text stringlengths 1 67.4k | label int64 0 1 | author stringlengths 2 25 | original_text stringlengths 6 75.8k | category stringclasses 23
values | round int64 0 8 | debate_id stringlengths 6 103 | idx int64 10 82.5k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I accept your challenge. Thank you. You have to understand the proper concepts of this before you take a stance on it. 1/3 equals to 0.3333 repeating, meaning it is infinite after that. It is not an approximation, it is INFINITY and repeating. Also, my original argument was simply that 0.99999999 REPEATING equals to 1.... | 0 | Sorrow |
I accept your challenge. Thank you.
You have to understand the proper concepts of this before you take a stance on it. 1/3 equals to 0.3333 repeating, meaning it is infinite after that. It is not an approximation, it is INFINITY and repeating. Also, my original argument was simply that 0.99999999 REPEATING e... | Miscellaneous | 0 | .999-Repeating-is-Equal-to-1/1/ | 10 |
If a calculator cannot contrive the possibility of there being what you have stated, then how can humans possibly do so ourselves if we were the original inventors of the calculator? What separates a calculator's "mathematical conduct" and a human's "mathematical conduct"? The only way for CON to win this argument is t... | 0 | Sorrow |
If a calculator cannot contrive the possibility of there being what you have stated, then how can humans possibly do so ourselves if we were the original inventors of the calculator? What separates a calculator's "mathematical conduct" and a human's "mathematical conduct"?
The only way for CON to win this ar... | Miscellaneous | 1 | .999-Repeating-is-Equal-to-1/1/ | 11 |
.(9)=1---Part 2! I would like to thank PoeJoe for bringing up the point that this is an auto-win, because he effectively instigated your challenge. I won't dig too deep into this in the first round, but just to give you some ammo to work with, the simplest proof goes like this: .(9)=?=1 /3 /3 .(3)=.(3) Simple division ... | 0 | abard124 |
.(9)=1---Part 2!
I would like to thank PoeJoe for bringing up the point that this is an auto-win, because he effectively instigated your challenge.
I won't dig too deep into this in the first round, but just to give you some ammo to work with, the simplest proof goes like this:
.(9)=?=1
/3 /3 ... | Miscellaneous | 0 | .99999...-repeating-is-equal-to-1/2/ | 41 |
Every fraction in the world can be written as a perfect decimal. These decimals are what we know as rational numbers. Rational numbers either terminate or repeat. 1/3 cannot be written as a terminating decimal, so it has to repeat. And like you said, so does .(9)/3. Also, like I said, empirical evidence doesn't really ... | 0 | abard124 |
Every fraction in the world can be written as a perfect decimal. These decimals are what we know as rational numbers. Rational numbers either terminate or repeat. 1/3 cannot be written as a terminating decimal, so it has to repeat. And like you said, so does .(9)/3.
Also, like I said, empirical evidence does... | Miscellaneous | 1 | .99999...-repeating-is-equal-to-1/2/ | 42 |
First round acceptance. Second round, debate | 0 | futurepresident7 |
First round acceptance. Second round, debate | Miscellaneous | 0 | 0-can-technically-equal-1./1/ | 49 |
0, although it might seem crazy can equal 1. When you find a number's factorial, you are finding the product of all whole numbers less than or equal to it. For example, 3! (Factorial),=3*2*1,or 6 Now, google search "0!" or "0 factorial" What did it come out to? It came out to 1. 0!=0x0=0=1 Therefore, 0 can equal 1 (The... | 0 | futurepresident7 |
0, although it might seem crazy can equal 1. When you find a number's factorial, you are finding the product of all whole numbers less than or equal to it. For example, 3! (Factorial),=3*2*1,or 6 Now, google search "0!" or "0 factorial" What did it come out to? It came out to 1. 0!=0×0=0=1 Therefore, 0 can... | Miscellaneous | 1 | 0-can-technically-equal-1./1/ | 50 |
I think that 0 isn't technically equals to zero and I can prove it .... See, 1/1= 1 ---------------(i) Now if 0 is equal to 1 then, 0/0= not defined --------------------because if we divide any number by 0 then it is not defined-------------------(ii) From (i) and (ii) 1= not defined But 1 is defined number as every nu... | 0 | sharang123 |
I think that 0 isn't technically equals to zero and I can prove it
....
See,
1/1= 1 ---------------(i)
Now if 0 is equal to 1 then,
0/0= not defined --------------------because if we divide any number by 0 then it is not defined-------------------(ii)
From (i) and (ii)
1= not defined
But 1 ... | Miscellaneous | 0 | 0-can-technically-equal-1./1/ | 51 |
My friend you are been confused by your own self I agree with 0!=1, zero factorial is equal to 1 , but zero isn't equal to one . I can prove it , If you want to say that 0=1,then Let's see 0=1 And 0!=1 0x0=1 But if we see minutely zero is multiplied only on one side of equal sign So we have to multiply it on both side ... | 0 | sharang123 |
My friend you are been confused by your own self
I agree with 0!=1, zero factorial is equal to 1 , but zero isn't equal to one .
I can prove it ,
If you want to say that 0=1,then
Let's see
0=1
And
0!=1
0x0=1
But if we see minutely zero is multiplied only on one side of equal sign
So w... | Miscellaneous | 1 | 0-can-technically-equal-1./1/ | 52 |
I think 0 is an even number so I think it is neither neutral or odd. | 0 | Chunkymilk |
I think 0 is an even number so I think it is neither neutral or odd. | Miscellaneous | 0 | 0-is-an-even-number./1/ | 53 |
If you follow the pattern 3 is odd 2 is even 1 is odd so 0 is even. This just makes sense to me but I do not understand why people think it is neutral. Also, the definition of odd is an integer is even if it is 'evenly divisible' by two and odd if it is not even according to Wikipedia and Google. 0 divided by 2 equals ... | 0 | Chunkymilk |
If you follow the pattern 3 is odd 2 is even 1 is odd so 0 is even. This just makes sense to me but I do not understand why people think it is neutral.
Also, the definition of odd is an integer is even if it is 'evenly divisible' by two and odd if it is not even according to Wikipedia and Google. 0 divided b... | Miscellaneous | 1 | 0-is-an-even-number./1/ | 54 |
First of all I understand Wikipedia is not always trustworthy. That is why I looked at the Google definition. If this is not enough Mathworld.wolfram.com/EvenNumber.html agrees that zero is an even number. This is stated in the second sentence. Second of all, you have not shown any prove that 0 is a neutral number. As ... | 0 | Chunkymilk |
First of all I understand Wikipedia is not always trustworthy. That is why I looked at the Google definition. If this is not enough Mathworld.wolfram.com/EvenNumber.html agrees that zero is an even number. This is stated in the second sentence.
