Peter Pak commited on
Commit ·
b3dc6f7
1
Parent(s): 1b03c8d
Adds source files.
Browse files- source/2024-05-01 M2 AMMTO Fatigue Blanks 05.hdf5 +3 -0
- source/ASTM E466 Drawing.pdf +3 -0
- source/ASTM E466.STL +3 -0
- source/Fatigue Results Summary.xlsx +3 -0
- source/Methods.docx +3 -0
- source/README.txt +155 -0
source/2024-05-01 M2 AMMTO Fatigue Blanks 05.hdf5
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:e38916df0880a8e0d4cd0d7ec3a11c7b88888171f463a7a8482137cedfe99150
|
| 3 |
+
size 127808960296
|
source/ASTM E466 Drawing.pdf
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:f8767dda23cca30be5654669dc15829b8af389a3bf651e8b1bb532f76db1f5b4
|
| 3 |
+
size 41987
|
source/ASTM E466.STL
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:e3281cf4bbb84b85bd7477d14fa6e183c33610c059aeeded02f26b8765c7424a
|
| 3 |
+
size 129684
|
source/Fatigue Results Summary.xlsx
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:87dac1ab0b2338d9911b42ccbea8620605718a53443003152a0941233ab5f143
|
| 3 |
+
size 234613
|
source/Methods.docx
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:a9d201d49a0910a77d177805899b9159b14e67df13fff05446e94f17ad3a63ad
|
| 3 |
+
size 30081
|
source/README.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
This readme file was generated on [2025-03-19] by [Zackary Snow]
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
| 5 |
+
|
| 6 |
+
1. Title of Dataset: In situ Visible Light and Thermal Imaging Data from a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process Co-Registered to X-ray Computed Tomography and Fatigue Data
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
2. Author Information
|
| 9 |
+
A. Principal Investigator Contact Information
|
| 10 |
+
Name: Zackary Snow
|
| 11 |
+
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5901-6785
|
| 12 |
+
Institution: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
|
| 13 |
+
Address: 2350 Cherahala Blvd, Knoxville, TN 37932
|
| 14 |
+
Email: snowzk@ornl.gov
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
B. Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information
|
| 17 |
+
Name: Luke Scime
|
| 18 |
+
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-253X
|
| 19 |
+
Institution: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
|
| 20 |
+
Address: 2350 Cherahala Blvd, Knoxville, TN 37932
|
| 21 |
+
Email: scimelr@ornl.gov
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
C. Alternate Contact Information
|
| 24 |
+
Name: Jeff Price
|
| 25 |
+
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3955-9473
|
| 26 |
+
Institution: Oak Ridge National Laboratory
|
| 27 |
+
Address: 2350 Cherahala Blvd, Knoxville, TN 37932
|
| 28 |
+
Email: pricejr@ornl.gov
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
3. Date of data collection: 2024-05-01 to 2024-05-05
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
4. Geographic location of data collection: Oak Ridge, TN
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data:
|
| 35 |
+
This research was sponsored by the US Department of Energy’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Office. This dataset has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05–00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
1. Reuse restrictions placed on the data: N/A
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: N/A
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: N/A
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: N/A
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
5. Was data derived from another source? If yes, list source(s): N/A
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
6. Recommended citation for this dataset:
|
| 50 |
+
Z. Snow, L. Scime, C. Joslin, W. Halsey, A. Marquez Rossy, A. Ziabari, V. Paquit, R. Dehoff, "In situ Visible Light and Thermal Imaging Data from a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process Co-Registered to X-ray Computed Tomography and Fatigue Data", Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2025), https://doi.org/10.13139/ORNLNCCS/2524534
