Prompt: Researchers have completed the first comprehensive study of the microbes living on and in and uncontacted tribe from the Amazon. They say the results show just how modern lifestyles and diets have changed us -  and that the  bacteria they found could be potentially beneficial to modern society. Researchers sequenced the microbiomes of Yanomami people living in a remote Amazon village in Venezuela who had not had previous contact with non-Yanomami. There are about 26,000 Yanomami living in Brazil and 15,000 in Venezuela, mostly in federally protected reserves near rivers and in remote mountains. The Yanomami are an indigenous ethnic group in the Amazonian region of South America. There are about 26,000 Yanomami living in Brazil and 15,000 in Venezuela, mostly in federally protected reserves near rivers and in remote mountains. The Yanomami are hunter-gatherers. They gather wild bananas, seasonal fruits, palm hearts and cassava. They hunt birds, small mammals, crabs, frogs, small fish and the occasional peccary, monkey or tapir. The group doesn't grow food or domesticate livestock. The researchers found that Yanomami people harbor microbiomes with the highest diversity of bacteria and genetic functions ever reported in a human group. 'That tells us that Western diets and lifestyles have a great impact on our microbiomes', experts at University of San Diego said. 'Studying the microbiomes of people in remote areas may hold the key to understanding microbes we have lost through antibiotics, sealed buildings and lack of exposure to the outdoors,' said study co-author Rob Knight. In the new study published April 17 by Science Advances, researchers sequenced the microbiomes of Yanomami people living in a remote Amazon village in Venezuela who had not had previous contact with non-Yanomami. This information revealed, for the first time, the species of bacteria that co-exist with people who have never been exposed to industrialized society, including Western food and antibiotics. 'Our findings emphasize the need for extensive characterization of the function of the microbiome and resistome in remote nonwesternized populations before globalization of modern practices affects potentially beneficial bacteria harbored in the human body,' the researchers wrote. Many Yanomami now regularly interact with Western civilization through trade, but some villages have never had contact with non-Yanomami people. One such unmapped village was first spotted by an army helicopter passing overhead in 2008. In 2009, a medical mission landed there. As part of their 2009 visit to this previously uncontacted Yanomami village, medical professionals collected samples from the skin, mouths and fecal matter of 34 of the 54 villagers before vaccines or antibiotics were administered. The samples were frozen until DNA extraction and bacterial culturing could be performed for the purposes of this study. Yanomami indigenous leader Davi Yanomami claims Americans' 'robbed blood' for the tests . Thousands of blood samples have been returned to the Yanomami tribe in Brazil, after they were taken by American scientists in the 1960s and held in U.S. academic institutions without the tribe's consent, according to Survival international. The Yanomami have been fighting for their return for over a decade. The Yanomami buried the 2,693 samples during a special funerary ceremony presided over by shamans in the Yanomami community where many of the samples were collected. Only 15 Yanomami whose blood was taken in the late 1960s were able to attend the ritual. Shamans performed funerary rites for those who gave blood and have since died. Keen to collect blood samples from a very isolated community, U.S. scientists collected thousands of samples from the Indians in Brazil and Venezuela without obtaining their informed consent. The Yanomami only discovered years later that their blood was being stored in research institutes – in violation of their beliefs and funerary customs of cremating those who have passed away and destroying their possessions. Without obtaining the Yanomami's consent, some institutions extracted DNA from the blood for genetic tests in the 1990s. Yanomami spokesman Davi Kopenawa said, 'These Americans robbed our blood. 'They did not say anything in our language about the tests they were going to do. Nobody knew that they were going to use our blood to do research.' Back in labs in the U.S. (at Mount Sinai, New York University, University of Colorado, Boulder and others), researchers sequenced DNA isolated from the Yanomami samples. From this, they were able to identify all of the bacterial species that make up the skin, mouth and gut microbiomes of people who had never been exposed to Western diets, antibiotics or other environmental factors that make up life in industrialized societies. The researchers then compared these non-Westernized microbiomes to the microbiomes of people living in Western society and people living in villages in the midst of transition from isolation to urban lifestyles. Bacteria isolated from Yanomami microbiomes carried genes that confer resistance to man-made antibiotics, despite the fact that they were never previously exposed to antibiotics. This finding suggests that many bacterial species contain antibiotic resistance genes naturally, even without the selective pressure of antibiotic use. What happens in Western cultures, the researchers hypothesize, is antibiotic use simply gives naturally resistant bacteria a survival advantage over non-resistant bacteria. The researchers say the study could help develop new medical treatments. 'First of all, this study gives us a glimpse of what our microbiomes might have looked like before our modern habits began to impact the beneficial bacteria that call us home. 'Studies like this one help us better understand what factors can alter a microbiome and the effect those changes can have on a person's health — information researchers need to guide efforts to manipulate the microbiome to treat disease and restore health.'

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Researchers have completed the first comprehensive study of the microbes living on and in and uncontacted tribe from the Amazon. They say the results show just how modern lifestyles and diets have changed us -  and that the  bacteria they found could be potentially beneficial to modern society. Researchers sequenced the microbiomes of Yanomami people living in a remote Amazon village in Venezuela who had not had previous contact with non-Yanomami. There are about 26,000 Yanomami living in Brazil and 15,000 in Venezuela, mostly in federally protected reserves near rivers and in remote mountains. The Yanomami are an indigenous ethnic group in the Amazonian region of South America. There are about 26,000 Yanomami living in Brazil and 15,000 in Venezuela, mostly in federally protected reserves near rivers and in remote mountains. The Yanomami are hunter-gatherers. They gather wild bananas, seasonal fruits, palm hearts and cassava. They hunt birds, small mammals, crabs, frogs, small fish and the occasional peccary, monkey or tapir. The group doesn't grow food or domesticate livestock. The researchers found that Yanomami people harbor microbiomes with the highest diversity of bacteria and genetic functions ever reported in a human group. 'That tells us that Western diets and lifestyles have a great impact on our microbiomes', experts at University of San Diego said. 'Studying the microbiomes of people in remote areas may hold the key to understanding microbes we have lost through antibiotics, sealed buildings and lack of exposure to the outdoors,' said study co-author Rob Knight. In the new study published April 17 by Science Advances, researchers sequenced the microbiomes of Yanomami people living in a remote Amazon village in Venezuela who had not had previous contact with non-Yanomami. This information revealed, for the first time, the species of bacteria that co-exist with people who have never been exposed to industrialized society, including Western food and antibiotics. 'Our findings emphasize the need for extensive characterization of the function of the microbiome and resistome in remote nonwesternized populations before globalization of modern practices affects potentially beneficial bacteria harbored in the human body,' the researchers wrote. Many Yanomami now regularly interact with Western civilization through trade, but some villages have never had contact with non-Yanomami people. One such unmapped village was first spotted by an army helicopter passing overhead in 2008. In 2009, a medical mission landed there. As part of their 2009 visit to this previously uncontacted Yanomami village, medical professionals collected samples from the skin, mouths and fecal matter of 34 of the 54 villagers before vaccines or antibiotics were administered. The samples were frozen until DNA extraction and bacterial culturing could be performed for the purposes of this study. Yanomami indigenous leader Davi Yanomami claims Americans' 'robbed blood' for the tests . Thousands of blood samples have been returned to the Yanomami tribe in Brazil, after they were taken by American scientists in the 1960s and held in U.S. academic institutions without the tribe's consent, according to Survival international. The Yanomami have been fighting for their return for over a decade. The Yanomami buried the 2,693 samples during a special funerary ceremony presided over by shamans in the Yanomami community where many of the samples were collected. Only 15 Yanomami whose blood was taken in the late 1960s were able to attend the ritual. Shamans performed funerary rites for those who gave blood and have since died. Keen to collect blood samples from a very isolated community, U.S. scientists collected thousands of samples from the Indians in Brazil and Venezuela without obtaining their informed consent. The Yanomami only discovered years later that their blood was being stored in research institutes – in violation of their beliefs and funerary customs of cremating those who have passed away and destroying their possessions. Without obtaining the Yanomami's consent, some institutions extracted DNA from the blood for genetic tests in the 1990s. Yanomami spokesman Davi Kopenawa said, 'These Americans robbed our blood. 'They did not say anything in our language about the tests they were going to do. Nobody knew that they were going to use our blood to do research.' Back in labs in the U.S. (at Mount Sinai, New York University, University of Colorado, Boulder and others), researchers sequenced DNA isolated from the Yanomami samples. From this, they were able to identify all of the bacterial species that make up the skin, mouth and gut microbiomes of people who had never been exposed to Western diets, antibiotics or other environmental factors that make up life in industrialized societies. The researchers then compared these non-Westernized microbiomes to the microbiomes of people living in Western society and people living in villages in the midst of transition from isolation to urban lifestyles. Bacteria isolated from Yanomami microbiomes carried genes that confer resistance to man-made antibiotics, despite the fact that they were never previously exposed to antibiotics. This finding suggests that many bacterial species contain antibiotic resistance genes naturally, even without the selective pressure of antibiotic use. What happens in Western cultures, the researchers hypothesize, is antibiotic use simply gives naturally resistant bacteria a survival advantage over non-resistant bacteria. The researchers say the study could help develop new medical treatments. 'First of all, this study gives us a glimpse of what our microbiomes might have looked like before our modern habits began to impact the beneficial bacteria that call us home. 'Studies like this one help us better understand what factors can alter a microbiome and the effect those changes can have on a person's health — information researchers need to guide efforts to manipulate the microbiome to treat disease and restore health.'

