prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | true | ## High: Gauge reward system can be gamed with repeatedly stake/withdraw
### Description
The RAAC Gauge system implements a reward distribution mechanism where users can stake tokens and earn rewards based on their stake amount and `veToken` balance (includes a boost multiplier feature that affects reward calculation... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unrestricted deadlines for swaps
### Description
In the `addLiquidity()` and the `_chargeGreenFee()` functions of the `StrategyAerodromeGaugeGreenFee` contract, there are several interactions with the Aerodrome router that allow for unlimited deadlines.
When interacting with external AMM protocols such as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | timing | true | false | ## High: Users can extend an expired boost using invalidated NFTs.
### Description
In `Goldilend.sol#L251`, a user can extend a boost with invalidated NFTs.
- The user has created a boost with a valid NFT.
- After that, the NFT was invalidated using `adjustBoosts()`.
- After the original boost is expired, the user can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | false | ## High: Unauthorized Access to `setCurves` Function
### Description
The `FeeSplitter.sol` contract, which is responsible for fee distribution and claiming, contains a significant security vulnerability related to the `setCurves` function. This function allows updating the reference to the `Curves` contract. However, ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary transferOwnership
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
In Sender.sol - In body of constructor, transferring ownership to msg.sender is already carried out by base contract's Ownable constructor.
**Recommendation**
remove that line of code. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Revoke membership should check and revoke votes
### Description
## Membership Tokens Revocation
When `mint_authority` revokes membership tokens, there should be a check for any live votes, and the ability for a DAO to relinquish those votes.
## Code Snippet
## Remediation
The Solana Labs team has noted th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Deprecate _chainID function in favor of block.chainid
### Description
`THUSDToken.sol` defines an internal function, `_chainID()`, that retrieves the chain ID through an assembly call to the `CHAIN` EVM opcode. However, since Solidity compiler version 0.8.0, it is possible to retrieve the chain ID through `blo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: `isSigner` addresses uniqueness check
### Description
Constructor: missing a `isSigner` addresses uniqueness check. Missing a `isSigner` zero check.
https://github.com/MetaLex-Tech/borg-core/blob/9074503d37cfa1d777ef16f6c88b84c98b4f54eb/src/libs/conditions/signatureCondition.sol#L49.
### Recommendation
We rec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unsafe call to .decimals
### Description
## Handle
cmichel
## Vulnerability details
The `FYToken.constructor` performs an external call to `IERC20Metadata(address(IJoin(join_).asset())).decimals()`.
This function was optional in the initial ERC-20 and might fail for old tokens that therefore did not implem... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Disallow users from extending their lock durations for inactive tokens
### Description
[Link to instance](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-05-munchables/blob/57dff486c3cd905f21b330c2157fe23da2a4807d/src/managers/LockManager.sol#L245)
Users should not be allowed to extend durations for their existing locks f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Single under-funded protocol can break paying off debt
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel, also found by walker and gpersoon_
The `SherXERC20.payOffDebtAll` function iterates over all protocols of the token.
If _a single project_ does not have enough funds to cover the premium payments, the transactions c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: Calling `transferEth` function can revert if `receiver` input corresponds to a contract that is unable to receive ETH through its `receive` or `fallback` function
### Description
_Submitted by rbserver, also found by CertoraInc, Jeiwan, and tonisives_
### Impact
The following `transferEth` function is ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Permit Signatures Cannot Be Revoked
### Description
The current implementation of [`ERC721Permit_v4`](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd339dc773d32f5fc4c91fc/src/base/ERC721Permit_v4.sol#L14) does not include any functionality for invalidating existing signatures before the deadli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Transfers could silently fail without safeTransfer
### Description
Several functions do not check the `ERC20.transfer` return value. Without a return value check, the transfer is error-prone, which may lead to unexpected results.
