\t4352\t854\ntotal africa\t189\t4444\t890\nother international\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t257\t4533\t1018\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_sum(", "total", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5808"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2010/page_124.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total estimated purchase price was cash?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents hologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( all tabular amounts in thousands except per share data ) which the cytyc stockholders received a premium over the fair market value of their shares on such date and cash of $ 16.50 per share ( or approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of the merger consideration ) .\nthere were no preexisting relationships between the two companies .\ncytyc , headquartered in marlborough , massachusetts , is a diversified diagnostic and medical device company that designs , develops , manufactures , and markets innovative and clinically effective diagnostics and surgical products .\ncytyc products cover a range of cancer and women 2019s health applications , including cervical cancer screening , prenatal diagnostics , treatment of excessive menstrual bleeding and radiation treatment of early-stage breast cancer .\nupon the close of the merger , cytyc shareholders received an aggregate of 132 million shares of hologic common stock and $ 2.1 billion in cash .\nin connection with the close of the merger , the company entered into a credit agreement relating to a senior secured credit facility ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) with goldman sachs credit partners l.p .\nand certain other lenders , in which the lenders committed to provide , in the aggregate , senior secured financing of up to approximately $ 2.55 billion to pay for the cash portion of the merger consideration , repayment of existing debt of cytyc , expenses relating to the merger and working capital following the completion of the merger .\nas of the closing of the merger , the company borrowed $ 2.35 billion under this credit agreement .\nsee note 5 for further discussion .\nthe aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 6.16 billion included $ 2.1 million in cash ; 132 million shares of hologic common stock at an estimated fair value of $ 3.67 billion ; 16.5 million of fully vested stock options granted to cytyc employees in exchange for their vested cytyc stock options , with an estimated fair value of approximately $ 241.4 million ; the fair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes assumed in the merger of $ 125.0 million ; and approximately $ 24.2 million of direct acquisition costs .\nthere were no potential contingent consideration arrangements payable to the former cytyc shareholders in connection with this transaction .\nthe company measured the fair value of the 132 million shares of the company common stock issued as consideration in connection with the merger under eitf 99-12 .\nthe company determined the measurement date to be may 20 , 2007 , the date the transaction was announced , as the number of shares to be issued according to the exchange ratio was fixed without subsequent revision .\nthe company valued the securities based on the average market price a few days before and after the measurement date .\nthe weighted average stock price was determined to be $ 27.81 .\n( i ) purchase price the purchase price is as follows: .\n\nTable:\ncash portion of consideration\t$ 2094800\nfair value of securities issued\t3671500\nfair value of vested options exchanged\t241400\nfair value of cytyc 2019s outstanding convertible notes\t125000\ndirect acquisition costs\t24200\ntotal estimated purchase price\t$ 6156900\n\nPost-table text:\nsource : hologic inc , 10-k , november 24 , 2010 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .\nthe user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .\npast financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2094800", "6156900", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34024"}
{"example_id": "ALXN/2007/page_104.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average future minimum annual rental payment for the next five years?\n\nPre-table text:\nalexion pharmaceuticals , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 4935\n2009\t3144\n2010\t3160\n2011\t3200\n2012\t2768\nthereafter\t9934\n\nPost-table text:\n9 .\ncommitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s .\ndistrict court for the district of delaware .\npdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris .\npdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees .\nalexion has denied pdl's claims .\nin addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s .\npatents held by pdl .\nalexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .\non february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc .\nfiled a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california .\nsb2 , inc .\nclaims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc .\npatents due to sales of soliris .\nsb2 , inc .\nseeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees .\nalexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .\nthe results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages .\nhowever , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) .\nproduct supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 .\nwe amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 .\nsuch commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "3144", "3160", ")", "add(", "#0", "3200", ")", "add(", "#1", "2768", ")", "add(", "#2", "9934", ")", "divide(", "#3", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4441.2"}
{"example_id": "AES/2015/page_117.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nnet cash provided by operating activities increased by what percentage in 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nproportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .\nthe proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .\nupon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .\nsee note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .\nbeginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nthe proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .\nwe also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .\nan example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .\nsee item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .\nthe gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .\nwe believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .\nfactors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .\nthe presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .\nproportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .\nproportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .\nour definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .\n\nTable:\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\t2015/2014 change\t2014/2013 change\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 2134\t$ 1791\t$ 2715\t$ 343\t$ -924 ( 924 )\nadd : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )\t165\t2014\t2014\t165\t2014\nadjusted operating cash flow\t2299\t1791\t2715\t508\t-924 ( 924 )\nless : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )\t-558 ( 558 )\t-359 ( 359 )\t-834 ( 834 )\t-199 ( 199 )\t475\nproportional adjusted operating cash flow\t1741\t1432\t1881\t309\t-449 ( 449 )\nless : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )\t-449 ( 449 )\t-485 ( 485 )\t-535 ( 535 )\t36\t50\nless : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )\t-51 ( 51 )\t-56 ( 56 )\t-75 ( 75 )\t5\t19\nproportional free cash flow\t$ 1241\t$ 891\t$ 1271\t$ 350\t$ -380 ( 380 )\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .\n( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .\nfor example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .\nthus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .\nassuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .\nthe company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .\nthe proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .\n( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .\n( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "343", "1791", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19151"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2011/page_70.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nassuming the same trend as in 2011 , what would total stock-based compensation cost be for 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .\nincome taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .\nsubsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .\nthe cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .\n18 .\nemployee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .\nemployees .\nthe company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .\nfor most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .\nfor those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .\nthe company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .\nthe company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .\neffective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .\nthis included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .\non january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .\ncompensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\na portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .\nas a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\n19 .\nother earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2011\t2010\t2009\nroyalty income\t55\t58\t45\nshare of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )\t37\t45\t-5 ( 5 )\ngain on sale of assets\t12\t8\t36\nother\t73\t69\t74\ntotal\t$ 177\t$ 180\t$ 150\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal $ 177 $ 180 $ 150 20 .\nstock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return .\nall current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc .\namended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 .\nshares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\ntotal stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nstock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc .\nstock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan .\nunder the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted .\nthe options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years .\nupon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock .\nthe ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "36", "52", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "36", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "24.92308"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_125.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2015 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?\n\nPre-table text:\nto maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2014\t$ 135\n2015\t127\n2016\t110\n2017\t109\n2018\t106\nthereafter\t699\ntotal\t$ 1286\n\nPost-table text:\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments .\nthe company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .\nsee note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .\ncontingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nin addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nthe fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .\nlegal proceedings .\nfrom time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .\nfederal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .\nit is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .\nadditionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .\nmanagement , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .\nhowever , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .\ndue to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .\nindemnifications .\nin the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .\nthe terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .\nconsequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .\nthe company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .\nthe fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "127", "1286", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09876"}
{"example_id": "VLO/2018/page_25.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the fourth quarter ended december 312018 what was the total number of shares purchased in november\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents tceq and harris county pollution control services department ( hcpcs ) ( houston terminal ) .\nwe have an outstanding noe from the tceq and an outstanding vn from the hcpcs alleging excess emissions from tank 003 that occurred during hurricane harvey .\nwe are working with the pertinent authorities to resolve these matters .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures part ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock trades on the nyse under the trading symbol 201cvlo . 201d as of january 31 , 2019 , there were 5271 holders of record of our common stock .\ndividends are considered quarterly by the board of directors , may be paid only when approved by the board , and will depend on our financial condition , results of operations , cash flows , prospects , industry conditions , capital requirements , and other factors and restrictions our board deems relevant .\nthere can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend at the rates we have paid historically , or at all , in the future .\nthe following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2018 .\nperiod total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal numberof sharespurchased\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )\ttotal number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms\tapproximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )\noctober 2018\t939957\t$ 87.23\t8826\t931131\t$ 2.7 billion\nnovember 2018\t3655945\t$ 87.39\t216469\t3439476\t$ 2.4 billion\ndecember 2018\t3077364\t$ 73.43\t4522\t3072842\t$ 2.2 billion\ntotal\t7673266\t$ 81.77\t229817\t7443449\t$ 2.2 billion\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2018 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .\n( b ) on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2018 program ) , with no expiration date , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under a $ 2.5 billion program authorized on september 21 , 2016 ( the 2016 program ) .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2018 , we completed our purchases under the 2016 program .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 2.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2018 program. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3655945", "7673266", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.47645"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_102.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in billions in tier 1 capital from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nmandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 .\nin 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities .\nthe frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards .\nunder the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability .\nthe amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions .\nat december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit .\nthe company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 .\nthe frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability .\nat december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit .\nthe frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions .\nthese may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets .\ncapital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines .\nto be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels .\nat december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a .\ncomponents of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin billions of dollars at year end\t2008\t2007\ntier 1 capital\t$ 71.0\t$ 82.0\ntotal capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )\t108.4\t121.6\ntier 1 capital ratio\t9.94% ( 9.94 % )\t8.98% ( 8.98 % )\ntotal capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )\t15.18\t13.33\nleverage ratio ( 1 )\t5.82\t6.65\n\nPost-table text:\nleverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets .\ncitibank , n.a .\nhad a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion .\nduring 2008 , citibank , n.a .\nreceived contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion .\ncitibank , n.a .\ndid not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 .\ntotal subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc .\nthat were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion .\ncitibank , n.a .\nreceived an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 .\nthe impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above .\nthe substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "71.0", "82.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-11"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2012/page_47.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in operating profit for space systems in 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\n2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .\nmst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .\nbacklog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .\noperating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .\noperating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .\ngovernment , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\nnet sales\t$ 8347\t$ 8161\t$ 8268\noperating profit\t1083\t1063\t1030\noperating margins\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t12.5% ( 12.5 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t18100\t16000\t17800\n\nPost-table text:\n2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .\npartially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1083", "1063", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1063", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01881"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2013/page_26.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2013 what was the ratio of square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia to the jersey city new jersey\n\nPre-table text:\nour ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time .\nany refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants , which could further restrict our business operations .\nin addition , any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating , which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness .\nif our cash flows and available cash are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations , we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations .\nwe may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them , and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due .\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments item 2 .\nproperties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2013 is shown in the following table .\nall facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia .\nsquare footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. .\n\nTable:\nlocation\tapproximate square footage\nalpharetta georgia\t254000\njersey city new jersey\t107000\narlington virginia\t102000\nsandy utah\t66000\nmenlo park california\t63000\nnew york new york\t39000\nchicago illinois ( 1 )\t36000\n\nPost-table text:\nchicago , illinois ( 1 ) 36000 ( 1 ) includes approximately 25000 square footage related to g1 execution services , llc .\nwe entered into a definitive agreement to sell g1 execution services , llc to an affiliate of susquehanna .\nthe lease was assigned to susquehanna upon closing of the sale on february 10 , all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category .\nall other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location .\nin addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet .\nwe believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2014 .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc .\n( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara .\najaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets .\nfollowing a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement .\nalthough the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief .\non december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets .\nalthough the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "254000", "107000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.37383"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2005/page_40.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2005 what was the percent of the total commitment applicable to the standby letters of credit\n\nPre-table text:\npage 38 five years .\nthe amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .\nto the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .\nwe have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcommitment expiration by period total commitment\tcommitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 3-5 years\tcommitment expiration by period after 5 years\nstandby letters of credit\t$ 2630\t$ 2425\t$ 171\t$ 18\t$ 16\nsurety bonds\t434\t79\t352\t3\t2014\nguarantees\t2\t1\t1\t2014\t2014\ntotal commitments\t$ 3066\t$ 2505\t$ 524\t$ 21\t$ 16\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .\nincluded in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .\napproximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .\nthese letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .\nsimilar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .\nour financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .\nif interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .\nthe estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .\nthe majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .\nwe have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .\nwe use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .\nthese exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .\nrelated gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .\nto the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .\nat december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .\nwe do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .\nrecent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .\nfas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2630", "3066", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.8578"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2002/page_40.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended march 31 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre .\nthe following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period .\ncomparable cash dividends are expected in the future .\non january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .\n\nTable:\nquarter ended\t2002 high\t2002 low\t2002 dividend\t2002 high\t2002 low\tdividend\ndecember 31\t$ 25.84\t$ 21.50\t$ .455\t$ 24.80\t$ 22.00\t$ .45\nseptember 30\t28.88\t21.40\t.455\t26.17\t21.60\t.45\njune 30\t28.95\t25.46\t.450\t24.99\t22.00\t.43\nmarch 31\t26.50\t22.92\t.450\t25.44\t21.85\t.43\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", ".455", ".450", ")", "divide(", "#0", ".450", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.11111"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_54.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2005 is related to non-tower cash flow?\n\nPre-table text:\nwith apb no .\n25 .\ninstead , companies will be required to account for such transactions using a fair-value method and recognize the related expense associated with share-based payments in the statement of operations .\nsfas 123r is effective for us as of january 1 , 2006 .\nwe have historically accounted for share-based payments to employees under apb no .\n25 2019s intrinsic value method .\nas such , we generally have not recognized compensation expense for options granted to employees .\nwe will adopt the provisions of sfas 123r under the modified prospective method , in which compensation cost for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date is recognized based upon the requirements of sfas 123r , and compensation cost for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date that are unvested as of the effective date of sfas 123r is recognized based on sfas 123 .\ntax benefits will be recognized related to the cost for share-based payments to the extent the equity instrument would ordinarily result in a future tax deduction under existing law .\ntax expense will be recognized to write off excess deferred tax assets when the tax deduction upon settlement of a vested option is less than the expense recorded in the statement of operations ( to the extent not offset by prior tax credits for settlements where the tax deduction was greater than the fair value cost ) .\nwe estimate that we will recognize equity-based compensation expense of approximately $ 35 million to $ 38 million for the year ending december 31 , 2006 .\nthis amount is subject to revisions as we finalize certain assumptions related to 2006 , including the size and nature of awards and forfeiture rates .\nsfas 123r also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow rather than as operating cash flow as was previously required .\nwe cannot estimate what the future tax benefits will be as the amounts depend on , among other factors , future employee stock option exercises .\ndue to the our tax loss position , there was no operating cash inflow realized for december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for such excess tax deductions .\nin march 2005 , the sec issued staff accounting bulletin ( sab ) no .\n107 regarding the staff 2019s interpretation of sfas 123r .\nthis interpretation provides the staff 2019s views regarding interactions between sfas 123r and certain sec rules and regulations and provides interpretations of the valuation of share-based payments for public companies .\nthe interpretive guidance is intended to assist companies in applying the provisions of sfas 123r and investors and users of the financial statements in analyzing the information provided .\nwe will follow the guidance prescribed in sab no .\n107 in connection with our adoption of sfas 123r .\ninformation presented pursuant to the indentures of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) the following table sets forth information that is presented solely to address certain tower cash flow reporting requirements contained in the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes , 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes and ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .\nthe information contained in note 19 to our consolidated financial statements is also presented to address certain reporting requirements contained in the indenture for our ati 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) notes .\nthe following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\ntower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005\t$ 139590\nconsolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t$ 498266\nless : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t-524804 ( 524804 )\nplus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2005\t558360\nadjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t$ 531822\nnon-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2005\t$ -30584 ( 30584 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "30584", "const_m1", ")", "divide(", "#0", "531822", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.05751"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_355.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008 compare to 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy new orleans , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 231.0\nvolume/weather\t15.5\nnet gas revenue\t6.6\nrider revenue\t3.9\nbase revenue\t-11.3 ( 11.3 )\nother\t7.0\n2008 net revenue\t$ 252.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .\nentergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .\nbilled retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .\nthe net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .\nthe rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .\nthe approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .\nthe settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\nthe base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .\nthe base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\ngross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .\nfuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "252.7", "231.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "231.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09394"}
{"example_id": "AON/2014/page_47.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total operating income in 2013 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .\nin 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .\noperating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .\nhr solutions .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2014\t2013\t2012\nrevenue\t$ 4264\t$ 4057\t$ 3925\noperating income\t485\t318\t289\noperating margin\t11.4% ( 11.4 % )\t7.8% ( 7.8 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\n2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .\n2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .\nour model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .\n2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .\n2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .\ndisruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nweak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1.6", "const_1000", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "108", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1492"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_377.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in net revenue for entergy texas , inc . during 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .\nthe recovery became effective july 2007 .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .\n2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2006 net revenue\t$ 403.3\npurchased power capacity\t13.1\nsecuritization transition charge\t9.9\nvolume/weather\t9.7\ntransmission revenue\t6.1\nbase revenue\t2.6\nother\t-2.4 ( 2.4 )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 442.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .\nthe securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .\nas discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .\nthe volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .\nthe increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .\nretail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .\nthe transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .\nthe base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .\nthe decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .\nthe receipt of such payments is being .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "442.3", "403.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "39"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2006/page_30.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the rate of return of an investment in s&p500 inc from 2001 to 2005?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .\nall rights reserved .\nwww.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 29 2001\tdecember 28 2002\tjanuary 3 2004\tjanuary 1 2005\tdecember 31 2005\tdecember 30 2006\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t54.38\t81.52\t61.65\t75.54\t79.96\ns & p 500\t100.00\t77.90\t100.24\t111.15\t116.61\t135.03\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t71.97\t107.18\t117.07\t120.50\t137.02\ns & p information technology\t100.00\t62.59\t92.14\t94.50\t95.44\t103.47\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "111.15", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1115"}
{"example_id": "UA/2015/page_71.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the profit margin in 2015\n\nPre-table text:\nsimplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements .\nthe adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations and cash flows .\n3 .\nacquisitions endomondo on january 5 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of endomondo , a denmark- based digital connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community .\nthe purchase price was $ 85.0 million , adjusted for working capital .\nthe company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively .\nthese costs are included in the consolidated statements of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d pro forma results are not presented , as the acquisition was not considered material to the consolidated company .\nmyfitnesspal on march 17 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of mfp , a digital nutrition and connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community .\nthe final adjusted transaction value totaled $ 474.0 million .\nthe total consideration of $ 463.9 million was adjusted to reflect the accelerated vesting of certain share awards of mfp , which are not conditioned upon continued employment , and transaction costs borne by the selling shareholders .\nthe acquisition was funded with $ 400.0 million of increased term loan borrowings and a draw on the revolving credit facility , with the remaining amount funded by cash on the company recognized $ 5.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 .\nthese costs are included in the consolidated statement of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d the following represents the pro forma consolidated income statement as if mfp had been included in the consolidated results of the company for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tyear ended december 31 , 2015\tyear ended december 31 , 2014\nnet revenues\t$ 3967008\t$ 3098341\nnet income\t231277\t189659\n\nPost-table text:\nthese amounts have been calculated after applying the company 2019s accounting policies and adjusting the results of mfp to reflect the acquisition as if it closed on january 1 , 2014 .\npro forma net income for the year ended december 31 , 2014 includes $ 5.7 million in transaction expenses which were included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , but excluded from the calculation of pro forma net income for december 31 , 2015. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "231277", "3967008", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0583"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2015/page_126.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nduring 2013 , what was the ratio of the accrued interest $ 1.2 million to the recognized a interest liability interest of $ 17.0 million .\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nbalance at beginning of year\t$ 70.1\t$ 72.0\t$ 84.7\nadditions based on tax positions related to current year\t0.2\t0.8\t0.3\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t1.4\t5.0\t11.4\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-10.2 ( 10.2 )\t-6.0 ( 6.0 )\t-2.4 ( 2.4 )\nreductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations\t-0.6 ( 0.6 )\t-0.2 ( 0.2 )\t-1.3 ( 1.3 )\nsettlements\t-13.9 ( 13.9 )\t-1.5 ( 1.5 )\t-20.7 ( 20.7 )\nbalance at end of year\t$ 47.0\t$ 70.1\t$ 72.0\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million .\nduring 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million .\nduring 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years .\nthe resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million .\nincluded in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods .\nwe recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income .\nrelated to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million .\nduring 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million .\nduring 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million .\ngross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months .\nwe are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years .\nthese state audits are ongoing .\nwe believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate .\nhowever , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "17.0", "1.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "14.16667"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_41.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2009 what was the ratio of the commercial mortgages at fair value to lower of cost or market \\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2009 , $ 397 million of the credit losses related to securities rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $ 1.1 billion and the related securities had a fair value of $ 2.6 billion .\nthe fair value of sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti credit loss as of december 31 , 2009 totaled $ 2.6 billion , with unrealized net losses of $ 658 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\ncommercial mortgage-backed securities the fair value of the non-agency commercial mortgage- backed securities portfolio was $ 6.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized by non-residential properties , primarily retail properties , office buildings , and multi-family housing .\nthe agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $ 1.3 billion fair value at december 31 , 2009 consisting of multi-family housing .\nsubstantially all of the securities are the most senior tranches in the subordination structure .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 6 million on non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities during 2009 .\nthe remaining fair value of the securities for which otti was recorded approximates zero .\nall of the credit-impaired securities were rated below investment grade .\nasset-backed securities the fair value of the asset-backed securities portfolio was $ 4.8 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate and floating-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized primarily by various consumer credit products , including residential mortgage loans , credit cards , and automobile loans .\nsubstantially all of the securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and have credit protection in the form of credit enhancement , over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 111 million on asset- backed securities during 2009 .\nall of the securities were collateralized by first and second lien residential mortgage loans and were rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for asset- backed securities totaled $ 221 million and the related securities had a fair value of $ 562 million .\nfor the sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti loss through december 31 , 2009 , the remaining fair value was $ 381 million , with unrealized net losses of $ 110 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\nif the current housing and economic conditions were to continue for the foreseeable future or worsen , if market volatility and illiquidity were to continue or worsen , or if market interest rates were to increase appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could continue to be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .\nloans held for sale in millions dec .\n31 dec .\n31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdec.31 2009\tdec . 312008\ncommercial mortgages at fair value\t$ 1050\t$ 1401\ncommercial mortgages at lower of cost or market\t251\t747\ntotal commercial mortgages\t1301\t2148\nresidential mortgages at fair value\t1012\t1824\nresidential mortgages at lower of cost or market\t\t138\ntotal residential mortgages\t1012\t1962\nother\t226\t256\ntotal\t$ 2539\t$ 4366\n\nPost-table text:\nwe stopped originating commercial mortgage loans held for sale designated at fair value during the first quarter of 2008 and intend to continue pursuing opportunities to reduce these positions at appropriate prices .\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale carried at the lower of cost or market , strong origination volumes partially offset sales to government agencies of $ 5.4 billion during 2009 .\nwe recognized net gains of $ 107 million in 2009 on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , carried at fair value and lower of cost or market compared with losses of $ 197 million in 2008 .\nwe sold $ .3 billion and $ .6 billion , respectively , of commercial mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value in 2009 and 2008 .\nresidential mortgage loans held for sale decreased during 2009 despite strong refinancing volumes , especially in the first quarter .\nloan origination volume was $ 19.1 billion .\nsubstantially all such loans were originated to agency standards .\nwe sold $ 19.8 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 435 million during 2009 .\nnet interest income on residential mortgage loans held for sale was $ 332 million for 2009. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1050", "251", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4.18327"}
{"example_id": "GIS/2019/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2019 what was the percent of the total future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations associated with long-term debt that was due in 2020\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year 2020\tpayments due by fiscal year 2021 -22\tpayments due by fiscal year 2023 -24\tpayments due by fiscal year 2025 and thereafter\nlong-term debt ( a )\t$ 13093.0\t$ 1396.3\t$ 3338.4\t$ 2810.2\t$ 5548.1\naccrued interest\t92.6\t92.6\t-\t-\t-\noperating leases ( b )\t482.6\t120.0\t186.7\t112.9\t63.0\ncapital leases\t0.3\t0.2\t0.1\t-\t-\npurchase obligations ( c )\t2961.8\t2605.1\t321.9\t27.6\t7.2\ntotal contractual obligations\t16630.3\t4214.2\t3847.1\t2950.7\t5618.3\nother long-term obligations ( d )\t1302.4\t-\t-\t-\t-\ntotal long-term obligations\t$ 17932.7\t$ 4214.2\t$ 3847.1\t$ 2950.7\t$ 5618.3\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.3 million for capital leases or $ 72.0 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments .\n( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases .\n( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands .\nfor purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction .\nmost arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) .\nany amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above .\n( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 17.3 million as of may 26 , 2019 , based on fair market values as of that date .\nfuture changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future .\nother long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities .\nwe expect to pay approximately $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and approximately $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2020 .\nwe are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2020 .\nas of may 26 , 2019 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 165.1 million .\nsignificant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\nour significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations .\nthese estimates include our accounting for promotional expenditures , valuation of long-lived assets , intangible assets , redeemable interest , stock-based compensation , income taxes , and defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans .\nrevenue recognition our revenues are reported net of variable consideration and consideration payable to our customers , including trade promotion , consumer coupon redemption and other costs , including estimated allowances for returns , unsalable product , and prompt pay discounts .\ntrade promotions are recorded using significant judgment of estimated participation and performance levels for offered programs at the time of sale .\ndifferences between estimated expenses and actual costs are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period .\nour accrued trade liabilities were $ 484 million as of may 26 , 2019 , and $ 500 million as of may 27 , 2018 .\nbecause these amounts are significant , if our estimates are inaccurate we would have to make adjustments in subsequent periods that could have a significant effect on our results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1396.3", "13093.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10664"}
{"example_id": "ADBE/2018/page_86.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor fiscal 2018 , what percentage of the total change in the valuation allowance was due to settlements with taxing authorities?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents adobe inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .\nthe deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .\nwe provide u.s .\nincome taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .\nto the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .\ntax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .\nincome taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .\nthe unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .\nwe also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .\nthe state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .\nfor fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .\naccounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 172945\t$ 178413\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t16191\t3680\ngross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t-4000 ( 4000 )\t-30166 ( 30166 )\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions\t60721\t24927\nsettlements with taxing authorities\t2014\t-3876 ( 3876 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-45922 ( 45922 )\t-8819 ( 8819 )\nforeign exchange gains and losses\t-3783 ( 3783 )\t8786\nending balance\t$ 196152\t$ 172945\n\nPost-table text:\nthe combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nthese amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .\nwe file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .\nstate and foreign jurisdictions .\nwe are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .\nour major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .\nfor ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .\nwe regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .\nwe believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .\nthe timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .\nthese events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .\nwe believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .\ngiven the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "0", "80.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2013/page_39.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the debt maturities outstanding at december 31 , 2013 that was unsecured debt\n\nPre-table text:\nannual report 2013 duke realty corporation 37 in addition to the capitalization of overhead costs discussed above , we also capitalized $ 16.8 million , $ 9.4 million and $ 4.3 million of interest costs in the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nthe following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nindustrial\t$ 41971\t$ 33095\t$ 34872\noffice\t46600\t30092\t63933\nmedical office\t3106\t641\t410\nnon-reportable rental operations segments\t121\t56\t49\ntotal\t$ 91798\t$ 63884\t$ 99264\n\nPost-table text:\nboth our first and second generation expenditures vary significantly between leases on a per square foot basis , dependent upon several factors including the product type , the nature of a tenant's operations , the specific physical characteristics of each individual property as well as the market in which the property is located .\nsecond generation expenditures related to the 79 suburban office buildings that were sold in the blackstone office disposition totaled $ 26.2 million in 2011 .\ndividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the \"code\" ) , in order to maintain our reit status .\nwe paid dividends of $ 0.68 per common share for each of the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .\nwe expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors .\ndistributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant .\nat december 31 , 2013 we had three series of preferred stock outstanding .\nthe annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) and are paid quarterly in arrears .\nin february 2013 , we redeemed all of our outstanding series o shares for a total payment of $ 178.0 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 3.7 million .\nin march 2012 , we redeemed all of our 6.950% ( 6.950 % ) series m cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( \"series m shares\" ) for a total payment of $ 168.3 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.9 million .\nin july 2011 , we redeemed all of our 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) series n cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( \"series n shares\" ) for a total payment of $ 108.6 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.0 million .\ndebt maturities debt outstanding at december 31 , 2013 had a face value totaling $ 4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.49% ( 5.49 % ) and with maturity dates ranging between 2014 and 2028 .\nof this total amount , we had $ 3.1 billion of unsecured debt , $ 1.1 billion of secured debt and $ 88.0 million outstanding on the drlp unsecured line of credit at december 31 , 2013 .\nwe made scheduled and unscheduled principal payments of $ 1.0 billion on outstanding debt during the year ended december 31 , 2013. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3.1", "4.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.72093"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2006/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the anticipated percentage increase in the capital investment in 2007 from 2006\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 .\nmillions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2006\t2005\t2004\ntrack\t$ 1487\t$ 1472\t$ 1328\ncapacity and commercial facilities\t510\t509\t347\nlocomotives and freight cars\t135\t98\t125\nother\t110\t90\t76\ntotal\t$ 2242\t$ 2169\t$ 1876\n\nPost-table text:\nin 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .\nthese investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .\nwe designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .\nwe expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\nwe expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .\nthe increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .\nthe ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .\nearnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .\nfixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .\nsee exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .\nfinancing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the \"facilities\" ) .\nthe facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .\nneither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .\nthese facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .\nthe facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .\nin addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .\nneither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .\ndividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .\nwe expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\ndividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .\nretained earnings available .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3.2", "2242", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2242", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.99857"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2006/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2006 what was the percent of the total investments amount attributable to the track\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 .\nmillions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2006\t2005\t2004\ntrack\t$ 1487\t$ 1472\t$ 1328\ncapacity and commercial facilities\t510\t509\t347\nlocomotives and freight cars\t135\t98\t125\nother\t110\t90\t76\ntotal\t$ 2242\t$ 2169\t$ 1876\n\nPost-table text:\nin 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .\nthese investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .\nwe designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .\nwe expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\nwe expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .\nthe increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .\nthe ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .\nearnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .\nfixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .\nsee exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .\nfinancing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the \"facilities\" ) .\nthe facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .\nneither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .\nthese facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .\nthe facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .\nin addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .\nneither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .\ndividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .\nwe expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\ndividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .\nretained earnings available .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1487", "2242", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.66325"}
{"example_id": "STZ/2006/page_68.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the robert mondavi's total assets acquired is related to goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nc o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .\nbaroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .\nopus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .\nthe acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .\nthe company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .\nthe vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .\nthe company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .\nthe company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .\nin particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .\ntotal con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .\nadditionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .\nthe purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .\nin accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .\nthe results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 513782\nproperty plant and equipment\t438140\nother assets\t124450\ntrademarks\t138000\ngoodwill\t634203\ntotal assets acquired\t1848575\ncurrent liabilities\t310919\nlong-term liabilities\t494995\ntotal liabilities assumed\t805914\nnet assets acquired\t$ 1042661\n\nPost-table text:\nthe trademarks are not subject to amortization .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nfollowing the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .\nthe company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .\namounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .\nno gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .\nhardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .\nas a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .\nthe acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .\nin october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .\ntotal consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .\nadditionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .\nthe acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .\nthe company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .\nthis charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .\nthe cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .\naddi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .\nthe company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .\nthe hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "634203", "1848575", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34308"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_157.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , assuming an average price per share of $ 12.12 , what would be the cost in millions to repurchase all the remaining shares remaining in the program?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 .\nstock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 .\nthe cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program .\nthe common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method .\na total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nrestricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock .\nthe company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 .\n15 .\nsegments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business .\nduring the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu .\nthe management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus .\nthe company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus .\nall prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure .\nin february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity .\nthe company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure .\ncorporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in \"corporate and other.\" also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation .\nthe company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure .\nadjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation .\nadjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities .\nthe company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments .\nadditionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results .\nrevenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable .\nall intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment .\ninter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results .\nthe following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31,\ttotal revenue 2017\ttotal revenue 2016\ttotal revenue 2015\nus sbu\t$ 3229\t$ 3429\t$ 3593\nandes sbu\t2710\t2506\t2489\nbrazil sbu\t542\t450\t962\nmcac sbu\t2448\t2172\t2353\neurasia sbu\t1590\t1670\t1875\ncorporate and other\t35\t77\t31\neliminations\t-24 ( 24 )\t-23 ( 23 )\t-43 ( 43 )\ntotal revenue\t$ 10530\t$ 10281\t$ 11260\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "246", "12.12", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2981.52"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2004/page_81.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2008 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar .\nthe company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit .\nthe fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal .\nnetwork development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies .\nthe company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 .\nthe company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units .\nsuch charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded .\nas discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively .\nrental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired .\nthe company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2004\t2003\nacquired customer base and network location intangibles\t$ 1369607\t$ 1299521\ndeferred financing costs\t89736\t111484\nacquired licenses and other intangibles\t43404\t43125\ntotal\t1502747\t1454130\nless accumulated amortization\t-517444 ( 517444 )\t-434381 ( 434381 )\nother intangible assets net\t$ 985303\t$ 1019749\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years .\namortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .\nthe company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .\n5 .\nnotes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a .\nde c.v .\n( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million .\nthe loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) .\nthe loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "97.8", "95.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "95.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01981"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_127.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 17 .\naccumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( losses ) earnings ( in millions )\t( losses ) earnings 2015\t( losses ) earnings 2014\t2013\ncurrency translation adjustments\t$ -6129 ( 6129 )\t$ -3929 ( 3929 )\t$ -2207 ( 2207 )\npension and other benefits\t-3332 ( 3332 )\t-3020 ( 3020 )\t-2046 ( 2046 )\nderivatives accounted for as hedges\t59\t123\t63\ntotal accumulated other comprehensive losses\t$ -9402 ( 9402 )\t$ -6826 ( 6826 )\t$ -4190 ( 4190 )\n\nPost-table text:\nreclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .\nthe movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business .\nin addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .\nfor additional information , see note 13 .\nbenefit plans and note 15 .\nfinancial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments .\nnote 18 .\ncolombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products .\nthe investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco .\nas a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 .\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement .\nthese discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 .\nnote 19 .\nrbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc .\n( \"rothmans\" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc .\n( \"rbh\" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand .\nthe settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period .\nrothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh .\nthe remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "9402", "6826", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6826", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.37738"}
{"example_id": "K/2013/page_62.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of total derivatives are from interest rate contracts in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .\nnote 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .\nmanagement uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .\ninstruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .\nthe company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .\nas a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .\ntotal notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2013\t2012\nforeign currency exchange contracts\t$ 517\t$ 570\ninterest rate contracts\t2400\t2150\ncommodity contracts\t361\t320\ntotal\t$ 3278\t$ 3040\n\nPost-table text:\nfollowing is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .\nlevel 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .\nfor the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .\nlevel 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .\nfor the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .\nthe company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .\nover-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .\nforeign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .\nthe company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .\nlevel 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .\nthese inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .\nthe company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2400", "3278", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.73215"}
{"example_id": "MS/2014/page_292.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\naccrued interest represented how much of the ending balance in uncertain tax benefits as of december 31 , 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nmorgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 2.2 billion , $ 4.1 billion , and $ 4.1 billion at december 31 , 2014 , december 31 , 2013 , and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .\nof this total , approximately $ 1.0 billion , $ 1.4 billion , and $ 1.6 billion , respectively ( net of federal benefit of state issues , competent authority and foreign tax credit offsets ) represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods .\ninterest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as provision for income taxes .\nthe company recognized $ ( 35 ) million , $ 50 million , and $ ( 10 ) million of interest expense ( benefit ) ( net of federal and state income tax benefits ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income for 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .\ninterest expense accrued at december 31 , 2014 , december 31 , 2013 , and december 31 , 2012 was approximately $ 258 million , $ 293 million , and $ 243 million , respectively , net of federal and state income tax benefits .\npenalties related to unrecognized tax benefits for the years mentioned above were immaterial .\nthe following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ( dollars in millions ) : unrecognized tax benefits .\n\nTable:\nbalance at december 31 2011\t$ 4045\nincrease based on tax positions related to the current period\t299\nincrease based on tax positions related to prior periods\t127\ndecreases based on tax positions related to prior periods\t-21 ( 21 )\ndecreases related to settlements with taxing authorities\t-260 ( 260 )\ndecreases related to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations\t-125 ( 125 )\nbalance at december 31 2012\t$ 4065\nincrease based on tax positions related to the current period\t$ 51\nincrease based on tax positions related to prior periods\t267\ndecreases based on tax positions related to prior periods\t-141 ( 141 )\ndecreases related to settlements with taxing authorities\t-146 ( 146 )\nbalance at december 31 2013\t$ 4096\nincrease based on tax positions related to the current period\t$ 135\nincrease based on tax positions related to prior periods\t100\ndecreases based on tax positions related to prior periods\t-2080 ( 2080 )\ndecreases related to settlements with taxing authorities\t-19 ( 19 )\ndecreases related to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations\t-4 ( 4 )\nbalance at december 31 2014\t$ 2228\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company is under continuous examination by the irs and other tax authorities in certain countries , such as japan and the u.k. , and in states in which the company has significant business operations , such as new york .\nthe company is currently under review by the irs appeals office for the remaining issues covering tax years 1999 2013 2005 and has substantially completed the irs field examination for the audit of tax years 2006 2013 2008 .\nalso , the company is currently at various levels of field examination with respect to audits by new york state and new york city for tax years 2007 2013 2009 .\nduring 2015 , the company expects to reach a conclusion with the u.k .\ntax authorities on substantially all issues through tax year 2010 , the resolution of which is not expected to have a material impact on the effective tax rate on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "258", "2228", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1158"}
{"example_id": "IP/2012/page_93.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in rent expenses between 2010 and 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2013\t2014\t2015\t2016\t2017\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 198\t$ 136\t$ 106\t$ 70\t$ 50\t$ 141\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3213\t828\t722\t620\t808\t2654\ntotal\t$ 3411\t$ 964\t$ 828\t$ 690\t$ 858\t$ 2795\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .\nrent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .\nguarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .\nwhere liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .\nenvironmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .\nmany of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .\nwhile joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .\nremedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .\ninternational paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .\none of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .\nduring 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .\nin june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .\nthe overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .\nin october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .\nin the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .\nin october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .\nit is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .\nin addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nother than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .\nthe company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .\nthe epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .\nregis .\nthe company is a successor in interest to st .\nregis .\ninternational paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .\naccordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .\nalso in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .\nthe suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .\nthe suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .\nregis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .\nalso named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .\nin mid-2011 , the suit was .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "205", "210", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-5"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2011/page_70.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the increase for the maximum company match on january 1 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .\nincome taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .\nsubsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .\nthe cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .\n18 .\nemployee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .\nemployees .\nthe company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .\nfor most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .\nfor those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .\nthe company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .\nthe company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .\neffective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .\nthis included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .\non january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .\ncompensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\na portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .\nas a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\n19 .\nother earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2011\t2010\t2009\nroyalty income\t55\t58\t45\nshare of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )\t37\t45\t-5 ( 5 )\ngain on sale of assets\t12\t8\t36\nother\t73\t69\t74\ntotal\t$ 177\t$ 180\t$ 150\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal $ 177 $ 180 $ 150 20 .\nstock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return .\nall current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc .\namended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 .\nshares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\ntotal stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nstock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc .\nstock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan .\nunder the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted .\nthe options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years .\nupon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock .\nthe ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "50%", "6%", ")", "multiply(", "75%", "6%", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.015"}
{"example_id": "C/2017/page_328.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth of the five-year cumulative total return of s&p financials from 2015 to 2016\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .\nthe graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .\ncomparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .\n\nTable:\ndate\tciti\ts&p 500\ts&p financials\n31-dec-2012\t100.0\t100.0\t100.0\n31-dec-2013\t131.8\t132.4\t135.6\n31-dec-2014\t137.0\t150.5\t156.2\n31-dec-2015\t131.4\t152.6\t153.9\n31-dec-2016\t152.3\t170.8\t188.9\n31-dec-2017\t193.5\t208.1\t230.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "188.9", "153.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "153.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.22742"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2013/page_112.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket risk management 2013 equity and other investment risk equity investment risk is the risk of potential losses associated with investing in both private and public equity markets .\npnc invests primarily in private equity markets .\nin addition to extending credit , taking deposits , and underwriting and trading financial instruments , we make and manage direct investments in a variety of transactions , including management buyouts , recapitalizations , and growth financings in a variety of industries .\nwe also have investments in affiliated and non- affiliated funds that make similar investments in private equity and in debt and equity-oriented hedge funds .\nthe economic and/or book value of these investments and other assets such as loan servicing rights are directly affected by changes in market factors .\nthe primary risk measurement for equity and other investments is economic capital .\neconomic capital is a common measure of risk for credit , market and operational risk .\nit is an estimate of the potential value depreciation over a one year horizon commensurate with solvency expectations of an institution rated single-a by the credit rating agencies .\ngiven the illiquid nature of many of these types of investments , it can be a challenge to determine their fair values .\nsee note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nvarious pnc business units manage our equity and other investment activities .\nour businesses are responsible for making investment decisions within the approved policy limits and associated guidelines .\na summary of our equity investments follows : table 55 : equity investments summary in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 312013\tdecember 312012\nblackrock\t$ 5940\t$ 5614\ntax credit investments\t2676\t2965\nprivate equity\t1656\t1802\nvisa\t158\t251\nother\t234\t245\ntotal\t$ 10664\t$ 10877\n\nPost-table text:\nblackrock pnc owned approximately 36 million common stock equivalent shares of blackrock equity at december 31 , 2013 , accounted for under the equity method .\nthe primary risk measurement , similar to other equity investments , is economic capital .\nthe business segments review section of this item 7 includes additional information about blackrock .\ntax credit investments included in our equity investments are tax credit investments which are accounted for under the equity method .\nthese investments , as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships , totaled $ 2.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.0 billion at december 31 , 2012 .\nthese equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $ 802 million and $ 685 million at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .\nthese unfunded commitments are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nnote 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report has further information on tax credit investments .\nsee also the critical accounting estimates and judgments section of this item 7 regarding asu 2014-01 and our intention to early adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2014 .\nprivate equity the private equity portfolio is an illiquid portfolio comprised of mezzanine and equity investments that vary by industry , stage and type of investment .\nprivate equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $ 1.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 1.8 billion at december 31 , 2012 .\nas of december 31 , 2013 , $ 1.1 billion was invested directly in a variety of companies and $ .6 billion was invested indirectly through various private equity funds .\nincluded in direct investments are investment activities of two private equity funds that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes .\nthe noncontrolling interests of these funds totaled $ 236 million as of december 31 , 2013 .\nthe interests held in indirect private equity funds are not redeemable , but pnc may receive distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments .\nsee item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation and item 1a risk factors of this report for discussion of the potential impacts of the volcker rule provisions of dodd-frank on our interests in and sponsorship of private funds covered by the volcker our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $ 164 million at december 31 , 2013 compared with $ 182 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nduring 2013 , we sold 4 million of visa class b common shares , in addition to the 9 million shares sold in 2012 , and entered into swap agreements with the purchaser of the shares .\nsee note 9 fair value and note 17 financial derivatives in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nat december 31 , 2013 , our investment in visa class b common shares totaled approximately 10 million shares and was recorded at $ 158 million .\nbased on the december 31 , 2013 closing price of $ 222.68 for the visa class a common shares , the fair value of our total investment was approximately $ 971 million at the 94 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "685", "10877", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06298"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2017/page_80.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nof prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .\nwe adopted the requirements of asu no .\n2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .\nwe expect the adoption of asu no .\n2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .\nwe do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .\n2017-07 .\nintangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .\n2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .\nthe new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .\nwewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .\nunder the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .\nthe new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .\nwe elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .\nthe impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .\nderivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .\n2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .\nthe guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .\nwe do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .\nwe plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .\nleases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .\n2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .\nthe new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .\nthe new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .\nwe plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .\nnote 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\t2016\t2015\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t287.8\t299.3\t310.3\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t2.8\t3.8\t4.4\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t290.6\t303.1\t314.7\n\nPost-table text:\nwe compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .\nour calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .\nthere were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .\nnote 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .\nthe purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .\nas a result of the acquisition .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "290.6", "303.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-12.5"}
{"example_id": "LLY/2018/page_63.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in inventories between 2017 and 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .\nother inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .\nfifo cost approximates current replacement cost .\ninventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .\ninventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .\ninventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nfinished products\t$ 988.1\t$ 1211.4\nwork in process\t2628.2\t2697.7\nraw materials and supplies\t506.5\t488.8\ntotal ( approximates replacement cost )\t4122.8\t4397.9\nincrease ( reduction ) to lifo cost\t-11.0 ( 11.0 )\t60.4\ninventories\t$ 4111.8\t$ 4458.3\n\nPost-table text:\ninventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nnote 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .\nwholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .\nwe seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .\na large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .\nwe monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .\nmajor financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .\nin accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .\nwe are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .\nwe consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .\nthe cost of these investments approximates fair value .\nour equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .\n2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .\nany change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .\n2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .\nany change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .\nwe review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .\nour derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .\nmanagement reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "4111.8", "4458.3", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4458.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.07772"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2008/page_144.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the estimated price of hologic common stock used in the acquisition of suros?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .\nthe projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .\nthe deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nacquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\non july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\n( 201csuros 201d ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .\nthe results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .\nsuros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .\nthe initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 4600 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .\nthe company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .\n99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .\nthe components and allocation of the final purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006\t$ 13100\nin-process research and development\t4900\ndeveloped technology and know-how\t46000\ncustomer relationship\t17900\ntrade name\t5800\ndeferred income taxes\t-21300 ( 21300 )\ngoodwill\t181700\nfinal purchase price\t$ 248100\n\nPost-table text:\nthe acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .\nthe earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing .\nthe company has considered the provision of eitf issue no .\n95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of and acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price .\nduring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the company paid approximately $ 19000 to former suros shareholders for the first annual earn-out period resulting in an increase to goodwill for the same amount .\nthe company also accrued $ 24500 for the second and final earn-out related to suros 2019 incremental revenue growth during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 , with an increase to goodwill , of which $ 24400 had been paid as of september 27 , 2008 .\nin addition to the earn-out discussed above , the company decreased goodwill in the amount of $ 1300 during the year ended september 27 , 2008 and increased goodwill in the amount of $ 210 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .\nthe increase in 2007 was primarily related to recording a liability of approximately $ 550 in accordance with eitf 95-3 related to the termination of certain employees who have ceased all services for the company .\napproximately $ 400 of this liability was paid during the year ended september 29 , 2007 and the balance was paid during fiscal 2008 .\nthis increase was partially offset by a decrease to goodwill as a result of a change in the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .\nthe decrease in goodwill during 2008 was related to the reduction of an income tax liability .\nthere have been no other material changes to purchase price allocations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "106500", "4600", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "23.15217"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2009/page_72.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the increase in compensation cost recognized for rsus from 2008 to 2009\n\nPre-table text:\n70| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 the following table summarizes transactions for our rsus , excluding dividend equivalents , for 2009 : weighted average number of grant date restricted stock units rsus fair value .\n\nTable:\nrestricted stock units\tnumber of rsus\tweighted average grant date fair value\nrsus at december 31 2008\t401375\t$ 29.03\ngranted\t1583616\t$ 9.32\nvested\t-129352 ( 129352 )\t$ 28.39\nforfeited\t-172033 ( 172033 )\t$ 12.53\nrsus at december 31 2009\t1683606\t$ 12.23\n\nPost-table text:\ncompensation cost recognized for rsus totaled $ 7.3 million , $ 4.9 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested rsus granted under the plan , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years .\n( 14 ) financial instruments we are exposed to capital market risk , such as changes in interest rates .\nin an effort to manage interest rate risk , we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time .\nwe do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .\nin november 2007 , we entered into forward starting interest swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2009 .\nthe forward starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges .\nin march 2008 , we settled the forward starting swaps and made a cash payment of $ 14.6 million to the counterparties .\nan effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge was still in place for the expected debt offering .\nof the amount paid in settlement , approximately $ 700000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense , as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date .\nthe net amount of $ 13.9 million was recorded in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and is being recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering , which took place in may 2008 .\nthe remaining unamortized amount included as a reduction to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 9.3 million .\nin august 2005 , we entered into $ 300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007 .\nthe swaps qualified for hedge accounting , with any changes in fair value recorded in oci .\nin conjunction with the september 2007 issuance of $ 300.0 million of senior unsecured notes , we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated .\nthe settlement amount received of $ 10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows .\nthe remaining unamortized amount included as an increase to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 8.2 million .\nthe ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant .\nthe effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap .\nwe had no material interest rate derivatives , when considering both fair value and notional amount , at december 31 , 2009. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "7.3", "4.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.4898"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2007/page_126.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 2007 what was the ratio of the future debt maturities for 2011 to the amounts after 2012\n\nPre-table text:\nbefore the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no .\n128 , earnings per share .\nunder this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement .\ntherefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 .\nsenior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility .\nas a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed .\ncorporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants .\nas of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants .\nearly extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption .\nthe company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs .\nthe company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 .\nother corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions .\nthese loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet .\nsee note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings .\nfuture maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 2014\n2009\t2014\n2010\t2014\n2011\t453815\n2012\t2014\nthereafter\t2996337\ntotal future principal payments of corporate debt\t3450152\nunamortized discount net\t-427454 ( 427454 )\ntotal corporate debt\t$ 3022698\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "453815", "2996337", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15146"}
{"example_id": "IP/2009/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nnorth american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nfor uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .\ninput costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .\nplanned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .\nasian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .\noperating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .\nu.s .\nmarket pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .\nsales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .\ninput costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .\nmill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .\nlack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .\nin the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .\ninput costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .\nplanned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .\noperating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .\nexcluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .\nbenefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .\nadditionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsales\t$ 3060\t$ 3195\t$ 3015\noperating profit\t433\t17\t112\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .\ncoated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .\nraw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .\noperating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .\nlack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .\noperating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .\nfoodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "2.5", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3195", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.78247"}
{"example_id": "ADBE/2018/page_86.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns in millions for fiscal 2018 and 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents adobe inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .\nthe deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .\nwe provide u.s .\nincome taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .\nto the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .\ntax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .\nincome taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .\nthe unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .\nwe also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .\nthe state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .\nfor fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .\naccounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 172945\t$ 178413\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t16191\t3680\ngross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t-4000 ( 4000 )\t-30166 ( 30166 )\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions\t60721\t24927\nsettlements with taxing authorities\t2014\t-3876 ( 3876 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-45922 ( 45922 )\t-8819 ( 8819 )\nforeign exchange gains and losses\t-3783 ( 3783 )\t8786\nending balance\t$ 196152\t$ 172945\n\nPost-table text:\nthe combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nthese amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .\nwe file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .\nstate and foreign jurisdictions .\nwe are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .\nour major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .\nfor ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .\nwe regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .\nwe believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .\nthe timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .\nthese events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .\nwe believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .\ngiven the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "24.6", "23.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "48.2"}
{"example_id": "C/2017/page_328.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock and s&p financials?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .\nthe graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .\ncomparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .\n\nTable:\ndate\tciti\ts&p 500\ts&p financials\n31-dec-2012\t100.0\t100.0\t100.0\n31-dec-2013\t131.8\t132.4\t135.6\n31-dec-2014\t137.0\t150.5\t156.2\n31-dec-2015\t131.4\t152.6\t153.9\n31-dec-2016\t152.3\t170.8\t188.9\n31-dec-2017\t193.5\t208.1\t230.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "193.5", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "230.9", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.374"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_46.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif there were 50 facilities being rated in 2009 , how many were bbb/baa?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket street commitments by credit rating ( a ) december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2009\tdecember 312008\naaa/aaa\t14% ( 14 % )\t19% ( 19 % )\naa/aa\t50\t6\na/a\t34\t72\nbbb/baa\t2\t3\ntotal\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the majority of our facilities are not explicitly rated by the rating agencies .\nall facilities are structured to meet rating agency standards for applicable rating levels .\nwe evaluated the design of market street , its capital structure , the note , and relationships among the variable interest holders .\nbased on this analysis and under accounting guidance effective during 2009 and 2008 , we are not the primary beneficiary and therefore the assets and liabilities of market street are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nwe considered changes to the variable interest holders ( such as new expected loss note investors and changes to program- level credit enhancement providers ) , terms of expected loss notes , and new types of risks related to market street as reconsideration events .\nwe reviewed the activities of market street on at least a quarterly basis to determine if a reconsideration event has occurred .\ntax credit investments we make certain equity investments in various limited partnerships or limited liability companies ( llcs ) that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the low income housing tax credit ( lihtc ) pursuant to sections 42 and 47 of the internal revenue code .\nthe purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital , to facilitate the sale of additional affordable housing product offerings and to assist us in achieving goals associated with the community reinvestment act .\nthe primary activities of the investments include the identification , development and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants .\ngenerally , these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity .\nwe typically invest in these partnerships as a limited partner or non-managing member .\nalso , we are a national syndicator of affordable housing equity ( together with the investments described above , the 201clihtc investments 201d ) .\nin these syndication transactions , we create funds in which our subsidiaries are the general partner or managing member and sell limited partnership or non-managing member interests to third parties , and in some cases may also purchase a limited partnership or non-managing member interest in the fund .\nthe purpose of this business is to generate income from the syndication of these funds , generate servicing fees by managing the funds , and earn tax credits to reduce our tax liability .\ngeneral partner or managing member activities include selecting , evaluating , structuring , negotiating , and closing the fund investments in operating limited partnerships , as well as oversight of the ongoing operations of the fund portfolio .\nwe evaluate our interests and third party interests in the limited partnerships/llcs in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary .\nthe primary beneficiary determination is based on which party absorbs a majority of the variability .\nthe primary sources of variability in lihtc investments are the tax credits , tax benefits due to passive losses on the investments and development and operating cash flows .\nwe have consolidated lihtc investments in which we absorb a majority of the variability and thus are considered the primary beneficiary .\nthe assets are primarily included in equity investments and other assets on our consolidated balance sheet with the liabilities classified in other liabilities and third party investors 2019 interests included in the equity section as noncontrolling interests .\nneither creditors nor equity investors in the lihtc investments have any recourse to our general credit .\nthe consolidated aggregate assets and liabilities of these lihtc investments are provided in the consolidated vies 2013 pnc is primary beneficiary table and reflected in the 201cother 201d business segment .\nwe also have lihtc investments in which we are not the primary beneficiary , but are considered to have a significant variable interest based on our interests in the partnership/llc .\nthese investments are disclosed in the non-consolidated vies 2013 significant variable interests table .\nthe table also reflects our maximum exposure to loss .\nour maximum exposure to loss is equal to our legally binding equity commitments adjusted for recorded impairment and partnership results .\nwe use the equity and cost methods to account for our investment in these entities with the investments reflected in equity investments on our consolidated balance sheet .\nin addition , we increase our recognized investments and recognize a liability for all legally binding unfunded equity commitments .\nthese liabilities are reflected in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\ncredit risk transfer transaction national city bank , ( a former pnc subsidiary which merged into pnc bank , n.a .\nin november 2009 ) sponsored a special purpose entity ( spe ) and concurrently entered into a credit risk transfer agreement with an independent third party to mitigate credit losses on a pool of nonconforming mortgage loans originated by its former first franklin business unit .\nthe spe was formed with a small equity contribution and was structured as a bankruptcy-remote entity so that its creditors have no recourse to us .\nin exchange for a perfected security interest in the cash flows of the nonconforming mortgage loans , the spe issued to us asset-backed securities in the form of senior , mezzanine , and subordinated equity notes .\nthe spe was deemed to be a vie as its equity was not sufficient to finance its activities .\nwe were determined to be the primary beneficiary of the spe as we would absorb the majority of the expected losses of the spe through our holding of the asset-backed securities .\naccordingly , this spe was consolidated and all of the entity 2019s assets , liabilities , and .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "100", "50", ")", "divide(", "#0", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_324.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat will be the yearly interest expense for entergy louisiana for the bond issued in 2012 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval .\npreferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements .\nentergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .\nentergy louisiana 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\n( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\n( $ 118415 )\t$ 49887\t$ 52807\t$ 61236\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .\nentergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 200 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , $ 50 million was outstanding on the credit facility .\nentergy louisiana obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 250 million .\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits .\nentergy louisiana has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances through july 2013 .\nin january 2012 , entergy louisiana issued $ 250 million of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due december 2014 .\nentergy louisiana used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the entergy system money pool .\nlittle gypsy repowering project in april 2007 , entergy louisiana announced that it intended to pursue the solid fuel repowering of a 538 mw unit at its little gypsy plant .\nin march 2009 the lpsc voted in favor of a motion directing entergy louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and , based upon an analysis of the project 2019s economic viability , to make a recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project .\nthis action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices , as well as environmental concerns , the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets .\nin april 2009 , entergy louisiana complied with the lpsc 2019s directive and recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of three years or more .\nin may 2009 the lpsc issued an order declaring that entergy louisiana 2019s decision to place the little gypsy project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and prudent .\nin october 2009 , entergy louisiana made a filing with the lpsc seeking permission to cancel the little gypsy repowering project and seeking project cost recovery over a five-year period .\nin june 2010 and august 2010 , the lpsc staff and intervenors filed testimony .\nthe lpsc staff ( 1 ) agreed that it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation and that the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent ; ( 2 ) indicated that , except for $ 0.8 million in compensation-related costs , the costs incurred should be deemed prudent ; ( 3 ) recommended recovery from customers over ten years but stated that the lpsc may want to consider 15 years ; ( 4 ) allowed for recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs , but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt , while also acknowledging that the lpsc may consider ordering no return ; and ( 5 ) indicated that entergy louisiana should be directed to securitize project costs , if legally feasible and in the public interest .\nin the third quarter 2010 , in accordance with accounting standards , entergy louisiana determined that it was probable that the little gypsy repowering project would be abandoned and accordingly reclassified $ 199.8 million of project costs from construction work in progress to a regulatory asset .\na hearing on the issues , except for cost allocation among customer classes , was held before the alj in november 2010 .\nin january 2011 all parties participated in a mediation on the disputed issues , resulting in a settlement of all disputed issues , including cost recovery and cost allocation .\nthe settlement provides for entergy louisiana to recover $ 200 million as of march 31 , 2011 , and carrying costs on that amount on specified terms thereafter .\nthe settlement also provides for entergy louisiana to recover the approved project costs by securitization .\nin april 2011 , entergy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "250", "1.875%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "249.98125"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_85.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the interest expense in 2015 assuming that all the debt is interest bearing debt , ( in billions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 750\t3.375% ( 3.375 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2025\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "28.5", "3.0%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.855"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2003/page_24.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were capital expenditures associated with the retail segment since its inception , exclusive of the amount incurred during 2003 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\n24 of 93 net sales in japan remained flat during 2002 versus 2001 , with a slight decline in unit sales of 2% ( 2 % ) .\nconsistent with the company 2019s other geographic operating segments , during 2002 japan showed growth in unit sales of consumer systems and a decline in unit sales of power macintosh systems .\njapan 2019s imac unit sales increased 85% ( 85 % ) in 2002 .\nhowever , in the case of japan the increase in imac unit shipments in 2002 versus 2001 was primarily the result of the unusually depressed level of net sales experienced by the company in the first quarter of 2001 as discussed above .\nadditionally , net sales in japan on a sequential and year-over-year comparative basis generally worsened as 2002 progressed reflecting particularly poor economic conditions in japan .\nretail the company opened 25 new retail stores during 2003 , bringing the total number of open stores to 65 as of september 27 , 2003 , which compares to 40 open stores as of september 28 , 2002 and 8 open stores as of september 29 , 2001 .\nduring the first quarter of fiscal 2004 , the company opened 9 additional stores including its first international store in the ginza in tokyo , japan .\nthe retail segment 2019s net sales grew to $ 621 million during 2003 from $ 283 million in 2002 and from $ 19 million in 2001 .\nthe $ 338 million or 119% ( 119 % ) increase in net sales during 2003 reflects the impact from opening 25 new stores in 2003 , the full year impact of 2002 store openings , as well as an increase in average revenue per store .\ntotal macintosh sales increased by approximately $ 170 million of which $ 108 million related to year-over-year increases in powerbook sales .\nthe retail segment has also contributed strongly to the increases in net sales of peripherals , software and services experienced by the company during 2003 .\nduring 2003 , approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the retail segment 2019s net sales came from the sale of apple-branded and third-party peripherals , software and services as compared to 28% ( 28 % ) for the company as a whole .\nwith an average of 54 stores open during 2003 , the retail segment achieved annualized revenue per store of approximately $ 11.5 million , as compared to approximately $ 10.2 million based on an average of 28 stores open in 2002 .\nas measured by the company 2019s operating segment reporting , the retail segment improved from a loss of $ 22 million during 2002 to a loss of $ 5 million during 2003 .\nthis improvement is primarily attributable to the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in net sales , which resulted in higher leverage on occupancy , depreciation and other fixed costs .\nexpansion of the retail segment has required and will continue to require a substantial investment in fixed assets and related infrastructure , operating lease commitments , personnel , and other operating expenses .\ncapital expenditures associated with the retail segment since its inception totaled approximately $ 290 million through the end of fiscal 2003 , $ 92 million of which was incurred during 2003 .\nas of september 27 , 2003 , the retail segment had approximately 1300 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of $ 354 million .\nthe company would incur substantial costs should it choose to terminate its retail segment or close individual stores .\nsuch costs could adversely affect the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition .\ninvestment in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment 2019s operating expenses .\ngross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2003 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2003\t2002\t2001\nnet sales\t$ 6207\t$ 5742\t$ 5363\ncost of sales\t4499\t4139\t4128\ngross margin\t$ 1708\t$ 1603\t$ 1235\ngross margin percentage\t27.5% ( 27.5 % )\t27.9% ( 27.9 % )\t23.0% ( 23.0 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ngross margin decreased to 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) of net sales in 2003 from 27.9% ( 27.9 % ) of net sales in 2002 .\nthis decline in gross margin reflects relatively aggressive pricing actions on several macintosh models instituted by the company beginning in late fiscal 2002 as a result of continued pricing pressure throughout the personal computer industry , lower sales of relatively higher margin power macintosh systems during the first three fiscal quarters of 2003 , and increased air freight and manufacturing costs associated with the production ramp-up of the new power mac g5 and 15-inch powerbook , both of which began shipping in volume during september 2003 .\nthis decline is also attributable to a rise in certain component costs as the year progressed .\nthe aforementioned negative factors affecting gross margins during 2003 were partially offset by the increase in higher margin software and direct sales .\nthe company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2004 in light of weak economic conditions , price competition in the personal computer industry , and potential increases in component pricing .\nthe company also expects to continue to incur air freight charges on the power mac g5 and other products during 2004 .\nthe foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin during 2004 , general demand for personal computers , anticipated industry component pricing , anticipated air freight charges , and future economic conditions are forward-looking .\nthere can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained .\nin general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "290", "92", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "198"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2015/page_109.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the difference in payments between entergy arkansas and entergy new orleans , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements entergy arkansas made its payment in january 2012 .\nin february 2012 , entergy arkansas filed for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $ 156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from march 2012 through december 2013 .\nin march 2012 the apsc issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider , subject to refund .\nthe lpsc and the apsc have requested rehearing of the ferc 2019s october 2011 order .\nin december 2013 the lpsc filed a petition for a writ of mandamus at the united states court of appeals for the d.c .\ncircuit .\nin its petition , the lpsc requested that the d.c .\ncircuit issue an order compelling the ferc to issue a final order on pending rehearing requests .\nin january 2014 the d.c .\ncircuit denied the lpsc 2019s petition .\nthe apsc , the lpsc , the puct , and other parties intervened in the december 2011 compliance filing proceeding , and the apsc and the lpsc also filed protests .\nin february 2014 the ferc issued a rehearing order addressing its october 2011 order .\nthe ferc denied the lpsc 2019s request for rehearing on the issues of whether the bandwidth remedy should be made effective earlier than june 1 , 2005 , and whether refunds should be ordered for the 20-month refund effective period .\nthe ferc granted the lpsc 2019s rehearing request on the issue of interest on the bandwidth payments/receipts for the june - december 2005 period , requiring that interest be accrued from june 1 , 2006 until the date those bandwidth payments/receipts are made .\nalso in february 2014 the ferc issued an order rejecting the december 2011 compliance filing that calculated the bandwidth payments/receipts for the june - december 2005 period .\nthe ferc order required a new compliance filing that calculates the bandwidth payments/receipts for the june - december 2005 period based on monthly data for the seven individual months including interest pursuant to the february 2014 rehearing order .\nentergy has sought rehearing of the february 2014 orders with respect to the ferc 2019s determinations regarding interest .\nin april 2014 the lpsc filed a petition for review of the ferc 2019s october 2011 and february 2014 orders with the u.s .\ncourt of appeals for the d.c .\ncircuit .\nthe appeal is pending .\nin april and may 2014 , entergy filed with the ferc an updated compliance filing that provides the payments and receipts among the utility operating companies pursuant to the ferc 2019s february 2014 orders .\nthe filing shows the following net payments and receipts , including interest , among the utility operating companies : payments ( receipts ) ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tpayments ( receipts ) ( in millions )\nentergy arkansas\t$ 68\nentergy louisiana\t( $ 10 )\nentergy mississippi\t( $ 11 )\nentergy new orleans\t$ 2\nentergy texas\t( $ 49 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthese payments were made in may 2014 .\nthe lpsc , city council , and apsc have filed protests. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "68", "2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "66"}
{"example_id": "MSI/2006/page_61.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average rental expense , net of sublease income from 2004 to 2006 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\n53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .\nthe company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .\nthe company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .\nutilization of the non-u.s .\ncredit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .\ncontractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .\npayments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) total\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2007\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2008\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2009\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2010\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2011\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter\nlong-term debt obligations\t$ 4134\t$ 1340\t$ 198\t$ 4\t$ 534\t$ 607\t$ 1451\nlease obligations\t2328\t351\t281\t209\t178\t158\t1151\npurchase obligations\t1035\t326\t120\t26\t12\t12\t539\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 7497\t$ 2017\t$ 599\t$ 239\t$ 724\t$ 777\t$ 3141\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .\ndebt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .\na table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , \"\"debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .\nlease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .\nat december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .\nrental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .\npurchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .\nthe longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .\ntotal payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .\ncommitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .\nmost of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .\nhowever , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .\nif the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .\nthe company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than \"\"cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .\nthe majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .\nif these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .\nthe company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .\nsubsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .\nthe company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .\nthe company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .\nthese contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .\nthe total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "241", "250", ")", "add(", "#0", "205", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "349.5"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2018/page_31.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the period ending 12/29/2018?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii .\nitem 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .\nas of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .\nstockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 29 .\ncopyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .\nall rights reserved .\nnasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .\ns&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .\n\nTable:\n\t12/28/2013\t1/3/2015\t1/2/2016\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\t12/29/2018\ncadence design systems inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 135.18\t$ 149.39\t$ 181.05\t$ 300.22\t$ 311.13\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t112.60\t113.64\t133.19\t172.11\t165.84\ns&p 500\t100.00\t110.28\t109.54\t129.05\t157.22\t150.33\ns&p 500 information technology\t100.00\t115.49\t121.08\t144.85\t201.10\t200.52\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "311.13", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "165.84", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.4529"}
{"example_id": "HWM/2016/page_40.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2016 , what was the percentual increase in the high sale price observed during the first and second quarters?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .\nthe company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .\nprior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .\nas a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .\nthe reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .\nthe company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .\non november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .\nthe separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .\nthe company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .\nthe company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .\nthe following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .\nthe prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .\n\nTable:\nquarter\t2016 high\t2016 low\t2016 dividend\t2016 high\t2016 low\tdividend\nfirst\t$ 30.66\t$ 18.42\t$ 0.09\t$ 51.30\t$ 37.95\t$ 0.09\nsecond\t34.50\t26.34\t0.09\t42.87\t33.45\t0.09\nthird\t32.91\t27.09\t0.09\t33.69\t23.91\t0.09\nfourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )\t32.10\t16.75\t0.09\t33.54\t23.43\t0.09\nyear\t$ 34.50\t$ 16.75\t$ 0.36\t$ 51.30\t$ 23.43\t$ 0.36\n\nPost-table text:\nthe number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "34.50", "30.66", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.12524"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_26.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in net revenue during 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\namortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .\nthe increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .\nthe louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .\nthe tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .\nsee note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .\nincluded in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .\nentergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 1666\nnuclear realized price changes\t-149 ( 149 )\nrhode island state energy center\t-44 ( 44 )\nnuclear volume\t-36 ( 36 )\nfitzpatrick reimbursement agreement\t41\nnuclear fuel expenses\t68\nother\t-4 ( 4 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1542\n\nPost-table text:\nas shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .\nthe effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .\nsee 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1542", "1666", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-124"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2006/page_75.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nthe non-recurring charge for the office facility closing was what percent of lease expense in 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .\nthe company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .\nin december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2007\t1703\n2008\t1371\n2009\t1035\n2010\t710\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4819\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .\non may 15 , 2006 richard a .\nnazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "58000", "1262000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04596"}
{"example_id": "BDX/2019/page_45.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2019 what was the percent of the financing structure that was based on the equity\n\nPre-table text:\ndebt-related activities certain measures relating to our total debt were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2019\t2018\t2017\ntotal debt ( millions of dollars )\t$ 19390\t$ 21496\t$ 18870\nshort-term debt as a percentage of total debt\t6.8% ( 6.8 % )\t12.1% ( 12.1 % )\t1.1% ( 1.1 % )\nweighted average cost of total debt\t2.9% ( 2.9 % )\t3.2% ( 3.2 % )\t3.3% ( 3.3 % )\ntotal debt as a percentage of total capital ( a )\t45.6% ( 45.6 % )\t47.8% ( 47.8 % )\t57.5% ( 57.5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) represents shareholders 2019 equity , net non-current deferred income tax liabilities , and debt .\nthe decrease in short-term debt as a percentage of total debt at september 30 , 2019 was primarily driven by the payment of certain short-term notes as well as the issuance of long-term notes in 2019 .\nthe increase in short-term debt as a percentage of total debt at september 30 , 2018 was primarily driven by the reclassification of certain notes from long-term to short-term .\nadditional disclosures regarding our debt instruments are provided in note 16 to the consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data .\ncash and short-term investments at september 30 , 2019 , total worldwide cash and short-term investments were $ 620 million , including restricted cash , which was primarily held in jurisdictions outside of the united states .\nfinancing facilities in may 2017 , we entered into a five-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility which provides borrowing of up to $ 2.25 billion .\nthis facility will expire in december 2022 .\nwe are able to issue up to $ 100 million in letters of credit under this new revolving credit facility and it also includes a provision that enables bd , subject to additional commitments made by the lenders , to access up to an additional $ 500 million in financing through the facility for a maximum aggregate commitment of $ 2.75 billion .\nwe use proceeds from this facility to fund general corporate needs .\nborrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility at september 30 , 2019 were $ 485 million .\nthe agreement for our revolving credit facility contained the following financial covenants .\nwe were in compliance with these covenants as of september 30 , 2019 .\n2022 we are required to maintain an interest expense coverage ratio of not less than 4-to-1 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter .\n2022 we are required to have a leverage coverage ratio of no more than : 25e6 6-to-1 from the closing date of the bard acquisition until and including the first fiscal quarter- end thereafter ; 25e6 5.75-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 5.25-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 4.5-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 4-to-1 for the subsequent four fiscal quarters thereafter ; 25e6 3.75-to-1 thereafter .\nwe also have informal lines of credit outside the united states .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2019 , the company fully repaid its borrowings outstanding on a 364-day senior unsecured term loan facility that the company entered in september 2018 .\nthe company had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding as of september 30 , 2019 .\nwe may , from time to time , sell certain trade receivable assets to third parties as we manage working capital over the normal course of our business activities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "const_1", "45.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-44.6"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_54.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2013 what was the percent of the total operating revenues from mexico\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .\n1 .\nnature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s .\nour network includes 31838 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .\ngateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .\nwe own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases .\nwe serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .\nexport and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .\nthe railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .\nalthough we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .\nthe following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2013\t2012\t2011\nagricultural\t$ 3276\t$ 3280\t$ 3324\nautomotive\t2077\t1807\t1510\nchemicals\t3501\t3238\t2815\ncoal\t3978\t3912\t4084\nindustrial products\t3822\t3494\t3166\nintermodal\t4030\t3955\t3609\ntotal freight revenues\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t$ 18508\nother revenues\t1279\t1240\t1049\ntotal operatingrevenues\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t$ 19557\n\nPost-table text:\nalthough our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s .\neach of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico .\nincluded in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.1 billion in 2013 , $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , and $ 1.8 billion in 2011 .\nbasis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .\n( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .\n2 .\nsignificant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .\ninvestments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nall intercompany transactions are eliminated .\nwe currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .\ncash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .\naccounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .\nthe allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .\nreceivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2.1", "21963", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0001"}
{"example_id": "AWK/2013/page_132.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components\n\nPre-table text:\ncoupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds .\nthe yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) .\nhistorically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments .\nthe expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios .\nassumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes .\nbased on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets .\nthe company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases .\nassumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans .\nthe health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions .\na one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .\n\nTable:\n\tone-percentage-pointincrease\tone-percentage-pointdecrease\neffect on total of service and interest cost components\t$ 7367\t$ -5974 ( 5974 )\neffect on other postretirement benefit obligation\t$ 72238\t$ -60261 ( 60261 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "7367", "-5974", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1393"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_56.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the spread between the high and low henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe .\nour operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .\n2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis .\n2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states .\ncertain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .\nthese statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .\nin accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements .\nwe hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) .\nas discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings .\nour investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nunless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .\nbusiness , item 1a .\nrisk factors , item 6 .\nselected financial data and item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data .\noverview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .\nprices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year .\nprices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark\t2009\t2008\t2007\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\t$ 62.09\t$ 99.75\t$ 72.41\ndated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\t$ 61.67\t$ 97.26\t$ 72.39\nhenry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )\t$ 3.99\t$ 9.04\t$ 6.86\n\nPost-table text:\nhenry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index .\ncrude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession .\nthe price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 .\nour domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does .\nsour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark .\nthe differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "79.36", "33.98", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "45.38"}
{"example_id": "IP/2006/page_32.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2005 what percentage of consumer packaging sales were represented by foodservice net sales?\n\nPre-table text:\nearnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .\ncontainerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .\nsales volumes for u.s .\nconverted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .\naverage sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .\nan additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .\ncosts for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .\nmanufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .\neuro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .\noperating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .\ncompared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2005\t2004\nsales\t$ 2455\t$ 2245\t$ 2295\noperating profit\t$ 131\t$ 121\t$ 155\n\nPost-table text:\ncoated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .\nsales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .\nin 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .\naverage sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .\noperating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .\nthe impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .\nfoodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .\nsales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .\noperating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .\nraw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .\nshorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .\nsales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .\naverage sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .\noperating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .\nentering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .\nit is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .\nfoodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .\nhowever , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .\nshorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .\ndistribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "437", "2245", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19465"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2005/page_40.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the total commitment with an expiration of less that 1 year was subject to renewal\n\nPre-table text:\npage 38 five years .\nthe amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .\nto the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .\nwe have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcommitment expiration by period total commitment\tcommitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 3-5 years\tcommitment expiration by period after 5 years\nstandby letters of credit\t$ 2630\t$ 2425\t$ 171\t$ 18\t$ 16\nsurety bonds\t434\t79\t352\t3\t2014\nguarantees\t2\t1\t1\t2014\t2014\ntotal commitments\t$ 3066\t$ 2505\t$ 524\t$ 21\t$ 16\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .\nincluded in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .\napproximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .\nthese letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .\nsimilar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .\nour financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .\nif interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .\nthe estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .\nthe majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .\nwe have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .\nwe use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .\nthese exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .\nrelated gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .\nto the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .\nat december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .\nwe do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .\nrecent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .\nfas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2262", "2425", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.93278"}
{"example_id": "APD/2014/page_44.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2014 , what is the variation between the capital expenditures on a gaap basis and the one on a non-gaap basis?\n\nPre-table text:\ninvesting activities for the year ended 30 september 2014 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1638.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment .\nfor the year ended 30 september 2013 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1697.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions .\nfor the year ended 30 september 2012 , cash used for investing activities was $ 2435.2 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment , acquisitions , and investments in unconsolidated affiliates .\nrefer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail .\ncapital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\nadditions to plant and equipment\t$ 1684.2\t$ 1524.2\t$ 1521.0\nacquisitions less cash acquired\t2014\t224.9\t863.4\ninvestments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates\t-2.0 ( 2.0 )\t-1.3 ( 1.3 )\t175.4\ncapital expenditures on a gaap basis\t$ 1682.2\t$ 1747.8\t$ 2559.8\ncapital lease expenditures ( a )\t202.4\t234.9\t212.2\npurchase of noncontrolling interests in asubsidiary ( a )\t.5\t14.0\t6.3\ncapital expenditures on a non-gaap basis\t$ 1885.1\t$ 1996.7\t$ 2778.3\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests .\ncertain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases , and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities , if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease .\nadditionally , the payment for subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows .\nthe presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures .\ncapital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1682.2 , compared to $ 1747.8 in 2013 .\nthe decrease of $ 65.6 was primarily due to the acquisitions in 2013 .\nadditions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses .\nadditions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine , ongoing nature , including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements .\nspending in 2014 and 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china , hydrogen to the global market , and renewable energy in the u.k .\nin 2013 , we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use , net of cash acquired , of $ 224.9 .\nin the fourth quarter , we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang , china .\nduring the third quarter , we acquired epco , the largest independent u.s .\nproducer of liquid carbon dioxide ( co2 ) , and wcg .\nin 2012 , we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a .\nfor $ 690 and e.i .\ndupont de nemours and co. , inc . 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in our joint venture , da nanomaterials for $ 147 .\nwe also purchased a 25% ( 25 % ) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co .\nltd .\n( ahg ) , an unconsolidated affiliate , for $ 155 .\nrefer to note 5 , business combinations , and note 7 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding the acquisitions and the investments .\ncapital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1885.1 compared to $ 1996.7 in 2013 .\ncapital lease expenditures of $ 202.4 decreased by $ 32.5 , reflecting lower project spending .\n2015 outlook excluding acquisitions , capital expenditures for new plant and equipment in 2015 on a gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1650 and $ 1800 , and on a non-gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1700 and $ 1900 .\nthe non-gaap capital expenditures include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases , which are expected to be between $ 50 and $ 100 .\na majority of the total capital expenditures is expected to be for new plants .\nit is anticipated that capital expenditures will be funded principally with cash from continuing operations .\nin addition , we intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and investments in equity affiliates .\nfinancing activities for the year ended 2014 , cash used by financing activities was $ 504.3 primarily attributable to cash used to pay dividends of $ 627.7 , which was partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises of $ 141.6 .\nour borrowings ( short- and long-term proceeds , net of repayments ) were a net source of cash ( issuance ) of $ 1.1 and included $ 148.7 of net commercial paper and other short-term debt issuances , debt proceeds from the issuance of a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1885.1", "1682.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "202.9"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2015/page_48.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in interest income from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7a .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items .\nfrom time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks .\nderivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes .\ninterest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations .\nthe majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates .\nwe do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows .\nthe fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below .\nincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .\n\nTable:\nas of december 31,\tincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates\tincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates\n2015\t$ -33.7 ( 33.7 )\t$ 34.7\n2014\t-35.5 ( 35.5 )\t36.6\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates .\nwe do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .\nwe had $ 1509.7 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2015 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities .\nthe interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements .\nduring 2015 and 2014 , we had interest income of $ 22.8 and $ 27.4 , respectively .\nbased on our 2015 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 15.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2015 levels .\nforeign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nsince we report revenues and expenses in u.s .\ndollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s .\ndollars ) from foreign operations .\nthe primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2015 included the australian dollar , brazilian real , british pound sterling and euro .\nbased on 2015 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s .\ndollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2015 levels .\nthe functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency .\nassets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented .\nthe resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets .\nour foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk .\nhowever , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency .\nassets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement .\ncurrency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses .\nwe regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures .\nwe do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "22.8", "27.4", ")", "divide(", "#0", "27.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.16788"}
{"example_id": "AES/2002/page_46.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average high and low stock price for the second quarter of 2002?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .\nthe common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .\nprice range of common stock .\n\nTable:\n2002 first quarter\thigh $ 17.84\tlow $ 4.11\t2001 first quarter\thigh $ 60.15\tlow $ 41.30\nsecond quarter\t9.17\t3.55\tsecond quarter\t52.25\t39.95\nthird quarter\t4.61\t1.56\tthird quarter\t44.50\t12.00\nfourth quarter\t3.57\t0.95\tfourth quarter\t17.80\t11.60\n\nPost-table text:\nholders .\nas of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .\ndividends .\nunder the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .\nin addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .\nthe ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .\nsee the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "9.17", "3.55", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6.36"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2008/page_85.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nassuming a 5% ( 5 % ) rate of return , what would the earnings be ( in millions ) on 2008 total adjusted average assets?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .\ncredit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nunexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .\nthe capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .\ncredit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .\nactual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nstatistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .\nmarket risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .\ndaily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .\nthe firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .\nsee market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .\noperational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .\nthe operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .\nthe firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .\nprivate equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .\nin addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .\nthe capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .\nregulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .\nthe office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .\nthe federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .\nthe amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .\nthe occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .\nsimilar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .\njpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .\nfor more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .\nrisk-based capital components and assets .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in millions )\t2008\t2007\ntotal tier 1capital ( a )\t$ 136104\t$ 88746\ntotal tier 2 capital\t48616\t43496\ntotal capital\t$ 184720\t$ 132242\nrisk-weighted assets\t$ 1244659\t$ 1051879\ntotal adjusted average assets\t1966895\t1473541\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .\nbased on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .\nthe ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5", "const_100", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "1966895", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "98344.75"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2009/page_72.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the value of the rsu's granted\n\nPre-table text:\n70| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 the following table summarizes transactions for our rsus , excluding dividend equivalents , for 2009 : weighted average number of grant date restricted stock units rsus fair value .\n\nTable:\nrestricted stock units\tnumber of rsus\tweighted average grant date fair value\nrsus at december 31 2008\t401375\t$ 29.03\ngranted\t1583616\t$ 9.32\nvested\t-129352 ( 129352 )\t$ 28.39\nforfeited\t-172033 ( 172033 )\t$ 12.53\nrsus at december 31 2009\t1683606\t$ 12.23\n\nPost-table text:\ncompensation cost recognized for rsus totaled $ 7.3 million , $ 4.9 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 6.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested rsus granted under the plan , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years .\n( 14 ) financial instruments we are exposed to capital market risk , such as changes in interest rates .\nin an effort to manage interest rate risk , we may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time .\nwe do not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .\nin november 2007 , we entered into forward starting interest swaps with notional amounts appropriate to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2009 .\nthe forward starting swaps were appropriately designated and tested for effectiveness as cash flow hedges .\nin march 2008 , we settled the forward starting swaps and made a cash payment of $ 14.6 million to the counterparties .\nan effectiveness test was performed as of the settlement date and it was concluded that a highly effective cash flow hedge was still in place for the expected debt offering .\nof the amount paid in settlement , approximately $ 700000 was immediately reclassified to interest expense , as the result of partial ineffectiveness calculated at the settlement date .\nthe net amount of $ 13.9 million was recorded in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and is being recognized through interest expense over the life of the hedged debt offering , which took place in may 2008 .\nthe remaining unamortized amount included as a reduction to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 9.3 million .\nin august 2005 , we entered into $ 300.0 million of cash flow hedges through forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge interest rates on $ 300.0 million of anticipated debt offerings in 2007 .\nthe swaps qualified for hedge accounting , with any changes in fair value recorded in oci .\nin conjunction with the september 2007 issuance of $ 300.0 million of senior unsecured notes , we terminated these cash flow hedges as designated .\nthe settlement amount received of $ 10.7 million is being recognized to earnings through a reduction of interest expense over the term of the hedged cash flows .\nthe remaining unamortized amount included as an increase to accumulated oci as of december 31 , 2009 is $ 8.2 million .\nthe ineffective portion of the hedge was insignificant .\nthe effectiveness of our hedges is evaluated throughout their lives using the hypothetical derivative method under which the change in fair value of the actual swap designated as the hedging instrument is compared to the change in fair value of a hypothetical swap .\nwe had no material interest rate derivatives , when considering both fair value and notional amount , at december 31 , 2009. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1583616", "9.32", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "14759301.12"}
{"example_id": "APTV/2014/page_49.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage total return for delphi automotive plc for the five years ended december 31 2014?\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 .\n( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .\ncompany index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\ncompany index\tnovember 17 2011\tdecember 31 2011\tdecember 31 2012\tdecember 31 2013\tdecember 31 2014\ndelphi automotive plc ( 1 )\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.98\t$ 179.33\t$ 285.81\t$ 350.82\ns&p 500 ( 2 )\t100.00\t100.80\t116.93\t154.80\t175.99\nautomotive supplier peer group ( 3 )\t100.00\t89.27\t110.41\t166.46\t178.05\n\nPost-table text:\ndividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .\nthe board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .\nin january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 .\nin addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "350.82", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.5082"}
{"example_id": "ILMN/2007/page_78.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in net income ( loss ) on a pro forma basis between 2006 and 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ngoodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .\nthe company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .\nthe combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .\nthe company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .\nthe company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .\nthe company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\n2022 operating efficiencies .\nthe combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .\nthe company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .\nthe following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tyear ended december 30 2007\tyear ended december 31 2006\nrevenue\t$ 366854\t$ 187103\nnet income ( loss )\t$ 17388\t$ -38957 ( 38957 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share basic\t$ 0.32\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share diluted\t$ 0.29\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .\nthe pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\ninvestment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .\nthis investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .\nthis investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .\nillumina , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "17388", "-38957", ")", "divide(", "#0", "38957", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.44634"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_160.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent did the balance increase between the beginning of 2010 and the end of 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\n19 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .\nat december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthe year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .\ngoodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .\nsee note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .\ncurrent income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .\nas of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nthe company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .\nthe excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nthe determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .\nthe following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tyear ended december 31 , 2012\tyear ended december 31 , 2011\tyear ended december 31 , 2010\nbalance at january 1\t$ 349\t$ 307\t$ 285\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t4\t22\t10\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-1 ( 1 )\t-17 ( 17 )\nadditions based on tax positions related to current year\t69\t46\t35\nlapse of statute of limitations\t2014\t2014\t-8 ( 8 )\nsettlements\t-29 ( 29 )\t-25 ( 25 )\t-2 ( 2 )\npositions assumed in acquisitions\t12\t2014\t4\nbalance at december 31\t$ 404\t$ 349\t$ 307\n\nPost-table text:\nincluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .\nthe company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .\nrelated to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .\npursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .\nblackrock is subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .\ntax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .\nfederal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .\nwith few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .\nfederal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .\nthe internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .\nin november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nin july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .\nthe tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nthe company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .\nthe significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .\nno state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .\nno state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "404", "285", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.41754"}
{"example_id": "EW/2017/page_82.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total purchase price net of cash acquired is ipr&d ?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\nacquisitions ( continued ) 12 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to harpoon medical , inc . 2019s former shareholders .\nacquisition-related costs of $ 0.4 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2017 .\nharpoon medical , inc .\nis a medical technology company pioneering beating-heart repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation .\nthe company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products .\nthe acquisition was accounted for as a business combination .\ntangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date .\nthe excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 3.6\nproperty and equipment net\t0.3\ngoodwill\t142.1\nipr&d\t53.1\nother assets\t0.1\ncurrent liabilities assumed\t-0.8 ( 0.8 )\ndeferred income taxes\t-12.7 ( 12.7 )\ntotal purchase price\t185.7\nless : cash acquired\t-3.5 ( 3.5 )\ntotal purchase price net of cash acquired\t$ 182.2\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .\ngoodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .\nipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .\nthe fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .\nthis approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .\nthe discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) .\ncompletion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .\nthe risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .\nthe valuation assumed $ 41.4 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction .\nin the valuation , net cash inflows were modeled to commence in europe in 2018 , and in the united states and japan in 2022 .\nupon completion of development , the underlying research and development asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .\nthe results of operations for harpoon medical , inc .\nhave been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .\npro forma results have not been presented as the results of harpoon medical , inc .\nare not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .\nvaltech cardio ltd .\non november 26 , 2016 , the company entered into an agreement and plan of merger to acquire valtech cardio ltd .\n( 201cvaltech 201d ) for approximately $ 340.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , with the potential for up to an additional $ 350.0 million in pre-specified milestone-driven payments over the next 10 years .\nthe .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "53.1", "182.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.29144"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2008/page_85.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ntier 2 capital is what percent of total capital for 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .\ncredit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nunexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .\nthe capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .\ncredit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .\nactual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nstatistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .\nmarket risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .\ndaily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .\nthe firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .\nsee market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .\noperational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .\nthe operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .\nthe firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .\nprivate equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .\nin addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .\nthe capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .\nregulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .\nthe office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .\nthe federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .\nthe amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .\nthe occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .\nsimilar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .\njpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .\nfor more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .\nrisk-based capital components and assets .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in millions )\t2008\t2007\ntotal tier 1capital ( a )\t$ 136104\t$ 88746\ntotal tier 2 capital\t48616\t43496\ntotal capital\t$ 184720\t$ 132242\nrisk-weighted assets\t$ 1244659\t$ 1051879\ntotal adjusted average assets\t1966895\t1473541\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .\nbased on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .\nthe ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "48616", "184720", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.26319"}
{"example_id": "APD/2018/page_59.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the fair market value of plan assets in 2018 , what is its estimated return for 10 years?\n\nPre-table text:\nincome tax liabilities tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2018 were $ 233.6 .\nthese tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results .\nin addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities .\nhowever , the contractual obligations table above includes our accrued liability of approximately $ 184 for deemed repatriation tax that is payable over eight years related to the tax act .\nrefer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nobligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia .\nair products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan .\nin total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture .\nas of 30 september 2018 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 94.4 for our obligation to make future equity contributions in 2020 based on our proportionate share of the advances received by the joint venture under the loan .\nexpected investment in joint venture on 12 august 2018 , air products entered an agreement to form a gasification/power joint venture ( \"jv\" ) with saudi aramco and acwa in jazan , saudi arabia .\nair products will own at least 55% ( 55 % ) of the jv , with saudi aramco and acwa power owning the balance .\nthe jv will purchase the gasification assets , power block , and the associated utilities from saudi aramco for approximately $ 8 billion .\nour expected investment has been excluded from the contractual obligations table above pending closing , which is currently expected in fiscal year 2020 .\nthe jv will own and operate the facility under a 25-year contract for a fixed monthly fee .\nsaudi aramco will supply feedstock to the jv , and the jv will produce power , hydrogen and other utilities for saudi aramco .\npension benefits the company and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees .\nthe principal defined benefit pension plans are the u.s .\nsalaried pension plan and the u.k .\npension plan .\nthese plans were closed to new participants in 2005 , after which defined contribution plans were offered to new employees .\nthe shift to defined contribution plans is expected to continue to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions .\nthe fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2018 measurement date decreased to $ 4273.1 from $ 4409.2 at the end of fiscal year 2017 .\nthe projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4583.3 and $ 5107.2 at the end of fiscal years 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nthe net unfunded liability decreased $ 387.8 from $ 698.0 to $ 310.2 , primarily due to higher discount rates and favorable asset experience .\nrefer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits .\npension expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\t2016\npension expense 2013 continuing operations\t$ 91.8\t$ 72.0\t$ 55.8\nsettlements termination benefits and curtailments ( included above )\t48.9\t15.0\t6.0\nweighted average discount rate 2013 service cost\t3.2% ( 3.2 % )\t2.9% ( 2.9 % )\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\nweighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost\t2.9% ( 2.9 % )\t2.5% ( 2.5 % )\t3.4% ( 3.4 % )\nweighted average expected rate of return on plan assets\t6.9% ( 6.9 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\t7.5% ( 7.5 % )\nweighted average expected rate of compensation increase\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6.9%", "const_100", ")", "add(", "const_1", "#0", ")", "exp(", "#1", "10", ")", "multiply(", "4273.1", "#2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4302.67611"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_24.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2002 what was the ratio of the net mw in operation to the generation in gwh for the year\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .\nthe decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .\nthe refund was made in december 2001 .\n2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .\nutility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .\nnon-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .\nthe increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .\nfollowing are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .\n\nTable:\n\t2002\t2001\t2000\nnet mw in operation at december 31\t3955\t3445\t2475\ngeneration in gwh for the year\t29953\t22614\t7171\ncapacity factor for the year\t93% ( 93 % )\t93% ( 93 % )\t94% ( 94 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3955", "29953", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13204"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_87.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor 2013 , what was the total in millions of the combined interest only product and principal and interest product?\n\nPre-table text:\ngenerally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .\nduring the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .\nbased upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .\nhome equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tinterest only product\tprincipal and interest product\n2012\t$ 904\t$ 266\n2013\t1211\t331\n2014\t2043\t598\n2015\t1988\t820\n2016 and thereafter\t6961\t5601\ntotal ( a )\t$ 13107\t$ 7616\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .\nwe view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .\nbased upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .\ngenerally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .\nat that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .\nsee note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nloan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .\ninitially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .\nif a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .\nour programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .\ntemporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .\nfurther , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .\nadditional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\na temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .\ntypically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .\na permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .\npermanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .\nfor consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .\nexamples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .\npermanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .\nresidential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .\nwe also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .\nthe following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .\n78 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1211", "331", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1542"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_76.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2011 , did the company distribute more to shareholders than debtholders?\n\nPre-table text:\nare allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n12 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2011\tdec . 31 2010\naccounts payable\t$ 819\t$ 677\nincome and other taxes\t482\t337\naccrued wages and vacation\t363\t357\ndividends payable\t284\t183\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t325\ninterest payable\t197\t200\nequipment rents payable\t90\t86\nother\t624\t548\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3108\t$ 2713\n\nPost-table text:\n13 .\nfinancial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices .\nwe are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .\nderivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period .\nwe formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness .\nchanges in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings .\nwe may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements .\nmarket and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item .\nwe manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements .\nat december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities .\ndetermination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows .\ninterest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period .\nwe generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings .\nwe employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix .\nin addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities .\nswaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates .\nwe account for swaps as fair value .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "284", "197", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "yes"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_104.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the ratio of the deffered tax assets for the state income tax credit carry-forwards to the net operating loss carry-forward\n\nPre-table text:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nother state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .\n14 .\ndebt long-term debt consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2017\tdecember 31 2016\nsenior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t2014\t600\nsenior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t600\t600\nsenior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )\t600\t2014\nmississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )\t84\t84\ngulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )\t21\t21\nless unamortized debt issuance costs\t-26 ( 26 )\t-27 ( 27 )\ntotal long-term debt\t1279\t1278\n\nPost-table text:\ncredit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the \"credit facility\" ) with third-party lenders .\nthe credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .\nthe revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .\nthe revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( \"libor\" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .\nthe revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .\nthe commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .\nthe credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .\neach of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .\nin july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nsenior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .\nin november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .\ninterest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .\nthe terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "16", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5.33333"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2009/page_70.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of assets acquired by the acquisition are non-tangible assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos .\ncontractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 .\nsuch sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows .\nwe do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale .\nproceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities .\nother 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a .\nand euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain .\nlfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america .\nthe purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations .\nduring fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states .\nthe purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering .\nthe following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal\ngoodwill\t$ 13536\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t4091\ncontract-based intangible assets\t1031\nproperty and equipment\t267\nother current assets\t502\ntotal assets acquired\t19427\ncurrent liabilities\t-2347 ( 2347 )\nminority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )\t-486 ( 486 )\nnet assets acquired\t$ 16594\n\nPost-table text:\nthe customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .\nthe contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years .\nthese business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions .\nin addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million .\nthe value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately .\nthe remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years .\nfiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific .\nthis business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region .\nthe .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "13536", "4091", ")", "add(", "#0", "1031", ")", "divide(", "#1", "19427", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.96042"}
{"example_id": "MSI/2009/page_65.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2009 what was the company 2019s consolidated net sales in billions\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations indemnification provisions : in addition , the company may provide indemnifications for losses that result from the breach of general warranties contained in certain commercial , intellectual property and divestiture agreements .\nhistorically , the company has not made significant payments under these agreements , nor have there been significant claims asserted against the company .\nhowever , there is an increasing risk in relation to intellectual property indemnities given the current legal climate .\nin indemnification cases , payment by the company is conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract , which procedures typically allow the company to challenge the other party 2019s claims .\nfurther , the company 2019s obligations under these agreements for indemnification based on breach of representations and warranties are generally limited in terms of duration , typically not more than 24 months , and for amounts not in excess of the contract value , and in some instances the company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by the company .\nlegal matters : the company is a defendant in various lawsuits , claims and actions , which arise in the normal course of business .\nin the opinion of management , the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , liquidity or results of operations .\nsegment information the following commentary should be read in conjunction with the financial results of each operating business segment as detailed in note 12 , 2018 2018information by segment and geographic region , 2019 2019 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nnet sales and operating results for the company 2019s three operating business segments for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 are presented below .\nmobile devices segment the mobile devices segment designs , manufactures , sells and services wireless handsets , including smartphones , with integrated software and accessory products , and licenses intellectual property .\nin 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales represented 32% ( 32 % ) of the company 2019s consolidated net sales , compared to 40% ( 40 % ) in 2008 and 52% ( 52 % ) in 2007. .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions )\tyears ended december 31 2009\tyears ended december 31 2008\tyears ended december 31 2007\tyears ended december 31 2009 20142008\t2008 20142007\nsegment net sales\t$ 7146\t$ 12099\t$ 18988\t( 41 ) % (  % )\t( 36 ) % (  % )\noperating earnings ( loss )\t-1077 ( 1077 )\t-2199 ( 2199 )\t-1201 ( 1201 )\t( 51 ) % (  % )\t83% ( 83 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nsegment results 20142009 compared to 2008 in 2009 , the segment 2019s net sales were $ 7.1 billion , a decrease of 41% ( 41 % ) compared to net sales of $ 12.1 billion in 2008 .\nthe 41% ( 41 % ) decrease in net sales was primarily driven by a 45% ( 45 % ) decrease in unit shipments , partially offset by an 8% ( 8 % ) increase in average selling price ( 2018 2018asp 2019 2019 ) .\nthe segment 2019s net sales were negatively impacted by reduced product offerings in large market segments , particularly 3g products , including smartphones , and the segment 2019s limited product offerings in very low-tier products .\non a product technology basis , net sales decreased substantially for gsm , cdma and 3g technologies , partially offset by an increase in net sales for iden technology .\non a geographic basis , net sales decreased substantially in latin america , the europe , middle east and african region ( 2018 2018emea 2019 2019 ) and asia and , to a lesser extent , decreased in north america .\nthe segment incurred an operating loss of $ 1.1 billion in 2009 , an improvement of 51% ( 51 % ) compared to an operating loss of $ 2.2 billion in 2008 .\nthe decrease in the operating loss was primarily due to decreases in : ( i ) selling , general and administrative ( 2018 2018sg&a 2019 2019 ) expenses , primarily due to lower marketing expenses and savings from cost-reduction initiatives , ( ii ) research and development ( 2018 2018r&d 2019 2019 ) expenditures , reflecting savings from cost-reduction initiatives , ( iii ) lower excess inventory and other related charges in 2009 than in 2008 , when the charges included a $ 370 million charge due to a decision to consolidate software and silicon platforms , and ( iv ) the absence in 2009 of a comparable $ 150 million charge in 2008 related to settlement of a purchase commitment , partially offset by a decrease in gross margin , driven by the 41% ( 41 % ) decrease in net sales .\nas a percentage of net sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 , gross margin and r&d expenditures increased and sg&a expenses decreased .\nthe segment 2019s industry typically experiences short life cycles for new products .\ntherefore , it is vital to the segment 2019s success that new , compelling products are continually introduced .\naccordingly , a strong commitment to .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "7.1", "32%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "22.1875"}
{"example_id": "DISH/2013/page_138.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average revenue from discontinued operations in 2013 and 2011 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ndish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9 .\nacquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2 , 2012 , the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us .\non march 9 , 2012 , we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction , pursuant to which we acquired , among other things , certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar .\nin addition , during the fourth quarter 2011 , we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement ( the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d ) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint , including , but not limited to , issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar .\nthe total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $ 2.860 billion .\nthis amount includes $ 1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction , $ 1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction , and the net payment of $ 114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement .\nsee note 16 for further information .\nas a result of these acquisitions , we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date , including $ 102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue , distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsubsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 .\n10 .\ndiscontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased all material operations .\naccordingly , our consolidated balance sheets , consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations , unless otherwise noted .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively .\n201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively .\nin addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tas of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )\ncurrent assets from discontinued operations\t$ 68239\nnoncurrent assets from discontinued operations\t9965\ncurrent liabilities from discontinued operations\t-49471 ( 49471 )\nlong-term liabilities from discontinued operations\t-19804 ( 19804 )\nnet assets from discontinued operations\t$ 8929\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "503", "974", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "738.5"}
{"example_id": "ANSS/2013/page_55.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 312013 what was the percent of the total contractual obligations global headquarters operating leases\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations the company's significant contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2013 are summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tpayments due by period total\tpayments due by period within 1 year\tpayments due by period 2 2013 3 years\tpayments due by period 4 2013 5 years\tpayments due by period after 5 years\nglobal headquarters operating leases ( 1 )\t$ 68389\t$ 1429\t$ 8556\t$ 8556\t$ 49848\nother operating leases ( 2 )\t35890\t11401\t12045\t5249\t7195\nunconditional purchase obligations ( 3 )\t3860\t2872\t988\t2014\t2014\nobligations related to uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties ( 4 )\t933\t933\t2014\t2014\t2014\nother long-term obligations ( 5 )\t35463\t11140\t17457\t3780\t3086\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 144535\t$ 27775\t$ 39046\t$ 17585\t$ 60129\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) on september 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a lease agreement for a to-be-built office facility in canonsburg , pennsylvania , which will serve as the company's new headquarters .\nthe lease was effective as of september 14 , 2012 , but because the premises are under construction , the company will not be obligated to pay rent until january 1 , 2015 .\nthe term of the lease is 183 months , beginning on the date the company takes possession of the facility .\nthe company shall have a one-time right to terminate the lease effective upon the last day of the tenth full year following the date of possession ( anticipated to be december 31 , 2025 ) , by providing the landlord with at least 18 months' prior written notice of such termination .\nthe company's lease for its existing headquarters expires on december 31 , 2014 .\n( 2 ) other operating leases primarily include noncancellable lease commitments for the company 2019s other domestic and international offices as well as certain operating equipment .\n( 3 ) unconditional purchase obligations primarily include software licenses and long-term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services , which are unrecorded as of december 31 , 2013 .\n( 4 ) the company has $ 17.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits , including estimated interest and penalties , that have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with income tax accounting guidance for which the company is uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled .\nas a result , such amounts are excluded from the table above .\n( 5 ) primarily includes deferred compensation of $ 20.0 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 250000 within 1 year , $ 580000 within 2-3 years and $ 90000 within 4-5 years ) , contingent consideration of $ 8.0 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 360000 within 1 year and $ 740000 within 2-3 years ) and pension obligations of $ 5.4 million for certain foreign locations of the company .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "68389", "144535", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.47317"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2008/page_69.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the difference between the high wti crude oil and western canadian select prices?\n\nPre-table text:\ncrude oil , and political unrest in the middle east and elsewhere .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices dropped more rapidly than they had climbed as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and other countries entered recessions which decreased demand .\nduring 2008 , the average spot price per barrel for wti was $ 99.75 , up from an average of $ 72.41 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 44.60 .\nthe average spot price per barrel for brent was $ 97.26 in 2008 , up from an average of $ 72.39 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 36.55 .\nthe differential between wti and brent average prices widened to $ 2.49 in 2008 from $ 0.02 in 2007 .\nour domestic crude oil production is on average heavier and higher in sulfur content than light sweet wti .\nheavier and higher sulfur crude oil ( commonly referred to as heavy sour crude oil ) sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude oil benchmark .\nnatural gas prices on average were higher in 2008 than in 2007 .\na significant portion of our u.s .\nlower 48 states natural gas production is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas .\nthe average henry hub first-of-month price index was $ 2.18 per thousand cubic feet ( 201cmcf 201d ) higher in 2008 than the 2007 average .\nnatural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts .\nour other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile .\nas we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease .\ne&p segment income during 2008 was up 57 percent from 2007 , with revenue increases tied to these increases in average commodity prices accounting for almost half of the income improvement .\nliquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales volumes were also higher in 2008 than 2007 .\noil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce .\nroughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select .\noutput mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader .\nduring 2008 , our average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil was $ 91.90 per barrel , up from 2007 , but ended the year at $ 24.97 per barrel impacted by a heavier yield in december and a seasonal decrease in the value of our heavy output .\nthe operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed , and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime .\nper unit costs are sensitive to production rates .\nkey variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively .\nthe table below shows benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs , listing high and low spot prices during the year. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\thigh $ 145.29\tdate july 3\tlow $ 33.87\tdate december 19\nwestern canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a )\t$ 114.95\tjuly\t$ 23.18\tdecember\naeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b )\t$ 11.34\tjuly 1\t$ 5.42\tseptember 19\n\nPost-table text:\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) $ 145.29 july 3 $ 33.87 december 19 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 114.95 july $ 23.18 december aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b ) $ 11.34 july 1 $ 5.42 september 19 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada .\n( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index .\nour osm segment reported income of $ 258 million for 2008 , reflecting synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil sales averaging 32 mboepd .\nderivative instruments intended to hedge price risk on future sales have impacted revenues in the periods presented , with net gains of $ 48 million in 2008 and net losses of $ 53 million in 2007 .\nin the first quarter of 2009 , we entered into derivative instruments which effectively offset certain of our open derivative positions .\nrefining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs , retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise , and the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "145.29", "114.95", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "30.34"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_93.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total amount of parent company guarantees combined for 2007 and 2008 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .\nthe amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .\ncontingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .\nin addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .\nthe amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .\nwe have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .\nwhen the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .\nhowever , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .\nin such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .\nif deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .\ncompensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .\nthis future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .\nthe following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .\nwe have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .\nas such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .\nall payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\tthereafter\ttotal\ndeferred acquisition payments\t$ 67.5\t$ 32.1\t$ 30.1\t$ 4.5\t$ 5.7\t$ 2014\t$ 139.9\nput and call options with affiliates1\t11.8\t34.3\t73.6\t70.8\t70.2\t2.2\t262.9\ntotal contingent acquisition payments\t79.3\t66.4\t103.7\t75.3\t75.9\t2.2\t402.8\nless cash compensation expense included above\t2.6\t1.3\t0.7\t0.7\t0.3\t2014\t5.6\ntotal\t$ 76.7\t$ 65.1\t$ 103.0\t$ 74.6\t$ 75.6\t$ 2.2\t$ 397.2\n\nPost-table text:\n1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .\nin such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .\nas a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .\nd-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "255.7", "327.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "582.8"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_316.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent increase in net income was experienced between 2015 and 2016\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy arkansas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income .\n2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\nnet revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1520.5\nretail electric price\t33.8\nopportunity sales\t5.6\nasset retirement obligation\t-14.8 ( 14.8 )\nvolume/weather\t-29.0 ( 29.0 )\nother\t6.5\n2017 net revenue\t$ 1522.6\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .\na significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 .\nthe increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase .\nthe opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1520.5", "92.9", ")", "divide(", "92.9", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06507"}
{"example_id": "HIG/2008/page_318.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2008 what was the percent of the total gaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital associated with life operations\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies .\nthe statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2007 in the table below are based on actual statutory filings with the applicable regulatory authorities .\nthe statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2008 are estimates , as the respective 2008 statutory filings have not yet been the company has received approval from the connecticut insurance department regarding the use of two permitted practices in the statutory financial statements of its connecticut-domiciled life insurance subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe first permitted practice relates to the statutory accounting for deferred income taxes .\nspecifically , this permitted practice modifies the accounting for deferred income taxes prescribed by the naic by increasing the realization period for deferred tax assets from one year to three years and increasing the asset recognition limit from 10% ( 10 % ) to 15% ( 15 % ) of adjusted statutory capital and surplus .\nthe benefits of this permitted practice may not be considered by the company when determining surplus available for dividends .\nthe second permitted practice relates to the statutory reserving requirements for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders .\nactuarial guidelines prescribed by the naic require a stand-alone asset adequacy analysis reflecting only benefits , expenses and charges that are associated with the riders for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits .\nthe permitted practice allows for all benefits , expenses and charges associated with the variable annuity contract to be reflected in the stand- alone asset adequacy test .\nthese permitted practices resulted in an increase to life operations estimated statutory surplus of $ 987 as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe effects of these permitted practices are included in the 2008 life operations surplus amount in the table above .\nstatutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s .\ngaap was $ 9.3 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cus stat 201d ) was $ 13.8 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .\nsignificant differences between u.s .\ngaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with us stat include the following: .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2007\nlife operations\t$ 6047\t$ 5786\njapan life operations\t1718\t1620\nproperty & casualty operations\t6012\t8509\ntotal\t$ 13777\t$ 15915\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s .\ngaap while those costs are expensed immediately under us stat .\n2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s .\ngaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under us stat .\n2022 certain assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves are prescribed under us stat and are intended to be conservative , while the assumptions used under u.s .\ngaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates .\nin addition , the methodologies used for determining life reserve amounts are different between us stat and u.s .\ngaap .\nannuity reserving and cash-flow testing for death and living benefit reserves under us stat are generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines .\nunder these actuarial guidelines , in general , future cash flows associated with the variable annuity business are included in these methodologies with estimates of future fee revenues , claim payments , expenses , reinsurance impacts and hedging impacts .\nat december 31 , 2008 , in determining the cash-flow impacts related to future hedging , assumptions were made in the scenarios that generate reserve requirements , about the potential future decreases in the hedge benefits and increases in hedge costs which resulted in increased reserve requirements .\nreserves for death and living benefits under u.s .\ngaap are either considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves .\n2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s .\ngaap , while us stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value .\nin the case of the company 2019s market value adjusted ( mva ) fixed annuity products , invested assets are marked to fair value ( including the impact of credit spreads ) and liabilities are marked to fair value ( but generally actual credit spreads are not fully reflected ) for statutory purposes only .\n2022 us stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s .\ngaap does not .\nalso , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , us stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s .\ngaap does not .\n2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s .\ngaap , while under us stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6047", "13777", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.43892"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_47.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the return on total assets during 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 6 .\nselected financial data the following table sets forth our selected financial data .\nthe table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k. .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions except per share amounts )\tyear ended december 31 2017\tyear ended december 31 2016\tyear ended december 31 2015\tyear ended december 31 2014\tyear ended december 31 2013\nsales and service revenues\t$ 7441\t$ 7068\t$ 7020\t$ 6957\t$ 6820\ngoodwill impairment\t2014\t2014\t75\t47\t2014\noperating income ( loss )\t865\t858\t769\t655\t512\nnet earnings ( loss )\t479\t573\t404\t338\t261\ntotal assets\t6374\t6352\t6024\t6239\t6190\nlong-term debt ( 1 )\t1279\t1278\t1273\t1562\t1665\ntotal long-term obligations\t3225\t3356\t3260\t3562\t3277\nnet cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities\t814\t822\t861\t755\t260\nfree cash flow ( 2 )\t453\t537\t673\t590\t121\ndividends declared per share\t$ 2.52\t$ 2.10\t$ 1.70\t$ 1.00\t$ 0.50\nbasic earnings ( loss ) per share\t$ 10.48\t$ 12.24\t$ 8.43\t$ 6.93\t$ 5.25\ndiluted earnings ( loss ) per share\t$ 10.46\t$ 12.14\t$ 8.36\t$ 6.86\t$ 5.18\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) long-term debt does not include the current portion of long-term debt , which is included in current liabilities .\n( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds .\nsee liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "261", "6190", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04216"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_105.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage of the anticipated approximate tax refund in 2003 based on the nol $ 90.0 million .\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively .\nif not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\tfederal\tstate\n2006 to 2010\t$ 5248\t$ 469747\n2011 to 2015\t10012\t272662\n2016 to 2020\t397691\t777707\n2021 to 2025\t1744552\t897896\ntotal\t$ 2157503\t$ 2418012\n\nPost-table text:\nsfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards .\napproximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date .\nthe balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets .\nthe company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .\nthe company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses .\nin june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million .\nbased on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 .\nthere can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund .\nthe recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations .\nthe projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense .\naccordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .\nbased on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .\nthe realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .\nif the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity .\nfrom time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations .\nthe company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations .\nduring the year ended .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "90.0", "380.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.23684"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2012/page_70.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 2010 percent of the cabinets and related products to the total gross goodwill\n\nPre-table text:\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .\n\nTable:\n\tgross goodwill at december 31 2010\taccumulated impairment losses\tnet goodwill at december 31 2010\tadditions ( a )\tdiscontinued operations ( b )\tpre-tax impairment charge\tother ( c )\tnet goodwill at december 31 2011\ncabinets and related products\t$ 587\t$ -364 ( 364 )\t$ 223\t$ 2014\t$ 2014\t$ -44 ( 44 )\t$ 2\t$ 181\nplumbing products\t536\t-340 ( 340 )\t196\t9\t2014\t2014\t-4 ( 4 )\t201\ninstallation and other services\t1819\t-762 ( 762 )\t1057\t2014\t-13 ( 13 )\t2014\t2014\t1044\ndecorative architectural products\t294\t2014\t294\t2014\t2014\t-75 ( 75 )\t2014\t219\nother specialty products\t980\t-367 ( 367 )\t613\t2014\t2014\t-367 ( 367 )\t2014\t246\ntotal\t$ 4216\t$ -1833 ( 1833 )\t$ 2383\t$ 9\t$ -13 ( 13 )\t$ -486 ( 486 )\t$ -2 ( 2 )\t$ 1891\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) additions include acquisitions .\n( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .\nsubsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .\n( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .\nin the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .\nthe impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .\nthe impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .\nthe company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .\nin 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .\nthe pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .\nthe pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .\nthe company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .\nother indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .\nin 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .\nthe company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nin 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "587", "4216", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13923"}
{"example_id": "L/2015/page_59.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\t2015\nloews common stock\t100.0\t97.37\t106.04\t126.23\t110.59\t101.72\ns&p 500 index\t100.0\t102.11\t118.45\t156.82\t178.29\t180.75\nloews peer group ( a )\t100.0\t101.59\t115.19\t145.12\t152.84\t144.70\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .\nberkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .\n( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .\nand the travelers companies , inc .\ndividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .\nregular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "97.37", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.0263"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2003/page_24.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the greatest gross margin percentage in the three year period?\n\nPre-table text:\n24 of 93 net sales in japan remained flat during 2002 versus 2001 , with a slight decline in unit sales of 2% ( 2 % ) .\nconsistent with the company 2019s other geographic operating segments , during 2002 japan showed growth in unit sales of consumer systems and a decline in unit sales of power macintosh systems .\njapan 2019s imac unit sales increased 85% ( 85 % ) in 2002 .\nhowever , in the case of japan the increase in imac unit shipments in 2002 versus 2001 was primarily the result of the unusually depressed level of net sales experienced by the company in the first quarter of 2001 as discussed above .\nadditionally , net sales in japan on a sequential and year-over-year comparative basis generally worsened as 2002 progressed reflecting particularly poor economic conditions in japan .\nretail the company opened 25 new retail stores during 2003 , bringing the total number of open stores to 65 as of september 27 , 2003 , which compares to 40 open stores as of september 28 , 2002 and 8 open stores as of september 29 , 2001 .\nduring the first quarter of fiscal 2004 , the company opened 9 additional stores including its first international store in the ginza in tokyo , japan .\nthe retail segment 2019s net sales grew to $ 621 million during 2003 from $ 283 million in 2002 and from $ 19 million in 2001 .\nthe $ 338 million or 119% ( 119 % ) increase in net sales during 2003 reflects the impact from opening 25 new stores in 2003 , the full year impact of 2002 store openings , as well as an increase in average revenue per store .\ntotal macintosh sales increased by approximately $ 170 million of which $ 108 million related to year-over-year increases in powerbook sales .\nthe retail segment has also contributed strongly to the increases in net sales of peripherals , software and services experienced by the company during 2003 .\nduring 2003 , approximately 45% ( 45 % ) of the retail segment 2019s net sales came from the sale of apple-branded and third-party peripherals , software and services as compared to 28% ( 28 % ) for the company as a whole .\nwith an average of 54 stores open during 2003 , the retail segment achieved annualized revenue per store of approximately $ 11.5 million , as compared to approximately $ 10.2 million based on an average of 28 stores open in 2002 .\nas measured by the company 2019s operating segment reporting , the retail segment improved from a loss of $ 22 million during 2002 to a loss of $ 5 million during 2003 .\nthis improvement is primarily attributable to the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in net sales , which resulted in higher leverage on occupancy , depreciation and other fixed costs .\nexpansion of the retail segment has required and will continue to require a substantial investment in fixed assets and related infrastructure , operating lease commitments , personnel , and other operating expenses .\ncapital expenditures associated with the retail segment since its inception totaled approximately $ 290 million through the end of fiscal 2003 , $ 92 million of which was incurred during 2003 .\nas of september 27 , 2003 , the retail segment had approximately 1300 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of $ 354 million .\nthe company would incur substantial costs should it choose to terminate its retail segment or close individual stores .\nsuch costs could adversely affect the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition .\ninvestment in a new business model such as the retail segment is inherently risky , particularly in light of the significant investment involved , the current economic climate , and the fixed nature of a substantial portion of the retail segment 2019s operating expenses .\ngross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 27 , 2003 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2003\t2002\t2001\nnet sales\t$ 6207\t$ 5742\t$ 5363\ncost of sales\t4499\t4139\t4128\ngross margin\t$ 1708\t$ 1603\t$ 1235\ngross margin percentage\t27.5% ( 27.5 % )\t27.9% ( 27.9 % )\t23.0% ( 23.0 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ngross margin decreased to 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) of net sales in 2003 from 27.9% ( 27.9 % ) of net sales in 2002 .\nthis decline in gross margin reflects relatively aggressive pricing actions on several macintosh models instituted by the company beginning in late fiscal 2002 as a result of continued pricing pressure throughout the personal computer industry , lower sales of relatively higher margin power macintosh systems during the first three fiscal quarters of 2003 , and increased air freight and manufacturing costs associated with the production ramp-up of the new power mac g5 and 15-inch powerbook , both of which began shipping in volume during september 2003 .\nthis decline is also attributable to a rise in certain component costs as the year progressed .\nthe aforementioned negative factors affecting gross margins during 2003 were partially offset by the increase in higher margin software and direct sales .\nthe company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer industry will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2004 in light of weak economic conditions , price competition in the personal computer industry , and potential increases in component pricing .\nthe company also expects to continue to incur air freight charges on the power mac g5 and other products during 2004 .\nthe foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin during 2004 , general demand for personal computers , anticipated industry component pricing , anticipated air freight charges , and future economic conditions are forward-looking .\nthere can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained , targeted gross margin levels will be achieved , or current margins on existing individual products will be maintained .\nin general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "gross margin percentage", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.279"}
{"example_id": "RE/2015/page_33.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total value of fixed maturities and cash as of december 31 , 2015 , in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million .\nin 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities .\nin 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nin 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nthe company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets .\nthe average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized .\nthe company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million .\ncmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) .\nfurthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s .\nthe following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions )\tdecember 31 , average investments ( 1 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax effective yield\tdecember 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )\n2015\t$ 17430.8\t$ 473.8\t2.72% ( 2.72 % )\t$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )\t$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )\n2014\t16831.9\t530.6\t3.15% ( 3.15 % )\t84.0\t20.3\n2013\t16472.5\t548.5\t3.33% ( 3.33 % )\t300.2\t-467.2 ( 467.2 )\n2012\t16220.9\t600.2\t3.70% ( 3.70 % )\t164.4\t161.0\n2011\t15680.9\t620.0\t3.95% ( 3.95 % )\t6.9\t106.6\n\nPost-table text:\npre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash .\nbonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value .\ncommon stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value .\n( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) .\n( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "17.7", "87.4%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "15.4698"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2009/page_70.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of assets acquired by the acquisition are non-tangible assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos .\ncontractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 .\nsuch sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows .\nwe do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale .\nproceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities .\nother 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a .\nand euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain .\nlfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america .\nthe purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations .\nduring fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states .\nthe purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering .\nthe following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal\ngoodwill\t$ 13536\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t4091\ncontract-based intangible assets\t1031\nproperty and equipment\t267\nother current assets\t502\ntotal assets acquired\t19427\ncurrent liabilities\t-2347 ( 2347 )\nminority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )\t-486 ( 486 )\nnet assets acquired\t$ 16594\n\nPost-table text:\nthe customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .\nthe contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years .\nthese business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions .\nin addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million .\nthe value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately .\nthe remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years .\nfiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific .\nthis business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region .\nthe .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "13536", "4091", ")", "add(", "#0", "1031", ")", "divide(", "#1", "19427", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.96042"}
{"example_id": "CAG/2008/page_75.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 25 , 2008 , may 27 , 2007 , and may 28 , 2006 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts administrative expenses , including the reclassification of the cumulative after-tax charges of $ 21.9 million from accumulated other comprehensive income .\nduring fiscal 2007 , the company closed on the sale of these notes for approximately $ 117 million , net of transaction expenses , resulting in no additional gain or loss .\n8 .\ninventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2007\nraw materials and packaging\t$ 580.8\t$ 458.5\nwork in progress\t100.0\t94.6\nfinished goods\t1179.1\t1001.3\nsupplies and other\t71.6\t70.7\ntotal\t$ 1931.5\t$ 1625.1\n\nPost-table text:\n9 .\ncredit facilities and borrowings at may 25 , 2008 , the company had credit lines from banks that totaled approximately $ 2.3 billion .\nthese lines are comprised of a $ 1.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions which matures in december 2011 , uncommitted short-term loan facilities approximating $ 364 million , and uncommitted trade finance facilities approximating $ 424 million .\nborrowings under the multi-year facility bear interest at or below prime rate and may be prepaid without penalty .\nthe company has not drawn upon this multi- year facility .\nthe uncommitted trade finance facilities mentioned above were maintained in order to finance certain working capital needs of the company 2019s trading and merchandising operations .\nsubsequent to the sale of this business in june 2008 , the company exited these facilities .\nthe company finances its short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings , commercial paper borrowings , and bankers 2019 acceptances .\nas of may 25 , 2008 , the company had outstanding borrowings of $ 578.3 million , primarily under the commercial paper arrangements .\nthe weighted average interest rate on these borrowings as of may 25 , 2008 was 2.76% ( 2.76 % ) .\nthe average consolidated short-term borrowings outstanding under these facilities were $ 418.5 million and $ 4.3 million for fiscal 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1001.3", "1625.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.61615"}
{"example_id": "K/2013/page_62.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the company recognized tax-related interest and penalties in 2011 .\n\nPre-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2011 , the company recognized a decrease of $ 3 million of tax-related interest and penalties and had approximately $ 16 million accrued at december 31 , 2011 .\nnote 12 derivative instruments and fair value measurements the company is exposed to certain market risks such as changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates , and commodity prices , which exist as a part of its ongoing business operations .\nmanagement uses derivative financial and commodity instruments , including futures , options , and swaps , where appropriate , to manage these risks .\ninstruments used as hedges must be effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged and must be designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract .\nthe company designates derivatives as cash flow hedges , fair value hedges , net investment hedges , and uses other contracts to reduce volatility in interest rates , foreign currency and commodities .\nas a matter of policy , the company does not engage in trading or speculative hedging transactions .\ntotal notional amounts of the company 2019s derivative instruments as of december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2013\t2012\nforeign currency exchange contracts\t$ 517\t$ 570\ninterest rate contracts\t2400\t2150\ncommodity contracts\t361\t320\ntotal\t$ 3278\t$ 3040\n\nPost-table text:\nfollowing is a description of each category in the fair value hierarchy and the financial assets and liabilities of the company that were included in each category at december 28 , 2013 and december 29 , 2012 , measured on a recurring basis .\nlevel 1 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market .\nfor the company , level 1 financial assets and liabilities consist primarily of commodity derivative contracts .\nlevel 2 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability .\nfor the company , level 2 financial assets and liabilities consist of interest rate swaps and over-the-counter commodity and currency contracts .\nthe company 2019s calculation of the fair value of interest rate swaps is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve .\nover-the-counter commodity derivatives are valued using an income approach based on the commodity index prices less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .\nforeign currency contracts are valued using an income approach based on forward rates less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount .\nthe company 2019s calculation of the fair value of level 2 financial assets and liabilities takes into consideration the risk of nonperformance , including counterparty credit risk .\nlevel 3 2014 financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement .\nthese inputs reflect management 2019s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability .\nthe company did not have any level 3 financial assets or liabilities as of december 28 , 2013 or december 29 , 2012. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "16", "3", ")", "divide(", "3", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15789"}
{"example_id": "UAA/2016/page_52.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the operating margin for connected fitness in 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .\noperating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tyear ended december 31 , 2015\tyear ended december 31 , 2014\tyear ended december 31 , $ change\tyear ended december 31 , % (  % ) change\nnorth america\t$ 460961\t$ 372347\t$ 88614\t23.8% ( 23.8 % )\nemea\t3122\t-11763 ( 11763 )\t14885\t126.5\nasia-pacific\t36358\t21858\t14500\t66.3\nlatin america\t-30593 ( 30593 )\t-15423 ( 15423 )\t-15170 ( 15170 )\t-98.4 ( 98.4 )\nconnected fitness\t-61301 ( 61301 )\t-13064 ( 13064 )\t-48237 ( 48237 )\t-369.2 ( 369.2 )\ntotal operating income\t$ 408547\t$ 353955\t$ 54592\t15.4% ( 15.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .\nthis increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .\n2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .\nthese acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .\nseasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .\nseasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .\nthe level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .\nwe generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "-13064", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "19.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.68042"}
{"example_id": "DISCA/2012/page_39.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the difference in millions of international subscribers between discovery channel and animal planet?\n\nPre-table text:\ninternational networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\nour international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks .\nthis segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami .\ndiscovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks .\ninternational networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world .\nat december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities .\ninternational networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion .\nour international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .\n\nTable:\nglobal networks discovery channel\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246\tregional networks dmax\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90\nanimal planet\t183\tdiscovery kids\t61\ntlc real time and travel & living\t174\tquest\t26\ndiscovery science\t75\tdiscovery history\t13\ninvestigation discovery\t63\tshed\t12\ndiscovery home & health\t57\tdiscovery en espanol ( u.s. )\t5\nturbo\t42\tdiscovery familia ( u.s )\t4\ndiscovery world\t27\t\t\n\nPost-table text:\non december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs .\nwe have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter .\nif we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter .\nthe arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france .\non december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming .\n( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\neducation is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings .\nthis segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content .\nour education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations .\ncontent development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers .\nour content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers .\nour production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed .\nsubstantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs .\ncoproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties .\nlicensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "246", "183", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "63"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_38.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in the weighted-average discount rate for non-u.s . pension plans from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates have been discussed with our audit committee .\nthe following is a discussion of the more significant assumptions , estimates , accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements : 2022 revenue recognition - we recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists , delivery of product has occurred , the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured .\nfor our company , this means that revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss is transferred to our customers .\ntitle transfers to our customers upon shipment or upon receipt at the customer's location as determined by the sales terms for each transaction .\nthe company estimates the cost of sales returns based on historical experience , and these estimates are normally immaterial .\n2022 goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .\nwe perform our annual impairment analysis in the first quarter of each year .\nwhile the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .\nthe impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .\nif the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .\nto determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .\nat december 31 , 2015 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.4 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which is comprised of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .\nthe estimated fair value of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2015 .\nto determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .\nwe concluded that the fair value of our non-amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value , and any reasonable movement in the assumptions would not result in an impairment .\nthese discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .\nmanagement considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .\nsince the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .\n2022 marketing and advertising costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs which include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .\nthe costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .\ngaap .\nrecognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .\nfor volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer achieving the specified targets and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .\nfor other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .\nchanges in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .\nwe have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to estimate our marketing programs during the past three years .\n2022 employee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .\nbenefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .\nwe record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .\ngaap .\nthese calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .\nwe review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .\nas permitted by u.s .\ngaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .\nwe believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .\nweighted-average discount rate assumptions for pensions and postretirement plans are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\nu.s . pension plans\t4.30% ( 4.30 % )\t3.95% ( 3.95 % )\nnon-u.s . pension plans\t1.68% ( 1.68 % )\t1.92% ( 1.92 % )\npostretirement plans\t4.45% ( 4.45 % )\t4.20% ( 4.20 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe anticipate that assumption changes , coupled with decreased amortization of deferred losses , will decrease 2016 pre-tax u.s .\nand non- u.s .\npension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 209 million as compared with approximately $ 240 million in 2015 , excluding .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1.68", "1.92", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1.92", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.125"}
{"example_id": "CME/2012/page_70.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of minimum total assets available for default that was guaranty fund contributions ( 2 )\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcme clearingavailable assets\ndesignated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )\t$ 100.0\nguaranty fund contributions ( 2 )\t2899.5\nassessment powers ( 3 )\t7973.6\nminimum total assets available for default ( 4 )\t$ 10973.1\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2899.5", "10973.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.26424"}
{"example_id": "APD/2013/page_32.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the gaap basis , what was the growth observed in the effective tax rate during 2012 and 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nshutdown .\nthe customer , which primarily received products from the tonnage gases segment , filed for bankruptcy in may 2012 and announced the mill shutdown in august 2012 .\npension settlement loss our u.s .\nsupplemental pension plan provides for a lump sum benefit payment option at the time of retirement , or for corporate officers , six months after the retirement date .\npension settlements are recognized when cash payments exceed the sum of the service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost of the plan for the fiscal year .\nthe participant 2019s vested benefit is considered fully settled upon cash payment of the lump sum .\nwe recognized $ 12.4 of settlement charges in 2013 .\nadvisory costs during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we incurred legal and other advisory fees of $ 10.1 ( $ 6.4 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) in connection with our response to the rapid acquisition of a large position in shares of our common stock by pershing square capital management llc and its affiliates ( pershing square ) .\nthese fees , which are reflected on the consolidated income statements as 201cadvisory costs , 201d include costs incurred before and after pershing square 2019s disclosure of its holdings and cover advisory services related to the adoption of the shareholders rights plan , preparation for a potential proxy solicitation campaign , and entering into an agreement with pershing square .\nother income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .\nthe detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .\n2013 vs .\n2012 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 70.2 increased $ 23.1 , primarily due to higher gains from the sale of a number of small assets and investments and a favorable commercial contract settlement , partially offset by lower government grants .\notherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .\n2012 vs .\n2011 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.1 increased $ 5.4 , primarily due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements from government grants for expense , partially offset by lower gains from the sale of assets .\notherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .\ninterest expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\ninterest incurred\t$ 167.6\t$ 153.9\t$ 138.2\nless : capitalized interest\t25.8\t30.2\t22.7\ninterest expense\t$ 141.8\t$ 123.7\t$ 115.5\n\nPost-table text:\n2013 vs .\n2012 interest incurred increased $ 13.7 .\nthe increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance for $ 41 , partially offset by a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 24 .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in project spending and a lower average interest rate .\n2012 vs .\n2011 interest incurred increased $ 15.7 .\nthe increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance and debt issuance costs related to the indura s.a .\nacquisition , partially offset by the impact of a stronger dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by an increase in project spending which qualified for capitalization .\neffective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .\nrefer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .\n2013 vs .\n2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively .\nthe current year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs .\nthe prior year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 105.0 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans , $ 58.3 related to the second quarter spanish tax ruling , and $ 3.7 related to the customer .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "22.8%", "21.9%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.009"}
{"example_id": "ILMN/2007/page_78.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the year ended december 302007 what was the net margin\n\nPre-table text:\ngoodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .\nthe company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .\nthe combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .\nthe company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .\nthe company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .\nthe company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\n2022 operating efficiencies .\nthe combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .\nthe company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .\nthe following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tyear ended december 30 2007\tyear ended december 31 2006\nrevenue\t$ 366854\t$ 187103\nnet income ( loss )\t$ 17388\t$ -38957 ( 38957 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share basic\t$ 0.32\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share diluted\t$ 0.29\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .\nthe pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\ninvestment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .\nthis investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .\nthis investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .\nillumina , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "17388", "366854", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0474"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_127.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase in total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 17 .\naccumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( losses ) earnings ( in millions )\t( losses ) earnings 2015\t( losses ) earnings 2014\t2013\ncurrency translation adjustments\t$ -6129 ( 6129 )\t$ -3929 ( 3929 )\t$ -2207 ( 2207 )\npension and other benefits\t-3332 ( 3332 )\t-3020 ( 3020 )\t-2046 ( 2046 )\nderivatives accounted for as hedges\t59\t123\t63\ntotal accumulated other comprehensive losses\t$ -9402 ( 9402 )\t$ -6826 ( 6826 )\t$ -4190 ( 4190 )\n\nPost-table text:\nreclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .\nthe movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business .\nin addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .\nfor additional information , see note 13 .\nbenefit plans and note 15 .\nfinancial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments .\nnote 18 .\ncolombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products .\nthe investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco .\nas a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 .\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement .\nthese discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 .\nnote 19 .\nrbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc .\n( \"rothmans\" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc .\n( \"rbh\" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand .\nthe settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period .\nrothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh .\nthe remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6826", "4190", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4190", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.62912"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2016/page_418.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .\n2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .\nnet revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 637.2\nreserve equalization\t14.3\npurchased power capacity\t12.4\ntransmission revenue\t7.0\nretail electric price\t5.4\nnet wholesale\t-27.8 ( 27.8 )\nother\t-4.3 ( 4.3 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 644.2\n\nPost-table text:\nthe reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .\nthe transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "644.2", "637.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "7"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2018/page_31.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the period ending 12/29/2018?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii .\nitem 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .\nas of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .\nstockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 29 .\ncopyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .\nall rights reserved .\nnasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .\ns&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .\n\nTable:\n\t12/28/2013\t1/3/2015\t1/2/2016\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\t12/29/2018\ncadence design systems inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 135.18\t$ 149.39\t$ 181.05\t$ 300.22\t$ 311.13\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t112.60\t113.64\t133.19\t172.11\t165.84\ns&p 500\t100.00\t110.28\t109.54\t129.05\t157.22\t150.33\ns&p 500 information technology\t100.00\t115.49\t121.08\t144.85\t201.10\t200.52\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "311.13", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.1113"}
{"example_id": "SNA/2012/page_33.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index in 2012\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .\nthe graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .\nsnap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ended ( 2 )\tsnap-onincorporated\tpeer group ( 3 )\ts&p 500\ndecember 31 2007\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\ndecember 31 2008\t83.66\t66.15\t63.00\ndecember 31 2009\t93.20\t84.12\t79.67\ndecember 31 2010\t128.21\t112.02\t91.67\ndecember 31 2011\t117.47\t109.70\t93.61\ndecember 31 2012\t187.26\t129.00\t108.59\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .\n( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .\n( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .\ngrainger , inc .\ncooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 .\n2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "187.26", "108.59", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.72447"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_48.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total revenues in 2009 based on the consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nof exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets .\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation .\norganic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .\nin 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 .\ncontributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives .\nthese items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation .\nconsulting .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 1267\t$ 1356\t$ 1345\nsegment operating income\t203\t208\t180\nsegment operating income margin\t16.0% ( 16.0 % )\t15.3% ( 15.3 % )\t13.4% ( 13.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 .\nhealth and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees .\nbenefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services .\n2 .\nretirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n3 .\ncompensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n4 .\nstrategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\noutsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services .\nbeginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nthe prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1267", "17%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "7452.94118"}
