prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: The malicious fd_shred34_t data passed between fd_shred and fd_store causes the Solana Rust code to crash.(fd_store)
### Description
Report type: Blockchain/DLT
Target: https://github.com/firedancer-io/firedancer/tree/e60d9a6206efaceac65a5a2c3a9e387a79d1d096
Impacts:
- Process to process RCE between sand... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Cross-chain system contract invocation is allowed and undocumented
### Description
System contract addresses can be specified in [`requestL2Transaction`](https://github.com/matter-labs/zksync-2-contracts/blob/3f345ce52bc378c4b5d710c80d817db170775049/ethereum/contracts/zksync/facets/Mailbox.sol#L232). However, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: IdleCDO.virtualPrice() and _updatePrices() yield different prices in a number of cases
### Description
The function `IdleCDO.virtualPrice()` is used to determine the current price of a tranche. Similarly, `IdleCDO._updatePrices()` is used to store the latest price of a tranche, as well as update other parts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Funds can be locked indefinitely in NukeFund.sol
### Description
### Impact
- Permanent loss of funds.
- Dependency on user action.
### Proof of Concept
The NukeFund contract has a unique fund distribution model where the primary - and only - method to withdraw funds is through the `nuke()` function. Thi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: The `owner` is a single point of failure and a centralization risk
### Description
*Note: This finding was reported via the winning [Automated Findings report](https://gist.github.com/itsmetechjay/57d432101e7d8c98f3a061502aa8f327). It was declared out of scope for the audit, but is being included here for c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Strict equality in `migrate()` method
### Description
**Severity** : Medium
**Status** : Resolved
**Description** :
In Contract TokenMigration.sol, the method migrate() allows users to migrate their TWSDM tokens to WSDM tokens.
This method contains the following logic:
If the balance is not equal to ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Neglecting to store the package hash under the contract's named keys results in non-compliance with the CEP18 standard
### Description
During the contract's deployment, rather than storing the contract package hash under the contract's named keys, it was inadvertently re-stored under the deployer's named keys,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Missing checks for null addresses in RenderToken and Airdrop contracts
### Description
In `RenderToken`, the [`setEscrowContractAddress`](https://github.com/jeualvarez/Token-Audit/blob/e946177747e57312690775204834b8fca1bbb0d5/contracts/RenderToken.sol#L58) function allows the token’s owner to change the esc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `calldata` is not used during NFT transfers
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-superposition/blob/4528c9d2dbe1550d2660dac903a8246076044905/pkg/sol/OwnershipNFTs.sol#L148-L157
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-08-superposition/blob/4528c9d2dbe1550d2660dac903a8246076044905/pkg/sol/OwnershipN... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Code Redundancy
### Description
## Light Protocol Audit 05 — General Findings
## Remediation
Remove the redundant and unused code instances highlighted above.
## Patch
1. Issue #2 was resolved in commit `dd97c8`.
2. `self.is_native` was removed in issue #6.
## Findings
1. In `process_initialize_nullifier_qu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: FUNCTIONALITY TO UPDATE FEES IS NOT APPLIED CORRECTLY
### Description
The `assert_fees` function in `update_config` from the **krp-cdp-contracts/liquidation\_queue** and **krp-market-contracts/liquidation\_queue** contracts is not applied correctly. As a consequence, some valid values will not be accepted, see... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: deposit() and mint() and _redeemInternal() in wfCashERC4626() will revert for all fcash that asset token is underlying token because they always call _mintInternal() with useUnderlying==True
### Description
_Submitted by unforgiven_
### Impact
For some `fcash` the asset token is underlying token (`asset.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Mismatch emission plan between doc and implementation
### Description
According to the doc(https://docs.kittenswap.finance/tokenomics/initial-distribution), our initial emission will start from `20,000,000 KITTEN (2%)`.
