Prompt: Two best mates from rural Victoria have vowed to keep Aussie lingo alive by making memorabilia that encapsulates the fading vernacular. Jeff McCubbery, 72, from Mandurang and Ian Bullock, 65, from Blackburn devised the plan for Captain Cootie Cards over twenty years ago in a bid to counter the influx of lingo from overseas. The pair now has a quirky range of greeting cards, coffee mugs, stubby-holders and calendars – but their hopes of spreading the message were dashed after they were spurned by the companies they pitched their products to. An Illustration from best mates Ian Bullock and Jeff McCubberry, who have vowed to keep Aussie slang alive through a range a range of custom memorabilia . McCubberry told Daily Mail Australia they designed the idea after meeting on a fishing trip 25 years ago. 'We met at an annual fishing trip, and quickly learned we shared the belief that the language we grew up with was waning.' 'People are dorks not drongos, guys not blokes. We decided to do something to keep the vocabulary afloat,' McCubbery said. 'We decided to consolidate the Australianisms we knew and loved from our upbringings-instead of the Americanisms which have ,' said Ian Bullock. With Ian Bullock (left) as illustrator and and Jeff McCubbery (right) as designer, the duo have devised a range of greeting cards, coffee mugs, stubby-holders and calendars emblazoned with down under lingo . One illustration depicts weather forecast map with the various Australian climatological zones – the Northern Territory is 'bloody muggy' , Alice Springs is 'dry as a dead dingo's donger', and Victoria is 'cold as a witch's tit'. Another card shows a fisherman sleeping next to a lake with beer can in hand and the accompanying message: 'flat out like a lizard drinking.' McCubberry believes the rise of television and the internet has let a torrent of lingo loose from Britain and America that has eclipsed the home grown counterpart. McCubberry said when the pair met on a fishing trip 20 years ago 'we quickly learned we shared the belief that the language we grew up with was waning' The best mates use lingo from their upbringing which they say has disappeared, such as the term: 'I don't give a rats a**' With McCubberry as designer and Bullock as illustrator, the mates got to work on a range of products that embody down under speech from a bygone time. But much to their dismay the pair got a rude shock when time came to pitch the product a manufacturers. 'Nobodies interested, said McCubbery. 'They say it's too crude or uncouth. It doesn't make sense because colourful language is a pivotal part of Aussie culture.' The duo plan to launch a digital campaign in hopes of finding a distributor to get their products on the market . Bullock said they had a deal with a major distributor that fell through before another wholesaler offered them a rather insulting rate to print the cards. 'It was pretty insulting really. It's been a real knock back but we're determined to stick at it.' The mates plan to launch a website and social media campaign in hopes of finding a distributor to get their products on the market. 'It's just a matter of getting my head around the online thing. We're sticking at it for sure,' said McCubbery.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Two best mates from rural Victoria have vowed to keep Aussie lingo alive by making memorabilia that encapsulates the fading vernacular. Jeff McCubbery, 72, from Mandurang and Ian Bullock, 65, from Blackburn devised the plan for Captain Cootie Cards over twenty years ago in a bid to counter the influx of lingo from overseas. The pair now has a quirky range of greeting cards, coffee mugs, stubby-holders and calendars – but their hopes of spreading the message were dashed after they were spurned by the companies they pitched their products to. An Illustration from best mates Ian Bullock and Jeff McCubberry, who have vowed to keep Aussie slang alive through a range a range of custom memorabilia . McCubberry told Daily Mail Australia they designed the idea after meeting on a fishing trip 25 years ago. 'We met at an annual fishing trip, and quickly learned we shared the belief that the language we grew up with was waning.' 'People are dorks not drongos, guys not blokes. We decided to do something to keep the vocabulary afloat,' McCubbery said. 'We decided to consolidate the Australianisms we knew and loved from our upbringings-instead of the Americanisms which have ,' said Ian Bullock. With Ian Bullock (left) as illustrator and and Jeff McCubbery (right) as designer, the duo have devised a range of greeting cards, coffee mugs, stubby-holders and calendars emblazoned with down under lingo . One illustration depicts weather forecast map with the various Australian climatological zones – the Northern Territory is 'bloody muggy' , Alice Springs is 'dry as a dead dingo's donger', and Victoria is 'cold as a witch's tit'. Another card shows a fisherman sleeping next to a lake with beer can in hand and the accompanying message: 'flat out like a lizard drinking.' McCubberry believes the rise of television and the internet has let a torrent of lingo loose from Britain and America that has eclipsed the home grown counterpart. McCubberry said when the pair met on a fishing trip 20 years ago 'we quickly learned we shared the belief that the language we grew up with was waning' The best mates use lingo from their upbringing which they say has disappeared, such as the term: 'I don't give a rats a**' With McCubberry as designer and Bullock as illustrator, the mates got to work on a range of products that embody down under speech from a bygone time. But much to their dismay the pair got a rude shock when time came to pitch the product a manufacturers. 'Nobodies interested, said McCubbery. 'They say it's too crude or uncouth. It doesn't make sense because colourful language is a pivotal part of Aussie culture.' The duo plan to launch a digital campaign in hopes of finding a distributor to get their products on the market . Bullock said they had a deal with a major distributor that fell through before another wholesaler offered them a rather insulting rate to print the cards. 'It was pretty insulting really. It's been a real knock back but we're determined to stick at it.' The mates plan to launch a website and social media campaign in hopes of finding a distributor to get their products on the market. 'It's just a matter of getting my head around the online thing. We're sticking at it for sure,' said McCubbery.

[Assistant] Two best mates from rural Victoria, Jeff McCubbery and Ian Bullock, have been working together for over 20 years to preserve Australian slang and lingo. They designed the Captain Cootie Cards, a range of greeting cards, coffee mugs, stubby-holders, and calendars featuring down-under expressions and phrases. However, despite their efforts, they were rejected by several manufacturers, who deemed the products too crude or uncouth. The duo is now planning to launch a digital campaign and website to find a distributor to bring their products to market. Despite facing setbacks, they remain determined to keep Australian slang alive and are willing to

Jeff McCubbery and Ian Bullock met on a fishing trip twenty years ago .
They believe traditional Aussie lingo is being lost to imported vernacular .
They make custom memorabilia which embodies traditional Aussie lingo .
But none of the companies they approached have taken on their products .


Prompt: A burlesque performer is attempting to eradicate all negativity surrounding the word 'fat' – by embracing it as an honest, body-positive description of her own physique. During a recent TED talk, Lillian Bustle, from New Jersey, revealed that she also calls herself 'short', because she is 5'3'', and 'wife', because she is married, noting that each of these words is just an honest description of what she is. And 'fat' is just another self-descriptor for her, who insists that the word doesn't have to be used as a synonym for 'ugly'. 'We as women are programmed to tell each other that we're not fat, because to many people - both men and women - fat is the worst thing that you can be,' she said during her talk, which took place earlier this month. Scroll down for video . Not-so-tiny dancer: Burlesque performer Lillian Bustle explained in her TED talk that 'fat' is just another word - and using it doesn't have to be an insult . Beauty comes in bigger packages, too: During her lecture, Lillian explained that 'fat' shouldn't mean the same thing as ugly . Unfortunately, Lillian added, her worldview isn't held by everyone, and she pointed to a statistic that shows that size discrimination in the workplace has risen 66 per cent in the past 30 years. And those negative perceptions of bigger people start young: The top 'magic wish' for girls 11 to 17, according to a study, is to be thinner. But there's hope. Lillian explained that, according to other studies, 'the more we're exposed to body diversity, the more we tolerate, accept, and yes, even prefer, different body types'. That promising fact is something that encourages the dancer to perform burlesque, which enables her to expose her audiences to a 'fat' body in a positive, glamorous way. Changing minds: Studies show that the more people are exposed to different body types, the more they like them; Lillian hopes exposing her audience to a fuller figure will change their perceptions . Lillian also quoted another performer named Beelzebabe, who has spoken out in the past about the fact that the body diversity of burlesque performers 'challenges us to rethink the narrow confines that society has given us for what's desirable'. It certainly challenged Lillian, who weighs in at 240lbs. She admits she was in awe at the first burlesque show she ever saw, immediately resolving to try it herself. She began performing in 2012, and says the experience has been both empowering and incredibly body-positive. While the first time she performed she was nervous about people seeing her arms jiggle, once she did it, she felt like she could 'walk through fire'. Now, whenever she's feeling insecure, she can think back to that first performance; Lillian recommends other people find a similar 'courage reference' - a moment you felt brave that you can think back to at times when you feel more insecure and afraid. Self-esteem boost: Lillian said she was nervous before her first performance because of how her arms looked, but now she feels great about her body . Plump crowd-pleaser: While a few people have left nasty comments on the YouTube page for her TED talk, Lillian said the response has been mostly positive . Though Lillian gave her TED talk in 2014, it was only posted on YouTube three weeks ago. Since then, the clip has generated nearly 38,000 views - and plenty of positive feedback. 'I’ve never been so happy in all my life,' she wrote for xoJane. 'I’ve had this stupid grin on my face for a week straight.' Besides a few 'trolls' posting vicious negative comments, Lillian received a slew of positive messages, including letters of thanks, personal stories, and an email from a teenage girl who watched the video with her younger sister and said it made them reevaluate the way they viewed their bodies. 'I really think we - and by "we" I mean nice people and body-positivity - are winning,' she said.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