{"example_id": "C/2010/page_223.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage of allowance of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nincluded in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .\nin accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .\naccordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .\nin addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .\nhowever , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .\nwhere the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .\nthe carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .\nthe changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\taccretable yield\tcarrying amount of loan receivable\tallowance\nbeginning balance\t$ 27\t$ 920\t$ 95\npurchases ( 1 )\t1\t130\t2014\ndisposals/payments received\t-11 ( 11 )\t-594 ( 594 )\t2014\naccretion\t-44 ( 44 )\t44\t2014\nbuilds ( reductions ) to the allowance\t128\t2014\t-18 ( 18 )\nincrease to expected cash flows\t-2 ( 2 )\t19\t2014\nfx/other\t17\t-50 ( 50 )\t2014\nbalance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )\t$ 116\t$ 469\t$ 77\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .\nthese balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .\nthe related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .\n( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "392", "77", ")", "divide(", "77", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.16418"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_139.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was highest net rental expense in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement .\noperating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\t2007\nminimum rental ( a )\t$ 238\t$ 245\t$ 209\ncontingent rental\t19\t22\t33\nnet rental expense\t$ 257\t$ 267\t$ 242\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases .\n26 .\ncommitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment .\ncertain of these matters are discussed below .\nthe ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements .\nhowever , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably .\nenvironmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment .\nthese laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites .\npenalties may be imposed for noncompliance .\nat december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million .\nit is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed .\nreceivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 .\nlegal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 .\npresently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination .\nlike the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings .\nthe other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) .\nplaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 .\nin the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe .\nwe are vigorously defending these cases .\nwe have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases .\nwe do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nwe voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 .\nwe are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases .\na qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government .\nthe case currently pending is u.s .\nex rel harrold e .\nwright v .\nagip petroleum co .\net al .\nit is primarily a gas valuation case .\nmarathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms .\nsuch settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nguarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies .\nunder the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements .\nin addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "net rental expense", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "267"}
{"example_id": "CMCSA/2015/page_64.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat would the investment income ( loss ) have been in 2015 without the gain from the sale of shares of arris group common stock in 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nconsolidated other income ( expense ) items , net .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\ninterest expense\t$ -2702 ( 2702 )\t$ -2617 ( 2617 )\t$ -2574 ( 2574 )\ninvestment income ( loss ) net\t81\t296\t576\nequity in net income ( losses ) of investees net\t-325 ( 325 )\t97\t-86 ( 86 )\nother income ( expense ) net\t320\t-215 ( 215 )\t-364 ( 364 )\ntotal\t$ -2626 ( 2626 )\t$ -2439 ( 2439 )\t$ -2448 ( 2448 )\n\nPost-table text:\ninterest expense interest expense increased in 2015 primarily due to an increase in our debt outstanding and $ 47 million of additional interest expense associated with the early redemption in june 2015 of our $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due november 2015 and our $ 1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) senior notes due march 2016 .\ninterest expense increased in 2014 primarily due to the effect of our interest rate derivative financial instruments .\ninvestment income ( loss ) , net the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2015 was primarily due to a $ 154 million gain related to the sale of our shares of arris group common stock in 2014 .\nthe change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2014 was primarily due to a $ 443 million gain related to the sale of our investment in clearwire corporation in 2013 .\nthe components of investment income ( loss ) , net are presented in a table in note 7 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nequity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2015 was primarily due to twcc holding corp .\n( 201cthe weather channel 201d ) recording impairment charges related to goodwill .\nwe recorded expenses of $ 333 million in 2015 that represent nbcuniversal 2019s proportionate share of these impairment charges .\nthe change in 2015 was also due to an increase in our proportionate share of losses in hulu , llc ( 201chulu 201d ) , which were driven by hulu 2019s higher programming and marketing costs .\nin 2015 and 2014 , we recognized our pro- portionate share of losses of $ 106 million and $ 20 million , respectively , related to our investment in hulu .\nthe change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2014 was primarily due to $ 142 million of total equity losses recorded in 2013 attributable to our investment in hulu .\nin july 2013 , we entered into an agreement to provide capital contributions totaling $ 247 million to hulu , which we had previously accounted for as a cost method investment .\nthis represented an agreement to provide our first capital contribution to hulu since we acquired our interest in it as part of our acquisition of a controlling interest in nbcuniversal in 2011 ( the 201cnbcuniversal transaction 201d ) ; therefore , we began to apply the equity method of accounting for this investment .\nthe change in the method of accounting for this investment required us to recognize our propor- tionate share of hulu 2019s accumulated losses from the date of the nbcuniversal transaction through july 2013 .\nother income ( expense ) , net other income ( expense ) , net for 2015 included gains of $ 335 million on the sales of a business and an invest- ment , $ 240 million recorded on the settlement of a contingent consideration liability with general electric company ( 201cge 201d ) related to the acquisition of nbcuniversal , and $ 43 million related to an equity method investment .\nthese gains were partially offset by $ 236 million of expenses related to fair value adjustments to a contractual obligation .\nsee note 11 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements for additional information on this contractual obligation .\nother income ( expense ) , net for 2014 included a $ 27 million favorable settlement of a contingency related to the at&t broadband transaction in 2002 , which was more than offset by $ 208 million of expenses related to 61 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "81", "154", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-73"}
{"example_id": "STZ/2006/page_68.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the current ratio of robert mondavi?\n\nPre-table text:\nc o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .\nbaroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .\nopus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .\nthe acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .\nthe company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .\nthe vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .\nthe company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .\nthe company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .\nin particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .\ntotal con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .\nadditionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .\nthe purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .\nin accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .\nthe results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 513782\nproperty plant and equipment\t438140\nother assets\t124450\ntrademarks\t138000\ngoodwill\t634203\ntotal assets acquired\t1848575\ncurrent liabilities\t310919\nlong-term liabilities\t494995\ntotal liabilities assumed\t805914\nnet assets acquired\t$ 1042661\n\nPost-table text:\nthe trademarks are not subject to amortization .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nfollowing the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .\nthe company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .\namounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .\nno gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .\nhardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .\nas a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .\nthe acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .\nin october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .\ntotal consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .\nadditionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .\nthe acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .\nthe company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .\nthis charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .\nthe cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .\naddi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .\nthe company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .\nthe hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "513782", "310919", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.65246"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_24.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2001 to 2002?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .\nthe decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .\nthe refund was made in december 2001 .\n2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .\nutility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .\nnon-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .\nthe increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .\nfollowing are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .\n\nTable:\n\t2002\t2001\t2000\nnet mw in operation at december 31\t3955\t3445\t2475\ngeneration in gwh for the year\t29953\t22614\t7171\ncapacity factor for the year\t93% ( 93 % )\t93% ( 93 % )\t94% ( 94 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "201", "128", ")", "divide(", "#0", "128", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.57031"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_54.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were average backlog at year-end for mfc from 2013 to 2015 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .\nbacklog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .\ntrends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .\noperating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .\naccordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .\nmissiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .\nmfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .\nmfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nnet sales\t$ 6770\t$ 7092\t$ 6795\noperating profit\t1282\t1344\t1379\noperating margins\t18.9% ( 18.9 % )\t19.0% ( 19.0 % )\t20.3% ( 20.3 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t$ 15500\t$ 13300\t$ 14300\n\nPost-table text:\n2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .\nmfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .\n2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .\nmfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .\nthe decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "15500", "13300", ")", "add(", "#0", "14300", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "14366.66667"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2015/page_126.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2015 what was the percentage decline in the gross unrecognized tax benefits from 2014 to 2015\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nbalance at beginning of year\t$ 70.1\t$ 72.0\t$ 84.7\nadditions based on tax positions related to current year\t0.2\t0.8\t0.3\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t1.4\t5.0\t11.4\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-10.2 ( 10.2 )\t-6.0 ( 6.0 )\t-2.4 ( 2.4 )\nreductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations\t-0.6 ( 0.6 )\t-0.2 ( 0.2 )\t-1.3 ( 1.3 )\nsettlements\t-13.9 ( 13.9 )\t-1.5 ( 1.5 )\t-20.7 ( 20.7 )\nbalance at end of year\t$ 47.0\t$ 70.1\t$ 72.0\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million .\nduring 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million .\nduring 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years .\nthe resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million .\nincluded in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods .\nwe recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income .\nrelated to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million .\nduring 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million .\nduring 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million .\ngross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months .\nwe are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years .\nthese state audits are ongoing .\nwe believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate .\nhowever , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "47.0", "70.1", ")", "divide(", "#0", "70.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.32953"}
{"example_id": "AAP/2012/page_12.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\nbeginning stores\t3460\t3369\t3264\t3243\t3153\nnew stores ( 1 )\t116\t95\t110\t75\t109\nstores closed\t2014\t-4 ( 4 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-54 ( 54 )\t-19 ( 19 )\nending stores\t3576\t3460\t3369\t3264\t3243\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .\nstore technology .\nour store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively \"store system\" ) .\ninformation maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly .\nour fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles .\nour store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers .\nif a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors .\navailable parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time .\nour centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information .\nwe also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities .\nall of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability .\nwe plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience .\namong the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project .\nstore support center merchandising .\npurchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan .\nour roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals .\nour global sourcing team works closely with both teams .\nin fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases .\nour purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume .\nthe merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand .\nwe believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3460", "3369", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3369", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.02701"}
{"example_id": "KHC/2016/page_23.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the company owned facilities are located in europe?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments .\nitem 2 .\nproperties .\nour corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .\nour co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .\nbusiness units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .\nwe maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .\nwe manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .\nas of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .\nwe own 83 and lease four of these facilities .\nour manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .\n\nTable:\n\towned\tleased\nunited states\t43\t2\ncanada\t3\t2014\neurope\t11\t2014\nrest of world\t26\t2\n\nPost-table text:\nwe maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .\nwe also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .\nin the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .\nwe have reflected this change in the table above .\nsee note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nseveral of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .\nsee note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings .\nwe are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .\non april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .\ndistrict court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .\nthe complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .\nas previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .\nthe separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .\nwe do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .\nwhile we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures .\nnot applicable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "11", "83", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13253"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_21.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average price per share from november to december?\n\nPre-table text:\nrepurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share2\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs\noctober 1-31\t29704\t$ 5.99\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1-30\t4468\t$ 3.24\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1-31\t12850\t$ 3.98\t2014\t2014\ntotal1\t47022\t$ 5.18\t2014\t2014\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal1 .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .\n2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "3.24", "3.98", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.61"}
{"example_id": "C/2010/page_223.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the gross carrying amount in millions of the company's purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nincluded in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .\nin accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .\naccordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .\nin addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .\nhowever , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .\nwhere the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .\nthe carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .\nthe changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\taccretable yield\tcarrying amount of loan receivable\tallowance\nbeginning balance\t$ 27\t$ 920\t$ 95\npurchases ( 1 )\t1\t130\t2014\ndisposals/payments received\t-11 ( 11 )\t-594 ( 594 )\t2014\naccretion\t-44 ( 44 )\t44\t2014\nbuilds ( reductions ) to the allowance\t128\t2014\t-18 ( 18 )\nincrease to expected cash flows\t-2 ( 2 )\t19\t2014\nfx/other\t17\t-50 ( 50 )\t2014\nbalance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )\t$ 116\t$ 469\t$ 77\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .\nthese balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .\nthe related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .\n( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "392", "77", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "469"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_35.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nincluding the shares repurchased under the december 2007 repo agreement , what was the total authorized shares ( in millions ) eligible for repurchase under the january 23 , 2008 repurchase authorization?\\\\n\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\npage 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla .\nthe usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million .\nbased on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company .\neurope in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages .\nball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court .\nall other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees .\nthe relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation .\nitem 4 .\nsubmission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 .\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange .\nthere were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 .\ncommon stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 .\npurchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased ( a )\taverage pricepaid per share\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )\noctober 1 to october 28 2007\t705292\t$ 53.53\t705292\t4904824\noctober 29 to november 25 2007\t431170\t$ 48.11\t431170\t4473654\nnovember 26 to december 31 2007\t8310 ( c )\t$ 44.99\t8310\t4465344\ntotal\t1144772\t$ 51.42\t1144772\t\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities .\n( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors .\non january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock .\nthis repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations .\n( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million .\nalso does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "675000", "const_1000000", ")", "add(", "#0", "12", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "12.675"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2010/page_28.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation for the five year period ending 12/31/10?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .\nit assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .\nthe dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .\ntotal return analysis .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\t12/31/07\t12/31/08\t12/31/09\t12/31/10\nball corporation\t$ 100.00\t$ 110.86\t$ 115.36\t$ 107.58\t$ 134.96\t$ 178.93\ndj containers & packaging index\t$ 100.00\t$ 112.09\t$ 119.63\t$ 75.00\t$ 105.34\t$ 123.56\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 115.80\t$ 122.16\t$ 76.96\t$ 97.33\t$ 111.99\ncopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\ncopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "178.93", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.7893"}
{"example_id": "AES/2015/page_117.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in proportional free cash flow between 2013 and 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nproportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .\nthe proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .\nupon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .\nsee note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .\nbeginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nthe proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .\nwe also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .\nan example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .\nsee item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .\nthe gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .\nwe believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .\nfactors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .\nthe presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .\nproportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .\nproportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .\nour definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .\n\nTable:\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\t2015/2014 change\t2014/2013 change\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 2134\t$ 1791\t$ 2715\t$ 343\t$ -924 ( 924 )\nadd : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )\t165\t2014\t2014\t165\t2014\nadjusted operating cash flow\t2299\t1791\t2715\t508\t-924 ( 924 )\nless : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )\t-558 ( 558 )\t-359 ( 359 )\t-834 ( 834 )\t-199 ( 199 )\t475\nproportional adjusted operating cash flow\t1741\t1432\t1881\t309\t-449 ( 449 )\nless : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )\t-449 ( 449 )\t-485 ( 485 )\t-535 ( 535 )\t36\t50\nless : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )\t-51 ( 51 )\t-56 ( 56 )\t-75 ( 75 )\t5\t19\nproportional free cash flow\t$ 1241\t$ 891\t$ 1271\t$ 350\t$ -380 ( 380 )\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .\n( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .\nfor example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .\nthus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .\nassuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .\nthe company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .\nthe proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .\n( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .\n( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "-380", "1271", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.29898"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2017/page_71.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2015 and 2016 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc .\nand subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our foreign pension plan assets measured at fair value that used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 78.7\ngains on assets sold\t0.3\nchange in fair value of assets\t3.8\nnet purchases and sales\t5.2\ntranslation gain\t3.0\nending balance\t$ 91.0\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect that we will have no legally required minimum funding requirements in 2018 for the qualified u.s .\nand puerto rico defined benefit retirement plans , nor do we expect to voluntarily contribute to these plans during 2018 .\ncontributions to foreign defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 17.0 million in 2018 .\nwe do not expect the assets in any of our plans to be returned to us in the next year .\ndefined contribution plans we also sponsor defined contribution plans for substantially all of the u.s .\nand puerto rico employees and certain employees in other countries .\nthe benefits offered under these plans are reflective of local customs and practices in the countries concerned .\nwe expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\n15 .\nincome taxes 2017 tax act : the president signed u.s .\ntax reform legislation ( 201c2017 tax act 201d ) on december 22 , 2017 , which is considered the enactment date .\nthe 2017 tax act includes a broad range of provisions , many of which significantly differ from those contained in previous u.s .\ntax law .\nchanges in tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment .\nas such , our 2017 consolidated financial statements reflect the immediate tax effect of the 2017 tax act .\nthe 2017 tax act contains several key provisions including , among other things : 2022 a one-time tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 untaxed foreign earnings and profits ( e&p ) , referred to as the toll charge ; 2022 a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2022 the introduction of a new u.s .\ntax on certain off-shore earnings referred to as global intangible low-taxed income ( gilti ) at an effective tax rate of 10.5 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2017 ( increasing to 13.125 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2025 ) , with a partial offset by foreign tax credits ; and 2022 the introduction of a territorial tax system beginning in 2018 by providing a 100 percent dividend received deduction on certain qualified dividends from foreign subsidiaries .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded an income tax benefit of $ 1272.4 million , which was comprised of the following : 2022 income tax benefit of $ 715.0 million for the one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings .\nthis is composed of a $ 1181.0 million benefit from the removal of a deferred tax liability we had recorded for the repatriation of foreign earnings prior to the 2017 tax act offset by $ 466.0 million for the toll charge recognized under the 2017 tax act .\nin accordance with the 2017 tax act , we expect to elect to pay the toll charge in installments over eight years .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , we have recorded current and non-current income tax liabilities related to the toll charge of $ 82.0 million and $ 384.0 million , respectively .\n2022 an income tax benefit of $ 557.4 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted corporate income tax rate of 21 percent .\nthe net benefit recorded was based on currently available information and interpretations made in applying the provisions of the 2017 tax act as of the time of filing this annual report on form 10-k .\nwe further refined our estimates related to the impact of the 2017 tax act subsequent to the issuance of our earnings release for the fourth quarter of 2017 .\nin accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the sec , the income tax effect for certain aspects of the 2017 tax act represent provisional amounts for which our accounting is incomplete , but with respect to which a reasonable estimate could be determined and recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017 .\nthe actual effects of the 2017 tax act and final amounts recorded may differ materially from our current estimate of provisional amounts due to , among other things , further interpretive guidance that may be issued by u.s .\ntax authorities or regulatory bodies , including the sec and the fasb .\nwe will continue to analyze the 2017 tax act and any additional guidance that may be issued so we can finalize the full effects of applying the new legislation on our financial statements in the measurement period , which ends in the fourth quarter of 2018 .\nwe continue to evaluate the impacts of the 2017 tax act and consider the amounts recorded to be provisional .\nin addition , we are still evaluating the gilti provisions of the 2017 tax act and their impact , if any , on our consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe fasb allows companies to adopt an accounting policy to either recognize deferred taxes for gilti or treat such as a tax cost in the year incurred .\nwe have not yet determined which accounting policy to adopt because determining the impact of the gilti provisions requires analysis of our existing legal entity structure , the reversal of our u.s .\ngaap and u.s .\ntax basis differences in the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries , and our ability to offset any tax with foreign tax credits .\nas such , we did not record a deferred income tax .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "42.5", "40.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.3"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2011/page_82.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total goodwill is attributable to retail bank reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\njudgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .\ngoodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .\neach of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .\nthere is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .\nthe following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nreporting unit\tdecember 31 2011\nu.s . brokerage\t$ 1751.2\ncapital markets\t142.4\nretail bank\t40.6\ntotal goodwill\t$ 1934.2\n\nPost-table text:\nin connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthe fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .\nwe also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .\neffects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .\nestimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .\nif management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .\nintangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .\nif changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "40.6", "1934.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.02099"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2005/page_40.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of total commitments expire in 1-3 years?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 38 five years .\nthe amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .\nto the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .\nwe have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcommitment expiration by period total commitment\tcommitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 3-5 years\tcommitment expiration by period after 5 years\nstandby letters of credit\t$ 2630\t$ 2425\t$ 171\t$ 18\t$ 16\nsurety bonds\t434\t79\t352\t3\t2014\nguarantees\t2\t1\t1\t2014\t2014\ntotal commitments\t$ 3066\t$ 2505\t$ 524\t$ 21\t$ 16\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .\nincluded in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .\napproximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .\nthese letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .\nsimilar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .\nour financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .\nif interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .\nthe estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .\nthe majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .\nwe have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .\nwe use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .\nthese exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .\nrelated gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .\nto the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .\nat december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .\nwe do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .\nrecent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .\nfas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "524", "3066", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.17091"}
{"example_id": "FIS/2007/page_94.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the future minimum operating lease payments is due in the next 12 months?\n\nPre-table text:\ncompany has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .\nas a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .\nthere were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .\nleases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .\nseveral of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .\nfuture minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2008\t83382\n2009\t63060\n2010\t35269\n2011\t21598\n2012\t14860\nthereafter\t30869\ntotal\t$ 249038\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .\nrent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .\ndata processing and maintenance services agreements .\nthe company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nhowever , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .\n( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .\nemployee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .\nsubsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .\nplan .\nunder the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .\npursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .\nshares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .\nthe company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .\nthe company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .\nfidelity national information services , inc .\nand subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "83382", "249038", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.33482"}
{"example_id": "HUM/2017/page_133.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2016-2017 , what is the percentual increase observed in the payment amount per share?\n\nPre-table text:\nhumana inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 .\nstockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\npaymentdate\tamountper share\ttotalamount ( in millions )\n2015\t$ 1.14\t$ 170\n2016\t$ 1.16\t$ 172\n2017\t$ 1.49\t$ 216\n\nPost-table text:\non november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million .\ndeclaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .\nstock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .\nunder the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .\npursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .\naccordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program .\non february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement .\nwe also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 .\non february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co .\nllc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .\non february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock .\nthe payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr .\nupon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million .\nin addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock .\nsubsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.49", "1.16", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.28448"}
{"example_id": "PKG/2009/page_65.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total purchase commitments are due in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices .\ntotal purchase commitments are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\n2010\t$ 6951\n2011\t5942\n2012\t3659\n2013\t1486\n2014\t1486\nthereafter\t25048\ntotal\t$ 44572\n\nPost-table text:\nthese purchase agreements are not marked to market .\nthe company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .\nlitigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business .\nthese legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows .\nenvironmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies .\nfrom 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects .\nliabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions .\nbecause of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows .\nin connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill .\n13 .\nasset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs .\npca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills .\nin accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1486", "44572", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03334"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2017/page_111.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor revisions of previous estimates , what was the impact in mmboe resulting from an increase in drilling programs in u.s . resource plays and an increase in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices?\n\nPre-table text:\nsupplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .\n2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .\n2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .\nresource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .\ntechnical revisions .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .\n2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .\n2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .\nresource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .\nresource plays .\n2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .\nconventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .\nchanges in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .\nthe following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .\n\nTable:\nbeginning of year\t552\nrevisions of previous estimates\t5\nimproved recovery\t2014\npurchases of reserves in place\t15\nextensions discoveries and other additions\t57\ndispositions\t2014\ntransfers to proved developed\t-83 ( 83 )\nend of year\t546\n\nPost-table text:\nrevisions of prior estimates .\nrevisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .\nextensions , discoveries and other additions .\nincreased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "105", "67", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "172"}
{"example_id": "LLY/2018/page_63.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the finished products to the total inventory\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .\nother inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .\nfifo cost approximates current replacement cost .\ninventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .\ninventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .\ninventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nfinished products\t$ 988.1\t$ 1211.4\nwork in process\t2628.2\t2697.7\nraw materials and supplies\t506.5\t488.8\ntotal ( approximates replacement cost )\t4122.8\t4397.9\nincrease ( reduction ) to lifo cost\t-11.0 ( 11.0 )\t60.4\ninventories\t$ 4111.8\t$ 4458.3\n\nPost-table text:\ninventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nnote 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .\nwholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .\nwe seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .\na large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .\nwe monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .\nmajor financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .\nin accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .\nwe are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .\nwe consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .\nthe cost of these investments approximates fair value .\nour equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .\n2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .\nany change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .\n2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .\nany change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .\nwe review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .\nour derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .\nmanagement reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "988.1", "4111.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.24031"}
{"example_id": "APD/2013/page_32.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentual increase of other income due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nshutdown .\nthe customer , which primarily received products from the tonnage gases segment , filed for bankruptcy in may 2012 and announced the mill shutdown in august 2012 .\npension settlement loss our u.s .\nsupplemental pension plan provides for a lump sum benefit payment option at the time of retirement , or for corporate officers , six months after the retirement date .\npension settlements are recognized when cash payments exceed the sum of the service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost of the plan for the fiscal year .\nthe participant 2019s vested benefit is considered fully settled upon cash payment of the lump sum .\nwe recognized $ 12.4 of settlement charges in 2013 .\nadvisory costs during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we incurred legal and other advisory fees of $ 10.1 ( $ 6.4 after-tax , or $ .03 per share ) in connection with our response to the rapid acquisition of a large position in shares of our common stock by pershing square capital management llc and its affiliates ( pershing square ) .\nthese fees , which are reflected on the consolidated income statements as 201cadvisory costs , 201d include costs incurred before and after pershing square 2019s disclosure of its holdings and cover advisory services related to the adoption of the shareholders rights plan , preparation for a potential proxy solicitation campaign , and entering into an agreement with pershing square .\nother income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .\nthe detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .\n2013 vs .\n2012 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 70.2 increased $ 23.1 , primarily due to higher gains from the sale of a number of small assets and investments and a favorable commercial contract settlement , partially offset by lower government grants .\notherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .\n2012 vs .\n2011 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.1 increased $ 5.4 , primarily due to favorable foreign exchange and reimbursements from government grants for expense , partially offset by lower gains from the sale of assets .\notherwise , no individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .\ninterest expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\ninterest incurred\t$ 167.6\t$ 153.9\t$ 138.2\nless : capitalized interest\t25.8\t30.2\t22.7\ninterest expense\t$ 141.8\t$ 123.7\t$ 115.5\n\nPost-table text:\n2013 vs .\n2012 interest incurred increased $ 13.7 .\nthe increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance for $ 41 , partially offset by a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 24 .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in project spending and a lower average interest rate .\n2012 vs .\n2011 interest incurred increased $ 15.7 .\nthe increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance and debt issuance costs related to the indura s.a .\nacquisition , partially offset by the impact of a stronger dollar on the translation of foreign currency interest .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by an increase in project spending which qualified for capitalization .\neffective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .\nrefer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .\n2013 vs .\n2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively .\nthe current year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs .\nthe prior year rate includes income tax benefits of $ 105.0 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans , $ 58.3 related to the second quarter spanish tax ruling , and $ 3.7 related to the customer .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5.4", "47.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11465"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2017/page_138.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2017 what was the debt to equity based on the 2017 actual asset allocation\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) we determine the discount rate used in the measurement of our obligations based on a model that matches the timing and amount of expected benefit payments to maturities of high quality bonds priced as of the plan measurement date .\nwhen that timing does not correspond to a published high-quality bond rate , our model uses an expected yield curve to determine an appropriate current discount rate .\nthe yields on the bonds are used to derive a discount rate for the liability .\nthe term of our obligation , based on the expected retirement dates of our workforce , is approximately seven years .\nin developing our expected rate of return assumption , we have evaluated the actual historical performance and long-term return projections of the plan assets , which give consideration to the asset mix and the anticipated timing of the plan outflows .\nwe employ a total return investment approach whereby a mix of equity and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets for what we consider a prudent level of risk .\nthe intent of this strategy is to minimize plan expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run .\nrisk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities , plan funded status and our financial condition .\nthe investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income investments .\nfurthermore , equity investments are diversified across u.s .\nand non-u.s .\nstocks as well as growth , value , and small and large capitalizations .\nderivatives may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner ; however , derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of the underlying investments .\ninvestment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual liability measurements , periodic asset and liability studies , and quarterly investment portfolio reviews .\nthe following table summarizes our target asset allocation for 2017 and actual asset allocation as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 for our plan : target allocation actual allocation actual allocation .\n\nTable:\n\ttargetassetallocation\t2017actualassetallocation\t2016actualassetallocation\ndebt securities\t72% ( 72 % )\t70% ( 70 % )\t72% ( 72 % )\nequity securities\t28\t30\t28\ntotal\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nfor 2018 , the investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maintain a broadly diversified portfolio designed to achieve our target of an average long-term rate of return of 5.36% ( 5.36 % ) .\nwhile we believe we can achieve a long- term average return of 5.36% ( 5.36 % ) , we cannot be certain that the portfolio will perform to our expectations .\nassets are strategically allocated among debt and equity portfolios to achieve a diversification level that reduces fluctuations in investment returns .\nasset allocation target ranges and strategies are reviewed periodically with the assistance of an independent external consulting firm. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "70", "30", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.33333"}
{"example_id": "MS/2017/page_74.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of average common equity attribution in 2016 is made up of institutional securities?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis environment , for example , to incorporate changes in stress testing or enhancements to modeling techniques .\nwe will continue to evaluate the framework with respect to the impact of future regulatory requirements , as appropriate .\naverage common equity attribution1 $ in billions 2017 2016 2015 .\n\nTable:\n$ in billions\t2017\t2016\t2015\ninstitutional securities\t$ 40.2\t$ 43.2\t$ 34.6\nwealth management\t17.2\t15.3\t11.2\ninvestment management\t2.4\t2.8\t2.2\nparent company\t10.0\t7.6\t18.9\ntotal\t$ 69.8\t$ 68.9\t$ 66.9\n\nPost-table text:\n1 .\naverage common equity is a non-gaap financial measure .\nsee 201cselected non-gaap financial information 201d herein .\nregulatory developments resolution and recovery planning pursuant to the dodd-frank act , we are required to periodi- cally submit to the federal reserve and the fdic a resolution plan that describes our strategy for a rapid and orderly resolu- tion under the u.s .\nbankruptcy code in the event of our material financial distress or failure .\nour preferred resolution strategy , which is set out in our 2017 resolution plan , is an spoe strategy .\nwe submitted our full 2017 resolution plan on june 30 , 2017 .\nas indicated in our 2017 resolution plan , the parent company has amended and restated its support agreement with its material entities , as defined in our 2017 resolution plan .\nunder the secured amended and restated support agreement , upon the occur- rence of a resolution scenario , the parent company would be obligated to contribute or loan on a subordinated basis all of its contributable material assets , other than shares in subsidi- aries of the parent company and certain intercompany receiv- ables , to provide capital and liquidity , as applicable , to our material entities .\nthe obligations of the parent company under the secured amended and restated support agreement are in most cases secured on a senior basis by the assets of the parent company ( other than shares in subsidiaries of the parent company ) .\nas a result , claims of our material entities against the assets of the parent company ( other than shares in subsidiaries of the parent company ) are effectively senior to unsecured obliga- tions of the parent company .\nin december 2017 , we received joint feedback on our 2017 resolution plan from the federal reserve and the fdic .\nthe feedback identified no deficiencies in our 2017 resolution plan but noted one shortcoming to be remediated in our next resolution plan submission .\nfurther , the federal reserve and the fdic have extended the next resolution plan filing deadline for eight large domestic banks , including us , by one year to july 1 , 2019 .\nfor more information about resolution and recovery planning requirements and our activities in these areas , including the implications of such activities in a resolution scenario , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014financial holding company 2014resolution and recovery planning 201d and 201crisk factors 2014legal , regulatory and compliance risk . 201d legacy covered funds under the volcker rule the volcker rule prohibits 201cbanking entities , 201d including us and our affiliates , from engaging in certain 201cproprietary trading 201d activities , as defined in the volcker rule , subject to exemptions for underwriting , market-making-related activities , risk-mitigating hedging and certain other activities .\nthe volcker rule also prohibits certain investments and relation- ships by banking entities with 201ccovered funds , 201d with a number of exemptions and exclusions .\nin june 2017 , we received approval from the federal reserve of our application for a five-year extension of the transition period to conform invest- ments in certain legacy volcker covered funds that are also illiquid funds .\nthe approval covered essentially all of our non-conforming investments in , and relationships with , legacy covered funds subject to the volcker rule .\nfor more informa- tion about the volcker rule , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014activities restrictions under the volcker rule . 201d u.s .\ndepartment of labor conflict of interest rule the u.s .\ndol 2019s final conflict of interest rule under erisa went into effect on june 9 , 2017 , with certain aspects subject to phased-in compliance .\nfull compliance with the rule 2019s related exemptions is currently scheduled to be required by july 1 , 2019 .\nin addition , the u.s .\ndol is undertaking an examination of the rule that may result in changes to the rule or its related exemptions or a change in the full compliance date .\nfor a discussion of the u.s .\ndol conflict of interest rule , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014instit- utional securities and wealth management . 201d u.k .\nreferendum following the u.k .\nelectorate vote to leave the e.u. , the u.k .\ninvoked article 50 of the lisbon treaty on march 29 , 2017 , which triggered a two-year period , subject to extension ( which would need the unanimous approval of the e.u .\nmember states ) , during which the u.k .\ngovernment is expected to negotiate its withdrawal agreement with the e.u .\nfor further discussion of u.k .\nreferendum 2019s potential impact on our operations , see 201crisk factors 2014international risk . 201d for further information regarding our exposure to the u.k. , see also 201cquantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 2014risk management 2014credit risk 2014country risk exposure . 201d 69 december 2017 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "43.2", "68.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.627"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_47.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the return on total assets during 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 6 .\nselected financial data the following table sets forth our selected financial data .\nthe table should be read in conjunction with item 7 and item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k. .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions except per share amounts )\tyear ended december 31 2017\tyear ended december 31 2016\tyear ended december 31 2015\tyear ended december 31 2014\tyear ended december 31 2013\nsales and service revenues\t$ 7441\t$ 7068\t$ 7020\t$ 6957\t$ 6820\ngoodwill impairment\t2014\t2014\t75\t47\t2014\noperating income ( loss )\t865\t858\t769\t655\t512\nnet earnings ( loss )\t479\t573\t404\t338\t261\ntotal assets\t6374\t6352\t6024\t6239\t6190\nlong-term debt ( 1 )\t1279\t1278\t1273\t1562\t1665\ntotal long-term obligations\t3225\t3356\t3260\t3562\t3277\nnet cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities\t814\t822\t861\t755\t260\nfree cash flow ( 2 )\t453\t537\t673\t590\t121\ndividends declared per share\t$ 2.52\t$ 2.10\t$ 1.70\t$ 1.00\t$ 0.50\nbasic earnings ( loss ) per share\t$ 10.48\t$ 12.24\t$ 8.43\t$ 6.93\t$ 5.25\ndiluted earnings ( loss ) per share\t$ 10.46\t$ 12.14\t$ 8.36\t$ 6.86\t$ 5.18\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) long-term debt does not include the current portion of long-term debt , which is included in current liabilities .\n( 2 ) free cash flow is a non-gaap financial measure and represents cash from operating activities less capital expenditures net of related grant proceeds .\nsee liquidity and capital resources in item 7 for more information on this measure. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "338", "6239", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05418"}
{"example_id": "MS/2014/page_267.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in shares of common stock outstanding from 2013 to 2014 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nmorgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) other regulated subsidiaries .\ncertain other u.s .\nand non-u.s .\nsubsidiaries are subject to various securities , commodities and banking regulations , and capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate .\nthese subsidiaries have consistently operated with capital in excess of their local capital adequacy requirements .\nmorgan stanley derivative products inc .\n( 201cmsdp 201d ) , a derivative products subsidiary rated a3 by moody 2019s and aa- by s&p , maintains certain operating restrictions that have been reviewed by moody 2019s and s&p .\nmsdp is operated such that creditors of the company should not expect to have any claims on the assets of msdp , unless and until the obligations to its own creditors are satisfied in full .\ncreditors of msdp should not expect to have any claims on the assets of the company or any of its affiliates , other than the respective assets of msdp .\nthe regulatory capital requirements referred to above , and certain covenants contained in various agreements governing indebtedness of the company , may restrict the company 2019s ability to withdraw capital from its subsidiaries .\nat december 31 , 2014 and december 31 , 2013 , approximately $ 31.8 billion and $ 21.9 billion , respectively , of net assets of consolidated subsidiaries may be restricted as to the payment of cash dividends and advances to the parent company .\n15 .\ntotal equity morgan stanley shareholders 2019 equity .\ncommon stock .\nchanges in shares of common stock outstanding for 2014 and 2013 were as follows ( share data in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\nshares outstanding at beginning of period\t1945\t1974\ntreasury stock purchases ( 1 )\t-46 ( 46 )\t-27 ( 27 )\nother ( 2 )\t52\t-2 ( 2 )\nshares outstanding at end of period\t1951\t1945\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) treasury stock purchases include repurchases of common stock for employee tax withholding .\n( 2 ) other includes net shares issued to and forfeited from employee stock trusts and issued for rsu conversions .\ntreasury shares .\nat december 31 , 2014 , the company had approximately $ 0.3 billion remaining under its current share repurchase program .\nthe share repurchase program is for capital management purposes and considers , among other things , business segment capital needs as well as equity-based compensation and benefit plan requirements .\nshare repurchases under the company 2019s existing authorized program will be exercised from time to time at prices the company deems appropriate subject to various factors , including the company 2019s capital position and market conditions .\nthe share repurchases may be effected through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions , including through rule 10b5-1 plans , and may be suspended at any time .\nshare repurchases by the company are subject to regulatory approval ( see 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities 201d in part ii , item 5 ) .\nin march 2014 , the company received no objection from the federal reserve to the company 2019s 2014 capital plan , which included a share repurchase of up to $ 1 billion of the company 2019s outstanding common stock beginning in the second quarter of 2014 through the end of the first quarter of 2015 as well as an increase in the company 2019s quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.10 per share from $ 0.05 per share , beginning with the dividend declared on april 17 , 2014 .\nthe cash dividends declared on the company 2019s outstanding preferred stock .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1951", "1945", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2008/page_32.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\non february 13 , 2009 what was the market capitalization\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .\n\nTable:\n2008\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 42.72\t$ 32.10\nquarter ended june 30\t46.10\t38.53\nquarter ended september 30\t43.43\t31.89\nquarter ended december 31\t37.28\t19.35\n2007\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 41.31\t$ 36.63\nquarter ended june 30\t43.84\t37.64\nquarter ended september 30\t45.45\t36.34\nquarter ended december 31\t46.53\t40.08\n\nPost-table text:\non february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .\ndividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .\nwe anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .\nthe indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .\nthe loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nin addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "397097677", "28.85", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "13764217.57366"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2008/page_69.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference between the high and low aeco natural gas sales index?\n\nPre-table text:\ncrude oil , and political unrest in the middle east and elsewhere .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices dropped more rapidly than they had climbed as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and other countries entered recessions which decreased demand .\nduring 2008 , the average spot price per barrel for wti was $ 99.75 , up from an average of $ 72.41 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 44.60 .\nthe average spot price per barrel for brent was $ 97.26 in 2008 , up from an average of $ 72.39 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 36.55 .\nthe differential between wti and brent average prices widened to $ 2.49 in 2008 from $ 0.02 in 2007 .\nour domestic crude oil production is on average heavier and higher in sulfur content than light sweet wti .\nheavier and higher sulfur crude oil ( commonly referred to as heavy sour crude oil ) sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude oil benchmark .\nnatural gas prices on average were higher in 2008 than in 2007 .\na significant portion of our u.s .\nlower 48 states natural gas production is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas .\nthe average henry hub first-of-month price index was $ 2.18 per thousand cubic feet ( 201cmcf 201d ) higher in 2008 than the 2007 average .\nnatural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts .\nour other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile .\nas we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease .\ne&p segment income during 2008 was up 57 percent from 2007 , with revenue increases tied to these increases in average commodity prices accounting for almost half of the income improvement .\nliquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales volumes were also higher in 2008 than 2007 .\noil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce .\nroughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select .\noutput mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader .\nduring 2008 , our average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil was $ 91.90 per barrel , up from 2007 , but ended the year at $ 24.97 per barrel impacted by a heavier yield in december and a seasonal decrease in the value of our heavy output .\nthe operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed , and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime .\nper unit costs are sensitive to production rates .\nkey variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively .\nthe table below shows benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs , listing high and low spot prices during the year. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\thigh $ 145.29\tdate july 3\tlow $ 33.87\tdate december 19\nwestern canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a )\t$ 114.95\tjuly\t$ 23.18\tdecember\naeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b )\t$ 11.34\tjuly 1\t$ 5.42\tseptember 19\n\nPost-table text:\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) $ 145.29 july 3 $ 33.87 december 19 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 114.95 july $ 23.18 december aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b ) $ 11.34 july 1 $ 5.42 september 19 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada .\n( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index .\nour osm segment reported income of $ 258 million for 2008 , reflecting synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil sales averaging 32 mboepd .\nderivative instruments intended to hedge price risk on future sales have impacted revenues in the periods presented , with net gains of $ 48 million in 2008 and net losses of $ 53 million in 2007 .\nin the first quarter of 2009 , we entered into derivative instruments which effectively offset certain of our open derivative positions .\nrefining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs , retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise , and the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "11.34", "5.42", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5.92"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2008/page_144.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the suros acquisition price is paid in cash?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .\nthe projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .\nthe deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nacquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\non july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\n( 201csuros 201d ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .\nthe results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .\nsuros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .\nthe initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 4600 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .\nthe company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .\n99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .\nthe components and allocation of the final purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006\t$ 13100\nin-process research and development\t4900\ndeveloped technology and know-how\t46000\ncustomer relationship\t17900\ntrade name\t5800\ndeferred income taxes\t-21300 ( 21300 )\ngoodwill\t181700\nfinal purchase price\t$ 248100\n\nPost-table text:\nthe acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .\nthe earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing .\nthe company has considered the provision of eitf issue no .\n95-8 , accounting for contingent consideration paid to the shareholders of and acquired enterprise in a purchase business combination , and concluded that this contingent consideration represents additional purchase price .\nduring the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 the company paid approximately $ 19000 to former suros shareholders for the first annual earn-out period resulting in an increase to goodwill for the same amount .\nthe company also accrued $ 24500 for the second and final earn-out related to suros 2019 incremental revenue growth during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 , with an increase to goodwill , of which $ 24400 had been paid as of september 27 , 2008 .\nin addition to the earn-out discussed above , the company decreased goodwill in the amount of $ 1300 during the year ended september 27 , 2008 and increased goodwill in the amount of $ 210 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .\nthe increase in 2007 was primarily related to recording a liability of approximately $ 550 in accordance with eitf 95-3 related to the termination of certain employees who have ceased all services for the company .\napproximately $ 400 of this liability was paid during the year ended september 29 , 2007 and the balance was paid during fiscal 2008 .\nthis increase was partially offset by a decrease to goodwill as a result of a change in the valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .\nthe decrease in goodwill during 2008 was related to the reduction of an income tax liability .\nthere have been no other material changes to purchase price allocations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "139000", "248100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.56026"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2016/page_177.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2016 what was the percent of the total commercial lending of the total commitments to extend credit and other commitments\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nthe following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2016 and december 31 , 2015 , respectively .\ntable 98 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 312016\tdecember 312015\ncommitments to extend credit\t\t\ntotal commercial lending\t$ 108256\t$ 101252\nhome equity lines of credit\t17438\t17268\ncredit card\t22095\t19937\nother\t4192\t4032\ntotal commitments to extend credit\t151981\t142489\nnet outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )\t8324\t8765\nreinsurance agreements ( b )\t1835\t2010\nstandby bond purchase agreements ( c )\t790\t911\nother commitments ( d )\t967\t966\ntotal commitments to extend credit and other commitments\t$ 163897\t$ 155141\n\nPost-table text:\ncommitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions .\nthese commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates .\nnet outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution .\napproximately 94% ( 94 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass as of december 31 , 2016 and december 31 , 2015 , respectively , with the remainder rated as below pass .\nan internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of below pass indicates a higher degree of risk .\nif the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them .\nthe standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2016 had terms ranging from less than 1 year to 8 years .\nas of december 31 , 2016 , assets of $ 1.0 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit .\nin addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us .\nthe carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2016 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 161 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "108256", "163897", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.66051"}
{"example_id": "AES/2015/page_117.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were average proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nproportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests .\nthe proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below .\nupon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities .\nsee note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance .\nbeginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nthe proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below .\nwe also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms .\nan example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker .\nsee item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments .\nthe gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities .\nwe believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes .\nfactors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company .\nthe presentation of free cash flow has material limitations .\nproportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap .\nproportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments .\nour definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies .\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change .\n\nTable:\ncalculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\t2015/2014 change\t2014/2013 change\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 2134\t$ 1791\t$ 2715\t$ 343\t$ -924 ( 924 )\nadd : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )\t165\t2014\t2014\t165\t2014\nadjusted operating cash flow\t2299\t1791\t2715\t508\t-924 ( 924 )\nless : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )\t-558 ( 558 )\t-359 ( 359 )\t-834 ( 834 )\t-199 ( 199 )\t475\nproportional adjusted operating cash flow\t1741\t1432\t1881\t309\t-449 ( 449 )\nless : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )\t-449 ( 449 )\t-485 ( 485 )\t-535 ( 535 )\t36\t50\nless : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )\t-51 ( 51 )\t-56 ( 56 )\t-75 ( 75 )\t5\t19\nproportional free cash flow\t$ 1241\t$ 891\t$ 1271\t$ 350\t$ -380 ( 380 )\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric .\n( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures .\nfor example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary .\nthus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest .\nassuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) .\nthe company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation .\nthe proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur .\n( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 .\n( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "205", "163", ")", "add(", "110", "#0", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "159.33333"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2018/page_31.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total return is $ 100000 are invested in s&p500 on january 1st , 2015 and sold at the end of 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii .\nitem 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .\nas of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .\nstockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 29 .\ncopyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .\nall rights reserved .\nnasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .\ns&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .\n\nTable:\n\t12/28/2013\t1/3/2015\t1/2/2016\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\t12/29/2018\ncadence design systems inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 135.18\t$ 149.39\t$ 181.05\t$ 300.22\t$ 311.13\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t112.60\t113.64\t133.19\t172.11\t165.84\ns&p 500\t100.00\t110.28\t109.54\t129.05\t157.22\t150.33\ns&p 500 information technology\t100.00\t115.49\t121.08\t144.85\t201.10\t200.52\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "129.05", "110.28", ")", "divide(", "100000", "const_100", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "18770"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2018/page_171.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage increase total commitments to extend credit and other commitments\n\nPre-table text:\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 155 of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position .\nhowever , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period .\nnote 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nthe following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\ntable 94 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 31 2018\tdecember 312017\ncommitments to extend credit\t\t\ntotal commercial lending\t$ 120165\t$ 112125\nhome equity lines of credit\t16944\t17852\ncredit card\t27100\t24911\nother\t5069\t4753\ntotal commitments to extend credit\t169278\t159641\nnet outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )\t8655\t8651\nreinsurance agreements ( b )\t1549\t1654\nstandby bond purchase agreements ( c )\t1000\t843\nother commitments ( d )\t1130\t1732\ntotal commitments to extend credit and other commitments\t$ 181612\t$ 172521\n\nPost-table text:\ncommitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions .\nthese commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and generally contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates .\nnet outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution .\napproximately 91% ( 91 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with the remainder rated as criticized .\nan internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of criticized indicates a higher degree of risk .\nif the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them .\nthe standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2018 had terms ranging from less than one year to six years .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , assets of $ 1.1 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit .\nin addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us .\nthe carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2018 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "181612", "172521", ")", "divide(", "#0", "172521", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0527"}
{"example_id": "V/2013/page_41.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the quarter ended september 30 , 2013 what was the total number of shares purchased in august\n\nPre-table text:\nadditionally , in october 2013 , our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share of class a common stock ( determined in the case of class b and c common stock , on an as-converted basis ) payable on december 3 , 2013 , to holders of record as of november 15 , 2013 of our class a , b and c common stock .\nsubject to legally available funds , we expect to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on our outstanding class a , b and c common stock in the future .\nhowever , the declaration and payment of future dividends is at the sole discretion of our board of directors after taking into account various factors , including , but not limited to , our financial condition , settlement indemnifications , operating results , available cash and current and anticipated cash needs .\nissuer purchases of equity securities the table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of the company 2019s common stock made by or on behalf of the company during the quarter ended september 30 , 2013 .\nperiod number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 2 ) approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 2 ) .\n\nTable:\nperiod\t( a ) totalnumber ofsharespurchased ( 1 )\t( b ) averageprice paidper share\t( c ) totalnumber ofsharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms ( 2 )\t( d ) approximatedollar valueof shares thatmay yet bepurchasedunder the plans orprograms ( 2 )\njuly 1-31 2013\t745148\t$ 183.69\t744500\t$ 1424252596\naugust 1-31 2013\t6640563\t$ 176.78\t6638189\t$ 250658812\nseptember 1-30 2013\t2014\t$ 2014\t2014\t$ 250658812\ntotal\t7385711\t$ 177.47\t7382689\t\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) includes 3022 shares of class a common stock withheld at an average price of $ 182.50 per share ( per the terms of grants under the visa 2007 equity incentive compensation plan ) to offset tax withholding obligations that occur upon vesting and release of restricted shares .\n( 2 ) the figures in the table reflect transactions according to the trade dates .\nfor purposes of our consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k , the impact of these repurchases is recorded according to the settlement dates .\nin october 2013 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an additional $ 5.0 billion share repurchase program. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6640563", "7385711", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.89911"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2008/page_142.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the purchasing price is dedicated to net tangible assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) the acquisition also provided for a one-year earn out of eur 1700 ( approximately $ 2000 usd ) which was payable in cash if aeg calendar year 2006 earnings , as defined , exceeded a pre-determined amount .\naeg 2019s 2006 earnings did not exceed such pre-determined amounts and no payment was made .\nthe components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of may 2 2006\t$ 24800\nin-process research and development\t600\ndeveloped technology and know-how\t1900\ncustomer relationship\t800\ntrade name\t400\ndeferred income taxes\t-3000 ( 3000 )\ngoodwill\t5800\nfinal purchase price\t$ 31300\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company implemented a plan to restructure certain of aeg 2019s historical activities .\nthe company originally recorded a liability of approximately $ 2100 in accordance with eitf issue no .\n95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees under this plan .\nupon completion of the plan in fiscal 2007 the company reduced this liability by approximately $ 241 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill .\nall amounts have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 .\nas part of the aeg acquisition the company acquired a minority interest in the equity securities of a private german company .\nthe company estimated the fair value of these securities to be approximately $ 1400 in its original purchase price allocation .\nduring the year ended september 29 , 2007 , the company sold these securities for proceeds of approximately $ 2150 .\nthe difference of approximately $ 750 between the preliminary fair value estimate and proceeds upon sale was recorded as a reduction of goodwill .\nthe final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations .\nthere have been no other material changes to the purchase price allocation .\nas part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued .\nit was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values .\nthe fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach .\ncustomer relationship represents aeg 2019s high dependency on a small number of large accounts .\naeg markets its products through distributors as well as directly to its own customers .\ntrade name represents aeg 2019s product names that the company intends to continue to use .\ndeveloped technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .\nthe intangible assets are expected to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives as the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are relatively consistent over the expected useful lives of the intangible assets .\nthe estimated $ 600 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects related to aeg 2019s organic photoconductor coating and selenium product lines .\nthe deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , land , building and related improvements as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nthe company had an existing relationship with aeg as a supplier of inventory items .\nthe supply agreement was entered into in prior years at arm 2019s length terms and conditions .\nno minimum purchase requirements existed and the pricing was consistent with other vendor agreements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "24800", "31300", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.79233"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2005/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwithout the commercial banking segment , what would 2005 operating income have been reduced to , in us$ m?\n\nPre-table text:\nsegment results 2013 operating basis ( a ) ( b ) ( table continued from previous page ) year ended december 31 , operating earnings return on common equity 2013 goodwill ( c ) .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )\tyear ended december 31 , 2005\tyear ended december 31 , 2004\tyear ended december 31 , change\t2005\t2004\ninvestment bank\t$ 3658\t$ 2948\t24% ( 24 % )\t18% ( 18 % )\t17% ( 17 % )\nretail financial services\t3427\t2199\t56\t26\t24\ncard services\t1907\t1274\t50\t16\t17\ncommercial banking\t1007\t608\t66\t30\t29\ntreasury & securities services\t1037\t440\t136\t55\t17\nasset & wealth management\t1216\t681\t79\t51\t17\ncorporate\t-1731 ( 1731 )\t61\tnm\tnm\tnm\ntotal\t$ 10521\t$ 8211\t28% ( 28 % )\t17% ( 17 % )\t16% ( 16 % )\n\nPost-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2005 annual report 35 and are retained in corporate .\nthese retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments .\nduring 2005 , the firm refined cost allocation methodologies related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations expenses in order to improve transparency , consistency and accountability with regard to costs allocated across business segments .\nprior periods have not been revised to reflect these new cost allocation methodologies .\ncapital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements .\nthe amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity .\nat the time of the merger , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , was allocated solely to corporate .\neffective january 2006 , the firm expects to refine its methodology for allocating capital to the business segments to include any goodwill associated with line of business-directed acquisitions since the merger .\nu.s .\ngaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see critical accounting estimates used by the firm and note 15 on pages 81 2013 83 and 114 2013116 , respectively , of this annual report ) .\nsee the capital management section on page 56 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework .\ncredit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share .\nat the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based upon pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures .\nprior to the merger , the credit reimbursement was based upon pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients .\ntax-equivalent adjustments segment and firm results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes .\nrefer to explanation and reconciliation of the firm 2019s non-gaap financial measures on page 31 of this annual report for additional details .\ndescription of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business .\nthe management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies .\neffective with the merger on july 1 , 2004 , several of the allocation methodologies were revised , as noted below .\nas prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods beginning with the third quarter of 2004 .\nfurther , the firm continues to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and further refinements may be implemented in future periods .\nrevenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions .\nthese revenue-sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of business .\nfunds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and expense to each business and transfer the primary interest rate risk exposures to corporate .\nthe allocation process is unique to each business and considers the interest rate risk , liquidity risk and regulatory requirements of its stand- alone peers .\nbusiness segments may retain certain interest rate exposures , subject to management approval , that would be expected in the normal operation of a similar peer business .\nin the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms .\nexpense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments .\nthose expenses are allocated based upon their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided .\neffective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments .\nin addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "10521", "1007", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9514"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2014/page_26.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in total return percentage beteween e*trade financial corporation and the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 12/14?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( \"s&p\" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/09\t12/10\t12/11\t12/12\t12/13\t12/14\ne*trade financial corporation\t100.00\t90.91\t45.23\t50.85\t111.59\t137.81\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.49\t136.30\t180.44\t205.14\ndow jones us financials index\t100.00\t112.72\t98.24\t124.62\t167.26\t191.67\n\nPost-table text:\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "137.81", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "205.14", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.6733"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2009/page_133.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif there were a 100bp rise in rates , how much more would the impact be on earnings in 2009 vs . 2008?\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 131 earnings-at-risk stress testing the var and stress-test measures described above illustrate the total economic sensitivity of the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets to changes in market variables .\nthe effect of interest rate exposure on reported net income is also important .\ninterest rate risk exposure in the firm 2019s core nontrading business activities ( i.e. , asset/liability management positions ) results from on 2013and off 2013balance sheet positions and can occur due to a variety of factors , including : 2022 differences in the timing among the maturity or repricing of assets , liabilities and off 2013balance sheet instruments .\nfor example , if liabilities reprice quicker than assets and funding interest rates are declining , earnings will increase initially .\n2022 differences in the amounts of assets , liabilities and off 2013balance sheet instruments that are repricing at the same time .\nfor example , if more deposit liabilities are repricing than assets when general interest rates are declining , earnings will increase initially .\n2022 differences in the amounts by which short-term and long-term market interest rates change ( for example , changes in the slope of the yield curve , because the firm has the ability to lend at long-term fixed rates and borrow at variable or short- term fixed rates ) .\nbased on these scenarios , the firm 2019s earnings would be affected negatively by a sudden and unanticipated increase in short-term rates paid on its liabilities ( e.g. , depos- its ) without a corresponding increase in long-term rates re- ceived on its assets ( e.g. , loans ) .\nconversely , higher long-term rates received on assets generally are beneficial to earnings , particularly when the increase is not accompanied by rising short-term rates paid on liabilities .\n2022 the impact of changes in the maturity of various assets , liabili- ties or off 2013balance sheet instruments as interest rates change .\nfor example , if more borrowers than forecasted pay down higher-rate loan balances when general interest rates are de- clining , earnings may decrease initially .\nthe firm manages interest rate exposure related to its assets and liabilities on a consolidated , corporate-wide basis .\nbusiness units transfer their interest rate risk to treasury through a transfer- pricing system , which takes into account the elements of interest rate exposure that can be risk-managed in financial markets .\nthese elements include asset and liability balances and contrac- tual rates of interest , contractual principal payment schedules , expected prepayment experience , interest rate reset dates and maturities , rate indices used for repricing , and any interest rate ceilings or floors for adjustable rate products .\nall transfer-pricing assumptions are dynamically reviewed .\nthe firm conducts simulations of changes in net interest income from its nontrading activities under a variety of interest rate scenarios .\nearnings-at-risk tests measure the potential change in the firm 2019s net interest income , and the corresponding impact to the firm 2019s pretax earnings , over the following 12 months .\nthese tests highlight exposures to various rate-sensitive factors , such as the rates themselves ( e.g. , the prime lending rate ) , pricing strate- gies on deposits , optionality and changes in product mix .\nthe tests include forecasted balance sheet changes , such as asset sales and securitizations , as well as prepayment and reinvestment behavior .\nimmediate changes in interest rates present a limited view of risk , and so a number of alternative scenarios are also reviewed .\nthese scenarios include the implied forward curve , nonparallel rate shifts and severe interest rate shocks on selected key rates .\nthese scenar- ios are intended to provide a comprehensive view of jpmorgan chase 2019s earnings at risk over a wide range of outcomes .\njpmorgan chase 2019s 12-month pretax earnings sensitivity profile as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , is as follows. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\timmediate change in rates +200bp\timmediate change in rates +100bp\timmediate change in rates -100bp\timmediate change in rates -200bp\ndecember 31 2009\t$ -1594 ( 1594 )\t$ -554 ( 554 )\tnm ( a )\tnm ( a )\ndecember 31 2008\t$ 336\t$ 672\tnm ( a )\tnm ( a )\n\nPost-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2009 $ ( 1594 ) $ ( 554 ) nm ( a ) nm ( a ) december 31 , 2008 $ 336 $ 672 nm ( a ) nm ( a ) ( a ) down 100- and 200-basis-point parallel shocks result in a fed funds target rate of zero , and negative three- and six-month treasury rates .\nthe earnings- at-risk results of such a low-probability scenario are not meaningful .\nthe change in earnings at risk from december 31 , 2008 , results from a higher level of afs securities and an updated baseline scenario that uses higher short-term interest rates .\nthe firm 2019s risk to rising rates is largely the result of increased funding costs on assets , partially offset by widening deposit margins , which are currently compressed due to very low short-term interest rates .\nadditionally , another interest rate scenario , involving a steeper yield curve with long-term rates rising 100 basis points and short- term rates staying at current levels , results in a 12-month pretax earnings benefit of $ 449 million .\nthe increase in earnings is due to reinvestment of maturing assets at the higher long-term rates , with funding costs remaining unchanged .\nrisk identification for large exposures individuals who manage risk positions , particularly those that are complex , are responsible for identifying potential losses that could arise from specific , unusual events , such as a potential tax change , and estimating the probabilities of losses arising from such events .\nthis information is entered into the firm 2019s rifle database .\nmanagement of trading businesses control rifle entries , thereby permitting the firm to monitor further earnings vulnerability not adequately covered by standard risk measures .\nrisk monitoring and control limits market risk is controlled primarily through a series of limits .\nlimits reflect the firm 2019s risk appetite in the context of the market environment and business strategy .\nin setting limits , the firm takes into consideration factors such as market volatility , product liquidity , business trends and management experience. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "672", "-554", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1226"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2007/page_134.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average expected life of the options for the three year period?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .\nmarathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .\nthrough 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .\nin general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .\nno stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nsimilar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .\nunder the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .\nin general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .\nno stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nbeginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .\nall stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .\nas a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .\nrestricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .\nin 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .\nthe restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nmarathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .\nthe restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nprior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .\nthe non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .\ncommon stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .\nall non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .\nwhen dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .\nstock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\nthe total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .\nin 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .\ntax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .\ncash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .\nstock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .\nthe weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2007\t2006\t2005\nweighted average exercise price per share\t$ 60.94\t$ 37.84\t$ 25.14\nexpected annual dividends per share\t$ 0.96\t$ 0.80\t$ 0.66\nexpected life in years\t5.0\t5.1\t5.5\nexpected volatility\t27% ( 27 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\nrisk-free interest rate\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\t3.8% ( 3.8 % )\nweighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted\t$ 17.24\t$ 10.19\t$ 6.15\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "expected life in years", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5.2"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the long-term retail/hnw in americas as a percentage of the total long-term retail/hnw?\n\nPre-table text:\nretail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tamericas\temea\tasia-pacific\ttotal\nequity\t$ 94805\t$ 53140\t$ 16803\t$ 164748\nfixed income\t121640\t11444\t5341\t138425\nmulti-asset class\t76714\t9538\t4374\t90626\nalternatives\t4865\t3577\t1243\t9685\nlong-term retail/hnw\t$ 298024\t$ 77699\t$ 27761\t$ 403484\n\nPost-table text:\nblackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds .\nat december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 .\nduring the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion .\nretail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors .\nclients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts .\nthe product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives .\nthe vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors .\nthe client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 .\n2022 u.s .\nretail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s .\nsector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity .\nin 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets .\nu.s .\nretail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 .\nthe year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 .\nwe are the leading u.s .\nmanager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 .\n2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion .\ninvestor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking .\nequity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets .\nour international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom .\nbgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 .\nover 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p .\nin 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 .\nin the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income .\nglobal clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements .\n2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "298024", "403484", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.73863"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2013/page_40.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ndoes the company spend more on advertising in 2012 than on research and development?\n\nPre-table text:\n38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 .\nsummary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc .\n( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s .\nand non-u.s. , that it controls .\nppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls .\nfor those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests .\ninvestments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nas a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in \"investments\" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet .\ntransactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation .\nuse of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s .\ngenerally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period .\nsuch estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated .\nactual outcomes could differ from those estimates .\nrevenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete .\nrevenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered .\nshipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nshipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nselling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning .\ndistribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities .\nadvertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nresearch and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred .\nthe following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\nresearch and development 2013 total\t$ 505\t$ 468\t$ 443\nless depreciation on research facilities\t17\t15\t15\nresearch and development net\t$ 488\t$ 453\t$ 428\n\nPost-table text:\nlegal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred .\nlegal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes .\nforeign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s .\noperations is their local currency .\nassets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s .\ndollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period .\nunrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity .\ncash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less .\nshort-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year .\nthe purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nmarketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "288", "468", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_321.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the annual interest expense for entergy louisiana incurred from the series first mortgage bonds due september 2018 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis entergy's utility supply plan initiative will continue to seek to transform its generation portfolio with new or repowered generation resources .\nopportunities resulting from the supply plan initiative , including new projects or the exploration of alternative financing sources , could result in increases or decreases in the capital expenditure estimates given above .\nthe estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints , environmental compliance , market volatility , economic trends , business restructuring , and the ability to access capital .\nmanagement provides more information on long- term debt and preferred stock maturities in notes 5 and 6 to the financial statements .\nsources of capital entergy louisiana's sources to meet its capital requirements include : internally generated funds ; cash on hand ; debt or preferred membership interest issuances ; and bank financing under new and existing facilities .\nentergy louisiana may refinance or redeem debt and preferred membership interests prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and distribution rates are favorable .\nall debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval .\npreferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in corporate charters , bond indentures , and other agreements .\nentergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .\nentergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .\n\nTable:\n2008\t2007\t2006\t2005\n( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\n$ 61236\t( $ 2791 )\t( $ 54041 )\t( $ 68677 )\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .\nentergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 200 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 .\nno borrowings were outstanding under the credit facility as of december 31 , 2008 .\nin april 2008 , entergy louisiana repurchased , prior to maturity , $ 60 million of auction rate governmental bonds , which are being held for possible remarketing at a later date .\nin august 2008 , entergy louisiana issued $ 300 million of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) series first mortgage bonds due september 2018 .\nthe net proceeds of the issuance will be used for capital expenditures , working capital needs , and general corporate purposes .\nprior to their application , the remaining net proceeds may be invested in temporary cash investments or the entergy system money pool .\nhurricane rita and hurricane katrina in august and september 2005 , hurricane katrina and hurricane rita , along with extensive flooding that resulted from levee breaks in and around entergy louisiana's service territory , caused catastrophic damage .\nthe storms and flooding resulted in widespread power outages ; significant damage to distribution , transmission , and generation infrastructure ; and the temporary loss of sales and customers due to mandatory evacuations and destruction of homes and businesses due to wind , rain , and extended periods of flooding .\nentergy pursued a broad range of initiatives to recover storm restoration and business continuity costs and incremental losses .\ninitiatives included obtaining reimbursement of certain costs covered by insurance and pursuing recovery through existing or new rate mechanisms regulated by the ferc and local regulatory bodies , in combination with securitization. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "300", "6.50%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "19.5"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_211.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2008 what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet to aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value of the trading assets\n\nPre-table text:\nthe notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthese items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nother items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .\nnone of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .\nsignificant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .\ncitigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .\nfair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .\nthe following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\t2008 trading assets\t2008 loans\t2008 trading assets\tloans\ncarrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet\t$ 16254\t$ 2315\t$ 26020\t$ 3038\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value\t$ 6501\t$ 3\t$ 899\t$ -5 ( 5 )\nbalance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due\t$ 77\t$ 1113\t$ 186\t$ 1292\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue\t$ 190\t$ -4 ( 4 )\t$ 68\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nin millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .\nchanges in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .\nthe changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .\ncertain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .\nthe company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .\nthe fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .\nas required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .\nthese investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\ncitigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .\nthe company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .\nsince the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .\nthus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .\nthese investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\ncertain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .\nthe company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .\nthese positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .\nfor those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nthe change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .\ncertain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "16254", "6501", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.50023"}
{"example_id": "AES/2003/page_52.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the three months ended march 2003 what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ntransaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .\nthese skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .\nthe company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .\nasset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .\nthis initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .\nthe following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .\nsales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .\n\nTable:\nproject name\tdate completed\tsales proceeds ( in millions )\tlocation\ncilcorp/medina valley\tjanuary 2003\t$ 495\tunited states\naes ecogen/aes mt . stuart\tjanuary 2003\t$ 59\taustralia\nmountainview\tmarch 2003\t$ 30\tunited states\nkelvin\tmarch 2003\t$ 29\tsouth africa\nsongas\tapril 2003\t$ 94\ttanzania\naes barry limited\tjuly 2003\ta340/$ 62\tunited kingdom\naes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd\tdecember 2003\t$ 145\tbangladesh\naes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi\taugust 2003\t$ 23\trepublic of georgia\nmedway power limited/aes medway operations limited\tnovember 2003\ta347/$ 78\tunited kingdom\naes oasis limited\tdecember 2003\t$ 150\tpakistan/oman\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .\nhowever given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .\nfor any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .\ndepending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .\nfurthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .\nsubsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .\nthe efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .\nbusinesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .\nbrazil eletropaulo .\naes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .\nin february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .\naes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .\n( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .\n( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .\n( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "495", "59", ")", "add(", "#0", "30", ")", "add(", "#1", "29", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "613"}
{"example_id": "STZ/2006/page_68.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ngoodwill was what percent of the mondavi acquisition?\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nc o n s t e l l a t i o n b r a n d s , i n c .\nbaroness philippine de rothschild announced an agree- ment to maintain equal ownership of opus one .\nopus one produces fine wines at its napa valley winery .\nthe acquisition of robert mondavi supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the premium , super-premium and fine wine categories .\nthe company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally .\nthe vast majority of sales from these brands are generated in the united states .\nthe company is leveraging the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure .\nthe company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition supports the com- pany 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets .\nthe robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the growing premium , super-premium and fine wine sectors within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets .\nin particular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom and other 201cnew world 201d wine markets .\ntotal con- sideration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million .\nadditionally , the company incurred direct acquisition costs of $ 12.0 million .\nthe purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) .\nin accordance with the purchase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of the robert mondavi business , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies .\nthe results of operations of the robert mondavi busi- ness are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statements of income since the acquisition date .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition , as adjusted for the final appraisal : ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 513782\nproperty plant and equipment\t438140\nother assets\t124450\ntrademarks\t138000\ngoodwill\t634203\ntotal assets acquired\t1848575\ncurrent liabilities\t310919\nlong-term liabilities\t494995\ntotal liabilities assumed\t805914\nnet assets acquired\t$ 1042661\n\nPost-table text:\nthe trademarks are not subject to amortization .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nfollowing the robert mondavi acquisition , the company sold certain of the acquired vineyard properties and related assets , investments accounted for under the equity method , and other winery properties and related assets , during the years ended february 28 , 2006 , and february 28 , 2005 .\nthe company realized net proceeds of $ 170.8 million from the sale of these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 .\namounts realized during the year ended february 28 , 2005 , were not material .\nno gain or loss has been recognized upon the sale of these assets .\nhardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock .\nas a result of the acquisi- tion of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 .\nthe acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in wineries and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s marketing and sales operations in the united kingdom .\nin october 2005 , pwp was merged into another subsidiary of the company .\ntotal consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million .\nadditionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million .\nthe acquisition date for accounting pur- poses is march 27 , 2003 .\nthe company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consideration .\nthis charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 .\nthe cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 million ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing bridge loan agreement .\naddi- tionally , the company issued 6577826 shares of the com- pany 2019s class a common stock , which were valued at $ 77.2 million based on the simple average of the closing market price of the company 2019s class a common stock beginning two days before and ending two days after april 4 , 2003 , the day the hardy shareholders elected the form of consid- eration they wished to receive .\nthe purchase price was based primarily on a discounted cash flow analysis that contemplated , among other things , the value of a broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets and a presence in the important australian winemaking regions .\nthe company and hardy have complementary businesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy .\nthe hardy acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "634203", "1848575", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34308"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2014/page_65.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total return of the jpmorgan chase & co . stock over the above refernced five year period?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .\n( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .\nthe s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .\nequity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .\nthe kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .\nand is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .\nthe s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .\nthe firm is a component of all three industry indices .\nthe following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .\nthe comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .\ndecember 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in dollars )\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njpmorgan chase\t$ 100.00\t$ 102.30\t$ 81.87\t$ 111.49\t$ 152.42\t$ 167.48\nkbw bank index\t100.00\t123.36\t94.75\t125.91\t173.45\t189.69\ns&p financial index\t100.00\t112.13\t93.00\t119.73\t162.34\t186.98\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.48\t136.27\t180.39\t205.07\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "167.48", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.6748"}
{"example_id": "NKE/2016/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of long-term debt is due after 2021?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii capital resources on april 23 , 2013 , we filed a shelf registration statement ( the 201cshelf 201d ) with the sec which permitted us to issue an unlimited amount of debt securities .\non april 23 , 2013 , we issued $ 1.0 billion of senior notes with tranches maturing in 2023 and 2043 .\nthe 2023 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $ 500 million at a 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) fixed , annual interest rate and will mature on may 1 , 2023 .\nthe 2043 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $ 500 million at a 3.625% ( 3.625 % ) fixed , annual interest rate and will mature on may 1 , 2043 .\ninterest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on may 1 and november 1 of each year .\nthe issuance resulted in gross proceeds before expenses of $ 998 million .\non october 29 , 2015 , we issued an additional $ 1.0 billion of senior notes at a 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) fixed , annual interest rate that will mature on november 1 , 2045 .\ninterest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on may 1 and november 1 of each year .\nthe issuance resulted in proceeds before expenses of $ 991 million .\nthe shelf expired on april 23 , 2016 .\nwe plan to file a new shelf registration statement with the sec in july 2016 .\non august 28 , 2015 , we entered into a committed credit facility agreement with a syndicate of banks , which provides for up to $ 2 billion of borrowings .\nthe facility matures august 28 , 2020 , with a one year extension option prior to any anniversary of the closing date , provided that in no event shall it extend beyond august 28 , 2022 .\nthis facility replaces the prior $ 1 billion credit facility agreement entered into on november 1 , 2011 , which would have matured november 1 , 2017 .\nas of and for the periods ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we had no amounts outstanding under either committed credit facility .\nwe currently have long-term debt ratings of aa- and a1 from standard and poor 2019s corporation and moody 2019s investor services , respectively .\nif our long- term debt ratings were to decline , the facility fee and interest rate under our committed credit facility would increase .\nconversely , if our long-term debt rating were to improve , the facility fee and interest rate would decrease .\nchanges in our long-term debt rating would not trigger acceleration of maturity of any then-outstanding borrowings or any future borrowings under the committed credit facility .\nunder this committed revolving credit facility , we have agreed to various covenants .\nthese covenants include limits on our disposal of fixed assets , the amount of debt secured by liens we may incur , as well as limits on the indebtedness we can incur relative to our net worth .\nin the event we were to have any borrowings outstanding under this facility and failed to meet any covenant , and were unable to obtain a waiver from a majority of the banks in the syndicate , any borrowings would become immediately due and payable .\nas of may 31 , 2016 , we were in full compliance with each of these covenants and believe it is unlikely we will fail to meet any of these covenants in the foreseeable future .\nliquidity is also provided by our $ 2 billion commercial paper program , which increased $ 1 billion during the second quarter of fiscal 2016 .\nduring the year ended may 31 , 2016 , we did not issue commercial paper , and as of may 31 , 2016 , there were no outstanding borrowings under this program .\nany future issuance of commercial paper or other debt securities during fiscal 2017 will depend on general corporate needs .\nwe currently have short-term debt ratings of a1+ and p1 from standard and poor 2019s corporation and moody 2019s investor services , respectively .\nas of may 31 , 2016 , we had cash , cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $ 5.5 billion , of which $ 4.6 billion was held by our foreign subsidiaries .\nincluded in cash and equivalents as of may 31 , 2016 was $ 105 million of cash collateral received from counterparties as a result of hedging activity .\ncash equivalents and short-term investments consist primarily of deposits held at major banks , money market funds , commercial paper , corporate notes , u.s .\ntreasury obligations , u.s .\ngovernment sponsored enterprise obligations and other investment grade fixed income securities .\nour fixed income investments are exposed to both credit and interest rate risk .\nall of our investments are investment grade to minimize our credit risk .\nwhile individual securities have varying durations , as of may 31 , 2016 , the weighted average remaining duration of our cash equivalents and short-term investments portfolio was 91 days .\nto date we have not experienced difficulty accessing the credit markets or incurred higher interest costs .\nfuture volatility in the capital markets , however , may increase costs associated with issuing commercial paper or other debt instruments or affect our ability to access those markets .\nwe believe that existing cash , cash equivalents , short-term investments and cash generated by operations , together with access to external sources of funds as described above , will be sufficient to meet our domestic and foreign capital needs in the foreseeable future .\nwe utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies to manage our worldwide cash and deploy funds to locations where they are needed .\nwe routinely repatriate a portion of our foreign earnings for which u.s .\ntaxes have previously been provided .\nwe also indefinitely reinvest a significant portion of our foreign earnings , and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate these earnings .\nshould we require additional capital in the united states , we may elect to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds or raise capital in the united states through debt .\nif we were to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds , we would be required to accrue and pay additional u.s .\ntaxes less applicable foreign tax credits .\nif we elect to raise capital in the united states through debt , we would incur additional interest expense .\noff-balance sheet arrangements in connection with various contracts and agreements , we routinely provide indemnification relating to the enforceability of intellectual property rights , coverage for legal issues that arise and other items where we are acting as the guarantor .\ncurrently , we have several such agreements in place .\nhowever , based on our historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , we have determined that the fair value of such indemnification is not material to our financial position or results of operations .\ncontractual obligations our significant long-term contractual obligations as of may 31 , 2016 and significant endorsement contracts , including related marketing commitments , entered into through the date of this report are as follows: .\n\nTable:\ndescription of commitment ( in millions )\tdescription of commitment 2017\tdescription of commitment 2018\tdescription of commitment 2019\tdescription of commitment 2020\tdescription of commitment 2021\tdescription of commitment thereafter\ttotal\noperating leases\t$ 491\t$ 453\t$ 395\t$ 347\t$ 301\t$ 1244\t$ 3231\ncapital leases\t7\t5\t2\t1\t2014\t2014\t15\nlong-term debt ( 1 )\t115\t75\t74\t74\t71\t3365\t3774\nendorsement contracts ( 2 )\t1198\t1238\t945\t827\t698\t4514\t9420\nproduct purchase obligations ( 3 )\t4149\t2014\t2014\t2014\t2014\t2014\t4149\nother purchase obligations ( 4 )\t384\t118\t90\t48\t42\t90\t772\ntotal\t$ 6344\t$ 1889\t$ 1506\t$ 1297\t$ 1112\t$ 9213\t$ 21361\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the cash payments due for long-term debt include estimated interest payments .\nestimates of interest payments are based on outstanding principal amounts , applicable fixed interest rates or currently effective interest rates as of may 31 , 2016 ( if variable ) , timing of scheduled payments and the term of the debt obligations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3365", "3774", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.89163"}
{"example_id": "L/2015/page_59.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the overall growth of the s&p 500 index from 2010 to 2015\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\t2015\nloews common stock\t100.0\t97.37\t106.04\t126.23\t110.59\t101.72\ns&p 500 index\t100.0\t102.11\t118.45\t156.82\t178.29\t180.75\nloews peer group ( a )\t100.0\t101.59\t115.19\t145.12\t152.84\t144.70\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .\nberkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .\n( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .\nand the travelers companies , inc .\ndividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .\nregular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "180.75", "100.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.8075"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2007/page_129.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total acquisition price of suros is dedicated to goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operation .\nthere have no other material changes to the purchase price allocation as disclosed in the company 2019s form 10-k for the year ended september 30 , 2006 .\nas part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued .\nit was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values .\ncustomer relationship represents r2 2019s strong active customer base , dominant market position and strong partnership with several large companies .\ntrade name represents the r2 product names that the company intends to continue to use .\norder backlog consists of customer orders for which revenue has not yet been recognized .\ndeveloped technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to resell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .\nthe estimated $ 10200 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects primarily related to r2 2019s digital cad products .\nthe projects added direct digital algorithm capabilities as well as a new platform technology to analyze images and breast density measurement .\nthe projects were substantially completed as planned in fiscal 2007 .\nthe deferred income tax asset relates to the tax effect of acquired net operating loss carry forwards that the company believes are realizable partially offset by acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nacquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\non july 27 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of suros surgical systems , inc .\n( suros ) , pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 17 , 2006 .\nthe results of operations for suros have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .\nsuros , located in indianapolis , indiana , develops , manufactures and sells minimally invasive interventional breast biopsy technology and products for biopsy , tissue removal and biopsy site marking .\nthe initial aggregate purchase price for suros of approximately $ 248100 ( subject to adjustment ) consisted of 2300 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 106500 , cash paid of $ 139000 , and approximately $ 2600 for acquisition related fees and expenses .\nthe company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .\n99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .\nthe components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of july 27 2006\t$ 11800\nin-process research and development\t4900\ndeveloped technology and know how\t46000\ncustomer relationship\t17900\ntrade name\t5800\ndeferred income taxes\t-21300 ( 21300 )\ngoodwill\t202000\nestimated purchase price\t$ 267100\n\nPost-table text:\nthe acquisition also provides for a two-year earn out .\nthe earn-out is payable in two annual cash installments equal to the incremental revenue growth in suros 2019 business in the two years following the closing. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "202000", "267100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.75627"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2016/page_26.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage cumulative return for lkq corporation for the five years ended 12/31/2016?\n\nPre-table text:\ncomparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/2011\t12/31/2012\t12/31/2013\t12/31/2014\t12/31/2015\t12/31/2016\nlkq corporation\t$ 100\t$ 140\t$ 219\t$ 187\t$ 197\t$ 204\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100\t$ 113\t$ 147\t$ 164\t$ 163\t$ 178\npeer group\t$ 100\t$ 111\t$ 140\t$ 177\t$ 188\t$ 217\n\nPost-table text:\nthis stock performance information is \"furnished\" and shall not be deemed to be \"soliciting material\" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed \"filed\" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .\ninformation about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "204", "100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.04"}
{"example_id": "VRTX/2003/page_71.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the total common stock plans are related to the vertex purchase plan?\n\nPre-table text:\nrights each holder of a share of outstanding common stock also holds one share purchase right ( a \"right\" ) for each share of common stock .\neach right entitles the holder to purchase from the company one half of one-hundredth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value ( the \"junior preferred shares\" ) , of the company at a price of $ 135 per one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share ( the \"purchase price\" ) .\nthe rights are not exercisable until the earlier of acquisition by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock ( an \"acquiring person\" ) or the announcement of an intention to make or commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer , the consummation of which would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock .\nin the event that any person or group becomes an acquiring person , each holder of a right other than the acquiring person will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the purchase price and , in the event that the company is acquired in a business combination transaction or 50% ( 50 % ) or more of its assets are sold , each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of the transaction will have a market value of two times the purchase price .\nunder certain specified circumstances , the board of directors of the company may cause the rights ( other than rights owned by such person or group ) to be exchanged , in whole or in part , for common stock or junior preferred shares , at an exchange rate of one share of common stock per right or one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share per right .\nat any time prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may redeem the rights in whole at a price of $ 0.01 per right .\ncommon stock reserved for future issuance at december 31 , 2003 , the company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance under all equity compensation plans as follows ( shares in thousands ) : p .\nsignificant revenue arrangements the company has formed strategic collaborations with major pharmaceutical companies in the areas of drug discovery , development , and commercialization .\nresearch and development agreements provide the company with financial support and other valuable resources for research programs and development of clinical drug candidates , product development and marketing and sales of products .\ncollaborative research and development agreements in the company's collaborative research , development and commercialization programs the company seeks to discover , develop and commercialize major pharmaceutical products in conjunction with and supported by the company's collaborators .\ncollaborative research and development arrangements provide research funding over an initial contract period with renewal and termination options that vary by agreement .\nthe agreements also include milestone payments based on the achievement or the occurrence of a designated event .\nthe agreements may also contain development reimbursement provisions , royalty rights or profit sharing rights and manufacturing options .\nthe terms of each agreement vary .\nthe company has entered into significant research and development collaborations with large pharmaceutical companies .\np .\nsignificant revenue arrangements novartis in may 2000 , the company and novartis pharma ag ( \"novartis\" ) entered into an agreement to collaborate on the discovery , development and commercialization of small molecule drugs directed at targets in the kinase protein family .\nunder the agreement , novartis agreed to pay the company an up-front payment of $ 15000000 made upon signing of the agreement , up to $ 200000000 in product research funding over six .\n\nTable:\ncommon stock under stock and option plans\t21829\ncommon stock under the vertex purchase plan\t249\ncommon stock under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan\t125\ntotal\t22203\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "249", "22203", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01121"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_87.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 what was the percent of the principal and interest product of the combined products\n\nPre-table text:\ngenerally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .\nduring the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .\nbased upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .\nhome equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tinterest only product\tprincipal and interest product\n2012\t$ 904\t$ 266\n2013\t1211\t331\n2014\t2043\t598\n2015\t1988\t820\n2016 and thereafter\t6961\t5601\ntotal ( a )\t$ 13107\t$ 7616\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .\nwe view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .\nbased upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .\ngenerally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .\nat that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .\nsee note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nloan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .\ninitially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .\nif a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .\nour programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .\ntemporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .\nfurther , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .\nadditional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\na temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .\ntypically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .\na permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .\npermanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .\nfor consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .\nexamples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .\npermanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .\nresidential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .\nwe also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .\nthe following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .\n78 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "904", "266", ")", "divide(", "266", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.22735"}
{"example_id": "GS/2012/page_165.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor miscellaneous receivables and other assets , what was the percentage that represented assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements note 12 .\nother assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets .\nthe table below presents other assets by type. .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tas of december 2012\tas of december 2011\nproperty leasehold improvements andequipment1\t$ 8217\t$ 8697\ngoodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2\t5099\t5468\nincome tax-related assets3\t5620\t5017\nequity-method investments4\t453\t664\nmiscellaneous receivables and other5\t20234\t3306\ntotal\t$ 39623\t$ 23152\n\nPost-table text:\n1 .\nnet of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively .\n2 .\nincludes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale .\nsee note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .\n3 .\nsee note 24 for further information about income taxes .\n4 .\nexcludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available .\n5 .\nincludes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 .\nassets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale .\nassets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value .\nthe firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale .\nupon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business .\nproperty , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations .\nthe remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm .\nsubstantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset .\nleasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter .\ncertain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software .\nproperty , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable .\nthe firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives .\nsee note 13 for further information .\ngoldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "20234", "const_1000", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "16.77", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.464"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2018/page_110.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average of the afs investment securities during the years 2016-2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nTable:\nas of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2018\t2017\t2016\ninvestment securities gains/ ( losses )\t$ -395 ( 395 )\t$ -78 ( 78 )\t$ 132\navailable-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t203449\t219345\t226892\nheld-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t31747\t47927\t51358\ninvestment securities portfolio ( average )\t235197\t267272\t278250\nafs investment securities ( period-end )\t228681\t200247\t236670\nhtm investment securities ( period-end )\t31434\t47733\t50168\ninvestment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )\t260115\t247980\t286838\n\nPost-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "228681", "200247", ")", "add(", "#0", "236670", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "221866"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_78.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbetween december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , what was the change in the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .\nchange in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nchange in assumption ( a )\testimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate\t$ 23\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets\t$ 18\n.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate\t$ 2\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .\nour pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .\ninvestment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .\nalso , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .\nwe do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .\nwe maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .\none form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .\ncommercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .\nwe participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .\nunder these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .\nat december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .\nthe potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .\nwe maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .\nthe reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nif payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .\nour exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .\nresidential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .\nthese loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .\nresidential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .\nas discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .\nour historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .\nrepurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .\npnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .\npnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .\nrepurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .\nloan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 69 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "13.2", "13.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.2"}
{"example_id": "ILMN/2007/page_78.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in revenue on a pro forma basis between 2006 and 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ngoodwill goodwill represents the excess of the solexa purchase price over the sum of the amounts assigned to assets acquired less liabilities assumed .\nthe company believes that the acquisition of solexa will produce the following significant benefits : 2022 increased market presence and opportunities .\nthe combination of the company and solexa should increase the combined company 2019s market presence and opportunities for growth in revenue , earnings and stockholder return .\nthe company believes that the solexa technology is highly complementary to the company 2019s own portfolio of products and services and will enhance the company 2019s capabilities to service its existing customers , as well as accelerate the develop- ment of additional technologies , products and services .\nthe company believes that integrating solexa 2019s capabilities with the company 2019s technologies will better position the company to address the emerging biomarker research and development and in-vitro and molecular diag- nostic markets .\nthe company began to recognize revenue from products shipped as a result of this acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\n2022 operating efficiencies .\nthe combination of the company and solexa provides the opportunity for potential economies of scale and cost savings .\nthe company believes that these primary factors support the amount of goodwill recognized as a result of the purchase price paid for solexa , in relation to other acquired tangible and intangible assets , including in-process research and development .\nthe following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the specified reporting periods as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of that period ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended december 30 , year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n\tyear ended december 30 2007\tyear ended december 31 2006\nrevenue\t$ 366854\t$ 187103\nnet income ( loss )\t$ 17388\t$ -38957 ( 38957 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share basic\t$ 0.32\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\nnet income ( loss ) per share diluted\t$ 0.29\t$ -0.68 ( 0.68 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisition taken place as of the beginning of the periods presented , or the results that may occur in the future .\nthe pro forma results exclude the $ 303.4 million non-cash acquired ipr&d charge recorded upon the closing of the acquisition during the first quarter of 2007 .\ninvestment in solexa on november 12 , 2006 , the company entered into a definitive securities purchase agreement with solexa in which the company invested approximately $ 50 million in solexa in exchange for 5154639 newly issued shares of solexa common stock in conjunction with the merger of the two companies .\nthis investment was valued at $ 67.8 million as of december 31 , 2006 , which represented a market value of $ 13.15 per share of solexa common stock .\nthis investment was eliminated as part of the company 2019s purchase accounting upon the closing of the merger on january 26 , 2007 .\nillumina , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "366854", "187103", ")", "divide(", "#0", "187103", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.96071"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_99.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate of the net earnings for basic and diluted eps?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .\nthis cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .\npmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .\nearnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .\nbasic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2015\nnet earnings attributable to pmi\t$ 6035\t$ 6967\t$ 6873\nless distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards\t14\t19\t24\nnet earnings for basic and diluted eps\t$ 6021\t$ 6948\t$ 6849\nweighted-average shares for basic eps\t1552\t1551\t1549\nplus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )\t1\t2014\t2014\nweighted-average shares for diluted eps\t1553\t1551\t1549\n\nPost-table text:\nfor the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6021", "6948", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6948", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.13342"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_94.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2014 and 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .\ncommon stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .\nthese grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .\nin addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .\nthese grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .\nthe company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .\nunder the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .\nthe espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .\nthe espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .\nthe number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .\nthe fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .\nthe risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .\ntreasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .\nexpected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .\nthe expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .\nthe company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .\nthe black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\naverage risk-free interest rate\t1.1% ( 1.1 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\t1.5% ( 1.5 % )\nexpected dividend yield\tnone\tnone\tnone\nexpected volatility\t33% ( 33 % )\t30% ( 30 % )\t31% ( 31 % )\nexpected life ( years )\t4.5\t4.6\t4.6\nfair value per share\t$ 31.00\t$ 18.13\t$ 11.75\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "18.13", "11.75", ")", "divide(", "#0", "11.75", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.54298"}
{"example_id": "HWM/2016/page_40.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average price per share of the company 2019s common stock in the third quarter of 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .\nthe company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .\nprior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .\nas a result of the reverse stock split , every 3 shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .\nthe reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .\nthe company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .\non november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .\nthe separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .\nthe company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .\nthe company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .\nthe following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .\nthe prices listed below for the fourth quarter of 2016 do not reflect any adjustment for the impact of the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to pre-separation prices from earlier periods. .\n\nTable:\nquarter\t2016 high\t2016 low\t2016 dividend\t2016 high\t2016 low\tdividend\nfirst\t$ 30.66\t$ 18.42\t$ 0.09\t$ 51.30\t$ 37.95\t$ 0.09\nsecond\t34.50\t26.34\t0.09\t42.87\t33.45\t0.09\nthird\t32.91\t27.09\t0.09\t33.69\t23.91\t0.09\nfourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )\t32.10\t16.75\t0.09\t33.54\t23.43\t0.09\nyear\t$ 34.50\t$ 16.75\t$ 0.36\t$ 51.30\t$ 23.43\t$ 0.36\n\nPost-table text:\nthe number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12885 as of february 23 , 2017. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "32.91", "27.09", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "30"}
{"example_id": "PM/2018/page_24.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage return for pmi common stock for the five years ended 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .\nthe graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .\ndate pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .\n\nTable:\ndate\tpmi\tpmi peer group ( 1 )\ts&p 500 index\ndecember 31 2013\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\ndecember 31 2014\t$ 97.90\t$ 107.80\t$ 113.70\ndecember 31 2015\t$ 111.00\t$ 116.80\t$ 115.30\ndecember 31 2016\t$ 120.50\t$ 118.40\t$ 129.00\ndecember 31 2017\t$ 144.50\t$ 140.50\t$ 157.20\ndecember 31 2018\t$ 96.50\t$ 127.70\t$ 150.30\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .\nthe pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .\nthe review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .\nas a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .\nnote : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "96.50", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.035"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_35.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in total debt to be repaid in the contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 between 2008 and 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obli- gations at december 31 , 2005 , were as follows : in millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2007\t2008\t2009\t2010\tthereafter\ntotal debt\t$ 1181\t$ 570\t$ 308\t$ 2330\t$ 1534\t$ 6281\nlease obligations\t172\t144\t119\t76\t63\t138\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3264\t393\t280\t240\t204\t1238\ntotal\t$ 4617\t$ 1107\t$ 707\t$ 2646\t$ 1801\t$ 7657\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the 2006 amount includes $ 2.4 billion for contracts made in the ordinary course of business to purchase pulpwood , logs and wood chips .\nthe majority of our other purchase obligations are take-or-pay or purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business related to raw material purchases and energy contracts .\nother significant items include purchase obligations related to contracted services .\ntransformation plan in july 2005 , the company announced a plan to focus its business portfolio on two key global platform businesses : uncoated papers ( including distribution ) and packaging .\nthe plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses , additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses , includ- ing possible sale or spin-off .\nin connection with this process , in the third quarter of 2005 , the company completed the sale of its 50.5% ( 50.5 % ) interest in carter holt harvey limited .\nother businesses currently under re- view include : 2022 the coated and supercalendered papers busi- ness , including the coated groundwood mill and associated assets in brazil , 2022 the beverage packaging business , including the pine bluff , arkansas mill , 2022 the kraft papers business , including the roa- noke rapids , north carolina mill , 2022 arizona chemical , 2022 the wood products business , and 2022 segments or potentially all of the company 2019s 6.5 million acres of u.s .\nforestlands .\nconsistent with this evaluation process , the com- pany has distributed bid package information for some of these businesses .\nthe exact timing of this evaluation process will vary by business ; however , it is anticipated that decisions will be made for some of these businesses during 2006 .\nwhile the exact use of any proceeds from potential future sales is dependent upon various factors affecting future cash flows , such as the amount of any proceeds received and changes in market conditions , input costs and capital spending , the company remains committed to using its free cash flow in 2006 to pay down debt , to return value to shareholders , and for se- lective high-return investments .\ncritical accounting policies the preparation of financial statements in con- formity with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states requires international paper to estab- lish accounting policies and to make estimates that af- fect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses .\nsome of these estimates require judgments about matters that are in- herently uncertain .\naccounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of international paper , and that can require judgments by management that affect their application , include sfas no .\n5 , 201caccounting for contingencies , 201d sfas no .\n144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d sfas no .\n142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets , 201d sfas no .\n87 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for pensions , 201d sfas no .\n106 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions , 201d as amended by sfas nos .\n132 and 132r , 201cemployers 2019 disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefits , 201d and sfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes . 201d the following is a discussion of the impact of these accounting policies on international paper : contingent liabilities .\naccruals for contingent li- abilities , including legal and environmental matters , are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated .\nliabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel .\nadditionally , as dis- cussed in note 10 of the notes to consolidated finan- cial statements in item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data , reserves for projected future claims settlements relating to exterior siding and roofing prod- ucts previously manufactured by masonite require judgments regarding projections of future claims rates and amounts .\ninternational paper utilizes an in- dependent third party consultant to assist in developing these estimates .\nliabilities for environmental matters require evaluations of relevant environmental regu- lations and estimates of future remediation alternatives and costs .\ninternational paper determines these esti- mates after a detailed evaluation of each site .\nimpairment of long-lived assets and goodwill .\nan impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the asset 2019s carrying amount exceeds its fair value , and is recorded when the carrying amount is not recoverable through future operations .\na goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value .\nassessments of possible impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill are made when events or changes in cir- cumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "308", "570", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-262"}
{"example_id": "UPS/2006/page_32.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the dow jones transportation average?\n\nPre-table text:\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .\nthe following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .\nthe comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .\ncomparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/01\t12/31/02\t12/31/03\t12/31/04\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\nunited parcel service inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 117.19\t$ 140.49\t$ 163.54\t$ 146.35\t$ 148.92\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 77.90\t$ 100.24\t$ 111.15\t$ 116.61\t$ 135.02\ndow jones transportation average\t$ 100.00\t$ 88.52\t$ 116.70\t$ 149.06\t$ 166.42\t$ 182.76\n\nPost-table text:\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .\nthese plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "148.92", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "182.76", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-33.84"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2015/page_118.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were total operating expenses as a percentage of revenue in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .\ninformation generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .\nthe current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .\nthe market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .\nthe income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .\nthe income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .\nprojected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .\nthe cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .\nthe cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .\nthe fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .\nthe weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .\npro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .\nthe pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .\nin addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .\nhowever , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .\naccordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .\ndecember 31 , ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2013 ( in millions )\nrevenue\t$ 40678\nnet income\t2526\n\nPost-table text:\n5 .\nbasis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .\nfor the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .\nall significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .\nthe preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .\nactual results could differ from those estimates .\nthe most significant areas .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "40678", "2526", ")", "divide(", "#0", "40678", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.9379"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2004/page_213.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy louisiana , inc.?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .\nthe increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .\nfuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .\nother regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .\n2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .\n\nTable:\n\t( in millions )\n2002 net revenue\t$ 922.9\ndeferred fuel cost revisions\t59.1\nasset retirement obligation\t8.2\nvolume\t-16.2 ( 16.2 )\nvidalia settlement\t-9.2 ( 9.2 )\nother\t8.9\n2003 net revenue\t$ 973.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .\nthe asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , \"accounting for asset retirement obligations\" adopted in january 2003 .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" for more details on sfas 143 .\nthe increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .\nthe volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .\nbilled usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "973.7", "922.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "50.8"}
{"example_id": "CME/2010/page_42.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the chicago headquarters lease , assuming the two options to extend the term are exercised , what is the last year the space can be leased?\n\nPre-table text:\ndirectors in advance for their review .\nin the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) .\nin connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members .\nitem 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable .\nitem 2 .\nproperties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive .\nthe following is a description of our key locations and facilities .\nlocation primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted .\n( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively .\n( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex .\n( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility .\nin accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord .\nwe do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income .\n( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building .\n( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 .\n( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 .\nwe also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers .\nwe believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 .\ncontingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nTable:\nlocation\tprimary use\towned/leased\tlease expiration\tapproximate size ( in squarefeet ) ( 1 )\n20south wacker drive chicagoillinois\tglobal headquarters and office space\tleased\t2022 ( 2 )\t490000\n141west jacksonchicago illinois\tchicago trading floor and office space\towned\tn/a\t1500000 ( 3 )\n550west washingtonchicago illinois\toffice space\tleased\t2023\t225000\nonenorth endnew york new york\tnew york trading floor and office space\tmixed ( 4 )\t2069\t500000 ( 5 )\n33cannon street london\toffice space\tleased\t2019\t14000 ( 6 )\nonenew change london\toffice space\tleased\t2026\t40000 ( 7 )\nannexdata centerchicagoland area\tbusiness continuity\tleased\t2014\t100000\nremotedata centerchicagoland area\tbusiness continuity\tleased\t2017\t50000\ndatacenter 3chicagoland area\tbusiness continuity and co-location\towned\tn/a\t430000\n\nPost-table text:\ndirectors in advance for their review .\nin the event the cbot directors determine in their sole discretion that a proposed rule change will materially impair the business of cbot or the business opportunities of the holders of the cbot memberships , such change must be submitted to a committee comprised of three cbot directors and two cme directors ( as defined in our bylaws ) .\nin connection with these rights , our ability to take certain actions that we may deem to be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders , including actions relating to the operation of our open outcry trading facilities and certain pricing decisions , may be limited by the rights of our members .\nitem 1b.unresolved staff comments not applicable .\nitem 2 .\nproperties our global headquarters are located in chicago , illinois at 20 south wacker drive .\nthe following is a description of our key locations and facilities .\nlocation primary use owned/leased lease expiration approximate size ( in square feet ) ( 1 ) 20 south wacker drive , chicago , illinois global headquarters and office space leased 2022 ( 2 ) 490000 141 west jackson chicago , illinois chicago trading floor and office space owned n/a 1500000 ( 3 ) 550 west washington chicago , illinois office space leased 2023 225000 one north end new york , new york new york trading floor and office space mixed ( 4 ) 2069 500000 ( 5 ) 33 cannon street , london office space leased 2019 14000 ( 6 ) one new change , london office space leased 2026 40000 ( 7 ) annex data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2014 100000 remote data center chicagoland area business continuity leased 2017 50000 data center 3 chicagoland area business continuity and co-location owned n/a 430000 ( 1 ) size represents the amount of space leased by us unless otherwise noted .\n( 2 ) the initial lease expires in 2022 with two consecutive options to extend the term for seven and ten years , respectively .\n( 3 ) we occupy approximately 425000 square feet of the 141 west jackson complex .\n( 4 ) the one north end property is subject to a ground lease with the battery park city authority for the site of our new york offices and trading facility .\nin accordance with the terms of the lease , we are deemed to lease the building and its improvements from the landlord .\nwe do not make lease payments to the landlord related to the building and we receive the financial benefit of the rental income .\n( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building .\n( 6 ) we have a termination right effective in the first quarter of 2012 , which we intend to exercise in the first quarter of 2011 .\n( 7 ) we expect to occupy the space at one new change in the second quarter of 2011 .\nwe also lease global office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers .\nwe believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings see 201clegal matters 201d in note 18 .\ncontingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 96 for cme group 2019s litigation disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "2022", "const_9", ")", "add(", "#0", "const_10", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2041"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2013/page_26.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2013 what was the percent of square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia not leased\n\nPre-table text:\nour ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time .\nany refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants , which could further restrict our business operations .\nin addition , any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating , which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness .\nif our cash flows and available cash are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations , we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations .\nwe may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them , and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due .\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments item 2 .\nproperties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2013 is shown in the following table .\nall facilities are leased , except for 165000 square feet of our office in alpharetta , georgia .\nsquare footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or part of a facility restructuring. .\n\nTable:\nlocation\tapproximate square footage\nalpharetta georgia\t254000\njersey city new jersey\t107000\narlington virginia\t102000\nsandy utah\t66000\nmenlo park california\t63000\nnew york new york\t39000\nchicago illinois ( 1 )\t36000\n\nPost-table text:\nchicago , illinois ( 1 ) 36000 ( 1 ) includes approximately 25000 square footage related to g1 execution services , llc .\nwe entered into a definitive agreement to sell g1 execution services , llc to an affiliate of susquehanna .\nthe lease was assigned to susquehanna upon closing of the sale on february 10 , all of our facilities are used by either our trading and investing or balance sheet management segments , in addition to the corporate/other category .\nall other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location .\nin addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 e*trade branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet .\nwe believe our facilities space is adequate to meet our needs in 2014 .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings on october 27 , 2000 , ajaxo , inc .\n( 201cajaxo 201d ) filed a complaint in the superior court for the state of california , county of santa clara .\najaxo sought damages and certain non-monetary relief for the company 2019s alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement with ajaxo pertaining to certain wireless technology that ajaxo offered the company as well as damages and other relief against the company for their alleged misappropriation of ajaxo 2019s trade secrets .\nfollowing a jury trial , a judgment was entered in 2003 in favor of ajaxo against the company for $ 1.3 million for breach of the ajaxo non-disclosure agreement .\nalthough the jury found in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets , the trial court subsequently denied ajaxo 2019s requests for additional damages and relief .\non december 21 , 2005 , the california court of appeal affirmed the above-described award against the company for breach of the nondisclosure agreement but remanded the case to the trial court for the limited purpose of determining what , if any , additional damages ajaxo may be entitled to as a result of the jury 2019s previous finding in favor of ajaxo on its claim against the company for misappropriation of trade secrets .\nalthough the company paid ajaxo the full amount due on the above-described judgment , the case was remanded back to the trial court , and on may 30 , 2008 , a jury returned a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "165000", "254000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.64961"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2010/page_42.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2009 to 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\n( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2010\t2009\t2008\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 3547\t$ 3173\t$ 4421\nnet cash used for investing activities\t-319 ( 319 )\t-1518 ( 1518 )\t-907 ( 907 )\nnet cash used for financing activities\t-3363 ( 3363 )\t-1476 ( 1476 )\t-3938 ( 3938 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .\nthe increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .\npartially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .\nthis reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .\noperating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .\nthe improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .\nthese improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .\nthe decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .\nthe increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .\nthe decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .\nnet cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .\nthe decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .\npartially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .\nthe decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .\ninvesting activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .\nwe also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .\ncapital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .\nwe expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .\nacquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .\namounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .\nwe paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .\nin 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .\nthere were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .\nduring 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .\nfinancing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .\nof the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .\nin october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .\nunder the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .\nwe repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .\nin connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .\ncash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .\nthose activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "820", "852", ")", "divide(", "#0", "852", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03756"}
{"example_id": "TSCO/2017/page_31.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth in the stock price performance for tractor supply company from 2012 to 2013\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .\nthe following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .\nthe comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .\nthe historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/29/2012\t12/28/2013\t12/27/2014\t12/26/2015\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\ntractor supply company\t$ 100.00\t$ 174.14\t$ 181.29\t$ 201.04\t$ 179.94\t$ 180.52\ns&p 500\t$ 100.00\t$ 134.11\t$ 155.24\t$ 156.43\t$ 173.74\t$ 211.67\ns&p retail index\t$ 100.00\t$ 147.73\t$ 164.24\t$ 207.15\t$ 219.43\t$ 286.13\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "174.14", "100.00", ")", "divide(", "#0", "100.00", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.7414"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_211.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the total loss due to instrument-specific credit risk for 2008 to 2007\n\nPre-table text:\nthe notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthese items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nother items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .\nnone of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .\nsignificant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .\ncitigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .\nfair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .\nthe following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\t2008 trading assets\t2008 loans\t2008 trading assets\tloans\ncarrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet\t$ 16254\t$ 2315\t$ 26020\t$ 3038\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value\t$ 6501\t$ 3\t$ 899\t$ -5 ( 5 )\nbalance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due\t$ 77\t$ 1113\t$ 186\t$ 1292\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue\t$ 190\t$ -4 ( 4 )\t$ 68\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nin millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .\nchanges in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .\nthe changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .\ncertain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .\nthe company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .\nthe fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .\nas required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .\nthese investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\ncitigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .\nthe company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .\nsince the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .\nthus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .\nthese investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\ncertain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .\nthe company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .\nthese positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .\nfor those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nthe change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .\ncertain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "38", "188", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.20213"}
{"example_id": "FRT/2005/page_117.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year during 2005 and 2004?\n\nPre-table text:\nfederal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .\n\nTable:\nbalance december 31 2002\t$ 450697000\nadditions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense\t68125000\ndeductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property\t-4645000 ( 4645000 )\nbalance december 31 2003\t514177000\nadditions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense\t82551000\ndeductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property\t-1390000 ( 1390000 )\nbalance december 31 2004\t595338000\nadditions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense\t83656000\ndeductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property\t-15244000 ( 15244000 )\nbalance december 31 2005\t$ 663750000\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "663750000", "595338000", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11491"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2011/page_82.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , what was percent of the capital markets goodwill to the total\n\nPre-table text:\njudgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .\ngoodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .\neach of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .\nthere is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .\nthe following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nreporting unit\tdecember 31 2011\nu.s . brokerage\t$ 1751.2\ncapital markets\t142.4\nretail bank\t40.6\ntotal goodwill\t$ 1934.2\n\nPost-table text:\nin connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthe fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .\nwe also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .\neffects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .\nestimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .\nif management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .\nintangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .\nif changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "142.4", "1934.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07362"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2007/page_65.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of as of december 31 , 2007 what was the percent of the total debt maturities that was due in 2009\n\nPre-table text:\ndebt maturities 2013 the following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of december 31 , 2007 , excluding market value adjustments .\nmillions of dollars .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 689\n2009\t542\n2010\t462\n2011\t550\n2012\t720\nthereafter\t4717\ntotal debt\t$ 7680\n\nPost-table text:\nat december 31 , 2007 , we reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 550 million of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance .\nthis reclassification reflected our ability and intent to refinance any short- term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term debt on a long-term basis .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we did not reclassify any short-term debt as long-term debt as we did not intend to refinance at that mortgaged properties 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.8 billion at both december 31 , 2007 and 2006 serves as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad equipment .\nas a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds .\nas of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion .\nin accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds .\ncredit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2007 , $ 1.9 billion of credit was available under our revolving credit facility ( the facility ) , which we entered into on april 20 , 2007 .\nthe facility is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe did not draw on the facility during 2007 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated , investment-grade borrowers .\nthe facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facility requires the maintenance of a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2007 , we were in compliance with this covenant .\nthe facility does not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require us to post collateral .\nthe facility , which expires in april 2012 , replaced two $ 1 billion , 5-year facilities with terms ending in march 2009 and march 2010 .\nthe facility includes terms that are comparable with those of the prior facilities , although the minimum net worth requirement of $ 7.5 billion in prior facilities was removed , and the facility includes a change-of-control provision .\nin addition to our revolving credit facility , a $ 75 million uncommitted line of credit was available .\nthe line of credit expires in april 2008 , and was not used in 2007 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facility to draw on this $ 75 million line .\ndividend restrictions 2013 our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant that , under certain circumstances , would restrict the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders .\nthe amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 11.5 billion and $ 7.8 billion at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 , respectively .\nthis facility replaced two credit facilities that had minimum net worth covenants that were more restrictive with respect to the amount of retained earnings available for dividends at december 31 , 2006. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "542", "7680", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07057"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_86.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding from 2005 to 2004?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .\n( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .\ncharles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .\n( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .\n( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .\nit is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2003\t$ 1150786\n2004\t$ 925005\n2005\t$ 540372\n2006\t$ 139952\n2007\t$ 475288\n\nPost-table text:\nnot included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .\nin december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .\nin november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\ncovenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .\nif entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .\nin january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "925005", "540372", ")", "divide(", "#0", "540372", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.71179"}
{"example_id": "CAT/2017/page_85.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the growth rate of maximum exposure to loss from vies from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\n64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .\noperations and summary of significant accounting policies a .\nnature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .\nfinancial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .\nthis category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .\n( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .\nour products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .\nwe conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .\nwe place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .\nalthough no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .\nour machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .\nreciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .\nsome of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .\nthe fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .\nsome of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .\nour dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .\nsome products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .\nat times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .\nthe financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .\nfinancing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .\nwe offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .\na significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .\nb .\nbasis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .\nand its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .\ninvestments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .\nsee note 9 for further discussion .\nwe consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .\nis the primary beneficiary .\nfor vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .\nthe primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .\nsee note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .\nwe have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .\nour maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nreceivables - trade and other\t$ 34\t$ 55\nreceivables - finance\t42\t174\nlong-term receivables - finance\t38\t246\ninvestments in unconsolidated affiliated companies\t39\t31\nguarantees\t259\t210\ntotal\t$ 412\t$ 716\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .\nour maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .\nthese risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "412", "716", ")", "divide(", "#0", "716", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.42458"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_175.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 was current?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .\naes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .\ntherefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .\nstarting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .\nas a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .\nin november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .\nthis agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .\nthe company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .\nafter the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .\nconsidering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .\nforeign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .\nfluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .\ndollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .\nconcentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .\nseveral of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .\nhowever , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .\nthe cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .\nif a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .\n26 .\nrelated party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .\nin the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .\nat two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .\nthese offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .\nin chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .\nadditionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .\nthe company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2017\t2016\t2015\nrevenue 2014non-regulated\t$ 1297\t$ 1100\t$ 1099\ncost of sales 2014non-regulated\t220\t210\t330\ninterest income\t8\t4\t25\ninterest expense\t36\t39\t33\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "86", "53", ")", "divide(", "#0", "86", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.38372"}
{"example_id": "HII/2014/page_69.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total backlog is related to newport news segment?\n\nPre-table text:\nuss abraham lincoln rcoh , the construction preparation contract for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and the inactivation contract for cvn-65 uss enterprise , partially offset by lower volumes on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the construction and engineering contracts for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford .\nhigher revenues in fleet support services were primarily the result of volumes associated with repair work on ssn-765 uss montpelier .\nincreased submarines revenues were related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , primarily driven by higher volumes on block iii boats and the advance procurement contract on block iv boats , partially offset by lower volumes on block ii boats following the delivery of ssn-783 uss minnesota .\nsegment operating income 2014 - newport news operating income in 2014 was $ 415 million , compared to income of $ 402 million in 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the volume changes discussed above and higher risk retirement on the construction contract for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford , offset by lower risk retirement on the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh .\n2013 - newport news operating income in 2013 was $ 402 million , compared to income of $ 372 million in 2012 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , driven by risk retirement , performance improvement and the favorable resolution of outstanding contract changes , as well as risk retirement on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the absence in 2013 of the workers' compensation expense adjustment recorded in 2012 , partially offset by the favorable resolution in 2012 of outstanding contract changes on the cvn-65 uss enterprise edsra .\nrevenues at our other segment for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , were $ 137 million , primarily due to the acquisition of upi on may 30 , 2014 .\nother operating loss for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was $ 59 million , primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 47 million described above .\nbacklog total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 21 billion .\ntotal backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) .\nbacklog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity orders .\nfor contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer .\nthe following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\tdecember 31 2014 total backlog\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\ttotal backlog\ningalls\t$ 5609\t$ 1889\t$ 7498\t$ 6335\t$ 2570\t$ 8905\nnewport news\t6158\t7709\t13867\t5495\t3638\t9133\nother\t65\t2014\t65\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal backlog\t$ 11832\t$ 9598\t$ 21430\t$ 11830\t$ 6208\t$ 18038\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 .\nu.s .\ngovernment orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .\nawards 2014 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 10.1 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2014 included contracts for block iv of the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , continued construction preparation for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and construction of nsc-7 kimball .\n2013 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was approximately $ 9.4 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2013 included contracts for the construction of five ddg-51 arleigh burke-class this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "9133", "18038", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.50632"}
{"example_id": "VTR/2007/page_47.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the value of the treasury stock as of december 312007\n\nPre-table text:\nas of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record .\ndividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock .\non february 13 , 2008 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2008 dividend in the amount of $ 0.5125 per share , payable on march 28 , 2008 to stockholders of record on march 6 , 2008 .\nwe expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2008 .\nour board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis .\nbecause the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above .\nplease see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy .\nour stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan .\nsee 201cnote 16 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k .\ndirector and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation .\nstock repurchases the table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 : number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per .\n\nTable:\n\tnumber of shares repurchased ( 1 )\taverage price per share\noctober 1 through october 31\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1 through november 30\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1 through december 31\t14669\t$ 43.89\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "14669", "43.89", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "643822.41"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2015/page_118.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\non december 312013 what was the net profit margin\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .\ninformation generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .\nthe current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .\nthe market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .\nthe income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .\nthe income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .\nprojected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .\nthe cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .\nthe cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .\nthe fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .\nthe weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .\npro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .\nthe pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .\nin addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .\nhowever , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .\naccordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .\ndecember 31 , ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2013 ( in millions )\nrevenue\t$ 40678\nnet income\t2526\n\nPost-table text:\n5 .\nbasis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .\nfor the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .\nall significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .\nthe preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .\nactual results could differ from those estimates .\nthe most significant areas .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2526", "40678", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0621"}
{"example_id": "CNP/2010/page_31.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the state of minnesota , what is the percentage of commercial/industrial customers concerning the total customers?\n\nPre-table text:\nsystem and to use that system to conduct its electric delivery business and for other purposes that the franchises permit .\nthe terms of the franchises , with various expiration dates , typically range from 30 to 50 years .\nnatural gas distribution cerc corp . 2019s natural gas distribution business ( gas operations ) engages in regulated intrastate natural gas sales to , and natural gas transportation for , approximately 3.3 million residential , commercial and industrial customers in arkansas , louisiana , minnesota , mississippi , oklahoma and texas .\nthe largest metropolitan areas served in each state by gas operations are houston , texas ; minneapolis , minnesota ; little rock , arkansas ; shreveport , louisiana ; biloxi , mississippi ; and lawton , oklahoma .\nin 2010 , approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of gas operations 2019 total throughput was to residential customers and approximately 58% ( 58 % ) was to commercial and industrial customers .\nthe table below reflects the number of natural gas distribution customers by state as of december 31 , 2010 : residential commercial/ industrial total customers .\n\nTable:\n\tresidential\tcommercial/industrial\ttotal customers\narkansas\t390668\t48033\t438701\nlouisiana\t232135\t17347\t249482\nminnesota\t738868\t67489\t806357\nmississippi\t109608\t12683\t122291\noklahoma\t93388\t10620\t104008\ntexas\t1451666\t90719\t1542385\ntotal gas operations\t3016333\t246891\t3263224\n\nPost-table text:\ngas operations also provides unregulated services consisting of heating , ventilating and air conditioning ( hvac ) equipment and appliance repair , and sales of hvac , hearth and water heating equipment in minnesota .\nthe demand for intrastate natural gas sales to residential customers and natural gas sales and transportation for commercial and industrial customers is seasonal .\nin 2010 , approximately 71% ( 71 % ) of the total throughput of gas operations 2019 business occurred in the first and fourth quarters .\nthese patterns reflect the higher demand for natural gas for heating purposes during those periods .\nsupply and transportation .\nin 2010 , gas operations purchased virtually all of its natural gas supply pursuant to contracts with remaining terms varying from a few months to four years .\nmajor suppliers in 2010 included bp canada energy marketing corp .\n( 25.6% ( 25.6 % ) of supply volumes ) , conocophillips company ( 8.3% ( 8.3 % ) ) , tenaska marketing ventures ( 6.8% ( 6.8 % ) ) , kinder morgan ( 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) ) , oneok energy marketing company ( 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) ) , and cargill , inc .\n( 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) ) .\nnumerous other suppliers provided the remaining 43.7% ( 43.7 % ) of gas operations 2019 natural gas supply requirements .\ngas operations transports its natural gas supplies through various intrastate and interstate pipelines , including those owned by our other subsidiaries , under contracts with remaining terms , including extensions , varying from one to twelve years .\ngas operations anticipates that these gas supply and transportation contracts will be renewed or replaced prior to their expiration .\ngas operations actively engages in commodity price stabilization pursuant to annual gas supply plans presented to and/or filed with each of its state regulatory authorities .\nthese price stabilization activities include use of storage gas , contractually establishing fixed prices with our physical gas suppliers and utilizing financial derivative instruments to achieve a variety of pricing structures ( e.g. , fixed price , costless collars and caps ) .\nits gas supply plans generally call for 25-50% ( 25-50 % ) of winter supplies to be hedged in some fashion .\ngenerally , the regulations of the states in which gas operations operates allow it to pass through changes in the cost of natural gas , including gains and losses on financial derivatives associated with the index-priced physical supply , to its customers under purchased gas adjustment provisions in its tariffs .\ndepending upon the jurisdiction , the purchased gas adjustment factors are updated periodically , ranging from monthly to semi-annually , using estimated gas costs .\nthe changes in the cost of gas billed to customers are subject to review by the applicable regulatory bodies. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "67489", "806357", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0837"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_99.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of total long-term debt net from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\nnotes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045\t$ 8150\t$ 1400\nnotes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046\t6089\t3589\nnotes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036\t1941\t1941\nother debt\t116\t111\ntotal long-term debt\t16296\t7041\nless : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs\t-1035 ( 1035 )\t-899 ( 899 )\ntotal long-term debt net\t$ 15261\t$ 6142\n\nPost-table text:\nrevolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 .\nthe 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes .\nthe undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million .\nthere were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky .\nconcurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility .\non november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility .\nborrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements .\neach bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements .\nlong-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt .\nthe november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) .\nwe may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption .\ninterest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 .\nthe november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness .\nthe proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15261", "6142", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9119"}
{"example_id": "HUM/2017/page_133.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the number of shares of stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nhumana inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 .\nstockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\npaymentdate\tamountper share\ttotalamount ( in millions )\n2015\t$ 1.14\t$ 170\n2016\t$ 1.16\t$ 172\n2017\t$ 1.49\t$ 216\n\nPost-table text:\non november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million .\ndeclaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .\nstock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .\nunder the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .\npursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .\naccordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program .\non february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement .\nwe also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 .\non february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co .\nllc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .\non february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock .\nthe payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr .\nupon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million .\nin addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock .\nsubsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "55", "0.40", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "137.5"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2013/page_209.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were net trading assets from derivatives in 2012 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 215 the firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer lending-related commitments .\nin many cases , the firm can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing the borrower notice or , in some cases , without notice as permitted by law .\nfor a further discussion of the valuation of lending-related commitments , see page 198 of this note .\ntrading assets and liabilities trading assets include debt and equity instruments owned by jpmorgan chase ( 201clong 201d positions ) that are held for client market-making and client-driven activities , as well as for certain risk management activities , certain loans managed on a fair value basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or market ( market approximates fair value ) .\ntrading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) .\nthe firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions .\nincluded in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unrealized losses ) related to derivatives .\ntrading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets .\nbalances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased ( short positions ) .\ntrading assets and liabilities 2013 average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\ntrading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments\t$ 340449\t$ 349337\t$ 393890\ntrading assets 2013 derivative receivables\t72629\t85744\t90003\ntrading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a )\t77706\t69001\t81916\ntrading liabilities 2013 derivative payables\t64553\t76162\t71539\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased .\nnote 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value .\nelections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , certain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrangements are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid instruments ) ; and/or 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis .\nelections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis .\n2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year .\n2022 owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument .\n2022 certain investments that receive tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction .\n2022 structured notes issued as part of cib 2019s client-driven activities .\n( structured notes are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests issued by cib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "85744", "76162", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9582"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2005/page_37.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwithout the asset & wealth management segment in 2015 , what would total operating income have been in us$ millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nsegment results 2013 operating basis ( a ) ( b ) ( table continued from previous page ) year ended december 31 , operating earnings return on common equity 2013 goodwill ( c ) .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios )\tyear ended december 31 , 2005\tyear ended december 31 , 2004\tyear ended december 31 , change\t2005\t2004\ninvestment bank\t$ 3658\t$ 2948\t24% ( 24 % )\t18% ( 18 % )\t17% ( 17 % )\nretail financial services\t3427\t2199\t56\t26\t24\ncard services\t1907\t1274\t50\t16\t17\ncommercial banking\t1007\t608\t66\t30\t29\ntreasury & securities services\t1037\t440\t136\t55\t17\nasset & wealth management\t1216\t681\t79\t51\t17\ncorporate\t-1731 ( 1731 )\t61\tnm\tnm\tnm\ntotal\t$ 10521\t$ 8211\t28% ( 28 % )\t17% ( 17 % )\t16% ( 16 % )\n\nPost-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2005 annual report 35 and are retained in corporate .\nthese retained expenses include parent company costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses ; adjustments to align certain corporate staff , technology and operations allocations with market prices ; and other one-time items not aligned with the business segments .\nduring 2005 , the firm refined cost allocation methodologies related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations expenses in order to improve transparency , consistency and accountability with regard to costs allocated across business segments .\nprior periods have not been revised to reflect these new cost allocation methodologies .\ncapital allocation each business segment is allocated capital by taking into consideration stand- alone peer comparisons , economic risk measures and regulatory capital requirements .\nthe amount of capital assigned to each business is referred to as equity .\nat the time of the merger , goodwill , as well as the associated capital , was allocated solely to corporate .\neffective january 2006 , the firm expects to refine its methodology for allocating capital to the business segments to include any goodwill associated with line of business-directed acquisitions since the merger .\nu.s .\ngaap requires the allocation of goodwill to the business segments for impairment testing ( see critical accounting estimates used by the firm and note 15 on pages 81 2013 83 and 114 2013116 , respectively , of this annual report ) .\nsee the capital management section on page 56 of this annual report for a discussion of the equity framework .\ncredit reimbursement tss reimburses the ib for credit portfolio exposures the ib manages on behalf of clients the segments share .\nat the time of the merger , the reimbursement methodology was revised to be based upon pre-tax earnings , net of the cost of capital related to those exposures .\nprior to the merger , the credit reimbursement was based upon pre-tax earnings , plus the allocated capital associated with the shared clients .\ntax-equivalent adjustments segment and firm results reflect revenues on a tax-equivalent basis for segment reporting purposes .\nrefer to explanation and reconciliation of the firm 2019s non-gaap financial measures on page 31 of this annual report for additional details .\ndescription of business segment reporting methodology results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a stand-alone business .\nthe management reporting process that derives these results allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies .\neffective with the merger on july 1 , 2004 , several of the allocation methodologies were revised , as noted below .\nas prior periods have not been revised to reflect these new methodologies , they are not comparable to the presentation of periods beginning with the third quarter of 2004 .\nfurther , the firm continues to assess the assumptions , methodologies and reporting reclassifications used for segment reporting , and further refinements may be implemented in future periods .\nrevenue sharing when business segments join efforts to sell products and services to the firm 2019s clients , the participating business segments agree to share revenues from those transactions .\nthese revenue-sharing agreements were revised on the merger date to provide consistency across the lines of business .\nfunds transfer pricing funds transfer pricing ( 201cftp 201d ) is used to allocate interest income and expense to each business and transfer the primary interest rate risk exposures to corporate .\nthe allocation process is unique to each business and considers the interest rate risk , liquidity risk and regulatory requirements of its stand- alone peers .\nbusiness segments may retain certain interest rate exposures , subject to management approval , that would be expected in the normal operation of a similar peer business .\nin the third quarter of 2004 , ftp was revised to conform the policies of the combined firms .\nexpense allocation where business segments use services provided by support units within the firm , the costs of those support units are allocated to the business segments .\nthose expenses are allocated based upon their actual cost , or the lower of actual cost or market cost , as well as upon usage of the services provided .\neffective with the third quarter of 2004 , the cost allocation methodologies of the heritage firms were aligned to provide consistency across the business segments .\nin addition , expenses related to certain corporate functions , technology and operations ceased to be allocated to the business segments .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "10521", "1216", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9305"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_79.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much goodwill does the company have as a % (  % ) of current assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\nacquisitions ( continued ) was recorded to goodwill .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 28.1\nproperty and equipment net\t0.2\ngoodwill\t258.9\nipr&d\t190.0\ncurrent liabilities assumed\t-32.9 ( 32.9 )\ndeferred income taxes\t-66.0 ( 66.0 )\ncontingent consideration\t-30.3 ( 30.3 )\ntotal cash purchase price\t348.0\nless : cash acquired\t-27.9 ( 27.9 )\ntotal cash purchase price net of cash acquired\t$ 320.1\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .\ngoodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .\nipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .\nthe fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .\nthis approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .\nthe discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) .\ncompletion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .\nthe risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .\nthe valuation assumed $ 97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction , and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program .\nthe company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018 , if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval .\nupon completion of development , the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .\nthe company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve .\nthis testing has been completed and , in collaboration with clinical investigators , the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials .\nthe results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .\npro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .\n8 .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets on july 3 , 2015 , the company acquired cardiaq ( see note 7 ) .\nthis transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $ 258.9 million and ipr&d of $ 190.0 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "258.9", "28.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9.21352"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2003/page_40.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales between 2001 and 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .\na n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k the following table sets forth the operating profit margin by cost of products sold .\nincluded in cost of product sold are segment for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , losses on foreign exchange hedge contracts , which increased 2002 and 2001 : in 2003 relative to 2002 .\nin the fourth quarter , the company reported operating profit as a percent of net sales of percent of net sales 47.1 percent for asia pacific. .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31,\t2003\t2002\t2001\namericas\t51.2% ( 51.2 % )\t48.3% ( 48.3 % )\t47.4% ( 47.4 % )\neurope\t26.3\t24.4\t19.5\nasia pacific\t45.3\t46.1\t45.4\n\nPost-table text:\noperating profit for the americas as a percentage of net sales increased to 48.3 percent in 2002 from 47.4 percent in year ended december 31 , 2003 2001 , reflecting improved gross profit margins due to higher compared to year ended december 31 , 2002 average selling prices and increased sales of higher margin operating profit for the americas as a percentage of net products , and lower selling expenses as a percent of sales sales increased due to improved gross margins driven by due to lower costs associated with the u.s .\ndistributor higher average selling prices and increased sales of higher network .\nthe americas continued to invest in strategic margin products , leveraged operating expenses and the initiatives such as mis technologies , field sales personnel , favorable impact of the change in accounting principle for medical education programs and new product launches .\ninstruments .\nthe change in accounting principle for operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of net instruments increased operating profit by 1.7 percentage sales increased to 46.1 percent in 2002 from 45.4 percent points .\nwith respect to sales growth , increased zimmer in 2001 .\nthis increase reflects lower selling , general and standalone average selling prices of 4 percent in 2003 and administrative expenses as a percent of sales in japan as favorable effects of volume and mix , 15 percent increase in a result of a sales force and dealer reorganization , partially 2003 , represent the most significant factors in improved offset by lower gross profit margins as a result of lower yen operating profit in the americas .\nas reconstructive implant hedge gains compared to 2001 .\nsales grow at a higher rate than trauma and orthopaedic operating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales surgical products , operating profit margins generally tend to increased to 24.4 percent in 2002 from 19.5 percent in 2001 , improve since reconstructive product sales generally earn due to improved gross profit margins as a result of higher higher gross margins .\nthis was the case in 2003 , with zimmer average selling prices and favorable product and country mix , standalone reconstructive implant sales growth of 22 percent the leveraging of sales growth in europe on controlled as compared with total zimmer standalone sales growth of increases in operating expenses and improved efficiency 19 percent .\nin the fourth quarter , the company reported in the utilization of instruments ( more frequent use of operating profit as a percent of net sales of 50.4 percent for instruments resulted in fewer placements and less expense ) .\nthe americas .\noperating profit for europe as a percentage of net sales liquidity and capital resources increased due to improved gross profit margins driven by cash flows provided by operations were $ 494.8 million higher zimmer standalone average selling prices and in 2003 , compared with $ 220.2 million in 2002 .\nthe principal favorable product and country mix , leveraged operating source of cash was net earnings before cumulative effect of expenses and the favorable impact of the change in change in accounting principle of $ 291.2 million .\nnon-cash accounting principle for instruments .\nthe change in expenses for the period included depreciation and accounting for instruments increased operating profit by amortization expense of $ 103.3 million , centerpulse inventory 1.4 percentage points .\nincreases in zimmer standalone step-up of $ 42.7 million and centerpulse in-process research average selling prices in europe of 2 percent in 2003 and the and development write-offs of $ 11.2 million .\nworking capital effect of volume and mix , 19 percent increase in 2003 , were management , together with the collection of $ 20.0 million of the key factors in improved operating profit .\nalso cash related to centerpulse tax loss carryforwards , contributing to the improvement was significantly lower contributed $ 80.4 million to operating cash flow .\ngrowth in operating expenses .\nin the fourth quarter , the working capital continues to be a key management focus .\ncompany reported operating profit as a percent of net sales at december 31 , 2003 , the company had 62 days of sales of 24.7 percent for europe .\noutstanding in accounts receivable , unfavorable to the prior operating profit for asia pacific as a percentage of year by 10 days .\nacquired centerpulse businesses had a net sales decreased primarily due to less favorable rates on negative impact of 10 days , due to centerpulse 2019s business hedge contracts during the year compared to the prior year , mix which has a greater proportion of european revenue with partially offset by increased zimmer standalone average payment terms generally longer than those in the u.s .\nat selling prices and leveraged operating expenses .\nthe change december 31 , 2003 , the company had 232 days of inventory in accounting for instruments had an immaterial effect on on hand compared to 247 days reported at the end of 2002 .\noperating profit for asia pacific .\nincreases in zimmer the reduction was principally due to improved inventory standalone average selling prices in asia pacific of 1 percent management and the acquired dental and spinal businesses and volume and mix improvements of 4 percent in 2003 carrying fewer days of inventory .\ncontributed modest improvement but was offset by higher .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "26.3", "19.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6.8"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_79.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the current ratio?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\nacquisitions ( continued ) was recorded to goodwill .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 28.1\nproperty and equipment net\t0.2\ngoodwill\t258.9\nipr&d\t190.0\ncurrent liabilities assumed\t-32.9 ( 32.9 )\ndeferred income taxes\t-66.0 ( 66.0 )\ncontingent consideration\t-30.3 ( 30.3 )\ntotal cash purchase price\t348.0\nless : cash acquired\t-27.9 ( 27.9 )\ntotal cash purchase price net of cash acquired\t$ 320.1\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .\ngoodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .\nipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .\nthe fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .\nthis approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .\nthe discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) .\ncompletion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .\nthe risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .\nthe valuation assumed $ 97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction , and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program .\nthe company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018 , if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval .\nupon completion of development , the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .\nthe company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve .\nthis testing has been completed and , in collaboration with clinical investigators , the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials .\nthe results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .\npro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .\n8 .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets on july 3 , 2015 , the company acquired cardiaq ( see note 7 ) .\nthis transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $ 258.9 million and ipr&d of $ 190.0 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "28.1", "-32.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.8541"}
{"example_id": "DISH/2013/page_138.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\ndish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued 9 .\nacquisitions dbsd north america and terrestar transactions on march 2 , 2012 , the fcc approved the transfer of 40 mhz of aws-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar to us .\non march 9 , 2012 , we completed the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction , pursuant to which we acquired , among other things , certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by dbsd north america and terrestar .\nin addition , during the fourth quarter 2011 , we and sprint entered into a mutual release and settlement agreement ( the 201csprint settlement agreement 201d ) pursuant to which all issues then being disputed relating to the dbsd transaction and the terrestar transaction were resolved between us and sprint , including , but not limited to , issues relating to costs allegedly incurred by sprint to relocate users from the spectrum then licensed to dbsd north america and terrestar .\nthe total consideration to acquire the dbsd north america and terrestar assets was approximately $ 2.860 billion .\nthis amount includes $ 1.364 billion for the dbsd transaction , $ 1.382 billion for the terrestar transaction , and the net payment of $ 114 million to sprint pursuant to the sprint settlement agreement .\nsee note 16 for further information .\nas a result of these acquisitions , we recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on our estimates of fair value at their acquisition date , including $ 102 million in an uncertain tax position in 201clong-term deferred revenue , distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities 201d on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsubsequently , in the third quarter 2013 , this uncertain tax position was resolved and $ 102 million was reversed and recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 .\n10 .\ndiscontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased all material operations .\naccordingly , our consolidated balance sheets , consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) and consolidated statements of cash flows have been recast to present blockbuster as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the amounts presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements relate only to our continuing operations , unless otherwise noted .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million , $ 1.085 billion and $ 974 million , respectively .\n201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million , $ 62 million and $ 3 million , respectively .\nin addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million , $ 37 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tas of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )\ncurrent assets from discontinued operations\t$ 68239\nnoncurrent assets from discontinued operations\t9965\ncurrent liabilities from discontinued operations\t-49471 ( 49471 )\nlong-term liabilities from discontinued operations\t-19804 ( 19804 )\nnet assets from discontinued operations\t$ 8929\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "62", "37", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "25"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_21.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor all of 2011 , approximately how much was spent on stock repurchases?\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 .\nthe graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested .\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 .\nthe following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal number ofsharespurchased [a]\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]\tmaximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]\noct . 1 through oct . 31\t379488\t87.46\t371639\t31370427\nnov . 1 through nov . 30\t1748964\t98.41\t1733877\t29636550\ndec . 1 through dec . 31\t1787343\t100.26\t1780142\t27856408\ntotal\t3915795\t$ 98.19\t3885658\tn/a\n\nPost-table text:\n[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .\n[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .\nthese repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .\nour management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "15340810", "96.08", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1473945024.8"}
{"example_id": "PM/2018/page_24.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of an investment in pmi from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .\nthe graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .\ndate pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .\n\nTable:\ndate\tpmi\tpmi peer group ( 1 )\ts&p 500 index\ndecember 31 2013\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\ndecember 31 2014\t$ 97.90\t$ 107.80\t$ 113.70\ndecember 31 2015\t$ 111.00\t$ 116.80\t$ 115.30\ndecember 31 2016\t$ 120.50\t$ 118.40\t$ 129.00\ndecember 31 2017\t$ 144.50\t$ 140.50\t$ 157.20\ndecember 31 2018\t$ 96.50\t$ 127.70\t$ 150.30\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .\nthe pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .\nthe review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .\nas a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .\nnote : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "97.90", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.021"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2013/page_118.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the lease obligations to entergy louisiana as a percentage of long-term debt maturities in 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2014\t$ 385373\n2015\t$ 1110566\n2016\t$ 270852\n2017\t$ 766801\n2018\t$ 1324616\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nin july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "385373", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "149", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.38664"}
{"example_id": "APD/2016/page_39.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2014-2016 , what is the lowest interest incurred observed?\n\nPre-table text:\nother income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .\nthe detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 24 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .\n2016 vs .\n2015 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 58.1 increased $ 10.8 primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses , favorable contract settlements , and receipt of a government subsidy .\nthe prior year included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after-tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land .\nno other individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .\n2015 vs .\n2014 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.3 decreased $ 5.5 and included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after-tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land .\nthe gain was partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange impacts and lower gains on other sales of assets and emissions credits .\nno other individual items were significant in comparison to fiscal year 2014 .\ninterest expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\ninterest incurred\t$ 148.4\t$ 152.6\t$ 158.1\nless : capitalized interest\t32.9\t49.1\t33.0\ninterest expense\t$ 115.5\t$ 103.5\t$ 125.1\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 vs .\n2015 interest incurred decreased $ 4.2 .\nthe decrease primarily resulted from a stronger u.s .\ndollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 6 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 2 .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our exit from the energy-from-waste business .\n2015 vs .\n2014 interest incurred decreased $ 5.5 .\nthe decrease was driven by the impact of a stronger u.s .\ndollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 12 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 7 .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by a higher carrying value in construction in progress .\nloss on extinguishment of debt on 30 september 2016 , in anticipation of the versum spin-off , versum issued $ 425.0 of notes to air products , who then exchanged these notes with certain financial institutions for $ 418.3 of air products 2019 outstanding commercial paper .\nthe exchange resulted in a loss of $ 6.9 ( $ 4.3 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) .\nin september 2015 , we made a payment of $ 146.6 to redeem 3000000 unidades de fomento ( 201cuf 201d ) series e 6.30% ( 6.30 % ) bonds due 22 january 2030 that had a carrying value of $ 130.0 and resulted in a net loss of $ 16.6 ( $ 14.2 after-tax , or $ .07 per share ) .\neffective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .\nrefer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .\n2016 vs .\n2015 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) and 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) in 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nthe change included a 240 bp impact from tax costs associated with business separation , primarily resulting from a dividend declared in 2016 to repatriate cash from a foreign subsidiary , as discussed above in 201cbusiness separation costs . 201d the remaining 110 bp change was primarily due to the increase in mix of income in jurisdictions with a higher effective tax rate and the impact of business separation costs for which a tax benefit was not available .\non a non- gaap basis , the effective tax rate increased from 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in 2015 to 24.8% ( 24.8 % ) in 2016 , primarily due to the increase in and mix of income in jurisdictions with a higher effective tax rate. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_min(", "interest incurred", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "148.4"}
