unit_id int64 | topic string | target_text string | top_level_post_text string | parent_posts list | author_id string | post_id string | top_level_post_id string | parent_ids list | label string | is_explicit string | is_sarcastic string | is_unsure string | timestamp string | subreddit string | system_prompt string | user_prompt string | complete_prompt string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | abortion | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral?
How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [] | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | h847k3 | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-13 11:18:44 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
2 | abortion | But even at a single day old? When it’s not even conscious? | [] | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | fuqgkqj | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-13 22:22:29 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
3 | abortion | I agree with your choice on recognizing that thinning out the movement is unproductive, but I'm still curious as to why you think it's wrong to destroy a day-one-old embryo? | [] | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | fuqnlw1 | nan | [
"nan"
] | undecided | 2020-06-13 23:25:13 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
4 | abortion | Yes, it’s human in the sense it has human DNA, but we wouldn’t call it a human being (or “person” if you prefer to call it that) since it doesn’t have any of the essential characteristics of such. | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [
"I don’t see how the fact that a one-day-old is developing makes it wrong to destroy it. Is it the fact that it’s potential life? In which case, I still don’t see anything wrong with terminating something that only has potential to be a person. And if we did value potential life, wouldn’t it be wrong to wear condom... | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | furtxli | h847k3 | [
"fuqz5hm",
"furs4di"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-14 06:52:31 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
5 | abortion | Really? A one-day-old embryo has the essential characteristics to be considered a human being? For me, I believe it lacks consciousness, capacity to feel, capacity to think, personality, wishes and desires, etc. Also, how would you define “human” and “human being”? | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [
"I don’t see how the fact that a one-day-old is developing makes it wrong to destroy it. Is it the fact that it’s potential life? In which case, I still don’t see anything wrong with terminating something that only has potential to be a person. And if we did value potential life, wouldn’t it be wrong to wear condom... | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | furvtjd | h847k3 | [
"fuqz5hm",
"furs4di",
"furtxli",
"furufpi"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-14 07:17:44 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
6 | abortion | Is a one-day-old embryo human? Sure. But is it a human being? I would say no. So in that sense, it’s still a potential life, just as much as sex cells that haven’t yet lead to conception. | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [
"I don’t see how the fact that a one-day-old is developing makes it wrong to destroy it. Is it the fact that it’s potential life? In which case, I still don’t see anything wrong with terminating something that only has potential to be a person. And if we did value potential life, wouldn’t it be wrong to wear condom... | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | furxo2a | h847k3 | [
"fuqz5hm",
"furx8t5"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-14 07:43:23 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
7 | abortion | But why? What about it makes you believe that it is wrong to destroy a single cell? | [] | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | fus1ndg | nan | [
"nan"
] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-14 08:42:57 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
8 | abortion | Yes, it was you in the sense that it lead to who you are now, but was it *you* in any meaningful sense beyond that? I mean, did it have any of the defining characteristics that you have now? I don’t think so. I don’t think the embryo that lead to you had consciousness, capacity to think, capacity to feel, wishes or des... | [] | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | futi3tn | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-14 19:48:33 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
9 | abortion | I’m not trying to change the definition of “human life” and “human being.” I’m just making it clear that the embryo, even though it’s technically human, is not a human being and, therefore, does not deserve the same rights as one. | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [
"I do because there is no solid line that you can draw that defines what is human life and what isn’t. Even an embryo is alive and has individual human dna, making it an unique human life. Just because it isn’t morally instinctual to view a cell as a human life doesn’t mean it’s not moral. Some things you can’t b... | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | fuvilfo | h847k3 | [
"fuufhki",
"fuuiu3z",
"fuuujsv"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-15 07:49:23 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
10 | abortion | I never said that having less cells means you are of lesser value, but a single cell isn't capable of producing any of the characteristics I would believe are necessary to be considered a human being. And what about biology? | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [
"But why? What about it makes you believe that it is wrong to destroy a single cell?",
"Two things, biology and the concept that just because a person has less cells ( say a baby, in this case a zygote) than someone else ( an adult) doesn’t mean they have less value."
] | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | fuybgsb | h847k3 | [
"fus1ndg",
"fuxkmon"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-06-16 00:54:41 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
12 | abortion | >so that mean when u abort an embryon that mean u kill a person in formation When you abort an embryo, you kill a person's information? I mean, I don't think you can "kill" information. I believe information is lost, but I don't see why that means it's wrong to destroy an embryo, unless you value potential human being... | How many of you are of the belief that even the destruction of a one-day-old embryo is still murder or at least immoral? | [
"Yes, it was you in the sense that it lead to who you are now, but was it *you* in any meaningful sense beyond that? I mean, did it have any of the defining characteristics that you have now? I don’t think so. I don’t think the embryo that lead to you had consciousness, capacity to think, capacity to feel, wishes o... | 00688165535582890ca34b3bf2306ab88b0601dbb0959d40128c3f3699c421eb | fv2mkds | h847k3 | [
"futi3tn",
"fv0ff25"
] | against | No | No | 1/3 | 2020-06-17 02:26:42 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "calm_catalyst", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics on r/prolife, questioning personhood of day-one embryos. Calm, analytical tone; largely pro-choice but open to discussion.", "persona": "Posts focus on abortion debates in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
13 | abortion | Wow I came here thinking I would find no reasonable compromise (I’m about as pro-choice as they come and think it terminating a pregnancy early should be between a person and their doctor 100% of the time) - but I have to give it to you: I would accept this compromise. So from a self described extremist on the pro-ab... | Actually compromise please. It can be about anything dealing with abortion, and effect areas not about abortion. Good compromise: increase funding, but put a "sin" tax on abortion/ illegalize certain abortions but make certain guns illegal. Bad compromise:grrr no compromise abortion is illegal/ grr no compromise, abo... | [
"I doubt one can be reached. I personally know that the one demand I'd have for the other side would be seen as unreasonable, so that pretty much kills the deal before it starts. You want a rough idea on what I mean? Let's say we wanted to set some timeframes- up until X weeks it's perfectly legal, after that poin... | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | f9iyxwt | e4j1on | [
"f9d104s"
] | s_favor | Yes | No | No | 2019-12-03 06:12:49 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
14 | abortion | I’m very familiar with the stem cell transplant process as my father had 3 and my father in law had 1. For someone of mixed race, there often isnt a close enough match for a doctor to agree to attempt it. It has to be close enough or no doctor will perform it. Often times that’s a familial donation. In the case of ... | Why would someone want the fetus to have more rights than my three year old? I’m forced to donate use of my womb for 9 months, yet if my three year old needed a kidney (which she would’nt have needed had I not had sex and gotten myself pregnant with her) I wouldn’t be forced to donate? Why is it that we can’t take a co... | [
"Maybe not a kidney. What about a stem cell transplant? There’s usually only one match in the world for a stem cell transplant, if any at all. Should the match be forced to donate the stem cells?",
"Bone marrow donor registries exist, and perfect matches aren't needed. So no, there aren't situations where there i... | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fbe4d3y | eapy7l | [
"fbcz802",
"fbdqvgl"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-19 18:51:58 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
15 | abortion | Because people own their bodies and forcing them to go through a medical procedure they do not want to have is barbaric and a violation of human rights as the world generally understands them today. And you’re not necessarily responsible for safeguarding your child in every other case. Adoption is a thing and once it ... | Why would someone want the fetus to have more rights than my three year old? I’m forced to donate use of my womb for 9 months, yet if my three year old needed a kidney (which she would’nt have needed had I not had sex and gotten myself pregnant with her) I wouldn’t be forced to donate? Why is it that we can’t take a co... | [
"Respect for consistency. But what a dystopia..",
"Well, why do you think we get to draw a line at organ donation? You're responsible for safeguarding your child's life in every other case. Why do you get to opt out of donating an organ?"
] | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fbhaen4 | eapy7l | [
"fbczbqp",
"fbgzib7"
] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2019-12-20 20:10:12 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
16 | abortion | Chemotherapy saved my dad’s life - 3 times. I can be pro-chemotherapy while also wishing he didn’t have cancer. I think saying otherwise is to belittle the good that chemotherapy has done to save people’s lives. | What are the values of your stance? What arguments do you use, and what has worked best for you? Do you still consider yourself pro-choice? How do you feel your stance is represented in the abortion debate? What kind of feedback do you get from both sides? How would you like the other sides to see you? What are your th... | [
"I can only speak for myself but as a pro-choicer I am not a pro-abortion-er.",
"I support access to abortion, but I don’t identify with the pro-abortion label either. I also would not identify with the label pro-chemotherapy. In both cases, abortion and chemotherapy, I want the procedures available when needed, ... | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fsu2yfx | gvj1u2 | [
"fspkra9",
"fsqmwih"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-04 08:46:26 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
17 | abortion | In my opinion, the only question that matters in the _legal_ abortion debate is if women are people with full human rights. If we do consider women to be people with full human rights, then no other person - born or not - is entitled to use our bodies against our will. Not even if they will die without the use of our... | I believe the abortion debate can be broken down into Fatalism VS Individualism. Fatalism is the philosophy that all things are pre-determined and free will is an illusion. Individualism is the philosophy that we all act independently of each other and we are in control of our lives. The Pro-Life Argument would argu... | [] | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fxhhhhe | hoelii | [] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2020-07-10 03:19:22 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
18 | abortion | Consent is - by definition - on going. Like if you consent to have sex with someone and then change your mind halfway through - the other person has to stop. They can’t claim you consented at the beginning so they have a right to use your body as long as they want. So even if we consider consent to sex to be consen... | This post is specifically for Pro Lifers and I want to hear their opinions on it. A common counter argument to Pro-Life is that you have right to bodily autonomy and you should not be forced to donate a lung to save someones life the same way you shouldn't be forced to give birth to a life if you don't want to. That ... | [
"The mother gives her bodily autonomy to the foetus when she consents to sex. She then can’t turn around and kill it. Just like the mother and no right to kill somebody and steal their organs, she has no right to kill the fetus. My pro life POV comes from a liberal choice perspective so of course nobody should b... | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fxrtbai | hpij8h | [
"fxrov0n"
] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2020-07-12 01:33:10 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
19 | abortion | For points 1-4 we could easily do a thought experiment that fits that criteria: you got in a car drunk and hit a person, causing them to lose so much blood that they will die without an immediate transfusion. You are the only one with the same blood type in the area and they will die if they don’t get the transfusion i... | This post is specifically for Pro Lifers and I want to hear their opinions on it. A common counter argument to Pro-Life is that you have right to bodily autonomy and you should not be forced to donate a lung to save someones life the same way you shouldn't be forced to give birth to a life if you don't want to. That ... | [
"False equivalency.",
"I would very much like to hear why you believe it is a false equivalence",
"Fair enough. In order for a bodily rights argument to be analogous to abortion, the hypothetical needs to include the following five elements: 1.) If you refuse bodily donation, someone else will die. 2.)You c... | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fxs1q2z | hpij8h | [
"fxrpuji",
"fxrvstp",
"fxrx9nn"
] | undecided | 2020-07-12 02:53:13 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
20 | abortion | > That is your opinion. I don’t agree. This. This right here is what I’m trying to say. It’s not my opinion that the right to bodily autonomy and integrity trumps the right to life. It’s a fact (in the US and every other county on earth that respects human rights). This is what I’m saying you aren’t seeing. In th... | This post is specifically for Pro Lifers and I want to hear their opinions on it. A common counter argument to Pro-Life is that you have right to bodily autonomy and you should not be forced to donate a lung to save someones life the same way you shouldn't be forced to give birth to a life if you don't want to. That ... | [
">I think there is a common theme in everything you are arguing, which is that you are missing the part where the woman’s bodily autonomy and integrity are being violated. I’ve responded by stating that the human fetus has a primary right to bodily autonomy and self defense since they were forced into a situation ... | 02039a7855f45e616ee63eba5d26127db2dac1b51721a1a550e85c160a80ba3d | fxw0iyz | hpij8h | [
"fxvpvvf"
] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2020-07-13 04:02:20 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "candid_dialogue", "bio": "Engages deeply in abortion debates with a strong pro‑choice, bodily autonomy focus. Uses thoughtful analogies and a calm, evidence‑based tone.", "persona": "Primarily active in 2019–2020 on r/Ab... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
21 | abortion | >This isn't a numbers game. You're comparing saving a potential person in utero to an actual living, breathing, human being who has to be sacrificed for that cause. A prenate is an actual human being. I agree it is not a numbers game, but in this case, since they have equal value, the numbers are important to conside... | Recently, I put out something that said that forced birth doesn’t make sense to me. I got a lot of pro choicers the comments, and to be honest they were right. I guess in a way we ARE for forced birth when the alternative is killing a fetus. So you guys are right, the term forced birth does make sense to me now, but it... | [
"The problem is, my intention is to save lives. And I will objectively save more lives with a ban than cause people them to die. Extra pregnancies coming to term may well cause an uptick in maternal deaths, but the death rate from maternity is already so low that it is hard to suggest that abortion isn't actual... | 036a6c4d6c505aa5afb0635cd090a5c479f439baa494b2b817bf19ecab44369b | fqnjuak | gjp4w7 | [
"fqnbrw3",
"fqnjahg"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-05-15 00:42:24 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Andrew Collins", "username": "andrew_civics", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics debates; generally pro-life and rights-based, with a calm, analytical tone.", "persona": "Active in mid-2020 on abortion threads in r/Abortiondebate and r/prolife. Tend... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
22 | abortion | >There's the rub. By medical ethics no human being has the right to another human's tissues to save or prolong their own life, not even if the donor is already dead. That only matters if the situation is not already in-being. You couldn't have a conjoined twin ask to have their dependent twin removed without the cons... | Mainly for PL but also PC. Are you against women getting abortions because killing is wrong (act) or because the killing is inhumane (process)? I've seen people quote that babies heads are crushed, the brains sucked out and they're torn limb from limb. For starters, no-one thinks this is a good way to die, even us pro... | [
"That's the medical \"exception\". If a woman is going to die from a pregnancy, she also has the right to protect her life, so treatment could be undertaken to save her life, at the possible expense of the child's life. This would be the application of the proportionate self-defense principle. Since both have a ... | 036a6c4d6c505aa5afb0635cd090a5c479f439baa494b2b817bf19ecab44369b | fqz5okw | gljous | [
"fqyh3qe",
"fqz55nm"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-05-18 02:06:48 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Andrew Collins", "username": "andrew_civics", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics debates; generally pro-life and rights-based, with a calm, analytical tone.", "persona": "Active in mid-2020 on abortion threads in r/Abortiondebate and r/prolife. Tend... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
23 | abortion | Two levels. First, if you go by the basic right to life concept, no one should be aborted unless there is an actual need for proportionate self-defense that requires premeditated lethal force. The prenate in this argument is considered a human being and not subject to be killed except when the right to life of anothe... | pro-lifers, why do you believe that a woman should not be allowed an abortion if she is raped? | [] | 036a6c4d6c505aa5afb0635cd090a5c479f439baa494b2b817bf19ecab44369b | fr90118 | gncyfy | [] | against | No | No | No | 2020-05-20 17:42:19 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Andrew Collins", "username": "andrew_civics", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics debates; generally pro-life and rights-based, with a calm, analytical tone.", "persona": "Active in mid-2020 on abortion threads in r/Abortiondebate and r/prolife. Tend... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
25 | abortion | If it prevents implantation, I do not support Plan B as it may cause an abortion, and even worse, an inadvertent abortion. I do not want to abort a child. However, I also would not want to get pregnant, if possible. So, if I use BC, I want it to be BC that prevents fertilization, not causes an abortion. I don't e... | [] | 036a6c4d6c505aa5afb0635cd090a5c479f439baa494b2b817bf19ecab44369b | fuzax6u | nan | [
"nan"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-16 06:37:58 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Andrew Collins", "username": "andrew_civics", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics debates; generally pro-life and rights-based, with a calm, analytical tone.", "persona": "Active in mid-2020 on abortion threads in r/Abortiondebate and r/prolife. Tend... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