Second of all, you have not shown any prove that 0 is a neutral ... | Miscellaneous | 2 | 0-is-an-even-number./1/ | 55 |
0 is not an even number or a odd number it is neutral (not helping or supporting either side) basically zero is neutral, because its not positive or negative. its also in between positive and negative integers. | 0 | pensfan |
0 is not an even number or a odd number it is neutral (not helping or supporting either side) basically zero is neutral, because its not positive or negative. its also in between positive and negative integers. | Miscellaneous | 0 | 0-is-an-even-number./1/ | 56 |
first of all you can't trust Wikipedia because anyone can go on there and change the answers. second of all 0 is a neutral number because it is in between negative and positive numbers, and it is not negative or positive. therefore it is neither even nor odd. | 0 | pensfan |
first of all you can't trust Wikipedia because anyone can go on there and change the answers. second of all 0 is a neutral number because it is in between negative and positive numbers, and it is not negative or positive. therefore it is neither even nor odd. | Miscellaneous | 1 | 0-is-an-even-number./1/ | 57 |
My proof for zero being neutral is that it is not negative nor positive (as I stated before) it is in-between positive and negative integers. Your second point is a false statement. zero divided by any number on a calculator = error. meaning that it can't be divided. zero does not correspond to anything in reality, bec... | 0 | pensfan |
My proof for zero being neutral is that it is not negative nor positive (as I stated before) it is in-between positive and negative integers. Your second point is a false statement. zero divided by any number on a calculator = error. meaning that it can't be divided. zero does not correspond to anything in reality... | Miscellaneous | 2 | 0-is-an-even-number./1/ | 58 |
.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is not equal to .9999999999999999999999999999999999999998, by reason that two values, structures, objects, concepts, or any measurably comparable entity, however similar in structure they may be, must retain ALL characteristics of one another to be 2 of the same entity. Therefo... | 0 | Ryvn |
.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is not equal to .9999999999999999999999999999999999999998, by reason that two values, structures, objects, concepts, or any measurably comparable entity, however similar in structure they may be, must retain ALL characteristics of one another to be 2 of the same entity.
... | Science | 0 | 0.999..-repeating-is-equal-to-1/1/ | 76 |
I am arguing that 0.9999... (going on forever) is equal to 1. My challenger is arguing that this is false. He may use the first round to make his argument. | 1 | The_Tom |
I am arguing that 0.9999... (going on forever) is equal to 1. My challenger is arguing that this is false. He may use the first round to make his argument. | Science | 0 | 0.999..-repeating-is-equal-to-1/1/ | 77 |
0.9999... = 1 (Note ... means repeating) This is a mathematically proven fact which most people find hard to believe. I will try an convince the readers that this is indeed a fact. My opponent claims "two values, structures, objects, concepts, or any measurably comparable entity, however similar in structure they may b... | 1 | The_Tom |
0.9999... = 1
(Note ... means repeating)
This is a mathematically proven fact which most people find hard to believe. I will try an convince the readers that this is indeed a fact.
My opponent claims "two values, structures, objects, concepts, or any measurably comparable entity, however similar in str... | Science | 1 | 0.999..-repeating-is-equal-to-1/1/ | 78 |
Well, since my opponent didn't refute me, I will refute myself. Dear the_tom, in the previous round you had stated that 4/2 is another way of writing 1. Well let me just say sir, this is blatantly incorrect! Not only this, but the number one looks bigger than 0.999.. therefore your proof is null! Seriously though, argu... | 1 | The_Tom |
Well, since my opponent didn't refute me, I will refute myself.
Dear the_tom, in the previous round you had stated that 4/2 is another way of writing 1. Well let me just say sir, this is blatantly incorrect! Not only this, but the number one looks bigger than 0.999.. therefore your proof is null!
Seriousl... | Science | 2 | 0.999..-repeating-is-equal-to-1/1/ | 79 |
The out of context absolute that we have for our resolution is, as an absolute, false. 1 pair of shoes equals 2 shoes. 1 pint equals 2 cups in United States fluid volume measurement. If units were predefined in the resolution, it could probably be fixed, but 1 of a given unit can occasionally equal 2 of another given u... | 1 | Ragnar_Rahl |
The out of context absolute that we have for our resolution is, as an absolute, false.
1 pair of shoes equals 2 shoes.
1 pint equals 2 cups in United States fluid volume measurement.
If units were predefined in the resolution, it could probably be fixed, but 1 of a given unit can occasionally equ... | Miscellaneous | 0 | 1-does-not-2/1/ | 139 |
Well, unfortunately, such ambiguities in resolutions should be resolved before debates if one wishes them to go in one's favor. :) | 1 | Ragnar_Rahl |
Well, unfortunately, such ambiguities in resolutions should be resolved before debates if one wishes them to go in one's favor. :) | Miscellaneous | 1 | 1-does-not-2/1/ | 140 |
Kentucky fried? | 1 | Ragnar_Rahl |
Kentucky fried? | Miscellaneous | 2 | 1-does-not-2/1/ | 141 |
Good lawd | 1 | Ragnar_Rahl |
Good lawd | Miscellaneous | 3 | 1-does-not-2/1/ | 142 |
Finalmente | 1 | Ragnar_Rahl |
Finalmente | Miscellaneous | 4 | 1-does-not-2/1/ | 143 |
1+1=2 subtract 1 from each side (1+1)-1=2-1 multiply by a, a=1.999 repeating {(1+1)-1}A=[2-1]A 0=0 therefore, 1.999 repeating = 2, because 1.999 feet is pretty close to 2 feet | 0 | Rob1Billion |
1+1=2
subtract 1 from each side
(1+1)-1=2-1
multiply by a, a=1.999 repeating
{(1+1)-1}A=[2-1]A
0=0
therefore, 1.999 repeating = 2, because 1.999 feet is pretty close to 2 feet | Science | 0 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 155 |
All rhetoric (j/k everything on here is all rhetoric). There is no reason why a rational number cannot be equal to an irrational number. Your definitions are great, but they don't necessarily preclude any possibility that the two could be equal to each other, only that the two cannot be IDENTICAL to each other. Tarzan'... | 0 | Rob1Billion |
All rhetoric (j/k everything on here is all rhetoric). There is no reason why a rational number cannot be equal to an irrational number. Your definitions are great, but they don't necessarily preclude any possibility that the two could be equal to each other, only that the two cannot be IDENTICAL to each other. Ta... | Science | 1 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 156 |
Your best argument is an inability to do the addition/subtraction to get the result in the proof. But this makes no sense. Addition cannot be undefined in this way, because we work with these numbers all the time. A third plus a third is two thirds. The fact that a third equals a repeating number does not automatically... | 0 | Rob1Billion |
Your best argument is an inability to do the addition/subtraction to get the result in the proof. But this makes no sense. Addition cannot be undefined in this way, because we work with these numbers all the time. A third plus a third is two thirds. The fact that a third equals a repeating number does not automati... | Science | 2 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 157 |
Your arguments do make some sense to me, as a non-mathematician, but when I look back at the proof I am still not convinced that you can't subtract 1.999 rep. from 19.999 rep. to make 18. Your wiki references did not say "a rational number can never equal an irrational number", unless you can direct me to the spot they... | 0 | Rob1Billion |
Your arguments do make some sense to me, as a non-mathematician, but when I look back at the proof I am still not convinced that you can't subtract 1.999 rep. from 19.999 rep. to make 18. Your wiki references did not say "a rational number can never equal an irrational number", unless you can direct me to the spot... | Science | 3 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 158 |