{"example_id": "AAP/2011/page_28.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of an investment in advance auto parts from 2006 to january 3 , 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .\nthe comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .\ncomparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .\n\nTable:\ncompany/index\tdecember 30 2006\tdecember 29 2007\tjanuary 3 2009\tjanuary 2 2010\tjanuary 1 2011\tdecember 31 2011\nadvance auto parts\t$ 100.00\t$ 108.00\t$ 97.26\t$ 116.01\t$ 190.41\t$ 201.18\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t104.24\t65.70\t78.62\t88.67\t88.67\ns&p retail index\t100.00\t82.15\t58.29\t82.36\t101.84\t104.81\n\nPost-table text:\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .\nthe comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .\ncomparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "97.26", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.0274"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_102.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2008 what was the ratio of the tier 2 capital compared to 2007\n\nPre-table text:\nmandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts total mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts ( trust preferred securities ) , which qualify as tier 1 capital , were $ 23.899 billion at december 31 , 2008 , as compared to $ 23.594 billion at december 31 , 2007 .\nin 2008 , citigroup did not issue any new enhanced trust preferred securities .\nthe frb issued a final rule , with an effective date of april 11 , 2005 , which retains trust preferred securities in tier 1 capital of bank holding companies , but with stricter quantitative limits and clearer qualitative standards .\nunder the rule , after a five-year transition period , the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain other restricted core capital elements included in tier 1 capital of internationally active banking organizations , such as citigroup , would be limited to 15% ( 15 % ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill , less any associated deferred tax liability .\nthe amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit could be included in tier 2 capital , subject to restrictions .\nat december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 11.8% ( 11.8 % ) against the limit .\nthe company expects to be within restricted core capital limits prior to the implementation date of march 31 , 2009 .\nthe frb permits additional securities , such as the equity units sold to adia , to be included in tier 1 capital up to 25% ( 25 % ) ( including the restricted core capital elements in the 15% ( 15 % ) limit ) of total core capital elements , net of goodwill less any associated deferred tax liability .\nat december 31 , 2008 , citigroup had approximately 16.1% ( 16.1 % ) against the limit .\nthe frb granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting sfas 158 at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe frb and the ffiec may propose amendments to , and issue interpretations of , risk-based capital guidelines and reporting instructions .\nthese may affect reported capital ratios and net risk-weighted assets .\ncapital resources of citigroup 2019s depository institutions citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions in the united states are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies , which are similar to the frb 2019s guidelines .\nto be 201cwell capitalized 201d under federal bank regulatory agency definitions , citigroup 2019s depository institutions must have a tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6% ( 6 % ) , a total capital ( tier 1 + tier 2 capital ) ratio of at least 10% ( 10 % ) and a leverage ratio of at least 5% ( 5 % ) , and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels .\nat december 31 , 2008 , all of citigroup 2019s subsidiary depository institutions were 201cwell capitalized 201d under the federal regulatory agencies 2019 definitions , including citigroup 2019s primary depository institution , citibank , n.a. , as noted in the following table : citibank , n.a .\ncomponents of capital and ratios under regulatory guidelines in billions of dollars at year end 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin billions of dollars at year end\t2008\t2007\ntier 1 capital\t$ 71.0\t$ 82.0\ntotal capital ( tier 1 and tier 2 )\t108.4\t121.6\ntier 1 capital ratio\t9.94% ( 9.94 % )\t8.98% ( 8.98 % )\ntotal capital ratio ( tier 1 and tier 2 )\t15.18\t13.33\nleverage ratio ( 1 )\t5.82\t6.65\n\nPost-table text:\nleverage ratio ( 1 ) 5.82 6.65 ( 1 ) tier 1 capital divided by adjusted average assets .\ncitibank , n.a .\nhad a net loss for 2008 amounting to $ 6.2 billion .\nduring 2008 , citibank , n.a .\nreceived contributions from its parent company of $ 6.1 billion .\ncitibank , n.a .\ndid not issue any additional subordinated notes in 2008 .\ntotal subordinated notes issued to citicorp holdings inc .\nthat were outstanding at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 and included in citibank , n.a . 2019s tier 2 capital , amounted to $ 28.2 billion .\ncitibank , n.a .\nreceived an additional $ 14.3 billion in capital contribution from its parent company in january 2009 .\nthe impact of this contribution is not reflected in the table above .\nthe substantial events in 2008 impacting the capital of citigroup , and the potential future events discussed on page 94 under 201ccitigroup regulatory capital ratios , 201d also affected , or could affect , citibank , n.a. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "108.4", "71.0", ")", "subtract(", "121.6", "82.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.94444"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2015/page_48.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total difference , in millions , in 2015 between a 10% ( 10 % ) increase and 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7a .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items .\nfrom time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks .\nderivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes .\ninterest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations .\nthe majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates .\nwe do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows .\nthe fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below .\nincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .\n\nTable:\nas of december 31,\tincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates\tincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates\n2015\t$ -33.7 ( 33.7 )\t$ 34.7\n2014\t-35.5 ( 35.5 )\t36.6\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates .\nwe do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .\nwe had $ 1509.7 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2015 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities .\nthe interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements .\nduring 2015 and 2014 , we had interest income of $ 22.8 and $ 27.4 , respectively .\nbased on our 2015 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 15.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2015 levels .\nforeign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nsince we report revenues and expenses in u.s .\ndollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s .\ndollars ) from foreign operations .\nthe primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2015 included the australian dollar , brazilian real , british pound sterling and euro .\nbased on 2015 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s .\ndollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2015 levels .\nthe functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency .\nassets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented .\nthe resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets .\nour foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk .\nhowever , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency .\nassets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement .\ncurrency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses .\nwe regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures .\nwe do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "34.7", "33.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "68.4"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2011/page_73.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much was cost of good sold in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements company , l.l.c .\nand odyssey pipeline l.l.c. , as well as certain other oil pipeline interests , including the eugene island pipeline system .\nthe value of this transaction is approximately $ 205 million , net of debt assumed by the buyer .\nthe carrying value of these assets was $ 38 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthis transaction closed on january 3 , 2012 .\nburns point gas plant 2013 during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we sold our e&p segment 2019s 50 percent interest in the burns point gas plant , a cryogenic processing plant located in st .\nmary parish , louisiana , for total consideration of $ 36 million and a pretax gain of $ 34 million was booked .\nalaska lng facility 2013 during the third quarter of 2011 , we sold our integrated gas segment 2019s equity interest in a lng processing facility in alaska and a pretax gain on the transaction of $ 8 million was recorded .\ndj basin 2013 in april 2011 , we assigned a 30 percent undivided working interest in our e&p segment 2019s approximately 180000 acres in the niobrara shale play located within the dj basin of southeast wyoming and northern colorado for total consideration of $ 270 million , recording a pretax gain of $ 37 million .\nwe remain operator of this jointly owned leasehold .\nangola 2013 during 2010 , we closed the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated interest in our e&p segment 2019s production sharing contract and joint operating agreement in block 32 offshore angola .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 1.3 billion and recorded a pretax gain on the sale of $ 811 million .\nwe retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in block 32 .\ngudrun 2013 in march 2011 , we closed the sale of our outside-operated interests in the gudrun field development and the brynhild and eirin exploration areas offshore norway for net proceeds of $ 85 million , excluding working capital adjustments .\na $ 64 million pretax loss on this disposition was recorded in the fourth quarter 2010 .\ngabon 2013 in december 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated fields offshore gabon , receiving net proceeds of $ 269 million , after closing adjustments .\na $ 232 million pretax gain on this disposition was reported in discontinued operations for 2009 .\npermian basin 2013 in june 2009 , we closed the sale of our e&p segment 2019s operated and a portion of our outside- operated permian basin producing assets in new mexico and west texas for net proceeds after closing adjustments of $ 293 million .\na $ 196 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nireland 2013 in april 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated properties in ireland for net proceeds of $ 84 million , after adjusting for cash held by the sold subsidiary .\na $ 158 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nas a result of this sale , we terminated our pension plan in ireland , incurring a charge of $ 18 million .\nin june 2009 , we entered into an agreement to sell the subsidiary holding our 19 percent outside-operated interest in the corrib natural gas development offshore ireland .\nan initial $ 100 million payment was received at closing .\nadditional fixed proceeds of $ 135 million will be received at the earlier of first commercial gas or december 31 , 2012 .\na $ 154 million impairment was recognized in discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009 .\nour irish and our gabonese businesses , which had been reported in our e&p segment , have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nrevenues and pretax income related to these businesses are shown in the table below .\n( in millions ) 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\nrevenues applicable to discontinued operations\t$ 188\npretax income from discontinued operations\t$ 80\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "188", "80", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "108"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_19.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2003 and 2004?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2005 were strongly impacted by significantly higher costs for en- ergy , wood , caustic soda and other raw materials which reduced operating profits compared with 2004 by $ 586 million .\nlower sales volumes were also a negative factor versus 2004 as we took a significant amount of lack-of-order downtime in our u.s .\nuncoated paper and containerboard mills , and downtime in our eastern european operations to rebuild paper machines in po- land and russia to add needed uncoated paper and pa- perboard capacity .\nwe were able to partially offset some of these negative impacts through operational improvements in our manufacturing operations , im- proved average pricing for our paper and packaging grades , a more favorable product mix , and higher earn- ings from forestland and real estate sales .\nlooking forward to 2006 , we expect operating prof- its for the first quarter to be flat with the 2005 fourth quarter .\nsales volumes should be seasonally slow in the quarter , but should show some improvement as the quarter progresses .\nprice realizations should also improve as previously announced price increases are im- plemented .\nwhile energy , wood and raw material price movements are mixed , their impact for the quarter is expected to be flat .\nhowever , we see favorable signs of positive mo- mentum for the remainder of 2006 .\nwe anticipate that demand in north america for both uncoated paper and industrial packaging products will be stronger , and that we will realize 2005 fourth-quarter and 2006 first-quarter announced price increases .\nadditionally , operating rates should improve in 2006 reflecting announced industry capacity reductions in uncoated papers and container- board .\nwe are also starting to see some reductions in natural gas and southern wood costs that , if the trend continues , should benefit operations as the year pro- gresses .\nin connection with our overall strategic direction , we are evaluating options for the possible sale or spin-off of certain of our businesses as previously announced in our transformation plan , with decisions on certain businesses anticipated during 2006 .\nwe also will con- tinue to improve our key operations in north america by realigning our uncoated and packaging mill oper- ations to reduce costs , improve our products and im- prove our overall profitability .\nresults of operations industry segment operating profits are used by international paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses .\nmanagement believes that this measure allows a better understanding of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes .\nin- dustry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items .\nindustry segment operating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states .\ninternational paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer packaging , distribution , forest products , and specialty businesses and other .\nthe following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2005 2004 2003 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2005\t2004\t2003\nindustry segment operating profits\t$ 1923\t$ 2040\t$ 1734\ncorporate items\t-597 ( 597 )\t-469 ( 469 )\t-466 ( 466 )\ncorporate special items*\t-147 ( 147 )\t-142 ( 142 )\t-281 ( 281 )\ninterest expense net\t-593 ( 593 )\t-710 ( 710 )\t-705 ( 705 )\nminority interest\t-12 ( 12 )\t-21 ( 21 )\t-80 ( 80 )\nincome tax benefit ( provision )\t285\t-242 ( 242 )\t56\ndiscontinued operations\t241\t-491 ( 491 )\t57\naccounting changes\t2013\t2013\t-13 ( 13 )\nnet earnings ( loss )\t$ 1100\t$ -35 ( 35 )\t$ 302\n\nPost-table text:\n* special items include restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impair- ments of businesses held for sale , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no lon- ger required .\nindustry segment operating profits were $ 117 mil- lion lower in 2005 due principally to the impact of higher energy and raw material costs ( $ 586 million ) , lower sales volume ( $ 251 million ) , and unfavorable for- eign currency translation rates ( $ 27 million ) which more than offset the benefits from higher average prices ( $ 478 million ) , cost reduction initiatives , improved operating performance and a more favorable product mix ( $ 235 million ) , and higher earnings from land sales ( $ 158 million ) .\nthe impact of divestitures ( $ 32 million ) , principally the fine papers and industrial pa- pers businesses , and other items ( $ 36 million ) also had a negative impact in 2005 .\nsegment operating profit ( in millions ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2040", "1734", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "306"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2015/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase from 2014-2015 in total cash flow data?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .\n\nTable:\ncash flow data\tyears ended december 31 , 2015\tyears ended december 31 , 2014\tyears ended december 31 , 2013\nnet income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1\t$ 848.2\t$ 831.2\t$ 598.4\nnet cash used in working capital2\t-117.5 ( 117.5 )\t-131.1 ( 131.1 )\t-9.6 ( 9.6 )\nchanges in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash\t-56.7 ( 56.7 )\t-30.6 ( 30.6 )\t4.1\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 674.0\t$ 669.5\t$ 592.9\nnet cash used in investing activities\t-202.8 ( 202.8 )\t-200.8 ( 200.8 )\t-224.5 ( 224.5 )\nnet cash used in financing activities\t-472.8 ( 472.8 )\t-343.9 ( 343.9 )\t-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )\n\nPost-table text:\n1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .\n2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .\ndue to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .\nour net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .\nnet cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .\nour net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .\nthe timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .\nin most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .\nto the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .\nthe amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .\nour assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .\nour accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .\nfor example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .\ninvesting activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .\nnet cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .\ncapital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .\nwe made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "848.2", "831.2", ")", "divide(", "#0", "831.2", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.04524"}
{"example_id": "STT/2009/page_73.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the amortized cost as a percent of the fair value of the securities in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nimpairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\nfair value\t$ 72699\t$ 54163\namortized cost\t74843\t60786\nnet unrealized loss pre-tax\t$ -2144 ( 2144 )\t$ -6623 ( 6623 )\nnet unrealized loss after-tax\t$ -1316 ( 1316 )\t$ -4057 ( 4057 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .\nthese after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .\nthe decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .\nwe conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .\nto the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .\nthe credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .\nthe assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .\nsuch factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .\nto the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .\nnational housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .\nmanagement currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .\nas an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .\nexcluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .\nadditional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "74843", "72699", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.02949"}
{"example_id": "MO/2012/page_44.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments as a percentage of the operating companies income increase?\n\nPre-table text:\nmiddleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains .\nin the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture .\nmarlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) .\nin january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally .\nmarlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family .\npm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount .\nthese gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands .\nin the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points .\nthe brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies .\nin december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 .\nthe following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 .\nnet revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments .\noperating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) .\nfor 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories .\nafter adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day .\npm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) .\nmarlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 .\nin the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) .\npm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 .\nmiddleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 .\nfor 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro .\nmarlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points .\nin 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels .\nmiddleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 .\nfor 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 .\nblack & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine .\nthis new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties .\nduring the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas .\nmiddleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically .\nsmokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management .\nthe following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( cans and packs in millions )\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010\ncopenhagen\t392.5\t354.2\t327.5\nskoal\t288.4\t286.8\t274.4\ncopenhagenandskoal\t680.9\t641.0\t601.9\nother\t82.4\t93.6\t122.5\ntotal smokeless products\t763.3\t734.6\t724.4\n\nPost-table text:\nvolume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment .\nother includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products .\nnew types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "87", "119", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.73109"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2017/page_111.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat would end of year proven reserves be without the increase for extensions , discoveries , and other additions , in mmboe?\n\nPre-table text:\nsupplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .\n2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .\n2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .\nresource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .\ntechnical revisions .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .\n2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .\n2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .\nresource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .\nresource plays .\n2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .\nconventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .\nchanges in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .\nthe following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .\n\nTable:\nbeginning of year\t552\nrevisions of previous estimates\t5\nimproved recovery\t2014\npurchases of reserves in place\t15\nextensions discoveries and other additions\t57\ndispositions\t2014\ntransfers to proved developed\t-83 ( 83 )\nend of year\t546\n\nPost-table text:\nrevisions of prior estimates .\nrevisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .\nextensions , discoveries and other additions .\nincreased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "546", "57", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "489"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2007/page_59.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the debts to the assets in the purchase transaction\n\nPre-table text:\nuse of estimates the preparation of the financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period .\nactual results could differ from those estimates .\n( 3 ) significant acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions we acquired total income producing real estate related assets of $ 219.9 million , $ 948.4 million and $ 295.6 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\nin december 2007 , in order to further establish our property positions around strategic port locations , we purchased a portfolio of five industrial buildings , in seattle , virginia and houston , as well as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston .\nthe total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million .\nof the total purchase price , $ 66.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 3.3 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities .\nthis allocation of purchase price based on the fair value of assets acquired is preliminary .\nthe results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements .\nin february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm .\nthe primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market .\nthe initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over the next three years .\napproximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce .\nthe results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements .\nin february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c .\nmetropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) .\nthe assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million are comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company .\nthe acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings .\nthe assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\noperating rental properties\t$ 602011\nland held for development\t154300\ntotal real estate investments\t756311\nother assets\t10478\nlease related intangible assets\t86047\ngoodwill\t14722\ntotal assets acquired\t867558\ndebt assumed\t-148527 ( 148527 )\nother liabilities assumed\t-5829 ( 5829 )\npurchase price net of assumed liabilities\t$ 713202\n\nPost-table text:\npurchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "5829", "148527", ")", "divide(", "#0", "867558", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.17792"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_85.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of long-term financing was classified as current at the end of 2005?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement .\nshould tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election .\nthe company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally .\nthe company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) .\nthe capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement .\non a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca .\nas of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required .\nan executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 .\nas of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 11.1 million and $ 11.2 million , respectively .\n7 .\nfinancing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2005\t2004\namerican tower credit facility\t$ 793000\t$ 698000\nspectrasite credit facility\t700000\t\nsenior subordinated notes\t400000\t400000\nsenior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation\t160252\t303755\nsenior notes net of discount and premium\t726754\t1001817\nconvertible notes net of discount\t773058\t830056\nnotes payable and capital leases\t60365\t59986\ntotal\t3613429\t3293614\nless current portion of other long-term obligations\t-162153 ( 162153 )\t-138386 ( 138386 )\nlong-term debt\t$ 3451276\t$ 3155228\n\nPost-table text:\nnew credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries .\nthe company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility .\nas a result of the repayment of the previous credit facilities , the company recorded a net loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $ 9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "162153", "3613429", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04488"}
{"example_id": "CME/2017/page_97.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2017 what was the percent of the common stock authorized that was issued and outstanding for the class a common stock\n\nPre-table text:\n14 .\ncapital stock shares outstanding .\nthe following table presents information regarding capital stock: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nclass a common stock authorized\t1000000\t1000000\nclass a common stock issued and outstanding\t339235\t338240\nclass b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.6\t0.6\nclass b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.8\t0.8\nclass b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t1.3\t1.3\nclass b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.4\t0.4\n\nPost-table text:\ncme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .\nassociated trading rights .\nmembers of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .\na cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .\nthe class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .\ntrading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .\nmembers of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .\ncore rights .\nholders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .\nthese core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .\nvotes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .\neach class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .\nthe approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .\nholders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .\nvoting rights .\nwith the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .\nin these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .\ntransfer restrictions .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .\nthese transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .\nelection of directors .\nthe cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .\nholders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .\nthe remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "339235", "1000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.33924"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2005/page_40.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of total commitments expire in less than 1 year?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 38 five years .\nthe amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customer and generally require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the original amount in the offset agreement .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding offset agreements totaling $ 8.4 bil- lion , primarily related to our aeronautics segment , that extend through 2015 .\nto the extent we have entered into purchase obligations at december 31 , 2005 that also satisfy offset agree- ments , those amounts are included in the preceding table .\nwe have entered into standby letter of credit agreements and other arrangements with financial institutions and custom- ers mainly relating to advances received from customers and/or the guarantee of future performance on some of our contracts .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had outstanding letters of credit , surety bonds and guarantees , as follows : commitment expiration by period ( in millions ) commitment 1 year ( a ) years ( a ) standby letters of credit $ 2630 $ 2425 $ 171 $ 18 $ 16 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcommitment expiration by period total commitment\tcommitment expiration by period less than 1 year ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 1-3 years ( a )\tcommitment expiration by period 3-5 years\tcommitment expiration by period after 5 years\nstandby letters of credit\t$ 2630\t$ 2425\t$ 171\t$ 18\t$ 16\nsurety bonds\t434\t79\t352\t3\t2014\nguarantees\t2\t1\t1\t2014\t2014\ntotal commitments\t$ 3066\t$ 2505\t$ 524\t$ 21\t$ 16\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) approximately $ 2262 million and $ 49 million of standby letters of credit in the 201cless than 1 year 201d and 201c1-3 year 201d periods , respectively , and approximately $ 38 million of surety bonds in the 201cless than 1 year 201d period are expected to renew for additional periods until completion of the contractual obligation .\nincluded in the table above is approximately $ 200 million representing letter of credit and surety bond amounts for which related obligations or liabilities are also recorded in the bal- ance sheet , either as reductions of inventories , as customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred , or as other liabilities .\napproximately $ 2 billion of the standby letters of credit in the table above were to secure advance payments received under an f-16 contract from an international cus- tomer .\nthese letters of credit are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance , and the amount available will be reduced as certain events occur throughout the period of performance in accordance with the contract terms .\nsimilar to the letters of credit for the f-16 contract , other letters of credit and surety bonds are available for draw down in the event of our nonperformance .\nat december 31 , 2005 , we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements as those arrangements are defined by the securities and exchange commission ( sec ) .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosure of market risk our main exposure to market risk relates to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates .\nour financial instruments that are subject to interest rate risk principally include fixed- rate and floating rate long-term debt .\nif interest rates were to change by plus or minus 1% ( 1 % ) , interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $ 10 million related to our float- ing rate debt .\nthe estimated fair values of the corporation 2019s long-term debt instruments at december 31 , 2005 aggregated approximately $ 6.2 billion , compared with a carrying amount of approximately $ 5.0 billion .\nthe majority of our long-term debt obligations are not callable until maturity .\nwe have used interest rate swaps in the past to manage our exposure to fixed and variable interest rates ; however , at year-end 2005 , we had no such agreements in place .\nwe use forward foreign exchange contracts to manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates , and do so in ways that qualify for hedge accounting treatment .\nthese exchange contracts hedge the fluctuations in cash flows associated with firm commitments or specific anticipated transactions contracted in foreign currencies , or hedge the exposure to rate changes affecting foreign currency denomi- nated assets or liabilities .\nrelated gains and losses on these contracts , to the extent they are effective hedges , are recog- nized in income at the same time the hedged transaction is recognized or when the hedged asset or liability is adjusted .\nto the extent the hedges are ineffective , gains and losses on the contracts are recognized in the current period .\nat december 31 , 2005 , the fair value of forward exchange con- tracts outstanding , as well as the amounts of gains and losses recorded during the year then ended , were not material .\nwe do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trad- ing or speculative purposes .\nrecent accounting pronouncements in december 2004 , the fasb issued fas 123 ( r ) , share- based payments , which will impact our net earnings and earn- ings per share and change the classification of certain elements of the statement of cash flows .\nfas 123 ( r ) requires stock options and other share-based payments made to employees to be accounted for as compensation expense and recorded at fair lockheed martin corporation management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations december 31 , 2005 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2505", "3066", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.81703"}
{"example_id": "EW/2017/page_82.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total purchase price net of cash acquired is goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\nacquisitions ( continued ) 12 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to harpoon medical , inc . 2019s former shareholders .\nacquisition-related costs of $ 0.4 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the year ended december 31 , 2017 .\nharpoon medical , inc .\nis a medical technology company pioneering beating-heart repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation .\nthe company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products .\nthe acquisition was accounted for as a business combination .\ntangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date .\nthe excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 3.6\nproperty and equipment net\t0.3\ngoodwill\t142.1\nipr&d\t53.1\nother assets\t0.1\ncurrent liabilities assumed\t-0.8 ( 0.8 )\ndeferred income taxes\t-12.7 ( 12.7 )\ntotal purchase price\t185.7\nless : cash acquired\t-3.5 ( 3.5 )\ntotal purchase price net of cash acquired\t$ 182.2\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .\ngoodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .\nipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .\nthe fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .\nthis approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .\nthe discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) .\ncompletion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .\nthe risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .\nthe valuation assumed $ 41.4 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction .\nin the valuation , net cash inflows were modeled to commence in europe in 2018 , and in the united states and japan in 2022 .\nupon completion of development , the underlying research and development asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .\nthe results of operations for harpoon medical , inc .\nhave been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .\npro forma results have not been presented as the results of harpoon medical , inc .\nare not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .\nvaltech cardio ltd .\non november 26 , 2016 , the company entered into an agreement and plan of merger to acquire valtech cardio ltd .\n( 201cvaltech 201d ) for approximately $ 340.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , with the potential for up to an additional $ 350.0 million in pre-specified milestone-driven payments over the next 10 years .\nthe .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "142.1", "182.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.77991"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2012/page_30.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nstockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .\nall rights reserved. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/29/2007\t1/3/2009\t1/2/2010\t1/1/2011\t12/31/2011\t12/29/2012\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t22.55\t35.17\t48.50\t61.07\t78.92\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t59.03\t82.25\t97.32\t98.63\t110.78\ns&p 400 information technology\t100.00\t54.60\t82.76\t108.11\t95.48\t109.88\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "110.78", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1078"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_324.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin december 2011 what was the ratio of the receivables to the credit facility outstanding\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval .\npreferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements .\nentergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .\nentergy louisiana 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\n( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\n( $ 118415 )\t$ 49887\t$ 52807\t$ 61236\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .\nentergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 200 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , $ 50 million was outstanding on the credit facility .\nentergy louisiana obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 250 million .\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits .\nentergy louisiana has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances through july 2013 .\nin january 2012 , entergy louisiana issued $ 250 million of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due december 2014 .\nentergy louisiana used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the entergy system money pool .\nlittle gypsy repowering project in april 2007 , entergy louisiana announced that it intended to pursue the solid fuel repowering of a 538 mw unit at its little gypsy plant .\nin march 2009 the lpsc voted in favor of a motion directing entergy louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and , based upon an analysis of the project 2019s economic viability , to make a recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project .\nthis action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices , as well as environmental concerns , the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets .\nin april 2009 , entergy louisiana complied with the lpsc 2019s directive and recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of three years or more .\nin may 2009 the lpsc issued an order declaring that entergy louisiana 2019s decision to place the little gypsy project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and prudent .\nin october 2009 , entergy louisiana made a filing with the lpsc seeking permission to cancel the little gypsy repowering project and seeking project cost recovery over a five-year period .\nin june 2010 and august 2010 , the lpsc staff and intervenors filed testimony .\nthe lpsc staff ( 1 ) agreed that it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation and that the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent ; ( 2 ) indicated that , except for $ 0.8 million in compensation-related costs , the costs incurred should be deemed prudent ; ( 3 ) recommended recovery from customers over ten years but stated that the lpsc may want to consider 15 years ; ( 4 ) allowed for recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs , but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt , while also acknowledging that the lpsc may consider ordering no return ; and ( 5 ) indicated that entergy louisiana should be directed to securitize project costs , if legally feasible and in the public interest .\nin the third quarter 2010 , in accordance with accounting standards , entergy louisiana determined that it was probable that the little gypsy repowering project would be abandoned and accordingly reclassified $ 199.8 million of project costs from construction work in progress to a regulatory asset .\na hearing on the issues , except for cost allocation among customer classes , was held before the alj in november 2010 .\nin january 2011 all parties participated in a mediation on the disputed issues , resulting in a settlement of all disputed issues , including cost recovery and cost allocation .\nthe settlement provides for entergy louisiana to recover $ 200 million as of march 31 , 2011 , and carrying costs on that amount on specified terms thereafter .\nthe settlement also provides for entergy louisiana to recover the approved project costs by securitization .\nin april 2011 , entergy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "118415", "50", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2368.3"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2014/page_119.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the fair value of all notes due by 2019 ? in millions $ .\n\nPre-table text:\ncredit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 .\nin march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 .\nthe amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 .\nthe 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\non october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion .\nblackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 .\nin april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion .\nthe cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t$ 750\t$ 2014\t$ 750\t$ 753\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-1 ( 1 )\t699\t785\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1134\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t825\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t783\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1029\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -12 ( 12 )\t$ 4938\t$ 5309\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "753", "785", ")", "add(", "1134", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2672"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_86.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2002 what was the ratio of the annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding that was due in 2004 to 2005\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .\n( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .\ncharles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .\n( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .\n( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .\nit is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2003\t$ 1150786\n2004\t$ 925005\n2005\t$ 540372\n2006\t$ 139952\n2007\t$ 475288\n\nPost-table text:\nnot included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .\nin december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .\nin november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\ncovenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .\nif entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .\nin january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "925005", "540372", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.71179"}
{"example_id": "HII/2014/page_69.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total backlog is related to ingalls segment?\n\nPre-table text:\nuss abraham lincoln rcoh , the construction preparation contract for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and the inactivation contract for cvn-65 uss enterprise , partially offset by lower volumes on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the construction and engineering contracts for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford .\nhigher revenues in fleet support services were primarily the result of volumes associated with repair work on ssn-765 uss montpelier .\nincreased submarines revenues were related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , primarily driven by higher volumes on block iii boats and the advance procurement contract on block iv boats , partially offset by lower volumes on block ii boats following the delivery of ssn-783 uss minnesota .\nsegment operating income 2014 - newport news operating income in 2014 was $ 415 million , compared to income of $ 402 million in 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the volume changes discussed above and higher risk retirement on the construction contract for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford , offset by lower risk retirement on the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh .\n2013 - newport news operating income in 2013 was $ 402 million , compared to income of $ 372 million in 2012 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , driven by risk retirement , performance improvement and the favorable resolution of outstanding contract changes , as well as risk retirement on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the absence in 2013 of the workers' compensation expense adjustment recorded in 2012 , partially offset by the favorable resolution in 2012 of outstanding contract changes on the cvn-65 uss enterprise edsra .\nrevenues at our other segment for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , were $ 137 million , primarily due to the acquisition of upi on may 30 , 2014 .\nother operating loss for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was $ 59 million , primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 47 million described above .\nbacklog total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 21 billion .\ntotal backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) .\nbacklog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity orders .\nfor contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer .\nthe following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\tdecember 31 2014 total backlog\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\ttotal backlog\ningalls\t$ 5609\t$ 1889\t$ 7498\t$ 6335\t$ 2570\t$ 8905\nnewport news\t6158\t7709\t13867\t5495\t3638\t9133\nother\t65\t2014\t65\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal backlog\t$ 11832\t$ 9598\t$ 21430\t$ 11830\t$ 6208\t$ 18038\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 .\nu.s .\ngovernment orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .\nawards 2014 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 10.1 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2014 included contracts for block iv of the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , continued construction preparation for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and construction of nsc-7 kimball .\n2013 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was approximately $ 9.4 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2013 included contracts for the construction of five ddg-51 arleigh burke-class this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "8905", "18038", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.49368"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_47.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the number of shares outstanding based on the cash dividends paid during 2006 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tpayments due by period ( a ) total\tpayments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years\nlong-term debt\t$ 2302.6\t$ 126.1\t$ 547.6\t$ 1174.9\t$ 454.0\ncapital lease obligations\t4.4\t1.0\t0.8\t0.5\t2.1\ninterest payments on long-term debt ( b )\t698.6\t142.9\t246.3\t152.5\t156.9\noperating leases\t218.5\t49.9\t71.7\t42.5\t54.4\npurchase obligations ( c )\t6092.6\t2397.2\t3118.8\t576.6\t2013\ncommon stock repurchase agreements\t131.0\t131.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\nlegal settlement\t70.0\t70.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\ntotal payments on contractual obligations\t$ 9517.7\t$ 2918.1\t$ 3985.2\t$ 1947.0\t$ 667.4\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates .\n( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments .\n( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials .\nalso included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items .\nin cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used .\ndepending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly .\ncontributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 .\nthis estimate may change based on plan asset performance .\nbenefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\npayments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\nin accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom .\nif the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan .\nthe guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees .\nour share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 .\nthe net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares .\nhowever , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares .\nthe contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash .\non december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings .\nthe company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price .\nthe exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date .\nthe company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares .\nincluding the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 .\nannual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\ntotal dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "40", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "41", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "102.5"}
{"example_id": "MS/2017/page_74.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of average common equity attribution in 2017 is made up of institutional securities?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis environment , for example , to incorporate changes in stress testing or enhancements to modeling techniques .\nwe will continue to evaluate the framework with respect to the impact of future regulatory requirements , as appropriate .\naverage common equity attribution1 $ in billions 2017 2016 2015 .\n\nTable:\n$ in billions\t2017\t2016\t2015\ninstitutional securities\t$ 40.2\t$ 43.2\t$ 34.6\nwealth management\t17.2\t15.3\t11.2\ninvestment management\t2.4\t2.8\t2.2\nparent company\t10.0\t7.6\t18.9\ntotal\t$ 69.8\t$ 68.9\t$ 66.9\n\nPost-table text:\n1 .\naverage common equity is a non-gaap financial measure .\nsee 201cselected non-gaap financial information 201d herein .\nregulatory developments resolution and recovery planning pursuant to the dodd-frank act , we are required to periodi- cally submit to the federal reserve and the fdic a resolution plan that describes our strategy for a rapid and orderly resolu- tion under the u.s .\nbankruptcy code in the event of our material financial distress or failure .\nour preferred resolution strategy , which is set out in our 2017 resolution plan , is an spoe strategy .\nwe submitted our full 2017 resolution plan on june 30 , 2017 .\nas indicated in our 2017 resolution plan , the parent company has amended and restated its support agreement with its material entities , as defined in our 2017 resolution plan .\nunder the secured amended and restated support agreement , upon the occur- rence of a resolution scenario , the parent company would be obligated to contribute or loan on a subordinated basis all of its contributable material assets , other than shares in subsidi- aries of the parent company and certain intercompany receiv- ables , to provide capital and liquidity , as applicable , to our material entities .\nthe obligations of the parent company under the secured amended and restated support agreement are in most cases secured on a senior basis by the assets of the parent company ( other than shares in subsidiaries of the parent company ) .\nas a result , claims of our material entities against the assets of the parent company ( other than shares in subsidiaries of the parent company ) are effectively senior to unsecured obliga- tions of the parent company .\nin december 2017 , we received joint feedback on our 2017 resolution plan from the federal reserve and the fdic .\nthe feedback identified no deficiencies in our 2017 resolution plan but noted one shortcoming to be remediated in our next resolution plan submission .\nfurther , the federal reserve and the fdic have extended the next resolution plan filing deadline for eight large domestic banks , including us , by one year to july 1 , 2019 .\nfor more information about resolution and recovery planning requirements and our activities in these areas , including the implications of such activities in a resolution scenario , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014financial holding company 2014resolution and recovery planning 201d and 201crisk factors 2014legal , regulatory and compliance risk . 201d legacy covered funds under the volcker rule the volcker rule prohibits 201cbanking entities , 201d including us and our affiliates , from engaging in certain 201cproprietary trading 201d activities , as defined in the volcker rule , subject to exemptions for underwriting , market-making-related activities , risk-mitigating hedging and certain other activities .\nthe volcker rule also prohibits certain investments and relation- ships by banking entities with 201ccovered funds , 201d with a number of exemptions and exclusions .\nin june 2017 , we received approval from the federal reserve of our application for a five-year extension of the transition period to conform invest- ments in certain legacy volcker covered funds that are also illiquid funds .\nthe approval covered essentially all of our non-conforming investments in , and relationships with , legacy covered funds subject to the volcker rule .\nfor more informa- tion about the volcker rule , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014activities restrictions under the volcker rule . 201d u.s .\ndepartment of labor conflict of interest rule the u.s .\ndol 2019s final conflict of interest rule under erisa went into effect on june 9 , 2017 , with certain aspects subject to phased-in compliance .\nfull compliance with the rule 2019s related exemptions is currently scheduled to be required by july 1 , 2019 .\nin addition , the u.s .\ndol is undertaking an examination of the rule that may result in changes to the rule or its related exemptions or a change in the full compliance date .\nfor a discussion of the u.s .\ndol conflict of interest rule , see 201cbusiness 2014supervision and regulation 2014instit- utional securities and wealth management . 201d u.k .\nreferendum following the u.k .\nelectorate vote to leave the e.u. , the u.k .\ninvoked article 50 of the lisbon treaty on march 29 , 2017 , which triggered a two-year period , subject to extension ( which would need the unanimous approval of the e.u .\nmember states ) , during which the u.k .\ngovernment is expected to negotiate its withdrawal agreement with the e.u .\nfor further discussion of u.k .\nreferendum 2019s potential impact on our operations , see 201crisk factors 2014international risk . 201d for further information regarding our exposure to the u.k. , see also 201cquantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 2014risk management 2014credit risk 2014country risk exposure . 201d 69 december 2017 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "40.2", "69.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.57593"}
{"example_id": "STT/2011/page_83.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the fair value from 2010 to 2011\n\nPre-table text:\nimpairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2011\t2010\nfair value\t$ 99832\t$ 81881\namortized cost\t100013\t82329\nnet unrealized loss pre-tax\t$ -181 ( 181 )\t$ -448 ( 448 )\nnet unrealized loss after-tax\t$ -113 ( 113 )\t$ -270 ( 270 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .\nthese unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .\nrefer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .\nthe decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .\nwe conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .\nto the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .\nthe credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .\nour assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .\nsuch factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .\nto the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .\ngiven the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .\nhousing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .\nas such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .\ngenerally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .\nas of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .\noverall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .\nthe performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .\nin addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .\nthe combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .\nour investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .\nultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .\nin addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .\nresidential mortgage-backed portfolio .\nwe estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .\nthis sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .\nto the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .\nexcluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "99832", "81881", ")", "divide(", "#0", "81881", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21923"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2014/page_26.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the s&p index to the e*trade financial corporation cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock compared as of 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( \"s&p\" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/09\t12/10\t12/11\t12/12\t12/13\t12/14\ne*trade financial corporation\t100.00\t90.91\t45.23\t50.85\t111.59\t137.81\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.49\t136.30\t180.44\t205.14\ndow jones us financials index\t100.00\t112.72\t98.24\t124.62\t167.26\t191.67\n\nPost-table text:\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "205.14", "137.81", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.48857"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2010/page_34.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 11 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .\n\nTable:\n2010\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 44.61\t$ 40.10\nquarter ended june 30\t45.33\t38.86\nquarter ended september 30\t52.11\t43.70\nquarter ended december 31\t53.14\t49.61\n2009\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 32.53\t$ 25.45\nquarter ended june 30\t34.52\t27.93\nquarter ended september 30\t37.71\t29.89\nquarter ended december 31\t43.84\t35.03\n\nPost-table text:\non february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders .\ndividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock .\npayment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status .\nin addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "397612895", "463", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "858775.15119"}
{"example_id": "MS/2014/page_292.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor us federal purposes , how many years are currently involved in irs controversies?\n\nPre-table text:\nmorgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 2.2 billion , $ 4.1 billion , and $ 4.1 billion at december 31 , 2014 , december 31 , 2013 , and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .\nof this total , approximately $ 1.0 billion , $ 1.4 billion , and $ 1.6 billion , respectively ( net of federal benefit of state issues , competent authority and foreign tax credit offsets ) represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would favorably affect the effective tax rate in future periods .\ninterest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as provision for income taxes .\nthe company recognized $ ( 35 ) million , $ 50 million , and $ ( 10 ) million of interest expense ( benefit ) ( net of federal and state income tax benefits ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income for 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .\ninterest expense accrued at december 31 , 2014 , december 31 , 2013 , and december 31 , 2012 was approximately $ 258 million , $ 293 million , and $ 243 million , respectively , net of federal and state income tax benefits .\npenalties related to unrecognized tax benefits for the years mentioned above were immaterial .\nthe following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ( dollars in millions ) : unrecognized tax benefits .\n\nTable:\nbalance at december 31 2011\t$ 4045\nincrease based on tax positions related to the current period\t299\nincrease based on tax positions related to prior periods\t127\ndecreases based on tax positions related to prior periods\t-21 ( 21 )\ndecreases related to settlements with taxing authorities\t-260 ( 260 )\ndecreases related to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations\t-125 ( 125 )\nbalance at december 31 2012\t$ 4065\nincrease based on tax positions related to the current period\t$ 51\nincrease based on tax positions related to prior periods\t267\ndecreases based on tax positions related to prior periods\t-141 ( 141 )\ndecreases related to settlements with taxing authorities\t-146 ( 146 )\nbalance at december 31 2013\t$ 4096\nincrease based on tax positions related to the current period\t$ 135\nincrease based on tax positions related to prior periods\t100\ndecreases based on tax positions related to prior periods\t-2080 ( 2080 )\ndecreases related to settlements with taxing authorities\t-19 ( 19 )\ndecreases related to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations\t-4 ( 4 )\nbalance at december 31 2014\t$ 2228\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company is under continuous examination by the irs and other tax authorities in certain countries , such as japan and the u.k. , and in states in which the company has significant business operations , such as new york .\nthe company is currently under review by the irs appeals office for the remaining issues covering tax years 1999 2013 2005 and has substantially completed the irs field examination for the audit of tax years 2006 2013 2008 .\nalso , the company is currently at various levels of field examination with respect to audits by new york state and new york city for tax years 2007 2013 2009 .\nduring 2015 , the company expects to reach a conclusion with the u.k .\ntax authorities on substantially all issues through tax year 2010 , the resolution of which is not expected to have a material impact on the effective tax rate on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2008", "1999", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2014/page_26.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the return on the e*trade financial corporation common stock from 2009 to 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( \"s&p\" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/09\t12/10\t12/11\t12/12\t12/13\t12/14\ne*trade financial corporation\t100.00\t90.91\t45.23\t50.85\t111.59\t137.81\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.49\t136.30\t180.44\t205.14\ndow jones us financials index\t100.00\t112.72\t98.24\t124.62\t167.26\t191.67\n\nPost-table text:\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "137.81", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.3781"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_21.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the 4th quarter of 2011 approximately how much was spent on stock repurchases?\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 .\nthe graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested .\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 .\nthe following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal number ofsharespurchased [a]\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]\tmaximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]\noct . 1 through oct . 31\t379488\t87.46\t371639\t31370427\nnov . 1 through nov . 30\t1748964\t98.41\t1733877\t29636550\ndec . 1 through dec . 31\t1787343\t100.26\t1780142\t27856408\ntotal\t3915795\t$ 98.19\t3885658\tn/a\n\nPost-table text:\n[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .\n[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .\nthese repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .\nour management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "3915795", "98.19", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "384491911.05"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_341.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in net revenue in 2011\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy mississippi , inc .\nmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2009 net revenue\t$ 536.7\nvolume/weather\t18.9\nother\t-0.3 ( 0.3 )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 555.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .\nfuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .\nother income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .\nthe decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .\ntaxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .\ndepreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .\ninterest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "18.9", "-0.3", ")", "add(", "#0", "536.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "555.3"}
{"example_id": "C/2017/page_328.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of 2017 what was the ratio of the overall five-year cumulative total return for s&p 500 compared to citi\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .\nthe graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .\ncomparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .\n\nTable:\ndate\tciti\ts&p 500\ts&p financials\n31-dec-2012\t100.0\t100.0\t100.0\n31-dec-2013\t131.8\t132.4\t135.6\n31-dec-2014\t137.0\t150.5\t156.2\n31-dec-2015\t131.4\t152.6\t153.9\n31-dec-2016\t152.3\t170.8\t188.9\n31-dec-2017\t193.5\t208.1\t230.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "193.5", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "208.1", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.15615"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2014/page_65.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased o n the review of the simultaneous investments of the jpmorgan chase common stock in the various index what was the ratio of the performance in the kbw bank index to the s&p financial index in 2010\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .\n( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .\nthe s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .\nequity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .\nthe kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .\nand is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .\nthe s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .\nthe firm is a component of all three industry indices .\nthe following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .\nthe comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .\ndecember 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in dollars )\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njpmorgan chase\t$ 100.00\t$ 102.30\t$ 81.87\t$ 111.49\t$ 152.42\t$ 167.48\nkbw bank index\t100.00\t123.36\t94.75\t125.91\t173.45\t189.69\ns&p financial index\t100.00\t112.13\t93.00\t119.73\t162.34\t186.98\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.48\t136.27\t180.39\t205.07\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "123.36", "112.13", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.10015"}
{"example_id": "HIG/2008/page_318.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the weight of the property&casualty operations relative to the total statutory capital?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies .\nthe statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2007 in the table below are based on actual statutory filings with the applicable regulatory authorities .\nthe statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2008 are estimates , as the respective 2008 statutory filings have not yet been the company has received approval from the connecticut insurance department regarding the use of two permitted practices in the statutory financial statements of its connecticut-domiciled life insurance subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe first permitted practice relates to the statutory accounting for deferred income taxes .\nspecifically , this permitted practice modifies the accounting for deferred income taxes prescribed by the naic by increasing the realization period for deferred tax assets from one year to three years and increasing the asset recognition limit from 10% ( 10 % ) to 15% ( 15 % ) of adjusted statutory capital and surplus .\nthe benefits of this permitted practice may not be considered by the company when determining surplus available for dividends .\nthe second permitted practice relates to the statutory reserving requirements for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders .\nactuarial guidelines prescribed by the naic require a stand-alone asset adequacy analysis reflecting only benefits , expenses and charges that are associated with the riders for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits .\nthe permitted practice allows for all benefits , expenses and charges associated with the variable annuity contract to be reflected in the stand- alone asset adequacy test .\nthese permitted practices resulted in an increase to life operations estimated statutory surplus of $ 987 as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe effects of these permitted practices are included in the 2008 life operations surplus amount in the table above .\nstatutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s .\ngaap was $ 9.3 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cus stat 201d ) was $ 13.8 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .\nsignificant differences between u.s .\ngaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with us stat include the following: .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2007\nlife operations\t$ 6047\t$ 5786\njapan life operations\t1718\t1620\nproperty & casualty operations\t6012\t8509\ntotal\t$ 13777\t$ 15915\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s .\ngaap while those costs are expensed immediately under us stat .\n2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s .\ngaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under us stat .\n2022 certain assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves are prescribed under us stat and are intended to be conservative , while the assumptions used under u.s .\ngaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates .\nin addition , the methodologies used for determining life reserve amounts are different between us stat and u.s .\ngaap .\nannuity reserving and cash-flow testing for death and living benefit reserves under us stat are generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines .\nunder these actuarial guidelines , in general , future cash flows associated with the variable annuity business are included in these methodologies with estimates of future fee revenues , claim payments , expenses , reinsurance impacts and hedging impacts .\nat december 31 , 2008 , in determining the cash-flow impacts related to future hedging , assumptions were made in the scenarios that generate reserve requirements , about the potential future decreases in the hedge benefits and increases in hedge costs which resulted in increased reserve requirements .\nreserves for death and living benefits under u.s .\ngaap are either considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves .\n2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s .\ngaap , while us stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value .\nin the case of the company 2019s market value adjusted ( mva ) fixed annuity products , invested assets are marked to fair value ( including the impact of credit spreads ) and liabilities are marked to fair value ( but generally actual credit spreads are not fully reflected ) for statutory purposes only .\n2022 us stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s .\ngaap does not .\nalso , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , us stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s .\ngaap does not .\n2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s .\ngaap , while under us stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6012", "13777", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.43638"}
{"example_id": "APD/2014/page_39.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the operating margin for 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\n2014 vs .\n2013 sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) , as higher volumes of 9% ( 9 % ) and favorable currency of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .\nelectronics sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) , as higher delivery systems equipment sales and materials volumes of 8% ( 8 % ) and favorable currency of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .\nperformance materials sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) , as higher volumes of 11% ( 11 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .\nthe higher volumes were across all product lines and major regions .\nthe lower pricing was primarily due to unfavorable mix impacts .\noperating income of $ 425.3 increased 32% ( 32 % ) , or $ 104.0 , primarily from higher volumes of $ 93 , lower operating costs of $ 31 , and favorable currency impacts of $ 5 , partially offset by unfavorable price and mix impacts of $ 26 .\noperating margin of 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) increased 310 bp , primarily due to improved loading and leverage from the higher volumes and improved cost performance , partially offset by the unfavorable pricing impacts .\n2013 vs .\n2012 sales decreased 3% ( 3 % ) , as lower volumes of 4% ( 4 % ) and lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by acquisitions of 2% ( 2 % ) .\nelectronics sales decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , as weaker materials volumes and equipment sales were partially offset by the acquisition of da nanomaterials .\nperformance materials sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) , as higher volumes of 4% ( 4 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 2% ( 2 % ) .\nthe increase in volumes was primarily due to strength in the automobile and u.s .\nhousing markets partially offset by weaker volumes to certain construction markets and marine coatings .\nthe lower pricing was primarily due to unfavorable mix impacts .\noperating income of $ 321.3 decreased 25% ( 25 % ) , or $ 104.3 , and operating margin of 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) decreased 400 bp , as 2012 included a gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials of $ 85.9 .\non a non-gaap basis , operating income of $ 321.3 decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 18.4 , primarily from unfavorable price and mix impacts of $ 15 , lower volumes of $ 9 , and higher operating costs of $ 4 partially offset by higher acquisitions of $ 6 and favorable currency of $ 4 .\noperating margin decreased 30 bp , primarily due to lower volumes and unfavorable price mix .\nequipment and energy .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\nsales\t$ 450.4\t$ 451.1\t$ 420.1\noperating income\t88.2\t65.5\t44.6\n\nPost-table text:\n2014 vs .\n2013 sales of $ 450.4 were relatively flat as higher liquefied natural gas ( lng ) project activity was offset by lower air separation ( asu ) project activity .\noperating income of $ 88.2 increased from the higher lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2014 was $ 520 , compared to $ 402 at 30 september 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily due to new lng orders as global project development activity remains high .\nit is expected that approximately $ 320 of the backlog will be completed during 2015 .\n2013 vs .\n2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .\noperating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .\nalso included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .\nother also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .\n2014 vs .\n2013 other operating loss was $ 13.5 , compared to $ 4.7 in the prior year .\nthe decrease was primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange losses of $ 5 and lifo adjustments of $ 4 .\n2013 vs .\n2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .\nthe other operating loss in 2013 includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .\nthe other operating loss in 2012 included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "44.6", "420.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10617"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2008/page_85.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was jpmorgan chase & co's tier 2 capital ratio ( cet2 ) ratio in 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .\ncredit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nunexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .\nthe capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .\ncredit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .\nactual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nstatistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .\nmarket risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .\ndaily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .\nthe firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .\nsee market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .\noperational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .\nthe operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .\nthe firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .\nprivate equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .\nin addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .\nthe capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .\nregulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .\nthe office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .\nthe federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .\nthe amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .\nthe occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .\nsimilar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .\njpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .\nfor more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .\nrisk-based capital components and assets .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in millions )\t2008\t2007\ntotal tier 1capital ( a )\t$ 136104\t$ 88746\ntotal tier 2 capital\t48616\t43496\ntotal capital\t$ 184720\t$ 132242\nrisk-weighted assets\t$ 1244659\t$ 1051879\ntotal adjusted average assets\t1966895\t1473541\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .\nbased on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .\nthe ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "48616", "1244659", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03906"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2009/page_70.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average yearly amortization expense related to contract-based intangible assets , ( in thousands ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in connection with these discover related purchases , we have sold the contractual rights to future commissions on discover transactions to certain of our isos .\ncontractual rights sold totaled $ 7.6 million during the year ended may 31 , 2008 and $ 1.0 million during fiscal 2009 .\nsuch sale proceeds are generally collected in installments over periods ranging from three to nine months .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we collected $ 4.4 million of such proceeds , which are included in the proceeds from sale of investment and contractual rights in our consolidated statement of cash flows .\nwe do not recognize gains on these sales of contractual rights at the time of sale .\nproceeds are deferred and recognized as a reduction of the related commission expense .\nduring fiscal 2009 , we recognized $ 1.2 million of such deferred sales proceeds as other long-term liabilities .\nother 2008 acquisitions during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a .\nand euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain .\nlfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america .\nthe purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations .\nduring fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states .\nthe purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering .\nthe following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of all these fiscal 2008 business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal\ngoodwill\t$ 13536\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t4091\ncontract-based intangible assets\t1031\nproperty and equipment\t267\nother current assets\t502\ntotal assets acquired\t19427\ncurrent liabilities\t-2347 ( 2347 )\nminority interest in equity of subsidiary ( at historical cost )\t-486 ( 486 )\nnet assets acquired\t$ 16594\n\nPost-table text:\nthe customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years .\nthe contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years .\nthese business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions .\nin addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million .\nthe value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately .\nthe remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years .\nfiscal 2007 on july 24 , 2006 , we completed the purchase of a fifty-six percent ownership interest in the asia-pacific merchant acquiring business of the hongkong and shanghai banking corporation limited , or hsbc asia pacific .\nthis business provides card payment processing services to merchants in the asia-pacific region .\nthe .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1031", "const_10", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "103.1"}
{"example_id": "ADBE/2018/page_86.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents adobe inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) certain states and foreign jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and other attributes .\nthe deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance to the extent it is more likely than not that they are not expected to be realized .\nwe provide u.s .\nincome taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless the subsidiaries 2019 earnings are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states or are exempted from taxation as a result of the new territorial tax system .\nto the extent that the foreign earnings previously treated as permanently reinvested are repatriated , the related u.s .\ntax liability may be reduced by any foreign income taxes paid on these earnings .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , the cumulative amount of earnings upon which u.s .\nincome taxes have not been provided is approximately $ 275 million .\nthe unrecognized deferred tax liability for these earnings is approximately $ 57.8 million .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 881.1 million for federal and $ 349.7 million for state .\nwe also have federal , state and foreign tax credit carryforwards of approximately $ 8.8 million , $ 189.9 million and $ 14.9 million , respectively .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and tax credits will expire in various years from fiscal 2019 through 2036 .\nthe state tax credit carryforwards and a portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely .\nthe net operating loss carryforward assets and certain credits are reduced by the valuation allowance and are subject to an annual limitation under internal revenue code section 382 , the carrying amount of which are expected to be fully realized .\nas of november 30 , 2018 , a valuation allowance of $ 174.5 million has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to certain state and foreign assets .\nfor fiscal 2018 , the total change in the valuation allowance was $ 80.9 million .\naccounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2018 and 2017 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 172945\t$ 178413\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t16191\t3680\ngross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions\t-4000 ( 4000 )\t-30166 ( 30166 )\ngross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions\t60721\t24927\nsettlements with taxing authorities\t2014\t-3876 ( 3876 )\nlapse of statute of limitations\t-45922 ( 45922 )\t-8819 ( 8819 )\nforeign exchange gains and losses\t-3783 ( 3783 )\t8786\nending balance\t$ 196152\t$ 172945\n\nPost-table text:\nthe combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns were approximately $ 24.6 million and $ 23.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nthese amounts were included in long-term income taxes payable in their respective years .\nwe file income tax returns in the united states on a federal basis and in many u.s .\nstate and foreign jurisdictions .\nwe are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities .\nour major tax jurisdictions are ireland , california and the united states .\nfor ireland , california and the united states , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2008 , 2014 and 2015 , respectively .\nwe regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from these examinations .\nwe believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position .\nthe timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process .\nthese events could cause large fluctuations in the balance of short-term and long- term assets , liabilities and income taxes payable .\nwe believe that within the next 12 months , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both .\ngiven the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential effect in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 45 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "172945", "178413", ")", "divide(", "#0", "178413", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03065"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_147.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much of the securitizations that hold asf framework loans were issued by third parties?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 145 subprime adjustable-rate mortgage loan modifications see the glossary of terms on page 183 of this annual report for the firm 2019s definition of subprime loans .\nwithin the confines of the limited decision-making abilities of a qspe under sfas 140 , the operating doc- uments that govern existing subprime securitizations generally authorize the servicer to modify loans for which default is reasonably foreseeable , provided that the modification is in the best interests of the qspe 2019s ben- eficial interest holders , and would not result in a remic violation .\nin december 2007 , the american securitization forum ( 201casf 201d ) issued the 201cstreamlined foreclosure and loss avoidance framework for securitized subprime adjustable rate mortgage loans 201d ( 201cthe framework 201d ) .\nthe framework provides guidance for servicers to stream- line evaluation procedures for borrowers with certain subprime adjustable rate mortgage ( 201carm 201d ) loans to more efficiently provide modifications of such loans with terms that are more appropriate for the individual needs of such borrowers .\nthe framework applies to all first-lien subprime arm loans that have a fixed rate of interest for an initial period of 36 months or less , are included in securitized pools , were originated between january 1 , 2005 , and july 31 , 2007 , and have an initial interest rate reset date between january 1 , 2008 , and july 31 , 2010 ( 201casf framework loans 201d ) .\nthe framework categorizes the population of asf framework loans into three segments .\nsegment 1 includes loans where the borrower is current and is likely to be able to refinance into any available mortgage product .\nsegment 2 includes loans where the borrower is current , is unlikely to be able to refinance into any readily available mortgage industry product and meets certain defined criteria .\nsegment 3 includes loans where the borrower is not current , as defined , and does not meet the criteria for segments 1 or 2 .\nasf framework loans in segment 2 of the framework are eligible for fast-track modification under which the interest rate will be kept at the existing initial rate , generally for five years following the interest rate reset date .\nthe framework indicates that for segment 2 loans , jpmorgan chase , as servicer , may presume that the borrower will be unable to make payments pursuant to the original terms of the borrower 2019s loan after the initial interest rate reset date .\nthus , the firm may presume that a default on that loan by the borrower is reasonably foreseeable unless the terms of the loan are modified .\njpmorgan chase has adopted the loss mitigation approaches under the framework for securitized sub- prime loans that meet the specific segment 2 screening criteria , and it expects to begin modifying segment 2 loans by the end of the first quar- ter of 2008 .\nthe firm believes that the adoption of the framework will not affect the off-balance sheet accounting treatment of jpmorgan chase-sponsored qspes that hold segment 2 subprime loans .\nthe total amount of assets owned by firm-sponsored qspes that hold asf framework loans ( including those loans that are not serviced by the firm ) as of december 31 , 2007 , was $ 20.0 billion .\nof this amount , $ 9.7 billion relates to asf framework loans serviced by the firm .\nbased on current economic conditions , the firm estimates that approximately 20% ( 20 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the asf framework loans it services that are owned by firm-sponsored qspes will fall within segments 1 , 2 and 3 , respectively .\nthis estimate could change substantially as a result of unanticipated changes in housing values , economic conditions , investor/borrower behavior and other factors .\nthe total principal amount of beneficial interests issued by firm-spon- sored securitizations that hold asf framework loans as of december 31 , 2007 , was as follows. .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 2007 ( in millions )\t2007\nthird-party\t$ 19636\nretained interest\t412\ntotal\t$ 20048\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "19636", "20048", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.97945"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_48.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the change in the consulting segment revenue from 2008 2009\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nof exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets .\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation .\norganic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .\nin 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 .\ncontributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives .\nthese items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation .\nconsulting .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 1267\t$ 1356\t$ 1345\nsegment operating income\t203\t208\t180\nsegment operating income margin\t16.0% ( 16.0 % )\t15.3% ( 15.3 % )\t13.4% ( 13.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 .\nhealth and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees .\nbenefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services .\n2 .\nretirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n3 .\ncompensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n4 .\nstrategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\noutsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services .\nbeginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nthe prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1267", "1356", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1356", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.06563"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_355.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in net revenue during 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy new orleans , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 231.0\nvolume/weather\t15.5\nnet gas revenue\t6.6\nrider revenue\t3.9\nbase revenue\t-11.3 ( 11.3 )\nother\t7.0\n2008 net revenue\t$ 252.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .\nentergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .\nbilled retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .\nthe net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .\nthe rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .\nthe approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .\nthe settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\nthe base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .\nthe base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\ngross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .\nfuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "252.7", "231.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "21.7"}
{"example_id": "APD/2019/page_48.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average cash provided by the operating activities during 2018 and 2019?\n\nPre-table text:\nliquidity and capital resources we maintained a strong financial position throughout fiscal year 2019 .\nas of 30 september 2019 , our consolidated balance sheet included cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .\nwe continue to have consistent access to commercial paper markets , and cash flows from operating and financing activities are expected to meet liquidity needs for the foreseeable future .\nas of 30 september 2019 , we had $ 971.5 of foreign cash and cash items compared to a total amount of cash and cash items of $ 2248.7 .\nas a result of the tax act , we do not expect that a significant portion of our foreign subsidiaries' and affiliates' earnings will be subject to u.s .\nincome tax upon subsequent repatriation to the united states .\nthe repatriation of these earnings may be subject to foreign withholding and other taxes depending on the country in which the subsidiaries and affiliates reside .\nhowever , because we have significant current investment plans outside the u.s. , it is our intent to permanently reinvest the majority of our foreign cash and cash items that would be subject to additional taxes outside the u.s .\nrefer to note 23 , income taxes , for additional information .\nthe table below summarizes our cash flows from operating activities , investing activities , and financing activities from continuing operations as reflected on the consolidated statements of cash flows: .\n\nTable:\ncash provided by ( used for )\t2019\t2018\noperating activities\t$ 2969.9\t$ 2547.2\ninvesting activities\t-2113.4 ( 2113.4 )\t-1641.6 ( 1641.6 )\nfinancing activities\t-1370.5 ( 1370.5 )\t-1359.8 ( 1359.8 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities for the fiscal year ended 30 september 2019 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2969.9 .\nincome from continuing operations of $ 1760.0 was adjusted for items including depreciation and amortization , deferred income taxes , impacts from the tax act , a charge for the facility closure of one of our customers , undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates , gain on sale of assets and investments , share-based compensation , noncurrent capital lease receivables , and certain other adjustments .\nthe caption \"gain on sale of assets and investments\" includes a gain of $ 14.1 recognized on the disposition of our interest in high-tech gases ( beijing ) co. , ltd. , a previously held equity investment in our industrial gases 2013 asia segment .\nrefer to note 7 , acquisitions , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nthe working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 25.3 , primarily driven by $ 69.0 from trade receivables and $ 41.8 from payables and accrued liabilities , partially offset by $ 79.8 from other receivables .\nthe use of cash within \"payables and accrued liabilities\" was primarily driven by a $ 48.9 decrease in accrued utilities and a $ 30.3 decrease in accrued interest , partially offset by a $ 51.6 increase in customer advances primarily related to sale of equipment activity .\nthe decrease in accrued utilities was primarily driven by a contract modification to a tolling arrangement in india and lower utility costs in the industrial gases 2013 americas segment .\nthe source of cash from other receivables of $ 79.8 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures and the collection of value added taxes .\nfor the fiscal year ended 30 september 2018 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 2547.2 , including income from continuing operations of $ 1455.6 .\nother adjustments of $ 131.6 include a $ 54.9 net impact from the remeasurement of intercompany transactions .\nthe related hedging instruments that eliminate the earnings impact are included as a working capital adjustment in other receivables or payables and accrued liabilities .\nin addition , other adjustments were impacted by cash received from the early termination of a cross currency swap of $ 54.4 , as well as the excess of pension expense over pension contributions of $ 23.5 .\nthe working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 265.4 , primarily driven by payables and accrued liabilities , inventories , and trade receivables , partially offset by other receivables .\nthe use of cash in payables and accrued liabilities of $ 277.7 includes a decrease in customer advances of $ 145.7 primarily related to sale of equipment activity and $ 67.1 for maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures .\nthe use of cash in inventories primarily resulted from the purchase of helium molecules .\nin addition , inventories reflect the noncash impact of our change in accounting for u.s .\ninventories from lifo to fifo .\nthe source of cash from other receivables of $ 128.3 was primarily due to the maturities of forward exchange contracts that hedged foreign currency exposures. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "operating activities", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2758.55"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2006/page_33.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin tpd , what were total matching buy/sell volumes in 2006 , 2005 and 2004?\n\nPre-table text:\nin 2006 , our board of directors approved a projected $ 3.2 billion expansion of our garyville , louisiana refinery by 180 mbpd to 425 mbpd , which will increase our total refining capacity to 1.154 million barrels per day ( 2018 2018mmbpd 2019 2019 ) .\nwe recently received air permit approval from the louisiana department of environmental quality for this project and construction is expected to begin in mid-2007 , with startup planned for the fourth quarter of 2009 .\nwe have also commenced front-end engineering and design ( 2018 2018feed 2019 2019 ) for a potential heavy oil upgrading project at our detroit refinery , which would allow us to process increased volumes of canadian oil sands production , and are undertaking a feasibility study for a similar upgrading project at our catlettsburg refinery .\nmarketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .\nin 2006 , our refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 21.5 billion gallons , or 1.401 mmbpd .\nthe average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 77.76 per barrel for 2006 .\nthe following table sets forth our refined product sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years .\nrefined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\n( thousands of barrels per day )\t2006\t2005\t2004\ngasoline\t804\t836\t807\ndistillates\t375\t385\t373\npropane\t23\t22\t22\nfeedstocks and special products\t106\t96\t92\nheavy fuel oil\t26\t29\t27\nasphalt\t91\t87\t79\ntotal ( a )\t1425\t1455\t1400\naverage sales price ( $ per barrel )\t$ 77.76\t$ 66.42\t$ 49.53\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd , 77 mbpd and 71 mbpd in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .\non april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard .\nthis change resulted in lower refined product sales volumes for the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under the previous accounting practices .\nsee note 2 to the consolidated financial statements .\nthe wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 71 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nwe sold 52 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis .\nhalf of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers .\npropylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry .\nbase lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide .\nwe market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .\nour customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .\nwe blended 35 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2006 .\nin 2005 and 2004 , we blended 35 mbpd and 30 mbpd of ethanol .\nthe expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations .\nwe sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4200 marathon branded retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois .\nbranded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , minnesota , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , virginia , north carolina , pennsylvania , alabama and south carolina .\nsales to marathon brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 14 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .\nsales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.7 billion in 2006 , compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2005 .\nprofit levels from the sale .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "24", "77", ")", "add(", "#0", "71", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "172"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_33.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2006 to 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2007 .\nfactors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion .\nfor a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 96 201398 of this annual report .\nrevenue .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2007\t2006\t2005\ninvestment banking fees\t$ 6635\t$ 5520\t$ 4088\nprincipal transactions\t9015\t10778\t8072\nlending & deposit-related fees\t3938\t3468\t3389\nasset management administration and commissions\t14356\t11855\t9988\nsecurities gains ( losses )\t164\t-543 ( 543 )\t-1336 ( 1336 )\nmortgage fees and related income\t2118\t591\t1054\ncredit card income\t6911\t6913\t6754\nother income\t1829\t2175\t2684\nnoninterest revenue\t44966\t40757\t34693\nnet interest income\t26406\t21242\t19555\ntotal net revenue\t$ 71372\t$ 61999\t$ 54248\n\nPost-table text:\n2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $ 71.4 billion was up $ 9.4 billion , or 15% ( 15 % ) , from the prior year .\nhigher net interest income , very strong private equity gains , record asset management , administration and commissions revenue , higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth .\nthese increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue .\ninvestment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 .\nrecord advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results , partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees .\nfor a further discussion of investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report .\nprincipal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains .\ntrading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level , primarily due to markdowns in ib of $ 1.4 billion ( net of hedges ) on subprime positions , including subprime cdos , and $ 1.3 billion ( net of fees ) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments .\nalso in ib , markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities .\nequities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products .\nib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year , primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities .\nthe increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains , the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 ( 201cfair value measurements 201d ) .\nfor a further discussion of principal transactions revenue , see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360 , respectively , and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report .\nlending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level , driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction .\nfor a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in rfs , tss and cb , see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348 , the tss segment results on pages 54 201355 , and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report .\nasset management , administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006 .\nincreased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results .\nthe 18% ( 18 % ) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments : institutional , retail , private bank and private client services .\ntss also contributed to the rise in asset management , administration and commissions revenue , driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody .\nfinally , commissions revenue increased , due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume ( primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib ) , which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities .\nfor additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342 , rfs on pages 43 201348 , tss on pages 54 201355 , and am on pages 56 201358 , of this annual report .\nthe favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio .\nalso contributing to the positive variance was a $ 234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares .\nfor a fur- ther discussion of securities gains ( losses ) , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business , see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report .\nconsol idated results of operat ions .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6635", "5520", ")", "divide(", "#0", "5520", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.20199"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2013/page_209.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2013 what was the net trading assets 2013 derivative receivables to the trading liabilities 2013 derivative payable\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 215 the firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer lending-related commitments .\nin many cases , the firm can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing the borrower notice or , in some cases , without notice as permitted by law .\nfor a further discussion of the valuation of lending-related commitments , see page 198 of this note .\ntrading assets and liabilities trading assets include debt and equity instruments owned by jpmorgan chase ( 201clong 201d positions ) that are held for client market-making and client-driven activities , as well as for certain risk management activities , certain loans managed on a fair value basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or market ( market approximates fair value ) .\ntrading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) .\nthe firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions .\nincluded in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unrealized losses ) related to derivatives .\ntrading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets .\nbalances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased ( short positions ) .\ntrading assets and liabilities 2013 average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\ntrading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments\t$ 340449\t$ 349337\t$ 393890\ntrading assets 2013 derivative receivables\t72629\t85744\t90003\ntrading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a )\t77706\t69001\t81916\ntrading liabilities 2013 derivative payables\t64553\t76162\t71539\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased .\nnote 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value .\nelections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , certain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrangements are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid instruments ) ; and/or 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis .\nelections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis .\n2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year .\n2022 owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument .\n2022 certain investments that receive tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction .\n2022 structured notes issued as part of cib 2019s client-driven activities .\n( structured notes are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests issued by cib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "72629", "64553", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "8076"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_24.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in operating revenues from 2001 to 2002?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .\nthe decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .\nthe refund was made in december 2001 .\n2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .\nutility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .\nnon-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .\nthe increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .\nfollowing are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .\n\nTable:\n\t2002\t2001\t2000\nnet mw in operation at december 31\t3955\t3445\t2475\ngeneration in gwh for the year\t29953\t22614\t7171\ncapacity factor for the year\t93% ( 93 % )\t93% ( 93 % )\t94% ( 94 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1.2", "const_1000", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "411.0", ")", "divide(", "#1", "411.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.91971"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_94.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage difference in the fair value per share between 2015 and 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .\ncommon stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .\nthese grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .\nin addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .\nthese grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .\nthe company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .\nunder the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .\nthe espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .\nthe espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .\nthe number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .\nthe fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .\nthe risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .\ntreasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .\nexpected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .\nthe expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .\nthe company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .\nthe black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\naverage risk-free interest rate\t1.1% ( 1.1 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\t1.5% ( 1.5 % )\nexpected dividend yield\tnone\tnone\tnone\nexpected volatility\t33% ( 33 % )\t30% ( 30 % )\t31% ( 31 % )\nexpected life ( years )\t4.5\t4.6\t4.6\nfair value per share\t$ 31.00\t$ 18.13\t$ 11.75\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "31", "18.13", ")", "divide(", "#0", "18.13", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.70987"}
{"example_id": "C/2010/page_223.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2010 what was the percent of the net allowance to the the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio\n\nPre-table text:\nincluded in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .\nin accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .\naccordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .\nin addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .\nhowever , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .\nwhere the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .\nthe carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .\nthe changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\taccretable yield\tcarrying amount of loan receivable\tallowance\nbeginning balance\t$ 27\t$ 920\t$ 95\npurchases ( 1 )\t1\t130\t2014\ndisposals/payments received\t-11 ( 11 )\t-594 ( 594 )\t2014\naccretion\t-44 ( 44 )\t44\t2014\nbuilds ( reductions ) to the allowance\t128\t2014\t-18 ( 18 )\nincrease to expected cash flows\t-2 ( 2 )\t19\t2014\nfx/other\t17\t-50 ( 50 )\t2014\nbalance at december 31 2010 ( 2 )\t$ 116\t$ 469\t$ 77\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .\nthese balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .\nthe related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .\n( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "77", "392", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19643"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_88.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average payment per year for the state tax settlement , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no .\n48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no .\n109 ( 201cfin no .\n48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no .\n109 , accounting for income taxes .\nfin no .\n48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return .\nfin no .\n48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized .\nas a result of its adoption of fin no .\n48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 .\nthis adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 .\nthe company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 .\nthe company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations .\nas of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 .\nas such , the company had no fin no .\n48 liability at march 31 , 2009 .\non a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest .\nit is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position .\na reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: .\n\nTable:\nbalance at march 31 2008\t$ 168\nreductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations\t-168 ( 168 )\nbalance at march 31 2009\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions .\nthe company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 .\nall tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts .\nhowever , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized .\nnote 15 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 .\nthe two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 .\nin april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device .\nin may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "168", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "56"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_157.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage was andes sbu of total revenue in 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 .\nstock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 .\nthe cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program .\nthe common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method .\na total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nrestricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock .\nthe company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 .\n15 .\nsegments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business .\nduring the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu .\nthe management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus .\nthe company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus .\nall prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure .\nin february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity .\nthe company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure .\ncorporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in \"corporate and other.\" also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation .\nthe company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure .\nadjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation .\nadjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities .\nthe company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments .\nadditionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results .\nrevenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable .\nall intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment .\ninter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results .\nthe following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31,\ttotal revenue 2017\ttotal revenue 2016\ttotal revenue 2015\nus sbu\t$ 3229\t$ 3429\t$ 3593\nandes sbu\t2710\t2506\t2489\nbrazil sbu\t542\t450\t962\nmcac sbu\t2448\t2172\t2353\neurasia sbu\t1590\t1670\t1875\ncorporate and other\t35\t77\t31\neliminations\t-24 ( 24 )\t-23 ( 23 )\t-43 ( 43 )\ntotal revenue\t$ 10530\t$ 10281\t$ 11260\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2710", "10530", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.25736"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_124.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the combined number of equity compensation plans approved by security holders\n\nPre-table text:\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .\nequity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights\tnumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\nequity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .\nof these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .\nin addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .\n( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .\nitem 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "448859", "4087587", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4536446"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2013/page_118.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat amount of long-term debt is due in the next 24 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2013 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2014\t$ 385373\n2015\t$ 1110566\n2016\t$ 270852\n2017\t$ 766801\n2018\t$ 1324616\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nin july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "385373", "1110566", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1495.939"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2008/page_142.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the purchasing price is dedicated to goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) the acquisition also provided for a one-year earn out of eur 1700 ( approximately $ 2000 usd ) which was payable in cash if aeg calendar year 2006 earnings , as defined , exceeded a pre-determined amount .\naeg 2019s 2006 earnings did not exceed such pre-determined amounts and no payment was made .\nthe components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of may 2 2006\t$ 24800\nin-process research and development\t600\ndeveloped technology and know-how\t1900\ncustomer relationship\t800\ntrade name\t400\ndeferred income taxes\t-3000 ( 3000 )\ngoodwill\t5800\nfinal purchase price\t$ 31300\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company implemented a plan to restructure certain of aeg 2019s historical activities .\nthe company originally recorded a liability of approximately $ 2100 in accordance with eitf issue no .\n95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees under this plan .\nupon completion of the plan in fiscal 2007 the company reduced this liability by approximately $ 241 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill .\nall amounts have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 .\nas part of the aeg acquisition the company acquired a minority interest in the equity securities of a private german company .\nthe company estimated the fair value of these securities to be approximately $ 1400 in its original purchase price allocation .\nduring the year ended september 29 , 2007 , the company sold these securities for proceeds of approximately $ 2150 .\nthe difference of approximately $ 750 between the preliminary fair value estimate and proceeds upon sale was recorded as a reduction of goodwill .\nthe final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the acquisition and the adjustments did not have a material impact on the company 2019s financial position or results of operations .\nthere have been no other material changes to the purchase price allocation .\nas part of the purchase price allocation , all intangible assets that were a part of the acquisition were identified and valued .\nit was determined that only customer relationship , trade name , developed technology and know how and in-process research and development had separately identifiable values .\nthe fair value of these intangible assets was determined through the application of the income approach .\ncustomer relationship represents aeg 2019s high dependency on a small number of large accounts .\naeg markets its products through distributors as well as directly to its own customers .\ntrade name represents aeg 2019s product names that the company intends to continue to use .\ndeveloped technology and know how represents currently marketable purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .\nthe intangible assets are expected to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives as the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are relatively consistent over the expected useful lives of the intangible assets .\nthe estimated $ 600 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects related to aeg 2019s organic photoconductor coating and selenium product lines .\nthe deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , land , building and related improvements as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nthe company had an existing relationship with aeg as a supplier of inventory items .\nthe supply agreement was entered into in prior years at arm 2019s length terms and conditions .\nno minimum purchase requirements existed and the pricing was consistent with other vendor agreements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5800", "31300", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1853"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_93.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .\nthe amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .\ncontingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .\nin addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .\nthe amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .\nwe have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .\nwhen the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .\nhowever , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .\nin such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .\nif deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .\ncompensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .\nthis future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .\nthe following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .\nwe have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .\nas such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .\nall payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\tthereafter\ttotal\ndeferred acquisition payments\t$ 67.5\t$ 32.1\t$ 30.1\t$ 4.5\t$ 5.7\t$ 2014\t$ 139.9\nput and call options with affiliates1\t11.8\t34.3\t73.6\t70.8\t70.2\t2.2\t262.9\ntotal contingent acquisition payments\t79.3\t66.4\t103.7\t75.3\t75.9\t2.2\t402.8\nless cash compensation expense included above\t2.6\t1.3\t0.7\t0.7\t0.3\t2014\t5.6\ntotal\t$ 76.7\t$ 65.1\t$ 103.0\t$ 74.6\t$ 75.6\t$ 2.2\t$ 397.2\n\nPost-table text:\n1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .\nin such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .\nas a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .\nd-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "76.7", "75.6", ")", "divide(", "#0", "76.7", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.43416"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_47.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the number of shares outstanding based on the cash dividends paid during 2006 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tpayments due by period ( a ) total\tpayments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years\nlong-term debt\t$ 2302.6\t$ 126.1\t$ 547.6\t$ 1174.9\t$ 454.0\ncapital lease obligations\t4.4\t1.0\t0.8\t0.5\t2.1\ninterest payments on long-term debt ( b )\t698.6\t142.9\t246.3\t152.5\t156.9\noperating leases\t218.5\t49.9\t71.7\t42.5\t54.4\npurchase obligations ( c )\t6092.6\t2397.2\t3118.8\t576.6\t2013\ncommon stock repurchase agreements\t131.0\t131.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\nlegal settlement\t70.0\t70.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\ntotal payments on contractual obligations\t$ 9517.7\t$ 2918.1\t$ 3985.2\t$ 1947.0\t$ 667.4\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates .\n( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments .\n( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials .\nalso included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items .\nin cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used .\ndepending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly .\ncontributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 .\nthis estimate may change based on plan asset performance .\nbenefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\npayments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\nin accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom .\nif the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan .\nthe guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees .\nour share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 .\nthe net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares .\nhowever , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares .\nthe contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash .\non december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings .\nthe company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price .\nthe exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date .\nthe company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares .\nincluding the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 .\nannual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\ntotal dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "40", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "41", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "102.5"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2012/page_113.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the gen-probe's purchase price is paid in cash?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents intangibles 2014goodwill and other in december 2010 , the fasb issued asu 2010-28 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) .\nasu 2010-28 modifies step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts .\nfor those reporting units , an entity is required to perform step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists .\nin determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists , an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist .\nasu 2010-28 is effective for the company in fiscal 2012 .\nthe adoption of asu 2010-28 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nin september 2011 , the fasb issued asu no .\n2011-08 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) : testing goodwill for impairment .\nasu 2011-08 allows entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test .\nif an entity believes , as a result of its qualitative assessment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount , the quantitative two-step impairment test is required ; otherwise , no further testing is required .\nasu 2011-08 is effective for the company beginning in fiscal 2013 , although early adoption is permitted .\nthe company does not believe that asu 2011-08 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements .\n3 .\nbusiness combinations fiscal 2012 acquisition : gen-probe , inc .\non august 1 , 2012 , the company completed the acquisition of gen-probe and acquired all of the outstanding shares of gen-probe .\npursuant to the merger agreement , each share of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the acquisition was cancelled and converted into the right to receive $ 82.75 in cash .\nin addition , all outstanding restricted shares , restricted stock units , performance shares , and those stock options granted prior to february 8 , 2012 were cancelled and converted into the right to receive $ 82.75 per share in cash less the applicable exercise price , as applicable .\nstock options granted after february 8 , 2012 were converted into stock options to acquire shares of hologic common stock determined by a conversion formula defined in the merger agreement .\nthe company paid the gen-probe shareholders $ 3.8 billion and $ 169.0 million to equity award holders .\nthe company funded the acquisition using available cash and financing consisting of senior secured credit facilities and senior notes ( see note 5 for further discussion ) resulting in aggregate proceeds of $ 3.48 billion , excluding financing fees to the underwriters .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 34.3 million of direct transaction costs recorded within general and administrative expenses .\ngen-probe , headquartered in san diego , california , is a leader in molecular diagnostics products and services that are used primarily to diagnose human diseases , screen donated human blood , and test transplant compatibility .\nthe company expects this acquisition to enhance its molecular diagnostics franchise and to complement its existing portfolio of diagnostics products .\ngen-probe 2019s results of operations are reported within the company 2019s diagnostics reportable segment from the date of acquisition .\nthe purchase price consideration was as follows: .\n\nTable:\ncash paid\t$ 3967866\ndeferred payment\t1655\nfair value of stock options exchanged\t2655\ntotal purchase price\t$ 3972176\n\nPost-table text:\nthe fair value of stock options exchanged recorded as purchase price represents the fair value of the gen-probe options converted into the company 2019s stock options attributable to pre-combination services pursuant to asc 805 , business combinations .\nthe remainder of the fair value of these options of $ 23.2 million will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining vesting period , which is approximately 3.5 years .\nthe company estimated the fair value of the stock options using a binomial valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions : risk free rate of 0.41% ( 0.41 % ) , expected volatility of 39.9% ( 39.9 % ) , expected life of 3.6 years and dividend of 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) .\nthe weighted average fair value of stock options granted is $ 7.07 per share .\nsource : hologic inc , 10-k , november 28 , 2012 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .\nthe user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .\npast financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3967866", "3972176", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.99891"}
{"example_id": "HUM/2017/page_133.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the number of shares issued in 2015 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nhumana inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 .\nstockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\npaymentdate\tamountper share\ttotalamount ( in millions )\n2015\t$ 1.14\t$ 170\n2016\t$ 1.16\t$ 172\n2017\t$ 1.49\t$ 216\n\nPost-table text:\non november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million .\ndeclaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .\nstock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .\nunder the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .\npursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .\naccordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program .\non february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement .\nwe also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 .\non february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co .\nllc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .\non february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock .\nthe payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr .\nupon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million .\nin addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock .\nsubsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "170", "1.14", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "149.12281"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_249.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of entergy's total employees are employed in entergy mississippi?\n\nPre-table text:\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees .\ngenerally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings .\nthese actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans .\nentergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants .\nemployees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , entergy employed 14669 people .\nutility: .\n\nTable:\nentergy arkansas\t1526\nentergy gulf states louisiana\t858\nentergy louisiana\t1008\nentergy mississippi\t828\nentergy new orleans\t378\nentergy texas\t744\nsystem energy\t-\nentergy operations\t2448\nentergy services\t3179\nentergy nuclear operations\t3620\nother subsidiaries\t80\ntotal entergy\t14669\n\nPost-table text:\napproximately 5000 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters union , and the united government security officers of america. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "828", "14669", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05645"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_46.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the change in the risk and insurance brokerage services segment revenue from 2008 2009\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nrisk and insurance brokerage services .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 6305\t$ 6197\t$ 5918\nsegment operating income\t900\t846\t954\nsegment operating income margin\t14.3% ( 14.3 % )\t13.7% ( 13.7 % )\t16.1% ( 16.1 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 we continued to see a soft market , which began in 2007 , in our retail brokerage product line .\nin 2007 , we experienced a soft market in many business lines and in many geographic areas .\nin a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity .\nchanges in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds .\nprices fell throughout 2007 , with the greatest declines seen in large and middle-market accounts .\nprices continued to decline during 2008 , although the rate of decline slowed toward the end of the year .\nin our reinsurance brokerage product line , pricing overall during 2009 was also down , although during a portion of the year it was flat to up slightly .\nadditionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets .\ncontinued volatility and further deterioration in the credit markets have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products , which have negatively hurt our operational results .\nin addition , overall capacity in the industry could decrease if a significant insurer either fails or withdraws from writing insurance coverages that we offer our clients .\nthis failure could reduce our revenues and profitability , since we would no longer have access to certain lines and types of insurance .\nrisk and insurance brokerage services generated approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 .\nrevenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients .\nour revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates .\nwe operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage .\nspecifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , healthcare providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability income , and personal lines for individuals , associations , and businesses ; provide reinsurance services to insurance and reinsurance companies and other risk assumption entities by acting as brokers or intermediaries on all classes of reinsurance ; provide investment banking products and services , including mergers and acquisitions and other financial advisory services , capital raising , contingent capital financing , insurance-linked securitizations and derivative applications ; provide managing underwriting to independent agents and brokers as well as corporate clients ; provide actuarial , loss prevention , and administrative services to businesses and consumers ; and manage captive insurance companies .\nin november 2008 we expanded our product offerings through the merger with benfield , a leading independent reinsurance intermediary .\nbenfield products have been integrated with our existing reinsurance products in 2009 .\nin february 2009 , we completed the sale of the u.s .\noperations of cananwill , our premium finance business .\nin june and july of 2009 , we entered into agreements with third parties with respect to our .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6305", "6197", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6197", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01743"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2018/page_83.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in the warranty reserve from 2017 to 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nwarranty reserve some of our salvage mechanical products are sold with a standard six month warranty against defects .\nadditionally , some of our remanufactured engines are sold with a standard three year warranty against defects .\nwe also provide a limited lifetime warranty for certain of our aftermarket products .\nthese assurance-type warranties are not considered a separate performance obligation , and thus no transaction price is allocated to them .\nwe record the warranty costs in cost of goods sold on our consolidated statements of income .\nour warranty reserve is calculated using historical claim information to project future warranty claims activity and is recorded within other accrued expenses and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets based on the expected timing of the related payments .\nthe changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nbalance as of january 1 2017\t$ 19634\nwarranty expense\t38608\nwarranty claims\t-35091 ( 35091 )\nbalance as of december 31 2017\t23151\nwarranty expense\t43682\nwarranty claims\t-43571 ( 43571 )\nbalance as of december 31 2018\t$ 23262\n\nPost-table text:\nself-insurance reserves we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program .\nwe purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure .\nwe also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , directors and officers liability , workers' compensation , and property coverage , under deductible insurance programs .\nthe insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods .\na reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analysis of historical data .\nwe monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves .\ntotal self-insurance reserves were $ 105 million and $ 94 million , of which $ 52 million and $ 43 million was classified as current , as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and are classified as other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets .\nthe remaining balances of self-insurance reserves are classified as other noncurrent liabilities , which reflects management's estimates of when claims will be paid .\nwe had outstanding letters of credit of $ 65 million and $ 71 million at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , to guarantee self-insurance claims payments .\nwhile we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claims experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions .\nstockholders' equity on october 25 , 2018 , our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we may purchase up to $ 500 million of our common stock from time to time through october 25 , 2021 .\nrepurchases under the program may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , with the amount and timing of repurchases depending on market conditions and corporate needs .\nthe repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time .\ndelaware law imposes restrictions on stock repurchases .\nduring 2018 , we repurchased 2.3 million shares of common stock for an aggregate price $ 60 million .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , there is $ 440 million of remaining capacity under our repurchase program .\nin 2019 , we have repurchased 1.8 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 46 million during the period ended february 22 , 2019 .\ntreasury stock is accounted for using the cost method .\nincome taxes current income taxes are provided on income reported for financial reporting purposes , adjusted for transactions that do not enter into the computation of income taxes payable in the same year .\ndeferred income taxes have been provided to show the effect of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements .\na valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before we are able to realize their benefit or that future deductibility is uncertain .\nprovision is made for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and related companies to the extent that such earnings are not deemed to be permanently invested. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "23262", "23151", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "111"}
{"example_id": "PM/2014/page_67.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total of u.s . dollar notes issued in 2014 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nour debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .\n( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .\n( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( e ) u.s .\ndollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .\nguarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .\nthere is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .\nat december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value ( e )\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\neuro notes\t( a )\t20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )\t1.875% ( 1.875 % )\tmarch 2014\tmarch 2021\neuro notes\t( a )\t20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )\t2.875% ( 2.875 % )\tmarch 2014\tmarch 2026\neuro notes\t( b )\t20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )\t2.875% ( 2.875 % )\tmay 2014\tmay 2029\nswiss franc notes\t( c )\tchf275 ( approximately $ 311 )\t0.750% ( 0.750 % )\tmay 2014\tdecember 2019\nswiss franc notes\t( b )\tchf250 ( approximately $ 283 )\t1.625% ( 1.625 % )\tmay 2014\tmay 2024\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 750\t3.250% ( 3.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2024\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 750\t4.250% ( 4.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2044\n\nPost-table text:\nour debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .\n( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .\n( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( e ) u.s .\ndollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .\nguarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .\nthere is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .\nat december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "750", "750", ")", "add(", "#0", "500", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2000"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_38.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the net earnings attributable to pmi in the previous year , ( in billions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nnet revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .\nthese net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .\nexcluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .\nin some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .\nin 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .\nexcise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .\nour cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , $\t% (  % )\ncost of sales\t$ 10432\t$ 9391\t$ 1041\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nmarketing administration and research costs\t6725\t6405\t320\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\noperating income\t11503\t10815\t688\t6.4% ( 6.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ncost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .\nmarketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .\noperating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .\ninterest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .\nour effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .\nthe 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 11 .\nincome taxes to our consolidated financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .\nbased upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .\nwe are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .\nit is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .\nan estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .\nnet earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .\nthis decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .\ndiluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .\nexcluding .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "932", "13.4%", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6.95522"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_93.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total estimated future contingent acquisition obligation is due in the 12 months?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .\nthe amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .\ncontingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .\nin addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .\nthe amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .\nwe have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .\nwhen the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .\nhowever , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .\nin such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .\nif deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .\ncompensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .\nthis future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .\nthe following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .\nwe have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .\nas such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .\nall payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\tthereafter\ttotal\ndeferred acquisition payments\t$ 67.5\t$ 32.1\t$ 30.1\t$ 4.5\t$ 5.7\t$ 2014\t$ 139.9\nput and call options with affiliates1\t11.8\t34.3\t73.6\t70.8\t70.2\t2.2\t262.9\ntotal contingent acquisition payments\t79.3\t66.4\t103.7\t75.3\t75.9\t2.2\t402.8\nless cash compensation expense included above\t2.6\t1.3\t0.7\t0.7\t0.3\t2014\t5.6\ntotal\t$ 76.7\t$ 65.1\t$ 103.0\t$ 74.6\t$ 75.6\t$ 2.2\t$ 397.2\n\nPost-table text:\n1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .\nin such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .\nas a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .\nd-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "76.7", "397.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1931"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_125.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2014 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?\n\nPre-table text:\nto maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2014\t$ 135\n2015\t127\n2016\t110\n2017\t109\n2018\t106\nthereafter\t699\ntotal\t$ 1286\n\nPost-table text:\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments .\nthe company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .\nsee note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .\ncontingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nin addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nthe fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .\nlegal proceedings .\nfrom time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .\nfederal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .\nit is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .\nadditionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .\nmanagement , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .\nhowever , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .\ndue to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .\nindemnifications .\nin the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .\nthe terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .\nconsequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .\nthe company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .\nthe fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "135", "1286", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10498"}
{"example_id": "AAP/2012/page_12.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in the number of stores during 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\nbeginning stores\t3460\t3369\t3264\t3243\t3153\nnew stores ( 1 )\t116\t95\t110\t75\t109\nstores closed\t2014\t-4 ( 4 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-54 ( 54 )\t-19 ( 19 )\nending stores\t3576\t3460\t3369\t3264\t3243\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .\nstore technology .\nour store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively \"store system\" ) .\ninformation maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly .\nour fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles .\nour store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers .\nif a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors .\navailable parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time .\nour centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information .\nwe also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities .\nall of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability .\nwe plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience .\namong the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project .\nstore support center merchandising .\npurchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan .\nour roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals .\nour global sourcing team works closely with both teams .\nin fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases .\nour purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume .\nthe merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand .\nwe believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3576", "3460", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3460", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03353"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2006/page_30.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the rate of return of an investment in cadence design systems inc from 2001 to 2004?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .\nall rights reserved .\nwww.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 29 2001\tdecember 28 2002\tjanuary 3 2004\tjanuary 1 2005\tdecember 31 2005\tdecember 30 2006\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t54.38\t81.52\t61.65\t75.54\t79.96\ns & p 500\t100.00\t77.90\t100.24\t111.15\t116.61\t135.03\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t71.97\t107.18\t117.07\t120.50\t137.02\ns & p information technology\t100.00\t62.59\t92.14\t94.50\t95.44\t103.47\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "81.52", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.1848"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_94.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in the fair value per share between 2014 and 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .\ncommon stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .\nthese grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .\nin addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .\nthese grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .\nthe company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .\nunder the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .\nthe espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .\nthe espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .\nthe number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .\nthe fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .\nthe risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .\ntreasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .\nexpected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .\nthe expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .\nthe company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .\nthe black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\naverage risk-free interest rate\t1.1% ( 1.1 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\t1.5% ( 1.5 % )\nexpected dividend yield\tnone\tnone\tnone\nexpected volatility\t33% ( 33 % )\t30% ( 30 % )\t31% ( 31 % )\nexpected life ( years )\t4.5\t4.6\t4.6\nfair value per share\t$ 31.00\t$ 18.13\t$ 11.75\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "31", "11.75", ")", "divide(", "#0", "11.75", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.6383"}
{"example_id": "VLO/2018/page_25.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 2018 what was the percent of the 2018 program still outstanding\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents tceq and harris county pollution control services department ( hcpcs ) ( houston terminal ) .\nwe have an outstanding noe from the tceq and an outstanding vn from the hcpcs alleging excess emissions from tank 003 that occurred during hurricane harvey .\nwe are working with the pertinent authorities to resolve these matters .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures part ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock trades on the nyse under the trading symbol 201cvlo . 201d as of january 31 , 2019 , there were 5271 holders of record of our common stock .\ndividends are considered quarterly by the board of directors , may be paid only when approved by the board , and will depend on our financial condition , results of operations , cash flows , prospects , industry conditions , capital requirements , and other factors and restrictions our board deems relevant .\nthere can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend at the rates we have paid historically , or at all , in the future .\nthe following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2018 .\nperiod total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal numberof sharespurchased\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )\ttotal number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms\tapproximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )\noctober 2018\t939957\t$ 87.23\t8826\t931131\t$ 2.7 billion\nnovember 2018\t3655945\t$ 87.39\t216469\t3439476\t$ 2.4 billion\ndecember 2018\t3077364\t$ 73.43\t4522\t3072842\t$ 2.2 billion\ntotal\t7673266\t$ 81.77\t229817\t7443449\t$ 2.2 billion\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2018 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .\n( b ) on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2018 program ) , with no expiration date , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under a $ 2.5 billion program authorized on september 21 , 2016 ( the 2016 program ) .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2018 , we completed our purchases under the 2016 program .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 2.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2018 program. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2.2", "2.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.88"}
{"example_id": "APD/2014/page_44.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2012 , how bigger is the capital expenditures on a non-gaap basis than the one on a gaap basis?\n\nPre-table text:\ninvesting activities for the year ended 30 september 2014 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1638.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment .\nfor the year ended 30 september 2013 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1697.0 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions .\nfor the year ended 30 september 2012 , cash used for investing activities was $ 2435.2 , primarily capital expenditures for plant and equipment , acquisitions , and investments in unconsolidated affiliates .\nrefer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail .\ncapital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\nadditions to plant and equipment\t$ 1684.2\t$ 1524.2\t$ 1521.0\nacquisitions less cash acquired\t2014\t224.9\t863.4\ninvestments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates\t-2.0 ( 2.0 )\t-1.3 ( 1.3 )\t175.4\ncapital expenditures on a gaap basis\t$ 1682.2\t$ 1747.8\t$ 2559.8\ncapital lease expenditures ( a )\t202.4\t234.9\t212.2\npurchase of noncontrolling interests in asubsidiary ( a )\t.5\t14.0\t6.3\ncapital expenditures on a non-gaap basis\t$ 1885.1\t$ 1996.7\t$ 2778.3\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests .\ncertain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases , and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities , if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease .\nadditionally , the payment for subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows .\nthe presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures .\ncapital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1682.2 , compared to $ 1747.8 in 2013 .\nthe decrease of $ 65.6 was primarily due to the acquisitions in 2013 .\nadditions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses .\nadditions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine , ongoing nature , including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements .\nspending in 2014 and 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china , hydrogen to the global market , and renewable energy in the u.k .\nin 2013 , we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use , net of cash acquired , of $ 224.9 .\nin the fourth quarter , we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang , china .\nduring the third quarter , we acquired epco , the largest independent u.s .\nproducer of liquid carbon dioxide ( co2 ) , and wcg .\nin 2012 , we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a .\nfor $ 690 and e.i .\ndupont de nemours and co. , inc . 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in our joint venture , da nanomaterials for $ 147 .\nwe also purchased a 25% ( 25 % ) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co .\nltd .\n( ahg ) , an unconsolidated affiliate , for $ 155 .\nrefer to note 5 , business combinations , and note 7 , summarized financial information of equity affiliates , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding the acquisitions and the investments .\ncapital expenditures on a non-gaap basis in 2014 totaled $ 1885.1 compared to $ 1996.7 in 2013 .\ncapital lease expenditures of $ 202.4 decreased by $ 32.5 , reflecting lower project spending .\n2015 outlook excluding acquisitions , capital expenditures for new plant and equipment in 2015 on a gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1650 and $ 1800 , and on a non-gaap basis are expected to be between $ 1700 and $ 1900 .\nthe non-gaap capital expenditures include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases , which are expected to be between $ 50 and $ 100 .\na majority of the total capital expenditures is expected to be for new plants .\nit is anticipated that capital expenditures will be funded principally with cash from continuing operations .\nin addition , we intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and investments in equity affiliates .\nfinancing activities for the year ended 2014 , cash used by financing activities was $ 504.3 primarily attributable to cash used to pay dividends of $ 627.7 , which was partially offset by proceeds from stock option exercises of $ 141.6 .\nour borrowings ( short- and long-term proceeds , net of repayments ) were a net source of cash ( issuance ) of $ 1.1 and included $ 148.7 of net commercial paper and other short-term debt issuances , debt proceeds from the issuance of a .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2778.3", "2559.8", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08536"}
{"example_id": "CME/2012/page_70.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent of available potential to increase the multi-currency line of credit\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcme clearingavailable assets\ndesignated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )\t$ 100.0\nguaranty fund contributions ( 2 )\t2899.5\nassessment powers ( 3 )\t7973.6\nminimum total assets available for default ( 4 )\t$ 10973.1\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "const_7", "const_5", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.4"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2017/page_122.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the commitments will be due after 2022?\n\nPre-table text:\nused to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes .\n2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2018\t141\n2019\t132\n2020\t126\n2021\t118\n2022\t109\nthereafter\t1580\ntotal\t$ 2206\n\nPost-table text:\nin may 2017 , the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc , for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards , new york , new york .\nthe term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin , expected to occur in may 2023 , with the option to renew for a specified term .\nthe lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $ 51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term , increasing every five years to $ 58 million , $ 66 million and $ 74 million per year ( or approximately $ 1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term ) .\nthis lease is classified as an operating lease and , as such , is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 134 million and $ 136 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2017 , the company had $ 298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .\nthese funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products .\nthe fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 236 million , including $ 128 million related to the first reserve transaction , and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1580", "2206", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.71623"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_29.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nof the square feet in the us what was the percent of the owned facility of the us total\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments not applicable .\nitem 2 .\nproperties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .\n\nTable:\n( square feet in millions )\tunitedstates\tothercountries\ttotal\nowned facilities1\t29.9\t16.7\t46.6\nleased facilities2\t2.3\t6.0\t8.3\ntotal facilities\t32.2\t22.7\t54.9\n\nPost-table text:\n1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .\n2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .\nour principal executive offices are located in the u.s .\nand a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .\nin addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .\nwe expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .\nwe also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .\nwe recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .\noutside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .\nour fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .\nour assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .\nin addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .\nwe believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .\nwe do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .\nfor information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures not applicable .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "29.9", "32.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.92857"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_324.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat amount of credit facility was paid by entergy louisiana prior to december 31 , 2011 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval .\npreferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements .\nentergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .\nentergy louisiana 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\n( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\n( $ 118415 )\t$ 49887\t$ 52807\t$ 61236\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .\nentergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 200 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , $ 50 million was outstanding on the credit facility .\nentergy louisiana obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 250 million .\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits .\nentergy louisiana has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances through july 2013 .\nin january 2012 , entergy louisiana issued $ 250 million of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due december 2014 .\nentergy louisiana used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the entergy system money pool .\nlittle gypsy repowering project in april 2007 , entergy louisiana announced that it intended to pursue the solid fuel repowering of a 538 mw unit at its little gypsy plant .\nin march 2009 the lpsc voted in favor of a motion directing entergy louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and , based upon an analysis of the project 2019s economic viability , to make a recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project .\nthis action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices , as well as environmental concerns , the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets .\nin april 2009 , entergy louisiana complied with the lpsc 2019s directive and recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of three years or more .\nin may 2009 the lpsc issued an order declaring that entergy louisiana 2019s decision to place the little gypsy project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and prudent .\nin october 2009 , entergy louisiana made a filing with the lpsc seeking permission to cancel the little gypsy repowering project and seeking project cost recovery over a five-year period .\nin june 2010 and august 2010 , the lpsc staff and intervenors filed testimony .\nthe lpsc staff ( 1 ) agreed that it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation and that the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent ; ( 2 ) indicated that , except for $ 0.8 million in compensation-related costs , the costs incurred should be deemed prudent ; ( 3 ) recommended recovery from customers over ten years but stated that the lpsc may want to consider 15 years ; ( 4 ) allowed for recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs , but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt , while also acknowledging that the lpsc may consider ordering no return ; and ( 5 ) indicated that entergy louisiana should be directed to securitize project costs , if legally feasible and in the public interest .\nin the third quarter 2010 , in accordance with accounting standards , entergy louisiana determined that it was probable that the little gypsy repowering project would be abandoned and accordingly reclassified $ 199.8 million of project costs from construction work in progress to a regulatory asset .\na hearing on the issues , except for cost allocation among customer classes , was held before the alj in november 2010 .\nin january 2011 all parties participated in a mediation on the disputed issues , resulting in a settlement of all disputed issues , including cost recovery and cost allocation .\nthe settlement provides for entergy louisiana to recover $ 200 million as of march 31 , 2011 , and carrying costs on that amount on specified terms thereafter .\nthe settlement also provides for entergy louisiana to recover the approved project costs by securitization .\nin april 2011 , entergy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "200", "50", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "150"}
{"example_id": "APD/2019/page_31.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2019 , what is the contribution of the first quarter in the total dividend?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol \"apd.\" as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock .\ncash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly .\nit is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels .\nthe board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant .\ndividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n\t2019\t2018\nfirst quarter\t$ 1.10\t$ .95\nsecond quarter\t1.16\t1.10\nthird quarter\t1.16\t1.10\nfourth quarter\t1.16\t1.10\ntotal\t$ 4.58\t$ 4.25\n\nPost-table text:\npurchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock .\nthis program does not have a stated expiration date .\nwe repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers .\nthere were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 .\nat 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained .\nadditional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.10", "4.58", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.24017"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2013/page_62.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2013 what was the change in total residential mortgages in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nconditions and changes to regulatory capital requirements under basel iii capital standards .\nbeginning in 2014 , other comprehensive income related to available for sale securities ( as well as pension and other post-retirement plans ) are included in pnc 2019s regulatory capital ( subject to a phase-in schedule ) and , therefore will affect pnc 2019s regulatory capital ratios .\nfor additional information , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 2013 business and the capital portion of the balance sheet review section in this item 7 of this report .\nthe duration of investment securities was 2.9 years at december 31 , 2013 .\nwe estimate that , at december 31 , 2013 , the effective duration of investment securities was 3.0 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel increase in interest rates and 2.8 years for an immediate 50 basis points parallel decrease in interest rates .\ncomparable amounts at december 31 , 2012 were 2.3 years and 2.2 years , respectively .\nwe conduct a quarterly comprehensive security-level impairment assessment on all securities .\nfor securities in an unrealized loss position , we determine whether the loss represents otti .\nfor debt securities that we neither intend to sell nor believe we will be required to sell prior to expected recovery , we recognize the credit portion of otti charges in current earnings and include the noncredit portion of otti in net unrealized gains ( losses ) on otti securities on our consolidated statement of comprehensive income and net of tax in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) on our consolidated balance sheet .\nduring 2013 and 2012 we recognized otti credit losses of $ 16 million and $ 111 million , respectively .\nsubstantially all of the credit losses related to residential mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities collateralized by non-agency residential loans .\nif current housing and economic conditions were to deteriorate from current levels , and if market volatility and illiquidity were to deteriorate from current levels , or if market interest rates were to increase or credit spreads were to widen appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .\nadditional information regarding our investment securities is included in note 8 investment securities and note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .\nloans held for sale table 15 : loans held for sale in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 312013\tdecember 312012\ncommercial mortgages at fair value\t$ 586\t$ 772\ncommercial mortgages at lower of cost or fair value\t281\t620\ntotal commercial mortgages\t867\t1392\nresidential mortgages at fair value\t1315\t2096\nresidential mortgages at lower of cost or fair value\t41\t124\ntotal residential mortgages\t1356\t2220\nother\t32\t81\ntotal\t$ 2255\t$ 3693\n\nPost-table text:\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale designated at fair value , we stopped originating these and continue to pursue opportunities to reduce these positions .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the balance relating to these loans was $ 586 million compared to $ 772 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale carried at lower of cost or fair value , we sold $ 2.8 billion in 2013 compared to $ 2.2 billion in 2012 .\nall of these loan sales were to government agencies .\ntotal gains of $ 79 million were recognized on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , in 2013 , and $ 41 million in 2012 .\nresidential mortgage loan origination volume was $ 15.1 billion in 2013 compared to $ 15.2 billion in 2012 .\nsubstantially all such loans were originated under agency or federal housing administration ( fha ) standards .\nwe sold $ 14.7 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 568 million in 2013 .\nthe comparable amounts for 2012 were $ 13.8 billion and $ 747 million , respectively .\ninterest income on loans held for sale was $ 157 million in 2013 and $ 168 million in 2012 .\nthese amounts are included in other interest income on our consolidated income statement .\nadditional information regarding our loan sale and servicing activities is included in note 3 loan sales and servicing activities and variable interest entities and note 9 fair value in our notes to consolidated financial statements included in item 8 of this report .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets goodwill and other intangible assets totaled $ 11.3 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 10.9 billion at december 31 , 2012 .\nthe increase of $ .4 billion was primarily due to additions to and changes in value of mortgage and other loan servicing rights .\nsee additional information regarding our goodwill and intangible assets in note 10 goodwill and other intangible assets included in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\n44 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1356", "2220", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-864"}
{"example_id": "KHC/2016/page_23.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2016 , what percentage of manufacturing and processing facilities are leased?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments .\nitem 2 .\nproperties .\nour corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .\nour co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .\nbusiness units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .\nwe maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .\nwe manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .\nas of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .\nwe own 83 and lease four of these facilities .\nour manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .\n\nTable:\n\towned\tleased\nunited states\t43\t2\ncanada\t3\t2014\neurope\t11\t2014\nrest of world\t26\t2\n\nPost-table text:\nwe maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .\nwe also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .\nin the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .\nwe have reflected this change in the table above .\nsee note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nseveral of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .\nsee note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings .\nwe are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .\non april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .\ndistrict court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .\nthe complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .\nas previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .\nthe separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .\nwe do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .\nwhile we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures .\nnot applicable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "const_4", "87", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04598"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_35.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during november 2007 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla .\nthe usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million .\nbased on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company .\neurope in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages .\nball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court .\nall other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees .\nthe relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation .\nitem 4 .\nsubmission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 .\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange .\nthere were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 .\ncommon stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 .\npurchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased ( a )\taverage pricepaid per share\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )\noctober 1 to october 28 2007\t705292\t$ 53.53\t705292\t4904824\noctober 29 to november 25 2007\t431170\t$ 48.11\t431170\t4473654\nnovember 26 to december 31 2007\t8310 ( c )\t$ 44.99\t8310\t4465344\ntotal\t1144772\t$ 51.42\t1144772\t\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities .\n( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors .\non january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock .\nthis repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations .\n( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million .\nalso does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "431170", "48.11", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "20.74359"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_200.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in amount of statutory capital and surplus for bermuda subsidiaries in 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nn o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively .\n19 .\nrelated party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda .\nthe trustees are principally comprised of ace management .\nthe company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers .\nthe borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities .\naccordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties .\n20 .\nstatutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate .\nthese regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities .\nthere are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries .\nthe company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators .\nstatutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items .\nthe statutory capital and surplus of the u.s .\nsubsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 .\nthe amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million .\nthe following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s .\nsubsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions of u.s . dollars )\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\tbermuda subsidiaries 2008\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\t2008\nstatutory capital and surplus\t$ 11798\t$ 9164\t$ 6205\t$ 6266\t$ 5885\t$ 5368\nstatutory net income\t$ 2430\t$ 2369\t$ 2196\t$ 1047\t$ 904\t$ 818\n\nPost-table text:\nas permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively .\nthe company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations .\nsome jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements .\nin some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business .\nthese licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests .\njurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "11798", "9164", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2634"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2011/page_73.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much was cost of good sold in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements company , l.l.c .\nand odyssey pipeline l.l.c. , as well as certain other oil pipeline interests , including the eugene island pipeline system .\nthe value of this transaction is approximately $ 205 million , net of debt assumed by the buyer .\nthe carrying value of these assets was $ 38 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthis transaction closed on january 3 , 2012 .\nburns point gas plant 2013 during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we sold our e&p segment 2019s 50 percent interest in the burns point gas plant , a cryogenic processing plant located in st .\nmary parish , louisiana , for total consideration of $ 36 million and a pretax gain of $ 34 million was booked .\nalaska lng facility 2013 during the third quarter of 2011 , we sold our integrated gas segment 2019s equity interest in a lng processing facility in alaska and a pretax gain on the transaction of $ 8 million was recorded .\ndj basin 2013 in april 2011 , we assigned a 30 percent undivided working interest in our e&p segment 2019s approximately 180000 acres in the niobrara shale play located within the dj basin of southeast wyoming and northern colorado for total consideration of $ 270 million , recording a pretax gain of $ 37 million .\nwe remain operator of this jointly owned leasehold .\nangola 2013 during 2010 , we closed the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated interest in our e&p segment 2019s production sharing contract and joint operating agreement in block 32 offshore angola .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 1.3 billion and recorded a pretax gain on the sale of $ 811 million .\nwe retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in block 32 .\ngudrun 2013 in march 2011 , we closed the sale of our outside-operated interests in the gudrun field development and the brynhild and eirin exploration areas offshore norway for net proceeds of $ 85 million , excluding working capital adjustments .\na $ 64 million pretax loss on this disposition was recorded in the fourth quarter 2010 .\ngabon 2013 in december 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated fields offshore gabon , receiving net proceeds of $ 269 million , after closing adjustments .\na $ 232 million pretax gain on this disposition was reported in discontinued operations for 2009 .\npermian basin 2013 in june 2009 , we closed the sale of our e&p segment 2019s operated and a portion of our outside- operated permian basin producing assets in new mexico and west texas for net proceeds after closing adjustments of $ 293 million .\na $ 196 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nireland 2013 in april 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated properties in ireland for net proceeds of $ 84 million , after adjusting for cash held by the sold subsidiary .\na $ 158 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nas a result of this sale , we terminated our pension plan in ireland , incurring a charge of $ 18 million .\nin june 2009 , we entered into an agreement to sell the subsidiary holding our 19 percent outside-operated interest in the corrib natural gas development offshore ireland .\nan initial $ 100 million payment was received at closing .\nadditional fixed proceeds of $ 135 million will be received at the earlier of first commercial gas or december 31 , 2012 .\na $ 154 million impairment was recognized in discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009 .\nour irish and our gabonese businesses , which had been reported in our e&p segment , have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nrevenues and pretax income related to these businesses are shown in the table below .\n( in millions ) 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\nrevenues applicable to discontinued operations\t$ 188\npretax income from discontinued operations\t$ 80\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "188", "80", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "108"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2009/page_65.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow many options were issued under the 2001 plan as of december 31 , 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\n4 .\nstock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) .\nthere are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation .\nwe no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans .\nin april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors .\nunder the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units .\nprior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan .\nthe union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 .\nthe 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards .\nnon-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan .\nwe no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan .\nthe union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 .\nthe 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan .\nunder the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries .\nnon-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan .\npursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .\nstock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model .\ngroups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .\nthe table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nweighted-average assumptions\t2009\t2008\t2007\nrisk-free interest rate\t1.9% ( 1.9 % )\t2.8% ( 2.8 % )\t4.9% ( 4.9 % )\ndividend yield\t2.3% ( 2.3 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\nexpected life ( years )\t5.1\t5.3\t4.7\nvolatility\t31.3% ( 31.3 % )\t22.2% ( 22.2 % )\t20.9% ( 20.9 % )\nweighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted\t$ 11.33\t$ 13.35\t$ 11.19\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "24000000", "3366230", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "20633770"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2007/page_126.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future principal payments of corporate debt are due in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nbefore the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no .\n128 , earnings per share .\nunder this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement .\ntherefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 .\nsenior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility .\nas a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed .\ncorporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants .\nas of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants .\nearly extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption .\nthe company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs .\nthe company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 .\nother corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions .\nthese loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet .\nsee note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings .\nfuture maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 2014\n2009\t2014\n2010\t2014\n2011\t453815\n2012\t2014\nthereafter\t2996337\ntotal future principal payments of corporate debt\t3450152\nunamortized discount net\t-427454 ( 427454 )\ntotal corporate debt\t$ 3022698\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "453815", "3450152", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13153"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_175.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in revenues from 2016 to 2017 for transactions with related parties?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .\naes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .\ntherefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .\nstarting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .\nas a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .\nin november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .\nthis agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .\nthe company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .\nafter the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .\nconsidering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .\nforeign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .\nfluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .\ndollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .\nconcentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .\nseveral of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .\nhowever , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .\nthe cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .\nif a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .\n26 .\nrelated party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .\nin the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .\nat two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .\nthese offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .\nin chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .\nadditionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .\nthe company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2017\t2016\t2015\nrevenue 2014non-regulated\t$ 1297\t$ 1100\t$ 1099\ncost of sales 2014non-regulated\t220\t210\t330\ninterest income\t8\t4\t25\ninterest expense\t36\t39\t33\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1297", "1100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.17909"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_47.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\npayments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be total approximately how much , in millions , for the years 2008 through 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tpayments due by period ( a ) total\tpayments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years\nlong-term debt\t$ 2302.6\t$ 126.1\t$ 547.6\t$ 1174.9\t$ 454.0\ncapital lease obligations\t4.4\t1.0\t0.8\t0.5\t2.1\ninterest payments on long-term debt ( b )\t698.6\t142.9\t246.3\t152.5\t156.9\noperating leases\t218.5\t49.9\t71.7\t42.5\t54.4\npurchase obligations ( c )\t6092.6\t2397.2\t3118.8\t576.6\t2013\ncommon stock repurchase agreements\t131.0\t131.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\nlegal settlement\t70.0\t70.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\ntotal payments on contractual obligations\t$ 9517.7\t$ 2918.1\t$ 3985.2\t$ 1947.0\t$ 667.4\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates .\n( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments .\n( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials .\nalso included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items .\nin cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used .\ndepending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly .\ncontributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 .\nthis estimate may change based on plan asset performance .\nbenefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\npayments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\nin accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom .\nif the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan .\nthe guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees .\nour share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 .\nthe net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares .\nhowever , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares .\nthe contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash .\non december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings .\nthe company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price .\nthe exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date .\nthe company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares .\nincluding the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 .\nannual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\ntotal dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2012", "2008", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "26", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "104"}
{"example_id": "MA/2008/page_126.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in total liabilities for litigation settlements from 2006 to 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) on june 24 , 2008 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201camerican express settlement 201d ) with american express company ( 201camerican express 201d ) relating to the u.s .\nfederal antitrust litigation between mastercard and american express .\nthe american express settlement ended all existing litigation between mastercard and american express .\nunder the terms of the american express settlement , mastercard is obligated to make 12 quarterly payments of up to $ 150000 per quarter beginning in the third quarter of 2008 .\nmastercard 2019s maximum nominal payments will total $ 1800000 .\nthe amount of each quarterly payment is contingent on the performance of american express 2019s u.s .\nglobal network services business .\nthe quarterly payments will be in an amount equal to 15% ( 15 % ) of american express 2019s u.s .\nglobal network services billings during the quarter , up to a maximum of $ 150000 per quarter .\nif , however , the payment for any quarter is less than $ 150000 , the maximum payment for subsequent quarters will be increased by the difference between $ 150000 and the lesser amount that was paid in any quarter in which there was a shortfall .\nmastercard assumes american express will achieve these financial hurdles .\nmastercard recorded the present value of $ 1800000 , at a 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) discount rate , or $ 1649345 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .\nin 2003 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cu.s .\nmerchant lawsuit settlement 201d ) related to the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit described under the caption 201cu.s .\nmerchant and consumer litigations 201d in note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) and contract disputes with certain customers .\nunder the terms of the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit settlement , the company was required to pay $ 125000 in 2003 and $ 100000 annually each december from 2004 through 2012 .\nin addition , in 2003 , several other lawsuits were initiated by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit .\nthe 201copt-out 201d merchant lawsuits were not covered by the terms of the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit settlement and all have been individually settled .\nwe recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods .\ntotal liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31 , 2006 , as follows: .\n\nTable:\nbalance as of december 31 2006\t$ 476915\nprovision for litigation settlements ( note 20 )\t3400\ninterest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit\t38046\npayments\t-113925 ( 113925 )\nbalance as of december 31 2007\t404436\nprovision for discover settlement\t862500\nprovision for american express settlement\t1649345\nprovision for other litigation settlements\t6000\ninterest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement\t32879\ninterest accretion on american express settlement\t44300\npayments on american express settlement\t-300000 ( 300000 )\npayments on discover settlement\t-862500 ( 862500 )\npayment on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement\t-100000 ( 100000 )\nother payments and accretion\t-662 ( 662 )\nbalance as of december 31 2008\t$ 1736298\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) for additional discussion regarding the company 2019s legal proceedings. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "404436", "476915", ")", "divide(", "#0", "476915", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.15197"}
{"example_id": "AWK/2013/page_132.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the one-percentage-point increase of effect on total of service and interest cost components as a percentage of the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation?\n\nPre-table text:\ncoupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds .\nthe yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) .\nhistorically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments .\nthe expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios .\nassumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes .\nbased on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets .\nthe company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases .\nassumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans .\nthe health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions .\na one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .\n\nTable:\n\tone-percentage-pointincrease\tone-percentage-pointdecrease\neffect on total of service and interest cost components\t$ 7367\t$ -5974 ( 5974 )\neffect on other postretirement benefit obligation\t$ 72238\t$ -60261 ( 60261 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "7367", "72238", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10198"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2007/page_134.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby how much did the weighted average exercise price per share increase from 2005 to 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .\nmarathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .\nthrough 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .\nin general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .\nno stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nsimilar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .\nunder the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .\nin general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .\nno stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nbeginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .\nall stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .\nas a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .\nrestricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .\nin 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .\nthe restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nmarathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .\nthe restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nprior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .\nthe non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .\ncommon stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .\nall non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .\nwhen dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .\nstock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\nthe total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .\nin 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .\ntax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .\ncash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .\nstock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .\nthe weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2007\t2006\t2005\nweighted average exercise price per share\t$ 60.94\t$ 37.84\t$ 25.14\nexpected annual dividends per share\t$ 0.96\t$ 0.80\t$ 0.66\nexpected life in years\t5.0\t5.1\t5.5\nexpected volatility\t27% ( 27 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\nrisk-free interest rate\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\t3.8% ( 3.8 % )\nweighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted\t$ 17.24\t$ 10.19\t$ 6.15\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "60.94", "25.14", ")", "divide(", "#0", "25.14", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.42403"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_29.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of major facilities by square footage are leased as of december 28 , 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments not applicable .\nitem 2 .\nproperties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .\n\nTable:\n( square feet in millions )\tunitedstates\tothercountries\ttotal\nowned facilities1\t29.9\t16.7\t46.6\nleased facilities2\t2.3\t6.0\t8.3\ntotal facilities\t32.2\t22.7\t54.9\n\nPost-table text:\n1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .\n2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .\nour principal executive offices are located in the u.s .\nand a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .\nin addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .\nwe expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .\nwe also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .\nwe recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .\noutside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .\nour fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .\nour assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .\nin addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .\nwe believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .\nwe do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .\nfor information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures not applicable .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "8.3", "54.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15118"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2018/page_35.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in operating profit margins as adjusted between 2016 and 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\ndivestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by two percent .\nnet sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware .\nnet sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products .\nnet sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products .\nour gross profit margins were 32.2 percent , 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nthe 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler , an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs and salaries ) and unfavorable sales mix .\nthese negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices , the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives , and increased sales volume .\nthe 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives .\nselling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016 .\nthe decrease in selling , general and administrative expenses , as a percentage of sales , was driven by leverage of fixed expenses , due primarily to increased sales volume , and improved cost control .\nthe following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\t2016\noperating profit as reported\t$ 1211\t$ 1194\t$ 1087\nrationalization charges\t14\t4\t22\nkichler inventory step up adjustment\t40\t2014\t2014\noperating profit as adjusted\t$ 1265\t$ 1198\t$ 1109\noperating profit margins as reported\t14.5% ( 14.5 % )\t15.6% ( 15.6 % )\t14.8% ( 14.8 % )\noperating profit margins as adjusted\t15.1% ( 15.1 % )\t15.7% ( 15.7 % )\t15.1% ( 15.1 % )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs , salaries and erp costs ) .\nthese negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices , benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume .\noperating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs .\noperating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count .\ndue to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china , and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019 , we could be exposed to approximately $ 150 million of potential annual direct cost increases .\nwe will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases , supplier negotiations , supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures .\nother income ( expense ) , net other , net , for 2018 included $ 14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $ 8 million of realized foreign currency losses .\nthese expenses were partially offset by $ 3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $ 1 million related to distributions from private equity funds .\nother , net , for 2017 included $ 26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs , $ 13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $ 2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund , partially offset by $ 3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $ 1 million of earnings related to equity method investments. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15.7%", "15.1%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.006"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2013/page_40.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ndoes the company spend more on advertising in 2013 than on research and development?\n\nPre-table text:\n38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 .\nsummary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc .\n( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s .\nand non-u.s. , that it controls .\nppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls .\nfor those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests .\ninvestments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nas a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in \"investments\" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet .\ntransactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation .\nuse of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s .\ngenerally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period .\nsuch estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated .\nactual outcomes could differ from those estimates .\nrevenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete .\nrevenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered .\nshipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nshipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nselling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning .\ndistribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities .\nadvertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nresearch and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred .\nthe following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\nresearch and development 2013 total\t$ 505\t$ 468\t$ 443\nless depreciation on research facilities\t17\t15\t15\nresearch and development net\t$ 488\t$ 453\t$ 428\n\nPost-table text:\nlegal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred .\nlegal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes .\nforeign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s .\noperations is their local currency .\nassets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s .\ndollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period .\nunrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity .\ncash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less .\nshort-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year .\nthe purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nmarketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "345", "505", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2015/page_131.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the sum of the value of the notes entergy issued to nypa with seven and eight annual installments payments\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .\n( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 109 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 35 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2016\t$ 204079\n2017\t$ 766451\n2018\t$ 822690\n2019\t$ 768588\n2020\t$ 1631181\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nas part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .\nwith the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "const_7", "108", ")", "add(", "20", "const_8", ")", "add(", "#0", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "143"}
{"example_id": "VNO/2012/page_84.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total five year change in the s&p 500 index?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index .\nthe graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions .\nthere can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .\n\nTable:\n\t2007\t2008\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\nvornado realty trust\t$ 100\t$ 72\t$ 89\t$ 110\t$ 105\t$ 114\ns&p 500 index\t100\t63\t80\t92\t94\t109\nthe nareit all equity index\t100\t62\t80\t102\t110\t132\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "109", "100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9"}
{"example_id": "VTR/2007/page_47.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased on the given average price per share , how much money did the repurchases cost in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nas of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record .\ndividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock .\non february 13 , 2008 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2008 dividend in the amount of $ 0.5125 per share , payable on march 28 , 2008 to stockholders of record on march 6 , 2008 .\nwe expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2008 .\nour board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis .\nbecause the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above .\nplease see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy .\nour stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan .\nsee 201cnote 16 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k .\ndirector and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation .\nstock repurchases the table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 : number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per .\n\nTable:\n\tnumber of shares repurchased ( 1 )\taverage price per share\noctober 1 through october 31\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1 through november 30\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1 through december 31\t14669\t$ 43.89\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "14669", "43.89", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "643822.41"}
{"example_id": "UPS/2006/page_32.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/06?\n\nPre-table text:\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .\nthe following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .\nthe comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .\ncomparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/01\t12/31/02\t12/31/03\t12/31/04\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\nunited parcel service inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 117.19\t$ 140.49\t$ 163.54\t$ 146.35\t$ 148.92\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 77.90\t$ 100.24\t$ 111.15\t$ 116.61\t$ 135.02\ndow jones transportation average\t$ 100.00\t$ 88.52\t$ 116.70\t$ 149.06\t$ 166.42\t$ 182.76\n\nPost-table text:\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .\nthese plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "148.92", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "135.02", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.139"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_124.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders remains available for future issuance?\n\nPre-table text:\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .\nequity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights\tnumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\nequity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .\nof these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .\nin addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .\n( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .\nitem 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "448859", "4087587", ")", "divide(", "4087587", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.90105"}
{"example_id": "VRTX/2003/page_71.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the total common stock plans are related to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan?\n\nPre-table text:\nrights each holder of a share of outstanding common stock also holds one share purchase right ( a \"right\" ) for each share of common stock .\neach right entitles the holder to purchase from the company one half of one-hundredth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value ( the \"junior preferred shares\" ) , of the company at a price of $ 135 per one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share ( the \"purchase price\" ) .\nthe rights are not exercisable until the earlier of acquisition by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock ( an \"acquiring person\" ) or the announcement of an intention to make or commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer , the consummation of which would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock .\nin the event that any person or group becomes an acquiring person , each holder of a right other than the acquiring person will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the purchase price and , in the event that the company is acquired in a business combination transaction or 50% ( 50 % ) or more of its assets are sold , each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of the transaction will have a market value of two times the purchase price .\nunder certain specified circumstances , the board of directors of the company may cause the rights ( other than rights owned by such person or group ) to be exchanged , in whole or in part , for common stock or junior preferred shares , at an exchange rate of one share of common stock per right or one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share per right .\nat any time prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may redeem the rights in whole at a price of $ 0.01 per right .\ncommon stock reserved for future issuance at december 31 , 2003 , the company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance under all equity compensation plans as follows ( shares in thousands ) : p .\nsignificant revenue arrangements the company has formed strategic collaborations with major pharmaceutical companies in the areas of drug discovery , development , and commercialization .\nresearch and development agreements provide the company with financial support and other valuable resources for research programs and development of clinical drug candidates , product development and marketing and sales of products .\ncollaborative research and development agreements in the company's collaborative research , development and commercialization programs the company seeks to discover , develop and commercialize major pharmaceutical products in conjunction with and supported by the company's collaborators .\ncollaborative research and development arrangements provide research funding over an initial contract period with renewal and termination options that vary by agreement .\nthe agreements also include milestone payments based on the achievement or the occurrence of a designated event .\nthe agreements may also contain development reimbursement provisions , royalty rights or profit sharing rights and manufacturing options .\nthe terms of each agreement vary .\nthe company has entered into significant research and development collaborations with large pharmaceutical companies .\np .\nsignificant revenue arrangements novartis in may 2000 , the company and novartis pharma ag ( \"novartis\" ) entered into an agreement to collaborate on the discovery , development and commercialization of small molecule drugs directed at targets in the kinase protein family .\nunder the agreement , novartis agreed to pay the company an up-front payment of $ 15000000 made upon signing of the agreement , up to $ 200000000 in product research funding over six .\n\nTable:\ncommon stock under stock and option plans\t21829\ncommon stock under the vertex purchase plan\t249\ncommon stock under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan\t125\ntotal\t22203\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "125", "22203", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.00563"}
{"example_id": "GS/2016/page_77.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total net revenue investing & lending segment is due to equity securities in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 7.83 billion for 2015 , 16% ( 16 % ) higher than 2014 .\nexcluding a gain of $ 121 million ( $ 30 million and $ 91 million included in equities client execution and securities services , respectively ) in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , net revenues in equities were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , primarily due to significantly higher net revenues in equities client execution across the major regions , reflecting significantly higher results in both derivatives and cash products , and higher net revenues in securities services , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances and improved securities lending spreads .\ncommissions and fees were essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .\nwe elect the fair value option for certain unsecured borrowings .\nthe fair value net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our credit spreads on these borrowings was $ 255 million ( $ 214 million and $ 41 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2015 , compared with a net gain of $ 144 million ( $ 108 million and $ 36 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2014 .\noperating expenses were $ 13.94 billion for 2015 , 28% ( 28 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher net provisions for mortgage-related litigation and regulatory matters , partially offset by decreased compensation and benefits expenses .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.21 billion in 2015 , 72% ( 72 % ) lower than 2014 .\ninvesting & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients .\nthese investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature .\nwe make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities .\nwe also make unsecured loans to individuals through our online platform .\nthe table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2016\tyear ended december 2015\tyear ended december 2014\nequity securities\t$ 2573\t$ 3781\t$ 4579\ndebt securities and loans\t1507\t1655\t2246\ntotal net revenues\t4080\t5436\t6825\noperating expenses\t2386\t2402\t2819\npre-tax earnings\t$ 1694\t$ 3034\t$ 4006\n\nPost-table text:\noperating environment .\nfollowing difficult market conditions and the impact of a challenging macroeconomic environment on corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions improved during the rest of the year as macroeconomic concerns moderated .\nglobal equity markets increased during 2016 , contributing to net gains from investments in public equities , and corporate performance rebounded from the difficult start to the year .\nif macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or company-specific events , or if global equity markets decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted .\nalthough net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of 2015 impacted results .\n2016 versus 2015 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to significantly lower net revenues from investments in equities , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were lower compared with 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges .\nlosses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 .\nthis decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities .\noperating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 .\n2015 versus 2014 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .\ngoldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 63 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3781", "5436", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.69555"}
{"example_id": "AES/2003/page_52.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the three months ended december 2003 what were the total sales proceeds for subsidiaries assets in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ntransaction and commercial issues in many of our businesses .\nthese skills are a valuable resource as we monitor regulatory and tariff schemes to determine our capital budgeting needs and integrate acquisitions .\nthe company expects to realize cost reduction and performance improvement benefits in both earnings and cash flows ; however , there can be no assurance that the reductions and improvements will continue and our inability to sustain the reductions and improvements may result in less than expected earnings and cash flows in 2004 and beyond .\nasset sales during 2003 , we continued the initiative to sell all or part of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries .\nthis initiative was designed to decrease the company 2019s dependence on access to capital markets and improve the strength of our balance sheet by reducing financial leverage and improving liquidity .\nthe following chart details the asset sales that were closed during 2003 .\nsales proceeds project name date completed ( in millions ) location .\n\nTable:\nproject name\tdate completed\tsales proceeds ( in millions )\tlocation\ncilcorp/medina valley\tjanuary 2003\t$ 495\tunited states\naes ecogen/aes mt . stuart\tjanuary 2003\t$ 59\taustralia\nmountainview\tmarch 2003\t$ 30\tunited states\nkelvin\tmarch 2003\t$ 29\tsouth africa\nsongas\tapril 2003\t$ 94\ttanzania\naes barry limited\tjuly 2003\ta340/$ 62\tunited kingdom\naes haripur private ltd/aes meghnaghat ltd\tdecember 2003\t$ 145\tbangladesh\naes mtkvari/aes khrami/aes telasi\taugust 2003\t$ 23\trepublic of georgia\nmedway power limited/aes medway operations limited\tnovember 2003\ta347/$ 78\tunited kingdom\naes oasis limited\tdecember 2003\t$ 150\tpakistan/oman\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company continues to evaluate its portfolio and business performance and may decide to dispose of additional businesses in the future .\nhowever given the improvements in our liquidity there will be a lower emphasis placed on asset sales in the future for purposes of improving liquidity and strengthening the balance sheet .\nfor any sales that happen in the future , there can be no guarantee that the proceeds from such sale transactions will cover the entire investment in the subsidiaries .\ndepending on which businesses are eventually sold , the entire or partial sale of any business may change the current financial characteristics of the company 2019s portfolio and results of operations .\nfurthermore future sales may impact the amount of recurring earnings and cash flows the company would expect to achieve .\nsubsidiary restructuring during 2003 , we completed and initiated restructuring transactions for several of our south american businesses .\nthe efforts are focused on improving the businesses long-term prospects for generating acceptable returns on invested capital or extending short-term debt maturities .\nbusinesses impacted include eletropaulo , tiete , uruguaiana and sul in brazil and gener in chile .\nbrazil eletropaulo .\naes has owned an interest in eletropaulo since april 1998 , when the company was privatized .\nin february 2002 aes acquired a controlling interest in the business and as a consequence started to consolidate it .\naes financed a significant portion of the acquisition of eletropaulo , including both common and preferred shares , through loans and deferred purchase price financing arrangements provided by the brazilian national development bank 2014 ( 2018 2018bndes 2019 2019 ) , and its wholly-owned subsidiary , bndes participac 0327o 0303es s.a .\n( 2018 2018bndespar 2019 2019 ) , to aes 2019s subsidiaries , aes elpa s.a .\n( 2018 2018aes elpa 2019 2019 ) and aes transgas empreendimentos , s.a .\n( 2018 2018aes transgas 2019 2019 ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "145", "23", ")", "add(", "#0", "78", ")", "add(", "#1", "150", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "396"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2012/page_70.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of net goodwill at december 31 2011 is comprised of\n\nPre-table text:\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) h .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets ( continued ) goodwill at december 31 , accumulated impairment losses goodwill at december 31 , 2010 additions ( a ) discontinued operations ( b ) pre-tax impairment charge other ( c ) goodwill at december 31 , cabinets and related products .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 587 $ ( 364 ) $ 223 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ ( 44 ) $ 2 $ 181 .\n\nTable:\n\tgross goodwill at december 31 2010\taccumulated impairment losses\tnet goodwill at december 31 2010\tadditions ( a )\tdiscontinued operations ( b )\tpre-tax impairment charge\tother ( c )\tnet goodwill at december 31 2011\ncabinets and related products\t$ 587\t$ -364 ( 364 )\t$ 223\t$ 2014\t$ 2014\t$ -44 ( 44 )\t$ 2\t$ 181\nplumbing products\t536\t-340 ( 340 )\t196\t9\t2014\t2014\t-4 ( 4 )\t201\ninstallation and other services\t1819\t-762 ( 762 )\t1057\t2014\t-13 ( 13 )\t2014\t2014\t1044\ndecorative architectural products\t294\t2014\t294\t2014\t2014\t-75 ( 75 )\t2014\t219\nother specialty products\t980\t-367 ( 367 )\t613\t2014\t2014\t-367 ( 367 )\t2014\t246\ntotal\t$ 4216\t$ -1833 ( 1833 )\t$ 2383\t$ 9\t$ -13 ( 13 )\t$ -486 ( 486 )\t$ -2 ( 2 )\t$ 1891\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) additions include acquisitions .\n( b ) during 2011 , the company reclassified the goodwill related to the business units held for sale .\nsubsequent to the reclassification , the company recognized a charge for those business units expected to be divested at a loss ; the charge included a write-down of goodwill of $ 13 million .\n( c ) other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation and purchase price adjustments related to prior-year acquisitions .\nin the fourth quarters of 2012 and 2011 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets .\nthe impairment test in 2012 indicated there was no impairment of goodwill for any of the company 2019s reporting units .\nthe impairment test in 2011 indicated that goodwill recorded for certain of the company 2019s reporting units was impaired .\nthe company recognized the non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges , in continuing operations , for goodwill of $ 486 million ( $ 330 million , after tax ) for 2011 .\nin 2011 , the pre-tax impairment charge in the cabinets and related products segment relates to the european ready-to- assemble cabinet manufacturer and reflects the declining demand for certain products , as well as decreased operating margins .\nthe pre-tax impairment charge in the decorative architectural products segment relates to the builders 2019 hardware business and reflects increasing competitive conditions for that business .\nthe pre-tax impairment charge in the other specialty products segment relates to the north american window and door business and reflects the continuing weak level of new home construction activity in the western u.s. , the reduced levels of repair and remodel activity and the expectation that recovery in these segments will be modestly slower than anticipated .\nthe company then assessed the long-lived assets associated with these business units and determined no impairment was necessary at december 31 , 2011 .\nother indefinite-lived intangible assets were $ 132 million and $ 174 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and principally included registered trademarks .\nin 2012 and 2011 , the impairment test indicated that the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the other specialty products segment and the registered trademark for a north american business unit in the plumbing products segment ( 2011 only ) were impaired due to changes in the long-term outlook for the business units .\nthe company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite- lived intangible assets of $ 42 million ( $ 27 million , after tax ) and $ 8 million ( $ 5 million , after tax ) in 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nin 2010 , the company recognized non-cash , pre-tax impairment charges for other indefinite-lived intangible assets of $ 10 million ( $ 6 million after tax ) related to the installation and other services segment ( $ 9 million pre-tax ) and the plumbing products segment ( $ 1 million pre-tax ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "181", "1891", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09572"}
{"example_id": "AON/2011/page_134.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2011 what was the percent of risk solutions revenues to the total revenues of aons\n\nPre-table text:\naon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .\nthe maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .\naon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .\nsome of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .\nduring 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .\naon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .\n17 .\nrelated party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .\nthese transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .\nduring 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .\n18 .\nsegment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .\nunallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .\nreportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .\nthe codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .\nthe company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .\nrisk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .\nhr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .\naon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2011\t2010\t2009\nrisk solutions\t$ 6817\t$ 6423\t$ 6305\nhr solutions\t4501\t2111\t1267\nintersegment elimination\t-31 ( 31 )\t-22 ( 22 )\t-26 ( 26 )\ntotal operating segments\t11287\t8512\t7546\nunallocated\t2014\t2014\t49\ntotal revenue\t$ 11287\t$ 8512\t$ 7595\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6817", "11287", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.60397"}
{"example_id": "HII/2014/page_69.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the anticipated amount of revenues from the of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 in billions\n\nPre-table text:\nuss abraham lincoln rcoh , the construction preparation contract for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and the inactivation contract for cvn-65 uss enterprise , partially offset by lower volumes on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the construction and engineering contracts for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford .\nhigher revenues in fleet support services were primarily the result of volumes associated with repair work on ssn-765 uss montpelier .\nincreased submarines revenues were related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , primarily driven by higher volumes on block iii boats and the advance procurement contract on block iv boats , partially offset by lower volumes on block ii boats following the delivery of ssn-783 uss minnesota .\nsegment operating income 2014 - newport news operating income in 2014 was $ 415 million , compared to income of $ 402 million in 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the volume changes discussed above and higher risk retirement on the construction contract for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford , offset by lower risk retirement on the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh .\n2013 - newport news operating income in 2013 was $ 402 million , compared to income of $ 372 million in 2012 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , driven by risk retirement , performance improvement and the favorable resolution of outstanding contract changes , as well as risk retirement on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the absence in 2013 of the workers' compensation expense adjustment recorded in 2012 , partially offset by the favorable resolution in 2012 of outstanding contract changes on the cvn-65 uss enterprise edsra .\nrevenues at our other segment for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , were $ 137 million , primarily due to the acquisition of upi on may 30 , 2014 .\nother operating loss for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was $ 59 million , primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 47 million described above .\nbacklog total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 21 billion .\ntotal backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) .\nbacklog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity orders .\nfor contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer .\nthe following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\tdecember 31 2014 total backlog\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\ttotal backlog\ningalls\t$ 5609\t$ 1889\t$ 7498\t$ 6335\t$ 2570\t$ 8905\nnewport news\t6158\t7709\t13867\t5495\t3638\t9133\nother\t65\t2014\t65\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal backlog\t$ 11832\t$ 9598\t$ 21430\t$ 11830\t$ 6208\t$ 18038\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 .\nu.s .\ngovernment orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .\nawards 2014 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 10.1 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2014 included contracts for block iv of the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , continued construction preparation for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and construction of nsc-7 kimball .\n2013 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was approximately $ 9.4 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2013 included contracts for the construction of five ddg-51 arleigh burke-class this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "21", "28%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5.88"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2009/page_56.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the decline in net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders from 2007 to 2008\n\nPre-table text:\n54| | duke realty corporation annual report 2009 net income ( loss ) per common share basic net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders , less dividends on share-based awards expected to vest , by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period .\ndiluted net income ( loss ) per common share is computed by dividing the sum of basic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders and the noncontrolling interest in earnings allocable to units not owned by us ( to the extent the units are dilutive ) , by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and , to the extent they are dilutive , limited partnership units outstanding , as well as any potential dilutive securities for the period .\nduring the first quarter of 2009 , we adopted a new accounting standard ( fasb asc 260-10 ) on participating securities , which we have applied retrospectively to prior period calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share .\npursuant to this new standard , certain of our share-based awards are considered participating securities because they earn dividend equivalents that are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest .\nthe following table reconciles the components of basic and diluted net income ( loss ) per common share ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2008\t2007\nnet income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders\t$ -333601 ( 333601 )\t$ 50408\t$ 211942\nless : dividends on share-based awards expected to vest\t-1759 ( 1759 )\t-1631 ( 1631 )\t-1149 ( 1149 )\nbasic net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders\t-335360 ( 335360 )\t48777\t210793\nnoncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders ( 1 )\t-\t2640\t13998\ndiluted net income ( loss ) attributable to common shareholders\t$ -335360 ( 335360 )\t$ 51417\t$ 224791\nweighted average number of common shares outstanding\t201206\t146915\t139255\nweighted average partnership units outstanding\t-\t7619\t9204\nother potential dilutive shares ( 2 )\t-\t19\t791\nweighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities\t201206\t154553\t149250\n\nPost-table text:\nweighted average number of common shares and potential diluted securities 201206 154553 149250 ( 1 ) the partnership units are anti-dilutive for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , as a result of the net loss for that period .\ntherefore , 6687 units ( in thousands ) are excluded from the weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive securities for the year ended december 31 , 2009 and $ 11099 noncontrolling interest in earnings of common unitholders ( in thousands ) is excluded from diluted net loss attributable to common shareholders for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .\n( 2 ) excludes ( in thousands of shares ) 7872 ; 8219 and 1144 of anti-dilutive shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively related to stock-based compensation plans .\nalso excludes ( in thousands of shares ) the exchangeable notes that have 8089 ; 11771 and 11751 of anti-dilutive shares for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nfederal income taxes we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ( 201creit 201d ) under the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended .\nto qualify as a reit , we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements , including a requirement to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our adjusted taxable income to our stockholders .\nmanagement intends to continue to adhere to these requirements and to maintain our reit status .\nas a reit , we are entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the dividends we pay to shareholders .\naccordingly , we generally will not be subject to federal income taxes as long as we distribute an amount equal to or in excess of our taxable income currently to shareholders .\nwe are also generally subject to federal income taxes on any taxable income that is not currently distributed to our shareholders .\nif we fail to qualify as a reit in any taxable year , we will be subject to federal income taxes and may not be able to qualify as a reit for four subsequent taxable years .\nreit qualification reduces , but does not eliminate , the amount of state and local taxes we pay .\nin addition , our financial statements include the operations of taxable corporate subsidiaries that are not entitled to a dividends paid deduction and are subject to corporate federal , state and local income taxes .\nas a reit , we may also be subject to certain federal excise taxes if we engage in certain types of transactions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "50408", "211942", ")", "divide(", "#0", "211942", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.76216"}
