nebula commited on
Commit
275f045
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 7c57f9e

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +75 -23
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,25 +1,77 @@
1
  ---
2
- dataset_info:
3
- features:
4
- - name: key
5
- dtype: string
6
- - name: image
7
- dtype: image
8
- - name: mask
9
- dtype: image
10
- - name: label
11
- dtype: int32
12
- - name: prompt
13
- dtype: string
14
- splits:
15
- - name: glide
16
- num_bytes: 122829264.128
17
- num_examples: 1024
18
- download_size: 122982932
19
- dataset_size: 122829264.128
20
- configs:
21
- - config_name: default
22
- data_files:
23
- - split: glide
24
- path: data/glide-*
25
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
  ---
2
+ pretty_name: CocoGlide
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - image-classification
5
+ - image-segmentation
6
+ - image-to-image
7
+ tags:
8
+ - image-forgery-detection
9
+ - image-manipulation-localization
10
+ - synthetic-image-detection
11
+ - diffusion-inpainting
12
+ - GLIDE
13
+ - COCO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14
  ---
15
+
16
+ # CocoGlide Dataset Card
17
+
18
+ ## Dataset Description
19
+
20
+ This dataset is a reformatted version of **CocoGlide**, a local image forgery detection and localization dataset associated with the paper **TruFor: Leveraging All-Round Clues for Trustworthy Image Forgery Detection and Localization**.
21
+
22
+ CocoGlide is built from images in the MS-COCO validation set. The fake images are generated by applying **GLIDE-based text-guided inpainting** to local image regions. Each manipulated image is paired with a binary localization mask indicating the forged region.
23
+
24
+ The dataset can be used for both:
25
+
26
+ - **Image-level forgery detection**, where the goal is to classify whether an image is real or fake.
27
+ - **Pixel-level forgery localization**, where the goal is to predict the manipulated region.
28
+
29
+ ## Dataset Structure
30
+
31
+ Each sample contains the following fields:
32
+
33
+ | Field | Type | Description |
34
+ |---|---|---|
35
+ | `key` | string | Sample identifier or image path |
36
+ | `image` | image | Input image |
37
+ | `mask` | image | Binary forgery localization mask |
38
+ | `label` | int | Image-level label, where `0` means real and `1` means fake |
39
+ | `prompt` | string or null | Text prompt/category used for GLIDE inpainting; `null` for real images |
40
+
41
+ ## Label Definition
42
+
43
+ | Label | Meaning |
44
+ |---|---|
45
+ | `0` | Real image |
46
+ | `1` | GLIDE-inpainted fake image |
47
+
48
+ For real images, the corresponding mask should be treated as an all-zero mask.
49
+
50
+ ## Intended Use
51
+
52
+ This dataset is intended for research on:
53
+
54
+ - Image forgery detection
55
+ - Image manipulation localization
56
+ - AI-generated image detection
57
+ - Diffusion-based inpainting forgery detection
58
+ - Robustness evaluation of forensic models
59
+
60
+ Typical evaluation settings include:
61
+
62
+ - Image-level metrics: Accuracy, AUC, AP, F1
63
+ - Pixel-level metrics: F1, IoU, AUC, localization AP
64
+
65
+ ## Source Paper
66
+
67
+ This dataset should be cited through the following paper:
68
+
69
+ ```bibtex
70
+ @InProceedings{Guillaro_2023_CVPR,
71
+ author = {Guillaro, Fabrizio and Cozzolino, Davide and Sud, Avneesh and Dufour, Nicholas and Verdoliva, Luisa},
72
+ title = {TruFor: Leveraging All-Round Clues for Trustworthy Image Forgery Detection and Localization},
73
+ booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)},
74
+ month = {June},
75
+ year = {2023},
76
+ pages = {20606--20615}
77
+ }