```solidity
function transferToken(address _asset, uint256 _amount) external onl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | flash-loan | true | false | ## High: An attacker can contribute to the ETH crowdfund using a flash loan and control the party as he likes
### Description
An attacker can have more than half of the total voting power using a flash loan and abuse other contributors.
### Proof of Concept
The main flaw is that the party can distribute funds right ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Leveraged trader with small collateral can create a riskless position until settlement
### Description
A highly leveraged trader (around max leverage) with small collateral can autoliquidate position to create a riskless position
### Impact
Alice obtains a riskless position, inducing potential shortfall on... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | cross-chain | false | false | ## Medium: cBridge integration fails to send native tokens
### Description
_Submitted by hickuphh3, also found by hyh, rayn, shw, WatchPug, and wuwe1_
[CBridgeFacet.sol#L150-L156](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-lifinance/blob/main/src/Facets/CBridgeFacet.sol#L150-L156)
The external `sendNative()` call fails t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | other | true | false | ## High: Function `getTotalStake()` fails to account for pending validators, leading to inaccurate accounting
### Description
The `getTotalStake()` function is the core accounting function to calculate the total stake of the `CasimirManager`. It's used to compute the change for `rewardStakeRatioSum` within the `finali... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Wallet migration blocked by pause logic and is impractical
### Description
_Acknowledged_
The protocol intends to support wallet migration and future contract upgrades via an opt-in approach, relying on users transferring their full portfolio using `transferAllSharesInWallet`, followed by off-chain indexing a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Any Selected Validator can Permanently DoS Reward Payouts
### Description
For a one-time upfront cost, any selected validator is capable of putting the contract into a permanently “stuck” state, where no further rewards can be paid out.
For any given `_rewardsDay`, anyone can precompute arbitrarily many “va... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Users can create NFTs with 0 locked amount through split function
### Description
VotingEscrow doesn't allow users to create NFTs with zero locked amount.
The `split` function also doesn't allow split to 0. However, it fails to check that both resulting NFTs have non-zero amounts. When a user sets `_amount` e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Using private rather than public for constants saves gas
### Description
**Description:**
If needed, the values can be read from the verified contract source code, or if there are[ multiple values t](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-08-frax/blob/90f55a9ce4e25bceed3a74290b854341d8de6afa/src/contracts/Fraxle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Rewards for initial period can be lost in all of the synthetix derivative contracts
### Description
### Lines of code
### Impact
Rewards in the synthetix derivative contracts (`EUSDMinningIncentives.sol`, `ProtocolRewardsPool.sol` and `stakerRewardsV2Pool.sol`) are initiated when the owner calls the `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | reentrancy | true | false | ## Medium: Reentrancy bug allows lender to steal other lenders funds
### Description
A reentrancy bug in `LineOfCredit.sol` allows the lender to steal other lenders tokens if they are lending the same tokens type (loss of funds).
The reentrancy occurs in the `_close(credit, id)` function in `LineOfCredit.sol`. The `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Race Condition in Bounce Messages Handling Lead to Overwritten Balances
### Description
**Update**
The team fixed the issue in commit `a6012d1` by introducing a new utility function, `increase_vault_balance_amount()`, to ensure the balance is added to the previous one.
**File(s) affected:**`executor-item.fc`,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Malicious observer can drain Solana bridge by adding failed deposit transaction to inbound tracker
### Description
Any single entity with the admin or observer role can drain the Solana-Zetachain bridge. Deposits can be spoofed by encoding a deposit instruction such that the transaction fails yet is still pro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: User may get less tokens than expected when collateral list order changes
### Description
The order of `ts.collateralList` is not stable: Whenever `LibSetters.revokeCollateral` is used to revoke a collateral, it may change because of the swap that is performed. However, the function `Redeemer.redeem` relies... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: ering the gauge weight can disrupt accounting, potentially leading to both excessive fund distribution and a loss of funds.
