ZhouChuYue commited on
Commit
16cc0da
·
1 Parent(s): 371de48

Update README: improve wording, add Quick Start section

Browse files

- Use HTML anchor tags in centered div for better HF rendering
- Lowercase "large language models", "embedding", "chain-of-thought"
- Replace "closed-source" with "proprietary"
- Remove "Level" from shortcoming bullet points
- Unify verb tense to present tense
- Change "scenarios" to "parsing", "hierarchical" to "tiered"
- Add transition sentence before dataset table
- Add Quick Start section with HuggingFace usage examples

Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +39 -16
README.md CHANGED
@@ -41,31 +41,30 @@ default_config_name: UltraData-Math-L3-Conversation-Synthetic
41
 
42
  <div align="center">
43
 
44
- [🤗 Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math) | [💻 Code Repository](https://github.com/UltraData-OpenBMB/UltraData-Math) | [🇨🇳 中文 README](README_ZH.md)
45
-
46
 
47
  </div>
48
 
49
  ## 📚 Introduction
50
 
51
- High-quality pre-training data is crucial for enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing mathematical pre-training data construction schemes have the following shortcomings:
52
 
53
- - **HTML Parsing Level**: General extractors (such as trafilatura, readability) are mainly designed for news/article scenarios, lacking specialized processing for mathematical formulas and other content, often leading to formula structure destruction or loss; meanwhile, mathematical discussions on forum-like pages are difficult to extract completely.
54
- - **Data Quality Level**: Existing datasets generally lack a systematic quality grading mechanism, with high-value mathematical content mixed with low-quality noise.
55
- - **Data Diversity Level**: Mainstream datasets mostly originate from textbooks or competition question banks, lacking mathematical discussions and application scenarios in real web pages; synthetic data formats are single, difficult to cover diverse needs such as multi-turn dialogues and multi-style expressions.
56
 
57
  To address these issues, we propose ***UltraData-Math***—a large-scale high-quality pre-training dataset for mathematical reasoning tasks. This dataset is developed based on the [UltraData](xxx) L0-L4 Tiered Data Management Framework, containing four progressive levels:
58
 
59
- - **L0 Raw Data Layer**: Developed a mathematical parser based on *magic-html*, combined with *w3m* layout preservation rendering and multi-level fallback strategies, standardizing MathML, KaTeX, and AsciiMath into LaTeX format.
60
  - **L1 Filtered Data Layer**: Cleans noise through heuristic rules and performs document-level deduplication.
61
- - **L2 Selected Data Layer**: Uses closed-source large models to annotate seed data and distills it into a lightweight Embedding classifier to achieve efficient quality grading of the full corpus.
62
  - **L3 Refined Data Layer**: Produces structured content with clear reasoning through rewriting, synthetic generation, and refinement in various formats such as Q&A, multi-turn dialogues, multi-style rewriting, and knowledge-grounded textbooks.
63
 
64
  Experiments show that on the MiniCPM-1.2B architecture, ***UltraData-Math*** achieves a score of **37.02** on the MATH500 benchmark, an improvement of **+3.62** compared to Nemotron-CC 4plus; it achieves **61.79** on GSM8K, an improvement of **+3.34**, while maintaining code generation and general knowledge capabilities.
65
 
66
  ***UltraData-Math*** has been applied to the mathematical pre-training of the [MiniCPM Series](https://huggingface.co/collections/openbmb/minicpm-4-6841ab29d180257e940baa9b) models.
67
 
68
- - **[UltraData-Math-L1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math)**: Large-scale high-quality mathematical pre-training dataset, containing 170.5B tokens of web mathematical corpus. (**<-- you are here**)
69
  - **[UltraData-Math-L2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math-L2)**: High-quality mathematical pre-training dataset selected by the quality model, containing 33.7B tokens of high-quality web mathematical corpus.
70
  - **[UltraData-Math-L3](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math-L3)**: High-quality refined mathematical dataset, containing 88B tokens of multi-format refined data (Q&A, multi-turn dialogues, knowledge textbooks, etc.).
71
 
@@ -81,11 +80,11 @@ To break through the limitations of existing mathematical datasets in quality an
81
 
82
  **Goal**: Address the poor support of general HTML parsers for mathematical formulas and maximize the preservation of mathematical semantics in web pages.
83
 