Researchers sequenced microbiomes of Yanomami people in Amazon .
Testing found they harbour microbiomes with the highest diversity of bacteria and genetic functions ever reported in a human group .
Bacteria they found could be potentially beneficial to modern society .


Prompt: Since it was revealed that Andreas Lubitz – the co-pilot who purposefully crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, killing 150 people – had been treated for psychiatric illness, a debate has ensued over whether privacy laws regarding medical records should be less strict when it comes to professions that carry special responsibilities. It has been widely argued that Germany's privacy laws were to blame for the tragedy. The Times, for example, ran an article with the headline: 'German obsession with privacy let killer pilot fly.' Similarly, another article published in TIME said: 'German privacy laws let pilot 'hide' his illness from employers.' While Dirk Fischer, German lawmaker and the transport spokesman for the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), called for airlines to have mandatory access to pilots' medical records, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, president of the German Medical Association (BÄK), disagreed. Co-pilot Andreas Lubitz, who purposefully crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, killing 150 people, had been treated for a psychiatric illness, it later emerged. The discovery sparked a debate over whether airlines should be given greater access to pilots' medical records . Mr Montgomery believes that current laws are appropriate, since aviation doctors are already relieved of their duties of confidentiality if they think a pilot could put other people's lives at risk. If Lubitz's doctor did not alert Germanwings, it must have been because Lubitz did not seem like a threat. There are two arguments for why Lubitz's doctor did the right thing by not disclosing Lubitz's depression to his employer. First, functional doctor-patient relationships depend on trust. If confidentiality between patients and doctors is breached, patients will no longer trust their doctors. And a lack of trust will lead (at least some) patients to hide some of their symptoms or refrain from seeking medical attention altogether for fear of bad consequences, such as stigmatisation and work-related penalties. More dangerous than a pilot with a mental illness – or any number of other professions that carry the responsibility of a great many lives – is that one with a mental illness who will not seek treatment because he does not trust his doctor. For these reasons, philosopher Kenneth Kipnis goes even further. The passenger jet crashed in Seyne-les-Alpes, France while en route from Barcalona to Dusseldorf. All 150 people on board were killed on impact . He argues that confidentiality should be 'far closer to an absolute obligation that it has generally taken to be' and that doctors should honour confidentiality even in cases where the patient might harm a third party. If patients come to doctors for help, doctors have a chance at avoiding a possible catastrophe. Strict German privacy laws which prevented doctors treating Andreas Lubitz from telling his airline about his 'suicidal tendencies' were introduced as a consequence of the Nazis. The Germanwings pilot had been forced to stop his training because of severe depression and had received psychotherapy for several years before last week's Alps disaster. But German law meant it was left entirely up to him to volunteer his mental health problems to his employer, something he failed to do with devastating consequences after tearing up a sick note for the day of the crash. The findings from the investigation have prompted heated debate in Germany on a patient's right to privacy, with Chancellor Angela Merkel proposing an inquiry to re-examine the law. Draconian legislation was initially brought in after World War Two to prevent a repeat of government spying during the Nazi era and subsequently the Stasi secret police in East Germany. This extends far beyond confidential medical data, however, to stringent protection of someone's identity, meaning many German publications only referred to Lubitz as Andreas L, even after his death. Further data protection laws traced back to 1907, which enshrines the 'right to your own picture', also mean images can only be published with the individual's consent. With respect to medical data, the criminal code means doctors are only allowed to breach confidentiality when they have reason to believe that sharing their knowledge could prevent 'a particularly serious crime' or a threat to someone's life. They can face a year in prison if they wrongly breach privacy, but up to five years in jail for withholding 'credible information about the planning or commission' of serious acts like murder. Despite the variation in sentences, doctors have tended to favour the individual's privacy. Many in Germany are now debating whether the potential to neutralise threats to public safety should trump doctor-patient privilege. If patients lose trust in doctors and do not ask for help, nothing will be gained – patients will remain afflicted by their illnesses and people who might be put at risk by patients will remain at risk. In the days before the crash, Lubitz searched online both for medical treatments and for ways to commit suicide, which suggests he was undecided as to what to do. So another way of thinking about his scenario is that perhaps if he had trusted his doctor even more – and shared with him or her the way in which he was thinking of committing suicide – his doctor could have done more to help him and to protect the passengers of the aircraft he piloted. Lubitz's doctor also did the right thing by not revealing his depression to Germanwings because his depression was far from obviously related to his crime. Simon Wessely, the president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and an adviser to the British army, said that 'there isn't a link between depression and aggressive suicide'. Jürgen Margraf, psychologist and professor at Bochum University, likewise told NBC News that, given the sheer weight of numbers involved, you are far less likely to be harmed by a person with depression than by a person without depression. 'The chances of killing others are higher for non-depressed than for depressed people,' he said. Furthermore, given the lack of relationship between depression and the pilot's crime, it was not obviously in the public's interest to know about Lubitz's depression and morally questionable that his medical history of depression has been exposed so freely. In Germany, medical confidentiality is supposed to be valid after death. Publicly disclosing Lubitz's ailment harms the public trust in doctor-patient confidentiality after death – and it may stigmatise people who are suffering from depression but who would never hurt anyone (but themselves). The avoidable deaths of 150 people is a calamity and it makes sense to have a public debate about how to prevent future similar events from happening. Luckily, breaching confidentiality and endangering relationships between patients and doctors is not the only answer. Along with the crucially important rule of having two people in the cockpit at all times (which violates nobody's privacy), one medical measure to avoid future catastrophes is to notify employers of stay-home orders from doctors for employees who have high-responsibility jobs without mentioning the cause of the incapacitation. Lubitz reportedly had a sick note for the day he flew but never told the airline. If they had been aware of the sick note things might have been different.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Since it was revealed that Andreas Lubitz – the co-pilot who purposefully crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, killing 150 people – had been treated for psychiatric illness, a debate has ensued over whether privacy laws regarding medical records should be less strict when it comes to professions that carry special responsibilities. It has been widely argued that Germany's privacy laws were to blame for the tragedy. The Times, for example, ran an article with the headline: 'German obsession with privacy let killer pilot fly.' Similarly, another article published in TIME said: 'German privacy laws let pilot 'hide' his illness from employers.' While Dirk Fischer, German lawmaker and the transport spokesman for the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), called for airlines to have mandatory access to pilots' medical records, Frank Ulrich Montgomery, president of the German Medical Association (BÄK), disagreed. Co-pilot Andreas Lubitz, who purposefully crashed Germanwings Flight 9525, killing 150 people, had been treated for a psychiatric illness, it later emerged. The discovery sparked a debate over whether airlines should be given greater access to pilots' medical records . Mr Montgomery believes that current laws are appropriate, since aviation doctors are already relieved of their duties of confidentiality if they think a pilot could put other people's lives at risk. If Lubitz's doctor did not alert Germanwings, it must have been because Lubitz did not seem like a threat. There are two arguments for why Lubitz's doctor did the right thing by not disclosing Lubitz's depression to his employer. First, functional doctor-patient relationships depend on trust. If confidentiality between patients and doctors is breached, patients will no longer trust their doctors. And a lack of trust will lead (at least some) patients to hide some of their symptoms or refrain from seeking medical attention altogether for fear of bad consequences, such as stigmatisation and work-related penalties. More dangerous than a pilot with a mental illness – or any number of other professions that carry the responsibility of a great many lives – is that one with a mental illness who will not seek treatment because he does not trust his doctor. For these reasons, philosopher Kenneth Kipnis goes even further. The passenger jet crashed in Seyne-les-Alpes, France while en route from Barcalona to Dusseldorf. All 150 people on board were killed on impact . He argues that confidentiality should be 'far closer to an absolute obligation that it has generally taken to be' and that doctors should honour confidentiality even in cases where the patient might harm a third party. If patients come to doctors for help, doctors have a chance at avoiding a possible catastrophe. Strict German privacy laws which prevented doctors treating Andreas Lubitz from telling his airline about his 'suicidal tendencies' were introduced as a consequence of the Nazis. The Germanwings pilot had been forced to stop his training because of severe depression and had received psychotherapy for several years before last week's Alps disaster. But German law meant it was left entirely up to him to volunteer his mental health problems to his employer, something he failed to do with devastating consequences after tearing up a sick note for the day of the crash. The findings from the investigation have prompted heated debate in Germany on a patient's right to privacy, with Chancellor Angela Merkel proposing an inquiry to re-examine the law. Draconian legislation was initially brought in after World War Two to prevent a repeat of government spying during the Nazi era and subsequently the Stasi secret police in East Germany. This extends far beyond confidential medical data, however, to stringent protection of someone's identity, meaning many German publications only referred to Lubitz as Andreas L, even after his death. Further data protection laws traced back to 1907, which enshrines the 'right to your own picture', also mean images can only be published with the individual's consent. With respect to medical data, the criminal code means doctors are only allowed to breach confidentiality when they have reason to believe that sharing their knowledge could prevent 'a particularly serious crime' or a threat to someone's life. They can face a year in prison if they wrongly breach privacy, but up to five years in jail for withholding 'credible information about the planning or commission' of serious acts like murder. Despite the variation in sentences, doctors have tended to favour the individual's privacy. Many in Germany are now debating whether the potential to neutralise threats to public safety should trump doctor-patient privilege. If patients lose trust in doctors and do not ask for help, nothing will be gained – patients will remain afflicted by their illnesses and people who might be put at risk by patients will remain at risk. In the days before the crash, Lubitz searched online both for medical treatments and for ways to commit suicide, which suggests he was undecided as to what to do. So another way of thinking about his scenario is that perhaps if he had trusted his doctor even more – and shared with him or her the way in which he was thinking of committing suicide – his doctor could have done more to help him and to protect the passengers of the aircraft he piloted. Lubitz's doctor also did the right thing by not revealing his depression to Germanwings because his depression was far from obviously related to his crime. Simon Wessely, the president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists and an adviser to the British army, said that 'there isn't a link between depression and aggressive suicide'. Jürgen Margraf, psychologist and professor at Bochum University, likewise told NBC News that, given the sheer weight of numbers involved, you are far less likely to be harmed by a person with depression than by a person without depression. 'The chances of killing others are higher for non-depressed than for depressed people,' he said. Furthermore, given the lack of relationship between depression and the pilot's crime, it was not obviously in the public's interest to know about Lubitz's depression and morally questionable that his medical history of depression has been exposed so freely. In Germany, medical confidentiality is supposed to be valid after death. Publicly disclosing Lubitz's ailment harms the public trust in doctor-patient confidentiality after death – and it may stigmatise people who are suffering from depression but who would never hurt anyone (but themselves). The avoidable deaths of 150 people is a calamity and it makes sense to have a public debate about how to prevent future similar events from happening. Luckily, breaching confidentiality and endangering relationships between patients and doctors is not the only answer. Along with the crucially important rule of having two people in the cockpit at all times (which violates nobody's privacy), one medical measure to avoid future catastrophes is to notify employers of stay-home orders from doctors for employees who have high-responsibility jobs without mentioning the cause of the incapacitation. Lubitz reportedly had a sick note for the day he flew but never told the airline. If they had been aware of the sick note things might have been different.