A burlesque performer is attempting to eradicate all negativity surrounding the word 'fat' – by embracing it as an honest, body-positive description of her own physique. During a recent TED talk, Lillian Bustle, from New Jersey, revealed that she also calls herself 'short', because she is 5'3'', and 'wife', because she is married, noting that each of these words is just an honest description of what she is. And 'fat' is just another self-descriptor for her, who insists that the word doesn't have to be used as a synonym for 'ugly'. 'We as women are programmed to tell each other that we're not fat, because to many people - both men and women - fat is the worst thing that you can be,' she said during her talk, which took place earlier this month. Scroll down for video . Not-so-tiny dancer: Burlesque performer Lillian Bustle explained in her TED talk that 'fat' is just another word - and using it doesn't have to be an insult . Beauty comes in bigger packages, too: During her lecture, Lillian explained that 'fat' shouldn't mean the same thing as ugly . Unfortunately, Lillian added, her worldview isn't held by everyone, and she pointed to a statistic that shows that size discrimination in the workplace has risen 66 per cent in the past 30 years. And those negative perceptions of bigger people start young: The top 'magic wish' for girls 11 to 17, according to a study, is to be thinner. But there's hope. Lillian explained that, according to other studies, 'the more we're exposed to body diversity, the more we tolerate, accept, and yes, even prefer, different body types'. That promising fact is something that encourages the dancer to perform burlesque, which enables her to expose her audiences to a 'fat' body in a positive, glamorous way. Changing minds: Studies show that the more people are exposed to different body types, the more they like them; Lillian hopes exposing her audience to a fuller figure will change their perceptions . Lillian also quoted another performer named Beelzebabe, who has spoken out in the past about the fact that the body diversity of burlesque performers 'challenges us to rethink the narrow confines that society has given us for what's desirable'. It certainly challenged Lillian, who weighs in at 240lbs. She admits she was in awe at the first burlesque show she ever saw, immediately resolving to try it herself. She began performing in 2012, and says the experience has been both empowering and incredibly body-positive. While the first time she performed she was nervous about people seeing her arms jiggle, once she did it, she felt like she could 'walk through fire'. Now, whenever she's feeling insecure, she can think back to that first performance; Lillian recommends other people find a similar 'courage reference' - a moment you felt brave that you can think back to at times when you feel more insecure and afraid. Self-esteem boost: Lillian said she was nervous before her first performance because of how her arms looked, but now she feels great about her body . Plump crowd-pleaser: While a few people have left nasty comments on the YouTube page for her TED talk, Lillian said the response has been mostly positive . Though Lillian gave her TED talk in 2014, it was only posted on YouTube three weeks ago. Since then, the clip has generated nearly 38,000 views - and plenty of positive feedback. 'I’ve never been so happy in all my life,' she wrote for xoJane. 'I’ve had this stupid grin on my face for a week straight.' Besides a few 'trolls' posting vicious negative comments, Lillian received a slew of positive messages, including letters of thanks, personal stories, and an email from a teenage girl who watched the video with her younger sister and said it made them reevaluate the way they viewed their bodies. 'I really think we - and by "we" I mean nice people and body-positivity - are winning,' she said.

[Assistant] Burlesque performer Lillian Bustle is using her TED talk to challenge negative perceptions of body types, particularly those associated with being "fat." In a recent talk, Lillian, who is 5'3" and married, explained that she calls herself "short" and "wife" as honest descriptions of her physique. She also emphasizes that "fat" is not inherently an insult, but rather a self-descriptor that doesn't have to be used as a synonym for "ugly." Lillian's message is supported by research, which shows that exposure to diverse body types can lead to increased acceptance and tolerance. She also cites

At 240lbs, Lillian Bustle says she's not being negative when she calls herself 'fat' - she is just being factual .
She says she likes performing burlesque because it helps open people up to liking different body types .
The dancer says she's thrilled at the positive reception her TED talk has received, adding that she believes it means 'body-positivity' is working .


Prompt: It was due to be a routine mission to examine the depths of the Gulf of Mexico. However, researchers were stunned when their underwater robosub had an unexpected encounter almost 2,000 feet under the ocean. Rather than the deep sea squid and corals they expected to see, a giant sperm whale swam to inspect their sub - causing gasps and shouts of 'holy cow' from the sub's operators. Scroll down for video . The robot sub was examining the depths of the Gulf of Mexico when the sperm whale suddenly appeared . The sperm whale is the largest toothed whale. Adult males reach 16-20 meters (50-65 feet) in length, although most are less than 18 meters (60 ft). Females are much smaller than males, reaching only 11 meters (36 feet) on average. The sperm whale's life is based on sound. It finds food and navigates using sound and it communicates and stays in touch with its family using sound. Sperm whales are listed as an endangered species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. The global population size is estimated as somewhere between 100,000-300,000 animals. 'What the heck is that?' says one of the crew, when all of a sudden a massive object begins to appear on the screen.'Hello baby,' says another. 'At 598 meters (1,962 ft) below the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, ROV Hercules encountered a magnificent sperm whale,' 'The whale circled several times and gave our cameras the chance to capture some incredible footage of this beautiful creature. 'Encounters between sperm whales and ROV's are quite rare.' Footage shows the curious leviathan swimming in and out of the camera lights, at times spinning and looking directly into the camera.'You can see its eye,' one of the crew says. 'According to biologists we've consulted, the animal on the video is likely a juvenile, especially if it's a male,' they say. 'General consensus among the experts who have examined the video is that it is a male, though the video of the underside of the whale is grainy so it is difficult to know with 100% certainty.' It was difficult to tell the actual size of the whale, the team say, but the ROV is 6 feet wide in the front. Using this as a guide, and how close he was to the vehicle, it is estimated the whale was between 35-40 feet in length. The team also investigated the scarring visible on the whale. 'It could be a number of things, including squid tentacles and suckers, especially the scars around the efface and mouth; but likely not propeller scars like the comments made in the video. This neutrally buoyant yellow remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is the workhorse of the Nautilus Exploration Program, and it always used in tandem with Argus, it's mothership. Hercules is equipped with six thrusters that allow the pilots to 'fly' it in any direction. It has two manipulator arms designed for collecting samples and recovering artifacts. Video from Hercules' high-definition main camera is streamed up a fiber-optic cable to the control van on Nautilus, then out to the world. It is capable of operating down to 4,000 meters. 'It could also be from other sperm whales. 'They often jaw each other when playing or socializing. 'Sperm whales are identified with the scars on the trailing edge of their tails.' The whale can be seen inspecting the robosub in the video . The researchers were piloting the Hercules sub when the encounter occured. This neutrally buoyant yellow remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is the workhorse of the Nautilus Exploration Program, and it always used in tandem with Argus, it's mothership. Hercules is equipped with six thrusters that allow the pilots to 'fly' it in any direction. It has two manipulator arms designed for collecting samples and recovering artifacts. Video from Hercules' high-definition main camera is streamed up a fiber-optic cable to the control van on Nautilus, then out to the world. It is capable of operating down to 4,000 meters. Dr. Robert Ballard’s Exploration Vessel E/V are on their most ambitious expedition season yet, exploring sites ranging from the Gulf of Mexico to British Columbia through late September. Over six weeks of the six-month expedition will be dedicated to exploration and mapping of the Galapagos Rift and the site of the first hydrothermal vent discovery in 1977. The six-month-long 2015 season marks the transition of the vessel and operations of the Ocean Exploration Trust (OET) to the west coast of the United States and the Pacific Ocean, concluding over two years of research in the Gulf and Caribbean regions. E/V Nautilus is owned and operated by the Ocean Exploration Trust (OET), a nonprofit founded in 2008 by Dr. Robert Ballard.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

It was due to be a routine mission to examine the depths of the Gulf of Mexico. However, researchers were stunned when their underwater robosub had an unexpected encounter almost 2,000 feet under the ocean. Rather than the deep sea squid and corals they expected to see, a giant sperm whale swam to inspect their sub - causing gasps and shouts of 'holy cow' from the sub's operators. Scroll down for video . The robot sub was examining the depths of the Gulf of Mexico when the sperm whale suddenly appeared . The sperm whale is the largest toothed whale. Adult males reach 16-20 meters (50-65 feet) in length, although most are less than 18 meters (60 ft). Females are much smaller than males, reaching only 11 meters (36 feet) on average. The sperm whale's life is based on sound. It finds food and navigates using sound and it communicates and stays in touch with its family using sound. Sperm whales are listed as an endangered species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. The global population size is estimated as somewhere between 100,000-300,000 animals. 'What the heck is that?' says one of the crew, when all of a sudden a massive object begins to appear on the screen.'Hello baby,' says another. 'At 598 meters (1,962 ft) below the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, ROV Hercules encountered a magnificent sperm whale,' 'The whale circled several times and gave our cameras the chance to capture some incredible footage of this beautiful creature. 'Encounters between sperm whales and ROV's are quite rare.' Footage shows the curious leviathan swimming in and out of the camera lights, at times spinning and looking directly into the camera.'You can see its eye,' one of the crew says. 'According to biologists we've consulted, the animal on the video is likely a juvenile, especially if it's a male,' they say. 'General consensus among the experts who have examined the video is that it is a male, though the video of the underside of the whale is grainy so it is difficult to know with 100% certainty.' It was difficult to tell the actual size of the whale, the team say, but the ROV is 6 feet wide in the front. Using this as a guide, and how close he was to the vehicle, it is estimated the whale was between 35-40 feet in length. The team also investigated the scarring visible on the whale. 'It could be a number of things, including squid tentacles and suckers, especially the scars around the efface and mouth; but likely not propeller scars like the comments made in the video. This neutrally buoyant yellow remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is the workhorse of the Nautilus Exploration Program, and it always used in tandem with Argus, it's mothership. Hercules is equipped with six thrusters that allow the pilots to 'fly' it in any direction. It has two manipulator arms designed for collecting samples and recovering artifacts. Video from Hercules' high-definition main camera is streamed up a fiber-optic cable to the control van on Nautilus, then out to the world. It is capable of operating down to 4,000 meters. 'It could also be from other sperm whales. 'They often jaw each other when playing or socializing. 'Sperm whales are identified with the scars on the trailing edge of their tails.' The whale can be seen inspecting the robosub in the video . The researchers were piloting the Hercules sub when the encounter occured. This neutrally buoyant yellow remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is the workhorse of the Nautilus Exploration Program, and it always used in tandem with Argus, it's mothership. Hercules is equipped with six thrusters that allow the pilots to 'fly' it in any direction. It has two manipulator arms designed for collecting samples and recovering artifacts. Video from Hercules' high-definition main camera is streamed up a fiber-optic cable to the control van on Nautilus, then out to the world. It is capable of operating down to 4,000 meters. Dr. Robert Ballard’s Exploration Vessel E/V are on their most ambitious expedition season yet, exploring sites ranging from the Gulf of Mexico to British Columbia through late September. Over six weeks of the six-month expedition will be dedicated to exploration and mapping of the Galapagos Rift and the site of the first hydrothermal vent discovery in 1977. The six-month-long 2015 season marks the transition of the vessel and operations of the Ocean Exploration Trust (OET) to the west coast of the United States and the Pacific Ocean, concluding over two years of research in the Gulf and Caribbean regions. E/V Nautilus is owned and operated by the Ocean Exploration Trust (OET), a nonprofit founded in 2008 by Dr. Robert Ballard.

