prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Signatures have no expiration deadline
### Description
**Description:** Signatures which have [no expiration parameter](https://dacian.me/signature-replay-attacks#heading-no-expiration) effectively grant a lifetime license. Consider adding an expiration parameter to the signature that if used after that time r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use underscores for number literals
### Description
FILE : 2023-03-canto-identity/canto-namespace-protocol/src/Utils.sol
258: iteratedState = _currState * 15485863;
259: iteratedState = (iteratedState * iteratedState * iteratedState) % 2038074743;
[Utils.sol#L258-L259](https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: No donations supported
### Description
The shares' value is determined by an external price (Spark's liquidity index, `IPool(pool).getReserveNormalizedIncome(asset)`). This means the share price cannot be increased by directly transferring underlying assets to the contract, as one might expect from similar vau... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Using `calldata` instead of `memory` for read-only arguments in `external` functions saves gas
### Description
1. File: core-contracts/contracts/CoreCollection.sol (line [79](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-03-joyn/blob/c9297ccd925ebb2c44dbc6eaa3effd8db5d2368a/core-contracts/contracts/CoreCollection.sol#L7... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: MixOracle is broken due to hardcoded position
### Description
_No response_
### Impact
Medium. Breaks core contract functionality. Oracle is a core feature in a protocol.
### Recommendation
Consider not hardcoding the position (`token1`) as the key of the mapping used within `MixOracle`. Instead, allow th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | storage | true | false | ## Medium: `proposedOwner` not reset on transfer, allowing ownership to be seized back
### Description
The ProposableOwnable.sol contract amends OpenZeppelin's Ownable Upgradeable contract to add in a two step ownership transfer process, where a new owner must be proposed and then accepted.
Because this contract inhe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Dilution bound should be a fixed-point number Won't Fix
### Description
The dilution bound is designed to mitigate an issue where a proposal is passed, then many users ragequit from the DAO and the remaining members have to pay more than they initially intended to. Because of that, the proposal will be automa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Inconsistent Fee Collector Address Validation in RAACMinter: Denial of Service for Disabling Fee Collection
### Description
The RAACMinter contract manages token minting and fee-related configurations by interfacing with the RAACToken contract. One such function, `setFeeCollector`, is used to update the fee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Tokens Can Be Stuck
### Description
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
While calling liquidateToken(), the funds are sent from the token contract into the vault contract. When tokens are sent to be swapped at the router, the contract does not check if this is successful and optimis... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Program Account Misuse
### Description
## Authority Field Explanation
The authority field is a `Signer`. This implies it is expected to be an account that has signed the transaction and, therefore, is responsible for authorizing the action. If the authority signer is a program, the program admin may misuse... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Revert message can be overwritten by return data
### Description
In `Lifebuoy.rescueERC20` and `Lifebuoy.rescueERC6909`, in case the transfer fails, we intend to revert with the `RescueTransferFailed()` error at `0x0c` in memory:
```solidity
// Perform the transfer, reverting upon failure.
if iszero(
and( /... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | front-running | true | false | ## High: Giant pools can be drained due to weak vault authenticity check
### Description
An attacker can withdraw all ETH staked by users in a Giant pool. Both `GiantSavETHVaultPool` and `GiantMevAndFeesPool` are affected.
### Proof of Concept
The `batchDepositETHForStaking` function in the Giant pools check whether... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | true | false | ## Low: MISSING REQUIREISCONTRACT CHECK IN COLLATERALMANAGER.SETADDRESSES()
### Description
In the `CollateralManager.sol` contract, when setting the contract addresses using `setAddresses()`, the `_requireIsContract()` check is missing for `_troveManagerRedemptionsAddress`.