Andreas Lubitz crashed Germanwings Flight 9525 into the French Alps, killing himself as well as the other 149 people on board the flight .
It has since emerged Lubitz had been treated for psychiatric illness .
News has triggered a debate over whether airlines should have mandatory access to all pilots' medical records, to try and prevent a similar tragedy .
Carissa Veliz is a philosophy graduate from Oxford University and is writing her dissertation on the subject of privacy .


Prompt: Victor Moses has returned to Chelsea after being ruled out for the season. The winger has been on loan at Stoke but damaged his hamstring in the 1-1 draw at West Ham United on Saturday and is expected to be out for six weeks. The 24-year-old has gone back to parent club Chelsea for treatment following the results of a scan. Stoke are still keen to strike a permanent deal for Moses in the summer. Victor Moses has returned to parent club Chelsea for treatment after injuring a hamstring against West Ham . Stoke are still interested in tying up a permanent move for the Nigeria international after a successful loan . Meanwhile, the Potters have opened talks with Ligue 1 side Evian over the possible transfer of defender Daniel Wass - who has been watched by Chelsea, Liverpool and Newcastle over the past year. The 25-year-old Denmark international is available for around £3.5million and is keen to try his luck in the Premier League, despite interest from the likes of Inter Milan and Schalke. Hughes has been given licence to spend this summer with players including Moses, Manchester United forward Javier Hernandez and Sunderland midfielder Lee Cattermole on his wishlist. Stoke scouts have also been monitoring Sporting Lisbon pair Islam Slimani and Andre Carrillo. Stoke have entered the chase for Evian full-back Daniel Wass (2nd left), who has been watched by Chelsea .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Victor Moses has returned to Chelsea after being ruled out for the season. The winger has been on loan at Stoke but damaged his hamstring in the 1-1 draw at West Ham United on Saturday and is expected to be out for six weeks. The 24-year-old has gone back to parent club Chelsea for treatment following the results of a scan. Stoke are still keen to strike a permanent deal for Moses in the summer. Victor Moses has returned to parent club Chelsea for treatment after injuring a hamstring against West Ham . Stoke are still interested in tying up a permanent move for the Nigeria international after a successful loan . Meanwhile, the Potters have opened talks with Ligue 1 side Evian over the possible transfer of defender Daniel Wass - who has been watched by Chelsea, Liverpool and Newcastle over the past year. The 25-year-old Denmark international is available for around £3.5million and is keen to try his luck in the Premier League, despite interest from the likes of Inter Milan and Schalke. Hughes has been given licence to spend this summer with players including Moses, Manchester United forward Javier Hernandez and Sunderland midfielder Lee Cattermole on his wishlist. Stoke scouts have also been monitoring Sporting Lisbon pair Islam Slimani and Andre Carrillo. Stoke have entered the chase for Evian full-back Daniel Wass (2nd left), who has been watched by Chelsea .

Chelsea winger Victor Moses has spent the season on loan at Stoke City .
Nigeria international has returned to Stamford Bridge for injury treatment .
Potters are chasing Daniel Wass, Javier Hernandez and Lee Cattermole .


Prompt: Ruby Walsh appears to jump his horse over a moving car in the latest promotional advert for betting firm Paddy Power. The 22-second clip shows the two-time Grand National winner galloping towards the speeding silver car and apparently jumping it as the bookmaker gears up for Saturday's big race at Aintree. Irish jockey Walsh, who is riding Ballycasey in the race, starts the clip by saying: 'This is how I've been getting ready for this year's Grand National.' The clip starts with champion jockey Ruby Walsh describing how he will prepare for the Grand National . The two-time National jockey appears to then leap over the speeding car on his horse . The horse clears the car, which Paddy Power say was travelling at 40mph, and lands . Walsh celebrates with a raised arm after completing the 'stunt' Paddy Power claims he jumped straight over the car, which was said to be travelling at 40mph. The horse barely clears the car's roof before landing. Walsh stands upright and raises his right arm in apparent celebration after the horse lands and gallops away. It is not the first time the bookmaker has produced a controversial advert ahead of a major racing festival. In February 2012, a publicity stunt prior to the Cheltenham Festival featured a suited hitman firing tranquillizer darts at unsuspecting members of the public, promising to 'take care of the chavs - veterinary style.' It was inspired by loutish racegoers fighting at Ascot. Another advert released ahead of the 2012 Cheltenham Festival showed a clip of transgender racegoers and invited viewers to spot the 'stallions' from the 'mares.' Walsh pictured after riding Sempre Medici to victory on Irish Grand National Day at Fairyhouse last week . The Irish jockey will ride Ballycasey in Saturday's Grand National at Aintree . It was banned from television broadcast by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) after it received 92 complaints the ad was offensive and condoned and encouraged harmful discriminatory behaviour. Although banned from TV, both adverts remain easily accessible on the internet. Another advert ahead of the Ryder Cup last year saw UKIP leader Nigel Farage feature in a spoof political broadcast in which he was 'swinging for Europe'. Walsh, 35, has twice won the Grand National before - on Papillon in 2000 and Hedgehunter in 2005.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Ruby Walsh appears to jump his horse over a moving car in the latest promotional advert for betting firm Paddy Power. The 22-second clip shows the two-time Grand National winner galloping towards the speeding silver car and apparently jumping it as the bookmaker gears up for Saturday's big race at Aintree. Irish jockey Walsh, who is riding Ballycasey in the race, starts the clip by saying: 'This is how I've been getting ready for this year's Grand National.' The clip starts with champion jockey Ruby Walsh describing how he will prepare for the Grand National . The two-time National jockey appears to then leap over the speeding car on his horse . The horse clears the car, which Paddy Power say was travelling at 40mph, and lands . Walsh celebrates with a raised arm after completing the 'stunt' Paddy Power claims he jumped straight over the car, which was said to be travelling at 40mph. The horse barely clears the car's roof before landing. Walsh stands upright and raises his right arm in apparent celebration after the horse lands and gallops away. It is not the first time the bookmaker has produced a controversial advert ahead of a major racing festival. In February 2012, a publicity stunt prior to the Cheltenham Festival featured a suited hitman firing tranquillizer darts at unsuspecting members of the public, promising to 'take care of the chavs - veterinary style.' It was inspired by loutish racegoers fighting at Ascot. Another advert released ahead of the 2012 Cheltenham Festival showed a clip of transgender racegoers and invited viewers to spot the 'stallions' from the 'mares.' Walsh pictured after riding Sempre Medici to victory on Irish Grand National Day at Fairyhouse last week . The Irish jockey will ride Ballycasey in Saturday's Grand National at Aintree . It was banned from television broadcast by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) after it received 92 complaints the ad was offensive and condoned and encouraged harmful discriminatory behaviour. Although banned from TV, both adverts remain easily accessible on the internet. Another advert ahead of the Ryder Cup last year saw UKIP leader Nigel Farage feature in a spoof political broadcast in which he was 'swinging for Europe'. Walsh, 35, has twice won the Grand National before - on Papillon in 2000 and Hedgehunter in 2005.

Walsh appears to jump a car travelling at 40mph in Paddy Power advert .
Irish jockey says in clip he is preparing for Saturday's Grand National .
Two-time National winner will ride Ballycasey at Aintree .
Bookmaker is no stranger to controversial ad campaigns .