{"example_id": "RCL/2014/page_17.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2010 what was the percentage of the global cruise guests from the european cruise\n\nPre-table text:\n16 royal caribbean cruises ltd .\nthe following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american and european cruise guests over the past five years : weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) royal caribbean cruises ltd .\ntotal berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tweighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )\troyal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths\tglobalcruiseguests ( 1 )\tnorth americancruiseguests ( 2 )\teuropeancruiseguests ( 3 )\n2010\t391000\t92300\t18800000\t10781000\t5540000\n2011\t412000\t92650\t20227000\t11625000\t5894000\n2012\t425000\t98650\t20898000\t11640000\t6139000\n2013\t432000\t98750\t21300000\t11816000\t6399000\n2014\t448000\t105750\t22006063\t12260238\t6535365\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combi- nation of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider , cruise industry news and clia .\nin addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .\n( 2 ) source : clia based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights ( see number 1 above ) .\nincludes the united states of america and canada .\n( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , ( see number 2 above ) .\nnorth america the majority of cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 55.7% ( 55.7 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .\nthe compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 3.3% ( 3.3 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .\neurope cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .\nthe compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .\nasia/pacific in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe .\nbased on industry data , cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .\nthe compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .\ncompetition we compete with a number of cruise lines .\nour princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line holdings ltd. , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .\ncruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time .\ndemand for such activi- ties is influenced by political and general economic conditions .\ncompanies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending .\noperating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : 2022 protect the health , safety and security of our guests and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , 2022 strengthen and support our human capital in order to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , 2022 further strengthen our consumer engagement in order to enhance our revenues , 2022 increase the awareness and market penetration of our brands globally , 2022 focus on cost efficiency , manage our operating expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , 2022 strategically invest in our fleet through the upgrade and maintenance of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while pru- dently expanding our fleet with new state-of-the- art cruise ships , 2022 capitalize on the portability and flexibility of our ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , 2022 further enhance our technological capabilities to service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and part i .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5540000", "18800000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.29468"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2015/page_118.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were total operating expenses in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines group inc .\ninformation generated by market transactions involving comparable assets , as well as pricing guides and other sources .\nthe current market for the aircraft , the maintenance condition of the aircraft and the expected proceeds from the sale of the assets , among other factors , were considered .\nthe market approach was utilized to value certain intangible assets such as airport take off and landing slots when sufficient market information was available .\nthe income approach was primarily used to value intangible assets , including customer relationships , marketing agreements , certain international route authorities , and the us airways tradename .\nthe income approach indicates value for a subject asset based on the present value of cash flows projected to be generated by the asset .\nprojected cash flows are discounted at a required market rate of return that reflects the relative risk of achieving the cash flows and the time value of money .\nthe cost approach , which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility , was used , as appropriate , for certain assets for which the market and income approaches could not be applied due to the nature of the asset .\nthe cost to replace a given asset reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost for the asset , less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation .\nthe fair value of us airways 2019 dividend miles loyalty program liability was determined based on the weighted average equivalent ticket value of outstanding miles which were expected to be redeemed for future travel at december 9 , 2013 .\nthe weighted average equivalent ticket value contemplates differing classes of service , domestic and international itineraries and the carrier providing the award travel .\npro-forma impact of the merger the company 2019s unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the merger as if it had been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .\nthe pro-forma results include the depreciation and amortization associated with the acquired tangible and intangible assets , lease and debt fair value adjustments , the elimination of any deferred gains or losses , adjustments relating to reflecting the fair value of the loyalty program liability and the impact of income changes on profit sharing expense , among others .\nin addition , the pro-forma results below reflect the impact of higher wage rates related to memorandums of understanding with us airways 2019 pilots that became effective upon closing of the merger , as well as the elimination of the company 2019s reorganization items , net and merger transition costs .\nhowever , the pro-forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the merger .\naccordingly , the unaudited pro-forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of january 1 , 2012 .\ndecember 31 , ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2013 ( in millions )\nrevenue\t$ 40678\nnet income\t2526\n\nPost-table text:\n5 .\nbasis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies ( a ) basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements for the full years of 2015 and 2014 and the period from december 9 , 2013 to december 31 , 2013 include the accounts of the company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries .\nfor the periods prior to december 9 , 2013 , the consolidated financial statements do not include the accounts of us airways group .\nall significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated .\nthe preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states ( gaap ) requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities , revenues and expenses , and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements .\nactual results could differ from those estimates .\nthe most significant areas .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "40678", "2526", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "38152"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_56.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was average net sales for space systems in millions from 2013 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\n2014 compared to 2013 mst 2019s net sales decreased $ 305 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nnet sales decreased by approximately $ 305 million due to the wind-down or completion of certain c4isr programs ( primarily ptds ) ; about $ 85 million for undersea systems programs due to decreased volume and deliveries ; and about $ 55 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) .\nthe decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 80 million for integrated warfare systems and sensors programs due to increased volume ( primarily space fence ) ; and approximately $ 40 million for training and logistics solutions programs due to increased deliveries ( primarily close combat tactical trainer ) .\nmst 2019s operating profit decreased $ 129 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 120 million related to the settlements of contract cost matters on certain programs in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ( including a portion of the terminated presidential helicopter program ) ; approximately $ 55 million due to the reasons described above for lower c4isr program sales , as well as performance matters on an international program ; and approximately $ 45 million due to higher reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs .\nthe decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 45 million for performance matters and reserves recorded in 2013 that were not repeated in 2014 ; and about $ 60 million for various programs due to increased risk retirements ( including mh-60 and radar surveillance programs ) .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 85 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to the addition of sikorsky backlog , as well as higher orders on new program starts ( such as australian defence force pilot training system ) .\nbacklog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to higher orders on new program starts ( such as space fence ) .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s 2016 net sales to increase in the mid-double digit percentage range compared to 2015 net sales due to the inclusion of sikorsky programs for a full year , partially offset by a decline in volume due to the wind-down or completion of certain programs .\noperating profit is expected to be equivalent to 2015 on higher volume , and operating margin is expected to decline due to costs associated with the sikorsky acquisition , including the impact of purchase accounting adjustments , integration costs and inherited restructuring costs associated with actions committed to by sikorsky prior to acquisition .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems and space transportation systems .\nspace systems provides network-enabled situational awareness and integrates complex global systems to help our customers gather , analyze , and securely distribute critical intelligence data .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile ( fbm ) , orion , space based infrared system ( sbirs ) , aehf , gps-iii , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , and muos .\noperating profit for our space systems business segment includes our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s .\ngovernment .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nnet sales\t$ 9105\t$ 9202\t$ 9288\noperating profit\t1171\t1187\t1198\noperating margins\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\t12.9% ( 12.9 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t$ 17400\t$ 20300\t$ 21400\n\nPost-table text:\n2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "net sales", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9198.33333"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_127.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average total accumulated other comprehensive losses from 2013 to 2015 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 17 .\naccumulated other comprehensive losses : pmi's accumulated other comprehensive losses , net of taxes , consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( losses ) earnings ( in millions )\t( losses ) earnings 2015\t( losses ) earnings 2014\t2013\ncurrency translation adjustments\t$ -6129 ( 6129 )\t$ -3929 ( 3929 )\t$ -2207 ( 2207 )\npension and other benefits\t-3332 ( 3332 )\t-3020 ( 3020 )\t-2046 ( 2046 )\nderivatives accounted for as hedges\t59\t123\t63\ntotal accumulated other comprehensive losses\t$ -9402 ( 9402 )\t$ -6826 ( 6826 )\t$ -4190 ( 4190 )\n\nPost-table text:\nreclassifications from other comprehensive earnings the movements in accumulated other comprehensive losses and the related tax impact , for each of the components above , that are due to current period activity and reclassifications to the income statement are shown on the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 , and 2013 .\nthe movement in currency translation adjustments for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was also impacted by the purchase of the remaining shares of the mexican tobacco business .\nin addition , $ 1 million , $ 5 million and $ 12 million of net currency translation adjustment gains were transferred from other comprehensive earnings to marketing , administration and research costs in the consolidated statements of earnings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , upon liquidation of subsidiaries .\nfor additional information , see note 13 .\nbenefit plans and note 15 .\nfinancial instruments for disclosures related to pmi's pension and other benefits and derivative financial instruments .\nnote 18 .\ncolombian investment and cooperation agreement : on june 19 , 2009 , pmi announced that it had signed an agreement with the republic of colombia , together with the departments of colombia and the capital district of bogota , to promote investment and cooperation with respect to the colombian tobacco market and to fight counterfeit and contraband tobacco products .\nthe investment and cooperation agreement provides $ 200 million in funding to the colombian governments over a 20-year period to address issues of mutual interest , such as combating the illegal cigarette trade , including the threat of counterfeit tobacco products , and increasing the quality and quantity of locally grown tobacco .\nas a result of the investment and cooperation agreement , pmi recorded a pre-tax charge of $ 135 million in the operating results of the latin america & canada segment during the second quarter of 2009 .\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , pmi had $ 73 million and $ 71 million , respectively , of discounted liabilities associated with the colombian investment and cooperation agreement .\nthese discounted liabilities are primarily reflected in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and are expected to be paid through 2028 .\nnote 19 .\nrbh legal settlement : on july 31 , 2008 , rothmans inc .\n( \"rothmans\" ) announced the finalization of a cad 550 million settlement ( or approximately $ 540 million , based on the prevailing exchange rate at that time ) between itself and rothmans , benson & hedges inc .\n( \"rbh\" ) , on the one hand , and the government of canada and all 10 provinces , on the other hand .\nthe settlement resolved the royal canadian mounted police's investigation relating to products exported from canada by rbh during the 1989-1996 period .\nrothmans' sole holding was a 60% ( 60 % ) interest in rbh .\nthe remaining 40% ( 40 % ) interest in rbh was owned by pmi. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "total accumulated other comprehensive losses", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-6806"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2012/page_47.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average operating profit of the space results from 2010 to 2012\n\nPre-table text:\n2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .\nmst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .\nbacklog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .\noperating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .\noperating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .\ngovernment , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\nnet sales\t$ 8347\t$ 8161\t$ 8268\noperating profit\t1083\t1063\t1030\noperating margins\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t12.5% ( 12.5 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t18100\t16000\t17800\n\nPost-table text:\n2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .\npartially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1083", "1063", ")", "add(", "#0", "1030", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "526.5"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2005/page_83.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average effective tax rate for the three year period?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 6 2014income taxes ( continued ) a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2005\t2004\t2003\ncomputed expected tax\t$ 636\t$ 134\t$ 32\nstate taxes net of federal effect\t-19 ( 19 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-4 ( 4 )\nindefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries\t-98 ( 98 )\t-31 ( 31 )\t-13 ( 13 )\nnondeductible executive compensation\t11\t10\t5\nresearch and development credit net\t-26 ( 26 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-7 ( 7 )\nother items\t-24 ( 24 )\t4\t11\nprovision for income taxes\t$ 480\t$ 107\t$ 24\neffective tax rate\t26% ( 26 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\t26% ( 26 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2005 , the company reversed certain tax contingency reserves and recorded a corresponding benefit to income tax expense primarily as a result of a change in the estimated outcome of certain tax disputes .\nadditionally , during the fourth quarter of 2005 , the company recorded a benefit to tax expense to adjust its net deferred tax assets as a result of the company 2019s year-end review of its deferred tax accounts , the impact of which was not material to the current or prior periods 2019 results of operations .\nthe total benefit to income tax expense from the reversal of these tax contingency reserves and adjustments to net deferred tax assets was $ 67 million .\nthe company also recorded a $ 14 million credit to income tax expense resulting from a reduction of the valuation allowance .\nthe internal revenue service ( irs ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for all years prior to 2002 and proposed certain adjustments .\ncertain of these adjustments are being contested through the irs appeals office .\nsubstantially all irs audit issues for these years have been resolved .\nin addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities .\nmanagement believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations .\nhowever , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty .\nshould any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits be resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs .\nnote 7 2014shareholders 2019 equity preferred stock the company has 5 million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is outstanding .\nunder the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "effective tax rate", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.26667"}
{"example_id": "PM/2014/page_67.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the exchange rate per dollar used to convert the face value of the euro notes with the maturity date in march 2021?\n\nPre-table text:\nour debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .\n( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .\n( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( e ) u.s .\ndollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .\nguarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .\nthere is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .\nat december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value ( e )\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\neuro notes\t( a )\t20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 )\t1.875% ( 1.875 % )\tmarch 2014\tmarch 2021\neuro notes\t( a )\t20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 )\t2.875% ( 2.875 % )\tmarch 2014\tmarch 2026\neuro notes\t( b )\t20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 )\t2.875% ( 2.875 % )\tmay 2014\tmay 2029\nswiss franc notes\t( c )\tchf275 ( approximately $ 311 )\t0.750% ( 0.750 % )\tmay 2014\tdecember 2019\nswiss franc notes\t( b )\tchf250 ( approximately $ 283 )\t1.625% ( 1.625 % )\tmay 2014\tmay 2024\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 750\t3.250% ( 3.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2024\nu.s . dollar notes\t( d )\t$ 750\t4.250% ( 4.250 % )\tnovember 2014\tnovember 2044\n\nPost-table text:\nour debt issuances in 2014 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value ( e ) interest rate issuance maturity euro notes ( a ) 20ac750 ( approximately $ 1029 ) 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) march 2014 march 2021 euro notes ( a ) 20ac1000 ( approximately $ 1372 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) march 2014 march 2026 euro notes ( b ) 20ac500 ( approximately $ 697 ) 2.875% ( 2.875 % ) may 2014 may 2029 swiss franc notes ( c ) chf275 ( approximately $ 311 ) 0.750% ( 0.750 % ) may 2014 december 2019 swiss franc notes ( b ) chf250 ( approximately $ 283 ) 1.625% ( 1.625 % ) may 2014 may 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) november 2014 november 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 3.250% ( 3.250 % ) november 2014 november 2024 u.s .\ndollar notes ( d ) $ 750 4.250% ( 4.250 % ) november 2014 november 2044 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in march 2015 .\n( b ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( c ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in december 2014 .\n( d ) interest on these notes is payable semiannually in arrears beginning in may 2015 .\n( e ) u.s .\ndollar equivalents for foreign currency notes were calculated based on exchange rates on the date of issuance .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2013 and 2014 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below .\nguarantees 2013 at december 31 , 2014 , we were contingently liable for $ 1.0 billion of guarantees of our own performance , which were primarily related to excise taxes on the shipment of our products .\nthere is no liability in the consolidated financial statements associated with these guarantees .\nat december 31 , 2014 , our third-party guarantees were insignificant. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "750", "1029", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.72886"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2013/page_118.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat amount of long-term debt is due in the next 36 months for entergy corporation as of december 31 , 2013 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2014\t$ 385373\n2015\t$ 1110566\n2016\t$ 270852\n2017\t$ 766801\n2018\t$ 1324616\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nin july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "385373", "1110566", ")", "add(", "#0", "270852", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_1000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1766.791"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2007/page_128.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the estimated purchase price of r2 is paid in cash?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .\nthe intangible assets are expected to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives as the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are relatively consistent over the expected useful lives of the intangible assets .\nthe estimated $ 600 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects related to aeg 2019s organic photoconductor coating and selenium product lines .\nthe deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , land , building and related improvements as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nthe company had an existing relationship with aeg as a supplier of inventory items .\nthe supply agreement was entered into in prior years at arm 2019s length terms and conditions .\nno minimum purchase requirements existed and the pricing was consistent with other vendor agreements .\nacquisition of r2 technology , inc .\non july 13 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of r2 technology , inc .\n( r2 ) pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 24 , 2006 .\nthe results of operations for r2 have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .\nr2 , previously located in santa clara , california , develops and sells computer-aided detection technology and products ( cad ) , an innovative technology that assists radiologists in the early detection of breast cancer .\nthe aggregate purchase price for r2 of approximately $ 220600 consisted of approximately 4400 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 205500 , cash paid of $ 6900 , debt assumed of $ 5700 and approximately $ 2500 for acquisition related fees and expenses .\nthe company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .\n99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .\nthe components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of july 13 2006\t$ 1200\nin-process research and development\t10200\ndeveloped technology and know how\t39500\ncustomer relationship\t15700\ntrade name\t3300\norder backlog\t800\ndeferred income taxes\t4400\ngoodwill\t145500\nestimated purchase price\t$ 220600\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company finalized and completed a plan to restructure certain of r2 2019s historical activities .\nas of the acquisition date the company recorded a liability of approximately $ 798 in accordance with eitf issue no .\n95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees and loss related to the abandonment of certain lease space under this plan .\nall amounts under this plan have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 .\nthe company reduced goodwill related to the r2 acquisition in the amount of approximately $ 400 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .\nthe reduction was primarily related to a change in the preliminary valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year .\nthe final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6900", "220600", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03128"}
{"example_id": "GIS/2019/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total long-term obligations are incurred from long-term debt?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations , including payments due by period: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year 2020\tpayments due by fiscal year 2021 -22\tpayments due by fiscal year 2023 -24\tpayments due by fiscal year 2025 and thereafter\nlong-term debt ( a )\t$ 13093.0\t$ 1396.3\t$ 3338.4\t$ 2810.2\t$ 5548.1\naccrued interest\t92.6\t92.6\t-\t-\t-\noperating leases ( b )\t482.6\t120.0\t186.7\t112.9\t63.0\ncapital leases\t0.3\t0.2\t0.1\t-\t-\npurchase obligations ( c )\t2961.8\t2605.1\t321.9\t27.6\t7.2\ntotal contractual obligations\t16630.3\t4214.2\t3847.1\t2950.7\t5618.3\nother long-term obligations ( d )\t1302.4\t-\t-\t-\t-\ntotal long-term obligations\t$ 17932.7\t$ 4214.2\t$ 3847.1\t$ 2950.7\t$ 5618.3\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $ 0.3 million for capital leases or $ 72.0 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs , premiums and discounts , and fair value adjustments .\n( b ) operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases .\n( c ) the majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands .\nfor purposes of this table , arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms , including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased , a pricing structure , and approximate timing of the transaction .\nmost arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice ( usually 30 days ) .\nany amounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above .\n( d ) the fair value of our foreign exchange , equity , commodity , and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $ 17.3 million as of may 26 , 2019 , based on fair market values as of that date .\nfuture changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future .\nother long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits , including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans , and miscellaneous liabilities .\nwe expect to pay approximately $ 20 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and approximately $ 18 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2020 .\nwe are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2020 .\nas of may 26 , 2019 , our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $ 165.1 million .\nsignificant accounting estimates for a complete description of our significant accounting policies , please see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\nour significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations .\nthese estimates include our accounting for promotional expenditures , valuation of long-lived assets , intangible assets , redeemable interest , stock-based compensation , income taxes , and defined benefit pension , other postretirement benefit , and postemployment benefit plans .\nrevenue recognition our revenues are reported net of variable consideration and consideration payable to our customers , including trade promotion , consumer coupon redemption and other costs , including estimated allowances for returns , unsalable product , and prompt pay discounts .\ntrade promotions are recorded using significant judgment of estimated participation and performance levels for offered programs at the time of sale .\ndifferences between estimated expenses and actual costs are recognized as a change in management estimate in a subsequent period .\nour accrued trade liabilities were $ 484 million as of may 26 , 2019 , and $ 500 million as of may 27 , 2018 .\nbecause these amounts are significant , if our estimates are inaccurate we would have to make adjustments in subsequent periods that could have a significant effect on our results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "13093.0", "17932.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.73012"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2009/page_85.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the mathematical range for the postretirement benefit plans?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) cash flows for 2010 , we expect to contribute $ 25.2 and $ 9.2 to our foreign pension plans and domestic pension plans , respectively .\na significant portion of our contributions to the foreign pension plans relate to the u.k .\npension plan .\nadditionally , we are in the process of modifying the schedule of employer contributions for the u.k .\npension plan and we expect to finalize this during 2010 .\nas a result , we expect our contributions to our foreign pension plans to increase from current levels in 2010 and subsequent years .\nduring 2009 , we contributed $ 31.9 to our foreign pension plans and contributions to the domestic pension plan were negligible .\nthe following estimated future benefit payments , which reflect future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid in the years indicated below .\ndomestic pension plans foreign pension plans postretirement benefit plans .\n\nTable:\nyears\tdomestic pension plans\tforeign pension plans\tpostretirement benefit plans\n2010\t$ 17.2\t$ 23.5\t$ 5.8\n2011\t11.1\t24.7\t5.7\n2012\t10.8\t26.4\t5.7\n2013\t10.5\t28.2\t5.6\n2014\t10.5\t32.4\t5.5\n2015 2013 2019\t48.5\t175.3\t24.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe estimated future payments for our postretirement benefit plans are before any estimated federal subsidies expected to be received under the medicare prescription drug , improvement and modernization act of 2003 .\nfederal subsidies are estimated to range from $ 0.5 in 2010 to $ 0.6 in 2014 and are estimated to be $ 2.4 for the period 2015-2019 .\nsavings plans we sponsor defined contribution plans ( the 201csavings plans 201d ) that cover substantially all domestic employees .\nthe savings plans permit participants to make contributions on a pre-tax and/or after-tax basis and allows participants to choose among various investment alternatives .\nwe match a portion of participant contributions based upon their years of service .\namounts expensed for the savings plans for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 35.1 , $ 29.6 and $ 31.4 , respectively .\nexpense includes a discretionary company contribution of $ 3.8 , $ 4.0 and $ 4.9 offset by participant forfeitures of $ 2.7 , $ 7.8 , $ 6.0 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin addition , we maintain defined contribution plans in various foreign countries and contributed $ 25.0 , $ 28.7 and $ 26.7 to these plans in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\ndeferred compensation and benefit arrangements we have deferred compensation arrangements which ( i ) permit certain of our key officers and employees to defer a portion of their salary or incentive compensation , or ( ii ) require us to contribute an amount to the participant 2019s account .\nthe arrangements typically provide that the participant will receive the amounts deferred plus interest upon attaining certain conditions , such as completing a certain number of years of service or upon retirement or termination .\nas of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the deferred compensation liability balance was $ 100.3 and $ 107.6 , respectively .\namounts expensed for deferred compensation arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 11.6 , $ 5.7 and $ 11.9 , respectively .\nwe have deferred benefit arrangements with certain key officers and employees that provide participants with an annual payment , payable when the participant attains a certain age and after the participant 2019s employment has terminated .\nthe deferred benefit liability was $ 178.2 and $ 182.1 as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\namounts expensed for deferred benefit arrangements in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 were $ 12.0 , $ 14.9 and $ 15.5 , respectively .\nwe have purchased life insurance policies on participants 2019 lives to assist in the funding of the related deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .\nas of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , the cash surrender value of these policies was $ 119.4 and $ 100.2 , respectively .\nin addition to the life insurance policies , certain investments are held for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and deferred benefit liabilities .\nthese investments , along with the life insurance policies , are held in a separate revocable trust for the purpose of paying the deferred compensation and the deferred benefit .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "24.8", "5.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "19.3"}
{"example_id": "RE/2017/page_159.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in the balance of the prudential insurance company of america from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\n15 .\ncommitments and contingencies in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance agreements .\nin some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it .\nin other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights .\nthese disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation .\nin all such matters , the company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable .\nthe company considers the statuses of these proceedings when determining its reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses .\naside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements , the company is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration .\nthe company has entered into separate annuity agreements with the prudential insurance of america ( 201cthe prudential 201d ) and an additional unaffiliated life insurance company in which the company has either purchased annuity contracts or become the assignee of annuity proceeds that are meant to settle claim payment obligations in the future .\nin both instances , the company would become contingently liable if either the prudential or the unaffiliated life insurance company were unable to make payments related to the respective annuity contract .\nthe table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the company was contingently liable for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in thousands )\tat december 31 , 2017\tat december 31 , 2016\nthe prudential insurance company of america\t$ 144618\t$ 146507\nunaffiliated life insurance company\t34444\t33860\n\nPost-table text:\n16 .\nshare-based compensation plans the company has a 2010 stock incentive plan ( 201c2010 employee plan 201d ) , a 2009 non-employee director stock option and restricted stock plan ( 201c2009 director plan 201d ) and a 2003 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( 201c2003 director plan 201d ) .\nunder the 2010 employee plan , 4000000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as non- qualified share options , incentive share options , share appreciation rights , restricted share awards or performance share unit awards to officers and key employees of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 2553473 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2010 employee plan .\nthe 2010 employee plan replaced a 2002 employee plan , which replaced a 1995 employee plan ; therefore , no further awards will be granted under the 2002 employee plan or the 1995 employee plan .\nthrough december 31 , 2017 , only non-qualified share options , restricted share awards and performance share unit awards had been granted under the employee plans .\nunder the 2009 director plan , 37439 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or restricted share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 34957 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2009 director plan .\nthe 2009 director plan replaced a 1995 director plan , which expired .\nunder the 2003 director plan , 500000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 there were 346714 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2003 director plan. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "144618", "146507", ")", "divide(", "#0", "146507", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.01289"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2018/page_110.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2017 what was the ratio of the htm investment securities ( period-end ) compared to investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nTable:\nas of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2018\t2017\t2016\ninvestment securities gains/ ( losses )\t$ -395 ( 395 )\t$ -78 ( 78 )\t$ 132\navailable-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t203449\t219345\t226892\nheld-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t31747\t47927\t51358\ninvestment securities portfolio ( average )\t235197\t267272\t278250\nafs investment securities ( period-end )\t228681\t200247\t236670\nhtm investment securities ( period-end )\t31434\t47733\t50168\ninvestment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )\t260115\t247980\t286838\n\nPost-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "47733", "247980", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19249"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_139.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks between december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement .\noperating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\t2007\nminimum rental ( a )\t$ 238\t$ 245\t$ 209\ncontingent rental\t19\t22\t33\nnet rental expense\t$ 257\t$ 267\t$ 242\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases .\n26 .\ncommitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment .\ncertain of these matters are discussed below .\nthe ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements .\nhowever , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably .\nenvironmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment .\nthese laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites .\npenalties may be imposed for noncompliance .\nat december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million .\nit is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed .\nreceivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 .\nlegal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 .\npresently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination .\nlike the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings .\nthe other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) .\nplaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 .\nin the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe .\nwe are vigorously defending these cases .\nwe have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases .\nwe do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nwe voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 .\nwe are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases .\na qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government .\nthe case currently pending is u.s .\nex rel harrold e .\nwright v .\nagip petroleum co .\net al .\nit is primarily a gas valuation case .\nmarathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms .\nsuch settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nguarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies .\nunder the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements .\nin addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "59", "60", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_35.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the cost per car for the buyout of locomotives in 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .\n\nTable:\ncash flowsmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\t$ 6161\ncash used in investing activities\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\t-3633 ( 3633 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\t-2682 ( 2682 )\nnet change in cash and cashequivalents\t$ 154\t$ 369\t$ -154 ( 154 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .\nhigher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .\nin addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .\nlower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .\nlower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .\nincluded in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "75", "const_1000000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "165", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "454545.45455"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2017/page_142.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas part of the employee stock purchase plan what was the percent of the decline in issuance under this plan from 2016 to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) employee stock purchase plan republic employees are eligible to participate in an employee stock purchase plan .\nthe plan allows participants to purchase our common stock for 95% ( 95 % ) of its quoted market price on the last day of each calendar quarter .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , issuances under this plan totaled 113941 shares , 130085 shares and 141055 shares , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , shares reserved for issuance to employees under this plan totaled 0.4 million and republic held employee contributions of approximately $ 1.8 million for the purchase of common stock .\n12 .\nstock repurchases and dividends stock repurchases stock repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\t2016\nnumber of shares repurchased\t9.6\t8.4\namount paid\t$ 610.7\t$ 403.8\nweighted average cost per share\t$ 63.84\t$ 48.56\n\nPost-table text:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , there were 0.5 million repurchased shares pending settlement and $ 33.8 million was unpaid and included within other accrued liabilities .\nin october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 .\nbefore this , $ 98.4 million remained under a prior authorization .\nshare repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws .\nwhile the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors .\nthe share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.8 billion .\nin december 2015 , our board of directors changed the status of 71272964 treasury shares to authorized and unissued .\nin doing so , the number of our issued shares was reduced by the stated amount .\nour accounting policy is to deduct the par value from common stock and to reflect the excess of cost over par value as a deduction from additional paid-in capital .\nthe change in unissued shares resulted in a reduction of $ 2295.3 million in treasury stock , $ 0.6 million in common stock , and $ 2294.7 million in additional paid-in capital .\nthere was no effect on our total stockholders 2019 equity position as a result of the change .\ndividends in october 2017 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.345 per share .\ncash dividends declared were $ 446.3 million , $ 423.8 million and $ 404.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 114.4 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2018 .\n13 .\nearnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc .\nby the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "113941", "130085", ")", "divide(", "#0", "130085", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.1241"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_211.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthese items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nother items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .\nnone of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .\nsignificant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .\ncitigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .\nfair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .\nthe following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\t2008 trading assets\t2008 loans\t2008 trading assets\tloans\ncarrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet\t$ 16254\t$ 2315\t$ 26020\t$ 3038\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value\t$ 6501\t$ 3\t$ 899\t$ -5 ( 5 )\nbalance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due\t$ 77\t$ 1113\t$ 186\t$ 1292\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue\t$ 190\t$ -4 ( 4 )\t$ 68\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nin millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .\nchanges in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .\nthe changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .\ncertain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .\nthe company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .\nthe fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .\nas required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .\nthese investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\ncitigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .\nthe company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .\nsince the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .\nthus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .\nthese investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\ncertain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .\nthe company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .\nthese positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .\nfor those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nthe change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .\ncertain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "16254", "26020", ")", "divide(", "#0", "26020", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.37533"}
{"example_id": "AES/2002/page_46.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the third quarter of 2002?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .\nthe common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .\nprice range of common stock .\n\nTable:\n2002 first quarter\thigh $ 17.84\tlow $ 4.11\t2001 first quarter\thigh $ 60.15\tlow $ 41.30\nsecond quarter\t9.17\t3.55\tsecond quarter\t52.25\t39.95\nthird quarter\t4.61\t1.56\tthird quarter\t44.50\t12.00\nfourth quarter\t3.57\t0.95\tfourth quarter\t17.80\t11.60\n\nPost-table text:\nholders .\nas of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .\ndividends .\nunder the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .\nin addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .\nthe ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .\nsee the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "4.61", "1.56", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.05"}
{"example_id": "UPS/2006/page_32.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the s&p 500 index?\n\nPre-table text:\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .\nthe following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .\nthe comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .\ncomparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/01\t12/31/02\t12/31/03\t12/31/04\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\nunited parcel service inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 117.19\t$ 140.49\t$ 163.54\t$ 146.35\t$ 148.92\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 77.90\t$ 100.24\t$ 111.15\t$ 116.61\t$ 135.02\ndow jones transportation average\t$ 100.00\t$ 88.52\t$ 116.70\t$ 149.06\t$ 166.42\t$ 182.76\n\nPost-table text:\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .\nthese plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "148.92", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "135.02", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "13.9"}
{"example_id": "NWS/2016/page_61.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat on the net interest reduction of 13 million or 23% ( 23 % ) compared to 2015 what was the interest amount in 2016 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nincreased investment in programming to support subscriber growth , higher offer costs and continued investment in presto , partially offset by lower depreciation expense resulting from foxtel 2019s reassessment of the useful lives of cable and satellite installations .\nnet income decreased as a result of the lower operating income noted above , partially offset by lower income tax expense .\n( b ) other equity affiliates , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 includes losses primarily from the company 2019s interests in draftstars and elara technologies , which owns proptiger .\ninterest , net 2014interest , net for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 decreased $ 13 million , or 23% ( 23 % ) , as compared to fiscal 2015 , primarily due to the negative impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest expense associated with the rea facility .\n( see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements ) .\nother , net 2014 for the fiscal years ended june 30 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016\tfor the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2015\ngain on iproperty transaction ( a )\t$ 29\t$ 2014\nimpairment of marketable securities and cost method investments ( b )\t-21 ( 21 )\t-5 ( 5 )\ngain on sale of marketable securities ( c )\t2014\t29\ndividends received from cost method investments\t2014\t25\ngain on sale of cost method investments\t2014\t15\nother\t10\t11\ntotal other net\t$ 18\t$ 75\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) rea group recognized a gain of $ 29 million resulting from the revaluation of its previously held equity interest in iproperty during the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 .\n( see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements ) .\n( b ) the company recorded write-offs and impairments of certain investments in the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 and 2015 .\nthese write-offs and impairments were taken either as a result of the deteriorating financial position of the investee or due to an other-than-temporary impairment resulting from sustained losses and limited prospects for recovery .\n( see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements. ) ( c ) in august 2014 , rea group completed the sale of a minority interest held in marketable securities for total cash consideration of $ 104 million .\nas a result of the sale , rea group recognized a pre-tax gain of $ 29 million , which was reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in other , net in the statement of operations .\nincome tax benefit ( expense ) 2014the company 2019s income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2016 were $ 54 million and ( 30% ( 30 % ) ) , respectively , as compared to an income tax expense and effective tax rate of $ 185 million and 34% ( 34 % ) , respectively , for fiscal 2015 .\nfor the fiscal years ended june 30 , 2016 the company recorded a tax benefit of $ 54 million on pre-tax income of $ 181 million resulting in an effective tax rate that was lower than the u.s .\nstatutory tax .\nthe lower tax rate was primarily due to a tax benefit of approximately $ 106 million related to the release of previously established valuation allowances related to certain u.s .\nfederal net operating losses and state deferred tax assets .\nthis benefit was recognized in conjunction with management 2019s plan to dispose of the company 2019s digital education business in the first quarter of fiscal 2016 , as the company now expects to generate sufficient u.s .\ntaxable income to utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration .\nin addition , the effective tax rate was also impacted by the $ 29 million non-taxable gain resulting from the revaluation of rea group 2019s previously held equity interest in iproperty .\nfor the fiscal year ended june 30 , 2015 , the company 2019s effective tax rate was lower than the u.s .\nstatutory tax rate primarily due to the impact from foreign operations which are subject to lower tax rates , partially offset by the impact of nondeductible items and changes in our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions .\n( see note 18 to the consolidated financial statements ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "13", "23%", ")", "add(", "#0", "13", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "69.52174"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2014/page_65.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total return of the kbw bank index over the above refernced five year period?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .\n( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .\nthe s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .\nequity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .\nthe kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .\nand is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .\nthe s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .\nthe firm is a component of all three industry indices .\nthe following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .\nthe comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .\ndecember 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in dollars )\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njpmorgan chase\t$ 100.00\t$ 102.30\t$ 81.87\t$ 111.49\t$ 152.42\t$ 167.48\nkbw bank index\t100.00\t123.36\t94.75\t125.91\t173.45\t189.69\ns&p financial index\t100.00\t112.13\t93.00\t119.73\t162.34\t186.98\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.48\t136.27\t180.39\t205.07\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "189.69", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.8969"}
{"example_id": "APD/2016/page_39.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2014-2016 , what is the highest interest expense observed?\n\nPre-table text:\nother income ( expense ) , net items recorded to other income ( expense ) , net arise from transactions and events not directly related to our principal income earning activities .\nthe detail of other income ( expense ) , net is presented in note 24 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements .\n2016 vs .\n2015 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 58.1 increased $ 10.8 primarily due to lower foreign exchange losses , favorable contract settlements , and receipt of a government subsidy .\nthe prior year included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after-tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land .\nno other individual items were significant in comparison to the prior year .\n2015 vs .\n2014 other income ( expense ) , net of $ 47.3 decreased $ 5.5 and included a gain of $ 33.6 ( $ 28.3 after-tax , or $ .13 per share ) resulting from the sale of two parcels of land .\nthe gain was partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange impacts and lower gains on other sales of assets and emissions credits .\nno other individual items were significant in comparison to fiscal year 2014 .\ninterest expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\ninterest incurred\t$ 148.4\t$ 152.6\t$ 158.1\nless : capitalized interest\t32.9\t49.1\t33.0\ninterest expense\t$ 115.5\t$ 103.5\t$ 125.1\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 vs .\n2015 interest incurred decreased $ 4.2 .\nthe decrease primarily resulted from a stronger u.s .\ndollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 6 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 2 .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily as a result of our exit from the energy-from-waste business .\n2015 vs .\n2014 interest incurred decreased $ 5.5 .\nthe decrease was driven by the impact of a stronger u.s .\ndollar on the translation of foreign currency interest of $ 12 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance of $ 7 .\nthe change in capitalized interest was driven by a higher carrying value in construction in progress .\nloss on extinguishment of debt on 30 september 2016 , in anticipation of the versum spin-off , versum issued $ 425.0 of notes to air products , who then exchanged these notes with certain financial institutions for $ 418.3 of air products 2019 outstanding commercial paper .\nthe exchange resulted in a loss of $ 6.9 ( $ 4.3 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) .\nin september 2015 , we made a payment of $ 146.6 to redeem 3000000 unidades de fomento ( 201cuf 201d ) series e 6.30% ( 6.30 % ) bonds due 22 january 2030 that had a carrying value of $ 130.0 and resulted in a net loss of $ 16.6 ( $ 14.2 after-tax , or $ .07 per share ) .\neffective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes .\nrefer to note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate .\n2016 vs .\n2015 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) and 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) in 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nthe change included a 240 bp impact from tax costs associated with business separation , primarily resulting from a dividend declared in 2016 to repatriate cash from a foreign subsidiary , as discussed above in 201cbusiness separation costs . 201d the remaining 110 bp change was primarily due to the increase in mix of income in jurisdictions with a higher effective tax rate and the impact of business separation costs for which a tax benefit was not available .\non a non- gaap basis , the effective tax rate increased from 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in 2015 to 24.8% ( 24.8 % ) in 2016 , primarily due to the increase in and mix of income in jurisdictions with a higher effective tax rate. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "interest expense", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "125.1"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_93.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in the amount of guarantees from parent company from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases .\nthe amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nin the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees .\ncontingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity .\nin addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries .\nthe amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors .\nwe have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable .\nwhen the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity .\nhowever , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date .\nin such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date .\nif deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense .\ncompensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses .\nthis future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners .\nthe following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date .\nwe have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 .\nas such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire .\nall payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\tthereafter\ttotal\ndeferred acquisition payments\t$ 67.5\t$ 32.1\t$ 30.1\t$ 4.5\t$ 5.7\t$ 2014\t$ 139.9\nput and call options with affiliates1\t11.8\t34.3\t73.6\t70.8\t70.2\t2.2\t262.9\ntotal contingent acquisition payments\t79.3\t66.4\t103.7\t75.3\t75.9\t2.2\t402.8\nless cash compensation expense included above\t2.6\t1.3\t0.7\t0.7\t0.3\t2014\t5.6\ntotal\t$ 76.7\t$ 65.1\t$ 103.0\t$ 74.6\t$ 75.6\t$ 2.2\t$ 397.2\n\nPost-table text:\n1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions .\nin such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable .\nas a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no .\nd-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "255.7", "327.1", ")", "divide(", "#0", "327.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.21828"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2004/page_81.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in amortization expense from from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar .\nthe company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit .\nthe fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal .\nnetwork development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies .\nthe company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 .\nthe company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units .\nsuch charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded .\nas discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively .\nrental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired .\nthe company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2004\t2003\nacquired customer base and network location intangibles\t$ 1369607\t$ 1299521\ndeferred financing costs\t89736\t111484\nacquired licenses and other intangibles\t43404\t43125\ntotal\t1502747\t1454130\nless accumulated amortization\t-517444 ( 517444 )\t-434381 ( 434381 )\nother intangible assets net\t$ 985303\t$ 1019749\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years .\namortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .\nthe company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .\n5 .\nnotes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a .\nde c.v .\n( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million .\nthe loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) .\nthe loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "95.9", "92.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "92.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04239"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_185.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2015 , what was the maximum premium on the dp&l preferred stock?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\nipalco common stock\t$ 618\t$ 460\ncolon quotas ( 1 )\t100\t2014\nipl preferred stock\t60\t60\nother common stock\t4\t2014\ndpl preferred stock\t2014\t18\ntotal redeemable stock of subsidiaries\t$ 782\t$ 538\n\nPost-table text:\n_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .\ncolon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .\nipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .\nthe total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .\ncertain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .\nholders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .\ndpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .\nthe dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .\nin addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .\nin september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .\nas such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .\nin october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .\nupon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .\nipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .\nin april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .\nas a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nno gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .\nin march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nin june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "103", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2015/page_131.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the sum of the annual long-term debt maturities due in five years\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .\n( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 109 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 35 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2016\t$ 204079\n2017\t$ 766451\n2018\t$ 822690\n2019\t$ 768588\n2020\t$ 1631181\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nas part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .\nwith the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "204079", "766451", ")", "add(", "#0", "822690", ")", "add(", "#1", "768588", ")", "add(", "#2", "1631181", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4192989"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_21.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much more , in percent , was spent on october shares than november shares?\n\nPre-table text:\nrepurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share2\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs\noctober 1-31\t29704\t$ 5.99\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1-30\t4468\t$ 3.24\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1-31\t12850\t$ 3.98\t2014\t2014\ntotal1\t47022\t$ 5.18\t2014\t2014\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal1 .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .\n2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "29704", "5.99", ")", "multiply(", "4468", "3.24", ")", "divide(", "#0", "#1", ")", "multiply(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1229.08971"}
{"example_id": "GS/2017/page_106.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions , what was the change in the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected between december 2017 and december 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .\nother sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .\n10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .\nthe table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tas of december 2017\tas of december 2016\tas of december 2015\nequity\t$ 2096\t$ 2085\t$ 2157\ndebt\t1606\t1702\t1479\ntotal\t$ 3702\t$ 3787\t$ 3636\n\nPost-table text:\nin the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .\n2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .\n2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .\n2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .\n2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .\ncredit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .\nvar excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .\nthe estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nin addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nhowever , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .\ninterest rate sensitivity .\nloans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .\nas of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .\nother market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .\nsee note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .\nin addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .\nwe also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .\ndirect investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nsee note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .\ngoldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "35", "25", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "10"}
{"example_id": "STT/2011/page_83.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in fair value between 2010 and 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nimpairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2011\t2010\nfair value\t$ 99832\t$ 81881\namortized cost\t100013\t82329\nnet unrealized loss pre-tax\t$ -181 ( 181 )\t$ -448 ( 448 )\nnet unrealized loss after-tax\t$ -113 ( 113 )\t$ -270 ( 270 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .\nthese unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci .\nrefer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 .\nthe decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization .\nwe conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .\nto the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .\nthe credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security .\nour assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors .\nsuch factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .\nto the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .\ngiven the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s .\nhousing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance .\nas such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices .\ngenerally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears .\nas of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current .\noverall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough .\nthe performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate .\nin addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above .\nthe combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations .\nour investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses .\nultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security .\nin addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s .\nresidential mortgage-backed portfolio .\nwe estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above .\nthis sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults .\nto the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated .\nexcluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "99832", "81881", ")", "divide(", "#0", "81881", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21923"}
{"example_id": "APD/2019/page_31.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the increase observed in the first quarter dividend percentage concerning the total value , during 2018 and 2019?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol \"apd.\" as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock .\ncash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly .\nit is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels .\nthe board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant .\ndividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n\t2019\t2018\nfirst quarter\t$ 1.10\t$ .95\nsecond quarter\t1.16\t1.10\nthird quarter\t1.16\t1.10\nfourth quarter\t1.16\t1.10\ntotal\t$ 4.58\t$ 4.25\n\nPost-table text:\npurchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock .\nthis program does not have a stated expiration date .\nwe repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers .\nthere were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 .\nat 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained .\nadditional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.10", "4.58", ")", "divide(", ".95", "4.25", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01665"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_54.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were average net sales for mfc from 2013 to 2015 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .\nbacklog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .\ntrends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .\noperating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .\naccordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .\nmissiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .\nmfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .\nmfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nnet sales\t$ 6770\t$ 7092\t$ 6795\noperating profit\t1282\t1344\t1379\noperating margins\t18.9% ( 18.9 % )\t19.0% ( 19.0 % )\t20.3% ( 20.3 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t$ 15500\t$ 13300\t$ 14300\n\nPost-table text:\n2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .\nmfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .\n2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .\nmfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .\nthe decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "net sales", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6885.66667"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2008/page_69.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) between july 3 and december 19 , 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\ncrude oil , and political unrest in the middle east and elsewhere .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices dropped more rapidly than they had climbed as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and other countries entered recessions which decreased demand .\nduring 2008 , the average spot price per barrel for wti was $ 99.75 , up from an average of $ 72.41 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 44.60 .\nthe average spot price per barrel for brent was $ 97.26 in 2008 , up from an average of $ 72.39 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 36.55 .\nthe differential between wti and brent average prices widened to $ 2.49 in 2008 from $ 0.02 in 2007 .\nour domestic crude oil production is on average heavier and higher in sulfur content than light sweet wti .\nheavier and higher sulfur crude oil ( commonly referred to as heavy sour crude oil ) sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude oil benchmark .\nnatural gas prices on average were higher in 2008 than in 2007 .\na significant portion of our u.s .\nlower 48 states natural gas production is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas .\nthe average henry hub first-of-month price index was $ 2.18 per thousand cubic feet ( 201cmcf 201d ) higher in 2008 than the 2007 average .\nnatural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts .\nour other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile .\nas we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease .\ne&p segment income during 2008 was up 57 percent from 2007 , with revenue increases tied to these increases in average commodity prices accounting for almost half of the income improvement .\nliquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales volumes were also higher in 2008 than 2007 .\noil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce .\nroughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select .\noutput mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader .\nduring 2008 , our average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil was $ 91.90 per barrel , up from 2007 , but ended the year at $ 24.97 per barrel impacted by a heavier yield in december and a seasonal decrease in the value of our heavy output .\nthe operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed , and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime .\nper unit costs are sensitive to production rates .\nkey variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively .\nthe table below shows benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs , listing high and low spot prices during the year. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\thigh $ 145.29\tdate july 3\tlow $ 33.87\tdate december 19\nwestern canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a )\t$ 114.95\tjuly\t$ 23.18\tdecember\naeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b )\t$ 11.34\tjuly 1\t$ 5.42\tseptember 19\n\nPost-table text:\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) $ 145.29 july 3 $ 33.87 december 19 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 114.95 july $ 23.18 december aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b ) $ 11.34 july 1 $ 5.42 september 19 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada .\n( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index .\nour osm segment reported income of $ 258 million for 2008 , reflecting synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil sales averaging 32 mboepd .\nderivative instruments intended to hedge price risk on future sales have impacted revenues in the periods presented , with net gains of $ 48 million in 2008 and net losses of $ 53 million in 2007 .\nin the first quarter of 2009 , we entered into derivative instruments which effectively offset certain of our open derivative positions .\nrefining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs , retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise , and the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "145.29", "33.87", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "111.42"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2013/page_209.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions for 2013 , what were net trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 215 the firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer lending-related commitments .\nin many cases , the firm can reduce or cancel these commitments by providing the borrower notice or , in some cases , without notice as permitted by law .\nfor a further discussion of the valuation of lending-related commitments , see page 198 of this note .\ntrading assets and liabilities trading assets include debt and equity instruments owned by jpmorgan chase ( 201clong 201d positions ) that are held for client market-making and client-driven activities , as well as for certain risk management activities , certain loans managed on a fair value basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or market ( market approximates fair value ) .\ntrading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) .\nthe firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions .\nincluded in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unrealized losses ) related to derivatives .\ntrading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets .\nbalances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased ( short positions ) .\ntrading assets and liabilities 2013 average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\ntrading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments\t$ 340449\t$ 349337\t$ 393890\ntrading assets 2013 derivative receivables\t72629\t85744\t90003\ntrading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a )\t77706\t69001\t81916\ntrading liabilities 2013 derivative payables\t64553\t76162\t71539\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased .\nnote 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value .\nelections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , certain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrangements are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid instruments ) ; and/or 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis .\nelections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis .\n2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year .\n2022 owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument .\n2022 certain investments that receive tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction .\n2022 structured notes issued as part of cib 2019s client-driven activities .\n( structured notes are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests issued by cib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "340449", "77706", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "262743"}
{"example_id": "AON/2010/page_115.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the expenses related to he issuing of stock option in 2009\n\nPre-table text:\nmaterial impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .\nfor most of the participants in the u.s .\nplan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .\nbecause of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .\nduring 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .\nplan over the next three years .\nthe impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .\n14 .\nstock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2010\t2009\t2008\nrsus\t$ 138\t$ 124\t$ 132\nperformance plans\t62\t60\t67\nstock options\t17\t21\t24\nemployee stock purchase plans\t4\t4\t3\ntotal stock-based compensation expense\t221\t209\t226\ntax benefit\t75\t68\t82\nstock-based compensation expense net of tax\t$ 146\t$ 141\t$ 144\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .\nin connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .\nstock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .\nservice-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .\nthe fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\nwith certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .\ncompensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .\ndividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .\nperformance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .\nvesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .\nthe performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .\nthe fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\ncompensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .\ncompensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .\nthe actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .\ndividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .\nduring 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .\nduring 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "12", "209", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05742"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_105.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total value of net operating loss carryforwards is related to state?\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively .\nif not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\tfederal\tstate\n2006 to 2010\t$ 5248\t$ 469747\n2011 to 2015\t10012\t272662\n2016 to 2020\t397691\t777707\n2021 to 2025\t1744552\t897896\ntotal\t$ 2157503\t$ 2418012\n\nPost-table text:\nsfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards .\napproximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date .\nthe balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets .\nthe company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .\nthe company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses .\nin june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million .\nbased on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 .\nthere can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund .\nthe recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations .\nthe projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense .\naccordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .\nbased on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .\nthe realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .\nif the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity .\nfrom time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations .\nthe company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations .\nduring the year ended .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "2157503", "2418012", ")", "divide(", "2418012", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.52847"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2015/page_37.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in cash in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .\n\nTable:\ncash flow data\tyears ended december 31 , 2015\tyears ended december 31 , 2014\tyears ended december 31 , 2013\nnet income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1\t$ 848.2\t$ 831.2\t$ 598.4\nnet cash used in working capital2\t-117.5 ( 117.5 )\t-131.1 ( 131.1 )\t-9.6 ( 9.6 )\nchanges in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash\t-56.7 ( 56.7 )\t-30.6 ( 30.6 )\t4.1\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 674.0\t$ 669.5\t$ 592.9\nnet cash used in investing activities\t-202.8 ( 202.8 )\t-200.8 ( 200.8 )\t-224.5 ( 224.5 )\nnet cash used in financing activities\t-472.8 ( 472.8 )\t-343.9 ( 343.9 )\t-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )\n\nPost-table text:\n1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes .\n2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2015 was $ 674.0 , which was an improvement of $ 4.5 as compared to 2014 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 13.6 .\ndue to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters .\nour net working capital usage in 2015 was primarily attributable to our media businesses .\nnet cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 .\nour net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses .\nthe timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow .\nin most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients .\nto the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients .\nthe amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities .\nour assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers .\nour accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments .\nfor example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year .\ninvesting activities net cash used in investing activities during 2015 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures of $ 161.1 , largely attributable to purchases of leasehold improvements and computer hardware .\nnet cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions .\ncapital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements .\nwe made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "674.0", "-202.8", ")", "add(", "#0", "-472.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1.6"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2013/page_74.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2011 to 2012 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .\nthe november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .\ngovernment spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .\nupon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .\nduring 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .\nin addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .\nthe accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .\nwe expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .\ngovernment and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .\n2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .\nduring 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .\nthe workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .\nduring 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .\nnote 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t320.9\t323.7\t335.9\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t5.6\t4.7\t4.0\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t326.5\t328.4\t339.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "328.4", "339.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-11.5"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_38.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in operating income from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nnet revenues include $ 3.8 billion in 2017 and $ 739 million in 2016 related to the sale of rrps , mainly driven by japan .\nthese net revenue amounts include excise taxes billed to customers .\nexcluding excise taxes , net revenues for rrps were $ 3.6 billion in 2017 and $ 733 million in 2016 .\nin some jurisdictions , including japan , we are not responsible for collecting excise taxes .\nin 2017 , approximately $ 0.9 billion of our $ 3.6 billion in rrp net revenues , excluding excise taxes , were from iqos devices and accessories .\nexcise taxes on products increased by $ 1.1 billion , due to : 2022 higher excise taxes resulting from changes in retail prices and tax rates ( $ 4.6 billion ) , partially offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 1.9 billion ) and 2022 lower excise taxes resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.6 billion ) .\nour cost of sales ; marketing , administration and research costs ; and operating income were as follows : for the years ended december 31 , variance .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , $\t% (  % )\ncost of sales\t$ 10432\t$ 9391\t$ 1041\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nmarketing administration and research costs\t6725\t6405\t320\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\noperating income\t11503\t10815\t688\t6.4% ( 6.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ncost of sales increased by $ 1.0 billion , due to : 2022 higher cost of sales resulting from volume/mix ( $ 1.1 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 lower manufacturing costs ( $ 36 million ) and 2022 favorable currency ( $ 30 million ) .\nmarketing , administration and research costs increased by $ 320 million , due to : 2022 higher expenses ( $ 570 million , largely reflecting increased investment behind reduced-risk products , predominately in the european union and asia ) , partly offset by 2022 favorable currency ( $ 250 million ) .\noperating income increased by $ 688 million , due primarily to : 2022 price increases ( $ 1.4 billion ) , partly offset by 2022 higher marketing , administration and research costs ( $ 570 million ) and 2022 unfavorable currency ( $ 157 million ) .\ninterest expense , net , of $ 914 million increased by $ 23 million , due primarily to unfavorably currency and higher average debt levels , partly offset by higher interest income .\nour effective tax rate increased by 12.8 percentage points to 40.7% ( 40.7 % ) .\nthe 2017 effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by $ 1.6 billion due to the tax cuts and jobs act .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 11 .\nincome taxes to our consolidated financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the impact that the tax cuts and jobs act will have on our tax liability .\nbased upon our current interpretation of the tax cuts and jobs act , we estimate that our 2018 effective tax rate will be approximately 28% ( 28 % ) , subject to future regulatory developments and earnings mix by taxing jurisdiction .\nwe are regularly examined by tax authorities around the world , and we are currently under examination in a number of jurisdictions .\nit is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months certain tax examinations will close , which could result in a change in unrecognized tax benefits along with related interest and penalties .\nan estimate of any possible change cannot be made at this time .\nnet earnings attributable to pmi of $ 6.0 billion decreased by $ 932 million ( 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) ) .\nthis decrease was due primarily to a higher effective tax rate as discussed above , partly offset by higher operating income .\ndiluted and basic eps of $ 3.88 decreased by 13.4% ( 13.4 % ) .\nexcluding .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "11503", "10815", ")", "divide(", "#0", "10815", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06362"}
{"example_id": "RCL/2014/page_17.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the mathematical range for european cruise guests from 2010-2014?\n\nPre-table text:\n16 royal caribbean cruises ltd .\nthe following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american and european cruise guests over the past five years : weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) royal caribbean cruises ltd .\ntotal berths global cruise guests ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tweighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )\troyal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths\tglobalcruiseguests ( 1 )\tnorth americancruiseguests ( 2 )\teuropeancruiseguests ( 3 )\n2010\t391000\t92300\t18800000\t10781000\t5540000\n2011\t412000\t92650\t20227000\t11625000\t5894000\n2012\t425000\t98650\t20898000\t11640000\t6139000\n2013\t432000\t98750\t21300000\t11816000\t6399000\n2014\t448000\t105750\t22006063\t12260238\t6535365\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combi- nation of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider , cruise industry news and clia .\nin addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base .\n( 2 ) source : clia based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights ( see number 1 above ) .\nincludes the united states of america and canada .\n( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , ( see number 2 above ) .\nnorth america the majority of cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 55.7% ( 55.7 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .\nthe compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 3.3% ( 3.3 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .\neurope cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .\nthe compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 4.2% ( 4.2 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .\nasia/pacific in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe .\nbased on industry data , cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) of global cruise guests in 2014 .\nthe compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) from 2010 to 2014 .\ncompetition we compete with a number of cruise lines .\nour princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line holdings ltd. , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises .\ncruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time .\ndemand for such activi- ties is influenced by political and general economic conditions .\ncompanies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending .\noperating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : 2022 protect the health , safety and security of our guests and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , 2022 strengthen and support our human capital in order to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , 2022 further strengthen our consumer engagement in order to enhance our revenues , 2022 increase the awareness and market penetration of our brands globally , 2022 focus on cost efficiency , manage our operating expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , 2022 strategically invest in our fleet through the upgrade and maintenance of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while pru- dently expanding our fleet with new state-of-the- art cruise ships , 2022 capitalize on the portability and flexibility of our ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , 2022 further enhance our technological capabilities to service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and part i .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6535365", "5540000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "995365"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_76.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nassuming 2010 accrued casualty costs were completely repaired in the following year , ,what would the repairs and maintenance expense increase to for 2011 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nare allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n12 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2011\tdec . 31 2010\naccounts payable\t$ 819\t$ 677\nincome and other taxes\t482\t337\naccrued wages and vacation\t363\t357\ndividends payable\t284\t183\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t325\ninterest payable\t197\t200\nequipment rents payable\t90\t86\nother\t624\t548\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3108\t$ 2713\n\nPost-table text:\n13 .\nfinancial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices .\nwe are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .\nderivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period .\nwe formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness .\nchanges in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings .\nwe may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements .\nmarket and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item .\nwe manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements .\nat december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities .\ndetermination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows .\ninterest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period .\nwe generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings .\nwe employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix .\nin addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities .\nswaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates .\nwe account for swaps as fair value .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "2.2", "const_1000", ")", "add(", "325", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2525"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2006/page_90.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year are due in 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .\nin 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .\nthe following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpensionbenefits\totherbenefits\n2007\t$ 1440\t$ 260\n2008\t1490\t260\n2009\t1540\t270\n2010\t1600\t270\n2011\t1660\t270\nyears 2012 2013 2016\t9530\t1260\n\nPost-table text:\nas noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .\nthe aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .\nthe expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .\nwe also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .\nthe liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nnote 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .\ncertain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .\ngovernment under short-term or cancelable arrangements .\nnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .\nwe believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .\nwe cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .\nthese matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .\nthe subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .\nwe are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .\non february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .\nwe submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .\nthe contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .\nair force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .\non august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .\nour appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .\non august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .\nnatural resources defense council , et al v .\nlockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .\njohn d .\ntillson v .\nlockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .\nthe doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1.1", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "254", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.23091"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_185.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of ipalco common stock from 2015 to 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\nipalco common stock\t$ 618\t$ 460\ncolon quotas ( 1 )\t100\t2014\nipl preferred stock\t60\t60\nother common stock\t4\t2014\ndpl preferred stock\t2014\t18\ntotal redeemable stock of subsidiaries\t$ 782\t$ 538\n\nPost-table text:\n_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .\ncolon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .\nipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .\nthe total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .\ncertain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .\nholders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .\ndpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .\nthe dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .\nin addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .\nin september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .\nas such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .\nin october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .\nupon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .\nipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .\nin april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .\nas a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nno gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .\nin march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nin june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "618", "460", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "158"}
{"example_id": "TSCO/2018/page_34.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth of the stock price performance from 2013 to 2014 for the tractor supply company\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .\nthe following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .\nthe comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .\nthe historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/28/2013\t12/27/2014\t12/26/2015\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\t12/29/2018\ntractor supply company\t$ 100.00\t$ 104.11\t$ 115.45\t$ 103.33\t$ 103.67\t$ 117.18\ns&p 500\t$ 100.00\t$ 115.76\t$ 116.64\t$ 129.55\t$ 157.84\t$ 149.63\ns&p retail index\t$ 100.00\t$ 111.18\t$ 140.22\t$ 148.53\t$ 193.68\t$ 217.01\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "104.11", "100.00", ")", "divide(", "#0", "100.00", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0411"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2004/page_26.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the facility leases that have remaining terms through fiscal 2010 , assuming the annual rent is approximately that of 2003 , what is the remaining total obligation?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits .\nof the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions .\nthe tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized .\n6 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively .\nduring the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture .\nthese leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased .\nrental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively .\nduring fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 .\nthis lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2005\t$ 781\n2006\t776\n2007\t769\n2008\t772\n2009\t772\nthereafter\t708\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4578\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2010", "2004", ")", "multiply(", "821000", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4926000"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_175.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor 2017 , what was net interest expense with related parties , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .\naes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .\ntherefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .\nstarting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .\nas a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .\nin november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .\nthis agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .\nthe company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .\nafter the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .\nconsidering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .\nforeign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .\nfluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .\ndollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .\nconcentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .\nseveral of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .\nhowever , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .\nthe cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .\nif a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .\n26 .\nrelated party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .\nin the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .\nat two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .\nthese offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .\nin chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .\nadditionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .\nthe company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2017\t2016\t2015\nrevenue 2014non-regulated\t$ 1297\t$ 1100\t$ 1099\ncost of sales 2014non-regulated\t220\t210\t330\ninterest income\t8\t4\t25\ninterest expense\t36\t39\t33\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "8", "36", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-28"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2016/page_48.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were average operating profit for aeronautics in millions between 2014 and 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 70 million .\nsince that time , we have continued to experience issues related to customer requirements and the implementation of this contract and have periodically accrued additional reserves .\nconsequently , we are continuing to monitor the scope , estimated costs , and viability of the program and the possibility of additional customer funding .\nit is possible that we may have to record additional loss reserves in future periods , which could be material to our operating results .\nhowever , we cannot make an estimate of the total expected costs at this time due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process .\nour consolidated net adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , net of state income taxes , increased segment operating profit by approximately $ 1.5 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.6 billion for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 .\nthe decrease in our consolidated net adjustments in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our mfc and space systems business segments , partially offset by an increase at our rms business segment .\nthe increase in our consolidated net adjustments in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our space systems and aeronautics business segments , offset by a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our rms and mfc business segments .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2016 are inclusive of approximately $ 530 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2015 are inclusive of approximately $ 550 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms and on commercial satellite programs at space systems .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 535 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at rms and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below .\naeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies .\naeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor .\naeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\nnet sales\t$ 17769\t$ 15570\t$ 14920\noperating profit\t1887\t1681\t1649\noperating margin\t10.6% ( 10.6 % )\t10.8% ( 10.8 % )\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nbacklog atyear-end\t$ 34200\t$ 31800\t$ 27600\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 compared to 2015 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 2.2 billion , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2015 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.7 billion for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities , partially offset by lower volume on development activities ; and approximately $ 290 million for the c-130 program due to increased deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2016 compared to 21 in 2015 ) and increased sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 250 million for the f-16 program primarily due to higher volume on aircraft modernization programs .\nthe increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the c-5 program due to decreased sustainment activities .\naeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 206 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , compared to 2015 .\noperating profit increased approximately $ 195 million for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities and higher risk retirements ; and by approximately $ 60 million for aircraft support and maintenance programs due to higher risk retirements and increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for the c-130 program due to contract mix and lower risk retirements .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 20 million higher in 2016 compared to 2015 .\n2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "operating profit", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1739"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2007/page_128.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the fair value of hologic common stock used for acquiring r2?\n\nPre-table text:\nhologic , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) ( in thousands , except per share data ) purchased products that the company continues to sell as well as utilize to enhance and incorporate into the company 2019s existing products .\nthe intangible assets are expected to be amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives as the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are relatively consistent over the expected useful lives of the intangible assets .\nthe estimated $ 600 of purchase price allocated to in-process research and development projects related to aeg 2019s organic photoconductor coating and selenium product lines .\nthe deferred income tax liability relates to the tax effect of acquired identifiable intangible assets , and fair value adjustments to acquired inventory , land , building and related improvements as such amounts are not deductible for tax purposes .\nthe company had an existing relationship with aeg as a supplier of inventory items .\nthe supply agreement was entered into in prior years at arm 2019s length terms and conditions .\nno minimum purchase requirements existed and the pricing was consistent with other vendor agreements .\nacquisition of r2 technology , inc .\non july 13 , 2006 , the company completed the acquisition of r2 technology , inc .\n( r2 ) pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger dated april 24 , 2006 .\nthe results of operations for r2 have been included in the company 2019s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition as part of its mammography/breast care business segment .\nr2 , previously located in santa clara , california , develops and sells computer-aided detection technology and products ( cad ) , an innovative technology that assists radiologists in the early detection of breast cancer .\nthe aggregate purchase price for r2 of approximately $ 220600 consisted of approximately 4400 shares of hologic common stock valued at $ 205500 , cash paid of $ 6900 , debt assumed of $ 5700 and approximately $ 2500 for acquisition related fees and expenses .\nthe company determined the fair value of the shares issued in connection with the acquisition in accordance with eitf issue no .\n99-12 , determination of the measurement date for the market price of acquirer securities issued in a purchase business combination .\nthe components and allocation of the purchase price , consists of the following approximate amounts: .\n\nTable:\nnet tangible assets acquired as of july 13 2006\t$ 1200\nin-process research and development\t10200\ndeveloped technology and know how\t39500\ncustomer relationship\t15700\ntrade name\t3300\norder backlog\t800\ndeferred income taxes\t4400\ngoodwill\t145500\nestimated purchase price\t$ 220600\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company finalized and completed a plan to restructure certain of r2 2019s historical activities .\nas of the acquisition date the company recorded a liability of approximately $ 798 in accordance with eitf issue no .\n95-3 , recognition of liabilities in connection with a purchase business combination , related to the termination of certain employees and loss related to the abandonment of certain lease space under this plan .\nall amounts under this plan have been paid as of september 29 , 2007 .\nthe company reduced goodwill related to the r2 acquisition in the amount of approximately $ 400 during the year ended september 29 , 2007 .\nthe reduction was primarily related to a change in the preliminary valuation of certain assets and liabilities acquired based on information received during the year .\nthe final purchase price allocations were completed within one year of the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "205500", "4400", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "46.70455"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_78.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , what was the average unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs , in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .\nchange in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nchange in assumption ( a )\testimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate\t$ 23\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets\t$ 18\n.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate\t$ 2\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .\nour pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .\ninvestment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .\nalso , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .\nwe do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .\nwe maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .\none form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .\ncommercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .\nwe participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .\nunder these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .\nat december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .\nthe potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .\nwe maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .\nthe reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nif payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .\nour exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .\nresidential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .\nthese loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .\nresidential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .\nas discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .\nour historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .\nrepurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .\npnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .\npnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .\nrepurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .\nloan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 69 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "13.0", "13.2", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "13.1"}
{"example_id": "GS/2014/page_136.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions in 2014 2013 and 2012 , what were the lowest amount of interest rate hedges?\\\\n\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements hedge accounting the firm applies hedge accounting for ( i ) certain interest rate swaps used to manage the interest rate exposure of certain fixed-rate unsecured long-term and short-term borrowings and certain fixed-rate certificates of deposit , ( ii ) certain foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt used to manage foreign currency exposures on the firm 2019s net investment in certain non-u.s .\noperations and ( iii ) certain commodities-related swap and forward contracts used to manage the exposure to the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sales of certain energy commodities by one of the firm 2019s consolidated investments .\nto qualify for hedge accounting , the derivative hedge must be highly effective at reducing the risk from the exposure being hedged .\nadditionally , the firm must formally document the hedging relationship at inception and test the hedging relationship at least on a quarterly basis to ensure the derivative hedge continues to be highly effective over the life of the hedging relationship .\nfair value hedges the firm designates certain interest rate swaps as fair value hedges .\nthese interest rate swaps hedge changes in fair value attributable to the designated benchmark interest rate ( e.g. , london interbank offered rate ( libor ) or ois ) , effectively converting a substantial portion of fixed-rate obligations into floating-rate obligations .\nthe firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing the effectiveness of its fair value hedging relationships in achieving offsetting changes in the fair values of the hedging instrument and the risk being hedged ( i.e. , interest rate risk ) .\nan interest rate swap is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in fair value attributable to changes in the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% ( 80 % ) or greater and a slope between 80% ( 80 % ) and 125% ( 125 % ) .\nfor qualifying fair value hedges , gains or losses on derivatives are included in 201cinterest expense . 201d the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is reported as an adjustment to its carrying value and is subsequently amortized into interest expense over its remaining life .\ngains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness are included in 201cinterest expense . 201d when a derivative is no longer designated as a hedge , any remaining difference between the carrying value and par value of the hedged item is amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the hedged item using the effective interest method .\nsee note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense .\nthe table below presents the gains/ ( losses ) from interest rate derivatives accounted for as hedges , the related hedged borrowings and bank deposits , and the hedge ineffectiveness on these derivatives , which primarily consists of amortization of prepaid credit spreads resulting from the passage of time. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2014\tyear ended december 2013\tyear ended december 2012\ninterest rate hedges\t$ 1936\t$ -8683 ( 8683 )\t$ -2383 ( 2383 )\nhedged borrowings and bank deposits\t-2451 ( 2451 )\t6999\t665\nhedge ineffectiveness\t$ -515 ( 515 )\t$ -1684 ( 1684 )\t$ -1718 ( 1718 )\n\nPost-table text:\n134 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_min(", "interest rate hedges", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-8683"}
{"example_id": "DISCA/2012/page_39.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the implied total value of the european sports satellite and cable network as of the transaction date?\n\nPre-table text:\ninternational networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\nour international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks .\nthis segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami .\ndiscovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks .\ninternational networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world .\nat december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities .\ninternational networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion .\nour international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .\n\nTable:\nglobal networks discovery channel\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246\tregional networks dmax\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90\nanimal planet\t183\tdiscovery kids\t61\ntlc real time and travel & living\t174\tquest\t26\ndiscovery science\t75\tdiscovery history\t13\ninvestigation discovery\t63\tshed\t12\ndiscovery home & health\t57\tdiscovery en espanol ( u.s. )\t5\nturbo\t42\tdiscovery familia ( u.s )\t4\ndiscovery world\t27\t\t\n\nPost-table text:\non december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs .\nwe have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter .\nif we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter .\nthe arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france .\non december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming .\n( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\neducation is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings .\nthis segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content .\nour education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations .\ncontent development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers .\nour content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers .\nour production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed .\nsubstantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs .\ncoproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties .\nlicensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "20", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "264", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1320"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_54.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2015 what was the ratio of the net sales to the backlog\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to sales being recognized on several multi-year programs ( such as hmsc , nisc iii , ciog and nsf asc ) related to prior year awards and a limited number of large new business awards .\nbacklog decreased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to lower customer funding levels and declining activities on direct warfighter support programs impacted by defense budget reductions .\ntrends we expect is&gs 2019 2016 net sales to decline in the high-single digit percentage range as compared to 2015 , primarily driven by key loss contracts in an increasingly competitive environment , along with volume contraction on the segment 2019s major contracts .\noperating profit is expected to decline at a higher percentage range in 2016 , as compared to net sales percentage declines , driven by higher margin program losses and re-compete programs awarded at lower margins .\naccordingly , 2016 margins are expected to be lower than 2015 results .\nmissiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; manned and unmanned ground vehicles ; and energy management solutions .\nmfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss .\nmfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\t2013\nnet sales\t$ 6770\t$ 7092\t$ 6795\noperating profit\t1282\t1344\t1379\noperating margins\t18.9% ( 18.9 % )\t19.0% ( 19.0 % )\t20.3% ( 20.3 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t$ 15500\t$ 13300\t$ 14300\n\nPost-table text:\n2015 compared to 2014 mfc 2019s net sales in 2015 decreased $ 322 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to the same period in 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 345 million for air and missile defense programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily pac-3 ) and lower volume ( primarily thaad ) ; and approximately $ 85 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily guided multiple launch rocket system ( gmlrs ) ) and joint air-to-surface standoff missile , partially offset by increased deliveries for hellfire .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 55 million for energy solutions programs due to increased volume .\nmfc 2019s operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 62 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 100 million for fire control programs due primarily to lower risk retirements ( primarily lantirn and sniper ) ; and approximately $ 65 million for tactical missile programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily hellfire and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries .\nthese decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 75 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased risk retirements ( primarily thaad ) .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 60 million lower in 2015 compared to 2014 .\n2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales increased $ 297 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 180 million for air and missile defense programs primarily due to increased volume for thaad ; about $ 115 million for fire control programs due to increased deliveries ( including apache ) ; and about $ 125 million for various other programs due to increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery rocket system and army tactical missile system ) .\nmfc 2019s operating profit decreased $ 35 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2014 as compared to 2013 .\nthe decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 20 million for tactical missile programs due to net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) and fewer deliveries ; and approximately $ 45 million for various other programs due to lower risk retirements .\nthe decreases were offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 20 million for air and missile defense programs due to increased volume ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6770", "15500", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.43677"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_99.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in total long-term debt net from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\nnotes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045\t$ 8150\t$ 1400\nnotes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046\t6089\t3589\nnotes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036\t1941\t1941\nother debt\t116\t111\ntotal long-term debt\t16296\t7041\nless : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs\t-1035 ( 1035 )\t-899 ( 899 )\ntotal long-term debt net\t$ 15261\t$ 6142\n\nPost-table text:\nrevolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 .\nthe 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes .\nthe undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million .\nthere were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky .\nconcurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility .\non november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility .\nborrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements .\neach bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements .\nlong-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt .\nthe november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) .\nwe may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption .\ninterest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 .\nthe november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness .\nthe proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15261", "6142", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6142", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.4847"}
{"example_id": "C/2008/page_211.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthe amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 .\nthese items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nother items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses .\nnone of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment .\nsignificant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party .\ncitigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications .\nfair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met .\nthe following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .\n\nTable:\nin millions of dollars\t2008 trading assets\t2008 loans\t2008 trading assets\tloans\ncarrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet\t$ 16254\t$ 2315\t$ 26020\t$ 3038\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value\t$ 6501\t$ 3\t$ 899\t$ -5 ( 5 )\nbalance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due\t$ 77\t$ 1113\t$ 186\t$ 1292\naggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue\t$ 190\t$ -4 ( 4 )\t$ 68\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nin millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively .\nchanges in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications .\nthe changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively .\ncertain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation .\nthe company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value .\nthe fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments .\nas required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value .\nthese investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\ncitigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method .\nthe company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity .\nsince the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting .\nthus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings .\nthese investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet .\nchanges in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\ncertain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) .\nthe company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis .\nthese positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form .\nfor those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nthe change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income .\nrelated interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement .\ncertain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "16254", "26020", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-9766"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2010/page_42.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in capital expenditures for property , plant and equipment from 2008 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\n( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2010\t2009\t2008\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 3547\t$ 3173\t$ 4421\nnet cash used for investing activities\t-319 ( 319 )\t-1518 ( 1518 )\t-907 ( 907 )\nnet cash used for financing activities\t-3363 ( 3363 )\t-1476 ( 1476 )\t-3938 ( 3938 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .\nthe increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .\npartially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .\nthis reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .\noperating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .\nthe improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .\nthese improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .\nthe decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .\nthe increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .\nthe decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .\nnet cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .\nthe decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .\npartially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .\nthe decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .\ninvesting activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .\nwe also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .\ncapital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .\nwe expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .\nacquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .\namounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .\nwe paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .\nin 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .\nthere were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .\nduring 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .\nfinancing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .\nof the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .\nin october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .\nunder the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .\nwe repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .\nin connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .\ncash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .\nthose activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "852", "926", ")", "divide(", "#0", "926", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.07991"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2011/page_82.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total goodwill is attributable to u.s . brokerage reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\njudgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .\ngoodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .\neach of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .\nthere is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .\nthe following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nreporting unit\tdecember 31 2011\nu.s . brokerage\t$ 1751.2\ncapital markets\t142.4\nretail bank\t40.6\ntotal goodwill\t$ 1934.2\n\nPost-table text:\nin connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthe fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .\nwe also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .\neffects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .\nestimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .\nif management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .\nintangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .\nif changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1751.2", "1934.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.90539"}
{"example_id": "AON/2010/page_115.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average total stock-based compensation expense from 2008 to 2010 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nmaterial impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .\nfor most of the participants in the u.s .\nplan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .\nbecause of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .\nduring 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .\nplan over the next three years .\nthe impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .\n14 .\nstock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2010\t2009\t2008\nrsus\t$ 138\t$ 124\t$ 132\nperformance plans\t62\t60\t67\nstock options\t17\t21\t24\nemployee stock purchase plans\t4\t4\t3\ntotal stock-based compensation expense\t221\t209\t226\ntax benefit\t75\t68\t82\nstock-based compensation expense net of tax\t$ 146\t$ 141\t$ 144\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .\nin connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .\nstock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .\nservice-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .\nthe fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\nwith certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .\ncompensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .\ndividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .\nperformance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .\nvesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .\nthe performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .\nthe fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\ncompensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .\ncompensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .\nthe actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .\ndividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .\nduring 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .\nduring 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "221", "209", ")", "add(", "#0", "226", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "329.5"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_41.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nrecognized net gains of $ 107 million in 2009 on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges\\\\nwere what percent of residential mortgages at fair value?\n\nPre-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2009 , $ 397 million of the credit losses related to securities rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $ 1.1 billion and the related securities had a fair value of $ 2.6 billion .\nthe fair value of sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti credit loss as of december 31 , 2009 totaled $ 2.6 billion , with unrealized net losses of $ 658 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\ncommercial mortgage-backed securities the fair value of the non-agency commercial mortgage- backed securities portfolio was $ 6.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized by non-residential properties , primarily retail properties , office buildings , and multi-family housing .\nthe agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $ 1.3 billion fair value at december 31 , 2009 consisting of multi-family housing .\nsubstantially all of the securities are the most senior tranches in the subordination structure .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 6 million on non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities during 2009 .\nthe remaining fair value of the securities for which otti was recorded approximates zero .\nall of the credit-impaired securities were rated below investment grade .\nasset-backed securities the fair value of the asset-backed securities portfolio was $ 4.8 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate and floating-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized primarily by various consumer credit products , including residential mortgage loans , credit cards , and automobile loans .\nsubstantially all of the securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and have credit protection in the form of credit enhancement , over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 111 million on asset- backed securities during 2009 .\nall of the securities were collateralized by first and second lien residential mortgage loans and were rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for asset- backed securities totaled $ 221 million and the related securities had a fair value of $ 562 million .\nfor the sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti loss through december 31 , 2009 , the remaining fair value was $ 381 million , with unrealized net losses of $ 110 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\nif the current housing and economic conditions were to continue for the foreseeable future or worsen , if market volatility and illiquidity were to continue or worsen , or if market interest rates were to increase appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could continue to be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .\nloans held for sale in millions dec .\n31 dec .\n31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdec.31 2009\tdec . 312008\ncommercial mortgages at fair value\t$ 1050\t$ 1401\ncommercial mortgages at lower of cost or market\t251\t747\ntotal commercial mortgages\t1301\t2148\nresidential mortgages at fair value\t1012\t1824\nresidential mortgages at lower of cost or market\t\t138\ntotal residential mortgages\t1012\t1962\nother\t226\t256\ntotal\t$ 2539\t$ 4366\n\nPost-table text:\nwe stopped originating commercial mortgage loans held for sale designated at fair value during the first quarter of 2008 and intend to continue pursuing opportunities to reduce these positions at appropriate prices .\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale carried at the lower of cost or market , strong origination volumes partially offset sales to government agencies of $ 5.4 billion during 2009 .\nwe recognized net gains of $ 107 million in 2009 on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , carried at fair value and lower of cost or market compared with losses of $ 197 million in 2008 .\nwe sold $ .3 billion and $ .6 billion , respectively , of commercial mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value in 2009 and 2008 .\nresidential mortgage loans held for sale decreased during 2009 despite strong refinancing volumes , especially in the first quarter .\nloan origination volume was $ 19.1 billion .\nsubstantially all such loans were originated to agency standards .\nwe sold $ 19.8 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 435 million during 2009 .\nnet interest income on residential mortgage loans held for sale was $ 332 million for 2009. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "107", "1012", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10573"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2011/page_73.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the sale of the 19 percent outside-operated interest in the corrib natural gas development offshore ireland , what is the total expected proceeds in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements company , l.l.c .\nand odyssey pipeline l.l.c. , as well as certain other oil pipeline interests , including the eugene island pipeline system .\nthe value of this transaction is approximately $ 205 million , net of debt assumed by the buyer .\nthe carrying value of these assets was $ 38 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthis transaction closed on january 3 , 2012 .\nburns point gas plant 2013 during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we sold our e&p segment 2019s 50 percent interest in the burns point gas plant , a cryogenic processing plant located in st .\nmary parish , louisiana , for total consideration of $ 36 million and a pretax gain of $ 34 million was booked .\nalaska lng facility 2013 during the third quarter of 2011 , we sold our integrated gas segment 2019s equity interest in a lng processing facility in alaska and a pretax gain on the transaction of $ 8 million was recorded .\ndj basin 2013 in april 2011 , we assigned a 30 percent undivided working interest in our e&p segment 2019s approximately 180000 acres in the niobrara shale play located within the dj basin of southeast wyoming and northern colorado for total consideration of $ 270 million , recording a pretax gain of $ 37 million .\nwe remain operator of this jointly owned leasehold .\nangola 2013 during 2010 , we closed the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated interest in our e&p segment 2019s production sharing contract and joint operating agreement in block 32 offshore angola .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 1.3 billion and recorded a pretax gain on the sale of $ 811 million .\nwe retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in block 32 .\ngudrun 2013 in march 2011 , we closed the sale of our outside-operated interests in the gudrun field development and the brynhild and eirin exploration areas offshore norway for net proceeds of $ 85 million , excluding working capital adjustments .\na $ 64 million pretax loss on this disposition was recorded in the fourth quarter 2010 .\ngabon 2013 in december 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated fields offshore gabon , receiving net proceeds of $ 269 million , after closing adjustments .\na $ 232 million pretax gain on this disposition was reported in discontinued operations for 2009 .\npermian basin 2013 in june 2009 , we closed the sale of our e&p segment 2019s operated and a portion of our outside- operated permian basin producing assets in new mexico and west texas for net proceeds after closing adjustments of $ 293 million .\na $ 196 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nireland 2013 in april 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated properties in ireland for net proceeds of $ 84 million , after adjusting for cash held by the sold subsidiary .\na $ 158 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nas a result of this sale , we terminated our pension plan in ireland , incurring a charge of $ 18 million .\nin june 2009 , we entered into an agreement to sell the subsidiary holding our 19 percent outside-operated interest in the corrib natural gas development offshore ireland .\nan initial $ 100 million payment was received at closing .\nadditional fixed proceeds of $ 135 million will be received at the earlier of first commercial gas or december 31 , 2012 .\na $ 154 million impairment was recognized in discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009 .\nour irish and our gabonese businesses , which had been reported in our e&p segment , have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nrevenues and pretax income related to these businesses are shown in the table below .\n( in millions ) 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\nrevenues applicable to discontinued operations\t$ 188\npretax income from discontinued operations\t$ 80\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "const_100", "135", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "235"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_54.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 312012 what was the percent of the total total freight revenues from agriculture\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .\n1 .\nnature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s .\nour network includes 31838 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .\ngateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .\nwe own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases .\nwe serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .\nexport and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .\nthe railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .\nalthough we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .\nthe following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2013\t2012\t2011\nagricultural\t$ 3276\t$ 3280\t$ 3324\nautomotive\t2077\t1807\t1510\nchemicals\t3501\t3238\t2815\ncoal\t3978\t3912\t4084\nindustrial products\t3822\t3494\t3166\nintermodal\t4030\t3955\t3609\ntotal freight revenues\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t$ 18508\nother revenues\t1279\t1240\t1049\ntotal operatingrevenues\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t$ 19557\n\nPost-table text:\nalthough our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s .\neach of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico .\nincluded in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.1 billion in 2013 , $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , and $ 1.8 billion in 2011 .\nbasis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .\n( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .\n2 .\nsignificant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .\ninvestments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nall intercompany transactions are eliminated .\nwe currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .\ncash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .\naccounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .\nthe allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .\nreceivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3280", "19686", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.16662"}
{"example_id": "JKHY/2014/page_30.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the annual performance of the jkhy stock from 2009 to 2010\n\nPre-table text:\n28 2014 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2014 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s & p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njkhy\t100.00\t116.85\t148.92\t173.67\t240.25\t307.57\nold peer group\t100.00\t112.45\t150.77\t176.12\t220.42\t275.73\nnew peer group\t100.00\t115.50\t159.31\t171.86\t198.72\t273.95\ns & p 500\t100.00\t114.43\t149.55\t157.70\t190.18\t236.98\n\nPost-table text:\nthis comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2009 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .\ntotal returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .\npeer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .\nin fiscal 2014 , we changed our peer group of companies used for this analysis to maintain alignment with peer companies selected by our compensation committee for use in determining compensation for executive management .\ncompanies in the new peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , micros systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. .\ncompanies in the old peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , cerner corp. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , sei investments company , telecommunications systems , inc. , and tyler technologies corp. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "116.85", "100.00", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1685"}
{"example_id": "L/2015/page_59.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\t2015\nloews common stock\t100.0\t97.37\t106.04\t126.23\t110.59\t101.72\ns&p 500 index\t100.0\t102.11\t118.45\t156.82\t178.29\t180.75\nloews peer group ( a )\t100.0\t101.59\t115.19\t145.12\t152.84\t144.70\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .\nberkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .\n( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .\nand the travelers companies , inc .\ndividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .\nregular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "106.04", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0604"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2007/page_52.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much of the total contractual commitments are current?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table ( in thousands ) summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2007 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods. .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year more than 5 years\noperating lease obligations\t$ 7669\t$ 1960\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\npurchase obligations\t6421\t6421\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 14090\t$ 8381\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or material commitments at march 31 , 2007 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding a contingent payment in the amount of $ 5.6 million made on january 30 , 2007 in the form of common stock , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella , and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nwe may make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 11.2 million .\nthese contingent payments may be made in a combination of cash or stock under circumstances described in the purchase agreement .\nif any contingent payments are made , they will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nwe apply the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to our agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which we are a guarantor .\nwe enter into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions .\nunder these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities .\nthese indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement .\nthe maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements .\nas a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal .\naccordingly , we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2007 .\nclinical study agreements 2013 in our clinical study agreements , we have agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to use of our devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and our instructions .\nthe indemnification provisions contained within our clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in our clinical study agreements .\nproduct warranties 2014we routinely accrue for estimated future warranty costs on our product sales at the time of shipment .\nall of our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers , our warranty obligations are affected by product failure rates .\nour operating results could be adversely affected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , we indemnify customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by our products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "8381", "14090", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.59482"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_99.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin november 2015 what was the percent of the discounts and debt issuance costs to the long-term debt november 2015 notes in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\nnotes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045\t$ 8150\t$ 1400\nnotes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046\t6089\t3589\nnotes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036\t1941\t1941\nother debt\t116\t111\ntotal long-term debt\t16296\t7041\nless : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs\t-1035 ( 1035 )\t-899 ( 899 )\ntotal long-term debt net\t$ 15261\t$ 6142\n\nPost-table text:\nrevolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 .\nthe 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes .\nthe undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million .\nthere were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky .\nconcurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility .\non november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility .\nborrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements .\neach bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements .\nlong-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt .\nthe november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) .\nwe may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption .\ninterest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 .\nthe november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness .\nthe proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "const_7", "6.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "7.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01429"}
{"example_id": "PKG/2009/page_65.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\npurchase commitments ( in thousands ) totaled what for 2010 and 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices .\ntotal purchase commitments are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\n2010\t$ 6951\n2011\t5942\n2012\t3659\n2013\t1486\n2014\t1486\nthereafter\t25048\ntotal\t$ 44572\n\nPost-table text:\nthese purchase agreements are not marked to market .\nthe company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .\nlitigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business .\nthese legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows .\nenvironmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies .\nfrom 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects .\nliabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions .\nbecause of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows .\nin connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill .\n13 .\nasset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs .\npca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills .\nin accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "6951", "5942", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "12893"}
{"example_id": "UPS/2006/page_32.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/06?\n\nPre-table text:\nshareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .\nthe following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .\nthe comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .\ncomparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/01\t12/31/02\t12/31/03\t12/31/04\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\nunited parcel service inc .\t$ 100.00\t$ 117.19\t$ 140.49\t$ 163.54\t$ 146.35\t$ 148.92\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 77.90\t$ 100.24\t$ 111.15\t$ 116.61\t$ 135.02\ndow jones transportation average\t$ 100.00\t$ 88.52\t$ 116.70\t$ 149.06\t$ 166.42\t$ 182.76\n\nPost-table text:\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .\nthese plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "148.92", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.4892"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_104.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nother state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .\n14 .\ndebt long-term debt consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2017\tdecember 31 2016\nsenior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t2014\t600\nsenior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t600\t600\nsenior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )\t600\t2014\nmississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )\t84\t84\ngulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )\t21\t21\nless unamortized debt issuance costs\t-26 ( 26 )\t-27 ( 27 )\ntotal long-term debt\t1279\t1278\n\nPost-table text:\ncredit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the \"credit facility\" ) with third-party lenders .\nthe credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .\nthe revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .\nthe revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( \"libor\" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .\nthe revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .\nthe commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .\nthe credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .\neach of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .\nin july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nsenior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .\nin november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .\ninterest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .\nthe terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15", "19", ")", "divide(", "#0", "19", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.21053"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2006/page_30.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock and the s&p 500 for the period ended december 30 , 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .\nall rights reserved .\nwww.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 29 2001\tdecember 28 2002\tjanuary 3 2004\tjanuary 1 2005\tdecember 31 2005\tdecember 30 2006\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t54.38\t81.52\t61.65\t75.54\t79.96\ns & p 500\t100.00\t77.90\t100.24\t111.15\t116.61\t135.03\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t71.97\t107.18\t117.07\t120.50\t137.02\ns & p information technology\t100.00\t62.59\t92.14\t94.50\t95.44\t103.47\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "79.96", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "135.03", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.5507"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2004/page_26.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ntotal future minimum lease payments due after 5 years are what percent of the total remaining?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits .\nof the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions .\nthe tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized .\n6 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively .\nduring the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture .\nthese leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased .\nrental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively .\nduring fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 .\nthis lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2005\t$ 781\n2006\t776\n2007\t769\n2008\t772\n2009\t772\nthereafter\t708\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4578\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "708", "4578", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15465"}
{"example_id": "ADI/2011/page_50.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the yearly interest expense incurred from the $ 375 million note with a fixed rate?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .\nthe effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .\nin addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .\nif libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .\nhowever , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .\nas of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .\nforeign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .\ndollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .\nthe terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .\ncurrently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .\nrelative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .\nthe market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .\nthe counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .\nbased on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .\nwhile the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .\nthe amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .\nthe following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .\ndollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .\n\nTable:\n\toctober 29 2011\toctober 30 2010\nfair value of forward exchange contracts asset\t$ 2472\t$ 7256\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset\t$ 17859\t$ 22062\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability\t$ -13332 ( 13332 )\t$ -7396 ( 7396 )\n\nPost-table text:\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 17859 $ 22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ ( 13332 ) $ ( 7396 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .\ndollar .\nin addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .\nour sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "375", "3%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "11.25"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_25.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif overall freight revenues in 2014 grow as the same rate as agricultural arc growth , what would projected 2015 revenues be in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nresults of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\t% (  % ) change 2014 v 2013\t% (  % ) change 2013 v 2012\nfreight revenues\t$ 22560\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\nother revenues\t1428\t1279\t1240\t12% ( 12 % )\t3% ( 3 % )\ntotal\t$ 23988\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .\nfreight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .\nchanges in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .\nwe provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .\nwe recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .\nwe allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .\nother revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .\nwe recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .\nfreight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .\nvolume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .\nfreight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .\nrevenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .\narc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .\nvolume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .\nour fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .\nfuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .\nfuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .\nin 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .\nin 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "22560", "5%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "22560.05"}
{"example_id": "ADI/2011/page_81.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in the total investment from 2010 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million .\nthe contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 .\nthe company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach .\nchanges in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change .\nas of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million .\nthe company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities .\nthe goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric .\nfuture technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nin addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million .\nroyalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods .\nas of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made .\nthe company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 .\nthese costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income .\nthe company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis .\nthe company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition .\n7 .\ndeferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc .\ndeferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading .\nthe components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2011\t2010\nmoney market funds\t$ 17187\t$ 1840\nmutual funds\t9223\t6850\ntotal deferred compensation plan investments\t$ 26410\t$ 8690\n\nPost-table text:\nthe fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively .\nadjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses .\ngross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 .\nthe company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) .\nthese investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan .\nhowever , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors .\n8 .\nother investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments .\ninvestments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate .\nadjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "26410", "8690", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "17720"}
{"example_id": "AWK/2013/page_132.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the one-percentage-point increase of effect on total of service and interest cost components as a percentage of the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation?\n\nPre-table text:\ncoupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds .\nthe yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) .\nhistorically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments .\nthe expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios .\nassumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes .\nbased on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets .\nthe company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases .\nassumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans .\nthe health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions .\na one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .\n\nTable:\n\tone-percentage-pointincrease\tone-percentage-pointdecrease\neffect on total of service and interest cost components\t$ 7367\t$ -5974 ( 5974 )\neffect on other postretirement benefit obligation\t$ 72238\t$ -60261 ( 60261 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "7367", "72238", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10198"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_79.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the value of the interest retained by upri from 2007 to 2008 was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively .\n\nPre-table text:\ninterest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings .\nat both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 .\nas of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding .\nearnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2008\t2007\t2006\n( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging\t$ 1\t$ -8 ( 8 )\t$ -8 ( 8 )\n( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives\t1\t-1 ( 1 )\t3\nincrease/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income\t$ 2\t$ -9 ( 9 )\t$ -5 ( 5 )\n\nPost-table text:\nfair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates .\nat december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value .\nat december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million .\nat december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par .\nsale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .\n( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .\nupri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .\nthe total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nupri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .\nthe value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nat december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively .\nthis retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .\nthe interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .\nif default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million .\nshould our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .\nthe railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .\nthe railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nupri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "431", "471", ")", "divide(", "#0", "471", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.08493"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2013/page_15.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the ratio of the total flight attendants to passenger service personnel\n\nPre-table text:\nfuture regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries .\nsee part i , item 1a .\nrisk factors - \" if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ,\" \"our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages\" and \"we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result\" for additional information .\nemployees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive .\nin 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses .\nthe table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 .\namerican us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .\n\nTable:\n\tamerican\tus airways\twholly-owned regional carriers\ttotal\npilots\t7900\t4100\t3400\t15400\nflight attendants\t15000\t7700\t2100\t24800\nmaintenance personnel\t11300\t3100\t2400\t16800\nfleet service personnel\t7400\t5500\t1700\t14600\npassenger service personnel\t10300\t6200\t6400\t22900\nadministrative and other\t8200\t5500\t2200\t15900\ntotal\t60100\t32100\t18200\t110400\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "24800", "22900", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.08297"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2012/page_125.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the mtn group acquisition , what was the cost per tower ? .\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 15.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 19.8 million .\nthe customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years .\n( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes .\nthe goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment .\nuganda acquisition 2014on december 8 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with mtn group to establish a joint venture in uganda .\nthe joint venture is controlled by a holding company of which a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( the 201catc uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 51% ( 51 % ) interest and a wholly owned subsidiary of mtn group ( the 201cmtn uganda subsidiary 201d ) holds a 49% ( 49 % ) interest .\nthe joint venture is managed and controlled by the company and owns a tower operations company in uganda .\npursuant to the agreement , the joint venture agreed to purchase a total of up to 1000 existing communications sites from mtn group 2019s operating subsidiary in uganda , subject to customary closing conditions .\non june 29 , 2012 , the joint venture acquired 962 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 171.5 million , subject to post-closing adjustments .\nthe aggregate purchase price was subsequently increased to $ 173.2 million , subject to future post-closing adjustments .\nunder the terms of the purchase agreement , legal title to certain of these communications sites will be transferred upon fulfillment of certain conditions by mtn group .\nprior to the fulfillment of these conditions , the company will operate and maintain control of these communications sites , and accordingly , reflect these sites in the allocation of purchase price and the consolidated operating results .\nthe following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .\n\nTable:\n\tpreliminary purchase price allocation\nnon-current assets\t$ 2258\nproperty and equipment\t102366\nintangible assets ( 1 )\t63500\nother non-current liabilities\t-7528 ( 7528 )\nfair value of net assets acquired\t$ 160596\ngoodwill ( 2 )\t12564\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 36.5 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 27.0 million .\nthe customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years .\n( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be not be deductible for tax purposes .\nthe goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment .\ngermany acquisition 2014on november 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase communications sites from e-plus mobilfunk gmbh & co .\nkg .\non december 4 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 2031 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 525.7 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "173.2", "const_1000000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "962", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "180041.58004"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_79.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total cash purchase price net of cash acquired was represented by goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\nacquisitions ( continued ) was recorded to goodwill .\nthe following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 28.1\nproperty and equipment net\t0.2\ngoodwill\t258.9\nipr&d\t190.0\ncurrent liabilities assumed\t-32.9 ( 32.9 )\ndeferred income taxes\t-66.0 ( 66.0 )\ncontingent consideration\t-30.3 ( 30.3 )\ntotal cash purchase price\t348.0\nless : cash acquired\t-27.9 ( 27.9 )\ntotal cash purchase price net of cash acquired\t$ 320.1\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition .\ngoodwill was assigned to the company 2019s united states segment and is not deductible for tax purposes .\nipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods .\nthe fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach .\nthis approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return .\nthe discount rate used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d was 16.5% ( 16.5 % ) .\ncompletion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies and human clinical studies are required prior to selling any product .\nthe risks and uncertainties associated with completing development within a reasonable period of time include those related to the design , development , and manufacturability of the product , the success of pre-clinical and clinical studies , and the timing of regulatory approvals .\nthe valuation assumed $ 97.7 million of additional research and development expenditures would be incurred prior to the date of product introduction , and the company does not currently anticipate significant changes to forecasted research and development expenditures associated with the cardiaq program .\nthe company 2019s valuation model also assumed net cash inflows would commence in late 2018 , if successful clinical trial experiences lead to a ce mark approval .\nupon completion of development , the underlying research and development intangible asset will be amortized over its estimated useful life .\nthe company disclosed in early february 2017 that it had voluntarily paused enrollment in its clinical trials for the edwards-cardiaq valve to perform further design validation testing on a feature of the valve .\nthis testing has been completed and , in collaboration with clinical investigators , the company has decided to resume screening patients for enrollment in its clinical trials .\nthe results of operations for cardiaq have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition .\npro forma results have not been presented as the results of cardiaq are not material in relation to the consolidated financial statements of the company .\n8 .\ngoodwill and other intangible assets on july 3 , 2015 , the company acquired cardiaq ( see note 7 ) .\nthis transaction resulted in an increase to goodwill of $ 258.9 million and ipr&d of $ 190.0 million. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "258.9", "320.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.80881"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_85.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in billions of total debt from december 31 , 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 750\t3.375% ( 3.375 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2025\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "28.5", "29.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2013/page_15.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total full-time employees of american are flight attendants?\n\nPre-table text:\nfuture regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries .\nsee part i , item 1a .\nrisk factors - \" if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ,\" \"our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages\" and \"we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result\" for additional information .\nemployees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive .\nin 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses .\nthe table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 .\namerican us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .\n\nTable:\n\tamerican\tus airways\twholly-owned regional carriers\ttotal\npilots\t7900\t4100\t3400\t15400\nflight attendants\t15000\t7700\t2100\t24800\nmaintenance personnel\t11300\t3100\t2400\t16800\nfleet service personnel\t7400\t5500\t1700\t14600\npassenger service personnel\t10300\t6200\t6400\t22900\nadministrative and other\t8200\t5500\t2200\t15900\ntotal\t60100\t32100\t18200\t110400\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "15000", "60100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.24958"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2011/page_73.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage of pretax income from discontinued operations to total revenues from discontinued operations?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements company , l.l.c .\nand odyssey pipeline l.l.c. , as well as certain other oil pipeline interests , including the eugene island pipeline system .\nthe value of this transaction is approximately $ 205 million , net of debt assumed by the buyer .\nthe carrying value of these assets was $ 38 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthis transaction closed on january 3 , 2012 .\nburns point gas plant 2013 during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we sold our e&p segment 2019s 50 percent interest in the burns point gas plant , a cryogenic processing plant located in st .\nmary parish , louisiana , for total consideration of $ 36 million and a pretax gain of $ 34 million was booked .\nalaska lng facility 2013 during the third quarter of 2011 , we sold our integrated gas segment 2019s equity interest in a lng processing facility in alaska and a pretax gain on the transaction of $ 8 million was recorded .\ndj basin 2013 in april 2011 , we assigned a 30 percent undivided working interest in our e&p segment 2019s approximately 180000 acres in the niobrara shale play located within the dj basin of southeast wyoming and northern colorado for total consideration of $ 270 million , recording a pretax gain of $ 37 million .\nwe remain operator of this jointly owned leasehold .\nangola 2013 during 2010 , we closed the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated interest in our e&p segment 2019s production sharing contract and joint operating agreement in block 32 offshore angola .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 1.3 billion and recorded a pretax gain on the sale of $ 811 million .\nwe retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in block 32 .\ngudrun 2013 in march 2011 , we closed the sale of our outside-operated interests in the gudrun field development and the brynhild and eirin exploration areas offshore norway for net proceeds of $ 85 million , excluding working capital adjustments .\na $ 64 million pretax loss on this disposition was recorded in the fourth quarter 2010 .\ngabon 2013 in december 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated fields offshore gabon , receiving net proceeds of $ 269 million , after closing adjustments .\na $ 232 million pretax gain on this disposition was reported in discontinued operations for 2009 .\npermian basin 2013 in june 2009 , we closed the sale of our e&p segment 2019s operated and a portion of our outside- operated permian basin producing assets in new mexico and west texas for net proceeds after closing adjustments of $ 293 million .\na $ 196 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nireland 2013 in april 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated properties in ireland for net proceeds of $ 84 million , after adjusting for cash held by the sold subsidiary .\na $ 158 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded .\nas a result of this sale , we terminated our pension plan in ireland , incurring a charge of $ 18 million .\nin june 2009 , we entered into an agreement to sell the subsidiary holding our 19 percent outside-operated interest in the corrib natural gas development offshore ireland .\nan initial $ 100 million payment was received at closing .\nadditional fixed proceeds of $ 135 million will be received at the earlier of first commercial gas or december 31 , 2012 .\na $ 154 million impairment was recognized in discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009 .\nour irish and our gabonese businesses , which had been reported in our e&p segment , have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nrevenues and pretax income related to these businesses are shown in the table below .\n( in millions ) 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\nrevenues applicable to discontinued operations\t$ 188\npretax income from discontinued operations\t$ 80\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "80", "188", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.42553"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2004/page_213.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the increase in other regulatory credits as a percentage of net revenue in 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .\nthe increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .\nfuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .\nother regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .\n2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .\n\nTable:\n\t( in millions )\n2002 net revenue\t$ 922.9\ndeferred fuel cost revisions\t59.1\nasset retirement obligation\t8.2\nvolume\t-16.2 ( 16.2 )\nvidalia settlement\t-9.2 ( 9.2 )\nother\t8.9\n2003 net revenue\t$ 973.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .\nthe asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , \"accounting for asset retirement obligations\" adopted in january 2003 .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" for more details on sfas 143 .\nthe increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .\nthe volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .\nbilled usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "14.3", "11.8", ")", "add(", "#0", "11.4", ")", "divide(", "#1", "973.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03851"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_41.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage gain recognized on the commercial mortgages held for sale in 2009\n\nPre-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2009 , $ 397 million of the credit losses related to securities rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $ 1.1 billion and the related securities had a fair value of $ 2.6 billion .\nthe fair value of sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti credit loss as of december 31 , 2009 totaled $ 2.6 billion , with unrealized net losses of $ 658 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\ncommercial mortgage-backed securities the fair value of the non-agency commercial mortgage- backed securities portfolio was $ 6.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized by non-residential properties , primarily retail properties , office buildings , and multi-family housing .\nthe agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $ 1.3 billion fair value at december 31 , 2009 consisting of multi-family housing .\nsubstantially all of the securities are the most senior tranches in the subordination structure .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 6 million on non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities during 2009 .\nthe remaining fair value of the securities for which otti was recorded approximates zero .\nall of the credit-impaired securities were rated below investment grade .\nasset-backed securities the fair value of the asset-backed securities portfolio was $ 4.8 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate and floating-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized primarily by various consumer credit products , including residential mortgage loans , credit cards , and automobile loans .\nsubstantially all of the securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and have credit protection in the form of credit enhancement , over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 111 million on asset- backed securities during 2009 .\nall of the securities were collateralized by first and second lien residential mortgage loans and were rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for asset- backed securities totaled $ 221 million and the related securities had a fair value of $ 562 million .\nfor the sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti loss through december 31 , 2009 , the remaining fair value was $ 381 million , with unrealized net losses of $ 110 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\nif the current housing and economic conditions were to continue for the foreseeable future or worsen , if market volatility and illiquidity were to continue or worsen , or if market interest rates were to increase appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could continue to be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .\nloans held for sale in millions dec .\n31 dec .\n31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdec.31 2009\tdec . 312008\ncommercial mortgages at fair value\t$ 1050\t$ 1401\ncommercial mortgages at lower of cost or market\t251\t747\ntotal commercial mortgages\t1301\t2148\nresidential mortgages at fair value\t1012\t1824\nresidential mortgages at lower of cost or market\t\t138\ntotal residential mortgages\t1012\t1962\nother\t226\t256\ntotal\t$ 2539\t$ 4366\n\nPost-table text:\nwe stopped originating commercial mortgage loans held for sale designated at fair value during the first quarter of 2008 and intend to continue pursuing opportunities to reduce these positions at appropriate prices .\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale carried at the lower of cost or market , strong origination volumes partially offset sales to government agencies of $ 5.4 billion during 2009 .\nwe recognized net gains of $ 107 million in 2009 on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , carried at fair value and lower of cost or market compared with losses of $ 197 million in 2008 .\nwe sold $ .3 billion and $ .6 billion , respectively , of commercial mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value in 2009 and 2008 .\nresidential mortgage loans held for sale decreased during 2009 despite strong refinancing volumes , especially in the first quarter .\nloan origination volume was $ 19.1 billion .\nsubstantially all such loans were originated to agency standards .\nwe sold $ 19.8 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 435 million during 2009 .\nnet interest income on residential mortgage loans held for sale was $ 332 million for 2009. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "107", "5.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "19.81481"}
{"example_id": "BKR/2017/page_103.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the expense which relates to the acceleration of equity awards upon termination of employment of baker hughes employees as a percentage of stock based compensation expense?\n\nPre-table text:\nbaker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 83 issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 .\na total of 53.7 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nas a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , on july 3 , 2017 , each outstanding baker hughes stock option was converted into an option to purchase a share of class a common stock in the company .\nconsequently , we issued 6.8 million stock options which are fully vested .\neach converted option is subject to the same terms and conditions as applied to the original option , and the per share exercise price of each converted option was reduced by $ 17.50 to reflect the per share amount of the special dividend pursuant to the agreement associated with the transactions .\nadditionally , as a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , there were 1.7 million baker hughes restricted stock units ( rsus ) that were converted to bhge rsus at a fair value of $ 40.18 .\nstock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant .\nthe compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates .\nforfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures .\nthere were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material .\nduring the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we issued 2.1 million rsus and 1.6 million stock options under the lti plan .\nthese rsus and stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date .\nstock based compensation expense was $ 37 million in 2017 .\nincluded in this amount is $ 15 million of expense which relates to the acceleration of equity awards upon termination of employment of baker hughes employees with change in control agreements , and are included as part of \"merger and related costs\" in the consolidated and combined statements of income ( loss ) .\nas bhge llc is a pass through entity , any tax benefit would be recognized by its partners .\ndue to its cumulative losses , bhge is unable to recognize a tax benefit on its share of stock related expenses .\nstock options the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model .\nthe following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan .\nthe expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding .\nthe expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards .\nthe expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period .\nthe risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s .\ntreasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted .\nthe dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\nexpected life ( years )\t6\nrisk-free interest rate\t2.1% ( 2.1 % )\nvolatility\t36.4% ( 36.4 % )\ndividend yield\t1.2% ( 1.2 % )\nweighted average fair value per share at grant date\t$ 12.32\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "15", "37", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.40541"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2010/page_34.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the quarter ended september 302010 what was the percentage change in the share price from the highest to the lowest\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .\n\nTable:\n2010\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 44.61\t$ 40.10\nquarter ended june 30\t45.33\t38.86\nquarter ended september 30\t52.11\t43.70\nquarter ended december 31\t53.14\t49.61\n2009\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 32.53\t$ 25.45\nquarter ended june 30\t34.52\t27.93\nquarter ended september 30\t37.71\t29.89\nquarter ended december 31\t43.84\t35.03\n\nPost-table text:\non february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders .\ndividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock .\npayment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status .\nin addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "52.11", "43.70", ")", "divide(", "#0", "43.70", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19245"}
{"example_id": "GS/2012/page_165.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total other assets in 2012 was comprised of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements note 12 .\nother assets other assets are generally less liquid , non-financial assets .\nthe table below presents other assets by type. .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tas of december 2012\tas of december 2011\nproperty leasehold improvements andequipment1\t$ 8217\t$ 8697\ngoodwill and identifiable intangibleassets2\t5099\t5468\nincome tax-related assets3\t5620\t5017\nequity-method investments4\t453\t664\nmiscellaneous receivables and other5\t20234\t3306\ntotal\t$ 39623\t$ 23152\n\nPost-table text:\n1 .\nnet of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $ 9.05 billion and $ 8.46 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively .\n2 .\nincludes $ 149 million of intangible assets classified as held for sale .\nsee note 13 for further information about goodwill and identifiable intangible assets .\n3 .\nsee note 24 for further information about income taxes .\n4 .\nexcludes investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option where the firm would otherwise apply the equity method of accounting of $ 5.54 billion and $ 4.17 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , which are included in 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value . 201d the firm has generally elected the fair value option for such investments acquired after the fair value option became available .\n5 .\nincludes $ 16.77 billion of assets related to the firm 2019s reinsurance business which were classified as held for sale as of december 2012 .\nassets held for sale in the fourth quarter of 2012 , the firm classified its reinsurance business within its institutional client services segment as held for sale .\nassets related to this business of $ 16.92 billion , consisting primarily of available-for-sale securities and separate account assets at fair value , are included in 201cother assets . 201d liabilities related to the business of $ 14.62 billion are included in 201cother liabilities and accrued expenses . 201d see note 8 for further information about insurance-related assets and liabilities held for sale at fair value .\nthe firm expects to complete the sale of a majority stake in its reinsurance business in 2013 and does not expect to recognize a material gain or loss upon the sale .\nupon completion of the sale , the firm will no longer consolidate this business .\nproperty , leasehold improvements and equipment property , leasehold improvements and equipment included $ 6.20 billion and $ 6.48 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to property , leasehold improvements and equipment that the firm uses in connection with its operations .\nthe remainder is held by investment entities , including vies , consolidated by the firm .\nsubstantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset .\nleasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease , whichever is shorter .\ncertain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software .\nproperty , leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset 2019s or asset group 2019s carrying value may not be fully recoverable .\nthe firm 2019s policy for impairment testing of property , leasehold improvements and equipment is the same as is used for identifiable intangible assets with finite lives .\nsee note 13 for further information .\ngoldman sachs 2012 annual report 163 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5099", "39623", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.12869"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2010/page_28.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ndid the five year total return on ball corporation outperform the dj containers & packaging index?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .\nit assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .\nthe dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .\ntotal return analysis .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\t12/31/07\t12/31/08\t12/31/09\t12/31/10\nball corporation\t$ 100.00\t$ 110.86\t$ 115.36\t$ 107.58\t$ 134.96\t$ 178.93\ndj containers & packaging index\t$ 100.00\t$ 112.09\t$ 119.63\t$ 75.00\t$ 105.34\t$ 123.56\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 115.80\t$ 122.16\t$ 76.96\t$ 97.33\t$ 111.99\ncopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\ncopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "178.93", "105.34", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "yes"}
{"example_id": "AON/2011/page_134.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the increase observed in the total revenue during 2010 and 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\naon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .\nthe maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .\naon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .\nsome of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .\nduring 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .\naon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .\n17 .\nrelated party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .\nthese transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .\nduring 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .\n18 .\nsegment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .\nunallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .\nreportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .\nthe codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .\nthe company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .\nrisk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .\nhr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .\naon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2011\t2010\t2009\nrisk solutions\t$ 6817\t$ 6423\t$ 6305\nhr solutions\t4501\t2111\t1267\nintersegment elimination\t-31 ( 31 )\t-22 ( 22 )\t-26 ( 26 )\ntotal operating segments\t11287\t8512\t7546\nunallocated\t2014\t2014\t49\ntotal revenue\t$ 11287\t$ 8512\t$ 7595\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "11287", "8512", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.32601"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2016/page_418.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .\n2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .\nnet revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 637.2\nreserve equalization\t14.3\npurchased power capacity\t12.4\ntransmission revenue\t7.0\nretail electric price\t5.4\nnet wholesale\t-27.8 ( 27.8 )\nother\t-4.3 ( 4.3 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 644.2\n\nPost-table text:\nthe reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .\nthe transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "644.2", "637.2", ")", "divide(", "#0", "637.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01099"}
{"example_id": "GS/2016/page_70.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in the number of staff in 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis non-interest revenues .\ninvestment banking revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 7.03 billion for 2015 , 9% ( 9 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher revenues in financial advisory , reflecting strong client activity , particularly in the u.s .\nindustry-wide completed mergers and acquisitions increased significantly compared with the prior year .\nrevenues in underwriting were lower compared with a strong 2014 .\nrevenues in debt underwriting were lower compared with 2014 , reflecting significantly lower leveraged finance activity .\nrevenues in equity underwriting were also lower , reflecting significantly lower revenues from initial public offerings and convertible offerings , partially offset by significantly higher revenues from secondary offerings .\ninvestment management revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 5.87 billion for 2015 , 2% ( 2 % ) higher than 2014 , due to slightly higher management and other fees , primarily reflecting higher average assets under supervision , and higher transaction revenues .\ncommissions and fees in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 3.32 billion for 2015 , essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .\nmarket-making revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 9.52 billion for 2015 , 14% ( 14 % ) higher than 2014 .\nexcluding a gain of $ 289 million in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , market-making revenues were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , reflecting significantly higher revenues in interest rate products , currencies , equity cash products and equity derivatives .\nthese increases were partially offset by significantly lower revenues in mortgages , commodities and credit products .\nother principal transactions revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 5.02 billion for 2015 , 24% ( 24 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to lower revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro international trade services ( metro ) in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .\nin addition , revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .\nnet interest income .\nnet interest income in the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.06 billion for 2015 , 24% ( 24 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthe decrease compared with 2014 was due to lower interest income resulting from a reduction in interest income related to financial instruments owned , at fair value , partially offset by the impact of an increase in total average loans receivable .\nthe decrease in interest income was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense , which primarily reflected lower interest expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value and other interest-bearing liabilities , partially offset by higher interest expense related to long-term borrowings .\nsee 201csupplemental financial information 2014 statistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income .\noperating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .\ncompensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .\ndiscretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share- based compensation programs and the external environment .\nin addition , see 201cuse of estimates 201d for additional information about expenses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings .\nin the context of the challenging environment during the first half of 2016 , we completed an initiative that identified areas where we can operate more efficiently , resulting in a reduction of approximately $ 900 million in annual run rate compensation .\nfor 2016 , net savings from this initiative , after severance and other related costs , were approximately $ 500 million .\nthe table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( which includes employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2016\tyear ended december 2015\tyear ended december 2014\ncompensation and benefits\t$ 11647\t$ 12678\t$ 12691\nbrokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees\t2555\t2576\t2501\nmarket development\t457\t557\t549\ncommunications and technology\t809\t806\t779\ndepreciation and amortization\t998\t991\t1337\noccupancy\t788\t772\t827\nprofessional fees\t882\t963\t902\nother expenses\t2168\t5699\t2585\ntotal non-compensation expenses\t8657\t12364\t9480\ntotal operating expenses\t$ 20304\t$ 25042\t$ 22171\ntotal staff at period-end\t34400\t36800\t34000\n\nPost-table text:\n56 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "34400", "36800", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-2400"}
{"example_id": "TSCO/2018/page_34.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much of a greater return , in percentage , was gained in the s&p retail index compared to the tractor supply company?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .\nthe following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .\nthe comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .\nthe historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/28/2013\t12/27/2014\t12/26/2015\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\t12/29/2018\ntractor supply company\t$ 100.00\t$ 104.11\t$ 115.45\t$ 103.33\t$ 103.67\t$ 117.18\ns&p 500\t$ 100.00\t$ 115.76\t$ 116.64\t$ 129.55\t$ 157.84\t$ 149.63\ns&p retail index\t$ 100.00\t$ 111.18\t$ 140.22\t$ 148.53\t$ 193.68\t$ 217.01\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "217.01", "100.00", ")", "divide(", "#0", "100.00", ")", "subtract(", "117.18", "100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.9983"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_157.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in total additions between 2006 and 2007 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 155 flows at risk-adjusted rates .\nthe model considers portfolio characteris- tics , contractually specified servicing fees , prepayment assumptions , delinquency rates , late charges , other ancillary revenue and costs to service , and other economic factors .\nthe firm reassesses and periodi- cally adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the oas model to reflect market conditions and assumptions that a market par- ticipant would consider in valuing the msr asset .\nduring the fourth quarter of the 2007 , the firm 2019s proprietary prepayment model was refined to reflect a decrease in estimated future mortgage prepay- ments based upon a number of market related factors including a downward trend in home prices , general tightening of credit under- writing standards and the associated impact on refinancing activity .\nthe firm compares fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data where available and to recent market activity and actual portfolio experience .\nthe fair value of msrs is sensitive to changes in interest rates , includ- ing their effect on prepayment speeds .\njpmorgan chase uses or has used combinations of derivatives , afs securities and trading instru- ments to manage changes in the fair value of msrs .\nthe intent is to offset any changes in the fair value of msrs with changes in the fair value of the related risk management instruments .\nmsrs decrease in value when interest rates decline .\nconversely , securities ( such as mort- gage-backed securities ) , principal-only certificates and certain deriva- tives ( when the firm receives fixed-rate interest payments ) increase in value when interest rates decline .\nin march 2006 , the fasb issued sfas 156 , which permits an entity a one-time irrevocable election to adopt fair value accounting for a class of servicing assets .\njpmorgan chase elected to adopt the standard effective january 1 , 2006 , and defined msrs as one class of servicing assets for this election .\nat the transition date , the fair value of the msrs exceeded their carrying amount , net of any related valuation allowance , by $ 150 million net of taxes .\nthis amount was recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of january 1 , 2006 .\nmsrs are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value , and changes in their fair value are recorded in current- period earnings .\nrevenue amounts related to msrs and the financial instruments used to manage the risk of msrs are recorded in mortgage fees and related income .\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2005 , msrs were accounted for under sfas 140 , using a lower of cost or fair value approach .\nunder this approach , msrs were amortized as a reduction of the actual servicing income received in proportion to , and over the period of , the estimated future net servicing income stream of the underlying mortgage loans .\nfor purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment of msrs , the firm stratified the portfolio on the basis of the predominant risk characteristics , which are loan type and interest rate .\nany indicated impairment was rec- ognized as a reduction in revenue through a valuation allowance , which represented the extent to which the carrying value of an individual stra- tum exceeded its estimated fair value .\nany gross carrying value and relat- ed valuation allowance amounts which were not expected to be recov- ered in the foreseeable future , based upon the interest rate scenario , were considered to be other-than-temporary .\nprior to the adoption of sfas 156 , the firm designated certain deriva- tives used to risk manage msrs ( e.g. , a combination of swaps , swap- tions and floors ) as sfas 133 fair value hedges of benchmark interest rate risk .\nsfas 133 hedge accounting allowed the carrying value of the hedged msrs to be adjusted through earnings in the same period that the change in value of the hedging derivatives was recognized through earnings .\nthe designated hedge period was daily .\nin designat- ing the benchmark interest rate , the firm considered the impact that the change in the benchmark rate had on the prepayment speed esti- mates in determining the fair value of the msrs .\nhedge effectiveness was assessed using a regression analysis of the change in fair value of the msrs as a result of changes in benchmark interest rates and of the change in the fair value of the designated derivatives .\nthe valua- tion adjustments to both the msrs and sfas 133 derivatives were recorded in mortgage fees and related income .\nwith the election to apply fair value accounting to the msrs under sfas 156 , sfas 133 hedge accounting is no longer necessary .\nfor a further discussion on derivative instruments and hedging activities , see note 30 on pages 168 2013169 of this annual report .\nthe following table summarizes msr activity , certain key assumptions , and the sensitivity of the fair value of msrs to adverse changes in those key assumptions for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , during which period msrs were accounted for under sfas year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2007 2006 .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( inmillions )\t2007\t2006\nbalance at beginning of period after valuation allowance\t$ 7546\t$ 6452\ncumulative effect of change in accounting principle\t2014\t230\nfair value at beginning of period\t7546\t6682\noriginations of msrs\t2335\t1512\npurchase of msrs\t798\t627\ntotal additions\t3133\t2139\nchange in valuation due to inputs and assumptions ( a )\t-516 ( 516 )\t165\nother changes in fair value ( b )\t-1531 ( 1531 )\t-1440 ( 1440 )\ntotal change in fair value\t-2047 ( 2047 )\t-1275 ( 1275 )\nfair value at december 31\t$ 8632\t$ 7546\nchange in unrealized ( losses ) gains included in income related to msrs held at december 31\t$ -516 ( 516 )\tna\n\nPost-table text:\nchange in unrealized ( losses ) gains included in income related to msrs held at december 31 $ ( 516 ) na ( a ) represents msr asset fair value adjustments due to changes in market-based inputs , such as interest rates and volatility , as well as updates to assumptions used in the msr valuation model .\nthis caption also represents total realized and unrealized gains ( losses ) included in net income per the sfas 157 disclosure for fair value measurement using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .\nthese changes in fair value are recorded in mortgage fees and related income .\n( b ) includes changes in the msr value due to modeled servicing portfolio runoff ( or time decay ) .\nthis caption represents the impact of cash settlements per the sfas 157 disclosure for fair value measurement using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .\nthese changes in fair value are recorded in mortgage fees and related income. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3133", "2139", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "994"}
{"example_id": "GS/2016/page_70.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in the number of staff in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis non-interest revenues .\ninvestment banking revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 7.03 billion for 2015 , 9% ( 9 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher revenues in financial advisory , reflecting strong client activity , particularly in the u.s .\nindustry-wide completed mergers and acquisitions increased significantly compared with the prior year .\nrevenues in underwriting were lower compared with a strong 2014 .\nrevenues in debt underwriting were lower compared with 2014 , reflecting significantly lower leveraged finance activity .\nrevenues in equity underwriting were also lower , reflecting significantly lower revenues from initial public offerings and convertible offerings , partially offset by significantly higher revenues from secondary offerings .\ninvestment management revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 5.87 billion for 2015 , 2% ( 2 % ) higher than 2014 , due to slightly higher management and other fees , primarily reflecting higher average assets under supervision , and higher transaction revenues .\ncommissions and fees in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 3.32 billion for 2015 , essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .\nmarket-making revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 9.52 billion for 2015 , 14% ( 14 % ) higher than 2014 .\nexcluding a gain of $ 289 million in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , market-making revenues were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , reflecting significantly higher revenues in interest rate products , currencies , equity cash products and equity derivatives .\nthese increases were partially offset by significantly lower revenues in mortgages , commodities and credit products .\nother principal transactions revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings were $ 5.02 billion for 2015 , 24% ( 24 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to lower revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro international trade services ( metro ) in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .\nin addition , revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .\nnet interest income .\nnet interest income in the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.06 billion for 2015 , 24% ( 24 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthe decrease compared with 2014 was due to lower interest income resulting from a reduction in interest income related to financial instruments owned , at fair value , partially offset by the impact of an increase in total average loans receivable .\nthe decrease in interest income was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense , which primarily reflected lower interest expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value and other interest-bearing liabilities , partially offset by higher interest expense related to long-term borrowings .\nsee 201csupplemental financial information 2014 statistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income .\noperating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .\ncompensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .\ndiscretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share- based compensation programs and the external environment .\nin addition , see 201cuse of estimates 201d for additional information about expenses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings .\nin the context of the challenging environment during the first half of 2016 , we completed an initiative that identified areas where we can operate more efficiently , resulting in a reduction of approximately $ 900 million in annual run rate compensation .\nfor 2016 , net savings from this initiative , after severance and other related costs , were approximately $ 500 million .\nthe table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( which includes employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2016\tyear ended december 2015\tyear ended december 2014\ncompensation and benefits\t$ 11647\t$ 12678\t$ 12691\nbrokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees\t2555\t2576\t2501\nmarket development\t457\t557\t549\ncommunications and technology\t809\t806\t779\ndepreciation and amortization\t998\t991\t1337\noccupancy\t788\t772\t827\nprofessional fees\t882\t963\t902\nother expenses\t2168\t5699\t2585\ntotal non-compensation expenses\t8657\t12364\t9480\ntotal operating expenses\t$ 20304\t$ 25042\t$ 22171\ntotal staff at period-end\t34400\t36800\t34000\n\nPost-table text:\n56 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "36800", "34000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2800"}
{"example_id": "UA/2015/page_71.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the acquisition related costs recognized in 2015 to 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nsimplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements .\nthe adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations and cash flows .\n3 .\nacquisitions endomondo on january 5 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of endomondo , a denmark- based digital connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community .\nthe purchase price was $ 85.0 million , adjusted for working capital .\nthe company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively .\nthese costs are included in the consolidated statements of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d pro forma results are not presented , as the acquisition was not considered material to the consolidated company .\nmyfitnesspal on march 17 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of mfp , a digital nutrition and connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community .\nthe final adjusted transaction value totaled $ 474.0 million .\nthe total consideration of $ 463.9 million was adjusted to reflect the accelerated vesting of certain share awards of mfp , which are not conditioned upon continued employment , and transaction costs borne by the selling shareholders .\nthe acquisition was funded with $ 400.0 million of increased term loan borrowings and a draw on the revolving credit facility , with the remaining amount funded by cash on the company recognized $ 5.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 .\nthese costs are included in the consolidated statement of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d the following represents the pro forma consolidated income statement as if mfp had been included in the consolidated results of the company for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tyear ended december 31 , 2015\tyear ended december 31 , 2014\nnet revenues\t$ 3967008\t$ 3098341\nnet income\t231277\t189659\n\nPost-table text:\nthese amounts have been calculated after applying the company 2019s accounting policies and adjusting the results of mfp to reflect the acquisition as if it closed on january 1 , 2014 .\npro forma net income for the year ended december 31 , 2014 includes $ 5.7 million in transaction expenses which were included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , but excluded from the calculation of pro forma net income for december 31 , 2015. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "0.6", "0.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.75"}
{"example_id": "RE/2015/page_33.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in average of investments from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million .\nin 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities .\nin 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nin 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nthe company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets .\nthe average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized .\nthe company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million .\ncmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) .\nfurthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s .\nthe following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions )\tdecember 31 , average investments ( 1 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax effective yield\tdecember 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )\n2015\t$ 17430.8\t$ 473.8\t2.72% ( 2.72 % )\t$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )\t$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )\n2014\t16831.9\t530.6\t3.15% ( 3.15 % )\t84.0\t20.3\n2013\t16472.5\t548.5\t3.33% ( 3.33 % )\t300.2\t-467.2 ( 467.2 )\n2012\t16220.9\t600.2\t3.70% ( 3.70 % )\t164.4\t161.0\n2011\t15680.9\t620.0\t3.95% ( 3.95 % )\t6.9\t106.6\n\nPost-table text:\npre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash .\nbonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value .\ncommon stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value .\n( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) .\n( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "17430.8", "16831.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "16831.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03558"}
{"example_id": "V/2008/page_17.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average payment volume per transaction for jcb?\n\nPre-table text:\nlargest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks the largest operators of open-loop and closed-loop retail electronic payments networks are visa , mastercard , american express , discover , jcb and diners club .\nwith the exception of discover , which primarily operates in the united states , all of the other network operators can be considered multi- national or global providers of payments network services .\nbased on payments volume , total volume , number of transactions and number of cards in circulation , visa is the largest retail electronic payments network in the world .\nthe following chart compares our network with those of our major competitors for calendar year 2007 : company payments volume volume transactions cards ( billions ) ( billions ) ( billions ) ( millions ) visa inc. ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 2457 $ 3822 50.3 1592 .\n\nTable:\ncompany\tpayments volume ( billions )\ttotal volume ( billions )\ttotal transactions ( billions )\tcards ( millions )\nvisa inc. ( 1 )\t$ 2457\t$ 3822\t50.3\t1592\nmastercard\t1697\t2276\t27.0\t916\namerican express\t637\t647\t5.0\t86\ndiscover\t102\t119\t1.6\t57\njcb\t55\t61\t0.6\t58\ndiners club\t29\t30\t0.2\t7\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) visa inc .\nfigures as reported previously in our filings .\nsource : the nilson report , issue 902 ( may 2008 ) and issue 903 ( may 2008 ) .\nnote : visa inc .\nfigures exclude visa europe .\nfigures for competitors include their respective european operations .\nvisa figures include visa , visa electron , and interlink brands .\nvisa cards include plus proprietary cards , but proprietary plus cash volume is not included .\ndomestic china figures are excluded .\nmastercard figures include pin-based debit card figures on mastercard cards , but not maestro or cirrus figures .\nchina commercial funds transfers are excluded .\namerican express and discover include business from third-party issuers .\njcb figures are for april 2006 through march 2007 , but cards and outlets are as of september 2007 .\njcb total transaction figures are estimates .\nour primary operations we generate revenue from the transaction processing services we offer to our customers .\nour customers deliver visa products and payment services to consumers and merchants based on the product platforms we define and manage .\npayments network management is a core part of our operations , as it ensures that our payments system provides a safe , efficient , consistent , and interoperable service to cardholders , merchants , and financial institutions worldwide .\ntransaction processing services core processing services our core processing services involve the routing of payment information and related data to facilitate the authorization , clearing and settlement of transactions between visa issuers , which are the financial institutions that issue visa cards to cardholders , and acquirers , which are the financial institutions that offer visa network connectivity and payments acceptance services to merchants .\nin addition , we offer a range of value-added processing services to support our customers 2019 visa programs and to promote the growth and security of the visa payments network .\nauthorization is the process of approving or declining a transaction before a purchase is finalized or cash is disbursed .\nclearing is the process of delivering final transaction data from an acquirer to an issuer for posting to the cardholder 2019s account , the calculation of certain fees and charges that apply to the issuer and acquirer involved in the transaction , and the conversion of transaction amounts to the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "55", "0.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "91.66667"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_48.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the lowest segment operating income margin?\n\nPre-table text:\nof exiting a business in japan , economic weakness in asia and political unrest in thailand , partially offset by growth in new zealand and certain emerging markets .\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue increased 48% ( 48 % ) , due mainly to the benfield merger , partially offset by unfavorable foreign currency translation .\norganic revenue is even with 2008 , as growth in domestic treaty business and slightly higher pricing was offset by greater client retention , and declines in investment banking and facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 54 million or 6% ( 6 % ) from 2008 to $ 900 million in 2009 .\nin 2009 , operating income margins in this segment were 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) , up 60 basis points from 13.7% ( 13.7 % ) in 2008 .\ncontributing to increased operating income and margins were the merger with benfield , lower e&o costs due to insurance recoveries , a pension curtailment gain of $ 54 million in 2009 versus a curtailment loss of $ 6 million in 2008 , declines in anti-corruption and compliance initiative costs of $ 35 million , restructuring savings , and other cost savings initiatives .\nthese items were partially offset by an increase of $ 140 million in restructuring costs , $ 95 million of lower fiduciary investment income , benfield integration costs and higher amortization of intangible assets obtained in the merger , and unfavorable foreign currency translation .\nconsulting .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 1267\t$ 1356\t$ 1345\nsegment operating income\t203\t208\t180\nsegment operating income margin\t16.0% ( 16.0 % )\t15.3% ( 15.3 % )\t13.4% ( 13.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour consulting segment generated 17% ( 17 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 and provides a broad range of human capital consulting services , as follows : consulting services : 1 .\nhealth and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees .\nbenefits consulting include health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services .\n2 .\nretirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n3 .\ncompensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n4 .\nstrategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\noutsourcing offers employment processing , performance improvement , benefits administration and other employment-related services .\nbeginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets has created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nthe prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and depressing the price of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_min(", "segment operating income margin", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.134"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2002/page_40.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended december 31 2002?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre .\nthe following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period .\ncomparable cash dividends are expected in the future .\non january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .\n\nTable:\nquarter ended\t2002 high\t2002 low\t2002 dividend\t2002 high\t2002 low\tdividend\ndecember 31\t$ 25.84\t$ 21.50\t$ .455\t$ 24.80\t$ 22.00\t$ .45\nseptember 30\t28.88\t21.40\t.455\t26.17\t21.60\t.45\njune 30\t28.95\t25.46\t.450\t24.99\t22.00\t.43\nmarch 31\t26.50\t22.92\t.450\t25.44\t21.85\t.43\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", ".455", ".450", ")", "divide(", "#0", ".450", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.11111"}
{"example_id": "APD/2016/page_96.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2016 , what is the short-term debt as a percent of total debt?\n\nPre-table text:\n15 .\ndebt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt .\n\nTable:\n30 september\t2016\t2015\nshort-term borrowings\t$ 935.8\t$ 1494.3\ncurrent portion of long-term debt\t371.3\t435.6\nlong-term debt\t4918.1\t3949.1\ntotal debt\t$ 6225.2\t$ 5879.0\nshort-term borrowings\t\t\n30 september\t2016\t2015\nbank obligations\t$ 133.1\t$ 234.3\ncommercial paper\t802.7\t1260.0\ntotal short-term borrowings\t$ 935.8\t$ 1494.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively .\ncash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "935.8", "371.3", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6225.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.20997"}
{"example_id": "SLB/2012/page_44.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby how much did the average price per share increase from 2010 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nduring the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) .\nduring the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) .\n0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 .\non july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 .\nschlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 .\nthe following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal cost of shares purchased\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share\n2012\t$ 971883\t14087.8\t$ 68.99\n2011\t$ 2997688\t36940.4\t$ 81.15\n2010\t$ 1716675\t26624.8\t$ 64.48\n\nPost-table text:\n0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 .\nin recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there .\nschlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries .\nat december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) .\n0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively .\non january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 .\non january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 .\non january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 .\n0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 .\ncapital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 .\n0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans .\nthe us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions .\n0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 .\nduring 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "81.15", "64.48", ")", "divide(", "#0", "64.48", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.25853"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_44.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2013 what was the percentage of the sites closed down\n\nPre-table text:\nour environmental site activity was as follows : 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nopen sites beginning balance\t284\t285\t294\nnew sites\t41\t56\t51\nclosed sites\t-57 ( 57 )\t-57 ( 57 )\t-60 ( 60 )\nopen sites ending balance atdecember 31\t268\t284\t285\n\nPost-table text:\nthe environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties .\ncost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations .\nthe ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs .\nestimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation .\ncurrent obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .\nproperty and depreciation 2013 our railroad operations are highly capital intensive , and our large base of homogeneous , network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis .\neach year we develop a capital program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers .\nassets purchased or constructed throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria .\nproperties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service lives , which are measured in years , except for rail in high-density traffic corridors ( i.e. , all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment , yard and switching tracks , and electronic yards ) for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track .\nwe use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics , use , and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes , and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates .\nthe group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources , not as singular items .\nwe currently have more than 60 depreciable asset classes , and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in technology , asset strategies , or other factors .\nwe determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property by means of depreciation studies .\nwe perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for track assets ( i.e. , rail and other track material , ties , and ballast ) and other road property .\nour depreciation studies take into account the following factors : f0b7 statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes ; f0b7 evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets ; f0b7 evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices ; and f0b7 expected salvage to be received upon retirement .\nfor rail in high-density traffic corridors , we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per mile of track .\nit has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely correlated to usage ( i.e. , the amount of weight carried over the rail ) .\nthe service lives also vary based on rail weight , rail condition ( e.g. , new or secondhand ) , and rail type ( e.g. , straight or curve ) .\nour depreciation studies for rail in high density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining the estimated service lives .\nfor rail in high-density traffic corridors , we calculate depreciation rates annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail ( i.e. , the weight of loaded and empty freight cars , locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail ) by the estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile .\nrail in high-density traffic corridors accounts for approximately 70 percent of the historical cost of rail and other track material .\nbased on the number of gross ton-miles carried over our rail in high density traffic corridors during 2013 , the estimated service lives of the majority of this rail ranged from approximately 15 years to approximately 30 years .\nfor all other depreciable assets , we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "57", "268", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21269"}
{"example_id": "DVN/2014/page_85.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2014 , what percentage of the total amortization amount was from intangibles?\n\nPre-table text:\ndevon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .\nimpairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .\nas a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .\nthis conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .\nconsequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .\nother intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .\nthe weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .\namortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .\nother intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .\nyear amortization amount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamortization amount ( in millions )\n2015\t$ 45\n2016\t$ 45\n2017\t$ 45\n2018\t$ 45\n2019\t$ 44\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "36", "45", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "80"}