26 | abortion | Human embryos are human beings. They are members of the species *homo sapiens* as you are. And indeed, you were an embryo as well. Human beings are never not human beings. >Sure, ‘life’ starts at conception, but bacteria is ‘life’ as well, it is living. This is a gross misunderstanding of what we're talking abou... | Sure, ‘life’ starts at conception, but bacteria is ‘life’ as well, it is living. Kill bacteria, and you are taking life. | [] | 036a6c4d6c505aa5afb0635cd090a5c479f439baa494b2b817bf19ecab44369b | fxkqkub | homgvx | [] | against | No | No | No | 2020-07-11 00:02:00 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Andrew Collins", "username": "andrew_civics", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics debates; generally pro-life and rights-based, with a calm, analytical tone.", "persona": "Active in mid-2020 on abortion threads in r/Abortiondebate and r/prolife. Tend... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
28 | brexit | Yeah, the future contortions of brexiters promise to be fairly amusing. | [] | 03a9c5c7b8bcf1cf5d15b3bd2cb66efcc567942a574fc508388e423bcb84af16 | fxtd9iu | nan | [
"nan"
] | against | No | No | 1/3 | 2020-07-12 11:43:30 | r/brexit | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "civic_tangent", "bio": "Comments on Brexit politics and its practical fallout, skeptical of Leave claims with dry humor. Focuses on arguments and process details.", "persona": "Primarily posts on r/brexit about UK politi... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
29 | brexit | > These people want to tear up the WA and start negotiations again? I don't think it works that way, the WA remains in force *until* a new agreement to replace it is negotiated. I *really* want to see the UK government make the attempt to renegotiate. | [] | 03a9c5c7b8bcf1cf5d15b3bd2cb66efcc567942a574fc508388e423bcb84af16 | fxteo9g | nan | [
"nan"
] | s_against | Yes | No | No | 2020-07-12 12:08:25 | r/brexit | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "civic_tangent", "bio": "Comments on Brexit politics and its practical fallout, skeptical of Leave claims with dry humor. Focuses on arguments and process details.", "persona": "Primarily posts on r/brexit about UK politi... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
30 | brexit | No argument with that at all. | [] | 03a9c5c7b8bcf1cf5d15b3bd2cb66efcc567942a574fc508388e423bcb84af16 | fxtf2xb | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-07-12 12:15:38 | r/brexit | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "civic_tangent", "bio": "Comments on Brexit politics and its practical fallout, skeptical of Leave claims with dry humor. Focuses on arguments and process details.", "persona": "Primarily posts on r/brexit about UK politi... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
33 | brexit | Yeah, it's all about the *belief*! | Companies, who are already reeling from the impact of COVID-19, are now facing additional costs [LINK]. > The government advises that companies hire an intermediary, such as a customs agent or a freight forwarder, to help them navigate the new requirements. Or they can buy special software and access to HMRC systems i... | [
"Pay attention to the brexit marketing, kid. Think of the *opportunities!* [LINK]",
"Love this guys optimism: > But I think we know, from all of the experience we have had with negotiations, these things happen at the last minute. ... and then Liz Truss starts waving her wand and all the procedures/training/inf... | 03a9c5c7b8bcf1cf5d15b3bd2cb66efcc567942a574fc508388e423bcb84af16 | fxynhu5 | hql0nd | [
"fxyhjd5",
"fxyly12"
] | undecided | 2020-07-13 21:49:48 | r/brexit | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "civic_tangent", "bio": "Comments on Brexit politics and its practical fallout, skeptical of Leave claims with dry humor. Focuses on arguments and process details.", "persona": "Primarily posts on r/brexit about UK politi... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
34 | abortion | I’m actually proposing you (hypothetically) carry to term to save the life in your womb. That’s the point of the risk. Why would you care what I think | Let's assume for arguments sake, that a fetus is not a person, or that it's life holds no value. Considering the fact that we all know that in nine months time, said fetus will be a fully formed human being whose life is in fact, very valuable, why is abortion at any point morally justifiable? | [
"Absolutely. That’s why I believe abortions should be legal when the mother’s life is in jeopardy, which is a small minority of pregnancies.",
"Women are 14 times more likely to die in childbirth than during an abortion. I’m not risking my life just because you think I should."
] | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwg72vj | hh178o | [
"fwfk60c",
"fwfs3fo"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-30 08:06:28 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
35 | abortion | She consented to the possibility of pregnancy upon engaging in the act, so she can’t go back later and claim the resulting fetus is infringing on her rights. Moreover, the fetus had no intent - the only intent was on the woman’s part. Its value doesn’t depend on that - I’m starting with* the assumption that all human... | Are newborn infants more valuable than late term fetuses? Why? Or do they have approximately same value, but since fetuses infringe on thé mother’s rights abortion is permissible. | [
"How can the fetus infringe on bodily autonomy when it didn’t consent to being in the body? The only reason it’s there is from a consensual sexual act by the mother (excluding the small minority of rapes).",
"How would consent change the fact that the woman does not consent with the foetus using her body, and sub... | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwga52c | hierg0 | [
"fwg7sqo",
"fwg873m"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-30 08:51:09 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
36 | abortion | Okay, so what’s the difference between a human and a human being? | Are newborn infants more valuable than late term fetuses? Why? Or do they have approximately same value, but since fetuses infringe on thé mother’s rights abortion is permissible. | [
"How can the fetus infringe on bodily autonomy when it didn’t consent to being in the body? The only reason it’s there is from a consensual sexual act by the mother (excluding the small minority of rapes).",
">How can the fetus infringe on bodily autonomy You're right. It can't infringe upon the rights of the mo... | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwgh0ea | hierg0 | [
"fwg7sqo",
"fwgdcqd",
"fwgeu5l",
"fwgfxb4"
] | undecided | 2020-06-30 10:40:35 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
37 | abortion | It’s *exactly* the point. You should undo an STD because it’s a disease. You shouldn’t “undo” a fetus because it’s a human life. To the rape thing - an (imperfect) analogy might be someone running up and shoving an infant in your hands, versus accepting a deal in which there was a 1% chance someone would walk up and h... | Are newborn infants more valuable than late term fetuses? Why? Or do they have approximately same value, but since fetuses infringe on thé mother’s rights abortion is permissible. | [
"So let’s say you have sex, and you get an STD, are you now unable to treat it? But let’s skip ahead, you’ll probably say no, you can treat it. Why? Because removing an STD doesn’t kill. Then great, there is your answer. You have a problem with abortion killing, and you can’t consistently apply “consent to this... | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwgirlq | hierg0 | [
"fwghb3i",
"fwghrwm",
"fwgial3"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-30 11:09:52 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
38 | abortion | If I’m responsible for that life being inside me, then yes - harming him/her would be the morally wrong. | Let's assume for arguments sake, that a fetus is not a person, or that it's life holds no value. Considering the fact that we all know that in nine months time, said fetus will be a fully formed human being whose life is in fact, very valuable, why is abortion at any point morally justifiable? | [
"Absolutely. That’s why I believe abortions should be legal when the mother’s life is in jeopardy, which is a small minority of pregnancies.",
"Women are 14 times more likely to die in childbirth than during an abortion. I’m not risking my life just because you think I should.",
"I’m actually proposing you (hyp... | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwihbf0 | hh178o | [
"fwfk60c",
"fwfs3fo",
"fwg72vj",
"fwh4ye7"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-30 22:30:36 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
40 | abortion | Okay fine, the open door example still supports my point in my opinion. The reason I introduced nailing to the floor was to illustrate how the fetus doesn’t want to be there but is stuck there anyway due to the mother’s actions. | Are newborn infants more valuable than late term fetuses? Why? Or do they have approximately same value, but since fetuses infringe on thé mother’s rights abortion is permissible. | [
"What? Pregnancy isn’t a purposeful or wrongful act like taking someone and nailing them to the floor. Yes, kidnapping a person, nailing them to your floor, and shooting them is wrong. Too bad pregnancy is nothing like that. Pregnancy is more like accidentally leaving your door open to let an invited guest in. The... | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwjs93y | hierg0 | [
"fwjraty"
] | undecided | 2020-07-01 05:45:58 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
41 | abortion | The stuck to the floor example is closer, but still misses the fact that you *created* a life *reliant* on you. So that guy walked off the street, versus you building him in your basement (to stretch the analogy). When you talk about trashing the house, I would consider that a health complication and fully support abo... | Are newborn infants more valuable than late term fetuses? Why? Or do they have approximately same value, but since fetuses infringe on thé mother’s rights abortion is permissible. | [
"What? Pregnancy isn’t a purposeful or wrongful act like taking someone and nailing them to the floor. Yes, kidnapping a person, nailing them to your floor, and shooting them is wrong. Too bad pregnancy is nothing like that. Pregnancy is more like accidentally leaving your door open to let an invited guest in. The... | 03ac1a4d4264ec813c848d7904db3b9a9e1d2352252917d5333a094d5ab201b9 | fwju9nl | hierg0 | [
"fwjraty",
"fwjs93y",
"fwjsj0l"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-07-01 06:08:42 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Turner", "username": "evenkeel_debater", "bio": "Active in abortion ethics threads with a generally pro-life lean, using consent/responsibility arguments; calm, analogy-driven, and non-sarcastic.", "persona": "Participates primarily in r/Aborti... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
42 | abortion | You don't understand the morality because you don't understand the difference between DNA and a human being (this is obvious because you bounce back and forth between the two in the space of three sentences, one of which being the title). I read your source, and that is one of the things he talks about. He's absolutely... | [] | 03d81de01201c3543e5fc97960b8b0aaa428887a71c3e92ce36907d2484cbe83 | f9i4bx2 | nan | [
"nan"