Prompt: Ryanair has taken the unprecedented step of banning passengers from bringing their own booze on board flights between Glasgow and the party island of Ibiza out of concerns for safety and comfort. The Dublin-based airline has informed passengers travelling on the notorious flight from Glasgow Prestwick Airport to the Spanish island that their alcohol purchases from duty free shops are no longer allowed in the cabin, and they risk being kicked off the flight if they don’t comply. Ryanair refused to explain the reason behind its decision, but it follows a handful of incidents involving boorish behaviour by inebriated travellers heading to the island for days of sun, booze and revelry. Passengers' hand luggage will be searched before they board at Glasgow Prestwick Airport, said the airline . An email sent to Ibiza-bound passengers and obtained by the Daily Record said: ‘Customers will not be allowed to carry alcohol on board and all cabin baggage will be searched at boarding gates. ‘Any alcohol purchased in airport shops or elsewhere must be packed in a suitable item of baggage, which will be tagged and placed in the aircraft hold free of charge. ‘Customers attempting to conceal alcohol will be denied travel without refund or compensation.’ In a statement to MailOnline Travel, a Ryanair spokesman said the airline made the decision after consultations with customers and airport officials. Passengers who are caught trying to sneak alcohol into the cabin risk being kicked off the flight . The spokesman said: ‘Those who have purchased duty free alcohol will be asked to either place their purchases in their cabin baggage and into the hold at the boarding gate, or leave their purchases behind. ‘The comfort and safety of our customers and crew is our number one priority and we will not tolerate unruly behaviour at any time.’ The spokesman declined to identify the incidents which sparked the ban or say what will happen to passengers caught trying to sneak alcohol on board. There have been problems with passengers opening alcohol purchased from duty free shops at Glasgow Prestwick Airport and imbibing on the flight  to Ibiza. Passengers who purchase booze from duty free shops at Glasgow Prestwick must place it in the luggage hold . Last year a flight made headlines when an online video showed passengers chanting and swearing. Rowdy passengers were recorded singing the theme to Dambusters and chanting ‘Here we, here we, here we f****** go’ after the plane landed. Travellers who didn’t join in appeared anxious or agitated with the scene unfolding just rows in front of them, and cabin crew were shown looking on helplessly as the singing continued uninterrupted. In 2013 a flight on the same route had to divert to Beauvais-Tille Airport, north of Paris, after a group of drunk passengers began causing trouble. Police said 14 men were thrown off the plane in France and were so inebriated they thought they had landed in Ibiza. It was believed the group had been drinking alcohol bought from duty free at Glasgow Prestwick before the two-hour flight. The budget carrier currently flies twice a week between Glasgow Prestwick and Ibiza, with flights operating on Sundays and Wednesdays.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Ryanair has taken the unprecedented step of banning passengers from bringing their own booze on board flights between Glasgow and the party island of Ibiza out of concerns for safety and comfort. The Dublin-based airline has informed passengers travelling on the notorious flight from Glasgow Prestwick Airport to the Spanish island that their alcohol purchases from duty free shops are no longer allowed in the cabin, and they risk being kicked off the flight if they don’t comply. Ryanair refused to explain the reason behind its decision, but it follows a handful of incidents involving boorish behaviour by inebriated travellers heading to the island for days of sun, booze and revelry. Passengers' hand luggage will be searched before they board at Glasgow Prestwick Airport, said the airline . An email sent to Ibiza-bound passengers and obtained by the Daily Record said: ‘Customers will not be allowed to carry alcohol on board and all cabin baggage will be searched at boarding gates. ‘Any alcohol purchased in airport shops or elsewhere must be packed in a suitable item of baggage, which will be tagged and placed in the aircraft hold free of charge. ‘Customers attempting to conceal alcohol will be denied travel without refund or compensation.’ In a statement to MailOnline Travel, a Ryanair spokesman said the airline made the decision after consultations with customers and airport officials. Passengers who are caught trying to sneak alcohol into the cabin risk being kicked off the flight . The spokesman said: ‘Those who have purchased duty free alcohol will be asked to either place their purchases in their cabin baggage and into the hold at the boarding gate, or leave their purchases behind. ‘The comfort and safety of our customers and crew is our number one priority and we will not tolerate unruly behaviour at any time.’ The spokesman declined to identify the incidents which sparked the ban or say what will happen to passengers caught trying to sneak alcohol on board. There have been problems with passengers opening alcohol purchased from duty free shops at Glasgow Prestwick Airport and imbibing on the flight  to Ibiza. Passengers who purchase booze from duty free shops at Glasgow Prestwick must place it in the luggage hold . Last year a flight made headlines when an online video showed passengers chanting and swearing. Rowdy passengers were recorded singing the theme to Dambusters and chanting ‘Here we, here we, here we f****** go’ after the plane landed. Travellers who didn’t join in appeared anxious or agitated with the scene unfolding just rows in front of them, and cabin crew were shown looking on helplessly as the singing continued uninterrupted. In 2013 a flight on the same route had to divert to Beauvais-Tille Airport, north of Paris, after a group of drunk passengers began causing trouble. Police said 14 men were thrown off the plane in France and were so inebriated they thought they had landed in Ibiza. It was believed the group had been drinking alcohol bought from duty free at Glasgow Prestwick before the two-hour flight. The budget carrier currently flies twice a week between Glasgow Prestwick and Ibiza, with flights operating on Sundays and Wednesdays.

Ryanair has informed passengers they cannot bring alcohol into the cabin .
Decision follows a handful of incidents involving unruly behaviour .
Passengers risk being kicked off the flight if they don't comply .
Travellers' hand luggage will be searched before they board the plane .
Fourteen men were kicked off a flight that diverted to an airport near Paris .


Prompt: A family overheard a terrifying message on their young son's baby monitor after the device and its camera were hacked. When the Washington couple's three-year-old had first began complaining of someone talking to him at night, his parents had put it down to their toddler's over-active imagination, reported CBS New York. That was until one night when they heard a strange man's voice come over the monitor to tell their son: 'Wake up little boy, daddy's looking for you.' A couple heard the terrifying message: 'Wake up little boy, daddy's looking for you' come through their 3-year-old son's baby monitor (stock image) And the horrified parents, who do not want to be named for fear the unknown man could track them down, believe it is not just the audio monitor that has been hacked. They believe the stranger has also got into the camera on the device. After the first creepy message, the boy's mother had walked into the room and overheard the hacker saying, 'Look someone's coming' or 'Someone's coming into view.' The mother said she broke down in tears after the realization hit home that a total stranger was able to control the camera to watch their son and spy on them. The stranger had managed to hack the baby monitor and the family says the hacker was even able to remotely control the camera on the monitor (stock image) She told CBS New York: 'Well, I started to cry in there, because it all started coming back to me, and I started figuring things out.' They reported the incident to Foscam, the company where they bought their monitor, who admitted it was possible the device's cameras were being controlled remotely but they could not say from where. Technology experts have now warned that it is becoming easier for hackers to infiltrate family's baby monitors as many of the newer devices connect to the internet. 'It's basically like they're standing next to you in your house,' Lance Ulanoff, chief correspondent for the digital media website Mashable,CBS. He warned that parents should change the passwords on the devices to make it more difficult for people to guess. Because some new baby monitors connect to the internet and come with a smartphone app, it has become easier for hackers to infiltrate them and listen in or speak to children . 'If somebody else has your login information, they can go to that same app, and log into your webcam, which is what happened here,' Ulanoff said. Earlier this month, another couple - this time from Rochester, Minnesota - discovered their baby monitors and cameras had been infiltrated after they found footage from the nanny cam posted online, according to Redbook. They first became suspicious after they heard music coming in from their baby's room. 'We were sleeping in bed, and basically heard music coming from the nursery, but then when we went into the room the music turned off,' she told KTTC. When she tracked down the IP address which was streaming the music, she found a web link to a page with thousands of pictures from baby monitors all over the world, including several from her own child's nursery. 'There's at least fifteen different countries listed and it's not just nurseries—it's people's living rooms, their bedrooms, their kitchens,' she explained. 'Every place that people think is sacred and private in their home is being accessed.'

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

A family overheard a terrifying message on their young son's baby monitor after the device and its camera were hacked. When the Washington couple's three-year-old had first began complaining of someone talking to him at night, his parents had put it down to their toddler's over-active imagination, reported CBS New York. That was until one night when they heard a strange man's voice come over the monitor to tell their son: 'Wake up little boy, daddy's looking for you.' A couple heard the terrifying message: 'Wake up little boy, daddy's looking for you' come through their 3-year-old son's baby monitor (stock image) And the horrified parents, who do not want to be named for fear the unknown man could track them down, believe it is not just the audio monitor that has been hacked. They believe the stranger has also got into the camera on the device. After the first creepy message, the boy's mother had walked into the room and overheard the hacker saying, 'Look someone's coming' or 'Someone's coming into view.' The mother said she broke down in tears after the realization hit home that a total stranger was able to control the camera to watch their son and spy on them. The stranger had managed to hack the baby monitor and the family says the hacker was even able to remotely control the camera on the monitor (stock image) She told CBS New York: 'Well, I started to cry in there, because it all started coming back to me, and I started figuring things out.' They reported the incident to Foscam, the company where they bought their monitor, who admitted it was possible the device's cameras were being controlled remotely but they could not say from where. Technology experts have now warned that it is becoming easier for hackers to infiltrate family's baby monitors as many of the newer devices connect to the internet. 'It's basically like they're standing next to you in your house,' Lance Ulanoff, chief correspondent for the digital media website Mashable,CBS. He warned that parents should change the passwords on the devices to make it more difficult for people to guess. Because some new baby monitors connect to the internet and come with a smartphone app, it has become easier for hackers to infiltrate them and listen in or speak to children . 'If somebody else has your login information, they can go to that same app, and log into your webcam, which is what happened here,' Ulanoff said. Earlier this month, another couple - this time from Rochester, Minnesota - discovered their baby monitors and cameras had been infiltrated after they found footage from the nanny cam posted online, according to Redbook. They first became suspicious after they heard music coming in from their baby's room. 'We were sleeping in bed, and basically heard music coming from the nursery, but then when we went into the room the music turned off,' she told KTTC. When she tracked down the IP address which was streaming the music, she found a web link to a page with thousands of pictures from baby monitors all over the world, including several from her own child's nursery. 'There's at least fifteen different countries listed and it's not just nurseries—it's people's living rooms, their bedrooms, their kitchens,' she explained. 'Every place that people think is sacred and private in their home is being accessed.'

