ljchang commited on
Commit
22f81a6
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): d34d1c9

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +46 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: mit
3
+ tags:
4
+ - facial-expression
5
+ - action-units
6
+ - emotion-recognition
7
+ - gaze-estimation
8
+ - benchmark
9
+ pretty_name: py-feat benchmarks
10
+ configs:
11
+ - config_name: accuracy
12
+ data_files: accuracy.csv
13
+ - config_name: throughput
14
+ data_files: throughput.csv
15
+ ---
16
+
17
+ # py-feat benchmarks
18
+
19
+ Live benchmark data for [py-feat](https://github.com/cosanlab/py-feat) and a
20
+ cross-tool comparison against **OpenFace 3.0**, **LibreFace**, and **PyAFAR**.
21
+ Powers the [py-feat live dashboard](https://py-feat.org). Updated by scheduled
22
+ benchmark runs.
23
+
24
+ ## Files
25
+
26
+ | File | What |
27
+ |---|---|
28
+ | `accuracy.csv` | Tidy long table: one row per `(tool, dataset, modality, metric)`. Covers AU F1 (DISFA+), 7-class emotion (AffectNet-val, RAF-DB), valence/arousal CCC (AffectNet-val), and gaze angular error (Columbia). |
29
+ | `throughput.csv` | py-feat detector frames/sec across hardware × batch. |
30
+ | `cross_tool_methodology.md` | How every tool was run end-to-end, the feature matrix, dataset/protocol choices, and per-tool integration notes. |
31
+ | `competitors/*.json` | Raw per-tool result JSONs (provenance for every number in `accuracy.csv`). |
32
+
33
+ ## `accuracy.csv` columns
34
+
35
+ `tool` · `dataset` · `modality` (au / emotion / valence_arousal / gaze) ·
36
+ `metric` · `value` · `n` (samples scored) · `notes`.
37
+
38
+ ## Protocol in one paragraph
39
+
40
+ Every competitor runs **end-to-end as shipped** (its own face detector, its own
41
+ models) on **identical images/labels** frozen into shared manifests — never as a
42
+ py-feat dependency, each in its own isolated env. Held-out sets only (DISFA+,
43
+ not DISFA, since DISFA trains several competitors). Emotion is scored on the 7
44
+ shared classes; gaze I/O conventions are resolved identically and in every
45
+ tool's favor. See `cross_tool_methodology.md` for the full story, including what
46
+ it took to get each competitor to run.