Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt_17484	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032375.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:55:56 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "What do u hope?)) \nKind regards,"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "16 Nov 2016, at 7:54 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "hope"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hey Jeffrey!! \nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not? \nvrote: \nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling to NY \noften to see him and can catch up with you.. \nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-) \nHugs,"}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt_17490	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt	Re: Fwd:	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "how much and who pays now?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I have so much more info to tell you on Sunday."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 8:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "decision :easier, harder, more complex?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20 2014 12:38 AM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Both harder and easier. He was there."}]	12
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032263.txt_17492	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032263.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/25/2016 11:05:51 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "I'm interviewing him this afternoon. Anything you think I should ask?"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt_17495	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029578.txt	Re: invitation	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/26/2018 3:26:46 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you call mc iy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:32 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "better?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:06 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "okay....let me revise with I and me in mind before I talk to you.\nCan I call you tomorrow am?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "count how many times you say I or me?"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\n\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar\nthemes to Lolita in that it's about a man whose whole life is stamped forever by his impression of a young\ngirl.\n\nThank you for this help with Serena. I'm so sorry about what happened with WA. I will keep the\n\"bootleg\" episode and hope to release someday. It's so good, and he was so kind to read the poem with me\nand you were so kind to make it happen.\n\nLisa"}]	7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt_17496	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032277.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "pretty black dress. you and ruth ginsburg"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I like that dress....narciso Rodriguez. Where did you see that picture? RBG was my date to state dinner."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 14, 2016, at 7:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "every news channel today . as she apologized for her trump remarks."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yikes"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2016, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "today?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/15/2016 1:38:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "That's a broad question."}]	6
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt_17502	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt	Re: Fwd:	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 4:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "free now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I think I should do it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "lets see how you feel sunday"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Good advice."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I don't want to give up my apartment in NY."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 5:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "no need to. call eric and get a data point"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, September 19 2014 09:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "I will. The rent on the apartment is significantly more than the monthly salary."}]	10
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031018.txt_17505	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031018.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? \| will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (bgC3)"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:35:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt_17516	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033057.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I know -- have been reading it. Good old MW. You still talk to him?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "YuP"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "No doubt he and DT know each other well too. Have to say, he is looking/sounding increasingly unhinged -- are you tempted to take any money off the table in the markets?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "1/3/2018 7:14:36 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "no. but no questions donalds statement is goofy. . early dementia?"}]	5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt_17520	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032349.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "But holy shit you were spot on about trump!"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026184.txt_17522	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026184.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/24/2017 1:38:25 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i got to ny today.. i hope you are having good time, as for my boss he is leaving tuesday i m travelling back to \neurope tomorrow, if not, monday for sure. lets hope that we see you next in kuwait"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table \nin new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff.. i m praying"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 3:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hey shiek i will be in new york saturday for a day trip .. i can drop by to say hello saturday night.. if you \nbussy dont worry, we can meet in kuwait in nov inshalla"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 1:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only you please"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 5:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "enjoy"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 1:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will return to new york wednesday or tues day night. ."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, 10:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well .. safe travel"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 2:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i dont know your plans but of course you are always invited to visit. florida. if i am here"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "that is nice of you .. you keep hosting us .. we need to see you in kuwait \nwill write more once i arrive and see my dear old man sunday"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 22, 2017, 6:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how long will you stay in new york how long will the old man be there?"}]	13