{"example_id": "APD/2014/page_39.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the operating margin for 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\n2014 vs .\n2013 sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) , as higher volumes of 9% ( 9 % ) and favorable currency of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .\nelectronics sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) , as higher delivery systems equipment sales and materials volumes of 8% ( 8 % ) and favorable currency of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .\nperformance materials sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) , as higher volumes of 11% ( 11 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) .\nthe higher volumes were across all product lines and major regions .\nthe lower pricing was primarily due to unfavorable mix impacts .\noperating income of $ 425.3 increased 32% ( 32 % ) , or $ 104.0 , primarily from higher volumes of $ 93 , lower operating costs of $ 31 , and favorable currency impacts of $ 5 , partially offset by unfavorable price and mix impacts of $ 26 .\noperating margin of 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) increased 310 bp , primarily due to improved loading and leverage from the higher volumes and improved cost performance , partially offset by the unfavorable pricing impacts .\n2013 vs .\n2012 sales decreased 3% ( 3 % ) , as lower volumes of 4% ( 4 % ) and lower pricing of 1% ( 1 % ) were partially offset by acquisitions of 2% ( 2 % ) .\nelectronics sales decreased 8% ( 8 % ) , as weaker materials volumes and equipment sales were partially offset by the acquisition of da nanomaterials .\nperformance materials sales increased 2% ( 2 % ) , as higher volumes of 4% ( 4 % ) were partially offset by lower pricing of 2% ( 2 % ) .\nthe increase in volumes was primarily due to strength in the automobile and u.s .\nhousing markets partially offset by weaker volumes to certain construction markets and marine coatings .\nthe lower pricing was primarily due to unfavorable mix impacts .\noperating income of $ 321.3 decreased 25% ( 25 % ) , or $ 104.3 , and operating margin of 14.3% ( 14.3 % ) decreased 400 bp , as 2012 included a gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials of $ 85.9 .\non a non-gaap basis , operating income of $ 321.3 decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 18.4 , primarily from unfavorable price and mix impacts of $ 15 , lower volumes of $ 9 , and higher operating costs of $ 4 partially offset by higher acquisitions of $ 6 and favorable currency of $ 4 .\noperating margin decreased 30 bp , primarily due to lower volumes and unfavorable price mix .\nequipment and energy .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\nsales\t$ 450.4\t$ 451.1\t$ 420.1\noperating income\t88.2\t65.5\t44.6\n\nPost-table text:\n2014 vs .\n2013 sales of $ 450.4 were relatively flat as higher liquefied natural gas ( lng ) project activity was offset by lower air separation ( asu ) project activity .\noperating income of $ 88.2 increased from the higher lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2014 was $ 520 , compared to $ 402 at 30 september 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily due to new lng orders as global project development activity remains high .\nit is expected that approximately $ 320 of the backlog will be completed during 2015 .\n2013 vs .\n2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .\noperating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .\nalso included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .\nother also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .\n2014 vs .\n2013 other operating loss was $ 13.5 , compared to $ 4.7 in the prior year .\nthe decrease was primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange losses of $ 5 and lifo adjustments of $ 4 .\n2013 vs .\n2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .\nthe other operating loss in 2013 includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .\nthe other operating loss in 2012 included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "88.2", "450.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.19583"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_157.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the fair value of msrs in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 155 flows at risk-adjusted rates .\nthe model considers portfolio characteris- tics , contractually specified servicing fees , prepayment assumptions , delinquency rates , late charges , other ancillary revenue and costs to service , and other economic factors .\nthe firm reassesses and periodi- cally adjusts the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the oas model to reflect market conditions and assumptions that a market par- ticipant would consider in valuing the msr asset .\nduring the fourth quarter of the 2007 , the firm 2019s proprietary prepayment model was refined to reflect a decrease in estimated future mortgage prepay- ments based upon a number of market related factors including a downward trend in home prices , general tightening of credit under- writing standards and the associated impact on refinancing activity .\nthe firm compares fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data where available and to recent market activity and actual portfolio experience .\nthe fair value of msrs is sensitive to changes in interest rates , includ- ing their effect on prepayment speeds .\njpmorgan chase uses or has used combinations of derivatives , afs securities and trading instru- ments to manage changes in the fair value of msrs .\nthe intent is to offset any changes in the fair value of msrs with changes in the fair value of the related risk management instruments .\nmsrs decrease in value when interest rates decline .\nconversely , securities ( such as mort- gage-backed securities ) , principal-only certificates and certain deriva- tives ( when the firm receives fixed-rate interest payments ) increase in value when interest rates decline .\nin march 2006 , the fasb issued sfas 156 , which permits an entity a one-time irrevocable election to adopt fair value accounting for a class of servicing assets .\njpmorgan chase elected to adopt the standard effective january 1 , 2006 , and defined msrs as one class of servicing assets for this election .\nat the transition date , the fair value of the msrs exceeded their carrying amount , net of any related valuation allowance , by $ 150 million net of taxes .\nthis amount was recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of january 1 , 2006 .\nmsrs are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value , and changes in their fair value are recorded in current- period earnings .\nrevenue amounts related to msrs and the financial instruments used to manage the risk of msrs are recorded in mortgage fees and related income .\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2005 , msrs were accounted for under sfas 140 , using a lower of cost or fair value approach .\nunder this approach , msrs were amortized as a reduction of the actual servicing income received in proportion to , and over the period of , the estimated future net servicing income stream of the underlying mortgage loans .\nfor purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment of msrs , the firm stratified the portfolio on the basis of the predominant risk characteristics , which are loan type and interest rate .\nany indicated impairment was rec- ognized as a reduction in revenue through a valuation allowance , which represented the extent to which the carrying value of an individual stra- tum exceeded its estimated fair value .\nany gross carrying value and relat- ed valuation allowance amounts which were not expected to be recov- ered in the foreseeable future , based upon the interest rate scenario , were considered to be other-than-temporary .\nprior to the adoption of sfas 156 , the firm designated certain deriva- tives used to risk manage msrs ( e.g. , a combination of swaps , swap- tions and floors ) as sfas 133 fair value hedges of benchmark interest rate risk .\nsfas 133 hedge accounting allowed the carrying value of the hedged msrs to be adjusted through earnings in the same period that the change in value of the hedging derivatives was recognized through earnings .\nthe designated hedge period was daily .\nin designat- ing the benchmark interest rate , the firm considered the impact that the change in the benchmark rate had on the prepayment speed esti- mates in determining the fair value of the msrs .\nhedge effectiveness was assessed using a regression analysis of the change in fair value of the msrs as a result of changes in benchmark interest rates and of the change in the fair value of the designated derivatives .\nthe valua- tion adjustments to both the msrs and sfas 133 derivatives were recorded in mortgage fees and related income .\nwith the election to apply fair value accounting to the msrs under sfas 156 , sfas 133 hedge accounting is no longer necessary .\nfor a further discussion on derivative instruments and hedging activities , see note 30 on pages 168 2013169 of this annual report .\nthe following table summarizes msr activity , certain key assumptions , and the sensitivity of the fair value of msrs to adverse changes in those key assumptions for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , during which period msrs were accounted for under sfas year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2007 2006 .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( inmillions )\t2007\t2006\nbalance at beginning of period after valuation allowance\t$ 7546\t$ 6452\ncumulative effect of change in accounting principle\t2014\t230\nfair value at beginning of period\t7546\t6682\noriginations of msrs\t2335\t1512\npurchase of msrs\t798\t627\ntotal additions\t3133\t2139\nchange in valuation due to inputs and assumptions ( a )\t-516 ( 516 )\t165\nother changes in fair value ( b )\t-1531 ( 1531 )\t-1440 ( 1440 )\ntotal change in fair value\t-2047 ( 2047 )\t-1275 ( 1275 )\nfair value at december 31\t$ 8632\t$ 7546\nchange in unrealized ( losses ) gains included in income related to msrs held at december 31\t$ -516 ( 516 )\tna\n\nPost-table text:\nchange in unrealized ( losses ) gains included in income related to msrs held at december 31 $ ( 516 ) na ( a ) represents msr asset fair value adjustments due to changes in market-based inputs , such as interest rates and volatility , as well as updates to assumptions used in the msr valuation model .\nthis caption also represents total realized and unrealized gains ( losses ) included in net income per the sfas 157 disclosure for fair value measurement using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .\nthese changes in fair value are recorded in mortgage fees and related income .\n( b ) includes changes in the msr value due to modeled servicing portfolio runoff ( or time decay ) .\nthis caption represents the impact of cash settlements per the sfas 157 disclosure for fair value measurement using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .\nthese changes in fair value are recorded in mortgage fees and related income. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "8632", "7546", ")", "divide(", "#0", "7546", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "8632"}
{"example_id": "CAT/2017/page_85.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow many countries are cat products distributed to?\n\nPre-table text:\n64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .\noperations and summary of significant accounting policies a .\nnature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .\nfinancial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .\nthis category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .\n( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .\nour products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .\nwe conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .\nwe place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .\nalthough no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .\nour machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .\nreciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .\nsome of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .\nthe fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .\nsome of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .\nour dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .\nsome products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .\nat times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .\nthe financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .\nfinancing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .\nwe offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .\na significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .\nb .\nbasis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .\nand its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .\ninvestments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .\nsee note 9 for further discussion .\nwe consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .\nis the primary beneficiary .\nfor vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .\nthe primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .\nsee note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .\nwe have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .\nour maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nreceivables - trade and other\t$ 34\t$ 55\nreceivables - finance\t42\t174\nlong-term receivables - finance\t38\t246\ninvestments in unconsolidated affiliated companies\t39\t31\nguarantees\t259\t210\ntotal\t$ 412\t$ 716\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .\nour maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .\nthese risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "192", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "193"}
{"example_id": "DISCA/2012/page_39.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were 2012 total consolidated revenues in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ninternational networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\nour international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks .\nthis segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami .\ndiscovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks .\ninternational networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world .\nat december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities .\ninternational networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion .\nour international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .\n\nTable:\nglobal networks discovery channel\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246\tregional networks dmax\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90\nanimal planet\t183\tdiscovery kids\t61\ntlc real time and travel & living\t174\tquest\t26\ndiscovery science\t75\tdiscovery history\t13\ninvestigation discovery\t63\tshed\t12\ndiscovery home & health\t57\tdiscovery en espanol ( u.s. )\t5\nturbo\t42\tdiscovery familia ( u.s )\t4\ndiscovery world\t27\t\t\n\nPost-table text:\non december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs .\nwe have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter .\nif we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter .\nthe arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france .\non december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming .\n( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\neducation is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings .\nthis segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content .\nour education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations .\ncontent development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers .\nour content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers .\nour production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed .\nsubstantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs .\ncoproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties .\nlicensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "105", "2%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5250"}
{"example_id": "AOS/2004/page_11.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total aggregate contractual obligations is due to long-term debt?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents item 7 2013 management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations liquidity and capital resources we recorded net earnings of $ 35.4 million or $ 1.18 per share in 2004 , compared with $ 52.2 million or $ 1.76 per share recorded in 2003 and $ 51.3 million or $ 1.86 per share in 2002 .\nnet earnings recorded in 2004 were negatively impacted by cost increases to steel and freight , as well as manufacturing inefficiencies during the first nine months of the year in our ashland city plant and higher selling , general and administrative expense ( sg&a ) .\nwhile net earnings were flat in 2003 compared with 2002 , the lower earnings per share amount in 2003 as compared with 2002 reflected the full-year impact of our stock offering in may 2002 .\nour individual segment performance will be discussed later in this section .\nour working capital , excluding short-term debt , was $ 339.8 million at december 31 , 2004 , compared with $ 305.9 million and $ 225.1 million at december 31 , 2003 , and december 31 , 2002 , respectively .\nthe $ 33.9 million increase in 2004 reflects $ 44.9 million higher receivable balances due to longer payment terms experienced by both of our businesses as well as higher sales levels in the fourth quarter .\noffsetting the increase in receivable balances were $ 13.5 million lower inventory levels split about equally between water systems and electrical products and $ 14.3 million higher accounts payable balances .\nthe $ 80.8 million increase in 2003 reflects $ 46.6 million higher inventory balances due primarily to extensive manufacturing repositioning in our electric motor business and several new product introductions and manufacturing consolidation in our water systems business .\nadditionally , receivable balances were $ 21.2 million higher due to price increases associated with new product introductions in our water systems business and an increase in international sales , which tend to have longer payment terms .\nfinally , a $ 13.1 million increase in accounts payable balances was largely offset by $ 9.4 million in restructuring expenses paid out in 2003 .\nreducing working capital is one of our major initiatives in 2005 .\ncash provided by operating activities during 2004 was $ 67.2 million compared with $ 29.0 million during 2003 and $ 116.0 million during 2002 .\ndespite lower earnings in 2004 , a smaller investment in working capital explains the majority of the improvement in cash flow compared with 2003 .\nthe higher investment in working capital in 2003 ( as discussed above ) , explains the majority of the difference between 2003 and our capital expenditures were $ 48.5 million in 2004 , essentially the same as in 2003 and approximately $ 2.2 million higher than in 2002 .\nthe increase in 2003 was associated with new product launches in our water systems business .\nwe are projecting 2005 capital expenditures to be approximately $ 55 million , essentially the same as our projected 2005 depreciation expense .\nwe believe that our present facilities and planned capital expenditures are sufficient to provide adequate capacity for our operations in 2005 .\nin june 2004 , we completed a $ 265 million , five-year revolving credit facility with a group of eight banks .\nthe new facility expires on june 10 , 2009 , and it replaced a $ 250 million credit facility which expired on august 2 , 2004 , and was terminated on june 10 , 2004 .\nthe new facility backs up commercial paper and credit line borrowings .\nas a result of the long-term nature of this facility , the commercial paper and credit line borrowings are now classified as long-term debt .\nat december 31 , 2004 , we had available borrowing capacity of $ 153.9 million under this facility .\nwe believe that the combination of available borrowing capacity and operating cash flow will provide sufficient funds to finance our existing operations for the foreseeable future .\nto take advantage of historically low long-term borrowing rates , we issued $ 50.0 million in senior notes with two insurance companies in june 2003 .\nthe notes range in maturity between 2013 and 2016 and carry a weighted average interest rate of slightly less than 4.5 percent .\nthe proceeds of the notes were used to repay commercial paper and borrowing under the credit facility .\nour leverage , as measured by the ratio of total debt to total capitalization , was 32 percent at the end of 2004 and the end of 2003 .\naggregate contractual obligations a summary of our contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2004 , is as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions ) contractual obligation\t( dollars in millions ) total\t( dollars in millions ) less than 1 year\t( dollars in millions ) 1 - 3 years\t( dollars in millions ) 3 - 5 years\tmore than 5 years\nlong-term debt\t$ 275.1\t$ 8.6\t$ 13.8\t$ 138.2\t$ 114.5\ncapital leases\t6.0\t2014\t2014\t6.0\t2014\noperating leases\t62.9\t14.4\t20.7\t11.6\t16.2\npurchase obligations\t177.3\t176.6\t0.7\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t$ 521.3\t$ 199.6\t$ 35.2\t$ 155.8\t$ 130.7\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "275.1", "521.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.52772"}
{"example_id": "AON/2011/page_134.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the highest value for total operating segments during this period?\n\nPre-table text:\naon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .\nthe maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .\naon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .\nsome of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .\nduring 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .\naon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .\n17 .\nrelated party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .\nthese transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .\nduring 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .\n18 .\nsegment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .\nunallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .\nreportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .\nthe codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .\nthe company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .\nrisk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .\nhr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .\naon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2011\t2010\t2009\nrisk solutions\t$ 6817\t$ 6423\t$ 6305\nhr solutions\t4501\t2111\t1267\nintersegment elimination\t-31 ( 31 )\t-22 ( 22 )\t-26 ( 26 )\ntotal operating segments\t11287\t8512\t7546\nunallocated\t2014\t2014\t49\ntotal revenue\t$ 11287\t$ 8512\t$ 7595\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "total operating segments", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "11287"}
{"example_id": "RE/2015/page_33.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , what was the percentage change in investment income from 2011 to 2012\n\nPre-table text:\nthe company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million .\nin 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities .\nin 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nin 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nthe company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets .\nthe average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized .\nthe company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million .\ncmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) .\nfurthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s .\nthe following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions )\tdecember 31 , average investments ( 1 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax effective yield\tdecember 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )\n2015\t$ 17430.8\t$ 473.8\t2.72% ( 2.72 % )\t$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )\t$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )\n2014\t16831.9\t530.6\t3.15% ( 3.15 % )\t84.0\t20.3\n2013\t16472.5\t548.5\t3.33% ( 3.33 % )\t300.2\t-467.2 ( 467.2 )\n2012\t16220.9\t600.2\t3.70% ( 3.70 % )\t164.4\t161.0\n2011\t15680.9\t620.0\t3.95% ( 3.95 % )\t6.9\t106.6\n\nPost-table text:\npre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash .\nbonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value .\ncommon stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value .\n( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) .\n( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "600.2", "620.0", ")", "divide(", "#0", "620.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03194"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_33.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in investment banking fees from 2005 to 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 31 the following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2007 .\nfactors that relate primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment than they are in this consolidated sec- tion .\nfor a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 96 201398 of this annual report .\nrevenue .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2007\t2006\t2005\ninvestment banking fees\t$ 6635\t$ 5520\t$ 4088\nprincipal transactions\t9015\t10778\t8072\nlending & deposit-related fees\t3938\t3468\t3389\nasset management administration and commissions\t14356\t11855\t9988\nsecurities gains ( losses )\t164\t-543 ( 543 )\t-1336 ( 1336 )\nmortgage fees and related income\t2118\t591\t1054\ncredit card income\t6911\t6913\t6754\nother income\t1829\t2175\t2684\nnoninterest revenue\t44966\t40757\t34693\nnet interest income\t26406\t21242\t19555\ntotal net revenue\t$ 71372\t$ 61999\t$ 54248\n\nPost-table text:\n2007 compared with 2006 total net revenue of $ 71.4 billion was up $ 9.4 billion , or 15% ( 15 % ) , from the prior year .\nhigher net interest income , very strong private equity gains , record asset management , administration and commissions revenue , higher mortgage fees and related income and record investment banking fees contributed to the revenue growth .\nthese increases were offset partially by lower trading revenue .\ninvestment banking fees grew in 2007 to a level higher than the pre- vious record set in 2006 .\nrecord advisory and equity underwriting fees drove the results , partially offset by lower debt underwriting fees .\nfor a further discussion of investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see the ib segment results on pages 40 201342 of this annual report .\nprincipal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains .\ntrading revenue declined significantly from the 2006 level , primarily due to markdowns in ib of $ 1.4 billion ( net of hedges ) on subprime positions , including subprime cdos , and $ 1.3 billion ( net of fees ) on leveraged lending funded loans and unfunded commitments .\nalso in ib , markdowns in securitized products on nonsubprime mortgages and weak credit trading performance more than offset record revenue in currencies and strong revenue in both rates and equities .\nequities benefited from strong client activity and record trading results across all products .\nib 2019s credit portfolio results increased compared with the prior year , primarily driven by higher revenue from risk management activities .\nthe increase in private equity gains from 2006 reflected a significantly higher level of gains , the classification of certain private equity carried interest as compensation expense and a fair value adjustment in the first quarter of 2007 on nonpublic private equity investments resulting from the adoption of sfas 157 ( 201cfair value measurements 201d ) .\nfor a further discussion of principal transactions revenue , see the ib and corporate segment results on pages 40 201342 and 59 201360 , respectively , and note 6 on page 122 of this annual report .\nlending & deposit-related fees rose from the 2006 level , driven pri- marily by higher deposit-related fees and the bank of new york transaction .\nfor a further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in rfs , tss and cb , see the rfs segment results on pages 43 201348 , the tss segment results on pages 54 201355 , and the cb segment results on pages 52 201353 of this annual report .\nasset management , administration and commissions revenue reached a level higher than the previous record set in 2006 .\nincreased assets under management and higher performance and placement fees in am drove the record results .\nthe 18% ( 18 % ) growth in assets under management from year-end 2006 came from net asset inflows and market appreciation across all segments : institutional , retail , private bank and private client services .\ntss also contributed to the rise in asset management , administration and commissions revenue , driven by increased product usage by new and existing clients and market appreciation on assets under custody .\nfinally , commissions revenue increased , due mainly to higher brokerage transaction volume ( primarily included within fixed income and equity markets revenue of ib ) , which more than offset the sale of the insurance business by rfs in the third quarter of 2006 and a charge in the first quarter of 2007 resulting from accelerated surrenders of customer annuities .\nfor additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for ib on pages 40 201342 , rfs on pages 43 201348 , tss on pages 54 201355 , and am on pages 56 201358 , of this annual report .\nthe favorable variance resulting from securities gains in 2007 compared with securities losses in 2006 was primarily driven by improvements in the results of repositioning of the treasury invest- ment securities portfolio .\nalso contributing to the positive variance was a $ 234 million gain from the sale of mastercard shares .\nfor a fur- ther discussion of securities gains ( losses ) , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s treasury business , see the corporate segment discussion on pages 59 201360 of this annual report .\nconsol idated results of operat ions .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5520", "4088", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4088", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.35029"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2015/page_48.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent decrease for interest income occurred between 2014 and 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7a .\nquantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items .\nfrom time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks .\nderivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes .\ninterest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations .\nthe majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates .\nwe do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows .\nthe fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below .\nincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .\n\nTable:\nas of december 31,\tincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates\tincrease/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates\n2015\t$ -33.7 ( 33.7 )\t$ 34.7\n2014\t-35.5 ( 35.5 )\t36.6\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates .\nwe do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 .\nwe had $ 1509.7 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2015 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities .\nthe interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements .\nduring 2015 and 2014 , we had interest income of $ 22.8 and $ 27.4 , respectively .\nbased on our 2015 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 15.0 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2015 levels .\nforeign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nsince we report revenues and expenses in u.s .\ndollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s .\ndollars ) from foreign operations .\nthe primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2015 included the australian dollar , brazilian real , british pound sterling and euro .\nbased on 2015 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s .\ndollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase approximately 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2015 levels .\nthe functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency .\nassets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented .\nthe resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets .\nour foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk .\nhowever , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency .\nassets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement .\ncurrency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses .\nwe regularly review our foreign exchange exposures that may have a material impact on our business and from time to time use foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates arising from these exposures .\nwe do not enter into foreign exchange contracts or other derivatives for speculative purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "27.4", "22.8", ")", "divide(", "#0", "27.4", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "16.78832"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2015/page_159.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2015 what was the net change from december 31 , 2014 on alll on total purchased impaired loans in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nduring 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 .\ncharge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively .\nthe decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy .\nfor purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively .\nindividual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes .\nthe cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans .\nactivity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2015\t2014\njanuary 1\t$ 1558\t$ 2055\naccretion ( including excess cash recoveries )\t-466 ( 466 )\t-587 ( 587 )\nnet reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable\t226\t208\ndisposals\t-68 ( 68 )\t-118 ( 118 )\ndecember 31\t$ 1250\t$ 1558\n\nPost-table text:\nnote 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date .\nwe use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies .\na rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows .\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 141 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", ".3", ".9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.6"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2016/page_418.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions , what is the total impact on the change in net revenue from the reserve equalization , the purchased power capacity , and the transmission revenue?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .\n2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .\nnet revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 637.2\nreserve equalization\t14.3\npurchased power capacity\t12.4\ntransmission revenue\t7.0\nretail electric price\t5.4\nnet wholesale\t-27.8 ( 27.8 )\nother\t-4.3 ( 4.3 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 644.2\n\nPost-table text:\nthe reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .\nthe transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "14.3", "12.4", ")", "add(", "#0", "const_7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "33.7"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2005/page_83.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the lowest amount of research and development credit net in the three year period , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 6 2014income taxes ( continued ) a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2005\t2004\t2003\ncomputed expected tax\t$ 636\t$ 134\t$ 32\nstate taxes net of federal effect\t-19 ( 19 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-4 ( 4 )\nindefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries\t-98 ( 98 )\t-31 ( 31 )\t-13 ( 13 )\nnondeductible executive compensation\t11\t10\t5\nresearch and development credit net\t-26 ( 26 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-7 ( 7 )\nother items\t-24 ( 24 )\t4\t11\nprovision for income taxes\t$ 480\t$ 107\t$ 24\neffective tax rate\t26% ( 26 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\t26% ( 26 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2005 , the company reversed certain tax contingency reserves and recorded a corresponding benefit to income tax expense primarily as a result of a change in the estimated outcome of certain tax disputes .\nadditionally , during the fourth quarter of 2005 , the company recorded a benefit to tax expense to adjust its net deferred tax assets as a result of the company 2019s year-end review of its deferred tax accounts , the impact of which was not material to the current or prior periods 2019 results of operations .\nthe total benefit to income tax expense from the reversal of these tax contingency reserves and adjustments to net deferred tax assets was $ 67 million .\nthe company also recorded a $ 14 million credit to income tax expense resulting from a reduction of the valuation allowance .\nthe internal revenue service ( irs ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for all years prior to 2002 and proposed certain adjustments .\ncertain of these adjustments are being contested through the irs appeals office .\nsubstantially all irs audit issues for these years have been resolved .\nin addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities .\nmanagement believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations .\nhowever , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty .\nshould any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits be resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs .\nnote 7 2014shareholders 2019 equity preferred stock the company has 5 million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is outstanding .\nunder the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_min(", "research and development credit net", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-26"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_139.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby how much did contingent rental liability decrease from 2007 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement .\noperating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\t2007\nminimum rental ( a )\t$ 238\t$ 245\t$ 209\ncontingent rental\t19\t22\t33\nnet rental expense\t$ 257\t$ 267\t$ 242\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases .\n26 .\ncommitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment .\ncertain of these matters are discussed below .\nthe ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements .\nhowever , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably .\nenvironmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment .\nthese laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites .\npenalties may be imposed for noncompliance .\nat december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million .\nit is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed .\nreceivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 .\nlegal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 .\npresently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination .\nlike the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings .\nthe other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) .\nplaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 .\nin the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe .\nwe are vigorously defending these cases .\nwe have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases .\nwe do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nwe voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 .\nwe are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases .\na qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government .\nthe case currently pending is u.s .\nex rel harrold e .\nwright v .\nagip petroleum co .\net al .\nit is primarily a gas valuation case .\nmarathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms .\nsuch settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nguarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies .\nunder the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements .\nin addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "19", "33", ")", "divide(", "#0", "33", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.42424"}
{"example_id": "APD/2018/page_59.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentual increase in the operating expenses during 2017 and 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nincome tax liabilities tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax benefits as of 30 september 2018 were $ 233.6 .\nthese tax liabilities were excluded from the contractual obligations table as it is impractical to determine a cash impact by year given that payments will vary according to changes in tax laws , tax rates , and our operating results .\nin addition , there are uncertainties in timing of the effective settlement of our uncertain tax positions with respective taxing authorities .\nhowever , the contractual obligations table above includes our accrued liability of approximately $ 184 for deemed repatriation tax that is payable over eight years related to the tax act .\nrefer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nobligation for future contribution to an equity affiliate on 19 april 2015 , a joint venture between air products and acwa holding entered into a 20-year oxygen and nitrogen supply agreement to supply saudi aramco 2019s oil refinery and power plant being built in jazan , saudi arabia .\nair products owns 25% ( 25 % ) of the joint venture and guarantees the repayment of its share of an equity bridge loan .\nin total , we expect to invest approximately $ 100 in this joint venture .\nas of 30 september 2018 , we recorded a noncurrent liability of $ 94.4 for our obligation to make future equity contributions in 2020 based on our proportionate share of the advances received by the joint venture under the loan .\nexpected investment in joint venture on 12 august 2018 , air products entered an agreement to form a gasification/power joint venture ( \"jv\" ) with saudi aramco and acwa in jazan , saudi arabia .\nair products will own at least 55% ( 55 % ) of the jv , with saudi aramco and acwa power owning the balance .\nthe jv will purchase the gasification assets , power block , and the associated utilities from saudi aramco for approximately $ 8 billion .\nour expected investment has been excluded from the contractual obligations table above pending closing , which is currently expected in fiscal year 2020 .\nthe jv will own and operate the facility under a 25-year contract for a fixed monthly fee .\nsaudi aramco will supply feedstock to the jv , and the jv will produce power , hydrogen and other utilities for saudi aramco .\npension benefits the company and certain of its subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans that cover a substantial portion of its worldwide employees .\nthe principal defined benefit pension plans are the u.s .\nsalaried pension plan and the u.k .\npension plan .\nthese plans were closed to new participants in 2005 , after which defined contribution plans were offered to new employees .\nthe shift to defined contribution plans is expected to continue to reduce volatility of both plan expense and contributions .\nthe fair market value of plan assets for our defined benefit pension plans as of the 30 september 2018 measurement date decreased to $ 4273.1 from $ 4409.2 at the end of fiscal year 2017 .\nthe projected benefit obligation for these plans was $ 4583.3 and $ 5107.2 at the end of fiscal years 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nthe net unfunded liability decreased $ 387.8 from $ 698.0 to $ 310.2 , primarily due to higher discount rates and favorable asset experience .\nrefer to note 16 , retirement benefits , to the consolidated financial statements for comprehensive and detailed disclosures on our postretirement benefits .\npension expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\t2016\npension expense 2013 continuing operations\t$ 91.8\t$ 72.0\t$ 55.8\nsettlements termination benefits and curtailments ( included above )\t48.9\t15.0\t6.0\nweighted average discount rate 2013 service cost\t3.2% ( 3.2 % )\t2.9% ( 2.9 % )\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\nweighted average discount rate 2013 interest cost\t2.9% ( 2.9 % )\t2.5% ( 2.5 % )\t3.4% ( 3.4 % )\nweighted average expected rate of return on plan assets\t6.9% ( 6.9 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\t7.5% ( 7.5 % )\nweighted average expected rate of compensation increase\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "91.8", "72.0", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "const_1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.275"}
{"example_id": "LLY/2018/page_63.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in raw materials and supplies between 2017 and 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 6 : inventories we use the last-in , first-out ( lifo ) method for the majority of our inventories located in the continental u.s .\nother inventories are valued by the first-in , first-out ( fifo ) method .\nfifo cost approximates current replacement cost .\ninventories measured using lifo must be valued at the lower of cost or market .\ninventories measured using fifo must be valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value .\ninventories at december 31 consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\nfinished products\t$ 988.1\t$ 1211.4\nwork in process\t2628.2\t2697.7\nraw materials and supplies\t506.5\t488.8\ntotal ( approximates replacement cost )\t4122.8\t4397.9\nincrease ( reduction ) to lifo cost\t-11.0 ( 11.0 )\t60.4\ninventories\t$ 4111.8\t$ 4458.3\n\nPost-table text:\ninventories valued under the lifo method comprised $ 1.57 billion and $ 1.56 billion of total inventories at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\nnote 7 : financial instruments financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of trade receivables and interest- bearing investments .\nwholesale distributors of life-science products account for a substantial portion of our trade receivables ; collateral is generally not required .\nwe seek to mitigate the risk associated with this concentration through our ongoing credit-review procedures and insurance .\na large portion of our cash is held by a few major financial institutions .\nwe monitor our exposures with these institutions and do not expect any of these institutions to fail to meet their obligations .\nmajor financial institutions represent the largest component of our investments in corporate debt securities .\nin accordance with documented corporate risk-management policies , we monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution or corporate issuer .\nwe are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to risk-management instruments but do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings .\nwe consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents .\nthe cost of these investments approximates fair value .\nour equity investments are accounted for using three different methods depending on the type of equity investment : 2022 investments in companies over which we have significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method , with our share of earnings or losses reported in other-net , ( income ) expense .\n2022 for equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values , we measure these investments at cost , less any impairment , plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar investment of the same issuer .\nany change in recorded value is recorded in other-net , ( income ) expense .\n2022 our public equity investments are measured and carried at fair value .\nany change in fair value is recognized in other-net , ( income ) expense .\nwe review equity investments other than public equity investments for indications of impairment on a regular basis .\nour derivative activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk-management policies and are intended to offset losses and gains on the assets , liabilities , and transactions being hedged .\nmanagement reviews the correlation and effectiveness of our derivatives on a quarterly basis. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "506.5", "488.8", ")", "divide(", "#0", "488.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03621"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2015/page_99.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the total long-term debt net from 2014 to 2015 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 10 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2015\t2014\nnotes with rates from 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) to 3.80% ( 3.80 % ) due 2016 to 2045\t$ 8150\t$ 1400\nnotes with rates from 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) to 5.72% ( 5.72 % ) due 2019 to 2046\t6089\t3589\nnotes with rates from 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) to 9.13% ( 9.13 % ) due 2016 to 2036\t1941\t1941\nother debt\t116\t111\ntotal long-term debt\t16296\t7041\nless : unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs\t-1035 ( 1035 )\t-899 ( 899 )\ntotal long-term debt net\t$ 15261\t$ 6142\n\nPost-table text:\nrevolving credit facilities on october 9 , 2015 , we entered into a new $ 2.5 billion revolving credit facility ( the 5-year facility ) with various banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in august 2019 .\nthe 5-year facility , which expires on october 9 , 2020 , is available for general corporate purposes .\nthe undrawn portion of the 5-year facility is also available to serve as a backup facility for the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase in the borrowing capacity under the 5-year facility of up to an additional $ 500 million .\nthere were no borrowings outstanding under the 5-year facility as of and during the year ended december 31 , in contemplation of our acquisition of sikorsky , on october 9 , 2015 , we also entered into a 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility , and together with the 5-year facility , the facilities ) with various banks that provided $ 7.0 billion of funding for general corporate purposes , including the acquisition of sikorsky .\nconcurrent with the consummation of the sikorsky acquisition , we borrowed $ 6.0 billion under the 364-day facility .\non november 23 , 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with proceeds received from an issuance of new debt ( see below ) and terminated any remaining commitments of the lenders under the 364-day facility .\nborrowings under the facilities bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the facilities 2019 agreements .\neach bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the 5-year facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties , and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the five-year facility agreement .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the 5-year facility agreement , as well as in our debt agreements .\nlong-term debt on november 23 , 2015 , we issued $ 7.0 billion of notes ( the november 2015 notes ) in a registered public offering .\nwe received net proceeds of $ 6.9 billion from the offering , after deducting discounts and debt issuance costs , which are being amortized as interest expense over the life of the debt .\nthe november 2015 notes consist of : 2022 $ 750 million maturing in 2018 with a fixed interest rate of 1.85% ( 1.85 % ) ( the 2018 notes ) ; 2022 $ 1.25 billion maturing in 2020 with a fixed interest rate of 2.50% ( 2.50 % ) ( the 2020 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2023 with a fixed interest rate of 3.10% ( 3.10 % ) the 2023 notes ) ; 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2026 with a fixed interest rate of 3.55% ( 3.55 % ) ( the 2026 notes ) ; 2022 $ 500 million maturing in 2036 with a fixed interest rate of 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) ( the 2036 notes ) ; and 2022 $ 2.0 billion maturing in 2046 with a fixed interest rate of 4.70% ( 4.70 % ) ( the 2046 notes ) .\nwe may , at our option , redeem some or all of the november 2015 notes and unpaid interest at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus any make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption .\ninterest is payable on the 2018 notes and the 2020 notes on may 23 and november 23 of each year , beginning on may 23 , 2016 ; on the 2023 notes and the 2026 notes on january 15 and july 15 of each year , beginning on july 15 , 2016 ; and on the 2036 notes and the 2046 notes on may 15 and november 15 of each year , beginning on may 15 , 2016 .\nthe november 2015 notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness .\nthe proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay $ 6.0 billion of borrowings under our 364-day facility and for general corporate purposes. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15261", "6142", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9119"}
{"example_id": "CME/2017/page_97.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow many directors can be elected by the class b-1 and class b-2 shareholders?\n\nPre-table text:\n14 .\ncapital stock shares outstanding .\nthe following table presents information regarding capital stock: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nclass a common stock authorized\t1000000\t1000000\nclass a common stock issued and outstanding\t339235\t338240\nclass b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.6\t0.6\nclass b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.8\t0.8\nclass b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t1.3\t1.3\nclass b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.4\t0.4\n\nPost-table text:\ncme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .\nassociated trading rights .\nmembers of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .\na cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .\nthe class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .\ntrading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .\nmembers of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .\ncore rights .\nholders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .\nthese core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .\nvotes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .\neach class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .\nthe approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .\nholders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .\nvoting rights .\nwith the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .\nin these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .\ntransfer restrictions .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .\nthese transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .\nelection of directors .\nthe cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .\nholders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .\nthe remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "const_3", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_56.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby what percentage did the average wti crude oil benchmark decrease from 2007 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe .\nour operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .\n2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis .\n2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states .\ncertain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .\nthese statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .\nin accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements .\nwe hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) .\nas discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings .\nour investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nunless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .\nbusiness , item 1a .\nrisk factors , item 6 .\nselected financial data and item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data .\noverview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .\nprices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year .\nprices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark\t2009\t2008\t2007\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\t$ 62.09\t$ 99.75\t$ 72.41\ndated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\t$ 61.67\t$ 97.26\t$ 72.39\nhenry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )\t$ 3.99\t$ 9.04\t$ 6.86\n\nPost-table text:\nhenry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index .\ncrude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession .\nthe price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 .\nour domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does .\nsour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark .\nthe differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "62.09", "72.41", ")", "divide(", "#0", "72.41", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.14252"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_62.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in the balance of liability for restructuring 2003 program from 2006 to 2008 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .\n\nTable:\n\t2007 program\t2003 program\t2001 program\ttotal\nliability at december 31 2006\t$ 2014\t$ 12.6\t$ 19.2\t$ 31.8\nnet charges ( reversals ) and adjustments\t19.1\t-0.5 ( 0.5 )\t-5.2 ( 5.2 )\t13.4\npayments and other1\t-7.2 ( 7.2 )\t-3.1 ( 3.1 )\t-5.3 ( 5.3 )\t-15.6 ( 15.6 )\nliability at december 31 2007\t$ 11.9\t$ 9.0\t$ 8.7\t$ 29.6\nnet charges and adjustments\t4.3\t0.8\t0.7\t5.8\npayments and other1\t-15.0 ( 15.0 )\t-4.1 ( 4.1 )\t-3.5 ( 3.5 )\t-22.6 ( 22.6 )\nliability at december 31 2008\t$ 1.2\t$ 5.7\t$ 5.9\t$ 12.8\n\nPost-table text:\n1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nother reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .\ncharges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .\nwe expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .\ncharges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .\nthe charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5.7", "12.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-6.9"}
{"example_id": "EW/2016/page_94.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the value , in millions of dollars , of the total issuable stock in 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nedwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 13 .\ncommon stock ( continued ) the company also maintains the nonemployee directors stock incentive compensation program ( the 2018 2018nonemployee directors program 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , upon a director 2019s initial election to the board , the director receives an initial grant of stock options or restricted stock units equal to a fair market value on grant date of $ 0.2 million , not to exceed 20000 shares .\nthese grants vest over three years from the date of grant , subject to the director 2019s continued service .\nin addition , annually each nonemployee director may receive up to 40000 stock options or 16000 restricted stock units of the company 2019s common stock , or a combination thereof , provided that in no event may the total value of the combined annual award exceed $ 0.2 million .\nthese grants generally vest over one year from the date of grant .\nunder the nonemployee directors program , an aggregate of 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock has been authorized for issuance .\nthe company has an employee stock purchase plan for united states employees and a plan for international employees ( collectively 2018 2018espp 2019 2019 ) .\nunder the espp , eligible employees may purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value of edwards lifesciences common stock on the effective date of subscription or the date of purchase .\nunder the espp , employees can authorize the company to withhold up to 12% ( 12 % ) of their compensation for common stock purchases , subject to certain limitations .\nthe espp is available to all active employees of the company paid from the united states payroll and to eligible employees of the company outside the united states , to the extent permitted by local law .\nthe espp for united states employees is qualified under section 423 of the internal revenue code .\nthe number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the espp was 13.8 million shares .\nthe fair value of each option award and employee stock purchase subscription is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following tables .\nthe risk-free interest rate is estimated using the u.s .\ntreasury yield curve and is based on the expected term of the award .\nexpected volatility is estimated based on a blend of the weighted-average of the historical volatility of edwards lifesciences 2019 stock and the implied volatility from traded options on edwards lifesciences 2019 stock .\nthe expected term of awards granted is estimated from the vesting period of the award , as well as historical exercise behavior , and represents the period of time that awards granted are expected to be outstanding .\nthe company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and has estimated an annual forfeiture rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) .\nthe black-scholes option pricing model was used with the following weighted-average assumptions for options granted during the following periods : option awards .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\naverage risk-free interest rate\t1.1% ( 1.1 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\t1.5% ( 1.5 % )\nexpected dividend yield\tnone\tnone\tnone\nexpected volatility\t33% ( 33 % )\t30% ( 30 % )\t31% ( 31 % )\nexpected life ( years )\t4.5\t4.6\t4.6\nfair value per share\t$ 31.00\t$ 18.13\t$ 11.75\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "13.8", "11.75", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "162.15"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_88.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change of the net favorable prior period development from 2010 to 2008\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table shows the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2009\t2008\nloss and loss expense ratio as reported\t59.2% ( 59.2 % )\t58.8% ( 58.8 % )\t60.6% ( 60.6 % )\ncatastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums\t( 3.2 ) % (  % )\t( 1.2 ) % (  % )\t( 4.7 ) % (  % )\nprior period development\t4.6% ( 4.6 % )\t4.9% ( 4.9 % )\t6.8% ( 6.8 % )\nlarge assumed loss portfolio transfers\t( 0.3 ) % (  % )\t( 0.8 ) % (  % )\t0.0% ( 0.0 % )\nloss and loss expense ratio adjusted\t60.3% ( 60.3 % )\t61.7% ( 61.7 % )\t62.7% ( 62.7 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe recorded net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 366 million in 2010 compared with net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 137 million and $ 567 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthe catastrophe losses for 2010 were primarily related to weather- related events in the u.s. , earthquakes in chile , mexico , and new zealand , and storms in australia and europe .\nthe catastrophe losses for 2009 were primarily related to an earthquake in asia , floods in europe , several weather-related events in the u.s. , and a european windstorm .\nfor 2008 , the catastrophe losses were primarily related to hurricanes gustav and ike .\nprior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from pre- vious accident years .\nwe experienced $ 503 million of net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments in 2010 .\nthis compares with net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments of $ 576 million and $ 814 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nrefer to 201cprior period development 201d for more information .\nthe adjusted loss and loss expense ratio declined in 2010 , compared with 2009 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , non-recurring premium adjustment and the reduction in assumed loss portfolio business , which is written at higher loss ratios than other types of business .\nour policy acquisition costs include commissions , premium taxes , underwriting , and other costs that vary with , and are primarily related to , the production of premium .\nadministrative expenses include all other operating costs .\nour policy acquis- ition cost ratio increased in 2010 , compared with 2009 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the impact of crop settlements , which generated higher profit-share commissions and a lower adjustment to net premiums earned , as well as the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with catastrophe activity and changes in business mix .\nour administrative expense ratio increased in 2010 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , reinstatement premiums expensed , and increased costs in our international operations .\nalthough the crop settlements generate minimal administrative expenses , they resulted in lower adjustment to net premiums earned in 2010 , compared with 2009 .\nadministrative expenses in 2010 , were partially offset by higher net results generated by our third party claims administration business , esis , the results of which are included within our administrative expenses .\nesis generated $ 85 million in net results in 2010 , compared with $ 26 million in 2009 .\nthe increase is primarily from non-recurring sources .\nour policy acquisition cost ratio was stable in 2009 , compared with 2008 , as increases in our combined insurance operations were offset by more favorable final crop year settlement of profit share commissions .\nadministrative expenses increased in 2009 , primarily due to the inclusion of administrative expenses related to combined insurance for the full year and costs associated with new product expansion in our domestic retail operation and in our personal lines business .\nour effective income tax rate , which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax , is depend- ent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates .\na change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate .\nour effective income tax rate was 15 percent in 2010 , compared with 17 percent and 24 percent in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthe decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2010 , was primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings to lower tax-paying jurisdictions , a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which was the result of a settlement with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service appeals division regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002-2004 , and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of rain and hail .\nthe 2009 year included a reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to investments .\nfor 2008 , our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by a change in mix of earnings due to the impact of catastrophe losses in lower tax-paying jurisdictions .\nprior period development the favorable prior period development , inclusive of the life segment , of $ 512 million during 2010 was the net result of sev- eral underlying favorable and adverse movements .\nwith respect to ace 2019s crop business , ace regularly receives reports from its managing general agent ( mga ) relating to the previous crop year ( s ) in subsequent calendar quarters and this typically results .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "503", "814", ")", "divide(", "#0", "814", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.38206"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2004/page_36.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise in 2004 , compared with in 2003 , in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe catlettsburg refinery multi-year improvement project was completed during early 2004 .\nat a cost of approximately $ 440 million , the project improves product yields and lowers overall refinery costs while making gasoline with less than 30 parts per million of sulfur , which allows map to meet tier ii gasoline regulations which became effective on january 1 , 2004 .\nmap is constructing approximately $ 300 million in new capital projects for its 74000 bpd detroit , michigan refinery .\none of the projects , a $ 110 million expansion project , is expected to raise the crude oil capacity at the refinery by 35 percent to 100000 bpd .\nother projects are expected to enable the refinery to produce new clean fuels and further control regulated air emissions .\ncompletion of the projects is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2005 .\nmarketing in 2004 map 2019s refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 20.4 billion gallons ( 1329000 bpd ) .\nthe wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers , primarily located in the midwest , the upper great plains and the southeast , and sales in the spot market , accounted for approximately 70 percent of map 2019s refined product sales volumes in 2004 , excluding sales related to matching buy/sell transactions .\napproximately 52 percent of map 2019s gasoline sales volumes and 92 percent of its distillate sales volumes were sold on a wholesale or spot market basis to independent unbranded customers or other wholesalers in 2004 .\napproximately 55 percent of map 2019s propane is sold into the home heating markets and industrial consumers purchase the balance .\npropylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are marketed to customers in the chemical industry .\nbase lube oils and slack wax are sold throughout the united states .\npitch is also sold domestically , but approximately 16 percent of pitch products are exported into growing markets in canada , mexico , india and south america .\nmap markets asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and the southeast .\nthe map customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .\nthe following table sets forth the volume of map 2019s consolidated refined product sales by product group for each of the last three years : refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2004 2003 2002 .\n\nTable:\n( thousands of barrels per day )\t2004\t2003\t2002\ngasoline\t807\t776\t773\ndistillates\t373\t365\t346\npropane\t22\t21\t22\nfeedstocks and special products\t92\t97\t82\nheavy fuel oil\t27\t24\t20\nasphalt\t79\t74\t75\ntotal\t1400\t1357\t1318\nmatching buy/sell volumes included in above\t71\t64\t71\n\nPost-table text:\nmap sells reformulated gasoline in parts of its marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin .\nmap also sells low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , map supplied petroleum products to about 3900 marathon and ashland branded retail outlets located primarily in michigan , ohio , indiana , kentucky and illinois .\nbranded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , minnesota , virginia , pennsylvania , north carolina , alabama , and south carolina .\nssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , ssa had 1669 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.3 billion in 2004 , compared with $ 2.2 billion in 2003 .\nprofit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel .\npilot travel centers llc ( 2018 2018ptc 2019 2019 ) , a joint venture with pilot corporation ( 2018 2018pilot 2019 2019 ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with approximately 250 locations in 35 states at december 31 , 2004 .\nthe travel centers .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2.3", "2.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2017/page_77.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total purchase consideration is allocated to goodwill?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\ncash\t$ 45826\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t42721\nacquired technology\t27954\ntrade name\t2901\nother assets\t2337\ndeferred income tax assets ( liabilities )\t-9788 ( 9788 )\nother liabilities\t-49797 ( 49797 )\ntotal identifiable net assets\t62154\ngoodwill\t203828\ntotal purchase consideration\t$ 265982\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .\ngoodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes .\nthe customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .\nnote 3 2014 settlement processing assets and obligations funds settlement refers to the process of transferring funds for sales and credits between card issuers and merchants .\nfor transactions processed on our systems , we use our internal network to provide funding instructions to financial institutions that in turn fund the merchants .\nwe process funds settlement under two models , a sponsorship model and a direct membership model .\nunder the sponsorship model , we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa , which means that member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsor us and require our adherence to the standards of the payment networks .\nin certain markets , we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements with financial institution sponsors .\nthese agreements allow us to route transactions under the members 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa .\nin this model , the standards of the payment networks restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing merchant settlement funds , and , instead , require that these funds be in the possession of the member until the merchant is funded .\nunder the direct membership model , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship .\nin this model , we route and clear transactions directly through the card brand 2019s network and are not restricted from performing funds settlement .\notherwise , we process these transactions similarly to how we process transactions in the sponsorship model .\nwe are required to adhere to the standards of the payment networks in which we are direct members .\nwe maintain relationships with financial institutions , which may also serve as our member sponsors for other card brands or in other markets , to assist with funds settlement .\ntiming differences , interchange fees , merchant reserves and exception items cause differences between the amount received from the payment networks and the amount funded to the merchants .\nthese intermediary balances arising in our settlement process for direct merchants are reflected as settlement processing assets and obligations on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsettlement processing assets and obligations include the components outlined below : 2022 interchange reimbursement .\nour receivable from merchants for the portion of the discount fee related to reimbursement of the interchange fee .\nglobal payments inc .\n| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 77 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "203828", "265982", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.76632"}
{"example_id": "APD/2013/page_40.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2011-2013 , what is the average capital expenditure on a gaap basis?\n\nPre-table text:\nbusiness restructuring actions , including the settlement of a long-term take-or-pay silane contract .\nthe current year payments were partially offset by a $ 69.7 net increase to accrued liabilities for the current year cost reduction and business restructuring actions .\nfor the year ended 2012 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 1765.1 .\nincome from continuing operations of $ 999.2 reflected the non-cash gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials of $ 85.9 , the write- down of long-lived assets associated with restructuring and a customer bankruptcy of $ 80.2 , and a non-cash tax benefit of $ 58.3 recognized as a result of the second quarter spanish tax ruling .\nthe working capital accounts were a source of cash of $ 100.1 .\nthe provision for the cost reduction and business restructuring plans resulted in an increase to accrued liabilities of $ 223.9 , partially offset by a use of cash of $ 32.9 for payments made in relation to these plans .\nfor the year ended 2011 , cash provided by operating activities was $ 1710.4 .\nincome from continuing operations of $ 1134.3 reflected the non-cash net loss of $ 48.5 related to the airgas transaction .\nwe also made cash payments of $ 156.2 related to the airgas transaction .\nthe working capital accounts were a use of cash of $ 114.6 , including $ 107.5 for an increase in inventory primarily to support growth in our performance materials business .\ninvesting activities for the year ended 30 september 2013 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1697.0 , primarily driven by capital expenditures for plant and equipment and acquisitions .\nfor the year ended 30 september 2012 , cash used for investing activities was $ 2435.2 , primarily driven by capital expenditures for plant and equipment , acquisitions , and investments in unconsolidated affiliates .\nrefer to the capital expenditures section below for additional detail .\nfor the year ended 30 september 2011 , cash used for investing activities was $ 1169.8 , primarily driven by capital expenditures for plant and equipment .\nwe received proceeds of $ 94.7 from the sale of approximately 1.5 million shares of airgas stock .\nrefer to note 6 , airgas transaction , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding this transaction .\ncapital expenditures capital expenditures are detailed in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nadditions to plant and equipment\t$ 1524.2\t$ 1521.0\t$ 1309.3\nacquisitions less cash acquired\t224.9\t863.4\t10.8\ninvestments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates\t-1.3 ( 1.3 )\t175.4\t45.8\ncapital expenditures on a gaap basis\t$ 1747.8\t$ 2559.8\t$ 1365.9\ncapital lease expenditures ( a )\t234.9\t212.2\t173.5\nnoncurrent liability related to purchase of shares from noncontrolling interests ( a )\t14.0\t6.3\t2014\ncapital expenditures on a non-gaap basis\t$ 1996.7\t$ 2778.3\t$ 1539.4\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) we utilize a non-gaap measure in the computation of capital expenditures and include spending associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases and purchases of noncontrolling interests .\ncertain contracts associated with facilities that are built to provide product to a specific customer are required to be accounted for as leases , and such spending is reflected as a use of cash within cash provided by operating activities , if the arrangement qualifies as a capital lease .\nadditionally , the purchase of noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary is accounted for as an equity transaction and will be reflected as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows .\nthe presentation of this non-gaap measure is intended to enhance the usefulness of information by providing a measure that our management uses internally to evaluate and manage our expenditures .\ncapital expenditures on a gaap basis in 2013 totaled $ 1747.8 , compared to $ 2559.8 in 2012 , resulting in a decrease of $ 812.0 , primarily due to the acquisition of indura s.a .\nin 2012 .\nadditions to plant and equipment are largely in support of the merchant gases and tonnage gases businesses .\nadditions to plant and equipment also included support capital of a routine , ongoing nature , including expenditures for distribution equipment and facility improvements .\nspending in 2013 included plant and equipment constructed to provide oxygen for coal gasification in china , hydrogen to the global market , and renewable energy in the u.k .\nin 2013 , we completed three acquisitions with an aggregate cash use , net of cash acquired , of $ 224.9 .\nin the fourth quarter , we acquired an air separation unit and integrated gases liquefier in guiyang , china .\nduring the third quarter , we acquired epco , the largest independent u.s .\nproducer of liquid carbon dioxide ( co2 ) , and wcg .\nin 2012 , we acquired a controlling stake in indura s.a .\nfor $ 690 and e.i .\ndupont de nemours and co. , inc . 2019s 50% ( 50 % ) interest in our joint venture , da nanomaterials for $ 147 .\nwe also purchased a 25% ( 25 % ) equity interest in abdullah hashim industrial gases & equipment co .\nltd .\n( ahg ) , an unconsolidated affiliate , for $ 155 in the third quarter. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "capital expenditures on a gaap basis", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1891.16667"}
{"example_id": "GS/2013/page_152.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions , for 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , what was average currency hedges?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements net investment hedges the firm seeks to reduce the impact of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on its net investment in certain non- u.s .\noperations through the use of foreign currency forward contracts and foreign currency-denominated debt .\nfor foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedges , the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on the overall changes in the fair value of the forward contracts ( i.e. , based on changes in forward rates ) .\nfor foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a hedge , the effectiveness of the hedge is assessed based on changes in spot rates .\nfor qualifying net investment hedges , the gains or losses on the hedging instruments , to the extent effective , are included in 201ccurrency translation 201d within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income .\nthe table below presents the gains/ ( losses ) from net investment hedging. .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tyear ended december 2013\tyear ended december 2012\tyear ended december 2011\ncurrency hedges\t$ 150\t$ -233 ( 233 )\t$ 160\nforeign currency-denominated debt hedges\t470\t347\t-147 ( 147 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe gain/ ( loss ) related to ineffectiveness was not material for 2013 , 2012 or 2011 .\nthe loss reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income was not material for 2013 or 2012 , and was $ 186 million for 2011 .\nas of december 2013 and december 2012 , the firm had designated $ 1.97 billion and $ 2.77 billion , respectively , of foreign currency-denominated debt , included in 201cunsecured long-term borrowings 201d and 201cunsecured short- term borrowings , 201d as hedges of net investments in non- u.s .\nsubsidiaries .\ncash flow hedges beginning in the third quarter of 2013 , the firm designated certain commodities-related swap and forward contracts as cash flow hedges .\nthese swap and forward contracts hedge the firm 2019s exposure to the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sales of certain energy commodities by one of the firm 2019s consolidated investments .\nthe firm applies a statistical method that utilizes regression analysis when assessing hedge effectiveness .\na cash flow hedge is considered highly effective in offsetting changes in forecasted cash flows attributable to the hedged risk when the regression analysis results in a coefficient of determination of 80% ( 80 % ) or greater and a slope between 80% ( 80 % ) and 125% ( 125 % ) .\nfor qualifying cash flow hedges , the gains or losses on derivatives , to the extent effective , are included in 201ccash flow hedges 201d within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income .\ngains or losses resulting from hedge ineffectiveness are included in 201cother principal transactions 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings .\nthe effective portion of the gains , before taxes , recognized on these cash flow hedges was $ 14 million for 2013 .\nthe gain/ ( loss ) related to hedge ineffectiveness was not material for 2013 .\nthere were no gains/ ( losses ) excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income during 2013 .\nthe amounts recorded in 201ccash flow hedges 201d will be reclassified to 201cother principal transactions 201d in the same periods as the corresponding gain or loss on the sale of the hedged energy commodities , which is also recorded in 201cother principal transactions . 201d the firm expects to reclassify $ 5 million of gains , net of taxes , related to cash flow hedges from 201ccash flow hedges 201d to earnings within the next twelve months .\nthe length of time over which the firm is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions is approximately two years .\n150 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "currency hedges", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "25.66667"}
{"example_id": "VTR/2007/page_47.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the number of shares outstanding as of december 31 , 2007\n\nPre-table text:\nas of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record .\ndividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock .\non february 13 , 2008 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2008 dividend in the amount of $ 0.5125 per share , payable on march 28 , 2008 to stockholders of record on march 6 , 2008 .\nwe expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2008 .\nour board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis .\nbecause the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above .\nplease see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy .\nour stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan .\nsee 201cnote 16 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k .\ndirector and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation .\nstock repurchases the table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 : number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per .\n\nTable:\n\tnumber of shares repurchased ( 1 )\taverage price per share\noctober 1 through october 31\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1 through november 30\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1 through december 31\t14669\t$ 43.89\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "138311810", "14669", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "138297141"}
{"example_id": "AMAT/2013/page_18.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is percentage change in rd&e spendings from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .\nbacklog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .\nbacklog by reportable segment as of october 27 , 2013 and october 28 , 2012 was as follows : 2013 2012 ( in millions , except percentages ) .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t\t( in millions except percentages )\nsilicon systems group\t$ 1295\t55% ( 55 % )\t$ 705\t44% ( 44 % )\napplied global services\t591\t25% ( 25 % )\t580\t36% ( 36 % )\ndisplay\t361\t15% ( 15 % )\t206\t13% ( 13 % )\nenergy and environmental solutions\t125\t5% ( 5 % )\t115\t7% ( 7 % )\ntotal\t$ 2372\t100% ( 100 % )\t$ 1606\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\napplied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .\ncustomers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .\ndelays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .\nmanufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .\napplied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .\napplied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .\nalthough applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .\naccordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .\napplied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .\nresearch , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products .\nthe company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .\napplied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .\nproduct development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .\nin addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india .\nprocess support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .\napplied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 , and $ 1.1 billion ( 11 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2011 .\napplied has spent an average of 14 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .\nin addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1.3", "1.2", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08333"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_376.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of of the total variance in net revenue is attributed to the variance in volume/weather?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .\nresults of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\n2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .\nnet revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 540.2\nretail electric price\t36.0\nvolume/weather\t21.3\npurchased power capacity\t-24.6 ( 24.6 )\nother\t4.9\n2011 net revenue\t$ 577.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .\nusage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "577.8", "540.2", ")", "divide(", "21.3", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.56649"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_124.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin the number of securities to be issued what is the ratio of the stock rights from the 2012 plan to the 2011 plan included in these securities\n\nPre-table text:\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .\nequity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights\tnumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\nequity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .\nof these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .\nin addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .\n( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .\nitem 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "28763", "27123", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.06047"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_33.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the change in the net revenues from dec . 282012 dec . 29 2013\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows .\nmd&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview .\ndiscussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a .\n2022 critical accounting estimates .\naccounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts .\n2022 results of operations .\nan analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources .\nan analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity .\n2022 fair value of financial instruments .\ndiscussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments .\n2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements .\noverview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule .\nthe various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties .\nwords such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements .\nin addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements .\nsuch statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k .\nour actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 .\noverview our results of operations for each period were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions except per share amounts )\tthree months ended dec . 282013\tthree months ended sept . 282013\tthree months ended change\tthree months ended dec . 282013\tthree months ended dec . 292012\tchange\nnet revenue\t$ 13834\t$ 13483\t$ 351\t$ 52708\t$ 53341\t$ -633 ( 633 )\ngross margin\t$ 8571\t$ 8414\t$ 157\t$ 31521\t$ 33151\t$ -1630 ( 1630 )\ngross margin percentage\t62.0% ( 62.0 % )\t62.4% ( 62.4 % )\t( 0.4 ) % (  % )\t59.8% ( 59.8 % )\t62.1% ( 62.1 % )\t( 2.3 ) % (  % )\noperating income\t$ 3549\t$ 3504\t$ 45\t$ 12291\t$ 14638\t$ -2347 ( 2347 )\nnet income\t$ 2625\t$ 2950\t$ -325 ( 325 )\t$ 9620\t$ 11005\t$ -1385 ( 1385 )\ndiluted earnings per common share\t$ 0.51\t$ 0.58\t$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )\t$ 1.89\t$ 2.13\t$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )\n\nPost-table text:\nrevenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 .\npccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization .\ndcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year .\nhigher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 .\nin response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities .\nthese actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "52708", "53341", ")", "divide(", "#0", "53341", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.01187"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2013/page_118.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 149 million at entergy louisiana and $ 97 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 95 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2014\t$ 385373\n2015\t$ 1110566\n2016\t$ 270852\n2017\t$ 766801\n2018\t$ 1324616\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nin july 2003 a payment of $ 102 million was made prior to maturity on the note payable to nypa .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2015 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2015 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2014 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "766801", "270852", ")", "divide(", "#0", "270852", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.83107"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_160.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of the balance increase is attributed to balances assumed in acquisitions?\n\nPre-table text:\n19 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .\nat december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthe year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .\ngoodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .\nsee note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .\ncurrent income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .\nas of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nthe company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .\nthe excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nthe determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .\nthe following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tyear ended december 31 , 2012\tyear ended december 31 , 2011\tyear ended december 31 , 2010\nbalance at january 1\t$ 349\t$ 307\t$ 285\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t4\t22\t10\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-1 ( 1 )\t-17 ( 17 )\nadditions based on tax positions related to current year\t69\t46\t35\nlapse of statute of limitations\t2014\t2014\t-8 ( 8 )\nsettlements\t-29 ( 29 )\t-25 ( 25 )\t-2 ( 2 )\npositions assumed in acquisitions\t12\t2014\t4\nbalance at december 31\t$ 404\t$ 349\t$ 307\n\nPost-table text:\nincluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .\nthe company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .\nrelated to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .\npursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .\nblackrock is subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .\ntax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .\nfederal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .\nwith few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .\nfederal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .\nthe internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .\nin november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nin july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .\nthe tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nthe company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .\nthe significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .\nno state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .\nno state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "404", "285", ")", "add(", "4", "12", ")", "divide(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13445"}
{"example_id": "BDX/2018/page_82.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2018 what was the ratio of the service cost to the interest cost\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .\npostretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .\nthe measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .\neffective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .\npension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tpension plans 2018\tpension plans 2017\tpension plans 2016\nservice cost\t$ 136\t$ 110\t$ 81\ninterest cost\t90\t61\t72\nexpected return on plan assets\t-154 ( 154 )\t-112 ( 112 )\t-109 ( 109 )\namortization of prior service credit\t-13 ( 13 )\t-14 ( 14 )\t-15 ( 15 )\namortization of loss\t78\t92\t77\nsettlements\t2\t2014\t7\nnet pension cost\t$ 137\t$ 138\t$ 113\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans\t$ 34\t$ 43\t$ 35\n\nPost-table text:\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .\nthe settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .\nsupplemental pension plan .\nthe company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "90", "136", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.66176"}
{"example_id": "FIS/2007/page_94.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in rent expense from 2006 yo 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ncompany has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .\nas a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .\nthere were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .\nleases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .\nseveral of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .\nfuture minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2008\t83382\n2009\t63060\n2010\t35269\n2011\t21598\n2012\t14860\nthereafter\t30869\ntotal\t$ 249038\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .\nrent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .\ndata processing and maintenance services agreements .\nthe company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nhowever , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .\n( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .\nemployee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .\nsubsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .\nplan .\nunder the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .\npursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .\nshares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .\nthe company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .\nthe company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .\nfidelity national information services , inc .\nand subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "106.4", "81.5", ")", "divide(", "#0", "81.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.30552"}
{"example_id": "MA/2008/page_126.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in total liabilities for litigation settlements during 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nmastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) on june 24 , 2008 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201camerican express settlement 201d ) with american express company ( 201camerican express 201d ) relating to the u.s .\nfederal antitrust litigation between mastercard and american express .\nthe american express settlement ended all existing litigation between mastercard and american express .\nunder the terms of the american express settlement , mastercard is obligated to make 12 quarterly payments of up to $ 150000 per quarter beginning in the third quarter of 2008 .\nmastercard 2019s maximum nominal payments will total $ 1800000 .\nthe amount of each quarterly payment is contingent on the performance of american express 2019s u.s .\nglobal network services business .\nthe quarterly payments will be in an amount equal to 15% ( 15 % ) of american express 2019s u.s .\nglobal network services billings during the quarter , up to a maximum of $ 150000 per quarter .\nif , however , the payment for any quarter is less than $ 150000 , the maximum payment for subsequent quarters will be increased by the difference between $ 150000 and the lesser amount that was paid in any quarter in which there was a shortfall .\nmastercard assumes american express will achieve these financial hurdles .\nmastercard recorded the present value of $ 1800000 , at a 5.75% ( 5.75 % ) discount rate , or $ 1649345 for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .\nin 2003 , mastercard entered into a settlement agreement ( the 201cu.s .\nmerchant lawsuit settlement 201d ) related to the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit described under the caption 201cu.s .\nmerchant and consumer litigations 201d in note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) and contract disputes with certain customers .\nunder the terms of the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit settlement , the company was required to pay $ 125000 in 2003 and $ 100000 annually each december from 2004 through 2012 .\nin addition , in 2003 , several other lawsuits were initiated by merchants who opted not to participate in the plaintiff class in the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit .\nthe 201copt-out 201d merchant lawsuits were not covered by the terms of the u.s .\nmerchant lawsuit settlement and all have been individually settled .\nwe recorded liabilities for certain litigation settlements in prior periods .\ntotal liabilities for litigation settlements changed from december 31 , 2006 , as follows: .\n\nTable:\nbalance as of december 31 2006\t$ 476915\nprovision for litigation settlements ( note 20 )\t3400\ninterest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit\t38046\npayments\t-113925 ( 113925 )\nbalance as of december 31 2007\t404436\nprovision for discover settlement\t862500\nprovision for american express settlement\t1649345\nprovision for other litigation settlements\t6000\ninterest accretion on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement\t32879\ninterest accretion on american express settlement\t44300\npayments on american express settlement\t-300000 ( 300000 )\npayments on discover settlement\t-862500 ( 862500 )\npayment on u.s . merchant lawsuit settlement\t-100000 ( 100000 )\nother payments and accretion\t-662 ( 662 )\nbalance as of december 31 2008\t$ 1736298\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 20 ( legal and regulatory proceedings ) for additional discussion regarding the company 2019s legal proceedings. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1736298", "404436", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1331862"}
{"example_id": "AES/2016/page_185.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor the ipl cumulative preferred stock , what was the dividend rate at december 31 , 2016 and 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements december 31 , 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 the following table summarizes the company's redeemable stock of subsidiaries balances as of the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31,\t2016\t2015\nipalco common stock\t$ 618\t$ 460\ncolon quotas ( 1 )\t100\t2014\nipl preferred stock\t60\t60\nother common stock\t4\t2014\ndpl preferred stock\t2014\t18\ntotal redeemable stock of subsidiaries\t$ 782\t$ 538\n\nPost-table text:\n_____________________________ ( 1 ) characteristics of quotas are similar to common stock .\ncolon 2014 during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , our partner in colon increased their ownership from 25% ( 25 % ) to 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) and made capital contributions of $ 106 million .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to our partner , or measure the investment at fair value , will be classified as temporary equity each reporting period as it is probable that the shares will become redeemable .\nipl 2014 ipl had $ 60 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , which represented five series of preferred stock .\nthe total annual dividend requirements were approximately $ 3 million at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 .\ncertain series of the preferred stock were redeemable solely at the option of the issuer at prices between $ 100 and $ 118 per share .\nholders of the preferred stock are entitled to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors if ipl has not paid dividends to its preferred stockholders for four consecutive quarters .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect a majority of ipl's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares is considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock is considered temporary equity .\ndpl 2014 dpl had $ 18 million of cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , which represented three series of preferred stock issued by dp&l , a wholly-owned subsidiary of dpl .\nthe dp&l preferred stock was redeemable at dp&l's option as determined by its board of directors at per-share redemption prices between $ 101 and $ 103 per share , plus cumulative preferred dividends .\nin addition , dp&l's amended articles of incorporation contained provisions that permitted preferred stockholders to elect members of the dp&l board of directors in the event that cumulative dividends on the preferred stock are in arrears in an aggregate amount equivalent to at least four full quarterly dividends .\nbased on the preferred stockholders' ability to elect members of dp&l's board of directors in this circumstance , the redemption of the preferred shares was considered to be not solely within the control of the issuer and the preferred stock was considered temporary equity .\nin september 2016 , it became probable that the preferred shares would become redeemable .\nas such , the company recorded an adjustment of $ 5 million to retained earnings to adjust the preferred shares to their redemption value of $ 23 million .\nin october 2016 , dp&l redeemed all of its preferred shares .\nupon redemption , the preferred shares were no longer outstanding and all rights of the holders thereof as shareholders of dp&l ceased to exist .\nipalco 2014 in february 2015 , cdpq purchased 15% ( 15 % ) of aes us investment , inc. , a wholly-owned subsidiary that owns 100% ( 100 % ) of ipalco , for $ 247 million , with an option to invest an additional $ 349 million in ipalco through 2016 in exchange for a 17.65% ( 17.65 % ) equity stake .\nin april 2015 , cdpq invested an additional $ 214 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 24.90% ( 24.90 % ) .\nas a result of these transactions , $ 84 million in taxes and transaction costs were recognized as a net decrease to equity .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of 377 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nno gain or loss was recognized in net income as the transaction was not considered to be a sale of in-substance real estate .\nin march 2016 , cdpq exercised its remaining option by investing $ 134 million in ipalco , which resulted in cdpq's combined direct and indirect interest in ipalco of 30% ( 30 % ) .\nthe company also recognized an increase to additional paid-in capital and a reduction to retained earnings of $ 84 million for the excess of the fair value of the shares over their book value .\nin june 2016 , cdpq contributed an additional $ 24 million to ipalco , with no impact to the ownership structure of the investment .\nany subsequent adjustments to allocate earnings and dividends to cdpq will be classified as nci within permanent equity as it is not probable that the shares will become redeemable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3", "60", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05"}
{"example_id": "OKE/2012/page_52.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements?\n\nPre-table text:\nguidance to amend or clarify portions of the final rule in 2013 .\nwe anticipate that if the epa issues additional responses , amendments and/or policy guidance on the final rule , it will reduce the anticipated capital , operations and maintenance costs resulting from the regulation .\ngenerally , the nsps final rule will require expenditures for updated emissions controls , monitoring and record-keeping requirements at affected facilities in the crude-oil and natural gas industry .\nwe do not expect these expenditures will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\ncercla - the federal comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act , also commonly known as superfund ( cercla ) , imposes strict , joint and several liability , without regard to fault or the legality of the original act , on certain classes of 201cpersons 201d ( defined under cercla ) that caused and/or contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment .\nthese persons include but are not limited to the owner or operator of a facility where the release occurred and/or companies that disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances found at the facility .\nunder cercla , these persons may be liable for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances released into the environment , damages to natural resources and the costs of certain health studies .\nneither we nor oneok partners expect our respective responsibilities under cercla , for this facility and any other , will have a material impact on our respective results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nchemical site security - the united states department of homeland security released an interim rule in april 2007 that requires companies to provide reports on sites where certain chemicals , including many hydrocarbon products , are stored .\nwe completed the homeland security assessments , and our facilities subsequently were assigned one of four risk-based tiers ranging from high ( tier 1 ) to low ( tier 4 ) risk , or not tiered at all due to low risk .\nto date , four of our facilities have been given a tier 4 rating .\nfacilities receiving a tier 4 rating are required to complete site security plans and possible physical security enhancements .\nwe do not expect the site security plans and possible security enhancements cost will have a material impact on our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\npipeline security - the united states department of homeland security 2019s transportation security administration and the dot have completed a review and inspection of our 201ccritical facilities 201d and identified no material security issues .\nalso , the transportation security administration has released new pipeline security guidelines that include broader definitions for the determination of pipeline 201ccritical facilities . 201d we have reviewed our pipeline facilities according to the new guideline requirements , and there have been no material changes required to date .\nenvironmental footprint - our environmental and climate change strategy focuses on taking steps to minimize the impact of our operations on the environment .\nthese strategies include : ( i ) developing and maintaining an accurate greenhouse gas emissions inventory according to current rules issued by the epa ; ( ii ) improving the efficiency of our various pipelines , natural gas processing facilities and natural gas liquids fractionation facilities ; ( iii ) following developing technologies for emission control and the capture of carbon dioxide to keep it from reaching the atmosphere ; and ( iv ) utilizing practices to reduce the loss of methane from our facilities .\nwe participate in the epa 2019s natural gas star program to voluntarily reduce methane emissions .\nwe continue to focus on maintaining low rates of lost-and-unaccounted-for natural gas through expanded implementation of best practices to limit the release of natural gas during pipeline and facility maintenance and operations .\nemployees we employed 4859 people at january 31 , 2013 , including 705 people at kansas gas service who are subject to collective bargaining agreements .\nthe following table sets forth our contracts with collective bargaining units at january 31 , 2013: .\n\nTable:\nunion\temployees\tcontract expires\nthe united steelworkers\t406\toctober 28 2016\ninternational brotherhood of electrical workers ( ibew )\t299\tjune 30 2014\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "705", "4859", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.14509"}
{"example_id": "ETFC/2011/page_82.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 312011 what was the ratio of the good will reported in the capital markets to the retail bank\n\nPre-table text:\njudgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .\ngoodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .\neach of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .\nthere is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .\nthe following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nreporting unit\tdecember 31 2011\nu.s . brokerage\t$ 1751.2\ncapital markets\t142.4\nretail bank\t40.6\ntotal goodwill\t$ 1934.2\n\nPost-table text:\nin connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .\nthe fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .\nwe also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .\neffects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .\nestimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .\nif management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .\nintangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .\nif changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "142.4", "40.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.50739"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2016/page_26.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage cumulative return for lkq corporation and the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/2016?\n\nPre-table text:\ncomparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/2011\t12/31/2012\t12/31/2013\t12/31/2014\t12/31/2015\t12/31/2016\nlkq corporation\t$ 100\t$ 140\t$ 219\t$ 187\t$ 197\t$ 204\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100\t$ 113\t$ 147\t$ 164\t$ 163\t$ 178\npeer group\t$ 100\t$ 111\t$ 140\t$ 177\t$ 188\t$ 217\n\nPost-table text:\nthis stock performance information is \"furnished\" and shall not be deemed to be \"soliciting material\" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed \"filed\" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .\ninformation about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "204", "100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "100", ")", "subtract(", "178", "100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.26"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_324.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average entergy louisiana receivables from 2008 to 2011 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis all debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by entergy louisiana require prior regulatory approval .\npreferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements .\nentergy louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .\nentergy louisiana 2019s receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\n( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\t( in thousands )\n( $ 118415 )\t$ 49887\t$ 52807\t$ 61236\n\nPost-table text:\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .\nentergy louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $ 200 million scheduled to expire in august 2012 .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , $ 50 million was outstanding on the credit facility .\nentergy louisiana obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow through october 2013 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 250 million .\nsee note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy louisiana 2019s short-term borrowing limits .\nentergy louisiana has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances through july 2013 .\nin january 2012 , entergy louisiana issued $ 250 million of 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due december 2014 .\nentergy louisiana used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the entergy system money pool .\nlittle gypsy repowering project in april 2007 , entergy louisiana announced that it intended to pursue the solid fuel repowering of a 538 mw unit at its little gypsy plant .\nin march 2009 the lpsc voted in favor of a motion directing entergy louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and , based upon an analysis of the project 2019s economic viability , to make a recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project .\nthis action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices , as well as environmental concerns , the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets .\nin april 2009 , entergy louisiana complied with the lpsc 2019s directive and recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of three years or more .\nin may 2009 the lpsc issued an order declaring that entergy louisiana 2019s decision to place the little gypsy project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and prudent .\nin october 2009 , entergy louisiana made a filing with the lpsc seeking permission to cancel the little gypsy repowering project and seeking project cost recovery over a five-year period .\nin june 2010 and august 2010 , the lpsc staff and intervenors filed testimony .\nthe lpsc staff ( 1 ) agreed that it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation and that the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent ; ( 2 ) indicated that , except for $ 0.8 million in compensation-related costs , the costs incurred should be deemed prudent ; ( 3 ) recommended recovery from customers over ten years but stated that the lpsc may want to consider 15 years ; ( 4 ) allowed for recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs , but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt , while also acknowledging that the lpsc may consider ordering no return ; and ( 5 ) indicated that entergy louisiana should be directed to securitize project costs , if legally feasible and in the public interest .\nin the third quarter 2010 , in accordance with accounting standards , entergy louisiana determined that it was probable that the little gypsy repowering project would be abandoned and accordingly reclassified $ 199.8 million of project costs from construction work in progress to a regulatory asset .\na hearing on the issues , except for cost allocation among customer classes , was held before the alj in november 2010 .\nin january 2011 all parties participated in a mediation on the disputed issues , resulting in a settlement of all disputed issues , including cost recovery and cost allocation .\nthe settlement provides for entergy louisiana to recover $ 200 million as of march 31 , 2011 , and carrying costs on that amount on specified terms thereafter .\nthe settlement also provides for entergy louisiana to recover the approved project costs by securitization .\nin april 2011 , entergy .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "118415", "const_m1", ")", "add(", "#0", "49887", ")", "add(", "#0", "52807", ")", "add(", "#1", "61236", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-16402"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_355.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in gas customers between 2007 and 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy new orleans , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 231.0\nvolume/weather\t15.5\nnet gas revenue\t6.6\nrider revenue\t3.9\nbase revenue\t-11.3 ( 11.3 )\nother\t7.0\n2008 net revenue\t$ 252.7\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 .\nentergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 .\nbilled retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) .\nthe net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase .\nthe rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 .\nthe approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account .\nthe settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\nthe base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 .\nthe base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements .\ngross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 .\nfuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "93000", "86000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "86000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0814"}
{"example_id": "INTC/2013/page_33.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in diluted earnings per common share december 29 2012 and december 28 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows .\nmd&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview .\ndiscussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a .\n2022 critical accounting estimates .\naccounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts .\n2022 results of operations .\nan analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources .\nan analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity .\n2022 fair value of financial instruments .\ndiscussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments .\n2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements .\noverview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule .\nthe various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties .\nwords such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements .\nin addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements .\nsuch statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k .\nour actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 .\noverview our results of operations for each period were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions except per share amounts )\tthree months ended dec . 282013\tthree months ended sept . 282013\tthree months ended change\tthree months ended dec . 282013\tthree months ended dec . 292012\tchange\nnet revenue\t$ 13834\t$ 13483\t$ 351\t$ 52708\t$ 53341\t$ -633 ( 633 )\ngross margin\t$ 8571\t$ 8414\t$ 157\t$ 31521\t$ 33151\t$ -1630 ( 1630 )\ngross margin percentage\t62.0% ( 62.0 % )\t62.4% ( 62.4 % )\t( 0.4 ) % (  % )\t59.8% ( 59.8 % )\t62.1% ( 62.1 % )\t( 2.3 ) % (  % )\noperating income\t$ 3549\t$ 3504\t$ 45\t$ 12291\t$ 14638\t$ -2347 ( 2347 )\nnet income\t$ 2625\t$ 2950\t$ -325 ( 325 )\t$ 9620\t$ 11005\t$ -1385 ( 1385 )\ndiluted earnings per common share\t$ 0.51\t$ 0.58\t$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )\t$ 1.89\t$ 2.13\t$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )\n\nPost-table text:\nrevenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 .\npccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization .\ndcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year .\nhigher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 .\nin response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities .\nthese actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1.89", "2.13", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2.13", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.11268"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_35.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat would 2014 capital expenditures have been without the early buyout of the operating lease of the headquarters , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .\n\nTable:\ncash flowsmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\t$ 6161\ncash used in investing activities\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\t-3633 ( 3633 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\t-2682 ( 2682 )\nnet change in cash and cashequivalents\t$ 154\t$ 369\t$ -154 ( 154 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .\nhigher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .\nin addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .\nlower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .\nlower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .\nincluded in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "4249", "261", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4510"}
{"example_id": "HII/2014/page_69.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent of the total backlog for ingalls as part of the total backlog\n\nPre-table text:\nuss abraham lincoln rcoh , the construction preparation contract for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and the inactivation contract for cvn-65 uss enterprise , partially offset by lower volumes on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the construction and engineering contracts for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford .\nhigher revenues in fleet support services were primarily the result of volumes associated with repair work on ssn-765 uss montpelier .\nincreased submarines revenues were related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , primarily driven by higher volumes on block iii boats and the advance procurement contract on block iv boats , partially offset by lower volumes on block ii boats following the delivery of ssn-783 uss minnesota .\nsegment operating income 2014 - newport news operating income in 2014 was $ 415 million , compared to income of $ 402 million in 2013 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the volume changes discussed above and higher risk retirement on the construction contract for cvn-78 gerald r .\nford , offset by lower risk retirement on the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh .\n2013 - newport news operating income in 2013 was $ 402 million , compared to income of $ 372 million in 2012 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , driven by risk retirement , performance improvement and the favorable resolution of outstanding contract changes , as well as risk retirement on the execution contract for the cvn-71 uss theodore roosevelt rcoh and the absence in 2013 of the workers' compensation expense adjustment recorded in 2012 , partially offset by the favorable resolution in 2012 of outstanding contract changes on the cvn-65 uss enterprise edsra .\nrevenues at our other segment for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , were $ 137 million , primarily due to the acquisition of upi on may 30 , 2014 .\nother operating loss for the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was $ 59 million , primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 47 million described above .\nbacklog total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 21 billion .\ntotal backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) .\nbacklog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity orders .\nfor contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer .\nthe following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\tdecember 31 2014 total backlog\tdecember 31 2014 funded\tdecember 31 2014 unfunded\ttotal backlog\ningalls\t$ 5609\t$ 1889\t$ 7498\t$ 6335\t$ 2570\t$ 8905\nnewport news\t6158\t7709\t13867\t5495\t3638\t9133\nother\t65\t2014\t65\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal backlog\t$ 11832\t$ 9598\t$ 21430\t$ 11830\t$ 6208\t$ 18038\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect approximately 28% ( 28 % ) of the $ 21 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2014 , to be converted into sales in 2015 .\nu.s .\ngovernment orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .\nawards 2014 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , was approximately $ 10.1 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2014 included contracts for block iv of the ssn-774 virginia-class submarine program , continued construction preparation for cvn-79 john f .\nkennedy and construction of nsc-7 kimball .\n2013 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2013 , was approximately $ 9.4 billion .\nsignificant new awards in 2013 included contracts for the construction of five ddg-51 arleigh burke-class this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "8905", "18038", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.49368"}
{"example_id": "IP/2009/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nnorth american consumer packaging net sales where what percentage of consumer packaging sales in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nfor uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .\ninput costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .\nplanned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .\nasian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .\noperating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .\nu.s .\nmarket pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .\nsales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .\ninput costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .\nmill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .\nlack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .\nin the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .\ninput costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .\nplanned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .\noperating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .\nexcluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .\nbenefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .\nadditionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsales\t$ 3060\t$ 3195\t$ 3015\noperating profit\t433\t17\t112\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .\ncoated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .\nraw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .\noperating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .\nlack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .\noperating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .\nfoodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "2.2", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3060", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.71895"}
{"example_id": "PM/2018/page_31.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby what percentage will the 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense be higher than that of 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\ninventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .\nif our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .\ngoodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .\nwhile the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .\nthe impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .\nif the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .\nto determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .\nthe estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .\nto determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .\nwe concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .\nthese discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .\nmanagement considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .\nsince the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .\nmarketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .\nthe costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .\ngaap .\nrecognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .\nfor volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .\nfor other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .\nchanges in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .\nemployee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .\nbenefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .\nwe record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .\ngaap .\nthese calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .\nwe review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .\nas permitted by u.s .\ngaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .\nwe believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .\nweighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\npension plans\t1.61% ( 1.61 % )\t1.51% ( 1.51 % )\npostretirement plans\t3.97% ( 3.97 % )\t3.79% ( 3.79 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .\nthe anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .\nweighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .\na fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "205", "160", ")", "divide(", "#0", "160", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.28125"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2014/page_65.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ndid jpmorgan chase outperform the s&p 500 over the five year period?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .\n( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .\nthe s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .\nequity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .\nthe kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .\nand is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .\nthe s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .\nthe firm is a component of all three industry indices .\nthe following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .\nthe comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .\ndecember 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in dollars )\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njpmorgan chase\t$ 100.00\t$ 102.30\t$ 81.87\t$ 111.49\t$ 152.42\t$ 167.48\nkbw bank index\t100.00\t123.36\t94.75\t125.91\t173.45\t189.69\ns&p financial index\t100.00\t112.13\t93.00\t119.73\t162.34\t186.98\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.48\t136.27\t180.39\t205.07\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "167.48", "205.07", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "SWKS/2006/page_81.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the total pension liability adjustment from 2004 to 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) on historical trends and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation .\nactual results may differ substantially from these assumptions .\nthese differences may significantly impact future pension or retiree medical expenses .\nannual pension and retiree medical expense is principally the sum of three components : 1 ) increase in liability from interest ; less 2 ) expected return on plan assets ; and 3 ) other gains and losses as described below .\nthe expected return on plan assets is calculated by applying an assumed long-term rate of return to the fair value of plan assets .\nin any given year , actual returns can differ significantly from the expected return .\ndifferences between the actual and expected return on plan assets are combined with gains or losses resulting from the revaluation of plan liabilities .\nplan liabilities are revalued annually , based on updated assumptions and infor- mation about the individuals covered by the plan .\nthe combined gain or loss is generally expensed evenly over the remaining years that employees are expected to work .\ncomprehensive income ( loss ) the company accounts for comprehensive income ( loss ) in accordance with the provisions of sfas no .\n130 , 201creporting comprehensive income 201d ( 201csfas no .\n130 201d ) .\nsfas no .\n130 is a financial statement presentation standard that requires the company to disclose non-owner changes included in equity but not included in net income or loss .\nother items of comprehensive income ( loss ) presented in the financial statements consists of adjustments to the company 2019s minimum pension liability as follows ( in thousands ) : pension adjustments accumulated comprehensive .\n\nTable:\n\tpension adjustments\taccumulated other comprehensive loss\nbalance as of october 1 2004\t$ -786 ( 786 )\t$ -786 ( 786 )\nchange in period\t-351 ( 351 )\t-351 ( 351 )\nbalance as of september 30 2005\t-1137 ( 1137 )\t-1137 ( 1137 )\nchange in period\t538\t538\nbalance as of september 29 2006\t$ -599 ( 599 )\t$ -599 ( 599 )\n\nPost-table text:\nrecently issued accounting pronouncements in november 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .\n151 , 201cinventory costs 2014 an amendment to apb no .\n23 , chapter 4 201d ( 201csfas no .\n151 201d ) .\nthe amendments made by sfas no .\n151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense , freight , handling costs and wasted materials ( spoilage ) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities .\nthe guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after june 15 , 2005 .\nthe company adopted sfas no .\n151 on october 1 , 2005 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements in fiscal 2006 .\nin december 2004 , the fasb issued sfas no .\n153 , 201cexchanges of nonmonetary assets 2014 an amend- ment of apb opinion no .\n29 201d ( 201csfas no .\n153 201d ) .\nthe guidance in apb opinion no .\n29 , 201caccounting for nonmonetary transactions 201d ( 201capb no .\n29 201d ) is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged .\nthe guidance in apb no .\n29 , however , included certain exceptions to that principle .\nsfas no .\n153 amends apb no .\n29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance .\nsfas no .\n153 is effective for such exchange transactions occurring in fiscal periods beginning after june 15 , 2005 .\nthe company adopted sfas no .\n153 on october 1 , 2005 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements in fiscal 2006 .\nin may 2005 , the fasb issued sfas no .\n154 , 201caccounting changes and error corrections 2014 a replacement of apb opinion no .\n20 and fasb statement no .\n3 201d ( 201csfas no .\n154 201d ) .\nthis statement replaces apb opinion no .\n20 , 201caccounting changes 201d and fasb statement no .\n3 , 201creporting accounting changes in interim financial statements 2014 an amendment of apb opinion no .\n28 , 201d and also changes the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "351", "const_m1", ")", "add(", "#0", "538", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "187"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_19.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in industry segment operating profits between 2004 and 2005?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2005 were strongly impacted by significantly higher costs for en- ergy , wood , caustic soda and other raw materials which reduced operating profits compared with 2004 by $ 586 million .\nlower sales volumes were also a negative factor versus 2004 as we took a significant amount of lack-of-order downtime in our u.s .\nuncoated paper and containerboard mills , and downtime in our eastern european operations to rebuild paper machines in po- land and russia to add needed uncoated paper and pa- perboard capacity .\nwe were able to partially offset some of these negative impacts through operational improvements in our manufacturing operations , im- proved average pricing for our paper and packaging grades , a more favorable product mix , and higher earn- ings from forestland and real estate sales .\nlooking forward to 2006 , we expect operating prof- its for the first quarter to be flat with the 2005 fourth quarter .\nsales volumes should be seasonally slow in the quarter , but should show some improvement as the quarter progresses .\nprice realizations should also improve as previously announced price increases are im- plemented .\nwhile energy , wood and raw material price movements are mixed , their impact for the quarter is expected to be flat .\nhowever , we see favorable signs of positive mo- mentum for the remainder of 2006 .\nwe anticipate that demand in north america for both uncoated paper and industrial packaging products will be stronger , and that we will realize 2005 fourth-quarter and 2006 first-quarter announced price increases .\nadditionally , operating rates should improve in 2006 reflecting announced industry capacity reductions in uncoated papers and container- board .\nwe are also starting to see some reductions in natural gas and southern wood costs that , if the trend continues , should benefit operations as the year pro- gresses .\nin connection with our overall strategic direction , we are evaluating options for the possible sale or spin-off of certain of our businesses as previously announced in our transformation plan , with decisions on certain businesses anticipated during 2006 .\nwe also will con- tinue to improve our key operations in north america by realigning our uncoated and packaging mill oper- ations to reduce costs , improve our products and im- prove our overall profitability .\nresults of operations industry segment operating profits are used by international paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses .\nmanagement believes that this measure allows a better understanding of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes .\nin- dustry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items .\nindustry segment operating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states .\ninternational paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer packaging , distribution , forest products , and specialty businesses and other .\nthe following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2005 2004 2003 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2005\t2004\t2003\nindustry segment operating profits\t$ 1923\t$ 2040\t$ 1734\ncorporate items\t-597 ( 597 )\t-469 ( 469 )\t-466 ( 466 )\ncorporate special items*\t-147 ( 147 )\t-142 ( 142 )\t-281 ( 281 )\ninterest expense net\t-593 ( 593 )\t-710 ( 710 )\t-705 ( 705 )\nminority interest\t-12 ( 12 )\t-21 ( 21 )\t-80 ( 80 )\nincome tax benefit ( provision )\t285\t-242 ( 242 )\t56\ndiscontinued operations\t241\t-491 ( 491 )\t57\naccounting changes\t2013\t2013\t-13 ( 13 )\nnet earnings ( loss )\t$ 1100\t$ -35 ( 35 )\t$ 302\n\nPost-table text:\n* special items include restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impair- ments of businesses held for sale , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no lon- ger required .\nindustry segment operating profits were $ 117 mil- lion lower in 2005 due principally to the impact of higher energy and raw material costs ( $ 586 million ) , lower sales volume ( $ 251 million ) , and unfavorable for- eign currency translation rates ( $ 27 million ) which more than offset the benefits from higher average prices ( $ 478 million ) , cost reduction initiatives , improved operating performance and a more favorable product mix ( $ 235 million ) , and higher earnings from land sales ( $ 158 million ) .\nthe impact of divestitures ( $ 32 million ) , principally the fine papers and industrial pa- pers businesses , and other items ( $ 36 million ) also had a negative impact in 2005 .\nsegment operating profit ( in millions ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1923", "2040", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-117"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2013/page_112.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin these equity investment balances , what is the percent of unfunded commitments at december 31 , 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarket risk management 2013 equity and other investment risk equity investment risk is the risk of potential losses associated with investing in both private and public equity markets .\npnc invests primarily in private equity markets .\nin addition to extending credit , taking deposits , and underwriting and trading financial instruments , we make and manage direct investments in a variety of transactions , including management buyouts , recapitalizations , and growth financings in a variety of industries .\nwe also have investments in affiliated and non- affiliated funds that make similar investments in private equity and in debt and equity-oriented hedge funds .\nthe economic and/or book value of these investments and other assets such as loan servicing rights are directly affected by changes in market factors .\nthe primary risk measurement for equity and other investments is economic capital .\neconomic capital is a common measure of risk for credit , market and operational risk .\nit is an estimate of the potential value depreciation over a one year horizon commensurate with solvency expectations of an institution rated single-a by the credit rating agencies .\ngiven the illiquid nature of many of these types of investments , it can be a challenge to determine their fair values .\nsee note 9 fair value in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nvarious pnc business units manage our equity and other investment activities .\nour businesses are responsible for making investment decisions within the approved policy limits and associated guidelines .\na summary of our equity investments follows : table 55 : equity investments summary in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 312013\tdecember 312012\nblackrock\t$ 5940\t$ 5614\ntax credit investments\t2676\t2965\nprivate equity\t1656\t1802\nvisa\t158\t251\nother\t234\t245\ntotal\t$ 10664\t$ 10877\n\nPost-table text:\nblackrock pnc owned approximately 36 million common stock equivalent shares of blackrock equity at december 31 , 2013 , accounted for under the equity method .\nthe primary risk measurement , similar to other equity investments , is economic capital .\nthe business segments review section of this item 7 includes additional information about blackrock .\ntax credit investments included in our equity investments are tax credit investments which are accounted for under the equity method .\nthese investments , as well as equity investments held by consolidated partnerships , totaled $ 2.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 3.0 billion at december 31 , 2012 .\nthese equity investment balances include unfunded commitments totaling $ 802 million and $ 685 million at december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 , respectively .\nthese unfunded commitments are included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nnote 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report has further information on tax credit investments .\nsee also the critical accounting estimates and judgments section of this item 7 regarding asu 2014-01 and our intention to early adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2014 .\nprivate equity the private equity portfolio is an illiquid portfolio comprised of mezzanine and equity investments that vary by industry , stage and type of investment .\nprivate equity investments carried at estimated fair value totaled $ 1.7 billion at december 31 , 2013 and $ 1.8 billion at december 31 , 2012 .\nas of december 31 , 2013 , $ 1.1 billion was invested directly in a variety of companies and $ .6 billion was invested indirectly through various private equity funds .\nincluded in direct investments are investment activities of two private equity funds that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes .\nthe noncontrolling interests of these funds totaled $ 236 million as of december 31 , 2013 .\nthe interests held in indirect private equity funds are not redeemable , but pnc may receive distributions over the life of the partnership from liquidation of the underlying investments .\nsee item 1 business 2013 supervision and regulation and item 1a risk factors of this report for discussion of the potential impacts of the volcker rule provisions of dodd-frank on our interests in and sponsorship of private funds covered by the volcker our unfunded commitments related to private equity totaled $ 164 million at december 31 , 2013 compared with $ 182 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nduring 2013 , we sold 4 million of visa class b common shares , in addition to the 9 million shares sold in 2012 , and entered into swap agreements with the purchaser of the shares .\nsee note 9 fair value and note 17 financial derivatives in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nat december 31 , 2013 , our investment in visa class b common shares totaled approximately 10 million shares and was recorded at $ 158 million .\nbased on the december 31 , 2013 closing price of $ 222.68 for the visa class a common shares , the fair value of our total investment was approximately $ 971 million at the 94 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "802", "10664", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07521"}
{"example_id": "KHC/2016/page_23.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2016 , what percentage of manufacturing and processing facilities are owned?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 1b .\nunresolved staff comments .\nitem 2 .\nproperties .\nour corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois .\nour co-headquarters are leased and house our executive offices , certain u.s .\nbusiness units , and our administrative , finance , and human resource functions .\nwe maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate .\nwe manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world .\nas of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 87 manufacturing and processing facilities .\nwe own 83 and lease four of these facilities .\nour manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 31 , 2016 was: .\n\nTable:\n\towned\tleased\nunited states\t43\t2\ncanada\t3\t2014\neurope\t11\t2014\nrest of world\t26\t2\n\nPost-table text:\nwe maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs .\nwe also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products .\nin the fourth quarter of 2016 , we reorganized our segment structure to move our russia business from the rest of world segment to the europe segment .\nwe have reflected this change in the table above .\nsee note 18 , segment reporting , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nseveral of our current manufacturing and processing facilities are scheduled to be closed within the next year .\nsee note 3 , integration and restructuring expenses , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information .\nitem 3 .\nlegal proceedings .\nwe are routinely involved in legal proceedings , claims , and governmental inquiries , inspections or investigations ( 201clegal matters 201d ) arising in the ordinary course of our business .\non april 1 , 2015 , the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) filed a formal complaint against mondel 0113z international ( formerly known as kraft foods inc. ) and kraft in the u.s .\ndistrict court for the northern district of illinois , eastern division , related to activities involving the trading of december 2011 wheat futures contracts .\nthe complaint alleges that mondel 0113z international and kraft ( 1 ) manipulated or attempted to manipulate the wheat markets during the fall of 2011 , ( 2 ) violated position limit levels for wheat futures , and ( 3 ) engaged in non-competitive trades by trading both sides of exchange-for-physical chicago board of trade wheat contracts .\nas previously disclosed by kraft , these activities arose prior to the october 1 , 2012 spin-off of kraft by mondel 0113z international to its shareholders and involve the business now owned and operated by mondel 0113z international or its affiliates .\nthe separation and distribution agreement between kraft and mondel 0113z international , dated as of september 27 , 2012 , governs the allocation of liabilities between mondel 0113z international and kraft and , accordingly , mondel 0113z international will predominantly bear the costs of this matter and any monetary penalties or other payments that the cftc may impose .\nwe do not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations , or business .\nwhile we cannot predict with certainty the results of legal matters in which we are currently involved or may in the future be involved , we do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve any of the legal matters that are currently pending will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures .\nnot applicable. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "83", "87", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.95402"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2015/page_35.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2014 what was the ratio of the cash used for investment to the cash from operations\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus .\nthis reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment .\nin addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2015\t2014\t2013\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7344\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\ncash used in investing activities\t-4476 ( 4476 )\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-3063 ( 3063 )\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\nnet change in cash and cash equivalents\t$ -195 ( 195 )\t$ 154\t$ 369\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 .\nsimilarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 .\nbonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 .\nhigher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 .\nhigher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3405", "6823", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.49905"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2008/page_32.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2008 and the closing price on february 13 , 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .\n\nTable:\n2008\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 42.72\t$ 32.10\nquarter ended june 30\t46.10\t38.53\nquarter ended september 30\t43.43\t31.89\nquarter ended december 31\t37.28\t19.35\n2007\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 41.31\t$ 36.63\nquarter ended june 30\t43.84\t37.64\nquarter ended september 30\t45.45\t36.34\nquarter ended december 31\t46.53\t40.08\n\nPost-table text:\non february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .\ndividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .\nwe anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .\nthe indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .\nthe loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nin addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "37.28", "28.85", ")", "divide(", "#0", "28.85", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.2922"}
{"example_id": "PKG/2009/page_65.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions from 2008 to 2009 under purchase commitments?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchase commitments the company has entered into various purchase agreements for minimum amounts of pulpwood processing and energy over periods ranging from one to twenty years at fixed prices .\ntotal purchase commitments are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\n2010\t$ 6951\n2011\t5942\n2012\t3659\n2013\t1486\n2014\t1486\nthereafter\t25048\ntotal\t$ 44572\n\nPost-table text:\nthese purchase agreements are not marked to market .\nthe company purchased $ 37.3 million , $ 29.4 million , and $ 14.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , under these purchase agreements .\nlitigation pca is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business .\nthese legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will , individually or in the aggregate , have a material adverse effect on its financial position , results of operations , or cash flows .\nenvironmental liabilities the potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs , the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations , and the timing , varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies .\nfrom 1994 through 2009 , remediation costs at the company 2019s mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $ 3.2 million .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the company maintained an environmental reserve of $ 9.1 million relating to on-site landfills ( see note 13 ) and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects .\nliabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions .\nbecause of these uncertainties , pca 2019s estimates may change .\nas of the date of this filing , the company believes that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures and asset retirement obligations above the $ 9.1 million accrued as of december 31 , 2009 , will have a material impact on its financial condition , results of operations , or cash flows .\nin connection with the sale to pca of its containerboard and corrugated products business , pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal and all environmental liabilities related to a closed landfill located near the company 2019s filer city mill .\n13 .\nasset retirement obligations asset retirement obligations consist primarily of landfill capping and closure and post-closure costs .\npca is legally required to perform capping and closure and post-closure care on the landfills at each of the company 2019s mills .\nin accordance with asc 410 , 201c asset retirement and environmental obligations , 201d pca recognizes the fair value of these liabilities as an asset retirement obligation for each landfill and capitalizes packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "37.3", "29.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "7.9"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_78.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total of the reserve for losses?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .\nchange in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nchange in assumption ( a )\testimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate\t$ 23\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets\t$ 18\n.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate\t$ 2\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .\nour pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .\ninvestment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .\nalso , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .\nwe do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .\nwe maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .\none form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .\ncommercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .\nwe participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .\nunder these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .\nat december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .\nthe potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .\nwe maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .\nthe reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nif payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .\nour exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .\nresidential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .\nthese loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .\nresidential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .\nas discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .\nour historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .\nrepurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .\npnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .\npnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .\nrepurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .\nloan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 69 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "47", "54", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "101"}
{"example_id": "PM/2018/page_31.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in weighted average discount rate for postretirement plans from 2017 to 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\ninventory on hand , as well as our future purchase commitments with our suppliers , considering multiple factors , including demand forecasts , product life cycle , current sales levels , pricing strategy and cost trends .\nif our review indicates that inventories of raw materials , components or finished products have become obsolete or are in excess of anticipated demand or that inventory cost exceeds net realizable value , we may be required to make adjustments that will impact the results of operations .\ngoodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets valuation - we test goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment annually or more frequently if events occur that would warrant such review .\nwhile the company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment for both goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets to determine if it is more likely than not that an impairment exists , the company elects to perform the quantitative assessment for our annual impairment analysis .\nthe impairment analysis involves comparing the fair value of each reporting unit or non-amortizable intangible asset to the carrying value .\nif the carrying value exceeds the fair value , goodwill or a non-amortizable intangible asset is considered impaired .\nto determine the fair value of goodwill , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model , supported by the market approach using earnings multiples of comparable global and local companies within the tobacco industry .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the carrying value of our goodwill was $ 7.2 billion , which is related to ten reporting units , each of which consists of a group of markets with similar economic characteristics .\nthe estimated fair value of each of our ten reporting units exceeded the carrying value as of december 31 , 2018 .\nto determine the fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets , we primarily use a discounted cash flow model applying the relief-from-royalty method .\nwe concluded that the fair value of our non- amortizable intangible assets exceeded the carrying value .\nthese discounted cash flow models include management assumptions relevant for forecasting operating cash flows , which are subject to changes in business conditions , such as volumes and prices , costs to produce , discount rates and estimated capital needs .\nmanagement considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values are estimated , and we believe these assumptions are consistent with the assumptions a hypothetical marketplace participant would use .\nsince the march 28 , 2008 , spin-off from altria group , inc. , we have not recorded a charge to earnings for an impairment of goodwill or non-amortizable intangible assets .\nmarketing costs - we incur certain costs to support our products through programs that include advertising , marketing , consumer engagement and trade promotions .\nthe costs of our advertising and marketing programs are expensed in accordance with u.s .\ngaap .\nrecognition of the cost related to our consumer engagement and trade promotion programs contain uncertainties due to the judgment required in estimating the potential performance and compliance for each program .\nfor volume-based incentives provided to customers , management continually assesses and estimates , by customer , the likelihood of the customer's achieving the specified targets , and records the reduction of revenue as the sales are made .\nfor other trade promotions , management relies on estimated utilization rates that have been developed from historical experience .\nchanges in the assumptions used in estimating the cost of any individual marketing program would not result in a material change in our financial position , results of operations or operating cash flows .\nemployee benefit plans - as discussed in item 8 , note 13 .\nbenefit plans to our consolidated financial statements , we provide a range of benefits to our employees and retired employees , including pensions , postretirement health care and postemployment benefits ( primarily severance ) .\nwe record annual amounts relating to these plans based on calculations specified by u.s .\ngaap .\nthese calculations include various actuarial assumptions , such as discount rates , assumed rates of return on plan assets , compensation increases , mortality , turnover rates and health care cost trend rates .\nwe review actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate to do so .\nas permitted by u.s .\ngaap , any effect of the modifications is generally amortized over future periods .\nwe believe that the assumptions utilized in calculating our obligations under these plans are reasonable based upon our historical experience and advice from our actuaries .\nweighted-average discount rate assumptions for pension and postretirement plan obligations at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\npension plans\t1.61% ( 1.61 % )\t1.51% ( 1.51 % )\npostretirement plans\t3.97% ( 3.97 % )\t3.79% ( 3.79 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe anticipate that assumption changes will increase 2019 pre-tax pension and postretirement expense to approximately $ 205 million as compared with approximately $ 160 million in 2018 , excluding amounts related to employee severance and early retirement programs .\nthe anticipated increase is primarily due to higher amortization out of other comprehensive earnings for unrecognized actuarial gains/ losses of $ 14 million , coupled with lower return on assets of $ 16 million , higher interest and service cost of $ 12 million and $ 4 million respectively , partially offset by other movements of $ 1 million .\nweighted-average expected rate of return and discount rate assumptions have a significant effect on the amount of expense reported for the employee benefit plans .\na fifty-basis-point decrease in our discount rate would increase our 2019 pension and postretirement expense by approximately $ 50 million , and a fifty-basis-point increase in our discount rate would decrease our 2019 pension and postretirement .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3.97", "3.79", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3.79", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04749"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_62.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage decrease in total liability from dec 31 2007 to dec 31 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .\n\nTable:\n\t2007 program\t2003 program\t2001 program\ttotal\nliability at december 31 2006\t$ 2014\t$ 12.6\t$ 19.2\t$ 31.8\nnet charges ( reversals ) and adjustments\t19.1\t-0.5 ( 0.5 )\t-5.2 ( 5.2 )\t13.4\npayments and other1\t-7.2 ( 7.2 )\t-3.1 ( 3.1 )\t-5.3 ( 5.3 )\t-15.6 ( 15.6 )\nliability at december 31 2007\t$ 11.9\t$ 9.0\t$ 8.7\t$ 29.6\nnet charges and adjustments\t4.3\t0.8\t0.7\t5.8\npayments and other1\t-15.0 ( 15.0 )\t-4.1 ( 4.1 )\t-3.5 ( 3.5 )\t-22.6 ( 22.6 )\nliability at december 31 2008\t$ 1.2\t$ 5.7\t$ 5.9\t$ 12.8\n\nPost-table text:\n1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates .\nother reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb .\ncharges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs .\nwe expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 .\ncharges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete .\nthe charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "29.6", "12.8", ")", "divide(", "#0", "29.6", ")", "multiply(", "#1", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "56.75676"}
{"example_id": "TSCO/2017/page_31.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ncompared to the s&p 500 ,what was the difference in percentage growth from the s&p 500 retail index .\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .\nthe following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .\nthe comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .\nthe historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/29/2012\t12/28/2013\t12/27/2014\t12/26/2015\t12/31/2016\t12/30/2017\ntractor supply company\t$ 100.00\t$ 174.14\t$ 181.29\t$ 201.04\t$ 179.94\t$ 180.52\ns&p 500\t$ 100.00\t$ 134.11\t$ 155.24\t$ 156.43\t$ 173.74\t$ 211.67\ns&p retail index\t$ 100.00\t$ 147.73\t$ 164.24\t$ 207.15\t$ 219.43\t$ 286.13\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "211.67", "100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "100", ")", "subtract(", "286.13", "100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "100", ")", "subtract(", "#3", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.7446"}
{"example_id": "APD/2016/page_96.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2014-2016 , what was the average cash paid for interest?\n\nPre-table text:\n15 .\ndebt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt .\n\nTable:\n30 september\t2016\t2015\nshort-term borrowings\t$ 935.8\t$ 1494.3\ncurrent portion of long-term debt\t371.3\t435.6\nlong-term debt\t4918.1\t3949.1\ntotal debt\t$ 6225.2\t$ 5879.0\nshort-term borrowings\t\t\n30 september\t2016\t2015\nbank obligations\t$ 133.1\t$ 234.3\ncommercial paper\t802.7\t1260.0\ntotal short-term borrowings\t$ 935.8\t$ 1494.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively .\ncash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "121.1", "97.5", ")", "add(", "132.4", "#0", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "117"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_47.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 2007 , what percentage of the long-term debt is current?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 31 of 94 other liquidity items cash payments required for long-term debt maturities , rental payments under noncancellable operating leases , purchase obligations and other commitments in effect at december 31 , 2007 , are summarized in the following table: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tpayments due by period ( a ) total\tpayments due by period ( a ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by period ( a ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by period ( a ) more than 5 years\nlong-term debt\t$ 2302.6\t$ 126.1\t$ 547.6\t$ 1174.9\t$ 454.0\ncapital lease obligations\t4.4\t1.0\t0.8\t0.5\t2.1\ninterest payments on long-term debt ( b )\t698.6\t142.9\t246.3\t152.5\t156.9\noperating leases\t218.5\t49.9\t71.7\t42.5\t54.4\npurchase obligations ( c )\t6092.6\t2397.2\t3118.8\t576.6\t2013\ncommon stock repurchase agreements\t131.0\t131.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\nlegal settlement\t70.0\t70.0\t2013\t2013\t2013\ntotal payments on contractual obligations\t$ 9517.7\t$ 2918.1\t$ 3985.2\t$ 1947.0\t$ 667.4\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal payments on contractual obligations $ 9517.7 $ 2918.1 $ 3985.2 $ 1947.0 $ 667.4 ( a ) amounts reported in local currencies have been translated at the year-end exchange rates .\n( b ) for variable rate facilities , amounts are based on interest rates in effect at year end and do not contemplate the effects of hedging instruments .\n( c ) the company 2019s purchase obligations include contracted amounts for aluminum , steel , plastic resin and other direct materials .\nalso included are commitments for purchases of natural gas and electricity , aerospace and technologies contracts and other less significant items .\nin cases where variable prices and/or usage are involved , management 2019s best estimates have been used .\ndepending on the circumstances , early termination of the contracts may not result in penalties and , therefore , actual payments could vary significantly .\ncontributions to the company 2019s defined benefit pension plans , not including the unfunded german plans , are expected to be $ 49 million in 2008 .\nthis estimate may change based on plan asset performance .\nbenefit payments related to these plans are expected to be $ 66 million , $ 70 million , $ 74 million , $ 77 million and $ 82 million for the years ending december 31 , 2008 through 2012 , respectively , and a total of $ 473 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\npayments to participants in the unfunded german plans are expected to be approximately $ 26 million in each of the years 2008 through 2012 and a total of $ 136 million for the years 2013 through 2017 .\nin accordance with united kingdom pension regulations , ball has provided an a38 million guarantee to the plan for its defined benefit plan in the united kingdom .\nif the company 2019s credit rating falls below specified levels , ball will be required to either : ( 1 ) contribute an additional a38 million to the plan ; ( 2 ) provide a letter of credit to the plan in that amount or ( 3 ) if imposed by the appropriate regulatory agency , provide a lien on company assets in that amount for the benefit of the plan .\nthe guarantee can be removed upon approval by both ball and the pension plan trustees .\nour share repurchase program in 2007 was $ 211.3 million , net of issuances , compared to $ 45.7 million net repurchases in 2006 and $ 358.1 million in 2005 .\nthe net repurchases included the $ 51.9 million settlement on january 5 , 2007 , of a forward contract entered into in december 2006 for the repurchase of 1200000 shares .\nhowever , the 2007 net repurchases did not include a forward contract entered into in december 2007 for the repurchase of 675000 shares .\nthe contract was settled on january 7 , 2008 , for $ 31 million in cash .\non december 12 , 2007 , in a privately negotiated transaction , ball entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement to buy $ 100 million of its common shares using cash on hand and available borrowings .\nthe company advanced the $ 100 million on january 7 , 2008 , and received approximately 2 million shares , which represented 90 percent of the total shares as calculated using the previous day 2019s closing price .\nthe exact number of shares to be repurchased under the agreement , which will be determined on the settlement date ( no later than june 5 , 2008 ) , is subject to an adjustment based on a weighted average price calculation for the period between the initial purchase date and the settlement date .\nthe company has the option to settle the contract in either cash or shares .\nincluding the settlements of the forward share purchase contract and the accelerated share repurchase agreement , we expect to repurchase approximately $ 300 million of our common shares , net of issuances , in 2008 .\nannual cash dividends paid on common stock were 40 cents per share in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\ntotal dividends paid were $ 40.6 million in 2007 , $ 41 million in 2006 and $ 42.5 million in 2005. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "126.1", "2302.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05476"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_25.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif the fuel surcharge grows by the same rate as in 2014what would expected 2015 revenues be in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nresults of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\t% (  % ) change 2014 v 2013\t% (  % ) change 2013 v 2012\nfreight revenues\t$ 22560\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\nother revenues\t1428\t1279\t1240\t12% ( 12 % )\t3% ( 3 % )\ntotal\t$ 23988\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .\nfreight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .\nchanges in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .\nwe provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .\nwe recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .\nwe allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .\nother revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .\nwe recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .\nfreight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .\nvolume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .\nfreight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .\nrevenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .\narc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .\nvolume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .\nour fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .\nfuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .\nfuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .\nin 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .\nin 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2.8", "2.6", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "2.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.01538"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2009/page_100.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2009 what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts\n\nPre-table text:\nin our primary disbursement accounts which were reclassified as accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nconcentration of credit risk financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents , trade accounts receivable and derivative instruments .\nwe place our cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions .\nsuch balances may be in excess of fdic insured limits .\nin order to manage the related credit exposure , we continually monitor the credit worthiness of the financial institutions where we have deposits .\nconcentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets in which we provide services , as well as the dispersion of our operations across many geographic areas .\nwe provide services to commercial , industrial , municipal and residential customers in the united states and puerto rico .\nwe perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers , but do not require collateral to support customer receivables .\nwe establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on various factors including the credit risk of specific customers , age of receivables outstanding , historical trends , economic conditions and other information .\nno customer exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of our outstanding accounts receivable balance at december 31 , 2009 or 2008 .\naccounts receivable , net of allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable represent receivables from customers for collection , transfer , recycling , disposal and other services .\nour receivables are recorded when billed or when the related revenue is earned , if earlier , and represent claims against third parties that will be settled in cash .\nthe carrying value of our receivables , net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , represents their estimated net realizable value .\nprovisions for doubtful accounts are evaluated on a monthly basis and are recorded based on our historical collection experience , the age of the receivables , specific customer information and economic conditions .\nwe also review outstanding balances on an account-specific basis .\nin general , reserves are provided for accounts receivable in excess of ninety days old .\npast due receivable balances are written-off when our collection efforts have been unsuccess- ful in collecting amounts due .\nthe following table reflects the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2008\t2007\nbalance at beginning of year\t$ 65.7\t$ 14.7\t$ 18.8\nadditions charged to expense\t27.3\t36.5\t3.9\naccounts written-off\t-37.8 ( 37.8 )\t-12.7 ( 12.7 )\t-7.8 ( 7.8 )\nacquisitions\t-\t27.2\t-0.2 ( 0.2 )\nbalance at end of year\t$ 55.2\t$ 65.7\t$ 14.7\n\nPost-table text:\nsubsequent to our acquisition of allied , we recorded a provision for doubtful accounts of $ 14.2 million to adjust the allowance acquired from allied to conform to republic 2019s accounting policies .\nwe also recorded $ 5.4 million to provide for specific bankruptcy exposures in 2008 .\nin 2007 , we recorded a $ 4.3 million reduction in our allowance for doubtful accounts as a result of refining our estimate of the allowance based on our historical collection experience .\nrestricted cash as of december 31 , 2009 , we had $ 236.6 million of restricted cash , of which $ 93.1 million was proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings and will be used to fund capital republic services , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "27.3", "-37.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-10.5"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_87.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average , in millions , home equity line of credit with balloon payments with draw periods from 2012 to 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\ngenerally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .\nduring the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .\nbased upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .\nhome equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tinterest only product\tprincipal and interest product\n2012\t$ 904\t$ 266\n2013\t1211\t331\n2014\t2043\t598\n2015\t1988\t820\n2016 and thereafter\t6961\t5601\ntotal ( a )\t$ 13107\t$ 7616\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .\nwe view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .\nbased upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .\ngenerally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .\nat that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .\nsee note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nloan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .\ninitially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .\nif a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .\nour programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .\ntemporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .\nfurther , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .\nadditional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\na temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .\ntypically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .\na permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .\npermanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .\nfor consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .\nexamples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .\npermanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .\nresidential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .\nwe also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .\nthe following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .\n78 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "306", "44", ")", "add(", "#0", "60", ")", "add(", "#1", "100", ")", "add(", "#2", "246", ")", "divide(", "#3", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "151.2"}
{"example_id": "AES/2001/page_44.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\n2001 revenue from large utilities were how many times the revenues from the growth distribution segment?\n\nPre-table text:\ngross margin gross margin increased $ 307 million , or 15% ( 15 % ) , to $ 2.3 billion in 2001 from $ 2.0 billion in 2000 .\ngross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 25% ( 25 % ) in 2000 from 26% ( 26 % ) in 2001 .\nthe increase in gross margin is due to acquisition of new businesses and new operations from greenfield projects offset by lower market prices in the united kingdom .\nthe decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenues is due to a decline in the competitive supply and contract generation gross margin percentages offset slightly by increased gross margin percentages from large utilities and growth distribution .\nexcluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations in 2001 or 2000 , gross margin decreased 2% ( 2 % ) to $ 1.8 billion in 2001. .\n\nTable:\n\t2001\t2000\t% (  % ) change\ncontract generation\t$ 827 million\t$ 767 million\t8% ( 8 % )\ncompetitive supply\t$ 440 million\t$ 559 million\t( 21% ( 21 % ) )\nlarge utilities\t$ 739 million\t$ 538 million\t37% ( 37 % )\ngrowth distribution\t$ 296 million\t$ 131 million\t126% ( 126 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ncontract generation gross margin increased $ 60 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 827 million in 2001 from $ 767 million in 2000 .\nexcluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2001 and 2000 , contract generation gross margin decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 710 million in 2001 .\ncontract generation gross margin increased in all geographic regions except for asia .\nthe contract generation gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2001 from 44% ( 44 % ) in 2000 .\nin south america , contract generation gross margin increased $ 17 million and was 27% ( 27 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due to the acquisition of gener offset by a decline at tiete from the rationing of electricity in brazil .\nin north america , contract generation gross margin increased $ 8 million and was 50% ( 50 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due to improvements at southland and beaver valley partially offset by a decrease at thames from the contract buydown ( see footnote 13 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements ) .\nin europe/ africa , contract generation gross margin increased $ 44 million and was 30% ( 30 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due primarily to our additional ownership interest in kilroot and the acquisition of ebute in nigeria .\nin asia , contract generation gross margin decreased $ 22 million and was 29% ( 29 % ) of revenues .\nthe decrease is due mainly to additional bad debt provisions at jiaozuo , hefei and aixi in china that were partially offset by the start of commercial operations at haripur .\nthe decrease in contract generation gross margin as a percentage of revenue is due to the acquisition of generation businesses with overall gross margin percentages , which are lower than the overall portfolio of generation businesses .\nas a percentage of sales , contract generation gross margin declined in south america and asia , was relatively flat in north america and increased in europe/africa and the caribbean .\nthe competitive supply gross margin decreased $ 119 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) , to $ 440 million in 2001 from $ 559 million in 2000 .\nexcluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2001 and 2000 , competitive supply gross margin decreased 26% ( 26 % ) to $ 408 million in 2001 .\nthe overall decrease is due to declines in europe/africa and south america that were partially offset by slight increases in north america , the caribbean and asia .\nthe competitive supply gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 16% ( 16 % ) in 2001 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2000 .\nin south america , competitive supply segment gross margin decreased $ 61 million and was 1% ( 1 % ) of revenues due to declines at our businesses in argentina .\nin europe/africa , competitive supply segment gross margin decreased $ 95 million and was 22% ( 22 % ) of revenues .\nthe decrease is due primarily to declines at drax , barry and fifoots from the lower market prices in the u.k .\nin north america , competitive supply segment gross margin increased $ 14 million and was 11% ( 11 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase was due to an expanded customer base at new energy and was partially offset by decreases at somerset in new york and deepwater in texas .\nin the caribbean ( which includes colombia ) , the competitive supply gross margin increased $ 15 million and was 29% ( 29 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due primarily to the acquisition of chivor .\nas a percentage .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "739", "296", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.49662"}
{"example_id": "FBHS/2017/page_43.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth in the defined benefit plan income from 2016 to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nnet sales increased $ 29.9 million , or 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , due to higher sales volume driven primarily by continuing improvement in the u.s .\nhome products market and the benefit from new product introductions and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases .\noperating income increased $ 12.6 million , or 20.4% ( 20.4 % ) , due to higher net sales , the benefits from productivity improvements and leveraging sales on our existing fixed cost base .\nsecurity net sales increased $ 12.8 million , or 2.2% ( 2.2 % ) , due to higher sales volume and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases .\nthese benefits were partially offset by the impact of our exiting of two product lines in our commercial distribution channel .\noperating income increased $ 5.8 million , or 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) , primarily due to the higher net sales , the benefits from productivity improvements , lower restructuring and other charges ( approximately $ 6 million ) relating to the completion in 2016 of a manufacturing facility relocation , favorable foreign exchange and the related cost savings resulting from the facility relocation .\ncorporate corporate expenses increased by $ 5.7 million mainly due to the impairment of a long lived asset and recognition of an actuarial gain versus an actuarial loss in 2016 and higher defined benefit plan income during 2017 compared to 2016 .\n( in millions ) 2017 2016 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2017\t2016\ngeneral and administrative expense\t$ -90.3 ( 90.3 )\t$ -80.9 ( 80.9 )\ndefined benefit plan income\t4.2\t2.9\ndefined benefit plan recognition of actuarial gains ( losses )\t0.5\t-1.9 ( 1.9 )\ntotal corporate expenses\t$ -85.6 ( 85.6 )\t$ -79.9 ( 79.9 )\n\nPost-table text:\nin future periods the company may record , in the corporate segment , material expense or income associated with actuarial gains and losses arising from periodic remeasurement of our liabilities for defined benefit plans .\nat a minimum the company will remeasure its defined benefit plan liabilities in the fourth quarter of each year .\nremeasurements due to plan amendments and settlements may also occur in interim periods during the year .\nremeasurement of these liabilities attributable to updating our liability discount rates and expected return on assets may , in particular , result in material income or expense recognition .\n2016 compared to 2015 total fortune brands net sales net sales increased $ 405.5 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) .\nthe increase was due to higher sales volume primarily from the continuing improvement in u.s .\nmarket conditions for home products , the benefit from the acquisitions in our cabinets and plumbing segments and price increases to help mitigate cumulative raw material cost increases and the effect of unfavorable foreign exchange .\nthese benefits were partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange of approximately $ 27 million and higher sales rebates .\ncost of products sold cost of products sold increased $ 182.8 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , due to higher net sales , including the impact of the acquisitions in our cabinets and plumbing segments , partially offset by the benefit of productivity improvements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "4.2", "2.9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.44828"}
{"example_id": "MSI/2006/page_61.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much did the lease obligations drop from 2004 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\n53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .\nthe company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .\nthe company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .\nutilization of the non-u.s .\ncredit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .\ncontractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .\npayments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) total\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2007\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2008\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2009\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2010\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2011\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter\nlong-term debt obligations\t$ 4134\t$ 1340\t$ 198\t$ 4\t$ 534\t$ 607\t$ 1451\nlease obligations\t2328\t351\t281\t209\t178\t158\t1151\npurchase obligations\t1035\t326\t120\t26\t12\t12\t539\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 7497\t$ 2017\t$ 599\t$ 239\t$ 724\t$ 777\t$ 3141\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .\ndebt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .\na table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , \"\"debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .\nlease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .\nat december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .\nrental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .\npurchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .\nthe longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .\ntotal payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .\ncommitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .\nmost of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .\nhowever , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .\nif the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .\nthe company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than \"\"cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .\nthe majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .\nif these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .\nthe company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .\nsubsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .\nthe company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .\nthe company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .\nthese contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .\nthe total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "205", "120", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "85"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_124.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much higher is the fair value than carrying value ? in millions $ .\n\nPre-table text:\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 1029\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t750\t2014\t750\t759\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-2 ( 2 )\t698\t812\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1140\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t799\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t745\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -11 ( 11 )\t$ 4939\t$ 5284\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2013 and 2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .\nduring the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .\n2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthese notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2017 notes .\nin september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .\na portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .\nthe 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5284", "4939", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "345"}
{"example_id": "SNA/2012/page_33.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the roi of s&p 500 from 2007 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .\nthe graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .\nsnap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ended ( 2 )\tsnap-onincorporated\tpeer group ( 3 )\ts&p 500\ndecember 31 2007\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\ndecember 31 2008\t83.66\t66.15\t63.00\ndecember 31 2009\t93.20\t84.12\t79.67\ndecember 31 2010\t128.21\t112.02\t91.67\ndecember 31 2011\t117.47\t109.70\t93.61\ndecember 31 2012\t187.26\t129.00\t108.59\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .\n( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .\n( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .\ngrainger , inc .\ncooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 .\n2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "108.59", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0859"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2016/page_48.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat were average net sales for aeronautics in millions between 2014 and 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 70 million .\nsince that time , we have continued to experience issues related to customer requirements and the implementation of this contract and have periodically accrued additional reserves .\nconsequently , we are continuing to monitor the scope , estimated costs , and viability of the program and the possibility of additional customer funding .\nit is possible that we may have to record additional loss reserves in future periods , which could be material to our operating results .\nhowever , we cannot make an estimate of the total expected costs at this time due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process .\nour consolidated net adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , net of state income taxes , increased segment operating profit by approximately $ 1.5 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.6 billion for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 .\nthe decrease in our consolidated net adjustments in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our mfc and space systems business segments , partially offset by an increase at our rms business segment .\nthe increase in our consolidated net adjustments in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our space systems and aeronautics business segments , offset by a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our rms and mfc business segments .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2016 are inclusive of approximately $ 530 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2015 are inclusive of approximately $ 550 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms and on commercial satellite programs at space systems .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 535 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at rms and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below .\naeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies .\naeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor .\naeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\nnet sales\t$ 17769\t$ 15570\t$ 14920\noperating profit\t1887\t1681\t1649\noperating margin\t10.6% ( 10.6 % )\t10.8% ( 10.8 % )\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nbacklog atyear-end\t$ 34200\t$ 31800\t$ 27600\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 compared to 2015 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 2.2 billion , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2015 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.7 billion for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities , partially offset by lower volume on development activities ; and approximately $ 290 million for the c-130 program due to increased deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2016 compared to 21 in 2015 ) and increased sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 250 million for the f-16 program primarily due to higher volume on aircraft modernization programs .\nthe increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the c-5 program due to decreased sustainment activities .\naeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 206 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , compared to 2015 .\noperating profit increased approximately $ 195 million for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities and higher risk retirements ; and by approximately $ 60 million for aircraft support and maintenance programs due to higher risk retirements and increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for the c-130 program due to contract mix and lower risk retirements .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 20 million higher in 2016 compared to 2015 .\n2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "net sales", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "16086.33333"}
{"example_id": "TROW/2010/page_22.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby what percent did the provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income decrease between 2008 and 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\ninvestment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .\naverage assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .\nother investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .\nnet inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .\nadministrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .\nthis change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .\nchanges in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .\nour largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .\nthe largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .\nreductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .\naverage headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .\nadvertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .\ndepreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .\nother operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .\nour cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .\nour non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .\nthe improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .\nthe following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2009\tchange\nother than temporary impairments recognized\t$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )\t$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )\t$ 55.2\ncapital gain distributions received\t5.6\t2.0\t-3.6 ( 3.6 )\nnet gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions\t-4.5 ( 4.5 )\t7.4\t11.9\nnet loss recognized on fund holdings\t$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )\t$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )\t$ 63.5\n\nPost-table text:\nlower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .\nthe 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .\nour 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .\nc a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .\nduring 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .\nwe repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .\ntangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .\ngiven the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .\nt .\nrowe price group annual report 2010 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "38.4", "37.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.3"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2014/page_38.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in property plant and equipment net from 2012 to 2013 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 27 , 2014 , september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .\nto provide additional flexibility in managing liquidity , the company began accessing the commercial paper markets in the third quarter of 2014 .\nthe company currently anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s .\noperating activities and from borrowings .\nas of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .\ndollar-denominated holdings .\namounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s .\nincome taxation on repatriation to the u.s .\nthe company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer .\nthe policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss .\nduring 2014 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 59.7 billion was a result of $ 39.5 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 13.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 7.0 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 22.6 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 9.0 billion ; cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 9.6 billion ; and cash paid for business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 3.8 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 37.5 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 45.0 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 11.1 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper of $ 12.0 billion and $ 6.3 billion , respectively .\nduring 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 16.4 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion .\napple inc .\n| 2014 form 10-k | 35 .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash cash equivalents and marketable securities\t$ 155239\t$ 146761\t$ 121251\nproperty plant and equipment net\t$ 20624\t$ 16597\t$ 15452\nlong-term debt\t$ 28987\t$ 16960\t$ 0\nworking capital\t$ 5083\t$ 29628\t$ 19111\ncash generated by operating activities\t$ 59713\t$ 53666\t$ 50856\ncash used in investing activities\t$ -22579 ( 22579 )\t$ -33774 ( 33774 )\t$ -48227 ( 48227 )\ncash used in financing activities\t$ -37549 ( 37549 )\t$ -16379 ( 16379 )\t$ -1698 ( 1698 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "16597", "15452", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1145"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_157.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwithout the us , what would the total net revenue be for 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 on december 8 , 2017 , the board of directors declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 15 , 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 1 , 2018 .\nstock repurchase program 2014 no shares were repurchased in 2017 .\nthe cumulative repurchases from the commencement of the program in july 2010 through december 31 , 2017 totaled 154.3 million shares for a total cost of $ 1.9 billion , at an average price per share of $ 12.12 ( including a nominal amount of commissions ) .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 246 million remained available for repurchase under the program .\nthe common stock repurchased has been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method .\na total of 155924785 and 156878891 shares were held as treasury stock at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nrestricted stock units under the company's employee benefit plans are issued from treasury stock .\nthe company has not retired any common stock repurchased since it began the program in july 2010 .\n15 .\nsegments and geographic information the segment reporting structure uses the company's organizational structure as its foundation to reflect how the company manages the businesses internally and is organized by geographic regions which provides a socio- political-economic understanding of our business .\nduring the third quarter of 2017 , the europe and asia sbus were merged in order to leverage scale and are now reported as part of the eurasia sbu .\nthe management reporting structure is organized by five sbus led by our president and chief executive officer : us , andes , brazil , mcac and eurasia sbus .\nthe company determined that it has five operating and five reportable segments corresponding to its sbus .\nall prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure .\nin february 2018 , we announced a reorganization as a part of our ongoing strategy to simplify our portfolio , optimize our cost structure , and reduce our carbon intensity .\nthe company is currently evaluating the impact this reorganization will have on our segment reporting structure .\ncorporate and other 2014 corporate overhead costs which are not directly associated with the operations of our five reportable segments are included in \"corporate and other.\" also included are certain intercompany charges such as self-insurance premiums which are fully eliminated in consolidation .\nthe company uses adjusted ptc as its primary segment performance measure .\nadjusted ptc , a non-gaap measure , is defined by the company as pre-tax income from continuing operations attributable to the aes corporation excluding gains or losses of the consolidated entity due to ( a ) unrealized gains or losses related to derivative transactions ; ( b ) unrealized foreign currency gains or losses ; ( c ) gains , losses and associated benefits and costs due to dispositions and acquisitions of business interests , including early plant closures ; ( d ) losses due to impairments ; ( e ) gains , losses and costs due to the early retirement of debt ; and ( f ) costs directly associated with a major restructuring program , including , but not limited to , workforce reduction efforts , relocations , and office consolidation .\nadjusted ptc also includes net equity in earnings of affiliates on an after-tax basis adjusted for the same gains or losses excluded from consolidated entities .\nthe company has concluded adjusted ptc better reflects the underlying business performance of the company and is the most relevant measure considered in the company's internal evaluation of the financial performance of its segments .\nadditionally , given its large number of businesses and complexity , the company concluded that adjusted ptc is a more transparent measure that better assists investors in determining which businesses have the greatest impact on the company's results .\nrevenue and adjusted ptc are presented before inter-segment eliminations , which includes the effect of intercompany transactions with other segments except for interest , charges for certain management fees , and the write-off of intercompany balances , as applicable .\nall intra-segment activity has been eliminated within the segment .\ninter-segment activity has been eliminated within the total consolidated results .\nthe following tables present financial information by segment for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31,\ttotal revenue 2017\ttotal revenue 2016\ttotal revenue 2015\nus sbu\t$ 3229\t$ 3429\t$ 3593\nandes sbu\t2710\t2506\t2489\nbrazil sbu\t542\t450\t962\nmcac sbu\t2448\t2172\t2353\neurasia sbu\t1590\t1670\t1875\ncorporate and other\t35\t77\t31\neliminations\t-24 ( 24 )\t-23 ( 23 )\t-43 ( 43 )\ntotal revenue\t$ 10530\t$ 10281\t$ 11260\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "10530", "3229", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_1000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "7301000000"}
{"example_id": "FIS/2007/page_91.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in unrecognized tax benefits during 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nexpire between 2019 and 2024 .\nthe company anticipates fully utilizing these net operating losses prior to expiration .\nthe company also has state net operating loss carryforwards resulting in a deferred tax asset of $ 5.3 million at december 31 , 2007 .\nthe company has a full valuation allowance against this amount at december 31 , 2007 .\nthe company has foreign net operating loss carryforwards resulting in deferred tax assets at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 of $ 45.6 million and $ 24.4 million , respectively .\nthe company has valuation allowances against these net operating losses at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 of $ 5.2 million and $ 6.0 million , respectively .\nat december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company had foreign tax credit carryovers of $ 12.4 million and $ 12.7 million , respectively , which expire between 2010 and 2025 .\nas of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company has a valuation allowance against $ 2.3 million of foreign tax credits that the company 2019s management believes it is more likely than not that it will not realize the benefit .\nas of january 1 , 2005 , the irs selected the company to participate in the compliance assurance process ( cap ) which is a real-time audit for 2005 and future years .\nthe irs has completed its review for years 2002-2006 which resulted in an immaterial adjustment for tax year 2004 related to a temporary difference and no changes to any other tax year .\ntax years 2007 and 2008 are currently under audit by the irs .\ncurrently management believes the ultimate resolution of the 2007 and 2008 examinations will not result in a material adverse effect to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations .\nthe company provides for united states income taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless they are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states .\nat december 31 , 2007 , the cumulative earnings on which united states taxes have not been provided for were $ 159.0 million .\nif these earnings were repatriated to the united states , they would generate foreign tax credits that could reduce the federal tax liability associated with the foreign dividend .\nthe 2007 calendar year is the first year the company is required to adopt fasb interpretation no .\n48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes ( 201cfin 48 201d ) .\nas a result of the adoption , the company had no change to reserves for uncertain tax positions .\ninterest and penalties on accrued but unpaid taxes are classified in the consolidated financial statements as income tax expense .\nthe following table reconciles the gross amounts of unrecognized gross tax benefits at the beginning and end of the period ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\tgross amount\namounts of unrecognized tax benefits at january 1 2007\t$ 11825\ndecreases as a result of tax positions taken in a prior period\t-3749 ( 3749 )\nincreases as a result of tax positions taken in a prior period\t15667\namount of unrecognized tax benefit at december 31 2007\t$ 23743\namount of decreases due to lapse of the applicable statute of limitations\t$ -3429 ( 3429 )\namount of decreases due to change of position\t$ -320 ( 320 )\n\nPost-table text:\nincluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2007 are potential benefits of $ 5.4 million that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations .\nthe total amount of interest expense recognized in the consolidated and combined statements of earnings for unpaid taxes is $ 1.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 .\nthe total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated balance sheet is $ 8.4 million at december 31 , 2007 .\ndue to the expiration of various statutes of limitation in the next twelve months , an estimated $ 3 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits may be recognized during that twelve month period .\nfidelity national information services , inc .\nand subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "15667", "-3749", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "11918"}
{"example_id": "CNP/2010/page_31.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the state of arkansas , what is the percentage of residential customers concerning the total customers?\n\nPre-table text:\nsystem and to use that system to conduct its electric delivery business and for other purposes that the franchises permit .\nthe terms of the franchises , with various expiration dates , typically range from 30 to 50 years .\nnatural gas distribution cerc corp . 2019s natural gas distribution business ( gas operations ) engages in regulated intrastate natural gas sales to , and natural gas transportation for , approximately 3.3 million residential , commercial and industrial customers in arkansas , louisiana , minnesota , mississippi , oklahoma and texas .\nthe largest metropolitan areas served in each state by gas operations are houston , texas ; minneapolis , minnesota ; little rock , arkansas ; shreveport , louisiana ; biloxi , mississippi ; and lawton , oklahoma .\nin 2010 , approximately 42% ( 42 % ) of gas operations 2019 total throughput was to residential customers and approximately 58% ( 58 % ) was to commercial and industrial customers .\nthe table below reflects the number of natural gas distribution customers by state as of december 31 , 2010 : residential commercial/ industrial total customers .\n\nTable:\n\tresidential\tcommercial/industrial\ttotal customers\narkansas\t390668\t48033\t438701\nlouisiana\t232135\t17347\t249482\nminnesota\t738868\t67489\t806357\nmississippi\t109608\t12683\t122291\noklahoma\t93388\t10620\t104008\ntexas\t1451666\t90719\t1542385\ntotal gas operations\t3016333\t246891\t3263224\n\nPost-table text:\ngas operations also provides unregulated services consisting of heating , ventilating and air conditioning ( hvac ) equipment and appliance repair , and sales of hvac , hearth and water heating equipment in minnesota .\nthe demand for intrastate natural gas sales to residential customers and natural gas sales and transportation for commercial and industrial customers is seasonal .\nin 2010 , approximately 71% ( 71 % ) of the total throughput of gas operations 2019 business occurred in the first and fourth quarters .\nthese patterns reflect the higher demand for natural gas for heating purposes during those periods .\nsupply and transportation .\nin 2010 , gas operations purchased virtually all of its natural gas supply pursuant to contracts with remaining terms varying from a few months to four years .\nmajor suppliers in 2010 included bp canada energy marketing corp .\n( 25.6% ( 25.6 % ) of supply volumes ) , conocophillips company ( 8.3% ( 8.3 % ) ) , tenaska marketing ventures ( 6.8% ( 6.8 % ) ) , kinder morgan ( 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) ) , oneok energy marketing company ( 4.7% ( 4.7 % ) ) , and cargill , inc .\n( 4.6% ( 4.6 % ) ) .\nnumerous other suppliers provided the remaining 43.7% ( 43.7 % ) of gas operations 2019 natural gas supply requirements .\ngas operations transports its natural gas supplies through various intrastate and interstate pipelines , including those owned by our other subsidiaries , under contracts with remaining terms , including extensions , varying from one to twelve years .\ngas operations anticipates that these gas supply and transportation contracts will be renewed or replaced prior to their expiration .\ngas operations actively engages in commodity price stabilization pursuant to annual gas supply plans presented to and/or filed with each of its state regulatory authorities .\nthese price stabilization activities include use of storage gas , contractually establishing fixed prices with our physical gas suppliers and utilizing financial derivative instruments to achieve a variety of pricing structures ( e.g. , fixed price , costless collars and caps ) .\nits gas supply plans generally call for 25-50% ( 25-50 % ) of winter supplies to be hedged in some fashion .\ngenerally , the regulations of the states in which gas operations operates allow it to pass through changes in the cost of natural gas , including gains and losses on financial derivatives associated with the index-priced physical supply , to its customers under purchased gas adjustment provisions in its tariffs .\ndepending upon the jurisdiction , the purchased gas adjustment factors are updated periodically , ranging from monthly to semi-annually , using estimated gas costs .\nthe changes in the cost of gas billed to customers are subject to review by the applicable regulatory bodies. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "390668", "438701", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.89051"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2009/page_65.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nassuming a fmv of a share equal to 2000 , under the pre-december 31 , 2007 plan , approximately how many shares would each non-employee director receive annually?\n\nPre-table text:\n4 .\nstock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) .\nthere are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation .\nwe no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans .\nin april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors .\nunder the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units .\nprior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan .\nthe union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 .\nthe 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards .\nnon-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan .\nwe no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan .\nthe union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 .\nthe 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan .\nunder the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries .\nnon-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan .\npursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively .\nstock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model .\ngroups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .\nthe table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nweighted-average assumptions\t2009\t2008\t2007\nrisk-free interest rate\t1.9% ( 1.9 % )\t2.8% ( 2.8 % )\t4.9% ( 4.9 % )\ndividend yield\t2.3% ( 2.3 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\t1.4% ( 1.4 % )\nexpected life ( years )\t5.1\t5.3\t4.7\nvolatility\t31.3% ( 31.3 % )\t22.2% ( 22.2 % )\t20.9% ( 20.9 % )\nweighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted\t$ 11.33\t$ 13.35\t$ 11.19\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2000", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "60000", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "90"}
{"example_id": "AON/2010/page_115.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase in rsus from 2009 to 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nmaterial impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .\nfor most of the participants in the u.s .\nplan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .\nbecause of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .\nduring 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .\nplan over the next three years .\nthe impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .\n14 .\nstock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2010\t2009\t2008\nrsus\t$ 138\t$ 124\t$ 132\nperformance plans\t62\t60\t67\nstock options\t17\t21\t24\nemployee stock purchase plans\t4\t4\t3\ntotal stock-based compensation expense\t221\t209\t226\ntax benefit\t75\t68\t82\nstock-based compensation expense net of tax\t$ 146\t$ 141\t$ 144\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .\nin connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .\nstock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .\nservice-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .\nthe fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\nwith certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .\ncompensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .\ndividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .\nperformance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .\nvesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .\nthe performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .\nthe fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\ncompensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .\ncompensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .\nthe actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .\ndividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .\nduring 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .\nduring 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "138", "124", ")", "divide(", "#0", "124", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.1129"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_377.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in net revenue for entergy texas , inc . in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .\nthe recovery became effective july 2007 .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .\n2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2006 net revenue\t$ 403.3\npurchased power capacity\t13.1\nsecuritization transition charge\t9.9\nvolume/weather\t9.7\ntransmission revenue\t6.1\nbase revenue\t2.6\nother\t-2.4 ( 2.4 )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 442.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .\nthe securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .\nas discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .\nthe volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .\nthe increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .\nretail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .\nthe transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .\nthe base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .\nthe decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .\nthe receipt of such payments is being .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "442.3", "403.3", ")", "divide(", "#0", "403.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0967"}
{"example_id": "TROW/2010/page_22.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent change in capital gain distributions between 2008 and 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\ninvestment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .\naverage assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .\nother investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .\nnet inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .\nadministrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .\nthis change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .\nchanges in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .\nour largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .\nthe largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .\nreductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .\naverage headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .\nadvertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .\ndepreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .\nother operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .\nour cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .\nour non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .\nthe improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .\nthe following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2009\tchange\nother than temporary impairments recognized\t$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )\t$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )\t$ 55.2\ncapital gain distributions received\t5.6\t2.0\t-3.6 ( 3.6 )\nnet gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions\t-4.5 ( 4.5 )\t7.4\t11.9\nnet loss recognized on fund holdings\t$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )\t$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )\t$ 63.5\n\nPost-table text:\nlower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .\nthe 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .\nour 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .\nc a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .\nduring 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .\nwe repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .\ntangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .\ngiven the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .\nt .\nrowe price group annual report 2010 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2.9", "5.6", ")", "divide(", "#0", "5.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.48214"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2015/page_18.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2017 , what percentage of undeveloped acres were located in africa?\n\nPre-table text:\nin the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .\nif production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .\nwe plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .\nthe kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .\nnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018\nu.s .\t68\t89\t128\ne.g .\t2014\t92\t36\nother africa\t189\t4352\t854\ntotal africa\t189\t4444\t890\nother international\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t257\t4533\t1018\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "4444", "4533", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.98037"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_376.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average net revenue from 2010 to 2011\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .\nresults of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\n2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .\nnet revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 540.2\nretail electric price\t36.0\nvolume/weather\t21.3\npurchased power capacity\t-24.6 ( 24.6 )\nother\t4.9\n2011 net revenue\t$ 577.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .\nusage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "577.8", "540.2", ")", "add(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "560"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_316.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much higher is net revenue in 2017 than 2016 ? ( in millions )\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy arkansas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income .\n2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\nnet revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1520.5\nretail electric price\t33.8\nopportunity sales\t5.6\nasset retirement obligation\t-14.8 ( 14.8 )\nvolume/weather\t-29.0 ( 29.0 )\nother\t6.5\n2017 net revenue\t$ 1522.6\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .\na significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 .\nthe increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase .\nthe opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1522.6", "1520.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.1"}
{"example_id": "CAG/2008/page_75.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 25 , 2008 , may 27 , 2007 , and may 28 , 2006 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts administrative expenses , including the reclassification of the cumulative after-tax charges of $ 21.9 million from accumulated other comprehensive income .\nduring fiscal 2007 , the company closed on the sale of these notes for approximately $ 117 million , net of transaction expenses , resulting in no additional gain or loss .\n8 .\ninventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2007\nraw materials and packaging\t$ 580.8\t$ 458.5\nwork in progress\t100.0\t94.6\nfinished goods\t1179.1\t1001.3\nsupplies and other\t71.6\t70.7\ntotal\t$ 1931.5\t$ 1625.1\n\nPost-table text:\n9 .\ncredit facilities and borrowings at may 25 , 2008 , the company had credit lines from banks that totaled approximately $ 2.3 billion .\nthese lines are comprised of a $ 1.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions which matures in december 2011 , uncommitted short-term loan facilities approximating $ 364 million , and uncommitted trade finance facilities approximating $ 424 million .\nborrowings under the multi-year facility bear interest at or below prime rate and may be prepaid without penalty .\nthe company has not drawn upon this multi- year facility .\nthe uncommitted trade finance facilities mentioned above were maintained in order to finance certain working capital needs of the company 2019s trading and merchandising operations .\nsubsequent to the sale of this business in june 2008 , the company exited these facilities .\nthe company finances its short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings , commercial paper borrowings , and bankers 2019 acceptances .\nas of may 25 , 2008 , the company had outstanding borrowings of $ 578.3 million , primarily under the commercial paper arrangements .\nthe weighted average interest rate on these borrowings as of may 25 , 2008 was 2.76% ( 2.76 % ) .\nthe average consolidated short-term borrowings outstanding under these facilities were $ 418.5 million and $ 4.3 million for fiscal 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1179.1", "1931.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.61046"}
{"example_id": "AES/2002/page_46.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwas the 2002 first quarter variance in high & low stock prices greater than the 2001 first quarter variance?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information .\nthe common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .\nprice range of common stock .\n\nTable:\n2002 first quarter\thigh $ 17.84\tlow $ 4.11\t2001 first quarter\thigh $ 60.15\tlow $ 41.30\nsecond quarter\t9.17\t3.55\tsecond quarter\t52.25\t39.95\nthird quarter\t4.61\t1.56\tthird quarter\t44.50\t12.00\nfourth quarter\t3.57\t0.95\tfourth quarter\t17.80\t11.60\n\nPost-table text:\nholders .\nas of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .\ndividends .\nunder the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends .\nin addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .\nthe ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .\nsecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans .\nsee the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "17.84", "4.11", ")", "subtract(", "60.15", "41.30", ")", "greater(", "#0", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2016/page_48.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the profit margin in 2014 for the aeronautics business segment\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 70 million .\nsince that time , we have continued to experience issues related to customer requirements and the implementation of this contract and have periodically accrued additional reserves .\nconsequently , we are continuing to monitor the scope , estimated costs , and viability of the program and the possibility of additional customer funding .\nit is possible that we may have to record additional loss reserves in future periods , which could be material to our operating results .\nhowever , we cannot make an estimate of the total expected costs at this time due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process .\nour consolidated net adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , net of state income taxes , increased segment operating profit by approximately $ 1.5 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.6 billion for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 .\nthe decrease in our consolidated net adjustments in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our mfc and space systems business segments , partially offset by an increase at our rms business segment .\nthe increase in our consolidated net adjustments in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our space systems and aeronautics business segments , offset by a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our rms and mfc business segments .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2016 are inclusive of approximately $ 530 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2015 are inclusive of approximately $ 550 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms and on commercial satellite programs at space systems .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 535 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at rms and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below .\naeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies .\naeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor .\naeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\nnet sales\t$ 17769\t$ 15570\t$ 14920\noperating profit\t1887\t1681\t1649\noperating margin\t10.6% ( 10.6 % )\t10.8% ( 10.8 % )\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nbacklog atyear-end\t$ 34200\t$ 31800\t$ 27600\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 compared to 2015 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 2.2 billion , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2015 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.7 billion for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities , partially offset by lower volume on development activities ; and approximately $ 290 million for the c-130 program due to increased deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2016 compared to 21 in 2015 ) and increased sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 250 million for the f-16 program primarily due to higher volume on aircraft modernization programs .\nthe increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the c-5 program due to decreased sustainment activities .\naeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 206 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , compared to 2015 .\noperating profit increased approximately $ 195 million for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities and higher risk retirements ; and by approximately $ 60 million for aircraft support and maintenance programs due to higher risk retirements and increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for the c-130 program due to contract mix and lower risk retirements .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 20 million higher in 2016 compared to 2015 .\n2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1649", "14920", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11052"}