84
- The L0 phase mainly processes raw web data obtained from sources such as Common Crawl. Given the specificity of mathematical web pages, we developed specialized parsing strategies instead of directly using general ones like trafilatura or readability.
85
 
86
  - **Unified Parsing Mode**: Automatically identifies page types to ensure complete content extraction as much as possible.
87
- - **Multi-level Fallback Strategy**: To prevent data loss due to parsing failures, we implemented a multi-level fallback mechanism to ensure text content is captured even if structured parsing fails.
88
- - **Mathematical Formula Standardization**: We unified different mathematical expressions in web pages into standard LaTeX format, achieving data format normalization for unified model learning.
89
 
90
  ### L1: Heuristic Cleaning and Filtering
91
 
@@ -107,8 +106,8 @@ After obtaining text containing complete mathematical formulas, we clean the L0
107
 
108
  Although L1 data has a clean format, the content quality varies. The L2 phase introduces a model-based quality assessment system:
109
 
110
- - **Seed Data Annotation**: Use closed-source large models to score a portion of seed data across multiple dimensions.
111
- - **Classifier Training and Distillation**: Train lightweight Embedding classifiers based on annotated data to equip them with the ability to identify high-value mathematical content.
112
  - **Full-scale Inference**: Use the trained classifier to score and screen L1 data in full.
113
  - *Retention*: Content containing detailed problem-solving steps, mathematical concept explanations, and high-level academic discussions.
114
  - *Exclusion*: Simple stacking of nouns, meaningless lists of numbers, juvenile content, or noise from non-mathematical fields.
@@ -117,7 +116,7 @@ Although L1 data has a clean format, the content quality varies. The L2 phase in
117
 
118
  **Goal**: Produce structured content with clear reasoning and explicit educational intent through rewriting, synthetic generation, and refinement, achieving textbook-quality standards and ensuring maximum learnability.
119
 
120
- Natural web data is mostly declarative text, lacking structured reasoning steps and diverse pedagogical formats. To enhance the model's Chain of Thought (CoT) capabilities and multi-turn interaction skills, we built the L3 refined data layer through the [UltraData-Math-Generator](https://github.com/UltraData-OpenBMB/UltraData-Math/tree/main/UltraData-Math-L3-Generator):
121
 
122
  - **Q&A Pair Generation**: Use high-performance models to rewrite declarative documents into "Question-Answer" pairs, constructing QA-style data with explicit reasoning steps.
123
  - **Multi-turn Dialogue Synthesis**: Simulate "Teacher-Student" tutoring scenarios to generate multi-turn dialogue data containing follow-up questions, corrections, and guidance.
@@ -125,12 +124,36 @@ Natural web data is mostly declarative text, lacking structured reasoning steps
125
  - **Knowledge Point Textbook Generation**: Generate systematic textbook-like content based on specific knowledge points to ensure the model masters core mathematical concepts.
126
  - **Format Repair and Enhancement**: Fix formatting issues in the source data (e.g., broken LaTeX formulas, inconsistent notation) and enhance content coherence to achieve textbook-quality standards.
127
 
 
 
128
  | Dataset | # Tokens | # Documents |
129
  |:---|:---:|:---:|
130
  | UltraData-Math-L1 | 170.5B | 85.6M |
131
  | UltraData-Math-L2-preview | 33.7B | 14.98M |
132
  | UltraData-Math-L3 | 88B | 81.4M |
133
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
134
  ## 📈 Experimental Results
135
 
136
  We evaluated data quality using the **Decay Verification** method: continuing pre-training of a **MiniCPM-1.2B** base model (pre-trained on 1.3T tokens with **MiniCPM3-4B** tokenizer) with **~100B tokens** (30% target data + 70% general data). We used [OpenCompass](https://github.com/open-compass/opencompass) as our evaluation framework. Evaluation benchmarks include:
@@ -154,7 +177,7 @@ To fairly compare different parsing strategies, we conducted experiments on a da
154
 
155
  ### Pipeline Effectiveness (L1 vs L2 vs L3)
156
 
157
- To validate the effectiveness of our L0-L3 hierarchical framework, we conducted ablation studies comparing models trained on different tiers of UltraData-Math. Unlike the L0 parser comparison above (which used a 2023-2024 subset), these results are based on the **full dataset**.
158
 
159
  | Dataset | Average | MMLU | MMLU-STEM | MATH500 | GSM8K | MBPP | HumanEval |
160
  | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: |
 