[Assistant] Researchers on an underwater robot sub, called ROV Hercules, encountered a giant sperm whale while examining the depths of the Gulf of Mexico. The unexpected encounter occurred 2,000 feet below the ocean surface, causing gasps and shouts from the sub's operators. The sperm whale, the largest toothed whale, was estimated to be around 35-40 feet in length and was likely a juvenile male. The ROV Hercules, a neutrally buoyant vehicle, was equipped with six thrusters and two manipulator arms, allowing it to collect samples and recover artifacts. The encounter was documented on video, showing the whale swimming in and out

Robosub was exploring the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana .
At 598 meters the sperm whale appeared in the robosub's cameras .


Prompt: Miami (CNN)Inside a plane at Miami International Airport, baggage handlers are going on a shopping spree with passengers' bags. What they don't know is that they are being recorded on a hidden camera. The Miami-Dade Police Department set up the camera as part of an ongoing police investigation into luggage thefts by the very airport workers who are supposed to get bags safely onto planes. Email your story ideas and tips to CNNtips@cnn.com. "It's a problem we all face," said police Lt. Pete Estis. "We will continue to be proactive until we can see that the claims of pilfering through luggage will actually decrease." Miami Aviation Director Emilio T. González said the insider theft cases "are indeed the exception among the thousands of decent, hardworking employees at MIA, and they have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for their crimes." And these insider thefts just don't happen in Miami. A CNN analysis of passenger property loss claims filed with the TSA from 2010 to 2014 shows 30,621 claims of missing valuables, mostly packed in checked luggage. The rest occurred at security checkpoints. Total property loss claimed: $2.5 million. John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York topped the list of airports with the most claims of thefts from luggage, followed by Los Angeles International, Orlando International and Miami International, according to the data. The problem has been so serious at JFK that in 2013, El Al Airlines set up a hidden camera in a baggage hold. The camera showed baggage handlers stealing items on flights bound for Israel, including a $5,000 Seiko watch, iPhones, an iPad, cameras, gold rings and cash. Six of those arrested pleaded guilty to possession of stolen property or petty larceny and the seventh suspect's case was sealed, according to the Queens District Attorney's Office. The high-profile case, though, didn't stop the thefts. Two more baggage handlers at JFK were arrested in 2014 after authorities said they stole two designer handbags from a suitcase, and then tried to sell them on eBay. Then, in December, seven more JFK baggage handlers were charged with stealing valuables from checked luggage. The items were stolen from suitcases of passengers traveling to or from Hawaii, Japan, Johannesburg, London, Bangkok, Dubai, Milan and various U.S. cities. In Miami, which aggressively goes after luggage thieves, police have arrested 31 baggage handlers and ramp workers since 2012, including six so far this year. Police set up a hidden camera inside the belly of a plane last year and caught baggage handlers rifling through luggage and stealing various items. Another hidden camera caught a baggage handler rummaging through bags in a secure luggage room inside the airport while a security guard looked the other way. "Insider threat is very scary for us in law enforcement, and certainly someone taking somebody's cell phone, iPad, computer -- what's next?" Estis said. A CNN investigation earlier this year found that Miami and Orlando are the only two major airports in the country that require employees to be screened through metal detectors. Miami even checks employees when they leave work to go into the main terminal. But that apparently hasn't stopped the luggage thieves. "As far as being able to get the property off the airfield, that's a great question," Estis said. "We have theories." In Los Angeles, police last year executed search warrants on 25 locations after getting complaints about thefts in two terminals. Among the valuables found were computers, watches, jewelry and cameras and designer bags. Sixteen airport workers were fired. "We cut theft in those two terminals by 60% because of doing that aggressive investigative work," said Patrick Gannon, police chief of Los Angeles International Airport. Luggage theft could definitely lead to more serious problems, he said. "I absolutely think that if we don't pay attention to the small things that happen around here, that it could lead to much larger things. So there is, I believe, a connection between baggage theft and terrorism," Gannon said. Even the TSA has had problem employees. Since 2002, the agency has fired 513 officers for theft. It employs about 50,000 officers today, and last year screened more than 443 million checked bags and nearly 1.7 billion carry-ons. DA: Guns smuggled on planes by Delta employee 'egregious' security breach . Luggage theft isn't confined to airport workers. Outsiders have been caught on surveillance cameras stealing luggage from carousels. CNN contacted airports around the country and found while the total thefts from carousels are relatively low, it continues to be a problem. For example, Seattle reported 214 luggage thefts from carousels and other airport locations last year, 200 in Las Vegas, 36 in Atlanta, 35 in Phoenix, 15 at Ronald Reagan Washington National, 14 at Dulles International and 10 at Chicago's O'Hare Airport. Odd TSA finds . CNN's Harmeet Kaur and Yasmin Khorram contributed to this report.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Miami (CNN)Inside a plane at Miami International Airport, baggage handlers are going on a shopping spree with passengers' bags. What they don't know is that they are being recorded on a hidden camera. The Miami-Dade Police Department set up the camera as part of an ongoing police investigation into luggage thefts by the very airport workers who are supposed to get bags safely onto planes. Email your story ideas and tips to CNNtips@cnn.com. "It's a problem we all face," said police Lt. Pete Estis. "We will continue to be proactive until we can see that the claims of pilfering through luggage will actually decrease." Miami Aviation Director Emilio T. González said the insider theft cases "are indeed the exception among the thousands of decent, hardworking employees at MIA, and they have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law for their crimes." And these insider thefts just don't happen in Miami. A CNN analysis of passenger property loss claims filed with the TSA from 2010 to 2014 shows 30,621 claims of missing valuables, mostly packed in checked luggage. The rest occurred at security checkpoints. Total property loss claimed: $2.5 million. John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York topped the list of airports with the most claims of thefts from luggage, followed by Los Angeles International, Orlando International and Miami International, according to the data. The problem has been so serious at JFK that in 2013, El Al Airlines set up a hidden camera in a baggage hold. The camera showed baggage handlers stealing items on flights bound for Israel, including a $5,000 Seiko watch, iPhones, an iPad, cameras, gold rings and cash. Six of those arrested pleaded guilty to possession of stolen property or petty larceny and the seventh suspect's case was sealed, according to the Queens District Attorney's Office. The high-profile case, though, didn't stop the thefts. Two more baggage handlers at JFK were arrested in 2014 after authorities said they stole two designer handbags from a suitcase, and then tried to sell them on eBay. Then, in December, seven more JFK baggage handlers were charged with stealing valuables from checked luggage. The items were stolen from suitcases of passengers traveling to or from Hawaii, Japan, Johannesburg, London, Bangkok, Dubai, Milan and various U.S. cities. In Miami, which aggressively goes after luggage thieves, police have arrested 31 baggage handlers and ramp workers since 2012, including six so far this year. Police set up a hidden camera inside the belly of a plane last year and caught baggage handlers rifling through luggage and stealing various items. Another hidden camera caught a baggage handler rummaging through bags in a secure luggage room inside the airport while a security guard looked the other way. "Insider threat is very scary for us in law enforcement, and certainly someone taking somebody's cell phone, iPad, computer -- what's next?" Estis said. A CNN investigation earlier this year found that Miami and Orlando are the only two major airports in the country that require employees to be screened through metal detectors. Miami even checks employees when they leave work to go into the main terminal. But that apparently hasn't stopped the luggage thieves. "As far as being able to get the property off the airfield, that's a great question," Estis said. "We have theories." In Los Angeles, police last year executed search warrants on 25 locations after getting complaints about thefts in two terminals. Among the valuables found were computers, watches, jewelry and cameras and designer bags. Sixteen airport workers were fired. "We cut theft in those two terminals by 60% because of doing that aggressive investigative work," said Patrick Gannon, police chief of Los Angeles International Airport. Luggage theft could definitely lead to more serious problems, he said. "I absolutely think that if we don't pay attention to the small things that happen around here, that it could lead to much larger things. So there is, I believe, a connection between baggage theft and terrorism," Gannon said. Even the TSA has had problem employees. Since 2002, the agency has fired 513 officers for theft. It employs about 50,000 officers today, and last year screened more than 443 million checked bags and nearly 1.7 billion carry-ons. DA: Guns smuggled on planes by Delta employee 'egregious' security breach . Luggage theft isn't confined to airport workers. Outsiders have been caught on surveillance cameras stealing luggage from carousels. CNN contacted airports around the country and found while the total thefts from carousels are relatively low, it continues to be a problem. For example, Seattle reported 214 luggage thefts from carousels and other airport locations last year, 200 in Las Vegas, 36 in Atlanta, 35 in Phoenix, 15 at Ronald Reagan Washington National, 14 at Dulles International and 10 at Chicago's O'Hare Airport. Odd TSA finds . CNN's Harmeet Kaur and Yasmin Khorram contributed to this report.

