cat(rep('=', 80), '\n\n', 'OUTPUT FROM: shorts/07_postprocessing_exploration.R', '\n\n', sep = '' ) ## Extremizing Sequences and Minimum Wage Opinions ## Data collected May 2024 via MTurk/CloudResearch ## Analysis for the Extremizing Sequences Experiment ## Preamble ---------------------------- library(tidyverse) library(janitor) library(lubridate) library(stargazer) library(broom) library(psych) w12 <- read_csv("../results/intermediate data/shorts/qualtrics_w12_clean_ytrecs_may2024.csv") ## SAMPLE SIZE AND CRONBACH'S ALPHA ------------------ # SAMPLE SIZE w12 %>% filter(!is.na(treatment_arm)) %>% count() %>% as.integer() %>% format(big.mark = ',') # CRONBACH'S ALPHA ON POLICY INDEX w12 %>% select(minwage15_pre, rtwa_v1_pre, rtwa_v2_pre, mw_support_pre, minwage_howhigh_pre, mw_help_pre_1, mw_restrict_pre_1, minwage_text_r_pre ) %>% alpha() %>% `[[`('total') %>% `[`('raw_alpha') %>% as.numeric() %>% format(digits = 2, nsmall = 2) %>% paste0('%') %>% # trailing comment char to prevent latex import issue writeLines('../results/alpha_study4.txt') # FACTOR ANALYSIS WITH VARIMAX ROTATION (PRE) pca2 <- psych::principal(select(w12, minwage15_pre, rtwa_v1_pre, rtwa_v2_pre, mw_support_pre, minwage_howhigh_pre, mw_help_pre_1, mw_restrict_pre_1, minwage_text_r_pre), rotate="varimax", nfactors=1 ) pc2 <- pca2$Vaccounted[2] writeLines(as.character(round(pc2, 2)),con = "../results/outcomes_pc2_study4_pre.tex",sep = "%") # FACTOR ANALYSIS WITH VARIMAX ROTATION (POST) pca2 <- psych::principal( select(w12, minwage15, rtwa_v1, rtwa_v2, mw_support, minwage_howhigh, mw_help_1, mw_restrict_1, minwage_text_r), rotate="varimax", nfactors=1 ) pc2 <- pca2$Vaccounted[2] writeLines(as.character(round(pc2, 2)),con = "../results/outcomes_pc2_study4_post.tex",sep = "%") ## BASIC DESCRIPTIVE FIGURES ------------------ ## TIME SPENT DURING THE SURVEY (surveytime_plot <- ggplot(w12) + geom_histogram(aes(x=survey_time,y=..density../sum(..density..))) + scale_x_continuous("Overall survey time taken (minutes)", breaks=seq(0,100,10), limits=c(-1,100) ) + scale_y_continuous("Density") + geom_vline(xintercept = mean(w12$survey_time,na.rm=T),lty=3,col="red") + annotate(x=mean(w12$survey_time+1,na.rm=T),y=0.13,geom = "text", label=paste0("Average: ",round(mean(w12$survey_time,na.rm=T),0)," minutes"),hjust=0) + geom_vline(xintercept = median(w12$survey_time,na.rm=T),lty=2,col="red") + annotate(x=median(w12$survey_time+1,na.rm=T),y=0.16,geom = "text", label=paste0("Median: ",round(median(w12$survey_time,na.rm=T),0)," minutes"),hjust=0) + theme_minimal() ) ## TIME SPENT ON THE INTERFACE (ytrecstime_plot <- ggplot(w12) + geom_histogram(aes(x=interface_duration/60,y=..density../sum(..density..))) + scale_x_continuous("Interface Time Taken (minutes)", breaks=seq(0,80,10), limits=c(-1,70)) + scale_y_continuous("Density") + geom_vline(xintercept = mean(w12$interface_duration/60,na.rm=T),lty=3,col="red") + annotate(x=mean(w12$interface_duration/60+1,na.rm=T),y=0.1,geom = "text", label=paste0("Average: ",round(mean(w12$interface_duration/60,na.rm=T),0)," minutes"),hjust=0) + geom_vline(xintercept = median(w12$interface_duration/60,na.rm=T),lty=2,col="red") + annotate(x=median(w12$interface_duration/60+1,na.rm=T),y=0.13,geom = "text", label=paste0("Median: ",round(median(w12$interface_duration/60,na.rm=T),0)," minutes"),hjust=0) + theme_minimal() ) ## PRE OPINIONS OVERALL (hist_mwindex <- ggplot(w12) + geom_histogram(aes(x=mw_index_pre)) + scale_x_continuous("Minimum Wage Opinions