ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_741 | 0 | Date of Decision: 13 September 2022. Kalyani Singh, Petitioner, versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Respondent. Present: Mr. R. S. Cheema, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sartej Singh Narula, Advocate; Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate; Mr. Arshdeep Singh Cheema, Advocate; Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocate; and Mr. Satish Sharma, ... |
id_741 | 1 | On 13 April 2015 at 17:25:22, Sippy Sidhu sent the postpaid mobile bill of 9646400004 belonging to Simarandeep Singh Sandhu, indicating the duration of calls exchanged by Simarandeep Singh with Kalyani Singh. On 28 April 2015 at 19:27:25, Sippy Sidhu sent objectionable pictures of Kalyani Singh with her so‑called mama.... |
id_741 | 2 | In consequence, the Central Bureau of Investigation now assigning any motive to the present petitioner is, prima facie, an afterthought and a stratagem employed to assign guilt to the petitioner. The High Court of India finds that this is a consequence of protest against the acceptance of the untraced report preferred ... |
id_746 | 0 | Date of decision: 12 May 2023. Writ Petition (Civil) 6332/2023 and Civil Miscellaneous Application 24870/2023 through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Mr. Saurabh Soni, Mr. Karan Prakash and Ms. Shruti Khosla versus through: Mr. T. Singh Dev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Ms. Anum Hussain, Mr. Aabhaas Sukhramani, Mr. Tanishq Srivastava an... |
id_747 | 0 | Reserved on 11.08.2021 and delivered on 25.08.2021. Applicant: Sher Ali. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Zia Uddin Ahmad and Tanisha Jahangir Monir. Counsel for Opposite Party: G. A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal, J., Heard Sri Zia Uddin Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant, and Sri Sanjay Kuma... |
id_747 | 1 | Thus, the order so passed by the High Court of Allahabad on 06.04.2021 cannot be approved for the reasons and observations in the preceding part of this order; and additionally for the reason that the impugned order dated 06.04.2021 stands in conflict with the stay order passed by the Supreme Court of India on 25.02.20... |
id_75 | 0 | Date of decision: 22 December 2023. Present: Mr. Gurinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate for the appellant‑wife; Mr. Ashok Kumar Jindal, Advocate for the respondent‑husband. The appellant‑husband has preferred the present appeal against the order dated 25 September 2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gur... |
id_75 | 1 | In other words, a Family Court is entitled to lay down its own procedure, as warranted by the facts and circumstances of a given case, and it is not bound by the procedural rigours of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. However, while devising its own procedure, the Family Court must ensure that such procedure is in con... |
id_750 | 0 | Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Present: Honourable Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) Criminal Revision 1284 of 2019 Shampa Deb (Basu) The State of West Bengal & Another For the Petitioner: Mister Pradip Kumar Mandal. For the State: Mister Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Public Prosecutor. Miss Rita Datta. For the Opposite Party: N... |
id_751 | 0 | Petitioner: Dr. Vijay Kumar Sharma. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. Counsel for petitioner: Vijay Kumar Dixit and Ashok Mehta. Senior Counsel for respondent: Additional Advocate General Honorable Munishwar Nath Bhandari, J., and Honorable Ajai Tyagi, J. (as per Honorable Munishwar Nath Bhandari, J.).... |
id_753 | 0 | Applicant: Dr. Shaharyar Ali. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and Another. Counsel for Applicant: Ramesh Chandra Yadav, Ajay Yadav. Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. This is an application for anticipatory bail on behalf of the applicant, Dr. Shaharyar Ali, in connection with Case Crime No. 124 of 2021, under Sec... |
id_754 | 0 | Sureshkumar (Petitioner) versus the Regional Passport Officer, Claret Plaza, Melakkal Main Road, Kochadai, Madurai 625016, and the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Q Branch CID Police Station, Madurai (Respondents). The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking... |
id_755 | 0 | Through: Ms. Aayushi Jain, Advocate versus Through: Mister Rajal Rai, Mister Rohan Sharma, Ms. Poonam Sharma, Advocates for Respondent 1. Mister Ajay Yadav, Advocate for Respondent 2., The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the orders dated 01 November 2021 and 14 March 2023 passed by the lea... |
id_756 | 0 | Original Petition (Civil) Number 1428 of 2020 dated 7 December 2020. The question before this original petition is the procedure to be followed by a Court when a case record goes missing., The petitioner is a co‑owner of the property comprised in Resurvey No. 558 in Block No. 3/10 in Kannur‑1 Village, having an extent ... |
