judgment_lex stringlengths 661 792k | summary_lex stringlengths 243 16.3k |
|---|---|
vil Appeal No. 113 of 1953. Appeal from the Judgment and Decree, dated the 25th day of March, 1952, of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Bavdekar and Dixit JJ.) in Appeal No. 554 of 1951, from Original Decree arising out of the Judgment and Decree, dated the 30th day of June, 1951, of the Court of the Joint Civil... | It’s a well-known legal rule that a consent decree (an agreement approved by a court) is just as binding as a court order made after a trial. If a settlement isn't based on fraud, lies, misunderstanding, or error, then the court's decision based on that settlement is final and prevents the same issue from being brought... |
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
1. Learned senior advocate for the State Mr. Kar
has raised the point of maintainability and
has submitted that the maintainability point
be kept open and to be decided later.
2. However, I find that there cannot be any
doubt about the maintainability of this writ
application and I am sa... | On Wednesday, the Calcutta High Court ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to look into a case about hiring primary school teachers. The court also told the CBI to give its report in a sealed envelope by June 15.
The person who filed the case told Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay that a former state minister ... |
, right in holding that Respondent No. From the Judgment and order dated 17.10. 1986 of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Civil Special (Writ) Appeals Nos. 27,28 of 1983 and 224 of 1982. Tapas Ray, S.K. Jain, Mrs. P.Jain and section Atreya for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SABYASACHI MUKHAR... | The first person involved worked for the company as an Internal Auditor and earned about Rs. 1186 per month. The company said that the person stopped coming to work on January 28, 1978. Because of this, they shouldn't get paid for any time after that date, according to the company. The person was then suspended from wo... |
Criminal Appeal No. 46, of 1969. Appeal under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution of India from the judgment and order dated December 10, 1968, of the Patna High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 116 of 1966. section M. Mishra and section section Jauhar, for the appellant. B. P. Jha, for the respondent. The Judgment of th... | The person appealing the case was under 21. He was found guilty of a crime under a specific law (section 326, along with 6. 140 of the Indian Penal Code, or I.P.C.). He was sentenced to 3 years in jail. The question was whether he could get help from another law (section 6 of a certain Act). The court said: (1) This ot... |
Civil Appeal No. 2031 of 1977. Appeal by special Leave from the judgment and order dated the 30th June, 1977 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 905 of 1975. WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 136 & 137 of 1978. From the judgment and order dated the 30th June, 1977 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petitio... | The Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, passed in 1905, was created to stop people from illegally taking over government land. If someone is illegally occupying land that belongs to the government, they must pay a fee as explained in section 3 of the law. According to section 6(1), officials like the Collector (distr... |
1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks transfer of investigation in case
FIR No. 243/2021 under Sections 302/34 IPC registered at P.S.Hari Nagar
from respondent No.3 to CBI, directions to preserve CCTV footages of the
relevant time and compensation to the petitioner/mother of the deceased.
2. According to th... | The Delhi High Court recently handed over the investigation into the supposed killing of a prisoner to the CBI. This happened after the court decided that a full and thorough investigation was needed. The prisoner was waiting for his trial inside Tihar Jail when he died.
Judge Mukta Gupta noticed that no one had looke... |
Appeal No. 383 of 1961. Appeal from the judgment and order dated July 21 1959, of the Special Bench of the Calcutta High Court in Matter No. 76 of 1952. D. R. Prem and R. L. Dhebar, for the appellant and respondents NOS. 2 and 3. section P. Desai and B. P. Maheshwari, for respondent No. 1 565 1962. April 30. The brief ... | Someone brought in 2,000 containers of mineral oil. The government took 50 containers and fined that person. The Central Board of Revenue (a tax court) said no to the person's appeal. The person then asked the Calcutta High Court for help, using a part of the Constitution (article 226). The High Court said it couldn't ... |
Each of these appeals is by special leave and is directed against the Award made in different disputes by the Labour Court. The common justification for ignoring the High Court and approaching this Court directly by way of special leave, according to Mr. Jitendra Sharma for each of the appellants, is that there are a c... | These appeals were made to challenge the Labour Court's decisions. The first appellant, a foreman for the Irrigation Department, asked the Labour Court to help him get back pay for annual raises. The second appellant was a worker in the P.W.D. Drainage Division. He was fired without following the proper legal steps, so... |
iminal Appeal No. 60 of 1962. Appeal by special Leave from the judgment and order dated October 25, 1961, of the Punjab High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 890 of 1961 of Murder Reference No. 74 of 1961. Jai Gopal Sethi, C. L. Sareen and R. L. Kohli, for appellant. Gopal Singh, D. Gupta, P. D. Menon, for respondent. Apri... | Someone was found guilty of murder and was sentenced to death. Two people who saw the crime said that he shot and killed the person who died from a store. The person who died was riding a motorcycle. The doctor who looked at the body after death said the shot could have been fired from three or four feet away. No one a... |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT INDORE
hri Abhinav Dhanodkar - Advocate for the petitioner (WP
1408/2016).
Shri L.C.Patne - Advocate for the petitioner (WP No. 5052/2016).
... | The Madhya Pradesh High Court heard a case involving doctors who had finished six months of training. These doctors asked to join the case so they could take a special exam called the Competency-Based Evaluation (CBE) test. Two judges, Vivek Rusia and Binod Kumar Dwivedi, allowed these doctors to join the case. In this... |
399 of 1952. Petition under article 32 of the Constitution of India for a writ in the nature of habeas corpus, Godavari Parutekar, the petitioner, in person. M. C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India, (G.N. Joshi and P. A. Mehta, with him) for the respondent. December 5. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BosE... | Section 11A was added to a law from 1950 by an update in 1952. It said that the longest time someone could be held under a detention order (an order to keep someone in custody) that was approved under section 11, was 12 months from when they were first detained. But subsection (2) made this rule more specific. It split... |
Appeal No.122 of 1956. Appeal from the judgment and order dated March 5, 1954, of the Bombay High Court in Appeal from its Original Jurisdiction Misc. 1 of 1954. H. N. Sanyal, Addl. Solicitor General, G. N. Joshi and R. H. Dhebar, for the appellants. N. A. Palkhivala, section N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, P. L. Vohra an... | The Income Tax Officer made an order on October 9, 1952. This order said the person had to pay taxes for the year 1952-53. The order also gave the person credit for about 50,603 rupees. This was for interest on taxes paid early, as allowed by a rule in the Income Tax Act. On May 24, 1953, a change to the Income Tax Act... |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Lovee Narula v. ED 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter "BNSS") and/or Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter "CrPC") read with Section 45... | A person asked the Delhi High Court to let them out on 'bail,' which means being temporarily released from jail while a case is ongoing. This request was made under various laws, including the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The person was accused of money laundering an... |
The matter comes up on an application preferred by Shri
Sunil Bhandari representing the respondents seeking dismissal of
the writ petition on the ground of it having been filed without
proper authorization.