Code Location
-------------
### Recommend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Aave’s module lacks reward-claiming functionality
### Description
**Description:** The D2 protocol's Aave integration lacks reward claiming functionality in the Aave_Module.sol contract. While the protocol successfully interacts with Aave's lending and borrowing features, it does not implement any mechanism to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Typos
### Description
* funciton
* \_potentialReplcia
* bridgable
* addressess
* a sthe
* sournce
* rlayer
* specicfied
* callabale
* everytime
* stabelswap
* briding
* identifer
* incomming | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary inline assembly operations can be removed and replaced by hardcoded constants
### Description
**Description:** `PoolKeyHelperLib::calldataToId` currently performs two unnecessary `mul` operations in computing the slice length:
Instead, these operations can be avoided by referencing the length of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | true | true | ## High: Tokens are left in the protocol when the swap at the destination chain fails
### Description
LiFi protocol finds the best bridge route for users. In some cases, it helps users do a swap at the destination chain. With the help of the bridge protocols, the LiFi protocol assists users in triggering `swapAndCompl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Motion Creators Can Block Creation of Other Motions
### Description
The EasyTrack contract enforces a global limit to the number of currently active motions. Once reached, no new motions can be created. If a malicious actor is able to create new motions, they can flood the contract with motions to fill up this... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged Roles
### Description
**Update**
The client has acknowledged the issue.
**File(s) affected:**`SSVNetwork.sol`, `SSVNetworkViews.sol`
**Description:** All privileged permissions should be clearly documented for users. The privileged permissions of each contract are documented below.
`SSVNetwork` a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing bracket in docs
### Description
**Description:** [The document](https://goldilocks-1.gitbook.io/goldidocs/locks/the-price-function) is missing a bracket.
**Client:** Acknowledged, this has been corrected.
**Cyfrin:** Acknowledged. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Implementation Contracts Can Be Initialized
### Description
According to the documentation, `CoreVault`, `MergeMarketplaceStrategy` and `Marketplace` contracts are upgradeable contracts. In order to prevent leaving the contracts uninitialized, OpenZeppelin's documentation recommends adding the `_disableInitial... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | true | ## Medium: `setGatewayAddress` incorrectly updates address of the gateway
### Description
The gateway owner can set a new address for it using `setGatewayAddress` function. Unfortunately, this function only updates `gatewayByAddress` mapping, leaving `Gateway` struct intact
```solidity
function setGatewayAddress(by... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Any call to Adapter.sendMessage() can be front-run by a malicious user submitting a 0 _- minGasLimit parameter
### Description
The Adapter contracts implement the function `sendMessage()`:
```solidity
/**
* @notice Send signer tokens to other chain through the linked adapter
* @param _signer The address of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Variable declared but not used
### Description
At this line: https://github.com/iearn-finance/yearn-vaults/blob/54db126821c4d7aaaf5839be935cecb9b1bf088b/contracts/BaseStrategy.sol#L273
The `callCost` variable is not used
### Recommendation
We recommend removing unused variables | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: Two nonReentrancy Modifiers Prevent liquidate() Execution
### Description
Two `nonReentrant` modifiers are executed in a single call, causing `ReentrancyGuard` to revert during `liquidate()`.
When the function `AbstractLender.liquidate()` is called, the following call sequence occurs:
1. `AbstractLender.liqu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | initialization | false | false | ## Gas: Using `calldata` instead of `memory` for read-only arguments in `external` functions saves gas
### Description
When a function with a `memory` array is called externally, the `abi.decode()` step has to use a for-loop to copy each index of the `calldata` to the `memory` index. **Each iteration of this for-loop ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: EntryPoint not included in user operation hash creates the possibility of Replay Attacks
### Description
**Description:** According to `EIP-4337`, the user operation hash should be constructed in a way to protect from replay attacks either on the same chain or different chains.
[eip-4337#useroperation](https... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Signatures have no expiration deadline
### Description
Signatures which have [no expiration parameter](https://dacian.me/signature-replay-attacks#heading-no-expiration) effectively grant a lifetime license. Consider adding an expiration parameter to the signature that if used after that time results in the sig... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | true | false | ## High: Users can burn delegated tokens using re-entrancy attack ✓ Addressed
### Description
When a user burns tokens, the following code is called:
**new\_code/contracts/ERC777/LockableERC777.sol:L413-L426**
```
uint locked = \_getAndUpdateLockedAmount(from);
if (locked > 0) {
require(\_balances[from] >= l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Missing Input Validation
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Acknowledged. The `price` and `amount` are `uint256`. It should fail the arithmetic check if the value is less than zero. For zero value, it’s practically 1 wei or a few... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: No money back.
