Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain oracle manipulation

Output:
{
  "name": "Oracle Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Manipulating price feeds for profit",
  "attack_types": [
    {
      "type": "Flash Loan Price Manipulation",
      "description": "Use flash loans to manipulate DEX prices",
      "steps": [
        "Take flash loan",
        "Manipulate AMM reserves",
        "Exploit protocol using manipulated price",
        "Restore AMM state",
        "Repay flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Multi-Block Attack",
      "description": "Manipulate price over multiple blocks",
      "requirements": "Control over multiple consecutive blocks"
    }
  ],
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Single source price oracle\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    function getPrice() public view returns (uint) {\n        // Using spot price from single DEX (VULNERABLE)\n        return UniswapPair.getReserves();\n    }\n    \n    function borrow(uint amount) public {\n        uint collateralValue = collateral * getPrice();\n        require(collateralValue > amount * 150 / 100);\n        // Borrow logic\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use multiple oracle sources",
    "Implement TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price)",
    "Use Chainlink or other decentralized oracles",
    "Add price deviation checks",
    "Delay price updates"
  ],
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Mango Markets",
      "date": "2022-10-11",
      "loss": "$110 million",
      "method": "Oracle price manipulation"
    }
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about oracle manipulation

Output:
{
  "name": "Oracle Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Manipulating price feeds for profit",
  "attack_types": [
    {
      "type": "Flash Loan Price Manipulation",
      "description": "Use flash loans to manipulate DEX prices",
      "steps": [
        "Take flash loan",
        "Manipulate AMM reserves",
        "Exploit protocol using manipulated price",
        "Restore AMM state",
        "Repay flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Multi-Block Attack",
      "description": "Manipulate price over multiple blocks",
      "requirements": "Control over multiple consecutive blocks"
    }
  ],
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Single source price oracle\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    function getPrice() public view returns (uint) {\n        // Using spot price from single DEX (VULNERABLE)\n        return UniswapPair.getReserves();\n    }\n    \n    function borrow(uint amount) public {\n        uint collateralValue = collateral * getPrice();\n        require(collateralValue > amount * 150 / 100);\n        // Borrow logic\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use multiple oracle sources",
    "Implement TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price)",
    "Use Chainlink or other decentralized oracles",
    "Add price deviation checks",
    "Delay price updates"
  ],
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Mango Markets",
      "date": "2022-10-11",
      "loss": "$110 million",
      "method": "Oracle price manipulation"
    }
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does oracle manipulation work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Oracle Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Manipulating price feeds for profit",
  "attack_types": [
    {
      "type": "Flash Loan Price Manipulation",
      "description": "Use flash loans to manipulate DEX prices",
      "steps": [
        "Take flash loan",
        "Manipulate AMM reserves",
        "Exploit protocol using manipulated price",
        "Restore AMM state",
        "Repay flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Multi-Block Attack",
      "description": "Manipulate price over multiple blocks",
      "requirements": "Control over multiple consecutive blocks"
    }
  ],
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Single source price oracle\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    function getPrice() public view returns (uint) {\n        // Using spot price from single DEX (VULNERABLE)\n        return UniswapPair.getReserves();\n    }\n    \n    function borrow(uint amount) public {\n        uint collateralValue = collateral * getPrice();\n        require(collateralValue > amount * 150 / 100);\n        // Borrow logic\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use multiple oracle sources",
    "Implement TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price)",
    "Use Chainlink or other decentralized oracles",
    "Add price deviation checks",
    "Delay price updates"
  ],
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Mango Markets",
      "date": "2022-10-11",
      "loss": "$110 million",
      "method": "Oracle price manipulation"
    }
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe oracle manipulation

Output:
{
  "name": "Oracle Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Manipulating price feeds for profit",
  "attack_types": [
    {
      "type": "Flash Loan Price Manipulation",
      "description": "Use flash loans to manipulate DEX prices",
      "steps": [
        "Take flash loan",
        "Manipulate AMM reserves",
        "Exploit protocol using manipulated price",
        "Restore AMM state",
        "Repay flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Multi-Block Attack",
      "description": "Manipulate price over multiple blocks",
      "requirements": "Control over multiple consecutive blocks"
    }
  ],
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Single source price oracle\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    function getPrice() public view returns (uint) {\n        // Using spot price from single DEX (VULNERABLE)\n        return UniswapPair.getReserves();\n    }\n    \n    function borrow(uint amount) public {\n        uint collateralValue = collateral * getPrice();\n        require(collateralValue > amount * 150 / 100);\n        // Borrow logic\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use multiple oracle sources",
    "Implement TWAP (Time-Weighted Average Price)",
    "Use Chainlink or other decentralized oracles",
    "Add price deviation checks",
    "Delay price updates"
  ],
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Mango Markets",
      "date": "2022-10-11",
      "loss": "$110 million",
      "method": "Oracle price manipulation"
    }
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is flash loan attacks?

Output:
{
  "name": "Flash Loan Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploits using uncollateralized loans",
  "attack_template": "\ncontract FlashLoanAttack {\n    function executeAttack() external {\n        // 1. Request flash loan\n        uint loanAmount = 10000 ether;\n        IFlashLoanProvider.flashLoan(loanAmount);\n    }\n    \n    function onFlashLoan(uint amount) external {\n        // 2. Manipulate protocol state\n        manipulatePrice();\n        \n        // 3. Exploit vulnerability\n        exploitProtocol();\n        \n        // 4. Restore state if needed\n        restorePrice();\n        \n        // 5. Repay flash loan\n        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "common_patterns": [
    "Price oracle manipulation",
    "Governance token borrowing for voting",
    "Arbitrage between protocols",
    "Collateral swapping",
    "Liquidation attacks"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use TWAP oracles",
    "Implement flash loan guards",
    "Add time delays for critical operations",
    "Validate state consistency"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain flash loan attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Flash Loan Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploits using uncollateralized loans",
  "attack_template": "\ncontract FlashLoanAttack {\n    function executeAttack() external {\n        // 1. Request flash loan\n        uint loanAmount = 10000 ether;\n        IFlashLoanProvider.flashLoan(loanAmount);\n    }\n    \n    function onFlashLoan(uint amount) external {\n        // 2. Manipulate protocol state\n        manipulatePrice();\n        \n        // 3. Exploit vulnerability\n        exploitProtocol();\n        \n        // 4. Restore state if needed\n        restorePrice();\n        \n        // 5. Repay flash loan\n        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "common_patterns": [
    "Price oracle manipulation",
    "Governance token borrowing for voting",
    "Arbitrage between protocols",
    "Collateral swapping",
    "Liquidation attacks"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use TWAP oracles",
    "Implement flash loan guards",
    "Add time delays for critical operations",
    "Validate state consistency"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about flash loan attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Flash Loan Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploits using uncollateralized loans",
  "attack_template": "\ncontract FlashLoanAttack {\n    function executeAttack() external {\n        // 1. Request flash loan\n        uint loanAmount = 10000 ether;\n        IFlashLoanProvider.flashLoan(loanAmount);\n    }\n    \n    function onFlashLoan(uint amount) external {\n        // 2. Manipulate protocol state\n        manipulatePrice();\n        \n        // 3. Exploit vulnerability\n        exploitProtocol();\n        \n        // 4. Restore state if needed\n        restorePrice();\n        \n        // 5. Repay flash loan\n        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "common_patterns": [
    "Price oracle manipulation",
    "Governance token borrowing for voting",
    "Arbitrage between protocols",
    "Collateral swapping",
    "Liquidation attacks"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use TWAP oracles",
    "Implement flash loan guards",
    "Add time delays for critical operations",
    "Validate state consistency"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does flash loan attacks work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Flash Loan Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploits using uncollateralized loans",
  "attack_template": "\ncontract FlashLoanAttack {\n    function executeAttack() external {\n        // 1. Request flash loan\n        uint loanAmount = 10000 ether;\n        IFlashLoanProvider.flashLoan(loanAmount);\n    }\n    \n    function onFlashLoan(uint amount) external {\n        // 2. Manipulate protocol state\n        manipulatePrice();\n        \n        // 3. Exploit vulnerability\n        exploitProtocol();\n        \n        // 4. Restore state if needed\n        restorePrice();\n        \n        // 5. Repay flash loan\n        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "common_patterns": [
    "Price oracle manipulation",
    "Governance token borrowing for voting",
    "Arbitrage between protocols",
    "Collateral swapping",
    "Liquidation attacks"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use TWAP oracles",
    "Implement flash loan guards",
    "Add time delays for critical operations",
    "Validate state consistency"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe flash loan attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Flash Loan Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploits using uncollateralized loans",
  "attack_template": "\ncontract FlashLoanAttack {\n    function executeAttack() external {\n        // 1. Request flash loan\n        uint loanAmount = 10000 ether;\n        IFlashLoanProvider.flashLoan(loanAmount);\n    }\n    \n    function onFlashLoan(uint amount) external {\n        // 2. Manipulate protocol state\n        manipulatePrice();\n        \n        // 3. Exploit vulnerability\n        exploitProtocol();\n        \n        // 4. Restore state if needed\n        restorePrice();\n        \n        // 5. Repay flash loan\n        IERC20(token).transfer(msg.sender, amount + fee);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "common_patterns": [
    "Price oracle manipulation",
    "Governance token borrowing for voting",
    "Arbitrage between protocols",
    "Collateral swapping",
    "Liquidation attacks"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use TWAP oracles",
    "Implement flash loan guards",
    "Add time delays for critical operations",
    "Validate state consistency"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is delegate call?