The instant writ petition has been filed in representative
capacity on behalf of a Union posed as Income Tax Cont... | The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a lawsuit (called a writ petition) filed for a group, without their official permission or a formal decision, cannot be accepted by the court.
Two judges, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani, part of a special court group, clearly stated, "We firmly believe this l... |
Civil Appeal No. 1415 of 1981. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 7th January 1981 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Application No. 113 of 1981 in Second Appeal No. 1484 of 1973. O.P. Rana, M. Qamaruddin and Mrs. M. Qamaruddin for the Appellants. 510 A.K. Sanghi for Respondent No. 1... | The person appealing a case found out the High Court threw out his appeal because his lawyer wasn't there when the case was discussed. So, he asked the court to undo the dismissal and let him be part of the appeal hearing. The High Court said no. They said the lawyer didn't give a good enough reason for waiting almost ... |
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3511 of 2022
Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Kumar Singh,Akhilendra Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Heard Sri Anurag Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri
Dhananjay Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the
State/respondents and perused... | The Allahabad High Court has decided something important. They said that when police freeze a bank account using a rule called Section 102 of the CrPC, they are supposed to tell a judge right away. But if they don't report it immediately, that doesn't automatically make the freezing illegal.
The two judges, Justice Ra... |
Appeal No. 1631 of 1967. Appeal by special leave from the order dated May 11, 1967 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1647 of 1967. S.V. Gupte 'and D.N. Mukherjee, for the appellant. M.K. Ramamurthi, Shayamala Pappu and Vineet Kumar for respondent No. 2. The Judgment of the Court was delivered... | The second party first asked the court for certain help against their employer (the company appealing the case). The Labor Court threw out the request because the second party didn't show up to court, so the case wasn't pursued. The second party then made a second request, asking for the same help. The company argued t... |
The present writ petition was filed by petitioner no.
1- who is suffering from cerebral palsy along with
petitioner no. 2 (Abled, Differently Abled, All People
Together, formerly known as the Spastics Society of India).
The grievance was in respect of the treatment mooted out to
the first ... | India's highest court looked at a request about plane travel for people with disabilities. The Court said people with artificial limbs or braces should not remove them at airport security. This helps keep their human dignity. The Court also said that lifting a person with a disability during a flight or security check ... |
One Bachan Singh and Anr., the two promotees to the post of 'AEE ' in the years 1958 and 1959 respectively, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Delhi challenging the appointment of several direct recruits to 'MES ' on the ground that their appointment was contrary to and in violation of the rules of recruitment ... | In a list from 1967, he was number 234. But after a court case called Bachan Singh's case, the government changed the lists from 1963 and 1967/68. They made a new list based on the rules from the Bachan Singh case. In this new list, the Appellant's name was not on it. This is based on the rules of the Military Engineer... |
For the respondent: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur Addl. Advocate General, Mr. Ram Lal Thakur Assistant Advocate General, and Mr. Rajat Damtal, Distt. Kangra, H.P. 21 & 22 of NDPS Act A pregnant woman, apprehending her arrest on the allegations of conspiring with her husband in substance trade, from whose house the Police had rec... | The Himachal Pradesh High Court recently stated that delaying a jail sentence for a pregnant woman would not cause any major problems. The court decided that every pregnant woman should be treated with respect during motherhood. Because of this, it ruled that a pregnant woman deserves bail instead of being kept in jail... |
2. The present appeals challenge the common judgment and
order dated 8th February, 2017, passed by the Division Bench of
the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior Bench, in Writ
Appeal No. 386 of 2016 along with companion matters, thereby
allowing the appeals filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh as
well as the Jan Bh... | The Supreme Court has confirmed a rule: a temporary employee cannot be replaced by another temporary employee. Instead, they can only be replaced by someone hired permanently through a proper process.
The Court noted this is a firm legal principle: a temporary worker cannot be replaced by another temporary worker. The... |
Appeals Nos. 137 to 141 of 1958. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated April 26, 1956 of the Patna High Court in Misc. Judicial Cases Nos. 362 to 366 of 1955. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri, section K. Majumdar and I. N. Shroff, for the appellants Nos. 2 to 4 (In all the appeals). Hardayal Hardy and D. Gu... | The person appealing this case used to put extra money into stocks and bonds. He kept track of these investments in a notebook called Book No. 1. From 1930 to 1942, he bought a lot of stocks and bonds. By 1942, they were worth a lot of money. He sold some of these stocks and bonds for a profit. In 1940, he borrowed mon... |
Appeal No. 156 of 1971. From the Judgment and Order dated 19 10 1970 of the Gujarat High Court in Special Civil Appln. No. 1177/70. B.R.L. Iyengar, S.K. Dholakia and R.C. Bhatia, for the appellant. B.B.Ahuja, for respondent No. 1. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UNTWALIA, J. The appellant 's writ petition fi... | Bapalal Purshottamdas Modi was the leader of a Hindu Undivided Family. This family owned land and ran different businesses, including lending money. Bapalal had five sons: Vadilal, Ramanlal, Jayantilal, Gulabehand, and Kantilal. Ramanlal and Jayantilal died before Bapalal, in 1933 and 1956. The person making the appeal... |
The instant Writ Petition has been filed by a mother seeking for compensation from the respondents for the physical pain and mental agony underwent by her for a period of nearly nine months after delivering a child in the 3rd respondent hospital, due to the alleged negligence on the part of the respondents. 2.The case ... | The Madras High Court has ordered a government hospital to pay Rs. 5 lakhs to a young mother. She had to have three surgeries because the hospital was too slow in moving her to a better facility. Because of this, she was separated from her new baby for nine months.