id_757 | 0 | Supreme Court of India\n\nSuo Motu Writ Petition No. 574 of 2015 and Writ Petition (Miscellaneous) No. 24178 of 2018 and Writ Petitions No. 30869 of 2017, 19652 of 2018, 20421 of 2020 and 1810, 1814, 1816, 1818, 1819, 1821 and 1822 of 2021.\n\nPetitioners:\n- The Director, Archaeological Survey of India, Janpat, New De... |
id_757 | 1 | Though the culture, tradition, style and design of various places of archaeological importance in the world differ, it was a poet from Tamil Nadu named Kaniyanpoongundranar who called upon the people to unite for the cause of love and affection by labelling all as one race, and laid down the world to be for all using t... |
id_757 | 2 | UNESCO has expressed its willingness to work with the Department and coordinate such activities provided that expenses for work and fees for experts are met by the Government of Tamil Nadu., The letter also refers to two properties proposed by the Government of Tamil Nadu for future World Heritage status and included i... |
id_757 | 3 | It is therefore proposed to reorganize the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Administration Department by establishing a Temple Administration Board to ensure proper maintenance and administration of the temples, besides observance of worship and rituals. The endeavour is to have a two‑tier system of administra... |
id_757 | 4 | Rule 49 provides that the Board of Trustees shall maintain paraphernalia such as cars, vahanams, palanquins and chapparams in good condition. Proposals for their repair shall be made to the appropriate authority for sanction at the time of budget submission, after obtaining the advice of an expert sthapathi from outsid... |
id_757 | 5 | Referring to Sri Narasimha Swamy Temple, Namakkal, the learned counsel stressed that the Archaeological Survey of India may be directed to declare all temples that are more than 100 years old, even if a single idol is present, as monuments as required under the Directive Principles of State Policy. According to the lea... |
id_757 | 6 | The Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department has decided to restore heritage temples in a phased manner, giving priority to structures degrading due to natural phenomena. It is creating a database of the present condition of all temples under its supervisory control. Subordinate officers are directed to ins... |
id_757 | 7 | So long as the prescriptions under a particular Agama or Agamas are not contrary to any constitutional mandate, the impugned Government Order dated 23 May 2006, which by blanket fiat states that any person who is a Hindu and possessing the requisite qualification and training can be appointed as an Archaka in Hindu tem... |
id_757 | 8 | The Heritage Commission shall consist of 17 members including the representatives from the Archaeological Survey of India, representatives from the State Archaeological Department, one renowned historian or anthropologist, two representatives of the Public Works Department i.e., one from Building Structural and Conserv... |
id_758 | 0 | Reserved on 07.05.2022, Pronounced on 21.05.2022, Bail Application Number 08/2022. Through: Mr. B. A. Bashir, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Falak Bashir, Advocate. Through: Mr. Sajad Ashraf, Government Advocate., The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this High Court under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Proced... |
id_759 | 0 | Amk Sahil Sanjay Shah, Applicant; The State of Maharashtra, Respondent; Mr. P. S. Malhi as well as Mr. Amandeep Singh for the Applicant; Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, Advocate for the Respondent State; Mr. Sreeram Shirsat, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent National Crime Bureau., This is an application for anticipatory bail in ... |
id_76 | 0 | Applicant: In Re. Opposite Party: Sri Shubham Kumar. Advocate. Counsel for Applicant: Sou Moto, Ashish Mishra. Counsel for Opposite Party: Ashok Kumar Upadhyay., Hon'ble Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh, J. Hon'ble Justice Rajendra Kumar IV, J. The present contempt proceeding has arisen upon the reference made by the then ... |
id_760 | 0 | Reserved on: 27.09.2023 Pronounced on: 20.11.2023 Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate and Mr. Pawash Piyush, Advocate versus Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, Applicant with Inspector Nitesh Bhardwaj, Police Station Maurice Nagar., The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Criminal ... |
id_761 | 0 | Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8730/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-11-2021 in CRR No. 1388/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh). Date: 22-11-2021. This petition was called on for hearing today., For Petitioners: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Se... |