[Assistant]
A hidden camera has been set up inside a plane at Miami International Airport to catch baggage handlers stealing from passengers' bags. The Miami-Dade Police Department has been investigating luggage thefts by airport workers, with 31 baggage handlers arrested since 2012. The police have also set up hidden cameras in other airports, including John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, Los Angeles International Airport, and Orlando International Airport.

According to the TSA, there were 30,621 claims of missing valuables, mostly packed in checked luggage, from 2010 to 2014. The top five airports with the most claims were Miami International,

TSA received more than 30,000 claims of missing valuables between 2010-2014 .
Most of the missing valuables were packed in checked luggage .
Miami-Dade police set up hidden cameras as part of sting .


Prompt: Brontosaurus has made a thundering comeback after being sent into exile by the scientific community. The long-necked dinosaur was one of the largest animals to ever walk the Earth with its legacy captivating children's imaginations the world over. But despite the 'thunder lizard' being deep rooted in popular culture, for more than a century scientists believed the infamous dinosaur never existed. The giant dinosaur and its evocative name - meaning 'thunder lizard' - has enthralled generations of youngsters.But since 1903, experts have believed the creature was originally misnamed. Pictured is a Brontosaurus as researchers see it today -- with a Diplodocus-like head . The researchers looked at 477 anatomical features across 81 individual dinosaurs found in museums throughout Europe and US. Instead of the traditional method of plotting how similar each species is to the others, they instead used a 'specimen-based protocol'. This meant they could analyse each individual animal, despite its species, and allowed them to look at differences within each species, as well as between different species. The main shape of the tree supported what other paleontologists had previously proposed.  But fossils that were originally labelled Brontosaurus appeared different from two Apatosaurus species. Most of the differences were in tiny anatomical features, but one distinctive trait was that Apatosaurus has a wider neck than Brontosaurus. Since 1903, experts have been arguing the creature was originally misnamed. Instead of belonging to the genus, or species 'family' Brontosaurus, they said it should in fact have been classified as 'Apatosaurus'. Now new research has shown that it is, after all, sufficiently different from Apatosaurus to deserve its own genus name. Scientists from the UK and Portugal submitted the evidence for resurrecting Brontosaurus in a study almost 300 pages long published in the open access journal PeerJ. 'The differences we found between Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus were at least as numerous as the ones between other closely related genera, and much more than what you normally find between species,' said Dr Roger Benson, one of the authors from Oxford University. The researchers used statistical techniques to calculate the differences between species and genera of 'diplodocid' dinosaurs - a group that included some of the longest animals that ever walked on the Earth. The researchers looked at 477 anatomical features across 81 individual dinosaurs. Instead of the traditional method of plotting how similar each species is to the others, they instead used a 'specimen-based protocol'. This meant they could analyse each individual animal, despite its species, and allowed them to look at differences within each species, as well as between different species. The main shape of the tree supported what other paleontologists had previously proposed, but fossils that were originally labelled Brontosaurus appeared different from two Apatosaurus species. Most of the differences were tiny anatomical features, but one distinctive trait was that Apatosaurus has a wider neck than Brontosaurus. The researchers looked at 477 anatomical landmarks across 81 individual dinosaurs.The general shape of the tree supported what other paleontologists had previously proposed, but fossils that were originally labelled Brontosaurus appeared different from two Apatosaurus species. Pictured is the revised family tree . The scientists claim that three known species of Brontosaurus exist — Brontosaurus excelsus, which was the first discovered, along with Brontosaurus parvus and Brontosaurus yahnahpin. They also found two members of the group, Diplodocus and Supersaurus, may have reached lengths of up to 112 ft (34 metres). Apatosaurus, also from the group, had an average length of 75 ft (22.8 metres), and weighed around 16.4 tonnes, they said. Colleague Emanuel Tschopp, from Nova de Lisboa University in Portugal, said: 'Our research would not have been possible at this level of detail 15 or more years ago. 'In fact, until very recently, the claim that Brontosaurus was the same as Apatosaurus was completely reasonable, based on the knowledge we had.' In 1877, Marsh’s crew uncovered the bones of a species he dubbed Apatosaurus ajax. Two years later, he found another giant dinosaur and named it Brontosaurus excelsus (pictured) Emanuel Tschopp (left) and Octávio Mateus examine a Galeamopus skull, a genus of diplodocid dinosaurs, as part of the study . The complex history of the the Brontosaurus has its roots in the ‘bone wars’ of nineteenth-century. This was characterised by a race between paleontologists Edward Cope and Othniel Marsh defined the era to find dinosaur fossils. In 1877, Marsh’s crew uncovered the bones of a species he dubbed Apatosaurus ajax. Two years later, he found another giant dinosaur and named it Brontosaurus excelsus. In the early 1900s, after discovering a fossil that was similar to both Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus, other researchers decided that the two dinosaurs were of the same genus. Eventually, palaeontologists agreed that Brontosaurus should be named Apatosaurus. This was under rules that state that the first name given for an animal takes priority. Brontosaurus has a complex history. In the 1870s, palaeontologists led by Othniel Charles Marsh discovered two enormous partial skeletons of long-necked dinosaurs in the US and shipped them to the Yale Peabody Museum in New Haven, Connecticut. Marsh described the first of the creatures as Apatosaurus ajax, the 'deceptive lizard', after the Greek hero Ajax. Two years later, he named the second skeleton Brontosaurus excelsus, the 'noble thunder lizard'. Neither skeleton was found with a skull, and Marsh reconstructed one for Brontosaurus excelsus. However, his reconstruction, based on evidence from another long-necked dinosaur, Camarasaurus, was later found to be wrong. Shortly after Marsh's death, scientists from the Field Museum of Chicago found another skeleton similar both to Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus. In fact they were so similar that experts decided it would be correct to treat them as two species from the same genus: Apatosaurus. The final blow to Brontosaurus came in the 1970s when researchers showed that Apatosaurus/Brontosaurus was not closely related to Camarasaurus but Diplodocus, another dinosaur from the same era. Diplodocus had a slender, horse-like skull, rather than the box-like one reconstructed by Marsh and modelled on Camarasaurus. Brontosaurus is one of the most charismatic dinosaurs of all time, inspiring generations of children thanks to its size and evocative name. But researchers long believe Brontosaurus was in fact a misnomer, and it should be correctly referred to as Apatosaurus (artist's impression pictured) Paleontologists Emanuel Tschopp and Octávio Mateus are pictured measuring a sauropod dinosaur femur on the right. On the left is an artist's impression of Brontosaurus . The myth was born that Brontosaurus was actually an Apatosaurus with the wrong head. In science, the distinction between species and genera is without clear rules. But the researchers argue the to resurrect Brontosaurus was not a matter of personal preference . 'We tried to be as objective as possible whenever making a decision which would differentiate between species and genus,' said Professor Tschopp. 'It's the classic example of how science works', said Professor Mateus, a collaborator on the research. 'Especially when hypotheses are based on fragmentary fossils, it is possible for new finds to overthrow years of research.' Pictured is Brontosaurus as researchers imagined it in the late 1800s: aquatic, and with a large, robust skull .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