] | undecided | 2019-12-03 00:05:44 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Brooks", "username": "skeptical_citizen", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates, stressing evidence, peer review, and legal context. Direct, skeptical style; stance varies across threads from pro-choice arguments to stricter views.", "persona": "... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
43 | abortion | It wasn't a matter of understanding. It was a matter of proof. They didn't have undeniable proof of the moment life begins with universal scientific agreement. Still don't. | [] | 03d81de01201c3543e5fc97960b8b0aaa428887a71c3e92ce36907d2484cbe83 | f9iopw1 | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2019-12-03 04:05:03 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Brooks", "username": "skeptical_citizen", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates, stressing evidence, peer review, and legal context. Direct, skeptical style; stance varies across threads from pro-choice arguments to stricter views.", "persona": "... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
44 | abortion | > overwhelming scientific consensus that life begins at conception is not sufficient? Prove it. I mean, conception is a bit vague already, but lets say it's when the sperm enters the egg. Okay, but that's not quite yet fertilized is it? No, it's not. So is it life? No. Is life therefor at fertilization then? Maybe, b... | [] | 03d81de01201c3543e5fc97960b8b0aaa428887a71c3e92ce36907d2484cbe83 | f9l7r83 | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2019-12-04 00:40:44 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Brooks", "username": "skeptical_citizen", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates, stressing evidence, peer review, and legal context. Direct, skeptical style; stance varies across threads from pro-choice arguments to stricter views.", "persona": "... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
45 | abortion | OP's link disproves itself. It is not a scientific study, it is not peer reviewed, it is a series of emails, a shit tone of them. That's great for an email account, but not for a scientific study. So when I say prove it, I mean exactly what I said (twice, this will be the third). Show me an overwhelming scientific cons... | [] | 03d81de01201c3543e5fc97960b8b0aaa428887a71c3e92ce36907d2484cbe83 | f9nn3we | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-04 20:22:43 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Brooks", "username": "skeptical_citizen", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates, stressing evidence, peer review, and legal context. Direct, skeptical style; stance varies across threads from pro-choice arguments to stricter views.", "persona": "... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
46 | abortion | Awesome. You're saying you can not prove when life begins, and that I'm supposed to take your word for it based on what?.... faith? I have no faith in your word, now what? | [] | 03d81de01201c3543e5fc97960b8b0aaa428887a71c3e92ce36907d2484cbe83 | f9npx5k | nan | [
"nan"
] | against | No | No | No | 2019-12-04 20:45:13 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Brooks", "username": "skeptical_citizen", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates, stressing evidence, peer review, and legal context. Direct, skeptical style; stance varies across threads from pro-choice arguments to stricter views.", "persona": "... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
47 | abortion | I think that if the woman was planning on carrying to term, then it is a double homicide. But if she was driving to the clinic to get an abortion, then no, single homicide. | [] | 03d81de01201c3543e5fc97960b8b0aaa428887a71c3e92ce36907d2484cbe83 | frp03vj | nan | [
"nan"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-05-24 21:26:46 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Brooks", "username": "skeptical_citizen", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates, stressing evidence, peer review, and legal context. Direct, skeptical style; stance varies across threads from pro-choice arguments to stricter views.", "persona": "... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
48 | nuclear-energy | What happens if a nuclear reactor has a meltdown at sea?
I'm putting together a small paper on the benefits and drawbacks of nuclear power for merchant shipping. I'm having a little trouble finding any papers on how a meltdown at sea might affect the environment and human safety. Does anyone have a good source for res... | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | ekx8h8 | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 18:30:12 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
49 | nuclear-energy | That's what I figured, but I'd like some good research to reference for environmental impact. What happens in shallow waters? What happens in salt water? Could a strong current bring enough radioactive material to a heavy fishing area? I want to be relatively thorough. | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | fdeav4l | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 19:23:20 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
50 | nuclear-energy | At this point that would be relatively well mixed correct? Would there be any concern that a much higher concentration could exist around the reactor that could affect wildlife in say shallow waters? | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | fdebdtl | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 19:28:43 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
51 | nuclear-energy | I was thinking of worse case scenario where either the ship is entirely inverted or there is a catastrophic loss of cooling. If material were to melt through the containment or if the containment were to be ruptured, what is the effect of that material in the environment? | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | fdeez5t | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 20:06:09 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
52 | nuclear-energy | Yes the logistics of putting together crews for merchant nuclear ships hurt the NS Savanah. It would definitely require incentives to make the switch happen, but I'm curious to see if it would be cheaper. As diesel and liquid natural gas become more expensive, it makes the nuclear option seem more economically friendly... | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | fdfrkbl | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-01-07 04:41:12 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
53 | nuclear-energy | Was the reason environmental or did they not want others to spy on it? | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | fdfrnlf | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-07 04:42:12 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
54 | nuclear-energy | Luckily I'm not the only one who still thinks it's a great idea. Theres a number of recent reports from a group and their insurance company on what that ship and power plant would look like along with who is responsible for what. There is one interesting thing though, I need to read more, but it seems like they chose a... | [] | 0446e9b99ef698dbd4832d1f491e1babf75d3f930ffa10cbf28c041410020467 | fdhpxbz | nan | [
"nan"
] | s_favor | Yes | No | No | 2020-01-07 21:10:33 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Carter", "username": "quiet_circuit", "bio": "Research-driven commenter on nuclear power and merchant shipping, weighing climate and cost tradeoffs. Generally pro-nuclear, asks for sources and real-world safety implications.", "persona": "Focus... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
55 | abortion | When we juxtapose two human beings like this, we're seriously undermining the very foundation of universal human value and equality. This is not an "either or" situation where either the baby is valued as a human being or the mother is, and thus we need to struggle to put our rights above the other's. They are both val... | Mom, you just don't understand! 😭😭😭😭 | [
"Why do you all care so much about another persons choice to keep or abort their pregnancy? Legitimately asking.",
"Because it’s a living fucking being",
"So is the mother who is carrying said pregnancy, is it okay to trample the rights of the mothers life? Forcing someone to carry a pregnancy that is unwanted ... | 0470995d7036916fd46f27ace66b0c707c8786631617d90ec509bf27ec0ec214 | fxwne2q | hq693w | [
"fxwhd7p",
"fxwi26w",
"fxwip0a"
] | s_against | No | No | No | 2020-07-13 08:44:08 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Michael Carter", "username": "urban_civics", "bio": "Discusses abortion policy on r/prolife; generally anti-abortion while advocating education and access to sexual health services. Calm, evidence-seeking, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
56 | abortion | Can you please tell me how you came to this conclusion? What data sets did you look at to say this with such assurance? And what also has caused you to insinuate that it seems so impossible to expand these centers, or just to bring attention to already existing organizations that are similar? | Mom, you just don't understand! 😭😭😭😭 | [
"Sure! If ruining someone's life is the outcome to be avoided, abortion would still be problematic. Not going through a birth canal doesn't change the fact that the individual inside her uterus is a living human being that would have to be killed in order for an abortion to be successful. That would not only ruin a... | 0470995d7036916fd46f27ace66b0c707c8786631617d90ec509bf27ec0ec214 | fxxx4gl | hq693w | [
"fxwmimm",
"fxwmlya",
"fxwop9h",
"fxxipiw"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-07-13 18:20:17 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Michael Carter", "username": "urban_civics", "bio": "Discusses abortion policy on r/prolife; generally anti-abortion while advocating education and access to sexual health services. Calm, evidence-seeking, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
57 | abortion | There are multiple local organizations, so for me to list every single one would require me to look at every city in every state. The simplest answer, besides they're there, is to say 1. With insurance (even Medicare), almost all of these services are free or no cost according to ACA. 2. There are many community cli... | Mom, you just don't understand! 😭😭😭😭 | [
"We don't need anything they offer nope, so get rid of them. Watch the increase in unwanted pregnancies without free or low cost access to birth control. Watch STDs spread without free or low cost access to testing. Society will thrive indeed.",
"All of those services can be, and are provided else where. It is a ... | 0470995d7036916fd46f27ace66b0c707c8786631617d90ec509bf27ec0ec214 | fxy2uvo | hq693w | [
"fxxhfjt",
"fxxxwqk",
"fxxxzy6"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-07-13 19:06:31 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Michael Carter", "username": "urban_civics", "bio": "Discusses abortion policy on r/prolife; generally anti-abortion while advocating education and access to sexual health services. Calm, evidence-seeking, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active in... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
60 | veganism | You want me to pick just one?