### Description
Similar issues were found by users [0xDetermination](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-verwa-findings/issues/386) and [bart1e](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Role Transfer Not Following Two-Step Pattern
### Description
**Update**
Addressed in: `1ce414257336c515a07a8f36b92d9106e915d7f6`. The client provided the following explanation:
> The Ownable library has been removed in favour of the AccessControl library, which allows for having multiple addresses for a singl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Protocol does not support token decimals
### Description
This iteration of the Fei Protocol is designed to be a generic version of the original protocol – now instead of supporting just ETH as the PCV of the system, the contracts are designed to be able to use any ERC20 token as PCV. However, the code is not ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Lack of rebasable tokens support
### Description
The issue is identified in the [`LOB`](https://github.com/longgammalabs/hanji-contracts/blob/09b6188e028650b9c1758010846080c5f8c80f8e/src/OnchainLOB.sol) contract.
For rebasable tokens, such as those that adjust their supply over time (e.g., Ampleforth), the L... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Frontrunning Deployment Process
### Description
## Factory::deploy Overview
In `Factory::deploy`, a new pool contract is deployed utilizing a deployer. The admin and salt parameters are provided as function arguments. On observing a deployment of a transaction with a specific salt, another user may front-run ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: The `nonReentrant` modifier should occur `before` all other modifiers
### Description
Reentrancy could occur in modifiers that are placed before `nonReentrant`. Several functions within the scope have this issue:
https://github.com/eywa-protocol/eywa-clp/blob/d68ba027ff19e927d64de123b2b02f15a43f8214/contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: As protocol relies heavily on admin actions, single-step ownership transfer pattern is dangerous
### Description
**Likelihood:**
Low, because it requires admin error when transferring ownership
**Impact:**
High, because it bricks core protocol functionality
**Description**
Inheriting from OpenZeppelin's ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Oracle uses a deprecated Pyth Hermes API endpoint
### Description
The oracle retrieves price updates through the Pyth network Hermes API by requesting the `/api/latest_vaas` endpoint. However, this endpoint is deprecated according to the Hermes API documentation available at [hermes.pyth.network/docs/#/rest/la... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Validation | true | false | ## Security Report
## Severity
**Medium Risk**
## Context
- SpokeConnector.sol#L403-L422
- SpokeConnector.sol#L456-L481
## Description
The functions `verifyAggregateRoot()` and `proveMessageRoot()` verify and confirm roots. A root value of `0` is a special case. If this value would be allowed, then the functions cou... | Spearbit | 5 | Connext |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Code Optimizations
### Description
## Findings and Recommendations
1. **Callback Redundancies**
The `sybil_always_allow_callback`, `bypass_protocol_fee`, and `assert_can_apply_callback` callbacks are unnecessary. Instead of performing an external call and waiting for a callback, invoke the internal logic ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | true | false | ## High: RewardDistributor claims can be DoSed through excess amount of userPoint creation
### Description
Report type: Smart Contract
Target: https://github.com/alchemix-finance/alchemix-v2-dao/blob/main/src/RewardsDistributor.sol
Impacts:
- Griefing (e.g. no profit motive for an attacker, but damage to the users ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Wallet can be embedded in iframe, enabling clickjacking attacks
### Description
The wallet SDK allows the wallet UI to be embedded in an iframe instead of opening in a popup window. This creates a clickjacking vulnerability where a malicious dapp can overlay the wallet interface with hidden elements or mislea... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: Lack Of Check Between Collection And Swap Pool
### Description
## Infinity Swap Vulnerability Report
The `execute_swap_tokens_for_specific_nfts` action takes a user-provided collection and `nfts_to_swap_for`. Each entry of `nfts_to_swap_for` includes a `pool_id` pointing to the target pool for a swap to occu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent burn application to sender due to recipient exclusion
### Description
The `_update()` function in the `GorplesCoin` contract performs the calculation of tokens to burn prior to updating the balances of the involved addresses.