Well there is tension in a lot of debates. The ones about religion can get really bad... That is actually the reason I took this debate, because since I am not a mathematician I could do this without caring TOO much about it, and joke around a little in the process. As far as your argument goes, I would say that I have... | 0 | Rob1Billion |
Well there is tension in a lot of debates. The ones about religion can get really bad... That is actually the reason I took this debate, because since I am not a mathematician I could do this without caring TOO much about it, and joke around a little in the process. As far as your argument goes, I would say that I... | Science | 4 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 159 |
My main point in this argument is that 1.9999 repeating CANNOT equal 2 because 1.999 repeating is an irrational number, while the number 2 is a rational number. Since a number cannot be rational and irrational at the same time, then 1.999 repeating CANNOT equal 2. The definition of a rational number is a number that ca... | 0 | kennard |
My main point in this argument is that 1.9999 repeating CANNOT equal 2 because 1.999 repeating is an irrational number, while the number 2 is a rational number. Since a number cannot be rational and irrational at the same time, then 1.999 repeating CANNOT equal 2.
The definition of a rational number is a num... | Science | 0 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 160 |
First of all, I want to indicate that this is not a philosophical debate. This is a mathematical debate, and anyone that has taken a course involving mathematical proof knows that definitions in mathematics are the basis or building blocks of any proof. You indicated that: "There is no reason why a rational number cann... | 0 | kennard |
First of all, I want to indicate that this is not a philosophical debate. This is a mathematical debate, and anyone that has taken a course involving mathematical proof knows that definitions in mathematics are the basis or building blocks of any proof.
You indicated that: "There is no reason why a rational ... | Science | 1 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 161 |
You wrote the following two statements: "why can't a rational number not be equal to an irrational number?" and "your definition did not include that a rational number cannot be equal to an irrational number. You say that it can't but us debaters on here are probably not just going to take your word for it. Saying that... | 0 | kennard |
You wrote the following two statements: "why can't a rational number not be equal to an irrational number?" and "your definition did not include that a rational number cannot be equal to an irrational number. You say that it can't but us debaters on here are probably not just going to take your word for it. Saying... | Science | 2 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 162 |
I think the following example is good evidence that addition, substraction, multiplication, and divison break down when used on the repeating form of a number. For example, people who claim that you can add repeating numbers do the following: 000.333 repeating + 0.666 repeating ----------------------- 000.999 repeating... | 0 | kennard |
I think the following example is good evidence that addition, substraction, multiplication, and divison break down when used on the repeating form of a number. For example, people who claim that you can add repeating numbers do the following:
000.333 repeating
+ 0.666 repeating
----------------------- ... | Science | 3 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 163 |
Well, for this last Round I'll just respond to some of the comments that have been posted down. Lazarus Long indicated that two integers whose ratio give 1.9999... repeating are 4/2. The proof that he gave is the following. "Since 1.999... = 2, then 4/2 = 1.99999.... Simple, no?" The only simple thing I see in this pro... | 0 | kennard |
Well, for this last Round I'll just respond to some of the comments that have been posted down.
Lazarus Long indicated that two integers whose ratio give 1.9999... repeating are 4/2. The proof that he gave is the following.
"Since
1.999... = 2, then
4/2 = 1.99999....
Simple, no?"
... | Science | 4 | 1.999-repeating-2/1/ | 164 |
Alright. This seemes to be a fun debate. | 0 | baseballkid |
Alright. This seemes to be a fun debate. | Society | 0 | 10.1-million-people-in-prison-is-much-worse-than-genocide./1/ | 176 |
I am sorry. I tried for a couple days to write a case but I am just not knowledgeable on the subject and all i could have done was make myself look stupid. | 0 | baseballkid |
I am sorry. I tried for a couple days to write a case but I am just not knowledgeable on the subject and all i could have done was make myself look stupid. | Society | 1 | 10.1-million-people-in-prison-is-much-worse-than-genocide./1/ | 177 |
If you ever do this again try to not emphasise the Holocaust so much. all cases I had written just attacked that. | 0 | baseballkid |
If you ever do this again try to not emphasise the Holocaust so much. all cases I had written just attacked that. | Society | 2 | 10.1-million-people-in-prison-is-much-worse-than-genocide./1/ | 178 |
emphasise the other parts of your case. That is what meant. | 0 | baseballkid |
emphasise the other parts of your case. That is what meant. | Society | 3 | 10.1-million-people-in-prison-is-much-worse-than-genocide./1/ | 179 |
I was hoping to create a debate without choosing a position myself, thus allowing my opponent to choose whichever side they'd like and leaving me to argue the opposite position. But since I apparently can't do that I'm hoping instead to debate one side, and upon conclusion rehash the debate (presumably with a different... | 1 | maxx233 |
I was hoping to create a debate without choosing a position myself, thus allowing my opponent to choose whichever side they'd like and leaving me to argue the opposite position. But since I apparently can't do that I'm hoping instead to debate one side, and upon conclusion rehash the debate (presumably with a diff... | Society | 0 | 15-is-a-better-age-of-sexual-consent-than-18/1/ | 232 |
I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate! My opponent appears to start in round one (acceptance and definitions,) by asserting his position as a definition in the form of a proposed policy (Policy) and guidelines for that policy (Guidelines). Therefore, as a matter of definition, I of course must rej... | 1 | maxx233 |
I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate! My opponent appears to start in round one (acceptance and definitions,) by asserting his position as a definition in the form of a proposed policy (Policy) and guidelines for that policy (Guidelines). Therefore, as a matter of definition, I of course m... | Society | 1 | 15-is-a-better-age-of-sexual-consent-than-18/1/ | 233 |
Point #1: Age of Majority - Carried from R2 Despite the connection evident in my R2 argument connecting Age of Majority as being a practical consideration regarding the most appropriate Age of Consent, my opponent has labeled the Age of Majority as irrelevant without providing any suggestions or rationale whatsoever as... | 1 | maxx233 |
Point #1: Age of Majority – Carried from R2 Despite the connection evident in my R2 argument connecting Age of Majority as being a practical consideration regarding the most appropriate Age of Consent, my opponent has labeled the Age of Majority as irrelevant without providing any suggestions or rationale wha... | Society | 2 | 15-is-a-better-age-of-sexual-consent-than-18/1/ | 234 |
I will address Pro"s final two questions in reverse order, as the first is dependent on the second: Because, at age 15, people would be devastated to be pregnant we should not allow them legal sexual relations for the following reasons: 1) Contraception and sex education are not fool proof. Continuous Abstinence is the... | 1 | maxx233 |
I will address Pro"s final two questions in reverse order, as the first is dependent on the second: Because, at age 15, people would be devastated to be pregnant we should not allow them legal sexual relations for the following reasons: 1) Contraception and sex education are not fool proof. Continuous Absti... | Society | 3 | 15-is-a-better-age-of-sexual-consent-than-18/1/ | 235 |
The number two is the same as one. 2 + 1 = 1 + 1 3 = 2 Of course, 3 = 2. That is very nice of a conundrum... | 0 | Jackie-Chan |
The number two is the same as one.