Justice Anand Venkatesh stated that the hospital knew... |
(Civil) No. 1155 of 1987. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). S.P. Malik and Mrs. Lalitha Kaushik for the Petitioner. Anil Dev Singh, R. Venkataramani, R.B. Mishra and Ms. A. Subhashini for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DUTT, J. The petitioner was the Additional Registrar of t... | Paragraph 17.3 of a government report said that government workers who retired between January 1, 1986, and September 30, 1986, should have all their cost of living allowance (called dearness allowance) up to December 31, 1985, counted as part of their salary when figuring out their pension. Rule 5(2) of the Central Ci... |
minal Appeal No. 443 of 1993. From the Judgment and Order dated 22.4.92 of the Calcutta High Court in Crl. Revision No. Sen, S.C. Ghosh, Rajiv K. Dutta and B.B. Tawakley for the Appellant. Amlan Ghosh and Ranjan Mukherjee for the Respondents. The appellant herein was, married to second respondent on 16th January, 1990 ... | The second person involved was married to the first person, who is appealing the case. The second person went to live with her parents to study for her final high school exams. While she was there, she became pregnant. The first person (her husband) and his family wanted her to get an abortion, but she didn't want to, ... |
Appeal No. 123/55 669 Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated November 12, 1951, of the Punjab High Court in Writ Petition No. 116 of 1951. N. C. Chatterjee, section N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji and Rameshwar Nath, for the appellants. section M. Sikri, Advocate General for the State of Punjab, N. secti... | Some business owners ("the appellants") made deals for future sales. They went to the High Court of Punjab and asked them to rule on a law called the Punjab Forward Contracts Tax Act of 1951. They argued the law was not legal because it went beyond what the state government was allowed to do. This argument was made und... |
Appeal No. 270 of 1959. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated December 23, 1957, of the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) at Lucknow in Civil Miscellaneous Application (0. J.) No. 86 of 1954. C. B. Aggarwala, G. C. Mathur and C. P. Lal, for the appellants. Achhru Ram, section N. Andley, J. B. Dad... | The police officer was in charge of a police station. Then, people complained to the District Magistrate (a local official) that the officer was taking bribes. The District Magistrate had another official, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, investigate. This official wrote a report. The District Magistrate sent this report... |
Civil Appeal Nos. 1575 and 1965 of 1971. From the Judgment and Order dated 12 1 1968 of the Calcutta High Court in Civil Rule No. 2523 and 2527 of 1960. section T. Desai, J. Ramamurthi and D. N. Gupta for the Respondents and Vice Versa. These two appeals one by the Union of India and the other by M/s Jardine Henderson ... | This was because the original notice asking for the tax amount was based on an assessment that was later lowered in an appeal. The court felt that a new notice had to be sent to the person before they could be considered a tax defaulter. Two brothers owned property that was bought by a company, M/s Jurdine Henderson (L... |
1. The Petitioner before this Court has filed the present writ petition
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in public interest, praying for
the following reliefs:-
“(a) Issue directions to the respondent no 1 to 3 to
identify the persons who caused damage to public
properties during unlawful protest wit... | The Delhi High Court has closed a public interest lawsuit. This lawsuit asked for money from people who were accused of destroying public and private property during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in 2019. A two-judge panel, made up of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad... |
Civil Appeal No. 699 of 1985. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.5.1984 of the Orissa High Court in O. J. C. No. 936 of 1979. G.L. Sanghi, Adv., R.K. Mehta, Ms. Uma Jain, M.A. Firoz and P.N. Misra for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. RAMASWAMY, J. These three appeals are against th... | The Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. used to have three types of services: Mechanical, Electrical, and a mix of both. Later, the company wanted to change things. It decided to combine the mixed group of workers into either the Electrical or Mechanical departments. The company asked for feedback on this plan. The compan... |
From the Judgment and Order dated 3.9.1988 of the Bombay High Court in Appeal from Order No. Under an agreement dated 23rd of August, 1951 the appellant and his father, who were then the joint tenants of the said property, agreed to hold the same as tenants in common, each having an equal undivided share therein so tha... | The person appealing the case (called the appellant) owned the property in question along with his father and mother. They were all joint owners. After the appellant's mother died, he and his father made an agreement in 1951. It stated they would own the property as "tenants in common," meaning they each owned a share ... |
Ms. Priyanka Chowdhury …for the Appellants.
Mr. Kunal Vajani ……. For the respondent no. 1.
1. This intra-court appeal by the Chief Election
Commissioner and Others is filed challenging
the order of the learned Single Judge
interfering with the “noting of defects” on the
writ petitioner’s nomination for the ele... | A group of judges at the Calcutta High Court has ruled that courts can only review mistakes made by an election official, called a Returning Officer, if those mistakes actually get in the way of the election process running smoothly. This review is done using a special court power called "writ jurisdiction."
The judge... |
Appeal No. 611 of 1962. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated February 11, 1959. of the Patna High Court in Appeal from Original Decree No. 525 of 1951. Bishan Narain. D. R. Prem. B. R. G. K. Achar and R. N. Sachthey, for the appellant. A. V. Viswanatha Sastri and K. K. Sinha, for respondents Nos. ... | The person answering the suit and someone named B sued and won a court order for money from the person appealing. The person appealing took the case to a higher court. B then died. The higher court refused to cancel the ending of the appeal against B. It also would not allow someone else to take B's place because the c... |
: Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 2076 of 1978. From the Judgment and Order dated 17 3 1978 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Criminal Revision No. 181/77) R.L. Kohli, S.K. Sabharwal and Subhash Chander for the Petitioner. 46 R.N. Sachthey for Respondent No. 1. Prem Malhotra for Respondent No. 2. The Order ... | The person making the complaint said his house was broken into and many valuable things were stolen. The police found the stolen items. Later, the trial court charged two more people who were said to have helped. While the criminal case was going on, the Assistant Public Prosecutor (a lawyer for the government) asked t... |
Civil Appeal No. 1716 of 1969. Appeal by special leave from the award dated the 31st March, 1969 of the Labour Court, Kolhapur, Maharashtra in Reference (IDA) No. f 1968. B. Sen and I. N. Shroff, for the appellant. R. K. Garg, section C. Agarwal and V. J. Francis, for the respondent. The Judgment of the Court was deliv... | If a company investigates an employee and the labor court (a court that deals with employment issues) finds the investigation unfair, does the court have to let the company present new evidence? And, if the court doesn't allow new evidence, does that ruin the court's decision? The court decided that when an employee's ... |
4. FSL Report not part of the Charge 18 - 21 1. The present Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the order dated 05.05.2022, passed by the Learned Trial Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, wherein Default Bail of the Petitioner, under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the learned Trial 2. ... | The Delhi High Court stated that the main purpose of "default bail" is closely tied to Article 21 of India's Constitution. This part of the Constitution protects a person's life and personal freedom, making sure they aren't held in jail unfairly.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made this point while rejecting an appeal. ... |