### Description
**Description**
AccessTokenContract.sol, paidMint() and referralMint()
There is no handling in case the user pays more than required. Thus extra funds are not returned to the user.
**Recommendation**
Add the processing of this case, returning the balance of the necessary fun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Typos in comments
### Description
Typos in comments, while seemingly minor, can hinder code readability and reduce the overall quality and professionalism of a Solidity smart contract. Comments are essential for providing context and explanations that help developers, auditors, and contributors understand the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Wrong validation in `toggleCollateralActiveState()`
### Description
The active state of the collateral can be toggled using `toggleCollateralActiveState()`, which will set `isActive` for the specified collateral index. This allows the governance to disable specified collateral when required and prevent openin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Attacker Can Disrupt Batch Processing and Spam Deposits
### Description
The `userDeposit()` function fails to enforce the `minDepositByUser` requirement defined in the contract, despite this being documented as a protocol invariant. The absence of this validation in the deposit processing logic (specificall... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | EIP-712 | true | false | ### Relevant GitHub Links
<a data-meta="codehawks-github-link" href="https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-08-sparkn/blob/0f139b2dc53905700dd29a01451b330f829653e9/src/ProxyFactory.sol#L159">https://github.com/Cyfrin/2023-08-sparkn/blob/0f139b2dc53905700dd29a01451b330f829653e9/src/ProxyFactory.sol#L159</a>
## Summary
The ca... | Codehawks | 5 | Sparkn |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Lack of `_disableInitializers` in upgradeable contracts
### Description
YieldFi utilizes upgradeable contracts. It's [best practice](https://docs.openzeppelin.com/upgrades-plugins/writing-upgradeable#initializing_the_implementation_contract) to disable the ability to initialize the implementation contracts.
C... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Lack of SY Program Verification
### Description
In the `CollectInterest` and `CollectTreasuryInterest` (shown below) instructions, the `sy_program` is not verified against the vault. The `sy_program` is intended to manage the SY tokens and should ideally be verified to ensure that it is the correct and author... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Should use >= instead of >
### Description
_Submitted by oyc_109_
The comparison should be 'a >= vlt.notional' instead of a > vlt.notional.
Otherwise dust amounts will always be left in vlt.notional when calling `removeNotional()` or `transferNotionalFrom()`.
**[JTraversa (Swivel) confirmed, but dis... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | token | true | true | ## Medium: Yield tokens can be permanently locked in the vault when all stakers withdraw during vesting window
### Description
Yield tokens can be permanently locked in the vault when all stakers withdraw during vesting window.
### Proof of Concept
Add test to `StakingVaultTest.t.sol`:
```solidity
function test_allSt... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: `totalBPTSupply` will be excessively inflated
### Description
The `totalBPTSupply` will be excessively inflated as `totalSupply` was used instead of `virtualSupply`. This might cause a boosted balancer leverage vault not to be emergency settled in a timely manner and holds too large of a share of the liquidit... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: The setMainTickSpacing does not emit MainTickSpacingChanged
### Description
The `setMainTickSpacing` does not emit `MainTickSpacingChanged` event.
### Recommendation
Consider emitting this event. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | First Depositor Issue | false | true | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-12-numa-audit-judging/issues/253
## Found by
0xlucky, Abhan1041, AestheticBhai, KupiaSec, Oblivionis, ZZhelev, blutorque, jokr, juaan, novaman33, smbv-1923
### Summary
Attacker can attack the first depositors in the vault and can steal all users funds. this att... | Sherlock | 5 | Numa |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: It is possible to steal the unallocated part of every delegation period budget
### Description
Attacker can monitor the standard proposals distribution and routinely steal each low activity period remainder by submitting a `transfer to self` proposal and voting a dust amount for it.
Since the criteria for ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | token | true | false | ## Gas: Use `assembly` for efficient event emission
### Description
To efficiently emit events, consider utilizing assembly by making use of scratch space and the free memory pointer. This approach can potentially avoid the costs associated with memory expansion.