Index, Pre") + scale_y_continuous("Count",limits=c(-5,200)) + annotate(x = 0.92,y=-3,geom = "text",label="More conservative\nopinions",col="red",hjust=1,size=3,lineheight=0.75) + annotate(x = 0.98,xend=1,y=-3,yend=-3,geom = "segment",arrow=arrow(type = "closed",angle = 20),col="red") + annotate(x = 0.08,y=-3,geom = "text",label="More liberal\nopinions",col="blue",hjust=0,size=3,lineheight=0.75) + annotate(x = 0.02,xend=0.00,y=-3,yend=-3,geom = "segment",arrow=arrow(type = "closed",angle = 20),col="blue") + theme_minimal() ) ## PRE OPINION BY TERCILE (hist_mwindex_thirds <- ggplot(w12,aes(x=mw_index_pre)) + geom_histogram(data=filter(w12,thirds==1),aes(x=mw_index_pre),fill="blue") + geom_histogram(data=filter(w12,thirds==2),aes(x=mw_index_pre),fill="grey") + geom_histogram(data=filter(w12,thirds==3),aes(x=mw_index_pre),fill="red") + scale_x_continuous("Minimum Wage Opinions Index, Pre") + scale_y_continuous("Count",limits=c(-5,200)) + annotate(x = 0.92,y=-5,geom = "text",label="More conservative\nopinions",col="red",hjust=1,size=3,lineheight=0.75) + annotate(x = 0.98,xend=1,y=-5,yend=-5,geom = "segment",arrow=arrow(type = "closed",angle = 20),col="red") + annotate(x = 0.08,y=-5,geom = "text",label="More liberal\nopinions",col="blue",hjust=0,size=3,lineheight=0.75) + annotate(x = 0.02,xend=0.00,y=-5,yend=-5,geom = "segment",arrow=arrow(type = "closed",angle = 20),col="blue") + theme_minimal() ) (hist_mwindex_thirds_nocolor <- ggplot(w12,aes(x=mw_index_pre)) + geom_histogram(data=filter(w12,thirds==1),aes(x=mw_index_pre),fill="grey") + geom_histogram(data=filter(w12,thirds==2),aes(x=mw_index_pre),fill="grey") + geom_histogram(data=filter(w12,thirds==3),aes(x=mw_index_pre),fill="grey") + scale_x_continuous("Minimum Wage Opinions Index, W1") + scale_y_continuous("Count",limits=c(-5,200)) + annotate(x = 0.92,y=-5,geom = "text",label="More conservative\nopinions",col="red",hjust=1,size=3,lineheight=0.75) + annotate(x = 0.98,xend=1,y=-5,yend=-5,geom = "segment",arrow=arrow(type = "closed",angle = 20),col="red") + annotate(x = 0.08,y=-5,geom = "text",label="More liberal\nopinions",col="blue",hjust=0,size=3,lineheight=0.75) + annotate(x = 0.02,xend=0.00,y=-5,yend=-5,geom = "segment",arrow=arrow(type = "closed",angle = 20),col="blue") + theme_minimal() ) # SUMMARY PRE OPINIONS FOR EACH CONDITION groupsumm_bythirds <- w12 %>% group_by(treatment_arm,thirds) %>% summarize(n = n()) %>% na.omit() %>% mutate(treatment_arm = factor(treatment_arm,levels=c("pc", "pi","ac" , "ai"), labels = c("Liberal\nconstant", "Liberal\nincreasing", "Conservative\nconstant", "Conservative\nincreasing"),ordered=T), thirds = factor(thirds,levels=c(1,2,3),ordered=T)) groupsumm <- w12 %>% group_by(treatment_arm) %>% summarize( minwage15 = mean(minwage15_pre,na.rm=T), rtwa_v1 = mean(rtwa_v1_pre, na.rm = T), rtwa_v2 = mean(rtwa_v2_pre, na.rm = T), mw_support = mean(mw_support_pre,na.rm = T), minwage_howhigh = mean(minwage_howhigh_pre, na.rm = T), mw_help_1 = mean(mw_help_pre_1, na.rm = T), mw_restrict_1 = mean(mw_restrict_pre_1,na.rm = T), minwage_text_r = mean(minwage_text_r_pre,na.rm = T), mw_index_pre = mean(mw_index_pre,na.rm = T), n = n()) %>% na.omit() %>% mutate(treatment_arm = factor(treatment_arm,levels=c("pc", "pi", "ac" , "ai"), labels = c("Liberal\nconstant", "Liberal\nincreasing", "Conservative\nconstant", "Conservative\nincreasing"),ordered=T)) # N IN EACH TREATMENT CONDITION (plot_hist_n <- ggplot(groupsumm) + geom_bar(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=n),stat="identity") + geom_text(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=n+15,label=n),stat="identity") + scale_x_discrete("Treatment Condition") + scale_y_continuous("N") + theme_minimal() ) ## N IN EACH TREATMENT CONDITION COLORED BY THIRDS (plot_hist_n_bythirds <- ggplot(groupsumm_bythirds) + geom_bar(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=n,fill=thirds),stat="identity") + geom_text(data=groupsumm,aes(x=treatment_arm,y=n+15,label=n),stat="identity") + scale_x_discrete("Treatment Condition") + scale_y_continuous("N") + scale_fill_manual("Tercile of\nPre-Opinion",breaks=c(1,2,3),values=c("blue","grey","red")) + theme_minimal() ) ## AVERAGE PRE-OPINION ON MINIMUM WAGE INDEX (plot_hist_mwindex <- ggplot(groupsumm) + geom_bar(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=mw_index_pre),stat="identity") + scale_x_discrete("Treatment Condition") + scale_y_continuous("Average Pre-Opinion\non Minimum Wage Index", limits=c(0,0.6), breaks = seq(0,0.6,0.2), labels=c("\n0.0\nMore\nliberal\nopinions","0.2","0.4","More\nconservative\nopinions\n0.6\n\n\n")) + theme_minimal() + theme(plot.margin = unit(c(1.75,0.5,0.5,0.5),"lines")) ) # SUMMARY FOR EACH CONDITION groupsumm <- w12 %>% group_by(treatment_arm) %>% summarize( minwage15 = mean(minwage15,na.rm=T), rtwa_v1 = mean(rtwa_v1, na.rm = T), rtwa_v2 = mean(rtwa_v2, na.rm = T), mw_support = mean(mw_support,na.rm = T), minwage_howhigh = mean(minwage_howhigh, na.rm = T), mw_help_1 = mean(mw_help_1, na.rm = T), mw_restrict_1 = mean(mw_restrict_1,na.rm = T), minwage_text_r = mean(minwage_text_r,na.rm = T), mw_index = mean(mw_index,na.rm = T), n = n()) %>% na.omit() %>% mutate(treatment_arm = factor(treatment_arm,levels=c("pc", "pi", "ac" , "ai"), labels = c("Liberal\nconstant", "Liberal\nincreasing", "Conservative\nconstant", "Conservative\nincreasing"), ordered=T)) (plot_hist_mwindex <- ggplot(groupsumm) + geom_bar(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=mw_index),stat="identity") + scale_x_discrete("Treatment Condition") + scale_y_continuous("Average Post-Opinion\non Minimum Wage Index", limits=c(0,0.6), breaks = seq(0,0.6,0.2), labels=c("\n0.0\nMore\nliberal\nopinions","0.2","0.4","More\nconservative\nopinions\n0.6\n\n\n")) + theme_minimal() + theme(plot.margin = unit(c(1.75,0.5,0.5,0.5),"lines")) ) ## CHANGES IN OPINION BETWEEN WAVES treatsumm <- w12 %>% group_by(treatment_arm) %>% summarize(minwage15 = mean(minwage15-minwage15_pre,na.rm=T), rtwa_v1 = mean(rtwa_v1-rtwa_v1_pre, na.rm = T), rtwa_v2 = mean(rtwa_v2-rtwa_v2_pre, na.rm = T), mw_support = mean(mw_support-mw_support_pre,na.rm = T), minwage_howhigh = mean(minwage_howhigh-minwage_howhigh_pre, na.rm = T), mw_help_1 = mean(mw_help_1-mw_help_pre_1, na.rm = T), mw_restrict_1 = mean(mw_restrict_1-mw_restrict_pre_1,na.rm = T), minwage_text_r = mean(minwage_text_r-minwage_text_r_pre,na.rm = T), mw_index_change = mean(mw_index - mw_index_pre,na.rm = T), n = n()) %>% na.omit() %>% mutate(treatment_arm = factor(treatment_arm,levels=c("pc", "pi", "ac" , "ai"), labels = c("Liberal\nconstant", "Liberal\nincreasing", "Conservative\nconstant", "Conservative\nincreasing"), ordered=T)) w1w2_corrplot <- corrplot::corrplot(cor(select(w12, minwage15_pre, rtwa_v1_pre, rtwa_v2_pre, mw_support_pre, minwage_howhigh_pre, mw_help_pre_1, mw_restrict_pre_1, minwage_text_r_pre, minwage15, rtwa_v1, rtwa_v2, mw_support, minwage_howhigh, mw_help_1, mw_restrict_1, minwage_text_r), use = "complete.obs")[1:8,9:16],method = "shade") dev.off() ## AVERAGE