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019412.txt_17525	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019412.txt	FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013	[{"sender": "John Pinette", "recipients": ["Bill Gates"], "timestamp": "8/26/2013 4:17 PM", "subject": "Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "CbgC3 Press Snapshot\n\nHeadline\tJournalist\tOutlet\tFull Text\n[...article summaries and full texts follow...]"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic <boris.nikolic@???>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 26 2013 02:46 PM", "subject": "FW: Press Snapshot: Monday, August 26th, 2013", "body": "See good article re balmer below.\nStill awaiting for call reply"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt_17543	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031742.txt	Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer	[{"sender": "Nicholas Riis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [JEEvacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/11/2017 3:05:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer", "body": "I thought you might be interested in this article:\n\nManafort ratted on Donald Jr.'s meeting with the Russian lawyer\n\nTrump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort alerted authorities to Donald Trump Jr.’s infamous meeting\nwith the Russian lawyer during his father’s presidential campaign.\n\nManafort, who is facing increasing pressure from U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller, divulged Trump Jr.’s\nmeeting with Natalia Veselnitskaya about three months ago, Bloomberg reported.\n\nResponding to a congressional request for information, Manafort revealed the meeting and provided 300\ndocuments, although FBI agents went on to raid his Virginia home two weeks ago.\n\nTrump, responding to news of the raid, said, \"I was very, very surprised to see it....I've always found Paul\nManafort to be a very decent man.”\n\nInvestigators are looking into accusations of money laundering in an attempt to pressure Manafort into\ncooperating with the probe into the Trump campaign’s possible ties to Russia, two sources told Reuters.\n\n“Tf Mueller's team can threaten criminal charges against Manafort, they could use that as leverage to convince\nhim to cooperate,” said one of the sources.\n\nBut the former campaign manager’s spokesman Jason Maloni said, “Paul Manafort is not a cooperating\nwitness.”\n\nMaloni also told Bloomberg that Manafort was enlisting the services of a D.C.-based law firm Miller &\nChevalier,which focuses on tax law, to replace WilmerHale, where Mueller previously worked.\n\nMueller’s investigation has extended to global bank transactions involving Manafort, as well as his business\npartner Rick Gates and son-in-law, Jeffrey Yohai.\n\nYohai, who is under investigation for real estate deals he made with Manafort, turned over documents to\nMueller’s probe more than two months"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt_17548	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028882.txt	writing up proposal	[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2014 1:48:05 PM", "subject": "writing up proposal", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nLarry has told me that you and a friend would like to contribute to my project (hallelujah and thank you a million times, Jeffrey) and that I ought to write up a proposal asking for 500,000. This is wonderful. If this comes to pass, the best way for that money to come, I think, is as a gift to Poetry in America, an initiative at EdLabs at Harvard University. This will give me discretion over its disbursement to HarvardX and WGBH, but this will be absolutely be a Harvard gift that will count as Campaign success and from which Harvard will take some (but not as much)overhead. . So far the best finance people I've met are at EdLabs and they are happy to manage these funds for me. There are other ways to give me this money that leave Harvard out, but my understanding is that your friend would like this to be a Harvard gift.\n\nHere's a draft of what I'd like to do with that money.\n\nI'd like 500,000 to do post-production and distribution of a whole historical period of American poetry (1914-1945 is what I'm thinking--Modernism) and including three episodes of tv.\n\nThe raw materials for that period include interviews with Bill Clinton (including footage not yet used by WGBB), Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen (whose lawyers didn't like our release a while ago, but we're hoping will soften over time), Harrison Ford (still a maybe), Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Al Filreis, Rafael Campo, Susan Howe, kids from Nantucket High School, kids from Brookline High School, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, Ray Dalio, Leon Wieseltier, Richard Dawkins and others; and footage shot in Harlem, Greenwich Village, midtown, Chicago, London (if I have the money to hire a crew there; don't now ), at museums including the Fogg, Harvard Museum of Natural History, Frost's house in Ripton Vermont and more.\n\nThis allows the donor to give to a big Harvard Campaign priority, Teaching and Learning , by supporting Poetry in America, allowing me to produce the crucial segment of the online course with the highest (TV quality) production values and so also supplying higher quality video to WGBH as a way also to cut their costs.\n\nCurrently, HarvardX skimps (on lighting, for instance--see the Bill Clinton interview) and while WGBH ladles money raised by others into everything. I have been pounding away at my friends at WGBH and I know that WGBH producer will work with HarvardX if they can give him footage of the right quality. . That is, we'll use HarvardX as the backlot for WGBH so as to squeeze three episodes out for 250.