id_763 | 0 | Bail Application No. 1096/2021 State Vs. Navneet Kalra FIR No. 116/2021 PS- Lodhi Colony (Crime Branch) under section 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1879 and Sections 420, 188, 120-B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code dated 13.05.2021. The present application has been receiv... |
id_764 | 0 | Dated: 16th May, 2022. In pursuance of Rule 4 of Order II of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Honourable the Chief Justice of India has directed that the Supreme Court will be closed for the annual Summer Vacation from Monday, the 23rd May, 2022 to Sunday, the 10th July, 2022 (both days inclusive) and will reopen on Mond... |
id_765 | 0 | Shailaja (Original Complainant) aged about 32 years, occupation: Laborer, resident at Masvane, Taluka Shahpur, District Thane (Accused in Nagpur Jail, Nagpur) Respondent (Original Accused) and wife Ashok Baban Mukane aged about 32 years, occupation: Laborer, resident at Masvane, Taluka Shahpur, District Thane (Accused ... |
id_765 | 1 | Position of limbs, especially of arms and fingers, in suspected drowning: the presence or absence of sand or earth within the nails or on the skin of hands and feet was noted in anatomical position. Black ink stains were present over the palmar aspect and fingers of both hands, chest and abdomen., Surface wounds and in... |
id_765 | 2 | In the absence of any such marks on the person of the appellant, it would lead to drawing an inference that the appellant had committed rape when the victim was either unconscious or no longer alive. As already discussed hereinabove, Petitioner Witness 18 – Dr. Dattatray Bhore opined about several injuries, contusions ... |
id_766 | 0 | Number K-13014/06/2023-US.I Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice Department of Justice (Appointments Division) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, New Delhi-110011, dated 23rd January 2024. In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased... |
id_767 | 0 | Whereas, the Odisha High Court, with a view to encouraging young lawyers practicing in the District Courts including the outlying stations of the districts, has instituted an award named Lawyer of the Year Award; whereas a draft scheme approved by the Odisha High Court for the said award was circulated among all the Ba... |
id_770 | 0 | Vide order dated 05th February, 2024, we had directed respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to remain present before the Supreme Court of India on 19th February, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. and answer as to why an action should not be taken against them for having committed contempt of the Supreme Court of India., The aforesaid order was pass... |
id_771 | 0 | The Collegium of the Supreme Court has recommended the names of three Judicial Officers of the Delhi Higher Judiciary, namely Shri Girish Kathpalia, Shri Dharmesh Sharma, and Shri Manoj Jain, as Judges of the High Court of Delhi in the following terms: On 22 December 2022, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi i... |
id_775 | 0 | Harishchandra Sitaram Khanorkar, aged 55 years, residing at Plot No.9, in front of the house of Bodare, Chakrapani Nagar, Nagpur (presently at Central Jail, Nagpur), State of Maharashtra, was represented by Shri A.S. Dhore, Advocate, together with Shri Sheikh Sohailuddin, Advocate and Shri Yash Bangale, Advocate. Shri ... |
id_775 | 1 | The ethos of criminal justice dispensation to prevent and punish crime would surreptitiously turn its back on the victim of such crime whose cries went unheard for centuries in the long corridors of the conventional apparatus. A few limited rights, including the right to participate in the trial, have now been bestowed... |
id_776 | 0 | Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 22 January 2024 passed in W.P. No. 3468 of 2023 on the file of the High Court. Petition under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the affidavit filed in support of the petition., Between: 1. M/s Ramadhuta Creations, Producer ... |
id_776 | 1 | Another exception to this Rule is where the writ petition is filed in public interest. The orthodox rule of interpretation regarding locus of a person to reach the court has undergone a sea change with the development of constitutional law in India and the constitutional courts have been adopting a liberal approach in ... |
id_777 | 0 | Appeal No. 456 of 2020. Sophy Thomas, Judge. The husband filed petition No. 620 before the Family Court, Alappuzha, under Section 10(1)(X) of the Indian Divorce Act, seeking dissolution of his marriage on the ground of matrimonial cruelty. He married the respondent on 09 February 2009 according to Christian rites, and ... |