However, it's crucial to cache and restore the free me... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Malicious Users Can Duplicate Protocol Earned Yield By Transferring wCVX Tokens To Another Account
### Description
## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
`ConvexYieldWrapper.sol` is a wrapper contract for staking convex tokens on the user's behalf, allowing them to earn rewards on their d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: `xERC4626.sol` Some users may not be able to withdraw until `rewardsCycleEnd` the due to underflow in `beforeWithdraw()`
### Description
_Submitted by WatchPug_
[xERC4626.sol#L65-L68](https://github.com/fei-protocol/ERC4626/blob/2b2baba0fc480326a89251716f52d2cfa8b09230/src/xERC4626.sol#L65-L68)
[xERC4626... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Consider checking adapter existence in MetaSwap ✓ Fixed
### Description
`MetaSwap` doesn’t check that an adapter exists before calling into `Spender`:
**code/contracts/MetaSwap.sol:L87-L100**
```
function swap(
string calldata aggregatorId,
IERC20 tokenFrom,
uint256 amount,
bytes calldata data
) ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Rounding | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-bond-judging/issues/20
## Found by
xiaoming90
## Summary
The market price does not conform to the specification documented within the whitepaper. As a result, the computed market price is lower than expected.
## Vulnerability Detail
The following definition of th... | Sherlock | 5 | Bond Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: New vest reset `unlockBegin` of existing vest without removing vested amount
### Description
_Submitted by gzeon, also found by cccz, TrungOre, minhquanym, cmichel, 0xDjango, and rayn_
### Impact
When `vest` is called by xCTDL vault, the previous amount will re-lock according to the new vesting timeline.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Take advantage of Custom Error's return value property
### Description
An important feature of Custom Error is that values such as address, tokenID, msg.value can
be written inside the `()` sign, this kind of approach provides a serious advantage in
debugging and examining the revert details of dapps such as... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: First token bought should be added directly to the list of owned tokens when using function `_buyCurvesToken`
### Description
https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-curves/blob/516aedb7b9a8d341d0d2666c23780d2bd8a9a600/contracts/Curves.sol#L263-L280
When someone buys the token, we check if it's the first token... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: [01]
### Description
In `Token`, when a founder has `wallet` set to `address(0)`, he will not receive any tokens (which is good), but he is still included in all of the calculations such as `numFounders` or `totalOwnership`, meaning that they will be wrong in such situations. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: Miscalculation of requested borrow amount in ETH
### Description
*Note for the reader: This issue was detected during our review of the fixes for the first audit round. The specific commit where the issue was introduced is [`8521bcd`](https://gitlab.com/aave-tech/dlp/contracts/commit/8521bcd6aeee58d57ae4f0e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Variable written twice in MyShare endOfEpoch.
### Description
**Description**
MyShare.sol: function endOfEpoch(). The "endTime" variable is written either in line 320 or in line 322 first time. After that it is written again in line 325.
**Recommendation**
Verify the correctness of the function so that t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: Missing Re-Entrancy Guard to `withdraw` function
### Description
[Turnstile.sol#L141](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-canto/blob/main/CIP-001/src/Turnstile.sol#L141)
Ether transfer is done with `Address.sendValue(_recipient, _amount);` in the `withdraw` function, OZ's Address.sol library is used
There... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Use of ticket table not respecting EIP-161 empty account rule
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: fa_bridge/ticket_table.rs
Description: The FA bridge has the concept of a ticket table. The ticket table is stored, under a special path, of
the account of SYSTEM_ACCOUNT_ADDRESS . After EIP-161, an accoun... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Lack of NatSpec Documentation for Functions
### Description
Several functions in the `Distributor.sol` and `Staking.sol` contracts lack complete or accurate NatSpec documentation, reducing clarity and usability for developers and external tools.