1. Heard Sri Ravi Sahu, learned counsel for the revisionists as well as Sri Munne Lal, learned A.G.A. 2. This is a revision under Sections 397/401 CrPC filed by the revisionists herein, wherein challenge has been raised to the order dated 2.11.2020 passed by the Court of Sessions Judge, Mahoba in Sessions Trial No. 16 ... | The Allahabad High Court recently clarified a law called Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). This rule lets a court order people to appear and stand trial. This can happen even if their names are not on the official list of accused persons, known as the charge sheet. But this only applies in certain s... |
tition (Civil) Nos. 63 & 449 of 1986 etc. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) A.K. Ganguli, A. Sharan and G.S. Chatterjee for the Petitioners. Sodhi for the Respondents. This is a batch of petitions under article 32 of the Constitution filed on behalf of Matriculate Junior Basic Trained Teachers in Governme... | The state government, in a letter from July 23, 1957, told the Education Department to change the pay for different types of staff, including teachers. Paragraph 3 of this letter said that teachers' pay should be changed and divided them into two groups: Category A and Category B. Each category had different requiremen... |
317 & 318 of 1950. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 29th June 1955 of the Labour Appellate Tribunal of India at Calcutta in Appeals Nos. 61 and 81 of 1954. N. C. Chatterjee, section N. Mukherjee and B. N. Ghose, for the appellants in C. A. No. 317 of 56 and respondent No. 1 in C. A. No. 31... | On March 23, 1948, while some issues were being decided, the workers demanded immediate solutions from the company without waiting for the court's decision. The company said no to these demands, and the workers then started an illegal sit-down strike (where they stayed at work but refused to do their jobs). The company... |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Bhuvan Goel ...Petitioner(s) Versus Punjab and Haryana High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh through its Registrar and another. ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH Present:- Mr. Nayandeep Rana, Advocate, ... | The Punjab and Haryana High Court looked at a legal request from a person who was not hired as a Civil Judge. He failed the exam by 6.75 marks. Two judges, Sheel Nagu, CJ., and Sudhir Singh, J., rejected his request. They decided that the applicant knew the rules of the hiring process and the passing scores from the ve... |
Verma for the Respondents. The first question is whether the exclusion of the jurisdiction of the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution in service matters specified in section 218of the Administrative Tribu nals Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned Act) and the vesting of exclusive jur... | They must be or have been a judge of a High Court, or have been a Vice Chairman for at least two years, or have been a Secretary to the Government of India for at least two years. Subsection (2) says that a Vice Chairman should be or have been a judge of a High Court, or have been a Secretary to the Government of India... |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI STATE BANK OF INDIA versus M/S. P. P. JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED DHARMESH SHARMA, J. 1. This common judgment shall adjudicate upon the aforementioned two writ petitions, which raise a common question of law and facts and can be conveniently heard and disposed of together. FACTUAL ... | The State Bank of India (SBI) went to the Delhi High Court. They asked the court to remove some harsh comments made by a judge called the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM). These comments were made during a legal process related to a law called the SARFAESI Act, which helps banks recover loans. SBI argued that the ju... |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3659 of 2025 Date of Decision: 15.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Indira Daroch .......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others ... Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Just... | The Himachal Pradesh High Court heard a legal case filed by the Principal of a government college in Solan. She was challenging a decision that rejected her request to cancel her early retirement. A single judge, Justice Sandeep Sharma, ruled in her favor. The judge stated that the employer cannot refuse an employee's ... |
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Vuenow Infotech Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India and Another ... Respondent(s) AND Vuenow Infotech Pvt. Ltd. ... Petitioner(s) Versus Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar Zonal Office, Punjab and Another ... Respondent(s) Reserved On: 19.12.2024 P... | The Punjab and Haryana High Court looked at two legal requests made by Vuenow Infotech Pvt. Ltd. (called VIPL). VIPL wanted the Enforcement Department (ED), a government agency that investigates financial crimes, to show all records related to an ongoing investigation against VIPL. This investigation was being done und... |
Civil Appeal No. 881 of 1974 From the Judgment and order dated 25.7.1973 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No . 3950 of 1971. K. Raj. Choudhary for the Appellant. V.C. Mahajan, C.V.S. Rao and R.P. Srivastava for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VENKATACHALIAH, J. This appeal, ... | The Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Act, passed in 1962, was made to help factories quickly recover if they were damaged during a war. The government decided to insure factories against risks related to war. This law created the Emergency Risks (Factories) Insurance Scheme. This meant factories had to get insuran... |
vil Appeal Nos. 4397 98 of 1989 etc. From the Judgment and Order dated 30.11.1988 of the Central Administrative Tribunal at New Delhi in O.A. Nos. 838 of 87 and 1502 of 1987. 606 K. Sibal, Additional Solicitor General, A. Subba Rao, C.V.S. Rao and M.S. Ganesh for the appellants. Respondent No. 1 in person. D.K. Garg, R... | This case is about a disagreement over who is more senior among officers in Class 'A' of the Indian Defence Estate Service. Class 'A' includes officers who were promoted from two different groups: Assistant Military Estate Officers and Assistant Military Estate Officers (Technical). Both groups came from Class 'B' of t... |
Appeal No. 897 of 1964. 887 Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated November 14, 1961 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Revi sion No. 686 of 1953. Bishan Narain and M. I. Khowaja, for the appellant. Niren De. Addl. Solicitor General, M. V. Goswami and Yogeshawr Parshad, for the respondent. The Judg... | In a lawsuit about providing financial records, the person being sued (the defendant) argued that the accounts were already settled. He said the person suing (the plaintiff) owed him money, so there was no need to provide records. He also said that if the court decided records *were* needed, the defendant should get a ... |
Civil Appeal No. 1794 (NL) of 1977. 22 From the award dated 23.3.1977 of the Industrial Tribunal, Maharashtra, Bombay in Reference (I.D.) No. 307 of 1968. K.K. Venugopal, Rameshwar Nath and Ravinder Nath, for the Appellant. M.K. Ramamurthi, A.D. Sastri and Mrs. Urmia Sirur, for the Respondent. Shardul section Shroff an... | The company made tires, tubes, and other things in Bombay. Workers in the tire curing department slowed down their work on purpose, which caused less stuff to be made. On September 14, 1967, the company told the workers to stop slowing down. But the workers didn't listen, and on October 4, 1967, the workers in the tire... |
1830 32 of 1981. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). U.R. Lalit, V.N. Ganpule, A.B. Lal and Ms. Punam Kumari for the Petitioners. V.C. Mahajan, Ms. A Subhashini, P.H. Parekh, A.S. Bhasme and A.M. Khanwilkar for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by OJHA, J. The petitioners in these pe... | The state government approved a development plan for Sholapur under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act of 1966. Even though the approval covered the petitioners' (people filing the case) land, some of their land was set aside for public use under that law. Later, the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act of... |
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 408 of 1978. From the Judgment and order dated 22 11 1973 of the Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No. The facts, more flabbergasting than fantasy, present themselves in this Special Leave Petition. 'The offence is bizarre, the 196 offender perplexing, the sentence incredibly in... | According to section 363(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, if someone is sentenced to jail, they must get a copy of the court's decision right away, for free. Section 363(2) says that if the person asks, they should get an official copy of the court's decision quickly. If the person can appeal the decision, they... |