Output:
{
  "name": "Delegatecall Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Unsafe delegatecall allowing storage collision",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Proxy with storage collision\ncontract Proxy {\n    address implementation; // slot 0\n    address owner;         // slot 1\n    \n    function upgrade(address newImpl) public {\n        implementation = newImpl;\n    }\n    \n    fallback() external payable {\n        address impl = implementation;\n        assembly {\n            calldatacopy(0, 0, calldatasize())\n            let result := delegatecall(gas(), impl, 0, calldatasize(), 0, 0)\n            returndatacopy(0, 0, returndatasize())\n            \n            switch result\n            case 0 { revert(0, returndatasize()) }\n            default { return(0, returndatasize()) }\n        }\n    }\n}\n\n// Implementation with different storage layout\ncontract Implementation {\n    address someVar;  // slot 0 - Collides with 'implementation'!\n    address owner;    // slot 1\n    \n    function destroy() public {\n        someVar = address(0); // Overwrites proxy implementation!\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "exploit_scenarios": [
    "Storage collision in upgradeable contracts",
    "Uninitialized storage pointers",
    "Delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Proxy implementation overwrite"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use standardized proxy patterns (EIP-1967)",
    "Maintain consistent storage layouts",
    "Never delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Use OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain delegate call

Output:
{
  "name": "Delegatecall Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Unsafe delegatecall allowing storage collision",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Proxy with storage collision\ncontract Proxy {\n    address implementation; // slot 0\n    address owner;         // slot 1\n    \n    function upgrade(address newImpl) public {\n        implementation = newImpl;\n    }\n    \n    fallback() external payable {\n        address impl = implementation;\n        assembly {\n            calldatacopy(0, 0, calldatasize())\n            let result := delegatecall(gas(), impl, 0, calldatasize(), 0, 0)\n            returndatacopy(0, 0, returndatasize())\n            \n            switch result\n            case 0 { revert(0, returndatasize()) }\n            default { return(0, returndatasize()) }\n        }\n    }\n}\n\n// Implementation with different storage layout\ncontract Implementation {\n    address someVar;  // slot 0 - Collides with 'implementation'!\n    address owner;    // slot 1\n    \n    function destroy() public {\n        someVar = address(0); // Overwrites proxy implementation!\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "exploit_scenarios": [
    "Storage collision in upgradeable contracts",
    "Uninitialized storage pointers",
    "Delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Proxy implementation overwrite"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use standardized proxy patterns (EIP-1967)",
    "Maintain consistent storage layouts",
    "Never delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Use OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about delegate call

Output:
{
  "name": "Delegatecall Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Unsafe delegatecall allowing storage collision",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Proxy with storage collision\ncontract Proxy {\n    address implementation; // slot 0\n    address owner;         // slot 1\n    \n    function upgrade(address newImpl) public {\n        implementation = newImpl;\n    }\n    \n    fallback() external payable {\n        address impl = implementation;\n        assembly {\n            calldatacopy(0, 0, calldatasize())\n            let result := delegatecall(gas(), impl, 0, calldatasize(), 0, 0)\n            returndatacopy(0, 0, returndatasize())\n            \n            switch result\n            case 0 { revert(0, returndatasize()) }\n            default { return(0, returndatasize()) }\n        }\n    }\n}\n\n// Implementation with different storage layout\ncontract Implementation {\n    address someVar;  // slot 0 - Collides with 'implementation'!\n    address owner;    // slot 1\n    \n    function destroy() public {\n        someVar = address(0); // Overwrites proxy implementation!\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "exploit_scenarios": [
    "Storage collision in upgradeable contracts",
    "Uninitialized storage pointers",
    "Delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Proxy implementation overwrite"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use standardized proxy patterns (EIP-1967)",
    "Maintain consistent storage layouts",
    "Never delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Use OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does delegate call work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Delegatecall Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Unsafe delegatecall allowing storage collision",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Proxy with storage collision\ncontract Proxy {\n    address implementation; // slot 0\n    address owner;         // slot 1\n    \n    function upgrade(address newImpl) public {\n        implementation = newImpl;\n    }\n    \n    fallback() external payable {\n        address impl = implementation;\n        assembly {\n            calldatacopy(0, 0, calldatasize())\n            let result := delegatecall(gas(), impl, 0, calldatasize(), 0, 0)\n            returndatacopy(0, 0, returndatasize())\n            \n            switch result\n            case 0 { revert(0, returndatasize()) }\n            default { return(0, returndatasize()) }\n        }\n    }\n}\n\n// Implementation with different storage layout\ncontract Implementation {\n    address someVar;  // slot 0 - Collides with 'implementation'!\n    address owner;    // slot 1\n    \n    function destroy() public {\n        someVar = address(0); // Overwrites proxy implementation!\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "exploit_scenarios": [
    "Storage collision in upgradeable contracts",
    "Uninitialized storage pointers",
    "Delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Proxy implementation overwrite"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use standardized proxy patterns (EIP-1967)",
    "Maintain consistent storage layouts",
    "Never delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Use OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe delegate call

Output:
{
  "name": "Delegatecall Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Unsafe delegatecall allowing storage collision",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Proxy with storage collision\ncontract Proxy {\n    address implementation; // slot 0\n    address owner;         // slot 1\n    \n    function upgrade(address newImpl) public {\n        implementation = newImpl;\n    }\n    \n    fallback() external payable {\n        address impl = implementation;\n        assembly {\n            calldatacopy(0, 0, calldatasize())\n            let result := delegatecall(gas(), impl, 0, calldatasize(), 0, 0)\n            returndatacopy(0, 0, returndatasize())\n            \n            switch result\n            case 0 { revert(0, returndatasize()) }\n            default { return(0, returndatasize()) }\n        }\n    }\n}\n\n// Implementation with different storage layout\ncontract Implementation {\n    address someVar;  // slot 0 - Collides with 'implementation'!\n    address owner;    // slot 1\n    \n    function destroy() public {\n        someVar = address(0); // Overwrites proxy implementation!\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "exploit_scenarios": [
    "Storage collision in upgradeable contracts",
    "Uninitialized storage pointers",
    "Delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Proxy implementation overwrite"
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use standardized proxy patterns (EIP-1967)",
    "Maintain consistent storage layouts",
    "Never delegatecall to untrusted contracts",
    "Use OpenZeppelin upgradeable contracts"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is signature malleability?

Output:
{
  "name": "Signature Malleability",
  "severity": "Medium",
  "description": "Multiple valid signatures for same message",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Signature replay\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(bytes32 => bool) public executed;\n    \n    function execute(\n        uint amount,\n        uint nonce,\n        bytes memory signature\n    ) public {\n        bytes32 hash = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, nonce));\n        \n        // Vulnerable to signature malleability\n        address signer = ecrecover(hash, v, r, s);\n        require(signer == owner);\n        \n        // Missing nonce/signature tracking!\n        transfer(amount);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use OpenZeppelin's ECDSA library",
    "Track used signatures/nonces",
    "Implement EIP-712 for structured data",
    "Check signature malleability (s value)"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain signature malleability

Output:
{
  "name": "Signature Malleability",
  "severity": "Medium",
  "description": "Multiple valid signatures for same message",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Signature replay\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(bytes32 => bool) public executed;\n    \n    function execute(\n        uint amount,\n        uint nonce,\n        bytes memory signature\n    ) public {\n        bytes32 hash = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, nonce));\n        \n        // Vulnerable to signature malleability\n        address signer = ecrecover(hash, v, r, s);\n        require(signer == owner);\n        \n        // Missing nonce/signature tracking!\n        transfer(amount);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use OpenZeppelin's ECDSA library",
    "Track used signatures/nonces",
    "Implement EIP-712 for structured data",
    "Check signature malleability (s value)"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about signature malleability

Output:
{
  "name": "Signature Malleability",
  "severity": "Medium",
  "description": "Multiple valid signatures for same message",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Signature replay\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(bytes32 => bool) public executed;\n    \n    function execute(\n        uint amount,\n        uint nonce,\n        bytes memory signature\n    ) public {\n        bytes32 hash = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, nonce));\n        \n        // Vulnerable to signature malleability\n        address signer = ecrecover(hash, v, r, s);\n        require(signer == owner);\n        \n        // Missing nonce/signature tracking!\n        transfer(amount);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use OpenZeppelin's ECDSA library",
    "Track used signatures/nonces",
    "Implement EIP-712 for structured data",
    "Check signature malleability (s value)"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does signature malleability work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Signature Malleability",
  "severity": "Medium",
  "description": "Multiple valid signatures for same message",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Signature replay\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(bytes32 => bool) public executed;\n    \n    function execute(\n        uint amount,\n        uint nonce,\n        bytes memory signature\n    ) public {\n        bytes32 hash = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, nonce));\n        \n        // Vulnerable to signature malleability\n        address signer = ecrecover(hash, v, r, s);\n        require(signer == owner);\n        \n        // Missing nonce/signature tracking!\n        transfer(amount);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use OpenZeppelin's ECDSA library",
    "Track used signatures/nonces",
    "Implement EIP-712 for structured data",
    "Check signature malleability (s value)"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe signature malleability

Output:
{
  "name": "Signature Malleability",
  "severity": "Medium",
  "description": "Multiple valid signatures for same message",
  "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Signature replay\ncontract Vulnerable {\n    mapping(bytes32 => bool) public executed;\n    \n    function execute(\n        uint amount,\n        uint nonce,\n        bytes memory signature\n    ) public {\n        bytes32 hash = keccak256(abi.encodePacked(amount, nonce));\n        \n        // Vulnerable to signature malleability\n        address signer = ecrecover(hash, v, r, s);\n        require(signer == owner);\n        \n        // Missing nonce/signature tracking!\n        transfer(amount);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use OpenZeppelin's ECDSA library",
    "Track used signatures/nonces",
    "Implement EIP-712 for structured data",
    "Check signature malleability (s value)"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is dos attacks?

