Index the parts and say so on the card

README.md

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ configs:
 
 # ViTweb
 
-> 1,749,322 Vietnamese documents from one public corpus, 3.9 GB of Parquet, one schema
+> 1,749,335 Vietnamese documents from one public corpus, 3.9 GB of Parquet, one schema
 
 This dataset is one row per page gao's own crawler fetched and kept: the extracted article as plain text, the same article as markdown, the whole page as markdown, and the address, host, fetch time, robots decision and every measurement the page was judged on.
 
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ Every page that was not kept is in `open-index/vitweb-rejects` with the stage an
 
 | source | documents | parts | input files | size | pinned at |
 | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
-| `web` | 1,749,322 | 197 | 3 | 3.9 GB | `web-20260819`, `web-20260820`, `web-20260820b`, `web-20260820c`, `web-20260820d`, `web-20260821x` |
-| **total** | **1,749,322** | **197** | | **3.9 GB** | |
+| `web` | 1,749,335 | 198 | 3 | 3.9 GB | `web-20260819`, `web-20260820`, `web-20260820b`, `web-20260820c`, `web-20260820d`, `web-20260821x` |
+| **total** | **1,749,335** | **198** | | **3.9 GB** | |
 
 Every count here is the row count in a part's own Parquet footer, added up. None of it is what a run reported writing, because a run that died between pushing a part and writing down that it had is exactly the case a count has to be right about.
 
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Four public corpora, pinned at a revision, read once, and written out under the
 
 ### `web`
 
-1,749,322 documents.
+1,749,335 documents.
 
 Two more are pinned in the ingest manifest and are not here. CulturaX is gated on the Hub and the terms were never granted to anybody on this project, so not one byte of it has been read and it is dropped rather than pending. It is mC4 and OSCAR, both built out of Common Crawl, so it went over the same pages the sources above went over, though that is worth less than it sounds: identity here is a hash of the extracted text, and two Common Crawl derivatives in this repo share under one percent of the smaller of them, because two extractors rarely agree on every byte of a page. MADLAD-400 ships as gzipped JSONL rather than Parquet, so it costs a rewrite that the Parquet sources do not, and it is queued behind them.
 
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ README.md
 parts.csv
 data/web/
   web-20260819-00000-00000.parquet
-  ... and 196 more
+  ... and 197 more
 ```
 
 One directory per source, and the file name is the snapshot, the input file of the source the part came out of, and the part. The snapshot is the source and the revision it was pinned at, so re-pinning a source puts its new parts beside the old ones in the same directory under a different name rather than moving the directory. That is deliberate: the directory is the config name somebody writes in a `load_dataset` call, and a name that moves every time a source is re-pinned is a name nobody can write down.
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ GROUP BY source ORDER BY documents DESC;
 │ source  │ parts │ documents │   gb   │
 │ varchar │ int64 │  int128   │ double │
 ├─────────┼───────┼───────────┼────────┤
-│ web     │   197 │   1749322 │    3.9 │
+│ web     │   198 │   1749335 │    3.9 │
 └─────────┴───────┴───────────┴────────┘
 ```
 
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ FROM read_parquet('hf://datasets/open-index/vitweb/data/web/*.parquet');
 │ documents │
 │   int64   │
 ├───────────┤
-│   1749322 │
+│   1749335 │
 └───────────┘
 ```
 
-**Group by a column.** Parquet is columnar, so a query over two columns reads two columns. This one touches 1,749,322 documents across 197 files.
+**Group by a column.** Parquet is columnar, so a query over two columns reads two columns. This one touches 1,749,335 documents across 198 files.
 
 ```sql
 SELECT license_class, count(*) AS documents,