When we check our implementation, the actual initial amount is `20,000,000 + 20,000,000 * ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Whitelist Extension cannot handle the case when there is no whitelist
### Description
The `WhitelistExtension` contract is designed to allow only certain resolvers to fill a maker order. However, it is possible to have no whitelist, meaning that any resolver can fill the maker order. If the resolver count is s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: `swapIntoFromRouter` missing the `checkPoolCap` modifier
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** Medium
**Likelihood:** Medium
**Description**
When depositing into the pools, the pool cap is enforced. This is done through the `checkPoolCap` modifier. The modifier tracks the pool's asset's balance, with... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | false | false | ## High: Tokens Can Be Redeemed From Any Sale
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `e57b33c4e7604080c2824c07dba116d77c5d02b5`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The sale key was added to the receipt PDA seeds and new unit tests were created to test this edge case
*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | oracle | true | false | ## Gas: Refactor code to avoid unnecessary memory expansion and data check within loops
### Description
In the instances below, the proof name is being read from memory and then stored into a new section of memory. After this is done an `if` statement is used to check a condition. Both the proof name and condition in ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Injected content script and InjectedProvider class are not hardened
### Description
The Uniswap wallet browser extension injects a content script (`injected.js` file) into every webpage. The injected content script runs in an isolated world from its parent webpage and creates an HTML script tag (`ethereum.js` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Strategy in StakerVault.sol can steal more rewards even though it’s designed strategies shouldn’t get rewards.
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/tree/main/protocol/contracts/StakerVault.sol#L95
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/tree/main/protocol/contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Cheaper to split struct if only part of it is updated frequently
### Description
The `currentStrike` and `currentExpiration` fields are updated frequently so they should be in a separate struct rather than re-writing the whole struct every time
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-2 ShortCollateral settleOptions may fail due to insolvency settled out of loop
### Description
**Description:**
settleOptions() loops over the input **positionIds** array and either sends proceeds to the user
or consumes their collateral. If there’s any insolvency, it is appended to
**baseInsolvent... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Transfer Should Occur Before Updating Internal State
### Description
The [`join` function](https://github.com/Ion-Protocol/ion-protocol/blob/98e282514ac5827196b49f688938e1e44709505a/src/join/GemJoin.sol#L51) of the `GemJoin` contract allows a user to deposit the `GEM` ERC-20 token into the contract and increas... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused Import
### Description
The issue is identified in the contract [`LGEStaking`](https://github.com/LayerLabs-app/Ozean-Contracts/blob/dacd9ed9c895c9b6be422531eea15fecc3c2b1d8/src/L1/LGEStaking.sol#L9). The `ISemver` interface is imported but never utilized.
### Recommendation
We recommend removing the un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: Platform fees withdrawal will sweep oracle agents earned fees
### Description
Oracle agents earn a portion of user-paid fees if their responses fall within established accuracy boundaries, defined by a specific range of standard deviations. Rather than directly transferring these fees to the agents, `LLMOra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect EIP-712 `TXTYPE_HASH` in `SecuritizeSwap`
### Description
**Description:** `SecuritizeSwap::TXTYPE_HASH` does not match the actual message structure being encoded for EIP-712 signature verification. The constant is defined as the hash of:
But the actual `abi.encode` call in `SecuritizeSwap::doEx... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary variables
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**File**: strategy/programs/vaultka/src/lib.rs: 712,713
**Description**
In the `request_deposit` function there are two variables introduced: `jlp_p`
and `sol_p` that are excessive.
**Recommendation**
Change the declar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Optimize names to save gas
### Description
Saves 27 instances.
Public/external function names and public member variable names can be optimized to save gas. See this [link](https://gist.github.com/IllIllI000/a5d8b486a8259f9f77891a919febd1a9) for an example of how it works. Below are the interfaces/abstract co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Code Clarity
### Description
## Token Implementation Overview
1. In the current implementation of `Token`, both `SERVICE_ROLE` and `MANAGER_ROLE` have the ability to withdraw the contract’s earnings. However, they do so through different functions: `payoutETH` and `withdrawEarnings`, respectively. This create... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Consider a two way transfer of `governance`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-07-axelar/blob/main/contracts/cgp/AxelarGateway.sol#L254-L258
The `governance` address has complete control over the `AxelarGatway` since it can do upgrades.