2 + 1 = 1 + 1
3 = 2
Of course, 3 = 2. That is very nice of a conundrum... | Science | 0 | 2-is-the-number-one./1/ | 273 |
You have not yet proved that 3 = 2 yet. Because the CON side can state that the PRO side has not proven its case and the CON can prevail, I use this option. | 0 | stephenyoo1995 |
You have not yet proved that 3 = 2 yet. Because the CON side can state that the PRO side has not proven its case and the CON can prevail, I use this option. | Science | 0 | 2-is-the-number-one./1/ | 274 |
The greatest indicator in today's society for where a person will end up in life is where they started in life. Nowhere is this more true for minorities where racism and bigotry has repeatedly and throughout the generations squandered any chance at the American dream. It is the duty of government to give everybody an e... | 0 | Tatarize |
The greatest indicator in today's society for where a person will end up in life is where they started in life. Nowhere is this more true for minorities where racism and bigotry has repeatedly and throughout the generations squandered any chance at the American dream. It is the duty of government to give everybody... | Politics | 0 | 2b.-Affirmative-Action/1/ | 283 |
0 is nothing, information, and matter is 1 you can never show me 0 bananas, but you can understand what im saying | 0 | vi_spex |
0 is nothing, information, and matter is 1
you can never show me 0 bananas, but you can understand what im saying | Science | 0 | 3-divided-by-0-is-3/1/ | 293 |
3 sodas shared by 0 people is 3 sodas, as nothing is being divided. dividing with 0 is the same as dividing with 1, because there is no division going on, I cant share 2 pizzas with myself, and I cant share them with an imaginary man if 3 sodas become imaginary by an imaginary man drinking it, then you are right, but m... | 0 | vi_spex |
3 sodas shared by 0 people is 3 sodas, as nothing is being divided.
dividing with 0 is the same as dividing with 1, because there is no division going on, I cant share 2 pizzas with myself, and I cant share them with an imaginary man
if 3 sodas become imaginary by an imaginary man drinking it, then you... | Science | 1 | 3-divided-by-0-is-3/1/ | 294 |
I have 3 real sodas, I divide them between no one, so no times, shared by none, so I have not done anything, so its true to say 0 division happened but I have 3 sodas 3/1=3 3/0=3 why is 3 divided with 1, 3 when there is no division going on? the outcome of dividing with 0 is the same as dividing with 1 everything is 1,... | 0 | vi_spex |
I have 3 real sodas, I divide them between no one, so no times, shared by none, so I have not done anything, so its true to say 0 division happened but I have 3 sodas
3/1=3
3/0=3
why is 3 divided with 1, 3 when there is no division going on?
the outcome of dividing with 0 is the same as dividi... | Science | 2 | 3-divided-by-0-is-3/1/ | 295 |
do you agree? | 0 | vi_spex |
do you agree? | Science | 3 | 3-divided-by-0-is-3/1/ | 296 |
3*0=0 I agree there | 0 | vi_spex |
3*0=0
I agree there | Science | 4 | 3-divided-by-0-is-3/1/ | 297 |
There are 3 sides to a coin. Heads. Tails. The edge. We perform coin tosses to make decisions sometimes. Sheeple pick a side. Never the edge. This debate is about the tendency of the human species to choose a side, which the sheeple do, so they can be declared by the elites to be winners. The elites, those in the .0000... | 0 | Max.Wallace |
There are 3 sides to a coin.
Heads.
Tails.
The edge.
We perform coin tosses to make decisions sometimes.
Sheeple pick a side. Never the edge.
This debate is about the tendency of the human species to choose a side, which the sheeple do, so they can be declared by the elites to be winners. T... | Philosophy | 0 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 308 |
Considering the fact, that you joined, most likely as an avatar with prior experience, to Master Debate this issue show's us all, "we the people", your clearly dedicated commitment to the destruction of free will, and the war your saviors propose, on those that live with the "pursuit of happiness" as their only goal. F... | 0 | Max.Wallace |
Considering the fact, that you joined, most likely as an avatar with prior experience, to Master Debate this issue show's us all, "we the people", your clearly dedicated commitment to the destruction of free will, and the war your saviors propose, on those that live with the "pursuit of happiness" as their only go... | Philosophy | 1 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 309 |
Here it goes, take it or leave it, it matters not one bit to me. I will address all of your assertions in order based on my observations of life, of which I have 41 years experience, while according to your profile you have 18, which would mean I have a 23 point lead already, in a measure of experience, if your profile... | 0 | Max.Wallace |
Here it goes, take it or leave it, it matters not one bit to me.
I will address all of your assertions in order based on my observations of life, of which I have 41 years experience, while according to your profile you have 18, which would mean I have a 23 point lead already, in a measure of experience, if your... | Philosophy | 2 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 310 |
forfeiture is an act of submission., clear win for the courageous. | 0 | Max.Wallace |
forfeiture is an act of submission., clear win for the courageous. | Philosophy | 4 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 311 |
Due to the black art of psychology, you believe you know who and what I am, but I believe I know you no less as well. | 0 | Max.Wallace |
Due to the black art of psychology, you believe you know who and what I am, but I believe I know you no less as well. | Philosophy | 6 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 312 |
Max Wallace, do you take pleasure in stating the obvious? Leaders, contrary too what many think, ultimately represent a percent of their population. This is where your first error lies. I take it you assume by your words "[they] want the sheeple to follow" that leaders represent 100% of their national electorate, and t... | 0 | PauseAndThink |
Max Wallace, do you take pleasure in stating the obvious?
