orgrctera commited on
Commit
86ee11d
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 6d61e3a

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +124 -18
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,28 +1,134 @@
1
  ---
2
- tags: ["benchmark", "beir", "cqadupstack_physics", "retrieval"]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3
  task_categories:
4
- - question-answering
5
  - text-retrieval
6
- size_categories:
7
- - 1K<n<10K
8
  ---
9
 
10
- # beir_cqadupstack_physics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11
 
12
- BEIR CQADupStack/physics test split
13
 
14
- | Field | Value |
15
- |-------|-------|
16
- | Benchmark | beir |
17
- | Sub-benchmark | cqadupstack_physics |
18
- | Type | retrieval |
19
- | Total items | 1039 |
20
- | Splits | 1 |
 
 
21
 
22
- ## Splits
23
 
24
- | Split | Items |
25
- |-------|-------|
26
- | test | 1039 |
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27
 
28
- Exported from Langfuse.
 
1
  ---
2
+ language:
3
+ - en
4
+ license: cc-by-sa-4.0
5
+ tags:
6
+ - retrieval
7
+ - text-retrieval
8
+ - beir
9
+ - physics
10
+ - stack-exchange
11
+ - duplicate-questions
12
+ - community-question-answering
13
+ - benchmark
14
+ pretty_name: BEIR CQADupStack Physics (retrieval)
15
+ size_categories: 1K<n<10K
16
  task_categories:
 
17
  - text-retrieval
 
 
18
  ---
19
 
20
+ # CQADupStack — Physics (BEIR)
21
+
22
+ ## Dataset description
23
+
24
+ **CQADupStack** is a benchmark for **community question answering (cQA)** research built from multiple **Stack Exchange** forums. Each subforum is distributed as a separate “stack” with posts, metadata, and **duplicate-question** annotations. The **Physics** stack draws from **Physics Stack Exchange**—short to medium-length questions and answers about concepts, experiments, and problem solving in physics.
25
+
26
+ **BEIR** (*Benchmarking IR*) incorporated selected CQADupStack forums—including **physics**—into a unified **zero-shot** **information retrieval** benchmark. In the BEIR formulation, the task is **ad hoc retrieval**: given a **query** (a question post), a system must rank **corpus documents** (other question posts) so that posts marked as **duplicates** or **relevant** in the official judgments appear at the top.
27
+
28
+ This repository (`orgrctera/beir_cqadupstack_physics`) exposes the **BEIR CQADupStack / physics** split in **Parquet** form for retrieval evaluation pipelines (aligned with CTERA-style **query + qrels** rows). The Hub snapshot corresponds to the **test** retrieval setting: **1,039** query rows (one per evaluation query).
29
+
30
+ ### Background: duplicate-question retrieval
31
+
32
+ The original CQADupStack resource was introduced to support research on **finding duplicate or near-duplicate questions** in large cQA archives—a core retrieval problem for forums that want to link users to existing threads. BEIR repurposes the annotated relationships as **qrels** (query–relevance labels) over a document collection of question posts, enabling standard IR metrics (nDCG, Recall@k, MRR, etc.) alongside other heterogeneous BEIR tasks.
33
+
34
+ ### Scale (Physics subset, BEIR / standard mirrors)
35
+
36
+ Reported statistics for the **test** split of CQADupStack Physics in retrieval benchmarks are on the order of:
37
+
38
+ | Aspect | Approximate scale |
39
+ |--------|-------------------|
40
+ | **Queries** | ~1,039 (unique evaluation queries) |
41
+ | **Corpus documents** | ~38k question posts (document collection to index) |
42
+ | **Qrels** | ~1.9k judged relevant pairs total; ~1.86 relevant documents per query on average (min 1, max can be large for highly duplicated threads) |
43
+
44
+ Exact counts should be verified against the specific BEIR export you pair with this file (corpus + qrels version).
45
+
46
+ ## Task: retrieval (CQADupStack Physics)
47
+
48
+ This dataset defines a **text retrieval** task for the **Physics** slice of CQADupStack under BEIR:
49
+
50
+ 1. **Input:** a natural-language **question** (the query text).
51
+ 2. **Output:** a ranked list of **document IDs** from the Physics corpus (or scores over the full collection), such that **relevant** IDs—per official **qrels**—receive high rank.
52
+
53
+ Evaluation uses standard **information retrieval** metrics. Full benchmarking also requires the **corpus** (passage or document text keyed by the same IDs as in BEIR).
54
+
55
+ > **Note:** Rows in this repository describe the **query + relevance judgments** side. Combine them with the **BEIR CQADupStack physics corpus** from the same release for end-to-end retrieval experiments.
56
+
57
+ ## Data format (this repository)
58
+
59
+ Each record typically includes:
60
+
61
+ | Field | Description |
62
+ |--------|-------------|
63
+ | `id` | UUID for this example row. |
64
+ | `input` | The **query text** (Physics Stack Exchange–style question). |
65
+ | `expected_output` | JSON string: list of objects `{"id": "<corpus-doc-id>", "score": <relevance>}`. Scores follow BEIR qrels conventions (e.g., relevance grades as released upstream). |
66
+ | `metadata.query_id` | Original BEIR / CQADupStack query identifier (string). |
67
+ | `metadata.split` | Split name (here: **`test`** for the exported BEIR evaluation split). |
68
 