\n\nThis proposal does not include experiments in schools or the curricular development into courses for teachers that you've seen in other (million dollar_) proposals. But the courses for teachers can't happen before the footage is developed, and these courses will have as their centerpiece the WGBH episodes, and so this funding will make all the rest possible.\n\nI can polish this narrative and or edit it, if there are things you think I have wrong. And I can attach a draft budget based on real Harvard numbers (what my Harvard video editor, producer, media manager cost) as well as a draft WGBH budget I'll now go an negotiate with them. Or we can do that at a second stage."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019406.txt_17549	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019406.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "R. Couri Hay", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 07:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Good morning Jeffery, \nThe Newsweek story is being written without your input as you read this. Lloyd Grove is not writing the story, he made a few calls but he \nwas taken off the project. This is for Newsweek, the magazine that is on the stands, not the website. It's still 1200 to 1500 words. \nAlexandra Wolfe needs to turn in a draft of the story by Monday. I've been subtly guiding Alexandra on your behalf, but would really like \nto formalize this job with your attorneys and then I would really need to give names and numbers of pro Jeffery power brokers for \nAlexandra to call. She has already called Donald Trump, Leon Black, and Les Wexner among others. I've given her Jonathans number, \nplease let me focus on this before its too late to spin this in your direction. I'm in all afternoon my office number is My cell \nis: My email i _________ \nCheers, \nCouri"}, {"sender": "jeffrey epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["R. Couri Hay"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 1, 2011 6:34 pm", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "I was told it was lloyd grove Not true? \nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "R. Couri Hay", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 1, 2011, at 3:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Jeffrey \nI hope I'm not bothering you, but this is information I think you need to know. Tina Brown has assigned a 1200 to 1500 \nword story with pictures about you for Newsweek and the deadline is next Wednesday. My good friend Alexandra Wolfe \nis writing the story; she called me within an hour of getting this assignment. If you hire me I feel confident that I can \npositively affect this feature on your behalf. That does not mean I can control it completely or that they won't reference \npast problems. However, I can assure you that the story will be fair and balanced and that your side will be represented \nintelligently. The story will be about your reemergence in New York post your previous problems. The party you gave for \nPrince Andrew will be a big part of it. I suggest we arrange for interviews with figures who have seen the good things that \nyou have done in business, science, and philanthropy. I'll be home after 7:30 tonight. My home number is \n, or you can call my cell at . I will also be in tomorrow morning. I suggest you act swiftly in this matter. \nAs I told you when we first met this story wont go away and you need to take positive steps to change your image. \nCheers, \nCouri"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt_17551	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030015.txt	Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run	[{"sender": "Peter Attia", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/6/2015 12:41:53 AM", "subject": "Bill Clinton Encouraged Donald Trump to Run", "body": "Funny article\n\nBill Clinton reportedly had an intriguing\nphone call with Donald Trump weeks\nbefore his campaign launch\n\nRudolph W. Giuliani, Donald Trump, and Bill Clinton attend the 2008 Joe Torre Safe\nat Home Foundation Golf Classic at Trump National Golf Club on July 14, 2008, in\nBriarcliff Manor, New York.\n\nFormer President Bill Clinton and real-estate magnate Donald Trump reportedly\nhad a phone conversation in May, only weeks before Trump launched his campaign.\n\nAccording to a new report from The Washington Post, Clinton called Trump in May\nand \"encouraged Trump's efforts\" to become more influential within the GOP,\naccording to four \"Trump allies\" and one Clinton associate \"familiar with the\nexchange.\"\n\nFrom The Washington Post's Robert Costa and Anne Gearan:\n\n\"Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that\nClinton encouraged Trump’s efforts to play a larger role in the Republican Party and\noffered his own views of the political landscape.\"\n\n\"The tone of the call was informal and Clinton never urged Trump to run, the four\npeople said. Rather, they said, Clinton sounded curious about Trump’s moves\ntoward a presidential bid and told Trump that he was striking a chord with\nfrustrated conservatives and was a rising force on the right.\"\n\nHillary Clinton, Bill's wife, is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for\npresident in 2016.\n\nThe Clintons have long had ties with the real-estate magnate. As The Post notes,\nHillary Clinton attended Trump's wedding in 2005, and the reality-television\npersonality donated money to her past Senate campaigns, though he has also"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt_17553	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033043.txt	Re: Got another call from Connelly..	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/27/2017 2:56:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Got another call from Connelly..", "body": "He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was \nasking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea -- I think he \nis doing some Trump-related digging too. \nAnyway, for what its worth... \nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index.html"}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032795.txt_17559	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032795.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/21/2018 10:34:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Quite a day...have a feeling cohen is just beginning to make trouble...where are you?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 21, 2018 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "avenatti civil suit now goes front and center? I guess trump just refuses ? how are you feeling?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025116.txt_17566	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025116.txt	Re: Is Donald still feeling good	[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/28/2017 11:36:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing \nPOTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u. \nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared. \nHow guilty is Donald? \nOf crudity surely \nOf gross ignorance surely \nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely \nOf being over line on family profiting very likely \nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely. \nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear \nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain \nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did. \nDo u agree w foregoing?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by \nfirms unwilling to represent donald."}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "R u still plugged in to the show?"}]	3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026124.txt_17573	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026124.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow \| wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]	7