Output:
{
  "name": "Denial of Service Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Attacks that block contract functionality",
  "patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Unbounded loops",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Unbounded loop\nfunction distribute() public {\n    for(uint i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {\n        users[i].transfer(amount); // Can hit gas limit\n    }\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block gas limit",
      "description": "Operations exceeding block gas limit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unexpected revert",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Can be blocked by malicious recipient\nfunction withdraw() public {\n    uint amount = balances[msg.sender];\n    balances[msg.sender] = 0;\n    \n    // If this fails, funds are locked\n    payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block stuffing",
      "description": "Filling blocks to prevent transactions"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement pull over push patterns",
    "Limit array sizes",
    "Use withdrawal patterns",
    "Implement circuit breakers",
    "Gas limit considerations"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain dos attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Denial of Service Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Attacks that block contract functionality",
  "patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Unbounded loops",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Unbounded loop\nfunction distribute() public {\n    for(uint i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {\n        users[i].transfer(amount); // Can hit gas limit\n    }\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block gas limit",
      "description": "Operations exceeding block gas limit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unexpected revert",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Can be blocked by malicious recipient\nfunction withdraw() public {\n    uint amount = balances[msg.sender];\n    balances[msg.sender] = 0;\n    \n    // If this fails, funds are locked\n    payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block stuffing",
      "description": "Filling blocks to prevent transactions"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement pull over push patterns",
    "Limit array sizes",
    "Use withdrawal patterns",
    "Implement circuit breakers",
    "Gas limit considerations"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about dos attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Denial of Service Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Attacks that block contract functionality",
  "patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Unbounded loops",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Unbounded loop\nfunction distribute() public {\n    for(uint i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {\n        users[i].transfer(amount); // Can hit gas limit\n    }\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block gas limit",
      "description": "Operations exceeding block gas limit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unexpected revert",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Can be blocked by malicious recipient\nfunction withdraw() public {\n    uint amount = balances[msg.sender];\n    balances[msg.sender] = 0;\n    \n    // If this fails, funds are locked\n    payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block stuffing",
      "description": "Filling blocks to prevent transactions"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement pull over push patterns",
    "Limit array sizes",
    "Use withdrawal patterns",
    "Implement circuit breakers",
    "Gas limit considerations"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does dos attacks work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Denial of Service Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Attacks that block contract functionality",
  "patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Unbounded loops",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Unbounded loop\nfunction distribute() public {\n    for(uint i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {\n        users[i].transfer(amount); // Can hit gas limit\n    }\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block gas limit",
      "description": "Operations exceeding block gas limit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unexpected revert",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Can be blocked by malicious recipient\nfunction withdraw() public {\n    uint amount = balances[msg.sender];\n    balances[msg.sender] = 0;\n    \n    // If this fails, funds are locked\n    payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block stuffing",
      "description": "Filling blocks to prevent transactions"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement pull over push patterns",
    "Limit array sizes",
    "Use withdrawal patterns",
    "Implement circuit breakers",
    "Gas limit considerations"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe dos attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Denial of Service Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Attacks that block contract functionality",
  "patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Unbounded loops",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Unbounded loop\nfunction distribute() public {\n    for(uint i = 0; i < users.length; i++) {\n        users[i].transfer(amount); // Can hit gas limit\n    }\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block gas limit",
      "description": "Operations exceeding block gas limit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unexpected revert",
      "vulnerable_code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Can be blocked by malicious recipient\nfunction withdraw() public {\n    uint amount = balances[msg.sender];\n    balances[msg.sender] = 0;\n    \n    // If this fails, funds are locked\n    payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount);\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "type": "Block stuffing",
      "description": "Filling blocks to prevent transactions"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement pull over push patterns",
    "Limit array sizes",
    "Use withdrawal patterns",
    "Implement circuit breakers",
    "Gas limit considerations"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is randomness vulnerabilities?

Output:
{
  "name": "Weak Randomness",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Predictable randomness in contracts",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "pattern": "Block variables",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Predictable randomness\nfunction random() public view returns (uint) {\n    return uint(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(\n        block.timestamp,  // Predictable\n        block.difficulty, // Predictable\n        msg.sender       // Known\n    )));\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "pattern": "Block hash",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Miner can influence\nfunction lottery() public {\n    if (uint(blockhash(block.number)) % 2 == 0) {\n        // Winner - miner can manipulate\n    }\n}\n                    "
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use Chainlink VRF",
    "Commit-reveal schemes",
    "External oracle randomness",
    "Multi-party computation"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain randomness vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Weak Randomness",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Predictable randomness in contracts",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "pattern": "Block variables",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Predictable randomness\nfunction random() public view returns (uint) {\n    return uint(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(\n        block.timestamp,  // Predictable\n        block.difficulty, // Predictable\n        msg.sender       // Known\n    )));\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "pattern": "Block hash",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Miner can influence\nfunction lottery() public {\n    if (uint(blockhash(block.number)) % 2 == 0) {\n        // Winner - miner can manipulate\n    }\n}\n                    "
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use Chainlink VRF",
    "Commit-reveal schemes",
    "External oracle randomness",
    "Multi-party computation"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about randomness vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Weak Randomness",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Predictable randomness in contracts",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "pattern": "Block variables",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Predictable randomness\nfunction random() public view returns (uint) {\n    return uint(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(\n        block.timestamp,  // Predictable\n        block.difficulty, // Predictable\n        msg.sender       // Known\n    )));\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "pattern": "Block hash",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Miner can influence\nfunction lottery() public {\n    if (uint(blockhash(block.number)) % 2 == 0) {\n        // Winner - miner can manipulate\n    }\n}\n                    "
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use Chainlink VRF",
    "Commit-reveal schemes",
    "External oracle randomness",
    "Multi-party computation"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does randomness vulnerabilities work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Weak Randomness",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Predictable randomness in contracts",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "pattern": "Block variables",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Predictable randomness\nfunction random() public view returns (uint) {\n    return uint(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(\n        block.timestamp,  // Predictable\n        block.difficulty, // Predictable\n        msg.sender       // Known\n    )));\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "pattern": "Block hash",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Miner can influence\nfunction lottery() public {\n    if (uint(blockhash(block.number)) % 2 == 0) {\n        // Winner - miner can manipulate\n    }\n}\n                    "
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use Chainlink VRF",
    "Commit-reveal schemes",
    "External oracle randomness",
    "Multi-party computation"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe randomness vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Weak Randomness",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Predictable randomness in contracts",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "pattern": "Block variables",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Predictable randomness\nfunction random() public view returns (uint) {\n    return uint(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(\n        block.timestamp,  // Predictable\n        block.difficulty, // Predictable\n        msg.sender       // Known\n    )));\n}\n                    "
    },
    {
      "pattern": "Block hash",
      "code": "\n// VULNERABLE: Miner can influence\nfunction lottery() public {\n    if (uint(blockhash(block.number)) % 2 == 0) {\n        // Winner - miner can manipulate\n    }\n}\n                    "
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Use Chainlink VRF",
    "Commit-reveal schemes",
    "External oracle randomness",
    "Multi-party computation"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is proxy vulnerabilities?