{"example_id": "RE/2017/page_159.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the estimated total cost to replace the annuities the company was liable for in 2017\n\nPre-table text:\n15 .\ncommitments and contingencies in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance agreements .\nin some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it .\nin other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights .\nthese disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation .\nin all such matters , the company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable .\nthe company considers the statuses of these proceedings when determining its reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses .\naside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements , the company is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration .\nthe company has entered into separate annuity agreements with the prudential insurance of america ( 201cthe prudential 201d ) and an additional unaffiliated life insurance company in which the company has either purchased annuity contracts or become the assignee of annuity proceeds that are meant to settle claim payment obligations in the future .\nin both instances , the company would become contingently liable if either the prudential or the unaffiliated life insurance company were unable to make payments related to the respective annuity contract .\nthe table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the company was contingently liable for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in thousands )\tat december 31 , 2017\tat december 31 , 2016\nthe prudential insurance company of america\t$ 144618\t$ 146507\nunaffiliated life insurance company\t34444\t33860\n\nPost-table text:\n16 .\nshare-based compensation plans the company has a 2010 stock incentive plan ( 201c2010 employee plan 201d ) , a 2009 non-employee director stock option and restricted stock plan ( 201c2009 director plan 201d ) and a 2003 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( 201c2003 director plan 201d ) .\nunder the 2010 employee plan , 4000000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as non- qualified share options , incentive share options , share appreciation rights , restricted share awards or performance share unit awards to officers and key employees of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 2553473 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2010 employee plan .\nthe 2010 employee plan replaced a 2002 employee plan , which replaced a 1995 employee plan ; therefore , no further awards will be granted under the 2002 employee plan or the 1995 employee plan .\nthrough december 31 , 2017 , only non-qualified share options , restricted share awards and performance share unit awards had been granted under the employee plans .\nunder the 2009 director plan , 37439 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or restricted share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 34957 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2009 director plan .\nthe 2009 director plan replaced a 1995 director plan , which expired .\nunder the 2003 director plan , 500000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 there were 346714 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2003 director plan. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "144618", "34444", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "179062"}
{"example_id": "BDX/2018/page_82.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average pension service cost from 2016 to 2018 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .\npostretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .\nthe measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .\neffective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .\npension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tpension plans 2018\tpension plans 2017\tpension plans 2016\nservice cost\t$ 136\t$ 110\t$ 81\ninterest cost\t90\t61\t72\nexpected return on plan assets\t-154 ( 154 )\t-112 ( 112 )\t-109 ( 109 )\namortization of prior service credit\t-13 ( 13 )\t-14 ( 14 )\t-15 ( 15 )\namortization of loss\t78\t92\t77\nsettlements\t2\t2014\t7\nnet pension cost\t$ 137\t$ 138\t$ 113\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans\t$ 34\t$ 43\t$ 35\n\nPost-table text:\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .\nthe settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .\nsupplemental pension plan .\nthe company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "136", "110", ")", "add(", "81", "#0", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "109"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_88.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average catastrophe losses from 2008 to 2010 in millions\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table shows the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2009\t2008\nloss and loss expense ratio as reported\t59.2% ( 59.2 % )\t58.8% ( 58.8 % )\t60.6% ( 60.6 % )\ncatastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums\t( 3.2 ) % (  % )\t( 1.2 ) % (  % )\t( 4.7 ) % (  % )\nprior period development\t4.6% ( 4.6 % )\t4.9% ( 4.9 % )\t6.8% ( 6.8 % )\nlarge assumed loss portfolio transfers\t( 0.3 ) % (  % )\t( 0.8 ) % (  % )\t0.0% ( 0.0 % )\nloss and loss expense ratio adjusted\t60.3% ( 60.3 % )\t61.7% ( 61.7 % )\t62.7% ( 62.7 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe recorded net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 366 million in 2010 compared with net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 137 million and $ 567 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthe catastrophe losses for 2010 were primarily related to weather- related events in the u.s. , earthquakes in chile , mexico , and new zealand , and storms in australia and europe .\nthe catastrophe losses for 2009 were primarily related to an earthquake in asia , floods in europe , several weather-related events in the u.s. , and a european windstorm .\nfor 2008 , the catastrophe losses were primarily related to hurricanes gustav and ike .\nprior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from pre- vious accident years .\nwe experienced $ 503 million of net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments in 2010 .\nthis compares with net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments of $ 576 million and $ 814 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nrefer to 201cprior period development 201d for more information .\nthe adjusted loss and loss expense ratio declined in 2010 , compared with 2009 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , non-recurring premium adjustment and the reduction in assumed loss portfolio business , which is written at higher loss ratios than other types of business .\nour policy acquisition costs include commissions , premium taxes , underwriting , and other costs that vary with , and are primarily related to , the production of premium .\nadministrative expenses include all other operating costs .\nour policy acquis- ition cost ratio increased in 2010 , compared with 2009 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the impact of crop settlements , which generated higher profit-share commissions and a lower adjustment to net premiums earned , as well as the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with catastrophe activity and changes in business mix .\nour administrative expense ratio increased in 2010 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , reinstatement premiums expensed , and increased costs in our international operations .\nalthough the crop settlements generate minimal administrative expenses , they resulted in lower adjustment to net premiums earned in 2010 , compared with 2009 .\nadministrative expenses in 2010 , were partially offset by higher net results generated by our third party claims administration business , esis , the results of which are included within our administrative expenses .\nesis generated $ 85 million in net results in 2010 , compared with $ 26 million in 2009 .\nthe increase is primarily from non-recurring sources .\nour policy acquisition cost ratio was stable in 2009 , compared with 2008 , as increases in our combined insurance operations were offset by more favorable final crop year settlement of profit share commissions .\nadministrative expenses increased in 2009 , primarily due to the inclusion of administrative expenses related to combined insurance for the full year and costs associated with new product expansion in our domestic retail operation and in our personal lines business .\nour effective income tax rate , which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax , is depend- ent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates .\na change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate .\nour effective income tax rate was 15 percent in 2010 , compared with 17 percent and 24 percent in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthe decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2010 , was primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings to lower tax-paying jurisdictions , a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which was the result of a settlement with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service appeals division regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002-2004 , and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of rain and hail .\nthe 2009 year included a reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to investments .\nfor 2008 , our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by a change in mix of earnings due to the impact of catastrophe losses in lower tax-paying jurisdictions .\nprior period development the favorable prior period development , inclusive of the life segment , of $ 512 million during 2010 was the net result of sev- eral underlying favorable and adverse movements .\nwith respect to ace 2019s crop business , ace regularly receives reports from its managing general agent ( mga ) relating to the previous crop year ( s ) in subsequent calendar quarters and this typically results .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "366", "137", ")", "add(", "567", "#0", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "356.66667"}
{"example_id": "AON/2014/page_47.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2013 and 2014 , what is the basis point variation observed in the operating margin?\n\nPre-table text:\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .\nin 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .\noperating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .\nhr solutions .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2014\t2013\t2012\nrevenue\t$ 4264\t$ 4057\t$ 3925\noperating income\t485\t318\t289\noperating margin\t11.4% ( 11.4 % )\t7.8% ( 7.8 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\n2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .\n2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .\nour model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .\n2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .\n2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .\ndisruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nweak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "11.4%", "7.8%", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.6"}
{"example_id": "AON/2014/page_47.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif the hr solutions segment generated 35% ( 35 % ) of the consolidated revenue , what would be the total revenue for 2014 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nreinsurance commissions , fees and other revenue decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2014 reflecting a 1% ( 1 % ) unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates and 1% ( 1 % ) decline in organic revenue growth due primarily to a significant unfavorable market impact in treaty , partially offset by net new business growth in treaty placements globally and growth in capital markets transactions and advisory business , as well as facultative placements .\noperating income operating income increased $ 108 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , from 2013 to $ 1.6 billion in 2014 .\nin 2014 , operating income margins in this segment were 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) , an increase of 120 basis points from 19.8% ( 19.8 % ) in 2013 .\noperating margin improvement was driven by solid organic revenue growth , return on investments , expense discipline and savings related to the restructuring programs , partially offset by a $ 61 million unfavorable impact from foreign currency exchange rates .\nhr solutions .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2014\t2013\t2012\nrevenue\t$ 4264\t$ 4057\t$ 3925\noperating income\t485\t318\t289\noperating margin\t11.4% ( 11.4 % )\t7.8% ( 7.8 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nour hr solutions segment generated approximately 35% ( 35 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2014 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration .\n2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries .\n2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management .\n2022 investment consulting advises public and private companies , other institutions and trustees on developing and maintaining investment programs across a broad range of plan types , including defined benefit plans , defined contribution plans , endowments and foundations .\n2022 benefits administration applies our human resource expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services .\nour model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions .\n2022 exchanges is building and operating healthcare exchanges that provide employers with a cost effective alternative to traditional employee and retiree healthcare , while helping individuals select the insurance that best meets their needs .\n2022 human resource business processing outsourcing provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core human resource process transactions as well as other complementary services such as flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy .\ndisruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace .\nweak economic conditions in many markets around the globe continued throughout 2014 and have adversely impacted our clients' financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate .\nwhile we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting continued pressure on the pricing of those services , which is having an adverse effect on our new business and results of operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "4264", "35%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "12182.85714"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2013/page_207.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwas the notional amount of derivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap greater than the notional amount of\\\\nderivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 17 financial derivatives we use derivative financial instruments ( derivatives ) primarily to help manage exposure to interest rate , market and credit risk and reduce the effects that changes in interest rates may have on net income , fair value of assets and liabilities , and cash flows .\nwe also enter into derivatives with customers to facilitate their risk management activities .\nderivatives represent contracts between parties that usually require little or no initial net investment and result in one party delivering cash or another type of asset to the other party based on a notional amount and an underlying as specified in the contract .\nderivative transactions are often measured in terms of notional amount , but this amount is generally not exchanged and it is not recorded on the balance sheet .\nthe notional amount is the basis to which the underlying is applied to determine required payments under the derivative contract .\nthe underlying is a referenced interest rate ( commonly libor ) , security price , credit spread or other index .\nresidential and commercial real estate loan commitments associated with loans to be sold also qualify as derivative instruments .\nthe following table presents the notional amounts and gross fair values of all derivative assets and liabilities held by pnc : table 127 : total gross derivatives .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 31 2013 notional/contractamount\tdecember 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )\tdecember 31 2013 liabilityfairvalue ( b )\tdecember 31 2013 notional/contractamount\tdecember 31 2013 assetfairvalue ( a )\tliabilityfairvalue ( b )\nderivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap\t$ 36197\t$ 1189\t$ 364\t$ 29270\t$ 1872\t$ 152\nderivatives not designated as hedging instruments under gaap\t345059\t3604\t3570\t337086\t6696\t6458\ntotal gross derivatives\t$ 381256\t$ 4793\t$ 3934\t$ 366356\t$ 8568\t$ 6610\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet .\n( b ) included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nall derivatives are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value .\nderivative balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheet on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements and any related cash collateral exchanged with counterparties .\nfurther discussion regarding the rights of setoff associated with these legally enforceable master netting agreements is included in the offsetting , counterparty credit risk , and contingent features section below .\nour exposure related to risk participations where we sold protection is discussed in the credit derivatives section below .\nany nonperformance risk , including credit risk , is included in the determination of the estimated net fair value of the derivatives .\nfurther discussion on how derivatives are accounted for is included in note 1 accounting policies .\nderivatives designated as hedging instruments under gaap certain derivatives used to manage interest rate risk as part of our asset and liability risk management activities are designated as accounting hedges under gaap .\nderivatives hedging the risks associated with changes in the fair value of assets or liabilities are considered fair value hedges , derivatives hedging the variability of expected future cash flows are considered cash flow hedges , and derivatives hedging a net investment in a foreign subsidiary are considered net investment hedges .\ndesignating derivatives as accounting hedges allows for gains and losses on those derivatives , to the extent effective , to be recognized in the income statement in the same period the hedged items affect earnings .\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 189 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "36197", "345059", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_88.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby what amount have catastrophic losses in 2010 surpass the catastrophic losses of 2009 , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table shows the impact of catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums and the impact of prior period development on our consolidated loss and loss expense ratio for the periods indicated. .\n\nTable:\n\t2010\t2009\t2008\nloss and loss expense ratio as reported\t59.2% ( 59.2 % )\t58.8% ( 58.8 % )\t60.6% ( 60.6 % )\ncatastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums\t( 3.2 ) % (  % )\t( 1.2 ) % (  % )\t( 4.7 ) % (  % )\nprior period development\t4.6% ( 4.6 % )\t4.9% ( 4.9 % )\t6.8% ( 6.8 % )\nlarge assumed loss portfolio transfers\t( 0.3 ) % (  % )\t( 0.8 ) % (  % )\t0.0% ( 0.0 % )\nloss and loss expense ratio adjusted\t60.3% ( 60.3 % )\t61.7% ( 61.7 % )\t62.7% ( 62.7 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe recorded net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 366 million in 2010 compared with net pre-tax catastrophe losses of $ 137 million and $ 567 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthe catastrophe losses for 2010 were primarily related to weather- related events in the u.s. , earthquakes in chile , mexico , and new zealand , and storms in australia and europe .\nthe catastrophe losses for 2009 were primarily related to an earthquake in asia , floods in europe , several weather-related events in the u.s. , and a european windstorm .\nfor 2008 , the catastrophe losses were primarily related to hurricanes gustav and ike .\nprior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves first reported in previous calendar years and excludes the effect of losses from the development of earned premium from pre- vious accident years .\nwe experienced $ 503 million of net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments in 2010 .\nthis compares with net favorable prior period development in our p&c segments of $ 576 million and $ 814 million in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nrefer to 201cprior period development 201d for more information .\nthe adjusted loss and loss expense ratio declined in 2010 , compared with 2009 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , non-recurring premium adjustment and the reduction in assumed loss portfolio business , which is written at higher loss ratios than other types of business .\nour policy acquisition costs include commissions , premium taxes , underwriting , and other costs that vary with , and are primarily related to , the production of premium .\nadministrative expenses include all other operating costs .\nour policy acquis- ition cost ratio increased in 2010 , compared with 2009 .\nthe increase was primarily related to the impact of crop settlements , which generated higher profit-share commissions and a lower adjustment to net premiums earned , as well as the impact of reinstatement premiums expensed in connection with catastrophe activity and changes in business mix .\nour administrative expense ratio increased in 2010 , primarily due to the impact of the crop settlements , reinstatement premiums expensed , and increased costs in our international operations .\nalthough the crop settlements generate minimal administrative expenses , they resulted in lower adjustment to net premiums earned in 2010 , compared with 2009 .\nadministrative expenses in 2010 , were partially offset by higher net results generated by our third party claims administration business , esis , the results of which are included within our administrative expenses .\nesis generated $ 85 million in net results in 2010 , compared with $ 26 million in 2009 .\nthe increase is primarily from non-recurring sources .\nour policy acquisition cost ratio was stable in 2009 , compared with 2008 , as increases in our combined insurance operations were offset by more favorable final crop year settlement of profit share commissions .\nadministrative expenses increased in 2009 , primarily due to the inclusion of administrative expenses related to combined insurance for the full year and costs associated with new product expansion in our domestic retail operation and in our personal lines business .\nour effective income tax rate , which we calculate as income tax expense divided by income before income tax , is depend- ent upon the mix of earnings from different jurisdictions with various tax rates .\na change in the geographic mix of earnings would change the effective income tax rate .\nour effective income tax rate was 15 percent in 2010 , compared with 17 percent and 24 percent in 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthe decrease in our effective income tax rate in 2010 , was primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings to lower tax-paying jurisdictions , a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits which was the result of a settlement with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service appeals division regarding federal tax returns for the years 2002-2004 , and the recognition of a non-taxable gain related to the acquisition of rain and hail .\nthe 2009 year included a reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance related to investments .\nfor 2008 , our effective income tax rate was adversely impacted by a change in mix of earnings due to the impact of catastrophe losses in lower tax-paying jurisdictions .\nprior period development the favorable prior period development , inclusive of the life segment , of $ 512 million during 2010 was the net result of sev- eral underlying favorable and adverse movements .\nwith respect to ace 2019s crop business , ace regularly receives reports from its managing general agent ( mga ) relating to the previous crop year ( s ) in subsequent calendar quarters and this typically results .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "366", "137", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "229"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_35.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total amount of cash outflow used for shares repurchased during october 2007 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla .\nthe usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million .\nbased on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company .\neurope in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages .\nball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court .\nall other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees .\nthe relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation .\nitem 4 .\nsubmission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 .\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange .\nthere were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 .\ncommon stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 .\npurchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased ( a )\taverage pricepaid per share\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )\noctober 1 to october 28 2007\t705292\t$ 53.53\t705292\t4904824\noctober 29 to november 25 2007\t431170\t$ 48.11\t431170\t4473654\nnovember 26 to december 31 2007\t8310 ( c )\t$ 44.99\t8310\t4465344\ntotal\t1144772\t$ 51.42\t1144772\t\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities .\n( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors .\non january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock .\nthis repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations .\n( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million .\nalso does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "705292", "53.53", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "37.75428"}
{"example_id": "GS/2016/page_77.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total net revenue investing & lending segment is due to equity securities in 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 7.83 billion for 2015 , 16% ( 16 % ) higher than 2014 .\nexcluding a gain of $ 121 million ( $ 30 million and $ 91 million included in equities client execution and securities services , respectively ) in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , net revenues in equities were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , primarily due to significantly higher net revenues in equities client execution across the major regions , reflecting significantly higher results in both derivatives and cash products , and higher net revenues in securities services , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances and improved securities lending spreads .\ncommissions and fees were essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .\nwe elect the fair value option for certain unsecured borrowings .\nthe fair value net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our credit spreads on these borrowings was $ 255 million ( $ 214 million and $ 41 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2015 , compared with a net gain of $ 144 million ( $ 108 million and $ 36 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2014 .\noperating expenses were $ 13.94 billion for 2015 , 28% ( 28 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher net provisions for mortgage-related litigation and regulatory matters , partially offset by decreased compensation and benefits expenses .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.21 billion in 2015 , 72% ( 72 % ) lower than 2014 .\ninvesting & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients .\nthese investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature .\nwe make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities .\nwe also make unsecured loans to individuals through our online platform .\nthe table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2016\tyear ended december 2015\tyear ended december 2014\nequity securities\t$ 2573\t$ 3781\t$ 4579\ndebt securities and loans\t1507\t1655\t2246\ntotal net revenues\t4080\t5436\t6825\noperating expenses\t2386\t2402\t2819\npre-tax earnings\t$ 1694\t$ 3034\t$ 4006\n\nPost-table text:\noperating environment .\nfollowing difficult market conditions and the impact of a challenging macroeconomic environment on corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions improved during the rest of the year as macroeconomic concerns moderated .\nglobal equity markets increased during 2016 , contributing to net gains from investments in public equities , and corporate performance rebounded from the difficult start to the year .\nif macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or company-specific events , or if global equity markets decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted .\nalthough net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of 2015 impacted results .\n2016 versus 2015 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to significantly lower net revenues from investments in equities , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were lower compared with 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges .\nlosses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 .\nthis decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities .\noperating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 .\n2015 versus 2014 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .\ngoldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 63 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2573", "4080", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.63064"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2010/page_28.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation compared to the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 12/31/10?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 .\nit assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested .\nthe dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .\ntotal return analysis .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/05\t12/31/06\t12/31/07\t12/31/08\t12/31/09\t12/31/10\nball corporation\t$ 100.00\t$ 110.86\t$ 115.36\t$ 107.58\t$ 134.96\t$ 178.93\ndj containers & packaging index\t$ 100.00\t$ 112.09\t$ 119.63\t$ 75.00\t$ 105.34\t$ 123.56\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100.00\t$ 115.80\t$ 122.16\t$ 76.96\t$ 97.33\t$ 111.99\ncopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\tcopyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )\ncopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\tcopyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "178.93", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "111.99", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#1", "#3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.6694"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2017/page_77.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total identifiable net assets is in cash?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\ncash\t$ 45826\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t42721\nacquired technology\t27954\ntrade name\t2901\nother assets\t2337\ndeferred income tax assets ( liabilities )\t-9788 ( 9788 )\nother liabilities\t-49797 ( 49797 )\ntotal identifiable net assets\t62154\ngoodwill\t203828\ntotal purchase consideration\t$ 265982\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .\ngoodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes .\nthe customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .\nnote 3 2014 settlement processing assets and obligations funds settlement refers to the process of transferring funds for sales and credits between card issuers and merchants .\nfor transactions processed on our systems , we use our internal network to provide funding instructions to financial institutions that in turn fund the merchants .\nwe process funds settlement under two models , a sponsorship model and a direct membership model .\nunder the sponsorship model , we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa , which means that member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsor us and require our adherence to the standards of the payment networks .\nin certain markets , we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements with financial institution sponsors .\nthese agreements allow us to route transactions under the members 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa .\nin this model , the standards of the payment networks restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing merchant settlement funds , and , instead , require that these funds be in the possession of the member until the merchant is funded .\nunder the direct membership model , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship .\nin this model , we route and clear transactions directly through the card brand 2019s network and are not restricted from performing funds settlement .\notherwise , we process these transactions similarly to how we process transactions in the sponsorship model .\nwe are required to adhere to the standards of the payment networks in which we are direct members .\nwe maintain relationships with financial institutions , which may also serve as our member sponsors for other card brands or in other markets , to assist with funds settlement .\ntiming differences , interchange fees , merchant reserves and exception items cause differences between the amount received from the payment networks and the amount funded to the merchants .\nthese intermediary balances arising in our settlement process for direct merchants are reflected as settlement processing assets and obligations on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsettlement processing assets and obligations include the components outlined below : 2022 interchange reimbursement .\nour receivable from merchants for the portion of the discount fee related to reimbursement of the interchange fee .\nglobal payments inc .\n| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 77 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "45826", "62154", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.7373"}
{"example_id": "CME/2012/page_70.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby what percentage can cme increase their current line of credit?\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcme clearingavailable assets\ndesignated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )\t$ 100.0\nguaranty fund contributions ( 2 )\t2899.5\nassessment powers ( 3 )\t7973.6\nminimum total assets available for default ( 4 )\t$ 10973.1\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "const_7", "const_5", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.4"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2007/page_59.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ngoodwill comprises what percentage of total assets acquired?\n\nPre-table text:\nuse of estimates the preparation of the financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period .\nactual results could differ from those estimates .\n( 3 ) significant acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions we acquired total income producing real estate related assets of $ 219.9 million , $ 948.4 million and $ 295.6 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\nin december 2007 , in order to further establish our property positions around strategic port locations , we purchased a portfolio of five industrial buildings , in seattle , virginia and houston , as well as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston .\nthe total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million .\nof the total purchase price , $ 66.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 3.3 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities .\nthis allocation of purchase price based on the fair value of assets acquired is preliminary .\nthe results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements .\nin february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm .\nthe primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market .\nthe initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over the next three years .\napproximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce .\nthe results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements .\nin february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c .\nmetropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) .\nthe assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million are comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company .\nthe acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings .\nthe assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\noperating rental properties\t$ 602011\nland held for development\t154300\ntotal real estate investments\t756311\nother assets\t10478\nlease related intangible assets\t86047\ngoodwill\t14722\ntotal assets acquired\t867558\ndebt assumed\t-148527 ( 148527 )\nother liabilities assumed\t-5829 ( 5829 )\npurchase price net of assumed liabilities\t$ 713202\n\nPost-table text:\npurchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "14722", "867558", ")", "multiply(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.69695"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_147.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much of the firm-sponsored qspes that hold asf framework loans are serviced by the firm?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 145 subprime adjustable-rate mortgage loan modifications see the glossary of terms on page 183 of this annual report for the firm 2019s definition of subprime loans .\nwithin the confines of the limited decision-making abilities of a qspe under sfas 140 , the operating doc- uments that govern existing subprime securitizations generally authorize the servicer to modify loans for which default is reasonably foreseeable , provided that the modification is in the best interests of the qspe 2019s ben- eficial interest holders , and would not result in a remic violation .\nin december 2007 , the american securitization forum ( 201casf 201d ) issued the 201cstreamlined foreclosure and loss avoidance framework for securitized subprime adjustable rate mortgage loans 201d ( 201cthe framework 201d ) .\nthe framework provides guidance for servicers to stream- line evaluation procedures for borrowers with certain subprime adjustable rate mortgage ( 201carm 201d ) loans to more efficiently provide modifications of such loans with terms that are more appropriate for the individual needs of such borrowers .\nthe framework applies to all first-lien subprime arm loans that have a fixed rate of interest for an initial period of 36 months or less , are included in securitized pools , were originated between january 1 , 2005 , and july 31 , 2007 , and have an initial interest rate reset date between january 1 , 2008 , and july 31 , 2010 ( 201casf framework loans 201d ) .\nthe framework categorizes the population of asf framework loans into three segments .\nsegment 1 includes loans where the borrower is current and is likely to be able to refinance into any available mortgage product .\nsegment 2 includes loans where the borrower is current , is unlikely to be able to refinance into any readily available mortgage industry product and meets certain defined criteria .\nsegment 3 includes loans where the borrower is not current , as defined , and does not meet the criteria for segments 1 or 2 .\nasf framework loans in segment 2 of the framework are eligible for fast-track modification under which the interest rate will be kept at the existing initial rate , generally for five years following the interest rate reset date .\nthe framework indicates that for segment 2 loans , jpmorgan chase , as servicer , may presume that the borrower will be unable to make payments pursuant to the original terms of the borrower 2019s loan after the initial interest rate reset date .\nthus , the firm may presume that a default on that loan by the borrower is reasonably foreseeable unless the terms of the loan are modified .\njpmorgan chase has adopted the loss mitigation approaches under the framework for securitized sub- prime loans that meet the specific segment 2 screening criteria , and it expects to begin modifying segment 2 loans by the end of the first quar- ter of 2008 .\nthe firm believes that the adoption of the framework will not affect the off-balance sheet accounting treatment of jpmorgan chase-sponsored qspes that hold segment 2 subprime loans .\nthe total amount of assets owned by firm-sponsored qspes that hold asf framework loans ( including those loans that are not serviced by the firm ) as of december 31 , 2007 , was $ 20.0 billion .\nof this amount , $ 9.7 billion relates to asf framework loans serviced by the firm .\nbased on current economic conditions , the firm estimates that approximately 20% ( 20 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the asf framework loans it services that are owned by firm-sponsored qspes will fall within segments 1 , 2 and 3 , respectively .\nthis estimate could change substantially as a result of unanticipated changes in housing values , economic conditions , investor/borrower behavior and other factors .\nthe total principal amount of beneficial interests issued by firm-spon- sored securitizations that hold asf framework loans as of december 31 , 2007 , was as follows. .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 2007 ( in millions )\t2007\nthird-party\t$ 19636\nretained interest\t412\ntotal\t$ 20048\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "20.0", "9.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "10.3"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2018/page_171.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2018 what was the percent of the total commitments to extend credit and other commitments for home equity lines of credit\n\nPre-table text:\nthe pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 155 of such other legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial position .\nhowever , we cannot now determine whether or not any claims asserted against us or others to whom we may have indemnification obligations , whether in the proceedings or other matters described above or otherwise , will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period , which will depend on , among other things , the amount of the loss resulting from the claim and the amount of income otherwise reported for the reporting period .\nnote 20 commitments in the normal course of business , we have various commitments outstanding , certain of which are not included on our consolidated balance sheet .\nthe following table presents our outstanding commitments to extend credit along with significant other commitments as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively .\ntable 94 : commitments to extend credit and other commitments in millions december 31 december 31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdecember 31 2018\tdecember 312017\ncommitments to extend credit\t\t\ntotal commercial lending\t$ 120165\t$ 112125\nhome equity lines of credit\t16944\t17852\ncredit card\t27100\t24911\nother\t5069\t4753\ntotal commitments to extend credit\t169278\t159641\nnet outstanding standby letters of credit ( a )\t8655\t8651\nreinsurance agreements ( b )\t1549\t1654\nstandby bond purchase agreements ( c )\t1000\t843\nother commitments ( d )\t1130\t1732\ntotal commitments to extend credit and other commitments\t$ 181612\t$ 172521\n\nPost-table text:\ncommitments to extend credit , or net unfunded loan commitments , represent arrangements to lend funds or provide liquidity subject to specified contractual conditions .\nthese commitments generally have fixed expiration dates , may require payment of a fee , and generally contain termination clauses in the event the customer 2019s credit quality deteriorates .\nnet outstanding standby letters of credit we issue standby letters of credit and share in the risk of standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions , in each case to support obligations of our customers to third parties , such as insurance requirements and the facilitation of transactions involving capital markets product execution .\napproximately 91% ( 91 % ) of our net outstanding standby letters of credit were rated as pass at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , with the remainder rated as criticized .\nan internal credit rating of pass indicates the expected risk of loss is currently low , while a rating of criticized indicates a higher degree of risk .\nif the customer fails to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract or there is a need to support a remarketing program , then upon a draw by a beneficiary , subject to the terms of the letter of credit , we would be obligated to make payment to them .\nthe standby letters of credit outstanding on december 31 , 2018 had terms ranging from less than one year to six years .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , assets of $ 1.1 billion secured certain specifically identified standby letters of credit .\nin addition , a portion of the remaining standby letters of credit issued on behalf of specific customers is also secured by collateral or guarantees that secure the customers 2019 other obligations to us .\nthe carrying amount of the liability for our obligations related to standby letters of credit and participations in standby letters of credit was $ .2 billion at december 31 , 2018 and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "16944", "181612", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0933"}
{"example_id": "HIG/2011/page_188.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 31 , 2011 , what was the percentage change in the estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits from 2013 to 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nthe hartford financial services group , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\ndeferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2011\t2010\t2009\nbalance january 1\t$ 9857\t$ 10686\t$ 13248\ndeferred costs\t2608\t2648\t2853\namortization 2014 dac\t-2920 ( 2920 )\t-2665 ( 2665 )\t-3247 ( 3247 )\namortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations\t2014\t-17 ( 17 )\t-10 ( 10 )\namortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]\t-507 ( 507 )\t138\t-1010 ( 1010 )\nadjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]\t-377 ( 377 )\t-1159 ( 1159 )\t-1031 ( 1031 )\neffect of currency translation\t83\t215\t-39 ( 39 )\ncumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]\t2014\t11\t-78 ( 78 )\nbalance december 31\t$ 8744\t$ 9857\t$ 10686\n\nPost-table text:\n[1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s .\nvariable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return .\nthe most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return .\nalso included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates .\nthe most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 .\n[2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci .\nother includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 .\n[3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit .\nin addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge .\nin addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "24", "58", ")", "divide(", "#0", "58", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.58621"}
{"example_id": "FBHS/2017/page_76.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the total debt associated with the 1250 million revolving credit agreement due june 2021\n\nPre-table text:\nthe components of external long-term debt were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2017\t2016\n$ 400 million unsecured senior note due june 2020\t$ 398.3\t$ 397.6\n$ 500 million unsecured senior note due june 2025\t494.3\t493.5\n$ 1250 million revolving credit agreement due june 2021\t615.0\t540.0\ntotal debt\t1507.6\t1431.1\nless : current portion\t2014\t2014\ntotal long-term debt\t$ 1507.6\t$ 1431.1\n\nPost-table text:\nsenior notes payments during the next five years as of december 31 , 2017 are zero in 2018 through 2019 , $ 400 million in 2020 and zero in 2021 through 2022 .\nin our debt agreements , there are normal and customary events of default which would permit the lenders to accelerate the debt if not cured within applicable grace periods , such as failure to pay principal or interest when due or a change in control of the company .\nthere were no events of default as of december 31 , 2017 .\n9 .\nfinancial instruments we do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .\nwe principally use financial instruments to reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and commodities used as raw materials in our products .\nthe principal derivative financial instruments we enter into on a routine basis are foreign exchange contracts .\nderivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value .\nthe counterparties to derivative contracts are major financial institutions .\nwe are subject to credit risk on these contracts equal to the fair value of these instruments .\nmanagement currently believes that the risk of incurring material losses is unlikely and that the losses , if any , would be immaterial to the company .\nraw materials used by the company are subject to price volatility caused by weather , supply conditions , geopolitical and economic variables , and other unpredictable external factors .\nas a result , from time to time , we enter into commodity swaps to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in our operations .\nwe account for these commodity derivatives as economic hedges or cash flow hedges .\nchanges in the fair value of economic hedges are recorded directly into current period earnings .\nthere were no material commodity swap contracts outstanding for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 .\nwe enter into foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge forecasted sales and purchases denominated in select foreign currencies , thereby limiting currency risk that would otherwise result from changes in exchange rates .\nthe periods of the foreign exchange contracts correspond to the periods of the forecasted transactions , which generally do not exceed 12 to 15 months subsequent to the latest balance sheet date .\nfor derivative instruments that are designated as fair value hedges , the gain or loss on the derivative instrument , as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item , are recognized on the same line of the statement of income .\nthe effective portions of cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and are recognized in the statement of income when the hedged item affects earnings .\nthe changes in fair value for net investment hedges are recognized in the statement of income when realized upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity .\nthe ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in current period earnings .\nin addition , changes in the fair value of all economic hedge transactions are immediately recognized in current period earnings .\nour primary foreign currency hedge contracts pertain to the canadian dollar , the british pound , and the mexican peso .\nthe gross u.s .\ndollar equivalent notional amount of all foreign currency derivative hedges outstanding at december 31 , 2017 was $ 282.8 million , representing a net settlement liability of $ 4.8 million .\nbased on foreign exchange rates as of december 31 , 2017 , we estimate that $ 3.0 million of net foreign currency .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "615.0", "1507.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.40793"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2013/page_15.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the ratio of the total flight attendants to pilots\n\nPre-table text:\nfuture regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries .\nsee part i , item 1a .\nrisk factors - \" if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ,\" \"our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages\" and \"we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result\" for additional information .\nemployees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive .\nin 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses .\nthe table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 .\namerican us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .\n\nTable:\n\tamerican\tus airways\twholly-owned regional carriers\ttotal\npilots\t7900\t4100\t3400\t15400\nflight attendants\t15000\t7700\t2100\t24800\nmaintenance personnel\t11300\t3100\t2400\t16800\nfleet service personnel\t7400\t5500\t1700\t14600\npassenger service personnel\t10300\t6200\t6400\t22900\nadministrative and other\t8200\t5500\t2200\t15900\ntotal\t60100\t32100\t18200\t110400\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "24800", "15400", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.61039"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2013/page_74.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage of the total severance actions related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters in 2011 related to the aeronautics\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 2 2013 restructuring charges 2013 actions during 2013 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 201 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 83 million , $ 37 million , and $ 81 million related to our information systems & global solutions ( is&gs ) , mission systems and training ( mst ) , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 130 million ( $ .40 per share ) and primarily related to a plan we committed to in november 2013 to close and consolidate certain facilities and reduce our total workforce by approximately 4000 positions within our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments .\nthese charges also include $ 30 million related to certain severance actions at our is&gs business segment that occurred in the first quarter of 2013 , which were subsequently paid in 2013 .\nthe november 2013 plan resulted from a strategic review of these businesses 2019 facility capacity and future workload projections and is intended to better align our organization and cost structure and improve the affordability of our products and services given the continued decline in u.s .\ngovernment spending as well as the rapidly changing competitive and economic landscape .\nupon separation , terminated employees will receive lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service .\nduring 2013 , we paid approximately $ 15 million in severance payments associated with these actions , with the remainder expected to be paid through the middle of 2015 .\nin addition to the severance charges described above , we expect to incur accelerated and incremental costs ( e.g. , accelerated depreciation expense related to long-lived assets at the sites to be closed , relocation of equipment and other employee related costs ) of approximately $ 15 million , $ 50 million , and $ 135 million at our is&gs , mst , and space systems business segments related to the facility closures and consolidations .\nthe accelerated and incremental costs will be expensed as incurred in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations through their completion in 2015 .\nwe expect to recover a substantial amount of the restructuring charges through the pricing of our products and services to the u.s .\ngovernment and other customers in future periods , with the impact included in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations .\n2012 and 2011 actions during 2012 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 48 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 25 million related to our aeronautics business segment and $ 23 million related to the reorganization of our former electronic systems business segment .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 31 million ( $ .09 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from cost reduction initiatives to better align our organization with changing economic conditions .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments primarily based on years of service , all of which were paid in 2013 .\nduring 2011 , we recorded charges related to certain severance actions totaling $ 136 million , net of state tax benefits , of which $ 49 million , $ 48 million , and $ 39 million related to our aeronautics , space systems , and our is&gs business segments and corporate headquarters .\nthese charges reduced our net earnings by $ 88 million ( $ .26 per share ) and consisted of severance costs associated with the elimination of certain positions through either voluntary or involuntary actions .\nthese severance actions resulted from a strategic review of these businesses and our corporate headquarters and are intended to better align our organization and cost structure with changing economic conditions .\nthe workforce reductions at the business segments also reflected changes in program lifecycles , where several of our major programs were either transitioning out of development and into production or were ending .\nupon separation , terminated employees received lump-sum severance payments based on years of service .\nduring 2011 , we made approximately half of the severance payments associated with these 2011 severance actions , and paid the remaining amounts in 2012 .\nnote 3 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t320.9\t323.7\t335.9\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t5.6\t4.7\t4.0\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t326.5\t328.4\t339.9\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "49", "48", ")", "add(", "39", "#0", ")", "divide(", "49", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.36029"}
{"example_id": "ALLE/2016/page_43.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2015 , what was the lowest return for the investment?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph the annual changes for the period shown november 18 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading in the \"when-issued\" market ) to december 31 , 2016 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( \"s&p 500\" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( \"s&p 400 capital goods\" ) on november 18 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested .\nthe total cumulative dollar returns shown on the graph represent the value that such investments would have had on december 31 , 2016 .\nnovember 18 , 2013 december 31 , 2013 december 31 , 2014 december 31 , 2015 december 31 , 2016 .\n\nTable:\n\tnovember 18 2013\tdecember 31 2013\tdecember 31 2014\tdecember 31 2015\tdecember 31 2016\nallegion plc\t100.00\t91.16\t115.11\t137.71\t134.67\ns&p 500\t100.00\t103.44\t117.59\t119.22\t133.48\ns&p 400 capital goods\t100.00\t105.46\t105.72\t99.90\t131.80\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "99.90", "100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.1"}
{"example_id": "HUM/2017/page_133.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage of the common stock repurchase among the total program of repurchases?\n\nPre-table text:\nhumana inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 .\nstockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\npaymentdate\tamountper share\ttotalamount ( in millions )\n2015\t$ 1.14\t$ 170\n2016\t$ 1.16\t$ 172\n2017\t$ 1.49\t$ 216\n\nPost-table text:\non november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million .\ndeclaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change .\nstock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 .\nunder the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing .\npursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards .\naccordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program .\non february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement .\nwe also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 .\non february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co .\nllc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above .\non february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock .\nthe payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr .\nupon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million .\nin addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock .\nsubsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.5", "2.25", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.66667"}
{"example_id": "FIS/2007/page_91.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total interest expense is related to unpaid taxes in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nexpire between 2019 and 2024 .\nthe company anticipates fully utilizing these net operating losses prior to expiration .\nthe company also has state net operating loss carryforwards resulting in a deferred tax asset of $ 5.3 million at december 31 , 2007 .\nthe company has a full valuation allowance against this amount at december 31 , 2007 .\nthe company has foreign net operating loss carryforwards resulting in deferred tax assets at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 of $ 45.6 million and $ 24.4 million , respectively .\nthe company has valuation allowances against these net operating losses at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 of $ 5.2 million and $ 6.0 million , respectively .\nat december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company had foreign tax credit carryovers of $ 12.4 million and $ 12.7 million , respectively , which expire between 2010 and 2025 .\nas of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company has a valuation allowance against $ 2.3 million of foreign tax credits that the company 2019s management believes it is more likely than not that it will not realize the benefit .\nas of january 1 , 2005 , the irs selected the company to participate in the compliance assurance process ( cap ) which is a real-time audit for 2005 and future years .\nthe irs has completed its review for years 2002-2006 which resulted in an immaterial adjustment for tax year 2004 related to a temporary difference and no changes to any other tax year .\ntax years 2007 and 2008 are currently under audit by the irs .\ncurrently management believes the ultimate resolution of the 2007 and 2008 examinations will not result in a material adverse effect to the company 2019s financial position or results of operations .\nthe company provides for united states income taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries unless they are considered permanently reinvested outside the united states .\nat december 31 , 2007 , the cumulative earnings on which united states taxes have not been provided for were $ 159.0 million .\nif these earnings were repatriated to the united states , they would generate foreign tax credits that could reduce the federal tax liability associated with the foreign dividend .\nthe 2007 calendar year is the first year the company is required to adopt fasb interpretation no .\n48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes ( 201cfin 48 201d ) .\nas a result of the adoption , the company had no change to reserves for uncertain tax positions .\ninterest and penalties on accrued but unpaid taxes are classified in the consolidated financial statements as income tax expense .\nthe following table reconciles the gross amounts of unrecognized gross tax benefits at the beginning and end of the period ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\tgross amount\namounts of unrecognized tax benefits at january 1 2007\t$ 11825\ndecreases as a result of tax positions taken in a prior period\t-3749 ( 3749 )\nincreases as a result of tax positions taken in a prior period\t15667\namount of unrecognized tax benefit at december 31 2007\t$ 23743\namount of decreases due to lapse of the applicable statute of limitations\t$ -3429 ( 3429 )\namount of decreases due to change of position\t$ -320 ( 320 )\n\nPost-table text:\nincluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2007 are potential benefits of $ 5.4 million that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations .\nthe total amount of interest expense recognized in the consolidated and combined statements of earnings for unpaid taxes is $ 1.4 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 .\nthe total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated balance sheet is $ 8.4 million at december 31 , 2007 .\ndue to the expiration of various statutes of limitation in the next twelve months , an estimated $ 3 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits may be recognized during that twelve month period .\nfidelity national information services , inc .\nand subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.4", "8.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.16667"}
{"example_id": "HIG/2008/page_318.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in total statutory capital from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies .\nthe statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2007 in the table below are based on actual statutory filings with the applicable regulatory authorities .\nthe statutory surplus amounts as of december 31 , 2008 are estimates , as the respective 2008 statutory filings have not yet been the company has received approval from the connecticut insurance department regarding the use of two permitted practices in the statutory financial statements of its connecticut-domiciled life insurance subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe first permitted practice relates to the statutory accounting for deferred income taxes .\nspecifically , this permitted practice modifies the accounting for deferred income taxes prescribed by the naic by increasing the realization period for deferred tax assets from one year to three years and increasing the asset recognition limit from 10% ( 10 % ) to 15% ( 15 % ) of adjusted statutory capital and surplus .\nthe benefits of this permitted practice may not be considered by the company when determining surplus available for dividends .\nthe second permitted practice relates to the statutory reserving requirements for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefit riders .\nactuarial guidelines prescribed by the naic require a stand-alone asset adequacy analysis reflecting only benefits , expenses and charges that are associated with the riders for variable annuities with guaranteed living benefits .\nthe permitted practice allows for all benefits , expenses and charges associated with the variable annuity contract to be reflected in the stand- alone asset adequacy test .\nthese permitted practices resulted in an increase to life operations estimated statutory surplus of $ 987 as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe effects of these permitted practices are included in the 2008 life operations surplus amount in the table above .\nstatutory capital the company 2019s stockholders 2019 equity , as prepared using u.s .\ngaap was $ 9.3 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate statutory capital and surplus , as prepared in accordance with the national association of insurance commissioners 2019 accounting practices and procedures manual ( 201cus stat 201d ) was $ 13.8 billion as of december 31 , 2008 .\nsignificant differences between u.s .\ngaap stockholders 2019 equity and aggregate statutory capital and surplus prepared in accordance with us stat include the following: .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2007\nlife operations\t$ 6047\t$ 5786\njapan life operations\t1718\t1620\nproperty & casualty operations\t6012\t8509\ntotal\t$ 13777\t$ 15915\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 costs incurred by the company to acquire insurance policies are deferred under u.s .\ngaap while those costs are expensed immediately under us stat .\n2022 temporary differences between the book and tax basis of an asset or liability which are recorded as deferred tax assets are evaluated for recoverability under u.s .\ngaap while those amounts deferred are subject to limitations under us stat .\n2022 certain assumptions used in the determination of life benefit reserves are prescribed under us stat and are intended to be conservative , while the assumptions used under u.s .\ngaap are generally the company 2019s best estimates .\nin addition , the methodologies used for determining life reserve amounts are different between us stat and u.s .\ngaap .\nannuity reserving and cash-flow testing for death and living benefit reserves under us stat are generally addressed by the commissioners 2019 annuity reserving valuation methodology and the related actuarial guidelines .\nunder these actuarial guidelines , in general , future cash flows associated with the variable annuity business are included in these methodologies with estimates of future fee revenues , claim payments , expenses , reinsurance impacts and hedging impacts .\nat december 31 , 2008 , in determining the cash-flow impacts related to future hedging , assumptions were made in the scenarios that generate reserve requirements , about the potential future decreases in the hedge benefits and increases in hedge costs which resulted in increased reserve requirements .\nreserves for death and living benefits under u.s .\ngaap are either considered embedded derivatives and recorded at fair value or they may be considered sop 03-1 reserves .\n2022 the difference between the amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity and other investments , net of tax , is recorded as an increase or decrease to the carrying value of the related asset and to equity under u.s .\ngaap , while us stat only records certain securities at fair value , such as equity securities and certain lower rated bonds required by the naic to be recorded at the lower of amortized cost or fair value .\nin the case of the company 2019s market value adjusted ( mva ) fixed annuity products , invested assets are marked to fair value ( including the impact of credit spreads ) and liabilities are marked to fair value ( but generally actual credit spreads are not fully reflected ) for statutory purposes only .\n2022 us stat for life insurance companies establishes a formula reserve for realized and unrealized losses due to default and equity risks associated with certain invested assets ( the asset valuation reserve ) , while u.s .\ngaap does not .\nalso , for those realized gains and losses caused by changes in interest rates , us stat for life insurance companies defers and amortizes the gains and losses , caused by changes in interest rates , into income over the original life to maturity of the asset sold ( the interest maintenance reserve ) while u.s .\ngaap does not .\n2022 goodwill arising from the acquisition of a business is tested for recoverability on an annual basis ( or more frequently , as necessary ) for u.s .\ngaap , while under us stat goodwill is amortized over a period not to exceed 10 years and the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "13777", "15915", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-2138"}
{"example_id": "RE/2015/page_33.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the book to market ratio of the commercial mortgage-backed securities\n\nPre-table text:\nthe company had net realized capital losses for 2015 of $ 184.1 million .\nin 2015 , the company recorded $ 102.2 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities , $ 45.6 million of losses due to fair value re-measurements and $ 36.3 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities .\nin 2014 , net realized capital gains were $ 84.0 million due to $ 121.7 million of gains from fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 1.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 39.5 million of other-than- temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nin 2013 , net realized capital gains were $ 300.2 million due to $ 258.9 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and $ 42.4 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities , partially offset by $ 1.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities .\nthe company 2019s cash and invested assets totaled $ 17.7 billion at december 31 , 2015 , which consisted of 87.4% ( 87.4 % ) fixed maturities and cash , of which 91.4% ( 91.4 % ) were investment grade ; 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) equity securities and 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) other invested assets .\nthe average maturity of fixed maturity securities was 4.1 years at december 31 , 2015 , and their overall duration was 3.0 years .\nas of december 31 , 2015 , the company did not have any direct investments in commercial real estate or direct commercial mortgages or any material holdings of derivative investments ( other than equity index put option contracts as discussed in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data 201d - note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) or securities of issuers that are experiencing cash flow difficulty to an extent that the company 2019s management believes could threaten the issuer 2019s ability to meet debt service payments , except where other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized .\nthe company 2019s investment portfolio includes structured commercial mortgage-backed securities ( 201ccmbs 201d ) with a book value of $ 264.9 million and a market value of $ 266.3 million .\ncmbs securities comprising more than 70% ( 70 % ) of the december 31 , 2015 market value are rated aaa by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc ( 201cstandard & poor 2019s 201d ) .\nfurthermore , securities comprising more than 90% ( 90 % ) of the market value are rated investment grade by standard & poor 2019s .\nthe following table reflects investment results for the company for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in millions )\tdecember 31 , average investments ( 1 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax investment income ( 2 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax effective yield\tdecember 31 , pre-tax realized net capital ( losses ) gains ( 3 )\tdecember 31 , pre-tax unrealized net capital gains ( losses )\n2015\t$ 17430.8\t$ 473.8\t2.72% ( 2.72 % )\t$ -184.1 ( 184.1 )\t$ -194.0 ( 194.0 )\n2014\t16831.9\t530.6\t3.15% ( 3.15 % )\t84.0\t20.3\n2013\t16472.5\t548.5\t3.33% ( 3.33 % )\t300.2\t-467.2 ( 467.2 )\n2012\t16220.9\t600.2\t3.70% ( 3.70 % )\t164.4\t161.0\n2011\t15680.9\t620.0\t3.95% ( 3.95 % )\t6.9\t106.6\n\nPost-table text:\npre-tax pre-tax pre-tax pre-tax realized net unrealized net average investment effective capital ( losses ) capital gains ( dollars in millions ) investments ( 1 ) income ( 2 ) yield gains ( 3 ) ( losses ) 17430.8$ 473.8$ 2.72% ( 2.72 % ) ( 184.1 ) $ ( 194.0 ) $ 16831.9 530.6 3.15% ( 3.15 % ) 84.0 20.3 16472.5 548.5 3.33% ( 3.33 % ) 300.2 ( 467.2 ) 16220.9 600.2 3.70% ( 3.70 % ) 164.4 161.0 15680.9 620.0 3.95% ( 3.95 % ) 6.9 106.6 ( 1 ) average of the beginning and ending carrying values of investments and cash , less net funds held , future policy benefit reserve , and non-interest bearing cash .\nbonds , common stock and redeemable and non-redeemable preferred stocks are carried at market value .\ncommon stock which are actively managed are carried at fair value .\n( 2 ) after investment expenses , excluding realized net capital gains ( losses ) .\n( 3 ) included in 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 are fair value re-measurements of ( $ 45.6 ) million , $ 121.7 million , $ 258.9 million , $ 118.1 million and ( $ 4.4 ) million , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "264.9", "266.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.99474"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_56.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby what percentage did the average henry hub natural gas benchmark decrease from 2007 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe .\nour operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis .\n2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis .\n2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states .\ncertain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business .\nthese statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain .\nin accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements .\nwe hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) .\nas discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings .\nour investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nunless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 .\nbusiness , item 1a .\nrisk factors , item 6 .\nselected financial data and item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data .\noverview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows .\nprices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year .\nprices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark\t2009\t2008\t2007\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\t$ 62.09\t$ 99.75\t$ 72.41\ndated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\t$ 61.67\t$ 97.26\t$ 72.39\nhenry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )\t$ 3.99\t$ 9.04\t$ 6.86\n\nPost-table text:\nhenry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index .\ncrude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession .\nthe price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 .\nour domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does .\nsour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark .\nthe differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3.99", "6.86", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6.86", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.41837"}
{"example_id": "MSI/2006/page_61.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage of decrease of long-term debt from 2007 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\n53management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in order to borrow funds under the 5-year credit facility , the company must be in compliance with various conditions , covenants and representations contained in the agreements .\nthe company was in compliance with the terms of the 5-year credit facility at december 31 , 2006 .\nthe company has never borrowed under its domestic revolving credit facilities .\nutilization of the non-u.s .\ncredit facilities may also be dependent on the company's ability to meet certain conditions at the time a borrowing is requested .\ncontractual obligations , guarantees , and other purchase commitments contractual obligations summarized in the table below are the company's obligations and commitments to make future payments under debt obligations ( assuming earliest possible exercise of put rights by holders ) , lease payment obligations , and purchase obligations as of december 31 , 2006 .\npayments due by period ( 1 ) ( in millions ) total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 thereafter .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) total\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2007\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2008\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2009\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2010\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) 2011\tpayments due by period ( 1 ) thereafter\nlong-term debt obligations\t$ 4134\t$ 1340\t$ 198\t$ 4\t$ 534\t$ 607\t$ 1451\nlease obligations\t2328\t351\t281\t209\t178\t158\t1151\npurchase obligations\t1035\t326\t120\t26\t12\t12\t539\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 7497\t$ 2017\t$ 599\t$ 239\t$ 724\t$ 777\t$ 3141\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) amounts included represent firm , non-cancelable commitments .\ndebt obligations : at december 31 , 2006 , the company's long-term debt obligations , including current maturities and unamortized discount and issue costs , totaled $ 4.1 billion , as compared to $ 4.0 billion at december 31 , 2005 .\na table of all outstanding long-term debt securities can be found in note 4 , \"\"debt and credit facilities'' to the company's consolidated financial statements .\nlease obligations : the company owns most of its major facilities , but does lease certain office , factory and warehouse space , land , and information technology and other equipment under principally non-cancelable operating leases .\nat december 31 , 2006 , future minimum lease obligations , net of minimum sublease rentals , totaled $ 2.3 billion .\nrental expense , net of sublease income , was $ 241 million in 2006 , $ 250 million in 2005 and $ 205 million in 2004 .\npurchase obligations : the company has entered into agreements for the purchase of inventory , license of software , promotional agreements , and research and development agreements which are firm commitments and are not cancelable .\nthe longest of these agreements extends through 2015 .\ntotal payments expected to be made under these agreements total $ 1.0 billion .\ncommitments under other long-term agreements : the company has entered into certain long-term agreements to purchase software , components , supplies and materials from suppliers .\nmost of the agreements extend for periods of one to three years ( three to five years for software ) .\nhowever , generally these agreements do not obligate the company to make any purchases , and many permit the company to terminate the agreement with advance notice ( usually ranging from 60 to 180 days ) .\nif the company were to terminate these agreements , it generally would be liable for certain termination charges , typically based on work performed and supplier on-hand inventory and raw materials attributable to canceled orders .\nthe company's liability would only arise in the event it terminates the agreements for reasons other than \"\"cause.'' the company also enters into a number of arrangements for the sourcing of supplies and materials with minimum purchase commitments and take-or-pay obligations .\nthe majority of the minimum purchase obligations under these contracts are over the life of the contract as opposed to a year-by-year take-or-pay .\nif these agreements were terminated at december 31 , 2006 , the company's obligation would not have been significant .\nthe company does not anticipate the cancellation of any of these agreements in the future .\nsubsequent to the end of 2006 , the company entered into take-or-pay arrangements with suppliers through may 2009 with minimum purchase obligations of $ 2.2 billion during that period .\nthe company estimates purchases during that period that exceed the minimum obligations .\nthe company outsources certain corporate functions , such as benefit administration and information technology-related services .\nthese contracts are expected to expire in 2013 .\nthe total remaining payments under these contracts are approximately $ 1.3 billion over the remaining seven years ; however , these contracts can be %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c11830 pcn : 055000000 *** %%pcmsg| |00030|yes|no|02/28/2007 13:05|0|1|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1340", "607", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1340", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.54701"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_87.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor 2012 , what percent of the home equity lines of credit interest only product was due to home equity lines of credit with balloon payments?\n\nPre-table text:\ngenerally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term .\nduring the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest .\nbased upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2011 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end .\nhome equity lines of credit - draw period end dates in millions interest only product principal and interest product .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tinterest only product\tprincipal and interest product\n2012\t$ 904\t$ 266\n2013\t1211\t331\n2014\t2043\t598\n2015\t1988\t820\n2016 and thereafter\t6961\t5601\ntotal ( a )\t$ 13107\t$ 7616\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes approximately $ 306 million , $ 44 million , $ 60 million , $ 100 million , and $ 246 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , and 2016 and thereafter , respectively .\nwe view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments .\nbased upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2011 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 4.32% ( 4.32 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.57% ( 5.57 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due .\ngenerally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated .\nat that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr .\nsee note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information .\nloan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate .\ninitially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program .\nif a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program .\nour programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal .\ntemporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs .\nfurther , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs .\nadditional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality and allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report .\na temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to the original loan terms as of a specific date or the occurrence of an event , such as a failure to pay in accordance with the terms of the modification .\ntypically , these modifications are for a period of up to 24 months after which the interest rate reverts to the original loan rate .\na permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed .\npermanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs .\nfor consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance .\nexamples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment .\npermanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made .\nresidential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months .\nwe also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses .\nthe following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months and twelve months after the modification date .\n78 the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "306", "904", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.3385"}
{"example_id": "SNA/2012/page_33.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate of snap's share price from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .\nthe graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .\nsnap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ended ( 2 )\tsnap-onincorporated\tpeer group ( 3 )\ts&p 500\ndecember 31 2007\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.00\ndecember 31 2008\t83.66\t66.15\t63.00\ndecember 31 2009\t93.20\t84.12\t79.67\ndecember 31 2010\t128.21\t112.02\t91.67\ndecember 31 2011\t117.47\t109.70\t93.61\ndecember 31 2012\t187.26\t129.00\t108.59\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .\n( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .\n( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .\ngrainger , inc .\ncooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 .\n2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "83.66", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.1634"}
{"example_id": "NKE/2016/page_37.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of may 31 , 2016 what percentage of cash and cash equivalents was held in foreign subsidiaries?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii capital resources on april 23 , 2013 , we filed a shelf registration statement ( the 201cshelf 201d ) with the sec which permitted us to issue an unlimited amount of debt securities .\non april 23 , 2013 , we issued $ 1.0 billion of senior notes with tranches maturing in 2023 and 2043 .\nthe 2023 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $ 500 million at a 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) fixed , annual interest rate and will mature on may 1 , 2023 .\nthe 2043 senior notes were issued in an initial aggregate principal amount of $ 500 million at a 3.625% ( 3.625 % ) fixed , annual interest rate and will mature on may 1 , 2043 .\ninterest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on may 1 and november 1 of each year .\nthe issuance resulted in gross proceeds before expenses of $ 998 million .\non october 29 , 2015 , we issued an additional $ 1.0 billion of senior notes at a 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) fixed , annual interest rate that will mature on november 1 , 2045 .\ninterest on the senior notes is payable semi-annually on may 1 and november 1 of each year .\nthe issuance resulted in proceeds before expenses of $ 991 million .\nthe shelf expired on april 23 , 2016 .\nwe plan to file a new shelf registration statement with the sec in july 2016 .\non august 28 , 2015 , we entered into a committed credit facility agreement with a syndicate of banks , which provides for up to $ 2 billion of borrowings .\nthe facility matures august 28 , 2020 , with a one year extension option prior to any anniversary of the closing date , provided that in no event shall it extend beyond august 28 , 2022 .\nthis facility replaces the prior $ 1 billion credit facility agreement entered into on november 1 , 2011 , which would have matured november 1 , 2017 .\nas of and for the periods ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 , we had no amounts outstanding under either committed credit facility .\nwe currently have long-term debt ratings of aa- and a1 from standard and poor 2019s corporation and moody 2019s investor services , respectively .\nif our long- term debt ratings were to decline , the facility fee and interest rate under our committed credit facility would increase .\nconversely , if our long-term debt rating were to improve , the facility fee and interest rate would decrease .\nchanges in our long-term debt rating would not trigger acceleration of maturity of any then-outstanding borrowings or any future borrowings under the committed credit facility .\nunder this committed revolving credit facility , we have agreed to various covenants .\nthese covenants include limits on our disposal of fixed assets , the amount of debt secured by liens we may incur , as well as limits on the indebtedness we can incur relative to our net worth .\nin the event we were to have any borrowings outstanding under this facility and failed to meet any covenant , and were unable to obtain a waiver from a majority of the banks in the syndicate , any borrowings would become immediately due and payable .\nas of may 31 , 2016 , we were in full compliance with each of these covenants and believe it is unlikely we will fail to meet any of these covenants in the foreseeable future .\nliquidity is also provided by our $ 2 billion commercial paper program , which increased $ 1 billion during the second quarter of fiscal 2016 .\nduring the year ended may 31 , 2016 , we did not issue commercial paper , and as of may 31 , 2016 , there were no outstanding borrowings under this program .\nany future issuance of commercial paper or other debt securities during fiscal 2017 will depend on general corporate needs .\nwe currently have short-term debt ratings of a1+ and p1 from standard and poor 2019s corporation and moody 2019s investor services , respectively .\nas of may 31 , 2016 , we had cash , cash equivalents and short-term investments totaling $ 5.5 billion , of which $ 4.6 billion was held by our foreign subsidiaries .\nincluded in cash and equivalents as of may 31 , 2016 was $ 105 million of cash collateral received from counterparties as a result of hedging activity .\ncash equivalents and short-term investments consist primarily of deposits held at major banks , money market funds , commercial paper , corporate notes , u.s .\ntreasury obligations , u.s .\ngovernment sponsored enterprise obligations and other investment grade fixed income securities .\nour fixed income investments are exposed to both credit and interest rate risk .\nall of our investments are investment grade to minimize our credit risk .\nwhile individual securities have varying durations , as of may 31 , 2016 , the weighted average remaining duration of our cash equivalents and short-term investments portfolio was 91 days .\nto date we have not experienced difficulty accessing the credit markets or incurred higher interest costs .\nfuture volatility in the capital markets , however , may increase costs associated with issuing commercial paper or other debt instruments or affect our ability to access those markets .\nwe believe that existing cash , cash equivalents , short-term investments and cash generated by operations , together with access to external sources of funds as described above , will be sufficient to meet our domestic and foreign capital needs in the foreseeable future .\nwe utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies to manage our worldwide cash and deploy funds to locations where they are needed .\nwe routinely repatriate a portion of our foreign earnings for which u.s .\ntaxes have previously been provided .\nwe also indefinitely reinvest a significant portion of our foreign earnings , and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate these earnings .\nshould we require additional capital in the united states , we may elect to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds or raise capital in the united states through debt .\nif we were to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds , we would be required to accrue and pay additional u.s .\ntaxes less applicable foreign tax credits .\nif we elect to raise capital in the united states through debt , we would incur additional interest expense .\noff-balance sheet arrangements in connection with various contracts and agreements , we routinely provide indemnification relating to the enforceability of intellectual property rights , coverage for legal issues that arise and other items where we are acting as the guarantor .\ncurrently , we have several such agreements in place .\nhowever , based on our historical experience and the estimated probability of future loss , we have determined that the fair value of such indemnification is not material to our financial position or results of operations .\ncontractual obligations our significant long-term contractual obligations as of may 31 , 2016 and significant endorsement contracts , including related marketing commitments , entered into through the date of this report are as follows: .\n\nTable:\ndescription of commitment ( in millions )\tdescription of commitment 2017\tdescription of commitment 2018\tdescription of commitment 2019\tdescription of commitment 2020\tdescription of commitment 2021\tdescription of commitment thereafter\ttotal\noperating leases\t$ 491\t$ 453\t$ 395\t$ 347\t$ 301\t$ 1244\t$ 3231\ncapital leases\t7\t5\t2\t1\t2014\t2014\t15\nlong-term debt ( 1 )\t115\t75\t74\t74\t71\t3365\t3774\nendorsement contracts ( 2 )\t1198\t1238\t945\t827\t698\t4514\t9420\nproduct purchase obligations ( 3 )\t4149\t2014\t2014\t2014\t2014\t2014\t4149\nother purchase obligations ( 4 )\t384\t118\t90\t48\t42\t90\t772\ntotal\t$ 6344\t$ 1889\t$ 1506\t$ 1297\t$ 1112\t$ 9213\t$ 21361\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) the cash payments due for long-term debt include estimated interest payments .\nestimates of interest payments are based on outstanding principal amounts , applicable fixed interest rates or currently effective interest rates as of may 31 , 2016 ( if variable ) , timing of scheduled payments and the term of the debt obligations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "4.6", "5.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.83636"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2017/page_71.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\npercent change in fair value of beginning assets in this time period?\n\nPre-table text:\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc .\nand subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our foreign pension plan assets measured at fair value that used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 78.7\ngains on assets sold\t0.3\nchange in fair value of assets\t3.8\nnet purchases and sales\t5.2\ntranslation gain\t3.0\nending balance\t$ 91.0\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect that we will have no legally required minimum funding requirements in 2018 for the qualified u.s .\nand puerto rico defined benefit retirement plans , nor do we expect to voluntarily contribute to these plans during 2018 .\ncontributions to foreign defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 17.0 million in 2018 .\nwe do not expect the assets in any of our plans to be returned to us in the next year .\ndefined contribution plans we also sponsor defined contribution plans for substantially all of the u.s .\nand puerto rico employees and certain employees in other countries .\nthe benefits offered under these plans are reflective of local customs and practices in the countries concerned .\nwe expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\n15 .\nincome taxes 2017 tax act : the president signed u.s .\ntax reform legislation ( 201c2017 tax act 201d ) on december 22 , 2017 , which is considered the enactment date .\nthe 2017 tax act includes a broad range of provisions , many of which significantly differ from those contained in previous u.s .\ntax law .\nchanges in tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment .\nas such , our 2017 consolidated financial statements reflect the immediate tax effect of the 2017 tax act .\nthe 2017 tax act contains several key provisions including , among other things : 2022 a one-time tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 untaxed foreign earnings and profits ( e&p ) , referred to as the toll charge ; 2022 a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2022 the introduction of a new u.s .\ntax on certain off-shore earnings referred to as global intangible low-taxed income ( gilti ) at an effective tax rate of 10.5 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2017 ( increasing to 13.125 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2025 ) , with a partial offset by foreign tax credits ; and 2022 the introduction of a territorial tax system beginning in 2018 by providing a 100 percent dividend received deduction on certain qualified dividends from foreign subsidiaries .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded an income tax benefit of $ 1272.4 million , which was comprised of the following : 2022 income tax benefit of $ 715.0 million for the one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings .\nthis is composed of a $ 1181.0 million benefit from the removal of a deferred tax liability we had recorded for the repatriation of foreign earnings prior to the 2017 tax act offset by $ 466.0 million for the toll charge recognized under the 2017 tax act .\nin accordance with the 2017 tax act , we expect to elect to pay the toll charge in installments over eight years .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , we have recorded current and non-current income tax liabilities related to the toll charge of $ 82.0 million and $ 384.0 million , respectively .\n2022 an income tax benefit of $ 557.4 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted corporate income tax rate of 21 percent .\nthe net benefit recorded was based on currently available information and interpretations made in applying the provisions of the 2017 tax act as of the time of filing this annual report on form 10-k .\nwe further refined our estimates related to the impact of the 2017 tax act subsequent to the issuance of our earnings release for the fourth quarter of 2017 .\nin accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the sec , the income tax effect for certain aspects of the 2017 tax act represent provisional amounts for which our accounting is incomplete , but with respect to which a reasonable estimate could be determined and recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017 .\nthe actual effects of the 2017 tax act and final amounts recorded may differ materially from our current estimate of provisional amounts due to , among other things , further interpretive guidance that may be issued by u.s .\ntax authorities or regulatory bodies , including the sec and the fasb .\nwe will continue to analyze the 2017 tax act and any additional guidance that may be issued so we can finalize the full effects of applying the new legislation on our financial statements in the measurement period , which ends in the fourth quarter of 2018 .\nwe continue to evaluate the impacts of the 2017 tax act and consider the amounts recorded to be provisional .\nin addition , we are still evaluating the gilti provisions of the 2017 tax act and their impact , if any , on our consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe fasb allows companies to adopt an accounting policy to either recognize deferred taxes for gilti or treat such as a tax cost in the year incurred .\nwe have not yet determined which accounting policy to adopt because determining the impact of the gilti provisions requires analysis of our existing legal entity structure , the reversal of our u.s .\ngaap and u.s .\ntax basis differences in the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries , and our ability to offset any tax with foreign tax credits .\nas such , we did not record a deferred income tax .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3.8", "78.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04828"}
{"example_id": "CMCSA/2015/page_64.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat would the investment income ( loss ) have been in 2014 without the gain from the sale of the investment in clearwire corporation in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nconsolidated other income ( expense ) items , net .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\ninterest expense\t$ -2702 ( 2702 )\t$ -2617 ( 2617 )\t$ -2574 ( 2574 )\ninvestment income ( loss ) net\t81\t296\t576\nequity in net income ( losses ) of investees net\t-325 ( 325 )\t97\t-86 ( 86 )\nother income ( expense ) net\t320\t-215 ( 215 )\t-364 ( 364 )\ntotal\t$ -2626 ( 2626 )\t$ -2439 ( 2439 )\t$ -2448 ( 2448 )\n\nPost-table text:\ninterest expense interest expense increased in 2015 primarily due to an increase in our debt outstanding and $ 47 million of additional interest expense associated with the early redemption in june 2015 of our $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due november 2015 and our $ 1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) senior notes due march 2016 .\ninterest expense increased in 2014 primarily due to the effect of our interest rate derivative financial instruments .\ninvestment income ( loss ) , net the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2015 was primarily due to a $ 154 million gain related to the sale of our shares of arris group common stock in 2014 .\nthe change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2014 was primarily due to a $ 443 million gain related to the sale of our investment in clearwire corporation in 2013 .\nthe components of investment income ( loss ) , net are presented in a table in note 7 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nequity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2015 was primarily due to twcc holding corp .\n( 201cthe weather channel 201d ) recording impairment charges related to goodwill .\nwe recorded expenses of $ 333 million in 2015 that represent nbcuniversal 2019s proportionate share of these impairment charges .\nthe change in 2015 was also due to an increase in our proportionate share of losses in hulu , llc ( 201chulu 201d ) , which were driven by hulu 2019s higher programming and marketing costs .\nin 2015 and 2014 , we recognized our pro- portionate share of losses of $ 106 million and $ 20 million , respectively , related to our investment in hulu .\nthe change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2014 was primarily due to $ 142 million of total equity losses recorded in 2013 attributable to our investment in hulu .\nin july 2013 , we entered into an agreement to provide capital contributions totaling $ 247 million to hulu , which we had previously accounted for as a cost method investment .\nthis represented an agreement to provide our first capital contribution to hulu since we acquired our interest in it as part of our acquisition of a controlling interest in nbcuniversal in 2011 ( the 201cnbcuniversal transaction 201d ) ; therefore , we began to apply the equity method of accounting for this investment .\nthe change in the method of accounting for this investment required us to recognize our propor- tionate share of hulu 2019s accumulated losses from the date of the nbcuniversal transaction through july 2013 .\nother income ( expense ) , net other income ( expense ) , net for 2015 included gains of $ 335 million on the sales of a business and an invest- ment , $ 240 million recorded on the settlement of a contingent consideration liability with general electric company ( 201cge 201d ) related to the acquisition of nbcuniversal , and $ 43 million related to an equity method investment .\nthese gains were partially offset by $ 236 million of expenses related to fair value adjustments to a contractual obligation .\nsee note 11 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements for additional information on this contractual obligation .\nother income ( expense ) , net for 2014 included a $ 27 million favorable settlement of a contingency related to the at&t broadband transaction in 2002 , which was more than offset by $ 208 million of expenses related to 61 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "296", "443", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-147"}
{"example_id": "SLB/2012/page_44.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nas of december 312012 what was the outstanding amount of share repurchase authorized in billions?\n\nPre-table text:\nduring the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) .\nduring the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) .\n0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 .\non july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 .\nschlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 .\nthe following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal cost of shares purchased\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share\n2012\t$ 971883\t14087.8\t$ 68.99\n2011\t$ 2997688\t36940.4\t$ 81.15\n2010\t$ 1716675\t26624.8\t$ 64.48\n\nPost-table text:\n0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 .\nin recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there .\nschlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries .\nat december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) .\n0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively .\non january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 .\non january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 .\non january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 .\n0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 .\ncapital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 .\n0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans .\nthe us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions .\n0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 .\nduring 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "const_8", "7.12", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.88"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2006/page_33.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was average propane sales in tbd for the three year period?\n\nPre-table text:\nin 2006 , our board of directors approved a projected $ 3.2 billion expansion of our garyville , louisiana refinery by 180 mbpd to 425 mbpd , which will increase our total refining capacity to 1.154 million barrels per day ( 2018 2018mmbpd 2019 2019 ) .\nwe recently received air permit approval from the louisiana department of environmental quality for this project and construction is expected to begin in mid-2007 , with startup planned for the fourth quarter of 2009 .\nwe have also commenced front-end engineering and design ( 2018 2018feed 2019 2019 ) for a potential heavy oil upgrading project at our detroit refinery , which would allow us to process increased volumes of canadian oil sands production , and are undertaking a feasibility study for a similar upgrading project at our catlettsburg refinery .\nmarketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .\nin 2006 , our refined product sales volumes ( excluding matching buy/sell transactions ) totaled 21.5 billion gallons , or 1.401 mmbpd .\nthe average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 77.76 per barrel for 2006 .\nthe following table sets forth our refined product sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years .\nrefined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\n( thousands of barrels per day )\t2006\t2005\t2004\ngasoline\t804\t836\t807\ndistillates\t375\t385\t373\npropane\t23\t22\t22\nfeedstocks and special products\t106\t96\t92\nheavy fuel oil\t26\t29\t27\nasphalt\t91\t87\t79\ntotal ( a )\t1425\t1455\t1400\naverage sales price ( $ per barrel )\t$ 77.76\t$ 66.42\t$ 49.53\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd , 77 mbpd and 71 mbpd in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 .\non april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard .\nthis change resulted in lower refined product sales volumes for the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under the previous accounting practices .\nsee note 2 to the consolidated financial statements .\nthe wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 71 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nwe sold 52 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis .\nhalf of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers .\npropylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics , and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry .\nbase lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide .\nwe market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , the upper great plains and southeastern united states .\nour customer base includes approximately 800 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers .\nwe blended 35 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2006 .\nin 2005 and 2004 , we blended 35 mbpd and 30 mbpd of ethanol .\nthe expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations .\nwe sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; and milwaukee , wisconsin , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4200 marathon branded retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois .\nbranded retail outlets are also located in florida , georgia , minnesota , wisconsin , west virginia , tennessee , virginia , north carolina , pennsylvania , alabama and south carolina .\nsales to marathon brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 14 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nssa sells gasoline and diesel fuel through company-operated retail outlets .\nsales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2006 .\nas of december 31 , 2006 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 2018 2018speedway 2019 2019 and 2018 2018superamerica . 2019 2019 ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.7 billion in 2006 , compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2005 .\nprofit levels from the sale .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "propane", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "22.33333"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2016/page_418.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwas the change in net revenue from changes in transmission revenue more significant than the change due to the retail electric price change?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .\n2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .\nnet revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 637.2\nreserve equalization\t14.3\npurchased power capacity\t12.4\ntransmission revenue\t7.0\nretail electric price\t5.4\nnet wholesale\t-27.8 ( 27.8 )\nother\t-4.3 ( 4.3 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 644.2\n\nPost-table text:\nthe reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .\nthe transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "7.0", "5.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "yes"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2015/page_18.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor 2016 , what was the total african and us net undeveloped acres expiring , in thousands ? \\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nin the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .\nif production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .\nwe plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .\nthe kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .\nnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017\tnet undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018\nu.s .\t68\t89\t128\ne.g .\t2014\t92\t36\nother africa\t189\t4352\t854\ntotal africa\t189\t4444\t890\nother international\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t257\t4533\t1018\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "189", "68", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "257"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2017/page_80.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2015 to 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nof prior service cost or credits , and net actuarial gains or losses ) as part of non-operating income .\nwe adopted the requirements of asu no .\n2017-07 on january 1 , 2018 using the retrospective transition method .\nwe expect the adoption of asu no .\n2017-07 to result in an increase to consolidated operating profit of $ 471 million and $ 846 million for 2016 and 2017 , respectively , and a corresponding decrease in non-operating income for each year .\nwe do not expect any impact to our business segment operating profit , our consolidated net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting asu no .\n2017-07 .\nintangibles-goodwill and other in january 2017 , the fasb issued asu no .\n2017-04 , intangibles-goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) , which eliminates the requirement to compare the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill ( commonly referred to as step 2 ) from the goodwill impairment test .\nthe new standard does not change how a goodwill impairment is identified .\nwewill continue to perform our quantitative and qualitative goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying amount , but if we are required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , under the new standard the amount of the charge will be calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s fair value from its carrying amount .\nunder the prior standard , if we were required to recognize a goodwill impairment charge , step 2 required us to calculate the implied value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the amount of the charge was calculated by subtracting the reporting unit 2019s implied fair value of goodwill from its actual goodwill balance .\nthe new standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after december 15 , 2019 , with early adoption permitted , and should be applied prospectively from the date of adoption .\nwe elected to adopt the new standard for future goodwill impairment tests at the beginning of the third quarter of 2017 , because it significantly simplifies the evaluation of goodwill for impairment .\nthe impact of the new standard will depend on the outcomes of future goodwill impairment tests .\nderivatives and hedging inaugust 2017 , the fasb issuedasu no .\n2017-12derivatives and hedging ( topic 815 ) , which eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness .\nthe guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after december 15 , 2018 , with early adoption permitted .\nwe do not expect a significant impact to our consolidated assets and liabilities , net earnings , or cash flows as a result of adopting this new standard .\nwe plan to adopt the new standard january 1 , 2019 .\nleases in february 2016 , the fasb issuedasu no .\n2016-02 , leases ( topic 842 ) , which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements for both lessees and lessors .\nthe new standard is effective january 1 , 2019 for public companies , with early adoption permitted .\nthe new standard currently requires the application of a modified retrospective approach to the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements .\nwe are continuing to evaluate the expected impact to our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures .\nwe plan to adopt the new standard effective january 1 , 2019 .\nnote 2 2013 earnings per share theweighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common sharewere as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\t2016\t2015\nweighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations\t287.8\t299.3\t310.3\nweighted average dilutive effect of equity awards\t2.8\t3.8\t4.4\nweighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations\t290.6\t303.1\t314.7\n\nPost-table text:\nwe compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respectiveweighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented .\nour calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) , performance stock units ( psus ) and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method .\nthere were no significant anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 .\nnote 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries .\nthe purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired .\nas a result of the acquisition .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "303.1", "314.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-11.6"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_377.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in net revenue between 2006 and 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nmanagement's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in power purchases as a result of the purchased power agreements between entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy texas and an increase in the average market prices of purchased power and natural gas , substantially offset by a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of decreased recovery from customers of fuel costs .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to an increase of $ 6.9 million in the recovery of bond expenses related to the securitization bonds .\nthe recovery became effective july 2007 .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds .\n2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2006 net revenue\t$ 403.3\npurchased power capacity\t13.1\nsecuritization transition charge\t9.9\nvolume/weather\t9.7\ntransmission revenue\t6.1\nbase revenue\t2.6\nother\t-2.4 ( 2.4 )\n2007 net revenue\t$ 442.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe purchased power capacity variance is due to changes in the purchased power capacity costs included in the calculation in 2007 compared to 2006 used to bill generation costs between entergy texas and entergy gulf states louisiana .\nthe securitization transition charge variance is due to the issuance of securitization bonds .\nas discussed above , in june 2007 , egsrf i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds .\nsee note 5 to the financial statements herein for details of the securitization bond issuance .\nthe volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage on billed retail sales , including the effects of more favorable weather in 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 .\nthe increase is also due to an increase in usage during the unbilled sales period .\nretail electricity usage increased a total of 139 gwh in all sectors .\nsee \"critical accounting estimates\" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues .\nthe transmission revenue variance is due to an increase in rates effective june 2007 and new transmission customers in late 2006 .\nthe base revenue variance is due to the transition to competition rider that began in march 2006 .\nrefer to note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate increase .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 179 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates and fuel refunds .\nthe decrease was partially offset by the $ 39 million increase in net revenue described above and an increase of $ 44 million in wholesale revenues , including $ 30 million from the system agreement cost equalization payments from entergy arkansas .\nthe receipt of such payments is being .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "442.3", "403.3", ")", "divide(", "#0", "403.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0967"}
{"example_id": "GS/2017/page_106.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var is comprised of equity in 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis sensitivity measures certain portfolios and individual positions are not included in var because var is not the most appropriate risk measure .\nother sensitivity measures we use to analyze market risk are described below .\n10% ( 10 % ) sensitivity measures .\nthe table below presents market risk for positions , accounted for at fair value , that are not included in var by asset category. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tas of december 2017\tas of december 2016\tas of december 2015\nequity\t$ 2096\t$ 2085\t$ 2157\ndebt\t1606\t1702\t1479\ntotal\t$ 3702\t$ 3787\t$ 3636\n\nPost-table text:\nin the table above : 2030 the market risk of these positions is determined by estimating the potential reduction in net revenues of a 10% ( 10 % ) decline in the value of these positions .\n2030 equity positions relate to private and restricted public equity securities , including interests in funds that invest in corporate equities and real estate and interests in hedge funds .\n2030 debt positions include interests in funds that invest in corporate mezzanine and senior debt instruments , loans backed by commercial and residential real estate , corporate bank loans and other corporate debt , including acquired portfolios of distressed loans .\n2030 equity and debt funded positions are included in our consolidated statements of financial condition in financial instruments owned .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about cash instruments .\n2030 these measures do not reflect the diversification effect across asset categories or across other market risk measures .\ncredit spread sensitivity on derivatives and financial liabilities .\nvar excludes the impact of changes in counterparty and our own credit spreads on derivatives , as well as changes in our own credit spreads ( debt valuation adjustment ) on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected .\nthe estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in credit spreads ( counterparty and our own ) on derivatives was a gain of $ 3 million and $ 2 million ( including hedges ) as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nin addition , the estimated sensitivity to a one basis point increase in our own credit spreads on financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected was a gain of $ 35 million and $ 25 million as of december 2017 and december 2016 , respectively .\nhowever , the actual net impact of a change in our own credit spreads is also affected by the liquidity , duration and convexity ( as the sensitivity is not linear to changes in yields ) of those financial liabilities for which the fair value option was elected , as well as the relative performance of any hedges undertaken .\ninterest rate sensitivity .\nloans receivable as of december 2017 and december 2016 were $ 65.93 billion and $ 49.67 billion , respectively , substantially all of which had floating interest rates .\nas of december 2017 and december 2016 , the estimated sensitivity to a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on such loans was $ 527 million and $ 405 million , respectively , of additional interest income over a twelve-month period , which does not take into account the potential impact of an increase in costs to fund such loans .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about loans receivable .\nother market risk considerations as of december 2017 and december 2016 , we had commitments and held loans for which we have obtained credit loss protection from sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc .\nsee note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about such lending commitments .\nin addition , we make investments in securities that are accounted for as available-for-sale and included in financial instruments owned in the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nsee note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further information .\nwe also make investments accounted for under the equity method and we also make direct investments in real estate , both of which are included in other assets .\ndirect investments in real estate are accounted for at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nsee note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about other assets .\ngoldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 93 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2085", "3787", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.55057"}
{"example_id": "RE/2017/page_159.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2017 under the 2010 employee plan what was the percent of shares that had been granted\n\nPre-table text:\n15 .\ncommitments and contingencies in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance agreements .\nin some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it .\nin other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights .\nthese disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation .\nin all such matters , the company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable .\nthe company considers the statuses of these proceedings when determining its reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses .\naside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements , the company is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration .\nthe company has entered into separate annuity agreements with the prudential insurance of america ( 201cthe prudential 201d ) and an additional unaffiliated life insurance company in which the company has either purchased annuity contracts or become the assignee of annuity proceeds that are meant to settle claim payment obligations in the future .\nin both instances , the company would become contingently liable if either the prudential or the unaffiliated life insurance company were unable to make payments related to the respective annuity contract .\nthe table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the company was contingently liable for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in thousands )\tat december 31 , 2017\tat december 31 , 2016\nthe prudential insurance company of america\t$ 144618\t$ 146507\nunaffiliated life insurance company\t34444\t33860\n\nPost-table text:\n16 .\nshare-based compensation plans the company has a 2010 stock incentive plan ( 201c2010 employee plan 201d ) , a 2009 non-employee director stock option and restricted stock plan ( 201c2009 director plan 201d ) and a 2003 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( 201c2003 director plan 201d ) .\nunder the 2010 employee plan , 4000000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as non- qualified share options , incentive share options , share appreciation rights , restricted share awards or performance share unit awards to officers and key employees of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 2553473 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2010 employee plan .\nthe 2010 employee plan replaced a 2002 employee plan , which replaced a 1995 employee plan ; therefore , no further awards will be granted under the 2002 employee plan or the 1995 employee plan .\nthrough december 31 , 2017 , only non-qualified share options , restricted share awards and performance share unit awards had been granted under the employee plans .\nunder the 2009 director plan , 37439 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or restricted share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 34957 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2009 director plan .\nthe 2009 director plan replaced a 1995 director plan , which expired .\nunder the 2003 director plan , 500000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 there were 346714 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2003 director plan. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "4000000", "2553473", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1446527"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2010/page_42.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase in the net cash provided by operating activities in 2010 compare to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\n( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2010\t2009\t2008\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 3547\t$ 3173\t$ 4421\nnet cash used for investing activities\t-319 ( 319 )\t-1518 ( 1518 )\t-907 ( 907 )\nnet cash used for financing activities\t-3363 ( 3363 )\t-1476 ( 1476 )\t-3938 ( 3938 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .\nthe increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .\npartially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .\nthis reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .\noperating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .\nthe improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .\nthese improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .\nthe decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .\nthe increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .\nthe decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .\nnet cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .\nthe decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .\npartially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .\nthe decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .\ninvesting activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .\nwe also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .\ncapital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .\nwe expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .\nacquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .\namounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .\nwe paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .\nin 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .\nthere were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .\nduring 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .\nfinancing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .\nof the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .\nin october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .\nunder the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .\nwe repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .\nin connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .\ncash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .\nthose activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "374", "3173", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11787"}
{"example_id": "AES/2017/page_175.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 was past due?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 was dispatched starting in february 2018 .\naes puerto rico continues to be the lowest cost and epa compliant energy provider in puerto rico .\ntherefore , we expect aes puerto rico to continue to be a critical supplier to prepa .\nstarting prior to the hurricanes , prepa has been facing economic challenges that could impact the company , and on july 2 , 2017 , filed for bankruptcy under title iii .\nas a result of the bankruptcy filing , aes puerto rico and aes ilumina 2019s non-recourse debt of $ 365 million and $ 36 million , respectively , is in default and has been classified as current as of december 31 , 2017 .\nin november 2017 , aes puerto rico signed a forbearance and standstill agreement with its lenders to prevent the lenders from taking any action against the company due to the default events .\nthis agreement will expire on march 22 , 2018 .\nthe company's receivable balances in puerto rico as of december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 86 million , of which $ 53 million was overdue .\nafter the filing of title iii protection , and up until the disruption caused by the hurricanes , aes in puerto rico was collecting the overdue amounts from prepa in line with historic payment patterns .\nconsidering the information available as of the filing date , management believes the carrying amount of our assets in puerto rico of $ 627 million is recoverable as of december 31 , 2017 and no reserve on the receivables is required .\nforeign currency risks 2014 aes operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations could be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates .\nfluctuations in currency exchange rate between u.s .\ndollar and the following currencies could create significant fluctuations in earnings and cash flows : the argentine peso , the brazilian real , the dominican republic peso , the euro , the chilean peso , the colombian peso , and the philippine peso .\nconcentrations 2014 due to the geographical diversity of its operations , the company does not have any significant concentration of customers or sources of fuel supply .\nseveral of the company's generation businesses rely on ppas with one or a limited number of customers for the majority of , and in some cases all of , the relevant businesses' output over the term of the ppas .\nhowever , no single customer accounted for 10% ( 10 % ) or more of total revenue in 2017 , 2016 or 2015 .\nthe cash flows and results of operations of our businesses depend on the credit quality of our customers and the continued ability of our customers and suppliers to meet their obligations under ppas and fuel supply agreements .\nif a substantial portion of the company's long-term ppas and/or fuel supply were modified or terminated , the company would be adversely affected to the extent that it would be unable to replace such contracts at equally favorable terms .\n26 .\nrelated party transactions certain of our businesses in panama and the dominican republic are partially owned by governments either directly or through state-owned institutions .\nin the ordinary course of business , these businesses enter into energy purchase and sale transactions , and transmission agreements with other state-owned institutions which are controlled by such governments .\nat two of our generation businesses in mexico , the offtakers exercise significant influence , but not control , through representation on these businesses' boards of directors .\nthese offtakers are also required to hold a nominal ownership interest in such businesses .\nin chile , we provide capacity and energy under contractual arrangements to our investment which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting .\nadditionally , the company provides certain support and management services to several of its affiliates under various agreements .\nthe company's consolidated statements of operations included the following transactions with related parties for the periods indicated ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2017\t2016\t2015\nrevenue 2014non-regulated\t$ 1297\t$ 1100\t$ 1099\ncost of sales 2014non-regulated\t220\t210\t330\ninterest income\t8\t4\t25\ninterest expense\t36\t39\t33\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "53", "86", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.61628"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_124.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders is to be issued upon the exercise of options warrants and rights?\n\nPre-table text:\nequity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .\nequity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights\tnumber of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\nequity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal\t448859\t$ 0.00\t4087587\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2012 plan\" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .\n2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the \"2011 plan\" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .\nof these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .\nin addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .\n( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .\nitem 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "448859", "4087587", ")", "divide(", "448859", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09895"}
{"example_id": "CME/2012/page_70.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the minimum total assets available for default is related to assessment powers?\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tcme clearingavailable assets\ndesignated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 )\t$ 100.0\nguaranty fund contributions ( 2 )\t2899.5\nassessment powers ( 3 )\t7973.6\nminimum total assets available for default ( 4 )\t$ 10973.1\n\nPost-table text:\n2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter credit default swap contracts , and 2022 a financial safeguard package for cleared over-the-counter interest rate swap contracts .\nin the unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing firm , we would first apply assets of the defaulting clearing firm to satisfy its payment obligation .\nthese assets include the defaulting firm 2019s guaranty fund contributions , performance bonds and any other available assets , such as assets required for membership and any associated trading rights .\nin addition , we would make a demand for payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to us by the parent company of the clearing firm .\nthereafter , if the payment default remains unsatisfied , we would use the corporate contributions designated for the respective financial safeguard package .\nwe would then use guaranty fund contributions of other clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package and funds collected through an assessment against solvent clearing firms within the respective financial safeguard package to satisfy the deficit .\nwe maintain a $ 5.0 billion 364-day multi-currency line of credit with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by cme clearing .\nwe have the option to request an increase in the line from $ 5.0 billion to $ 7.0 billion .\nwe may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default , in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary ( custodian of the collateral ) , or in the event of a temporary disruption with the payments systems that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms .\nthe credit agreement requires us to pledge certain assets to the line of credit custodian prior to drawing on the line of credit .\npledged assets may include clearing firm guaranty fund deposits held by us in the form of u.s .\ntreasury or agency securities , as well as select money market mutual funds approved for our select interest earning facility ( ief ) programs .\nperformance bond collateral of a defaulting clearing firm may also be used to secure a draw on the line .\nin addition to the 364-day multi- currency line of credit , we also have the option to use our $ 1.8 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility to provide liquidity for our clearing house in the unlikely event of default .\naggregate performance bond deposits for clearing firms for all three cme financial safeguard packages was $ 86.8 billion , including $ 5.6 billion of cash performance bond deposits and $ 4.2 billion of letters of credit .\na defaulting firm 2019s performance bond deposits can be used in the event of default of that clearing firm .\nthe following shows the available assets at december 31 , 2012 in the event of a payment default by a clearing firm for the base financial safeguard package after first utilizing the defaulting firm 2019s available assets : ( in millions ) cme clearing available assets designated corporate contributions for futures and options ( 1 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 100.0 guaranty fund contributions ( 2 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n2899.5 assessment powers ( 3 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n7973.6 minimum total assets available for default ( 4 ) .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 10973.1 ( 1 ) cme clearing designates $ 100.0 million of corporate contributions to satisfy a clearing firm default in the event that the defaulting clearing firm 2019s guaranty contributions and performance bonds do not satisfy the deficit .\n( 2 ) guaranty fund contributions of clearing firms include guaranty fund contributions required of clearing firms , but do not include any excess deposits held by us at the direction of clearing firms .\n( 3 ) in the event of a clearing firm default , if a loss continues to exist after the utilization of the assets of the defaulted firm , our designated working capital and the non-defaulting clearing firms 2019 guaranty fund contributions , we have the right to assess all non-defaulting clearing members as defined in the rules governing the guaranty fund .\n( 4 ) represents the aggregate minimum resources available to satisfy any obligations not met by a defaulting firm subsequent to the liquidation of the defaulting firm 2019s performance bond collateral. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "7973.6", "10973.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.72665"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_26.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the nuclear fuel expenses as a percentage of 2016 net revenue?\n\nPre-table text:\namortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .\nthe increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .\nthe louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .\nthe tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .\nsee note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .\nincluded in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .\nentergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 1666\nnuclear realized price changes\t-149 ( 149 )\nrhode island state energy center\t-44 ( 44 )\nnuclear volume\t-36 ( 36 )\nfitzpatrick reimbursement agreement\t41\nnuclear fuel expenses\t68\nother\t-4 ( 4 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1542\n\nPost-table text:\nas shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .\nthe effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .\nsee 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "68", "1542", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0441"}
{"example_id": "CDNS/2012/page_30.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the five years ended 12/29/2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nstockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .\ncomparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .\nnasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nindexes calculated on month-end basis .\ncopyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .\nall rights reserved. .\n\nTable:\n\t12/29/2007\t1/3/2009\t1/2/2010\t1/1/2011\t12/31/2011\t12/29/2012\ncadence design systems inc .\t100.00\t22.55\t35.17\t48.50\t61.07\t78.92\nnasdaq composite\t100.00\t59.03\t82.25\t97.32\t98.63\t110.78\ns&p 400 information technology\t100.00\t54.60\t82.76\t108.11\t95.48\t109.88\n\nPost-table text:\nthe stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "78.92", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "110.78", "const_100", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_100", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "#2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-31.86"}
{"example_id": "FIS/2007/page_94.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year are due in 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\ncompany has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .\nas a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .\nthere were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .\nleases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .\nseveral of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .\nfuture minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2008\t83382\n2009\t63060\n2010\t35269\n2011\t21598\n2012\t14860\nthereafter\t30869\ntotal\t$ 249038\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .\nrent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .\ndata processing and maintenance services agreements .\nthe company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nhowever , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .\n( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .\nemployee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .\nsubsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .\nplan .\nunder the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .\npursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .\nshares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .\nthe company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .\nthe company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .\nfidelity national information services , inc .\nand subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "35269", "249038", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.14162"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2008/page_32.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average number of common stock shares per register holder as of february 13 , 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .\n\nTable:\n2008\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 42.72\t$ 32.10\nquarter ended june 30\t46.10\t38.53\nquarter ended september 30\t43.43\t31.89\nquarter ended december 31\t37.28\t19.35\n2007\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 41.31\t$ 36.63\nquarter ended june 30\t43.84\t37.64\nquarter ended september 30\t45.45\t36.34\nquarter ended december 31\t46.53\t40.08\n\nPost-table text:\non february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders .\ndividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock .\nwe anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .\nthe indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .\nthe loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nin addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "397097677", "499", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "795786.92786"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_99.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in weighted-average shares for diluted eps from 2016 to 2017 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .\nthis cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .\npmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .\nearnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .\nbasic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2015\nnet earnings attributable to pmi\t$ 6035\t$ 6967\t$ 6873\nless distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards\t14\t19\t24\nnet earnings for basic and diluted eps\t$ 6021\t$ 6948\t$ 6849\nweighted-average shares for basic eps\t1552\t1551\t1549\nplus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )\t1\t2014\t2014\nweighted-average shares for diluted eps\t1553\t1551\t1549\n\nPost-table text:\nfor the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1553", "1551", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2011/page_78.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much of an increase , in millions , to the pension expenses did the three changes in assumption cause?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2012 estimated expense as a baseline .\nchange in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2012 pension expense ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nchange in assumption ( a )\testimatedincrease to 2012pensionexpense ( in millions )\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate\t$ 23\n.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets\t$ 18\n.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate\t$ 2\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant .\nour pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions .\ninvestment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of permitted contributions in future years .\nalso , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan .\nwe do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2012 .\nwe maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees .\nrecourse and repurchase obligations as discussed in note 3 loan sale and servicing activities and variable interest entities in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , pnc has sold commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans directly or indirectly in securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions with continuing involvement .\none form of continuing involvement includes certain recourse and loan repurchase obligations associated with the transferred assets in these transactions .\ncommercial mortgage loan recourse obligations we originate , close , and service certain multi-family commercial mortgage loans which are sold to fnma under fnma 2019s delegated underwriting and servicing ( dus ) program .\nwe participated in a similar program with the fhlmc .\nunder these programs , we generally assume up to a one-third pari passu risk of loss on unpaid principal balances through a loss share arrangement .\nat december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the unpaid principal balance outstanding of loans sold as a participant in these programs was $ 13.0 billion and $ 13.2 billion , respectively .\nthe potential maximum exposure under the loss share arrangements was $ 4.0 billion at both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 .\nwe maintain a reserve for estimated losses based on our exposure .\nthe reserve for losses under these programs totaled $ 47 million and $ 54 million as of december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively , and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet .\nif payment is required under these programs , we would not have a contractual interest in the collateral underlying the mortgage loans on which losses occurred , although the value of the collateral is taken into account in determining our share of such losses .\nour exposure and activity associated with these recourse obligations are reported in the corporate & institutional banking segment .\nresidential mortgage loan and home equity repurchase obligations while residential mortgage loans are sold on a non-recourse basis , we assume certain loan repurchase obligations associated with mortgage loans we have sold to investors .\nthese loan repurchase obligations primarily relate to situations where pnc is alleged to have breached certain origination covenants and representations and warranties made to purchasers of the loans in the respective purchase and sale agreements .\nresidential mortgage loans covered by these loan repurchase obligations include first and second-lien mortgage loans we have sold through agency securitizations , non-agency securitizations , and whole-loan sale transactions .\nas discussed in note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , agency securitizations consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with fnma , fhlmc , and the government national mortgage association ( gnma ) program , while non-agency securitizations and whole-loan sale transactions consist of mortgage loans sale transactions with private investors .\nour historical exposure and activity associated with agency securitization repurchase obligations has primarily been related to transactions with fnma and fhlmc , as indemnification and repurchase losses associated with federal housing agency ( fha ) and department of veterans affairs ( va ) -insured and uninsured loans pooled in gnma securitizations historically have been minimal .\nrepurchase obligation activity associated with residential mortgages is reported in the residential mortgage banking segment .\npnc 2019s repurchase obligations also include certain brokered home equity loans/lines that were sold to a limited number of private investors in the financial services industry by national city prior to our acquisition .\npnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , and our exposure under these loan repurchase obligations is limited to repurchases of the whole-loans sold in these transactions .\nrepurchase activity associated with brokered home equity lines/loans are reported in the non-strategic assets portfolio segment .\nloan covenants and representations and warranties are established through loan sale agreements with various investors to provide assurance that pnc has sold loans to the pnc financial services group , inc .\n2013 form 10-k 69 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "23", "18", ")", "add(", "#0", "2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "43"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2009/page_133.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif there were a 200bp rise in rates , how much more would the impact be on earnings in 2009 vs . 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 131 earnings-at-risk stress testing the var and stress-test measures described above illustrate the total economic sensitivity of the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets to changes in market variables .\nthe effect of interest rate exposure on reported net income is also important .\ninterest rate risk exposure in the firm 2019s core nontrading business activities ( i.e. , asset/liability management positions ) results from on 2013and off 2013balance sheet positions and can occur due to a variety of factors , including : 2022 differences in the timing among the maturity or repricing of assets , liabilities and off 2013balance sheet instruments .\nfor example , if liabilities reprice quicker than assets and funding interest rates are declining , earnings will increase initially .\n2022 differences in the amounts of assets , liabilities and off 2013balance sheet instruments that are repricing at the same time .\nfor example , if more deposit liabilities are repricing than assets when general interest rates are declining , earnings will increase initially .\n2022 differences in the amounts by which short-term and long-term market interest rates change ( for example , changes in the slope of the yield curve , because the firm has the ability to lend at long-term fixed rates and borrow at variable or short- term fixed rates ) .\nbased on these scenarios , the firm 2019s earnings would be affected negatively by a sudden and unanticipated increase in short-term rates paid on its liabilities ( e.g. , depos- its ) without a corresponding increase in long-term rates re- ceived on its assets ( e.g. , loans ) .\nconversely , higher long-term rates received on assets generally are beneficial to earnings , particularly when the increase is not accompanied by rising short-term rates paid on liabilities .\n2022 the impact of changes in the maturity of various assets , liabili- ties or off 2013balance sheet instruments as interest rates change .\nfor example , if more borrowers than forecasted pay down higher-rate loan balances when general interest rates are de- clining , earnings may decrease initially .\nthe firm manages interest rate exposure related to its assets and liabilities on a consolidated , corporate-wide basis .\nbusiness units transfer their interest rate risk to treasury through a transfer- pricing system , which takes into account the elements of interest rate exposure that can be risk-managed in financial markets .\nthese elements include asset and liability balances and contrac- tual rates of interest , contractual principal payment schedules , expected prepayment experience , interest rate reset dates and maturities , rate indices used for repricing , and any interest rate ceilings or floors for adjustable rate products .\nall transfer-pricing assumptions are dynamically reviewed .\nthe firm conducts simulations of changes in net interest income from its nontrading activities under a variety of interest rate scenarios .\nearnings-at-risk tests measure the potential change in the firm 2019s net interest income , and the corresponding impact to the firm 2019s pretax earnings , over the following 12 months .\nthese tests highlight exposures to various rate-sensitive factors , such as the rates themselves ( e.g. , the prime lending rate ) , pricing strate- gies on deposits , optionality and changes in product mix .\nthe tests include forecasted balance sheet changes , such as asset sales and securitizations , as well as prepayment and reinvestment behavior .\nimmediate changes in interest rates present a limited view of risk , and so a number of alternative scenarios are also reviewed .\nthese scenarios include the implied forward curve , nonparallel rate shifts and severe interest rate shocks on selected key rates .\nthese scenar- ios are intended to provide a comprehensive view of jpmorgan chase 2019s earnings at risk over a wide range of outcomes .\njpmorgan chase 2019s 12-month pretax earnings sensitivity profile as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , is as follows. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\timmediate change in rates +200bp\timmediate change in rates +100bp\timmediate change in rates -100bp\timmediate change in rates -200bp\ndecember 31 2009\t$ -1594 ( 1594 )\t$ -554 ( 554 )\tnm ( a )\tnm ( a )\ndecember 31 2008\t$ 336\t$ 672\tnm ( a )\tnm ( a )\n\nPost-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2009 $ ( 1594 ) $ ( 554 ) nm ( a ) nm ( a ) december 31 , 2008 $ 336 $ 672 nm ( a ) nm ( a ) ( a ) down 100- and 200-basis-point parallel shocks result in a fed funds target rate of zero , and negative three- and six-month treasury rates .\nthe earnings- at-risk results of such a low-probability scenario are not meaningful .\nthe change in earnings at risk from december 31 , 2008 , results from a higher level of afs securities and an updated baseline scenario that uses higher short-term interest rates .\nthe firm 2019s risk to rising rates is largely the result of increased funding costs on assets , partially offset by widening deposit margins , which are currently compressed due to very low short-term interest rates .\nadditionally , another interest rate scenario , involving a steeper yield curve with long-term rates rising 100 basis points and short- term rates staying at current levels , results in a 12-month pretax earnings benefit of $ 449 million .\nthe increase in earnings is due to reinvestment of maturing assets at the higher long-term rates , with funding costs remaining unchanged .\nrisk identification for large exposures individuals who manage risk positions , particularly those that are complex , are responsible for identifying potential losses that could arise from specific , unusual events , such as a potential tax change , and estimating the probabilities of losses arising from such events .\nthis information is entered into the firm 2019s rifle database .\nmanagement of trading businesses control rifle entries , thereby permitting the firm to monitor further earnings vulnerability not adequately covered by standard risk measures .\nrisk monitoring and control limits market risk is controlled primarily through a series of limits .\nlimits reflect the firm 2019s risk appetite in the context of the market environment and business strategy .\nin setting limits , the firm takes into consideration factors such as market volatility , product liquidity , business trends and management experience. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "336", "-1594", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1930"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2006/page_90.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the rental expense under operating leases from 2004 to 2005\n\nPre-table text:\nthe defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .\nin 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .\nthe following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpensionbenefits\totherbenefits\n2007\t$ 1440\t$ 260\n2008\t1490\t260\n2009\t1540\t270\n2010\t1600\t270\n2011\t1660\t270\nyears 2012 2013 2016\t9530\t1260\n\nPost-table text:\nas noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .\nthe aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .\nthe expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .\nwe also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .\nthe liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nnote 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .\ncertain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .\ngovernment under short-term or cancelable arrangements .\nnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .\nwe believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .\nwe cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .\nthese matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .\nthe subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .\nwe are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .\non february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .\nwe submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .\nthe contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .\nair force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .\non august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .\nour appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .\non august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .\nnatural resources defense council , et al v .\nlockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .\njohn d .\ntillson v .\nlockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .\nthe doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "324", "318", ")", "divide(", "#0", "318", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01887"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2005/page_105.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2005 what was the percentage of the federal nol set to expire between 2016 to 2020\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) at december 31 , 2005 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $ 2.2 billion and $ 2.4 billion , respectively .\nif not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\tfederal\tstate\n2006 to 2010\t$ 5248\t$ 469747\n2011 to 2015\t10012\t272662\n2016 to 2020\t397691\t777707\n2021 to 2025\t1744552\t897896\ntotal\t$ 2157503\t$ 2418012\n\nPost-table text:\nsfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2005 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 422.4 million , including approximately $ 249.5 million attributable to spectrasite , primarily related to net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards .\napproximately $ 237.8 million of the spectrasite valuation allowance was assumed as of the acquisition date .\nthe balance of the valuation allowance primarily relates to net state deferred tax assets .\nthe company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient time to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period .\nthe company intends to recover a portion of its deferred tax asset through its federal income tax refund claims related to the carry back of certain federal net operating losses .\nin june 2003 and october 2003 , the company filed federal income tax refund claims with the irs relating to the carry back of $ 380.0 million of net operating losses generated prior to 2003 , of which the company initially anticipated receiving approximately $ 90.0 million .\nbased on preliminary discussions with tax authorities , the company has revised its estimate of the net realizable value of the federal income tax refund claims and anticipates receiving a refund of approximately $ 65.0 million as a result of these claims by the end of 2006 .\nthere can be no assurances , however , with respect to the specific amount and timing of any refund .\nthe recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing stable state ( no growth ) projections based on its current operations .\nthe projections show a significant decrease in depreciation and interest expense in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period and debt repayments reducing interest expense .\naccordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions .\nbased on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized .\nthe realization of the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2005 will be dependent upon its ability to generate approximately $ 1.3 billion in taxable income from january 1 , 2006 to december 31 , 2025 .\nif the company is unable to generate sufficient taxable income in the future , or carry back losses , as described above , it will be required to reduce its net deferred tax asset through a charge to income tax expense , which would result in a corresponding decrease in stockholders 2019 equity .\nfrom time to time the company is subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the company has significant business operations .\nthe company regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax jurisdictions resulting from these examinations .\nduring the year ended .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "397691", "2157503", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.18433"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2013/page_39.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2012 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment that was office related\n\nPre-table text:\nannual report 2013 duke realty corporation 37 in addition to the capitalization of overhead costs discussed above , we also capitalized $ 16.8 million , $ 9.4 million and $ 4.3 million of interest costs in the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nthe following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by reportable operating segment ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nindustrial\t$ 41971\t$ 33095\t$ 34872\noffice\t46600\t30092\t63933\nmedical office\t3106\t641\t410\nnon-reportable rental operations segments\t121\t56\t49\ntotal\t$ 91798\t$ 63884\t$ 99264\n\nPost-table text:\nboth our first and second generation expenditures vary significantly between leases on a per square foot basis , dependent upon several factors including the product type , the nature of a tenant's operations , the specific physical characteristics of each individual property as well as the market in which the property is located .\nsecond generation expenditures related to the 79 suburban office buildings that were sold in the blackstone office disposition totaled $ 26.2 million in 2011 .\ndividends and distributions we are required to meet the distribution requirements of the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended ( the \"code\" ) , in order to maintain our reit status .\nwe paid dividends of $ 0.68 per common share for each of the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .\nwe expect to continue to distribute at least an amount equal to our taxable earnings , to meet the requirements to maintain our reit status , and additional amounts as determined by our board of directors .\ndistributions are declared at the discretion of our board of directors and are subject to actual cash available for distribution , our financial condition , capital requirements and such other factors as our board of directors deems relevant .\nat december 31 , 2013 we had three series of preferred stock outstanding .\nthe annual dividend rates on our preferred shares range between 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and 6.625% ( 6.625 % ) and are paid quarterly in arrears .\nin february 2013 , we redeemed all of our outstanding series o shares for a total payment of $ 178.0 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 3.7 million .\nin march 2012 , we redeemed all of our 6.950% ( 6.950 % ) series m cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( \"series m shares\" ) for a total payment of $ 168.3 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.9 million .\nin july 2011 , we redeemed all of our 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) series n cumulative redeemable preferred shares ( \"series n shares\" ) for a total payment of $ 108.6 million , thus reducing our future quarterly dividend commitments by $ 2.0 million .\ndebt maturities debt outstanding at december 31 , 2013 had a face value totaling $ 4.3 billion with a weighted average interest rate of 5.49% ( 5.49 % ) and with maturity dates ranging between 2014 and 2028 .\nof this total amount , we had $ 3.1 billion of unsecured debt , $ 1.1 billion of secured debt and $ 88.0 million outstanding on the drlp unsecured line of credit at december 31 , 2013 .\nwe made scheduled and unscheduled principal payments of $ 1.0 billion on outstanding debt during the year ended december 31 , 2013. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "30092", "63884", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.47104"}
{"example_id": "AON/2011/page_134.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the increase in the aons revenues for risk solutions from 2010 to 2011\n\nPre-table text:\naon has certain contractual contingent guarantees for premium payments owed by clients to certain insurance companies .\nthe maximum exposure with respect to such contractual contingent guarantees was approximately $ 48 million at december 31 , 2011 .\naon has provided commitments to fund certain limited partnerships in which it has an interest in the event that the general partners request funding .\nsome of these commitments have specific expiration dates and the maximum potential funding under these commitments was $ 64 million at december 31 , 2011 .\nduring 2011 , the company funded $ 15 million of these commitments .\naon expects that as prudent business interests dictate , additional guarantees and indemnifications may be issued from time to time .\n17 .\nrelated party transactions during 2011 , the company , in the ordinary course of business , provided retail brokerage , consulting and financial advisory services to , and received wholesale brokerage services from , an entity that is controlled by one of the company 2019s stockholders .\nthese transactions were negotiated at an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions .\nduring 2011 , commissions and fee revenue from these transactions was approximately $ 9 million .\n18 .\nsegment information the company has two reportable operating segments : risk solutions and hr solutions .\nunallocated income and expenses , when combined with the operating segments and after the elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses , total to the amounts in the consolidated financial statements .\nreportable operating segments have been determined using a management approach , which is consistent with the basis and manner in which aon 2019s chief operating decision maker ( 2018 2018codm 2019 2019 ) uses financial information for the purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance .\nthe codm assesses performance based on operating segment operating income and generally accounts for intersegment revenue as if the revenue were from third parties and at what management believes are current market prices .\nthe company does not present net assets by segment as this information is not reviewed by the codm .\nrisk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through aon 2019s global distribution network .\nhr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies .\naon 2019s total revenue is as follows ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2011\t2010\t2009\nrisk solutions\t$ 6817\t$ 6423\t$ 6305\nhr solutions\t4501\t2111\t1267\nintersegment elimination\t-31 ( 31 )\t-22 ( 22 )\t-26 ( 26 )\ntotal operating segments\t11287\t8512\t7546\nunallocated\t2014\t2014\t49\ntotal revenue\t$ 11287\t$ 8512\t$ 7595\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6817", "6423", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6423", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06134"}
{"example_id": "DISCA/2012/page_39.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the difference in millions of international subscribers between discovery channel and tlc real time and travel & living?\n\nPre-table text:\ninternational networks international networks generated revenues of $ 1637 million during 2012 , which represented 37% ( 37 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\nour international networks segment principally consists of national and pan-regional television networks .\nthis segment generates revenue from operations in virtually every pay-television market in the world through an infrastructure that includes operational centers in london , singapore and miami .\ndiscovery channel , animal planet and tlc lead the international networks 2019 portfolio of television networks .\ninternational networks has one of the largest international distribution platforms of networks with as many as fourteen networks in more than 200 countries and territories around the world .\nat december 31 , 2012 , international networks operated over 180 unique distribution feeds in over 40 languages with channel feeds customized according to language needs and advertising sales opportunities .\ninternational networks also has free-to-air networks in the u.k. , germany , italy and spain and continues to pursue international expansion .\nour international networks segment owns and operates the following television networks which reached the following number of subscribers as of december 31 , 2012 : global networks international subscribers ( millions ) regional networks international subscribers ( millions ) .\n\nTable:\nglobal networks discovery channel\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 246\tregional networks dmax\tinternationalsubscribers ( millions ) 90\nanimal planet\t183\tdiscovery kids\t61\ntlc real time and travel & living\t174\tquest\t26\ndiscovery science\t75\tdiscovery history\t13\ninvestigation discovery\t63\tshed\t12\ndiscovery home & health\t57\tdiscovery en espanol ( u.s. )\t5\nturbo\t42\tdiscovery familia ( u.s )\t4\ndiscovery world\t27\t\t\n\nPost-table text:\non december 21 , 2012 , our international networks segment acquired 20% ( 20 % ) equity ownership interests in eurosport , a european sports satellite and cable network , and a portfolio of pay television networks from tf1 , a french media company , for $ 264 million , including transaction costs .\nwe have a call right that enables us to purchase a controlling interest in eurosport starting december 2014 and for one year thereafter .\nif we exercise our call right , tf1 will have the right to put its remaining interest to us for one year thereafter .\nthe arrangement is intended to increase the growth of eurosport , which focuses on niche but regionally popular sports such as tennis , skiing , cycling and skating , and enhance our pay television offerings in france .\non december 28 , 2012 , we acquired switchover media , a group of five italian television channels with children's and entertainment programming .\n( see note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) education education generated revenues of $ 105 million during 2012 , which represented 2% ( 2 % ) of our total consolidated revenues .\neducation is comprised of curriculum-based product and service offerings .\nthis segment generates revenues primarily from subscriptions charged to k-12 schools for access to an online suite of curriculum-based vod tools , professional development services , digital textbooks and , to a lesser extent , student assessments and publication of hardcopy curriculum-based content .\nour education business also participates in global brand and content licensing and engages in partnerships with leading non-profits , corporations , foundations and trade associations .\ncontent development our content development strategy is designed to increase viewership , maintain innovation and quality leadership , and provide value for our network distributors and advertising customers .\nour content is sourced from a wide range of third-party producers , which include some of the world 2019s leading nonfiction production companies as well as independent producers .\nour production arrangements fall into three categories : produced , coproduced and licensed .\nsubstantially all produced content includes content that we engage third parties to develop and produce , while we retain editorial control and own most or all of the rights , in exchange for paying all development and production costs .\ncoproduced content refers to program rights that we have collaborated with third parties to finance and develop because at times world-wide rights are not available for acquisition or we save costs by collaborating with third parties .\nlicensed content is comprised of films or series that have been previously produced by third parties. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "246", "174", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "72"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2018/page_35.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in operating profit margins as adjusted between 2017 and 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\ndivestiture of our arrow and moores businesses , and an unfavorable sales mix of international plumbing products , which , in aggregate , decreased sales by two percent .\nnet sales for 2016 were positively affected by increased sales volume of plumbing products , paints and other coating products and builders' hardware .\nnet sales for 2016 were also positively affected by favorable sales mix of cabinets and windows , and net selling price increases of north american windows and north american and international plumbing products .\nnet sales for 2016 were negatively affected by lower sales volume of cabinets and lower net selling prices of paints and other coating products .\nour gross profit margins were 32.2 percent , 34.2 percent and 33.4 percent in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nthe 2018 gross profit margin was negatively impacted by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler , an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs and salaries ) and unfavorable sales mix .\nthese negative impacts were partially offset by an increase in net selling prices , the benefits associated with cost savings initiatives , and increased sales volume .\nthe 2017 gross profit margin was positively impacted by increased sales volume , a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs , and cost savings initiatives .\nselling , general and administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 17.7 percent in 2018 compared with 18.6 percent in 2017 and 18.7 percent in 2016 .\nthe decrease in selling , general and administrative expenses , as a percentage of sales , was driven by leverage of fixed expenses , due primarily to increased sales volume , and improved cost control .\nthe following table reconciles reported operating profit to operating profit , as adjusted to exclude certain items , dollars in millions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2018\t2017\t2016\noperating profit as reported\t$ 1211\t$ 1194\t$ 1087\nrationalization charges\t14\t4\t22\nkichler inventory step up adjustment\t40\t2014\t2014\noperating profit as adjusted\t$ 1265\t$ 1198\t$ 1109\noperating profit margins as reported\t14.5% ( 14.5 % )\t15.6% ( 15.6 % )\t14.8% ( 14.8 % )\noperating profit margins as adjusted\t15.1% ( 15.1 % )\t15.7% ( 15.7 % )\t15.1% ( 15.1 % )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating profit margin in 2018 was negatively affected by an increase in commodity costs , the recognition of the inventory step up adjustment established as a part of the the acquisition of kichler and an increase in other expenses ( such as logistics costs , salaries and erp costs ) .\nthese negative impacts were partially offset by increased net selling prices , benefits associated with cost savings initiatives and increased sales volume .\noperating profit margin in 2017 was positively impacted by increased sales volume , cost savings initiatives , and a more favorable relationship between net selling prices and commodity costs .\noperating profit margin in 2017 was negatively impacted by an increase in strategic growth investments and certain other expenses , including stock-based compensation , health insurance costs , trade show costs and increased head count .\ndue to the recently-announced increase in tariffs on imported materials from china , and assuming tariffs rise to 25 percent in 2019 , we could be exposed to approximately $ 150 million of potential annual direct cost increases .\nwe will work to mitigate the impact of these tariffs through a combination of price increases , supplier negotiations , supply chain repositioning and other internal productivity measures .\nother income ( expense ) , net other , net , for 2018 included $ 14 million of net periodic pension and post-retirement benefit cost and $ 8 million of realized foreign currency losses .\nthese expenses were partially offset by $ 3 million of earnings related to equity method investments and $ 1 million related to distributions from private equity funds .\nother , net , for 2017 included $ 26 million related to periodic pension and post-retirement benefit costs , $ 13 million net loss related to the divestitures of moores and arrow and $ 2 million related to the impairment of a private equity fund , partially offset by $ 3 million related to distributions from private equity funds and $ 1 million of earnings related to equity method investments. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "15.1%", "15.7%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.006"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2008/page_69.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nduring 2008 , what was the change in average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil between the end of 2007 and the end of 2008 , per barrel?\n\nPre-table text:\ncrude oil , and political unrest in the middle east and elsewhere .\nlater in 2008 , crude oil prices dropped more rapidly than they had climbed as the u.s .\ndollar rebounded and other countries entered recessions which decreased demand .\nduring 2008 , the average spot price per barrel for wti was $ 99.75 , up from an average of $ 72.41 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 44.60 .\nthe average spot price per barrel for brent was $ 97.26 in 2008 , up from an average of $ 72.39 in 2007 , but ended the year at $ 36.55 .\nthe differential between wti and brent average prices widened to $ 2.49 in 2008 from $ 0.02 in 2007 .\nour domestic crude oil production is on average heavier and higher in sulfur content than light sweet wti .\nheavier and higher sulfur crude oil ( commonly referred to as heavy sour crude oil ) sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil .\nour international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the brent crude oil benchmark .\nnatural gas prices on average were higher in 2008 than in 2007 .\na significant portion of our u.s .\nlower 48 states natural gas production is sold at bid-week prices or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas .\nthe average henry hub first-of-month price index was $ 2.18 per thousand cubic feet ( 201cmcf 201d ) higher in 2008 than the 2007 average .\nnatural gas sales in alaska are subject to term contracts .\nour other major natural gas-producing regions are europe and equatorial guinea , where large portions of our natural gas sales are subject to term contracts , making realized prices in these areas less volatile .\nas we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions , to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices , our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease .\ne&p segment income during 2008 was up 57 percent from 2007 , with revenue increases tied to these increases in average commodity prices accounting for almost half of the income improvement .\nliquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales volumes were also higher in 2008 than 2007 .\noil sands mining oil sands mining segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce .\nroughly two-thirds of the normal output mix will track movements in wti and one-third will track movements in the canadian heavy sour crude oil marker , primarily western canadian select .\noutput mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader .\nduring 2008 , our average realized price for synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil was $ 91.90 per barrel , up from 2007 , but ended the year at $ 24.97 per barrel impacted by a heavier yield in december and a seasonal decrease in the value of our heavy output .\nthe operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed , and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime .\nper unit costs are sensitive to production rates .\nkey variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel , which track commodity markets such as the canadian aeco natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively .\nthe table below shows benchmark prices that impact both our revenues and variable costs , listing high and low spot prices during the year. .\n\nTable:\nbenchmark wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )\thigh $ 145.29\tdate july 3\tlow $ 33.87\tdate december 19\nwestern canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a )\t$ 114.95\tjuly\t$ 23.18\tdecember\naeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b )\t$ 11.34\tjuly 1\t$ 5.42\tseptember 19\n\nPost-table text:\nwti crude oil ( dollars per barrel ) $ 145.29 july 3 $ 33.87 december 19 western canadian select ( dollars per barrel ) ( a ) $ 114.95 july $ 23.18 december aeco natural gas sales index ( canadian dollars per gigajoule ) ( b ) $ 11.34 july 1 $ 5.42 september 19 ( a ) monthly pricing based upon average wti adjusted for differentials unique to western canada .\n( b ) alberta energy company day ahead index .\nour osm segment reported income of $ 258 million for 2008 , reflecting synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil sales averaging 32 mboepd .\nderivative instruments intended to hedge price risk on future sales have impacted revenues in the periods presented , with net gains of $ 48 million in 2008 and net losses of $ 53 million in 2007 .\nin the first quarter of 2009 , we entered into derivative instruments which effectively offset certain of our open derivative positions .\nrefining , marketing and transportation rm&t segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin , refinery throughputs , retail marketing gross margins for gasoline , distillates and merchandise , and the profitability of our pipeline transportation operations. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "91.90", "24.97", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "66.93"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2009/page_139.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much did net rental expense increase from 2007 to 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nmarathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement .\noperating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\t2007\nminimum rental ( a )\t$ 238\t$ 245\t$ 209\ncontingent rental\t19\t22\t33\nnet rental expense\t$ 257\t$ 267\t$ 242\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases .\n26 .\ncommitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment .\ncertain of these matters are discussed below .\nthe ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements .\nhowever , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably .\nenvironmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment .\nthese laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites .\npenalties may be imposed for noncompliance .\nat december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million .\nit is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed .\nreceivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 .\nlegal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 .\npresently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination .\nlike the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings .\nthe other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) .\nplaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 .\nin the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe .\nwe are vigorously defending these cases .\nwe have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases .\nwe do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nwe voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 .\nwe are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases .\na qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government .\nthe case currently pending is u.s .\nex rel harrold e .\nwright v .\nagip petroleum co .\net al .\nit is primarily a gas valuation case .\nmarathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms .\nsuch settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nguarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies .\nunder the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements .\nin addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "257", "242", ")", "divide(", "#0", "242", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06198"}
{"example_id": "SPGI/2015/page_57.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the net equity in the assets acquired\n\nPre-table text:\nfocusing on strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity 2019s operations and financial results .\nin addition , the guidance permits companies to have continuing cash flows and significant continuing involvement with the disposed com- ponent .\nwe adopted the amendments to this guidance on january 1 , 2015 .\nreclassification certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for compara- bility purposes .\n2 .\nacquisitions and divestitures for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we paid cash for acqui- sitions , net of cash acquired , totaling $ 2.4 billion .\nwe used the net proceeds of our $ 2.0 billion of senior notes issued in august of 2015 and cash on hand to finance the acquisition of snl .\nall other acquisitions were funded with cash flows from operations .\nacquisitions completed during the year ended december 31 , 2015 by segment included : s&p capital iq and snl on september 1 , 2015 ( the 201cacquisition date 201d ) , we acquired snl financial lc ( 201csnl 201d ) for $ 2.225 billion in cash , subject to working capital adjustments .\nsnl 2019s results of operations have been included in our consolidated statements of income subsequent to the acquisition date .\nsnl is a global provider of news , data , and analytical tools to five sectors in the global economy : financial services , real estate , energy , media & communications , and metals & mining .\nsnl delivers infor- mation through its suite of web , mobile and direct data feed platforms that helps clients , including investment and com- mercial banks , investors , corporations , and regulators make decisions , improve efficiency , and manage risk .\nacquisition-related expenses during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , the company incurred approximately $ 37 million of acquisition-related costs related to the acquisition of snl .\nthese expenses are included in selling and general expenses in our consolidated statements of income .\npreliminary allocation of purchase price our acquisition of snl was accounted for using the purchase method .\nunder the purchase method , the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired is allocated to goodwill and other intangibles .\nthe goodwill recognized is largely attributable to anticipated operational synergies and growth opportunities as a result of the acquisition .\nthe intangible assets , excluding goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles , will be amortized over their anticipated useful lives between 10 and 18 years which will be determined when we finalize our purchase price allocation .\nthe goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nthe following table presents the preliminary allocation of pur- chase price to the assets and liabilities of snl as a result of the acquisition .\n( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\ncurrent assets\t$ 23\nproperty plant and equipment\t19\ngoodwill\t1563\nother intangible assets net:\t\ndatabases and software\t421\ncustomer relationships\t162\ntradenames\t185\nother intangibles\t4\nother intangible assets net\t772\nother non-current assets\t1\ntotal assets acquired\t2378\ncurrent liabilities\t-23 ( 23 )\nunearned revenue\t-117 ( 117 )\nother non-current liabilities\t-4 ( 4 )\ntotal liabilities acquired\t-144 ( 144 )\nnet assets acquired\t$ 2234\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company has performed a preliminary valuation analysis of the fair market value of assets and liabilities of the snl financial business .\nthe final purchase price allocation will be determined when the company has completed the detailed valuations and necessary calculations .\nthe final allocation could differ materi- ally from the preliminary allocation .\nthe final allocation may include ( 1 ) changes in fair values of property , plant and equip- ment , ( 2 ) changes in allocations to intangible assets as well as goodwill and ( 3 ) other changes to assets and liabilities .\nsupplemental pro forma information supplemental infor- mation on an unaudited pro forma basis is presented below for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 as if the acquisi- tion of snl occurred on january 1 , 2014 .\nthe pro forma financial information is presented for comparative purposes only , based on estimates and assumptions , which the company believes to be reasonable but not necessarily indicative of the consolidated financial position or results of operations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized had this acquisition been completed at the beginning of 2015 .\nthe unau- dited pro forma information includes intangible asset charges and incremental borrowing costs as a result of the acquisition , mcgraw hill financial 2015 annual report 55 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2378", "144", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2234"}
{"example_id": "FBHS/2017/page_76.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth in the total long-term debt from 2016 to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nthe components of external long-term debt were as follows : ( in millions ) 2017 2016 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2017\t2016\n$ 400 million unsecured senior note due june 2020\t$ 398.3\t$ 397.6\n$ 500 million unsecured senior note due june 2025\t494.3\t493.5\n$ 1250 million revolving credit agreement due june 2021\t615.0\t540.0\ntotal debt\t1507.6\t1431.1\nless : current portion\t2014\t2014\ntotal long-term debt\t$ 1507.6\t$ 1431.1\n\nPost-table text:\nsenior notes payments during the next five years as of december 31 , 2017 are zero in 2018 through 2019 , $ 400 million in 2020 and zero in 2021 through 2022 .\nin our debt agreements , there are normal and customary events of default which would permit the lenders to accelerate the debt if not cured within applicable grace periods , such as failure to pay principal or interest when due or a change in control of the company .\nthere were no events of default as of december 31 , 2017 .\n9 .\nfinancial instruments we do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes .\nwe principally use financial instruments to reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and commodities used as raw materials in our products .\nthe principal derivative financial instruments we enter into on a routine basis are foreign exchange contracts .\nderivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value .\nthe counterparties to derivative contracts are major financial institutions .\nwe are subject to credit risk on these contracts equal to the fair value of these instruments .\nmanagement currently believes that the risk of incurring material losses is unlikely and that the losses , if any , would be immaterial to the company .\nraw materials used by the company are subject to price volatility caused by weather , supply conditions , geopolitical and economic variables , and other unpredictable external factors .\nas a result , from time to time , we enter into commodity swaps to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in our operations .\nwe account for these commodity derivatives as economic hedges or cash flow hedges .\nchanges in the fair value of economic hedges are recorded directly into current period earnings .\nthere were no material commodity swap contracts outstanding for the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 .\nwe enter into foreign exchange contracts primarily to hedge forecasted sales and purchases denominated in select foreign currencies , thereby limiting currency risk that would otherwise result from changes in exchange rates .\nthe periods of the foreign exchange contracts correspond to the periods of the forecasted transactions , which generally do not exceed 12 to 15 months subsequent to the latest balance sheet date .\nfor derivative instruments that are designated as fair value hedges , the gain or loss on the derivative instrument , as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item , are recognized on the same line of the statement of income .\nthe effective portions of cash flow hedges are reported in other comprehensive income ( 201coci 201d ) and are recognized in the statement of income when the hedged item affects earnings .\nthe changes in fair value for net investment hedges are recognized in the statement of income when realized upon sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment in the foreign entity .\nthe ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in current period earnings .\nin addition , changes in the fair value of all economic hedge transactions are immediately recognized in current period earnings .\nour primary foreign currency hedge contracts pertain to the canadian dollar , the british pound , and the mexican peso .\nthe gross u.s .\ndollar equivalent notional amount of all foreign currency derivative hedges outstanding at december 31 , 2017 was $ 282.8 million , representing a net settlement liability of $ 4.8 million .\nbased on foreign exchange rates as of december 31 , 2017 , we estimate that $ 3.0 million of net foreign currency .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1507.6", "1431.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "76.5"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_75.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage growth from 2013 to 2014 in the total accounts payable and other current liabilities\n\nPre-table text:\nthe analysis of our depreciation studies .\nchanges in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively .\nunder group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized .\nthe historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies .\nthe indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes .\nbecause of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate .\nin addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies .\nany deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets .\nfor retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies .\na gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations .\nwhen we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .\nhowever , many of our assets are self-constructed .\na large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects .\ncosts that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized .\ndirect costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .\nindirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .\ngeneral and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .\nnormal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .\nthese costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n13 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2014 2013 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2014\tdec . 312013\naccounts payable\t$ 877\t$ 803\ndividends payable\t438\t356\nincome and other taxes payable\t412\t491\naccrued wages and vacation\t409\t385\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t207\ninterest payable\t178\t169\nequipment rents payable\t100\t96\nother\t640\t579\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3303\t$ 3086\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "3303", "3086", ")", "divide(", "#0", "3086", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07032"}
{"example_id": "STT/2009/page_73.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change of securities between 2008 and 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nimpairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2009\t2008\nfair value\t$ 72699\t$ 54163\namortized cost\t74843\t60786\nnet unrealized loss pre-tax\t$ -2144 ( 2144 )\t$ -6623 ( 6623 )\nnet unrealized loss after-tax\t$ -1316 ( 1316 )\t$ -4057 ( 4057 )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity .\nthese after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income .\nthe decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities .\nwe conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists .\nto the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component .\nthe credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) .\nthe assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 .\nsuch factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance .\nto the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income .\nnational housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current .\nmanagement currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) .\nas an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income .\nexcluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities .\nadditional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "72699", "54163", ")", "divide(", "#0", "54163", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.34223"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2017/page_111.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby how much did proved undeveloped reserves increase during 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nsupplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) 2017 proved reserves decreased by 647 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 49 mmboe primarily due to the acceleration of higher economic wells in the bakken into the 5-year plan resulting in an increase of 44 mmboe , with the remainder being due to revisions across the business .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 116 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 97 mmboe associated with the expansion of proved areas and wells to sales from unproved categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 28 mmboe from acquisitions of assets in the northern delaware basin in new mexico .\n2022 production : decreased by 145 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 695 mmboe including 685 mmboe associated with the sale of our canadian business and 10 mmboe associated with divestitures of certain conventional assets in oklahoma and colorado .\nsee item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding these dispositions .\n2016 proved reserves decreased by 67 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : increased by 63 mmboe primarily due to an increase of 151 mmboe associated with the acceleration of higher economic wells in the u.s .\nresource plays into the 5-year plan and a decrease of 64 mmboe due to u.s .\ntechnical revisions .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by 60 mmboe primarily associated with the expansion of proved areas and new wells to sales from unproven categories in oklahoma .\n2022 purchases of reserves in place : increased by 34 mmboe from acquisition of stack assets in oklahoma .\n2022 production : decreased by 144 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : decreased by 84 mmboe associated with the divestitures of certain wyoming and gulf of mexico assets .\n2015 proved reserves decreased by 35 mmboe primarily due to the following : 2022 revisions of previous estimates : decreased by 2 mmboe primarily resulting from an increase of 105 mmboe associated with drilling programs in u.s .\nresource plays and an increase of 67 mmboe in discontinued operations due to technical reevaluation and lower royalty percentages related to lower realized prices , offset by a decrease of 173 mmboe which was largely due to reductions to our capital development program and adherence to the sec 5-year rule .\n2022 extensions , discoveries , and other additions : increased by140 mmboe as a result of drilling programs in our u.s .\nresource plays .\n2022 production : decreased by 157 mmboe .\n2022 sales of reserves in place : u.s .\nconventional assets sales contributed to a decrease of 18 mmboe .\nchanges in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2017 , 546 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 6 mmboe from december 31 , 2016 .\nthe following table shows changes in proved undeveloped reserves for 2017 : ( mmboe ) .\n\nTable:\nbeginning of year\t552\nrevisions of previous estimates\t5\nimproved recovery\t2014\npurchases of reserves in place\t15\nextensions discoveries and other additions\t57\ndispositions\t2014\ntransfers to proved developed\t-83 ( 83 )\nend of year\t546\n\nPost-table text:\nrevisions of prior estimates .\nrevisions of prior estimates increased 5 mmboe during 2017 , primarily due to a 44 mmboe increase in the bakken from an acceleration of higher economic wells into the 5-year plan , offset by a decrease of 40 mmboe in oklahoma due to the removal of less economic wells from the 5-year plan .\nextensions , discoveries and other additions .\nincreased 57 mmboe through expansion of proved areas in oklahoma. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "546", "552", ")", "divide(", "#0", "552", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.01087"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2015/page_142.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the 2016 hedged gallons to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .\nfinancial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .\nthese swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .\nthe following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .\n\nTable:\nyear\tgallons hedged\tweighted average contractprice per gallon\n2016\t27000000\t$ 3.57\n2017\t12000000\t2.92\n\nPost-table text:\nif the national u.s .\non-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .\nif the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .\nthe fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .\nthe aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 were current liabilities of $ 37.8 million and $ 34.4 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .\nthe ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 respectively , and a gain of less than $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .\ntotal ( loss ) gain recognized in other comprehensive ( loss ) income for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 2.0 ) million , $ ( 24.2 ) million and $ 2.4 million , for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .\nrecycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard and old newspaper .\nfrom time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .\nwe had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 .\nno amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .\ntotal gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million and $ ( 0.1 ) million for the years ended december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively .\nno amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 .\nfair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) .\nwe also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "27000000", "12000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.25"}
{"example_id": "APD/2016/page_57.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the 2016's special terminations settlements and curtailments , what is the percentage of pension settlement losses concerning the total value?\n\nPre-table text:\npension expense .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\npension expense\t$ 68.1\t$ 135.6\t$ 135.9\nspecial terminations settlements and curtailments ( included above )\t7.3\t35.2\t5.8\nweighted average discount rate ( a )\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\t4.0% ( 4.0 % )\t4.6% ( 4.6 % )\nweighted average expected rate of return on plan assets\t7.5% ( 7.5 % )\t7.4% ( 7.4 % )\t7.7% ( 7.7 % )\nweighted average expected rate of compensation increase\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.5% ( 3.5 % )\t3.9% ( 3.9 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) effective in 2016 , the company began to measure the service cost and interest cost components of pension expense by applying spot rates along the yield curve to the relevant projected cash flows , as we believe this provides a better measurement of these costs .\nthe company has accounted for this as a change in accounting estimate and , accordingly has accounted for it on a prospective basis .\nthis change does not affect the measurement of the total benefit obligation .\n2016 vs .\n2015 pension expense , excluding special items , decreased from the prior year due to the adoption of the spot rate approach which reduced service cost and interest cost , the impact from expected return on assets and demographic gains , partially offset by the impact of the adoption of new mortality tables for our major plans .\nspecial items of $ 7.3 included pension settlement losses of $ 6.4 , special termination benefits of $ 2.0 , and curtailment gains of $ 1.1 .\nthese resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions .\n2015 vs .\n2014 the decrease in pension expense , excluding special items , was due to the impact from expected return on assets , a 40 bp reduction in the weighted average compensation increase assumption , and lower service cost and interest cost .\nthe decrease was partially offset by the impact of higher amortization of actuarial losses , which resulted primarily from a 60 bp decrease in weighted average discount rate .\nspecial items of $ 35.2 included pension settlement losses of $ 21.2 , special termination benefits of $ 8.7 , and curtailment losses of $ 5.3 .\nthese resulted primarily from our recent business restructuring and cost reduction actions .\n2017 outlook in 2017 , pension expense , excluding special items , is estimated to be approximately $ 70 to $ 75 , an increase of $ 10 to $ 15 from 2016 , resulting primarily from a decrease in discount rates , offset by favorable asset experience , effects of the versum spin-off and the adoption of new mortality tables .\npension settlement losses of $ 10 to $ 15 are expected , dependent on the timing of retirements .\nin 2017 , we expect pension expense to include approximately $ 164 for amortization of actuarial losses compared to $ 121 in 2016 .\nnet actuarial losses of $ 484 were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in 2016 , primarily attributable to lower discount rates and improved mortality projections .\nactuarial gains/losses are amortized into pension expense over prospective periods to the extent they are not offset by future gains or losses .\nfuture changes in the discount rate and actual returns on plan assets different from expected returns would impact the actuarial gains/losses and resulting amortization in years beyond 2017 .\nduring the first quarter of 2017 , the company expects to record a curtailment loss estimated to be $ 5 to $ 10 related to employees transferring to versum .\nthe loss will be reflected in the results from discontinued operations on the consolidated income statements .\nwe continue to evaluate opportunities to manage the liabilities associated with our pension plans .\npension funding pension funding includes both contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are primarily non-qualified plans .\nwith respect to funded plans , our funding policy is that contributions , combined with appreciation and earnings , will be sufficient to pay benefits without creating unnecessary surpluses .\nin addition , we make contributions to satisfy all legal funding requirements while managing our capacity to benefit from tax deductions attributable to plan contributions .\nwith the assistance of third party actuaries , we analyze the liabilities and demographics of each plan , which help guide the level of contributions .\nduring 2016 and 2015 , our cash contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans were $ 79.3 and $ 137.5 , respectively .\nfor 2017 , cash contributions to defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 65 to $ 85 .\nthe estimate is based on expected contributions to certain international plans and anticipated benefit payments for unfunded plans , which .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6.4", "7.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.87671"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2007/page_52.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total possible purchase price for impella including potential contingent payments , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table ( in thousands ) summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2007 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods. .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year more than 5 years\noperating lease obligations\t$ 7669\t$ 1960\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\npurchase obligations\t6421\t6421\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 14090\t$ 8381\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or material commitments at march 31 , 2007 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding a contingent payment in the amount of $ 5.6 million made on january 30 , 2007 in the form of common stock , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella , and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nwe may make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 11.2 million .\nthese contingent payments may be made in a combination of cash or stock under circumstances described in the purchase agreement .\nif any contingent payments are made , they will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nwe apply the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to our agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which we are a guarantor .\nwe enter into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions .\nunder these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities .\nthese indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement .\nthe maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements .\nas a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal .\naccordingly , we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2007 .\nclinical study agreements 2013 in our clinical study agreements , we have agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to use of our devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and our instructions .\nthe indemnification provisions contained within our clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in our clinical study agreements .\nproduct warranties 2014we routinely accrue for estimated future warranty costs on our product sales at the time of shipment .\nall of our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers , our warranty obligations are affected by product failure rates .\nour operating results could be adversely affected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , we indemnify customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by our products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "11.2", "45.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "56.3"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2016/page_144.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges for 2015 and 2016\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 16 .\nfinancial instruments fuel hedges we have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices .\nthese swaps qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases ( fuel hedges ) .\nthe following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 : year gallons hedged weighted average contract price per gallon .\n\nTable:\nyear\tgallons hedged\tweighted average contractprice per gallon\n2017\t12000000\t$ 2.92\n2018\t3000000\t2.61\n\nPost-table text:\nif the national u.s .\non-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel as published by the department of energy exceeds the contract price per gallon , we receive the difference between the average price and the contract price ( multiplied by the notional gallons ) from the counterparty .\nif the average price is less than the contract price per gallon , we pay the difference to the counterparty .\nthe fair values of our fuel hedges are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) .\nthe aggregate fair values of our outstanding fuel hedges as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 were current liabilities of $ 2.7 million and $ 37.8 million , respectively , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets .\nthe ineffective portions of the changes in fair values resulted in a gain of $ 0.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , and a loss of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , and have been recorded in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income .\ntotal gain ( loss ) recognized in other comprehensive income ( loss ) for fuel hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 20.7 million , $ ( 2.0 ) million and $ ( 24.2 ) million , for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively .\nwe classify cash inflows and outflows from our fuel hedges within operating activities in the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows .\nrecycling commodity hedges revenue from the sale of recycled commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated containers and old newsprint .\nfrom time to time we use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities .\nduring 2016 , we entered into multiple agreements related to the forecasted occ sales .\nthe agreements qualified for , and were designated as , effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain forecasted recycling commodity sales ( commodity hedges ) .\nwe entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of occ .\nthe agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell occ at an established floor strike price with a written call option obligating us to deliver occ at an established cap strike price .\nthe puts and calls have the same settlement dates , are net settled in cash on such dates and have the same terms to expiration .\nthe contemporaneous combination of options resulted in no net premium for us and represents costless collars .\nunder these agreements , we will make or receive no payments as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price ; however , if the settlement price is above the cap , we will pay the counterparty an amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged .\nif the settlement price is below the floor , the counterparty will pay us the deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged .\nthe objective of these agreements is to reduce variability of cash flows for forecasted sales of occ between two designated strike prices. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "37.8", "2.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "14"}
{"example_id": "GPN/2017/page_77.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow much money can the company deduct on the income tax in the future after this acquisition?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe estimated acquisition-date fair values of major classes of assets acquired and liabilities assumed , including a reconciliation to the total purchase consideration , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\ncash\t$ 45826\ncustomer-related intangible assets\t42721\nacquired technology\t27954\ntrade name\t2901\nother assets\t2337\ndeferred income tax assets ( liabilities )\t-9788 ( 9788 )\nother liabilities\t-49797 ( 49797 )\ntotal identifiable net assets\t62154\ngoodwill\t203828\ntotal purchase consideration\t$ 265982\n\nPost-table text:\ngoodwill of $ 203.8 million arising from the acquisition , included in the asia-pacific segment , was attributable to expected growth opportunities in australia and new zealand , as well as growth opportunities and operating synergies in integrated payments in our existing asia-pacific and north america markets .\ngoodwill associated with this acquisition is not deductible for income tax purposes .\nthe customer-related intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 15 years .\nthe trade name has an estimated amortization period of 5 years .\nnote 3 2014 settlement processing assets and obligations funds settlement refers to the process of transferring funds for sales and credits between card issuers and merchants .\nfor transactions processed on our systems , we use our internal network to provide funding instructions to financial institutions that in turn fund the merchants .\nwe process funds settlement under two models , a sponsorship model and a direct membership model .\nunder the sponsorship model , we are designated as a merchant service provider by mastercard and an independent sales organization by visa , which means that member clearing banks ( 201cmember 201d ) sponsor us and require our adherence to the standards of the payment networks .\nin certain markets , we have sponsorship or depository and clearing agreements with financial institution sponsors .\nthese agreements allow us to route transactions under the members 2019 control and identification numbers to clear credit card transactions through mastercard and visa .\nin this model , the standards of the payment networks restrict us from performing funds settlement or accessing merchant settlement funds , and , instead , require that these funds be in the possession of the member until the merchant is funded .\nunder the direct membership model , we are members in various payment networks , allowing us to process and fund transactions without third-party sponsorship .\nin this model , we route and clear transactions directly through the card brand 2019s network and are not restricted from performing funds settlement .\notherwise , we process these transactions similarly to how we process transactions in the sponsorship model .\nwe are required to adhere to the standards of the payment networks in which we are direct members .\nwe maintain relationships with financial institutions , which may also serve as our member sponsors for other card brands or in other markets , to assist with funds settlement .\ntiming differences , interchange fees , merchant reserves and exception items cause differences between the amount received from the payment networks and the amount funded to the merchants .\nthese intermediary balances arising in our settlement process for direct merchants are reflected as settlement processing assets and obligations on our consolidated balance sheets .\nsettlement processing assets and obligations include the components outlined below : 2022 interchange reimbursement .\nour receivable from merchants for the portion of the discount fee related to reimbursement of the interchange fee .\nglobal payments inc .\n| 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 77 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "27954", "42721", ")", "add(", "2901", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "73576"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2014/page_58.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the board of directors approved budget was capital expenditures?\n\nPre-table text:\noutlook budget our board of directors approved a budget of $ 3.5 billion for 2015 , including capital expenditures of $ 3.4 billion .\nwith the continued uncertainty in commodity pricing , we have taken decisive action to protect our optionality and position us to be a stronger e&p company in the long term .\nour exploration spending has been reduced by more than 50 percent while we continue to focus on our three u.s .\nresource plays .\nwe are also prepared to exercise further flexibility in our spend levels as pricing and the macro environment warrant .\nour budget is broken down by reportable segment in the table below .\n( in millions ) 2015 budget percent of .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2015 budget\tpercent of total\nnorth america e&p\t$ 2885\t82% ( 82 % )\ninternational e&p\t536\t15% ( 15 % )\noil sands mining ( a )\t21\t1% ( 1 % )\nsegment total\t3442\t98% ( 98 % )\ncorporate and other\t79\t2% ( 2 % )\ntotal capital investment and exploration spending budget\t$ 3521\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) represents the net budget after factoring in reimbursements from the canadian federal and provincial government related to the quest ccs project .\nnorth america e&p 2013 approximately $ 2.4 billion of our budget is allocated to our three core u.s .\nresource plays .\nmore than $ 1.4 billion is earmarked for the eagle ford , where rig count is expected to drop from 18 in late 2014 to 10 by the end of the second quarter of 2015 .\nincluded in eagle ford spending is approximately $ 1 billion for drilling and completions .\nwe plan to spend $ 760 million in the bakken in north dakota .\ndrilling activity will be reduced to two rigs by the end of the first quarter of 2015 , down from seven rigs at the end of 2014 .\nbakken spending includes approximately $ 550 million for drilling , completions and recompletions .\nspending of $ 226 million is targeted for the oklahoma resource basins , which will also be down to two rigs by the end of the first quarter of 2015 .\nthis includes spending of approximately $ 200 million for drilling and completions .\ninternational e&p 2013 we plan to spend approximately $ 429 million on our international assets , primarily in e.g. , the u.k .\nand the kurdistan region of iraq .\napproximately $ 232 million will be spent on a targeted exploration program impacting both the north america e&p and the international e&p segments .\nthe program includes one operated gulf of mexico well , participation in a non-operated appraisal well at shenandoah in the gulf of mexico and seismic surveys in gabon and ethiopia .\noil sands mining 2013 we expect to spend $ 95 million for sustaining capital projects in the osm segment .\nwe hold a 20 percent outside-operated interest in the athabasca oil sands project .\nthe remainder of our budget consists of corporate and other and is expected to total approximately $ 79 million , of which $ 40 million represents capitalized interest on assets under construction .\nfor information about expected exploration and development activities more specific to individual assets , see item 1 .\nbusiness .\nproduction volumes we forecast 2015 production available for sale from the combined north america e&p and international e&p segments , excluding libya , to be 370 to 390 net mboed and the osm segment to be 35 to 45 net mbbld of synthetic crude oil .\nwe expect our u.s .\nresource plays to achieve production growth of approximately 20 percent in 2015 over 2014 .\nin addition , we expect total production growth , excluding libya , of 5 to 7 percent year-over-year .\nacquisitions and dispositions excluded from our budget are the impacts of acquisitions and dispositions not previously announced .\nwe continually evaluate ways to optimize our portfolio through acquisitions and divestitures .\nin connection with our ongoing portfolio management , future decisions to dispose of assets could result in non-cash impairments in the period such decisions are made .\npersonnel in february 2015 , we announced a reduction in workforce impacting approximately 350-400 employees .\nthese reductions focus largely on u.s .\npayroll employees , weighted toward above-the-field and support services personnel , though we will continue to analyze our staffing needs at all levels and in all locations .\naffected employees will be eligible for severance benefits. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3.4", "3.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.97143"}
{"example_id": "CME/2017/page_97.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nhow many class a common stocks issued and outstanding were issued between 2016 and 2017 in thousands?\n\nPre-table text:\n14 .\ncapital stock shares outstanding .\nthe following table presents information regarding capital stock: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nclass a common stock authorized\t1000000\t1000000\nclass a common stock issued and outstanding\t339235\t338240\nclass b-1 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.6\t0.6\nclass b-2 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.8\t0.8\nclass b-3 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t1.3\t1.3\nclass b-4 common stock authorized issued and outstanding\t0.4\t0.4\n\nPost-table text:\ncme group has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding .\nassociated trading rights .\nmembers of cme , cbot , nymex and comex own or lease trading rights which entitle them to access open outcry trading , discounts on trading fees and the right to vote on certain exchange matters as provided for by the rules of the particular exchange and cme group 2019s or the subsidiaries 2019 organizational documents .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division for trading at cme .\na cme trading right is a separate asset that is not part of or evidenced by the associated share of class b common stock of cme group .\nthe class b common stock of cme group is intended only to ensure that the class b shareholders of cme group retain rights with respect to representation on the board of directors and approval rights with respect to the core rights described below .\ntrading rights at cbot are evidenced by class b memberships in cbot , at nymex by class a memberships in nymex and at comex by comex division memberships .\nmembers of cbot , nymex and comex do not have any rights to elect members of the board of directors and are not entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on their memberships or trading permits .\ncore rights .\nholders of cme group class b common shares have the right to approve changes in specified rights relating to the trading privileges at cme associated with those shares .\nthese core rights relate primarily to trading right protections , certain trading fee protections and certain membership benefit protections .\nvotes on changes to these core rights are weighted by class .\neach class of class b common stock has the following number of votes on matters relating to core rights : class b-1 , six votes per share ; class b-2 , two votes per share ; class b-3 , one vote per share ; and class b-4 , 1/6th of one vote per share .\nthe approval of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of class b common stock is required in order to approve any changes to core rights .\nholders of shares of class a common stock do not have the right to vote on changes to core rights .\nvoting rights .\nwith the exception of the matters reserved to holders of cme group class b common stock , holders of cme group common stock vote together on all matters for which a vote of common shareholders is required .\nin these votes , each holder of shares of class a or class b common stock of cme group has one vote per share .\ntransfer restrictions .\neach class of cme group class b common stock is subject to transfer restrictions contained in the certificate of incorporation of cme group .\nthese transfer restrictions prohibit the sale or transfer of any shares of class b common stock separate from the sale of the associated trading rights .\nelection of directors .\nthe cme group board of directors is currently comprised of 20 members .\nholders of class b-1 , class b-2 and class b-3 common stock have the right to elect six directors , of which three are elected by class b-1 shareholders , two are elected by class b-2 shareholders and one is elected by class b-3 shareholders .\nthe remaining directors are elected by the class a and class b shareholders voting as a single class. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "339235", "338240", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "995"}
{"example_id": "SLB/2012/page_44.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the growth rate of the cash flows from operations from 2011 to 2012\n\nPre-table text:\nduring the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) .\nduring the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program .\nschlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) .\n0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 .\non july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 .\nschlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 .\nthe following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal cost of shares purchased\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share\n2012\t$ 971883\t14087.8\t$ 68.99\n2011\t$ 2997688\t36940.4\t$ 81.15\n2010\t$ 1716675\t26624.8\t$ 64.48\n\nPost-table text:\n0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 .\nin recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there .\nschlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries .\nat december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) .\n0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively .\non january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 .\non january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 .\non january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 .\n0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 .\ncapital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 .\n0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans .\nthe us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation .\nthis compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 .\nschlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions .\n0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 .\nduring 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6.8", "6.1", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11475"}