Brontosaurus has made a thundering comeback after being sent into exile by the scientific community. The long-necked dinosaur was one of the largest animals to ever walk the Earth with its legacy captivating children's imaginations the world over. But despite the 'thunder lizard' being deep rooted in popular culture, for more than a century scientists believed the infamous dinosaur never existed. The giant dinosaur and its evocative name - meaning 'thunder lizard' - has enthralled generations of youngsters.But since 1903, experts have believed the creature was originally misnamed. Pictured is a Brontosaurus as researchers see it today -- with a Diplodocus-like head . The researchers looked at 477 anatomical features across 81 individual dinosaurs found in museums throughout Europe and US. Instead of the traditional method of plotting how similar each species is to the others, they instead used a 'specimen-based protocol'. This meant they could analyse each individual animal, despite its species, and allowed them to look at differences within each species, as well as between different species. The main shape of the tree supported what other paleontologists had previously proposed.  But fossils that were originally labelled Brontosaurus appeared different from two Apatosaurus species. Most of the differences were in tiny anatomical features, but one distinctive trait was that Apatosaurus has a wider neck than Brontosaurus. Since 1903, experts have been arguing the creature was originally misnamed. Instead of belonging to the genus, or species 'family' Brontosaurus, they said it should in fact have been classified as 'Apatosaurus'. Now new research has shown that it is, after all, sufficiently different from Apatosaurus to deserve its own genus name. Scientists from the UK and Portugal submitted the evidence for resurrecting Brontosaurus in a study almost 300 pages long published in the open access journal PeerJ. 'The differences we found between Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus were at least as numerous as the ones between other closely related genera, and much more than what you normally find between species,' said Dr Roger Benson, one of the authors from Oxford University. The researchers used statistical techniques to calculate the differences between species and genera of 'diplodocid' dinosaurs - a group that included some of the longest animals that ever walked on the Earth. The researchers looked at 477 anatomical features across 81 individual dinosaurs. Instead of the traditional method of plotting how similar each species is to the others, they instead used a 'specimen-based protocol'. This meant they could analyse each individual animal, despite its species, and allowed them to look at differences within each species, as well as between different species. The main shape of the tree supported what other paleontologists had previously proposed, but fossils that were originally labelled Brontosaurus appeared different from two Apatosaurus species. Most of the differences were tiny anatomical features, but one distinctive trait was that Apatosaurus has a wider neck than Brontosaurus. The researchers looked at 477 anatomical landmarks across 81 individual dinosaurs.The general shape of the tree supported what other paleontologists had previously proposed, but fossils that were originally labelled Brontosaurus appeared different from two Apatosaurus species. Pictured is the revised family tree . The scientists claim that three known species of Brontosaurus exist — Brontosaurus excelsus, which was the first discovered, along with Brontosaurus parvus and Brontosaurus yahnahpin. They also found two members of the group, Diplodocus and Supersaurus, may have reached lengths of up to 112 ft (34 metres). Apatosaurus, also from the group, had an average length of 75 ft (22.8 metres), and weighed around 16.4 tonnes, they said. Colleague Emanuel Tschopp, from Nova de Lisboa University in Portugal, said: 'Our research would not have been possible at this level of detail 15 or more years ago. 'In fact, until very recently, the claim that Brontosaurus was the same as Apatosaurus was completely reasonable, based on the knowledge we had.' In 1877, Marsh’s crew uncovered the bones of a species he dubbed Apatosaurus ajax. Two years later, he found another giant dinosaur and named it Brontosaurus excelsus (pictured) Emanuel Tschopp (left) and Octávio Mateus examine a Galeamopus skull, a genus of diplodocid dinosaurs, as part of the study . The complex history of the the Brontosaurus has its roots in the ‘bone wars’ of nineteenth-century. This was characterised by a race between paleontologists Edward Cope and Othniel Marsh defined the era to find dinosaur fossils. In 1877, Marsh’s crew uncovered the bones of a species he dubbed Apatosaurus ajax. Two years later, he found another giant dinosaur and named it Brontosaurus excelsus. In the early 1900s, after discovering a fossil that was similar to both Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus, other researchers decided that the two dinosaurs were of the same genus. Eventually, palaeontologists agreed that Brontosaurus should be named Apatosaurus. This was under rules that state that the first name given for an animal takes priority. Brontosaurus has a complex history. In the 1870s, palaeontologists led by Othniel Charles Marsh discovered two enormous partial skeletons of long-necked dinosaurs in the US and shipped them to the Yale Peabody Museum in New Haven, Connecticut. Marsh described the first of the creatures as Apatosaurus ajax, the 'deceptive lizard', after the Greek hero Ajax. Two years later, he named the second skeleton Brontosaurus excelsus, the 'noble thunder lizard'. Neither skeleton was found with a skull, and Marsh reconstructed one for Brontosaurus excelsus. However, his reconstruction, based on evidence from another long-necked dinosaur, Camarasaurus, was later found to be wrong. Shortly after Marsh's death, scientists from the Field Museum of Chicago found another skeleton similar both to Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus. In fact they were so similar that experts decided it would be correct to treat them as two species from the same genus: Apatosaurus. The final blow to Brontosaurus came in the 1970s when researchers showed that Apatosaurus/Brontosaurus was not closely related to Camarasaurus but Diplodocus, another dinosaur from the same era. Diplodocus had a slender, horse-like skull, rather than the box-like one reconstructed by Marsh and modelled on Camarasaurus. Brontosaurus is one of the most charismatic dinosaurs of all time, inspiring generations of children thanks to its size and evocative name. But researchers long believe Brontosaurus was in fact a misnomer, and it should be correctly referred to as Apatosaurus (artist's impression pictured) Paleontologists Emanuel Tschopp and Octávio Mateus are pictured measuring a sauropod dinosaur femur on the right. On the left is an artist's impression of Brontosaurus . The myth was born that Brontosaurus was actually an Apatosaurus with the wrong head. In science, the distinction between species and genera is without clear rules. But the researchers argue the to resurrect Brontosaurus was not a matter of personal preference . 'We tried to be as objective as possible whenever making a decision which would differentiate between species and genus,' said Professor Tschopp. 'It's the classic example of how science works', said Professor Mateus, a collaborator on the research. 'Especially when hypotheses are based on fragmentary fossils, it is possible for new finds to overthrow years of research.' Pictured is Brontosaurus as researchers imagined it in the late 1800s: aquatic, and with a large, robust skull .

[Assistant]
A 19th-century misconception has been debunked, as new research has revealed that the "Brontosaurus" was actually a misnamed dinosaur. The long-necked, giant creature was first discovered in the 1870s by Othniel Charles Marsh, who named it "Apatosaurus ajax." However, subsequent discoveries, including a 1903 fossil found in the US, led scientists to believe that the creature was actually a different species, "Brontosaurus."

A team of researchers from the UK and Portugal conducted a study using a "specimen-based protocol" to analyze 477 anatomical features

Since 1903, scientists have been claiming Brontosaurus doesn't exist .
They said the famous species should be classified as an Apatosaurus .
New study calculated the differences between families of Diplodocid .
Brontosaurus had a thinner neck and slightly different bone structure .


Prompt: This is the dramatic moment a brave village watchman fought off a wild leopard armed with only a stick in India. The incident took place in Olani village, four kilometres from Manpur, in central India and was recorded by terrified villagers from the relative safety of hut rooftops. To try and protect his fellow villagers, the fearless ward ran towards the leopard brandishing the weapon. The brave village watchman stands on guard with his stick as the leopard moves towards him . Watched on by a crowd of bystanders, the ward beats the leopard twice on the head as it tries to slash him with its claws . Even though the man sits defenceless on the dusty earth, he continues to fend off the leopard with his stick . After a few terrifying seconds, the leopard - inches away from the man's bare feet - eventually runs off . He managed to strike the big cat on the head twice before it retaliated, dumping the ward to the ground. Astonished bystanders could be heard screaming as the leopard stood at the feet of the seemingly doomed man. Despite being injured on the floor and unable to move, the courageous ward continued to fend off the leopard with his stick and after a few seconds the animal ran off. Mahendra Sharma, a school teacher, said: 'Even the armed forest officials seldom muster courage to fight a beast.' According to local media, the man did not suffer any serious injuries as a result of his death-defying encounter. In last year's Indian elections, rural communities blamed the government for placing them at risk of leopard attacks by failing to provide basic infrastructure such as electrical lighting and street lighting. The dramatic incident recorded by a terrified onlooker took place in Olani village, in central India .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

This is the dramatic moment a brave village watchman fought off a wild leopard armed with only a stick in India. The incident took place in Olani village, four kilometres from Manpur, in central India and was recorded by terrified villagers from the relative safety of hut rooftops. To try and protect his fellow villagers, the fearless ward ran towards the leopard brandishing the weapon. The brave village watchman stands on guard with his stick as the leopard moves towards him . Watched on by a crowd of bystanders, the ward beats the leopard twice on the head as it tries to slash him with its claws . Even though the man sits defenceless on the dusty earth, he continues to fend off the leopard with his stick . After a few terrifying seconds, the leopard - inches away from the man's bare feet - eventually runs off . He managed to strike the big cat on the head twice before it retaliated, dumping the ward to the ground. Astonished bystanders could be heard screaming as the leopard stood at the feet of the seemingly doomed man. Despite being injured on the floor and unable to move, the courageous ward continued to fend off the leopard with his stick and after a few seconds the animal ran off. Mahendra Sharma, a school teacher, said: 'Even the armed forest officials seldom muster courage to fight a beast.' According to local media, the man did not suffer any serious injuries as a result of his death-defying encounter. In last year's Indian elections, rural communities blamed the government for placing them at risk of leopard attacks by failing to provide basic infrastructure such as electrical lighting and street lighting. The dramatic incident recorded by a terrified onlooker took place in Olani village, in central India .

[Assistant] A brave village watchman in India bravely fought off a wild leopard with only a stick, saving his fellow villagers from the animal's attack. The incident occurred in Olani village, four kilometers from Manpur, and was recorded by terrified villagers from a safe distance. The watchman, who was unarmed, stood his ground and beat the leopard twice on the head with his stick, eventually driving it off. Despite being injured, the watchman continued to fend off the leopard for several seconds before it retreated. The incident highlights the bravery of the watchman and the risks faced by rural communities in India, particularly in areas with high leopard populations

Village watchman fought off a wild leopard armed with only a stick in India .
Managed to strike the big cat on the head before it dumped him to the floor .
Bystanders could be heard screaming as it stood at the feet of the man .
Managed to fend off the leopard with his stick while still on the ground .


Prompt: The classic denial, 'This old thing?' continues to be used in full force by Australians, according to a new study. A staggering 1.2 million either possess a secret credit card of hide purchases from their partner. According to new research, one in ten cardholders, or an estimated 800,000 Australians, also admit their credit card spending has lead to an argument with a partner. Put it on plastic: A new study of Australians' spending habits reveals that 1.2 million either have a secret credit card or hide purchases from a partner . The study of 1,200 cardholders by Creditcardfinder.com.au found that the biggest culprits of covert credit behaviour are women. 17 per cent will hide their credit card spending, versus 14 per cent of men. It isn't just women keeping mum either, Generation Y (aged 18-34 ) were found to be the least trustworthy of the age categories when it came to their credit card spending. 25 per cent of Gen Y were found to either have a secret credit card or hidden purchases, well above other age groups. This old thing? 17 per cent will hide their credit card spending, versus 14 per cent of men . They were also likely to be the most argumentative about their spending, versus Baby Boomers who had a much clearer concious and weren't likely to hide their spending or argue about it. Crafty card holding habits also varied between states too. Those in New South Wales  were found to argue over their spending more than Western Australians. However, Victorians had the most cunning credit card behaviour with 18 per cent admitting to a secret credit card versus the 9 per cent of Queenslanders. The stats: One in three don’t pay off their bill each month and 96 per cent make at least one unplanned purchase per month . Generational: 25 per cent of Gen Y were found to either have a secret credit card or hidden purchases . Yet, when it comes to spending habits across the board, credit card holders  were found to have a penchant for purchasing over paying back. One in three don’t pay off their bill each month and 96 per cent  make at least one unplanned purchase a month, with shopping sprees being the most common transaction. With the latest Reserve Bank Australia research showing Australians currently owe a net worth of over $50.1 billion across 16 million credit cards, it then comes at no surprise card holders are hiding their  habits.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