Missing tags such as `@notice`, `@dev`, `@param`, and `@retu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Presence Of Typographical Error
### Description
Within the contracts in scope, the [following](https://github.com/atlasprotocol-com/atlasprotocol/blob/46760b44faf88f23ae5d1aa41d0936f7d1769f40/contract/src/modules/deposits.rs#L366) typographical error was identified:
```
"Receiving adress is not a valid EVM ad... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | false | false | ## Low: Potential Loss of Precision when Trading From Tokens with Nine Decimals to Six
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> We acknowledge this and the users can only lose very small amounts of funds due to precision loss. It cannot be avo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `RankedBattle._getStakingFactor()` accesses the same storage variable a second time whenever it's called (in `stakeNRN()`, `unstakeNRN()`, and `updateBattleRecord()`)
### Description
`RankedBattle._getStakingFactor()` accesses the storage variable `amountStaked[tokenId]` after the three mentioned functions acc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | true | ## Medium: Update state requests or Purchase requests occurring at the end of the phase will not process
### Description
BuyerAgent can make two requests either `purchase` request or `StateUpdate` request.
First, he should make a `BuyerAgent::oraclePurchaseRequest()` request to buy all the items he needs, then call `... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | logic | false | false | ## Medium: LACK OF BUSINESS LOGIC VALIDATION
### Description
It was possible to add bogus or malicious tokens to the user’s balance by manipulating the server response.
The wallet allowed users to add tokens either manually or by searching through a list of supported tokens. Although manual addition of malicious toke... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: ESD price defaults to one
### Description
In the `StabilizerComptroller` contract, whenever the oracle becomes unhealthy, the protocol [sets immediately the `ema` to 1](https://github.com/emptysetsquad/emptyset/blob/bf9753ef9cd5b17236036257f290e0d0b850a029/protocol/contracts/src/stabilizer/StabilizerComptrolle... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Long revert strings
### Description
**Description:**
Using a revert string of less than 32 bytes save gas.
**Recommendations:**
It's recommended to change the long revert string to a short string. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: BasePool.mint() Is Callable By Anyone
### Description
## Handle
leastwood
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The `BasePool.mint()` function differs from its implementation in `BasePoolV2.mint()` in which it lacks an `onlyRouter` modifier. This ensures that users cannot call this function directly as `V... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of oracle setting in autoReducePositions
### Description
Function `autoReducePositions` will be always reverted because the price is not set.
### Impact
`autoReducePositions` is one key part of the whole system's risk control. If `autoReducePositions` does not work, the whole system need to face more ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of Authentication in OnRecvPacket
### Description
The Axelar sample code acknowledges the importance of authenticating the message based on the channel ID, in addition to verifying the packet sender. However, the Allora chain's implementation does not include any channel ID/sender authentication logic.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [05] CONSTANTS CAN BE USED INSTEAD OF MAGIC NUMBERS
### Description
To improve readability and maintainability, a constant can be used instead of the magic number. Please consider replacing the magic numbers, such as `1e18`, used in the following code with constants. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | false | false | ## Low: Missing Zero-Address Checks in Constructors
### Description
This issue has been identified within constructors of `P2pEthenaProxyFactory` and `P2pEthenaProxy` contracts.
There are no explicit checks for zero addresses for critical parameters (`_p2pTreasury`, `_stakedUSDeV2`, `_USDe`, `_factory`), potentially... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: MarginalV1LBLiquidityReceiver.mintUniswapV3() updates reserves incorrectly
### Description
The `MarginalV1LBLiquidityReceiver.mintUniswapV3()` function deposits funds into a Uniswap pool as liquidity. The available amounts of tokens are stored in the `reserve0` / `reserve1` state variables, which are reduce... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Duplicated validation can be moved to shared internal function
### Description
**Description:** Currently, both `RiskOracle::publishRiskParameterUpdate` and `RiskOracle::publishBulkRiskParameterUpdates` contain essentially the same validation:
Both functions also call the internal `_processUpdate()` function,... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistency in constant usage
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**File**: legacymigration.go
**Function**: legacyAddressBytesFromTrytes
**Details**:
The given function accesses two constants: "hashTrytesSize" and "consts.AddressWithChecksumTrytesSize". The first one is declared righ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: Denote MAX_MSAFE_OWNERS_LIMIT Semantic Meaning
### Description
## Maximum Limit for Owners of a msafe
The maximum limit for the number of owners of a msafe is derived from the `aptos-core` multisig crate’s `MAX_NUMBER_OF_PUBLIC_KEYS`. This semantic dependency should be noted.