Washington couple's son began complaining of someone talking to him .
One night they heard: 'Wake up little boy daddy's looking for you'
Also believe  hacker has infiltrated the device's camera to watch their son .
Tech experts warned baby monitors linked to internet are more vulnerable .


Prompt: A Philadelphia woman lost her leg and her home went up in flames, all because a neighbor believed she was trying to steal her boyfriend and ran her down in her SUV, family members say. Precious Richardson Coleman, 29, turned herself in to police Saturday and awaits two charges of attempted murder after running down 24-year-old Beatrice 'Dee Dee' Spence and her uncle in her 2004 white Dodge Durango. WPVI reports that Coleman had shown up on Spence's block in the Nicetown neighborhood of Philadelphia, before Spence went out to confront her. Struck down: 'Dee Dee' Spence, 24, lost her leg in an intentional hit and run by 29-year-old Precious Richardson Coleman, who believed Spence was trying to steal her boyfriend, according to family members . That's when Coleman sped forward, hopping the curb and striking both Spence and her uncle, 37-year-old Damon Watson, who was standing alongside his niece. 'She jumped up on the pavement,' Watson told the Daily News. 'I turned, and the car threw me. She hit me on the side. I bounced off the car.' 'I turned and saw Dee Dee. Her whole leg was flying off,' Watson continued. 'It was hanging off. She was screaming in pain.' Family members said the SUV briefly pinned Spence against the porch, before Coleman reversed and sped away. Paramedics arrived and transported Spence to Temple University Hospital in critical condition, where she had to have her right leg amputated below the knee. Spence's mother, Danika, had been frying chicken and cooking macaroni and cheese, but left the kitchen in a rush to help her daughter. Charged: Coleman turned herself in to police Saturday morning and is held on $750,000 for attempted murder and related charges . Hit and run: A security camera caught Coleman's SUV speeding away from the scene. The vehicle was later found by police with significant damage to the front bumper . Double tragedy: Spence's mother, Danika, ran out of the house to help her daughter, leaving unattended food cooking on the stove, which triggered a housefire . The unattended stove went up in flames, causing a housefire that consumed both the Spences' home and a neighbor's, before firefighters extinguished the blaze. The hit and run was the climax of a simmering feud between the two women over Coleman's current boyfriend, whom Spence had reportedly dated in the past. 'She thought Dee Dee was with him,' Spence's sister Alissa, 14, told the Daily News. 'She wasn't at all. That was her ex. They weren't seeing each other anymore. She had moved on.' At 5 a.m. on the morning of the incident, relatives say, Coleman showed up at the front of the home that Spence shared with her mother and two younger sisters. 'It's Precious,' Ameria Spence, 9, recalled hearing Coleman saying. 'Tell your daughter to stop f****** blocking me on Instagram!' 'Then she picked up a brick and threw it through the window,' Ameria added. Danika Spence filed a police report, family members said, but Coleman phoned Dee Dee Spence a few hours later to say she was going to return. Police found Spence's SUV with significant damage to the front bumper Saturday morning. Coleman is currently being held on $750,000 bail at Riverside Correctional Facility on attempted murder and related charges. For now, the Spence family is trying to recover from the traumatic incident, staying at the home of Spence's grandmother next door to the house that went up in flames. 'My mom, she's just so hurt. She's devastated,' Spence's 14-year-old sister said. 'She just wants Dee Dee home and safe.' 'My sister says she's trying not to be depressed. She's strong. But this is a lot.'

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

A Philadelphia woman lost her leg and her home went up in flames, all because a neighbor believed she was trying to steal her boyfriend and ran her down in her SUV, family members say. Precious Richardson Coleman, 29, turned herself in to police Saturday and awaits two charges of attempted murder after running down 24-year-old Beatrice 'Dee Dee' Spence and her uncle in her 2004 white Dodge Durango. WPVI reports that Coleman had shown up on Spence's block in the Nicetown neighborhood of Philadelphia, before Spence went out to confront her. Struck down: 'Dee Dee' Spence, 24, lost her leg in an intentional hit and run by 29-year-old Precious Richardson Coleman, who believed Spence was trying to steal her boyfriend, according to family members . That's when Coleman sped forward, hopping the curb and striking both Spence and her uncle, 37-year-old Damon Watson, who was standing alongside his niece. 'She jumped up on the pavement,' Watson told the Daily News. 'I turned, and the car threw me. She hit me on the side. I bounced off the car.' 'I turned and saw Dee Dee. Her whole leg was flying off,' Watson continued. 'It was hanging off. She was screaming in pain.' Family members said the SUV briefly pinned Spence against the porch, before Coleman reversed and sped away. Paramedics arrived and transported Spence to Temple University Hospital in critical condition, where she had to have her right leg amputated below the knee. Spence's mother, Danika, had been frying chicken and cooking macaroni and cheese, but left the kitchen in a rush to help her daughter. Charged: Coleman turned herself in to police Saturday morning and is held on $750,000 for attempted murder and related charges . Hit and run: A security camera caught Coleman's SUV speeding away from the scene. The vehicle was later found by police with significant damage to the front bumper . Double tragedy: Spence's mother, Danika, ran out of the house to help her daughter, leaving unattended food cooking on the stove, which triggered a housefire . The unattended stove went up in flames, causing a housefire that consumed both the Spences' home and a neighbor's, before firefighters extinguished the blaze. The hit and run was the climax of a simmering feud between the two women over Coleman's current boyfriend, whom Spence had reportedly dated in the past. 'She thought Dee Dee was with him,' Spence's sister Alissa, 14, told the Daily News. 'She wasn't at all. That was her ex. They weren't seeing each other anymore. She had moved on.' At 5 a.m. on the morning of the incident, relatives say, Coleman showed up at the front of the home that Spence shared with her mother and two younger sisters. 'It's Precious,' Ameria Spence, 9, recalled hearing Coleman saying. 'Tell your daughter to stop f****** blocking me on Instagram!' 'Then she picked up a brick and threw it through the window,' Ameria added. Danika Spence filed a police report, family members said, but Coleman phoned Dee Dee Spence a few hours later to say she was going to return. Police found Spence's SUV with significant damage to the front bumper Saturday morning. Coleman is currently being held on $750,000 bail at Riverside Correctional Facility on attempted murder and related charges. For now, the Spence family is trying to recover from the traumatic incident, staying at the home of Spence's grandmother next door to the house that went up in flames. 'My mom, she's just so hurt. She's devastated,' Spence's 14-year-old sister said. 'She just wants Dee Dee home and safe.' 'My sister says she's trying not to be depressed. She's strong. But this is a lot.'

Precious Richard Coleman turned herself in to police Saturday after running down Beatrice 'Dee Dee' Spence and her uncle .
Coleman believed Spence was going after her boyfriend, family members say .
Spence had her leg amputated after the hit and run, and the home caught fire while Spence's mother Danika accompanied her daughter to the hospital .
Coleman is being held on $750,000 on attempted murder charges .