Output:
{
  "name": "Proxy Contract Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Issues in upgradeable contract patterns",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Uninitialized proxy",
      "description": "Implementation not initialized after deployment",
      "impact": "Anyone can become owner"
    },
    {
      "type": "Function clashing",
      "description": "Proxy functions clash with implementation",
      "example": "Admin functions accessible through fallback"
    },
    {
      "type": "Storage collision",
      "description": "Proxy and implementation share storage slots"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unsafe upgrade",
      "description": "No checks on new implementation compatibility"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT: Take over uninitialized proxy\ncontract ProxyTakeover {\n    function attack(address proxy) external {\n        // Call initialize on uninitialized proxy\n        IProxy(proxy).initialize(address(this));\n        \n        // Now we're the owner\n        IProxy(proxy).upgrade(maliciousImplementation);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Initialize proxy in same transaction as deployment",
    "Use proven proxy patterns (UUPS, Transparent)",
    "Implement upgrade safety checks",
    "Storage gap for future variables"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain proxy vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Proxy Contract Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Issues in upgradeable contract patterns",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Uninitialized proxy",
      "description": "Implementation not initialized after deployment",
      "impact": "Anyone can become owner"
    },
    {
      "type": "Function clashing",
      "description": "Proxy functions clash with implementation",
      "example": "Admin functions accessible through fallback"
    },
    {
      "type": "Storage collision",
      "description": "Proxy and implementation share storage slots"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unsafe upgrade",
      "description": "No checks on new implementation compatibility"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT: Take over uninitialized proxy\ncontract ProxyTakeover {\n    function attack(address proxy) external {\n        // Call initialize on uninitialized proxy\n        IProxy(proxy).initialize(address(this));\n        \n        // Now we're the owner\n        IProxy(proxy).upgrade(maliciousImplementation);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Initialize proxy in same transaction as deployment",
    "Use proven proxy patterns (UUPS, Transparent)",
    "Implement upgrade safety checks",
    "Storage gap for future variables"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about proxy vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Proxy Contract Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Issues in upgradeable contract patterns",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Uninitialized proxy",
      "description": "Implementation not initialized after deployment",
      "impact": "Anyone can become owner"
    },
    {
      "type": "Function clashing",
      "description": "Proxy functions clash with implementation",
      "example": "Admin functions accessible through fallback"
    },
    {
      "type": "Storage collision",
      "description": "Proxy and implementation share storage slots"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unsafe upgrade",
      "description": "No checks on new implementation compatibility"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT: Take over uninitialized proxy\ncontract ProxyTakeover {\n    function attack(address proxy) external {\n        // Call initialize on uninitialized proxy\n        IProxy(proxy).initialize(address(this));\n        \n        // Now we're the owner\n        IProxy(proxy).upgrade(maliciousImplementation);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Initialize proxy in same transaction as deployment",
    "Use proven proxy patterns (UUPS, Transparent)",
    "Implement upgrade safety checks",
    "Storage gap for future variables"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does proxy vulnerabilities work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Proxy Contract Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Issues in upgradeable contract patterns",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Uninitialized proxy",
      "description": "Implementation not initialized after deployment",
      "impact": "Anyone can become owner"
    },
    {
      "type": "Function clashing",
      "description": "Proxy functions clash with implementation",
      "example": "Admin functions accessible through fallback"
    },
    {
      "type": "Storage collision",
      "description": "Proxy and implementation share storage slots"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unsafe upgrade",
      "description": "No checks on new implementation compatibility"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT: Take over uninitialized proxy\ncontract ProxyTakeover {\n    function attack(address proxy) external {\n        // Call initialize on uninitialized proxy\n        IProxy(proxy).initialize(address(this));\n        \n        // Now we're the owner\n        IProxy(proxy).upgrade(maliciousImplementation);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Initialize proxy in same transaction as deployment",
    "Use proven proxy patterns (UUPS, Transparent)",
    "Implement upgrade safety checks",
    "Storage gap for future variables"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe proxy vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Proxy Contract Vulnerabilities",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Issues in upgradeable contract patterns",
  "vulnerable_patterns": [
    {
      "type": "Uninitialized proxy",
      "description": "Implementation not initialized after deployment",
      "impact": "Anyone can become owner"
    },
    {
      "type": "Function clashing",
      "description": "Proxy functions clash with implementation",
      "example": "Admin functions accessible through fallback"
    },
    {
      "type": "Storage collision",
      "description": "Proxy and implementation share storage slots"
    },
    {
      "type": "Unsafe upgrade",
      "description": "No checks on new implementation compatibility"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_code": "\n// EXPLOIT: Take over uninitialized proxy\ncontract ProxyTakeover {\n    function attack(address proxy) external {\n        // Call initialize on uninitialized proxy\n        IProxy(proxy).initialize(address(this));\n        \n        // Now we're the owner\n        IProxy(proxy).upgrade(maliciousImplementation);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Initialize proxy in same transaction as deployment",
    "Use proven proxy patterns (UUPS, Transparent)",
    "Implement upgrade safety checks",
    "Storage gap for future variables"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is sandwich attacks?

Output:
{
  "name": "Sandwich Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Front-run and back-run user transactions",
  "attack_flow": "\n1. Monitor mempool for large trades\n2. Calculate optimal sandwich parameters\n3. Front-run: Buy token before victim\n4. Victim trade executes (price increases)\n5. Back-run: Sell token after victim\n6. Profit from price difference\n            ",
  "implementation": "\ncontract SandwichBot {\n    struct SandwichParams {\n        address token;\n        uint frontRunAmount;\n        uint backRunAmount;\n        uint minProfit;\n    }\n    \n    function executeSandwich(SandwichParams memory params) external {\n        // Front-run transaction\n        buyToken(params.token, params.frontRunAmount);\n        \n        // Wait for victim transaction...\n        \n        // Back-run transaction\n        sellToken(params.token, params.backRunAmount);\n        \n        require(getProfit() >= params.minProfit);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use private mempools (Flashbots)",
    "Implement MEV protection",
    "Set appropriate slippage limits",
    "Use commit-reveal for trades"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain sandwich attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Sandwich Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Front-run and back-run user transactions",
  "attack_flow": "\n1. Monitor mempool for large trades\n2. Calculate optimal sandwich parameters\n3. Front-run: Buy token before victim\n4. Victim trade executes (price increases)\n5. Back-run: Sell token after victim\n6. Profit from price difference\n            ",
  "implementation": "\ncontract SandwichBot {\n    struct SandwichParams {\n        address token;\n        uint frontRunAmount;\n        uint backRunAmount;\n        uint minProfit;\n    }\n    \n    function executeSandwich(SandwichParams memory params) external {\n        // Front-run transaction\n        buyToken(params.token, params.frontRunAmount);\n        \n        // Wait for victim transaction...\n        \n        // Back-run transaction\n        sellToken(params.token, params.backRunAmount);\n        \n        require(getProfit() >= params.minProfit);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use private mempools (Flashbots)",
    "Implement MEV protection",
    "Set appropriate slippage limits",
    "Use commit-reveal for trades"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about sandwich attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Sandwich Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Front-run and back-run user transactions",
  "attack_flow": "\n1. Monitor mempool for large trades\n2. Calculate optimal sandwich parameters\n3. Front-run: Buy token before victim\n4. Victim trade executes (price increases)\n5. Back-run: Sell token after victim\n6. Profit from price difference\n            ",
  "implementation": "\ncontract SandwichBot {\n    struct SandwichParams {\n        address token;\n        uint frontRunAmount;\n        uint backRunAmount;\n        uint minProfit;\n    }\n    \n    function executeSandwich(SandwichParams memory params) external {\n        // Front-run transaction\n        buyToken(params.token, params.frontRunAmount);\n        \n        // Wait for victim transaction...\n        \n        // Back-run transaction\n        sellToken(params.token, params.backRunAmount);\n        \n        require(getProfit() >= params.minProfit);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use private mempools (Flashbots)",
    "Implement MEV protection",
    "Set appropriate slippage limits",
    "Use commit-reveal for trades"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does sandwich attacks work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Sandwich Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Front-run and back-run user transactions",
  "attack_flow": "\n1. Monitor mempool for large trades\n2. Calculate optimal sandwich parameters\n3. Front-run: Buy token before victim\n4. Victim trade executes (price increases)\n5. Back-run: Sell token after victim\n6. Profit from price difference\n            ",
  "implementation": "\ncontract SandwichBot {\n    struct SandwichParams {\n        address token;\n        uint frontRunAmount;\n        uint backRunAmount;\n        uint minProfit;\n    }\n    \n    function executeSandwich(SandwichParams memory params) external {\n        // Front-run transaction\n        buyToken(params.token, params.frontRunAmount);\n        \n        // Wait for victim transaction...\n        \n        // Back-run transaction\n        sellToken(params.token, params.backRunAmount);\n        \n        require(getProfit() >= params.minProfit);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use private mempools (Flashbots)",
    "Implement MEV protection",
    "Set appropriate slippage limits",
    "Use commit-reveal for trades"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe sandwich attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Sandwich Attack Patterns",
  "severity": "High",
  "description": "Front-run and back-run user transactions",
  "attack_flow": "\n1. Monitor mempool for large trades\n2. Calculate optimal sandwich parameters\n3. Front-run: Buy token before victim\n4. Victim trade executes (price increases)\n5. Back-run: Sell token after victim\n6. Profit from price difference\n            ",
  "implementation": "\ncontract SandwichBot {\n    struct SandwichParams {\n        address token;\n        uint frontRunAmount;\n        uint backRunAmount;\n        uint minProfit;\n    }\n    \n    function executeSandwich(SandwichParams memory params) external {\n        // Front-run transaction\n        buyToken(params.token, params.frontRunAmount);\n        \n        // Wait for victim transaction...\n        \n        // Back-run transaction\n        sellToken(params.token, params.backRunAmount);\n        \n        require(getProfit() >= params.minProfit);\n    }\n}\n            ",
  "prevention": [
    "Use private mempools (Flashbots)",
    "Implement MEV protection",
    "Set appropriate slippage limits",
    "Use commit-reveal for trades"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is governance attacks?