You want me to pick just one? | [] | 0596938d1d6df9432cf69d3ff5c4434f6422142a0a12bc1f3212ed4e209c3d96 | e2fu61 | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-11-27 14:13:40 | r/Veganism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Ethan Parker", "username": "plainspoken_jay", "bio": "Vegan ethics advocate engaging in r/Veganism debates, strongly condemning animal killing. Blunt, moralistic, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Primarily posts about veganism and animal rights, ar... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
61 | veganism | People do taste good, human tastes like pig. You would kill people for a taste pleasure? Those are the sick words that would come from a serial killer like Jeffrey Dahmer. So you believe people should be able to rape and theive and bash people if it gives them pleasure too? | [] | 0596938d1d6df9432cf69d3ff5c4434f6422142a0a12bc1f3212ed4e209c3d96 | f9ozlxf | nan | [
"nan"
] | s_favor | No | No | 1/3 | 2019-12-05 04:46:39 | r/Veganism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Ethan Parker", "username": "plainspoken_jay", "bio": "Vegan ethics advocate engaging in r/Veganism debates, strongly condemning animal killing. Blunt, moralistic, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Primarily posts about veganism and animal rights, ar... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
62 | veganism | So you think all farm animals die of natural causes before we eat them? No, they are murdered. So when you say you would eat people it implies you would murder them. If you think i sound violent for mentioning something that is also violent that is wrong, im sorry but you are stupid. If im violent for mentioning rape t... | [] | 0596938d1d6df9432cf69d3ff5c4434f6422142a0a12bc1f3212ed4e209c3d96 | f9p2u67 | nan | [
"nan"
] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2019-12-05 05:27:59 | r/Veganism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Ethan Parker", "username": "plainspoken_jay", "bio": "Vegan ethics advocate engaging in r/Veganism debates, strongly condemning animal killing. Blunt, moralistic, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Primarily posts about veganism and animal rights, ar... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
63 | veganism | I already explained that part in the second sentence Edit: third sentence. Third sentence gave the context. Since this entire conversation and post is about murder | [] | 0596938d1d6df9432cf69d3ff5c4434f6422142a0a12bc1f3212ed4e209c3d96 | f9p30f5 | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2019-12-05 05:30:18 | r/Veganism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Ethan Parker", "username": "plainspoken_jay", "bio": "Vegan ethics advocate engaging in r/Veganism debates, strongly condemning animal killing. Blunt, moralistic, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Primarily posts about veganism and animal rights, ar... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
65 | abortion | I was just using your logic to point out the flaws in your reasoning. If your going to use that reasoning for making abortion legal, then use that same logic and apply it to other things. | I'm talking here about babies conceived through consented sex, not rape. Sex, as you may know, creates a baby if unprotected and both parties are fertile. Of course you can use a condom or birth control pill when having sex to reduce your risk but if that fails, sorry, you're pregnant. If a couple doesn't want kids ... | [
">If you don't want to be pregnant, then don't have sex If you don't want to kill babies, don't have an abortion.",
"If you don't like slavery, don't own a slave. If you don't like child pornography, don't ask children for nudes. If you don't like pineapple on pizza, don't eat pineapple on pizza.",
"Both slave... | 06568a3b23d23e15ac5ff405c4770e83545756bb1c448aa5644adab6ec2a73a8 | fqt12eq | gkpdop | [
"fqsyrpg",
"fqt0oc4",
"fqt0vtc"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-05-16 12:51:11 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "measured_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics and rights debates, weighing bodily autonomy vs right to life. Leans pro-life, argues logically and politely, asks clarifying questions.", "persona": "Active in May ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
66 | abortion | > If you decide to keep a pregnancy, you are agreeing to bring the fetus into the world. This puts certain obligations on you. So no, I don't believe a pregnant woman who consents to be pregnant can do whatever drug she Should we enforce laws that would stop a mother taking drugs while pregnant? | What are the limits of bodily autonomy? Is it when you are putting somebody else's life in danger? There must be a line at where you can say it's bodily autonomy and where it is putting other people at risk. If I refused to wear a mask while going shopping and I put other people's lives at risk is that allowed because ... | [
">If I refused to wear a mask while going shopping and I put other people's lives at risk is that allowed because of my bodily autonomy? Wearing a mask isn't really a bodily autonomy issue. However, if the store doesn't have a mask wearing policy, you dont have to wear a mask. >I just want to know where the lin... | 06568a3b23d23e15ac5ff405c4770e83545756bb1c448aa5644adab6ec2a73a8 | fqth6zq | gkuh1z | [
"fqtg8ys"
] | undecided | 2020-05-16 16:22:06 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "measured_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics and rights debates, weighing bodily autonomy vs right to life. Leans pro-life, argues logically and politely, asks clarifying questions.", "persona": "Active in May ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
67 | abortion | In this scenario you should be the one to choose, but in a pregnancy you aren't choosing to save a life you are deliberately killing it by having an abortion. | What are the limits of bodily autonomy? Is it when you are putting somebody else's life in danger? There must be a line at where you can say it's bodily autonomy and where it is putting other people at risk. If I refused to wear a mask while going shopping and I put other people's lives at risk is that allowed because ... | [
"Can you explain to me how this is similar to being pregnant?",
"We'll get there. This is more about me trying to get a baseline for how you feel about our rights. If you think I should be able to force you to risk your life to save another, that's a baseline. If you think it should be up to you to choose on your... | 06568a3b23d23e15ac5ff405c4770e83545756bb1c448aa5644adab6ec2a73a8 | fqu376w | gkuh1z | [
"fqtyugm",
"fqu24ed"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-05-16 19:45:42 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "measured_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics and rights debates, weighing bodily autonomy vs right to life. Leans pro-life, argues logically and politely, asks clarifying questions.", "persona": "Active in May ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
68 | abortion | >what difference is there between different outcomes for you, if in both outcomes you never had any experience? What do you mean? >meaning that it is the same as if you temporarily cease to exist when you are under anaesthesia. The difference is one will not be able to function again and the other is temporarily no... | 1 - Your body is being kept alive by all sorts of technology, but your brain doesn't exist. Are you still there in your body, just because it's alive? 2 - If we theoretically switched brains so that your brain is fully functioning in my body and my brain is fully functioning in your body, what do you think would happe... | [
"At conception a human being is created, in the uterus I probably still don't know what's going on. If \"you\" is referring to sentence/consciousness I am not me at the moment of conception, and a person who is under anaesthesia wouldn't be themselves either. That's the problem with using metrics like that",
"> a... | 06568a3b23d23e15ac5ff405c4770e83545756bb1c448aa5644adab6ec2a73a8 | fqwwosb | gkv8y2 | [
"fqwrs03",
"fqwup2c"
] | undecided | 2020-05-17 14:51:23 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "measured_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics and rights debates, weighing bodily autonomy vs right to life. Leans pro-life, argues logically and politely, asks clarifying questions.", "persona": "Active in May ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
70 | abortion | I believe in justified killings but the earlier comments believed the right to life makes no sense so I was just clearing things up. | ‘What do you consider more important: the right to life or the right to your own body?’ Pro-choicers will consider the right to their own body more important. Pro-lifers will consider the right to life more important. This is the debate we are supposed to be having: not whether the fetus is a clump of cells, if it’s ... | [
"The right to life is the right not to be killed.",
"Is it your position then that there is no such thing as a justified killing?"
] | 06568a3b23d23e15ac5ff405c4770e83545756bb1c448aa5644adab6ec2a73a8 | frgxpn6 | gofo76 | [
"frgl0ge",
"frgxdo5"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-05-22 19:53:55 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "measured_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion ethics and rights debates, weighing bodily autonomy vs right to life. Leans pro-life, argues logically and politely, asks clarifying questions.", "persona": "Active in May ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
72 | abortion | If you get pregnant and have a child, the child is now 3-years old, you can’t kick him or her out because you don’t want to be a parent anymore, you have to go through a legal process, I see the right to the womb as much the same, | Even if the mother wants to keep the fetus that's out of the sentimental value she asigned to her fetus, but not because they had a right. That's how I understand this. And what's the origin of this argument, that the fetus has no valid right to live and grow in their mother's womb? | [] | 0677d6c436c68632481d4d5e8a56bf8b9ead46e8e7d2badb4e14a91ce2a70003 | f8nu2jl | dzy5w6 | [] | against | No | No | No | 2019-11-25 04:35:53 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Aaron Bennett", "username": "steadfast_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates with a pro-life lean, focusing on compassion and support. Shares resources and seeks constructive, non-confrontational discussion.", "persona": "Active mainly from... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
73 | abortion | The type of prolifer I strive to be...