### Recommendation
Consider implementing a two way (p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Several functions receive the wrong number of arguments
### Description
Several functions in the chainport-backend repository are called with an incorrect number of arguments:
- Several functions in the `/project/deprecated_files` folder
- A call to `release_tokens_by_maintainer` from the `rebalance_bridge` f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: SALT staker can get extra voting power by simply unstaking their xSALT
### Description
SALT staker might have chance to finalize the vote by manipulating the required quorum.
### Proof of Concept
When a proposal is created, anyone can vote by calling `Proposals#castVote()` as far as they have voting power... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect functions visibility
### Description
Whenever a function is not being called internally in the code, it can be easily declared as `external`, [saving also gas](https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#description-44). While the entire code base have explicit visibilities for ever... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-7 MozToken allows owner to mint an arbitrary amount of tokens, although supply is fixed
### Description
**Description:**
Supply of MozToken is defined to be fixed at 1B tokens:
**Max Supply**
1B MOZ will be minted at the genesis and will be the entire finite supply of tokens
However, there is an exp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Query Response Missing Height
### Description
## Issue with `Query` in `ssStore`
The issue is present in `Query` of `ssStore`. Query forgets to set `res.Height` when handling the request.
> _store v2/state/store.gogo
This would result in incomplete query responses.
## Remediation
Always set `res.Height` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Providing and withdrawing liquidity lacks slippage protection
### Description
The `ProvideLiquidity` and `WithdrawLiquidity` messages do not include slippage protection parameters. This omission exposes users to the risk of receiving fewer tokens than expected due to market conditions between the transactio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Faucet.withdrawAll() does not change active status
### Description
`Faucet.active` is `false` if the native balance is below `CLAIM_AMOUNT`.
- https://github.com/KintoXYZ/kinto-core/blob/f7dd98f66b9dfba1f73758703b808051196e740b/src/Faucet.sol#L78-L79
But when `withdrawAll()` is called, it does not change the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: It is possible to mint 0 tokens
### Description
The various minting functions ([`mintPayable`](https://github.com/AuctusProject/aco/blob/36bcab024c9781d799381f8f973e99fd5b0f4d2d/smart-contracts/contracts/core/ACOToken.sol#L378), [`mintToPayable`](https://github.com/AuctusProject/aco/blob/36bcab024c9781d7993... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: Fee target mismatch in `deposit`, `mint`, `withdraw`, `redeem` and `preview***` methods
### Description
When users want to deposit their tokens, code calculates fee in `previewDeposit()` and `previewMint()` and add/subtract it from the amount/share. As you can see code checks entry fee based on `msg.sender`:
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Natspec comments
### Description
In various places (documented below), natspec comments for function parameters and return values are missing:
- **Points.award(address to, uint256 amount, uint256 campaignId)**: Missing natspec for `amount` parameter.
- **Points.award(address to, uint256 amount, addres... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Incorrect Emission Rate Calculation in RAACMinter Creates Liquidity Bootstrapping Risk with Zero Deposits
### Description
The emission rate calculation mechanism in `RAACMinter.calculateNewEmissionRate` contains inverted incentives when the stability pool is empty. This critical flaw causes the protocol to red... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: OwnershipTransferred event emits incorrect data when called via `execCalls()`
### Description
When `transferOwnership()` is called, it emits the `OwnershipTransferred` event, which includes the old and new owners:
It is assumed that, because the function is guarded by the `onlyOwner` modifier, the old owner ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Check __GAP s
### Description
All `__GAP` variables have the same size, while the different contracts have a different number of storage variables. If the `__GAP` size isn't logical, it is more difficult to maintain the code.