OPINION CHANGE POST-PRE ON MIN WAGE POLICY INDEX (plot_hist_mwindex <- ggplot(treatsumm) + geom_bar(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=mw_index_change),stat="identity") + scale_x_discrete("Treatment Condition") + scale_y_continuous("Average Opinion Change Post-Pre\non Min. Wage Policy Index", limits=c(-0.2,0.2), breaks = seq(-0.2,0.2,0.1), labels=c("\n\n\n-0.2\nLiberal\nopinion\nchange","-0.1","0.00","0.1","Conservative\nopinion\nchange\n0.2\n\n\n") ) + theme_minimal() + theme(plot.margin = unit(c(1.75,0.5,0.5,0.5),"lines")) ) ### CHANGE FOR MODERATES treatsumm_thirds <- w12 %>% group_by(thirds, treatment_arm) %>% summarize(minwage15 = mean(minwage15-minwage15_pre,na.rm=T), rtwa_v1 = mean(rtwa_v1-rtwa_v1_pre, na.rm = T), rtwa_v2 = mean(rtwa_v2-rtwa_v2_pre, na.rm = T), mw_support = mean(mw_support-mw_support_pre,na.rm = T), minwage_howhigh = mean(minwage_howhigh-minwage_howhigh_pre, na.rm = T), mw_help_1 = mean(mw_help_1-mw_help_pre_1, na.rm = T), mw_restrict_1 = mean(mw_restrict_1-mw_restrict_pre_1,na.rm = T), minwage_text_r = mean(minwage_text_r-minwage_text_r_pre,na.rm = T), mw_index_change = mean(mw_index - mw_index_pre,na.rm = T), n = n()) %>% na.omit() %>% mutate(treatment_arm = factor(treatment_arm,levels=c("pc", "pi", "ac" , "ai"), labels = c("Liberal\nconstant", "Liberal\nincreasing", "Conservative\nconstant", "Conservative\nincreasing"), ordered=T)) (plot_hist_mwindex_thirds <- ggplot(treatsumm_thirds %>% filter(thirds == 2)) + geom_bar(aes(x=treatment_arm,y=mw_index_change),stat="identity") + scale_x_discrete("Treatment Condition") + scale_y_continuous("Average Opinion Change Post-Pre\non Min. Wage Policy Index\nfor Moderates", limits=c(-0.2,0.2), breaks = seq(-0.2,0.2,0.1), labels=c("\n\n\n-0.2\nLiberal\nopinion\nchange","-0.1","0.00","0.1","Conservative\nopinion\nchange\n0.2\n\n\n") ) + theme_minimal() + theme(plot.margin = unit(c(1.75,0.5,0.5,0.5),"lines")) ) ## BASE CONTROL FIGURES -------------------------------------- ## ## RUN 04_analysis_multipletesting_basecontrol_may2024.R, THEN READ IN ADJUSTED P-VALUES ## coefs_basecontrol <- read_csv("../results/padj_basecontrol_pretty_ytrecs_may2024.csv") outcome_labels <- data.frame(outcome = c("Minimum wage\nindex"), specificoutcome = c("mw_index"), family = c(rep("Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)",1))) #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among LIBERAL participants #### coefs_third1_basecontrol <- coefs_basecontrol %>% filter(layer2_treatmentcontrast == "attitude.pro:recsys.pi - attitude.pro:recsys.pc" & layer3_specificoutcome != "overall") coefs_third1_basecontrol$outcome = outcome_labels$outcome[match(coefs_third1_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third1_basecontrol$family = outcome_labels$family[match(coefs_third1_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome,outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third1_basecontrol <- mutate(coefs_third1_basecontrol, family = factor(family, levels = c("Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)" ),ordered = T)) coefs_third1_basecontrol <- coefs_third1_basecontrol %>% mutate(ci_lo_99 = est + qnorm(0.001)*se, ci_hi_99 = est + qnorm(0.995)*se, ci_lo_95 = est + qnorm(0.025)*se, ci_hi_95 = est + qnorm(0.975)*se, ci_lo_90 = est + qnorm(0.05)*se, ci_hi_90 = est + qnorm(0.95)*se, plotorder = nrow(coefs_third1_basecontrol):1 ) writeLines(as.character(round(100*abs(filter(coefs_third1_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="pro_fraction_chosen")$est),0)), con = "../results/beta_recsys_pro_fraction_chosen_third1.tex",sep="%") #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among LIBERAL participants #### (coefplot_third1_basecontrol <- ggplot(filter(coefs_third1_basecontrol),aes(y=plotorder)) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_95,xmax=ci_hi_95),height=0,lwd=0.5) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_90,xmax=ci_hi_90),height=0,lwd=1) + geom_point(aes(x=est),size=1.5) + geom_vline(xintercept = 0,lty=2) + facet_wrap(~family,ncol=1,scales="free") + scale_y_continuous("", breaks = coefs_third1_basecontrol$plotorder, labels = coefs_third1_basecontrol$outcome) + scale_x_continuous("Increasing Liberal seed vs. Constant Liberal seed assignment \namong Liberal participants \n(95% and 90% CIs)") + coord_cartesian(xlim=c(-0.2,0.2)) + theme_bw(base_family = "sans") + theme(strip.background = element_rect(fill="white")) ) #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among CONSERVATIVE participants #### coefs_third3_basecontrol <- coefs_basecontrol %>% filter(layer2_treatmentcontrast == "attitude.anti:recsys.ai - attitude.anti:recsys.ac" & layer3_specificoutcome != "overall") coefs_third3_basecontrol$outcome = outcome_labels$outcome[match(coefs_third3_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third3_basecontrol$family = outcome_labels$family[match(coefs_third3_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third3_basecontrol <- mutate(coefs_third3_basecontrol, family = factor(family,levels = c("Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)" ),ordered = T)) coefs_third3_basecontrol <- coefs_third3_basecontrol %>% mutate(ci_lo_99 = est + qnorm(0.001)*se, ci_hi_99 = est + qnorm(0.995)*se, ci_lo_95 = est + qnorm(0.025)*se, ci_hi_95 = est + qnorm(0.975)*se, ci_lo_90 = est + qnorm(0.05)*se, ci_hi_90 = est + qnorm(0.95)*se, plotorder = nrow(coefs_third3_basecontrol):1 ) writeLines(as.character(round(100*abs(filter(coefs_third3_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="pro_fraction_chosen")$est),0)),con = "../results/beta_recsys_pro_fraction_chosen_third3.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(round(abs(filter(coefs_third3_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="mw_index_w2")$est),2)),con = "../results/beta_recsys_mwindex_third3.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(round(abs(filter(coefs_third3_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="mw_index_w2")$ci_hi_95),2)),con = "../results/cihi_recsys_mwindex_third3.tex",sep="%") #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among CONSERVATIVE participants #### (coefplot_third3_basecontrol <- ggplot(filter(coefs_third3_basecontrol),aes(y=plotorder)) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_95,xmax=ci_hi_95),height=0,lwd=0.5) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_90,xmax=ci_hi_90),height=0,lwd=1) + geom_point(aes(x=est),size=1.5) + geom_vline(xintercept = 0,lty=2) + facet_wrap(~family,ncol=1,scales="free") + scale_y_continuous("", breaks = coefs_third3_basecontrol$plotorder,labels = coefs_third3_basecontrol$outcome) + scale_x_continuous("Increasing Conservative vs. Constant Conservative \n seed among Conservative participants \n(95% and 90% CIs)") + coord_cartesian(xlim=c(-0.2,0.2)) + theme_bw(base_family = "sans") + theme(strip.background = element_rect(fill="white")) ) #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to a LIBERAL sequence #### coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol <- coefs_basecontrol %>% filter(layer2_treatmentcontrast == "attitude.neutral:recsys.pi - attitude.neutral:recsys.pc" & layer3_specificoutcome != "overall") coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol$outcome = outcome_labels$outcome[match(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol$family = outcome_labels$family[match(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol <- mutate(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol, family = factor(family,levels = c("Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)" ),ordered = T)) coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol <- coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol %>% mutate(ci_lo_99 = est + qnorm(0.001)*se, ci_hi_99 = est + qnorm(0.995)*se, ci_lo_95 = est + qnorm(0.025)*se, ci_hi_95 = est + qnorm(0.975)*se, ci_lo_90 = est + qnorm(0.05)*se, ci_hi_90 = est + qnorm(0.95)*se, plotorder = nrow(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol):1 ) writeLines(as.character(round(100*abs(filter(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="pro_fraction_chosen")$est),0)),con = "../results/beta_recsys_pro_fraction_chosen_third2_proseed.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(abs(round(filter(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="platform_duration")$est,2))),con = "../results/beta_recsys_duration_third2_proseed.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(abs(round(filter(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="platform_duration")$est*60,1))),con = "../results/beta_minutes_recsys_duration_third2_proseed.tex",sep="%") #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to a LIBERAL sequence #### (coefplot_third2_pro_basecontrol <- ggplot(filter(coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol),aes(y=plotorder)) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_95,xmax=ci_hi_95),height=0,lwd=0.5) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_90,xmax=ci_hi_90),height=0,lwd=1) + geom_point(aes(x=est),size=1.5) + geom_vline(xintercept = 0,lty=2) + facet_wrap(~family,ncol=1,scales="free") + scale_y_continuous("", breaks = coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol$plotorder,labels = coefs_third2_pro_basecontrol$outcome) + scale_x_continuous("Increasing Liberal vs. Constant Liberal seed among Moderates \n(95% and 90% CIs)") + coord_cartesian(xlim=c(-0.2,0.2)) + theme_bw(base_family = "sans") + theme(strip.background = element_rect(fill="white")) ) ggsave(coefplot_third2_pro_basecontrol, filename = "../results/coefplot_third2_pro_basecontrol.png",width=5,height=8) #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to a CONSERVATIVE sequence #### coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol <- coefs_basecontrol %>% filter(layer2_treatmentcontrast == "attitude.neutral:recsys.ai - attitude.neutral:recsys.ac" & layer3_specificoutcome != "overall") coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol$outcome = outcome_labels$outcome[match(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol$family = outcome_labels$family[match(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol <- mutate(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol, family = factor(family,levels = c("Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)" ),ordered = T)) coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol <- coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol %>% mutate(ci_lo_99 = est + qnorm(0.001)*se, ci_hi_99 = est + qnorm(0.995)*se, ci_lo_95 = est + qnorm(0.025)*se, ci_hi_95 = est + qnorm(0.975)*se, ci_lo_90 = est + qnorm(0.05)*se, ci_hi_90 = est + qnorm(0.95)*se, plotorder = nrow(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol):1 ) writeLines(as.character(round(100*abs(filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="pro_fraction_chosen")$est),0)),con = "../results/beta_recsys_pro_fraction_chosen_third2_antiseed.