Appeal No. 754 of 1957. Appeal by special leave from the judgment, and order dated September 29, 1954, of the Deputy Custodian General, Evacuee Property, in Revision Petition No. 321 R/ADCG/53. Achhru Ram and K. L. Mehta, for the appellant. Bishan Narain, T.N. Sethia A. N. Arora and K. R. Choudhury, for respondent No. ... | Two people, the appellant and the respondent, who had moved from West Pakistan, were given land in the same village. Someone complained, and the first land assignment was canceled. The land was then assigned again. The respondent was unhappy with this cancellation. On September 27, 1950, he asked the Deputy Commissione... |
Appeal No. 647 of 1962. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree ,dated December 3, 1959 of the Patna High Court in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 642 of 1957. section P. Varma, for the appellant. section P. Sinha, Shahzadi Mahiuddin and Shaukat Hussain.for the respondent. February 14, 1964. The Judgment ... | K, the person appealing the case, said he owned certain property. He said he bought it from A, who had secretly bought it using H's name (a "benami" transaction). Then, H sold the property to S, the person K is fighting against in court (the respondent). The court decided: (i) Section 66 of the Code of Civil Procedure ... |
10 to 16. After protected correspondence with the 811 authorities of the Education Department Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava president of the Society by his letter dated Novem ber 26, 1941 (Exhibit C B 6) informed the Inspector of Schools Lucknow that he has given away the premises occupied by the school free of rent which ma... | To get the school approved, the President of the Society, who owned the property, wrote a letter on November 26, 1941, saying he was letting the school use the property for free. The person who gave the land, or his family, didn't object to this construction. They also said they had spent money to build permanent struc... |
Appeal No. 271 of 1956. Appeal from the judgment and order dated August 2, 1955, of the former Nagpur High Court in Misc. Petition No. 249 of 1955. M. Adhikari, Advocate General for the State of Madhya Pradesh, B. K. B. Naidu and I. N. Shroff, for the appellants. R. Patnaik, for the respondent. October 3. This appeal w... | The government of Madhya Pradesh told the respondent (the person involved in the case) to leave the district of Chhindwara. This order was based on a law called the Central Provinces and Berar Goondas Act, which was made in 1946 and changed in 1950. The law said Chhindwara was a "proclaimed area." The District Magistra... |
3003 of 1988. From the Judgment and Order dated 8/9th April, 1986 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in R.A. No. AND Civil Appeal No. 889 of 1988. From the Judgment and Order dated 29.10.86 and 5.11.1986 in the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad in O.A. No. 103 of 1986. No. 3003 of 1988. No. 889 ... | Nyadar Singh and M.J. Ninama were punished in separate cases. They were "reduced in rank," meaning they were moved to a lower position than the one they were first hired for. The Central Administrative Tribunals (special courts for government worker issues) said no to the appeals from Singh and Ninama. They had challen... |
vil Appeal Nos. 54 to 56 of 1975. From the Judgment and Order dated 29.6.1973 of the Kerala High Court in A.S. Nos. 603,604 and 605 of 1969. N. Sudhakaran for the Appellants. K.V. Viswanathan, K.R. Nambiar and T.T. Kunhikannan for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. RAMASWAMY, J. These appeal... | Three brothers and their oldest brother made a deal in 1954 to divide their family's property. They agreed to keep some of the inherited land together, and the oldest brother would manage it. The government wanted to buy this land. They announced this plan on January 15, 1967, following the rules of the Land Acquisitio... |
l Leave Petition (Civil) No. 890 of 1964. Petition for special leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from the judgment and decree dated December 16, 1963 of the Rajasthan High Court in Civil First Appeal No., 54 of 1956. Mukat Behari Lal Bhargava, Zalim Singh, Meeratwal and Naunit Lal, for the petitioner M. C. Setalvad,... | The person making the request (the petitioner) started a case in the lower court. They wanted the court to order the other side to pay them about 10,665 rupees. They also wanted the court to figure out exactly how much money they were owed from sales the other side made as their agents. The first court agreed and said ... |
No. Goswami, S.K. Bhattacharya, C.V.S. Rao Ms. K.K. Manglam, L. R. Singh, Vikas Singh, Yunus Malik, B.B. Singh Ms. Vimal Sinha and Ms Kumud L. Das for the Respondents. Leave granted. He had field a petition in the nature of a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Cour... | Article 316 of the Constitution says that about half of the members of the Public Service Commission should have worked in government jobs. 6, who is blind and a well-known English professor at Patna University, was chosen as the seventh member of the Bihar State Public Service Commission on March 4, 1991. 5, who was t... |
vil Appeal No. 2080 (L) of 1977. Appeal by Certificate from the Judgment and Order dated 20.12.74 of the Calcutta High Court in Appeal No. Khera, M. Quamaruddin and Mrs. M. Quamaruddin for the Respondents. This appeal, by certificate granted under Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution, is directed against judgment and ... | The real estate company in this case rented out its property. It also provided services to its renters. These services included electricity, water, cleaning, elevators, and repairs. Renters paid for these services. The company hired workers to provide these services. The workers and the company disagreed about wages, p... |
rary to principles of natural justice to retire prematurely a government employee on the basis of adverse entries which are either not commu nicated to him or if communicated representations made against those entries are not considered and disposed of. In the instant case, the appellant had submitted his represen tati... | Under Rule 3 of the Punjab Civil Services (Premature Retirement) Rules, 1975, the government can make an employee retire early if it's in the best interest of the public. The rule doesn't list specific reasons for early retirement, but it says it must be in the public interest. This means the government can only use th... |
No. 467 of 1972. Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. B. Sen and R. M. Mehta, section K. Dholakia and R. C. Bhatia, for the petitioner. L. N. Sinha, Solicitor General of India, G. A. Shah and section P. Nayar, for the respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by UNTWALIA, J. By this petitio... | The Gujarat Vacant Lands in Urban Area (Prohibition of Alienation) Act of 1972 was created to stop people from selling or giving away empty land in cities in Gujarat. Section 2 of the Act says that the law is meant to help the state follow the rules in Article 39, clauses (b) and (c) of the Constitution. These rules ar... |
ivil Appeals Nos. 945 47 of 1991. From the Judgment and Order dated 8.8.1990 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in L.P.A. Nos. 266, 267 and 268 of 1986. Rao, J. Lal, Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, S.K. Bagga and C.M. Singhi, J.K. Sibal and Ms. Kamini Jaiswal for the Respondents. Special leave granted. These Civil Appeals arise f... | They followed rules from 1956 called the State Service Class III A Rules. The other group was called "Excise & Taxation Officers." They followed rules called the State Service Class II Rules. Under the Class II Rules, new "Excise & Taxation Officers" were chosen in two ways: (a) 50% were hired directly, and (b) 50% wer... |
No. The appellants were in service as tube well operators in the irrigation branch of the Public Works Department of the Punjab State. It was contended: (a) that the impugned notices did not fulfil the requirements of clauses (b) and (c) of section 25 F; (b) that the notifica tion by which the tubewells were transferre... | The workers were tubewell operators for the Irrigation Branch of the Punjab Government's Public Works Department. The government decided to move all the tubewells from this branch to the Punjab State Tubewell Corporation. This corporation was owned and run by the government. It said that all tubewell operator jobs in t... |