**Note:** Set to a risk rating of medium because the probability of something goi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | rounding | false | false | ## High: Issues with MetaVesTs Having Different Decimals in the Same Set
### Description
If MetaVesTs with different decimals are included in the same set, MetaVesTs with higher decimals will have an exponential advantage over those with lower decimals [during the calculation of the governing power](https://github.com... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: A malicious user can send tokens to the TribeRedeemer contract to make the redeem function work, and other users may lose assets as a result
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-09-tribe/blob/769b0586b4975270b669d7d1581aa5672d6999d5/contracts/shutdown/redeem/TribeRedeemer.sol... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: _handleOpenFees returns an incorrect value for _feePaid. This directly impacts margin calculations
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/588c84b7bb354d20cbca6034544c4faa46e6a80e/contracts/Trading.sol#L178
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-12-tigris/blob/588c84b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused Imports, Errors and Events
### Description
Throughout the code in scope, there are several instances where the imports, errors, and events are declared but never used.
In `Babburuzu.sol`:
* `import {IBorpaPair} from "../contracts/interfaces/IBorpaPair.sol"`
* `error Babburuzu__E1(); // Transfer failed... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use storage pointer
### Description
**Description**
StakingData.sol, line 308, _getAllAcountUnstakesForAddress()
StakingData.sol, line 287, _getAccountStakesForAddress()
StakingData.sol, line 225, _getRoundRewardsForAddress()
RoundData.sol, line 15, endRound()
Burn.sol, line 64, getCurrentBurnData()
Burn.sol,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: For self-lending pairs rewards will be stuck
### Description
For self-lending pods, the paired LP token of the pod is a fToken, which is a share of a lending pair.
In the `AutoCompoundingPodLp`, it converts the reward token into the paired LP token. However for self-lending pods, instead of converting to the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: pendingDecreaseCollateral variable isn't excluded from the positionNetBalance() value in the leverage and rebalance calculations, which may lead to incorrect rebalance actions for the strategy
### Description
**Severity:** High
**Path:** src/strategy/BasisStrategy.sol#L779-L884
**Description:** During a par... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: [17] Restrict calling `ChefIncentivesController#recoverERC20()` on the underlying token
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-07-loopfi/blob/57871f64bdea450c1f04c9a53dc1a78223719164/src/reward/ChefIncentivesController.sol#L430-L433
This function allows the owner to withdraw an arbitrary amount o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: A User Can Register an Unlimited Number of Subscriptions
### Description
A user can register an infinite number of times since there are no restrictions in place to prevent it. It is therefore possible to register a large number of subscriptions such that `registerSubscription()` and `getSubscribers()` functio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero-address Validation
### Description
Lack of zero-address validation on address parameters may lead to transaction reverts, waste gas, require resubmission of transactions and may even force contract redeployments in certain cases within the protocol.
### Recommendation
Consider adding explicit zer... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: TRST-H-1 More than one hat of the same hatId can be assigned to a user
### Description
**Description:**
Hats are minted internally using `_mintHat()`.
As documentation states, it is unsafe if **_wearer** already has the **hatId**. However, this could
easily be the case when called from `mintHat()`.
The fu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Current decay percentage could be too high
### Description
https://github.com/with-backed/papr/blob/9528f2711ff0c1522076b9f93fba13f88d5bd5e6/src/PaprController.sol#L44-L47
Currently, we have a decay per period of 70% and a period of 1 day. This means that every day, price drop will be 70%. While I understand ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of contract documentation
### Description
The codebases lack code documentation, high-level descriptions, and examples, making the contracts difficult to review and increasing the likelihood of user mistakes. The CrosslayerPortal codebase would benefit from additional documentation, including on the follo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: 14] Read-only reentrancy in withdraw can lead to swap fee manipulation
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Path:** src/STEXAMM.sol:withdraw#L523-L624
**Description:** In the `withdraw` function for LP shareholders in STEXAMM, the caller can choose to unwrap their wHYPE and receive native HYPE instead. ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Violation of Protocol Integrity via Emission Removal
### Description
The vulnerability concerns the potential for an emission to be removed from SyMeta in a way that breaks the integrity of the system.
