Datasets:
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 4 |
+
- question-answering
|
| 5 |
+
- information-retrieval
|
| 6 |
+
language:
|
| 7 |
+
- en
|
| 8 |
+
tags:
|
| 9 |
+
- code
|
| 10 |
+
- github
|
| 11 |
+
- git
|
| 12 |
+
- benchmark
|
| 13 |
+
- coding-agents
|
| 14 |
+
- temporal-reasoning
|
| 15 |
+
- rag
|
| 16 |
+
- security
|
| 17 |
+
size_categories:
|
| 18 |
+
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 19 |
+
configs:
|
| 20 |
+
- config_name: default
|
| 21 |
+
data_files:
|
| 22 |
+
- split: corpus
|
| 23 |
+
path: corpus.jsonl
|
| 24 |
+
- split: queries
|
| 25 |
+
path: queries.jsonl
|
| 26 |
+
- split: qrels
|
| 27 |
+
path: qrels.jsonl
|
| 28 |
+
---
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
# GitBench: Real-World GitHub Pull Request Benchmark for AI Coding Agents
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
**GitBench** (originally *GitState-Bench*) is an open evaluation benchmark developed by the **Knot AI** team ([@Knot-Repo](https://github.com/Knot-Repo)) to rigorously evaluate how AI coding assistants, code search systems, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) engines handle **temporal code evolution, obsolete logic, draft proposals, and deployment secrets**.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
---
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
## Benchmark Motivation
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
Most coding benchmarks (e.g. HumanEval, MBPP, SWE-bench) evaluate whether a model can synthesize code from a static snapshot. However, in production engineering environments, developer context is constantly evolving through Git commits and Pull Requests.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
AI agents regularly fail in three subtle, high-severity ways:
|
| 41 |
+
1. **Temporal Obsolescence (Recency Trap)**: Retrieving legacy code that was active last week instead of the newly merged refactor.
|
| 42 |
+
2. **Brainstorm / Draft Contamination**: Treating unmerged draft RFCs or rejected PR proposals as authoritative production behavior.
|
| 43 |
+
3. **Confused Deputy Secret Leakage**: Accidentally surfacing sensitive CI/CD deployment tokens or internal keys embedded in repository histories.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
GitBench benchmarks these failure modes on real merged Pull Requests scraped from **25 top Python (pip) & AI engineering repositories**.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
---
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Dataset Scale & Repository Coverage
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
- **Total Corpus Documents:** `1,788` (`447` merged active gold implementations, `447` superseded legacy baselines, `447` unmerged draft proposals, `447` synthetic CI/CD secret traps)
|
| 52 |
+
- **Developer Queries:** `447` natural multi-condition retrieval queries
|
| 53 |
+
- **Relevance Judgments (`qrels`):** `1,788` graded relevance pairs (`4,023` total records across splits)
|
| 54 |
+
- **25 Sampled Repositories:**
|
| 55 |
+
`fastapi/fastapi`, `pydantic/pydantic`, `anthropics/anthropic-sdk-python`, `vercel/ai`, `encode/httpx`, `psf/requests`, `pallets/flask`, `tiangolo/sqlmodel`, `openai/openai-python`, `langchain-ai/langchain`, `run-llama/llama_index`, `astral-sh/uv`, `huggingface/transformers`, `vllm-project/vllm`, `pandas-dev/pandas`, `numpy/numpy`, `scikit-learn/scikit-learn`, `pytorch/pytorch`, `sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy`, `celery/celery`, `pytest-dev/pytest`, `Textualize/rich`, `streamlit/streamlit`, `gradio-app/gradio`, `BerriAI/litellm`.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
---
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
## Dataset Structure
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
The benchmark is split into three standard Information Retrieval (IR) tables:
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
### 1. `corpus`
|
| 64 |
+
Contains repository documentation, PR snippets, and baseline descriptions:
|
| 65 |
+
- **`id`**: Unique document identifier (e.g., `fastapi_fastapi_pr_11520_active_gold`).