Output:
{
  "name": "Governance Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploiting governance mechanisms",
  "attack_vectors": [
    {
      "type": "Flash loan governance",
      "description": "Borrow tokens to pass malicious proposal",
      "steps": [
        "Flash loan governance tokens",
        "Create malicious proposal",
        "Vote with borrowed tokens",
        "Execute proposal immediately",
        "Return flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Proposal spam",
      "description": "Flood governance with proposals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Last-minute voting",
      "description": "Vote manipulation at end of period"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement voting delays",
    "Snapshot voting power",
    "Timelock on execution",
    "Quorum requirements",
    "Vote delegation limits"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain governance attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Governance Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploiting governance mechanisms",
  "attack_vectors": [
    {
      "type": "Flash loan governance",
      "description": "Borrow tokens to pass malicious proposal",
      "steps": [
        "Flash loan governance tokens",
        "Create malicious proposal",
        "Vote with borrowed tokens",
        "Execute proposal immediately",
        "Return flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Proposal spam",
      "description": "Flood governance with proposals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Last-minute voting",
      "description": "Vote manipulation at end of period"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement voting delays",
    "Snapshot voting power",
    "Timelock on execution",
    "Quorum requirements",
    "Vote delegation limits"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about governance attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Governance Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploiting governance mechanisms",
  "attack_vectors": [
    {
      "type": "Flash loan governance",
      "description": "Borrow tokens to pass malicious proposal",
      "steps": [
        "Flash loan governance tokens",
        "Create malicious proposal",
        "Vote with borrowed tokens",
        "Execute proposal immediately",
        "Return flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Proposal spam",
      "description": "Flood governance with proposals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Last-minute voting",
      "description": "Vote manipulation at end of period"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement voting delays",
    "Snapshot voting power",
    "Timelock on execution",
    "Quorum requirements",
    "Vote delegation limits"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does governance attacks work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Governance Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploiting governance mechanisms",
  "attack_vectors": [
    {
      "type": "Flash loan governance",
      "description": "Borrow tokens to pass malicious proposal",
      "steps": [
        "Flash loan governance tokens",
        "Create malicious proposal",
        "Vote with borrowed tokens",
        "Execute proposal immediately",
        "Return flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Proposal spam",
      "description": "Flood governance with proposals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Last-minute voting",
      "description": "Vote manipulation at end of period"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement voting delays",
    "Snapshot voting power",
    "Timelock on execution",
    "Quorum requirements",
    "Vote delegation limits"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe governance attacks

Output:
{
  "name": "Governance Manipulation",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Exploiting governance mechanisms",
  "attack_vectors": [
    {
      "type": "Flash loan governance",
      "description": "Borrow tokens to pass malicious proposal",
      "steps": [
        "Flash loan governance tokens",
        "Create malicious proposal",
        "Vote with borrowed tokens",
        "Execute proposal immediately",
        "Return flash loan"
      ]
    },
    {
      "type": "Proposal spam",
      "description": "Flood governance with proposals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Last-minute voting",
      "description": "Vote manipulation at end of period"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Implement voting delays",
    "Snapshot voting power",
    "Timelock on execution",
    "Quorum requirements",
    "Vote delegation limits"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is cross chain vulnerabilities?

Output:
{
  "name": "Cross-Chain Bridge Exploits",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Vulnerabilities in blockchain bridges",
  "common_vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "type": "Signature verification",
      "description": "Weak validator signature verification",
      "impact": "Fake deposits/withdrawals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Race conditions",
      "description": "Multiple withdrawals from single deposit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Proof validation",
      "description": "Insufficient merkle proof validation"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_patterns": "\n// Bridge exploit pattern\n1. Find vulnerability in proof verification\n2. Generate fake proof of deposit\n3. Withdraw on target chain without deposit\n4. Repeat for maximum damage\n            ",
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Ronin Bridge",
      "date": "2022-03-23",
      "loss": "$624 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Wormhole",
      "date": "2022-02-02",
      "loss": "$326 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Nomad",
      "date": "2022-08-01",
      "loss": "$190 million"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Multi-signature validation",
    "Time delays on large withdrawals",
    "Proof-of-reserve mechanisms",
    "Regular security audits",
    "Bug bounty programs"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain cross chain vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Cross-Chain Bridge Exploits",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Vulnerabilities in blockchain bridges",
  "common_vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "type": "Signature verification",
      "description": "Weak validator signature verification",
      "impact": "Fake deposits/withdrawals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Race conditions",
      "description": "Multiple withdrawals from single deposit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Proof validation",
      "description": "Insufficient merkle proof validation"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_patterns": "\n// Bridge exploit pattern\n1. Find vulnerability in proof verification\n2. Generate fake proof of deposit\n3. Withdraw on target chain without deposit\n4. Repeat for maximum damage\n            ",
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Ronin Bridge",
      "date": "2022-03-23",
      "loss": "$624 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Wormhole",
      "date": "2022-02-02",
      "loss": "$326 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Nomad",
      "date": "2022-08-01",
      "loss": "$190 million"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Multi-signature validation",
    "Time delays on large withdrawals",
    "Proof-of-reserve mechanisms",
    "Regular security audits",
    "Bug bounty programs"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about cross chain vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Cross-Chain Bridge Exploits",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Vulnerabilities in blockchain bridges",
  "common_vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "type": "Signature verification",
      "description": "Weak validator signature verification",
      "impact": "Fake deposits/withdrawals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Race conditions",
      "description": "Multiple withdrawals from single deposit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Proof validation",
      "description": "Insufficient merkle proof validation"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_patterns": "\n// Bridge exploit pattern\n1. Find vulnerability in proof verification\n2. Generate fake proof of deposit\n3. Withdraw on target chain without deposit\n4. Repeat for maximum damage\n            ",
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Ronin Bridge",
      "date": "2022-03-23",
      "loss": "$624 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Wormhole",
      "date": "2022-02-02",
      "loss": "$326 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Nomad",
      "date": "2022-08-01",
      "loss": "$190 million"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Multi-signature validation",
    "Time delays on large withdrawals",
    "Proof-of-reserve mechanisms",
    "Regular security audits",
    "Bug bounty programs"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does cross chain vulnerabilities work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Cross-Chain Bridge Exploits",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Vulnerabilities in blockchain bridges",
  "common_vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "type": "Signature verification",
      "description": "Weak validator signature verification",
      "impact": "Fake deposits/withdrawals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Race conditions",
      "description": "Multiple withdrawals from single deposit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Proof validation",
      "description": "Insufficient merkle proof validation"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_patterns": "\n// Bridge exploit pattern\n1. Find vulnerability in proof verification\n2. Generate fake proof of deposit\n3. Withdraw on target chain without deposit\n4. Repeat for maximum damage\n            ",
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Ronin Bridge",
      "date": "2022-03-23",
      "loss": "$624 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Wormhole",
      "date": "2022-02-02",
      "loss": "$326 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Nomad",
      "date": "2022-08-01",
      "loss": "$190 million"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Multi-signature validation",
    "Time delays on large withdrawals",
    "Proof-of-reserve mechanisms",
    "Regular security audits",
    "Bug bounty programs"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe cross chain vulnerabilities

Output:
{
  "name": "Cross-Chain Bridge Exploits",
  "severity": "Critical",
  "description": "Vulnerabilities in blockchain bridges",
  "common_vulnerabilities": [
    {
      "type": "Signature verification",
      "description": "Weak validator signature verification",
      "impact": "Fake deposits/withdrawals"
    },
    {
      "type": "Race conditions",
      "description": "Multiple withdrawals from single deposit"
    },
    {
      "type": "Proof validation",
      "description": "Insufficient merkle proof validation"
    }
  ],
  "exploit_patterns": "\n// Bridge exploit pattern\n1. Find vulnerability in proof verification\n2. Generate fake proof of deposit\n3. Withdraw on target chain without deposit\n4. Repeat for maximum damage\n            ",
  "real_world_incidents": [
    {
      "name": "Ronin Bridge",
      "date": "2022-03-23",
      "loss": "$624 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Wormhole",
      "date": "2022-02-02",
      "loss": "$326 million"
    },
    {
      "name": "Nomad",
      "date": "2022-08-01",
      "loss": "$190 million"
    }
  ],
  "prevention": [
    "Multi-signature validation",
    "Time delays on large withdrawals",
    "Proof-of-reserve mechanisms",
    "Regular security audits",
    "Bug bounty programs"
  ]
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is amm exploits?

Output:
{
  "name": "AMM Manipulation Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting Automated Market Makers",
  "techniques": {
    "impermanent_loss_extraction": {
      "description": "Force LPs to suffer impermanent loss",
      "method": "Large trades to move price significantly"
    },
    "k_invariant_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit x*y=k formula weaknesses",
      "vulnerable_scenarios": [
        "Low liquidity pools",
        "New token listings",
        "Imbalanced pools"
      ]
    },
    "jit_liquidity": {
      "description": "Just-In-Time liquidity provision",
      "steps": [
        "Detect large pending trade",
        "Add liquidity before trade",
        "Collect fees",
        "Remove liquidity after trade"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain amm exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "AMM Manipulation Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting Automated Market Makers",
  "techniques": {
    "impermanent_loss_extraction": {
      "description": "Force LPs to suffer impermanent loss",
      "method": "Large trades to move price significantly"
    },
    "k_invariant_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit x*y=k formula weaknesses",
      "vulnerable_scenarios": [
        "Low liquidity pools",
        "New token listings",
        "Imbalanced pools"
      ]
    },
    "jit_liquidity": {
      "description": "Just-In-Time liquidity provision",
      "steps": [
        "Detect large pending trade",
        "Add liquidity before trade",
        "Collect fees",
        "Remove liquidity after trade"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about amm exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "AMM Manipulation Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting Automated Market Makers",
  "techniques": {
    "impermanent_loss_extraction": {
      "description": "Force LPs to suffer impermanent loss",
      "method": "Large trades to move price significantly"
    },
    "k_invariant_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit x*y=k formula weaknesses",
      "vulnerable_scenarios": [
        "Low liquidity pools",
        "New token listings",
        "Imbalanced pools"
      ]
    },
    "jit_liquidity": {
      "description": "Just-In-Time liquidity provision",
      "steps": [
        "Detect large pending trade",
        "Add liquidity before trade",
        "Collect fees",
        "Remove liquidity after trade"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does amm exploits work?