Civil Appeal No.257 of 1958. Appeal by special leave from the Award dated August 20, 1957, of the Industrial Court, Bombay, in Reference (IC) No. 197 of 1956. section N. Andley, J. B. P. Maheshwari, for the respondent. I. N. Shroff, for Interveners Nos. 1 and 2. The Intervener No. 1960 January 22, The Judgment of the C... | To figure out how much extra money a company has to pay bonuses, the Industrial Court used a certain formula. The court allowed the company to subtract the standard amount for depreciation (the loss of value of equipment over time). However, the court didn't give the company credit for the money it claimed it needed fo... |
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. The petitioner after completing his 10th standard, joined Diploma in
Mechanical Engineering and thereafter, he obtained B.E Degree Course through
lateral entry. Now he wants to study law. Since he has not done 12th standard,
he had difficulties in taking up the Law Degree Co... | A college graduate asked the court to let him study law even though he hadn't finished 12th grade. During this hearing, the Bar Council of India spoke to a judge named Justice GR Swaminathan. The Council explained that its Legal Education Committee had decided on May 21, 2022. This decision meant that diploma and polyt... |
etition (C) No. 381 of 1998. 8 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). S.K. Sinha for the Petitioner. D. Goburdhan, Ms. A. Subhashini, K.K. Lahiri, Ms. Lira Goswami and D.N. Misra for the Respondents. The Judgement of the Court was delivered by SINGH,J. We heard the arguments in detail on 13.12. 1990 and dismi... | The petitioner (the person who filed the case) asked the court to step in, arguing it was a matter of public interest. They claimed that West Bokaro Collieries and Tata Iron and Steel Company (TISCO) were polluting the Bokaro River. They said these companies were dumping waste (sludge/slurry) from their cleaning proces... |
Criminal Appeal No. 82 of 1967. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 15. 1967 of the Rajasthan High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 219 of 1965. Sobhag Mal Jain and V.S. Dave, for the appellant. K.B. Mehta, for the respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hegde, J. The appellant 's... | The person appealing the case was accused of helping someone named R cause a woman to have a miscarriage. The woman died during the attempt. R was found not guilty. However, the person appealing was found guilty of helping the woman commit the act that led to her death. The High Court agreed with the guilty verdict. In... |
Summary- Supreme Court by 4:1 majority holds that the decision-making process behind the demonetisation of Rs.500 and Rs.1000 currency notes in 2016 was lawful - Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian in majority - Justice BV Nagarathna in minority. Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Section ... | In her disagreement with the main ruling on the cases challenging demonetisation, Supreme Court judge Justice BV Nagarathna said that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) did not think for itself. Instead, it simply followed the Central Government's idea to cancel all Rs.500 and Rs.1000 notes. Justice Nagarathna formed this... |
Civil Appeal No. 2281 of 1969 Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 6th December, 1965 of the Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal No. 978/62. Shiv Pujan Singh and M. V. Goswami for the Appellant. B. P. Maheshwari and Suresh Sethi for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KAIL... | Two businesses that were owned by stockholders made deals with a former kingdom. The deals allowed the businesses to use farmland if they paid a fair amount of tax on the land. Later, the two businesses joined together to form a partnership. When the kingdom became part of India, the tax office in Uttar Pradesh sent th... |
Appeal No. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 2, 1966 of the Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal No. 4 and 5. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by VAIDIALINGAM, J. The short question that raises for consideration in this appeal, by special leave, is whether the State Government ha... | The company appealed because of a problem with three workers who were retired. The problem was sent to the Labour Court in Gorakhpur to be decided. The Labour Court called it Case No. 93 of 1960. Both sides wrote down their arguments, and the Labour Court looked at everything. On February 26, 1961, the Labour Court sai... |
No. 151 of 1967. M. C. Chagla and Mohan Behari Lal, for the petitioner. O. P. Rana, for respondent No. P. M. Mukhi, Bishamber Lal and H. K. Puri, for the intervener. The Judgment of WANCHOO, C.J., SIKRI, SHELAT and VAIDIALINGAM, JJ. was delivered by SHELAT, J. BHARGAVA, J., delivered a separate opinion. Shelat, J. On A... | A company that had a license to sell electricity was supplying it to a business. The Electric Supply Act of 1948 created an Electricity Board. Later, a change to the law allowed the Board to sell electricity directly to customers, like the business mentioned above. The state government told the Board to start selling e... |
ition (Civil) No. 849 of 1987. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Petitioner in person and M.S.Ganesh for the petitioner. 442 K. Parasaran, Attorney General and Ms. A. Subhashini for the Respondents. The following order of the Court was delivered: O R D E R This application has been filed by an Advocate o... | A lawyer filed a lawsuit saying the Supreme Court justices were mixing up Western and American legal ideas. He also claimed the Court wasn't stopping the government's illegal actions and was ignoring important problems. The Court rejected the lawsuit and said the lawyer was likely guilty of contempt of court. The Court... |
From the Judgment and Order dated 17.3.1978 of the Bombay High Court in Second Appeal Nos. Litigation, between two sisters, by way of cross suits, one, for permanent injunction by the appellant basing her claim on gift deed executed in 1954 by her mother, a Hindu widow, of the entire estate inherited by her from her hu... | A Hindu widow made a gift in 1954 of all the property she inherited from her husband. She gave it to her daughter, the appellant in this case. She wanted the gift declared invalid and the property divided, claiming that as a relative who would inherit after the mother's death in 1968, she had rights. The trial court ru... |
N: Criminal Appeal No. 386 of 1983. From the Judgment and order dated the 23rd June, 1981 of the High Court of Bombay in Crl. Appeal No. 1138 and 1144 of 1980. section N. Jha, Amicus Curiae for the Appellant. M. N. Shroff for the Respondent. The order of the Court was delivered by CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. Special Leave gran... | The person asking for the appeal (the petitioner) was found guilty of a crime under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The Sessions Judge (a type of judge) sentenced him to prison for life. He tried to appeal the decision, but the Bombay High Court quickly dismissed it (in limine). This means the court didn't even f... |
WPA(P) 299 of 2021 ... for the State Election Commission ...for the State ... for Union of India 1. CAN 7 of 2022 has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondent No. 4 State Election Commissioner to deploy central paramilitary forces in the elections of 108 Municipalities in the State scheduled o... | On Wednesday, the Calcutta High Court ordered the State Election Commission (SEC) to meet with West Bengal government officials within 24 hours. They need to decide if central police forces should be sent to ensure peaceful elections in the 108 towns (municipalities) remaining. These elections are set for February 27. ... |
From the Judgment and Decree dated 14.3.1973 of the Rajasthan High Court in S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. This appeal by special leave is from the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated March 14, 1973 in S.B. (Civil) 2nd Appeal No. According to them 359 it is known as 'Baghichi Darjian ' since it belongs to Darji co... | This case is about a garden in Jaipur with temples and buildings. Different people made claims to the garden at different times and for different reasons. Narayan, who took care of the temples, supposedly sold the garden to Khawas Bala Bux. The Darjee community sued to cancel the sale and declare their right to manage ... |
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
1. This intra Court appeal at the instance of the department
is directed against the order dated 1st March, 2022 in W.P.A.