Leaders, contrary too what many think, ultimately represent a percent of their population. This is where your first error lies. I take it you assume by your words "[they] want the sheeple to follow" that leaders represent 100% of their national electo... | Philosophy | 0 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 313 |
Mr Max Wallace... *sigh* What say I? Well, for one; I'm flattered that you think of me as an 'avatar'. Rest assured however Wallace, that I am indeed a 'rookie' with no prior experience of debating online. I hope to see you give me a chance to discourse this topic- regardless of how polished I sound ( a mere matter of ... | 0 | PauseAndThink |
Mr Max Wallace... *sigh*
What say I? Well, for one; I'm flattered that you think of me as an 'avatar'. Rest assured however Wallace, that I am indeed a 'rookie' with no prior experience of debating online. I hope to see you give me a chance to discourse this topic- regardless of how polished I sound ( a mere ma... | Philosophy | 1 | 3-sides-of-the-coin/1/ | 314 |
Yes, the first argument is twisting the resolution. That's called a prison wall. It is neither a fence in the traditional sense or a border. The term border fence is specific enough to warrant the exclusion of such definitions. People illegally enter the country anyway. A massive super-expensive fence isn't going to do... | 0 | Tatarize |
Yes, the first argument is twisting the resolution. That's called a prison wall. It is neither a fence in the traditional sense or a border. The term border fence is specific enough to warrant the exclusion of such definitions.
People illegally enter the country anyway. A massive super-expensive fence isn't ... | Society | 0 | 3b.-Border-Fence/1/ | 329 |
Some of you may be wondering, what exactly do I mean by a border fence? Some of you may think you already know. I will define border fence: Border Fence: The fence around the border of any prison. I am in favor of continuing to use the idea of a border fence. First, it keeps criminals in. This goal also requires other ... | 0 | beem0r |
Some of you may be wondering, what exactly do I mean by a border fence? Some of you may think you already know. I will define border fence:
Border Fence: The fence around the border of any prison.
I am in favor of continuing to use the idea of a border fence.
First, it keeps criminals in. This go... | Society | 0 | 3b.-Border-Fence/1/ | 330 |
hai i wil argue imnem i s bes rap artiist. | 0 | ADHDavid |
hai i wil argue imnem i s bes rap artiist. | Education | 0 | 3minem-iz-th-bet-raper/1/ | 331 |
As you can see, con has not provided a stable opening with evidence to back it up, claiming that he is a "god". I see no proof of his omnipotence, omniscience, or omnipresence, so this is easily refuted. Now I will follow up on why I Eminem is the best rapper. 1: Sales and Records Eminem is the best selling rap artist ... | 0 | ADHDavid |
As you can see, con has not provided a stable opening with evidence to back it up, claiming that he is a "god". I see no proof of his omnipotence, omniscience, or omnipresence, so this is easily refuted. Now I will follow up on why I Eminem is the best rapper.
1: Sales and Records
Eminem is the best selli... | Education | 1 | 3minem-iz-th-bet-raper/1/ | 332 |
3 pac is legendary. <URL>... | 0 | DATXDUDE |
3 pac is legendary.
https://www.youtube.com... | Arts | 0 | 3pac/1/ | 333 |
0 hoots s0n, str8 up. Donn giv no h00ts bout' noWacK a$$ shii]t s0m. Brieh. | 0 | DATXDUDE |
0 hoots s0n, str8 up. Donn giv no h00ts bout' noWacK a$$ shii]t s0m. Brieh. | Arts | 1 | 3pac/1/ | 334 |
Legendary s0n. <URL>... H00t a$$ BlTCH | 0 | DATXDUDE |
Legendary s0n.
https://www.youtube.com...
H00t a$$ BlTCH | Arts | 2 | 3pac/1/ | 335 |
gOOGlE? Wh0 neds G000GlE? 3pAc doN't Ned dat shiiet brieh. 0 h00ts #ZHG | 0 | DATXDUDE |
gOOGlE? Wh0 neds G000GlE? 3pAc doN't Ned dat shiiet brieh. 0 h00ts #ZHG | Arts | 3 | 3pac/1/ | 336 |
Definition: legend G2;ledA8;(@)nd/ noun 1. a traditional story sometimes popularly regarded as historical but not authenticated. "the legend of King Arthur" synonyms:myth, saga, epic, folk tale, folk story, traditional story, tale, story, fairy tale, narrative, fable, romance; More historical the story of a saint's lif... | 0 | Morganic |
Definition: legend
G2;lɛdA8;(ə)nd/
noun
1.
a traditional story sometimes popularly regarded as historical but not authenticated.
"the legend of King Arthur"
synonyms:myth, saga, epic, folk tale, folk story, traditional story, tale, story, fairy tale, narrative, fable, romance; More
historical ... | Arts | 1 | 3pac/1/ | 337 |
My opponent makes another excellent point, however after running "3pac" through a Google trends search I discover yet more evidence that "3pac" cannot be described as a "legend" <URL>... In fact when looking for searches related to "3pac" Google says "Not enough search volume to show results." I thank my opponent for h... | 0 | Morganic |
My opponent makes another excellent point, however after running "3pac" through a Google trends search I discover yet more evidence that "3pac" cannot be described as a "legend" https://www.google.com...
In fact when looking for searches related to "3pac" Google says
"Not enough search volume to show resul... | Arts | 2 | 3pac/1/ | 338 |
We have acceptable amounts of campaign finance regulations we simply need to enforce those regulations in order to properly ensure a fair and productive election. While many people worry about lobbyists and companies buying up politicians one need look no further than Barack Obama. He ran an entire campaign primarily o... | 0 | Tatarize |
We have acceptable amounts of campaign finance regulations we simply need to enforce those regulations in order to properly ensure a fair and productive election. While many people worry about lobbyists and companies buying up politicians one need look no further than Barack Obama. He ran an entire campaign primar... | Politics | 0 | 4a.-Campaign-Finance-Reform/1/ | 341 |
A campaign lives and dies by money and it's getting worse and worse every election cycle. When money is more important than votes, we find that anybody we need to elect is going to be far more indebted to the money than the people. The current system is a legal nightmare, a joke, and an albatross around the necks of ev... | 0 | Tatarize |
A campaign lives and dies by money and it's getting worse and worse every election cycle. When money is more important than votes, we find that anybody we need to elect is going to be far more indebted to the money than the people. The current system is a legal nightmare, a joke, and an albatross around the necks ... | Politics | 0 | 4b.-Campaign-Finance-Reform/1/ | 342 |
Thank you for this debate. My opponent has failed to provide an opening argument, so I will be forced to reply to another one of his arguments on this site on the same subject, but first I will say my views on the subject. There is absolutely no evidence that the government had anything to do with the 9/11 disasters, b... | 0 | DucoNihilum |
Thank you for this debate.