Output:
{
  "name": "AMM Manipulation Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting Automated Market Makers",
  "techniques": {
    "impermanent_loss_extraction": {
      "description": "Force LPs to suffer impermanent loss",
      "method": "Large trades to move price significantly"
    },
    "k_invariant_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit x*y=k formula weaknesses",
      "vulnerable_scenarios": [
        "Low liquidity pools",
        "New token listings",
        "Imbalanced pools"
      ]
    },
    "jit_liquidity": {
      "description": "Just-In-Time liquidity provision",
      "steps": [
        "Detect large pending trade",
        "Add liquidity before trade",
        "Collect fees",
        "Remove liquidity after trade"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe amm exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "AMM Manipulation Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting Automated Market Makers",
  "techniques": {
    "impermanent_loss_extraction": {
      "description": "Force LPs to suffer impermanent loss",
      "method": "Large trades to move price significantly"
    },
    "k_invariant_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit x*y=k formula weaknesses",
      "vulnerable_scenarios": [
        "Low liquidity pools",
        "New token listings",
        "Imbalanced pools"
      ]
    },
    "jit_liquidity": {
      "description": "Just-In-Time liquidity provision",
      "steps": [
        "Detect large pending trade",
        "Add liquidity before trade",
        "Collect fees",
        "Remove liquidity after trade"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is lending protocol exploits?

Output:
{
  "name": "Lending Protocol Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting lending and borrowing protocols",
  "attack_vectors": {
    "collateral_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate collateral value",
      "steps": [
        "Deposit collateral",
        "Manipulate oracle price",
        "Borrow against inflated value",
        "Default on loan"
      ]
    },
    "interest_rate_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit interest rate models",
      "method": "Force extreme utilization rates"
    },
    "liquidation_attacks": {
      "description": "Profit from liquidations",
      "techniques": [
        "Oracle manipulation to trigger liquidation",
        "Front-run liquidation transactions",
        "Self-liquidation for profit"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain lending protocol exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "Lending Protocol Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting lending and borrowing protocols",
  "attack_vectors": {
    "collateral_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate collateral value",
      "steps": [
        "Deposit collateral",
        "Manipulate oracle price",
        "Borrow against inflated value",
        "Default on loan"
      ]
    },
    "interest_rate_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit interest rate models",
      "method": "Force extreme utilization rates"
    },
    "liquidation_attacks": {
      "description": "Profit from liquidations",
      "techniques": [
        "Oracle manipulation to trigger liquidation",
        "Front-run liquidation transactions",
        "Self-liquidation for profit"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about lending protocol exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "Lending Protocol Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting lending and borrowing protocols",
  "attack_vectors": {
    "collateral_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate collateral value",
      "steps": [
        "Deposit collateral",
        "Manipulate oracle price",
        "Borrow against inflated value",
        "Default on loan"
      ]
    },
    "interest_rate_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit interest rate models",
      "method": "Force extreme utilization rates"
    },
    "liquidation_attacks": {
      "description": "Profit from liquidations",
      "techniques": [
        "Oracle manipulation to trigger liquidation",
        "Front-run liquidation transactions",
        "Self-liquidation for profit"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does lending protocol exploits work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Lending Protocol Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting lending and borrowing protocols",
  "attack_vectors": {
    "collateral_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate collateral value",
      "steps": [
        "Deposit collateral",
        "Manipulate oracle price",
        "Borrow against inflated value",
        "Default on loan"
      ]
    },
    "interest_rate_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit interest rate models",
      "method": "Force extreme utilization rates"
    },
    "liquidation_attacks": {
      "description": "Profit from liquidations",
      "techniques": [
        "Oracle manipulation to trigger liquidation",
        "Front-run liquidation transactions",
        "Self-liquidation for profit"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe lending protocol exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "Lending Protocol Attacks",
  "description": "Exploiting lending and borrowing protocols",
  "attack_vectors": {
    "collateral_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate collateral value",
      "steps": [
        "Deposit collateral",
        "Manipulate oracle price",
        "Borrow against inflated value",
        "Default on loan"
      ]
    },
    "interest_rate_manipulation": {
      "description": "Exploit interest rate models",
      "method": "Force extreme utilization rates"
    },
    "liquidation_attacks": {
      "description": "Profit from liquidations",
      "techniques": [
        "Oracle manipulation to trigger liquidation",
        "Front-run liquidation transactions",
        "Self-liquidation for profit"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is yield farming exploits?

Output:
{
  "name": "Yield Farming Attack Vectors",
  "description": "Exploiting yield aggregators and farms",
  "patterns": {
    "reward_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate reward calculations",
      "methods": [
        "Flash loan to inflate stake",
        "Sybil attack with multiple accounts",
        "Reward calculation overflow"
      ]
    },
    "migration_attacks": {
      "description": "Exploit vault migrations",
      "vulnerability": "Unsafe migration functions"
    },
    "strategy_exploits": {
      "description": "Attack yield strategies",
      "examples": [
        "Force strategy losses",
        "Sandwich strategy transactions",
        "Manipulate underlying protocols"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain yield farming exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "Yield Farming Attack Vectors",
  "description": "Exploiting yield aggregators and farms",
  "patterns": {
    "reward_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate reward calculations",
      "methods": [
        "Flash loan to inflate stake",
        "Sybil attack with multiple accounts",
        "Reward calculation overflow"
      ]
    },
    "migration_attacks": {
      "description": "Exploit vault migrations",
      "vulnerability": "Unsafe migration functions"
    },
    "strategy_exploits": {
      "description": "Attack yield strategies",
      "examples": [
        "Force strategy losses",
        "Sandwich strategy transactions",
        "Manipulate underlying protocols"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about yield farming exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "Yield Farming Attack Vectors",
  "description": "Exploiting yield aggregators and farms",
  "patterns": {
    "reward_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate reward calculations",
      "methods": [
        "Flash loan to inflate stake",
        "Sybil attack with multiple accounts",
        "Reward calculation overflow"
      ]
    },
    "migration_attacks": {
      "description": "Exploit vault migrations",
      "vulnerability": "Unsafe migration functions"
    },
    "strategy_exploits": {
      "description": "Attack yield strategies",
      "examples": [
        "Force strategy losses",
        "Sandwich strategy transactions",
        "Manipulate underlying protocols"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does yield farming exploits work?

Output:
{
  "name": "Yield Farming Attack Vectors",
  "description": "Exploiting yield aggregators and farms",
  "patterns": {
    "reward_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate reward calculations",
      "methods": [
        "Flash loan to inflate stake",
        "Sybil attack with multiple accounts",
        "Reward calculation overflow"
      ]
    },
    "migration_attacks": {
      "description": "Exploit vault migrations",
      "vulnerability": "Unsafe migration functions"
    },
    "strategy_exploits": {
      "description": "Attack yield strategies",
      "examples": [
        "Force strategy losses",
        "Sandwich strategy transactions",
        "Manipulate underlying protocols"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe yield farming exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "Yield Farming Attack Vectors",
  "description": "Exploiting yield aggregators and farms",
  "patterns": {
    "reward_manipulation": {
      "description": "Manipulate reward calculations",
      "methods": [
        "Flash loan to inflate stake",
        "Sybil attack with multiple accounts",
        "Reward calculation overflow"
      ]
    },
    "migration_attacks": {
      "description": "Exploit vault migrations",
      "vulnerability": "Unsafe migration functions"
    },
    "strategy_exploits": {
      "description": "Attack yield strategies",
      "examples": [
        "Force strategy losses",
        "Sandwich strategy transactions",
        "Manipulate underlying protocols"
      ]
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is nft exploits?

Output:
{
  "name": "NFT Protocol Vulnerabilities",
  "description": "NFT marketplace and protocol exploits",
  "vulnerabilities": {
    "metadata_manipulation": {
      "description": "Alter NFT metadata after sale",
      "impact": "Rug pull after purchase"
    },
    "reentrancy_in_nft": {
      "description": "Reentrancy during NFT transfers",
      "vulnerable_function": "onERC721Received callback"
    },
    "signature_replay": {
      "description": "Replay signatures for multiple claims",
      "affected": "Merkle tree whitelists, signatures"
    },
    "slippage_attacks": {
      "description": "NFT/token swap manipulation",
      "method": "Manipulate floor price during swaps"
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain nft exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "NFT Protocol Vulnerabilities",
  "description": "NFT marketplace and protocol exploits",
  "vulnerabilities": {
    "metadata_manipulation": {
      "description": "Alter NFT metadata after sale",
      "impact": "Rug pull after purchase"
    },
    "reentrancy_in_nft": {
      "description": "Reentrancy during NFT transfers",
      "vulnerable_function": "onERC721Received callback"
    },
    "signature_replay": {
      "description": "Replay signatures for multiple claims",
      "affected": "Merkle tree whitelists, signatures"
    },
    "slippage_attacks": {
      "description": "NFT/token swap manipulation",
      "method": "Manipulate floor price during swaps"
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about nft exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "NFT Protocol Vulnerabilities",
  "description": "NFT marketplace and protocol exploits",
  "vulnerabilities": {
    "metadata_manipulation": {
      "description": "Alter NFT metadata after sale",
      "impact": "Rug pull after purchase"
    },
    "reentrancy_in_nft": {
      "description": "Reentrancy during NFT transfers",
      "vulnerable_function": "onERC721Received callback"
    },
    "signature_replay": {
      "description": "Replay signatures for multiple claims",
      "affected": "Merkle tree whitelists, signatures"
    },
    "slippage_attacks": {
      "description": "NFT/token swap manipulation",
      "method": "Manipulate floor price during swaps"
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does nft exploits work?