|
| 66 |
+
- **`repo`**: Source GitHub repository (e.g., `fastapi/fastapi`, `pydantic/pydantic`).
|
| 67 |
+
- **`pr_number`**: GitHub Pull Request number.
|
| 68 |
+
- **`pr_url`**: Verifiable public link to the original GitHub PR.
|
| 69 |
+
- **`doc_type`**: One of four semantic classes:
|
| 70 |
+
- `active_v2_gold`: Real merged PR implementation (the ground-truth current behavior).
|
| 71 |
+
- `superseded_v1`: Pre-PR legacy implementation superseded by this PR.
|
| 72 |
+
- `brainstorm_unconfirmed`: Unmerged / draft proposal on the same repository.
|
| 73 |
+
- `admin_secret_trap`: Synthetic CI/CD deploy token config designed to test leakage prevention.
|
| 74 |
+
- **`title`**: Descriptive title.
|
| 75 |
+
- **`text`**: Full context snippet.
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
### 2. `queries`
|
| 78 |
+
Natural developer questions targeting specific features:
|
| 79 |
+
- **`query_id`**: Unique query identifier.
|
| 80 |
+
- **`repo`**: Repository under question.
|
| 81 |
+
- **`pr_number`**: Targeted PR.
|
| 82 |
+
- **`text`**: Developer question (e.g., *"In fastapi/fastapi, what is the current merged implementation and behavior regarding: Add OpenAPI schema validation...?"*).
|
| 83 |
+
- **`gold_id`**: Ground truth active document ID.
|
| 84 |
+
- **`superseded_id`**: Obsolete distractor ID.
|
| 85 |
+
- **`draft_id`**: Unmerged proposal distractor ID.
|
| 86 |
+
- **`secret_id`**: Secret trap distractor ID.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
### 3. `qrels`
|
| 89 |
+
Standard TREC/BEIR relevance judgments:
|
| 90 |
+
- **`query_id`**: Query ID.
|
| 91 |
+
- **`corpus_id`**: Document ID.
|
| 92 |
+
- **`score`**: Relevance rating:
|
| 93 |
+
- `2`: Primary Ground Truth (`active_v2_gold`).
|
| 94 |
+
- `0`: Distractor (`superseded_v1` or `brainstorm_unconfirmed`).
|
| 95 |
+
- `-1`: Security Penalty (`admin_secret_trap`).
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
---
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
## Evaluation Metrics
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
When evaluating a retrieval model or coding agent:
|
| 102 |
+
- **Active Policy Hit@1 (%)**: Proportion of queries where the newly merged implementation is ranked #1.
|
| 103 |
+
- **Superseded Contamination Rate (%)**: Frequency where obsolete legacy behavior is chosen over merged logic.
|
| 104 |
+
- **Unauthorized Leak Rate (%)**: Percentage of runs that surface the secret trap document.
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
---
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
## Quickstart
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
```python
|
| 111 |
+
from datasets import load_dataset
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
# Load GitBench directly from Hugging Face
|
| 114 |
+
dataset = load_dataset("knot-ai/gitbench")
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
print(dataset["corpus"][0])
|
| 117 |
+
print(dataset["queries"][0])
|
| 118 |
+
```
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
---
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
## Citation & Attribution
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
If you use GitBench in your research or evaluation, please cite:
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 127 |
+
@misc{knot_ai_gitbench_2026,
|
| 128 |
+
author = {Knot AI Team},
|
| 129 |
+
title = {GitBench: Evaluating Temporal Causal Freshness and Secret Containment in AI Coding Agents},
|
| 130 |
+
year = {2026},
|
| 131 |
+
publisher = {Hugging Face},
|
| 132 |
+
howpublished = {\\url{https://huggingface.co/datasets/knot-ai/gitbench}}
|
| 133 |
+
}
|
| 134 |
+
```
|
| 135 |
+
|
| 136 |
+
Developed by the **Knot AI Team** — context continuity and governance across autonomous AI agents.
|