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029975.txt_17574	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029975.txt	are they still bothering you/ if so what about	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 20 2015 12:14 AM", "subject": "are they still bothering you/ if so what about", "body": "have to hand it to msi I'm sure she deserves the pretty penny she has made for her effort . She has certainly caught the imagination of a public hungry for salacious fiction. To suggest her story is anything other than that, a fiction , is ludicrous. Presidents at dinner on caribean islands. ( clinton was never ever there, easy to confirm ). Sharing a bath with a Prince ( bathtub too small even for one adult ). sex slave being paid thousands of dollars. (while at the exact same time, she was working as a hostess in a burger bar ). being lent out to a prime minister though this prime mininster, never out of sight of his massive security detail also never visited the island, , sex ona small airplane with a famous lawyer while the other passengers must have been all looking out the window during the event . I would have thought that her fabrications were readilly apparent , but now , being asked to deny what the press has termed her\" allegations \" is frankly silly. ok, to play along I deny each and every allegation . The only person she didn't suggest she was forced to have sex with , was Bilbo Baggins. , maybe its in the sequel."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027067.txt_17577	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027067.txt	Re: Trump@War	[{"sender": "Sean Banno", "recipients": ["Steve Bannor", "jeevacation@gmail.com", "Dan Fleuette"], "timestamp": "8/23/2018 8:26:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump@War", "body": "Just sent to you from my ProtonMail"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon <steve@arc-ent.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Aug 23, 2018, at 4:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump@War", "body": "• Can we get Jeffrey latest version of film"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt_17579	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021416.txt	Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment	[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 3:22:48 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Thanks.. I need to get this or something to them quickly. I do feel the need to respond to each of their claims otherwise they would say I don't deny them.. Will include a short preamble. I am going to cc the letter to the Buzzfeed lawyers. I figure I will see whether the buzzfeed story gets any traction at all, or appears before putting on my web site, or tweeting and facebooking it. LMK"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 4:18 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "normaly thier strategy will be to take back your defense to the accusers. and attack each one. if they find you are right they will leave out. and only go with the conflicted. I think you should include short concise cover letter. that you would like published in it entirety. it can refence your attacjment that you will put on your web site? . that goes into more details but in general , these are false. they were either investigated and found lacking or ignored. etc. often they throw out the near publishing date merely to get you to ansser."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "a few more minor changes.. one in first line of second paragraph and one misspelling corrected. .so you can read this one:"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\nI appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While I am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts', as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\nThe items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers falsely and inaccurately to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn't want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The 'female companion' in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\nIt is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,\nRe item 2: the student in question was interested in science communication, and on dozens of occasions came to me or wrote to me with questions. When she asked about advice for after graduation I DID tell her she was different than the other students in her year. The rest of them were interested in going on to graduate school, but she was interested in science communication so I told her that she might want to take a different path."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 9:53 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "First draft:\nIt is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. Needless to say, I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people."}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss:\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail."}]	6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023201.txt_17588	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023201.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Jul 29, 2017, at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "wash this week. what time see apt"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/29/2017 10:28:10 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "This week was totally bananas. Did Andrea Mitchell yesterday to discuss Trump/DOJ. \nApartment appointment is Aug. 2 at 4 pm."