41
 
42
  <div align="center">
43
 
44
+ <a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math">🤗 Dataset</a> | <a href="https://github.com/UltraData-OpenBMB/UltraData-Math">💻 Code Repository</a> | <a href="README_ZH.md">🇨🇳 中文 README</a>
 
45
 
46
  </div>
47
 
48
  ## 📚 Introduction
49
 
50
+ High-quality pre-training data is crucial for enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, existing mathematical pre-training data construction schemes have the following shortcomings:
51
 
52
+ - **HTML Parsing**: General extractors (such as trafilatura, readability) are mainly designed for news/article parsing, lacking specialized processing for mathematical formulas and other content, often leading to formula structure destruction or loss; meanwhile, mathematical discussions on forum-like pages are difficult to extract completely.
53
+ - **Data Quality**: Existing datasets generally lack a systematic quality grading mechanism, with high-value mathematical content mixed with low-quality noise.
54
+ - **Data Diversity**: Mainstream datasets mostly originate from textbooks or competition question banks, lacking mathematical discussions and application scenarios in real web pages; synthetic data formats are single, difficult to cover diverse needs such as multi-turn dialogues and multi-style expressions.
55
 
56
  To address these issues, we propose ***UltraData-Math***—a large-scale high-quality pre-training dataset for mathematical reasoning tasks. This dataset is developed based on the [UltraData](xxx) L0-L4 Tiered Data Management Framework, containing four progressive levels:
57
 
58
+ - **L0 Raw Data Layer**: Develops a mathematical parser based on *magic-html*, combined with *w3m* layout preservation rendering and multi-level fallback strategies, standardizing MathML, KaTeX, and AsciiMath into LaTeX format.
59
  - **L1 Filtered Data Layer**: Cleans noise through heuristic rules and performs document-level deduplication.
60
+ - **L2 Selected Data Layer**: Uses proprietary large models to annotate seed data and distills it into a lightweight embedding classifier to achieve efficient quality grading of the full corpus.
61
  - **L3 Refined Data Layer**: Produces structured content with clear reasoning through rewriting, synthetic generation, and refinement in various formats such as Q&A, multi-turn dialogues, multi-style rewriting, and knowledge-grounded textbooks.
62
 
63
  Experiments show that on the MiniCPM-1.2B architecture, ***UltraData-Math*** achieves a score of **37.02** on the MATH500 benchmark, an improvement of **+3.62** compared to Nemotron-CC 4plus; it achieves **61.79** on GSM8K, an improvement of **+3.34**, while maintaining code generation and general knowledge capabilities.
64
 
65
  ***UltraData-Math*** has been applied to the mathematical pre-training of the [MiniCPM Series](https://huggingface.co/collections/openbmb/minicpm-4-6841ab29d180257e940baa9b) models.
66
 
67
+ - **[UltraData-Math-L1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math)**: Large-scale high-quality mathematical pre-training dataset, containing 170.5B tokens of web mathematical corpus.
68
  - **[UltraData-Math-L2](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math-L2)**: High-quality mathematical pre-training dataset selected by the quality model, containing 33.7B tokens of high-quality web mathematical corpus.
69
  - **[UltraData-Math-L3](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraData-Math-L3)**: High-quality refined mathematical dataset, containing 88B tokens of multi-format refined data (Q&A, multi-turn dialogues, knowledge textbooks, etc.).
70
 
 
80
 
81
  **Goal**: Address the poor support of general HTML parsers for mathematical formulas and maximize the preservation of mathematical semantics in web pages.
82
 
83
+ The L0 phase mainly processes raw web data obtained from sources such as Common Crawl. Given the specificity of mathematical web pages, we develop specialized parsing strategies instead of directly using general ones like trafilatura or readability.
84
 
85
  - **Unified Parsing Mode**: Automatically identifies page types to ensure complete content extraction as much as possible.
86
+ - **Multi-level Fallback Strategy**: To prevent data loss due to parsing failures, we implement a multi-level fallback mechanism to ensure text content is captured even if structured parsing fails.
87
+ - **Mathematical Formula Standardization**: We unify different mathematical expressions in web pages into standard LaTeX format, achieving data format normalization for unified model learning.
88
 
89
  ### L1: Heuristic Cleaning and Filtering
90
 
 
106
 
107
  Although L1 data has a clean format, the content quality varies. The L2 phase introduces a model-based quality assessment system:
108
 