The classic denial, 'This old thing?' continues to be used in full force by Australians, according to a new study. A staggering 1.2 million either possess a secret credit card of hide purchases from their partner. According to new research, one in ten cardholders, or an estimated 800,000 Australians, also admit their credit card spending has lead to an argument with a partner. Put it on plastic: A new study of Australians' spending habits reveals that 1.2 million either have a secret credit card or hide purchases from a partner . The study of 1,200 cardholders by Creditcardfinder.com.au found that the biggest culprits of covert credit behaviour are women. 17 per cent will hide their credit card spending, versus 14 per cent of men. It isn't just women keeping mum either, Generation Y (aged 18-34 ) were found to be the least trustworthy of the age categories when it came to their credit card spending. 25 per cent of Gen Y were found to either have a secret credit card or hidden purchases, well above other age groups. This old thing? 17 per cent will hide their credit card spending, versus 14 per cent of men . They were also likely to be the most argumentative about their spending, versus Baby Boomers who had a much clearer concious and weren't likely to hide their spending or argue about it. Crafty card holding habits also varied between states too. Those in New South Wales  were found to argue over their spending more than Western Australians. However, Victorians had the most cunning credit card behaviour with 18 per cent admitting to a secret credit card versus the 9 per cent of Queenslanders. The stats: One in three don’t pay off their bill each month and 96 per cent make at least one unplanned purchase per month . Generational: 25 per cent of Gen Y were found to either have a secret credit card or hidden purchases . Yet, when it comes to spending habits across the board, credit card holders  were found to have a penchant for purchasing over paying back. One in three don’t pay off their bill each month and 96 per cent  make at least one unplanned purchase a month, with shopping sprees being the most common transaction. With the latest Reserve Bank Australia research showing Australians currently owe a net worth of over $50.1 billion across 16 million credit cards, it then comes at no surprise card holders are hiding their  habits.

[Assistant]
A new study by Creditcardfinder.com.au found that 1.2 million Australians have a secret credit card or hide purchases from their partner. The study revealed that women are more likely to hide their spending (17%) compared to men (14%), with Generation Y (18-34) being the least trustworthy when it comes to credit card spending.

The study also found that 25% of Gen Y have a secret credit card or hidden purchases, making them the most argumentative about their spending. Additionally, the study showed that credit card holders are more likely to make unplanned purchases (96%) and have a penchant for overspending

New survey  analysed Australian credit card habits .
15 per cent admit to having a credit card their partner doesn't know about .
One in ten have fights with partners over credit card purchases .
Gen Y are the most stealthy credit card culprits over other age groups .
17 per cent of women hide their spending, versus 14 per cent of men .


Prompt: A New York man has been caught on camera catcalling women in the street – completely oblivious to the fact that the interview he is taking part in is meant to highlight the horrible and derogatory culture of catcalling. Patrick Jones of Buzz60 was covering a recent anti-catcalling campaign, which saw signs a series of pro-feminist signs being placed on several streets around New York City, when he took to the street to hear opinions from the public. And while the women he spoke to all called the practice 'disgusting,' saying it makes them feel 'horrible' and 'uncomfortable,' one man was only too happy to demonstrate his own tactics for harassing women in public. Scroll down for video . Clueless catcaller: This New York man, right, didn't realize Buzz60's Patrick Jones, left, was doing a segment criticizing catcalling; the man showed his own catcalling techniques throughout the interview . 'Sometimes, you know, you gotta call a girl,' says the man, who is wearing sunglasses and a T-shirt with a logo of what appears to be the Playboy bunny with a marijuana leaf for ears. Unprompted, the man begins demonstrating by whistling and making ticking and kissing noises with his mouth. When Patrick, who looks surprised to have found one of the very street harassers that his other interviewees hit out at, asks the man how he would call a dog, he unabashedly replies: 'The same way'. Demeaning dude: The man on the right laughs as he admits he would call a dog with the same whistling noises he uses to call out to women on the street . 'It feels good,' the New York man says in response to a question about how catcalling makes women on the receiving end feel. The man, who throughout the interview can be seen casting his eyes around seemingly looking for women, then demonstrates his tactics again on a passerby. 'If it's far away it's even better because they're not that scared,' he continues, not acknowledging that his comment implies that when women are close to their catcallers, they feel a sense of fear. 'Sometimes you've gotta have a little distance.' Highlighting the problem: The video was made in response to anti-catcalling signs like these, which have been put up around New York City . Totally oblivious: The man being interviewed didn't seem to notice that he was being filmed in front of a sign like this one, which says 'no catcall zone' Before the video wraps up, the man finally realizes that the interview is not meant to show catcalling in a positive light, asking: 'Wait a second, are you reporting that girls don't like this?' 'They don't like catacalling,' says Patrick insists. 'Get the f** out of here,' says the man, who becomes visibly irritated. 'We're acknowledging that you did a good thing today getting up out of bed,' he adds, before getting distracted by another woman and whistling at her while yelling: 'Yo, sweetheart!'

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

A New York man has been caught on camera catcalling women in the street – completely oblivious to the fact that the interview he is taking part in is meant to highlight the horrible and derogatory culture of catcalling. Patrick Jones of Buzz60 was covering a recent anti-catcalling campaign, which saw signs a series of pro-feminist signs being placed on several streets around New York City, when he took to the street to hear opinions from the public. And while the women he spoke to all called the practice 'disgusting,' saying it makes them feel 'horrible' and 'uncomfortable,' one man was only too happy to demonstrate his own tactics for harassing women in public. Scroll down for video . Clueless catcaller: This New York man, right, didn't realize Buzz60's Patrick Jones, left, was doing a segment criticizing catcalling; the man showed his own catcalling techniques throughout the interview . 'Sometimes, you know, you gotta call a girl,' says the man, who is wearing sunglasses and a T-shirt with a logo of what appears to be the Playboy bunny with a marijuana leaf for ears. Unprompted, the man begins demonstrating by whistling and making ticking and kissing noises with his mouth. When Patrick, who looks surprised to have found one of the very street harassers that his other interviewees hit out at, asks the man how he would call a dog, he unabashedly replies: 'The same way'. Demeaning dude: The man on the right laughs as he admits he would call a dog with the same whistling noises he uses to call out to women on the street . 'It feels good,' the New York man says in response to a question about how catcalling makes women on the receiving end feel. The man, who throughout the interview can be seen casting his eyes around seemingly looking for women, then demonstrates his tactics again on a passerby. 'If it's far away it's even better because they're not that scared,' he continues, not acknowledging that his comment implies that when women are close to their catcallers, they feel a sense of fear. 'Sometimes you've gotta have a little distance.' Highlighting the problem: The video was made in response to anti-catcalling signs like these, which have been put up around New York City . Totally oblivious: The man being interviewed didn't seem to notice that he was being filmed in front of a sign like this one, which says 'no catcall zone' Before the video wraps up, the man finally realizes that the interview is not meant to show catcalling in a positive light, asking: 'Wait a second, are you reporting that girls don't like this?' 'They don't like catacalling,' says Patrick insists. 'Get the f** out of here,' says the man, who becomes visibly irritated. 'We're acknowledging that you did a good thing today getting up out of bed,' he adds, before getting distracted by another woman and whistling at her while yelling: 'Yo, sweetheart!'

[Assistant] A New York man, Patrick Jones, was caught on camera catcalling women in the street during an anti-catcalling campaign. While speaking with Patrick Jones, a man who was also catcalling women, demonstrated his tactics, including whistling, kissing, and making derogatory noises. The man, who wore sunglasses and a Playboy bunny logo on his shirt, claimed that he would call a dog with the same whistling noises. When asked how catcalling makes women feel, he replied, "It feels good." However, when asked about the difference between catcalling and flirting, he said, "Sometimes you've gotta have a little

The New York man unapologetically demonstrates how he harasses women on the street while taking part in an on-camera interview .
He insists that the ticking, whistling, and kissing noises he makes at strangers makes them 'feel good'
The man also explains that choosing a woman who is far away from him is better because she won't be as 'scared'


Prompt: What better way to kick off the week you get married than by settling a pressing matter at work before you relax and prepare for the big day? That is how Andy Murray may be feeling  as he looks to face Novak Djokovic in the final of the Miami Open. The British No1 marries Kim Sears in Dunblane on Saturday and, win or lose on Sunday, he will be heading straight to the airport to get back and focus on what lies ahead next weekend. Andy Murray reacts as he reaches the Miami Open final with a win over Tomas Berdych in the last four . He will face long-time rival Novak Djokovic in the final in Miami on Sunday . Murray's fiancee Kim Sears watches on in the heat in Miami during his semi-final . He would dearly love to do so with the trophy in his luggage. For one, it would represent his biggest tournament win since taking the Wimbledon title in 2013, irrefutable proof that he is back towards his best. Perhaps even more importantly it would end the growing dominance of Djokovic over the Scot — and everyone else for that matter. Murray will need no reminding that he has lost nine out of his last 10 matches against the Serb, so it is a huge task. Even more remarkably, Djokovic has won his past nine finals at these Masters-level events, which are one tier down from the Grand Slams. Murray allowed himself to get befuddled by the world No1’s histrionics in the Australian Open final, and then played a plain bad match when thrashed by him in their Indian Wells semi-final last month. The 27-year-old was in clinical form as he set up a final showdown with Novak Djokovic . Murray reacts after winning the final point before shaking hands with Berdych as he heads into the final . ‘I learned more in the Indian Wells match from what I didn’t do,’ said Murray. ‘The final in Australia didn’t necessarily feel like it came down to the tennis or the tactics, but in Indian Wells there were a few things I did wrong.’ Top of that list was to lapse into his tendency to feel his way into the match, rather than come out firing on all cylinders. If Murray does that again he will lose, but he plays well here and is hugely familiar with the heavier conditions, so this should be closer. He has also played all his matches during the day, which will help with the lunchtime start (6pm UK). His opponent, however, looked incredibly sharp in defusing John Isner’s big serve in the semi-final and Djokovic knows recent history is on his side. Murray is set to marry his fiancee in Dunblane next Saturday . ‘It can only serve as a positive, going in with the fact I won the last six matches we played against each other, especially the most recent one,’ said Djokovic. ‘It gives me confidence and maybe a slight mental advantage. But we are talking about small margins, that’s always the case when we play each other.’ One thing for sure is that the next big tournament when they face off, two players who have been rivals since before their teenage years will both be married men.