However, the calculation of the fees to burn is not executed when ei... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | logic-error | true | false | ## Low: Inefficient `free_index` Selection in Assets Array Causes Performance Degradation
### Description
The `find_or_alloc_asset` function in `client_primary` always selects the last vacant slot (`asset_id == 0`) instead of the first available slot when allocating new assets. This causes unnecessary `O(n)` iteration... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: Users Can Frontrun challenge()Function
### Description
NEAR has taken an optimistic approach in maintaining the canonical chain on Ethereum. Watchdog services are tasked with monitoring the addition of NEAR light client blocks, performing the necessary verification off-chain.
In the event a watchdog service ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: LACK OF EXTERNAL CALLS VALIDATION
### Description
Non-validated external calls occur when a function invokes an external contract without verifying the return value or handling potential errors.
Several external calls were detected without proper validation.
### Impact
This can lead to reentrancy attacks or... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: State variables should be cached in stack variables rather than re-reading them from storage
### Description
The instances (outlined in the warden's [full report](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-alchemix-findings/issues/228)) point to the second+ access of a state variable within a function. Caching will... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Check that address contains code before calling it
### Description
The contract performs a low-level `isValidSignature` static-call to an EIP1271 contract. This call is always performed if verifying the signature failed, and it does not check if the address is a contract. The call will still be done for EOAs (... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent Scaling in RToken Transfer Functions
### Description
RToken is an interest‐bearing token for the RAAC lending protocol. It is modeled similarly to Aave’s AToken, where user balances (and the total supply) are stored in “scaled” form and then converted to underlying units by multiplying with a “... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [05] Missing `rewardPPQ` validation in campaign deployment functions
### Description
The `deployCampaign` and `deployAndFundCampaign` functions in the NudgeCampaignFactory contract do not validate that the `rewardPPQ` parameter is greater than zero and less than `PPQ_DENOMINATOR`; potentially allowing campaign... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Usage of `uints`/`ints` smaller than 32 bytes (256 bits) incurs overhead
### Description
Usage of uints/ints smaller than 32 bytes (256 bits) incurs overhead. The Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) operates on 32 bytes at a time. Therefore, if an element is smaller than 32 bytes, the EVM must use more operations t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: No Error if Commitment Exists in `updateClientCommitments()`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `877957b44b10420ff424b96cd6e349db4adcf375`.
**File(s) affected:**`IBCClient.sol`
**Description:**`IBCClient.updateClientCommitments()` does not enforce that the `commitments... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Inefficient Inequality Operator in Deposit Check
### Description
The issue is identified within the function [`depositERC20`](https://github.com/LayerLabs-app/Ozean-Contracts/blob/dacd9ed9c895c9b6be422531eea15fecc3c2b1d8/src/L1/LGEStaking.sol#L106) of contract `LGEStaking`. Currently, the deposit requirement u... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `require()` or `revert()` statements that check input arguments should be at the top of the function
### Description
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. By doing these checks first, the function is able to revert before wasting... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Limit QUIC Certificate Options
### Description
## Solana TPU Communication and Certificate Management
The Solana TPU uses QUIC for communications. Clients can provide TLS certificates in order to show ownership of a particular Solana keypair during the connection handshake. See OS-SDA2-ADV-00.
While clients ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: User Controlled Options Price
### Description
**Severity** - Critical
**Severity** - Resolved
**Description**
When joining a duel the amount put up as wager is compared against an options price and can’t be lower than that price. But since the options price is controlled by the user →
The user can provid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Move lesser gas costing require/revert checks to the top
### Description
Require() or Revert() statements that check input arguments or cost lesser gas should be at the top of the function.