69
+ ### Example 1
70
 
71
+ ```json
72
+ {
73
+ "id": "a1b2c3d4-e5f6-7890-abcd-ef1234567890",
74
+ "input": "Why does the sky appear blue during the day but red at sunset?",
75
+ "expected_output": "[{\"id\": \"12345\", \"score\": 1}, {\"id\": \"67890\", \"score\": 1}]",
76
+ "metadata.query_id": "42",
77
+ "metadata.split": "test"
78
+ }
79
+ ```
80
 
81
+ ### Example 2
82
 
83
+ ```json
84
+ {
85
+ "id": "f0e1d2c3-b4a5-6978-9012-3456789abcde",
86
+ "input": "How is the Higgs boson related to the mechanism that gives mass to elementary particles?",
87
+ "expected_output": "[{\"id\": \"24680\", \"score\": 1}]",
88
+ "metadata.query_id": "108",
89
+ "metadata.split": "test"
90
+ }
91
+ ```
92
+
93
+ *(Example IDs and query text are illustrative; real `query_id` and document IDs match the BEIR physics export.)*
94
+
95
+ ## References
96
+
97
+ ### CQADupStack (original dataset)
98
+
99
+ **Doris Hoogeveen, Karin M. Verspoor, Timothy Baldwin**
100
+ *CQADupStack: A Benchmark Data Set for Community Question-Answering Research*
101
+ Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Document Computing Symposium (**ADCS 2015**), Parramatta, Australia.
102
+
103
+ The paper presents CQADupStack as a multi-forum Stack Exchange resource with duplicate annotations and predefined splits, intended to make cQA and duplicate-detection experiments comparable across studies.
104
+
105
+ - DOI: [10.1145/2838931.2838934](https://doi.org/10.1145/2838931.2838934)
106
+ - Resource page (historical): [nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/resources/cqadupstack/](http://nlp.cis.unimelb.edu.au/resources/cqadupstack/)
107
+
108
+ ### BEIR benchmark (CQADupStack as a retrieval task)
109
+
110
+ **Nandan Thakur, Nils Reimers, Andreas Rücklé, Abhishek Srivastava, Iryna Gurevych**
111
+ *BEIR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models*
112
+ NeurIPS 2021 (Datasets and Benchmarks Track).
113
+
114
+ **Abstract (from arXiv):** *“Existing neural information retrieval (IR) models have often been studied in homogeneous and narrow settings, which has considerably limited insights into their out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization capabilities. To address this, and to facilitate researchers to broadly evaluate the effectiveness of their models, we introduce Benchmarking-IR (BEIR), a robust and heterogeneous evaluation benchmark for information retrieval. We leverage a careful selection of 18 publicly available datasets from diverse text retrieval tasks and domains and evaluate 10 state-of-the-art retrieval systems including lexical, sparse, dense, late-interaction and re-ranking architectures on the BEIR benchmark. Our results show BM25 is a robust baseline and re-ranking and late-interaction-based models on average achieve the best zero-shot performances, however, at high computational costs. In contrast, dense and sparse-retrieval models are computationally more efficient but often underperform other approaches, highlighting the considerable room for improvement in their generalization capabilities.”*
115
+
116
+ - Paper: [arXiv:2104.08663](https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08663)
117
+ - OpenReview: [openreview.net/forum?id=wCu6T5xFjeJ](https://openreview.net/forum?id=wCu6T5xFjeJ)
118
+ - Code and data: [github.com/beir-cellar/beir](https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir)
119
+
120
+ ### Related Hub resources
121
+
122
+ - Raw BEIR-style dataset layouts on Hugging Face (corpus / queries / qrels), e.g. community mirrors under **`BeIR/`** or **`irds/beir_*`** collections—search for CQADupStack physics in the dataset hub to match your tooling.
123
+
124
+ ## Citation
125
+
126
+ If you use **CQADupStack**, cite the ADCS 2015 paper above. If you use the **BEIR** packaging and evaluation protocol, cite the BEIR NeurIPS 2021 paper. BibTeX for BEIR is available from the [official BEIR repository](https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir).
127
+
128
+ ## License
129
+
130
+ Stack Exchange content is typically distributed under **Creative Commons** terms (commonly **CC BY-SA**). This card uses **`cc-by-sa-4.0`** as a conventional label for Stack Exchange–derived text; confirm against your exact data snapshot and [Stack Exchange’s content policy](https://stackoverflow.com/legal/terms-of-service) for compliance-sensitive deployments.
131
+
132
+ ---
133
 
134
+ *Dataset card for `orgrctera/beir_cqadupstack_physics` — BEIR CQADupStack Physics retrieval split.*