Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,91 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
license: mit
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 4 |
+
- image-to-text
|
| 5 |
+
- text-to-image
|
| 6 |
+
language:
|
| 7 |
+
- en
|
| 8 |
+
pretty_name: simons ARC (abstraction & reasoning corpus) task version 11
|
| 9 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 10 |
+
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 11 |
+
configs:
|
| 12 |
+
- config_name: default
|
| 13 |
+
data_files:
|
| 14 |
+
- split: train
|
| 15 |
+
path: data.jsonl
|
| 16 |
+
---
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
# Version 1
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
Have dataset items that are somewhat evenly of each type. The LLM validation loss went down and then continue to rise afterwards,
|
| 21 |
+
so I guess the complexity of the dataset was too high.
|
| 22 |
+
The image sizes are between 1 and 10 pixels.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
# Version 2
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
Here the majority of dataset items are histograms.
|
| 27 |
+
Smaller images. Here the image sizes are between 1 and 5 pixels.
|
| 28 |
+
Let's see if the LLM does better on this one.
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
# Version 3
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
Focus on pair comparisons finding color intersection and color union.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
# Version 4
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
image size 3-10.
|
| 37 |
+
This converged slowly. I suspect the bigger image size was too optimistic. Next time try with a smaller image size.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
# Version 5
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
image size 3-8.
|
| 42 |
+
Added `pair_histogram_add`, `pair_histogram_max`, `pair_histogram_min`.
|
| 43 |
+
This converged slowly. I suspect the big image size is still too optimistic. Next time try with an even smaller image size.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
# Version 6
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
I'm trying even smaller images.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
image width 1-5, this is what it has been trained on in the past.
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
image height 3-8, this is slightly bigger than what it has been trained on.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
This did the LLM make sense of quite fast. Next I'm goint to try with a wider image.
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
# Version 7
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
image width 3-8, this is slightly bigger than what it has been trained on, and something that the model has struggled learning.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
image height 1-5, this is what it has been trained on in the past.
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
# Version 8
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
image size 1-8.
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
I have been training on image pairs, so the model is now somewhat ok at making sense on image pairs.
|
| 66 |
+
So I hope it will be better at processing tasks, since a task is a list of image pairs.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
# Version 9
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
image size 1-10.
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
same weight to all transformations.
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
Making use of TaskFormatterRLECompact` for the first time.
|
| 75 |
+
Oh, the number of tokens per row is too high. I'm going to use smaller images.
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
# Version 10
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
image size 1-5.
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
same weight to all transformations.
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
Making use of TaskFormatterRLECompact`.
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
# Version 11
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
image size 1-5.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
same weight to all transformations.
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
Making use of TaskFormatterRLECompact`.
|