| # Kernel API {#gapi_kernel_api} | |
| [TOC] | |
| # G-API Kernel API | |
| The core idea behind G-API is portability -- a pipeline built with | |
| G-API must be portable (or at least able to be portable). It means | |
| that either it works out-of-the box when compiled for new platform, | |
| _or_ G-API provides necessary tools to make it running there, with | |
| little-to-no changes in the algorithm itself. | |
| This idea can be achieved by separating kernel interface from its | |
| implementation. Once a pipeline is built using kernel interfaces, it | |
| becomes implementation-neutral -- the implementation details | |
| (i.e. which kernels to use) are passed on a separate stage (graph | |
| compilation). | |
| Kernel-implementation hierarchy may look like: | |
| @dot Kernel API/implementation hierarchy example | |
| digraph { | |
| rankdir=BT; | |
| node [shape=record]; | |
| ki_a [label="{<f0> interface\nA}"]; | |
| ki_b [label="{<f0> interface\nB}"]; | |
| {rank=same; ki_a ki_b}; | |
| "CPU::A" -> ki_a [dir="forward"]; | |
| "OpenCL::A" -> ki_a [dir="forward"]; | |
| "Halide::A" -> ki_a [dir="forward"]; | |
| "CPU::B" -> ki_b [dir="forward"]; | |
| "OpenCL::B" -> ki_b [dir="forward"]; | |
| "Halide::B" -> ki_b [dir="forward"]; | |
| } | |
| @enddot | |
| A pipeline itself then can be expressed only in terms of `A`, `B`, and | |
| so on, and choosing which implementation to use in execution becomes | |
| an external parameter. | |
| # Defining a kernel {#gapi_defining_kernel} | |
| G-API provides a macro to define a new kernel interface -- | |
| G_TYPED_KERNEL(): | |
| @snippet samples/cpp/tutorial_code/gapi/doc_snippets/kernel_api_snippets.cpp filter2d_api | |
| This macro is a shortcut to a new type definition. It takes three | |
| arguments to register a new type, and requires type body to be present | |
| (see [below](@ref gapi_kernel_supp_info)). The macro arguments are: | |
| 1. Kernel interface name -- also serves as a name of new type defined | |
| with this macro; | |
| 2. Kernel signature -- an `std::function<>`-like signature which defines | |
| API of the kernel; | |
| 3. Kernel's unique name -- used to identify kernel when its type | |
| informattion is stripped within the system. | |
| Kernel declaration may be seen as function declaration -- in both cases | |
| a new entity must be used then according to the way it was defined. | |
| Kernel signature defines kernel's usage syntax -- which parameters | |
| it takes during graph construction. Implementations can also use this | |
| signature to derive it into backend-specific callback signatures (see | |
| next chapter). | |
| Kernel may accept values of any type, and G-API _dynamic_ types are | |
| handled in a special way. All other types are opaque to G-API and | |
| passed to kernel in `outMeta()` or in execution callbacks as-is. | |
| Kernel's return value can _only_ be of G-API dynamic type -- cv::GMat, | |
| cv::GScalar, or `cv::GArray<T>`. If an operation has more than one | |
| output, it should be wrapped into an `std::tuple<>` (which can contain | |
| only mentioned G-API types). Arbitrary-output-number operations are | |
| not supported. | |
| Once a kernel is defined, it can be used in pipelines with special, | |
| G-API-supplied method "::on()". This method has the same signature as | |
| defined in kernel, so this code: | |
| @snippet samples/cpp/tutorial_code/gapi/doc_snippets/kernel_api_snippets.cpp filter2d_on | |
| is a perfectly legal construction. This example has some verbosity, | |
| though, so usually a kernel declaration comes with a C++ function | |
| wrapper ("factory method") which enables optional parameters, more | |
| compact syntax, Doxygen comments, etc: | |
| @snippet samples/cpp/tutorial_code/gapi/doc_snippets/kernel_api_snippets.cpp filter2d_wrap | |
| so now it can be used like: | |
| @snippet samples/cpp/tutorial_code/gapi/doc_snippets/kernel_api_snippets.cpp filter2d_wrap_call | |
| # Extra information {#gapi_kernel_supp_info} | |
| In the current version, kernel declaration body (everything within the | |
| curly braces) must contain a static function `outMeta()`. This function | |
| establishes a functional dependency between operation's input and | |
| output metadata. | |
| _Metadata_ is an information about data kernel operates on. Since | |