No.11085 of 2021. In the said writ petition, the respondent
herein challeged the order passed by the Joint Commissio... | A panel of judges from the Calcutta High Court, Justice T.S. Shivagnanam and Justice Hirnmay Bhattacharyya, decided that the GST department could not stop and hold vehicles just because a second e-way bill was missing. This was because the first e-way bill was still good when the vehicle was stopped.
The company invol... |
The principal question for decision 5 in this appeal by Special Leave is whether the father in exercise of his right as Patria Potestas or otherwise can effect a partial partition between himself and his minor sons of joint family properties of a Hindu joint family governed by the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law. The me... | A Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is like a family business under Hindu law. In this case, the HUF had four members: Mr. Apoorva Shantilal Shah, his wife Mrs. Karuna, and their two young sons, Chintan and Tejal. During the tax assessment for the year 1975-76, Mr. Apoorva, as the head (Karta) of the HUF, asked the Income T... |
1. Having noted that there is a clear conflict between the two decisions of this Court, one in the case of Ch. Tika Ramji & Others, Etc. vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Others [AIR 1956 SC 676 = 1956 SCR 393 = 1956 SCJ 625] and another subsequent decision in the case of U.P. Cooperative Cane Unions Federations vs. Wes... | A special group of Supreme Court judges decided recently that both the national government and state governments have the power to set sugarcane prices. However, the price a state government sets for sugarcane cannot be lower than the lowest price set by the national government, the Court added. Also, states are allowe... |
ivil Appeal No. 269 of 1962. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated October 5, 1959 of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 712 of 1955. 212 section G. Patwardhan and B.R.G.K. Achar, for the appellant. G. section Pathak and Naunit Lal, for the respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivere... | The state sent a notice to the landowners saying their farmland was not being used. The state said it would take over managing the land, as allowed by the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, unless the owners started farming it again. Later, someone looked into the matter because the Deputy Collector ordered it.... |
Civil Appeal No. 3121 of 1981. From the Judgment and Order dated 28 9 1979 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc. Petition No. 408 of 1978. M.K. Ramamurthi and H.S. Parihar for the Appellants. Maheshwari T. V.S.N. Chari and R.N. Poddar for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KHALID, J. The qu... | Senior Draughtsmen worked in government-owned factories that made weapons and equipment. They were either hired directly or promoted from lower-level Draughtsmen positions. All Senior Draughtsmen in these factories were paid the same amount: Rs. 205-280. When the government was deciding how much to pay different worker... |
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2516/2022
Aman Chopra S/o Shri Virendra Chopra, Aged About 36 Years, R/
o I-1901, Arihant Arden, Sector - 1, Greater Noida West,
Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.
... | The Rajasthan High Court, from its Jodhpur branch, has told the state police not to look into the accusations against News 18 journalist Aman Chopra. These accusations claim he committed a crime called sedition, which is covered by Section 124-A of India's main criminal law. Sedition means stirring up people against th... |
1. By reference to FIR no. 02/2022 of the Police Station, Anti-Corruption
Bureau, Rajouri (camp Jammu), the petitioner has come to be arrested on
14.11.2022 after being allegedly caught red handed in the course of an alleged
trap laid by the trap team of the Anti Corruption Bureau, while accepting bribe
amounti... | The High Court in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh recently reminded everyone. Winning a criminal case in court does not depend on how long police hold a suspect. This is true during the investigation.
Justice Rahul Bharti and other judges explained this point. They said that winning a criminal case relies on a good polic... |
ivil Appeal No. 3951 of 1990. From the Judgment and Order dated 10.4.1990 of the Himachal Pradesh High Court in C.W.P. No. 12 of 1990. V.A. Bobde, A.K.Sanghi and section Mudaliar for the Appellants. Dr. Y.S. Chitale, Mrs. Sadhna Ramachandran and Jagan Mohan Rao for the Respondent. Respondent, Raj Kumar Thakur, was a st... | A teacher at the University who wants to get a doctorate degree has to follow certain rules. These rules say: (a) the course they want to take must not be offered at other schools, (b) they can only get time off to study outside the University for approved courses, (c) they must have worked at the University for at lea... |
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 59616 of 2022
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Saksham Srivastava,Veerendra Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
By means of the the bail application the applicant has
prayed to be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No.144 of
2018 at Police Station-A... | Last week, the Allahabad High Court told the head of Uttar Pradesh's Legal Services Authority to make sure a 2022 court order was being followed. This 2022 order, from a case called 'Anil Gaur v. State of U.P.', gave specific instructions to the state. These instructions were about how to make sure people in jail waiti... |
Criminal Appeal No. 189 of 1966. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated July 4, 1966 of the Patna High Court in Criminal W.J.C. No. 11 of 1966. B.R.L. lyengar and U.P. Singh, for the appellants. V. A. Seyid Muhammad and S.P. Nayar, for respondent No. 1. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hegd... | The people in charge of a sugar company were the appellants (those appealing a decision). Someone filed a police complaint against them. The complaint said they broke a rule about sugarcane prices. Specifically, they didn't pay sugarcane sellers on time. This violated the Sugarcane (Control) Order from 1955 and Section... |
Appeal No. 47 of 1965. Appeal from the judgment and decree dated December 12, 1962 of the Patna High Court in Appeal from Original Decree No. 433 of 1959. H. R. Gokhale, section N. Prasad and B. P. Singh, for the appellant. 883 emption and not of renewal was granted to the appellant Com pany. The High Court of Patna co... | A company rented land containing mica from the owners for fifteen years. The rental agreement said the company could renew the lease when it ended, if they wanted to. The land was part of a larger property. A law in Bihar (the Bihar Land Reforms Act of 1950) said that the government now owned the property, taking it ov... |
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27194 of 2021
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
1-Today, when the case is taken up, Mr. Ram Ker Singh, learned
counsel, (Enrollment No. UP 4309 of 1980, Advocate Roll No.
