--- license: mit language: - en tags: - construction-safety - osha - regulatory-compliance - low-resource - niche-domain size_categories: - 10K", "input": "", "hazards": [{ "code_event": {"id": "", "title": "..."}, "code_source": {"id": "", "title": "..."}, "code_nature": {"id": "", "title": "..."}, "code_body": {"id": "", "title": "..."}, "severity": "low|moderate|high" }], "citations": [], "naics": "<6-digit NAICS>", "naics_subsector": "<4-digit>", "event_date": "YYYY-MM-DD", "inspection_nr": "", "source": "sir", "split": "train|dev|test" } ``` The `citations` field is empty in v1 (SIR does not carry OSHA standard citations directly). Citation supervision comes from a separate join on `inspection_nr` to the DOL OSHA enforcement violations corpus, planned for v2. ## Splits Stratified by NAICS subsector (first 4 digits), 70/15/15. - train: 72,467 - dev: 15,410 - test: 15,873 (SHA-256 `c9490ed3...`, hash-pinned, never re-shuffled) ## Known biases - SIR over-represents severe injuries (hospitalization, amputation, loss of eye) — the corpus is by definition skewed toward high-severity events. - Source-code distribution has a heavy long tail: 1,478 unique codes, top-75 cover only 57% of records. Models will need either a code-collapse strategy or hierarchical (division-level) prediction. ## License MIT (this dataset). OSHA SIR is public domain. OSHA 29 CFR 1926 text is public domain. ## Citation If you use this dataset, please cite: ``` @misc{construction-code-corpus-2026, title = {Construction Code-Citation Corpus v1}, author = {Oversite Innovations}, year = {2026}, note = {Built for the Adaption Labs AutoScientist Challenge} } ```