| non-G-API types are opaque to G-API, G-API cares only about `G*` data | |
| descriptors (i.e. dimensions and format of cv::GMat, etc). | |
| `outMeta()` is also an example of how kernel's signature can be | |
| transformed into a derived callback -- note that in this example, | |
| `outMeta()` signature exactly follows the kernel signature (defined | |
| within the macro) but is different -- where kernel expects cv::GMat, | |
| `outMeta()` takes and returns cv::GMatDesc (a G-API structure metadata | |
| for cv::GMat). | |
| The point of `outMeta()` is to propagate metadata information within | |
| computation from inputs to outputs and infer metadata of internal | |
| (intermediate, temporary) data objects. This information is required | |
| for further pipeline optimizations, memory allocation, and other | |
| operations done by G-API framework during graph compilation. | |
| <!-- TODO add examples --> | |
| # Implementing a kernel {#gapi_kernel_implementing} | |
| Once a kernel is declared, its interface can be used to implement | |
| versions of this kernel in different backends. This concept is | |
| naturally projected from object-oriented programming | |
| "Interface/Implementation" idiom: an interface can be implemented | |
| multiple times, and different implementations of a kernel should be | |
| substitutable with each other without breaking the algorithm | |
| (pipeline) logic (Liskov Substitution Principle). | |
| Every backend defines its own way to implement a kernel interface. | |
| This way is regular, though -- whatever plugin is, its kernel | |
| implementation must be "derived" from a kernel interface type. | |
| Kernel implementation are then organized into _kernel | |
| packages_. Kernel packages are passed to cv::GComputation::compile() | |
| as compile arguments, with some hints to G-API on how to select proper | |
| kernels (see more on this in "Heterogeneity"[TBD]). | |
| For example, the aforementioned `Filter2D` is implemented in | |
| "reference" CPU (OpenCV) plugin this way (*NOTE* -- this is a | |
| simplified form with improper border handling): | |
| @snippet samples/cpp/tutorial_code/gapi/doc_snippets/kernel_api_snippets.cpp filter2d_ocv | |
| Note how CPU (OpenCV) plugin has transformed the original kernel | |
| signature: | |
| - Input cv::GMat has been substituted with cv::Mat, holding actual input | |
| data for the underlying OpenCV function call; | |
| - Output cv::GMat has been transformed into extra output parameter, thus | |
| `GCPUFilter2D::run()` takes one argument more than the original | |
| kernel signature. | |
| The basic intuition for kernel developer here is _not to care_ where | |
| that cv::Mat objects come from instead of the original cv::GMat -- and | |
| just follow the signature conventions defined by the plugin. G-API | |
| will call this method during execution and supply all the necessary | |
| information (and forward the original opaque data as-is). | |
| # Compound kernels {#gapi_kernel_compound} | |
| Sometimes kernel is a single thing only on API level. It is convenient | |
| for users, but on a particular implementation side it would be better to | |
| have multiple kernels (a subgraph) doing the thing instead. An example | |
| is goodFeaturesToTrack() -- while in OpenCV backend it may remain a | |
| single kernel, with Fluid it becomes compound -- Fluid can handle Harris | |
| response calculation but can't do sparse non-maxima suppression and | |
| point extraction to an STL vector: | |
| <!-- PIC --> | |
| A compound kernel _implementation_ can be defined using a generic | |
| macro GAPI_COMPOUND_KERNEL(): | |
| @snippet samples/cpp/tutorial_code/gapi/doc_snippets/kernel_api_snippets.cpp compound | |
| <!-- TODO: ADD on how Compound kernels may simplify dispatching --> | |
| <!-- TODO: Add details on when expand() is called! --> | |
| It is important to distinguish a compound kernel from G-API high-order | |
| function, i.e. a C++ function which looks like a kernel but in fact | |
| generates a subgraph. The core difference is that a compound kernel is | |
| an _implementation detail_ and a kernel implementation may be either | |
| compound or not (depending on backend capabilities), while a | |
| high-order function is a "macro" in terms of G-API and so cannot act as | |
| an interface which then needs to be implemented by a backend. | |