### Recommendation
- Disallow the **RemoveEmission** operation. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | true | false | ## Medium: Risk of Registering Invalid NFT/token Pairs
### Description
**Update**
1. For the first concern, the team fixed the issue as recommended in the commit `5fb99de`.
2. The team is concerned about the gas limit for the second concern. If the gas is insufficient, it might cause the message not able to be execu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: `vaultID`’s NFT/ERC20 bundle can be modified while the loan is outstanding
### Description
UserVault.sol allows a user to bundle assets (NFT/ERC20) together in a vault to be used as a collateral NFT.
According to [doc](https://app.gitbook.com/o/4HJV0LcOOnJ7AVJ77p8e/s/W2WSJrV6PSLWo4p8vIGq/vaults), the intended... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: L05] Undocumented assembly code
### Description
###### Low
Components: [`policy`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/tree/af3428020545e3f3ae2f3567b94e1fbc5e5bdb4c/contracts/policy), [`deploy`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/tree/af3428020545e3f3ae2f3567b94e1fbc5e5bdb4c/contracts/deploy), and [`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Rewards in the StakingContract are not calculated correctly
### Description
The `StakingContract.sol` contract allows users to stake ERC20 tokens via the `stake()` function, and based on their stake, emissions,epochs passed and the total staked amount they are supposed to receive a certain amount of rewards.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | true | ## High: Malicious pool deployer can set a malicious interest rate contract to lock funds of vault depositors
### Description
Once vault depositors have deposited funds into a pool, a malicious pool creator can upgrade the `interestRateStrategy` contract (using `PoolConfigurator.setReserveInterestRateStrategyAddress()... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Registering and Paying a Subscription Will Not Be Possible in a Single UserOperation Batch
### Description
The Bastion wallet supports batched userOperations. However, it will not be possible to register a subscription and initiate payment for it in the same batch. That is because with the current implement... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: CONFIG PARAMETERS VALUE CAN BE CHANGED UNRESTRICTEDLY
### Description
`instantiate` and `update_config` functions in **contracts/martian-field/src/execute.rs** allow contract's owner to update `max_ltv`, `bonus_rate` and `fee_rate` fields with a potential unfair amount. This situation can produce the follow... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Removal of Deprecated Functions
### Description
The function `setPause()` and `paused()` in `LendingPool` have been deprecated in favour of handling the logic in `LendingPoolConfigurator` to save on storage reads. These functions are public in `LendingPool` and no longer provide accurate outputs, which may pot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Omit SafeMath usage
### Description
**Description**
Since Solidity 0.8.x has built-in support of overflow/underflow restrictions, SafeMath lib can be
safely omitted. Such solution will decrease gas usage of the contract.
**Recommendation**:
Omit SafeMath | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Redundant Check for Zero Address in `_transfer` Function
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
The `_transfer` function in the provided in nerd token contains a redundant check for the zero address. Initially, the function checks if the to address is the zero ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Scope 1 - Misleading Revert Message
### Description
When [checking signatures](https://github.com/ZKsync-Association/zk-governance/blob/a3e361d00d8100ed1724b079ea7509f7f13e3d94/l1-contracts/src/Multisig.sol#L46) in `Multisig.sol`, a `while` loop is used to efficiently match a `member` to a recovered signer, ot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Transfers inside loops can lead to reverted transactions
### Description
In the `transferToMainPool` function of the `CachePool.sol` contract, multiple transfers are executed inside a loop. This implementation can lead to reverted transactions if any individual transfer fails, causing the entire operation to r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of events in setBLabs is error-prone
### Description
`BFactory.setBLabs` changes the `blabs` address without emitting an event:
```solidity
function setBLabs(address b) external {
require(msg.sender == _blabs, "ERR_NOT_BLABS");
_blabs = b;
}
```
_Figure 2.1: BFactory.sol#L51-L54_
The lack of event... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Vault | false | true | _Submitted by 0x52, also found by ayeslick_
User funds stolen.