}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031177.txt_17603	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031177.txt	Re: Some of those girls I invited to ibiza	[{"sender": "Daniel Siad <danielsiad@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Some of those girls I invited to ibiza", "body": "Hello Jeffrey\nA great friend of mine rented Huge House in Ibiza so invited a lots of girls from Russia all models because they will be doing the shootings down there for several magazines with and great scout named Tigrane He use to scout For Trump but he deosnt work for him any more he coming with 12 girls the first weeck 22th of Jully then 13 others the second weeck from the th of 5 th of august\nHe would like to meet you . I just called Jean Luc to see with him if he can come too that will be great to build this great network for Mc2\nPlease let me know if you can come to spend some time with us\nMy best regards"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Daniel Siad"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 16 2010 04:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Some of those girls I invited to ibiza", "body": "tigran has the best taste next to you.. i am happy to meet him, he had a girl named= in paris, that he had told many bad things about me."}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt_17608	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033110.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tim Zagat"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 4:26:31 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im back in ny after the 15th of sept"}, {"sender": "Tim Zagat", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\n\nI'm sending you a copy of House of Trump, House of Putin in case you haven't already received 10.\n\nWhen are you available to get together?"}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt_17622	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026118.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:14 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ok"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 29, 2017 8:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You can come earlier if you like?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can you call my cell"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 7:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "At wake now. Is AM ok - what is #"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nick , Donald has recently said that I betrayed him 15 years ago , he said there was a lawsuit that he asked me to get involved and help and I refused . Do you have any insight ??"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Friday, June 2, 2017 8:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What's ur #1 will call u"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/3/2017 12:32:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He said that because he wants to discredit or downgrade u with the person he said it to"}]	7
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032836.txt_17624	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032836.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i hope the fasting is easy for you.. see you soon ?"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Want to know what you think.. is there a war coming in our region?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "May 11, 2019, at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "WASHINGTON — Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro is deriding President Donald Trump as foolish for trying to oust him. Kim Jong Un is testing Trump's \"love\" — and his resolve — in the North Korea negotiations. And Iran's leaders are finding new ways to threaten the U.S. and to defy the president's \"maximum pressure\" campaign."}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/11/2019 7:50:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Well that is good to know bcz i got concerned lately Ii"}]	4
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026551.txt_17625	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026551.txt	Fwd: Foreign Policy magazine: The Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets):	[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem Po", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/24/2012 4:28:07 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Foreign Policy magazine: The Ayatollah Under the Bed(sheets):", "body": "http://www. foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/04/23/the ayatollah under _the bedsheets\n\nThe Ayatollah Under the\nBed(sheets)\n\nIn the Islamic Republic of Iran, all politics may not be sexual, but all sex is political.\n\nBY KARIM SADJADPOUR \| MAY/JUNE 2012"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030689.txt_17626	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030689.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great. Im thrilled for you. At the moment he’s coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:08:34 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}]	4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033138.txt_17627	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033138.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid ay"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fethullah-gulen-tayyip-erdogan-foe-us-\nremoval _us_ Sbedf361e4b0510a1f2f16e9"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:17 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So fucking much going on"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid ay"], "timestamp": "11/16/2018 11:52:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, 1 no one asking how the turks got that recording? 2 for you - steve says the republicans also want\ntrump gone. he is now a liability"}]	3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031597.txt_17635	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031597.txt	Re: Trump	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr. ii"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:52:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "when we bet that marla maples was pregnnat , i olst and sent him 10,000 dollars of baby food. the hawain tropic girls all have photos he was the judge"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. iii.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon UY", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die.\n\nLandon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\n\nhttp: //topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon jr thomas/index\n.htm!"}]	4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033296.txt_17645	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033296.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 11:29:02 AM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/donald-trump-conversation-politics-dark-898465"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt_17646	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt	Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg	[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Oct 14, 2014 8:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Oct 14, 2014 8:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "number?