My opponent has failed to provide an opening argument, so I will be forced to reply to another one of his arguments on this site on the same subject, but first I will say my views on the subject.
There is absolutely no evidence that the government had anything to do with the ... | Politics | 0 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 399 |
As I tried to make clear for you before, while some politicians (Including GwB) may have used buzz words like 'they hate us for our freedom' the official reason was absolutely not 'they hate us for our freedom'- and to prove that I read though my copy of The 9/11 Commission Report- entitled the "Final report of the nat... | 0 | DucoNihilum |
As I tried to make clear for you before, while some politicians (Including GwB) may have used buzz words like 'they hate us for our freedom' the official reason was absolutely not 'they hate us for our freedom'- and to prove that I read though my copy of The 9/11 Commission Report- entitled the "Final report of th... | Politics | 1 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 400 |
There was no need to keep every piece of steel in storage forever. The causes were thoroughly investigated, to do that not all pieces of steel were necessary. Your idea that it is standard procedure for NORAD to scramble jets whenever a jetliner goes "Off course" is highly misleading. It is not uncommon for planes to g... | 0 | DucoNihilum |
There was no need to keep every piece of steel in storage forever. The causes were thoroughly investigated, to do that not all pieces of steel were necessary.
Your idea that it is standard procedure for NORAD to scramble jets whenever a jetliner goes "Off course" is highly misleading. It is not uncommon for ... | Politics | 2 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 401 |
Key words to your opening were "President Kennedy rejected the proposal and removed [him] from his duties as Joint chiefs of Staff [afterward].It's quite clear that proposals like this were not welcome from Kennedy- especially after his failed Bay of Pigs fiasco. Government officials propose things all the time- some o... | 0 | DucoNihilum |
Key words to your opening were "President Kennedy rejected the proposal and removed [him] from his duties as Joint chiefs of Staff [afterward].It's quite clear that proposals like this were not welcome from Kennedy- especially after his failed Bay of Pigs fiasco. Government officials propose things all the time- s... | Politics | 3 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 402 |
You wanted to debate, the debate i was having has ended because KindYosef forfeited his second round. -I'm not going to post an argument in this first round, I'll just state my position, which is 9/11 was organized by the U.S. government. So lets rock and roll brother man, and yes...Ron Paul hope for America | 0 | inrainbows |
You wanted to debate, the debate i was having has ended because KindYosef forfeited his second round.
-I'm not going to post an argument in this first round, I'll just state my position, which is 9/11 was organized by the U.S. government. So lets rock and roll brother man, and yes...Ron Paul hope for America | Politics | 0 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 403 |
My claim of what we were told on the reason they attacked us was correct. Like the selling of the Iraq war, the leaders of our government used the media to convey their message. By simply stating the same message over and over on all the mainstream news channels, they attacked the American people with their propaganda.... | 0 | inrainbows |
My claim of what we were told on the reason they attacked us was correct. Like the selling of the Iraq war, the leaders of our government used the media to convey their message. By simply stating the same message over and over on all the mainstream news channels, they attacked the American people with their propag... | Politics | 1 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 404 |
Not every piece of steel needed to be investigated yes, but why the rush to get rid of it so quickly? You would think that the government would like to know as much about it as possible because it was one of the three buildings to ever fall from a fire. It's standard procedure for NORAD to scramble jet fighters wheneve... | 0 | inrainbows |
Not every piece of steel needed to be investigated yes, but why the rush to get rid of it so quickly? You would think that the government would like to know as much about it as possible because it was one of the three buildings to ever fall from a fire.
It's standard procedure for NORAD to scramble jet fight... | Politics | 2 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 405 |
Operation Northwoods was proposed by several high class senior U.S. Department of Defense Leaders, including the chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer. It was wanted by a number of high officers and CIA agents, but president Kennedy rejected the proposal and removed Lyman Louis Lemnitzer from his ... | 0 | inrainbows |
Operation Northwoods was proposed by several high class senior U.S. Department of Defense Leaders, including the chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Lyman Louis Lemnitzer. It was wanted by a number of high officers and CIA agents, but president Kennedy rejected the proposal and removed Lyman Louis Lemnitzer from... | Politics | 3 | 9-11-Who-really-attacked-us-and-why/1/ | 406 |
I will be arguing that 9/11 must have been assisted by the US government...... (A)Unanswered questions: (1)Who was really in charge on the morning of 9/11 - Bush or Cheney? (2)Why did NORAD mislead investigators on why its planes didn't intercept 9/11 hijackers? (3)What really happened aboard Flight 93? (4)How could th... | 0 | KILLUMINATI |
I will be arguing that 9/11 must have been assisted by the US government...... (A)Unanswered questions: (1)Who was really in charge on the morning of 9/11 - Bush or Cheney? (2)Why did NORAD mislead investigators on why its planes didn't intercept 9/11 hijackers? (3)What really happened aboard Flig... | Politics | 0 | 9-11-must-have-been-assisted-by-the-US-government/1/ | 412 |
To my opponent thank you for accepting this debate........ When your not given answers to your questions about 911 by the people who SHOULD be able to do so,it is PERFECTLY normal to ask questions. If our goverment has answers to questions about 911 why have they not yet given the answers to squash the debate ? When yo... | 0 | KILLUMINATI |
To my opponent thank you for accepting this debate........ When your not given answers to your questions about 911 by the people who SHOULD be able to do so,it is PERFECTLY normal to ask questions. If our goverment has answers to questions about 911 why have they not yet given the answers to squash the d... | Politics | 1 | 9-11-must-have-been-assisted-by-the-US-government/1/ | 413 |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ---Arthur Schopenhauer My opponent stated:"Seeing as my opponent mostly didn't support his non-mainstream argument about 9/11 with reputable sources, despite my previous post aski... | 0 | KILLUMINATI |
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ---Arthur Schopenhauer My opponent stated:"Seeing as my opponent mostly didn't support his non-mainstream argument about 9/11 with reputable sources, despite my previous ... | Politics | 2 | 9-11-must-have-been-assisted-by-the-US-government/1/ | 414 |
I have acknowledged my opponents arguments and refuted all of them. If I do not agree with them makes me a "troll" so be it. My opponent has repeatedly committed the "red herring" fallacy of focusing on trivial issues that are irrelevant to this debate. As well as the "argument from personal incredulity" fallacy. (1) H... | 0 | KILLUMINATI |
I have acknowledged my opponents arguments and refuted all of them. If I do not agree with them makes me a "troll" so be it. My opponent has repeatedly committed the "red herring" fallacy of focusing on trivial issues that are irrelevant to this debate. As well as the "argument from personal incredulity" fal... | Politics | 3 | 9-11-must-have-been-assisted-by-the-US-government/1/ | 415 |
There will be no winner in this debate simply because no matter what 2,973 innocent Americans lost their lives....... On the day of the attack, details about the alleged perpetrators emerged with a rapidity that is remarkable given the assertions by high ranking administration officials that no one had ever considered ... | 0 | KILLUMINATI |
There will be no winner in this debate simply because no matter what 2,973 innocent Americans lost their lives....... On the day of the attack, details about the alleged perpetrators emerged with a rapidity that is remarkable given the assertions by high ranking administration officials that no one had ever c... | Politics | 4 | 9-11-must-have-been-assisted-by-the-US-government/1/ | 416 |
I would like to thank 'wjmelements' for challenging me to this debate. To prove why a Canadian-style Health System would be more beneficial to The United States, I must begin by pointing out the overly costly health care bills most Americans have to Pay compared to those in other countries. In Canada, for example, an a... | 0 | Plato |
I would like to thank 'wjmelements' for challenging me to this debate.