Prompt: Gordon Brown has warned that the Scottish nationalists want an SNP vote in the General Election to force a second referendum on independence. The former prime minister said that SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon's answers on the issue are 'all evasion'. But that her party want 'chaos and constitutional crisis' at Westminster to force another independence referendum. Scroll down for video . Gordon Brown, pictured campaigning this week, has warned that the SNP want to use the chaos after the election to force another referendum on Scottish independence and urged 'patriotic Scots' to vote Labour . And he warned that those casting their vote on May 7 will be deciding the future of Scotland for the next few years. Mr Brown was speaking during a joint event with local Labour candidate and shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander at Elderslie Village Hall in Renfrewshire. He said: 'There is an SNP candidate in this constituency. She says vote SNP, get SNP MPs at Westminster and we will twist their arms and get another referendum. 'Remember what the SNP used to say - the referendum was once in a generation, then it changed a little to once in a lifetime, then it was once every 15 years and now when you ask Ms Sturgeon about this her answers are all evasion. She cannot give a straight answer to the question. 'But does not the SNP candidate in this constituency tell the truth, that what they want is an SNP vote not to deliver social justice but to deliver the chaos and constitutional crisis at Westminster to as she said force a second referendum. 'And I say I don't want the divisiveness, I don't want the bitterness, I don't want the acrimony, I don't want the divisions between families and communities in the next few months that we had in the past few months.' The former prime minister said that SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon's answers on the issue are 'all evasion' Mr Brown urged people to vote Labour to end the bedroom tax, food bank poverty, zero-hours contracts and the neglect of the NHS. He added: 'When you vote on May 7 remember that you are not just voting to end Tory austerity and the possibility of five more years of the bedroom tax and everything else, you're also voting on whether you are going to allow the SNP to use your vote to try to force a second referendum on this country within a few months or after the 2016 Scottish Parliament elections.' He also said that Labour will hold an economic summit immediately after the General Election to boost jobs, expand city deals, encourage investment and provide jobs and training for young people. Mr Brown also urged people to be 'proud patriotic Scots' and back Labour's plan for full employment in Scotland. He said: 'Patriotism means, yes, supporting a strong Scottish parliament, but it doesn't mean rejecting the co-operation across the whole country that can deliver us full employment and more jobs. 'It doesn't mean rejecting the money that comes from the bankers' bonus tax that will allow Scottish young people to have jobs in the future. 'It doesn't mean rejecting the co-operation on research and innovation that will replace the Linwoods of the past and the lost jobs of the present with the new high-quality jobs of the future. 'And, yes, patriotism means a strong Scottish parliament but it doesn't need or require us to reject the partnership that allows us to fund the pensions of this country, sharing the resources of 60 million people across the whole country, far better than pooling the resources of only five million people, to secure the best pensions imaginable.' SNP Leader Nicola Sturgeon joins  female activists in Glasgow's Buchanan Street to launch the party's womens pledge today . Scotland's Deputy First Minister John Swinney said: 'While Gordon Brown appears to be re-fighting last year's referendum, the SNP are out talking to voters about next month's General Election and the huge opportunity to make Scotland stronger at Westminster. The contrast could not be clearer. 'Unfortunately for Labour Brown's speech this morning simply reminds people once again of how Labour stood shoulder to shoulder with the Tories for two and a half years to talk Scotland down. 'The question Labour's current leadership have repeatedly failed to answer is if there are more anti-Tory MPs - between the SNP and Labour - than there are Tory MPs, will they work with us to lock the Tories out and to deliver better policies for people not just in Scotland but across the rest of the UK. 'A strong team of SNP MPs can give Labour the backbone to oppose further cuts and pursue a progressive alternative to austerity.' From left, Anas Sarwar MP, former prime minister Gordon Brown and former leader of the Scottish Labour party Johann Lamont attend the Scottish Labour campaign launch to keep Scotland part of the UK in 2013 .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Gordon Brown has warned that the Scottish nationalists want an SNP vote in the General Election to force a second referendum on independence. The former prime minister said that SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon's answers on the issue are 'all evasion'. But that her party want 'chaos and constitutional crisis' at Westminster to force another independence referendum. Scroll down for video . Gordon Brown, pictured campaigning this week, has warned that the SNP want to use the chaos after the election to force another referendum on Scottish independence and urged 'patriotic Scots' to vote Labour . And he warned that those casting their vote on May 7 will be deciding the future of Scotland for the next few years. Mr Brown was speaking during a joint event with local Labour candidate and shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander at Elderslie Village Hall in Renfrewshire. He said: 'There is an SNP candidate in this constituency. She says vote SNP, get SNP MPs at Westminster and we will twist their arms and get another referendum. 'Remember what the SNP used to say - the referendum was once in a generation, then it changed a little to once in a lifetime, then it was once every 15 years and now when you ask Ms Sturgeon about this her answers are all evasion. She cannot give a straight answer to the question. 'But does not the SNP candidate in this constituency tell the truth, that what they want is an SNP vote not to deliver social justice but to deliver the chaos and constitutional crisis at Westminster to as she said force a second referendum. 'And I say I don't want the divisiveness, I don't want the bitterness, I don't want the acrimony, I don't want the divisions between families and communities in the next few months that we had in the past few months.' The former prime minister said that SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon's answers on the issue are 'all evasion' Mr Brown urged people to vote Labour to end the bedroom tax, food bank poverty, zero-hours contracts and the neglect of the NHS. He added: 'When you vote on May 7 remember that you are not just voting to end Tory austerity and the possibility of five more years of the bedroom tax and everything else, you're also voting on whether you are going to allow the SNP to use your vote to try to force a second referendum on this country within a few months or after the 2016 Scottish Parliament elections.' He also said that Labour will hold an economic summit immediately after the General Election to boost jobs, expand city deals, encourage investment and provide jobs and training for young people. Mr Brown also urged people to be 'proud patriotic Scots' and back Labour's plan for full employment in Scotland. He said: 'Patriotism means, yes, supporting a strong Scottish parliament, but it doesn't mean rejecting the co-operation across the whole country that can deliver us full employment and more jobs. 'It doesn't mean rejecting the money that comes from the bankers' bonus tax that will allow Scottish young people to have jobs in the future. 'It doesn't mean rejecting the co-operation on research and innovation that will replace the Linwoods of the past and the lost jobs of the present with the new high-quality jobs of the future. 'And, yes, patriotism means a strong Scottish parliament but it doesn't need or require us to reject the partnership that allows us to fund the pensions of this country, sharing the resources of 60 million people across the whole country, far better than pooling the resources of only five million people, to secure the best pensions imaginable.' SNP Leader Nicola Sturgeon joins  female activists in Glasgow's Buchanan Street to launch the party's womens pledge today . Scotland's Deputy First Minister John Swinney said: 'While Gordon Brown appears to be re-fighting last year's referendum, the SNP are out talking to voters about next month's General Election and the huge opportunity to make Scotland stronger at Westminster. The contrast could not be clearer. 'Unfortunately for Labour Brown's speech this morning simply reminds people once again of how Labour stood shoulder to shoulder with the Tories for two and a half years to talk Scotland down. 'The question Labour's current leadership have repeatedly failed to answer is if there are more anti-Tory MPs - between the SNP and Labour - than there are Tory MPs, will they work with us to lock the Tories out and to deliver better policies for people not just in Scotland but across the rest of the UK. 'A strong team of SNP MPs can give Labour the backbone to oppose further cuts and pursue a progressive alternative to austerity.' From left, Anas Sarwar MP, former prime minister Gordon Brown and former leader of the Scottish Labour party Johann Lamont attend the Scottish Labour campaign launch to keep Scotland part of the UK in 2013 .

Former prime minister says Nicola Sturgeon's answers are 'all evasion'
But that her party want 'constitutional crisis' to force another referendum .
Warned voters on May 7 will decide Scotland's future for next few years .
Mr Brown urged people to vote Labour to end bedroom tax, food bank poverty, zero-hours contracts and the neglect of the NHS .


