Clarify FineWeb comparison conclusion
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ For a URL-level comparison on `CC-MAIN-2025-26`, the deduplicated Ultra-FineWeb-
|
|
| 101 |
| Recall against FineWeb | 94.30% | **90.61%** |
|
| 102 |
| Precision | 70.69% | **90.16%** |
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
-
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
## 📁 Dataset Structure
|
| 107 |
|
|
|
|
| 101 |
| Recall against FineWeb | 94.30% | **90.61%** |
|
| 102 |
| Precision | 70.69% | **90.16%** |
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
+
On this validation dump, MinHash deduplication removes many URLs that are not present in FineWeb: precision increases from 70.69% to 90.16%, while recall decreases from 94.30% to 90.61%. This reflects a trade-off in URL coverage and deduplication, not a direct measurement of overall text quality. The figures describe URL overlap for this dump only; they do not imply that the two datasets contain identical documents or that the same metrics apply to all released dumps.
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
## 📁 Dataset Structure
|
| 107 |
|