To prove why a Canadian-style Health System would be more beneficial to The United States, I must begin by pointing out the overly costly health care bills most Americans have to Pay compared to those in other countries. In Canada, for ex... | Politics | 0 | A-Canadian-style-National-Healthcare-system-would-be-a-good-thing-for-the-United-States-to-have./1/ | 596 |
"Round 2...yay!" In round one I talked about the increasingly high medical bills in the US. My opponent says that a universal health care system would force every American to pay a health insurance, but my question is, is: Does my opponent think it is reasonable for the US to be so heavily invested in international aff... | 0 | Plato |
"Round 2...yay!"
In round one I talked about the increasingly high medical bills in the US. My opponent says that a universal health care system would force every American to pay a health insurance, but my question is, is: Does my opponent think it is reasonable for the US to be so heavily invested in intern... | Politics | 1 | A-Canadian-style-National-Healthcare-system-would-be-a-good-thing-for-the-United-States-to-have./1/ | 597 |
Hello friend. I look forward to the debate, I'll start in round 2 after you give your opening points. This is a little bit of a devils advocate position for me. Here is what I believe 1. In as much as it depends on the finished work of Jesus on the cross, I am safe. [1] 2. In as much as it depends on the choice and cal... | 0 | gordonjames |
Hello friend.
I look forward to the debate, I'll start in round 2 after you give your opening points.
This is a little bit of a devils advocate position for me.
Here is what I believe
1. In as much as it depends on the finished work of Jesus on the cross, I am safe. [1]
2. In as much as it dep... | Religion | 0 | A-Christian-Cannot-Lose-His-Salvation/1/ | 611 |
Thanks again to PRO for the great topic. I look forward to a great debate. I want to present a framework for my arguments and then move on to a point by point response to PRO's points from round 2. 1. Lets define some terms. Christian - one who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ [1] Lose - 1a : to bring ... | 0 | gordonjames |
Thanks again to PRO for the great topic. I look forward to a great debate. I want to present a framework for my arguments and then move on to a point by point response to PRO’s points from round 2. 1. Lets define some terms. Christian - one who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ [1]
L... | Religion | 1 | A-Christian-Cannot-Lose-His-Salvation/1/ | 612 |
1. Although PRO did not formally challenge my definition of Christian from Round 2, his question in round 3 shows that he does not accept the definition in Webster's Online Dictionary- Christian - one who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ. [1] PRO's first question essentially asks "was Charles Templeton... | 0 | gordonjames |
1. Although PRO did not formally challenge my definition of Christian from Round 2, his question in round 3 shows that he does not accept the definition in Webster’s Online Dictionary- Christian - one who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ. [1] PRO’s first question essentially asks “was Charles T... | Religion | 2 | A-Christian-Cannot-Lose-His-Salvation/1/ | 613 |
As it is the last round I would like to state my position clearly. 1. We are saved by grace (God's kindness that we don't deserve) Through faith (Complete trust or confidence) This faith is a gift from God. [Eph 2:8] NOTE - Belief in a set of precepts is not enough. James 2:19 (NASB) You believe that God is one. You do... | 0 | gordonjames |
As it is the last round I would like to state my position clearly. 1. We are saved by grace (God’s kindness that we don’t deserve) Through faith (Complete trust or confidence) This faith is a gift from God. [Eph 2:8] NOTE - Belief in a set of precepts is not enough. James 2:19 (NASB) You believe that Go... | Religion | 3 | A-Christian-Cannot-Lose-His-Salvation/1/ | 614 |
Tbh i do believe that there are many Monsters in the Dr. Who series that would definitely fall to the Daleks they are the greatest. But would say the Weeping angels but i have an understanding that there "magic/power" has no effect on the Robot force so the Cybermen would be my choice... | 0 | BenjyBrown |
Tbh i do believe that there are many Monsters in the Dr. Who series that would definitely fall to the Daleks they are the greatest. But would say the Weeping angels but i have an understanding that there "magic/power" has no effect on the Robot force so the Cybermen would be my choice... | Entertainment | 0 | A-Dalek-would-win-in-a-fight/1/ | 678 |
I will be arguing that if in a fight, a dalek would beat any other monster from Dr. Who. First round is for acceptance and to pick your monster that you believe would beat a Dalek in a fight. Circumstances: In order to debate this, we need to set up the background. The dalek and the monster my opponent chooses will be ... | 0 | Merrit |
I will be arguing that if in a fight, a dalek would beat any other monster from Dr. Who. First round is for acceptance and to pick your monster that you believe would beat a Dalek in a fight. Circumstances: In order to debate this, we need to set up the background. The dalek and the monster my opponent chooses... | Entertainment | 0 | A-Dalek-would-win-in-a-fight/1/ | 679 |
I would like to thank Con for accepting my challenge, and wish him luck. Con stated that a Cyberman will defeat a Dalek. I will proceed to present my case. Argument: In the Dr. Who season 2 finale "Doomsday," the Cybermen actually declare war on the Daleks.[1] The four Daleks then proceed to destroy several cybermen. T... | 0 | Merrit |
I would like to thank Con for accepting my challenge, and wish him luck. Con stated that a Cyberman will defeat a Dalek. I will proceed to present my case. Argument: In the Dr. Who season 2 finale "Doomsday," the Cybermen actually declare war on the Daleks.[1] The four Daleks then proceed to destroy several ... | Entertainment | 1 | A-Dalek-would-win-in-a-fight/1/ | 680 |
This is a debate on the Electoral College. I am con and will allow my opponent to start. The resolution is that the Electoral College should remain unchanged | 0 | ournamestoolong |
This is a debate on the Electoral College. I am con and will allow my opponent to start.