Prompt: Two teenage cancer survivors have been left distraught after photographs they posted on Facebook to celebrate getting the all-clear were reported for nudity. Tiffany Williams and Jessica Versey, both 19 and from Chester, Cheshire, became close friends during their treatment and went into remission around the same time. They then took to social media to post images of themselves - including one of Miss Williams’s bald head and another of Miss Versey’s chest scar - but these were reported for being ‘offensive’. Reported for nudity: Tiffany Williams and Jessica Versey, took to social media to post images of themselves – including one of Miss Williams’s bald head (left) and another of Miss Versey’s chest scar (right) Battled through: Tiffany Williams, pictured with Peter Andre, was cleared of Hodgkin lymphoma this month . Shock: The picture Tiffany Williams uploaded (left) was reported by someone on Facebook for 'nudity' Miss Williams was cleared of Hodgkin lymphoma earlier this month and regularly documented her struggle with losing hair during chemotherapy on Facebook. While undergoing treatment she decided to cut off all her hair after choosing against it on many previous occasions - making a ‘ten-minute decision’ that she would get a friend to shave it off. But, telling of what happened next, she said: ‘Feeling proud, I updated my friends on Facebook with the caption “I did it!” - and about two hours later found that someone had reported it for nudity. ‘It didn’t get deleted but I knew it must have been someone I had as a friend. I posted a nice one of me with my make-up on the day after, and that got reported too. Tough: This picture, the first selfie Miss Versey uploaded showing her bald head, was reported for nudity . Survivors: Miss Williams is seen in a photo - not reported to Facebook - revealing she had got the all-clear (left), and Miss Versey's post with the image of her scar which was reported for nudity is also pictured (right) Feeling happy: Miss Versey, who received lifesaving bone marrow treatment from her ten-year-old sister Maisy, said it was 'a massive deal' for her chemotherapy catheter be taken out after her gruelling cancer battle . Joking around: Miss Williams regularly wrote on her struggle with losing hair to chemotherapy on Facebook . ‘All I was doing was trying to help others that might need that little boost to show that no one is different, with or without hair or scars.’ If a user wishes to tell Facebook that they believe a picture is breaching nudity guidelines, he or she can click on ‘options’ under the image and ‘report photo’. The user must then click on ‘nudity’ as the reason for a complaint, before confirming they want to report the image to Facebook. It is then sent to the website’s community operations team in Ireland, who consider every report and make a decision based on Facebook’s community standards. The user whose profile carries the photo will receive a notification to say their image has been reported – but it is only removed if Facebook find it breaches guidelines. And she was further shocked last week when leukaemia sufferer Miss Versey’s photo of the scar left by the removal of her chemotherapy catheter also got reported for nudity. Miss Versey, who received lifesaving bone marrow treatment from her ten-year-old sister Maisy, said it was ‘a massive deal’ for it be taken out after her gruelling cancer battle. She added: ‘Having that taken out was a big thing for me, as it essentially kept me alive for so long. I shared my scar to show people my body was one step further away from cancer. ‘As soon as I put it up it was reported for nudity, then straight away a selfie of my bald head was also reported - the first ever picture I posed with no hair. It really upset me as I didn’t see what the big deal was. 'It’s weird that people find it acceptable to post half-naked pictures but yet people get offended by me sharing my journey with cancer.’ Miss Williams added that she was distraught to know that ‘someone that knows me and Jess gets a kick’ out of reporting the photographs. A spokesman for Facebook said today that it does not comment on individual cases, but referred MailOnline to its community guidelines published online for ‘encouraging respectful behaviour’. The ‘nudity’ section states: ‘We remove photographs of people displaying genitals or focusing in on fully exposed buttocks. We also restrict some images of female breasts if they include the nipple. ‘But we always allow photos of women actively engaged in breastfeeding or showing breasts with post-mastectomy scarring. We also allow photographs of paintings, sculptures and other art that depicts nude figures. ‘Restrictions on the display of both nudity and sexual activity also apply to digitally-created content unless the content is posted for educational, humorous or satirical purposes. 'Explicit images of sexual intercourse are prohibited. Descriptions of sexual acts that go into vivid detail may also be removed.' Miss Versey has almost 4,200 friends on Facebook, with 80 of these mutual with Miss Williams. Struggles over: Jessica Versey (left) and Tiffany Williams (right) pictured today after their battles with cancer .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Two teenage cancer survivors have been left distraught after photographs they posted on Facebook to celebrate getting the all-clear were reported for nudity. Tiffany Williams and Jessica Versey, both 19 and from Chester, Cheshire, became close friends during their treatment and went into remission around the same time. They then took to social media to post images of themselves - including one of Miss Williams’s bald head and another of Miss Versey’s chest scar - but these were reported for being ‘offensive’. Reported for nudity: Tiffany Williams and Jessica Versey, took to social media to post images of themselves – including one of Miss Williams’s bald head (left) and another of Miss Versey’s chest scar (right) Battled through: Tiffany Williams, pictured with Peter Andre, was cleared of Hodgkin lymphoma this month . Shock: The picture Tiffany Williams uploaded (left) was reported by someone on Facebook for 'nudity' Miss Williams was cleared of Hodgkin lymphoma earlier this month and regularly documented her struggle with losing hair during chemotherapy on Facebook. While undergoing treatment she decided to cut off all her hair after choosing against it on many previous occasions - making a ‘ten-minute decision’ that she would get a friend to shave it off. But, telling of what happened next, she said: ‘Feeling proud, I updated my friends on Facebook with the caption “I did it!” - and about two hours later found that someone had reported it for nudity. ‘It didn’t get deleted but I knew it must have been someone I had as a friend. I posted a nice one of me with my make-up on the day after, and that got reported too. Tough: This picture, the first selfie Miss Versey uploaded showing her bald head, was reported for nudity . Survivors: Miss Williams is seen in a photo - not reported to Facebook - revealing she had got the all-clear (left), and Miss Versey's post with the image of her scar which was reported for nudity is also pictured (right) Feeling happy: Miss Versey, who received lifesaving bone marrow treatment from her ten-year-old sister Maisy, said it was 'a massive deal' for her chemotherapy catheter be taken out after her gruelling cancer battle . Joking around: Miss Williams regularly wrote on her struggle with losing hair to chemotherapy on Facebook . ‘All I was doing was trying to help others that might need that little boost to show that no one is different, with or without hair or scars.’ If a user wishes to tell Facebook that they believe a picture is breaching nudity guidelines, he or she can click on ‘options’ under the image and ‘report photo’. The user must then click on ‘nudity’ as the reason for a complaint, before confirming they want to report the image to Facebook. It is then sent to the website’s community operations team in Ireland, who consider every report and make a decision based on Facebook’s community standards. The user whose profile carries the photo will receive a notification to say their image has been reported – but it is only removed if Facebook find it breaches guidelines. And she was further shocked last week when leukaemia sufferer Miss Versey’s photo of the scar left by the removal of her chemotherapy catheter also got reported for nudity. Miss Versey, who received lifesaving bone marrow treatment from her ten-year-old sister Maisy, said it was ‘a massive deal’ for it be taken out after her gruelling cancer battle. She added: ‘Having that taken out was a big thing for me, as it essentially kept me alive for so long. I shared my scar to show people my body was one step further away from cancer. ‘As soon as I put it up it was reported for nudity, then straight away a selfie of my bald head was also reported - the first ever picture I posed with no hair. It really upset me as I didn’t see what the big deal was. 'It’s weird that people find it acceptable to post half-naked pictures but yet people get offended by me sharing my journey with cancer.’ Miss Williams added that she was distraught to know that ‘someone that knows me and Jess gets a kick’ out of reporting the photographs. A spokesman for Facebook said today that it does not comment on individual cases, but referred MailOnline to its community guidelines published online for ‘encouraging respectful behaviour’. The ‘nudity’ section states: ‘We remove photographs of people displaying genitals or focusing in on fully exposed buttocks. We also restrict some images of female breasts if they include the nipple. ‘But we always allow photos of women actively engaged in breastfeeding or showing breasts with post-mastectomy scarring. We also allow photographs of paintings, sculptures and other art that depicts nude figures. ‘Restrictions on the display of both nudity and sexual activity also apply to digitally-created content unless the content is posted for educational, humorous or satirical purposes. 'Explicit images of sexual intercourse are prohibited. Descriptions of sexual acts that go into vivid detail may also be removed.' Miss Versey has almost 4,200 friends on Facebook, with 80 of these mutual with Miss Williams. Struggles over: Jessica Versey (left) and Tiffany Williams (right) pictured today after their battles with cancer .

Tiffany Williams and Jessica Versey became friends during treatment .
Both posted images on Facebook to celebrate going into remission .
But were 'upset' to hear pictures were reported for being 'offensive'
19-year-old girls from Chester had Hodgkin lymphoma and leukemia .


Prompt: Ed Miliband, pictured arriving in Manchester ahead of the manifesto launch, will today pledge to cut the deficit every year if Labour wins the election . Ed Miliband will today pledge to cut the deficit every year if Labour wins the election. In a last-ditch attempt to steal the Tories’ mantle as the party of economic responsibility, he will warn supporters that Labour faces coming to power in a ‘time of scarcity’. Launching the party’s manifesto in Manchester, Mr Miliband will claim ‘not one policy’ in it would be funded through additional government borrowing. He will insist a Labour government would ‘cut the deficit every year’ and have national debt falling ‘as soon as possible’, though he will not set a date. Labour’s manifesto, published last night, contains a commitment on its first page to a ‘Budget Responsibility Lock’. The party says this would be ‘the basis for all our plans because it is by securing our national finances that we are able to secure the family finances of the working people of Britain’. Mr Miliband infamously forgot to make any mention of the deficit in his party conference speech last year, and polls show Labour lags far behind the Conservatives in trust on managing the public finances. But Mr Miliband will today insist that Labour is ‘not only the party of change but the party of responsibility too’. He will accuse the Tories of ‘throwing spending promises around with no idea of where the money is coming from’. The Labour leader will pledge ‘strong, fair fiscal rules’ meaning the national debt falls and a surplus on the ‘current budget’ – applying to day-to-day spending, not capital spending – is secured ‘as soon as possible in the next parliament’. He will say: ‘The very start of our manifesto is different to previous elections. ‘It does not do what most manifestos do...It does something different: its very first page sets out a vow to protect our nation’s finances; a clear commitment that every policy in this manifesto is paid for without a single penny of extra borrowing. ‘The plan we lay before you is no less ambitious because we live in a time of scarcity. It is more ambitious because it starts from a clear commitment to balance the books.’ Policies in Labour’s manifesto include a £2.5billion NHS fund paid for from a mansion tax, a levy on tobacco firms and closing a hedge fund tax avoidance loophole. The Labour leader, pictured in Leeds yesterday after launching the health manifesto, will insist a Labour government would ‘cut the deficit every year’ and have national debt falling ‘as soon as possible' Scrapping the ‘non-dom’ rule could set Labour on a collision course with the Governor of the Bank of England. Mark Carney features among a list of heavyweight figures in the City who could be forced to pay higher taxes if Labour wins power next month. The Canadian is one of 116,000 non-doms in Britain, meaning he has to pay tax on his UK earnings but not on income generated overseas. Mr Miliband wants to scrap the tax break, describing it as ‘indefensible’. A spokesman for the Bank defended the Governor’s status, saying: ‘This is not a choice. It’s a straight outcome of the tests that determine domicile status in the UK.’ He added that Mr Carney pays full UK tax on his £874,000 pay package. Others who would be affected by the crackdown include the foreign-born chiefs of RBS and Lloyds. It will also commit to 25 hours of childcare for working parents of three and four-year-olds, paid for by increasing the banking levy, and smaller class sizes for five, six and seven-year-olds, funded by scrapping the free schools programme. George Osborne said Labour’s plans would ‘bankrupt’ the country, and put the 300-year-old union with Scotland at risk if the party were propped up by the Scottish Nationalists. ‘If you have an Ed Miliband/Scottish Nationalist government, they will trash this economy,’ Mr Osborne told the BBC’s Andrew Marr. He said the Tories had a ‘balanced plan’ to finish the job of restoring order to the public finances that involved cutting £1 in every £100 of government spending for a further two years. Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg accused Labour of ‘playing Russian roulette’ with the economy. Labour officials said ‘any government led by Ed Miliband’ would not compromise on the deficit. That will be seen as a bid to ease fears a Labour administration propped up by the SNP would wreak havoc with the public finances. ■ Labour would ensure Premiership football teams give millions to smaller clubs, Andy Burnham has said. The shadow health spokesman said it would enforce a Premier League commitment to invest 5 per cent of the proceeds from lucrative TV rights deals in grassroots sport. By Jason Groves, Deputy Political Editor for The Daily Mail . Labour yesterday admitted it cannot match David Cameron’s pledge to provide the NHS with an £8billion cash injection. The two main parties angrily traded blows over which would provide the most secure future for the Health Service. But independent experts urged Labour to back plans to plug a £30billion hole in the books. Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (pictured) repeatedly refused to say whether Labour would provide the £8billion funding . These plans, drawn up by NHS boss Simon Stevens, commit the service to making £22billion of savings, but also require an extra £8billion a year by 2020. The independent Nuffield Trust said failure to make the financial commitment would have ‘serious consequences for the viability of the service’. Chief executive Nigel Edwards said Labour’s stance was ‘regrettable’, adding: ‘The NHS has a plan, which has been endorsed by all leading organisations in the sector. Labour are now the only party not to have committed to this £8billion and yet their proposals are likely to require more spending on the NHS.’ The Nuffield Trust also warned that Labour’s ‘health manifesto’, launched at the weekend, suggested a return to the top-down management style it used when it was last in office. Mr Edwards said: ‘The level of detail set out in this [Labour] document is somewhat concerning. The NHS is complex and often responds best to locally driven initiatives. ‘There is a risk that elements of this detailed approach could trigger further reorganisation.’ Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeatedly refused to say whether Labour would provide the £8billion funding. She said: ‘We will make sure the NHS has the money it needs and that’s what we’ve always done. ‘We’ll have practical measures that will raise £2.5billion – we can say where the money will come from, the Tories can’t.’ Miss Cooper also denied that Labour’s target to cut tax dodging by £7.5billion was simply ‘plucked from the air’. The party has promised to reduce evasion and avoidance by this amount by the end of 2017. But tax experts warned it would lead to a crackdown by HMRC on small firms – further souring relations between Labour and business. Challenged on the pledge yesterday, Miss Cooper said: ‘It is an ambitious and it’s a stretching target but we think it is right to do so because under the Conservatives the gap between the amount of tax that should be being paid and that is being paid has been widening.’