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(round(filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol,layer1_hypothesisfamily=="gunpolicy")$est,2)),con = "../results/beta_recsys_mwindex_third2_antiseed.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(round(filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol,layer1_hypothesisfamily=="gunpolicy")$est + qnorm(0.975)*filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol,layer1_hypothesisfamily=="gunpolicy")$se,2)),con = "../results/cihi_recsys_mwindex_third2_antiseed.tex",sep="%") writeLines(as.character(round(filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol,layer1_hypothesisfamily=="gunpolicy")$est + qnorm(0.025)*filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol,layer1_hypothesisfamily=="gunpolicy")$se,2)),con = "../results/cilo_recsys_mwindex_third2_antiseed.tex",sep="%") #### THE effect of INCREASING vs. CONSTANT assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to a CONSERVATIVE sequence #### (coefplot_third2_anti_basecontrol <- ggplot(filter(coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol),aes(y=plotorder)) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_95,xmax=ci_hi_95),height=0,lwd=0.5) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_90,xmax=ci_hi_90),height=0,lwd=1) + geom_point(aes(x=est),size=1.5) + geom_vline(xintercept = 0,lty=2) + facet_wrap(~family,ncol=1,scales="free") + scale_y_continuous("", breaks = coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol$plotorder,labels = coefs_third2_anti_basecontrol$outcome) + scale_x_continuous("Increasing Conservative vs. Constant Conservative seed \namong Moderates \n(95% and 90% CIs)") + coord_cartesian(xlim=c(-0.2,0.2)) + theme_bw(base_family = "sans") + theme(strip.background = element_rect(fill="white")) ) ggsave(coefplot_third2_anti_basecontrol, filename = "../results/coefplot_third2_anti_basecontrol.png",width=5,height=8) #### THE effect of CONSERVATIVE vs. LIBERAL assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to an INCREASING sequence #### coefs_third2_31_basecontrol <- coefs_basecontrol %>% filter(layer2_treatmentcontrast == "attitude.neutral:recsys.ai - attitude.neutral:recsys.pi" & layer3_specificoutcome != "overall") coefs_third2_31_basecontrol$outcome = outcome_labels$outcome[match(coefs_third2_31_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_31_basecontrol$family = outcome_labels$family[match(coefs_third2_31_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_31_basecontrol <- mutate(coefs_third2_31_basecontrol, family = factor(family,levels = c("Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)" ),ordered = T)) coefs_third2_31_basecontrol <- coefs_third2_31_basecontrol %>% mutate(ci_lo_99 = est + qnorm(0.001)*se, ci_hi_99 = est + qnorm(0.995)*se, ci_lo_95 = est + qnorm(0.025)*se, ci_hi_95 = est + qnorm(0.975)*se, ci_lo_90 = est + qnorm(0.05)*se, ci_hi_90 = est + qnorm(0.95)*se, plotorder = nrow(coefs_third2_31_basecontrol):1 ) writeLines(as.character(round(100*abs(filter(coefs_third2_31_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="pro_fraction_chosen")$est),0)),con = "../results/beta_seed_pro_fraction_chosen_third2_31.tex",sep="%") #### THE effect of CONSERVATIVE vs. LIBERAL assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to an INCREASING sequence #### (coefplot_third2_31_basecontrol <- ggplot(filter(coefs_third2_31_basecontrol),aes(y=plotorder)) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_95,xmax=ci_hi_95),height=0,lwd=0.5) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_90,xmax=ci_hi_90),height=0,lwd=1) + geom_point(aes(x=est),size=1.5) + geom_vline(xintercept = 0,lty=2) + facet_wrap(~family,ncol=1,scales="free") + scale_y_continuous("", breaks = coefs_third2_31_basecontrol$plotorder,labels = coefs_third2_31_basecontrol$outcome) + scale_x_continuous("Conservative vs. Liberal seed assignment among Moderates\n with Increasing assignment\n(95% and 90% CIs)") + coord_cartesian(xlim=c(-0.2,0.2)) + theme_bw(base_family = "sans") + theme(strip.background = element_rect(fill="white")) ) ggsave(coefplot_third2_31_basecontrol, filename = "../results/coefplot_third2_31_basecontrol.png",width=5,height=8) #### THE effect of CONSERVATIVE vs. LIBERAL assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to an CONSTANT sequence #### coefs_third2_22_basecontrol <- coefs_basecontrol %>% filter(layer2_treatmentcontrast == "attitude.neutral:recsys.ac - attitude.neutral:recsys.pc" & layer3_specificoutcome != "overall") coefs_third2_22_basecontrol$outcome = outcome_labels$outcome[match(coefs_third2_22_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_22_basecontrol$family = outcome_labels$family[match(coefs_third2_22_basecontrol$layer3_specificoutcome, outcome_labels$specificoutcome)] coefs_third2_22_basecontrol <- mutate(coefs_third2_22_basecontrol, family = factor(family,levels = c(#"Platform Interaction", "Policy Attitudes\n(unit scale, + is more conservative)" #"Media Trust\n(unit scale, + is more trusting)", #"Affective Polarization\n(unit scale, + is greater polarization)" ),ordered = T)) #### THE effect of CONSERVATIVE vs. LIBERAL assignment among MODERATE participants assigned to an CONSTANT sequence #### coefs_third2_22_basecontrol <- coefs_third2_22_basecontrol %>% mutate(ci_lo_99 = est + qnorm(0.001)*se, ci_hi_99 = est + qnorm(0.995)*se, ci_lo_95 = est + qnorm(0.025)*se, ci_hi_95 = est + qnorm(0.975)*se, ci_lo_90 = est + qnorm(0.05)*se, ci_hi_90 = est + qnorm(0.95)*se, plotorder = nrow(coefs_third2_22_basecontrol):1 ) writeLines(as.character(round(100*abs(filter(coefs_third2_22_basecontrol,layer3_specificoutcome=="pro_fraction_chosen")$est),0)),con = "../results/beta_seed_pro_fraction_chosen_third2_22.tex",sep="%") (coefplot_third2_22_basecontrol <- ggplot(filter(coefs_third2_22_basecontrol),aes(y=plotorder)) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_95,xmax=ci_hi_95),height=0,lwd=0.5) + geom_errorbarh(aes(xmin=ci_lo_90,xmax=ci_hi_90),height=0,lwd=1) + geom_point(aes(x=est),size=1.5) + geom_vline(xintercept = 0,lty=2) + facet_wrap(~family,ncol=1,scales="free") + scale_y_continuous("", breaks = coefs_third2_22_basecontrol$plotorder,labels = coefs_third2_22_basecontrol$outcome) + scale_x_continuous("Conservative vs. Liberal seed assignment among Moderates\n with Constant assignment\n(95% and 90% CIs)") + coord_cartesian(xlim=c(-0.2,0.2)) + theme_bw(base_family = "sans") + theme(strip.background = element_rect(fill="white")) ) rm(list = ls())