Output:
{
  "name": "NFT Protocol Vulnerabilities",
  "description": "NFT marketplace and protocol exploits",
  "vulnerabilities": {
    "metadata_manipulation": {
      "description": "Alter NFT metadata after sale",
      "impact": "Rug pull after purchase"
    },
    "reentrancy_in_nft": {
      "description": "Reentrancy during NFT transfers",
      "vulnerable_function": "onERC721Received callback"
    },
    "signature_replay": {
      "description": "Replay signatures for multiple claims",
      "affected": "Merkle tree whitelists, signatures"
    },
    "slippage_attacks": {
      "description": "NFT/token swap manipulation",
      "method": "Manipulate floor price during swaps"
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe nft exploits

Output:
{
  "name": "NFT Protocol Vulnerabilities",
  "description": "NFT marketplace and protocol exploits",
  "vulnerabilities": {
    "metadata_manipulation": {
      "description": "Alter NFT metadata after sale",
      "impact": "Rug pull after purchase"
    },
    "reentrancy_in_nft": {
      "description": "Reentrancy during NFT transfers",
      "vulnerable_function": "onERC721Received callback"
    },
    "signature_replay": {
      "description": "Replay signatures for multiple claims",
      "affected": "Merkle tree whitelists, signatures"
    },
    "slippage_attacks": {
      "description": "NFT/token swap manipulation",
      "method": "Manipulate floor price during swaps"
    }
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is static analysis?

Output:
{
  "slither": {
    "description": "Static analysis framework",
    "usage": "slither contract.sol",
    "detectors": [
      "reentrancy",
      "access-control",
      "arithmetic",
      "unchecked-calls"
    ]
  },
  "mythril": {
    "description": "Security analysis tool",
    "usage": "myth analyze contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "symbolic execution",
      "taint analysis",
      "control flow analysis"
    ]
  },
  "securify": {
    "description": "Security scanner",
    "usage": "securify contract.sol",
    "patterns": [
      "locked-ether",
      "dao-reentrancy",
      "unhandled-exceptions"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain static analysis

Output:
{
  "slither": {
    "description": "Static analysis framework",
    "usage": "slither contract.sol",
    "detectors": [
      "reentrancy",
      "access-control",
      "arithmetic",
      "unchecked-calls"
    ]
  },
  "mythril": {
    "description": "Security analysis tool",
    "usage": "myth analyze contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "symbolic execution",
      "taint analysis",
      "control flow analysis"
    ]
  },
  "securify": {
    "description": "Security scanner",
    "usage": "securify contract.sol",
    "patterns": [
      "locked-ether",
      "dao-reentrancy",
      "unhandled-exceptions"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about static analysis

Output:
{
  "slither": {
    "description": "Static analysis framework",
    "usage": "slither contract.sol",
    "detectors": [
      "reentrancy",
      "access-control",
      "arithmetic",
      "unchecked-calls"
    ]
  },
  "mythril": {
    "description": "Security analysis tool",
    "usage": "myth analyze contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "symbolic execution",
      "taint analysis",
      "control flow analysis"
    ]
  },
  "securify": {
    "description": "Security scanner",
    "usage": "securify contract.sol",
    "patterns": [
      "locked-ether",
      "dao-reentrancy",
      "unhandled-exceptions"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does static analysis work?

Output:
{
  "slither": {
    "description": "Static analysis framework",
    "usage": "slither contract.sol",
    "detectors": [
      "reentrancy",
      "access-control",
      "arithmetic",
      "unchecked-calls"
    ]
  },
  "mythril": {
    "description": "Security analysis tool",
    "usage": "myth analyze contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "symbolic execution",
      "taint analysis",
      "control flow analysis"
    ]
  },
  "securify": {
    "description": "Security scanner",
    "usage": "securify contract.sol",
    "patterns": [
      "locked-ether",
      "dao-reentrancy",
      "unhandled-exceptions"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe static analysis

Output:
{
  "slither": {
    "description": "Static analysis framework",
    "usage": "slither contract.sol",
    "detectors": [
      "reentrancy",
      "access-control",
      "arithmetic",
      "unchecked-calls"
    ]
  },
  "mythril": {
    "description": "Security analysis tool",
    "usage": "myth analyze contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "symbolic execution",
      "taint analysis",
      "control flow analysis"
    ]
  },
  "securify": {
    "description": "Security scanner",
    "usage": "securify contract.sol",
    "patterns": [
      "locked-ether",
      "dao-reentrancy",
      "unhandled-exceptions"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is dynamic analysis?

Output:
{
  "echidna": {
    "description": "Smart contract fuzzer",
    "usage": "echidna-test contract.sol",
    "features": [
      "property testing",
      "assertion testing"
    ]
  },
  "manticore": {
    "description": "Symbolic execution tool",
    "usage": "manticore contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "path exploration",
      "input generation"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain dynamic analysis

Output:
{
  "echidna": {
    "description": "Smart contract fuzzer",
    "usage": "echidna-test contract.sol",
    "features": [
      "property testing",
      "assertion testing"
    ]
  },
  "manticore": {
    "description": "Symbolic execution tool",
    "usage": "manticore contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "path exploration",
      "input generation"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about dynamic analysis

Output:
{
  "echidna": {
    "description": "Smart contract fuzzer",
    "usage": "echidna-test contract.sol",
    "features": [
      "property testing",
      "assertion testing"
    ]
  },
  "manticore": {
    "description": "Symbolic execution tool",
    "usage": "manticore contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "path exploration",
      "input generation"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does dynamic analysis work?

Output:
{
  "echidna": {
    "description": "Smart contract fuzzer",
    "usage": "echidna-test contract.sol",
    "features": [
      "property testing",
      "assertion testing"
    ]
  },
  "manticore": {
    "description": "Symbolic execution tool",
    "usage": "manticore contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "path exploration",
      "input generation"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe dynamic analysis

Output:
{
  "echidna": {
    "description": "Smart contract fuzzer",
    "usage": "echidna-test contract.sol",
    "features": [
      "property testing",
      "assertion testing"
    ]
  },
  "manticore": {
    "description": "Symbolic execution tool",
    "usage": "manticore contract.sol",
    "capabilities": [
      "path exploration",
      "input generation"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is formal verification?

Output:
{
  "certora": {
    "description": "Formal verification platform",
    "usage": "certoraRun spec.conf",
    "proves": [
      "invariants",
      "properties",
      "equivalence"
    ]
  },
  "k_framework": {
    "description": "Formal verification framework",
    "capabilities": [
      "reachability logic",
      "matching logic"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain formal verification

Output:
{
  "certora": {
    "description": "Formal verification platform",
    "usage": "certoraRun spec.conf",
    "proves": [
      "invariants",
      "properties",
      "equivalence"
    ]
  },
  "k_framework": {
    "description": "Formal verification framework",
    "capabilities": [
      "reachability logic",
      "matching logic"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about formal verification

Output:
{
  "certora": {
    "description": "Formal verification platform",
    "usage": "certoraRun spec.conf",
    "proves": [
      "invariants",
      "properties",
      "equivalence"
    ]
  },
  "k_framework": {
    "description": "Formal verification framework",
    "capabilities": [
      "reachability logic",
      "matching logic"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does formal verification work?

Output:
{
  "certora": {
    "description": "Formal verification platform",
    "usage": "certoraRun spec.conf",
    "proves": [
      "invariants",
      "properties",
      "equivalence"
    ]
  },
  "k_framework": {
    "description": "Formal verification framework",
    "capabilities": [
      "reachability logic",
      "matching logic"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe formal verification

Output:
{
  "certora": {
    "description": "Formal verification platform",
    "usage": "certoraRun spec.conf",
    "proves": [
      "invariants",
      "properties",
      "equivalence"
    ]
  },
  "k_framework": {
    "description": "Formal verification framework",
    "capabilities": [
      "reachability logic",
      "matching logic"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is runtime monitoring?

Output:
{
  "forta": {
    "description": "Runtime security monitoring",
    "usage": "Deploy detection bots",
    "monitors": [
      "anomalies",
      "attacks",
      "exploits"
    ]
  },
  "tenderly": {
    "description": "Transaction monitoring",
    "features": [
      "alerts",
      "simulations",
      "debugging"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain runtime monitoring

Output:
{
  "forta": {
    "description": "Runtime security monitoring",
    "usage": "Deploy detection bots",
    "monitors": [
      "anomalies",
      "attacks",
      "exploits"
    ]
  },
  "tenderly": {
    "description": "Transaction monitoring",
    "features": [
      "alerts",
      "simulations",
      "debugging"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about runtime monitoring

Output:
{
  "forta": {
    "description": "Runtime security monitoring",
    "usage": "Deploy detection bots",
    "monitors": [
      "anomalies",
      "attacks",
      "exploits"
    ]
  },
  "tenderly": {
    "description": "Transaction monitoring",
    "features": [
      "alerts",
      "simulations",
      "debugging"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does runtime monitoring work?

Output:
{
  "forta": {
    "description": "Runtime security monitoring",
    "usage": "Deploy detection bots",
    "monitors": [
      "anomalies",
      "attacks",
      "exploits"
    ]
  },
  "tenderly": {
    "description": "Transaction monitoring",
    "features": [
      "alerts",
      "simulations",
      "debugging"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe runtime monitoring

Output:
{
  "forta": {
    "description": "Runtime security monitoring",
    "usage": "Deploy detection bots",
    "monitors": [
      "anomalies",
      "attacks",
      "exploits"
    ]
  },
  "tenderly": {
    "description": "Transaction monitoring",
    "features": [
      "alerts",
      "simulations",
      "debugging"
    ]
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is exploit tools?