Is one that will be there for someone going through a difficult time, whether that time be abusive relationship, single parent with other kids, rape, incest, etc. I don’t want to be the pro-lifer that yells at women making the most difficult decision of their life, I want to be t... | Is one that will be there for someone going through a difficult time, whether that time be abusive relationship, single parent with other kids, rape, incest, etc. I don’t want to be the pro-lifer that yells at women making the most difficult decision of their life, I want to be there and I hope that’s what the majority... | [] | 0677d6c436c68632481d4d5e8a56bf8b9ead46e8e7d2badb4e14a91ce2a70003 | ek98py | ek98py | [] | favor | Yes | No | No | 2020-01-05 07:21:04 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Aaron Bennett", "username": "steadfast_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates with a pro-life lean, focusing on compassion and support. Shares resources and seeks constructive, non-confrontational discussion.", "persona": "Active mainly from... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
74 | abortion | As a pro-lifer, I believe the only way to support a woman in crisis is to offer her a different solution to abortion, the only time I support abortion is when her life is in danger. | Is one that will be there for someone going through a difficult time, whether that time be abusive relationship, single parent with other kids, rape, incest, etc. I don’t want to be the pro-lifer that yells at women making the most difficult decision of their life, I want to be there and I hope that’s what the majority... | [
"What if the best way to be there for them is to support their choice to abort?"
] | 0677d6c436c68632481d4d5e8a56bf8b9ead46e8e7d2badb4e14a91ce2a70003 | fd7xz9z | ek98py | [
"fd7xslr"
] | s_against | Yes | No | No | 2020-01-05 09:08:15 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Aaron Bennett", "username": "steadfast_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates with a pro-life lean, focusing on compassion and support. Shares resources and seeks constructive, non-confrontational discussion.", "persona": "Active mainly from... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
75 | abortion | Some women that I know didn’t know of some resources that local charities/churches/generous rich people ( they exist, surprisingly) offer, one church will pay for everything for 2 years whether or not you put the baby up for adoption if you need it, that’s the one I recommend the most. | Is one that will be there for someone going through a difficult time, whether that time be abusive relationship, single parent with other kids, rape, incest, etc. I don’t want to be the pro-lifer that yells at women making the most difficult decision of their life, I want to be there and I hope that’s what the majority... | [
"What if the best way to be there for them is to support their choice to abort?",
"As a pro-lifer, I believe the only way to support a woman in crisis is to offer her a different solution to abortion, the only time I support abortion is when her life is in danger.",
"Do you think women are unaware of alternativ... | 0677d6c436c68632481d4d5e8a56bf8b9ead46e8e7d2badb4e14a91ce2a70003 | fd7ywiz | ek98py | [
"fd7xslr",
"fd7xz9z",
"fd7yb76"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-01-05 09:12:16 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Aaron Bennett", "username": "steadfast_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates with a pro-life lean, focusing on compassion and support. Shares resources and seeks constructive, non-confrontational discussion.", "persona": "Active mainly from... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
77 | abortion | Yeah, I want to be there, being there is not confined to whether or not they went with my belief. | [] | 0677d6c436c68632481d4d5e8a56bf8b9ead46e8e7d2badb4e14a91ce2a70003 | fd84ir6 | nan | [
"nan"
] | against | No | No | 1/3 | 2020-01-05 09:44:06 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Aaron Bennett", "username": "steadfast_dialogue", "bio": "Engages in abortion debates with a pro-life lean, focusing on compassion and support. Shares resources and seeks constructive, non-confrontational discussion.", "persona": "Active mainly from... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
81 | feminism | Harvey Weinstein Says He's the Real Victim Here
Harvey Weinstein Says He's the Real Victim Here | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | ebq5dr | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-17 04:27:05 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
82 | feminism | Housing. Money. Benefits. Military Wives Can Lose It All When They Report Domestic Abuse.
Housing. Money. Benefits. Military Wives Can Lose It All When They Report Domestic Abuse. | Housing. Money. Benefits. Military Wives Can Lose It All When They Report Domestic Abuse.
Housing. Money. Benefits. Military Wives Can Lose It All When They Report Domestic Abuse. | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | ec8og5 | ec8og5 | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-18 07:06:44 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
83 | feminism | Don't Forget That Saudi Arabia Is Imprisoning and Torturing Women's Rights Activist Loujain al-Hathloul
Don't Forget That Saudi Arabia Is Imprisoning and Torturing Women's Rights Activist Loujain al-Hathloul | Don't Forget That Saudi Arabia Is Imprisoning and Torturing Women's Rights Activist Loujain al-Hathloul
Don't Forget That Saudi Arabia Is Imprisoning and Torturing Women's Rights Activist Loujain al-Hathloul | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | efgjs8 | efgjs8 | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-25 14:36:02 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
84 | feminism | I was jailed for my trafficker's death. I'm free now — but other women languish.
I was jailed for my trafficker's death. I'm free now — but other women languish. | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | efso5m | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2019-12-26 08:47:40 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
85 | feminism | Reports That Bloomberg's Campaign Exploited Women's Prison Labor Spark Outrage
Reports That Bloomberg's Campaign Exploited Women's Prison Labor Spark Outrage | Reports That Bloomberg's Campaign Exploited Women's Prison Labor Spark Outrage
Reports That Bloomberg's Campaign Exploited Women's Prison Labor Spark Outrage | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | egcisi | egcisi | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-27 16:33:32 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
86 | feminism | I'm very glad this was published in The Morning Star and very glad it included a critique of pornography, but I'm also distressed by how reductive it becomes. Gang rape predated pornography. Surely FiLiA is aware that pornography grew out of patriarchy and not the other way around? | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | fdd8kun | nan | [
"nan"
] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-01-06 09:36:04 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |
88 | feminism | The Reason Republicans Won't Even Vote on the Violence Against Women Act
The Reason Republicans Won't Even Vote on the Violence Against Women Act | The Reason Republicans Won't Even Vote on the Violence Against Women Act | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | epdquy | epdquy | [] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-01-16 04:44:53 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
89 | feminism | >along with another that seeks to protect transgender women the same as their heterosexual counterparts Important article, but bizarre that VICE just conflated gender identity with sexual orientation. | The Reason Republicans Won't Even Vote on the Violence Against Women Act | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | feisxdk | epdquy | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-16 04:46:18 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
90 | feminism | Sanders Unveils Plan to Ensure Universal Access to Reproductive Healthcare and Take on the Maternal Mortality Crisis
Sanders Unveils Plan to Ensure Universal Access to Reproductive Healthcare and Take on the Maternal Mortality Crisis | Sanders Unveils Plan to Ensure Universal Access to Reproductive Healthcare and Take on the Maternal Mortality Crisis | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | fflcxa | fflcxa | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-03-09 00:34:55 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
91 | feminism | I'm so happy he is using the phrase "reproductive justice," à la Loretta Ross. | Sanders Unveils Plan to Ensure Universal Access to Reproductive Healthcare and Take on the Maternal Mortality Crisis | [] | 06bf662033302b38c8975dc701e5fc3ad64eadc505cd0176e13de861ca1cc4f7 | fjz3v6q | fflcxa | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-03-09 00:39:28 | r/feminisms | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Lauren Bennett", "username": "quiet_willow", "bio": "Shares news on feminism, women's rights, and reproductive justice; generally supportive and policy-aware with an earnest, non-sarcastic tone.", "persona": "Active from late 2019 to early 2020 on r... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
92 | feminism | Scientific Study: Feminsm Makes You More Man Hating. STUDY: Self-identified feminists are much more likely than other women to "sacrifice" men in a hypothetical "Moral Choice Dilemma Task" over women. Plus other studies proving gynocentrism is real and misandry among feminists is real
Scientific Study: Feminsm Makes Y... | Scientific Study: Feminsm Makes You More Man Hating. STUDY: Self-identified feminists are much more likely than other women to "sacrifice" men in a hypothetical "Moral Choice Dilemma Task" over women. Plus other studies proving gynocentrism is real and misandry among feminists is real
Scientific Study: Feminsm Makes Y... | [] | 06e5b4d0754fa118394ec7afc72f4b8acb785c9818c7de483215b9975be97774 | hbt4r4 | hbt4r4 | [] | s_against | No | No | No | 2020-06-19 05:22:29 | r/Egalitarianism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "candid_commons", "bio": "Discusses feminism and gender politics, mostly critical of feminist subreddits; direct, occasionally sharp. Active in late June 2020.", "persona": "Engages in r/Egalitarianism threads focused on ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
93 | feminism | Some good news.