The resolution is that the Electoral College should remain unchanged | Politics | 0 | A-Debate-On-The-Electoral-College/1/ | 681 |
I am new to debate.org so I may make some mistakes. First of all I refute that the founding fathers in creating the Electoral College, knew exactly what they were doing. They had no idea how the times would change so they added a means for ammends in the constitution. Second I refute that because of the Electoral Colle... | 0 | ournamestoolong |
I am new to debate.org so I may make some mistakes.
First of all I refute that the founding fathers in creating the Electoral College, knew exactly what they were doing. They had no idea how the times would change so they added a means for ammends in the constitution.
Second I refute that because of the E... | Politics | 1 | A-Debate-On-The-Electoral-College/1/ | 682 |
I must say I was incorrect in stating that Wyoming was more overrepresented in the Electoral College by a margain of 6 to one, I meant 3 to 1. (Wyoming has .2% of the population with .6% of the Electoral Vote). There is still overrepresentation however. And to refute I will explain how 500,000 people can measure up to ... | 0 | ournamestoolong |
I must say I was incorrect in stating that Wyoming was more overrepresented in the Electoral College by a margain of 6 to one, I meant 3 to 1. (Wyoming has .2% of the population with .6% of the Electoral Vote). There is still overrepresentation however. And to refute I will explain how 500,000 people can measure u... | Politics | 2 | A-Debate-On-The-Electoral-College/1/ | 683 |
I would like to thank my opponent for this chance to debate and hope that it is informative. Now by the existence of God I am assuming we are meaning. the supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of worship in monotheistic religions[1] No... | 0 | Strikeeagle84015 |
I would like to thank my opponent for this chance to debate and hope that it is informative. Now by the existence of God I am assuming we are meaning.
the supernatural being conceived as the perfect and omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of worship in monotheistic religio... | Religion | 0 | A-God-is-illogical./1/ | 703 |
There is nothing that has a full explanation in the bible or Torah. Nothing saying how . Where did god come from? It doesn't make any sense. I'm open to explanations. | 0 | Taylor6696 |
There is nothing that has a full explanation in the bible or Torah. Nothing saying how . Where did god come from? It doesn't make any sense. I'm open to explanations. | Religion | 0 | A-God-is-illogical./1/ | 704 |
No definitions mean that I can argue anything. I interpret the resolution to mean that there is a 100% chance that a Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren ticket would defeat a Hillary Clinton / ___ ticket in the primaries. Nothing is ever 100%. It's our laws of nature that reflect every aspect of life and existence. You can't ha... | 0 | TheQuestionMark |
No definitions mean that I can argue anything. I interpret the resolution to mean that there is a 100% chance that a Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren ticket would defeat a Hillary Clinton / ___ ticket in the primaries.
Nothing is ever 100%. It's our laws of nature that reflect every aspect of life and existence. Y... | Politics | 0 | A-Joe-Biden-Elizabeth-Warren-ticket-would-defeat-a-Hillary-Clinton-ticket-in-the-primaries/1/ | 713 |
Your position in this debate is to argue that there is a 100% chance. Mine isn't to say that there is a 0% chance. I am just arguing against the resolution which means that all I have to do is argue that there isn't a 100% chance. Not why there is a 0% chance and I interpret this debate so that the BoP is on Pro since ... | 0 | TheQuestionMark |
Your position in this debate is to argue that there is a 100% chance. Mine isn't to say that there is a 0% chance. I am just arguing against the resolution which means that all I have to do is argue that there isn't a 100% chance. Not why there is a 0% chance and I interpret this debate so that the BoP is on Pro ... | Politics | 1 | A-Joe-Biden-Elizabeth-Warren-ticket-would-defeat-a-Hillary-Clinton-ticket-in-the-primaries/1/ | 714 |
It isn't about how well you have argued your case. You may have provided reasons as why it is likely to happen but those reasons certainly aren't 100% because if they were then this wouldn't be a debatable topic. I don't need to provide an argument all I need to do is prove that your arguments aren't 100% and that mean... | 0 | TheQuestionMark |
It isn't about how well you have argued your case. You may have provided reasons as why it is likely to happen but those reasons certainly aren't 100% because if they were then this wouldn't be a debatable topic. I don't need to provide an argument all I need to do is prove that your arguments aren't 100% and t... | Politics | 2 | A-Joe-Biden-Elizabeth-Warren-ticket-would-defeat-a-Hillary-Clinton-ticket-in-the-primaries/1/ | 715 |
3 rounds, 24 hours between rounds I will argue that a nomination ticket of Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren (As Pres and Vice Pres respectively) would defeat a Hillary Clinton ticket regardless of whoever she picked as her VP for the nomination of the Democratic Party. (Whoever Hillary picks as her VP has to be eligible ... | 0 | imabench |
3 rounds, 24 hours between rounds I will argue that a nomination ticket of Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren (As Pres and Vice Pres respectively) would defeat a Hillary Clinton ticket regardless of whoever she picked as her VP for the nomination of the Democratic Party. (Whoever Hillary picks as her VP has to be e... | Politics | 0 | A-Joe-Biden-Elizabeth-Warren-ticket-would-defeat-a-Hillary-Clinton-ticket-in-the-primaries/1/ | 716 |
"I interpret the resolution to mean that there is a 100% chance that a Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren ticket would defeat a Hillary Clinton / ___ ticket in the primaries." So you want to play that kind of a game? lol, youre out of youre league, kid ;D If my position is to argue that there is a 100% chance of Biden/Warren b... | 0 | imabench |
"I interpret the resolution to mean that there is a 100% chance that a Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren ticket would defeat a Hillary Clinton / ___ ticket in the primaries." So you want to play that kind of a game? lol, youre out of youre league, kid ;D If my position is to argue that there is a 100% chance of Bi... | Politics | 1 | A-Joe-Biden-Elizabeth-Warren-ticket-would-defeat-a-Hillary-Clinton-ticket-in-the-primaries/1/ | 717 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.