## Constant Definitions
In the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `abi.encodePacked()` should not be used with dynamic types when passing the result to a hash function such as `keccak256()`
### Description
Use `abi.encode()` instead which will pad items to 32 bytes, which will [prevent hash collisions](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.8.13/abi-spec.html#non-standard-packe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Shadowed State Variable
### Description
The [`subscriber` state variable](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd339dc773d32f5fc4c91fc/src/base/Notifier.sol#L28) is being shadowed in the inheriting contract's [subscribe](https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-periphery/blob/df47aa9ba521fc15ffd3... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Lack of event emission after fee update
### Description
The [`setWeeklyDelayFee`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/9d403ddb5f2f07194daefe7da51e0e0a6306f2c4/core/contracts/oracle/implementation/Store.sol#L134) and [`setFinalFee`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/9d403ddb5f2f07194daefe7da... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | false | false | ## High: Liquidation will reduce total cds deposited amount, leading to incorrect option fees
### Description
`borrowLiquidation::liquidationType1()` [reduces](https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2024-11-autonomint/blob/main/Blockchain/Blockchian/contracts/Core_logic/borrowLiquidation.sol#L248) `omniChainData.totalCdsDe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: In `Bet::accept,resolve,cancel` update `Bet` state prior to external calls
### Description
**Description:** It is wise to follow the Checks-Effects-Interactions [[1](https://fravoll.github.io/solidity-patterns/checks_effects_interactions.html), [2](https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.6.11/security-consideratio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `getClaimableAmount` function can return incorrect information
### Description
The `getClaimableAmount` view function does not check the existence of a leaf with given `claimData` and `recipient`. Users can receive answers even for incorrect data. Consider checking leaves existence. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | false | false | ## Medium: No incentives to write off bad debt when remaining collateral is very small
### Description
_Submitted by Lambda_
### Impact
When a position only has a bit of collateral left (e.g., because a previous `liquidateClean` call provided just too little shares or the exchange rate just changed), there is no in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Value `minMarketTokens`, `minLongTokenAmount`, `minShortTokenAmount` Hardcoded to 0
### Description
**Severity** - Medium
**Status** - Resolved
**Description**
There is GMX `ExchangeRouter.createDeposit()` external call made in GmRouter.sol and GlmRebalance.sol contracts.
The value for `minMarketTokens` ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Commented out code
### Description
The `Registry` contract includes [a commented out line of code](https://github.com/withtally/safeguard/blob/b2c63a9dfc4090be13320d999e7c6c1d842625d3/contracts/Registry.sol#L4). To improve readability, consider removing it from the codebase.
**Update:** *Fixed in [PR #10](ht... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Best practices on signature verification process
### Description
The _verifySignedHash function in `MechMarketplace.sol` does not fully implement best practices for signature verification. Specifically, the function does not apply signature malleability checks as recommended in EIP-2, which could allow multiple... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Infrared contract cannot receive bribes in native BERA
### Description
The `harvestBribes()` method is responsible for forwarding bribe assets to the `BribeCollector`. The Infrared contract aims to receive bribes in native BERA, which is then wrapped into WBERA. However, the Infrared contract is unable to r... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | true | ## Medium: Incorrect bound check when updating the findex
### Description
When `updateFloatingRate` is called by a keeper, the value provided as `floatingRate` is actually a time-weighted value \( r_s \, t_s \) (where \( s \) indexes the \( s \)-th update and \( t_s \) is the delta time between the \( s \)-th update a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Outdated ReentrancyGuard contract in use
### Description
The [`ReentrancyGuard`](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b61a72db58e32e4749/packages/augur-core/source/contracts/libraries/ReentrancyGuard.sol) [contract](https://github.com/AugurProject/augur/blob/9a33c3269e812d0cb66d49b6... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Boundary check is missing when setting _optimalUtilizationRate in the constructor
### Description
This check is missing in the context:
```solidity
if (optimalUtilizationRate >= uint256(RAY)) {
revert(Errors.IR_U0_GREATER_THAN_RAY);
}
```
It is best to use internal setter functions that refactor all the ne... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: Rewards distribution DoS due to uncached secondary asset classes
### Description
**Description:** The rewards calculation directly accesses the totalStakeCache mapping instead of using the getTotalStake() function with proper fallback logic:
Only specific operations trigger caching for secondary asset cla... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: WETH Gateway Works for Any Token
### Description
The RizRegistry contract implements the functionality to [perform an emergency transfer](https://github.com/radiant-capital/riz/blob/65ca7bb55550d30388e2b2277fefe5686ab7e4e8/src/RizRegistry.sol#L283) of tokens on behalf of the contract owner. However, the contra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | initialization | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-02-hats-judging/issues/35
## Found by
obront, cducrest-brainbot, roguereddwarf, unforgiven
## Summary
When a tophat is unlinked from its admin, it is intended to regain its status as a tophat that is fully self-sovereign. However, because the `linkedTreeRequests` valu... | Sherlock | 5 | Hats |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | logic-error | true | false | ## High: A malicious DAO Pool can create a token sale tier without actually transferring any DAO tokens
### Description
`TokenSaleProposalCreate::createTier` is called by a DAO Pool owner to create a new token sale tier. A fundamental prerequisite for creating a tier is that the DAO Pool owner must transfer the `total... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: If coolDownDuration is lowered, users may be able to reduce their cooldown end times
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
**Severity:** Low Risk
**Context:** sNUSD.sol#L270, sNUSD.sol#L285
**Description:**
Both `sNUSD.cooldownAssets()` and `sNUSD.cooldownShares()` update the user's cooldown end time... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `internal` functions not called by the contract should be removed to save deployment gas
### Description
If the functions are required by an interface, the contract should inherit from that interface and use the `override` keyword.
*There are 2 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-11-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Important fields in events are not indexed
### Description
None of the important fields in the events emitted in the `pontis-bridge-fee-manager.sol` contract and the `pontis-bridge-v1.sol` contracts are indexed.
### Recommendation
Index the appropriate fields in the events that are emitted in the `pontis-brid... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | initialization | true | false | ## High: WNT in depositVault can be drained by abusing initialLongToken/initialShortToken of CreateDepositParams
### Description
The attacker can abuse the `initialLongToken`/`initialShortToken` of `CreateDepositParams` to drain all the WNT from depositVault.
### Impact
The malicious user can drain all WNT from depos... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Incorrect check of `timeWindow`
### Description
At the line https://github.com/CoverProtocol/cover-core-v2/blob/513f5e502a8e8a623729c2c3480fca4e80fdef39/contracts/ClaimConfig.sol#L50 there is incorrect check of `_newTimeWindow`
### Recommendation
Change to `require(_newTimeWindow >= 3 days, "CC: window too s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Yield tokens can be permanently locked in the vault when all stakers withdraw during vesting window
### Description
**Description:** Yield tokens can be permanently locked in the vault when all stakers withdraw during vesting window.
**Proof of Concept:** Add test to `StakingVaultTest.t.sol`:
**Recommend... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Division Overflow in Float and Double Arithmetic
### Description
**Update**
Fixed by adding pre-checks: Both `div()` functions will revert if the value of `a` is too large. Addressed in commits `8d0e536e169268b84dadca576905b1c9adb8fc3c`.
**File(s) affected:**`bucket_framework/sources/float.move`, `bucket_fram... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Denial of service
### Description
_Submitted by danb_
on the first deposit, the total liquidity is set to `nativeDeposit`.
this might be a very low number compared to `foreignDeposit`.
It can cause a denial of service of the pair.
#### Impact
A pair can enter a denial of service state.
#### Proof of Conc... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Id Aliasing Between Addresses and Associated Objectid
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `2543c06f8a4f5a7a1bedff85ff858a0d1cc2e831`.
**File(s) affected:**`LibHelpers.sol`, `AdminFacet.sol`, `UserFacet.sol`, `LibMarket.sol`, `LibAdmin.sol`, `LibTokenizedVault.sol`
**D... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.