### Proof of Concept
Swap data is completely arbitrary and can be used to swap though malicious ERC20 tokens allowing control transfer. This control transfer would allow the attacker to call rebalance on a second vault and exploit both as long as both va... | Code4rena | 4 | Mimo DeFi |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | false | false | ## Gas: Unchecked arithmetic
### Description
The default "checked" behavior costs more gas when adding/diving/multiplying, because under-the-hood those checks are implemented as a series of opcodes that, prior to performing the actual arithmetic, check for under/overflow and revert if it is detected.
If it can static... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Magic numbers are used
### Description
Throughout the codebase, there are occurrences of literal values with unexplained meaning. For example, the operation to get the [maximum slashable stake](https://github.com/forta-protocol/forta-token/blob/92d7a7ddd6672a7530a4bfc532d0d697e7f12744/contracts/components/stak... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Miscellaneous General Statements
### Description
This section describes general observations made by the testing team during this assessment that do not have direct security implications:
1. The STORE token contract unnecessarily uses `safeAdd()` in `transfer()` and `transferFrom()` when the total supply of S... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Nouns will not be able to be transferred once the `block.number` passes `type(uint32).max`
### Description
While this currently equates to ~1260 years, if there's a hard fork which makes block times much more frequent (e.g. to compete with Solana), then this limit may be reached much faster than expected, and ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | false | false | ## High: | Reward Compounds Are Sandwichable
### Description
**Description**
There exists no fee or lockup period associated with staking to receive a portion of the rewards compounded during the `updateAllRewardsForTransferReceiverAndTransferFee` function.
A malicious actor may simply buy GMXKey and stake right befo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Stale Price | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-isomorph-judging/issues/200
## Found by
\_\_141345\_\_, 8olidity, yixxas, caventa, HonorLt
## Summary
No check for round completeness could lead to stale prices and wrong price return value, or outdated price. The functions rely on accurate price feed might not wor... | Sherlock | 3 | Isomorph |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: `returnFunds()` can be frontrun to profit from an increase in share price
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:** High, an attacker can profit from the share price increase
**Likelihood:** Low, only profitable if a large amount of funds are returned
**Description**
`SafetyModule.returnFunds()` is used ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] MIPS: `sc` does not write a 0 to `rt` if the write is non-atomic
### Description
As per the MIPS ISA, `sc` will write a 1 to `rt` if a write is atomic and a 0 to `rt` is non-atomic. A write is atomic if the value of the memory address pointed to by the `sc` instruction has not been changed since the value... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Allowance check in `FiveFiftyRule::canTransfer` is inverted
### Description
**Description:** The following snippet from `FiveFiftyRule::canTransfer` has inverted logic.
This is also present in `FiveFiftyRule::checkCanTransfer`.
**Impact:** No transfers to entities are possible except in the rare cases th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Possible to Create a Lien without Supplying an Nft
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `a6290e37e2ebde7397b8d8efdc505bda4cf3fd15`. The client provided the following explanation:
> Fixed together with [PRL-3](https://certificate.quantstamp.com/full/particle/3cd57a7b-681f-4... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Rearrange stale price check formula out of absurd paranoia
### Description
In `_getFeedAnswer()`, we check if the Chainlink oracle has returned a stale price:
`feed_.staleAfter` is a `uint24`, so for any chain that uses standard Unix timestamps, it should be impossible for `block.timestamp - feed_.staleAfter`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [27] Protocol currently does not consider all windows in regards to `minDelay`
### Description
### Proof of Concept
Take a look at https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/4f0ba34f34a864c354c7e8c47643ed8f4a250e13/code/contracts/ethereum/contracts/governance/Governance.sol#L250-L253
The `updateDelay... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Liquidity pool can be set multiple times in MyShare.
### Description
**Description**
MyShare.sol: function setLP(). In the comment section, it is declared that a liquidity pool can be set only once, and the "txnLiqPoolIsSet" variable is checked to be false to verify this. However, the stake of this variable ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Use functions instead of modifiers
### Description
### Proof Of Concept
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-03-asymmetry/tree/main/contracts/SafEth/SafEth.sol#L52
### Recommended Mitigation Steps
Functions guaranteed to revert when called by normal users can be marked payable. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Amend Order Missing Refund
### Description
## amend_bid_order Function Issue
In the `amend_bid_order` function, when a user tries to decrease the size of an order having the same price, the size of the order gets reduced silently without a refund. Users should be refunded when the size is reduced.