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. B... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use O_CLOEXEC �lag by default when opening files on Linux
### Description
The RawFile wrapper used for opening files does not use the `O_CLOEXEC` flag by default. Enabling this flag allows an opened file to close when a process calls `execve` and thereby prevents unexpected leaks of file descriptors to child pr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Locked Ether In Contracts
### Description
## Ether Withdrawal Issue in Contracts
**Contracts Involved:**
- `Treasury.sol`
- `USX.sol`
These contracts allow for the receipt of ether through their `receive` functions but do not contain functions to withdraw it. As a result, if ether is sent to the contracts, i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | logic | false | false | ## Low: Insu�ficient testing coverage
### Description
The StakerDao Vault codebase does not include sufficient test cases. Robust unit and integration tests are critical for catching the introduction of certain bugs and logic errors early in the development process. Projects should strive for thorough coverage, both ag... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: NatSpec `@return` argument is missing
### Description
NatSpec `@return` argument is missing | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: CrownyVesting changeVestingAddress function doesn’t transfer claimed tokens
### Description
**Description**
In a case when transferring a vesting which is already partly claimed, the new address is able
to claim this partly claimed amount once more as a consequence of this issue. This double
claim can also c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: `depositFromNotional` function is payable, which means that it should accept Ether, but in reality will revert 100% when msg.value > 0
### Description
The function `depositFromNotional` used in `BaseStrategyVault.sol` is payable, which means that it should accept Ether, but in reality it will revert every t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: IClear Text Logging of Sensitive Credentials (client/export.go)
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Status:** Acknowledged
**Impact:**
Unsanitized input from sensitive credentials is logged in clear text, potentially exposing private keys.
**Likelihood:**
Moderate, as malicious actors could access... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Unsafe integer conversions in FPIControllerPool
### Description
Explicit integer conversions can be used to bypass certain restrictions (e.g., the borrowing cap) in the `FPIControllerPool` contract. The `FPIControllerPool` contract allows certain users to either borrow or repay FRAX within certain limits (e.g... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: L10] Important state variables are not public
### Description
###### Low
In the `Inflation` contract, the [`generation`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/51b65c5c7af455391af2bc30d13d761566d8c236/contracts/inflation/Inflation.sol#L44) [state variable](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: View function will never return value.
### Description
**Description**
StakingB.sol Line 46
“stakesInfo” will never return value because it creates an array [from; to) but tries to iterate
through [from; to].
**Recommendation**:
Change the format of array to
“ s = new Stake[](_to - _from+1)” or
“for (ui... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unlocked Pragma
### Description
**Update**
The Solidity version was fixed at `0.8.19`. Addressed in: `7b957ba46ffb0b746ed4064ccbf7489f2f543760`.
**Description:** Every Solidity file specifies in the header a version number of the format `pragma solidity (^)0.8.*`. The caret (`^`) before the version number imp... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Mutable `whitelistReserve()` Allows Rewriting Allocation Rules After Deposits
### Description
The `setWhitelistReserve()` function allows the owner to change the whitelist reserve at any time before settlement, including after users have already deposited funds. This directly changes the priority vs public ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Attackers can force liquidations by borrowing large amounts of an asset.
### Description
_Submitted by tensors_
Consider an attacker who borrows enough to greatly increase the oracle rate. It is claimed that arbitrageurs will come in and fix this discrepancy before the attacker has a chance to profit off o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Penalized users due to changes in `_earlyWithdrawalThreshold`
### Description
Users may face unexpected penalties due to changes in the `_earlyWithdrawalThreshold` variable. This variable is used to calculate whether a penalty applies to users removing liquidity prematurely `PerpRewardDistributor#L132-L138`.
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Redundant balance check in safeTransferFrom before calling underlying transfer function
### Description
**Description:** The `RWASegWrap::safeTransferFrom()` function performs an unnecessary balance check on lines 452-454 before calling the underlying transfer function:
This balance check is redundant becaus... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Using `camelCase` style for variables
### Description
Variable naming can be updated:
- https://github.com/EnsoFinance/enso-weiroll/tree/9289118113f753d460a97d7c6ee72577e5c3f5eb/contracts/VM.sol#L43 `outdata` by `outData`
- https://github.com/EnsoFinance/enso-weiroll/tree/9289118113f753d460a97d7c6ee72577e5c3f5... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: [20] Duplicated `require()`/`revert()` checks should be refactored to a modifier or function
### Description
Saves deployment costs
*There are 3 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Replace inline assembly with
### Description
[L-05] Replace inline assembly with account.code.length
<address>.code.length can be used in Solidity >= 0.8.0 to access an account’s code size and check if it is a contract without inline assembly.