id_778 | 0 | Competition Appeal (AT) No. 01 of 2023 [Arising out of Order dated 20.10.2022 passed by the Competition Commission of India in Case No. 39 of 2018] Google LLC having its office at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington; Google India Private Limited having its office at Unitech Signature Tower‑II, Tower‑B, Sector‑15, Part‑I... |
id_778 | 1 | Android Fragmentation Agreement / Android Compatibility Commitment (AFA/ACC) set out the minimum baseline that an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) has to follow. In Android there are about 15,000 models and 1,100 OEMs and there is no restriction on OEMs to innovate. AFA/ACC cannot be said to be anti‑competitive an... |
id_778 | 2 | Google is a virtual monopolist in the licensable smart device operating system. The Competition Commission of India, after detailed analyses, has found that Google has reduced the ability and incentive of original equipment manufacturers to develop and sell devices operating on forks, thereby limiting technical or scie... |
id_778 | 3 | It is a well‑established rule of statutory interpretation that the preamble does not control the interpretation of statutory provisions contained in the Act, but the preamble is a key to explain the object and purpose of enactment. Section 18, as noticed above, contains the duties of the Commission, which provides that... |
id_778 | 4 | It was stated that the current test of Section 4(2) has not proven to be a hindrance to the Competition Commission of India's ability to assess effects in abuse of dominance disputes., Based on the above, the Committee discussed that the Competition Commission of India has interpreted Section 4(2) keeping in mind that ... |
id_778 | 5 | At p. 514 it was elaborated that this difficulty was removed in 1977 by the provision of a comprehensive application for judicial review, under which remedies in both facilities became interchangeable. At p. 573 with the heading Application for Judicial Review in Chapter 17, it is stated thus: All the remedies mentione... |
id_778 | 6 | The Competition Commission of India reiterates the obligations imposed by the Android Fragmentation Agreement (AFA) on signatory original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for better understanding of the allegation. The AFA places the following obligations on a signatory OEM: (d) the company will not take any actions that... |
id_778 | 7 | As far as the objectives of competition laws are concerned, they vary from country to country and even within a country they seem to change and evolve over the time. However, it will be useful to refer to some of the common objectives of competition law. The main objective of competition law is to promote economic effi... |
id_778 | 8 | It is not a curable irregularity. In the above case, the Honourable Supreme Court of India was considering the provisions of the Evidence Act and the question which a prosecutor is entitled to put to a witness in a criminal trial. The above analogy cannot be applied with regard to investigation which is to be carried o... |
id_778 | 9 | We have also noticed the submission of the learned Additional Solicitor General relying on the Digital Markets Act (Regulation 2022/1925; DMA) and Article 6(4) of the DMA, which directs that sideloading be permitted, while allowing the relevant operating system developer to impose measures that are strictly necessary a... |
id_778 | 10 | In such a situation, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has carried out the best estimation on the basis of financial statements and information submitted by Google. Therefore, we agree with the CCI's decision to quantify the monetary penalties on the basis of data presented by Google. In doing so, also note tha... |
id_783 | 0 | Reserved On: 13.07.2023 Delivered On: 18.07.2023 Applicant: Jai Govind @ Ramji Yadav Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh Counsel for Applicant: Vineet Vikram, Imran Ullah Counsel for Opposite Party: Additional Government Advocate, Vipin Kumar Hon'ble Justice Siddharth, J., Heard Sri Imran Ullah, learned counsel for ... |
id_784 | 0 | Judgment pronounced on: 18.10.2022. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant: Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate along with the Appellant (produced in custody). For the Respondent: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with S.I. P.S.: Lodhi Colony., The present appeal under the provision of Section 374(2) of the Co... |
id_784 | 1 | After some time accused Bagender came and took away Jyoti. After some time I started searching for Jyoti. When I was searching I heard that Jyoti was found in the nearby Jhuggi. I noticed that accused Bagender was having Jyoti in his lap and was coming out of his Jhuggi. My daughter Jyoti was continuously crying, altho... |
