--- pretty_name: MuxaBench language: - en license: other license_name: muxa2 license_link: LICENSE size_categories: - n<1K task_categories: - question-answering - other tags: - benchmark - evaluation - code - systems-programming - zig - coding-benchmark - llm-benchmark - rubric configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: test path: MuxaBench.jsonl dataset_info: features: - name: id_aa dtype: string - name: title dtype: string - name: category dtype: string - name: prompt dtype: string - name: system_prompt dtype: string - name: rubric dtype: string - name: expected_deliverables dtype: string - name: reference_files dtype: string splits: - name: test num_bytes: 270174 num_examples: 26 download_size: 270174 dataset_size: 270174 --- # MuxaBench: Systems Programming Benchmark MuxaBench is an evaluation benchmark designed to assess LLMs and coding agents on 26 staff/principal-level systems programming tasks in pure **Zig 0.15.1**. ## Benchmark Overview The benchmark contains 26 tasks divided into 5 core engineering domains: 1. **Rendering and content pipelines** (6 tasks): ReSTIR DI on BVH, perceptual 8 bpp texture codec, analytic-AA vector rasteriser, 10 km² city + navmesh, HZB occlusion culling. 2. **Physics and motion simulation** (6 tasks): GJK/EPA CCD rigid body, XPBD rope/cloth, active ragdoll, full-body IK, 128³ Eulerian multigrid smoke solver, quadcopter simulator. 3. **Numerical and ML kernels** (5 tasks): Fused transformer step, Int8 GQA engine with paged KV-cache, runtime SPIR-V shader generator, FlashAttention causal attention, spatial audio synthesizer. 4. **Systems infrastructure** (5 tasks): Crash-safe WAL KV engine, deterministic matching engine (10M ops/s), x86_64 microkernel slice (4-level VMM/page allocator), Raft under 30% packet loss, JIT compiler with generational GC. 5. **Security and cryptography** (4 tasks): Constant-time ML-KEM-768, ML-DSA-65 signatures, R1CS SHA-256 prover, static PE heuristic analyzer. ## Evaluation Methodology (Score Against Rubric) Each task in MuxaBench is scored **against a multi-criteria rubric** with discrete scoring levels (0 to 2 or 3) across ~6 explicit criteria per task. Models are evaluated on: - Strict correctness and mathematical formulation - Enforcing zero dynamic allocation in hot loops after initialization - Deterministic hashing across runs and threads - metric_provenance: verifying that reported metrics trace directly to executable test harness code