## Code S... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `_MAX_FEE`Can be Greater Than `100` Percentage
### Description
The `setMaxFee()` functions allow the `treasury` to update `_MAX_FEE`. The `setMaxFee()` permits values exceeding 100% (i.e., >10000 basis points), which can lead to economically irrational fees.
### Impact
The protocol may charge excessive or ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Suboptimal gas usage due to post-increment in loops
### Description
In multiple functions across the codebase, the for loops use`i++` (post-increment) for incrementing the loop counter. In Solidity, post-increment (`i++`) is slightly less efficient than pre-increment (`++i`) because `i++` requires storing the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: MaxWithdraw should potentially account for the funds available in the ramp. ✓ Fixed
### Description
Since `InfinityPool` is ERC4626 it should also support the `MaxWithdraw` method. According to the EIP it should include any withdrawal limitation that the participant could encounter. At the moment the `MaxWithd... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `++i` costs less gas than `i++`, especially when it's used in `for`-loops (`--i`/`i--` too)
### Description
Saves 6 gas *PER LOOP*
*There are 5 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: TRST-M-7 Incorrect permission check due to confusion between empty call and the zero selector
### Description
**Description:**
In case the caller of LSP6 does not have **_PERMISSION_SUPER_CALL**, `_verifyAllowedCall()` is
called to check they have specific permissions for the call. It will use the function... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary State Storage of `pyth` Address
### Description
The `pyth` address is stored as a regular state variable. If this address is never intended to change, making it effectively immutable could save gas on repeated reads.
The issue is classified as **low** severity because it focuses on optimization ra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: Unitas swap function is vulnerable to Sandwich Attack at oracle price update
### Description
WHen the oracle price is updates, an attacker can sandwich the update adderss with 2 swap transactions to gain a profit and drain the collateral.
### Impact
Attacker can gain profit and "steal" collateral
### Recomm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Missing additional safety for multicall may lead to lost ETH in future
### Description
If the function `multicall()` would be payable, then multiple delegated-to functions could use the same `msg.value`, which could result in losing ETH from the pair. A future upgrade of Solidity might change the default setti... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Usage of `uints`/`ints` smaller than 32 bytes (256 bits) incurs overhead
### Description
> When using elements that are smaller than 32 bytes, your contract’s gas usage may be higher. This is because the EVM operates on 32 bytes at a time. Therefore, if the element is smaller than that, the EVM must use more o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | false | ## Low: Lack of SafeMath in the dutch-auction pallet could result in incorrect prices
### Description
The `off_chain_run_auctions` function in the `dutch-auction` pallet iterates through auction orders and computes an adjusted price for each order before submitting it to the Orderbook. This adjusted price is calculate... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent check for LP balance in AMO
### Description
While pulling LP tokens from the CVXStaker contract, the AMO queries the current available balance using the staked balance, which is inconsistent with the implementation of the withdraw function.
Curve LP tokens owned by the AMO contract are staked ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: `priceFeeds` can't be changed
### Description
`priceFeeds` can't be changed:
https://github.com/Gearbox-protocol/gearbox-contracts/blob/0ac33ba87212ce056ac6b6357ad74161d417158a/contracts/oracles/PriceOracle.sol#L56
### Recommendation
We recommend adding a function for changing `priceFeeds`. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Two step ownership transfer
### Description
The function `setAdmin()` transfers ownership to a new address. If a wrong address is supplied, ownership becomes inaccessible. This same issue occurs with `transferOwnership` in the `OwnableUpgradeable` of several Nomad contracts. Additionally, the Nomad contract tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: `ReleasePol()` can be frontrun to bypass incentive rules
### Description
_Acknowledged_
When users deposit the UniV3 position into the staker, they accumulate some rewards from incentives. Users can stake this position in different incentives, capped at some limit. Incentives could be in different reward toke... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.