id_785 | 0 | Through: Delhi High Court on its own motion versus Mr. Amit Prasad, Special Public Prosecutor with Mr. Rajesh Deo, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Legal Cell in Application No. 23830/2020. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Criminal) for Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. Extension of Interim Orders., Pr... |
id_786 | 0 | WRIT PETITION Nos. 22010 of 2021, 18304 of 2022, 19570 of 2022, 19561 of 2022, 20119 of 2022 and 20120 of 2022 are filed. The main issue that arises for consideration in these petitions is whether offline or online games such as rummy, which are substantially based on skill and not on chance, and are played without sta... |
id_786 | 1 | Narmada Bachao Andolan (34) Somasundaram Chettiar & Others v. Emperor, 1947 Supreme Court Cases Online Madras 193; (35) Krishnachandra and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh, All India Reporter 1965 Supreme Court 307; (36) Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh v. Motors & General Stores (P) Ltd., All India Reporter... |
id_786 | 2 | It is distressing to note that while on the one hand, the Central and the State Governments are pushing to make the country a gaming hub, on the other hand, the Revenue is seeking to effectively kill the industry. It was submitted that the impugned Show Cause Notice is arbitrary and ignores settled law, reiterated time... |
id_786 | 3 | One of the restrictions placed on the power of the High Court is that an effective alternate remedy must be available to the aggrieved person. Exceptions to the rule of alternate remedy arise where (a) the writ petition has been filed for the enforcement of a fundamental right protected by Part III of the Constitution;... |
id_786 | 4 | The word wagering is practically synonymous with the words betting and gambling and the terms are so used in common parlance and in statutory and constitutional enactments (Mc Donald v Bryant, 238 Ark. 338, 381 S.W.2d 736). The Rule of Ejusdem Generis shall apply. As per this doctrine, when particular words pertaining ... |
id_786 | 5 | Section 2(2) of the 1939 Act defined prize competition as follows: Prize Competition includes (a) crossword prize competition, missing words competition, picture prize competition, number prize competition, or any other competition for which the solution is prepared beforehand by the promoters of the competition or for... |
id_786 | 6 | As rightly contended by the petitioners and intervenors, the contention of the respondents that in RMDC1, it was held that any game whose result is based on a forecast is a gambling activity is liable to be rejected. At paragraph 17, the tripartite categorisation of competitions by the Supreme Court of India was in the... |
id_786 | 7 | The contention regarding this definition is that the evidence clearly disclosed that the club was being used as a common gambling house and therefore the penal provisions of the Hyderabad Gambling Act were clearly attracted. Several sections of the Gambling Act need to be considered. Section 4, which follows in outline... |
id_786 | 8 | These proceedings before us are a sequel to the chequered history of litigation between the parties over a period of two decades. From the pleadings of the parties and the arguments addressed before us by the learned counsel the following questions arise for our consideration: What is gambling? What is the meaning of t... |
id_786 | 9 | Supreme Court of India held the game of rummy to be a game of mere skill on the following reasoning: The protection of Section 14 is not available in this case. The game of rummy is not a game entirely of chance like the three‑card game mentioned in the Madras case (Somasundaram Chettiar, In re, AIR 1948 Mad 264 : 49 C... |
id_786 | 10 | Hence, the ratio that emerges is that wager or betting on a game of skill does not amount to gambling. The contention of the Respondents that an exception on wagering or betting on horse racing is carved out in specific circumstances, and therefore wagering or betting otherwise is not permitted is specifically answered... |
id_786 | 11 | Supreme Court of India was treating the question, whether it was constitutionally permissible for section 2(d) of the Prize Competition Act, 1955, which defined Prize Competition to take within its embrace not only the competitions in which success depended on chance but also those wherein success depended to a substan... |
id_786 | 12 | It is true that Arnold Palmer or Severiano Ballesteros may never have mastered how golf is played on the computer, and Messi or Ronaldo may be outplayed by a team of infants in a virtual game of football, but Viswanathan Anand or Omar Sharif would not be so disadvantaged when playing their chosen games of skill on the ... |
id_788 | 0 | Writ Petition(s) (Civil) No(s). 48/2024 Date: 22-01-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ankit Singh, Advocate, Mr. Chandratanay Chaube, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Puja Dewan, Advocate on Record. For Respondent(s)., Upon hearing th... |