VoterID#isContract
function isContract(address account) ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Users unable to withdraw their funds due to FRAX admin action
### Description
FRAX admin action can lead to the fund of Naiper protocol and its users being stuck, resulting in users being unable to withdraw their assets.
### Impact
The fund of Naiper protocol and its users will be stuck, resulting in users... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: On-Chain Slippage Calculation Can Be Manipulated
### Description
The `_swap` function defined in the SwapperUniV3 contract is designed to swap tokens for a given amount and ensure that the swap does not exceed a specified slippage. It is used during the foreclosure process, to swap the collateral to the bor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing Timestamp Update
### Description
## BidState Update Issue
The `updated_at` field in the `BidState` structure is not updated during the execution of `take_bid_shared`, and stakeholders will not have an accurate record of when the bid was last modified.
## Remediation
Ensure `updated_at` field is upda... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Repayer can brick lending functionality of `LenderCommitmentGroup_Smart` by repaying excess
### Description
`LenderCommitmentGroup_Smart` doesn't handle excess repayments making it possible to brick the lending functionality
### Impact
Bricked lending functionality
### Recommendation
In case repaid princi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Dust Token Balances Cannot Be Claimed By An `admin` Account
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood, also found by 0x0x0x_
#### Impact
Users who have a small claim on rewards for various promotions, may not feasibly be able to claim these rewards as gas costs could outweigh the sum they receive in return.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: CurveAdapter uses non-existent exchange_with_best_rate() method, breaking fee conversion on Arbitrum.
### Description
The CurveAdapter contract calls the `exchange_with_best_rate()` method, however this method does not exist in the [newer CurveRouterNG contract deployed on Arbitrum](https://arbiscan.io/address... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | false | false | ## Medium: No allowance front-running mitigation
### Description
The [`ArroToken` contract](https://github.com/pjsimpkins/ArroERC20Code/blob/1ca1cc85f2e7e046070c187031b75b3335ef57c3/Solidity#L105) is vulnerable to the ERC20 approve and double spend front-running attack.
In this attack, a token owner authorizes anot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: UniV3 tokens with fees can bypass strategist checks
### Description
Each UniV3 strategy includes a value for `feeinnlrDetails` that is used to constrain their strategy to UniV3 pools with matching fees. This is enforced with the following check (where `details.fee` is the strategist's set fee, and `fee` is ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: DUPLICATED ERROR CHECKS
### Description
There are two instances where an error check is not required, and the logic can be adjusted to only return the value.
Code Location
-------------
[x/leverage/types/tx.go, Lines 115-121](https://github.com/umee-network/umee/blob/rafilx/umeed-cosmwasmd/x/leverage/types/t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: API CSRF protection bypass leading to arbitrary 'operator-cli' command execution
### Description
Hey team, | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Block finalization is immediate and permissionless
### Description
Once a block is proposed by the operator, which might be malicious (e.g., containing a specifically crafted withdrawal root), anyone can immediately invoke the `finalize_block` instruction to finalize it. Consequently, a malicious withdrawal ca... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | true | false | ## Gas: Add `unchecked {}` for subtractions where the operands cannot underflow because of a previous `require()` or `if`-statement
### Description
`require(a `require(a <= b); unchecked { x = b - a }`
*There is 1 instance of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-paraspace/blob/c6820a279c64a299a7839557... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Fallback mechanism risks data loss due to lack of backup file validation
### Description
The `fallback_backup_kernel` function assumes that the backup files (`BACKUP_KERNEL_ROOT_HASH` and `BACKUP_KERNEL_BOOT_PATH`) exist and contain valid data. However, it does not perform any checks to verify the existence... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | flash-loan | true | false | ## High: Attacker can combine flashloan with delegated voting to decide a proposal and withdraw their tokens while the proposal is still in Locked state
### Description
**Description:** Attacker can combine a flashloan with delegated voting to bypass the existing flashloan mitigations, allowing the attacker to decide ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Minor improvements to code
### Description
## Context
See each case below.
