Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
tags:
|
| 4 |
+
- facial-expression
|
| 5 |
+
- action-units
|
| 6 |
+
- emotion-recognition
|
| 7 |
+
- gaze-estimation
|
| 8 |
+
- benchmark
|
| 9 |
+
pretty_name: py-feat benchmarks
|
| 10 |
+
configs:
|
| 11 |
+
- config_name: accuracy
|
| 12 |
+
data_files: accuracy.csv
|
| 13 |
+
- config_name: throughput
|
| 14 |
+
data_files: throughput.csv
|
| 15 |
+
---
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
# py-feat benchmarks
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
Live benchmark data for [py-feat](https://github.com/cosanlab/py-feat) and a
|
| 20 |
+
cross-tool comparison against **OpenFace 3.0**, **LibreFace**, and **PyAFAR**.
|
| 21 |
+
Powers the [py-feat live dashboard](https://py-feat.org). Updated by scheduled
|
| 22 |
+
benchmark runs.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Files
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
| File | What |
|
| 27 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 28 |
+
| `accuracy.csv` | Tidy long table: one row per `(tool, dataset, modality, metric)`. Covers AU F1 (DISFA+), 7-class emotion (AffectNet-val, RAF-DB), valence/arousal CCC (AffectNet-val), and gaze angular error (Columbia). |
|
| 29 |
+
| `throughput.csv` | py-feat detector frames/sec across hardware × batch. |
|
| 30 |
+
| `cross_tool_methodology.md` | How every tool was run end-to-end, the feature matrix, dataset/protocol choices, and per-tool integration notes. |
|
| 31 |
+
| `competitors/*.json` | Raw per-tool result JSONs (provenance for every number in `accuracy.csv`). |
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## `accuracy.csv` columns
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
`tool` · `dataset` · `modality` (au / emotion / valence_arousal / gaze) ·
|
| 36 |
+
`metric` · `value` · `n` (samples scored) · `notes`.
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
## Protocol in one paragraph
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
Every competitor runs **end-to-end as shipped** (its own face detector, its own
|
| 41 |
+
models) on **identical images/labels** frozen into shared manifests — never as a
|
| 42 |
+
py-feat dependency, each in its own isolated env. Held-out sets only (DISFA+,
|
| 43 |
+
not DISFA, since DISFA trains several competitors). Emotion is scored on the 7
|
| 44 |
+
shared classes; gaze I/O conventions are resolved identically and in every
|
| 45 |
+
tool's favor. See `cross_tool_methodology.md` for the full story, including what
|
| 46 |
+
it took to get each competitor to run.
|