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "I'm almost home. Call there in 10?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 12:23:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Obama Favoring Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler to Succeed Holder as Attorney General - Bloomberg", "body": "ok"}]	4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031639.txt_17647	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031639.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Harry Fisch"], "timestamp": "11/9/2016 7:57:45 PM", "subject": null, "body": "We should pay attention, too, to the many men whose lives are about to get significantly worse under Trump. \nImmigrant men. Gay men. Black men at risk of police violence. Men who rely on the Affordable Care Act for \ntheir health insurance. Men who reject traditional masculinity. And even the men and women who voted Trump \nto victory — white people who traded racial resentment for the kind of progressive change that would have \nimproved their lives, too. They surely think feminism has nothing to offer them compared with a promise to \nrestore them to their former position of unearned power; they are about to see how wrong they are. \ndear. I would like to confirm our recent and frankly very perplexing conversation. I had agreed to your \nproposal and that of Arthur Klein, . salary, sharings , responsbilities. etc. Arthur and I were clear and had \nagreed that expenses would be in the form of a stipend. What I think I heard from you is that you no longer can \nstand by the proposed agreement. . If that is true, please confirm to me in writing. I am very surprised , and \nfind it difficult to understand"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt_17651	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033282.txt	Re: (no subject)	[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 11:32:13 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "Trump no chance of president but upending Bushes chance"}, {"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "8/24/2015 7:16:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "trump.,is scaring the market not china"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:49 AM", "subject": "Re: (no subject)", "body": "jeffrey Hi what is the final outcome of this devaluation race is it a breton woods collapsapse and does it take the markets with it thanks Jonathan"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt_17652	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026351.txt	Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story	[{"sender": "Yablon, Alex", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:23 AM", "subject": "fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": "Hi Jeffrey, \nSorry for the phone tag. In case it's easier to respond by email, I have put my questions below. I'm at my desk and should be \nhere until 5, and should be free on my cell phone after 6:30. \nBest, \nAlex\n\n-what is the square footage of your Manhattan home? \n-do you work on a laptop from your dining room, with a large white board for notes and several pairs of reading glasses close at \nhand? Is the dining room windowless? \n-do paparazzi often camp outside your home? \n-did Michael once visit on the same day as a head of state who'd had a police escort? \n-did you tell Michael about a dinner you'd hosted for six tech entrepreneurs who had a combined worth of several hundred \nbillion dollars? When was this meal? \n-Do you believe that there are now more people who possess Roosevelt or Carnegie-levels of wealth, the sort that can rival \ngovernments in influence? That these people face unusual challenges when entering philanthropy due to the sheer size of \ntheir fortunes? That the rich may know the business that made them rich, but not money itself? \n-are you interested in what will happen to the $4.2 trillion possessed by the super-rich in 40-odd years once they have mostly \ndied? \n-Do you believe no superrich people want to give their entire fortunes to their children for fear of how it might affect them? \n-do you advise the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on how to convince other billionaires to join their initiatives? \n-did you volunteer to invest $20 million dollars in Michael's attempt to buy New York Magazine in 2004? \n-do you believe the recent claims about Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew in relation to you are \"ludicrous\" ? \n-When you met Michael for lunch in the West Village, was it the first time in 10 years you'd gone to lunch at a restaurant? \n-Do you have a support staff of young women in their 20s and 30s? Have some of them worked for you for many years, through \ntheir own marriages and as they raise families? Have any of these employees been romantically involved with you? When \nMichael came to your home, had one of these women recently gone on an around the world honeymoon, which you \narranged? Do they often travel with you to your other homes — in New Mexico, Paris, Palm Beach, and in the Caribbean? Do \nyou maintain there is no quid-pro-quo in the relationships with these women? Do these women often socialize with the policy \nmakers and businessmen with whom you often meet? \n-Is your current girlfriend a dental student you met four years ago at a dinner party in New York? \n-Did you date Eva Andersson Dubin? Have you known her for 30 years? Did you pay for her to go to medical school? \n-when you take meetings in your Manhattan dining room, do you take your guests out to a Sabrett hot dog cart? Will the \nwomen who work for you accompany you? \n-Did you invite Michael to sit in on a presentation by a group of quants? Are you looking for a group of quants who have \ndeveloped promising investing algorithms, and do you plan to invest $5 million with each? \n-during U.N. Week in late September, did you host a Sunday night discussion with Bill Gates, Mort Zuckerman, and Peter Thiel? \nWas anyone else in attendance? Were you discussing a possible Gates Foundation donor advised fund? \n-Did you host Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim and several others from Qatar? Do you know if the Sheikh has a home across the street \nfrom you in Manhattan? Did they talk to you about bribery compromising their bid for the World Cup? When was this? Did \nthey bring a gift of chocolate made with pistachios grown on the Sheikh's farm? \n-The morning after the Qataris came over, did you have a 9 AM breakfast with the attorney Reid Weingarten? Did you discuss \nhis defense of CT governor John Rowland, the Qatari visit, and who controls ISIS? Did Weingarten believe Turkey was using ISIS \nas a proxy against the Kurds? \n-After