Court Allahabad, Mobile Nos. 9451302056 and 9807344717), has appeared
in this case on behalf of the appli... | In a bail hearing at the Allahabad High Court, it came out that the lawyers for the person accused of a crime and the person making the complaint (the complainant) were secretly working together. The lawyer for the accused had created a fake document called a 'vakalatnama' for the complainant's lawyer. A vakalatnama is... |
224 and 225 of 1954. Both these appeals are directed against the judgment of the High Court of Nagpur passed in an appeal under section 19(1) (f) of the Defence of India Act, 1939, hereinafter referred to as the Act. 224 of 1954. As there was no agreement on the amount of compensation payable to him, the Central Govern... | These two appeals were made against the Nagpur High Court's decision. That court was hearing an appeal related to the Defence of India Act of 1939, specifically section 19(1)(f). This section deals with changes to compensation awards made under section 19(i)(b) of that same Act. The compensation was for property the go... |
The present appeal is directed against an order
passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission [in short, “NCDRC”] in R.P. No. 170 of
2006 on 21.10.2009, whereby the revision against an
order of the State Dispute Redressal Commission
dismissing the complaint was upheld.
The appellant is th... | The Supreme Court ruled that a Karta cannot file a consumer complaint about poor service from a hospital or doctor. This was regarding the medical treatment given to his pregnant sister-in-law. A Karta is the head of a traditional Indian family, known as a Joint Hindu Family.
The judges who heard the case, Justices He... |
N THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 23rd January, 2025 + CONT.CAS. (CRL) 13/2024 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv, Mr. Dayan versus ROOP DARSHAN PANDEY AND ORS. .....Respondents JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. Th... | Delhi High Court: A case was filed claiming someone disrespected a court order. This order, from October 28, 2024, was made by a single judge in a criminal case brought by Hero MotoCorp. Hero MotoCorp had challenged an earlier order from July 19, 2023. In that earlier order, a judge had told the police to start an inve... |
742 of 1979. 656 of 1976. A.S. Sohal and P.N. Kiran Choudhri and T. Sridharan for the Respondent. S of 1976 convicting appellant for offences under Sections 302 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing her to imprisonment for life, raises certain questions as to the nature and extent of corroboration of an acc... | The prosecution said that the appellant, who was about 15 and a half years old, had a troubled marriage. They claimed she was having an affair with the other accused person (who didn't appeal), and also had an affair with PW 2 (a witness) outside of her marriage. They said that on November 13, 1973, she asked the other... |
% 30.01.2025 CRL.M.A. 2893/2025-EX.
1. Allowed subject to all just exceptions.
2. The application stands disposed of.
3. This is a petition filed under section 483 of BNSS seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. 383/2016, dated 18.08.2016 registered at PS Jyoti Nagar under sections 302/120-B of IP... | Delhi High Court: The court looked at a request to appeal a decision made on February 10, 2020. In that earlier decision, the person accused was found not guilty under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (called the POCSO Act). Justice Jasmeet Singh said that society and the law shoul... |
: Criminal Appeal No, 385 of 1976. (From the Judgment and Order dated 22 12 1975 of the Gujarat High Court in Crl. Appeal No. 180/74) N.N. Keswani & Ramesh N. Keswani for the appellant. K.H. Kazi & M.N. Shroff for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHAGWATI, J. This appeal, by special leave, is ... | Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act of 1949 says that anyone can be punished if they are found guilty of "drinking, using, having, or moving any alcohol or drugs." Section 66(2)(b) says there's a limit of 0.05 percent of alcohol allowed in a person's blood. In cases 798 and 799 from 1972, a court in Gujarat ... |
(Crl.) No. 15 of 1989. Shah, M.N. Shroff and K.M.M. RAY, J. This writ petition is directed against the order of detention made under section 3(1) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985, mainly on the grounds that the grounds are not germane and relevant and there has been non application of mind by t... | In this case, the person filing the petition ("Petitioner") argued that their detention order was illegal. This order was issued by the other party ("Respondent") under a law called the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985. The person detained ("detenu") was arrested and put in jail on October 5, 1988... |
[304D] & CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petitions Nos. 2687, 5822 of 1983 etc. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). Dr. Shankar Ghosh, T.S.K. Iyer, M.L. Lahoty, P.S. Jha, D.D. Gupta, S.K. Jain, D.P. Mukherjee, S.R. Srivastava, P.N. Tewari and Parijat Sinha for the petitioners. Tapas Ray, Anil B. Dewan, T... | Section 4(1) of the West Bengal Rural Employment and Production Act, 1976 said that a tax called a rural employment cess could be put on properties that can't be moved, like land. Clause (aa) of section 4(2), which was changed by section 7(b) of the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1981, said that a rural emp... |
1. In the facts and circumstances of the case and having heard the
learned counsel for the respective parties, the delay caused in filing the
special leave petition is hereby condoned.
1A. Leave granted.
2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment
and order dated 12.09.201... | The Supreme Court stated that a person's full defence, where they argue their innocence, should not be reviewed at an early stage. This includes when the court decides if there's enough evidence to formally accuse someone or when it's asked to drop the charges.
Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah added that at this ea... |
Appeals Nos. 1153 to 1160 and 1161 to 1168 of 1968. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order, dated November 16, 1967 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc. Civil Cases Nos. 96 to 103 of 1967. I. N. Shroff, for the appellant (in C.As. Nos. 1161 to 1168 of 1968). Desai, B.L. Neema and Anjali Varma, for th... | The Electricity Board, created under the Electricity Supply Act of 1948, provided electricity in Madhya Pradesh. During the years in question, the Board sold and distributed electricity to different customers. It also provided steam to a company called Nepa Mills. Nepa Mills provided water for free. The Board charged t... |
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 9th April 1975 of the Allahabad High Court in Application No. A. We have already announced our order in this appeal on the 2nd May 1975. Respondent No. 1 Chaudhari Ram Gopal Singh and Respondents 2 to 11 contested election, as rival candidates from U. P. Leg... | The person appealing this case (the appellant) and another candidate (respondent No. 1) ran in an election for the U.P. Legislative Assembly from Sarsaul. The appellant got 23,626 votes. Respondent No. 1 got 23,604 votes. The appellant won by only 22 votes. Respondent No. 1 filed a complaint about the election. They sa... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.