id_791 | 0 | Case: Writ Petition (A) No. 2211 of 2023. Petitioner: Saroj Kumari. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh and five others. Counsel for the petitioner: Satyendra Chandra Tripathi. Counsel for the respondents: Chief Standing Counsel, Sanjay Kumar Srivastava. Honourable Justice Ashutosh Srivastava of the Allahabad High Court... |
id_792 | 0 | Petitioner: Deepak. Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Lucknow, and others. Counsel for the petitioner: Prateek Shrivastava, Avinash Singh Vishen, Vishram Kumar Chauhan. Counsel for the respondent: Government Advocate Honourable Ramesh Sinha, Judge Honourable Narendra Kumar... |
id_796 | 0 | Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Mr. Pawan Sharma, Mr. Suman Yadav, Mr. Ambar Bhushan and Mr. Nishant Varun, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate for Union of India, with Mr. Anurag K. Andley, Mr. Prakarsh Airan and Ms.... |
id_797 | 0 | Haji Abdul Gani Khan & Anr. Petitioners v. Union of India & Ors. Respondents. The main challenge in this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is to the legality and validity of the action of constituting a Delimitation Commission for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir under the provisions o... |
id_797 | 1 | Any such law as is referred to in clause (1) shall not be deemed to be an amendment of this Constitution for the purposes of article 368 notwithstanding that it contains any provision which amends or has the effect of amending this Constitution. Article 239A as it originally stood provided that Parliament may by law cr... |
id_797 | 2 | The Delimitation Act, 2002 is silent about the term of the appointment of the Chairperson. Exclusion of the North-Eastern States from the purview of the notification dated 6th March 2020 is another challenge which is seriously pressed, namely that part of the second impugned notification dated 31st March 2021 by which ... |
id_798 | 0 | The Board of Control for Cricket in India (Appellant) versus Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation and others (Respondents). Mr. Aditya Thakkar with Mr. Ranjit Shetty and Mr. Rahul Dev in behalf of Argus Partners for the Appellant. Mr. Shailesh Pathak as well as Mr. Jay Vora for the Respondents., The ... |
id_798 | 1 | The benefit of cricketers or their spouses and children by introducing benevolent fund schemes or other benefit schemes, as the Board of Control for Cricket in India deems fit, subject to its rules and regulations; (iii) The benefit of any other persons who have served cricket or their spouses and children as the Board... |
id_798 | 2 | Though the Memorandum of Association prescribe that the income, funds and properties of the Board of Control for Cricket in India shall be utilized and applied solely for promotion of objects of the Board of Control for Cricket in India, to aid and assist financially, or otherwise to promote, encourage, advance and dev... |
id_80 | 0 | In this clutch of writ petitions maintained under Article 32 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court of India is called upon to consider the true effect of Article 324 and, in particular, Article 324(2) of the Constitution. The sub‑Article reads as follows: 324(2) The Election Commission shall consist of the Chief Elect... |
id_80 | 1 | It will be seen that, in terms of the recommendation made by the sub‑committee, the appointment of all Election Commissions, irrespective of whether they were to function in relation to elections to the Legislature of the Union or in relation to elections to the Legislature of a unit, was to be regulated by Union law. ... |
id_80 | 2 | The members of the Constituent Assembly were to be elected not on the basis of adult suffrage. At the time, that is, in 1946, India was still under British rule. British India broadly consisted of the Governor's provinces and the Chief Commissioner’s provinces. There were also a large number of princely states. An inte... |
id_80 | 3 | His term commenced on 18 June 1977 and expired on 17 June 1982 (his term lasted for four years and three hundred and sixty‑four days). Shri R. K. Trivedi, the Seventh Chief Election Commissioner, was also a Civil Servant, and he had a term of three years and one hundred and ninety‑six days. Shri R. V. S. Perishastri wa... |
id_80 | 4 | The Election Commission may, by unanimous decision, regulate the procedure for transaction of its business as also allocation of its business amongst the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners. Save as provided in sub‑section (1), all business of the Election Commission shall, as far as possible, ... |
id_80 | 5 | Separation of powers is a favourite topic for some of us. Each organ of the State in terms of the constitutional scheme performs one or the other functions which have been assigned to the other organ. Although drafting of legislation and its implementation by and large are functions of the legislature and the executive... |
