Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# Assignment #1 - EDA & Dataset - orian rivlin
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
**Goal:**
|
| 4 |
-
Explore which audio features are most strongly related to a track’s
|
| 5 |
This repository includes the dataset sample, a well-documented notebook, saved figures, and a short video walkthrough.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
---
|
|
@@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ This repository includes the dataset sample, a well-documented notebook, saved f
|
|
| 24 |
- Dropped rows with NA in core numeric features if present.
|
| 25 |
- Built a numeric-only DataFrame for stats and correlations.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
Result:
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
---
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
## EDA Highlights
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
### 1) Distributions
|
| 34 |
-
- **Popularity** is concentrated around
|
| 35 |
- **Danceability** ~ bell-shaped around ~0.56.
|
| 36 |
- **Energy** skews higher (many tracks at 0.7-0.9).
|
| 37 |
- **Valence** is broadly spread (neutral on average).
|
|
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Top relationships:
|
|
| 51 |
| valence | −0.06 |
|
| 52 |
| **acousticness** | **−0.35** |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
**Interpretation.** Popular tracks tend to be
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |

|
| 57 |
|
|
@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ Top relationships:
|
|
| 65 |
---
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
## Key Insights
|
| 68 |
-
- Popularity on Spotify is
|
| 69 |
-
-
|
| 70 |
-
- Highly popular songs tend to sound
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
---
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-
##
|
| 75 |
**Video:** (https://youtu.be/CIxhSgZXnyw)
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
---
|
|
@@ -85,5 +85,5 @@ Top relationships:
|
|
| 85 |
---
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
## Notes and Decisions
|
| 88 |
-
- **Outliers** (very long tracks; very low/high popularity) were
|
| 89 |
-
- Correlations are
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# Assignment #1 - EDA & Dataset - orian rivlin
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
**Goal:**
|
| 4 |
+
Explore which audio features are most strongly related to a track’s popularity on Spotify.
|
| 5 |
This repository includes the dataset sample, a well-documented notebook, saved figures, and a short video walkthrough.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
- Dropped rows with NA in core numeric features if present.
|
| 25 |
- Built a numeric-only DataFrame for stats and correlations.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
Result: 10,000 rows × 11 numeric features** ready for EDA.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
---
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
## EDA Highlights
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
### 1) Distributions
|
| 34 |
+
- **Popularity** is concentrated around 40-60 with few very high hits (80+).
|
| 35 |
- **Danceability** ~ bell-shaped around ~0.56.
|
| 36 |
- **Energy** skews higher (many tracks at 0.7-0.9).
|
| 37 |
- **Valence** is broadly spread (neutral on average).
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
| valence | −0.06 |
|
| 52 |
| **acousticness** | **−0.35** |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
+
**Interpretation.** Popular tracks tend to be louder and more energetic, and less acoustic.
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |

|
| 57 |
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
---
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
## Key Insights
|
| 68 |
+
- Popularity on Spotify is uneven: only a small minority of tracks become very popular.
|
| 69 |
+
- Loudness and energy are the strongest positive correlates of popularity; acousticness is the strongest negative correlate.
|
| 70 |
+
- Highly popular songs tend to sound modern/produced (loud, energetic), while purely acoustic/instrumental tracks underperform on average.
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
---
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
## Prestation Video
|
| 75 |
**Video:** (https://youtu.be/CIxhSgZXnyw)
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 85 |
---
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
## Notes and Decisions
|
| 88 |
+
- **Outliers** (very long tracks; very low/high popularity) were kept as real observations; statistics were interpreted cautiously.
|
| 89 |
+
- Correlations are modest overall (music success is multifactorial); results describe associations, not causation.
|