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Ed Miliband, pictured arriving in Manchester ahead of the manifesto launch, will today pledge to cut the deficit every year if Labour wins the election . Ed Miliband will today pledge to cut the deficit every year if Labour wins the election. In a last-ditch attempt to steal the Tories’ mantle as the party of economic responsibility, he will warn supporters that Labour faces coming to power in a ‘time of scarcity’. Launching the party’s manifesto in Manchester, Mr Miliband will claim ‘not one policy’ in it would be funded through additional government borrowing. He will insist a Labour government would ‘cut the deficit every year’ and have national debt falling ‘as soon as possible’, though he will not set a date. Labour’s manifesto, published last night, contains a commitment on its first page to a ‘Budget Responsibility Lock’. The party says this would be ‘the basis for all our plans because it is by securing our national finances that we are able to secure the family finances of the working people of Britain’. Mr Miliband infamously forgot to make any mention of the deficit in his party conference speech last year, and polls show Labour lags far behind the Conservatives in trust on managing the public finances. But Mr Miliband will today insist that Labour is ‘not only the party of change but the party of responsibility too’. He will accuse the Tories of ‘throwing spending promises around with no idea of where the money is coming from’. The Labour leader will pledge ‘strong, fair fiscal rules’ meaning the national debt falls and a surplus on the ‘current budget’ – applying to day-to-day spending, not capital spending – is secured ‘as soon as possible in the next parliament’. He will say: ‘The very start of our manifesto is different to previous elections. ‘It does not do what most manifestos do...It does something different: its very first page sets out a vow to protect our nation’s finances; a clear commitment that every policy in this manifesto is paid for without a single penny of extra borrowing. ‘The plan we lay before you is no less ambitious because we live in a time of scarcity. It is more ambitious because it starts from a clear commitment to balance the books.’ Policies in Labour’s manifesto include a £2.5billion NHS fund paid for from a mansion tax, a levy on tobacco firms and closing a hedge fund tax avoidance loophole. The Labour leader, pictured in Leeds yesterday after launching the health manifesto, will insist a Labour government would ‘cut the deficit every year’ and have national debt falling ‘as soon as possible' Scrapping the ‘non-dom’ rule could set Labour on a collision course with the Governor of the Bank of England. Mark Carney features among a list of heavyweight figures in the City who could be forced to pay higher taxes if Labour wins power next month. The Canadian is one of 116,000 non-doms in Britain, meaning he has to pay tax on his UK earnings but not on income generated overseas. Mr Miliband wants to scrap the tax break, describing it as ‘indefensible’. A spokesman for the Bank defended the Governor’s status, saying: ‘This is not a choice. It’s a straight outcome of the tests that determine domicile status in the UK.’ He added that Mr Carney pays full UK tax on his £874,000 pay package. Others who would be affected by the crackdown include the foreign-born chiefs of RBS and Lloyds. It will also commit to 25 hours of childcare for working parents of three and four-year-olds, paid for by increasing the banking levy, and smaller class sizes for five, six and seven-year-olds, funded by scrapping the free schools programme. George Osborne said Labour’s plans would ‘bankrupt’ the country, and put the 300-year-old union with Scotland at risk if the party were propped up by the Scottish Nationalists. ‘If you have an Ed Miliband/Scottish Nationalist government, they will trash this economy,’ Mr Osborne told the BBC’s Andrew Marr. He said the Tories had a ‘balanced plan’ to finish the job of restoring order to the public finances that involved cutting £1 in every £100 of government spending for a further two years. Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg accused Labour of ‘playing Russian roulette’ with the economy. Labour officials said ‘any government led by Ed Miliband’ would not compromise on the deficit. That will be seen as a bid to ease fears a Labour administration propped up by the SNP would wreak havoc with the public finances. ■ Labour would ensure Premiership football teams give millions to smaller clubs, Andy Burnham has said. The shadow health spokesman said it would enforce a Premier League commitment to invest 5 per cent of the proceeds from lucrative TV rights deals in grassroots sport. By Jason Groves, Deputy Political Editor for The Daily Mail . Labour yesterday admitted it cannot match David Cameron’s pledge to provide the NHS with an £8billion cash injection. The two main parties angrily traded blows over which would provide the most secure future for the Health Service. But independent experts urged Labour to back plans to plug a £30billion hole in the books. Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (pictured) repeatedly refused to say whether Labour would provide the £8billion funding . These plans, drawn up by NHS boss Simon Stevens, commit the service to making £22billion of savings, but also require an extra £8billion a year by 2020. The independent Nuffield Trust said failure to make the financial commitment would have ‘serious consequences for the viability of the service’. Chief executive Nigel Edwards said Labour’s stance was ‘regrettable’, adding: ‘The NHS has a plan, which has been endorsed by all leading organisations in the sector. Labour are now the only party not to have committed to this £8billion and yet their proposals are likely to require more spending on the NHS.’ The Nuffield Trust also warned that Labour’s ‘health manifesto’, launched at the weekend, suggested a return to the top-down management style it used when it was last in office. Mr Edwards said: ‘The level of detail set out in this [Labour] document is somewhat concerning. The NHS is complex and often responds best to locally driven initiatives. ‘There is a risk that elements of this detailed approach could trigger further reorganisation.’ Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeatedly refused to say whether Labour would provide the £8billion funding. She said: ‘We will make sure the NHS has the money it needs and that’s what we’ve always done. ‘We’ll have practical measures that will raise £2.5billion – we can say where the money will come from, the Tories can’t.’ Miss Cooper also denied that Labour’s target to cut tax dodging by £7.5billion was simply ‘plucked from the air’. The party has promised to reduce evasion and avoidance by this amount by the end of 2017. But tax experts warned it would lead to a crackdown by HMRC on small firms – further souring relations between Labour and business. Challenged on the pledge yesterday, Miss Cooper said: ‘It is an ambitious and it’s a stretching target but we think it is right to do so because under the Conservatives the gap between the amount of tax that should be being paid and that is being paid has been widening.’

Miliband will warn that the party faces coming to power in ‘time of scarcity’
He will insist Labour would have national debt falling ‘as soon as possible'
Manifesto also pledges 'Budget Responsibility Lock' for no more borrowing .
Other policies include £2.5bn NHS fund paid for from a mansion tax and closing hedge fund tax avoidance loophole .


Prompt: Justin Rose is not resting on his laurels after his impressive Masters 2015 display and is continuing his training ahead of his next PGA tour event - on his state-of-the-art indoor golf simulator. Joint runner-up with Phil Mickelson, the Englishman was delighted with his performance, as he pushed winner Jordan Speith all the way on the final day and earned himself a hefty pay-day. Rose, however, is already looking ahead to his next outing and posted a photograph on Twitter, showing his followers his high-tech 'TrackMan Indoor High Definition Golf Simulator.' Justin Rose is back training and was pictured using his state-of-the-art £30,000 indoor simulator . His caption read: 'Week at home working on my game before my next event on the #PGAtour.' The simulator gives the opportunity to practice in HD and includes such wind conditions to elevation levels, as it lets players practice their games inside their own homes, with incredible accuracy. It doesn't come cheap though and will set you back around £30,000 to have one installed. Rose was in top form during the Masters and pushed winner Jordan Speith all the way at Augusta .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Justin Rose is not resting on his laurels after his impressive Masters 2015 display and is continuing his training ahead of his next PGA tour event - on his state-of-the-art indoor golf simulator. Joint runner-up with Phil Mickelson, the Englishman was delighted with his performance, as he pushed winner Jordan Speith all the way on the final day and earned himself a hefty pay-day. Rose, however, is already looking ahead to his next outing and posted a photograph on Twitter, showing his followers his high-tech 'TrackMan Indoor High Definition Golf Simulator.' Justin Rose is back training and was pictured using his state-of-the-art £30,000 indoor simulator . His caption read: 'Week at home working on my game before my next event on the #PGAtour.' The simulator gives the opportunity to practice in HD and includes such wind conditions to elevation levels, as it lets players practice their games inside their own homes, with incredible accuracy. It doesn't come cheap though and will set you back around £30,000 to have one installed. Rose was in top form during the Masters and pushed winner Jordan Speith all the way at Augusta .

Justin Rose posted photo on Twitter of his high-tech indoor simulator .
The technology is worth £30,000 and offers player high-definition golf .
Rose impressed during Masters 2015 and finished in joint second .