The popular feminist subreddit r/BlackPillFeminism has been banned from Reddit for hateful content. It's good to know the rules apply to women too, or at least occasionally. | The popular feminist subreddit r/BlackPillFeminism has been banned from Reddit for hateful content. It's good to know the rules apply to women too, or at least occasionally. | [] | 06e5b4d0754fa118394ec7afc72f4b8acb785c9818c7de483215b9975be97774 | hdkiq1 | hdkiq1 | [] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-22 05:36:40 | r/Egalitarianism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "candid_commons", "bio": "Discusses feminism and gender politics, mostly critical of feminist subreddits; direct, occasionally sharp. Active in late June 2020.", "persona": "Engages in r/Egalitarianism threads focused on ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
96 | feminism | Men "make better plasma donors than women" and have "more Covid-19 antibodies", as appeal for male donors is made.
But my question is why should we donate? Feminists have been keen to revel in the higher death toll incurred by men in this pandemic, they revelled in our suffering and vulnerability, yet now we are need... | But my question is why should we donate? Feminists have been keen to revel in the higher death toll incurred by men in this pandemic, they revelled in our suffering and vulnerability, yet now we are needed to donate plasma? Jog on, quite frankly. Public health bodies did little to offer specific support to men durin... | [] | 06e5b4d0754fa118394ec7afc72f4b8acb785c9818c7de483215b9975be97774 | he60pu | he60pu | [] | undecided | 2020-06-23 04:16:36 | r/Egalitarianism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "candid_commons", "bio": "Discusses feminism and gender politics, mostly critical of feminist subreddits; direct, occasionally sharp. Active in late June 2020.", "persona": "Engages in r/Egalitarianism threads focused on ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
98 | feminism | PinkPillFeminism is still up as far as I know. | How feminism aggresively and sometimes violenty assualts science - Good article, with real high profile examples. Examples of how feminists are blocking the publication of real scientific data - yet are the ones churning out countless women are wonderful fake science | [
"With feminists subs promoting hates gone, I think people will finally look at the situation of genders with a critical eye."
] | 06e5b4d0754fa118394ec7afc72f4b8acb785c9818c7de483215b9975be97774 | fwfonbx | hi5a5j | [
"fwei1q1"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-30 04:32:20 | r/Egalitarianism | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Harris", "username": "candid_commons", "bio": "Discusses feminism and gender politics, mostly critical of feminist subreddits; direct, occasionally sharp. Active in late June 2020.", "persona": "Engages in r/Egalitarianism threads focused on ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
99 | feminism | What do you mean exactly with the added “children use them” part? | [] | 06f000bfabd862e3a5c680da43ce31e8363b3e222f450fda359323bd6f2ea1ba | fuxaq6w | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-15 20:00:36 | r/GenderCritical | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Reeves", "username": "careful_conversant", "bio": "Engages in feminism and gendered spaces debates, focusing on practical questions around restrooms and minors. Respectful, inquisitive tone with clarifying questions and occasional light humor... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
100 | feminism | I understand, but that doesn’t rhyme with emphasizing they are female spaces only right? Or am I misunderstanding you? | [] | 06f000bfabd862e3a5c680da43ce31e8363b3e222f450fda359323bd6f2ea1ba | fuxe17g | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-15 20:25:36 | r/GenderCritical | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Reeves", "username": "careful_conversant", "bio": "Engages in feminism and gendered spaces debates, focusing on practical questions around restrooms and minors. Respectful, inquisitive tone with clarifying questions and occasional light humor... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
104 | climate-change | Aboriginal cultures did not have written records. They do have art work and stories though. | [] | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | fdlfx3e | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-08 23:39:21 | r/climatechange | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
105 | climate-change | Do you think they would sign an agreement that you would endorse. Could you give us some details of what you think they would agree with. I think they would agree to continue as they seem fit, particularly if they were subsidised to do it. | Are you seriously OK with all the waste going into our oceans? Ok with eating and breathing in microplastics? Pollution still causes health problems, coral reefs are still dying. Are you seriously OK with all the smoke contaminating the atmosphere from the bushfires and the destruction of the Amazon forest? Humans have... | [
">I guarantee every developing nation will say we dont have the money to do that or etc etc excuse. >We cant even get the fucking US president to sign an agreement similar to that? (paris agreement) I won't discuss the rational our current President has for not promoting heavy self-regulating agreements, but he'... | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | feazh95 | eo14b2 | [
"fe9eo2z",
"fe9gkhg"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-13 23:17:45 | r/climatechange | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
107 | climate-change | Then all the alarmists of everything should stop supporting corporate business. But l suppose that isn't enough for the nutters. How long will it be before violence and extreme vandalism is used to support the minority view. Have a look at history to balance your ignorance. | Global Hypocrisy | [
"I mean exactly, the climate problem is perpetuated by corporations while the burden of solving it is placed on individuals. This comic illustrates why people fight for meaningful change as opposed to being able to “do what you want” and cause a difference."
] | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | ftiyyg0 | gzjbr5 | [
"fti49lz"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-06-10 00:49:35 | r/climateskeptics | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
108 | climate-change | What methods have been used to measure the average ocean pH currently and in the past so a change can be shown. I particularly emphasise what errors these measurement have. My skepticism of the conclusion of ocean pH variation is based on my understanding that very little research based on the complexity of the ocean... | The Oceans Aren’t 'Acidifying': The Term Is Just Being Abused by Science and Media | [
"This site is such a joke. First of all, we *have* been recording the decrease in ocean pH. [LINK] Second, their image of a “healthy reef” depicts bleached corals overgrown with algae and water dominated by small reef fishes. A healthy reef is primarily predatory fish by biomass."
] | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | funjf3u | h7870v | [
"ftrldmf"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-13 01:53:13 | r/climateskeptics | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
109 | climate-change | I've been thinking for some time now, that as the alarmism of climate change wanes, the energy of alarmist will be directed to so other cause. As you know energy can not be created nor destroyed only changed without loss to other forms. | The Oceans Aren’t 'Acidifying': The Term Is Just Being Abused by Science and Media | [
"I'm not sure if that's meant to be sarcastic. I'll assume not and answer seriously... I come across at least two articles on climate per day that I don't bother to post simply because they're absolute gibberish. But they're not just total nonsense, they're boring. The only ones I post here I consider to be SO rid... | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | funkmp7 | h7870v | [
"fuko7jq",
"fukp9d4"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-06-13 02:05:02 | r/climateskeptics | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
111 | climate-change | How stupid a comment is this. Have you ever seen a denier rally. Do you know of any denier activist groups. Skeptics have been saying for decade that the science has been politicised. This claim has gained so much credibility that alarmist are trying to adopt it for themselves. | If people are sceptical of “the experts” & if government should enact crippling policy based on such expert opinions, it is not a reflection of their own ignorance or stubbornness. It is a reflection of how modern science has been politicized to the point of discrediting itself. | [
"It’s politicized by the deniers."
] | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | fxriwt4 | hp7uao | [
"fxnq18d"
] | s_favor | No | No | No | 2020-07-12 00:26:54 | r/climateskeptics | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
112 | climate-change | Those rebuttals are becoming more common day by day. You may have to look more into the science yourself. | If people are sceptical of “the experts” & if government should enact crippling policy based on such expert opinions, it is not a reflection of their own ignorance or stubbornness. It is a reflection of how modern science has been politicized to the point of discrediting itself. | [
"It’s politicized by the deniers.",
"They have to. Luckily they are backed by deep pockets. on the other hand I'm a meteorologist and my kids call George Soros \"Uncle George\" when he drops off my checks for keeping quiet about this stuff. Look at all the brilliant rebuttals the deniers have published despite... | 07716281e246fb3ed2829064848ec723d98dbb3a1d9e2ecef139e249f2e56423 | fxrjvrz | hp7uao | [
"fxnq18d",
"fxobwp0"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-07-12 00:32:39 | r/climateskeptics | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Graham Nolan", "username": "quiet_harbor", "bio": "Debates climate change topics, often skeptical of alarmism and policy claims. Direct, non-sarcastic tone; questions evidence on ocean acidification and politicization of science.", "persona": "Activ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
113 | abortion | I’m all for paid maternity leave starting during pregnancy and lasting several years after. | Not talking about sue/take to court = awarded payment. Talking about having it be expected in society that if it's illegal to have an abortion, you will be awarded compensation by social security equivalent to full time working wages for a *minimum* of two years. If you are pro-choice but faced with illegal abortion ... | [] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fbnhxzb | ecys4g | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2019-12-22 08:01:07 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
114 | abortion | So women do in fact have penises sometimes in your view? | And even if it wasn't, it's still very much inside her. But as trivial as this point is, I do end up arguing it enough to justify a thread. It is physically inside her. It cannot be readily detached. It is part of her body. The lack of shared DNA doesn't matter. My gut microbiome isn't even the same species but I stil... | [
"So because I’m pregnant with a boy, I have a penis?",
"You have a penis on your fetus, yes. Which is very different from what we usually mean when we say \"I have a penis\"."
] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fdeiwdk | ekx03d | [
"fdef7ng",
"fdeh2g5"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 20:46:25 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
115 | abortion | It used to be legal and allowable to give birth to your baby and leave it to die. Ancient Roman prostitutes did it all the time. What’s currently legally allowed has no bearing on whether someone is a person. | And even if it wasn't, it's still very much inside her. But as trivial as this point is, I do end up arguing it enough to justify a thread. It is physically inside her. It cannot be readily detached. It is part of her body. The lack of shared DNA doesn't matter. My gut microbiome isn't even the same species but I stil... | [] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fdej13j | ekx03d | [] | favor | No | No | No | 2020-01-06 20:47:45 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
117 | abortion | I’m saying what’s currently legally allowed isn’t a good measure of what’s actually moral or acceptable. You need to have a better argument than “this is what’s legal now, so hah. I win.” | And even if it wasn't, it's still very much inside her. But as trivial as this point is, I do end up arguing it enough to justify a thread. It is physically inside her. It cannot be readily detached. It is part of her body. The lack of shared DNA doesn't matter. My gut microbiome isn't even the same species but I stil... | [] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fdekkik | ekx03d | [] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 21:03:16 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
118 | abortion | Generally though your organs won’t run on a completely different blood type than the rest of you like a fetus can and often does. The types can even be completely incompatible and kill you if they were in your body under any other condition besides pregnancy. | And even if it wasn't, it's still very much inside her. But as trivial as this point is, I do end up arguing it enough to justify a thread. It is physically inside her. It cannot be readily detached. It is part of her body. The lack of shared DNA doesn't matter. My gut microbiome isn't even the same species but I stil... | [
"I used to be an embryo/fetus. So for the first 9 months of my existence I was actually my own mother and not me? Your view is quite trippy.",
"Traditionally we say that you were a part of your mother."
] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fdel63g | ekx03d | [
"fdekawg",
"fdekfh6"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-01-06 21:09:19 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | |||
119 | abortion | It isn’t just my feelings that human beings are all created equally and have the right to life. That’s been around since Enlightenment and is what our country is based on. | And even if it wasn't, it's still very much inside her. But as trivial as this point is, I do end up arguing it enough to justify a thread. It is physically inside her. It cannot be readily detached. It is part of her body. The lack of shared DNA doesn't matter. My gut microbiome isn't even the same species but I stil... | [] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fdelblb | ekx03d | [] | s_against | No | No | No | 2020-01-06 21:10:50 | r/Abortiondebate | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
120 | abortion | They saw a developed fetus, looking exactly like a baby, and still deny it’s a baby. They have a mental illness at this point. | In medical gore, a miscarried child is posted and pro choicers get offended it was referred to as a child. | [] | 08456fb9c85c1d0ce706892049e88fa9ea43e0c8e722cd4fe6b55bb8f55088b1 | fdtvrga | en3sol | [] | s_against | No | No | No | 2020-01-11 07:10:03 | r/prolife | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Daniel Carter", "username": "evening_ledger", "bio": "Engages heavily in abortion debates with a strong pro‑life stance, citing biology and rights. Direct, assertive tone with occasional harshness; supports paid maternity leave.", "persona": "Active... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
123 | nuclear-energy | I'm crowdsourcing the best arguments and sources for the nuclear power debate on one platform. I'm sure this subreddit can develop a compelling argument, check it out!
I'm crowdsourcing the best arguments and sources for the nuclear power debate on one platform. I'm sure this subreddit can develop a compelling argumen... | [] | 0a9e2e91d91c4e2e9922c5c642925bbe901979ab4494d9ca72dd9b00868ce030 | gqh32x | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-05-25 21:06:23 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "quiet_signal", "bio": "Focuses on nuclear power debates around timelines and costs. Tries to facilitate balanced discussion with mixed stances; measured, persistent tone.", "persona": "Active in May 2020 on r/NuclearPower ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
125 | nuclear-energy | Your source says construction time, his source says planning-to-operation (PTO) time. Those are two different things. If you believe so strongly, then submit a point proving that nuclear plants can be built quickly to show the counter-argument. | I'm crowdsourcing the best arguments and sources for the nuclear power debate on one platform. I'm sure this subreddit can develop a compelling argument, check it out! | [
"Your site is hosting pure lies, that’s not debate. The anti-nuclear person says *all* nuclear plants ever have had 19 or 20 years from planning to operation. There have been many, many nuclear plants in China, Japan and Korea done in well under 10 years. There’s no point trying to argue with straight up lies. ... | 0a9e2e91d91c4e2e9922c5c642925bbe901979ab4494d9ca72dd9b00868ce030 | frsrdfh | gqh32x | [
"frspdla",
"frsqs09",
"frsr1eh"
] | against | No | No | No | 2020-05-25 21:48:47 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "quiet_signal", "bio": "Focuses on nuclear power debates around timelines and costs. Tries to facilitate balanced discussion with mixed stances; measured, persistent tone.", "persona": "Active in May 2020 on r/NuclearPower ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
127 | nuclear-energy | That's why I'm building this platform. It's an even playing field for everyone. You get to call out their lies and spread the truth. If you refuse to post your side of it, then you're right, every activist that goes to my site will just see anti-nuclear posts. It's concerning if no one is willing to argue the points... | [] | 0a9e2e91d91c4e2e9922c5c642925bbe901979ab4494d9ca72dd9b00868ce030 | frss3t6 | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-05-25 21:55:12 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "quiet_signal", "bio": "Focuses on nuclear power debates around timelines and costs. Tries to facilitate balanced discussion with mixed stances; measured, persistent tone.", "persona": "Active in May 2020 on r/NuclearPower ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
128 | nuclear-energy | Again, the beautiful part is, if they're lying you can point it out and it will support your side even more. The fact that you're not even willing to engage at all is disheartening | [] | 0a9e2e91d91c4e2e9922c5c642925bbe901979ab4494d9ca72dd9b00868ce030 | frsuye5 | nan | [
"nan"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-05-25 22:20:28 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "quiet_signal", "bio": "Focuses on nuclear power debates around timelines and costs. Tries to facilitate balanced discussion with mixed stances; measured, persistent tone.", "persona": "Active in May 2020 on r/NuclearPower ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... | ||||
129 | nuclear-energy | Again, Greg, those are not sponsors. Those orgs are simply a list of mainstream climate action groups that I've included on the site. Recommend me other orgs of the same scale and I will absolutely consider adding them. Also, what are the straight-up lies? /u/lets_chill_dude claims the biggest (and only?) lie is th... | I'm crowdsourcing the best arguments and sources for the nuclear power debate on one platform. I'm sure this subreddit can develop a compelling argument, check it out! | [
"Your site is hosting pure lies, that’s not debate. The anti-nuclear person says *all* nuclear plants ever have had 19 or 20 years from planning to operation. There have been many, many nuclear plants in China, Japan and Korea done in well under 10 years. There’s no point trying to argue with straight up lies. ... | 0a9e2e91d91c4e2e9922c5c642925bbe901979ab4494d9ca72dd9b00868ce030 | frtze47 | gqh32x | [
"frspdla",
"frtps9n"
] | stance_not_inferrable | 2020-05-26 04:46:28 | r/nuclear | ### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### INPUT FIELDS (pr... | ### USER_PROFILE (auxiliary, do NOT override target text)
"realname": "Evan Parker", "username": "quiet_signal", "bio": "Focuses on nuclear power debates around timelines and costs. Tries to facilitate balanced discussion with mixed stances; measured, persistent tone.", "persona": "Active in May 2020 on r/NuclearPower ... | SYSTEM PROMPT
### ROLE
You are a careful, neutral annotator.
### TASK
Using the provided topic definition, classify whether the TARGET_POST_TEXT expresses a stance toward the TOPIC itself (favor/against/stance_not_inferrable). Do NOT judge whether the post agrees with, replies to, or criticises another author.
### I... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.