this, did you meet with Brock Pierce to discuss bitcoin? Did Larry Summers join this meeting? \n-That evening, did you host Australian PM Kevin Rudd and Thorborn Jagland for a cocktail party? Did Jagland critique US \nforeign policy? Did you offer to fly him back to Europe on your jet? \n-The following morning, did Ehud Barack come over for breakfast? Did he have an omelet? Did he defend both Putin and \nObama? \n-Was this followed by a senior White House official, whose name you don't want mentioned? \n-Did you then meet with Elisa New to discuss supporting a poetry series and other sources of funding? Did you forcefully \ncritique her proposed budget? \n-After meeting with New, did you meet with the following: Hardeep Purie, Kairat Kelimbetov, Nathan Myhrvold, Martin \nNowak, Richard Axel, Ron Baron, Josh Harris? Have you funded Nowak's program at Harvard with $30 million? \n-did Michael join a lunch at your home with Bill Richardson? \n-do you believe powerful people seek your advice because you're not affiliated with any institution, so you have no ulterior \nmotives when giving them advice? \n-is your Paris home a 10,000 sq ft apartment on Avenue Foch? Does it have a stuffed baby elephant in its living room? Is it \nmeant as a reminder that elephants have 23 copies of tumor suppressor genes? \n-Is the only book on your bedside table Lolita? Are you a fan of Nabokov? \n-Did you tell Michael that he should make a particular $100k investment in early September? What was it? \n-Were you born on 1953 in Coney Island? Was your father a Parks dept employee? Was your mother a housewife? \n-were you the captain of the math team at Lafayette High School? \n-did you study at Cooper Union for two years before beginning classes at NYU's Courant classes? After this, did you teach math \nat Dalton? Was this your first exposure to wealthy people? Did this teach you the rich had just as many problems as the \nworking class, only theirs were caused by too much money rather than too little? \n-Did Punch Sulzberger try to convince you to join the NYT from Dalton? Did you once drive with Sulzberger to his country \nestate in a wood paneled station wagon, while he talked on a phone to his chaffeur? \n-did you meet Ace Greenberg through his children at Dalton? \n-Did he say that given your reputation for intelligence and Jewish heritage, you should be working at Bear Stearns? Was this in \nthe late 70s? \n-Did you soon move to a penthouse at 66th St. and 2nd Avenue? \n-During this time did you regularly attend Studio 54? \n-Have you ever drank or taken drugs? \n-Do you believe that in the 50's, finance was governed by personal relationships, but in the 70's, with the rise of derivatives \ntrading, math began to dominate the field? \n-Did you never want to get married to maintain your freedom? \n-Did you become close to Jimmy Cayne? \n-Did you leave Bear Stearns in 1982? Why? Did you take clients including Marvin Davis and Herb Siegel? \n-Were you then dating Morgan Fairchild? \n-During the 80s, did you frequently go to England where you befriended Robin Reach and attended country shooting parties \nand black tie dinners? \n-Were you mainly interested in meeting smart people rather than amassing a personal fortune? \n-do you think that billionaire-level worth creates worries that millionaires don't face? Does traditional wealth management \nnot work for billionaires? \n-Did you help governments that came after corrupt dictators reclaim stolen assets? Which governments? \n-Did you begin advising and representing wealthy people and families regarding philanthropy during this period? \n-Did you advise Steven Hoffenberg? \n-Did you attend the 1994 Serpentine Gallery gala? Did you socialize with Princess Diana at that event? \n-Did you meet Bill Clinton after he left the White House? Did this change the arc of your life? \n-did you buy your Manhattan home from Les Wexner? \n-Did you meet with Larry Page and Sergey Brin during your 2002 trip to the TED conference? Did they describe a plan to market \nGoogle bras with the o's as cups? Did they believe Google was a good company name because men would be drawn to the oo? \n-Soon after this, did you have an assistant schedule a meeting with Michael for advice about the media as both Vanity Fair and \nNew York Magazine were profiling you? Did you also ask Graydon Carter for advice, expressing doubts about increased public \nprofile, to which Carter said you should have moved to a Queens 2 bedroom if you wanted to avoid publicity? \n-Have you had a daily massage for several years? When you got your daily massage in Palm Beach, did the masseuses often \ncome from parlors your termed \"Jack Shacks\" ? Did they sometimes have \"happy endings\" ? Would there be many different \nmasseuses, recommended by word of mouth? \n-After Palm Beach police started investigating you, did you ask Alan Dershowitz to come to Florida to provide you with legal \nhelp?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, March 31 2015 03:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: fact checking questions for New York Magazine story", "body": ""}]	2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032554.txt_17656	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032554.txt	Kuhn	[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2017 5:25:55 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Disappointed to miss in NY - I’m here until August ~11 if your schedule changes.\nTiming for Breakthrough series? Appreciate for planning purposes.\n\nLatest China -\n\nQ&A on US-China, China risks - http://www.atimes.com/article/us-china-talks-no-trade-war-xi-trump-\nbromance-cools/\n\nBeijing Meeting - http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/Document/1558546/1558546.htm"}]	1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021509.txt_17669	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021509.txt	Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008	[{"sender": "6... e", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008", "body": "LEAD (s) :\nSet Lead 1: .(Info)\nMIAMI\nAT MIAMI, FL\n\nParty Draft is requested to issue AFI\nan advance check in the amount of\nto\n\nmade payable to \"Delaware Secretary of State\" in order b3\naPIL will provide an invoice for these records once BIC\n\nobtained from the Delaware Secretary of State. It should be\nnoted that the receipt of the invoice will take 14 to 20 days."}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt_17672	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt	Re: A few favors...	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Woli"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 1:23:41 PM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "of course ok to both. . ."