{"example_id": "APD/2013/page_36.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?\n\nPre-table text:\nequipment and energy .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nsales\t$ 451.1\t$ 420.1\t$ 400.6\noperating income\t65.5\t44.6\t62.8\n\nPost-table text:\n2013 vs .\n2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .\noperating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 .\nit is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 .\n2012 vs .\n2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity .\noperating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity .\nthe sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 .\nother operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .\nalso included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .\nother also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .\n2013 vs .\n2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .\nthe current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .\nthe prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 .\n2012 vs .\n2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "420.1", "44.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9.41928"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2017/page_71.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in defined contribution plans expenses for the u.s . between 2016 and 2017 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nzimmer biomet holdings , inc .\nand subsidiaries 2017 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our foreign pension plan assets measured at fair value that used significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\tdecember 31 2017\nbeginning balance\t$ 78.7\ngains on assets sold\t0.3\nchange in fair value of assets\t3.8\nnet purchases and sales\t5.2\ntranslation gain\t3.0\nending balance\t$ 91.0\n\nPost-table text:\nwe expect that we will have no legally required minimum funding requirements in 2018 for the qualified u.s .\nand puerto rico defined benefit retirement plans , nor do we expect to voluntarily contribute to these plans during 2018 .\ncontributions to foreign defined benefit plans are estimated to be $ 17.0 million in 2018 .\nwe do not expect the assets in any of our plans to be returned to us in the next year .\ndefined contribution plans we also sponsor defined contribution plans for substantially all of the u.s .\nand puerto rico employees and certain employees in other countries .\nthe benefits offered under these plans are reflective of local customs and practices in the countries concerned .\nwe expensed $ 47.9 million , $ 42.5 million and $ 40.2 million related to these plans for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\n15 .\nincome taxes 2017 tax act : the president signed u.s .\ntax reform legislation ( 201c2017 tax act 201d ) on december 22 , 2017 , which is considered the enactment date .\nthe 2017 tax act includes a broad range of provisions , many of which significantly differ from those contained in previous u.s .\ntax law .\nchanges in tax law are accounted for in the period of enactment .\nas such , our 2017 consolidated financial statements reflect the immediate tax effect of the 2017 tax act .\nthe 2017 tax act contains several key provisions including , among other things : 2022 a one-time tax on the mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 untaxed foreign earnings and profits ( e&p ) , referred to as the toll charge ; 2022 a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2022 the introduction of a new u.s .\ntax on certain off-shore earnings referred to as global intangible low-taxed income ( gilti ) at an effective tax rate of 10.5 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2017 ( increasing to 13.125 percent for tax years beginning after december 31 , 2025 ) , with a partial offset by foreign tax credits ; and 2022 the introduction of a territorial tax system beginning in 2018 by providing a 100 percent dividend received deduction on certain qualified dividends from foreign subsidiaries .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2017 , we recorded an income tax benefit of $ 1272.4 million , which was comprised of the following : 2022 income tax benefit of $ 715.0 million for the one-time deemed repatriation of foreign earnings .\nthis is composed of a $ 1181.0 million benefit from the removal of a deferred tax liability we had recorded for the repatriation of foreign earnings prior to the 2017 tax act offset by $ 466.0 million for the toll charge recognized under the 2017 tax act .\nin accordance with the 2017 tax act , we expect to elect to pay the toll charge in installments over eight years .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , we have recorded current and non-current income tax liabilities related to the toll charge of $ 82.0 million and $ 384.0 million , respectively .\n2022 an income tax benefit of $ 557.4 million , primarily related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted corporate income tax rate of 21 percent .\nthe net benefit recorded was based on currently available information and interpretations made in applying the provisions of the 2017 tax act as of the time of filing this annual report on form 10-k .\nwe further refined our estimates related to the impact of the 2017 tax act subsequent to the issuance of our earnings release for the fourth quarter of 2017 .\nin accordance with authoritative guidance issued by the sec , the income tax effect for certain aspects of the 2017 tax act represent provisional amounts for which our accounting is incomplete , but with respect to which a reasonable estimate could be determined and recorded during the fourth quarter of 2017 .\nthe actual effects of the 2017 tax act and final amounts recorded may differ materially from our current estimate of provisional amounts due to , among other things , further interpretive guidance that may be issued by u.s .\ntax authorities or regulatory bodies , including the sec and the fasb .\nwe will continue to analyze the 2017 tax act and any additional guidance that may be issued so we can finalize the full effects of applying the new legislation on our financial statements in the measurement period , which ends in the fourth quarter of 2018 .\nwe continue to evaluate the impacts of the 2017 tax act and consider the amounts recorded to be provisional .\nin addition , we are still evaluating the gilti provisions of the 2017 tax act and their impact , if any , on our consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe fasb allows companies to adopt an accounting policy to either recognize deferred taxes for gilti or treat such as a tax cost in the year incurred .\nwe have not yet determined which accounting policy to adopt because determining the impact of the gilti provisions requires analysis of our existing legal entity structure , the reversal of our u.s .\ngaap and u.s .\ntax basis differences in the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries , and our ability to offset any tax with foreign tax credits .\nas such , we did not record a deferred income tax .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "47.9", "42.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5.4"}
{"example_id": "RSG/2017/page_142.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent change in the weighted average cost per share from 2016 to 2017\n\nPre-table text:\nrepublic services , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) employee stock purchase plan republic employees are eligible to participate in an employee stock purchase plan .\nthe plan allows participants to purchase our common stock for 95% ( 95 % ) of its quoted market price on the last day of each calendar quarter .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , issuances under this plan totaled 113941 shares , 130085 shares and 141055 shares , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , shares reserved for issuance to employees under this plan totaled 0.4 million and republic held employee contributions of approximately $ 1.8 million for the purchase of common stock .\n12 .\nstock repurchases and dividends stock repurchases stock repurchase activity during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 follows ( in millions except per share amounts ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\t2016\nnumber of shares repurchased\t9.6\t8.4\namount paid\t$ 610.7\t$ 403.8\nweighted average cost per share\t$ 63.84\t$ 48.56\n\nPost-table text:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , there were 0.5 million repurchased shares pending settlement and $ 33.8 million was unpaid and included within other accrued liabilities .\nin october 2017 , our board of directors added $ 2.0 billion to the existing share repurchase authorization that now extends through december 31 , 2020 .\nbefore this , $ 98.4 million remained under a prior authorization .\nshare repurchases under the program may be made through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws .\nwhile the board of directors has approved the program , the timing of any purchases , the prices and the number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management , at its discretion , and will depend upon market conditions and other factors .\nthe share repurchase program may be extended , suspended or discontinued at any time .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the remaining authorized purchase capacity under our october 2017 repurchase program was $ 1.8 billion .\nin december 2015 , our board of directors changed the status of 71272964 treasury shares to authorized and unissued .\nin doing so , the number of our issued shares was reduced by the stated amount .\nour accounting policy is to deduct the par value from common stock and to reflect the excess of cost over par value as a deduction from additional paid-in capital .\nthe change in unissued shares resulted in a reduction of $ 2295.3 million in treasury stock , $ 0.6 million in common stock , and $ 2294.7 million in additional paid-in capital .\nthere was no effect on our total stockholders 2019 equity position as a result of the change .\ndividends in october 2017 , our board of directors approved a quarterly dividend of $ 0.345 per share .\ncash dividends declared were $ 446.3 million , $ 423.8 million and $ 404.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , we recorded a quarterly dividend payable of $ 114.4 million to shareholders of record at the close of business on january 2 , 2018 .\n13 .\nearnings per share basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to republic services , inc .\nby the weighted average number of common shares ( including vested but unissued rsus ) outstanding during the .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "63.84", "48.56", ")", "divide(", "#0", "48.56", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.31466"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2008/page_84.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the long-term debt is reported under the current liabilities section of balance sheet as of september 27 , 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nas a result of our acquisition of third wave on july 24 , 2008 , we assumed certain operating leases , the most significant of which is related to their corporate facility in madison , wisconsin , which is effective through september 2014 .\nfuture lease payments on these operating leases were approximately $ 5.8 million as of september 27 , 2008 .\nadditionally , we assumed several license agreements for certain patent rights .\nthese payments will be made through 2011 and future payments under these license agreements are approximately $ 7.0 million as of september 27 , 2008 .\ncontractual obligations .\nthe following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commitments as of september 27 , 2008: .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by period less than 1 year\tpayments due by period 1-3 years\tpayments due by period 3-5 years\tpayments due by period more than 5 years\tpayments due by period total\nlong-term debt obligations\t$ 38480\t$ 109436\t$ 327400\t$ 1725584\t$ 2200900\ninterest on long-term debt obligations\t58734\t110973\t90433\t7484\t267624\noperating leases\t18528\t33162\t27199\t63616\t142505\npurchase obligations ( 1 )\t33176\t15703\t2014\t2014\t48879\nfinancing leases\t2408\t5035\t5333\t15008\t27784\nlong-term supply contracts ( 2 )\t3371\t6000\t3750\t2014\t13121\nprivate equity investment ( 3 )\t1874\t2014\t2014\t2014\t1874\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 156571\t$ 280309\t$ 454115\t$ 1811692\t$ 2702687\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) approximately $ 6.4 million of the purchase obligations relates to an exclusive distribution and service agreement in the united states under which we will sell and service a line of extremity mri systems .\npursuant to the terms of this contract , we have certain minimum inventory purchase obligations for the initial term of eighteen months .\nthereafter the purchase obligations are subject to renegotiation in the event of any unforeseen changes in the market dynamics .\n( 2 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed on a consolidated basis certain non-cancelable supply contracts .\nfor reasons of quality assurance , sole source availability or cost effectiveness , certain key components and raw materials are available only from a sole supplier .\nto assure continuity of supply while maintaining high quality and reliability , long-term supply contracts have been executed with these suppliers .\nin certain of these contracts , a minimum purchase commitment has been established .\n( 3 ) as a result of the merger with cytyc , we assumed a private equity investment commitment with a limited liability partnership , which could be paid over the succeeding three years .\nthe amounts above do not include any amount that may be payable to biolucent and adiana for earn-outs .\nwe are working on several projects and we expect to continue to review and evaluate potential acquisitions of businesses , products or technologies , and strategic alliances that we believe will complement our current or future business .\nsubject to the risk factors set forth in part i , item 1a of this report and the general disclaimers set forth in our special note regarding forward-looking statements at the outset of this report , we believe that cash flow from operations and cash available from our amended credit agreement will provide us with sufficient funds in order to fund our expected operations over the next twelve months .\nour longer-term liquidity is contingent upon future operating performance and our ability to continue to meet financial covenants under our amended credit agreement .\nwe may also require additional capital in the future to fund capital expenditures , acquisitions or other investments , or to repay our convertible notes .\nthe holders of the convertible notes may require us to repurchase the notes on december 13 of 2013 , and on each of december 15 , 2017 , 2022 , 2027 and 2032 at a repurchase price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of their accreted principal amount .\nthese capital requirements could be substantial .\nour operating performance may also be affected by matters discussed under the above-referenced risk factors as elsewhere in this report .\nthese risks , trends and uncertainties may also adversely affect our long- term liquidity. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "38480", "2200900", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01748"}
{"example_id": "HIG/2011/page_188.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in dac balance resulting from all amortization accounts in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe hartford financial services group , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 .\ndeferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits ( continued ) results changes in the dac balance are as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2011\t2010\t2009\nbalance january 1\t$ 9857\t$ 10686\t$ 13248\ndeferred costs\t2608\t2648\t2853\namortization 2014 dac\t-2920 ( 2920 )\t-2665 ( 2665 )\t-3247 ( 3247 )\namortization 2014 dac from discontinued operations\t2014\t-17 ( 17 )\t-10 ( 10 )\namortization 2014 unlock benefit ( charge ) pre-tax [1]\t-507 ( 507 )\t138\t-1010 ( 1010 )\nadjustments to unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and other [2]\t-377 ( 377 )\t-1159 ( 1159 )\t-1031 ( 1031 )\neffect of currency translation\t83\t215\t-39 ( 39 )\ncumulative effect of accounting change pre-tax [3]\t2014\t11\t-78 ( 78 )\nbalance december 31\t$ 8744\t$ 9857\t$ 10686\n\nPost-table text:\n[1] the most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2011 were assumption changes which reduced expected future gross profits including additional costs associated with implementing the japan hedging strategy and the u.s .\nvariable annuity macro hedge program , as well as actual separate account returns below our aggregated estimated return .\nthe most significant contributors to the unlock benefit recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2010 were actual separate account returns being above our aggregated estimated return .\nalso included in the benefit are assumption updates related to benefits from withdrawals and lapses , offset by hedging , annuitization estimates on japan products , and long-term expected rate of return updates .\nthe most significant contributors to the unlock charge recorded during the year ended december 31 , 2009 were the results of actual separate account returns being significantly below our aggregated estimated return for the first quarter of 2009 , partially offset by actual returns being greater than our aggregated estimated return for the period from april 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2009 .\n[2] the most significant contributor to the adjustments was the effect of declining interest rates , resulting in unrealized gains on securities classified in aoci .\nother includes a $ 34 decrease as a result of the disposition of dac from the sale of the hartford investment canadian canada in 2010 .\n[3] for the year ended december 31 , 2010 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for embedded credit derivatives resulted in a decrease to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac benefit .\nin addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses decreased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .\nfor the year ended december 31 , 2009 the effect of adopting new accounting guidance for investments other- than- temporarily impaired resulted in an increase to retained earnings and , as a result , a dac charge .\nin addition , an offsetting amount was recorded in unrealized losses as unrealized losses increased upon adoption of the new accounting guidance .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , estimated future net amortization expense of present value of future profits for the succeeding five years is $ 39 , $ 58 , $ 24 , $ 23 and $ 22 in 2012 , 2013 , 2014 , 2015 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "-2920", "-507", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-3427"}
{"example_id": "UA/2009/page_50.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts from 2008 to 2009\n\nPre-table text:\naddition , we are exposed to gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on transactions generated by our international subsidiaries in currencies other than their local currencies .\nthese gains and losses are primarily driven by inter-company transactions .\nthese exposures are included in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .\nsince 2007 , we have used foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions and projected inventory purchases for our canadian subsidiary .\nbeginning in december 2008 , we began using foreign currency forward contracts in order to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on inter-company transactions for our european subsidiary .\nwe do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes .\nbased on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 , we receive us dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.04 cad per $ 1.00 and us dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 0.70 eur per $ 1.00 .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 15.4 million with contract maturities of 1 month , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 56.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month .\nthe foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other income ( expense ) , net on the consolidated statements of income .\nthe fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was $ 0.3 million and $ 1.2 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nthese amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet .\nrefer to note 9 for a discussion of the fair value measurements .\nother income ( expense ) , net included the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 , ( in thousands )\tyear ended december 31 , 2009\tyear ended december 31 , 2008\t2007\nunrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )\t$ 5222\t$ -5459 ( 5459 )\t$ 2567\nrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )\t-261 ( 261 )\t-2166 ( 2166 )\t174\nunrealized derivative gains ( losses )\t-1060 ( 1060 )\t1650\t-243 ( 243 )\nrealized derivative losses\t-4412 ( 4412 )\t-204 ( 204 )\t-469 ( 469 )\n\nPost-table text:\nalthough we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations .\ninflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results .\nalthough we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "0.3", "1.2", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.75"}
{"example_id": "ZBH/2003/page_58.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the change in finished goods in millions between 2002 and 2003?\n\nPre-table text:\nz i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c .\na n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable .\nan impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s .\nfederal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount .\noperating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 .\nperiod and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse .\nthe unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service .\nrespective years or of future results .\nthe new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc .\nperiods benefited , typically five years .\nfor approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets .\nthe company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica .\nshare .\nthe cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp .\nnew capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 .\nthe pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp .\n( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash .\neach the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes .\nreceive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 .\ninventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 .\nthe net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .\n\nTable:\n\t2003\t2002\nfinished goods\t$ 384.3\t$ 206.7\nraw materials and work in progress\t90.8\t50.9\ninventory step-up\t52.6\t2013\ninventories net\t$ 527.7\t$ 257.6\n\nPost-table text:\nmade by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items .\nthe acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting .\ninventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 .\nchange in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively .\nprovisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures .\neffective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nrecognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment .\nundeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence .\ninstruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively .\nfield are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation .\nfollowing the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments .\nthis change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years .\nin accordance with sfas no .\n144 , the quarter .\ncompany reviews instruments for impairment whenever .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "384.3", "206.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "177.6"}
{"example_id": "HOLX/2012/page_113.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the expected yearly stock-based compensation expense over the remaining vesting period , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents intangibles 2014goodwill and other in december 2010 , the fasb issued asu 2010-28 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) .\nasu 2010-28 modifies step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts .\nfor those reporting units , an entity is required to perform step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists .\nin determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists , an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist .\nasu 2010-28 is effective for the company in fiscal 2012 .\nthe adoption of asu 2010-28 is not expected to have a material impact on the company 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nin september 2011 , the fasb issued asu no .\n2011-08 , intangibles 2014goodwill and other ( topic 350 ) : testing goodwill for impairment .\nasu 2011-08 allows entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test .\nif an entity believes , as a result of its qualitative assessment , that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount , the quantitative two-step impairment test is required ; otherwise , no further testing is required .\nasu 2011-08 is effective for the company beginning in fiscal 2013 , although early adoption is permitted .\nthe company does not believe that asu 2011-08 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements .\n3 .\nbusiness combinations fiscal 2012 acquisition : gen-probe , inc .\non august 1 , 2012 , the company completed the acquisition of gen-probe and acquired all of the outstanding shares of gen-probe .\npursuant to the merger agreement , each share of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the acquisition was cancelled and converted into the right to receive $ 82.75 in cash .\nin addition , all outstanding restricted shares , restricted stock units , performance shares , and those stock options granted prior to february 8 , 2012 were cancelled and converted into the right to receive $ 82.75 per share in cash less the applicable exercise price , as applicable .\nstock options granted after february 8 , 2012 were converted into stock options to acquire shares of hologic common stock determined by a conversion formula defined in the merger agreement .\nthe company paid the gen-probe shareholders $ 3.8 billion and $ 169.0 million to equity award holders .\nthe company funded the acquisition using available cash and financing consisting of senior secured credit facilities and senior notes ( see note 5 for further discussion ) resulting in aggregate proceeds of $ 3.48 billion , excluding financing fees to the underwriters .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 34.3 million of direct transaction costs recorded within general and administrative expenses .\ngen-probe , headquartered in san diego , california , is a leader in molecular diagnostics products and services that are used primarily to diagnose human diseases , screen donated human blood , and test transplant compatibility .\nthe company expects this acquisition to enhance its molecular diagnostics franchise and to complement its existing portfolio of diagnostics products .\ngen-probe 2019s results of operations are reported within the company 2019s diagnostics reportable segment from the date of acquisition .\nthe purchase price consideration was as follows: .\n\nTable:\ncash paid\t$ 3967866\ndeferred payment\t1655\nfair value of stock options exchanged\t2655\ntotal purchase price\t$ 3972176\n\nPost-table text:\nthe fair value of stock options exchanged recorded as purchase price represents the fair value of the gen-probe options converted into the company 2019s stock options attributable to pre-combination services pursuant to asc 805 , business combinations .\nthe remainder of the fair value of these options of $ 23.2 million will be recognized as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining vesting period , which is approximately 3.5 years .\nthe company estimated the fair value of the stock options using a binomial valuation model with the following weighted average assumptions : risk free rate of 0.41% ( 0.41 % ) , expected volatility of 39.9% ( 39.9 % ) , expected life of 3.6 years and dividend of 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) .\nthe weighted average fair value of stock options granted is $ 7.07 per share .\nsource : hologic inc , 10-k , november 28 , 2012 powered by morningstar ae document research 2120 the information contained herein may not be copied , adapted or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate , complete or timely .\nthe user assumes all risks for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information , except to the extent such damages or losses cannot be limited or excluded by applicable law .\npast financial performance is no guarantee of future results. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "23.2", "3.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6.62857"}
{"example_id": "GS/2016/page_77.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin millions for 2016 2015 , and 2014 , what are total equity securities?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 7.83 billion for 2015 , 16% ( 16 % ) higher than 2014 .\nexcluding a gain of $ 121 million ( $ 30 million and $ 91 million included in equities client execution and securities services , respectively ) in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , net revenues in equities were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , primarily due to significantly higher net revenues in equities client execution across the major regions , reflecting significantly higher results in both derivatives and cash products , and higher net revenues in securities services , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances and improved securities lending spreads .\ncommissions and fees were essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .\nwe elect the fair value option for certain unsecured borrowings .\nthe fair value net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our credit spreads on these borrowings was $ 255 million ( $ 214 million and $ 41 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2015 , compared with a net gain of $ 144 million ( $ 108 million and $ 36 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2014 .\noperating expenses were $ 13.94 billion for 2015 , 28% ( 28 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher net provisions for mortgage-related litigation and regulatory matters , partially offset by decreased compensation and benefits expenses .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.21 billion in 2015 , 72% ( 72 % ) lower than 2014 .\ninvesting & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients .\nthese investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature .\nwe make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities .\nwe also make unsecured loans to individuals through our online platform .\nthe table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2016\tyear ended december 2015\tyear ended december 2014\nequity securities\t$ 2573\t$ 3781\t$ 4579\ndebt securities and loans\t1507\t1655\t2246\ntotal net revenues\t4080\t5436\t6825\noperating expenses\t2386\t2402\t2819\npre-tax earnings\t$ 1694\t$ 3034\t$ 4006\n\nPost-table text:\noperating environment .\nfollowing difficult market conditions and the impact of a challenging macroeconomic environment on corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions improved during the rest of the year as macroeconomic concerns moderated .\nglobal equity markets increased during 2016 , contributing to net gains from investments in public equities , and corporate performance rebounded from the difficult start to the year .\nif macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or company-specific events , or if global equity markets decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted .\nalthough net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of 2015 impacted results .\n2016 versus 2015 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to significantly lower net revenues from investments in equities , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were lower compared with 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges .\nlosses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 .\nthis decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities .\noperating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 .\n2015 versus 2014 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .\ngoldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 63 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_sum(", "equity securities", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "10933"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2018/page_110.pdf-5", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2018 what was the available for sale securities average compared to the period end\n\nPre-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nTable:\nas of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2018\t2017\t2016\ninvestment securities gains/ ( losses )\t$ -395 ( 395 )\t$ -78 ( 78 )\t$ 132\navailable-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t203449\t219345\t226892\nheld-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average )\t31747\t47927\t51358\ninvestment securities portfolio ( average )\t235197\t267272\t278250\nafs investment securities ( period-end )\t228681\t200247\t236670\nhtm investment securities ( period-end )\t31434\t47733\t50168\ninvestment securities portfolio ( period 2013end )\t260115\t247980\t286838\n\nPost-table text:\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis 78 jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k treasury and cio overview treasury and cio is predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding , capital , structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks .\nthe risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off- balance sheet assets and liabilities .\ntreasury and cio seek to achieve the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high- quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\ntreasury and cio also use derivatives to meet the firm 2019s asset- liability management objectives .\nfor further information on derivatives , refer to note 5 .\nin addition , treasury and cio manage the firm 2019s cash position primarily through depositing at central banks and investing in short-term instruments .\nfor further information on liquidity and funding risk , refer to liquidity risk management on pages 95 2013100 .\nfor information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , refer to market risk management on pages 124 2013131 .\nthe investment securities portfolio primarily consists of agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities , u.s .\nand non-u.s .\ngovernment securities , obligations of u.s .\nstates and municipalities , other abs and corporate debt securities .\nat december 31 , 2018 , the investment securities portfolio was $ 260.1 billion , and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and , where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) .\nrefer to note 10 for further information on the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio .\nselected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 investment securities gains/ ( losses ) $ ( 395 ) $ ( 78 ) $ 132 available-for-sale ( 201cafs 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 203449 219345 226892 held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) investment securities ( average ) 31747 47927 51358 investment securities portfolio ( average ) 235197 267272 278250 afs investment securities ( period-end ) 228681 200247 236670 htm investment securities ( period-end ) 31434 47733 50168 investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) 260115 247980 286838 as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance , the firm elected to transfer certain investment securities from htm to afs in the first quarter of 2018 .\nfor additional information , refer to notes 1 and 10. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "203449", "228681", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.88966"}
{"example_id": "SNPS/2006/page_69.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of the total purchase price is represented by intangible assets?\n\nPre-table text:\nsoftware and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .\nintegrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .\npurchase price .\nthe company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .\nin addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .\nthe total purchase consideration consisted of: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\ncash paid\t$ 11001\nprior investment in hpl\t1872\nacquisition-related costs\t2831\ntotal purchase price\t$ 15704\n\nPost-table text:\nacquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .\nas of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .\nthe $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .\nassets acquired .\nthe company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .\napproximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .\naccordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .\nadditionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .\ngoodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .\ngoodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .\nother .\nduring the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .\nthis acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .\nfiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .\nreasons for the acquisition .\nthe company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .\npurchase price .\nthe company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .\nin addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "8.5", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "15704", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.54126"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2010/page_84.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2009 to 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t$ 62465\n2012\t54236\n2013\t47860\n2014\t37660\n2015\t28622\nthereafter\t79800\nfuture minimum lease payments\t$ 310643\n\nPost-table text:\nrental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nin connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .\ntypical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .\nwe also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .\nlease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nwe guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .\nthe residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .\nin the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .\nsimilarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .\nhad we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .\nwe have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .\nlitigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .\ninfringed on ford design patents .\nthe parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .\npursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .\nof aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .\ndesign patent .\nwe have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .\nthe amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .\nwe also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .\nwe currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "66.9", "57.2", ")", "divide(", "#0", "57.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.16958"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2008/page_249.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of entergy's total employees are employed in entergy arkansas?\n\nPre-table text:\npart i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees .\ngenerally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings .\nthese actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans .\nentergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants .\nemployees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers .\nas of december 31 , 2008 , entergy employed 14669 people .\nutility: .\n\nTable:\nentergy arkansas\t1526\nentergy gulf states louisiana\t858\nentergy louisiana\t1008\nentergy mississippi\t828\nentergy new orleans\t378\nentergy texas\t744\nsystem energy\t-\nentergy operations\t2448\nentergy services\t3179\nentergy nuclear operations\t3620\nother subsidiaries\t80\ntotal entergy\t14669\n\nPost-table text:\napproximately 5000 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters union , and the united government security officers of america. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1526", "14669", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10403"}
{"example_id": "STT/2008/page_83.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average variance of the value at risk of each 2008 section? ( $ )\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table presents var with respect to our trading activities , as measured by our var methodology for the periods indicated : value-at-risk .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31 ( inmillions )\t2008 annual average\t2008 maximum\t2008 minimum\t2008 annual average\t2008 maximum\tminimum\nforeign exchange products\t$ 1.8\t$ 4.7\t$ .3\t$ 1.8\t$ 4.0\t$ .7\ninterest-rate products\t1.1\t2.4\t.6\t1.4\t3.7\t.1\n\nPost-table text:\nwe back-test the estimated one-day var on a daily basis .\nthis information is reviewed and used to confirm that all relevant trading positions are properly modeled .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we did not experience any actual trading losses in excess of our end-of-day var estimate .\nasset and liability management activities the primary objective of asset and liability management is to provide sustainable and growing net interest revenue , or nir , under varying economic environments , while protecting the economic values of our balance sheet assets and liabilities from the adverse effects of changes in interest rates .\nmost of our nir is earned from the investment of deposits generated by our core investment servicing and investment management businesses .\nwe structure our balance sheet assets to generally conform to the characteristics of our balance sheet liabilities , but we manage our overall interest-rate risk position in the context of current and anticipated market conditions and within internally-approved risk guidelines .\nour overall interest-rate risk position is maintained within a series of policies approved by the board and guidelines established and monitored by alco .\nour global treasury group has responsibility for managing state street 2019s day-to-day interest-rate risk .\nto effectively manage the consolidated balance sheet and related nir , global treasury has the authority to take a limited amount of interest-rate risk based on market conditions and its views about the direction of global interest rates over both short-term and long-term time horizons .\nglobal treasury manages our exposure to changes in interest rates on a consolidated basis organized into three regional treasury units , north america , europe and asia/pacific , to reflect the growing , global nature of our exposures and to capture the impact of change in regional market environments on our total risk position .\nour investment activities and our use of derivative financial instruments are the primary tools used in managing interest-rate risk .\nwe invest in financial instruments with currency , repricing , and maturity characteristics we consider appropriate to manage our overall interest-rate risk position .\nin addition to on-balance sheet assets , we use certain derivatives , primarily interest-rate swaps , to alter the interest-rate characteristics of specific balance sheet assets or liabilities .\nthe use of derivatives is subject to alco-approved guidelines .\nadditional information about our use of derivatives is in note 17 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k under item 8 .\nas a result of growth in our non-u.s .\noperations , non-u.s .\ndollar denominated customer liabilities are a significant portion of our consolidated balance sheet .\nthis growth results in exposure to changes in the shape and level of non-u.s .\ndollar yield curves , which we include in our consolidated interest-rate risk management process .\nbecause no one individual measure can accurately assess all of our exposures to changes in interest rates , we use several quantitative measures in our assessment of current and potential future exposures to changes in interest rates and their impact on net interest revenue and balance sheet values .\nnet interest revenue simulation is the primary tool used in our evaluation of the potential range of possible net interest revenue results that could occur under a variety of interest-rate environments .\nwe also use market valuation and duration analysis to assess changes in the economic value of balance sheet assets and liabilities caused by assumed changes in interest rates .\nfinally , gap analysis 2014the difference between the amount of balance sheet assets and liabilities re-pricing within a specified time period 2014is used as a measurement of our interest-rate risk position. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "4.7", ".3", ")", "subtract(", "const_4", ".7", ")", "add(", "#0", "#1", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3.85"}
{"example_id": "CB/2010/page_200.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate of net income for bermuda subsidiaries from 2009 to 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nn o t e s t o t h e c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s 2013 ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries excluded from adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding and assumed conversions is the impact of securities that would have been anti-dilutive during the respective years .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , the potential anti-dilutive share conversions were 256868 shares , 1230881 shares , and 638401 shares , respectively .\n19 .\nrelated party transactions the ace foundation 2013 bermuda is an unconsolidated not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to fund charitable causes in bermuda .\nthe trustees are principally comprised of ace management .\nthe company maintains a non-interest bear- ing demand note receivable from the ace foundation 2013 bermuda , the balance of which was $ 30 million and $ 31 million , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe receivable is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe borrower has used the related proceeds to finance investments in bermuda real estate , some of which have been rented to ace employees at rates established by independent , professional real estate appraisers .\nthe borrower uses income from the investments to both repay the note and to fund charitable activities .\naccordingly , the company reports the demand note at the lower of its principal value or the fair value of assets held by the borrower to repay the loan , including the real estate properties .\n20 .\nstatutory financial information the company 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are subject to insurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate .\nthese regulations include restrictions that limit the amount of dividends or other distributions , such as loans or cash advances , available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities .\nthere are no statutory restrictions on the payment of dividends from retained earnings by any of the bermuda subsidiaries as the minimum statutory capital and surplus requirements are satisfied by the share capital and additional paid-in capital of each of the bermuda subsidiaries .\nthe company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries file financial statements prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by insurance regulators .\nstatutory accounting differs from gaap in the reporting of certain reinsurance contracts , investments , subsidiaries , acquis- ition expenses , fixed assets , deferred income taxes , and certain other items .\nthe statutory capital and surplus of the u.s .\nsubsidiaries met regulatory requirements for 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 .\nthe amount of dividends available to be paid in 2011 , without prior approval from the state insurance departments , totals $ 850 million .\nthe following table presents the combined statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income of the bermuda and u.s .\nsubsidiaries at and for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008. .\n\nTable:\n( in millions of u.s . dollars )\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\tbermuda subsidiaries 2008\tbermuda subsidiaries 2010\tbermuda subsidiaries 2009\t2008\nstatutory capital and surplus\t$ 11798\t$ 9164\t$ 6205\t$ 6266\t$ 5885\t$ 5368\nstatutory net income\t$ 2430\t$ 2369\t$ 2196\t$ 1047\t$ 904\t$ 818\n\nPost-table text:\nas permitted by the restructuring discussed previously in note 7 , certain of the company 2019s u.s .\nsubsidiaries discount certain a&e liabilities , which increased statutory capital and surplus by approximately $ 206 million , $ 215 million , and $ 211 million at december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , respectively .\nthe company 2019s international subsidiaries prepare statutory financial statements based on local laws and regulations .\nsome jurisdictions impose complex regulatory requirements on insurance companies while other jurisdictions impose fewer requirements .\nin some countries , the company must obtain licenses issued by governmental authorities to conduct local insurance business .\nthese licenses may be subject to reserves and minimum capital and solvency tests .\njurisdictions may impose fines , censure , and/or criminal sanctions for violation of regulatory requirements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2430", "2369", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2369", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.02575"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2014/page_38.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin what year was the cash cash equivalents and marketable securities the highest?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 27 , 2014 , september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .\nto provide additional flexibility in managing liquidity , the company began accessing the commercial paper markets in the third quarter of 2014 .\nthe company currently anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s .\noperating activities and from borrowings .\nas of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .\ndollar-denominated holdings .\namounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s .\nincome taxation on repatriation to the u.s .\nthe company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer .\nthe policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss .\nduring 2014 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 59.7 billion was a result of $ 39.5 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 13.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 7.0 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 22.6 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 9.0 billion ; cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 9.6 billion ; and cash paid for business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 3.8 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 37.5 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 45.0 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 11.1 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper of $ 12.0 billion and $ 6.3 billion , respectively .\nduring 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 16.4 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion .\napple inc .\n| 2014 form 10-k | 35 .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash cash equivalents and marketable securities\t$ 155239\t$ 146761\t$ 121251\nproperty plant and equipment net\t$ 20624\t$ 16597\t$ 15452\nlong-term debt\t$ 28987\t$ 16960\t$ 0\nworking capital\t$ 5083\t$ 29628\t$ 19111\ncash generated by operating activities\t$ 59713\t$ 53666\t$ 50856\ncash used in investing activities\t$ -22579 ( 22579 )\t$ -33774 ( 33774 )\t$ -48227 ( 48227 )\ncash used in financing activities\t$ -37549 ( 37549 )\t$ -16379 ( 16379 )\t$ -1698 ( 1698 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "cash cash equivalents and marketable securities", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "155239"}
{"example_id": "AAL/2013/page_15.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the total full-time employees of american are pilots?\n\nPre-table text:\nfuture regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries .\nsee part i , item 1a .\nrisk factors - \" if we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations ,\" \"our business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages\" and \"we are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result\" for additional information .\nemployees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive .\nin 2013 , salaries , wages , and benefits were one of our largest expenses and represented approximately 22% ( 22 % ) of our operating expenses .\nthe table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2013 .\namerican us airways wholly-owned regional carriers total .\n\nTable:\n\tamerican\tus airways\twholly-owned regional carriers\ttotal\npilots\t7900\t4100\t3400\t15400\nflight attendants\t15000\t7700\t2100\t24800\nmaintenance personnel\t11300\t3100\t2400\t16800\nfleet service personnel\t7400\t5500\t1700\t14600\npassenger service personnel\t10300\t6200\t6400\t22900\nadministrative and other\t8200\t5500\t2200\t15900\ntotal\t60100\t32100\t18200\t110400\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "7900", "60100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13145"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_341.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average price of the increased electricity usage per gwh?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy mississippi , inc .\nmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2009 net revenue\t$ 536.7\nvolume/weather\t18.9\nother\t-0.3 ( 0.3 )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 555.3\n\nPost-table text:\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .\ngross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .\nfuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .\nother regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .\nother income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .\nthe decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .\ntaxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .\ndepreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .\ninterest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "18.9", "const_1000000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1046", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "18068.83365"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2014/page_65.pdf-5", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ndid jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index over the five year period?\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .\n( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .\nthe s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .\nequity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .\nthe kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .\nand is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .\nthe s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .\nthe firm is a component of all three industry indices .\nthe following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .\nthe comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .\ndecember 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in dollars )\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njpmorgan chase\t$ 100.00\t$ 102.30\t$ 81.87\t$ 111.49\t$ 152.42\t$ 167.48\nkbw bank index\t100.00\t123.36\t94.75\t125.91\t173.45\t189.69\ns&p financial index\t100.00\t112.13\t93.00\t119.73\t162.34\t186.98\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t115.06\t117.48\t136.27\t180.39\t205.07\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["greater(", "167.48", "189.69", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "no"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2014/page_38.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in property plant and equipment net from 2013 to 2014 in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 27 , 2014 , september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 ( in millions ) : the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months .\nto provide additional flexibility in managing liquidity , the company began accessing the commercial paper markets in the third quarter of 2014 .\nthe company currently anticipates the cash used for future dividends and the share repurchase program will come from its current domestic cash , cash generated from on-going u.s .\noperating activities and from borrowings .\nas of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .\ndollar-denominated holdings .\namounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s .\nincome taxation on repatriation to the u.s .\nthe company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer .\nthe policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss .\nduring 2014 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 59.7 billion was a result of $ 39.5 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 13.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 7.0 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 22.6 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 9.0 billion ; cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 9.6 billion ; and cash paid for business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 3.8 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 37.5 billion during 2014 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 45.0 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 11.1 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and commercial paper of $ 12.0 billion and $ 6.3 billion , respectively .\nduring 2013 , cash generated from operating activities of $ 53.7 billion was a result of $ 37.0 billion of net income , non-cash adjustments to net income of $ 10.2 billion and an increase in net change in operating assets and liabilities of $ 6.5 billion .\ncash used in investing activities of $ 33.8 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used for purchases of marketable securities , net of sales and maturities , of $ 24.0 billion and cash used to acquire property , plant and equipment of $ 8.2 billion .\ncash used in financing activities of $ 16.4 billion during 2013 consisted primarily of cash used to repurchase common stock of $ 22.9 billion and cash used to pay dividends and dividend equivalents of $ 10.6 billion , partially offset by net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $ 16.9 billion .\napple inc .\n| 2014 form 10-k | 35 .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash cash equivalents and marketable securities\t$ 155239\t$ 146761\t$ 121251\nproperty plant and equipment net\t$ 20624\t$ 16597\t$ 15452\nlong-term debt\t$ 28987\t$ 16960\t$ 0\nworking capital\t$ 5083\t$ 29628\t$ 19111\ncash generated by operating activities\t$ 59713\t$ 53666\t$ 50856\ncash used in investing activities\t$ -22579 ( 22579 )\t$ -33774 ( 33774 )\t$ -48227 ( 48227 )\ncash used in financing activities\t$ -37549 ( 37549 )\t$ -16379 ( 16379 )\t$ -1698 ( 1698 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "20624", "16597", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4027"}
{"example_id": "RE/2017/page_159.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in unaffiliated life insurance company from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\n15 .\ncommitments and contingencies in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance agreements .\nin some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it .\nin other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights .\nthese disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation .\nin all such matters , the company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable .\nthe company considers the statuses of these proceedings when determining its reserves for unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses .\naside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements , the company is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration .\nthe company has entered into separate annuity agreements with the prudential insurance of america ( 201cthe prudential 201d ) and an additional unaffiliated life insurance company in which the company has either purchased annuity contracts or become the assignee of annuity proceeds that are meant to settle claim payment obligations in the future .\nin both instances , the company would become contingently liable if either the prudential or the unaffiliated life insurance company were unable to make payments related to the respective annuity contract .\nthe table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the company was contingently liable for the periods indicated: .\n\nTable:\n( dollars in thousands )\tat december 31 , 2017\tat december 31 , 2016\nthe prudential insurance company of america\t$ 144618\t$ 146507\nunaffiliated life insurance company\t34444\t33860\n\nPost-table text:\n16 .\nshare-based compensation plans the company has a 2010 stock incentive plan ( 201c2010 employee plan 201d ) , a 2009 non-employee director stock option and restricted stock plan ( 201c2009 director plan 201d ) and a 2003 non-employee director equity compensation plan ( 201c2003 director plan 201d ) .\nunder the 2010 employee plan , 4000000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as non- qualified share options , incentive share options , share appreciation rights , restricted share awards or performance share unit awards to officers and key employees of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 2553473 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2010 employee plan .\nthe 2010 employee plan replaced a 2002 employee plan , which replaced a 1995 employee plan ; therefore , no further awards will be granted under the 2002 employee plan or the 1995 employee plan .\nthrough december 31 , 2017 , only non-qualified share options , restricted share awards and performance share unit awards had been granted under the employee plans .\nunder the 2009 director plan , 37439 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or restricted share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 , there were 34957 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2009 director plan .\nthe 2009 director plan replaced a 1995 director plan , which expired .\nunder the 2003 director plan , 500000 common shares have been authorized to be granted as share options or share awards to non-employee directors of the company .\nat december 31 , 2017 there were 346714 remaining shares available to be granted under the 2003 director plan. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "34444", "33860", ")", "divide(", "#0", "33860", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01725"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2012/page_47.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the decreases in the net sales to the operating profit for mst from 2010 to 2011\n\nPre-table text:\n2011 compared to 2010 mst 2019s net sales for 2011 decreased $ 311 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased volume of approximately $ 390 million for certain ship and aviation system programs ( primarily maritime patrol aircraft and ptds ) and approximately $ 75 million for training and logistics solutions programs .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher sales of about $ 165 million from production on the lcs program .\nmst 2019s operating profit for 2011 decreased $ 68 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2010 .\nthe decrease was attributable to decreased operating profit of approximately $ 55 million as a result of increased reserves for contract cost matters on various ship and aviation system programs ( including the terminated presidential helicopter program ) and approximately $ 40 million due to lower volume and increased reserves on training and logistics solutions .\npartially offsetting these decreases was higher operating profit of approximately $ 30 million in 2011 primarily due to the recognition of reserves on certain undersea systems programs in 2010 .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 55 million lower in 2011 compared to 2010 .\nbacklog backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders on ship and aviation system programs ( primarily mh-60 and lcs ) , partially offset decreased orders and higher sales volume on integrated warfare systems and sensors programs ( primarily aegis ) .\nbacklog decreased slightly in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher sales volume on various integrated warfare systems and sensors programs .\ntrends we expect mst 2019s net sales to decline in 2013 in the low single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 due to the completion of ptds deliveries in 2012 and expected lower volume on training services programs .\noperating profit and margin are expected to increase slightly from 2012 levels primarily due to anticipated improved contract performance .\nspace systems our space systems business segment is engaged in the research and development , design , engineering , and production of satellites , strategic and defensive missile systems , and space transportation systems .\nspace systems is also responsible for various classified systems and services in support of vital national security systems .\nspace systems 2019 major programs include the space-based infrared system ( sbirs ) , advanced extremely high frequency ( aehf ) system , mobile user objective system ( muos ) , global positioning satellite ( gps ) iii system , geostationary operational environmental satellite r-series ( goes-r ) , trident ii d5 fleet ballistic missile , and orion .\noperating results for our space systems business segment include our equity interests in united launch alliance ( ula ) , which provides expendable launch services for the u.s .\ngovernment , united space alliance ( usa ) , which provided processing activities for the space shuttle program and is winding down following the completion of the last space shuttle mission in 2011 , and a joint venture that manages the u.k . 2019s atomic weapons establishment program .\nspace systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\nnet sales\t$ 8347\t$ 8161\t$ 8268\noperating profit\t1083\t1063\t1030\noperating margins\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t13.0% ( 13.0 % )\t12.5% ( 12.5 % )\nbacklog at year-end\t18100\t16000\t17800\n\nPost-table text:\n2012 compared to 2011 space systems 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 186 million , or 2% ( 2 % ) , compared to 2011 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 150 million due to increased commercial satellite deliveries ( two commercial satellites delivered in 2012 compared to one during 2011 ) ; about $ 125 million from the orion program due to higher volume and an increase in risk retirements ; and approximately $ 70 million from increased volume on various strategic and defensive missile programs .\npartially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 105 million from certain government satellite programs ( primarily sbirs and muos ) as a result of decreased volume and a decline in risk retirements ; and about $ 55 million from the nasa external tank program , which ended in connection with the completion of the space shuttle program in 2011. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "311", "68", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "4.57353"}
{"example_id": "BKR/2017/page_103.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the risk free interest of the stock based compensation expense in 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nbaker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 83 issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 .\na total of 53.7 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nas a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , on july 3 , 2017 , each outstanding baker hughes stock option was converted into an option to purchase a share of class a common stock in the company .\nconsequently , we issued 6.8 million stock options which are fully vested .\neach converted option is subject to the same terms and conditions as applied to the original option , and the per share exercise price of each converted option was reduced by $ 17.50 to reflect the per share amount of the special dividend pursuant to the agreement associated with the transactions .\nadditionally , as a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , there were 1.7 million baker hughes restricted stock units ( rsus ) that were converted to bhge rsus at a fair value of $ 40.18 .\nstock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant .\nthe compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates .\nforfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures .\nthere were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material .\nduring the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we issued 2.1 million rsus and 1.6 million stock options under the lti plan .\nthese rsus and stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date .\nstock based compensation expense was $ 37 million in 2017 .\nincluded in this amount is $ 15 million of expense which relates to the acceleration of equity awards upon termination of employment of baker hughes employees with change in control agreements , and are included as part of \"merger and related costs\" in the consolidated and combined statements of income ( loss ) .\nas bhge llc is a pass through entity , any tax benefit would be recognized by its partners .\ndue to its cumulative losses , bhge is unable to recognize a tax benefit on its share of stock related expenses .\nstock options the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model .\nthe following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan .\nthe expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding .\nthe expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards .\nthe expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period .\nthe risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s .\ntreasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted .\nthe dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\nexpected life ( years )\t6\nrisk-free interest rate\t2.1% ( 2.1 % )\nvolatility\t36.4% ( 36.4 % )\ndividend yield\t1.2% ( 1.2 % )\nweighted average fair value per share at grant date\t$ 12.32\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "37", "const_1000000", ")", "multiply(", "2.1%", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "777000"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2016/page_48.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2016 based on the increase in the net sales what was the ratio of the increasing factor to the offsetting factors that reduced sales\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 70 million .\nsince that time , we have continued to experience issues related to customer requirements and the implementation of this contract and have periodically accrued additional reserves .\nconsequently , we are continuing to monitor the scope , estimated costs , and viability of the program and the possibility of additional customer funding .\nit is possible that we may have to record additional loss reserves in future periods , which could be material to our operating results .\nhowever , we cannot make an estimate of the total expected costs at this time due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process .\nour consolidated net adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , net of state income taxes , increased segment operating profit by approximately $ 1.5 billion , $ 1.7 billion and $ 1.6 billion for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 .\nthe decrease in our consolidated net adjustments in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our mfc and space systems business segments , partially offset by an increase at our rms business segment .\nthe increase in our consolidated net adjustments in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our space systems and aeronautics business segments , offset by a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our rms and mfc business segments .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2016 are inclusive of approximately $ 530 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2015 are inclusive of approximately $ 550 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves for performance matters on an international program at rms and on commercial satellite programs at space systems .\nthe consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $ 535 million in unfavorable items , which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at rms and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs ( including jassm and gmlrs ) at mfc as described in the respective business segment 2019s results of operations below .\naeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles and related technologies .\naeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , c-5m super galaxy and f-22 raptor .\naeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2016\t2015\t2014\nnet sales\t$ 17769\t$ 15570\t$ 14920\noperating profit\t1887\t1681\t1649\noperating margin\t10.6% ( 10.6 % )\t10.8% ( 10.8 % )\t11.1% ( 11.1 % )\nbacklog atyear-end\t$ 34200\t$ 31800\t$ 27600\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 compared to 2015 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 2.2 billion , or 14% ( 14 % ) , compared to 2015 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.7 billion for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities , partially offset by lower volume on development activities ; and approximately $ 290 million for the c-130 program due to increased deliveries ( 24 aircraft delivered in 2016 compared to 21 in 2015 ) and increased sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 250 million for the f-16 program primarily due to higher volume on aircraft modernization programs .\nthe increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $ 55 million for the c-5 program due to decreased sustainment activities .\naeronautics 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 206 million , or 12% ( 12 % ) , compared to 2015 .\noperating profit increased approximately $ 195 million for the f-35 program due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities and higher risk retirements ; and by approximately $ 60 million for aircraft support and maintenance programs due to higher risk retirements and increased volume .\nthese increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for the c-130 program due to contract mix and lower risk retirements .\nadjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 20 million higher in 2016 compared to 2015 .\n2015 compared to 2014 aeronautics 2019 net sales in 2015 increased $ 650 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2014 .\nthe increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 1.4 billion for f-35 production contracts due to increased volume on aircraft production and sustainment activities ; and approximately $ 150 million for the c-5 program due to increased deliveries ( nine aircraft .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1.7", "290", ")", "add(", "#0", "250", ")", "divide(", "#1", "550", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.98491"}
{"example_id": "SYY/2019/page_9.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the percentage of sales to restaurants from 2017 to 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nsysco corporation a0- a0form a010-k 3 part a0i item a01 a0business we estimate that our sales by type of customer during the past three fiscal years were as follows: .\n\nTable:\ntype of customer\t2019\t2018\t2017\nrestaurants\t62% ( 62 % )\t62% ( 62 % )\t61% ( 61 % )\neducation government\t9\t8\t9\ntravel leisure retail\t9\t8\t9\nhealthcare\t8\t9\t9\nother ( 1 )\t12\t13\t12\ntotals\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) other includes cafeterias that are not stand-alone restaurants , bakeries , caterers , churches , civic and fraternal organizations , vending distributors , other distributors and international exports .\nnone of these types of customers , as a group , exceeded 5% ( 5 % ) of total sales in any of the years for which information is presented .\nsources of supply we purchase from thousands of suppliers , both domestic and international , none of which individually accounts for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of our purchases .\nthese suppliers consist generally of large corporations selling brand name and private label merchandise , as well as independent regional brand and private label processors and packers .\nwe also provide specialty and seasonal products from small to mid-sized producers to meet a growing demand for locally sourced products .\nour locally sourced products , including produce , meats , cheese and other products , help differentiate our customers 2019 offerings , satisfy demands for new products , and support local communities .\npurchasing is generally carried out through both centrally developed purchasing programs , domestically and internationally , and direct purchasing programs established by our various operating companies .\nwe administer a consolidated product procurement program designed to develop , obtain and ensure consistent quality food and non-food products .\nthe program covers the purchasing and marketing of branded merchandise , as well as products from a number of national brand suppliers , encompassing substantially all product lines .\nsome of our products are purchased internationally within global procurement centers in order to build strategic relationships with international suppliers and to optimize our supply chain network .\nsysco 2019s operating companies purchase product from the suppliers participating in these consolidated programs and from other suppliers , although sysco brand products are only available to the operating companies through these consolidated programs .\nwe also focus on increasing profitability by lowering operating costs and by lowering aggregate inventory levels , which reduces future facility expansion needs at our broadline operating companies , while providing greater value to our suppliers and customers .\nworking capital practices our growth is funded through a combination of cash flow from operations , commercial paper issuances and long-term borrowings .\nsee the discussion in item 7 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations - liquidity and capital resources 201d regarding our liquidity , financial position and sources and uses of funds .\nwe extend credit terms to our customers that can vary from cash on delivery to 30 days or more based on our assessment of each customer 2019s credit worthiness .\nwe monitor each customer 2019s account and will suspend shipments if necessary .\na majority of our sales orders are filled within 24 hours of when customer orders are placed .\nwe generally maintain inventory on hand to be able to meet customer demand .\nthe level of inventory on hand will vary by product depending on shelf-life , supplier order fulfillment lead times and customer demand .\nwe also make purchases of additional volumes of certain products based on supply or pricing opportunities .\nwe take advantage of suppliers 2019 cash discounts where appropriate and otherwise generally receive payment terms from our suppliers ranging from weekly to 45 days or more .\ncorporate headquarters and shared services center our corporate staff makes available a number of services to our operating companies and our shared services center performs support services for employees , suppliers and customers .\nmembers of these groups possess experience and expertise in , among other areas , customer and vendor contract administration , accounting and finance , treasury , legal , information technology , payroll and employee benefits , risk management and insurance , sales and marketing , merchandising , inbound logistics , human resources , strategy and tax compliance services .\nthe corporate office also makes available supply chain expertise , such as in warehousing and distribution services , which provide assistance in operational best practices , including space utilization , energy conservation , fleet management and work flow. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "62%", "61%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01"}
{"example_id": "FIS/2007/page_94.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year are due in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\ncompany has a contingent liability relating to proper disposition of these balances , which amounted to $ 1926.8 mil- lion at december 31 , 2007 .\nas a result of holding these customers 2019 assets in escrow , the company has ongoing programs for realizing economic benefits during the year through favorable borrowing and vendor arrangements with various banks .\nthere were no loans outstanding as of december 31 , 2007 and these balances were invested in short term , high grade investments that minimize the risk to principal .\nleases the company leases certain of its property under leases which expire at various dates .\nseveral of these agreements include escalation clauses and provide for purchases and renewal options for periods ranging from one to five years .\nfuture minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2012 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2008\t83382\n2009\t63060\n2010\t35269\n2011\t21598\n2012\t14860\nthereafter\t30869\ntotal\t$ 249038\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.0 million per year which renew on a short-term basis .\nrent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 was $ 106.4 million , $ 81.5 million and $ 61.1 million , respectively .\ndata processing and maintenance services agreements .\nthe company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2008 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions .\nthe company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 888.3 million as of december 31 , 2007 .\nhowever , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs .\n( 17 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan prior to the certegy merger ( note 6 ) , fis employees participated in the fidelity national financial , inc .\nemployee stock purchase plan ( espp ) .\nsubsequent to the certegy merger , the company instituted its own plan with the same terms as the fidelity national financial , inc .\nplan .\nunder the terms of both plans and subsequent amendments , eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fnf 2019s ( prior to the certegy merger ) or fis 2019s ( post certegy merger ) common stock through payroll deductions .\npursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions .\nshares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions .\nthe company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp .\nthe company recorded an expense of $ 15.2 million , $ 13.1 million and $ 11.1 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp .\nfidelity national information services , inc .\nand subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "63060", "249038", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.25321"}
{"example_id": "AON/2009/page_46.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average segment revenue , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nrisk and insurance brokerage services .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31,\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsegment revenue\t$ 6305\t$ 6197\t$ 5918\nsegment operating income\t900\t846\t954\nsegment operating income margin\t14.3% ( 14.3 % )\t13.7% ( 13.7 % )\t16.1% ( 16.1 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 we continued to see a soft market , which began in 2007 , in our retail brokerage product line .\nin 2007 , we experienced a soft market in many business lines and in many geographic areas .\nin a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity .\nchanges in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds .\nprices fell throughout 2007 , with the greatest declines seen in large and middle-market accounts .\nprices continued to decline during 2008 , although the rate of decline slowed toward the end of the year .\nin our reinsurance brokerage product line , pricing overall during 2009 was also down , although during a portion of the year it was flat to up slightly .\nadditionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing throughout 2009 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets .\ncontinued volatility and further deterioration in the credit markets have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our retail brokerage and reinsurance brokerage products , which have negatively hurt our operational results .\nin addition , overall capacity in the industry could decrease if a significant insurer either fails or withdraws from writing insurance coverages that we offer our clients .\nthis failure could reduce our revenues and profitability , since we would no longer have access to certain lines and types of insurance .\nrisk and insurance brokerage services generated approximately 83% ( 83 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2009 .\nrevenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients .\nour revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates .\nwe operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage .\nspecifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , healthcare providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability income , and personal lines for individuals , associations , and businesses ; provide reinsurance services to insurance and reinsurance companies and other risk assumption entities by acting as brokers or intermediaries on all classes of reinsurance ; provide investment banking products and services , including mergers and acquisitions and other financial advisory services , capital raising , contingent capital financing , insurance-linked securitizations and derivative applications ; provide managing underwriting to independent agents and brokers as well as corporate clients ; provide actuarial , loss prevention , and administrative services to businesses and consumers ; and manage captive insurance companies .\nin november 2008 we expanded our product offerings through the merger with benfield , a leading independent reinsurance intermediary .\nbenfield products have been integrated with our existing reinsurance products in 2009 .\nin february 2009 , we completed the sale of the u.s .\noperations of cananwill , our premium finance business .\nin june and july of 2009 , we entered into agreements with third parties with respect to our .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "segment revenue", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "6140"}
{"example_id": "TROW/2010/page_22.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of tangible book value at december 31 , 2010 is due to cash and cash equivalents and mutual fund investment holdings?\n\nPre-table text:\ninvestment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 44 million , or 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , to $ 477.8 million in 2009 .\naverage assets in these portfolios were $ 129.5 billion during 2009 , down $ 12.6 billion or 9% ( 9 % ) from 2008 .\nother investment portfolio assets under management increased $ 46.7 billion during 2009 , including $ 36.5 billion in market gains and income and $ 10.2 billion of net inflows , primarily from institutional investors .\nnet inflows include $ 1.3 billion transferred from the stock and blended asset mutual funds during 2009 .\nadministrative fees decreased $ 35 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 319 million in 2009 .\nthis change includes a $ 4 million decrease in 12b-1 distribution and service fees recognized on lower average assets under management in the advisor and r classes of our sponsored mutual funds and a $ 31 million reduction in our mutual fund servicing revenue , which is primarily attributable to our cost reduction efforts in the mutual fund and retirement plan servicing functions .\nchanges in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors .\nour largest expense , compensation and related costs , decreased $ 42 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , from 2008 to $ 773 million in 2009 .\nthe largest part of this decrease is attributable to a $ 19 million reduction in our annual bonus program .\nreductions in the use of outside contractors lowered 2009 costs $ 14 million with the remainder of the cost savings primarily attributable to the workforce reduction and lower employee benefits and other employment expenses .\naverage headcount in 2009 was down 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) from 2008 due to attrition , retirements and our workforce reduction in april 2009 .\nadvertising and promotion expenditures were down $ 31 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) , versus 2008 due to our decision to reduce spending in response to lower investor activity in the 2009 market environment .\ndepreciation expense and other occupancy and facility costs together increased $ 4 million , or 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) compared to 2008 , as we moderated or delayed our capital spending and facility growth plans .\nother operating expenses decreased $ 33 million , or 18% ( 18 % ) from 2008 , including a decline of $ 4 million in distribution and service expenses recognized on lower average assets under management in our advisor and r classes of mutual fund shares that are sourced from financial intermediaries .\nour cost control efforts resulted in the remaining expense reductions , including lower professional fees and travel and related costs .\nour non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 .\nthe improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 .\nthe following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the two years ended december 31 , 2009. .\n\nTable:\n\t2008\t2009\tchange\nother than temporary impairments recognized\t$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )\t$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )\t$ 55.2\ncapital gain distributions received\t5.6\t2.0\t-3.6 ( 3.6 )\nnet gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions\t-4.5 ( 4.5 )\t7.4\t11.9\nnet loss recognized on fund holdings\t$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )\t$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )\t$ 63.5\n\nPost-table text:\nlower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments .\nthe 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 .\nour 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) .\nc a p i t a l r e s o u r c e s a n d l i q u i d i t y .\nduring 2010 , stockholders 2019 equity increased from $ 2.9 billion to $ 3.3 billion .\nwe repurchased nearly 5.0 million common shares for $ 240.0 million in 2010 .\ntangible book value is $ 2.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 , and our cash and cash equivalents and our mutual fund investment holdings total more than $ 1.5 billion .\ngiven the availability of these financial resources , we do not maintain an available external source of liquidity .\nt .\nrowe price group annual report 2010 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.5", "2.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.57692"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_376.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average price per gwh for the variance in volume?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .\nresults of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\n2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .\nnet revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 540.2\nretail electric price\t36.0\nvolume/weather\t21.3\npurchased power capacity\t-24.6 ( 24.6 )\nother\t4.9\n2011 net revenue\t$ 577.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .\nusage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "21.3", "const_1000000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "721", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1386.93301"}
{"example_id": "VTR/2007/page_47.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nprior to the shares repurchased in 2007 , how many shares of common stock were outstanding?\n\nPre-table text:\nas of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record .\ndividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock .\non february 13 , 2008 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2008 dividend in the amount of $ 0.5125 per share , payable on march 28 , 2008 to stockholders of record on march 6 , 2008 .\nwe expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2008 .\nour board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis .\nbecause the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above .\nplease see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy .\nour stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan .\nsee 201cnote 16 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k .\ndirector and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation .\nstock repurchases the table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 : number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per .\n\nTable:\n\tnumber of shares repurchased ( 1 )\taverage price per share\noctober 1 through october 31\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1 through november 30\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1 through december 31\t14669\t$ 43.89\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "138311810", "14669", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "138326479"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2016/page_119.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the interest from 2017 to 2025 as a percentage of the total long-term borrowings?\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 239 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2015 .\nthe fair value of the company 2019s interest reflected the pennymac stock price at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ( a level 1 input ) .\nthe company performed an other-than- temporary impairment analysis as of december 31 , 2016 and determined the decline in fair value below the carrying value to be temporary .\n12 .\nborrowings short-term borrowings 2016 revolving credit facility .\nthe company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2016 to extend the maturity date to march 2021 ( the 201c2016 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2016 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2016 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2016 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2016 .\nthe 2016 credit facility provides back-up liquidity to fund ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2016 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2016 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\nthe company can issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 4.0 billion .\nthe commercial paper program is currently supported by the 2016 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2016 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices and foreign exchange rates at december 31 , 2016 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount and debt issuance costs carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturityamount\tunamortized discount and debt issuance costs\tcarrying value\tfair value\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t$ 700\t$ 2014\t$ 700\t$ 724\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1086\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t808\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t775\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-6 ( 6 )\t994\t1030\n1.25% ( 1.25 % ) notes due 2025\t738\t-6 ( 6 )\t732\t742\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4938\t$ -23 ( 23 )\t$ 4915\t$ 5165\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2015 had a carrying value of $ 4.9 billion and a fair value of $ 5.2 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2025 notes .\nin may 2015 , the company issued 20ac700 million of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) senior unsecured notes maturing on may 6 , 2025 ( the 201c2025 notes 201d ) .\nthe notes are listed on the new york stock exchange .\nthe net proceeds of the 2025 notes were used for general corporate purposes , including refinancing of outstanding indebtedness .\ninterest of approximately $ 9 million per year based on current exchange rates is payable annually on may 6 of each year .\nthe 2025 notes may be redeemed in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2025 notes .\nupon conversion to u.s .\ndollars the company designated the 20ac700 million debt offering as a net investment hedge to offset its currency exposure relating to its net investment in certain euro functional currency operations .\ngains of $ 14 million ( net of tax of $ 8 million ) and $ 19 million ( net of tax of $ 11 million ) were recognized in other comprehensive income for 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nno hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during 2016 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake- whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "9", "9", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4938", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0164"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2016/page_119.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the notes due 2021 as a percentage of total long-term borrowings?\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 239 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2015 .\nthe fair value of the company 2019s interest reflected the pennymac stock price at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ( a level 1 input ) .\nthe company performed an other-than- temporary impairment analysis as of december 31 , 2016 and determined the decline in fair value below the carrying value to be temporary .\n12 .\nborrowings short-term borrowings 2016 revolving credit facility .\nthe company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2016 to extend the maturity date to march 2021 ( the 201c2016 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2016 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2016 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2016 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2016 .\nthe 2016 credit facility provides back-up liquidity to fund ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2016 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2016 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\nthe company can issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 4.0 billion .\nthe commercial paper program is currently supported by the 2016 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2016 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices and foreign exchange rates at december 31 , 2016 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount and debt issuance costs carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturityamount\tunamortized discount and debt issuance costs\tcarrying value\tfair value\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t$ 700\t$ 2014\t$ 700\t$ 724\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1086\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t808\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t775\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-6 ( 6 )\t994\t1030\n1.25% ( 1.25 % ) notes due 2025\t738\t-6 ( 6 )\t732\t742\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4938\t$ -23 ( 23 )\t$ 4915\t$ 5165\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2015 had a carrying value of $ 4.9 billion and a fair value of $ 5.2 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2025 notes .\nin may 2015 , the company issued 20ac700 million of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) senior unsecured notes maturing on may 6 , 2025 ( the 201c2025 notes 201d ) .\nthe notes are listed on the new york stock exchange .\nthe net proceeds of the 2025 notes were used for general corporate purposes , including refinancing of outstanding indebtedness .\ninterest of approximately $ 9 million per year based on current exchange rates is payable annually on may 6 of each year .\nthe 2025 notes may be redeemed in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2025 notes .\nupon conversion to u.s .\ndollars the company designated the 20ac700 million debt offering as a net investment hedge to offset its currency exposure relating to its net investment in certain euro functional currency operations .\ngains of $ 14 million ( net of tax of $ 8 million ) and $ 19 million ( net of tax of $ 11 million ) were recognized in other comprehensive income for 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nno hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during 2016 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake- whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "750", "4938", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15188"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2004/page_81.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the decrease in the other intangible assets net from 2003 to 2004\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\namerican tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar .\nthe company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit .\nthe fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal .\nnetwork development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies .\nthe company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 .\nthe company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units .\nsuch charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded .\nas discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively .\nrental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired .\nthe company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2004\t2003\nacquired customer base and network location intangibles\t$ 1369607\t$ 1299521\ndeferred financing costs\t89736\t111484\nacquired licenses and other intangibles\t43404\t43125\ntotal\t1502747\t1454130\nless accumulated amortization\t-517444 ( 517444 )\t-434381 ( 434381 )\nother intangible assets net\t$ 985303\t$ 1019749\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years .\namortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) .\nthe company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively .\n5 .\nnotes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a .\nde c.v .\n( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million .\nthe loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) .\nthe loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) .\nas of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .\nthe term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "985303", "1019749", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1019749", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03378"}
{"example_id": "BLL/2007/page_35.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nfor q4 2007 , what was the total amount spent on share repurchases?\n\nPre-table text:\npage 19 of 94 responded to the request for information pursuant to section 104 ( e ) of cercla .\nthe usepa has initially estimated cleanup costs to be between $ 4 million and $ 5 million .\nbased on the information available to the company at the present time , the company does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect upon the liquidity , results of operations or financial condition of the company .\neurope in january 2003 the german government passed legislation that imposed a mandatory deposit of 25 eurocents on all one-way packages containing beverages except milk , wine , fruit juices and certain alcoholic beverages .\nball packaging europe gmbh ( bpe ) , together with certain other plaintiffs , contested the enactment of the mandatory deposit for non-returnable containers based on the german packaging regulation ( verpackungsverordnung ) in federal and state administrative court .\nall other proceedings have been terminated except for the determination of minimal court fees that are still outstanding in some cases , together with minimal ancillary legal fees .\nthe relevant industries , including bpe and its competitors , have successfully set up a germany-wide return system for one-way beverage containers , which has been operational since may 1 , 2006 , the date required under the deposit legislation .\nitem 4 .\nsubmission of matters to a vote of security holders there were no matters submitted to the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007 .\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for the registrant 2019s common stock and related stockholder matters ball corporation common stock ( bll ) is traded on the new york stock exchange and the chicago stock exchange .\nthere were 5424 common shareholders of record on february 3 , 2008 .\ncommon stock repurchases the following table summarizes the company 2019s repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 .\npurchases of securities total number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased ( a )\taverage pricepaid per share\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b )\noctober 1 to october 28 2007\t705292\t$ 53.53\t705292\t4904824\noctober 29 to november 25 2007\t431170\t$ 48.11\t431170\t4473654\nnovember 26 to december 31 2007\t8310 ( c )\t$ 44.99\t8310\t4465344\ntotal\t1144772\t$ 51.42\t1144772\t\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes open market purchases and/or shares retained by the company to settle employee withholding tax liabilities .\n( b ) the company has an ongoing repurchase program for which shares are authorized for repurchase from time to time by ball 2019s board of directors .\non january 23 , 2008 , ball's board of directors authorized the repurchase by the company of up to a total of 12 million shares of its common stock .\nthis repurchase authorization replaces all previous authorizations .\n( c ) does not include 675000 shares under a forward share repurchase agreement entered into in december 2007 and settled on january 7 , 2008 , for approximately $ 31 million .\nalso does not include shares to be acquired in 2008 under an accelerated share repurchase program entered into in december 2007 and funded on january 7 , 2008. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1144772", "51.42", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "58864176.24"}
{"example_id": "TFX/2015/page_70.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total value of the issued options , warrants and rights , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\npart iii item 10 .\ndirectors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .\nfor the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .\nof this report .\nitem 11 .\nexecutive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 12 .\nsecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights\tnumber of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t1442912\t$ 86.98\t4446967\n\nPost-table text:\npart iii item 10 .\ndirectors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .\nfor the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .\nof this report .\nitem 11 .\nexecutive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 12 .\nsecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1442912", "86.98", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "125.50449"}
{"example_id": "ADI/2011/page_50.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2010 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .\nthe effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .\nin addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .\nif libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .\nhowever , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .\nas of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .\nforeign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .\ndollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .\nthe terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .\ncurrently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .\nrelative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .\nthe market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .\nthe counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .\nbased on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .\nwhile the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .\nthe amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .\nthe following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .\ndollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .\n\nTable:\n\toctober 29 2011\toctober 30 2010\nfair value of forward exchange contracts asset\t$ 2472\t$ 7256\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset\t$ 17859\t$ 22062\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability\t$ -13332 ( 13332 )\t$ -7396 ( 7396 )\n\nPost-table text:\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 17859 $ 22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ ( 13332 ) $ ( 7396 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .\ndollar .\nin addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .\nour sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2472", "7256", ")", "divide(", "#0", "7256", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.65932"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2010/page_42.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the net change in cash in 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\n( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\t2010\t2009\t2008\nnet cash provided by operating activities\t$ 3547\t$ 3173\t$ 4421\nnet cash used for investing activities\t-319 ( 319 )\t-1518 ( 1518 )\t-907 ( 907 )\nnet cash used for financing activities\t-3363 ( 3363 )\t-1476 ( 1476 )\t-3938 ( 3938 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities net cash provided by operating activities increased by $ 374 million to $ 3547 million in 2010 as compared to 2009 .\nthe increase primarily was attributable to an improvement in our operating working capital balances of $ 570 million as discussed below , and $ 187 million related to lower net income tax payments , as compared to 2009 .\npartially offsetting these improvements was a net reduction in cash from operations of $ 350 million related to our defined benefit pension plan .\nthis reduction was the result of increased contributions to the pension trust of $ 758 million as compared to 2009 , partially offset by an increase in the cas costs recovered on our contracts .\noperating working capital accounts consists of receivables , inventories , accounts payable , and customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred .\nthe improvement in cash provided by operating working capital was due to a decline in 2010 accounts receivable balances compared to 2009 , and an increase in 2010 customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred balances compared to 2009 .\nthese improvements partially were offset by a decline in accounts payable balances in 2010 compared to 2009 .\nthe decline in accounts receivable primarily was due to higher collections on various programs at electronic systems , is&gs , and space systems business areas .\nthe increase in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred primarily was attributable to an increase on government and commercial satellite programs at space systems and air mobility programs at aeronautics , partially offset by a decrease on various programs at electronic systems .\nthe decrease in accounts payable was attributable to the timing of accounts payable activities across all segments .\nnet cash provided by operating activities decreased by $ 1248 million to $ 3173 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 .\nthe decline primarily was attributable to an increase in our contributions to the defined benefit pension plan of $ 1373 million as compared to 2008 and an increase in our operating working capital accounts of $ 147 million .\npartially offsetting these items was the impact of lower net income tax payments in 2009 as compared to 2008 in the amount of $ 319 million .\nthe decline in cash provided by operating working capital primarily was due to growth of receivables on various programs in the ms2 and gt&l lines of business at electronic systems and an increase in inventories on combat aircraft programs at aeronautics , which partially were offset by increases in customer advances and amounts in excess of costs incurred on government satellite programs at space systems and the timing of accounts payable activities .\ninvesting activities capital expenditures 2013 the majority of our capital expenditures relate to facilities infrastructure and equipment that are incurred to support new and existing programs across all of our business segments .\nwe also incur capital expenditures for it to support programs and general enterprise it infrastructure .\ncapital expenditures for property , plant and equipment amounted to $ 820 million in 2010 , $ 852 million in 2009 , and $ 926 million in 2008 .\nwe expect that our operating cash flows will continue to be sufficient to fund our annual capital expenditures over the next few years .\nacquisitions , divestitures and other activities 2013 acquisition activities include both the acquisition of businesses and investments in affiliates .\namounts paid in 2010 of $ 148 million primarily related to investments in affiliates .\nwe paid $ 435 million in 2009 for acquisition activities , compared with $ 233 million in 2008 .\nin 2010 , we received proceeds of $ 798 million from the sale of eig , net of $ 17 million in transaction costs ( see note 2 ) .\nthere were no material divestiture activities in 2009 and 2008 .\nduring 2010 , we increased our short-term investments by $ 171 million compared to an increase of $ 279 million in 2009 .\nfinancing activities share activity and dividends 2013 during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 , we repurchased 33.0 million , 24.9 million , and 29.0 million shares of our common stock for $ 2483 million , $ 1851 million , and $ 2931 million .\nof the shares we repurchased in 2010 , 0.9 million shares for $ 63 million were repurchased in december but settled and were paid for in january 2011 .\nin october 2010 , our board of directors approved a new share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , up to an authorized amount of $ 3.0 billion ( see note 12 ) .\nunder the program , we have discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .\nwe repurchased a total of 11.2 million shares under the program for $ 776 million , and as of december 31 , 2010 , there remained $ 2224 million available for additional share repurchases .\nin connection with their approval of the new share repurchase program , our board terminated our previous share repurchase program .\ncash received from the issuance of our common stock in connection with stock option exercises during 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 totaled $ 59 million , $ 40 million , and $ 250 million .\nthose activities resulted in the issuance of 1.4 million shares , 1.0 million shares , and 4.7 million shares during the respective periods. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "3547", "-319", ")", "add(", "#0", "-3363", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-135"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2007/page_147.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2007 what was the percent of the retained interest of the total principal amount of beneficial interests\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2007 annual report 145 subprime adjustable-rate mortgage loan modifications see the glossary of terms on page 183 of this annual report for the firm 2019s definition of subprime loans .\nwithin the confines of the limited decision-making abilities of a qspe under sfas 140 , the operating doc- uments that govern existing subprime securitizations generally authorize the servicer to modify loans for which default is reasonably foreseeable , provided that the modification is in the best interests of the qspe 2019s ben- eficial interest holders , and would not result in a remic violation .\nin december 2007 , the american securitization forum ( 201casf 201d ) issued the 201cstreamlined foreclosure and loss avoidance framework for securitized subprime adjustable rate mortgage loans 201d ( 201cthe framework 201d ) .\nthe framework provides guidance for servicers to stream- line evaluation procedures for borrowers with certain subprime adjustable rate mortgage ( 201carm 201d ) loans to more efficiently provide modifications of such loans with terms that are more appropriate for the individual needs of such borrowers .\nthe framework applies to all first-lien subprime arm loans that have a fixed rate of interest for an initial period of 36 months or less , are included in securitized pools , were originated between january 1 , 2005 , and july 31 , 2007 , and have an initial interest rate reset date between january 1 , 2008 , and july 31 , 2010 ( 201casf framework loans 201d ) .\nthe framework categorizes the population of asf framework loans into three segments .\nsegment 1 includes loans where the borrower is current and is likely to be able to refinance into any available mortgage product .\nsegment 2 includes loans where the borrower is current , is unlikely to be able to refinance into any readily available mortgage industry product and meets certain defined criteria .\nsegment 3 includes loans where the borrower is not current , as defined , and does not meet the criteria for segments 1 or 2 .\nasf framework loans in segment 2 of the framework are eligible for fast-track modification under which the interest rate will be kept at the existing initial rate , generally for five years following the interest rate reset date .\nthe framework indicates that for segment 2 loans , jpmorgan chase , as servicer , may presume that the borrower will be unable to make payments pursuant to the original terms of the borrower 2019s loan after the initial interest rate reset date .\nthus , the firm may presume that a default on that loan by the borrower is reasonably foreseeable unless the terms of the loan are modified .\njpmorgan chase has adopted the loss mitigation approaches under the framework for securitized sub- prime loans that meet the specific segment 2 screening criteria , and it expects to begin modifying segment 2 loans by the end of the first quar- ter of 2008 .\nthe firm believes that the adoption of the framework will not affect the off-balance sheet accounting treatment of jpmorgan chase-sponsored qspes that hold segment 2 subprime loans .\nthe total amount of assets owned by firm-sponsored qspes that hold asf framework loans ( including those loans that are not serviced by the firm ) as of december 31 , 2007 , was $ 20.0 billion .\nof this amount , $ 9.7 billion relates to asf framework loans serviced by the firm .\nbased on current economic conditions , the firm estimates that approximately 20% ( 20 % ) , 10% ( 10 % ) and 70% ( 70 % ) of the asf framework loans it services that are owned by firm-sponsored qspes will fall within segments 1 , 2 and 3 , respectively .\nthis estimate could change substantially as a result of unanticipated changes in housing values , economic conditions , investor/borrower behavior and other factors .\nthe total principal amount of beneficial interests issued by firm-spon- sored securitizations that hold asf framework loans as of december 31 , 2007 , was as follows. .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 2007 ( in millions )\t2007\nthird-party\t$ 19636\nretained interest\t412\ntotal\t$ 20048\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "412", "20048", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "20460"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_21.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the cash outflow for the repurchase of shares during october 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nrepurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share2\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs\noctober 1-31\t29704\t$ 5.99\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1-30\t4468\t$ 3.24\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1-31\t12850\t$ 3.98\t2014\t2014\ntotal1\t47022\t$ 5.18\t2014\t2014\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal1 .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .\n2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "29704", "5.99", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "177926.96"}
{"example_id": "GS/2016/page_77.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\noperating expenses were what multiple of pre-tax earnings in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe goldman sachs group , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis net revenues in equities were $ 7.83 billion for 2015 , 16% ( 16 % ) higher than 2014 .\nexcluding a gain of $ 121 million ( $ 30 million and $ 91 million included in equities client execution and securities services , respectively ) in 2014 related to the extinguishment of certain of our junior subordinated debt , net revenues in equities were 18% ( 18 % ) higher than 2014 , primarily due to significantly higher net revenues in equities client execution across the major regions , reflecting significantly higher results in both derivatives and cash products , and higher net revenues in securities services , reflecting the impact of higher average customer balances and improved securities lending spreads .\ncommissions and fees were essentially unchanged compared with 2014 .\nwe elect the fair value option for certain unsecured borrowings .\nthe fair value net gain attributable to the impact of changes in our credit spreads on these borrowings was $ 255 million ( $ 214 million and $ 41 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2015 , compared with a net gain of $ 144 million ( $ 108 million and $ 36 million related to fixed income , currency and commodities client execution and equities client execution , respectively ) for 2014 .\noperating expenses were $ 13.94 billion for 2015 , 28% ( 28 % ) higher than 2014 , due to significantly higher net provisions for mortgage-related litigation and regulatory matters , partially offset by decreased compensation and benefits expenses .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.21 billion in 2015 , 72% ( 72 % ) lower than 2014 .\ninvesting & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients .\nthese investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature .\nwe make investments , some of which are consolidated , directly and indirectly through funds that we manage , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities .\nwe also make unsecured loans to individuals through our online platform .\nthe table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .\n\nTable:\n$ in millions\tyear ended december 2016\tyear ended december 2015\tyear ended december 2014\nequity securities\t$ 2573\t$ 3781\t$ 4579\ndebt securities and loans\t1507\t1655\t2246\ntotal net revenues\t4080\t5436\t6825\noperating expenses\t2386\t2402\t2819\npre-tax earnings\t$ 1694\t$ 3034\t$ 4006\n\nPost-table text:\noperating environment .\nfollowing difficult market conditions and the impact of a challenging macroeconomic environment on corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions improved during the rest of the year as macroeconomic concerns moderated .\nglobal equity markets increased during 2016 , contributing to net gains from investments in public equities , and corporate performance rebounded from the difficult start to the year .\nif macroeconomic concerns negatively affect corporate performance or company-specific events , or if global equity markets decline , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted .\nalthough net revenues in investing & lending for 2015 benefited from favorable company-specific events , including sales , initial public offerings and financings , a decline in global equity prices and widening high-yield credit spreads during the second half of 2015 impacted results .\n2016 versus 2015 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to significantly lower net revenues from investments in equities , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were lower compared with 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges .\nlosses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 .\nthis decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income .\nsee note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities .\noperating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 .\npre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 .\n2015 versus 2014 .\nnet revenues in investing & lending were $ 5.44 billion for 2015 , 20% ( 20 % ) lower than 2014 .\nthis decrease was primarily due to lower net revenues from investments in equities , principally reflecting the sale of metro in the fourth quarter of 2014 and lower net gains from investments in private equities , driven by corporate performance .\nin addition , net revenues in debt securities and loans were significantly lower , reflecting lower net gains from investments .\ngoldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 63 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "13.94", "1.21", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "11.52066"}
{"example_id": "LMT/2006/page_90.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year are due in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 .\nin 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments .\nthe following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tpensionbenefits\totherbenefits\n2007\t$ 1440\t$ 260\n2008\t1490\t260\n2009\t1540\t270\n2010\t1600\t270\n2011\t1660\t270\nyears 2012 2013 2016\t9530\t1260\n\nPost-table text:\nas noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits .\nthe aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million .\nthe expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 .\nwe also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans .\nthe liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows .\nnote 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) .\ncertain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s .\ngovernment under short-term or cancelable arrangements .\nnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment .\nwe believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole .\nwe cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty .\nthese matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio .\nthe subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology .\nwe are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation .\non february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california .\nwe submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program .\nthe contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s .\nair force , as authorized by public law 85-804 .\non august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim .\nour appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals .\non august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel .\nnatural resources defense council , et al v .\nlockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel .\njohn d .\ntillson v .\nlockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al .\nthe doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1.1", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "288", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.26182"}
{"example_id": "MAS/2018/page_60.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the total current assets of kichler included in the acquisition price with the revised version?\n\nPre-table text:\nmasco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) c .\nacquisitions on march 9 , 2018 , we acquired substantially all of the net assets of the l.d .\nkichler co .\n( \"kichler\" ) , a leader in decorative residential and light commercial lighting products , ceiling fans and led lighting systems .\nthis business expands our product offerings to our customers .\nthe results of this acquisition for the period from the acquisition date are included in the consolidated financial statements and are reported in the decorative architectural products segment .\nwe recorded $ 346 million of net sales as a result of this acquisition during 2018 .\nthe purchase price , net of $ 2 million cash acquired , consisted of $ 549 million paid with cash on hand .\nsince the acquisition , we have revised the allocation of the purchase price to identifiable assets and liabilities based on analysis of information as of the acquisition date that has been made available through december 31 , 2018 .\nthe allocation will continue to be updated through the measurement period , if necessary .\nthe preliminary allocation of the fair value of the acquisition of kichler is summarized in the following table , in millions. .\n\nTable:\n\tinitial\trevised\nreceivables\t$ 101\t$ 100\ninventories\t173\t166\nprepaid expenses and other\t5\t5\nproperty and equipment\t33\t33\ngoodwill\t46\t64\nother intangible assets\t243\t240\naccounts payable\t-24 ( 24 )\t-24 ( 24 )\naccrued liabilities\t-25 ( 25 )\t-30 ( 30 )\nother liabilities\t-4 ( 4 )\t-5 ( 5 )\ntotal\t$ 548\t$ 549\n\nPost-table text:\nthe goodwill acquired , which is generally tax deductible , is related primarily to the operational and financial synergies we expect to derive from combining kichler's operations into our business , as well as the assembled workforce .\nthe other intangible assets acquired consist of $ 59 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets , which is related to trademarks , and $ 181 million of definite-lived intangible assets .\nthe definite-lived intangible assets consist of $ 145 million related to customer relationships , which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 20 years , and $ 36 million of other definite-lived intangible assets , which is being amortized over a weighted average amortization period of three years .\nin the fourth quarter of 2017 , we acquired mercury plastics , inc. , a plastics processor and manufacturer of water handling systems for appliance and faucet applications , for approximately $ 89 million in cash .\nthis business is included in the plumbing products segment .\nthis acquisition enhances our ability to develop faucet technology and provides continuity of supply of quality faucet components .\nin connection with this acquisition , we recognized $ 38 million of goodwill , which is tax deductible , and is related primarily to the expected synergies from combining the operations into our business. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "const_2", "100", ")", "add(", "#0", "166", ")", "add(", "#1", "5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "273"}
{"example_id": "MRO/2007/page_134.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nby how much did the expected annual dividends per share increase from 2005 to 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock-based awards under the plan stock options 2013 marathon grants stock options under the 2007 plan and previously granted options under the 2003 plan .\nmarathon 2019s stock options represent the right to purchase shares of common stock at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant .\nthrough 2004 , certain stock options were granted under the 2003 plan with a tandem stock appreciation right , which allows the recipient to instead elect to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock , as determined in accordance with the 2003 plan , over the option price of the shares .\nin general , stock options granted under the 2007 plan and the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock appreciation rights 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted sars under the 2003 plan .\nno stock appreciation rights have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nsimilar to stock options , stock appreciation rights represent the right to receive a payment equal to the excess of the fair market value of shares of common stock on the date the right is exercised over the grant price .\nunder the 2003 plan , certain sars were granted as stock-settled sars and others were granted in tandem with stock options .\nin general , sars granted under the 2003 plan vest ratably over a three-year period and have a maximum term of ten years from the date they are granted .\nstock-based performance awards 2013 prior to 2005 , marathon granted stock-based performance awards under the 2003 plan .\nno stock-based performance awards have been granted under the 2007 plan .\nbeginning in 2005 , marathon discontinued granting stock-based performance awards and instead now grants cash-settled performance units to officers .\nall stock-based performance awards granted under the 2003 plan have either vested or been forfeited .\nas a result , there are no outstanding stock-based performance awards .\nrestricted stock 2013 marathon grants restricted stock and restricted stock units under the 2007 plan and previously granted such awards under the 2003 plan .\nin 2005 , the compensation committee began granting time-based restricted stock to certain u.s.-based officers of marathon and its consolidated subsidiaries as part of their annual long-term incentive package .\nthe restricted stock awards to officers vest three years from the date of grant , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nmarathon also grants restricted stock to certain non-officer employees and restricted stock units to certain international employees ( 201crestricted stock awards 201d ) , based on their performance within certain guidelines and for retention purposes .\nthe restricted stock awards to non-officers generally vest in one-third increments over a three-year period , contingent on the recipient 2019s continued employment .\nprior to vesting , all restricted stock recipients have the right to vote such stock and receive dividends thereon .\nthe non-vested shares are not transferable and are held by marathon 2019s transfer agent .\ncommon stock units 2013 marathon maintains an equity compensation program for its non-employee directors under the 2007 plan and previously maintained such a program under the 2003 plan .\nall non-employee directors other than the chairman receive annual grants of common stock units , and they are required to hold those units until they leave the board of directors .\nwhen dividends are paid on marathon common stock , directors receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional common stock units .\nstock-based compensation expense 2013 total employee stock-based compensation expense was $ 80 million , $ 83 million and $ 111 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 .\nthe total related income tax benefits were $ 29 million , $ 31 million and $ 39 million .\nin 2007 and 2006 , cash received upon exercise of stock option awards was $ 27 million and $ 50 million .\ntax benefits realized for deductions during 2007 and 2006 that were in excess of the stock-based compensation expense recorded for options exercised and other stock-based awards vested during the period totaled $ 30 million and $ 36 million .\ncash settlements of stock option awards totaled $ 1 million and $ 3 million in 2007 and 2006 .\nstock option awards granted 2013 during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , marathon granted stock option awards to both officer and non-officer employees .\nthe weighted average grant date fair value of these awards was based on the following black-scholes assumptions: .\n\nTable:\n\t2007\t2006\t2005\nweighted average exercise price per share\t$ 60.94\t$ 37.84\t$ 25.14\nexpected annual dividends per share\t$ 0.96\t$ 0.80\t$ 0.66\nexpected life in years\t5.0\t5.1\t5.5\nexpected volatility\t27% ( 27 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\t28% ( 28 % )\nrisk-free interest rate\t4.1% ( 4.1 % )\t5.0% ( 5.0 % )\t3.8% ( 3.8 % )\nweighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted\t$ 17.24\t$ 10.19\t$ 6.15\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "0.96", "0.66", ")", "divide(", "#0", "0.66", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.45455"}
{"example_id": "PM/2017/page_99.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in weighted-average shares for diluted eps from 2015 to 2016 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .\nthis cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .\nduring the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .\npmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .\nearnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .\nbasic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2017\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2016\tfor the years ended december 31 , 2015\nnet earnings attributable to pmi\t$ 6035\t$ 6967\t$ 6873\nless distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards\t14\t19\t24\nnet earnings for basic and diluted eps\t$ 6021\t$ 6948\t$ 6849\nweighted-average shares for basic eps\t1552\t1551\t1549\nplus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )\t1\t2014\t2014\nweighted-average shares for diluted eps\t1553\t1551\t1549\n\nPost-table text:\nfor the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1551", "1549", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2"}
{"example_id": "JPM/2008/page_85.pdf-5", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2008 what was the percent of the total capital risk based capital components and assets that was tier 2 capital\n\nPre-table text:\njpmorgan chase & co .\n/ 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) .\ncredit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nunexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained .\nthe capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation .\ncredit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation .\nactual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard .\nstatistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate .\nmarket risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices .\ndaily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels .\nthe firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures .\nsee market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures .\noperational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis .\nthe operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts .\nthe firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework .\nprivate equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations .\nin addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk .\nthe capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions .\nregulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company .\nthe office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a .\nthe federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired .\nthe amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 .\nthe occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a .\nsimilar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements .\njpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below .\nfor more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report .\nrisk-based capital components and assets .\n\nTable:\ndecember 31 ( in millions )\t2008\t2007\ntotal tier 1capital ( a )\t$ 136104\t$ 88746\ntotal tier 2 capital\t48616\t43496\ntotal capital\t$ 184720\t$ 132242\nrisk-weighted assets\t$ 1244659\t$ 1051879\ntotal adjusted average assets\t1966895\t1473541\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies .\nbased on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points .\nthe ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "48616", "184720", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.26319"}
{"example_id": "TFX/2015/page_70.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total value of the options , warrants and rights that remain available for future issuance , ( in millions ) ?\n\nPre-table text:\npart iii item 10 .\ndirectors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .\nfor the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .\nof this report .\nitem 11 .\nexecutive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 12 .\nsecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights\tnumber of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t1442912\t$ 86.98\t4446967\n\nPost-table text:\npart iii item 10 .\ndirectors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .\nfor the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .\nof this report .\nitem 11 .\nexecutive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 12 .\nsecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "4446967", "86.98", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_1000000", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "386.79719"}
{"example_id": "AWK/2013/page_132.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased on the information provided what is the ratio of the post retirement benefit obligation to the service and interest one-point percentage increase\n\nPre-table text:\ncoupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds .\nthe yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) .\nhistorically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments .\nthe expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios .\nassumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes .\nbased on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets .\nthe company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases .\nassumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans .\nthe health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions .\na one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .\n\nTable:\n\tone-percentage-pointincrease\tone-percentage-pointdecrease\neffect on total of service and interest cost components\t$ 7367\t$ -5974 ( 5974 )\neffect on other postretirement benefit obligation\t$ 72238\t$ -60261 ( 60261 )\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "72238", "7367", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "9.80562"}
{"example_id": "HWM/2017/page_41.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the second quarter of 2017 , what is the average sale price per share of the company 2019s common stock?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .\nthe company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange .\nprior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) .\nas a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share .\nthe reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares .\nthe company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 .\non november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation .\nthe separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders .\nthe company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date .\nthe company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation .\nsee disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k .\nthe following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 .\nthe prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc .\nprior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. .\n\nTable:\nquarter\t2017 high\t2017 low\t2017 dividend\t2017 high\t2017 low\tdividend\nfirst\t$ 30.69\t$ 18.64\t$ 0.06\t$ 30.66\t$ 18.42\t$ 0.09\nsecond\t28.65\t21.76\t0.06\t34.50\t26.34\t0.09\nthird\t26.84\t22.67\t0.06\t32.91\t27.09\t0.09\nfourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )\t27.85\t22.74\t0.06\t32.10\t16.75\t0.09\nyear\t$ 30.69\t$ 18.64\t$ 0.24\t$ 34.50\t$ 16.75\t$ 0.36\n\nPost-table text:\nthe number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "28.65", "21.76", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "25.205"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_75.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases and purchase obligations were due to lease obligations for the year of 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nsettlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments .\nwhile the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision .\nthe provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s .\nfederal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\ninternational paper has non-u.s .\nnet operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million .\ninterna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million .\ninternational paper also has federal , non-u.s .\nand state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million .\nfurther , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million .\ndeferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .\nsubsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested .\ncomputation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable .\nnote 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments .\nunconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) .\nat december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2008\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 136\t$ 116\t$ 101\t$ 84\t$ 67\t$ 92\npurchase obligations ( a )\t1953\t294\t261\t235\t212\t1480\ntotal\t$ 2089\t$ 410\t$ 362\t$ 319\t$ 279\t$ 1572\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales .\nrent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\ninternational paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer .\nin the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations .\nthe company has no future obligations under this agreement. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "136", "2089", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0651"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_31.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of industrial packaging sales where represented by european industrial packaging net sales in 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\ntissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia .\naverage sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp .\noperating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 .\nthe benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly .\nhowever , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages .\nindustrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix .\nindustrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings .\nbene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) .\nin addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard .\nthe segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related .\nindustrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2007\t2006\t2005\nsales\t$ 5245\t$ 4925\t$ 4625\noperating profit\t$ 501\t$ 399\t$ 219\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 .\ncontainerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 .\nmargins improved reflecting stronger export demand .\nmanu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages .\nraw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly .\noperating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine .\nu.s .\nconverting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand .\nearnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 .\nfavorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs .\nlooking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 .\nhowever , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy .\nmanufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter .\neuropean industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .\nsales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 .\nsales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes .\nconversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues .\nprofit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "const_1", "const_1000", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4925", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.20305"}
{"example_id": "AMAT/2014/page_18.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in sales from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nbacklog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .\nbacklog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .\nbacklog by reportable segment as of october 26 , 2014 and october 27 , 2013 was as follows : 2014 2013 ( in millions , except percentages ) .\n\nTable:\n\t2014\t2013\t\t( in millions except percentages )\nsilicon systems group\t$ 1400\t48% ( 48 % )\t$ 1295\t55% ( 55 % )\napplied global services\t775\t27% ( 27 % )\t591\t25% ( 25 % )\ndisplay\t593\t20% ( 20 % )\t361\t15% ( 15 % )\nenergy and environmental solutions\t149\t5% ( 5 % )\t125\t5% ( 5 % )\ntotal\t$ 2917\t100% ( 100 % )\t$ 2372\t100% ( 100 % )\n\nPost-table text:\napplied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of orders .\ncustomers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .\ndelays in delivery schedules and/or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .\nmanufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies ( collectively , parts ) that are used to manufacture systems .\napplied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including the united states , europe , israel , singapore , taiwan , and other countries in asia , and assembly of some systems is completed at customer sites .\napplied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products .\nalthough applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .\naccordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .\napplied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by : ( 1 ) selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; ( 2 ) monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; ( 3 ) maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; ( 4 ) qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ( 5 ) locating certain manufacturing operations in close proximity to suppliers and customers .\nresearch , development and engineering applied 2019s long-term growth strategy requires continued development of new products , including products that enable expansion into new markets .\nthe company 2019s significant investment in research , development and engineering ( rd&e ) has generally enabled it to deliver new products and technologies before the emergence of strong demand , thus allowing customers to incorporate these products into their manufacturing plans at an early stage in the technology selection cycle .\napplied works closely with its global customers to design systems and processes that meet their planned technical and production requirements .\nproduct development and engineering organizations are located primarily in the united states , as well as in europe , israel , taiwan , and china .\nin addition , applied outsources certain rd&e activities , some of which are performed outside the united states , primarily in india and singapore .\nprocess support and customer demonstration laboratories are located in the united states , china , taiwan , europe , and israel .\napplied 2019s investments in rd&e for product development and engineering programs to create or improve products and technologies over the last three years were as follows : $ 1.4 billion ( 16 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2014 , $ 1.3 billion ( 18 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2013 , and $ 1.2 billion ( 14 percent of net sales ) in fiscal 2012 .\napplied has spent an average of 13 percent of net sales in rd&e over the last five years .\nin addition to rd&e for specific product technologies , applied maintains ongoing programs for automation control systems , materials research , and environmental control that are applicable to its products. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.4", "16", ")", "divide(", "1.3", "18", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "#1", ")", "divide(", "#2", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21154"}
{"example_id": "AMT/2010/page_34.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2010 and the closing price on february 11 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\npart ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .\n\nTable:\n2010\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 44.61\t$ 40.10\nquarter ended june 30\t45.33\t38.86\nquarter ended september 30\t52.11\t43.70\nquarter ended december 31\t53.14\t49.61\n2009\thigh\tlow\nquarter ended march 31\t$ 32.53\t$ 25.45\nquarter ended june 30\t34.52\t27.93\nquarter ended september 30\t37.71\t29.89\nquarter ended december 31\t43.84\t35.03\n\nPost-table text:\non february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse .\nas of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders .\ndividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock .\npayment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status .\nin addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .\nfor more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "56.73", "53.14", ")", "divide(", "#0", "53.14", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.06756"}
{"example_id": "JKHY/2014/page_30.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the cumulative total return on the s & p 500 for the five year period?\n\nPre-table text:\n28 2014 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2014 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s & p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .\n\nTable:\n\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\t2013\t2014\njkhy\t100.00\t116.85\t148.92\t173.67\t240.25\t307.57\nold peer group\t100.00\t112.45\t150.77\t176.12\t220.42\t275.73\nnew peer group\t100.00\t115.50\t159.31\t171.86\t198.72\t273.95\ns & p 500\t100.00\t114.43\t149.55\t157.70\t190.18\t236.98\n\nPost-table text:\nthis comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2009 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .\ntotal returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .\npeer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .\nin fiscal 2014 , we changed our peer group of companies used for this analysis to maintain alignment with peer companies selected by our compensation committee for use in determining compensation for executive management .\ncompanies in the new peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , micros systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. .\ncompanies in the old peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , cerner corp. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , sei investments company , telecommunications systems , inc. , and tyler technologies corp. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "236.98", "100.00", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "136.98"}
{"example_id": "AAPL/2004/page_36.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the greatest gross margin in millions for the three year period?\n\nPre-table text:\nnet sales of the retail segment grew to $ 1.185 billion during 2004 from $ 621 million and $ 283 million , in 2003 and 2002 , respectively .\nthe increases in net sales during both 2004 and 2003 reflect the impact of new store openings for each fiscal year , including the opening of 21 new stores in 2004 and 25 new stores in 2003 .\nan increase in average revenue per store also contributed to the segment 2019s strong sales in fiscal 2004 .\nwith an average of 76 stores open during 2004 , the retail segment achieved annualized revenue per store of approximately $ 15.6 million , as compared to $ 11.5 million in 2003 with a 54 store average and $ 10.2 million in 2002 with a 28 store average .\nas measured by the company 2019s operating segment reporting , the retail segment reported profit of $ 39 million during fiscal 2004 as compared to losses of $ 5 million and $ 22 million during 2003 and 2002 , respectively .\nthis improvement is primarily attributable to the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in average quarterly revenue per store , the impact of opening new stores , and the segment 2019s year-over-year increase in net sales , which resulted in higher leverage on occupancy , depreciation and other fixed costs .\nexpansion of the retail segment has required and will continue to require a substantial investment in fixed assets and related infrastructure , operating lease commitments , personnel , and other operating expenses .\ncapital expenditures associated with the retail segment were $ 104 million in fiscal 2004 , bringing the total capital expenditures since inception of the retail segment to approximately $ 394 million .\nas of september 25 , 2004 , the retail segment had approximately 2100 employees and had outstanding operating lease commitments associated with retail store space and related facilities of approximately $ 436 million .\nthe company would incur substantial costs should it choose to terminate its retail segment or close individual stores .\nsuch costs could adversely affect the company 2019s results of operations and financial condition .\ngross margin gross margin for the three fiscal years ended september 25 , 2004 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .\n\nTable:\n\t2004\t2003\t2002\nnet sales\t$ 8279\t$ 6207\t$ 5742\ncost of sales\t6020\t4499\t4139\ngross margin\t$ 2259\t$ 1708\t$ 1603\ngross margin percentage\t27.3% ( 27.3 % )\t27.5% ( 27.5 % )\t27.9% ( 27.9 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ngross margin declined in fiscal 2004 to 27.3% ( 27.3 % ) of net sales from 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) of net sales in 2003 .\nthe company 2019s gross margin during fiscal 2004 declined due to an increase in mix towards lower margin ipod and ibook sales , pricing actions on certain power macintosh g5 models that were transitioned during the beginning of 2004 , higher warranty costs on certain portable macintosh products , and higher freight and duty costs during fiscal 2004 .\nthese unfavorable factors were partially offset by an increase in direct sales and a 39% ( 39 % ) year-over-year increase in higher margin software sales .\nthe company anticipates that its gross margin and the gross margin of the overall personal computer and consumer electronics industries will remain under pressure throughout fiscal 2005 in light of price competition , especially for the ipod product line .\nthe company also expects to continue to incur air freight charges , which negatively impact gross margins on the imac and other products during the first quarter of 2005 and possibly beyond .\nthe foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin during 2005 , general demand for personal computers , anticipated air freight charges , and future economic conditions are forward- looking .\nthere can be no assurance that current gross margins will be maintained or targeted gross margin levels will be achieved .\nin general , gross margins and margins on individual products , including ipods , will remain under significant downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_max(", "gross margin", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2259"}
{"example_id": "PNC/2009/page_41.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total commercial mortgages were at fair value?\n\nPre-table text:\ndecember 31 , 2009 , $ 397 million of the credit losses related to securities rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities totaled $ 1.1 billion and the related securities had a fair value of $ 2.6 billion .\nthe fair value of sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti credit loss as of december 31 , 2009 totaled $ 2.6 billion , with unrealized net losses of $ 658 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\ncommercial mortgage-backed securities the fair value of the non-agency commercial mortgage- backed securities portfolio was $ 6.1 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized by non-residential properties , primarily retail properties , office buildings , and multi-family housing .\nthe agency commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolio was $ 1.3 billion fair value at december 31 , 2009 consisting of multi-family housing .\nsubstantially all of the securities are the most senior tranches in the subordination structure .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 6 million on non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities during 2009 .\nthe remaining fair value of the securities for which otti was recorded approximates zero .\nall of the credit-impaired securities were rated below investment grade .\nasset-backed securities the fair value of the asset-backed securities portfolio was $ 4.8 billion at december 31 , 2009 and consisted of fixed-rate and floating-rate , private-issuer securities collateralized primarily by various consumer credit products , including residential mortgage loans , credit cards , and automobile loans .\nsubstantially all of the securities are senior tranches in the securitization structure and have credit protection in the form of credit enhancement , over-collateralization and/or excess spread accounts .\nwe recorded otti credit losses of $ 111 million on asset- backed securities during 2009 .\nall of the securities were collateralized by first and second lien residential mortgage loans and were rated below investment grade .\nas of december 31 , 2009 , the noncredit portion of otti losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss for asset- backed securities totaled $ 221 million and the related securities had a fair value of $ 562 million .\nfor the sub-investment grade investment securities for which we have not recorded an otti loss through december 31 , 2009 , the remaining fair value was $ 381 million , with unrealized net losses of $ 110 million .\nthe results of our security-level assessments indicate that we will recover the entire cost basis of these securities .\nnote 7 investment securities in the notes to consolidated financial statements of this report provides further detail regarding our process for assessing otti for these securities .\nif the current housing and economic conditions were to continue for the foreseeable future or worsen , if market volatility and illiquidity were to continue or worsen , or if market interest rates were to increase appreciably , the valuation of our investment securities portfolio could continue to be adversely affected and we could incur additional otti credit losses that would impact our consolidated income statement .\nloans held for sale in millions dec .\n31 dec .\n31 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\tdec.31 2009\tdec . 312008\ncommercial mortgages at fair value\t$ 1050\t$ 1401\ncommercial mortgages at lower of cost or market\t251\t747\ntotal commercial mortgages\t1301\t2148\nresidential mortgages at fair value\t1012\t1824\nresidential mortgages at lower of cost or market\t\t138\ntotal residential mortgages\t1012\t1962\nother\t226\t256\ntotal\t$ 2539\t$ 4366\n\nPost-table text:\nwe stopped originating commercial mortgage loans held for sale designated at fair value during the first quarter of 2008 and intend to continue pursuing opportunities to reduce these positions at appropriate prices .\nfor commercial mortgages held for sale carried at the lower of cost or market , strong origination volumes partially offset sales to government agencies of $ 5.4 billion during 2009 .\nwe recognized net gains of $ 107 million in 2009 on the valuation and sale of commercial mortgage loans held for sale , net of hedges , carried at fair value and lower of cost or market compared with losses of $ 197 million in 2008 .\nwe sold $ .3 billion and $ .6 billion , respectively , of commercial mortgage loans held for sale carried at fair value in 2009 and 2008 .\nresidential mortgage loans held for sale decreased during 2009 despite strong refinancing volumes , especially in the first quarter .\nloan origination volume was $ 19.1 billion .\nsubstantially all such loans were originated to agency standards .\nwe sold $ 19.8 billion of loans and recognized related gains of $ 435 million during 2009 .\nnet interest income on residential mortgage loans held for sale was $ 332 million for 2009. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1301", "2148", ")", "add(", "1050", "1401", ")", "divide(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.71064"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2002/page_86.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the sum of the notes entergy issued to nypa with seven and eight annual payment installments\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( d ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on october 1 , 2003 and will then be remarketed .\n( e ) on june 1 , 2002 , entergy louisiana remarketed $ 55 million st .\ncharles parish pollution control revenue refunding bonds due 2030 , resetting the interest rate to 4.9% ( 4.9 % ) through may 2005 .\n( f ) the bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase from the holders at 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount outstanding on june 1 , 2005 and will then be remarketed .\n( g ) the fair value excludes lease obligations , long-term doe obligations , and other long-term debt and includes debt due within one year .\nit is determined using bid prices reported by dealer markets and by nationally recognized investment banking firms .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations ) and annual cash sinking fund requirements for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2002 , for the next five years are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\n2003\t$ 1150786\n2004\t$ 925005\n2005\t$ 540372\n2006\t$ 139952\n2007\t$ 475288\n\nPost-table text:\nnot included are other sinking fund requirements of approximately $ 30.2 million annually , which may be satisfied by cash or by certification of property additions at the rate of 167% ( 167 % ) of such requirements .\nin december 2002 , when the damhead creek project was sold , the buyer of the project assumed all obligations under the damhead creek credit facilities and the damhead creek interest rate swap agreements .\nin november 2000 , entergy's non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 resulted in entergy's non-utility nuclear business becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\ncovenants in the entergy corporation 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) notes require it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% ( 65 % ) or less of its total capitalization .\nif entergy's debt ratio exceeds this limit , or if entergy or certain of the domestic utility companies default on other credit facilities or are in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings , an acceleration of the facility's maturity may occur .\nin january 2003 , entergy paid in full , at maturity , the outstanding debt relating to the top of iowa wind project .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : fffd maintain system energy's equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short-term debt ) ; fffd permit the continued commercial operation of grand gulf 1 ; fffd pay in full all system energy indebtedness for borrowed money when due ; and fffd enable system energy to make payments on specific system energy debt , under supplements to the agreement assigning system energy's rights in the agreement as security for the specific debt. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "108", "const_7", ")", "multiply(", "20", "const_8", ")", "add(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "916"}
{"example_id": "PM/2015/page_85.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in millions of trade receivables sold from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nTable:\ntype\t\tface value\tinterest rate\tissuance\tmaturity\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 500\t1.250% ( 1.250 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2017\nu.s . dollar notes\t( a )\t$ 750\t3.375% ( 3.375 % )\taugust 2015\taugust 2025\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition to the committed credit facilities discussed above , certain of our subsidiaries maintain short-term credit arrangements to meet their respective working capital needs .\nthese credit arrangements , which amounted to approximately $ 2.9 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 , are for the sole use of our subsidiaries .\nborrowings under these arrangements amounted to $ 825 million at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 1.2 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\ncommercial paper program 2013 we have commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe .\nat december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , we had no commercial paper outstanding .\neffective april 19 , 2013 , our commercial paper program in the u.s .\nwas increased by $ 2.0 billion .\nas a result , our commercial paper programs in place in the u.s .\nand in europe currently have an aggregate issuance capacity of $ 8.0 billion .\nwe expect that the existence of the commercial paper program and the committed credit facilities , coupled with our operating cash flows , will enable us to meet our liquidity requirements .\nsale of accounts receivable 2013 to mitigate credit risk and enhance cash and liquidity management we sell trade receivables to unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthese arrangements allow us to sell , on an ongoing basis , certain trade receivables without recourse .\nthe trade receivables sold are generally short-term in nature and are removed from the consolidated balance sheets .\nwe sell trade receivables under two types of arrangements , servicing and non-servicing .\npmi 2019s operating cash flows were positively impacted by the amount of the trade receivables sold and derecognized from the consolidated balance sheets , which remained outstanding with the unaffiliated financial institutions .\nthe trade receivables sold that remained outstanding under these arrangements as of december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 were $ 888 million , $ 120 million and $ 146 million , respectively .\nthe net proceeds received are included in cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 23 .\nsale of accounts receivable to our consolidated financial statements .\ndebt 2013 our total debt was $ 28.5 billion at december 31 , 2015 , and $ 29.5 billion at december 31 , 2014 .\nour total debt is primarily fixed rate in nature .\nfor further details , see item 8 , note 7 .\nindebtedness .\nthe weighted-average all-in financing cost of our total debt was 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2015 , compared to 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) in 2014 .\nsee item 8 , note 16 .\nfair value measurements to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our disclosures related to the fair value of debt .\nthe amount of debt that we can issue is subject to approval by our board of directors .\non february 21 , 2014 , we filed a shelf registration statement with the u.s .\nsecurities and exchange commission , under which we may from time to time sell debt securities and/or warrants to purchase debt securities over a three-year period .\nour debt issuances in 2015 were as follows : ( in millions ) type face value interest rate issuance maturity u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 500 1.250% ( 1.250 % ) august 2015 august 2017 u.s .\ndollar notes ( a ) $ 750 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) august 2015 august 2025 ( a ) interest on these notes is payable annually in arrears beginning in february 2016 .\nthe net proceeds from the sale of the securities listed in the table above will be used for general corporate purposes .\nthe weighted-average time to maturity of our long-term debt was 10.8 years at the end of 2014 and 10.5 years at the end of 2015 .\n2022 off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations we have no off-balance sheet arrangements , including special purpose entities , other than guarantees and contractual obligations discussed below. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "888", "120", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "768"}
{"example_id": "DRE/2007/page_59.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the total purchase price for the purchase of a portfolio of five industrial buildings , in seattle , virginia and houston that was allocated to in-service real estate assets\n\nPre-table text:\nuse of estimates the preparation of the financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period .\nactual results could differ from those estimates .\n( 3 ) significant acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions we acquired total income producing real estate related assets of $ 219.9 million , $ 948.4 million and $ 295.6 million in 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\nin december 2007 , in order to further establish our property positions around strategic port locations , we purchased a portfolio of five industrial buildings , in seattle , virginia and houston , as well as approximately 161 acres of undeveloped land and a 12-acre container storage facility in houston .\nthe total price was $ 89.7 million and was financed in part through assumption of secured debt that had a fair value of $ 34.3 million .\nof the total purchase price , $ 66.1 million was allocated to in-service real estate assets , $ 20.0 million was allocated to undeveloped land and the container storage facility , $ 3.3 million was allocated to lease related intangible assets , and the remaining amount was allocated to acquired working capital related assets and liabilities .\nthis allocation of purchase price based on the fair value of assets acquired is preliminary .\nthe results of operations for the acquired properties since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing rental operations in our consolidated financial statements .\nin february 2007 , we completed the acquisition of bremner healthcare real estate ( 201cbremner 201d ) , a national health care development and management firm .\nthe primary reason for the acquisition was to expand our development capabilities within the health care real estate market .\nthe initial consideration paid to the sellers totaled $ 47.1 million , and the sellers may be eligible for further contingent payments over the next three years .\napproximately $ 39.0 million of the total purchase price was allocated to goodwill , which is attributable to the value of bremner 2019s overall development capabilities and its in-place workforce .\nthe results of operations for bremner since the date of acquisition have been included in continuing operations in our consolidated financial statements .\nin february 2006 , we acquired the majority of a washington , d.c .\nmetropolitan area portfolio of suburban office and light industrial properties ( the 201cmark winkler portfolio 201d ) .\nthe assets acquired for a purchase price of approximately $ 867.6 million are comprised of 32 in-service properties with approximately 2.9 million square feet for rental , 166 acres of undeveloped land , as well as certain related assets of the mark winkler company , a real estate management company .\nthe acquisition was financed primarily through assumed mortgage loans and new borrowings .\nthe assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition , as summarized below ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\noperating rental properties\t$ 602011\nland held for development\t154300\ntotal real estate investments\t756311\nother assets\t10478\nlease related intangible assets\t86047\ngoodwill\t14722\ntotal assets acquired\t867558\ndebt assumed\t-148527 ( 148527 )\nother liabilities assumed\t-5829 ( 5829 )\npurchase price net of assumed liabilities\t$ 713202\n\nPost-table text:\npurchase price , net of assumed liabilities $ 713202 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "66.1", "89.7", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5929.17"}
{"example_id": "AES/2001/page_44.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ncontract generation revenues were what in millions in 2001?\n\nPre-table text:\ngross margin gross margin increased $ 307 million , or 15% ( 15 % ) , to $ 2.3 billion in 2001 from $ 2.0 billion in 2000 .\ngross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 25% ( 25 % ) in 2000 from 26% ( 26 % ) in 2001 .\nthe increase in gross margin is due to acquisition of new businesses and new operations from greenfield projects offset by lower market prices in the united kingdom .\nthe decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenues is due to a decline in the competitive supply and contract generation gross margin percentages offset slightly by increased gross margin percentages from large utilities and growth distribution .\nexcluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations in 2001 or 2000 , gross margin decreased 2% ( 2 % ) to $ 1.8 billion in 2001. .\n\nTable:\n\t2001\t2000\t% (  % ) change\ncontract generation\t$ 827 million\t$ 767 million\t8% ( 8 % )\ncompetitive supply\t$ 440 million\t$ 559 million\t( 21% ( 21 % ) )\nlarge utilities\t$ 739 million\t$ 538 million\t37% ( 37 % )\ngrowth distribution\t$ 296 million\t$ 131 million\t126% ( 126 % )\n\nPost-table text:\ncontract generation gross margin increased $ 60 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 827 million in 2001 from $ 767 million in 2000 .\nexcluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2001 and 2000 , contract generation gross margin decreased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 710 million in 2001 .\ncontract generation gross margin increased in all geographic regions except for asia .\nthe contract generation gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 33% ( 33 % ) in 2001 from 44% ( 44 % ) in 2000 .\nin south america , contract generation gross margin increased $ 17 million and was 27% ( 27 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due to the acquisition of gener offset by a decline at tiete from the rationing of electricity in brazil .\nin north america , contract generation gross margin increased $ 8 million and was 50% ( 50 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due to improvements at southland and beaver valley partially offset by a decrease at thames from the contract buydown ( see footnote 13 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements ) .\nin europe/ africa , contract generation gross margin increased $ 44 million and was 30% ( 30 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due primarily to our additional ownership interest in kilroot and the acquisition of ebute in nigeria .\nin asia , contract generation gross margin decreased $ 22 million and was 29% ( 29 % ) of revenues .\nthe decrease is due mainly to additional bad debt provisions at jiaozuo , hefei and aixi in china that were partially offset by the start of commercial operations at haripur .\nthe decrease in contract generation gross margin as a percentage of revenue is due to the acquisition of generation businesses with overall gross margin percentages , which are lower than the overall portfolio of generation businesses .\nas a percentage of sales , contract generation gross margin declined in south america and asia , was relatively flat in north america and increased in europe/africa and the caribbean .\nthe competitive supply gross margin decreased $ 119 million , or 21% ( 21 % ) , to $ 440 million in 2001 from $ 559 million in 2000 .\nexcluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2001 and 2000 , competitive supply gross margin decreased 26% ( 26 % ) to $ 408 million in 2001 .\nthe overall decrease is due to declines in europe/africa and south america that were partially offset by slight increases in north america , the caribbean and asia .\nthe competitive supply gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 16% ( 16 % ) in 2001 from 23% ( 23 % ) in 2000 .\nin south america , competitive supply segment gross margin decreased $ 61 million and was 1% ( 1 % ) of revenues due to declines at our businesses in argentina .\nin europe/africa , competitive supply segment gross margin decreased $ 95 million and was 22% ( 22 % ) of revenues .\nthe decrease is due primarily to declines at drax , barry and fifoots from the lower market prices in the u.k .\nin north america , competitive supply segment gross margin increased $ 14 million and was 11% ( 11 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase was due to an expanded customer base at new energy and was partially offset by decreases at somerset in new york and deepwater in texas .\nin the caribbean ( which includes colombia ) , the competitive supply gross margin increased $ 15 million and was 29% ( 29 % ) of revenues .\nthe increase is due primarily to the acquisition of chivor .\nas a percentage .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "827", "33%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2506.06061"}
{"example_id": "AON/2010/page_115.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage increase in total stock-based compensation expense from 2009 to 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nmaterial impact on the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs for a 1% ( 1 % ) change in the assumed health care trend rate .\nfor most of the participants in the u.s .\nplan , aon 2019s liability for future plan cost increases for pre-65 and medical supplement plan coverage is limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per annum .\nbecause of this cap , net employer trend rates for these plans are effectively limited to 5% ( 5 % ) per year in the future .\nduring 2007 , aon recognized a plan amendment which phases out post-65 retiree coverage in its u.s .\nplan over the next three years .\nthe impact of this amendment on net periodic benefit cost is being recognized over the average remaining service life of the employees .\n14 .\nstock compensation plans the following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income in compensation and benefits ( in millions ) : .\n\nTable:\nyears ended december 31\t2010\t2009\t2008\nrsus\t$ 138\t$ 124\t$ 132\nperformance plans\t62\t60\t67\nstock options\t17\t21\t24\nemployee stock purchase plans\t4\t4\t3\ntotal stock-based compensation expense\t221\t209\t226\ntax benefit\t75\t68\t82\nstock-based compensation expense net of tax\t$ 146\t$ 141\t$ 144\n\nPost-table text:\nduring 2009 , the company converted its stock administration system to a new service provider .\nin connection with this conversion , a reconciliation of the methodologies and estimates utilized was performed , which resulted in a $ 12 million reduction of expense for the year ended december 31 , 2009 .\nstock awards stock awards , in the form of rsus , are granted to certain employees and consist of both performance-based and service-based rsus .\nservice-based awards generally vest between three and ten years from the date of grant .\nthe fair value of service-based awards is based upon the market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\nwith certain limited exceptions , any break in continuous employment will cause the forfeiture of all unvested awards .\ncompensation expense associated with stock awards is recognized over the service period .\ndividend equivalents are paid on certain service-based rsus , based on the initial grant amount .\nperformance-based rsus have been granted to certain employees .\nvesting of these awards is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period .\nthe performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards .\nthe fair value of performance-based awards is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant .\ncompensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest .\ncompensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares paid out at the end of the programs .\nthe actual payout of shares under these performance- based plans may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the number of units granted , based on the plan .\ndividend equivalents are generally not paid on the performance-based rsus .\nduring 2010 , the company granted approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans .\nduring 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company granted approximately 3.5 million .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "221", "209", ")", "divide(", "#0", "209", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05742"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2017/page_26.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in net revenue from 2015 to 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\namortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .\nthe increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry .\nthe louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc .\nthe tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike .\nsee note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .\nincluded in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .\nentergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2015 net revenue\t$ 1666\nnuclear realized price changes\t-149 ( 149 )\nrhode island state energy center\t-44 ( 44 )\nnuclear volume\t-36 ( 36 )\nfitzpatrick reimbursement agreement\t41\nnuclear fuel expenses\t68\nother\t-4 ( 4 )\n2016 net revenue\t$ 1542\n\nPost-table text:\nas shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue .\nthe effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 .\nsee note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 .\nsee 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1666", "1542", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1542", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08042"}
{"example_id": "HII/2017/page_104.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage change in the unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities from 2016 to 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\nas of december 31 , 2017 , the company had gross state income tax credit carry-forwards of approximately $ 20 million , which expire from 2018 through 2020 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 16 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established related to these state income tax credit carry-forwards , with a valuation allowance of $ 7 million against such deferred tax asset as of december 31 , 2017 .\nthe company had a gross state net operating loss carry-forward of $ 39 million , which expires in 2027 .\na deferred tax asset of approximately $ 3 million ( net of federal benefit ) has been established for the net operating loss carry-forward , with a full valuation allowance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nother state and foreign net operating loss carry-forwards are separately and cumulatively immaterial to the company 2019s deferred tax balances and expire between 2026 and 2036 .\n14 .\ndebt long-term debt consisted of the following: .\n\nTable:\n( $ in millions )\tdecember 31 2017\tdecember 31 2016\nsenior notes due december 15 2021 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t2014\t600\nsenior notes due november 15 2025 5.000% ( 5.000 % )\t600\t600\nsenior notes due december 1 2027 3.483% ( 3.483 % )\t600\t2014\nmississippi economic development revenue bonds due may 1 2024 7.81% ( 7.81 % )\t84\t84\ngulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due december 1 2028 4.55% ( 4.55 % )\t21\t21\nless unamortized debt issuance costs\t-26 ( 26 )\t-27 ( 27 )\ntotal long-term debt\t1279\t1278\n\nPost-table text:\ncredit facility - in november 2017 , the company terminated its second amended and restated credit agreement and entered into a new credit agreement ( the \"credit facility\" ) with third-party lenders .\nthe credit facility includes a revolving credit facility of $ 1250 million , which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from november 22 , 2017 .\nthe revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $ 500 million .\nthe revolving credit facility has a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the london interbank offered rate ( \"libor\" ) plus a spread based upon the company's credit rating , which may vary between 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) and 1.500% ( 1.500 % ) .\nthe revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the company 2019s leverage ratio .\nthe commitment fee rate as of december 31 , 2017 was 0.25% ( 0.25 % ) and may vary between 0.20% ( 0.20 % ) and 0.30% ( 0.30 % ) .\nthe credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants , as well as a financial covenant based on a maximum total leverage ratio .\neach of the company's existing and future material wholly owned domestic subsidiaries , except those that are specifically designated as unrestricted subsidiaries , are and will be guarantors under the credit facility .\nin july 2015 , the company used cash on hand to repay all amounts outstanding under a prior credit facility , including $ 345 million in principal amount of outstanding term loans .\nas of december 31 , 2017 , $ 15 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn , and the remaining $ 1235 million of the revolving credit facility was unutilized .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with its credit facilities of $ 11 million and $ 8 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .\nsenior notes - in december 2017 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes with registration rights due december 2027 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2017 redemption described below .\nin november 2015 , the company issued $ 600 million aggregate principal amount of unregistered 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) senior notes due november 2025 , the net proceeds of which were used to repurchase the company's 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due in 2021 in connection with the 2015 tender offer and redemption described below .\ninterest on the company's senior notes is payable semi-annually .\nthe terms of the 5.000% ( 5.000 % ) and 3.483% ( 3.483 % ) senior notes limit the company 2019s ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to create liens , enter into sale and leaseback transactions , sell assets , and effect consolidations or mergers .\nthe company had unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the senior notes of $ 15 million and $ 19 million as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "11", "8", ")", "divide(", "#0", "8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.375"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2015/page_131.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percent change in annual long-term debt maturities from 2018 to 2019?\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds .\n( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\n( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service .\nthe contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 .\nentergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt .\n( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 and grand gulf lease obligations .\n( e ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 109 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , long-term doe obligations of $ 181 million at entergy arkansas , and the note payable to nypa of $ 35 million at entergy , and includes debt due within one year .\nfair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 16 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades .\nthe annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in thousands )\n2016\t$ 204079\n2017\t$ 766451\n2018\t$ 822690\n2019\t$ 768588\n2020\t$ 1631181\n\nPost-table text:\nin november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction .\nentergy issued notes to nypa with seven annual installments of approximately $ 108 million commencing one year from the date of the closing , and eight annual installments of $ 20 million commencing eight years from the date of the closing .\nthese notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) .\nin accordance with the purchase agreement with nypa , the purchase of indian point 2 in 2001 resulted in entergy becoming liable to nypa for an additional $ 10 million per year for 10 years , beginning in september 2003 .\nthis liability was recorded upon the purchase of indian point 2 in september 2001 .\nas part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date .\nwith the planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its current fuel cycle , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million in 2015 pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement .\nunder a provision in a letter of credit supporting these notes , if certain of the utility operating companies or system energy were to default on other indebtedness , entergy could be required to post collateral to support the letter of credit .\nentergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 .\nentergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 .\nentergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through july 2016 .\ncapital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to: .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "822690", "768588", ")", "divide(", "#0", "768588", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07039"}
{"example_id": "UAA/2016/page_52.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percent of total operating income was emea in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\n2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .\noperating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tyear ended december 31 , 2015\tyear ended december 31 , 2014\tyear ended december 31 , $ change\tyear ended december 31 , % (  % ) change\nnorth america\t$ 460961\t$ 372347\t$ 88614\t23.8% ( 23.8 % )\nemea\t3122\t-11763 ( 11763 )\t14885\t126.5\nasia-pacific\t36358\t21858\t14500\t66.3\nlatin america\t-30593 ( 30593 )\t-15423 ( 15423 )\t-15170 ( 15170 )\t-98.4 ( 98.4 )\nconnected fitness\t-61301 ( 61301 )\t-13064 ( 13064 )\t-48237 ( 48237 )\t-369.2 ( 369.2 )\ntotal operating income\t$ 408547\t$ 353955\t$ 54592\t15.4% ( 15.4 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nthe increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .\n2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .\nthis increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .\n2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .\nthese acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .\nseasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .\nseasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .\nthe level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .\nwe generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "3122", "408547", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.00764"}
{"example_id": "IPG/2008/page_21.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total cash outflow for the repurchase of shares in the last three months of 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nrepurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .\n\nTable:\n\ttotal number of shares purchased\taverage price paid per share2\ttotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs\tmaximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs\noctober 1-31\t29704\t$ 5.99\t2014\t2014\nnovember 1-30\t4468\t$ 3.24\t2014\t2014\ndecember 1-31\t12850\t$ 3.98\t2014\t2014\ntotal1\t47022\t$ 5.18\t2014\t2014\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal1 .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .\n2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "47022", "5.18", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "47016.82"}
{"example_id": "VNO/2012/page_84.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the total five year change in the nareit all equity index?\n\nPre-table text:\nperformance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index .\nthe graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions .\nthere can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .\n\nTable:\n\t2007\t2008\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\nvornado realty trust\t$ 100\t$ 72\t$ 89\t$ 110\t$ 105\t$ 114\ns&p 500 index\t100\t63\t80\t92\t94\t109\nthe nareit all equity index\t100\t62\t80\t102\t110\t132\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "132", "100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "32"}
{"example_id": "ETR/2011/page_376.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the ratio of the net income to the revenues in 2010\n\nPre-table text:\nentergy texas , inc .\nand subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .\nresults of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .\n2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .\nnet revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .\nfollowing is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .\namount ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\n\tamount ( in millions )\n2010 net revenue\t$ 540.2\nretail electric price\t36.0\nvolume/weather\t21.3\npurchased power capacity\t-24.6 ( 24.6 )\nother\t4.9\n2011 net revenue\t$ 577.8\n\nPost-table text:\nthe retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .\nsee note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .\nthe volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .\nusage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .\nthe purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2.4", "540.2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.00444"}
{"example_id": "CMCSA/2015/page_64.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average investment income ( loss ) net 2013 to 2015\n\nPre-table text:\nconsolidated other income ( expense ) items , net .\n\nTable:\nyear ended december 31 ( in millions )\t2015\t2014\t2013\ninterest expense\t$ -2702 ( 2702 )\t$ -2617 ( 2617 )\t$ -2574 ( 2574 )\ninvestment income ( loss ) net\t81\t296\t576\nequity in net income ( losses ) of investees net\t-325 ( 325 )\t97\t-86 ( 86 )\nother income ( expense ) net\t320\t-215 ( 215 )\t-364 ( 364 )\ntotal\t$ -2626 ( 2626 )\t$ -2439 ( 2439 )\t$ -2448 ( 2448 )\n\nPost-table text:\ninterest expense interest expense increased in 2015 primarily due to an increase in our debt outstanding and $ 47 million of additional interest expense associated with the early redemption in june 2015 of our $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of 5.85% ( 5.85 % ) senior notes due november 2015 and our $ 1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.90% ( 5.90 % ) senior notes due march 2016 .\ninterest expense increased in 2014 primarily due to the effect of our interest rate derivative financial instruments .\ninvestment income ( loss ) , net the change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2015 was primarily due to a $ 154 million gain related to the sale of our shares of arris group common stock in 2014 .\nthe change in investment income ( loss ) , net in 2014 was primarily due to a $ 443 million gain related to the sale of our investment in clearwire corporation in 2013 .\nthe components of investment income ( loss ) , net are presented in a table in note 7 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements .\nequity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net the change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2015 was primarily due to twcc holding corp .\n( 201cthe weather channel 201d ) recording impairment charges related to goodwill .\nwe recorded expenses of $ 333 million in 2015 that represent nbcuniversal 2019s proportionate share of these impairment charges .\nthe change in 2015 was also due to an increase in our proportionate share of losses in hulu , llc ( 201chulu 201d ) , which were driven by hulu 2019s higher programming and marketing costs .\nin 2015 and 2014 , we recognized our pro- portionate share of losses of $ 106 million and $ 20 million , respectively , related to our investment in hulu .\nthe change in equity in net income ( losses ) of investees , net in 2014 was primarily due to $ 142 million of total equity losses recorded in 2013 attributable to our investment in hulu .\nin july 2013 , we entered into an agreement to provide capital contributions totaling $ 247 million to hulu , which we had previously accounted for as a cost method investment .\nthis represented an agreement to provide our first capital contribution to hulu since we acquired our interest in it as part of our acquisition of a controlling interest in nbcuniversal in 2011 ( the 201cnbcuniversal transaction 201d ) ; therefore , we began to apply the equity method of accounting for this investment .\nthe change in the method of accounting for this investment required us to recognize our propor- tionate share of hulu 2019s accumulated losses from the date of the nbcuniversal transaction through july 2013 .\nother income ( expense ) , net other income ( expense ) , net for 2015 included gains of $ 335 million on the sales of a business and an invest- ment , $ 240 million recorded on the settlement of a contingent consideration liability with general electric company ( 201cge 201d ) related to the acquisition of nbcuniversal , and $ 43 million related to an equity method investment .\nthese gains were partially offset by $ 236 million of expenses related to fair value adjustments to a contractual obligation .\nsee note 11 to comcast 2019s consolidated financial statements for additional information on this contractual obligation .\nother income ( expense ) , net for 2014 included a $ 27 million favorable settlement of a contingency related to the at&t broadband transaction in 2002 , which was more than offset by $ 208 million of expenses related to 61 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "81", "296", ")", "add(", "576", "#0", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "478"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_31.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in net sales in millions in 2007 in billions\n\nPre-table text:\ntissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia .\naverage sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp .\noperating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 .\nthe benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly .\nhowever , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages .\nindustrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix .\nindustrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings .\nbene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) .\nin addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard .\nthe segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related .\nindustrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2007\t2006\t2005\nsales\t$ 5245\t$ 4925\t$ 4625\noperating profit\t$ 501\t$ 399\t$ 219\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 .\ncontainerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 .\nmargins improved reflecting stronger export demand .\nmanu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages .\nraw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly .\noperating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine .\nu.s .\nconverting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand .\nearnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 .\nfavorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs .\nlooking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 .\nhowever , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy .\nmanufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter .\neuropean industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .\nsales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 .\nsales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes .\nconversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues .\nprofit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "5.2", "4.9", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.3"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_25.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in fuel surcharge program freight revenue from 2012 to 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nresults of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\t% (  % ) change 2014 v 2013\t% (  % ) change 2013 v 2012\nfreight revenues\t$ 22560\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\nother revenues\t1428\t1279\t1240\t12% ( 12 % )\t3% ( 3 % )\ntotal\t$ 23988\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .\nfreight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .\nchanges in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .\nwe provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .\nwe recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .\nwe allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .\nother revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .\nwe recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .\nfreight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .\nvolume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .\nfreight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .\nrevenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .\narc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .\nvolume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .\nour fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .\nfuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .\nfuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .\nin 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .\nin 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2.6", "2.6", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2006/page_37.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in cash capital investments in track from 2004 to 2005?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 .\nmillions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2006\t2005\t2004\ntrack\t$ 1487\t$ 1472\t$ 1328\ncapacity and commercial facilities\t510\t509\t347\nlocomotives and freight cars\t135\t98\t125\nother\t110\t90\t76\ntotal\t$ 2242\t$ 2169\t$ 1876\n\nPost-table text:\nin 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .\nthese investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .\nwe designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .\nwe expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\nwe expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .\nthe increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .\nthe ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .\nearnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .\nfixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .\nsee exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .\nfinancing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the \"facilities\" ) .\nthe facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .\nneither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .\nthese facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .\nthe facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .\nin addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .\nneither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .\ndividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .\nwe expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\ndividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .\nretained earnings available .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1472", "1328", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1328", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10843"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_35.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2012 to 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .\n\nTable:\ncash flowsmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\t$ 6161\ncash used in investing activities\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\t-3633 ( 3633 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\t-2682 ( 2682 )\nnet change in cash and cashequivalents\t$ 154\t$ 369\t$ -154 ( 154 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .\nhigher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .\nin addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .\nlower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .\nlower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .\nincluded in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "6823", "6161", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6161", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10745"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_56.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of contractual obligations is expected to be paid within 12 months?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchases of short-term marketable securities , net of sales of short-term marketable securities during the quarter .\nadditionally , we incurred $ 3.8 million related to cash expenditures for property and equipment primarily on computer software projects and manufacturing equipment related to our expansion in ireland .\nour financing activities during the year ended march 31 , 2009 provided cash of $ 46.2 million as compared to $ 2.1 million during the same period in the prior year .\ncash provided by financing activities for the year ended march 31 , 2009 was primarily comprised of $ 42.0 million in net proceeds related to our august 2008 public offering and $ 5.0 million attributable to the exercise of stock options and proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan .\ncapital expenditures for fiscal 2010 are estimated to be $ 2.5 to $ 3.0 million , which relate primarily to our planned manufacturing capacity increases for impella in germany , our expansion in ireland , and software development projects .\nour liquidity is influenced by our ability to sell our products in a competitive industry and our customers 2019 ability to pay for our products .\nfactors that may affect liquidity include our ability to penetrate the market for our products , maintain or reduce the length of the selling cycle , and collect cash from clients after our products are sold .\nexclusive of activities involving any future acquisitions of products or companies that complement or augment our existing line of products , we believe that current available funds and cash generated from operations will provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements for the foreseeable future .\nwe believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital , and other cash requirements at least through the next 12 months .\nwe continue to review our long-term cash needs on a regular basis .\ncurrently , we have no debt outstanding .\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2009 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods .\npayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) contractual obligations total than 1 than 5 .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) total\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) more than 5 years\noperating lease commitments\t$ 10690\t$ 2313\t$ 4267\t$ 2592\t$ 1518\ncontractual obligations ( 1 )\t9457\t4619\t4838\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 20147\t$ 6932\t$ 9105\t$ 2592\t$ 1518\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and expected liabilities under agreements with third parties for clinical trials .\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or other material commitments for open purchase orders and clinical trial agreements at march 31 , 2009 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding contingent payments , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nat the time of the transaction , we agreed to make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to product sales and fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 16.8 million .\nin january 2007 upon the sale of 1000 impella units , we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .\nin june 2008 we received 510 ( k ) clearance of our impella 2.5 , and we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .\nin april 2009 , we received 501 ( k ) clearance of our impella 5.0 , triggering an obligation to make the final$ 5.6 million milestone payment .\non may 15 , 2009 , we paid $ 1.75 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of our common stock .\nthis contingent payment will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nin june 2008 , we amended the lease for our facility in danvers , massachusetts .\nthe amendment extended the lease from february 28 , 2010 to february 28 , 2016 .\nthe lease continues to be accounted for as an operating lease .\nthe amendment changed the rent payments under the lease from $ 64350 per month to the following schedule : 2022 the base rent for july 2008 through october 2008 was $ 0 per month ; 2022 the base rent for november 2008 through june 2010 is $ 40000 per month ; 2022 the base rent for july 2010 through february 2014 will be $ 64350 per month ; and 2022 the base rent for march 2014 through february 2016 will be $ 66000 per month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "4619", "9457", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.48842"}
{"example_id": "CAT/2017/page_85.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies is related to guarantees in 2018?\n\nPre-table text:\n64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .\noperations and summary of significant accounting policies a .\nnature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .\nfinancial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .\nthis category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .\n( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .\nour products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .\nwe conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .\nwe place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .\nalthough no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .\nour machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .\nreciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .\nsome of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .\nthe fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .\nsome of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .\nour dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .\nsome products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .\nat times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .\nthe financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .\nfinancing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .\nwe offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .\na significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .\nb .\nbasis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .\nand its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .\ninvestments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .\nsee note 9 for further discussion .\nwe consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .\nis the primary beneficiary .\nfor vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .\nthe primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .\nsee note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .\nwe have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .\nour maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nreceivables - trade and other\t$ 34\t$ 55\nreceivables - finance\t42\t174\nlong-term receivables - finance\t38\t246\ninvestments in unconsolidated affiliated companies\t39\t31\nguarantees\t259\t210\ntotal\t$ 412\t$ 716\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .\nour maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .\nthese risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "210", "716", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.2933"}
{"example_id": "AAP/2012/page_12.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average annual creation of new stores for aap from 2008 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years: .\n\nTable:\n\t2012\t2011\t2010\t2009\t2008\nbeginning stores\t3460\t3369\t3264\t3243\t3153\nnew stores ( 1 )\t116\t95\t110\t75\t109\nstores closed\t2014\t-4 ( 4 )\t-5 ( 5 )\t-54 ( 54 )\t-19 ( 19 )\nending stores\t3576\t3460\t3369\t3264\t3243\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores .\nstore technology .\nour store-based information systems are comprised of a proprietary and integrated point of sale , electronic parts catalog , or epc , and store-level inventory management system ( collectively \"store system\" ) .\ninformation maintained by our store system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly .\nour fully integrated system enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles .\nour store system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level allowing store team members to check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers .\nif a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the store system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors .\navailable parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time .\nour centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information .\nwe also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities .\nall of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability .\nwe plan to start rolling out a new and enhanced epc in fiscal 2013 which is expected to simplify and improve the customer experience .\namong the improvements is a more efficient way to systematically identify add-on sales to ensure our customers have what they need to complete their automotive repair project .\nstore support center merchandising .\npurchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan .\nour roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals .\nour global sourcing team works closely with both teams .\nin fiscal 2012 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 450 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases .\nour purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume .\nthe merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand .\nwe believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "116", "109", ")", "divide(", "#0", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "112.5"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_75.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in total expense for repairs and maintenance from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe analysis of our depreciation studies .\nchanges in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively .\nunder group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized .\nthe historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies .\nthe indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes .\nbecause of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate .\nin addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies .\nany deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets .\nfor retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies .\na gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations .\nwhen we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .\nhowever , many of our assets are self-constructed .\na large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects .\ncosts that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized .\ndirect costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .\nindirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .\ngeneral and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .\nnormal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .\nthese costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n13 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2014 2013 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2014\tdec . 312013\naccounts payable\t$ 877\t$ 803\ndividends payable\t438\t356\nincome and other taxes payable\t412\t491\naccrued wages and vacation\t409\t385\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t207\ninterest payable\t178\t169\nequipment rents payable\t100\t96\nother\t640\t579\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3303\t$ 3086\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2.4", "2.3", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2.3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04348"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2015/page_24.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nto , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .\nthe following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2015\t2014\t2013\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7344\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\ncash used in investing activities\t-4476 ( 4476 )\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\ndividends paid\t-2344 ( 2344 )\t-1632 ( 1632 )\t-1333 ( 1333 )\nfree cash flow\t$ 524\t$ 1504\t$ 2085\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .\nwe will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .\nwe will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .\nwe will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .\nf0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .\nf0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .\nwe again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .\ndomestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .\nas prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .\ncontinuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .\nalternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .\nf0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .\nthe capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .\n( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .\nwe expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .\nthe strong u.s .\ndollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .\none of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .\nin the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .\nover the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .\neconomy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1504", "2085", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2085", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.27866"}
{"example_id": "BDX/2018/page_82.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average cost of interest , in millions , for 2016-2018?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .\npostretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .\nthe measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .\neffective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .\npension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tpension plans 2018\tpension plans 2017\tpension plans 2016\nservice cost\t$ 136\t$ 110\t$ 81\ninterest cost\t90\t61\t72\nexpected return on plan assets\t-154 ( 154 )\t-112 ( 112 )\t-109 ( 109 )\namortization of prior service credit\t-13 ( 13 )\t-14 ( 14 )\t-15 ( 15 )\namortization of loss\t78\t92\t77\nsettlements\t2\t2014\t7\nnet pension cost\t$ 137\t$ 138\t$ 113\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans\t$ 34\t$ 43\t$ 35\n\nPost-table text:\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .\nthe settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .\nsupplemental pension plan .\nthe company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "90", "61", ")", "add(", "#0", "72", ")", "divide(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "74.33333"}
{"example_id": "IP/2012/page_93.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2012 , what was the percent of the total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operating leases that was due in 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2013\t2014\t2015\t2016\t2017\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 198\t$ 136\t$ 106\t$ 70\t$ 50\t$ 141\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3213\t828\t722\t620\t808\t2654\ntotal\t$ 3411\t$ 964\t$ 828\t$ 690\t$ 858\t$ 2795\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .\nrent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .\nguarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .\nwhere liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .\nenvironmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .\nmany of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .\nwhile joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .\nremedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .\ninternational paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .\none of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .\nduring 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .\nin june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .\nthe overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .\nin october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .\nin the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .\nin october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .\nit is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .\nin addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nother than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .\nthe company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .\nthe epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .\nregis .\nthe company is a successor in interest to st .\nregis .\ninternational paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .\naccordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .\nalso in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .\nthe suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .\nthe suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .\nregis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .\nalso named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .\nin mid-2011 , the suit was .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "136", "964", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.14108"}
{"example_id": "BDX/2018/page_82.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total net pension cost from 2016-2018 , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nnote 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .\npostretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .\nthe measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .\neffective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .\npension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tpension plans 2018\tpension plans 2017\tpension plans 2016\nservice cost\t$ 136\t$ 110\t$ 81\ninterest cost\t90\t61\t72\nexpected return on plan assets\t-154 ( 154 )\t-112 ( 112 )\t-109 ( 109 )\namortization of prior service credit\t-13 ( 13 )\t-14 ( 14 )\t-15 ( 15 )\namortization of loss\t78\t92\t77\nsettlements\t2\t2014\t7\nnet pension cost\t$ 137\t$ 138\t$ 113\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans\t$ 34\t$ 43\t$ 35\n\nPost-table text:\nnet pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .\nthe settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .\nsupplemental pension plan .\nthe company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "137", "138", ")", "add(", "#0", "113", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "388"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2011/page_70.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was royalty income as a percentage of total other income in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .\nincome taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .\nsubsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .\nthe cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .\n18 .\nemployee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .\nemployees .\nthe company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .\nfor most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .\nfor those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .\nthe company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .\nthe company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .\neffective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .\nthis included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .\non january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .\ncompensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\na portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .\nas a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\n19 .\nother earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2011\t2010\t2009\nroyalty income\t55\t58\t45\nshare of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )\t37\t45\t-5 ( 5 )\ngain on sale of assets\t12\t8\t36\nother\t73\t69\t74\ntotal\t$ 177\t$ 180\t$ 150\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal $ 177 $ 180 $ 150 20 .\nstock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return .\nall current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc .\namended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 .\nshares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\ntotal stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nstock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc .\nstock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan .\nunder the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted .\nthe options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years .\nupon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock .\nthe ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "45", "150", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.3"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2006/page_75.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future minimum lease payments are due in 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .\nthe company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .\nin december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2007\t1703\n2008\t1371\n2009\t1035\n2010\t710\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4819\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .\non may 15 , 2006 richard a .\nnazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1371", "4819", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.2845"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_76.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total accounts payable and other current liabilities was accrued casualty costs at december 31 , 2010?\n\nPre-table text:\nare allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n12 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2011\tdec . 31 2010\naccounts payable\t$ 819\t$ 677\nincome and other taxes\t482\t337\naccrued wages and vacation\t363\t357\ndividends payable\t284\t183\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t325\ninterest payable\t197\t200\nequipment rents payable\t90\t86\nother\t624\t548\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3108\t$ 2713\n\nPost-table text:\n13 .\nfinancial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices .\nwe are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .\nderivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period .\nwe formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness .\nchanges in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings .\nwe may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements .\nmarket and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item .\nwe manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements .\nat december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities .\ndetermination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows .\ninterest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period .\nwe generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings .\nwe employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix .\nin addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities .\nswaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates .\nwe account for swaps as fair value .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "325", "2713", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.11979"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_88.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders if all targets are achieved?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no .\n48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no .\n109 ( 201cfin no .\n48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no .\n109 , accounting for income taxes .\nfin no .\n48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return .\nfin no .\n48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized .\nas a result of its adoption of fin no .\n48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 .\nthis adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 .\nthe company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 .\nthe company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations .\nas of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 .\nas such , the company had no fin no .\n48 liability at march 31 , 2009 .\non a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest .\nit is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position .\na reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: .\n\nTable:\nbalance at march 31 2008\t$ 168\nreductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations\t-168 ( 168 )\nbalance at march 31 2009\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions .\nthe company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 .\nall tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts .\nhowever , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized .\nnote 15 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 .\nthe two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 .\nin april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device .\nin may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "5583333", "5583333", ")", "add(", "#0", "5583334", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "16750000"}