109
+ - **Seed Data Annotation**: Use proprietary large models to score a portion of seed data across multiple dimensions.
110
+ - **Classifier Training and Distillation**: Train lightweight embedding classifiers based on annotated data to equip them with the ability to identify high-value mathematical content.
111
  - **Full-scale Inference**: Use the trained classifier to score and screen L1 data in full.
112
  - *Retention*: Content containing detailed problem-solving steps, mathematical concept explanations, and high-level academic discussions.
113
  - *Exclusion*: Simple stacking of nouns, meaningless lists of numbers, juvenile content, or noise from non-mathematical fields.
 
116
 
117
  **Goal**: Produce structured content with clear reasoning and explicit educational intent through rewriting, synthetic generation, and refinement, achieving textbook-quality standards and ensuring maximum learnability.
118
 
119
+ Natural web data is mostly declarative text, lacking structured reasoning steps and diverse pedagogical formats. To enhance the model's chain-of-thought (CoT) capabilities and multi-turn interaction skills, we build the L3 refined data layer through the [UltraData-Math-Generator](https://github.com/UltraData-OpenBMB/UltraData-Math/tree/main/UltraData-Math-L3-Generator):
120
 
121
  - **Q&A Pair Generation**: Use high-performance models to rewrite declarative documents into "Question-Answer" pairs, constructing QA-style data with explicit reasoning steps.
122
  - **Multi-turn Dialogue Synthesis**: Simulate "Teacher-Student" tutoring scenarios to generate multi-turn dialogue data containing follow-up questions, corrections, and guidance.
 
124
  - **Knowledge Point Textbook Generation**: Generate systematic textbook-like content based on specific knowledge points to ensure the model masters core mathematical concepts.
125
  - **Format Repair and Enhancement**: Fix formatting issues in the source data (e.g., broken LaTeX formulas, inconsistent notation) and enhance content coherence to achieve textbook-quality standards.
126
 
127
+ Based on the above methodology, we produce the following ***UltraData-Math*** datasets:
128
+
129
  | Dataset | # Tokens | # Documents |
130
  |:---|:---:|:---:|
131
  | UltraData-Math-L1 | 170.5B | 85.6M |
132
  | UltraData-Math-L2-preview | 33.7B | 14.98M |
133
  | UltraData-Math-L3 | 88B | 81.4M |
134
 
135
+ ## 🚀 Quick Start
136
+
137
+ You can load the dataset directly from Hugging Face:
138
+
139
+ ```python
140
+ from datasets import load_dataset
141
+
142
+ # Load UltraData-Math-L1
143
+ ds = load_dataset("openbmb/UltraData-Math", "UltraData-Math-L1")
144
+
145
+ # Load UltraData-Math-L2-preview
146
+ ds = load_dataset("openbmb/UltraData-Math", "UltraData-Math-L2-preview")
147
+
148
+ # Load UltraData-Math-L3 (default: Conversation-Synthetic)
149
+ ds = load_dataset("openbmb/UltraData-Math", "UltraData-Math-L3-Conversation-Synthetic")
150
+
151
+ # Other L3 configs:
152
+ # - UltraData-Math-L3-Multi-Style-Synthetic
153
+ # - UltraData-Math-L3-QA-Synthetic
154
+ # - UltraData-Math-L3-Textbook-Exercise-Synthetic
155
+ ```
156
+
157
  ## 📈 Experimental Results
158
 
159
  We evaluated data quality using the **Decay Verification** method: continuing pre-training of a **MiniCPM-1.2B** base model (pre-trained on 1.3T tokens with **MiniCPM3-4B** tokenizer) with **~100B tokens** (30% target data + 70% general data). We used [OpenCompass](https://github.com/open-compass/opencompass) as our evaluation framework. Evaluation benchmarks include:
 
177
 
178
  ### Pipeline Effectiveness (L1 vs L2 vs L3)
179
 
180
+ To validate the effectiveness of our L0-L3 tiered framework, we conducted ablation studies comparing models trained on different tiers of UltraData-Math. Unlike the L0 parser comparison above (which used a 2023-2024 subset), these results are based on the **full dataset**.
181
 
182
  | Dataset | Average | MMLU | MMLU-STEM | MATH500 | GSM8K | MBPP | HumanEval |
183
  | :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: |