Output:
{
  "foundry": {
    "description": "Smart contract development and testing",
    "tools": {
      "forge": "Testing and fuzzing",
      "cast": "Blockchain interaction",
      "anvil": "Local testnet"
    },
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Foundry exploit test\ncontract ExploitTest is Test {\n    function testReentrancy() public {\n        // Setup\n        Vulnerable victim = new Vulnerable();\n        Attacker attacker = new Attacker();\n        \n        // Fund contracts\n        vm.deal(address(victim), 10 ether);\n        vm.deal(address(attacker), 1 ether);\n        \n        // Execute attack\n        attacker.attack{value: 1 ether}();\n        \n        // Verify exploit success\n        assertEq(address(attacker).balance, 11 ether);\n    }\n}\n                "
  },
  "hardhat": {
    "description": "Development environment",
    "features": [
      "mainnet forking",
      "time manipulation",
      "impersonation"
    ],
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Hardhat exploit test\ndescribe(\"Exploit\", function() {\n    it(\"Should drain contract\", async function() {\n        // Fork mainnet\n        await network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_reset\",\n            params: [{\n                forking: {\n                    jsonRpcUrl: MAINNET_URL,\n                    blockNumber: 14390000\n                }\n            }]\n        });\n        \n        // Impersonate whale\n        await hre.network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_impersonateAccount\",\n            params: [WHALE_ADDRESS]\n        });\n        \n        // Execute exploit\n        await attacker.exploit();\n    });\n});\n                "
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Explain exploit tools

Output:
{
  "foundry": {
    "description": "Smart contract development and testing",
    "tools": {
      "forge": "Testing and fuzzing",
      "cast": "Blockchain interaction",
      "anvil": "Local testnet"
    },
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Foundry exploit test\ncontract ExploitTest is Test {\n    function testReentrancy() public {\n        // Setup\n        Vulnerable victim = new Vulnerable();\n        Attacker attacker = new Attacker();\n        \n        // Fund contracts\n        vm.deal(address(victim), 10 ether);\n        vm.deal(address(attacker), 1 ether);\n        \n        // Execute attack\n        attacker.attack{value: 1 ether}();\n        \n        // Verify exploit success\n        assertEq(address(attacker).balance, 11 ether);\n    }\n}\n                "
  },
  "hardhat": {
    "description": "Development environment",
    "features": [
      "mainnet forking",
      "time manipulation",
      "impersonation"
    ],
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Hardhat exploit test\ndescribe(\"Exploit\", function() {\n    it(\"Should drain contract\", async function() {\n        // Fork mainnet\n        await network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_reset\",\n            params: [{\n                forking: {\n                    jsonRpcUrl: MAINNET_URL,\n                    blockNumber: 14390000\n                }\n            }]\n        });\n        \n        // Impersonate whale\n        await hre.network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_impersonateAccount\",\n            params: [WHALE_ADDRESS]\n        });\n        \n        // Execute exploit\n        await attacker.exploit();\n    });\n});\n                "
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Tell me about exploit tools

Output:
{
  "foundry": {
    "description": "Smart contract development and testing",
    "tools": {
      "forge": "Testing and fuzzing",
      "cast": "Blockchain interaction",
      "anvil": "Local testnet"
    },
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Foundry exploit test\ncontract ExploitTest is Test {\n    function testReentrancy() public {\n        // Setup\n        Vulnerable victim = new Vulnerable();\n        Attacker attacker = new Attacker();\n        \n        // Fund contracts\n        vm.deal(address(victim), 10 ether);\n        vm.deal(address(attacker), 1 ether);\n        \n        // Execute attack\n        attacker.attack{value: 1 ether}();\n        \n        // Verify exploit success\n        assertEq(address(attacker).balance, 11 ether);\n    }\n}\n                "
  },
  "hardhat": {
    "description": "Development environment",
    "features": [
      "mainnet forking",
      "time manipulation",
      "impersonation"
    ],
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Hardhat exploit test\ndescribe(\"Exploit\", function() {\n    it(\"Should drain contract\", async function() {\n        // Fork mainnet\n        await network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_reset\",\n            params: [{\n                forking: {\n                    jsonRpcUrl: MAINNET_URL,\n                    blockNumber: 14390000\n                }\n            }]\n        });\n        \n        // Impersonate whale\n        await hre.network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_impersonateAccount\",\n            params: [WHALE_ADDRESS]\n        });\n        \n        // Execute exploit\n        await attacker.exploit();\n    });\n});\n                "
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: How does exploit tools work?

Output:
{
  "foundry": {
    "description": "Smart contract development and testing",
    "tools": {
      "forge": "Testing and fuzzing",
      "cast": "Blockchain interaction",
      "anvil": "Local testnet"
    },
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Foundry exploit test\ncontract ExploitTest is Test {\n    function testReentrancy() public {\n        // Setup\n        Vulnerable victim = new Vulnerable();\n        Attacker attacker = new Attacker();\n        \n        // Fund contracts\n        vm.deal(address(victim), 10 ether);\n        vm.deal(address(attacker), 1 ether);\n        \n        // Execute attack\n        attacker.attack{value: 1 ether}();\n        \n        // Verify exploit success\n        assertEq(address(attacker).balance, 11 ether);\n    }\n}\n                "
  },
  "hardhat": {
    "description": "Development environment",
    "features": [
      "mainnet forking",
      "time manipulation",
      "impersonation"
    ],
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Hardhat exploit test\ndescribe(\"Exploit\", function() {\n    it(\"Should drain contract\", async function() {\n        // Fork mainnet\n        await network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_reset\",\n            params: [{\n                forking: {\n                    jsonRpcUrl: MAINNET_URL,\n                    blockNumber: 14390000\n                }\n            }]\n        });\n        \n        // Impersonate whale\n        await hre.network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_impersonateAccount\",\n            params: [WHALE_ADDRESS]\n        });\n        \n        // Execute exploit\n        await attacker.exploit();\n    });\n});\n                "
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: Describe exploit tools

Output:
{
  "foundry": {
    "description": "Smart contract development and testing",
    "tools": {
      "forge": "Testing and fuzzing",
      "cast": "Blockchain interaction",
      "anvil": "Local testnet"
    },
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Foundry exploit test\ncontract ExploitTest is Test {\n    function testReentrancy() public {\n        // Setup\n        Vulnerable victim = new Vulnerable();\n        Attacker attacker = new Attacker();\n        \n        // Fund contracts\n        vm.deal(address(victim), 10 ether);\n        vm.deal(address(attacker), 1 ether);\n        \n        // Execute attack\n        attacker.attack{value: 1 ether}();\n        \n        // Verify exploit success\n        assertEq(address(attacker).balance, 11 ether);\n    }\n}\n                "
  },
  "hardhat": {
    "description": "Development environment",
    "features": [
      "mainnet forking",
      "time manipulation",
      "impersonation"
    ],
    "exploit_testing": "\n// Hardhat exploit test\ndescribe(\"Exploit\", function() {\n    it(\"Should drain contract\", async function() {\n        // Fork mainnet\n        await network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_reset\",\n            params: [{\n                forking: {\n                    jsonRpcUrl: MAINNET_URL,\n                    blockNumber: 14390000\n                }\n            }]\n        });\n        \n        // Impersonate whale\n        await hre.network.provider.request({\n            method: \"hardhat_impersonateAccount\",\n            params: [WHALE_ADDRESS]\n        });\n        \n        // Execute exploit\n        await attacker.exploit();\n    });\n});\n                "
  }
}


Instruction: Answer question

Input: What is cloud security testing?

Output:
{
  "aws": {
    "methodology": "AWS Security Testing Approach",
    "phases": {
      "1_information_gathering": {
        "public_resources": [
          "S3 bucket enumeration",
          "Public snapshots",
          "Public AMIs",
          "CloudFront distributions"
        ],
        "authenticated_enumeration": [
          "IAM policies review",
          "Security group analysis",
          "VPC configuration",
          "CloudTrail logs"
        ]
      },
      "2_vulnerability_identification": {
        "common_issues": [
          "Overly permissive S3 buckets",
          "Exposed databases",
          "Weak IAM policies",
          "Unencrypted data",
          "Missing MFA",
          "Public snapshots with sensitive data"
        ]
      },
      "3_exploitation": {
        "techniques": [
          "SSRF to metadata service",
          "IAM privilege escalation",
          "Cross-account access",
          "Lambda function exploitation"
        ]
      },
      "4_post_exploitation": {
        "activities": [
          "Lateral movement between services",
          "Data exfiltration",
          "Persistence via Lambda",
          "CloudFormation backdoors"
        ]
      }
    }
  },
  "azure": {
    "methodology": "Azure Security Assessment",
    "focus_areas": [
      "Azure AD configuration",
      "Storage account security",
      "Key Vault access",
      "Network security groups",
      "Azure SQL databases",
      "Function Apps"
    ]
  },
  "gcp": {
    "methodology": "Google Cloud Platform Testing",
    "focus_areas": [
      "Cloud Storage buckets",
      "Compute Engine instances",
      "Cloud Functions",
      "BigQuery datasets",
      "Cloud SQL instances",
      "IAM bindings"
    ]
  },
  "kubernetes": {
    "methodology": "Kubernetes Security Testing",
    "areas": {
      "cluster_security": [
        "API server configuration",
        "RBAC policies",
        "Network policies",
        "Pod security policies",
        "Admis