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

What better way to kick off the week you get married than by settling a pressing matter at work before you relax and prepare for the big day? That is how Andy Murray may be feeling  as he looks to face Novak Djokovic in the final of the Miami Open. The British No1 marries Kim Sears in Dunblane on Saturday and, win or lose on Sunday, he will be heading straight to the airport to get back and focus on what lies ahead next weekend. Andy Murray reacts as he reaches the Miami Open final with a win over Tomas Berdych in the last four . He will face long-time rival Novak Djokovic in the final in Miami on Sunday . Murray's fiancee Kim Sears watches on in the heat in Miami during his semi-final . He would dearly love to do so with the trophy in his luggage. For one, it would represent his biggest tournament win since taking the Wimbledon title in 2013, irrefutable proof that he is back towards his best. Perhaps even more importantly it would end the growing dominance of Djokovic over the Scot — and everyone else for that matter. Murray will need no reminding that he has lost nine out of his last 10 matches against the Serb, so it is a huge task. Even more remarkably, Djokovic has won his past nine finals at these Masters-level events, which are one tier down from the Grand Slams. Murray allowed himself to get befuddled by the world No1’s histrionics in the Australian Open final, and then played a plain bad match when thrashed by him in their Indian Wells semi-final last month. The 27-year-old was in clinical form as he set up a final showdown with Novak Djokovic . Murray reacts after winning the final point before shaking hands with Berdych as he heads into the final . ‘I learned more in the Indian Wells match from what I didn’t do,’ said Murray. ‘The final in Australia didn’t necessarily feel like it came down to the tennis or the tactics, but in Indian Wells there were a few things I did wrong.’ Top of that list was to lapse into his tendency to feel his way into the match, rather than come out firing on all cylinders. If Murray does that again he will lose, but he plays well here and is hugely familiar with the heavier conditions, so this should be closer. He has also played all his matches during the day, which will help with the lunchtime start (6pm UK). His opponent, however, looked incredibly sharp in defusing John Isner’s big serve in the semi-final and Djokovic knows recent history is on his side. Murray is set to marry his fiancee in Dunblane next Saturday . ‘It can only serve as a positive, going in with the fact I won the last six matches we played against each other, especially the most recent one,’ said Djokovic. ‘It gives me confidence and maybe a slight mental advantage. But we are talking about small margins, that’s always the case when we play each other.’ One thing for sure is that the next big tournament when they face off, two players who have been rivals since before their teenage years will both be married men.

[Assistant] The article discusses Andy Murray's upcoming match against Novak Djokovic in the final of the Miami Open. Murray, who is getting married next Saturday, is looking to settle a pressing matter at work before the big day. He will face Djokovic in the final on Sunday. The two long-time rivals have a history of intense matches, with Djokovic having won nine of their last 10 matches against Murray. Murray has learned from their previous encounters, including a recent loss in the Australian Open semi-final, and is hoping to improve his performance in the final. Despite being favored to win, Murray is aware that Djokovic

Andy Murray faces Novak Djokovic in Miami Open final on Sunday .
Set to marry fiancee Kim Sears in Dunblane next Saturday .
British No 1 has lost nine of his last 10 meetings with Djokovic .


Prompt: A neo-Nazi charged with killing a gay supervisor at a community college said he did so because he hates homosexuality. Stancil, who gave himself fascist face tattoos, is awaiting extradition from Florida to North Carolina, where he is accused of fatally shooting 44-year-old Ron Lane. Kenneth Morgan Stancil III, 20, told Raleigh's WRAL-TV on Wednesday that he killed Lane earlier this week in North Carolina because Lane had made sexual advances to Stancil's 16-year-old brother. Scroll down for video . Kenneth Morgan Stancil III, 20, claimed in a prison interview on Wednesday that he had killed a gay college supervisor because he made sexual advances towards his teenage brother . In a telephone interview from a Daytona Beach jail, Stancil said Lane tried to take advantage of his brother. 'He ain't physically touched him, but he was in the proposal to try to and I wasn't going to let that happen,' Stancil said. Stancil said Lane was looking for Stancil on Facebook and found his brother. A Goldsboro police spokesman did not immediately return a phone message on Thursday about that allegation. 'I'd do anything necessary to take care of my family,' Stancil said. He said he has no regrets about the shooting. 'I did what I did, and I've got to live with it. If I get life, I just get life. 'I'm a murderer, you know, what the hell do I got to care? 'I don't give a damn if I go back to society.' Stancil, shot dead his former work-study supervisor Ron Lane (pictured) and claimed to have killed three others - although police had no reports of unsolved homicides . Stancil said he is a neo-Nazi who is concerned about the future of white children. 'I try to look out for my fellow white people,' he said. 'I don't believe in race mixing.' He was asked if he hates gays. 'Yes, I do, with a passion,' he replied, though he said that was only one of the reasons he killed Lane, who had been his supervisor in a work study program at the college before he was fired for absenteeism. Stancil also told the television station he had killed three other people, including two in the Wayne County area. But the sheriff's department told the station it has no report of any unsolved homicides that match Stancil's account. The accused killer appeared in court in Florida on Tuesday where he admitted to the killing, WRAL reported, despite the judge advising him he could remain silent. He confessed to the shooting in an obscenity-laced statement, saying he 'ridded one last child molester from the Earth'. He said Lane, who had been his supervisor at the college's print shop until Stancil was fired last month, had been 'messing with' one of Stancil's family members. Lane was gay, and authorities said they are investigating a possible hate crime. They haven't released a motive for the shooting, but Stancil was dismissed from a work study program at the print shop last month. His mother, Debbie Stancil, said her son was angry over being dismissed from his work-study job for excessive absenteeism. She also said Lane made sexually laced comments to her son. 'He was verbally inappropriate with Morgan at school. Very much verbally inappropriate,' she said. 'He would tell him to stop and he kept on.' The 20-year-old is facing a charge of open murder. Stancil pictured with his mother Debbie at his graduation. She said he is 'rattled and confused and needs mental help'. The mother also claimed that the victim had made sexually laced comments to her son .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

A neo-Nazi charged with killing a gay supervisor at a community college said he did so because he hates homosexuality. Stancil, who gave himself fascist face tattoos, is awaiting extradition from Florida to North Carolina, where he is accused of fatally shooting 44-year-old Ron Lane. Kenneth Morgan Stancil III, 20, told Raleigh's WRAL-TV on Wednesday that he killed Lane earlier this week in North Carolina because Lane had made sexual advances to Stancil's 16-year-old brother. Scroll down for video . Kenneth Morgan Stancil III, 20, claimed in a prison interview on Wednesday that he had killed a gay college supervisor because he made sexual advances towards his teenage brother . In a telephone interview from a Daytona Beach jail, Stancil said Lane tried to take advantage of his brother. 'He ain't physically touched him, but he was in the proposal to try to and I wasn't going to let that happen,' Stancil said. Stancil said Lane was looking for Stancil on Facebook and found his brother. A Goldsboro police spokesman did not immediately return a phone message on Thursday about that allegation. 'I'd do anything necessary to take care of my family,' Stancil said. He said he has no regrets about the shooting. 'I did what I did, and I've got to live with it. If I get life, I just get life. 'I'm a murderer, you know, what the hell do I got to care? 'I don't give a damn if I go back to society.' Stancil, shot dead his former work-study supervisor Ron Lane (pictured) and claimed to have killed three others - although police had no reports of unsolved homicides . Stancil said he is a neo-Nazi who is concerned about the future of white children. 'I try to look out for my fellow white people,' he said. 'I don't believe in race mixing.' He was asked if he hates gays. 'Yes, I do, with a passion,' he replied, though he said that was only one of the reasons he killed Lane, who had been his supervisor in a work study program at the college before he was fired for absenteeism. Stancil also told the television station he had killed three other people, including two in the Wayne County area. But the sheriff's department told the station it has no report of any unsolved homicides that match Stancil's account. The accused killer appeared in court in Florida on Tuesday where he admitted to the killing, WRAL reported, despite the judge advising him he could remain silent. He confessed to the shooting in an obscenity-laced statement, saying he 'ridded one last child molester from the Earth'. He said Lane, who had been his supervisor at the college's print shop until Stancil was fired last month, had been 'messing with' one of Stancil's family members. Lane was gay, and authorities said they are investigating a possible hate crime. They haven't released a motive for the shooting, but Stancil was dismissed from a work study program at the print shop last month. His mother, Debbie Stancil, said her son was angry over being dismissed from his work-study job for excessive absenteeism. She also said Lane made sexually laced comments to her son. 'He was verbally inappropriate with Morgan at school. Very much verbally inappropriate,' she said. 'He would tell him to stop and he kept on.' The 20-year-old is facing a charge of open murder. Stancil pictured with his mother Debbie at his graduation. She said he is 'rattled and confused and needs mental help'. The mother also claimed that the victim had made sexually laced comments to her son .

[Assistant] A 20-year-old neo-Nazi, Kenneth Morgan Stancil III, has been charged with fatally shooting a 44-year-old gay college supervisor, Ron Lane, in North Carolina. Stancil, who has fascist face tattoos, claimed that Lane made sexual advances towards his 16-year-old brother, which led to the shooting. Stancil said he killed Lane because he was angry over being dismissed from a work-study program for excessive absenteeism. He also admitted to killing three other people, including two in the Wayne County area, although the sheriff's department has no report of unsolved homicides matching Stancil's account.