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:16 AM", "subject": "Re: A few favors...", "body": "So...I'm doing this Trump book for a pile of money and with so far quite a bit of cooperation from them (DT \ncalled me the other day and spent 45 minutes on the phone ranting and raving about the media--alarming). I \nwonder if you could introduce me to Tom Barrack--just to say I'm a journalist who you know and trust, and \nthat I'll follow up with a description of the project that I'm doing. Also, I'd love a reintroduction to Kathy \nRuemmler. I need some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures. \nAre you in NYC soon?"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt_17675	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Ken Starr"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "ken ,would take a stab at the article for the law journal. ? thx"}, {"sender": "Ken Starr", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:24 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Here goes:\n\"Sweetheart deal! \" So goes the critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving our former client -- and now-friend -- Jeffrey Epstein. The critique is profoundly misplaced, supported neither by the law or the facts, nor by the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an unprecedented federal intrusion into a quintessentially local criminal matter in south Florida. His offense to the social order -- involving sex for hire -- was entirely a matter entrusted to laws of the several States, not the federal government. His conduct -- a classic state offense --was being treated exactly that way by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County, but the overweening federal government intruded where it did not belong. And now, over ten years after the fact, the current assault on federal decision-makers at the time, including now-Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (then the United States Attorney in south Florida), condemns the federal authorities for not going far enough.\nThe critics are entirely wrong. Neither the facts nor the law support the misguided criticisms being leveled by journalists and politicians at federal officials from over a decade ago -- including the highest levels of the Justice Department in Washington, D.C..\nHere are the key facts: Jeffrey Epstein, a successful self-made businessman with no prior criminal history whatever, engaged in illegal conduct that amounts to solicitation of prostitution. That was wrong, and it was reasonably viewed as a violation of Florida state law. Although no coercion, violence, alcohol, drugs and the like were involved, the unsavory facts were carefully assessed by experienced state prosecutors who aggressively enforce state criminal laws. No one turned a blind eye to potential offenses to the public order. To the contrary, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office conducted an extensive 15-month investigation, led by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by a state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of prostitution.\nDuring that intense investigation, the state prosecutors extensively gathered and analyzed the evidence, met face-to-face with many of the asserted victims, considered their credibility -- or lack thereof -- and considered the extent of exculpatory evidence. Then, after months of elaborate negotiations, the state prosecutors believed they had reached a reasoned resolution of the matter that vindicated the public interest -- a resolution entirely consistent with that of cases involving other similarly-situated defendants.\nThen, in came the feds. The United States Attorney's Office tried, to no avail, to fit Mr. Epstein's situation into its vision of what it viewed as a commercial trafficking ring targeting minors. This was anything but. At long last, the federal authorities acknowledged that stark reality and grudgingly agreed to defer prosecution to the state. But there was a huge catch. In the face of our arguments sharply condemning their overreach, the federal prosecutors insisted on many unorthodox requirements that tugged at fundamental values of due process. For example, the agreement required Mr. Epstein to pay an undisclosed list of asserted victims $150,000 each. Even more, the feds insisted that Jeffrey pay for an attorney to represent such unidentified victims if any chose to filed civil litigation against him. When asked what possible legal authority supported this extravagant exercise of national power, the feds lamely cited a wildly inapposite case from Alaska involving cocaine and forced on-the-street prostitution. Apples and oranges.\nUnder the federally-forced deal, Jeffrey was sentenced to jail. That would not have been the case under the agreed-upon state disposition of this non-violent, consensual commercial arrangement. Jeffrey complied, served that sentence, and in the process was treated exactly the same as other state-incarcerated individuals. His conduct was exemplary, and so characterized by the state custodial authorities. He continued his work, including his many philanthropic efforts.\nOur friend Jeffrey Epstein has paid his debt to society. He has also paid out millions of dollars to the asserted victims and their highly-creative lawyers. For over ten years, he has lived an exemplary life, including carrying on his wide-ranging philanthropies. Those of us who represented him in the Florida proceedings -- for customary professional fees -- now count him as a trusted friend.\nOur nation faces vitally important challenges, many involving the treatment of women and basic human dignity. Voices are rightly being raised speaking truth to power, especially about women in the workplace. But Jeffrey, an exemplary employer, has long since been called to account by the criminal justice system for his misdeeds of yesteryear. In the spirit of the bedrock American belief in second chances, that unhappy chapter in Jeffrey's otherwise-magnificent life should be allowed to close once and for all."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thoughts."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 15, 2018, at 12:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Seems very good. Is there reason or opportunity here to evoke JE's Clinton connection? He had been publicly connected to the former President and became a proxy for the considerable anger at high levels of the Federal government that still surrounded Clinton. Likewise now, one reason to revive the story is that it is a way to tar a Trump administration official, who, in the normal course of his duties, happened to deal with the case."}, {"sender": "Matthew Hiltzik", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/15/2018 6:40:52 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Darren Indyke\nAlso think there should be a line in there somewhere which clearly confirms that JE understands and recognizes\nthat he did something wrong"}]	5