## Description/Recommendation:
1. **InfraredV1_3.sol#L11-L12**
- These imports, including ConfigTypes, are unused and can be removed.
2. **InfraredV1_3.sol#L77-L86**
- The functionality in `queueMultipleValCommissions()` is a du... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Negative Slippage Allowed During Position Decrease
### Description
The `_checkSlippage` function does not properly validate slippage conditions when decreasing positions, particularly for long positions. The function applies different logic based on the `isLong` value, leading to inconsistent and potentiall... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use scientific notation (e.g. `1e18`) rather than exponentiation (e.g. `10**18`)
### Description
While the compiler knows to optimize away the exponentiation, it's still better coding practice to use idioms that do not require compiler optimization, if they exist
*There are 2 instances of this issue:*
https:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | other | true | true |
Can reroll attributes based on a different fighterType, and can bypass maxRerollsAllowed.
### Proof of Concept
`maxRerollsAllowed` can be set differently depending on the `fighterType`. Precisely, it increases as the generation of fighterType increases.
```solidity
function incrementGeneration(uint8 fighterType) ex... | Code4rena | 5 | AI Arena |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Canonical NTT chain ID should be fetched directly from Wormhole or mapped accordingly | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Non-usage of specific imports
### Description
The current form of relative path import is not recommended for use because it can unpredictably pollute the namespace.
Instead, the Solidity docs recommend specifying imported symbols explicitly.
https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.15/layout-of-source-files.html... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: middle level admins can steal child trees because function unlinkTopHatFromTree() is callable by them
### Description
in normal scenario middle level admins can't relink a child tree to another tree and when code link a tree it checks that the old and new admin is in the same tree(have same tippy hat). but ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | true | true | ## Low: Free Memory Pointer Overflow
### Description
Solidity versions prior to 0.6.5 contain a bug that may be exploited in Borsh.sol decoding. The bug exists as an overflow of the memory pointer when allowing arbitrarily length arrays to be passed as input to public or external functions. The bug stems from Solidity ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use a more recent version of solidity
### Description
Use a solidity version of at least 0.8.13 to get the ability to use `using for` with a list of free functions
*There are 3 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-sturdy/blob/78f51a7a74ebe8adfd055bdbaedfddc05632566f/smart-contracts... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: _DOMAIN_SEPARATOR can omit unused values
### Description
The `HashLib.sol` file defines two constants:
```solidity
/// @dev `keccak256("EIP712Domain(string name,string version,uint256 chainId,address verifyingContract)")`.
bytes32 constant _DOMAIN_TYPEHASH = 0x8b73c3c69bb8fe3d512ecc4cf759cc79239f7b179b0ffacaa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: L17] Incomplete API documentation
### Description
###### Low
The [README.md](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/tree/c0d8477866a8667a37f45c85378c5938c84569cd/contracts/currency#api) file includes a section where the public API of the [`BeamBalanceStore`](https://github.com/BeamNetwork/currency/blob/c0d8... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: [46] Named returns are recommended
### Description
Using named returns makes the code more self-documenting, makes it easier to fill out NatSpec, and in some cases can save gas. The cases below are where there currently is at most one return statement, which is ideal for named returns.
There are 17 instances:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | false | false | ## Low: ERC20 race condition for allowances
### Description
## Handle
toastedsteaksandwich
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Due to the implementation of the approve() function in Vader.sol, Vether.sol and mainnet Vether4 at 0x4Ba6dDd7b89ed838FEd25d208D4f644106E34279, it's possible for a user to over spend their ... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.