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
1. File List:
|
| 56 |
+
- 2024-05-01 M2 AMMTO Fatigue Blanks 05.hdf5, which contains:
|
| 57 |
+
- build notes
|
| 58 |
+
- machine information
|
| 59 |
+
- ambient print conditions
|
| 60 |
+
- feedstock information
|
| 61 |
+
- partwise process parameters
|
| 62 |
+
- post-build reference images
|
| 63 |
+
- test results
|
| 64 |
+
- log10(cycles to failure)
|
| 65 |
+
- layerwise scan path information
|
| 66 |
+
- line: x1, y1, x2, y2, time
|
| 67 |
+
- point: x, y, photodiode intensity
|
| 68 |
+
- layerwise sensor images
|
| 69 |
+
- visible/0: post-melt visible light
|
| 70 |
+
- visible/1: post-recoat visible light
|
| 71 |
+
- nir/0: temporally integrated sum image in the near infrared
|
| 72 |
+
- nir/1: temporally integrated max image in the near infrared
|
| 73 |
+
- nir/2: temporally integrated argmax image in the near infrared
|
| 74 |
+
- layerwise part template images
|
| 75 |
+
- layerwise sample template images
|
| 76 |
+
- layerwise thermal simulation results
|
| 77 |
+
- melt pool depth
|
| 78 |
+
- melt pool length
|
| 79 |
+
- melt pool width
|
| 80 |
+
- time since start of melting (relative to the start of melting of each part)
|
| 81 |
+
- layerwise X-ray computed tomography (XCT) results
|
| 82 |
+
- raw XCT data
|
| 83 |
+
- segmented flaws
|
| 84 |
+
- layerwise anomaly detection results
|
| 85 |
+
- 0: Powder
|
| 86 |
+
- 1: Printed
|
| 87 |
+
- 2: Recoater Hopping
|
| 88 |
+
- 3: Recoater Streaking
|
| 89 |
+
- 4: Incomplete Spreading
|
| 90 |
+
- 5: Powder Mounding
|
| 91 |
+
- 6: Debris
|
| 92 |
+
- 7: Spatter on Powder
|
| 93 |
+
- 8: Swelling
|
| 94 |
+
- 9: Super-Elevation
|
| 95 |
+
- 10: Misprint
|
| 96 |
+
- 11: Stripe Boundary
|
| 97 |
+
- 12: Over Melting
|
| 98 |
+
- 13: Under Melting
|
| 99 |
+
- 14: Localized Bright Spot
|
| 100 |
+
- 15: Localized Dark Spot
|
| 101 |
+
- 16: Dropped NIR Data
|
| 102 |
+
- 17: Pitting
|
| 103 |
+
- log file information
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
- Fatigue Results Summary, which contains:
|
| 106 |
+
- specimen number
|
| 107 |
+
- gage diameter (mm)
|
| 108 |
+
- test temperature (°C)
|
| 109 |
+
- frequency (Hz)
|
| 110 |
+
- stress ratio
|
| 111 |
+
- stress parameters
|
| 112 |
+
- total cycles
|
| 113 |
+
- failure location
|
| 114 |
+
- test hours
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
- ASTM E466.stl
|
| 117 |
+
- .stl file of the machine fatigue coupon geometry
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
- ASTM E466 Drawing.pdf
|
| 120 |
+
- defines specified geometry of the fatigue coupon
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
- Methods.docx
|
| 123 |
+
- description of methods for data collection and processing
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
2. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: N/A
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
3. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? No
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
|
| 130 |
+
METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION
|
| 131 |
+
|
| 132 |
+
1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data:
|
| 133 |
+
See Methods.docx
|
| 134 |
+
|
| 135 |
+
2. Methods for processing the data:
|
| 136 |
+
See Methods.docx
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data:
|
| 139 |
+
Any software or library able to load .hdf5 files (e.g., HDFView, h5py)
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: N/A
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
5. Environmental/experimental conditions: N/A
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: N/A
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission:
|
| 148 |
+
- Zackary Snow,
|
| 149 |
+
- Luke Scime,
|
| 150 |
+
- Chase Joslin,
|
| 151 |
+
- William Halsey,
|
| 152 |
+
- Andres Marquez Rossy,
|
| 153 |
+
- Amir Ziabari,
|
| 154 |
+
- Vincent Paquit,
|
| 155 |
+
- Ryan Dehoff
|