{"example_id": "IP/2012/page_93.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average rent expense from 2010 to 2012 \\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2012 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows: .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2013\t2014\t2015\t2016\t2017\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 198\t$ 136\t$ 106\t$ 70\t$ 50\t$ 141\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3213\t828\t722\t620\t808\t2654\ntotal\t$ 3411\t$ 964\t$ 828\t$ 690\t$ 858\t$ 2795\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 3.6 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the company 2019s 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquis- ition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business .\nrent expense was $ 231 million , $ 205 million and $ 210 million for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively .\nguarantees in connection with sales of businesses , property , equipment , forestlands and other assets , interna- tional paper commonly makes representations and warranties relating to such businesses or assets , and may agree to indemnify buyers with respect to tax and environmental liabilities , breaches of representations and warranties , and other matters .\nwhere liabilities for such matters are determined to be probable and subject to reasonable estimation , accrued liabilities are recorded at the time of sale as a cost of the transaction .\nenvironmental proceedings international paper has been named as a potentially responsible party in environmental remediation actions under various federal and state laws , includ- ing the comprehensive environmental response , compensation and liability act ( cercla ) .\nmany of these proceedings involve the cleanup of hazardous substances at large commercial landfills that received waste from many different sources .\nwhile joint and several liability is authorized under cercla and equivalent state laws , as a practical matter , liability for cercla cleanups is typically allocated among the many potential responsible parties .\nremedial costs are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they become probable and reasonably estimable .\ninternational paper has estimated the probable liability associated with these matters to be approximately $ 92 million in the aggregate at december 31 , 2012 .\none of the matters referenced above is a closed wood treating facility located in cass lake , minneso- ta .\nduring 2009 , in connection with an environmental site remediation action under cercla , international paper submitted to the epa a site remediation feasi- bility study .\nin june 2011 , the epa selected and published a proposed soil remedy at the site with an estimated cost of $ 46 million .\nthe overall remediation reserve for the site is currently $ 48 mil- lion to address this selection of an alternative for the soil remediation component of the overall site remedy .\nin october 2011 , the epa released a public statement indicating that the final soil remedy deci- sion would be delayed .\nin the unlikely event that the epa changes its proposed soil remedy and approves instead a more expensive clean-up alternative , the remediation costs could be material , and sig- nificantly higher than amounts currently recorded .\nin october 2012 , the natural resource trustees for this site provided notice to international paper and other potentially responsible parties of their intent to per- form a natural resource damage assessment .\nit is premature to predict the outcome of the assessment or to estimate a loss or range of loss , if any , which may be incurred .\nin addition to the above matters , other remediation costs typically associated with the cleanup of hazardous substances at the company 2019s current , closed or formerly-owned facilities , and recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet , totaled approximately $ 46 million at december 31 , 2012 .\nother than as described above , completion of required remedial actions is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements .\nthe company is a potentially responsible party with respect to the allied paper , inc./portage creek/ kalamazoo river superfund site ( kalamazoo river superfund site ) in michigan .\nthe epa asserts that the site is contaminated primarily by pcbs as a result of discharges from various paper mills located along the river , including a paper mill formerly owned by st .\nregis .\nthe company is a successor in interest to st .\nregis .\ninternational paper has not received any orders from the epa with respect to the site and is in the process of collecting information from the epa and other parties relative to the kalamazoo river superfund site to evaluate the extent of its liability , if any , with respect to the site .\naccordingly , it is pre- mature to estimate a loss or range of loss with respect to this site .\nalso in connection with the kalamazoo river superfund site , the company was named as a defendant by georgia-pacific consumer products lp , fort james corporation and georgia pacific llc in a contribution and cost recovery action for alleged pollution at the kalamazoo river super- fund site .\nthe suit seeks contribution under cercla for $ 79 million in costs purportedly expended by plaintiffs as of the filing of the com- plaint , and for future remediation costs .\nthe suit alleges that a mill , during the time it was allegedly owned and operated by st .\nregis , discharged pcb contaminated solids and paper residuals resulting from paper de-inking and recycling .\nalso named as defendants in the suit are ncr corporation and weyerhaeuser company .\nin mid-2011 , the suit was .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "231", "205", ")", "add(", "210", "#0", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "324.5"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_56.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of operating lease commitments is expected to be paid within 12 months?\n\nPre-table text:\npurchases of short-term marketable securities , net of sales of short-term marketable securities during the quarter .\nadditionally , we incurred $ 3.8 million related to cash expenditures for property and equipment primarily on computer software projects and manufacturing equipment related to our expansion in ireland .\nour financing activities during the year ended march 31 , 2009 provided cash of $ 46.2 million as compared to $ 2.1 million during the same period in the prior year .\ncash provided by financing activities for the year ended march 31 , 2009 was primarily comprised of $ 42.0 million in net proceeds related to our august 2008 public offering and $ 5.0 million attributable to the exercise of stock options and proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan .\ncapital expenditures for fiscal 2010 are estimated to be $ 2.5 to $ 3.0 million , which relate primarily to our planned manufacturing capacity increases for impella in germany , our expansion in ireland , and software development projects .\nour liquidity is influenced by our ability to sell our products in a competitive industry and our customers 2019 ability to pay for our products .\nfactors that may affect liquidity include our ability to penetrate the market for our products , maintain or reduce the length of the selling cycle , and collect cash from clients after our products are sold .\nexclusive of activities involving any future acquisitions of products or companies that complement or augment our existing line of products , we believe that current available funds and cash generated from operations will provide sufficient liquidity to meet operating requirements for the foreseeable future .\nwe believe that our existing cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected capital expenditures , working capital , and other cash requirements at least through the next 12 months .\nwe continue to review our long-term cash needs on a regular basis .\ncurrently , we have no debt outstanding .\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2009 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods .\npayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) contractual obligations total than 1 than 5 .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) total\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year ( in $ 000 2019s ) more than 5 years\noperating lease commitments\t$ 10690\t$ 2313\t$ 4267\t$ 2592\t$ 1518\ncontractual obligations ( 1 )\t9457\t4619\t4838\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 20147\t$ 6932\t$ 9105\t$ 2592\t$ 1518\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) contractual obligations represent future cash commitments and expected liabilities under agreements with third parties for clinical trials .\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or other material commitments for open purchase orders and clinical trial agreements at march 31 , 2009 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding contingent payments , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nat the time of the transaction , we agreed to make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to product sales and fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 16.8 million .\nin january 2007 upon the sale of 1000 impella units , we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .\nin june 2008 we received 510 ( k ) clearance of our impella 2.5 , and we paid $ 5.6 million in the form of common stock .\nin april 2009 , we received 501 ( k ) clearance of our impella 5.0 , triggering an obligation to make the final$ 5.6 million milestone payment .\non may 15 , 2009 , we paid $ 1.75 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of our common stock .\nthis contingent payment will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nin june 2008 , we amended the lease for our facility in danvers , massachusetts .\nthe amendment extended the lease from february 28 , 2010 to february 28 , 2016 .\nthe lease continues to be accounted for as an operating lease .\nthe amendment changed the rent payments under the lease from $ 64350 per month to the following schedule : 2022 the base rent for july 2008 through october 2008 was $ 0 per month ; 2022 the base rent for november 2008 through june 2010 is $ 40000 per month ; 2022 the base rent for july 2010 through february 2014 will be $ 64350 per month ; and 2022 the base rent for march 2014 through february 2016 will be $ 66000 per month. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2313", "10690", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21637"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2007/page_65.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total debt is due in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\ndebt maturities 2013 the following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of december 31 , 2007 , excluding market value adjustments .\nmillions of dollars .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 689\n2009\t542\n2010\t462\n2011\t550\n2012\t720\nthereafter\t4717\ntotal debt\t$ 7680\n\nPost-table text:\nat december 31 , 2007 , we reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 550 million of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance .\nthis reclassification reflected our ability and intent to refinance any short- term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term debt on a long-term basis .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we did not reclassify any short-term debt as long-term debt as we did not intend to refinance at that mortgaged properties 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.8 billion at both december 31 , 2007 and 2006 serves as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad equipment .\nas a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds .\nas of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion .\nin accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds .\ncredit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2007 , $ 1.9 billion of credit was available under our revolving credit facility ( the facility ) , which we entered into on april 20 , 2007 .\nthe facility is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe did not draw on the facility during 2007 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated , investment-grade borrowers .\nthe facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facility requires the maintenance of a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2007 , we were in compliance with this covenant .\nthe facility does not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require us to post collateral .\nthe facility , which expires in april 2012 , replaced two $ 1 billion , 5-year facilities with terms ending in march 2009 and march 2010 .\nthe facility includes terms that are comparable with those of the prior facilities , although the minimum net worth requirement of $ 7.5 billion in prior facilities was removed , and the facility includes a change-of-control provision .\nin addition to our revolving credit facility , a $ 75 million uncommitted line of credit was available .\nthe line of credit expires in april 2008 , and was not used in 2007 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facility to draw on this $ 75 million line .\ndividend restrictions 2013 our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant that , under certain circumstances , would restrict the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders .\nthe amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 11.5 billion and $ 7.8 billion at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 , respectively .\nthis facility replaced two credit facilities that had minimum net worth covenants that were more restrictive with respect to the amount of retained earnings available for dividends at december 31 , 2006. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "550", "7680", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07161"}
{"example_id": "BKR/2017/page_103.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the compensation expense in 2017 is relates to the acceleration of equity awards upon termination of employment at baker hughes?\n\nPre-table text:\nbaker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 83 issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 .\na total of 53.7 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nas a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , on july 3 , 2017 , each outstanding baker hughes stock option was converted into an option to purchase a share of class a common stock in the company .\nconsequently , we issued 6.8 million stock options which are fully vested .\neach converted option is subject to the same terms and conditions as applied to the original option , and the per share exercise price of each converted option was reduced by $ 17.50 to reflect the per share amount of the special dividend pursuant to the agreement associated with the transactions .\nadditionally , as a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , there were 1.7 million baker hughes restricted stock units ( rsus ) that were converted to bhge rsus at a fair value of $ 40.18 .\nstock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant .\nthe compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates .\nforfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures .\nthere were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material .\nduring the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we issued 2.1 million rsus and 1.6 million stock options under the lti plan .\nthese rsus and stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date .\nstock based compensation expense was $ 37 million in 2017 .\nincluded in this amount is $ 15 million of expense which relates to the acceleration of equity awards upon termination of employment of baker hughes employees with change in control agreements , and are included as part of \"merger and related costs\" in the consolidated and combined statements of income ( loss ) .\nas bhge llc is a pass through entity , any tax benefit would be recognized by its partners .\ndue to its cumulative losses , bhge is unable to recognize a tax benefit on its share of stock related expenses .\nstock options the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model .\nthe following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan .\nthe expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding .\nthe expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards .\nthe expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period .\nthe risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s .\ntreasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted .\nthe dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\nexpected life ( years )\t6\nrisk-free interest rate\t2.1% ( 2.1 % )\nvolatility\t36.4% ( 36.4 % )\ndividend yield\t1.2% ( 1.2 % )\nweighted average fair value per share at grant date\t$ 12.32\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "15", "37", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.40541"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2011/page_70.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was royalty income as a percentage of total other income in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements unrealized currency translation adjustments related to translation of foreign denominated balance sheets are not presented net of tax given that no deferred u.s .\nincome taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings of non- u.s .\nsubsidiaries because they are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to unrealized currency translation adjustments other than translation of foreign denominated balance sheets , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 7 ) million , $ 8 million and $ 62 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 98 million , $ 65 million and $ 18 million , respectively .\nthe cumulative tax benefit related to the adjustment for pension and other postretirement benefits at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 990 million and $ 889 million , respectively .\nthe tax ( cost ) benefit related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on marketable securities for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ ( 0.2 ) million , $ 0.6 million and $ 0.1 million , respectively .\nthe tax benefit ( cost ) related to the change in the unrealized gain ( loss ) on derivatives for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was $ 19 million , $ 1 million and $ ( 16 ) million , respectively .\n18 .\nemployee savings plan ppg 2019s employee savings plan ( 201csavings plan 201d ) covers substantially all u.s .\nemployees .\nthe company makes matching contributions to the savings plan based upon participants 2019 savings , subject to certain limitations .\nfor most participants not covered by a collective bargaining agreement , company-matching contributions are established each year at the discretion of the company and are applied to a maximum of 6% ( 6 % ) of eligible participant compensation .\nfor those participants whose employment is covered by a collective bargaining agreement , the level of company-matching contribution , if any , is determined by the relevant collective bargaining agreement .\nthe company-matching contribution was 100% ( 100 % ) for the first two months of 2009 .\nthe company-matching contribution was suspended from march 2009 through june 2010 as a cost savings measure in recognition of the adverse impact of the global recession .\neffective july 1 , 2010 , the company match was reinstated at 50% ( 50 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed for most employees eligible for the company-matching contribution feature .\nthis included the union represented employees in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements .\non january 1 , 2011 , the company match was increased to 75% ( 75 % ) on the first 6% ( 6 % ) of compensation contributed by these eligible employees .\ncompensation expense and cash contributions related to the company match of participant contributions to the savings plan for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 26 million , $ 9 million and $ 7 million , respectively .\na portion of the savings plan qualifies under the internal revenue code as an employee stock ownership plan .\nas a result , the tax deductible dividends on ppg shares held by the savings plan were $ 20 million , $ 24 million and $ 28 million for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\n19 .\nother earnings ( millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2011\t2010\t2009\nroyalty income\t55\t58\t45\nshare of net earnings ( loss ) of equity affiliates ( see note 5 )\t37\t45\t-5 ( 5 )\ngain on sale of assets\t12\t8\t36\nother\t73\t69\t74\ntotal\t$ 177\t$ 180\t$ 150\n\nPost-table text:\ntotal $ 177 $ 180 $ 150 20 .\nstock-based compensation the company 2019s stock-based compensation includes stock options , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and grants of contingent shares that are earned based on achieving targeted levels of total shareholder return .\nall current grants of stock options , rsus and contingent shares are made under the ppg industries , inc .\namended and restated omnibus incentive plan ( 201cppg amended omnibus plan 201d ) , which was amended and restated effective april 21 , 2011 .\nshares available for future grants under the ppg amended omnibus plan were 9.7 million as of december 31 , 2011 .\ntotal stock-based compensation cost was $ 36 million , $ 52 million and $ 34 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nthe total income tax benefit recognized in the accompanying consolidated statement of income related to the stock-based compensation was $ 13 million , $ 18 million and $ 12 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively .\nstock options ppg has outstanding stock option awards that have been granted under two stock option plans : the ppg industries , inc .\nstock plan ( 201cppg stock plan 201d ) and the ppg amended omnibus plan .\nunder the ppg amended omnibus plan and the ppg stock plan , certain employees of the company have been granted options to purchase shares of common stock at prices equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date the options were granted .\nthe options are generally exercisable beginning from six to 48 months after being granted and have a maximum term of 10 years .\nupon exercise of a stock option , shares of company stock are issued from treasury stock .\nthe ppg stock plan includes a restored option provision for options originally granted prior to january 1 , 2003 that 68 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "55", "177", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.31073"}
{"example_id": "CAT/2017/page_85.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies is related to guarantees in 2017?\n\nPre-table text:\n64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 .\noperations and summary of significant accounting policies a .\nnature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations .\nfinancial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment .\nthis category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc .\n( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries .\nour products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d .\nwe conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition .\nwe place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support .\nalthough no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products .\nour machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries .\nreciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products .\nsome of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries .\nthe fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries .\nsome of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries .\nour dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business .\nsome products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company .\nat times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives .\nthe financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions .\nfinancing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies .\nwe offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company .\na significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east .\nb .\nbasis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc .\nand its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest .\ninvestments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method .\nsee note 9 for further discussion .\nwe consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc .\nis the primary beneficiary .\nfor vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies .\nthe primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie .\nsee note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie .\nwe have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity .\nour maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .\n\nTable:\n( millions of dollars )\tdecember 31 , 2017\tdecember 31 , 2016\nreceivables - trade and other\t$ 34\t$ 55\nreceivables - finance\t42\t174\nlong-term receivables - finance\t38\t246\ninvestments in unconsolidated affiliated companies\t39\t31\nguarantees\t259\t210\ntotal\t$ 412\t$ 716\n\nPost-table text:\nin addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary .\nalthough we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance .\nour maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided .\nthese risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "259", "412", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.62864"}
{"example_id": "IP/2009/page_37.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nconsidering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the variation observed in the operating profit , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nfor uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .\ninput costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .\nplanned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .\nasian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .\noperating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .\nu.s .\nmarket pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .\nsales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .\ninput costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .\nmill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .\nlack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .\nin the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .\ninput costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .\nplanned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .\noperating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .\nexcluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .\nbenefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .\nadditionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsales\t$ 3060\t$ 3195\t$ 3015\noperating profit\t433\t17\t112\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .\ncoated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .\nraw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .\noperating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .\nlack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .\noperating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .\nfoodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "433", "17", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "416"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_54.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total freight revenues was automotive in 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .\n1 .\nnature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s .\nour network includes 31838 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .\ngateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .\nwe own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases .\nwe serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .\nexport and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .\nthe railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .\nalthough we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .\nthe following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2013\t2012\t2011\nagricultural\t$ 3276\t$ 3280\t$ 3324\nautomotive\t2077\t1807\t1510\nchemicals\t3501\t3238\t2815\ncoal\t3978\t3912\t4084\nindustrial products\t3822\t3494\t3166\nintermodal\t4030\t3955\t3609\ntotal freight revenues\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t$ 18508\nother revenues\t1279\t1240\t1049\ntotal operatingrevenues\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t$ 19557\n\nPost-table text:\nalthough our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s .\neach of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico .\nincluded in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.1 billion in 2013 , $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , and $ 1.8 billion in 2011 .\nbasis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .\n( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .\n2 .\nsignificant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .\ninvestments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nall intercompany transactions are eliminated .\nwe currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .\ncash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .\naccounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .\nthe allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .\nreceivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2077", "21963", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09457"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_19.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the average industry segment operating profits from 2003 to 2005\n\nPre-table text:\nitem 7 .\nmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations executive summary international paper 2019s operating results in 2005 were strongly impacted by significantly higher costs for en- ergy , wood , caustic soda and other raw materials which reduced operating profits compared with 2004 by $ 586 million .\nlower sales volumes were also a negative factor versus 2004 as we took a significant amount of lack-of-order downtime in our u.s .\nuncoated paper and containerboard mills , and downtime in our eastern european operations to rebuild paper machines in po- land and russia to add needed uncoated paper and pa- perboard capacity .\nwe were able to partially offset some of these negative impacts through operational improvements in our manufacturing operations , im- proved average pricing for our paper and packaging grades , a more favorable product mix , and higher earn- ings from forestland and real estate sales .\nlooking forward to 2006 , we expect operating prof- its for the first quarter to be flat with the 2005 fourth quarter .\nsales volumes should be seasonally slow in the quarter , but should show some improvement as the quarter progresses .\nprice realizations should also improve as previously announced price increases are im- plemented .\nwhile energy , wood and raw material price movements are mixed , their impact for the quarter is expected to be flat .\nhowever , we see favorable signs of positive mo- mentum for the remainder of 2006 .\nwe anticipate that demand in north america for both uncoated paper and industrial packaging products will be stronger , and that we will realize 2005 fourth-quarter and 2006 first-quarter announced price increases .\nadditionally , operating rates should improve in 2006 reflecting announced industry capacity reductions in uncoated papers and container- board .\nwe are also starting to see some reductions in natural gas and southern wood costs that , if the trend continues , should benefit operations as the year pro- gresses .\nin connection with our overall strategic direction , we are evaluating options for the possible sale or spin-off of certain of our businesses as previously announced in our transformation plan , with decisions on certain businesses anticipated during 2006 .\nwe also will con- tinue to improve our key operations in north america by realigning our uncoated and packaging mill oper- ations to reduce costs , improve our products and im- prove our overall profitability .\nresults of operations industry segment operating profits are used by international paper 2019s management to measure the earn- ings performance of its businesses .\nmanagement believes that this measure allows a better understanding of trends in costs , operating efficiencies , prices and volumes .\nin- dustry segment operating profits are defined as earnings before taxes and minority interest , interest expense , corporate items and corporate special items .\nindustry segment operating profits are defined by the securities and exchange commission as a non-gaap financial measure , and are not gaap alternatives to net income or any other operating measure prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the united states .\ninternational paper operates in six segments : print- ing papers , industrial packaging , consumer packaging , distribution , forest products , and specialty businesses and other .\nthe following table shows the components of net earnings ( loss ) for each of the last three years : in millions 2005 2004 2003 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2005\t2004\t2003\nindustry segment operating profits\t$ 1923\t$ 2040\t$ 1734\ncorporate items\t-597 ( 597 )\t-469 ( 469 )\t-466 ( 466 )\ncorporate special items*\t-147 ( 147 )\t-142 ( 142 )\t-281 ( 281 )\ninterest expense net\t-593 ( 593 )\t-710 ( 710 )\t-705 ( 705 )\nminority interest\t-12 ( 12 )\t-21 ( 21 )\t-80 ( 80 )\nincome tax benefit ( provision )\t285\t-242 ( 242 )\t56\ndiscontinued operations\t241\t-491 ( 491 )\t57\naccounting changes\t2013\t2013\t-13 ( 13 )\nnet earnings ( loss )\t$ 1100\t$ -35 ( 35 )\t$ 302\n\nPost-table text:\n* special items include restructuring and other charges , net losses on sales and impair- ments of businesses held for sale , insurance recoveries and reversals of reserves no lon- ger required .\nindustry segment operating profits were $ 117 mil- lion lower in 2005 due principally to the impact of higher energy and raw material costs ( $ 586 million ) , lower sales volume ( $ 251 million ) , and unfavorable for- eign currency translation rates ( $ 27 million ) which more than offset the benefits from higher average prices ( $ 478 million ) , cost reduction initiatives , improved operating performance and a more favorable product mix ( $ 235 million ) , and higher earnings from land sales ( $ 158 million ) .\nthe impact of divestitures ( $ 32 million ) , principally the fine papers and industrial pa- pers businesses , and other items ( $ 36 million ) also had a negative impact in 2005 .\nsegment operating profit ( in millions ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "1923", "2040", ")", "add(", "1734", "#0", ")", "add(", "#1", "const_3", ")", "divide(", "#2", "const_2", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2850"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_79.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the difference in billions of sold receivables from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\ninterest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings .\nat both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 .\nas of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding .\nearnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2008\t2007\t2006\n( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging\t$ 1\t$ -8 ( 8 )\t$ -8 ( 8 )\n( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives\t1\t-1 ( 1 )\t3\nincrease/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income\t$ 2\t$ -9 ( 9 )\t$ -5 ( 5 )\n\nPost-table text:\nfair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates .\nat december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value .\nat december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million .\nat december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par .\nsale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .\n( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .\nupri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .\nthe total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nupri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .\nthe value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nat december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively .\nthis retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .\nthe interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .\nif default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million .\nshould our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .\nthe railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .\nthe railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nupri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "17.8", "16.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.7"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_160.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of tax benefit would affect the effective tax rate if recognized as of december 31 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\n19 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .\nat december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthe year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .\ngoodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .\nsee note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .\ncurrent income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .\nas of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nthe company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .\nthe excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nthe determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .\nthe following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tyear ended december 31 , 2012\tyear ended december 31 , 2011\tyear ended december 31 , 2010\nbalance at january 1\t$ 349\t$ 307\t$ 285\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t4\t22\t10\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-1 ( 1 )\t-17 ( 17 )\nadditions based on tax positions related to current year\t69\t46\t35\nlapse of statute of limitations\t2014\t2014\t-8 ( 8 )\nsettlements\t-29 ( 29 )\t-25 ( 25 )\t-2 ( 2 )\npositions assumed in acquisitions\t12\t2014\t4\nbalance at december 31\t$ 404\t$ 349\t$ 307\n\nPost-table text:\nincluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .\nthe company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .\nrelated to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .\npursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .\nblackrock is subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .\ntax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .\nfederal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .\nwith few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .\nfederal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .\nthe internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .\nin november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nin july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .\nthe tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nthe company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .\nthe significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .\nno state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .\nno state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "226", "349", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.64756"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_75.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nat december 31 , 2007 , what was the percent of the total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases for purchase obligations\n\nPre-table text:\nsettlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments .\nwhile the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision .\nthe provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s .\nfederal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\ninternational paper has non-u.s .\nnet operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million .\ninterna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million .\ninternational paper also has federal , non-u.s .\nand state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million .\nfurther , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million .\ndeferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .\nsubsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested .\ncomputation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable .\nnote 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments .\nunconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) .\nat december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2008\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 136\t$ 116\t$ 101\t$ 84\t$ 67\t$ 92\npurchase obligations ( a )\t1953\t294\t261\t235\t212\t1480\ntotal\t$ 2089\t$ 410\t$ 362\t$ 319\t$ 279\t$ 1572\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales .\nrent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\ninternational paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer .\nin the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations .\nthe company has no future obligations under this agreement. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "261", "362", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.72099"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_77.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in equipment rents payable from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nwhen we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .\nhowever , many of our assets are self-constructed .\na large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .\napproximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .\ncosts that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .\ndirect costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .\nindirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .\nthese costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\nthe capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .\n67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .\ngeneral and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .\nnormal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n10 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\tdec . 31 2008\tdec . 31 2007\naccounts payable\t$ 629\t$ 732\naccrued wages and vacation\t367\t394\naccrued casualty costs\t390\t371\nincome and other taxes\t207\t343\ndividends and interest\t328\t284\nequipment rents payable\t93\t103\nother\t546\t675\ntotal accounts payable and other current liabilities\t$ 2560\t$ 2902\n\nPost-table text:\n11 .\nfair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .\n157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .\nfas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .\nthe adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .\nfas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .\nthis enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .\nthe statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .\nlevel 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .\nlevel 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "93", "103", ")", "divide(", "#0", "103", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.09709"}
{"example_id": "ANSS/2013/page_55.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total contractual obligations come from after five years?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations the company's significant contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2013 are summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tpayments due by period total\tpayments due by period within 1 year\tpayments due by period 2 2013 3 years\tpayments due by period 4 2013 5 years\tpayments due by period after 5 years\nglobal headquarters operating leases ( 1 )\t$ 68389\t$ 1429\t$ 8556\t$ 8556\t$ 49848\nother operating leases ( 2 )\t35890\t11401\t12045\t5249\t7195\nunconditional purchase obligations ( 3 )\t3860\t2872\t988\t2014\t2014\nobligations related to uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties ( 4 )\t933\t933\t2014\t2014\t2014\nother long-term obligations ( 5 )\t35463\t11140\t17457\t3780\t3086\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 144535\t$ 27775\t$ 39046\t$ 17585\t$ 60129\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) on september 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a lease agreement for a to-be-built office facility in canonsburg , pennsylvania , which will serve as the company's new headquarters .\nthe lease was effective as of september 14 , 2012 , but because the premises are under construction , the company will not be obligated to pay rent until january 1 , 2015 .\nthe term of the lease is 183 months , beginning on the date the company takes possession of the facility .\nthe company shall have a one-time right to terminate the lease effective upon the last day of the tenth full year following the date of possession ( anticipated to be december 31 , 2025 ) , by providing the landlord with at least 18 months' prior written notice of such termination .\nthe company's lease for its existing headquarters expires on december 31 , 2014 .\n( 2 ) other operating leases primarily include noncancellable lease commitments for the company 2019s other domestic and international offices as well as certain operating equipment .\n( 3 ) unconditional purchase obligations primarily include software licenses and long-term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services , which are unrecorded as of december 31 , 2013 .\n( 4 ) the company has $ 17.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits , including estimated interest and penalties , that have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with income tax accounting guidance for which the company is uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled .\nas a result , such amounts are excluded from the table above .\n( 5 ) primarily includes deferred compensation of $ 20.0 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 250000 within 1 year , $ 580000 within 2-3 years and $ 90000 within 4-5 years ) , contingent consideration of $ 8.0 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 360000 within 1 year and $ 740000 within 2-3 years ) and pension obligations of $ 5.4 million for certain foreign locations of the company .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "60129", "144535", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.41602"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_75.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in total expense for repairs and maintenance from 2012 to 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe analysis of our depreciation studies .\nchanges in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively .\nunder group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized .\nthe historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies .\nthe indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes .\nbecause of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate .\nin addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies .\nany deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets .\nfor retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies .\na gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations .\nwhen we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .\nhowever , many of our assets are self-constructed .\na large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects .\ncosts that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized .\ndirect costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .\nindirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .\ngeneral and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .\nnormal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .\nthese costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n13 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2014 2013 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2014\tdec . 312013\naccounts payable\t$ 877\t$ 803\ndividends payable\t438\t356\nincome and other taxes payable\t412\t491\naccrued wages and vacation\t409\t385\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t207\ninterest payable\t178\t169\nequipment rents payable\t100\t96\nother\t640\t579\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3303\t$ 3086\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2.3", "2.1", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09524"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2017/page_122.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in based rent for hudson yards , new york facility in the second period?\n\nPre-table text:\nused to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes .\n2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2018\t141\n2019\t132\n2020\t126\n2021\t118\n2022\t109\nthereafter\t1580\ntotal\t$ 2206\n\nPost-table text:\nin may 2017 , the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc , for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards , new york , new york .\nthe term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin , expected to occur in may 2023 , with the option to renew for a specified term .\nthe lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $ 51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term , increasing every five years to $ 58 million , $ 66 million and $ 74 million per year ( or approximately $ 1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term ) .\nthis lease is classified as an operating lease and , as such , is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 134 million and $ 136 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2017 , the company had $ 298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .\nthese funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products .\nthe fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 236 million , including $ 128 million related to the first reserve transaction , and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "58", "51", ")", "divide(", "#0", "51", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13725"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2015/page_35.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus .\nthis reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment .\nin addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2015\t2014\t2013\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7344\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\ncash used in investing activities\t-4476 ( 4476 )\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-3063 ( 3063 )\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\nnet change in cash and cash equivalents\t$ -195 ( 195 )\t$ 154\t$ 369\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 .\nsimilarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 .\nbonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 .\nhigher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 .\nhigher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "7344", "7385", ")", "divide(", "#0", "7385", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.00555"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_25.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in fuel surcharge program freight revenue from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nresults of operations operating revenues millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\t% (  % ) change 2014 v 2013\t% (  % ) change 2013 v 2012\nfreight revenues\t$ 22560\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\nother revenues\t1428\t1279\t1240\t12% ( 12 % )\t3% ( 3 % )\ntotal\t$ 23988\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t9% ( 9 % )\t5% ( 5 % )\n\nPost-table text:\nwe generate freight revenues by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups .\nfreight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) .\nchanges in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc .\nwe provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as reductions to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments .\nwe recognize freight revenues as shipments move from origin to destination .\nwe allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them .\nother revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage .\nwe recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations .\nfreight revenues from all six commodity groups increased during 2014 compared to 2013 driven by 7% ( 7 % ) volume growth and core pricing gains of 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) .\nvolume growth from grain , frac sand , rock , and intermodal ( domestic and international ) shipments offset declines in crude oil .\nfreight revenues from five of our six commodity groups increased during 2013 compared to 2012 .\nrevenue from agricultural products was down slightly compared to 2012 .\narc increased 5% ( 5 % ) , driven by core pricing gains , shifts in business mix and an automotive logistics management arrangement .\nvolume essentially was flat year over year as growth in automotive , frac sand , crude oil and domestic intermodal offset declines in coal , international intermodal and grain shipments .\nour fuel surcharge programs generated freight revenues of $ 2.8 billion , $ 2.6 billion , and $ 2.6 billion in 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , respectively .\nfuel surcharge in 2014 increased 6% ( 6 % ) driven by our 7% ( 7 % ) carloadings increase .\nfuel surcharge in 2013 essentially was flat versus 2012 as lower fuel price offset improved fuel recovery provisions and the lag effect of our programs ( surcharges trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months ) .\nin 2014 , other revenue increased from 2013 due to higher revenues at our subsidiaries , primarily those that broker intermodal and automotive services , accessorial revenue driven by increased volume and per diem revenue for container usage ( previously included in automotive freight revenue ) .\nin 2013 , other revenue increased from 2012 due primarily to miscellaneous contract revenue and higher revenues at our subsidiaries that broker intermodal and automotive services. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "2.8", "2.6", ")", "divide(", "#0", "2.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07692"}
{"example_id": "IP/2009/page_37.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the average value for sales?\n\nPre-table text:\nfor uncoated freesheet paper and market pulp announced at the end of 2009 become effective .\ninput costs are expected to be higher due to wood supply constraints at the kwidzyn mill and annual tariff increases on energy in russia .\nplanned main- tenance outage costs are expected to be about flat , while operating costs should be favorable .\nasian printing papers net sales were approx- imately $ 50 million in 2009 compared with approx- imately $ 20 million in both 2008 and 2007 .\noperating earnings increased slightly in 2009 compared with 2008 , but were less than $ 1 million in all periods .\nu.s .\nmarket pulp net sales in 2009 totaled $ 575 million compared with $ 750 million in 2008 and $ 655 million in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 140 million ( a loss of $ 71 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and plant closure costs ) compared with a loss of $ 156 million ( a loss of $ 33 million excluding costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the bastrop mill ) in 2008 and earn- ings of $ 78 million in 2007 .\nsales volumes in 2009 decreased from 2008 levels due to weaker global demand .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly lower as the decline in demand resulted in significant price declines for market pulp and smaller declines in fluff pulp .\ninput costs for wood , energy and chemicals decreased , and freight costs were significantly lower .\nmill operating costs were favorable across all mills , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower .\nlack-of-order downtime in 2009 increased to approx- imately 540000 tons , including 480000 tons related to the permanent shutdown of our bastrop mill in the fourth quarter of 2008 , compared with 135000 tons in 2008 .\nin the first quarter of 2010 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , reflecting improving customer demand for fluff pulp , offset by slightly seasonally weaker demand for softwood and hard- wood pulp in china .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to improve , reflecting the realization of previously announced sales price increases for fluff pulp , hardwood pulp and softwood pulp .\ninput costs are expected to increase for wood , energy and chemicals , and freight costs may also increase .\nplanned maintenance downtime costs will be higher , but operating costs should be about flat .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales in 2009 decreased 4% ( 4 % ) compared with 2008 and increased 1% ( 1 % ) compared with 2007 .\noperating profits increased significantly compared with both 2008 and 2007 .\nexcluding alternative fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs , 2009 operating profits were sig- nificantly higher than 2008 and 57% ( 57 % ) higher than 2007 .\nbenefits from higher average sales price realizations ( $ 114 million ) , lower raw material and energy costs ( $ 114 million ) , lower freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , lower costs associated with the reorganiza- tion of the shorewood business ( $ 23 million ) , favor- able foreign exchange effects ( $ 14 million ) and other items ( $ 12 million ) were partially offset by lower sales volumes and increased lack-of-order downtime ( $ 145 million ) and costs associated with the perma- nent shutdown of the franklin mill ( $ 67 million ) .\nadditionally , operating profits in 2009 included $ 330 million of alternative fuel mixture credits .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2009 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2009\t2008\t2007\nsales\t$ 3060\t$ 3195\t$ 3015\noperating profit\t433\t17\t112\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.2 billion compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2008 and $ 2.4 billion in 2007 .\noperating earnings in 2009 were $ 343 million ( $ 87 million excluding alter- native fuel mixture credits and facility closure costs ) compared with $ 8 million ( $ 38 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2008 and $ 70 million in 2007 .\ncoated paperboard sales volumes were lower in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting weaker market conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher , reflecting the full-year realization of price increases implemented in the second half of 2008 .\nraw material costs for wood , energy and chemicals were significantly lower in 2009 , while freight costs were also favorable .\noperating costs , however , were unfavorable and planned main- tenance downtime costs were higher .\nlack-of-order downtime increased to 300000 tons in 2009 from 15000 tons in 2008 due to weak demand .\noperating results in 2009 include income of $ 330 million for alternative fuel mixture credits and $ 67 million of expenses for shutdown costs for the franklin mill .\nfoodservice sales volumes were lower in 2009 than in 2008 due to generally weak world-wide economic conditions .\naverage sales price realizations were .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["table_average(", "sales", "none", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3090"}
{"example_id": "ANSS/2013/page_55.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total contractual obligations comes from global headquarters operating leases?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations the company's significant contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2013 are summarized below: .\n\nTable:\n( in thousands )\tpayments due by period total\tpayments due by period within 1 year\tpayments due by period 2 2013 3 years\tpayments due by period 4 2013 5 years\tpayments due by period after 5 years\nglobal headquarters operating leases ( 1 )\t$ 68389\t$ 1429\t$ 8556\t$ 8556\t$ 49848\nother operating leases ( 2 )\t35890\t11401\t12045\t5249\t7195\nunconditional purchase obligations ( 3 )\t3860\t2872\t988\t2014\t2014\nobligations related to uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties ( 4 )\t933\t933\t2014\t2014\t2014\nother long-term obligations ( 5 )\t35463\t11140\t17457\t3780\t3086\ntotal contractual obligations\t$ 144535\t$ 27775\t$ 39046\t$ 17585\t$ 60129\n\nPost-table text:\n( 1 ) on september 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a lease agreement for a to-be-built office facility in canonsburg , pennsylvania , which will serve as the company's new headquarters .\nthe lease was effective as of september 14 , 2012 , but because the premises are under construction , the company will not be obligated to pay rent until january 1 , 2015 .\nthe term of the lease is 183 months , beginning on the date the company takes possession of the facility .\nthe company shall have a one-time right to terminate the lease effective upon the last day of the tenth full year following the date of possession ( anticipated to be december 31 , 2025 ) , by providing the landlord with at least 18 months' prior written notice of such termination .\nthe company's lease for its existing headquarters expires on december 31 , 2014 .\n( 2 ) other operating leases primarily include noncancellable lease commitments for the company 2019s other domestic and international offices as well as certain operating equipment .\n( 3 ) unconditional purchase obligations primarily include software licenses and long-term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services , which are unrecorded as of december 31 , 2013 .\n( 4 ) the company has $ 17.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits , including estimated interest and penalties , that have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with income tax accounting guidance for which the company is uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled .\nas a result , such amounts are excluded from the table above .\n( 5 ) primarily includes deferred compensation of $ 20.0 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 250000 within 1 year , $ 580000 within 2-3 years and $ 90000 within 4-5 years ) , contingent consideration of $ 8.0 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 360000 within 1 year and $ 740000 within 2-3 years ) and pension obligations of $ 5.4 million for certain foreign locations of the company .\ntable of contents .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "68389", "144535", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.47317"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2009/page_88.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the last payment for the final milestone was paid through the issuance of common stock?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) on april 1 , 2007 , the company adopted financial interpretation fin no .\n48 , accounting for uncertainty in income taxes 2014an interpretation of fasb statement no .\n109 ( 201cfin no .\n48 201d ) , which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise 2019s financial statements in accordance with fasb statement no .\n109 , accounting for income taxes .\nfin no .\n48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return .\nfin no .\n48 also provides guidance on derecognition , classification , interest and penalties , accounting in interim periods , disclosure , and transition and defines the criteria that must be met for the benefits of a tax position to be recognized .\nas a result of its adoption of fin no .\n48 , the company recorded the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $ 0.3 million as a decrease to opening retained earnings and an increase to other long-term liabilities as of april 1 , 2007 .\nthis adjustment related to state nexus for failure to file tax returns in various states for the years ended march 31 , 2003 , 2004 , and 2005 .\nthe company initiated a voluntary disclosure plan , which it completed in fiscal year 2009 .\nthe company elected to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense in its consolidated statements of operations .\nas of march 31 , 2009 , the company had remitted all outstanding amounts owed to each of the states in connection with the outstanding taxes owed at march 31 , 2008 .\nas such , the company had no fin no .\n48 liability at march 31 , 2009 .\non a quarterly basis , the company accrues for the effects of uncertain tax positions and the related potential penalties and interest .\nit is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefit with respect to certain of the unrecognized tax positions will increase or decrease during the next 12 months ; however , it is not expected that the change will have a significant effect on the company 2019s results of operations or financial position .\na reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of unrecognized tax benefits , excluding accrued interest recorded at march 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) is as follows: .\n\nTable:\nbalance at march 31 2008\t$ 168\nreductions for tax positions for closing of the applicable statute of limitations\t-168 ( 168 )\nbalance at march 31 2009\t$ 2014\n\nPost-table text:\nthe company and its subsidiaries are subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions .\nthe company has accumulated significant losses since its inception in 1981 .\nall tax years remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions , including the federal government and the commonwealth of massachusetts .\nhowever , since the company has net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards which may be utilized in future years to offset taxable income , those years may also be subject to review by relevant taxing authorities if the carry forwards are utilized .\nnote 15 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company 2019s acquisition of impella provided that abiomed was required to make contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders as follows : 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 2.5 device , a payment of $ 5583333 2022 upon fda approval of the impella 5.0 device , a payment of $ 5583333 , and 2022 upon the sale of 1000 units of impella 2019s products worldwide , a payment of $ 5583334 .\nthe two milestones related to sales and fda approval of the impella 2.5 device were achieved and paid prior to march 31 , 2009 .\nin april 2009 , the company received fda 510 ( k ) clearance of its impella 5.0 product , triggering an obligation to pay the milestone related to the impella 5.0 device .\nin may 2009 , the company paid $ 1.8 million of this final milestone in cash and elected to pay the remaining amount through the issuance of approximately 664612 shares of common stock. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "5583334", "const_1000000", ")", "subtract(", "#0", "1.8", ")", "divide(", "#1", "#0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.67761"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2007/page_52.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total future obligations is related to operating lease obligations as of march 31 , 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table ( in thousands ) summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2007 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods. .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year more than 5 years\noperating lease obligations\t$ 7669\t$ 1960\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\npurchase obligations\t6421\t6421\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 14090\t$ 8381\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or material commitments at march 31 , 2007 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding a contingent payment in the amount of $ 5.6 million made on january 30 , 2007 in the form of common stock , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella , and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nwe may make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 11.2 million .\nthese contingent payments may be made in a combination of cash or stock under circumstances described in the purchase agreement .\nif any contingent payments are made , they will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nwe apply the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to our agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which we are a guarantor .\nwe enter into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions .\nunder these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities .\nthese indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement .\nthe maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements .\nas a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal .\naccordingly , we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2007 .\nclinical study agreements 2013 in our clinical study agreements , we have agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to use of our devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and our instructions .\nthe indemnification provisions contained within our clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in our clinical study agreements .\nproduct warranties 2014we routinely accrue for estimated future warranty costs on our product sales at the time of shipment .\nall of our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers , our warranty obligations are affected by product failure rates .\nour operating results could be adversely affected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , we indemnify customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by our products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "7669", "14090", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.54429"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2015/page_24.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in free cash flow from 2014 to 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\nto , rather than as a substitute for , cash provided by operating activities .\nthe following table reconciles cash provided by operating activities ( gaap measure ) to free cash flow ( non-gaap measure ) : .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2015\t2014\t2013\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7344\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\ncash used in investing activities\t-4476 ( 4476 )\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\ndividends paid\t-2344 ( 2344 )\t-1632 ( 1632 )\t-1333 ( 1333 )\nfree cash flow\t$ 524\t$ 1504\t$ 2085\n\nPost-table text:\n2016 outlook f0b7 safety 2013 operating a safe railroad benefits all our constituents : our employees , customers , shareholders and the communities we serve .\nwe will continue using a multi-faceted approach to safety , utilizing technology , risk assessment , quality control , training and employee engagement , and targeted capital investments .\nwe will continue using and expanding the deployment of total safety culture and courage to care throughout our operations , which allows us to identify and implement best practices for employee and operational safety .\nwe will continue our efforts to increase detection of rail defects ; improve or close crossings ; and educate the public and law enforcement agencies about crossing safety through a combination of our own programs ( including risk assessment strategies ) , industry programs and local community activities across our network .\nf0b7 network operations 2013 in 2016 , we will continue to align resources with customer demand , continue to improve network performance , and maintain our surge capability .\nf0b7 fuel prices 2013 with the dramatic drop in fuel prices during 2015 , fuel price projections continue to be uncertain in the current environment .\nwe again could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s .\ndomestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical events , weather conditions and other factors .\nas prices fluctuate , there will be a timing impact on earnings , as our fuel surcharge programs trail fluctuations in fuel price by approximately two months .\ncontinuing lower fuel prices could have a positive impact on the economy by increasing consumer discretionary spending that potentially could increase demand for various consumer products that we transport .\nalternatively , lower fuel prices will likely have a negative impact on other commodities such as coal , frac sand and crude oil shipments .\nf0b7 capital plan 2013 in 2016 , we expect our capital plan to be approximately $ 3.75 billion , including expenditures for ptc , 230 locomotives and 450 freight cars .\nthe capital plan may be revised if business conditions warrant or if new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments .\n( see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan. ) f0b7 financial expectations 2013 economic conditions in many of our market sectors continue to drive uncertainty with respect to our volume levels .\nwe expect volumes to be down slightly in 2016 compared to 2015 , but will depend on the overall economy and market conditions .\nthe strong u.s .\ndollar and historic low commodity prices could also drive continued volatility .\none of the biggest uncertainties is the outlook for energy markets , which will bring both challenges and opportunities .\nin the current environment , we expect continued margin improvement driven by continued pricing opportunities , ongoing productivity initiatives , and the ability to leverage our resources and strengthen our franchise .\nover the longer term , we expect the overall u.s .\neconomy to continue to improve at a modest pace , with some markets outperforming others. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "524", "1504", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1504", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.6516"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2014/page_119.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total long-term borrowings is due in the next 24 months?\n\nPre-table text:\ncredit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 .\nin march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 .\nthe amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 .\nthe 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\non october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion .\nblackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 .\nin april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion .\nthe cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t$ 750\t$ 2014\t$ 750\t$ 753\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-1 ( 1 )\t699\t785\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1134\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t825\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t783\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1029\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -12 ( 12 )\t$ 4938\t$ 5309\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "750", "4950", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15152"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2010/page_84.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2010 what was the sum of the future minimum lease commitments due in 2014\n\nPre-table text:\nthe future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t$ 62465\n2012\t54236\n2013\t47860\n2014\t37660\n2015\t28622\nthereafter\t79800\nfuture minimum lease payments\t$ 310643\n\nPost-table text:\nrental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nin connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .\ntypical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .\nwe also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .\nlease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nwe guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .\nthe residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .\nin the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .\nsimilarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .\nhad we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .\nwe have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .\nlitigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .\ninfringed on ford design patents .\nthe parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .\npursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .\nof aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .\ndesign patent .\nwe have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .\nthe amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .\nwe also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .\nwe currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "37660", "310643", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.12123"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_21.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total number of shares purchased were purchased in october ?\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 .\nthe graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested .\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 .\nthe following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal number ofsharespurchased [a]\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]\tmaximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]\noct . 1 through oct . 31\t379488\t87.46\t371639\t31370427\nnov . 1 through nov . 30\t1748964\t98.41\t1733877\t29636550\ndec . 1 through dec . 31\t1787343\t100.26\t1780142\t27856408\ntotal\t3915795\t$ 98.19\t3885658\tn/a\n\nPost-table text:\n[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .\n[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .\nthese repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .\nour management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "379488", "3915795", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.09691"}
{"example_id": "MO/2012/page_44.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in total shipment volume from 2011 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nmiddleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains .\nin the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture .\nmarlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) .\nin january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally .\nmarlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family .\npm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount .\nthese gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands .\nin the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points .\nthe brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies .\nin december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 .\nthe following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 .\nnet revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments .\noperating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) .\nfor 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories .\nafter adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day .\npm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) .\nmarlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 .\nin the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) .\npm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 .\nmiddleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 .\nfor 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro .\nmarlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points .\nin 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels .\nmiddleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 .\nfor 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 .\nblack & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine .\nthis new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties .\nduring the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas .\nmiddleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically .\nsmokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management .\nthe following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( cans and packs in millions )\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010\ncopenhagen\t392.5\t354.2\t327.5\nskoal\t288.4\t286.8\t274.4\ncopenhagenandskoal\t680.9\t641.0\t601.9\nother\t82.4\t93.6\t122.5\ntotal smokeless products\t763.3\t734.6\t724.4\n\nPost-table text:\nvolume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment .\nother includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products .\nnew types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "763.3", "734.6", ")", "divide(", "#0", "734.6", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03907"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2018/page_83.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the change in the warranty reserve in 2017 in thousands\n\nPre-table text:\nwarranty reserve some of our salvage mechanical products are sold with a standard six month warranty against defects .\nadditionally , some of our remanufactured engines are sold with a standard three year warranty against defects .\nwe also provide a limited lifetime warranty for certain of our aftermarket products .\nthese assurance-type warranties are not considered a separate performance obligation , and thus no transaction price is allocated to them .\nwe record the warranty costs in cost of goods sold on our consolidated statements of income .\nour warranty reserve is calculated using historical claim information to project future warranty claims activity and is recorded within other accrued expenses and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets based on the expected timing of the related payments .\nthe changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nbalance as of january 1 2017\t$ 19634\nwarranty expense\t38608\nwarranty claims\t-35091 ( 35091 )\nbalance as of december 31 2017\t23151\nwarranty expense\t43682\nwarranty claims\t-43571 ( 43571 )\nbalance as of december 31 2018\t$ 23262\n\nPost-table text:\nself-insurance reserves we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program .\nwe purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure .\nwe also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , directors and officers liability , workers' compensation , and property coverage , under deductible insurance programs .\nthe insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods .\na reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analysis of historical data .\nwe monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves .\ntotal self-insurance reserves were $ 105 million and $ 94 million , of which $ 52 million and $ 43 million was classified as current , as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and are classified as other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets .\nthe remaining balances of self-insurance reserves are classified as other noncurrent liabilities , which reflects management's estimates of when claims will be paid .\nwe had outstanding letters of credit of $ 65 million and $ 71 million at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , to guarantee self-insurance claims payments .\nwhile we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claims experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions .\nstockholders' equity on october 25 , 2018 , our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we may purchase up to $ 500 million of our common stock from time to time through october 25 , 2021 .\nrepurchases under the program may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , with the amount and timing of repurchases depending on market conditions and corporate needs .\nthe repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time .\ndelaware law imposes restrictions on stock repurchases .\nduring 2018 , we repurchased 2.3 million shares of common stock for an aggregate price $ 60 million .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , there is $ 440 million of remaining capacity under our repurchase program .\nin 2019 , we have repurchased 1.8 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 46 million during the period ended february 22 , 2019 .\ntreasury stock is accounted for using the cost method .\nincome taxes current income taxes are provided on income reported for financial reporting purposes , adjusted for transactions that do not enter into the computation of income taxes payable in the same year .\ndeferred income taxes have been provided to show the effect of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements .\na valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before we are able to realize their benefit or that future deductibility is uncertain .\nprovision is made for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and related companies to the extent that such earnings are not deemed to be permanently invested. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "23151", "19634", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "3517"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_37.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the fixed income is related to americas?\n\nPre-table text:\nretail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tamericas\temea\tasia-pacific\ttotal\nequity\t$ 94805\t$ 53140\t$ 16803\t$ 164748\nfixed income\t121640\t11444\t5341\t138425\nmulti-asset class\t76714\t9538\t4374\t90626\nalternatives\t4865\t3577\t1243\t9685\nlong-term retail/hnw\t$ 298024\t$ 77699\t$ 27761\t$ 403484\n\nPost-table text:\nblackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds .\nat december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 .\nduring the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion .\nretail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors .\nclients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts .\nthe product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives .\nthe vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors .\nthe client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 .\n2022 u.s .\nretail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s .\nsector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity .\nin 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets .\nu.s .\nretail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 .\nthe year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 .\nwe are the leading u.s .\nmanager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 .\n2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion .\ninvestor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking .\nequity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets .\nour international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom .\nbgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 .\nover 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p .\nin 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 .\nin the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income .\nglobal clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements .\n2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "121640", "138425", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.87874"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_124.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the annual interest expense related to '2022 notes' , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 1029\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t750\t2014\t750\t759\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-2 ( 2 )\t698\t812\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1140\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t799\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t745\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -11 ( 11 )\t$ 4939\t$ 5284\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2013 and 2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .\nduring the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .\n2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthese notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2017 notes .\nin september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .\na portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .\nthe 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "750", "3.375%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "25.3125"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2010/page_84.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the cumulative lease payments to the employee who became an officer of the company following his business acquisition from 2008 to 2010\n\nPre-table text:\nthe future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .\n\nTable:\n2011\t$ 62465\n2012\t54236\n2013\t47860\n2014\t37660\n2015\t28622\nthereafter\t79800\nfuture minimum lease payments\t$ 310643\n\nPost-table text:\nrental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nin connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations .\ntypical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods .\nwe also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property .\nlease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .\nwe guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases .\nthe residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost .\nin the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall .\nsimilarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value .\nhad we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million .\nwe have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value .\nlitigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s .\ninfringed on ford design patents .\nthe parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 .\npursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s .\nof aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s .\ndesign patent .\nwe have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell .\nthe amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income .\nwe also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business .\nwe currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "0.9", "0.9", ")", "add(", "#0", "1.0", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.8"}
{"example_id": "APTV/2014/page_49.pdf-1", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the lowest return for the first month of the investment?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 .\n( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .\ncompany index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\ncompany index\tnovember 17 2011\tdecember 31 2011\tdecember 31 2012\tdecember 31 2013\tdecember 31 2014\ndelphi automotive plc ( 1 )\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.98\t$ 179.33\t$ 285.81\t$ 350.82\ns&p 500 ( 2 )\t100.00\t100.80\t116.93\t154.80\t175.99\nautomotive supplier peer group ( 3 )\t100.00\t89.27\t110.41\t166.46\t178.05\n\nPost-table text:\ndividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .\nthe board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .\nin january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 .\nin addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "89.27", "const_100", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-10.73"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_35.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent f the purchase obligations in 2006 set aside for the contract for the purchase of pulpwood , logs and wood chips\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obli- gations at december 31 , 2005 , were as follows : in millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2007\t2008\t2009\t2010\tthereafter\ntotal debt\t$ 1181\t$ 570\t$ 308\t$ 2330\t$ 1534\t$ 6281\nlease obligations\t172\t144\t119\t76\t63\t138\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3264\t393\t280\t240\t204\t1238\ntotal\t$ 4617\t$ 1107\t$ 707\t$ 2646\t$ 1801\t$ 7657\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the 2006 amount includes $ 2.4 billion for contracts made in the ordinary course of business to purchase pulpwood , logs and wood chips .\nthe majority of our other purchase obligations are take-or-pay or purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business related to raw material purchases and energy contracts .\nother significant items include purchase obligations related to contracted services .\ntransformation plan in july 2005 , the company announced a plan to focus its business portfolio on two key global platform businesses : uncoated papers ( including distribution ) and packaging .\nthe plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses , additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses , includ- ing possible sale or spin-off .\nin connection with this process , in the third quarter of 2005 , the company completed the sale of its 50.5% ( 50.5 % ) interest in carter holt harvey limited .\nother businesses currently under re- view include : 2022 the coated and supercalendered papers busi- ness , including the coated groundwood mill and associated assets in brazil , 2022 the beverage packaging business , including the pine bluff , arkansas mill , 2022 the kraft papers business , including the roa- noke rapids , north carolina mill , 2022 arizona chemical , 2022 the wood products business , and 2022 segments or potentially all of the company 2019s 6.5 million acres of u.s .\nforestlands .\nconsistent with this evaluation process , the com- pany has distributed bid package information for some of these businesses .\nthe exact timing of this evaluation process will vary by business ; however , it is anticipated that decisions will be made for some of these businesses during 2006 .\nwhile the exact use of any proceeds from potential future sales is dependent upon various factors affecting future cash flows , such as the amount of any proceeds received and changes in market conditions , input costs and capital spending , the company remains committed to using its free cash flow in 2006 to pay down debt , to return value to shareholders , and for se- lective high-return investments .\ncritical accounting policies the preparation of financial statements in con- formity with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states requires international paper to estab- lish accounting policies and to make estimates that af- fect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses .\nsome of these estimates require judgments about matters that are in- herently uncertain .\naccounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of international paper , and that can require judgments by management that affect their application , include sfas no .\n5 , 201caccounting for contingencies , 201d sfas no .\n144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d sfas no .\n142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets , 201d sfas no .\n87 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for pensions , 201d sfas no .\n106 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions , 201d as amended by sfas nos .\n132 and 132r , 201cemployers 2019 disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefits , 201d and sfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes . 201d the following is a discussion of the impact of these accounting policies on international paper : contingent liabilities .\naccruals for contingent li- abilities , including legal and environmental matters , are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated .\nliabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel .\nadditionally , as dis- cussed in note 10 of the notes to consolidated finan- cial statements in item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data , reserves for projected future claims settlements relating to exterior siding and roofing prod- ucts previously manufactured by masonite require judgments regarding projections of future claims rates and amounts .\ninternational paper utilizes an in- dependent third party consultant to assist in developing these estimates .\nliabilities for environmental matters require evaluations of relevant environmental regu- lations and estimates of future remediation alternatives and costs .\ninternational paper determines these esti- mates after a detailed evaluation of each site .\nimpairment of long-lived assets and goodwill .\nan impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the asset 2019s carrying amount exceeds its fair value , and is recorded when the carrying amount is not recoverable through future operations .\na goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value .\nassessments of possible impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill are made when events or changes in cir- cumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "2.4", "3264", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.00074"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2014/page_119.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total long-term borrowings is due in the next 36 months?\n\nPre-table text:\ncredit facility , which was amended in 2013 and 2012 .\nin march 2014 , the company 2019s credit facility was further amended to extend the maturity date to march 2019 .\nthe amount of the aggregate commitment is $ 3.990 billion ( the 201c2014 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2014 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2014 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 4.990 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2014 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2014 .\nthe 2014 credit facility provides back-up liquidity , funds ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and funds various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2014 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2014 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\non october 14 , 2009 , blackrock established a commercial paper program ( the 201ccp program 201d ) under which the company could issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.0 billion .\nblackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount that could be borrowed under the cp program to $ 3.5 billion in 2011 and to $ 3.785 billion in 2012 .\nin april 2013 , blackrock increased the maximum aggregate amount for which the company could issue unsecured cp notes on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 3.990 billion .\nthe cp program is currently supported by the 2014 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2014 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2014 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t$ 750\t$ 2014\t$ 750\t$ 753\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-1 ( 1 )\t699\t785\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1134\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t825\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t783\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1029\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -12 ( 12 )\t$ 4938\t$ 5309\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2013 had a carrying value of $ 4.939 billion and a fair value of $ 5.284 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2013 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2024 notes were issued at a discount of $ 3 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 6 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the term of the 2024 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2014 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "750", "700", ")", "divide(", "#0", "4950", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.29293"}
{"example_id": "TFX/2015/page_70.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nif the company were to purchase the remaining shares at the price at december 31 , 2015 , how much would the company have to pay for the remaining shares .\n\nPre-table text:\npart iii item 10 .\ndirectors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .\nfor the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .\nof this report .\nitem 11 .\nexecutive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 12 .\nsecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nTable:\nplan category\tnumber of securitiesto be issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) ( b )\tweighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options warrants and rights\tnumber of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans ( excludingsecurities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )\nequity compensation plans approved by security holders\t1442912\t$ 86.98\t4446967\n\nPost-table text:\npart iii item 10 .\ndirectors , executive officers and corporate governance for the information required by this item 10 , other than information with respect to our executive officers contained at the end of part i , item 1 of this report , see 201celection of directors , 201d 201cnominees for election to the board of directors , 201d 201ccorporate governance 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting will be filed within 120 days of the close of our year .\nfor the information required by this item 10 with respect to our executive officers , see part i , item 1 .\nof this report .\nitem 11 .\nexecutive compensation for the information required by this item 11 , see 201ccompensation discussion and analysis , 201d 201ccompensation committee report , 201d and 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 12 .\nsecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters for the information required by this item 12 with respect to beneficial ownership of our common stock , see 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nthe following table sets forth certain information as of december 31 , 2015 regarding our equity plans : plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1442912 $ 86.98 4446967 item 13 .\ncertain relationships and related transactions , and director independence for the information required by this item 13 , see 201ccertain transactions 201d and 201ccorporate governance 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference .\nitem 14 .\nprincipal accounting fees and services for the information required by this item 14 , see 201caudit and non-audit fees 201d and 201caudit committee pre-approval procedures 201d in the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "86.98", "4446967", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "386797189.66"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_44.pdf-2", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the net change in the number of environmental sites from 2011 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nour environmental site activity was as follows : 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nopen sites beginning balance\t284\t285\t294\nnew sites\t41\t56\t51\nclosed sites\t-57 ( 57 )\t-57 ( 57 )\t-60 ( 60 )\nopen sites ending balance atdecember 31\t268\t284\t285\n\nPost-table text:\nthe environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties .\ncost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations .\nthe ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs .\nestimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation .\ncurrent obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .\nproperty and depreciation 2013 our railroad operations are highly capital intensive , and our large base of homogeneous , network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis .\neach year we develop a capital program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers .\nassets purchased or constructed throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria .\nproperties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service lives , which are measured in years , except for rail in high-density traffic corridors ( i.e. , all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment , yard and switching tracks , and electronic yards ) for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track .\nwe use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics , use , and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes , and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates .\nthe group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources , not as singular items .\nwe currently have more than 60 depreciable asset classes , and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in technology , asset strategies , or other factors .\nwe determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property by means of depreciation studies .\nwe perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for track assets ( i.e. , rail and other track material , ties , and ballast ) and other road property .\nour depreciation studies take into account the following factors : f0b7 statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes ; f0b7 evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets ; f0b7 evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices ; and f0b7 expected salvage to be received upon retirement .\nfor rail in high-density traffic corridors , we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per mile of track .\nit has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely correlated to usage ( i.e. , the amount of weight carried over the rail ) .\nthe service lives also vary based on rail weight , rail condition ( e.g. , new or secondhand ) , and rail type ( e.g. , straight or curve ) .\nour depreciation studies for rail in high density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining the estimated service lives .\nfor rail in high-density traffic corridors , we calculate depreciation rates annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail ( i.e. , the weight of loaded and empty freight cars , locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail ) by the estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile .\nrail in high-density traffic corridors accounts for approximately 70 percent of the historical cost of rail and other track material .\nbased on the number of gross ton-miles carried over our rail in high density traffic corridors during 2013 , the estimated service lives of the majority of this rail ranged from approximately 15 years to approximately 30 years .\nfor all other depreciable assets , we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "284", "285", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-1"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2014/page_35.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .\n\nTable:\ncash flowsmillions\t2014\t2013\t2012\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\t$ 6161\ncash used in investing activities\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\t-3633 ( 3633 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\t-2682 ( 2682 )\nnet change in cash and cashequivalents\t$ 154\t$ 369\t$ -154 ( 154 )\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .\nhigher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .\nin addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .\nlower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .\nlower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .\nincluded in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "7385", "6823", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6823", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08237"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_21.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total number of shares purchased were purchased in december?\n\nPre-table text:\nfive-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 .\nthe graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested .\npurchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 .\nthe following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal number ofsharespurchased [a]\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b]\tmaximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]\noct . 1 through oct . 31\t379488\t87.46\t371639\t31370427\nnov . 1 through nov . 30\t1748964\t98.41\t1733877\t29636550\ndec . 1 through dec . 31\t1787343\t100.26\t1780142\t27856408\ntotal\t3915795\t$ 98.19\t3885658\tn/a\n\nPost-table text:\n[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares .\n[b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 .\nthese repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions .\nour management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1787343", "3915795", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.45644"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2016/page_119.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the pre tax gains recognized in other comprehensive income in 2015?\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 239 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2015 .\nthe fair value of the company 2019s interest reflected the pennymac stock price at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ( a level 1 input ) .\nthe company performed an other-than- temporary impairment analysis as of december 31 , 2016 and determined the decline in fair value below the carrying value to be temporary .\n12 .\nborrowings short-term borrowings 2016 revolving credit facility .\nthe company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2016 to extend the maturity date to march 2021 ( the 201c2016 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2016 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2016 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2016 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2016 .\nthe 2016 credit facility provides back-up liquidity to fund ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2016 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2016 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\nthe company can issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 4.0 billion .\nthe commercial paper program is currently supported by the 2016 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2016 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices and foreign exchange rates at december 31 , 2016 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount and debt issuance costs carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturityamount\tunamortized discount and debt issuance costs\tcarrying value\tfair value\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t$ 700\t$ 2014\t$ 700\t$ 724\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1086\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t808\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t775\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-6 ( 6 )\t994\t1030\n1.25% ( 1.25 % ) notes due 2025\t738\t-6 ( 6 )\t732\t742\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4938\t$ -23 ( 23 )\t$ 4915\t$ 5165\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2015 had a carrying value of $ 4.9 billion and a fair value of $ 5.2 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2025 notes .\nin may 2015 , the company issued 20ac700 million of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) senior unsecured notes maturing on may 6 , 2025 ( the 201c2025 notes 201d ) .\nthe notes are listed on the new york stock exchange .\nthe net proceeds of the 2025 notes were used for general corporate purposes , including refinancing of outstanding indebtedness .\ninterest of approximately $ 9 million per year based on current exchange rates is payable annually on may 6 of each year .\nthe 2025 notes may be redeemed in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2025 notes .\nupon conversion to u.s .\ndollars the company designated the 20ac700 million debt offering as a net investment hedge to offset its currency exposure relating to its net investment in certain euro functional currency operations .\ngains of $ 14 million ( net of tax of $ 8 million ) and $ 19 million ( net of tax of $ 11 million ) were recognized in other comprehensive income for 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nno hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during 2016 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake- whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "19", "11", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "30"}
{"example_id": "SNPS/2006/page_69.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the variation observed between the tangible and intangible assets , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nsoftware and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .\nintegrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .\npurchase price .\nthe company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .\nin addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .\nthe total purchase consideration consisted of: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\ncash paid\t$ 11001\nprior investment in hpl\t1872\nacquisition-related costs\t2831\ntotal purchase price\t$ 15704\n\nPost-table text:\nacquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .\nas of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .\nthe $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .\nassets acquired .\nthe company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .\napproximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .\naccordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .\nadditionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .\ngoodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .\ngoodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .\nother .\nduring the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .\nthis acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .\nfiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .\nreasons for the acquisition .\nthe company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .\npurchase price .\nthe company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .\nin addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "14.0", "8.5", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "5.5"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_77.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in accrued wages and vacation from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\nwhen we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use .\nhowever , many of our assets are self-constructed .\na large portion of our capital expenditures is for track structure expansion ( capacity projects ) and replacement ( program projects ) , which is typically performed by our employees .\napproximately 13% ( 13 % ) of our full-time equivalent employees are dedicated to the construction of capital assets .\ncosts that are directly attributable or overhead costs that relate directly to capital projects are capitalized .\ndirect costs that are capitalized as part of self-constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment .\nindirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset .\nthese costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\nthe capitalization of indirect costs is consistent with fasb statement no .\n67 , accounting for costs and initial rental operations of real estate projects .\ngeneral and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred .\nnormal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n10 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions of dollars 2008 2007 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\tdec . 31 2008\tdec . 31 2007\naccounts payable\t$ 629\t$ 732\naccrued wages and vacation\t367\t394\naccrued casualty costs\t390\t371\nincome and other taxes\t207\t343\ndividends and interest\t328\t284\nequipment rents payable\t93\t103\nother\t546\t675\ntotal accounts payable and other current liabilities\t$ 2560\t$ 2902\n\nPost-table text:\n11 .\nfair value measurements during the first quarter of 2008 , we fully adopted fasb statement no .\n157 , fair value measurements ( fas 157 ) .\nfas 157 established a framework for measuring fair value and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements .\nthe adoption of fas 157 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations .\nfas 157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis .\nthis enables the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values .\nthe statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fair value be classified into one of the following categories : level 1 : quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities .\nlevel 2 : observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data .\nlevel 3 : unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "367", "394", ")", "divide(", "#0", "394", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.06853"}
{"example_id": "AAP/2011/page_28.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\ncompared to the lowest stock price , how much did advanced auto parts outperform the overall market?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .\nthe comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .\ncomparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .\n\nTable:\ncompany/index\tdecember 30 2006\tdecember 29 2007\tjanuary 3 2009\tjanuary 2 2010\tjanuary 1 2011\tdecember 31 2011\nadvance auto parts\t$ 100.00\t$ 108.00\t$ 97.26\t$ 116.01\t$ 190.41\t$ 201.18\ns&p 500 index\t100.00\t104.24\t65.70\t78.62\t88.67\t88.67\ns&p retail index\t100.00\t82.15\t58.29\t82.36\t101.84\t104.81\n\nPost-table text:\nstock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .\nthe graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .\nthe comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .\ncomparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "88.67", "65.70", ")", "divide(", "#0", "65.70", ")", "subtract(", "201.18", "97.26", ")", "divide(", "#2", "97.26", ")", "subtract(", "#3", "#1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.71886"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2016/page_119.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat are the pre tax gains recognized in other comprehensive income in 2016?\n\nPre-table text:\n$ 239 million , respectively , at december 31 , 2015 .\nthe fair value of the company 2019s interest reflected the pennymac stock price at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively ( a level 1 input ) .\nthe company performed an other-than- temporary impairment analysis as of december 31 , 2016 and determined the decline in fair value below the carrying value to be temporary .\n12 .\nborrowings short-term borrowings 2016 revolving credit facility .\nthe company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2016 to extend the maturity date to march 2021 ( the 201c2016 credit facility 201d ) .\nthe 2016 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2016 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion .\ninterest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread .\nthe 2016 credit facility requires the company not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio ( ratio of net debt to earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization , where net debt equals total debt less unrestricted cash ) of 3 to 1 , which was satisfied with a ratio of less than 1 to 1 at december 31 , 2016 .\nthe 2016 credit facility provides back-up liquidity to fund ongoing working capital for general corporate purposes and various investment opportunities .\nat december 31 , 2016 , the company had no amount outstanding under the 2016 credit facility .\ncommercial paper program .\nthe company can issue unsecured commercial paper notes ( the 201ccp notes 201d ) on a private-placement basis up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $ 4.0 billion .\nthe commercial paper program is currently supported by the 2016 credit facility .\nat december 31 , 2016 , blackrock had no cp notes outstanding .\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices and foreign exchange rates at december 31 , 2016 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount and debt issuance costs carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturityamount\tunamortized discount and debt issuance costs\tcarrying value\tfair value\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t$ 700\t$ 2014\t$ 700\t$ 724\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-3 ( 3 )\t997\t1086\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t808\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t775\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2024\t1000\t-6 ( 6 )\t994\t1030\n1.25% ( 1.25 % ) notes due 2025\t738\t-6 ( 6 )\t732\t742\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4938\t$ -23 ( 23 )\t$ 4915\t$ 5165\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2015 had a carrying value of $ 4.9 billion and a fair value of $ 5.2 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2025 notes .\nin may 2015 , the company issued 20ac700 million of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) senior unsecured notes maturing on may 6 , 2025 ( the 201c2025 notes 201d ) .\nthe notes are listed on the new york stock exchange .\nthe net proceeds of the 2025 notes were used for general corporate purposes , including refinancing of outstanding indebtedness .\ninterest of approximately $ 9 million per year based on current exchange rates is payable annually on may 6 of each year .\nthe 2025 notes may be redeemed in whole or in part prior to maturity at any time at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2025 notes .\nupon conversion to u.s .\ndollars the company designated the 20ac700 million debt offering as a net investment hedge to offset its currency exposure relating to its net investment in certain euro functional currency operations .\ngains of $ 14 million ( net of tax of $ 8 million ) and $ 19 million ( net of tax of $ 11 million ) were recognized in other comprehensive income for 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\nno hedge ineffectiveness was recognized during 2016 .\n2024 notes .\nin march 2014 , the company issued $ 1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on march 18 , 2024 ( the 201c2024 notes 201d ) .\nthe net proceeds of the 2024 notes were used to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake- whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["add(", "14", "8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "22"}
{"example_id": "MO/2012/page_44.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in total shipment volume from 2010 to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nmiddleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains .\nin the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture .\nmarlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) .\nin january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally .\nmarlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family .\npm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount .\nthese gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands .\nin the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points .\nthe brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies .\nin december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 .\nthe following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 .\nnet revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments .\noperating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) .\nfor 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories .\nafter adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 .\npm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day .\npm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) .\nmarlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 .\nin the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) .\npm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 .\nmiddleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 .\nfor 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro .\nmarlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points .\nin 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels .\nmiddleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 .\nfor 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 .\nblack & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine .\nthis new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties .\nduring the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas .\nmiddleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically .\nsmokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management .\nthe following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 .\n\nTable:\n( cans and packs in millions )\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011\tshipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010\ncopenhagen\t392.5\t354.2\t327.5\nskoal\t288.4\t286.8\t274.4\ncopenhagenandskoal\t680.9\t641.0\t601.9\nother\t82.4\t93.6\t122.5\ntotal smokeless products\t763.3\t734.6\t724.4\n\nPost-table text:\nvolume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment .\nother includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products .\nnew types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "734.6", "724.4", ")", "divide(", "#0", "724.4", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01408"}
{"example_id": "IP/2006/page_32.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage reduction in net sales for shorewood in 2006 from 2005 s\n\nPre-table text:\nearnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .\ncontainerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .\nsales volumes for u.s .\nconverted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .\naverage sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .\nan additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .\ncosts for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .\nmanufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .\neuro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .\noperating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .\ncompared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2005\t2004\nsales\t$ 2455\t$ 2245\t$ 2295\noperating profit\t$ 131\t$ 121\t$ 155\n\nPost-table text:\ncoated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .\nsales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .\nin 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .\naverage sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .\noperating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .\nthe impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .\nfoodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .\nsales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .\noperating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .\nraw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .\nshorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .\nsales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .\naverage sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .\noperating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .\nentering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .\nit is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .\nfoodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .\nhowever , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .\nshorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .\ndistribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "670", "691", ")", "divide(", "#0", "691", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.03039"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2018/page_83.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the total self-insurance reserves that was classified as current in 2018\n\nPre-table text:\nwarranty reserve some of our salvage mechanical products are sold with a standard six month warranty against defects .\nadditionally , some of our remanufactured engines are sold with a standard three year warranty against defects .\nwe also provide a limited lifetime warranty for certain of our aftermarket products .\nthese assurance-type warranties are not considered a separate performance obligation , and thus no transaction price is allocated to them .\nwe record the warranty costs in cost of goods sold on our consolidated statements of income .\nour warranty reserve is calculated using historical claim information to project future warranty claims activity and is recorded within other accrued expenses and other noncurrent liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets based on the expected timing of the related payments .\nthe changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nbalance as of january 1 2017\t$ 19634\nwarranty expense\t38608\nwarranty claims\t-35091 ( 35091 )\nbalance as of december 31 2017\t23151\nwarranty expense\t43682\nwarranty claims\t-43571 ( 43571 )\nbalance as of december 31 2018\t$ 23262\n\nPost-table text:\nself-insurance reserves we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program .\nwe purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure .\nwe also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , directors and officers liability , workers' compensation , and property coverage , under deductible insurance programs .\nthe insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods .\na reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analysis of historical data .\nwe monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves .\ntotal self-insurance reserves were $ 105 million and $ 94 million , of which $ 52 million and $ 43 million was classified as current , as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , and are classified as other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets .\nthe remaining balances of self-insurance reserves are classified as other noncurrent liabilities , which reflects management's estimates of when claims will be paid .\nwe had outstanding letters of credit of $ 65 million and $ 71 million at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , to guarantee self-insurance claims payments .\nwhile we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claims experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions .\nstockholders' equity on october 25 , 2018 , our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we may purchase up to $ 500 million of our common stock from time to time through october 25 , 2021 .\nrepurchases under the program may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , with the amount and timing of repurchases depending on market conditions and corporate needs .\nthe repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares and may be suspended or discontinued at any time .\ndelaware law imposes restrictions on stock repurchases .\nduring 2018 , we repurchased 2.3 million shares of common stock for an aggregate price $ 60 million .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , there is $ 440 million of remaining capacity under our repurchase program .\nin 2019 , we have repurchased 1.8 million shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $ 46 million during the period ended february 22 , 2019 .\ntreasury stock is accounted for using the cost method .\nincome taxes current income taxes are provided on income reported for financial reporting purposes , adjusted for transactions that do not enter into the computation of income taxes payable in the same year .\ndeferred income taxes have been provided to show the effect of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements .\na valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before we are able to realize their benefit or that future deductibility is uncertain .\nprovision is made for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and related companies to the extent that such earnings are not deemed to be permanently invested. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "52", "105", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.49524"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2013/page_40.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in research and development net from 2012 to 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\n38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 .\nsummary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc .\n( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s .\nand non-u.s. , that it controls .\nppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls .\nfor those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests .\ninvestments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nas a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in \"investments\" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet .\ntransactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation .\nuse of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s .\ngenerally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period .\nsuch estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated .\nactual outcomes could differ from those estimates .\nrevenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete .\nrevenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered .\nshipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nshipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nselling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning .\ndistribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities .\nadvertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nresearch and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred .\nthe following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\nresearch and development 2013 total\t$ 505\t$ 468\t$ 443\nless depreciation on research facilities\t17\t15\t15\nresearch and development net\t$ 488\t$ 453\t$ 428\n\nPost-table text:\nlegal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred .\nlegal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes .\nforeign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s .\noperations is their local currency .\nassets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s .\ndollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period .\nunrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity .\ncash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less .\nshort-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year .\nthe purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nmarketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "488", "453", ")", "divide(", "#0", "453", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07726"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_75.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits recorded as part of the company recorded an income tax provision for 2007\n\nPre-table text:\nsettlements , and the expiration of statutes of limi- tation , the company currently estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by up to $ 365 million during the next twelve months , with no significant impact on earnings or cash tax payments .\nwhile the company believes that it is adequately accrued for possible audit adjust- ments , the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2007 of $ 415 million , including a $ 41 million benefit related to the effective settlement of tax audits , and $ 8 million of other tax benefits .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 423 million , or 30% ( 30 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax provision for 2006 of $ 1.9 billion , consisting of a $ 1.6 billion deferred tax provision ( principally reflecting deferred taxes on the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales ) and a $ 300 million current tax provision .\nthe provision also includes an $ 11 million provision related to a special tax adjustment .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 272 million , or 29% ( 29 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\nthe company recorded an income tax benefit for 2005 of $ 407 million , including a $ 454 million net tax benefit related to a special tax adjustment , consisting of a tax benefit of $ 627 million resulting from an agreement reached with the u.s .\ninternal revenue service concerning the 1997 through 2000 u.s .\nfederal income tax audit , a $ 142 million charge for deferred taxes related to earnings repatriations under the american jobs creation act of 2004 , and $ 31 million of other tax charges .\nexcluding the impact of special items , the tax provision was $ 83 million , or 20% ( 20 % ) of pre-tax earnings before minority interest .\ninternational paper has non-u.s .\nnet operating loss carryforwards of approximately $ 352 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 14 million and indefinite carryforwards of $ 338 million .\ninterna- tional paper has tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards for state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $ 258 million that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014$ 83 million and 2018 through 2027 2014$ 175 million .\ninternational paper also has federal , non-u.s .\nand state tax credit carryforwards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 67 million , 2018 through 2027 2014 $ 92 million , and indefinite carryforwards 2014 $ 316 million .\nfurther , international paper has state capital loss carryfor- wards that expire as follows : 2008 through 2017 2014 $ 9 million .\ndeferred income taxes are not provided for tempo- rary differences of approximately $ 3.7 billion , $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.4 billion as of december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , representing earnings of non-u.s .\nsubsidiaries intended to be permanently reinvested .\ncomputation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable .\nnote 10 commitments and contingent liabilities certain property , machinery and equipment are leased under cancelable and non-cancelable agree- ments .\nunconditional purchase obligations have been entered into in the ordinary course of business , prin- cipally for capital projects and the purchase of cer- tain pulpwood , wood chips , raw materials , energy and services , including fiber supply agreements to purchase pulpwood that were entered into con- currently with the 2006 transformation plan forest- land sales ( see note 7 ) .\nat december 31 , 2007 , total future minimum commitments under existing non-cancelable operat- ing leases and purchase obligations were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2008\t2009\t2010\t2011\t2012\tthereafter\nlease obligations\t$ 136\t$ 116\t$ 101\t$ 84\t$ 67\t$ 92\npurchase obligations ( a )\t1953\t294\t261\t235\t212\t1480\ntotal\t$ 2089\t$ 410\t$ 362\t$ 319\t$ 279\t$ 1572\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales .\nrent expense was $ 168 million , $ 217 million and $ 216 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively .\ninternational paper entered into an agreement in 2000 to guarantee , for a fee , an unsecured con- tractual credit agreement between a financial institution and an unrelated third-party customer .\nin the fourth quarter of 2006 , the customer cancelled the agreement and paid the company a fee of $ 11 million , which is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying consolidated statement of oper- ations .\nthe company has no future obligations under this agreement. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "41", "415", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.0988"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_37.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of the long-term assets is related to americas?\n\nPre-table text:\nretail and hnw investors ( excluding investments in ishares ) retail / hnw long-term aum by asset class & client region december 31 , 2012 ( dollar amounts in millions ) americas emea asia-pacific total .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tamericas\temea\tasia-pacific\ttotal\nequity\t$ 94805\t$ 53140\t$ 16803\t$ 164748\nfixed income\t121640\t11444\t5341\t138425\nmulti-asset class\t76714\t9538\t4374\t90626\nalternatives\t4865\t3577\t1243\t9685\nlong-term retail/hnw\t$ 298024\t$ 77699\t$ 27761\t$ 403484\n\nPost-table text:\nblackrock serves retail and hnw investors globally through separate accounts , open-end and closed-end funds , unit trusts and private investment funds .\nat december 31 , 2012 , long-term assets managed for retail and hnw investors totaled $ 403.5 billion , up 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 40.1 billion , versus year-end 2011 .\nduring the year , net inflows of $ 11.6 billion in long-term products were augmented by market valuation improvements of $ 28.3 billion .\nretail and hnw investors are served principally through intermediaries , including broker-dealers , banks , trust companies , insurance companies and independent financial advisors .\nclients invest primarily in mutual funds , which totaled $ 322.4 billion , or 80% ( 80 % ) , of retail and hnw long-term aum at year-end , with the remainder invested in private investment funds and separately managed accounts .\nthe product mix is well diversified , with 41% ( 41 % ) of long-term aum in equities , 34% ( 34 % ) in fixed income , 23% ( 23 % ) in multi-asset class and 2% ( 2 % ) in alternatives .\nthe vast majority ( 98% ( 98 % ) ) of long-term aum is invested in active products , although this is partially inflated by the fact that ishares is shown separately , since we do not identify all of the underlying investors .\nthe client base is also diversified geographically , with 74% ( 74 % ) of long-term aum managed for investors based in the americas , 19% ( 19 % ) in emea and 7% ( 7 % ) in asia-pacific at year- end 2012 .\n2022 u.s .\nretail and hnw long-term inflows of $ 9.8 billion were driven by strong demand for u.s .\nsector- specialty and municipal fixed income mutual fund offerings and income-oriented equity .\nin 2012 , we broadened the distribution of alternatives funds to bring higher alpha , institutional quality hedge fund products to retail investors as three mutual funds launched at the end of 2011 gained traction and acceptance , raising close to $ 0.8 billion of assets .\nu.s .\nretail alternatives aum crossed the $ 5.0 billion threshold in 2012 .\nthe year also included the launch of the blackrock municipal target term trust ( 201cbtt 201d ) with $ 2.1 billion of assets raised , making it the largest municipal fund ever launched and the largest overall industry offering since 2007 .\nwe are the leading u.s .\nmanager by aum of separately managed accounts , the second largest closed-end fund manager and a top-ten manager of long-term open-end mutual funds2 .\n2022 international retail net inflows of $ 1.8 billion in 2012 were driven by fixed income net inflows of $ 5.2 billion .\ninvestor demand remained distinctly risk-off in 2012 , largely driven by macro political and economic instability and continued trends toward de-risking .\nequity net outflows of $ 2.9 billion were predominantly from sector-specific and regional and country- specific equity strategies due to uncertainty in european markets .\nour international retail and hnw offerings include our luxembourg cross-border fund families , blackrock global funds ( 201cbgf 201d ) , blackrock strategic funds with $ 83.1 billion and $ 2.4 billion of aum at year-end 2012 , respectively , and a range of retail funds in the united kingdom .\nbgf contained 67 funds registered in 35 jurisdictions at year-end 2012 .\nover 60% ( 60 % ) of the funds were rated by s&p .\nin 2012 , we were ranked as the third largest cross border fund provider3 .\nin the united kingdom , we ranked among the five largest fund managers3 , and are known for our innovative product offerings , especially within natural resources , european equity , asian equity and equity income .\nglobal clientele our footprint in each of these regions reflects strong relationships with intermediaries and an established ability to deliver our global investment expertise in funds and other products tailored to local regulations and requirements .\n2 simfund , cerulli 3 lipper feri .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "298024", "403484", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.73863"}
{"example_id": "PPG/2013/page_40.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in research and development net from 2011 to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\n38 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k notes to the consolidated financial statements 1 .\nsummary of significant accounting policies principles of consolidation the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ppg industries , inc .\n( 201cppg 201d or the 201ccompany 201d ) and all subsidiaries , both u.s .\nand non-u.s. , that it controls .\nppg owns more than 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock of most of the subsidiaries that it controls .\nfor those consolidated subsidiaries in which the company 2019s ownership is less than 100% ( 100 % ) , the outside shareholders 2019 interests are shown as noncontrolling interests .\ninvestments in companies in which ppg owns 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) of the voting stock and has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nas a result , ppg 2019s share of the earnings or losses of such equity affiliates is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income and ppg 2019s share of these companies 2019 shareholders 2019 equity is included in \"investments\" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet .\ntransactions between ppg and its subsidiaries are eliminated in consolidation .\nuse of estimates in the preparation of financial statements the preparation of financial statements in conformity with u.s .\ngenerally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements , as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period .\nsuch estimates also include the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as a result of allocations of purchase price of business combinations consummated .\nactual outcomes could differ from those estimates .\nrevenue recognition the company recognizes revenue when the earnings process is complete .\nrevenue from sales is recognized by all operating segments when goods are shipped and title to inventory and risk of loss passes to the customer or when services have been rendered .\nshipping and handling costs amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are reported in 201cnet sales 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nshipping and handling costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods to customers are included in 201ccost of sales , exclusive of depreciation and amortization 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income .\nselling , general and administrative costs amounts presented as 201cselling , general and administrative 201d in the accompanying consolidated statement of income are comprised of selling , customer service , distribution and advertising costs , as well as the costs of providing corporate- wide functional support in such areas as finance , law , human resources and planning .\ndistribution costs pertain to the movement and storage of finished goods inventory at company- owned and leased warehouses , terminals and other distribution facilities .\nadvertising costs advertising costs are expensed in the year incurred and totaled $ 345 million , $ 288 million and $ 245 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nresearch and development research and development costs , which consist primarily of employee related costs , are charged to expense as incurred .\nthe following are the research and development costs for the years ended december 31: .\n\nTable:\n( millions )\t2013\t2012\t2011\nresearch and development 2013 total\t$ 505\t$ 468\t$ 443\nless depreciation on research facilities\t17\t15\t15\nresearch and development net\t$ 488\t$ 453\t$ 428\n\nPost-table text:\nlegal costs legal costs are expensed as incurred .\nlegal costs incurred by ppg include legal costs associated with acquisition and divestiture transactions , general litigation , environmental regulation compliance , patent and trademark protection and other general corporate purposes .\nforeign currency translation the functional currency of most significant non-u.s .\noperations is their local currency .\nassets and liabilities of those operations are translated into u.s .\ndollars using year-end exchange rates ; income and expenses are translated using the average exchange rates for the reporting period .\nunrealized foreign currency translation adjustments are deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss , a separate component of shareholders 2019 equity .\ncash equivalents cash equivalents are highly liquid investments ( valued at cost , which approximates fair value ) acquired with an original maturity of three months or less .\nshort-term investments short-term investments are highly liquid , high credit quality investments ( valued at cost plus accrued interest ) that have stated maturities of greater than three months to one year .\nthe purchases and sales of these investments are classified as investing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows .\nmarketable equity securities the company 2019s investment in marketable equity securities is recorded at fair market value and reported in 201cother current assets 201d and 201cinvestments 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet with changes in fair market value recorded in income for those securities designated as trading securities and in other comprehensive income , net of tax , for those designated as available for sale securities. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "453", "428", ")", "divide(", "#0", "428", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05841"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_125.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense in 2013 compare to 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\nto maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2014\t$ 135\n2015\t127\n2016\t110\n2017\t109\n2018\t106\nthereafter\t699\ntotal\t$ 1286\n\nPost-table text:\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments .\nthe company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .\nsee note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .\ncontingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nin addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nthe fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .\nlegal proceedings .\nfrom time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .\nfederal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .\nit is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .\nadditionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .\nmanagement , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .\nhowever , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .\ndue to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .\nindemnifications .\nin the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .\nthe terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .\nconsequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .\nthe company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .\nthe fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "137", "133", ")", "divide(", "#0", "133", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.03008"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2004/page_26.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future minimum lease payments are due after 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits .\nof the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions .\nthe tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized .\n6 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively .\nduring the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture .\nthese leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased .\nrental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively .\nduring fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 .\nthis lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2005\t$ 781\n2006\t776\n2007\t769\n2008\t772\n2009\t772\nthereafter\t708\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4578\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "708", "4578", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.15465"}
{"example_id": "IP/2005/page_35.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percent of the total contractual obligations for future payments for total debt in 2005\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obli- gations at december 31 , 2005 , were as follows : in millions 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 thereafter .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2007\t2008\t2009\t2010\tthereafter\ntotal debt\t$ 1181\t$ 570\t$ 308\t$ 2330\t$ 1534\t$ 6281\nlease obligations\t172\t144\t119\t76\t63\t138\npurchase obligations ( a )\t3264\t393\t280\t240\t204\t1238\ntotal\t$ 4617\t$ 1107\t$ 707\t$ 2646\t$ 1801\t$ 7657\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the 2006 amount includes $ 2.4 billion for contracts made in the ordinary course of business to purchase pulpwood , logs and wood chips .\nthe majority of our other purchase obligations are take-or-pay or purchase commitments made in the ordinary course of business related to raw material purchases and energy contracts .\nother significant items include purchase obligations related to contracted services .\ntransformation plan in july 2005 , the company announced a plan to focus its business portfolio on two key global platform businesses : uncoated papers ( including distribution ) and packaging .\nthe plan also focuses on improving shareholder return through mill realignments in those two businesses , additional cost improvements and exploring strategic options for other businesses , includ- ing possible sale or spin-off .\nin connection with this process , in the third quarter of 2005 , the company completed the sale of its 50.5% ( 50.5 % ) interest in carter holt harvey limited .\nother businesses currently under re- view include : 2022 the coated and supercalendered papers busi- ness , including the coated groundwood mill and associated assets in brazil , 2022 the beverage packaging business , including the pine bluff , arkansas mill , 2022 the kraft papers business , including the roa- noke rapids , north carolina mill , 2022 arizona chemical , 2022 the wood products business , and 2022 segments or potentially all of the company 2019s 6.5 million acres of u.s .\nforestlands .\nconsistent with this evaluation process , the com- pany has distributed bid package information for some of these businesses .\nthe exact timing of this evaluation process will vary by business ; however , it is anticipated that decisions will be made for some of these businesses during 2006 .\nwhile the exact use of any proceeds from potential future sales is dependent upon various factors affecting future cash flows , such as the amount of any proceeds received and changes in market conditions , input costs and capital spending , the company remains committed to using its free cash flow in 2006 to pay down debt , to return value to shareholders , and for se- lective high-return investments .\ncritical accounting policies the preparation of financial statements in con- formity with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states requires international paper to estab- lish accounting policies and to make estimates that af- fect both the amounts and timing of the recording of assets , liabilities , revenues and expenses .\nsome of these estimates require judgments about matters that are in- herently uncertain .\naccounting policies whose application may have a significant effect on the reported results of operations and financial position of international paper , and that can require judgments by management that affect their application , include sfas no .\n5 , 201caccounting for contingencies , 201d sfas no .\n144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d sfas no .\n142 , 201cgoodwill and other intangible assets , 201d sfas no .\n87 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for pensions , 201d sfas no .\n106 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postretirement benefits other than pensions , 201d as amended by sfas nos .\n132 and 132r , 201cemployers 2019 disclosures about pension and other postretirement benefits , 201d and sfas no .\n109 , 201caccounting for income taxes . 201d the following is a discussion of the impact of these accounting policies on international paper : contingent liabilities .\naccruals for contingent li- abilities , including legal and environmental matters , are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated .\nliabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel .\nadditionally , as dis- cussed in note 10 of the notes to consolidated finan- cial statements in item 8 .\nfinancial statements and supplementary data , reserves for projected future claims settlements relating to exterior siding and roofing prod- ucts previously manufactured by masonite require judgments regarding projections of future claims rates and amounts .\ninternational paper utilizes an in- dependent third party consultant to assist in developing these estimates .\nliabilities for environmental matters require evaluations of relevant environmental regu- lations and estimates of future remediation alternatives and costs .\ninternational paper determines these esti- mates after a detailed evaluation of each site .\nimpairment of long-lived assets and goodwill .\nan impairment of a long-lived asset exists when the asset 2019s carrying amount exceeds its fair value , and is recorded when the carrying amount is not recoverable through future operations .\na goodwill impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value .\nassessments of possible impairments of long-lived assets and goodwill are made when events or changes in cir- cumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1181", "4617", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.25579"}
{"example_id": "IP/2006/page_32.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the consumer packaging profit margin in 2006\n\nPre-table text:\nearnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2006 .\ncontainerboard export sales volumes are expected to decline due to scheduled first-quarter main- tenance outages .\nsales volumes for u.s .\nconverted products will be higher due to more shipping days , but expected softer demand should cause the ship- ments per day to decrease .\naverage sales price real- izations are expected to be comparable to fourth- quarter averages .\nan additional containerboard price increase was announced in january that is expected to be fully realized in the second quarter .\ncosts for wood , energy , starch , adhesives and freight are expected to increase .\nmanufacturing costs will be higher due to costs associated with scheduled main- tenance outages in the containerboard mills .\neuro- pean container operating results are expected to improve as seasonally higher sales volumes and improved margins more than offset slightly higher manufacturing costs .\nconsumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix .\nconsumer packaging net sales increased 9% ( 9 % ) compared with 2005 and 7% ( 7 % ) compared with 2004 .\noperating profits rose 8% ( 8 % ) from 2005 , but declined 15% ( 15 % ) from 2004 levels .\ncompared with 2005 , higher sales volumes ( $ 9 million ) , improved average sales price realizations ( $ 33 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 18 million ) , and favorable mill oper- ations ( $ 25 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material costs ( $ 19 million ) and freight costs ( $ 21 million ) , unfavorable mix ( $ 14 million ) and other costs ( $ 21 million ) .\nconsumer packaging in millions 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2006\t2005\t2004\nsales\t$ 2455\t$ 2245\t$ 2295\noperating profit\t$ 131\t$ 121\t$ 155\n\nPost-table text:\ncoated paperboard net sales of $ 1.5 billion in 2006 were higher than $ 1.3 billion in 2005 and $ 1.1 billion in 2004 .\nsales volumes increased in 2006 compared with 2005 , particularly in the folding car- ton board segment , reflecting improved demand for coated paperboard products .\nin 2006 , our coated paperboard mills took 4000 tons of lack-of-order downtime , compared with 82000 tons of lack-of-order downtime in 2005 .\naverage sales price realizations were substantially improved in the cur- rent year , principally for folding carton board and cupstock board .\noperating profits were 51% ( 51 % ) higher in 2006 than in 2005 , and 7% ( 7 % ) better than in 2004 .\nthe impact of the higher sales prices along with more favorable manufacturing operations due to strong performance at the mills more than offset higher input costs for energy and freight .\nfoodservice net sales declined to $ 396 million in 2006 , compared with $ 437 million in 2005 and $ 480 million in 2004 , due principally to the sale of the jackson , tennessee plant in july 2005 .\nsales vol- umes were lower in 2006 than in 2005 , although average sales prices were higher due to the realiza- tion of price increases implemented during 2005 .\noperating profits for 2006 improved over 2005 and 2004 levels largely due to the benefits from higher sales prices .\nraw material costs for bleached board were higher than in 2005 , but manufacturing costs were more favorable due to increased productivity and reduced waste .\nshorewood net sales of $ 670 million were down from $ 691 million in 2005 and $ 687 million in 2004 .\nsales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels due to weak demand in the home entertainment and consumer products markets , although demand was strong in the tobacco segment .\naverage sales prices for the year were lower than in 2005 .\noperating prof- its were down significantly from both 2005 and 2004 due to the decline in sales , particularly in the higher margin home entertainment markets , higher raw material costs for bleached board and certain inventory adjustment costs .\nentering 2007 , coated paperboard first-quarter sales volumes are expected to be seasonally stronger than in the fourth quarter 2006 for folding carton board and bristols .\naverage sales price realizations are expected to rise with a price increase announced in january .\nit is anticipated that manufacturing costs will improve versus an unfavorable fourth quarter .\nfoodservice earnings for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to decline due to seasonally weaker vol- ume .\nhowever , sales price realizations will be slightly higher , and the seasonal switch to hot cup contain- ers will have a favorable impact on product mix .\nshorewood sales volumes for the first quarter of 2007 are expected to seasonally decline , but the earnings impact will be partially offset by pricing improvements and an improved product mix .\ndistribution our distribution business , principally represented by our xpedx business , markets a diverse array of products and supply chain services to customers in .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "131", "2455", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.05336"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2015/page_35.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?\n\nPre-table text:\nat december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus .\nthis reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment .\nin addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .\ncash flows .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2015\t2014\t2013\ncash provided by operating activities\t$ 7344\t$ 7385\t$ 6823\ncash used in investing activities\t-4476 ( 4476 )\t-4249 ( 4249 )\t-3405 ( 3405 )\ncash used in financing activities\t-3063 ( 3063 )\t-2982 ( 2982 )\t-3049 ( 3049 )\nnet change in cash and cash equivalents\t$ -195 ( 195 )\t$ 154\t$ 369\n\nPost-table text:\noperating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments .\nfederal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .\nas a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .\ncongress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 .\nsimilarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 .\nbonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 .\nhigher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .\n2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation .\ninvesting activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 .\nhigher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 .\nsignificant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .\ncapital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "7385", "6823", ")", "divide(", "#0", "6823", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08237"}
{"example_id": "VLO/2018/page_25.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total price paid for the total number of shares purchased?\n\nPre-table text:\ntable of contents tceq and harris county pollution control services department ( hcpcs ) ( houston terminal ) .\nwe have an outstanding noe from the tceq and an outstanding vn from the hcpcs alleging excess emissions from tank 003 that occurred during hurricane harvey .\nwe are working with the pertinent authorities to resolve these matters .\nitem 4 .\nmine safety disclosures part ii item 5 .\nmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock trades on the nyse under the trading symbol 201cvlo . 201d as of january 31 , 2019 , there were 5271 holders of record of our common stock .\ndividends are considered quarterly by the board of directors , may be paid only when approved by the board , and will depend on our financial condition , results of operations , cash flows , prospects , industry conditions , capital requirements , and other factors and restrictions our board deems relevant .\nthere can be no assurance that we will pay a dividend at the rates we have paid historically , or at all , in the future .\nthe following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2018 .\nperiod total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .\n\nTable:\nperiod\ttotal numberof sharespurchased\taverageprice paidper share\ttotal number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )\ttotal number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms\tapproximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )\noctober 2018\t939957\t$ 87.23\t8826\t931131\t$ 2.7 billion\nnovember 2018\t3655945\t$ 87.39\t216469\t3439476\t$ 2.4 billion\ndecember 2018\t3077364\t$ 73.43\t4522\t3072842\t$ 2.2 billion\ntotal\t7673266\t$ 81.77\t229817\t7443449\t$ 2.2 billion\n\nPost-table text:\n( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2018 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans .\n( b ) on january 23 , 2018 , we announced that our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( the 2018 program ) , with no expiration date , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under a $ 2.5 billion program authorized on september 21 , 2016 ( the 2016 program ) .\nduring the fourth quarter of 2018 , we completed our purchases under the 2016 program .\nas of december 31 , 2018 , we had $ 2.2 billion remaining available for purchase under the 2018 program. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "7673266", "81.77", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "627442960.82"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2011/page_76.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total accounts payable and other current liabilities was accrued casualty costs at december 31 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nare allocated using appropriate statistical bases .\ntotal expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.2 billion for 2011 , $ 2.0 billion for 2010 , and $ 1.9 billion for 2009 .\nassets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease .\namortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease .\n12 .\naccounts payable and other current liabilities dec .\n31 , dec .\n31 , millions 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\tdec . 31 2011\tdec . 31 2010\naccounts payable\t$ 819\t$ 677\nincome and other taxes\t482\t337\naccrued wages and vacation\t363\t357\ndividends payable\t284\t183\naccrued casualty costs\t249\t325\ninterest payable\t197\t200\nequipment rents payable\t90\t86\nother\t624\t548\ntotal accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities\t$ 3108\t$ 2713\n\nPost-table text:\n13 .\nfinancial instruments strategy and risk 2013 we may use derivative financial instruments in limited instances for other than trading purposes to assist in managing our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and fuel prices .\nwe are not a party to leveraged derivatives and , by policy , do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .\nderivative financial instruments qualifying for hedge accounting must maintain a specified level of effectiveness between the hedging instrument and the item being hedged , both at inception and throughout the hedged period .\nwe formally document the nature and relationships between the hedging instruments and hedged items at inception , as well as our risk- management objectives , strategies for undertaking the various hedge transactions , and method of assessing hedge effectiveness .\nchanges in the fair market value of derivative financial instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are charged to earnings .\nwe may use swaps , collars , futures , and/or forward contracts to mitigate the risk of adverse movements in interest rates and fuel prices ; however , the use of these derivative financial instruments may limit future benefits from favorable interest rate and fuel price movements .\nmarket and credit risk 2013 we address market risk related to derivative financial instruments by selecting instruments with value fluctuations that highly correlate with the underlying hedged item .\nwe manage credit risk related to derivative financial instruments , which is minimal , by requiring high credit standards for counterparties and periodic settlements .\nat december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , we were not required to provide collateral , nor had we received collateral , relating to our hedging activities .\ndetermination of fair value 2013 we determine the fair values of our derivative financial instrument positions based upon current fair values as quoted by recognized dealers or the present value of expected future cash flows .\ninterest rate fair value hedges 2013 we manage our overall exposure to fluctuations in interest rates by adjusting the proportion of fixed and floating rate debt instruments within our debt portfolio over a given period .\nwe generally manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt through the issuance of targeted amounts of each as debt matures or as we require incremental borrowings .\nwe employ derivatives , primarily swaps , as one of the tools to obtain the targeted mix .\nin addition , we also obtain flexibility in managing interest costs and the interest rate mix within our debt portfolio by evaluating the issuance of and managing outstanding callable fixed-rate debt securities .\nswaps allow us to convert debt from fixed rates to variable rates and thereby hedge the risk of changes in the debt 2019s fair value attributable to the changes in interest rates .\nwe account for swaps as fair value .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "249", "3108", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.08012"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_125.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in rent expense and certain office equipment expense in 2012 compare to 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nto maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2014\t$ 135\n2015\t127\n2016\t110\n2017\t109\n2018\t106\nthereafter\t699\ntotal\t$ 1286\n\nPost-table text:\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments .\nthe company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty .\nsee note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion .\ncontingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nin addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date .\nthe fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities .\nlegal proceedings .\nfrom time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s .\nfederal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings .\nit is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries .\nthe company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities .\nadditionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages .\nmanagement , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows .\nhowever , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period .\ndue to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters .\nindemnifications .\nin the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances .\nthe terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote .\nconsequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement .\nat december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion .\nthe company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 .\nthe fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "133", "154", ")", "divide(", "#0", "154", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-0.13636"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2013/page_124.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the annual interest expense related to '2015 notes' , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nlong-term borrowings the carrying value and fair value of long-term borrowings estimated using market prices at december 31 , 2013 included the following : ( in millions ) maturity amount unamortized discount carrying value fair value .\n\nTable:\n( in millions )\tmaturity amount\tunamortized discount\tcarrying value\tfair value\n3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes due 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 2014\t$ 1000\t$ 1029\n1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes due 2015\t750\t2014\t750\t759\n6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes due 2017\t700\t-2 ( 2 )\t698\t812\n5.00% ( 5.00 % ) notes due 2019\t1000\t-2 ( 2 )\t998\t1140\n4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due 2021\t750\t-3 ( 3 )\t747\t799\n3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes due 2022\t750\t-4 ( 4 )\t746\t745\ntotal long-term borrowings\t$ 4950\t$ -11 ( 11 )\t$ 4939\t$ 5284\n\nPost-table text:\nlong-term borrowings at december 31 , 2012 had a carrying value of $ 5.687 billion and a fair value of $ 6.275 billion determined using market prices at the end of december 2012 .\n2015 and 2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2015 ( the 201c2015 notes 201d ) and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2015 notes and the 2022 notes of approximately $ 10 million and $ 25 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year , which commenced december 1 , 2012 .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2015 and 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe 2015 notes and 2022 notes were issued at a discount of $ 5 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the 2015 notes and 2022 notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2013 and 2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes ( 201c2013 floating rate notes 201d ) , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\n( 201cmerrill lynch 201d ) .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , which commenced november 24 , 2011 , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 2021 notes were issued at a discount of $ 4 million that is being amortized over the term of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 7 million of debt issuance costs for the $ 1.5 billion note issuances , which are being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\nin may 2011 , in conjunction with the issuance of the 2013 floating rate notes , the company entered into a $ 750 million notional interest rate swap maturing in 2013 to hedge the future cash flows of its obligation at a fixed rate of 1.03% ( 1.03 % ) .\nduring the second quarter of 2013 , the interest rate swap matured and the 2013 floating rate notes were fully repaid .\n2012 , 2014 and 2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2014 and 2019 , respectively .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors ( 201cbgi 201d ) from barclays on december 1 , 2009 ( the 201cbgi transaction 201d ) , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2014 notes and 2019 notes of approximately $ 35 million and $ 50 million per year , respectively , is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthese notes were issued collectively at a discount of $ 5 million , which is being amortized over the respective terms of the notes .\nthe company incurred approximately $ 13 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over the respective terms of these notes .\nat december 31 , 2013 , $ 4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition .\n2017 notes .\nin september 2007 , the company issued $ 700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes maturing on september 15 , 2017 ( the 201c2017 notes 201d ) .\na portion of the net proceeds of the 2017 notes was used to fund the initial cash payment for the acquisition of the fund of funds business of quellos and the remainder was used for general corporate purposes .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 15 and september 15 of each year , or approximately $ 44 million per year .\nthe 2017 notes may be redeemed prior .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "750", "1.375%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "10.3125"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2004/page_26.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future minimum lease payments are due in 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) march 31 , 2004 5 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) the effective tax rate of zero differs from the statutory rate of 34% ( 34 % ) primarily due to the inability of the company to recognize deferred tax assets for its operating losses and tax credits .\nof the total valuation allowance , approximately $ 2400000 relates to stock option compensation deductions .\nthe tax benefit associated with the stock option compensation deductions will be credited to equity when realized .\n6 .\ncommitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 , accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2013 the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile the company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of component suppliers , its warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2013 in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2004 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe company has elected not to exercise a buyout option available under its primary lease that would have allowed for early termination in 2005 .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations , was approximately $ 856000 , $ 823000 and $ 821000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 , 2003 and 2004 , respectively .\nduring the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2000 , the company entered into 36-month operating leases totaling approximately $ 644000 for the lease of office furniture .\nthese leases ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option the furniture was purchased .\nrental expense recorded for these leases during the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2002 and 2003 was approximately $ 215000 and $ 127000 respectively .\nduring fiscal 2000 , the company entered into a 36-month capital lease for computer equipment and software for approximately $ 221000 .\nthis lease ended in fiscal year 2003 and at the company 2019s option these assets were purchased .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2004 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : .\n\nTable:\nyear ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2005\t$ 781\n2006\t776\n2007\t769\n2008\t772\n2009\t772\nthereafter\t708\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4578\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , will not have a material adverse effect on the company. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "769", "4578", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.16798"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2008/page_79.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage difference in sold receivables from 2007 to 2008?\n\nPre-table text:\ninterest rate cash flow hedges 2013 we report changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged item affects earnings .\nat both december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had reductions of $ 4 million recorded as an accumulated other comprehensive loss that is being amortized on a straight-line basis through september 30 , 2014 .\nas of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , we had no interest rate cash flow hedges outstanding .\nearnings impact 2013 our use of derivative financial instruments had the following impact on pre-tax income for the years ended december 31 : millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2008\t2007\t2006\n( increase ) /decrease in interest expense from interest rate hedging\t$ 1\t$ -8 ( 8 )\t$ -8 ( 8 )\n( increase ) /decrease in fuel expense from fuel derivatives\t1\t-1 ( 1 )\t3\nincrease/ ( decrease ) in pre-tax income\t$ 2\t$ -9 ( 9 )\t$ -5 ( 5 )\n\nPost-table text:\nfair value of debt instruments 2013 the fair value of our short- and long-term debt was estimated using quoted market prices , where available , or current borrowing rates .\nat december 31 , 2008 , the fair value of total debt is approximately $ 247 million less than the carrying value .\nat december 31 , 2007 , the fair value of total debt exceeded the carrying value by approximately $ 96 million .\nat december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , approximately $ 320 million and $ 181 million , respectively , of fixed-rate debt securities contained call provisions that allowed us to retire the debt instruments prior to final maturity , with the payment of fixed call premiums , or in certain cases , at par .\nsale of receivables 2013 the railroad transfers most of its accounts receivable to union pacific receivables , inc .\n( upri ) , a bankruptcy-remote subsidiary , as part of a sale of receivables facility .\nupri sells , without recourse on a 364-day revolving basis , an undivided interest in such accounts receivable to investors .\nthe total capacity to sell undivided interests to investors under the facility was $ 700 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors under the facility was $ 584 million and $ 600 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nupri reduced the outstanding undivided interest held by investors due to a decrease in available receivables at december 31 , 2008 .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors is not included in our consolidated financial statements .\nthe value of the undivided interest held by investors was supported by $ 1015 million and $ 1071 million of accounts receivable held by upri at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nat december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the value of the interest retained by upri was $ 431 million and $ 471 million , respectively .\nthis retained interest is included in accounts receivable in our consolidated financial statements .\nthe interest sold to investors is sold at carrying value , which approximates fair value , and there is no gain or loss recognized from the transaction .\nthe value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors could fluctuate based upon the availability of eligible receivables and is directly affected by changing business volumes and credit risks , including default and dilution .\nif default or dilution percentages were to increase one percentage point , the amount of eligible receivables would decrease by $ 6 million .\nshould our credit rating fall below investment grade , the value of the outstanding undivided interest held by investors would be reduced , and , in certain cases , the investors would have the right to discontinue the facility .\nthe railroad services the sold receivables ; however , the railroad does not recognize any servicing asset or liability as the servicing fees adequately compensate us for these responsibilities .\nthe railroad collected approximately $ 17.8 billion and $ 16.1 billion during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .\nupri used certain of these proceeds to purchase new receivables under the facility. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "17.8", "16.1", ")", "divide(", "#0", "16.1", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.10559"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_54.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total freight revenues was automotive in 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nnotes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201ccompany 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d .\n1 .\nnature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s .\nour network includes 31838 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s .\ngateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways .\nwe own 26009 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases .\nwe serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico .\nexport and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders .\nthe railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment .\nalthough we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network .\nthe following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\nmillions\t2013\t2012\t2011\nagricultural\t$ 3276\t$ 3280\t$ 3324\nautomotive\t2077\t1807\t1510\nchemicals\t3501\t3238\t2815\ncoal\t3978\t3912\t4084\nindustrial products\t3822\t3494\t3166\nintermodal\t4030\t3955\t3609\ntotal freight revenues\t$ 20684\t$ 19686\t$ 18508\nother revenues\t1279\t1240\t1049\ntotal operatingrevenues\t$ 21963\t$ 20926\t$ 19557\n\nPost-table text:\nalthough our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s .\neach of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico .\nincluded in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 2.1 billion in 2013 , $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , and $ 1.8 billion in 2011 .\nbasis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s .\n( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) .\n2 .\nsignificant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries .\ninvestments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting .\nall intercompany transactions are eliminated .\nwe currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements .\ncash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less .\naccounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts .\nthe allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions .\nreceivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1510", "19557", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.07721"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2013/page_44.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the net change in the number of environmental sites from 2012 to 2013?\n\nPre-table text:\nour environmental site activity was as follows : 2013 2012 2011 .\n\nTable:\n\t2013\t2012\t2011\nopen sites beginning balance\t284\t285\t294\nnew sites\t41\t56\t51\nclosed sites\t-57 ( 57 )\t-57 ( 57 )\t-60 ( 60 )\nopen sites ending balance atdecember 31\t268\t284\t285\n\nPost-table text:\nthe environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties .\ncost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations .\nthe ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs .\nestimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation .\ncurrent obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity .\nproperty and depreciation 2013 our railroad operations are highly capital intensive , and our large base of homogeneous , network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis .\neach year we develop a capital program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers .\nassets purchased or constructed throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria .\nproperties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service lives , which are measured in years , except for rail in high-density traffic corridors ( i.e. , all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment , yard and switching tracks , and electronic yards ) for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track .\nwe use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics , use , and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes , and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates .\nthe group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources , not as singular items .\nwe currently have more than 60 depreciable asset classes , and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in technology , asset strategies , or other factors .\nwe determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property by means of depreciation studies .\nwe perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for track assets ( i.e. , rail and other track material , ties , and ballast ) and other road property .\nour depreciation studies take into account the following factors : f0b7 statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes ; f0b7 evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets ; f0b7 evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices ; and f0b7 expected salvage to be received upon retirement .\nfor rail in high-density traffic corridors , we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per mile of track .\nit has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely correlated to usage ( i.e. , the amount of weight carried over the rail ) .\nthe service lives also vary based on rail weight , rail condition ( e.g. , new or secondhand ) , and rail type ( e.g. , straight or curve ) .\nour depreciation studies for rail in high density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining the estimated service lives .\nfor rail in high-density traffic corridors , we calculate depreciation rates annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail ( i.e. , the weight of loaded and empty freight cars , locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail ) by the estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile .\nrail in high-density traffic corridors accounts for approximately 70 percent of the historical cost of rail and other track material .\nbased on the number of gross ton-miles carried over our rail in high density traffic corridors during 2013 , the estimated service lives of the majority of this rail ranged from approximately 15 years to approximately 30 years .\nfor all other depreciable assets , we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "268", "284", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "-16"}
{"example_id": "IP/2007/page_31.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nin 2005 what was industrial packaging the profit margin\n\nPre-table text:\ntissue pulp due to strong market demand , partic- ularly from asia .\naverage sales price realizations improved significantly in 2007 , principally reflecting higher average prices for softwood , hardwood and fluff pulp .\noperating earnings in 2007 were $ 104 mil- lion compared with $ 48 million in 2006 and $ 37 mil- lion in 2005 .\nthe benefits from higher sales price realizations were partially offset by increased input costs for energy , chemicals and freight .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , demand for market pulp remains strong , and average sales price realiza- tions should increase slightly .\nhowever , input costs for energy , chemicals and freight are expected to be higher , and increased spending is anticipated for planned mill maintenance outages .\nindustrial packaging demand for industrial packaging products is closely correlated with non-durable industrial goods pro- duction , as well as with demand for processed foods , poultry , meat and agricultural products .\nin addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of industrial packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing effi- ciency and product mix .\nindustrial packaging net sales for 2007 increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 5.2 billion compared with $ 4.9 bil- lion in 2006 , and 13% ( 13 % ) compared with $ 4.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were 26% ( 26 % ) higher than in 2006 and more than double 2005 earnings .\nbene- fits from improved price realizations ( $ 147 million ) , sales volume increases net of increased lack of order downtime ( $ 3 million ) , a more favorable mix ( $ 31 million ) , strong mill and converting operations ( $ 33 million ) and other costs ( $ 47 million ) were partially offset by the effects of higher raw material costs ( $ 76 million ) and higher freight costs ( $ 18 million ) .\nin addition , a gain of $ 13 million was recognized in 2006 related to a sale of property in spain and costs of $ 52 million were incurred in 2007 related to the conversion of the paper machine at pensacola to production of lightweight linerboard .\nthe segment took 165000 tons of downtime in 2007 which included 16000 tons of market-related downtime compared with 135000 tons of downtime in 2006 of which none was market-related .\nindustrial packaging in millions 2007 2006 2005 .\n\nTable:\nin millions\t2007\t2006\t2005\nsales\t$ 5245\t$ 4925\t$ 4625\noperating profit\t$ 501\t$ 399\t$ 219\n\nPost-table text:\nnorth american industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 3.9 billion , compared with $ 3.7 billion in 2006 and $ 3.6 billion in 2005 .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 407 million , up from $ 327 mil- lion in 2006 and $ 170 million in 2005 .\ncontainerboard shipments were higher in 2007 compared with 2006 , including production from the paper machine at pensacola that was converted to lightweight linerboard during 2007 .\naverage sales price realizations were significantly higher than in 2006 reflecting price increases announced early in 2006 and in the third quarter of 2007 .\nmargins improved reflecting stronger export demand .\nmanu- facturing performance was strong , although costs associated with planned mill maintenance outages were higher due to timing of outages .\nraw material costs for wood , energy , chemicals and recycled fiber increased significantly .\noperating results for 2007 were also unfavorably impacted by $ 52 million of costs associated with the conversion and startup of the pensacola paper machine .\nu.s .\nconverting sales volumes were slightly lower in 2007 compared with 2006 reflecting softer customer box demand .\nearnings improvement in 2007 bene- fited from the realization of box price increases announced in early 2006 and late 2007 .\nfavorable manufacturing operations and higher sales prices for waste fiber more than offset significantly higher raw material and freight costs .\nlooking ahead to the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly , and results should benefit from a full-quarter impact of the price increases announced in the third quarter of 2007 .\nhowever , additional mill maintenance outages are planned for the first quarter , and freight and input costs are expected to rise , particularly for wood and energy .\nmanufacturing operations should be favorable compared with the fourth quarter .\neuropean industrial packaging net sales for 2007 were $ 1.1 billion , up from $ 1.0 billion in 2006 and $ 880 million in 2005 .\nsales volumes were about flat as early stronger demand in the industrial segment weakened in the second half of the year .\noperating profits in 2007 were $ 88 million compared with $ 69 million in 2006 and $ 53 million in 2005 .\nsales margins improved reflecting increased sales prices for boxes .\nconversion costs were favorable as the result of manufacturing improvement programs .\nentering the first quarter of 2008 , sales volumes should be strong seasonally across all regions as the winter fruit and vegetable season continues .\nprofit margins , however , are expected to be somewhat lower. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "219", "4625", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.04735"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2017/page_122.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the growth rate in based rent for hudson yards , new york facility in the third period?\n\nPre-table text:\nused to refinance certain indebtedness which matured in the fourth quarter of 2014 .\ninterest is payable semi-annually in arrears on march 18 and september 18 of each year , or approximately $ 35 million per year .\nthe 2024 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2024 notes .\n2022 notes .\nin may 2012 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 1.375% ( 1.375 % ) notes , which were repaid in june 2015 at maturity , and $ 750 million of 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) notes maturing in june 2022 ( the 201c2022 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s common stock and series b preferred from barclays and affiliates and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2022 notes of approximately $ 25 million per year is payable semi-annually on june 1 and december 1 of each year .\nthe 2022 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price represents a price , subject to the specific terms of the 2022 notes and related indenture , that is the greater of ( a ) par value and ( b ) the present value of future payments that will not be paid because of an early redemption , which is discounted at a fixed spread over a comparable treasury security .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2022 notes .\n2021 notes .\nin may 2011 , the company issued $ 1.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as two separate series of senior debt securities , including $ 750 million of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes maturing in may 2021 and $ 750 million of floating rate notes , which were repaid in may 2013 at maturity .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to fund the repurchase of blackrock 2019s series b preferred from affiliates of merrill lynch & co. , inc .\ninterest on the 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) notes due in 2021 ( 201c2021 notes 201d ) is payable semi-annually on may 24 and november 24 of each year , and is approximately $ 32 million per year .\nthe 2021 notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2021 notes .\n2019 notes .\nin december 2009 , the company issued $ 2.5 billion in aggregate principal amount of unsecured and unsubordinated obligations .\nthese notes were issued as three separate series of senior debt securities including $ 0.5 billion of 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2012 , $ 1.0 billion of 3.50% ( 3.50 % ) notes , which were repaid in december 2014 at maturity , and $ 1.0 billion of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) notes maturing in december 2019 ( the 201c2019 notes 201d ) .\nnet proceeds of this offering were used to repay borrowings under the cp program , which was used to finance a portion of the acquisition of barclays global investors from barclays on december 1 , 2009 , and for general corporate purposes .\ninterest on the 2019 notes of approximately $ 50 million per year is payable semi-annually in arrears on june 10 and december 10 of each year .\nthese notes may be redeemed prior to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price .\nthe unamortized discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized over the remaining term of the 2019 notes .\n13 .\ncommitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2043 .\nfuture minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .\n\nTable:\nyear\tamount\n2018\t141\n2019\t132\n2020\t126\n2021\t118\n2022\t109\nthereafter\t1580\ntotal\t$ 2206\n\nPost-table text:\nin may 2017 , the company entered into an agreement with 50 hymc owner llc , for the lease of approximately 847000 square feet of office space located at 50 hudson yards , new york , new york .\nthe term of the lease is twenty years from the date that rental payments begin , expected to occur in may 2023 , with the option to renew for a specified term .\nthe lease requires annual base rental payments of approximately $ 51 million per year during the first five years of the lease term , increasing every five years to $ 58 million , $ 66 million and $ 74 million per year ( or approximately $ 1.2 billion in base rent over its twenty-year term ) .\nthis lease is classified as an operating lease and , as such , is not recorded as a liability on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nrent expense and certain office equipment expense under lease agreements amounted to $ 132 million , $ 134 million and $ 136 million in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .\ninvestment commitments .\nat december 31 , 2017 , the company had $ 298 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including consolidated vies .\nthese funds include private equity funds , real assets funds , and opportunistic funds .\nthis amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds .\ngenerally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment .\nthese unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthese commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company that are not yet legally binding .\nthe company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients .\ncontingencies contingent payments related to business acquisitions .\nin connection with certain acquisitions , blackrock is required to make contingent payments , subject to achieving specified performance targets , which may include revenue related to acquired contracts or new capital commitments for certain products .\nthe fair value of the remaining aggregate contingent payments at december 31 , 2017 totaled $ 236 million , including $ 128 million related to the first reserve transaction , and is included in other liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "66", "58", ")", "divide(", "#0", "58", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.13793"}
{"example_id": "LKQ/2016/page_26.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nbased on the review of the comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s . ) index and the peer group what was the ratio of the lkq performance to the peer group in 2013\n\nPre-table text:\ncomparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .\n\nTable:\n\t12/31/2011\t12/31/2012\t12/31/2013\t12/31/2014\t12/31/2015\t12/31/2016\nlkq corporation\t$ 100\t$ 140\t$ 219\t$ 187\t$ 197\t$ 204\ns&p 500 index\t$ 100\t$ 113\t$ 147\t$ 164\t$ 163\t$ 178\npeer group\t$ 100\t$ 111\t$ 140\t$ 177\t$ 188\t$ 217\n\nPost-table text:\nthis stock performance information is \"furnished\" and shall not be deemed to be \"soliciting material\" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed \"filed\" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .\ninformation about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "219", "140", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "1.56429"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2006/page_37.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in cash capital investments in track from 2005 to 2006?\n\nPre-table text:\nthe table below details cash capital investments for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 .\nmillions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 .\n\nTable:\nmillions of dollars\t2006\t2005\t2004\ntrack\t$ 1487\t$ 1472\t$ 1328\ncapacity and commercial facilities\t510\t509\t347\nlocomotives and freight cars\t135\t98\t125\nother\t110\t90\t76\ntotal\t$ 2242\t$ 2169\t$ 1876\n\nPost-table text:\nin 2007 , we expect our total capital investments to be approximately $ 3.2 billion , which may include long- term leases .\nthese investments will be used to maintain track and structures , continue capacity expansions on our main lines in constrained corridors , remove bottlenecks , upgrade and augment equipment to better meet customer needs , build and improve facilities and terminals , and develop and implement new technologies .\nwe designed these investments to maintain infrastructure for safety , enhance customer service , promote growth , and improve operational fluidity .\nwe expect to fund our 2007 cash capital investments through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\nwe expect that these sources will continue to provide sufficient funds to meet our expected capital requirements for 2007 .\nfor the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 4.4 , 2.9 , and 2.1 , respectively .\nthe increases in 2006 and 2005 were driven by higher net income .\nthe ratio of earnings to fixed charges was computed on a consolidated basis .\nearnings represent income from continuing operations , less equity earnings net of distributions , plus fixed charges and income taxes .\nfixed charges represent interest charges , amortization of debt discount , and the estimated amount representing the interest portion of rental charges .\nsee exhibit 12 for the calculation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges .\nfinancing activities credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 2 billion in revolving credit facilities available , including $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2009 and $ 1 billion under a five-year facility expiring in march 2010 ( collectively , the \"facilities\" ) .\nthe facilities are designated for general corporate purposes and support the issuance of commercial paper .\nneither of the facilities were drawn on in 2006 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facilities are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated investment-grade borrowers .\nthese facilities allow for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants .\nthe facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral .\nin addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 .\nneither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines .\ndividends 2013 on january 30 , 2007 , we increased the quarterly dividend to $ 0.35 per share , payable beginning on april 2 , 2007 , to shareholders of record on february 28 , 2007 .\nwe expect to fund the increase in the quarterly dividend through cash generated from operations , the sale or lease of various operating and non-operating properties , and cash on hand at december 31 , 2006 .\ndividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under our credit facilities .\nretained earnings available .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "1487", "1472", ")", "divide(", "#0", "1472", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01019"}
{"example_id": "BLK/2012/page_160.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of tax benefit would affect the effective tax rate if recognized as of december 31 , 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\n19 .\nincome taxes ( continued ) capital loss carryforwards of $ 69 million and $ 90 million , which were acquired in the bgi transaction and will expire on or before 2013 .\nat december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had $ 95 million and $ 95 million of valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets , respectively , recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition .\nthe year- over-year increase in the valuation allowance primarily related to certain foreign deferred income tax assets .\ngoodwill recorded in connection with the quellos transaction has been reduced during the period by the amount of tax benefit realized from tax-deductible goodwill .\nsee note 9 , goodwill , for further discussion .\ncurrent income taxes are recorded net in the consolidated statements of financial condition when related to the same tax jurisdiction .\nas of december 31 , 2012 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 102 million and $ 121 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nas of december 31 , 2011 , the company had current income taxes receivable and payable of $ 108 million and $ 102 million , respectively , recorded in other assets and accounts payable and accrued liabilities , respectively .\nthe company does not provide deferred taxes on the excess of the financial reporting over tax basis on its investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially permanent in duration .\nthe excess totaled $ 2125 million and $ 1516 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .\nthe determination of the additional deferred income taxes on the excess has not been provided because it is not practicable due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation .\nthe following tabular reconciliation presents the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits : year ended december 31 , ( dollar amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 2010 .\n\nTable:\n( dollar amounts in millions )\tyear ended december 31 , 2012\tyear ended december 31 , 2011\tyear ended december 31 , 2010\nbalance at january 1\t$ 349\t$ 307\t$ 285\nadditions for tax positions of prior years\t4\t22\t10\nreductions for tax positions of prior years\t-1 ( 1 )\t-1 ( 1 )\t-17 ( 17 )\nadditions based on tax positions related to current year\t69\t46\t35\nlapse of statute of limitations\t2014\t2014\t-8 ( 8 )\nsettlements\t-29 ( 29 )\t-25 ( 25 )\t-2 ( 2 )\npositions assumed in acquisitions\t12\t2014\t4\nbalance at december 31\t$ 404\t$ 349\t$ 307\n\nPost-table text:\nincluded in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , are $ 250 million , $ 226 million and $ 194 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate .\nthe company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense .\nrelated to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above , the company accrued interest and penalties of $ 3 million during 2012 and in total , as of december 31 , 2012 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 69 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 10 million during 2011 and in total , as of december 31 , 2011 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 66 million .\nthe company accrued interest and penalties of $ 8 million during 2010 and in total , as of december 31 , 2010 , had recognized a liability for interest and penalties of $ 56 million .\npursuant to the amended and restated stock purchase agreement , the company has been indemnified by barclays for $ 73 million and guggenheim for $ 6 million of unrecognized tax benefits .\nblackrock is subject to u.s .\nfederal income tax , state and local income tax , and foreign income tax in multiple jurisdictions .\ntax years after 2007 remain open to u.s .\nfederal income tax examination , tax years after 2005 remain open to state and local income tax examination , and tax years after 2006 remain open to income tax examination in the united kingdom .\nwith few exceptions , as of december 31 , 2012 , the company is no longer subject to u.s .\nfederal , state , local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2006 .\nthe internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) completed its examination of blackrock 2019s 2006 and 2007 tax years in march 2011 .\nin november 2011 , the irs commenced its examination of blackrock 2019s 2008 and 2009 tax years , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nin july 2011 , the irs commenced its federal income tax audit of the bgi group , which blackrock acquired in december 2009 .\nthe tax years under examination are 2007 through december 1 , 2009 , and while the impact on the consolidated financial statements is undetermined , it is not expected to be material .\nthe company is currently under audit in several state and local jurisdictions .\nthe significant state and local income tax examinations are in california for tax years 2004 through 2006 , new york city for tax years 2007 through 2008 , and new jersey for tax years 2003 through 2009 .\nno state and local income tax audits cover years earlier than 2007 except for california , new jersey and new york city .\nno state and local income tax audits are expected to result in an assessment material to the consolidated financial statements. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "250", "404", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.61881"}
{"example_id": "BKR/2017/page_103.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the total value of rsus converted to bhge rsus , in millions?\n\nPre-table text:\nbaker hughes , a ge company notes to consolidated and combined financial statements bhge 2017 form 10-k | 83 issuance pursuant to awards granted under the lti plan over its term which expires on the date of the annual meeting of the company in 2027 .\na total of 53.7 million shares of class a common stock are available for issuance as of december 31 , 2017 .\nas a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , on july 3 , 2017 , each outstanding baker hughes stock option was converted into an option to purchase a share of class a common stock in the company .\nconsequently , we issued 6.8 million stock options which are fully vested .\neach converted option is subject to the same terms and conditions as applied to the original option , and the per share exercise price of each converted option was reduced by $ 17.50 to reflect the per share amount of the special dividend pursuant to the agreement associated with the transactions .\nadditionally , as a result of the acquisition of baker hughes , there were 1.7 million baker hughes restricted stock units ( rsus ) that were converted to bhge rsus at a fair value of $ 40.18 .\nstock-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant based on the calculated fair value of the award and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the equity grant .\nthe compensation cost is determined based on awards ultimately expected to vest ; therefore , we have reduced the cost for estimated forfeitures based on historical forfeiture rates .\nforfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised , if necessary , in subsequent periods to reflect actual forfeitures .\nthere were no stock-based compensation costs capitalized as the amounts were not material .\nduring the year ended december 31 , 2017 , we issued 2.1 million rsus and 1.6 million stock options under the lti plan .\nthese rsus and stock options generally vest in equal amounts over a three-year vesting period provided that the employee has remained continuously employed by the company through such vesting date .\nstock based compensation expense was $ 37 million in 2017 .\nincluded in this amount is $ 15 million of expense which relates to the acceleration of equity awards upon termination of employment of baker hughes employees with change in control agreements , and are included as part of \"merger and related costs\" in the consolidated and combined statements of income ( loss ) .\nas bhge llc is a pass through entity , any tax benefit would be recognized by its partners .\ndue to its cumulative losses , bhge is unable to recognize a tax benefit on its share of stock related expenses .\nstock options the fair value of each stock option granted is estimated using the black-scholes option pricing model .\nthe following table presents the weighted average assumptions used in the option pricing model for options granted under the lti plan .\nthe expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding .\nthe expected life is based on a simple average of the vesting term and original contractual term of the awards .\nthe expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our five main competitors over a six year period .\nthe risk-free interest rate is based on the observed u.s .\ntreasury yield curve in effect at the time the options were granted .\nthe dividend yield is based on a five year history of dividend payouts in baker hughes. .\n\nTable:\n\t2017\nexpected life ( years )\t6\nrisk-free interest rate\t2.1% ( 2.1 % )\nvolatility\t36.4% ( 36.4 % )\ndividend yield\t1.2% ( 1.2 % )\nweighted average fair value per share at grant date\t$ 12.32\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "1.7", "40.18", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "68.306"}
{"example_id": "SNPS/2006/page_69.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the percentage of tax and accounting fees among the total acquisition-related costs?\n\nPre-table text:\nsoftware and will give the company a comprehensive design-to-silicon flow that links directly into the semiconductor manufacturing process .\nintegrating hpl 2019s yield management and test chip technologies into the company 2019s industry-leading dfm portfolio is also expected to enable customers to increase their productivity and improve profitability in the design and manufacture of advanced semiconductor devices .\npurchase price .\nthe company paid $ 11.0 million in cash for all outstanding shares of hpl .\nin addition , the company had a prior investment in hpl of approximately $ 1.9 million .\nthe total purchase consideration consisted of: .\n\nTable:\n\t( in thousands )\ncash paid\t$ 11001\nprior investment in hpl\t1872\nacquisition-related costs\t2831\ntotal purchase price\t$ 15704\n\nPost-table text:\nacquisition-related costs of $ 2.8 million consist primarily of legal , tax and accounting fees of $ 1.6 million , $ 0.3 million of estimated facilities closure costs and other directly related charges , and $ 0.9 million in employee termination costs .\nas of october 31 , 2006 , the company had paid $ 2.2 million of the acquisition related costs , of which $ 1.1 million were for professional services costs , $ 0.2 million were for facilities closure costs and $ 0.9 million were for employee termination costs .\nthe $ 0.6 million balance remaining at october 31 , 2006 consists of professional and tax-related service fees and facilities closure costs .\nassets acquired .\nthe company acquired $ 8.5 million of intangible assets consisting of $ 5.1 million in core developed technology , $ 3.2 million in customer relationships and $ 0.2 million in backlog to be amortized over two to four years .\napproximately $ 0.8 million of the purchase price represents the fair value of acquired in-process research and development projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use .\naccordingly , the amount was immediately expensed and included in the company 2019s condensed consolidated statement of operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 .\nadditionally , the company acquired tangible assets of $ 14.0 million and assumed liabilities of $ 10.9 million .\ngoodwill , representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in the merger was $ 3.4 million .\ngoodwill resulted primarily from the company 2019s expectation of synergies from the integration of hpl 2019s technology with the company 2019s technology and operations .\nother .\nduring the fiscal year 2006 , the company completed an asset acquisition for cash consideration of $ 1.5 million .\nthis acquisition is not considered material to the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet and results of operations .\nfiscal 2005 acquisitions nassda corporation ( nassda ) the company acquired nassda on may 11 , 2005 .\nreasons for the acquisition .\nthe company believes nassda 2019s full-chip circuit simulation and analysis software will broaden its offerings of transistor-level circuit simulation tools , particularly in the area of mixed-signal and memory design .\npurchase price .\nthe company acquired all the outstanding shares of nassda for total cash consideration of $ 200.2 million , or $ 7.00 per share .\nin addition , as required by the merger agreement , certain nassda officers , directors and employees who were defendants in certain preexisting litigation .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1.6", "2.8", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.57143"}
{"example_id": "VRTX/2003/page_71.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage change in the common stock and option\n\nPre-table text:\nrights each holder of a share of outstanding common stock also holds one share purchase right ( a \"right\" ) for each share of common stock .\neach right entitles the holder to purchase from the company one half of one-hundredth of a share of series a junior participating preferred stock , $ 0.01 par value ( the \"junior preferred shares\" ) , of the company at a price of $ 135 per one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share ( the \"purchase price\" ) .\nthe rights are not exercisable until the earlier of acquisition by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock ( an \"acquiring person\" ) or the announcement of an intention to make or commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer , the consummation of which would result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock .\nin the event that any person or group becomes an acquiring person , each holder of a right other than the acquiring person will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock having a market value of two times the purchase price and , in the event that the company is acquired in a business combination transaction or 50% ( 50 % ) or more of its assets are sold , each holder of a right will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring company which at the time of the transaction will have a market value of two times the purchase price .\nunder certain specified circumstances , the board of directors of the company may cause the rights ( other than rights owned by such person or group ) to be exchanged , in whole or in part , for common stock or junior preferred shares , at an exchange rate of one share of common stock per right or one half of one-hundredth of a junior preferred share per right .\nat any time prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15% ( 15 % ) or more of the outstanding common stock , the board of directors of the company may redeem the rights in whole at a price of $ 0.01 per right .\ncommon stock reserved for future issuance at december 31 , 2003 , the company has reserved shares of common stock for future issuance under all equity compensation plans as follows ( shares in thousands ) : p .\nsignificant revenue arrangements the company has formed strategic collaborations with major pharmaceutical companies in the areas of drug discovery , development , and commercialization .\nresearch and development agreements provide the company with financial support and other valuable resources for research programs and development of clinical drug candidates , product development and marketing and sales of products .\ncollaborative research and development agreements in the company's collaborative research , development and commercialization programs the company seeks to discover , develop and commercialize major pharmaceutical products in conjunction with and supported by the company's collaborators .\ncollaborative research and development arrangements provide research funding over an initial contract period with renewal and termination options that vary by agreement .\nthe agreements also include milestone payments based on the achievement or the occurrence of a designated event .\nthe agreements may also contain development reimbursement provisions , royalty rights or profit sharing rights and manufacturing options .\nthe terms of each agreement vary .\nthe company has entered into significant research and development collaborations with large pharmaceutical companies .\np .\nsignificant revenue arrangements novartis in may 2000 , the company and novartis pharma ag ( \"novartis\" ) entered into an agreement to collaborate on the discovery , development and commercialization of small molecule drugs directed at targets in the kinase protein family .\nunder the agreement , novartis agreed to pay the company an up-front payment of $ 15000000 made upon signing of the agreement , up to $ 200000000 in product research funding over six .\n\nTable:\ncommon stock under stock and option plans\t21829\ncommon stock under the vertex purchase plan\t249\ncommon stock under the vertex 401 ( k ) plan\t125\ntotal\t22203\n\nPost-table text:\n.\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "22203", "21829", ")", "divide(", "#0", "21829", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.01713"}
{"example_id": "APTV/2014/page_49.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat is the difference between the highest and lowest return for the first year of the investment?\n\nPre-table text:\nstock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .\nfiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 .\n( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .\ncompany index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .\n\nTable:\ncompany index\tnovember 17 2011\tdecember 31 2011\tdecember 31 2012\tdecember 31 2013\tdecember 31 2014\ndelphi automotive plc ( 1 )\t$ 100.00\t$ 100.98\t$ 179.33\t$ 285.81\t$ 350.82\ns&p 500 ( 2 )\t100.00\t100.80\t116.93\t154.80\t175.99\nautomotive supplier peer group ( 3 )\t100.00\t89.27\t110.41\t166.46\t178.05\n\nPost-table text:\ndividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .\nthe board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .\nin january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 .\nin addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "179.33", "110.41", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "68.92"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2007/page_52.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat portion of total future obligations is related to purchase obligations as of march 31 , 2007?\n\nPre-table text:\ncontractual obligations and commercial commitments the following table ( in thousands ) summarizes our contractual obligations at march 31 , 2007 and the effects such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods. .\n\nTable:\ncontractual obligations\tpayments due by fiscal year total\tpayments due by fiscal year less than 1 year\tpayments due by fiscal year 1-3 years\tpayments due by fiscal year 3-5 years\tpayments due by fiscal year more than 5 years\noperating lease obligations\t$ 7669\t$ 1960\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\npurchase obligations\t6421\t6421\t2014\t2014\t2014\ntotal obligations\t$ 14090\t$ 8381\t$ 3441\t$ 1652\t$ 616\n\nPost-table text:\nwe have no long-term debt , capital leases or material commitments at march 31 , 2007 other than those shown in the table above .\nin may 2005 , we acquired all the shares of outstanding capital stock of impella cardiosystems ag , a company headquartered in aachen , germany .\nthe aggregate purchase price excluding a contingent payment in the amount of $ 5.6 million made on january 30 , 2007 in the form of common stock , was approximately $ 45.1 million , which consisted of $ 42.2 million of our common stock , $ 1.6 million of cash paid to certain former shareholders of impella , and $ 1.3 million of transaction costs , consisting primarily of fees paid for financial advisory and legal services .\nwe may make additional contingent payments to impella 2019s former shareholders based on additional milestone payments related to fda approvals in the amount of up to $ 11.2 million .\nthese contingent payments may be made in a combination of cash or stock under circumstances described in the purchase agreement .\nif any contingent payments are made , they will result in an increase to the carrying value of goodwill .\nwe apply the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to our agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which we are a guarantor .\nwe enter into agreements with other companies in the ordinary course of business , typically with underwriters , contractors , clinical sites and customers that include indemnification provisions .\nunder these provisions we generally indemnify and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities .\nthese indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement .\nthe maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements .\nas a result , the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal .\naccordingly , we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of march 31 , 2007 .\nclinical study agreements 2013 in our clinical study agreements , we have agreed to indemnify the participating institutions against losses incurred by them for claims related to any personal injury of subjects taking part in the study to the extent they relate to use of our devices in accordance with the clinical study agreement , the protocol for the device and our instructions .\nthe indemnification provisions contained within our clinical study agreements do not generally include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs related to the indemnification provisions contained in our clinical study agreements .\nproduct warranties 2014we routinely accrue for estimated future warranty costs on our product sales at the time of shipment .\nall of our products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\nwhile we engage in extensive product quality programs and processes , including monitoring and evaluating the quality of our component suppliers , our warranty obligations are affected by product failure rates .\nour operating results could be adversely affected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , we indemnify customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by our products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nwe have never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "6421", "14090", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.45571"}
{"example_id": "ABMD/2006/page_75.pdf-4", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total future minimum lease payments are due in 2009?\n\nPre-table text:\nabiomed , inc .\nand subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( 7 ) commitments and contingencies the company applies the disclosure provisions of fin no .\n45 , guarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including guarantees of indebtedness of others , and interpretation of fasb statements no .\n5 , 57 and 107 and rescission of fasb interpretation no .\n34 ( fin no .\n45 ) to its agreements that contain guarantee or indemnification clauses .\nthese disclosure provisions expand those required by sfas no .\n5 accounting for contingencies , by requiring that guarantors disclose certain types of guarantees , even if the likelihood of requiring the guarantor 2019s performance is remote .\nthe following is a description of arrangements in which the company is a guarantor .\nproduct warranties 2014the company routinely accrues for estimated future warranty costs on its product sales at the time of sale .\nthe ab5000 and bvs products are subject to rigorous regulation and quality standards .\noperating results could be adversely effected if the actual cost of product failures exceeds the estimated warranty provision .\npatent indemnifications 2014in many sales transactions , the company indemnifies customers against possible claims of patent infringement caused by the company 2019s products .\nthe indemnifications contained within sales contracts usually do not include limits on the claims .\nthe company has never incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle patent infringement claims related to sales transactions .\nunder the provisions of fin no .\n45 , intellectual property indemnifications require disclosure only .\nas of march 31 , 2006 , the company had entered into leases for its facilities , including its primary operating facility in danvers , massachusetts , with terms through fiscal 2010 .\nthe danvers lease may be extended , at the company 2019s option , for two successive additional periods of five years each with monthly rent charges to be determined based on then current fair rental values .\nthe company 2019s lease for its aachen location expires in august 2008 unless an option to extend for an additional four years is exercised by the company .\nin december 2005 we closed our office facility in the netherlands , recording a charge of approximately $ 58000 for the remaining lease term .\ntotal rent expense under these leases , included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations approximated $ 821000 , $ 824000 and $ 1262000 for the fiscal years ended march 31 , 2004 , 2005 and 2006 , respectively .\nfuture minimum lease payments under all significant non-cancelable operating leases as of march 31 , 2006 are approximately as follows ( in thousands ) : fiscal year ending march 31 , operating leases .\n\nTable:\nfiscal year ending march 31,\toperating leases\n2007\t1703\n2008\t1371\n2009\t1035\n2010\t710\ntotal future minimum lease payments\t$ 4819\n\nPost-table text:\nfrom time-to-time , the company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings and claims of various types .\nwhile any litigation contains an element of uncertainty , management , in consultation with the company 2019s general counsel , presently believes that the outcome of each such other proceedings or claims which are pending or known to be threatened , or all of them combined , is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , cash flow and results .\non may 15 , 2006 richard a .\nnazarian , as selling stockholder representative , filed a demand for arbitration ( subsequently amended ) with the boston office of the american arbitration association .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "1035", "4819", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.21477"}
{"example_id": "ADI/2011/page_81.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat was the percentage increase of total deferred compensation plan investments from 2010 to 2011?\\\\n\n\nPre-table text:\ncontingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million .\nthe contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 .\nthe company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach .\nchanges in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change .\nas of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million .\nthe company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities .\nthe goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric .\nfuture technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business .\nnone of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes .\nin addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million .\nroyalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods .\nas of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made .\nthe company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 .\nthese costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income .\nthe company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis .\nthe company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition .\n7 .\ndeferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc .\ndeferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading .\nthe components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: .\n\nTable:\n\t2011\t2010\nmoney market funds\t$ 17187\t$ 1840\nmutual funds\t9223\t6850\ntotal deferred compensation plan investments\t$ 26410\t$ 8690\n\nPost-table text:\nthe fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively .\nadjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses .\ngross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 .\nthe company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) .\nthese investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan .\nhowever , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors .\n8 .\nother investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments .\ninvestments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate .\nadjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc .\nnotes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["subtract(", "26410", "8690", ")", "divide(", "#0", "8690", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.03913"}
{"example_id": "ADI/2011/page_50.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat would the amount accrued because of interest on the term loan facility after october 29 , 2011?\n\nPre-table text:\nwe hold an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the benchmark interest rate of our $ 375 million 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) senior unsecured notes due july 1 , 2014 .\nthe effect of the swap is to convert our 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) fixed interest rate to a variable interest rate based on the three-month libor plus 2.05% ( 2.05 % ) ( 2.42% ( 2.42 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .\nin addition , we have a term loan facility of $ 145 million that bears interest at a fluctuating rate for each period equal to the libor rate corresponding with the tenor of the interest period plus a spread of 1.25% ( 1.25 % ) ( 1.61% ( 1.61 % ) as of october 29 , 2011 ) .\nif libor increases by 100 basis points , our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $ 5 million .\nhowever , this hypothetical change in interest rates would not impact the interest expense on our $ 375 million of 3% ( 3 % ) fixed-rate debt , which is not hedged .\nas of october 30 , 2010 , a similar 100 basis point increase in libor would have resulted in an increase of approximately $ 4 million to our annual interest expense .\nforeign currency exposure as more fully described in note 2i in the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k , we regularly hedge our non-u.s .\ndollar-based exposures by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts .\nthe terms of these contracts are for periods matching the duration of the underlying exposure and generally range from one month to twelve months .\ncurrently , our largest foreign currency exposure is the euro , primarily because our european operations have the highest proportion of our local currency denominated expenses .\nrelative to foreign currency exposures existing at october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates over the course of the year would expose us to approximately $ 6 million in losses in earnings or cash flows .\nthe market risk associated with our derivative instruments results from currency exchange rates that are expected to offset the market risk of the underlying transactions , assets and liabilities being hedged .\nthe counterparties to the agreements relating to our foreign exchange instruments consist of a number of major international financial institutions with high credit ratings .\nbased on the credit ratings of our counterparties as of october 29 , 2011 , we do not believe that there is significant risk of nonperformance by them .\nwhile the contract or notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provide one measure of the volume of these transactions , they do not represent the amount of our exposure to credit risk .\nthe amounts potentially subject to credit risk ( arising from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts ) are generally limited to the amounts , if any , by which the counterparties 2019 obligations under the contracts exceed our obligations to the counterparties .\nthe following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .\ndollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010: .\n\nTable:\n\toctober 29 2011\toctober 30 2010\nfair value of forward exchange contracts asset\t$ 2472\t$ 7256\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset\t$ 17859\t$ 22062\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability\t$ -13332 ( 13332 )\t$ -7396 ( 7396 )\n\nPost-table text:\nfair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ 17859 $ 22062 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n$ ( 13332 ) $ ( 7396 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .\ndollar .\nin addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .\nour sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["multiply(", "145", "1.61%", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "2.3345"}
{"example_id": "UNP/2007/page_65.pdf-3", "task_id": "TA_PROGGEN_FINQA_v0", "messages": [{"role": "system", "content": "You are solving numerical reasoning over financial reports. Use only the provided question, pre-table text, table, and post-table text. Return ONLY a JSON object with exactly one key: \"program_tokens\". The value must be a list of FinQA DSL program tokens ending with \"EOF\". Do not return the final answer directly and do not include extra text."}, {"role": "user", "content": "Question:\nwhat percentage of total debt is due after 2012?\n\nPre-table text:\ndebt maturities 2013 the following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of december 31 , 2007 , excluding market value adjustments .\nmillions of dollars .\n\nTable:\n2008\t$ 689\n2009\t542\n2010\t462\n2011\t550\n2012\t720\nthereafter\t4717\ntotal debt\t$ 7680\n\nPost-table text:\nat december 31 , 2007 , we reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 550 million of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance .\nthis reclassification reflected our ability and intent to refinance any short- term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term debt on a long-term basis .\nat december 31 , 2006 , we did not reclassify any short-term debt as long-term debt as we did not intend to refinance at that mortgaged properties 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.8 billion at both december 31 , 2007 and 2006 serves as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad equipment .\nas a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds .\nas of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion .\nin accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds .\ncredit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2007 , $ 1.9 billion of credit was available under our revolving credit facility ( the facility ) , which we entered into on april 20 , 2007 .\nthe facility is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper .\nwe did not draw on the facility during 2007 .\ncommitment fees and interest rates payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated , investment-grade borrowers .\nthe facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings .\nthe facility requires the maintenance of a debt to net worth coverage ratio .\nat december 31 , 2007 , we were in compliance with this covenant .\nthe facility does not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require us to post collateral .\nthe facility , which expires in april 2012 , replaced two $ 1 billion , 5-year facilities with terms ending in march 2009 and march 2010 .\nthe facility includes terms that are comparable with those of the prior facilities , although the minimum net worth requirement of $ 7.5 billion in prior facilities was removed , and the facility includes a change-of-control provision .\nin addition to our revolving credit facility , a $ 75 million uncommitted line of credit was available .\nthe line of credit expires in april 2008 , and was not used in 2007 .\nwe must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facility to draw on this $ 75 million line .\ndividend restrictions 2013 our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant that , under certain circumstances , would restrict the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders .\nthe amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 11.5 billion and $ 7.8 billion at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 , respectively .\nthis facility replaced two credit facilities that had minimum net worth covenants that were more restrictive with respect to the amount of retained earnings available for dividends at december 31 , 2006. .\n\nAllowed operations:\nadd, subtract, multiply, divide, greater, exp, table_max, table_min, table_sum, table_average\n\nReturn JSON only in this form:\n{\"program_tokens\": [\"divide(\", \"9413\", \"20.01\", \")\", \"EOF\"]}"}], "gold_program_tokens": ["divide(", "4717", "7680", ")", "EOF"], "gold_execution_answer": "0.61419"}