Suspect Kenneth Morgan Stancil claimed he killed Ron Lane because the college employee made sexual advances to his 16-year-old brother .
The murder suspect gave himself fascist face tattoos .
Stancil also said he is a neo-Nazi who is concerned about the future of white children and hates 'race-mixing'


Prompt: The captain of a ship that sank off the coast of Africa 'started applauding and cheering' when his vessel was entirely submerged, according to anti-poaching activists who saved the man and his crew. Crew aboard Sea Shepherd vessel Bob Barker, which had been pursuing the ruined vessel named Thunder for 110 days in an effort to stop alleged poaching activities in Antarctic waters, found themselves taking on the role of saviours when the boat's distress signals were sounded. 'What was incredibly strange was that the captain of the Thunder, when the vessel did actually sink, started applauding and cheering, which I took to be very unusual behaviour and further evidence that he deliberately sank his own vessel,' Captain Peter Hammarstedt told Fairfax media. Scroll down for video . Thunder, one of six vessels known to illegally fish vulnerable toothfish in the Southern Ocean, sunk off the coast of Africa on Monday . Crew on Sea Shepherd vessel Bob Barker, which rescued those on board Thunder, said the captain of the now submerged ship was seen cheering . Sea Shepherd claims that Thunder is one of six vessels known to illegally fish vulnerable toothfish in the Southern Ocean. The conservation organisation's ships collected and delivered to authorities over 72 kilometres of illegal gillnet that it alleges was abandoned by the vessel in December. Thunder's sinking is believed to be another deliberate move by the vessel to hide evidence of any illegal activities. 'When my Chief Engineer boarded the Thunder in the hours leading up to the sinking, he was able to confirm that there were clear signs that the vessel was intentionally scuttled,' Captain Hammarstedt said. 'What was incredibly strange was that the captain of the Thunder, when the vessel did actually sink, started applauding and cheering,' Sea Shepherd Captain Peter Hammarstedt said . He added: 'I took to be very unusual behaviour and further evidence that he deliberately sank his own vessel' 'Usually when a vessel is sinking, the captain will close all hatches so as to maintain buoyancy. However, on the Thunder, the reverse was done - doors and hatches were tied open and the fishhold was opened. It is an incredibly suspicious situation, to say the least.' The alleged poaching vessel  issued a distressing signal, claiming that the ship was sinking at about 4.00pm on Monday. 'The Captain of Thunder radioed us and said their ship was sinking. We  launched our small boat and did everything we could to assist,' Mr Hammarstedt said. 'It appeared as though the ship and crew were in a serious situation.' All 40 crew members, who abandoned the sinking ship, were safely rescued and are being taken to the Sao Tome, in the Gulf of Guinea after receiving food, water and medical attention . The rescue was made despite numerous reports of violent behaviour from the vessel towards Bob Barker, including that crew had thrown grappling hooks at the ship and tried to ram it on more than one occasion . The rescue was made despite numerous reports of violent behaviour from the vessel towards Bob Barker, including that crew had thrown grappling hooks at the ship and tried to ram it on more than one occasion. Mr Hammarstedt told ABC News they have been following the 'internationally-wanted poaching vessel for the past 110 days' as part of its Operation Icefish. 'Our suspicion is that the captain of the Thunder, knowing he's run out of fuel, has deliberately sunk his own boat in order to destroy any physical evidence,' he said. 'Our suspicion is that the captain of the Thunder, knowing he's run out of fuel, has deliberately sunk his own boat in order to destroy any physical evidence,' he said. All 40 crew members, who abandoned the sinking ship, were safely rescued  off the coast of Africa and are being taken to the Sao Tome, in the Gulf of Guinea after receiving food, water and medical attention. The conservation organisation's ships collected and delivered to authorities over 72 kilometres of illegal gillnet that it alleges was abandoned by Thunder (pictured) in December . Environmentalist group Sea Shepherd ship 'Bob Barker' has rescued 40 crew members from the sinking ship . Operation Icefish has been very successful in exposing the operations of the alleged poachers and making connections between them and fishing companies in Spain. The Thunder  lost its nets, its catch and its profits for the entire season during the pursuit as they face prosecution in whichever port it is forced to go to once short of fuel and supplies. This four month chase was the longest pursuit of a poacher in maritime history, surpassing the 21-day pursuit of a Uruguayan poacher in 2003 by Australian Customs. The four month chase was the longest pursuit of a poacher in maritime history, surpassing the 21-day pursuit of a Uruguayan poacher in 2003 by Australian Customs .

[System] You are a helpful assistant that writes a brief, factual summary of a news article.

[User]
Summarize the following article:

The captain of a ship that sank off the coast of Africa 'started applauding and cheering' when his vessel was entirely submerged, according to anti-poaching activists who saved the man and his crew. Crew aboard Sea Shepherd vessel Bob Barker, which had been pursuing the ruined vessel named Thunder for 110 days in an effort to stop alleged poaching activities in Antarctic waters, found themselves taking on the role of saviours when the boat's distress signals were sounded. 'What was incredibly strange was that the captain of the Thunder, when the vessel did actually sink, started applauding and cheering, which I took to be very unusual behaviour and further evidence that he deliberately sank his own vessel,' Captain Peter Hammarstedt told Fairfax media. Scroll down for video . Thunder, one of six vessels known to illegally fish vulnerable toothfish in the Southern Ocean, sunk off the coast of Africa on Monday . Crew on Sea Shepherd vessel Bob Barker, which rescued those on board Thunder, said the captain of the now submerged ship was seen cheering . Sea Shepherd claims that Thunder is one of six vessels known to illegally fish vulnerable toothfish in the Southern Ocean. The conservation organisation's ships collected and delivered to authorities over 72 kilometres of illegal gillnet that it alleges was abandoned by the vessel in December. Thunder's sinking is believed to be another deliberate move by the vessel to hide evidence of any illegal activities. 'When my Chief Engineer boarded the Thunder in the hours leading up to the sinking, he was able to confirm that there were clear signs that the vessel was intentionally scuttled,' Captain Hammarstedt said. 'What was incredibly strange was that the captain of the Thunder, when the vessel did actually sink, started applauding and cheering,' Sea Shepherd Captain Peter Hammarstedt said . He added: 'I took to be very unusual behaviour and further evidence that he deliberately sank his own vessel' 'Usually when a vessel is sinking, the captain will close all hatches so as to maintain buoyancy. However, on the Thunder, the reverse was done - doors and hatches were tied open and the fishhold was opened. It is an incredibly suspicious situation, to say the least.' The alleged poaching vessel  issued a distressing signal, claiming that the ship was sinking at about 4.00pm on Monday. 'The Captain of Thunder radioed us and said their ship was sinking. We  launched our small boat and did everything we could to assist,' Mr Hammarstedt said. 'It appeared as though the ship and crew were in a serious situation.' All 40 crew members, who abandoned the sinking ship, were safely rescued and are being taken to the Sao Tome, in the Gulf of Guinea after receiving food, water and medical attention . The rescue was made despite numerous reports of violent behaviour from the vessel towards Bob Barker, including that crew had thrown grappling hooks at the ship and tried to ram it on more than one occasion . The rescue was made despite numerous reports of violent behaviour from the vessel towards Bob Barker, including that crew had thrown grappling hooks at the ship and tried to ram it on more than one occasion. Mr Hammarstedt told ABC News they have been following the 'internationally-wanted poaching vessel for the past 110 days' as part of its Operation Icefish. 'Our suspicion is that the captain of the Thunder, knowing he's run out of fuel, has deliberately sunk his own boat in order to destroy any physical evidence,' he said. 'Our suspicion is that the captain of the Thunder, knowing he's run out of fuel, has deliberately sunk his own boat in order to destroy any physical evidence,' he said. All 40 crew members, who abandoned the sinking ship, were safely rescued  off the coast of Africa and are being taken to the Sao Tome, in the Gulf of Guinea after receiving food, water and medical attention. The conservation organisation's ships collected and delivered to authorities over 72 kilometres of illegal gillnet that it alleges was abandoned by Thunder (pictured) in December . Environmentalist group Sea Shepherd ship 'Bob Barker' has rescued 40 crew members from the sinking ship . Operation Icefish has been very successful in exposing the operations of the alleged poachers and making connections between them and fishing companies in Spain. The Thunder  lost its nets, its catch and its profits for the entire season during the pursuit as they face prosecution in whichever port it is forced to go to once short of fuel and supplies. This four month chase was the longest pursuit of a poacher in maritime history, surpassing the 21-day pursuit of a Uruguayan poacher in 2003 by Australian Customs. The four month chase was the longest pursuit of a poacher in maritime history, surpassing the 21-day pursuit of a Uruguayan poacher in 2003 by Australian Customs .

[Assistant]
A Sea Shepherd vessel, Bob Barker, rescued 40 crew members from a sinking ship, the Thunder, off the coast of Africa. The ship, which was pursuing the vessel to stop alleged poaching activities in Antarctic waters, sank on Monday after 110 days of pursuit. The captain of the Thunder, Peter Hammarstedt, started applauding and cheering when the ship was entirely submerged, which Sea Shepherd activists found unusual and suspicious.

The Thunder was one of six vessels known to illegally fish vulnerable toothfish in the Southern Ocean. Sea Shepherd collected and delivered over 72 kilometers of illegal gillnet to authorities. Hammarstedt

Conservationist group saved fishing ship's crew as boat sank on Monday .
Group's Bob Barker was chasing the ship collecting 'evidence of poaching'
40 crew were rescused as fishing ship Thunder sank off the coast of Africa .
Bob Barker captain said Thunder skipper cheered as his boat went down .
Peter Hammarstedt said scuttling would destroy evidence of poaching .