id_80 | 6 | The eligibility for registration of persons who have been tested under Section 16 or Section 27 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and for whom the electoral roll has been prepared, is subject to the disqualifications listed in clauses (a), (b) and (c) of subsection (1) of Section 16. If a person becomes su... |
id_80 | 7 | Equally, we may notice that even if a person is included in the electoral roll, if he is in confinement in a prison, it would not entitle him or rather it would disentitle him to cast his vote. In other words, while ordinarily, the Right to Vote inevitably follows from the inclusion of a person in the electoral roll, t... |
id_80 | 8 | The character and content of parliamentary democracy in the ultimate analysis depends upon the quality of persons who man the Legislature as representatives of the people. It is said that elections are the barometer of democracy and the contestants the lifeline of the parliamentary system and its set‑up. Constitutional... |
id_80 | 9 | Paragraph -16A of the Symbols Order inserted by Notification dated 18.02.1994 reads as follows: 16A. Power of Commission to suspend or withdraw recognition of a recognised political party for its failure to observe Model Code of Conduct or follow lawful directions and instructions of the Commission. Notwithstanding any... |
id_80 | 10 | This is for the reason that, under Section 4 of the 1991 Act, an Election Commissioner is entitled to a term of six years, subject, however, to the condition that the Officer would have to vacate the Office upon his reaching the age of 65 years. In fact, even the appointed Officer was due to retire on 31.12.2022, at th... |
id_80 | 11 | Supreme Court of India proceeded to lay down norms in the absence of any specific guidelines. The absence of specific guidelines in the enacted provisions appears to be deliberate, since the power is vested in high constitutional functionaries and it was expected of them to develop requisite norms by convention in actu... |
id_80 | 12 | In law, there may not be an insuperable obstacle for Parliament to decide to do away with the post of Election Commissioner. In fact, it happened, as can be seen in the Judgment in Dhanoa (supra) wherein it was found that the termination of service of the Election Commissioners following the abolition of the posts did ... |
id_80 | 13 | In their drafts prepared for the consideration of the Constituent Assembly, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar and K. T. Shah proposed the incorporation of the right to vote in the fundamental rights portion. This proposal was initially endorsed in the initial draft report of the Fundamental Rights Sub‑Committee, which was a part of t... |
id_80 | 14 | In that case, a plea was made that since privacy was not included as a fundamental right in the original Constitution, it cannot be declared a fundamental right. Supreme Court of India rejected this argument and held that it cannot be concluded that the Constituent Assembly had expressly resolved to reject the notion o... |
id_80 | 15 | Such a view would render the position of the Election Commissioners to that of mere advisers which does not emerge from the scheme of Article 324. (emphasis added) The judgment in T.N. Seshan did not directly consider the issues which are before this Bench. Furthermore, the observations made in T.N. Seshan indicate tha... |
id_80 | 16 | This has been done in exercise of the plenary power of the Supreme Court of India under Article 142 of the Constitution. Our decision is therefore to lay down parameters or guidelines for the selection process for the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and the Election Commissioner. This decision is support... |
id_800 | 0 | Reserved on: 25th September, 2020. Decided on: 6th October, 2020. Represented by: Plaintiff in person, Mr. Arun Batta, Ms. Neha Kumari and Mr. Abdul Vahid, Advocates. Versus Represented by: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocate for defendant No.1, Supreme Court Bar Association. Ms. Rajdipa B... |
id_800 | 1 | If any question arises with respect to any matter not provided for in the rules or in the bye-laws made by the Executive Committee, such question shall, subject to the provisions of these rules, be decided by the President whose decision shall be binding unless the General Body of the members in a subsequent meeting ot... |
id_801 | 0 | S. Manikumar, Chief Justice, has filed a writ petition seeking the following reliefs: Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing or compelling respondents 1 to 5 to take adequate and effective measures so that wild animals in the various forest divisions of Kerala are protected... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.