--- license: cc-by-4.0 language: - en tags: - medical - oncology - rag - benchmark - evaluation - llm - retrieval-augmented-generation - mirlig size_categories: - n<1K --- # Oncology RAG Benchmark — provable, MIRAGE/MedRGB-ready, open An oncology RAG evaluation suite whose answers are **provable from the KB's own structured data** — every question carries a citation (PMID / NCT / SEER URL) and `golden_docs` (the retrieval units that contain the answer). - **152 questions** across prognosis / staging / subtypes / drugs / codes / biomarkers / prevention, each with `difficulty`, `evidence_level`, `citation`, and `golden_docs`. - **456 MedRGB-style variants** — sufficiency (golden docs only), noise (golden + 5 irrelevant docs), robustness (golden + a counterfactually edited doc). The robustness rows carry an explicit `counterfactual_doc`. - **1,239-chunk retrieval pool** (sections, markdown tables, domain tables) for end-to-end RAG evaluation. - **MIRAGE + MedRGB interchange exports** (`mirage_format.jsonl`, `medrgb_format.jsonl`) for ingestion by external harnesses/leaderboards. - **Dependency-free harness** (`eval_mcq.py`: BM25 / embeddings / predictions), a reproducible baseline (`baseline_preds.jsonl`), and a submission protocol (`SUBMISSION.md`). ## Baseline (BM25@top3, no LLM) | Scenario | Accuracy | vs random (25%) | |----------|----------|------------------| | sufficiency | 31.6% | +6.6 pts | | noise | 31.6% | +6.6 pts | | robustness | 31.6% | +6.6 pts | | retrieval@3 | 61.8% | — | Real headroom for embedding retrievers and strong generators. Because every answer is provable, score differences reflect genuine retrieval + reasoning, not answer leakage. ## Reproduce ```bash # BM25 end-to-end (retrieval + answer) python3 eval_mcq.py --retriever bm25 --topk 3 # Score your own system's predictions ({"question_id": 1, "answer_index": 3}) python3 eval_mcq.py --predictions preds.jsonl # Verify the shipped baseline python3 eval_mcq.py --predictions baseline_preds.jsonl ``` ## Citation ```bibtex @misc{oncology-rag-benchmark-2026, title = {{Oncology RAG Benchmark}: a provable, MIRAGE/MedRGB-ready oncology evaluation suite}, author = {Ranjithraj, {R}}, year = {2026}, howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/ranjithraj/cancer-knowledge-base}}, note = {CC-BY-4.0; 152 questions; 456 MedRGB variants; answers provable from cited KB data} } ``` ## Files | File | Contents | |------|----------| | `mcq_benchmark.parquet` | 152 questions (question, choices, answer_key, answer, difficulty, evidence_level, citation, golden_docs) | | `mcq_robustness.parquet` | 456 variants (sufficiency / noise / robustness + counterfactual_doc) | | `retrieval_pool.parquet` | 1,239 retrieval units (sections, tables, domain tables) | | `mirage_format.jsonl` | 152 MIRAGE-compatible question instances | | `medrgb_format.jsonl` | 456 MedRGB variants (sufficiency / noise / robustness) | | `leaderboard.json` + `releases/` | recorded systems with KB-commit / date / release snapshots | | `baseline_preds.jsonl` | reproducible BM25@top3 predictions | | `SUBMISSION.md` | reference-benchmark submission protocol | | `MIRAGE_INTEGRATION.md` | MIRAGE/MedRGB integration guide | ## What makes it *provable* Unlike exam-style medical benchmarks (MedQA, PubMedQA, MedXpertQA), each answer here is a row in the source KB with a citation chain. A grader can audit any answer against the cited chunk — the benchmark is *open-book verifiable*. ## Notes Built from the [Cancer Knowledge Base](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ranjithraj/cancer-knowledge-base) (CC-BY-4.0). Educational reference only — **not medical advice**.