Merge branch 'main' of hf.co:datasets/ro-h/regulatory_comments_api
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Dataset Card for Dataset Name
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
United States governmental agencies often make proposed regulations open to the public for comment.
|
| 4 |
+
Proposed regulations are organized into "dockets". This dataset will use Regulation.gov public API
|
| 5 |
+
to aggregate and clean public comments for dockets that mention opioid use.
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
Each example will consist of one docket, and include metadata such as docket id, docket title, etc.
|
| 8 |
+
Each docket entry will also include information about the top 10 comments, including comment metadata
|
| 9 |
+
and comment text.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
In this version, the data is called directly from the API, which can result in slow load times.
|
| 12 |
+
If the user wants to simply load a pre-downloaded dataset,
|
| 13 |
+
reference https://huggingface.co/datasets/ro-h/regulatory_comments.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
## Dataset Details
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
### Dataset Description and Structure
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
This dataset will call the API to individually gather docket and comment information; data collection will stop when
|
| 20 |
+
all dockets with opioid-related information have been gathered, or when the API hits a rate-limit. The government
|
| 21 |
+
API limit is 1000 calls per hour. Since each comment's text requires an individual call and there will be ~10 comments collected per docket,
|
| 22 |
+
only around 100 dockets can be collected without extending the limit. Furthermore, since some dockets don't have comment data and
|
| 23 |
+
thus will not be included, it is realistic to expect approximatley 60-70 dockets collected.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
If a larger set of dockets are required, consider requesting a rate-unlimited API key. For more details, visit
|
| 26 |
+
[https://open.gsa.gov/api/regulationsgov/].
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
The following information is included in this dataset:
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
**Docket Metadata**
|
| 31 |
+
id (int): A unique numerical identifier assigned to each regulatory docket.
|
| 32 |
+
title (str): The official title or name of the regulatory docket. This title typically summarizes the main issue or area of regulation covered by the docket.
|
| 33 |
+
context (str): The date when the docket was last modified on Regulations.gov.
|
| 34 |
+
purpose (str): Whether the docket was rulemaking, non-rulemaking, or other.
|
| 35 |
+
keywords (list): A string of keywords, as determined by Regulations.gov.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
**Comment Metadata**
|
| 38 |
+
comment_id (int): A unique numerical identifier for each public comment submitted on the docket.
|
| 39 |
+
comment_title (str): The title or subject line of the individual public comment.
|
| 40 |
+
comment_url (str): A URL or web link to the specific comment or docket on Regulations.gov. This allows direct access to the original document or page for replicability purposes.
|
| 41 |
+
comment_date (str): The date when the comment was posted on Regulations.gov. This is important for understanding the timeline of public engagement.
|
| 42 |
+
commenter_fname (str): The first name of the individual or entity that submitted the comment. This could be a person, organization, business, or government entity.
|
| 43 |
+
commenter_lname (str): The last name of the individual or entity that submitted the comment.
|
| 44 |
+
comment_length (int): The length of the comment in terms of the number of characters (spaces included)
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
**Comment Content**
|
| 47 |
+
text (str): The actual text of the comment submitted. This is the primary content for analysis, containing the commenter's views, arguments, and feedback on the regulatory matter.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
- **Curated by:** Ro Huang
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
### Dataset Sources
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
- **Repository:** [https://huggingface.co/datasets/ro-h/regulatory_comments_api]
|
| 54 |
+
- **Original Website:** [https://www.regulations.gov/]
|
| 55 |
+
- **API Website:** [https://open.gsa.gov/api/regulationsgov/]
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## Uses
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
This dataset may be used by researchers or policy-stakeholders curious about the influence of
|
| 60 |
+
public comments on regulation development. For example, sentiment analysis may be run on
|
| 61 |
+
comment text; alternatively, simple descriptive analysis on the comment length and agency regulation
|
| 62 |
+
may prove interesting.
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
## Dataset Creation
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
### Curation Rationale
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
After a law is passed, it may require specific details or guidelines to be practically enforceable or operable.
|
| 69 |
+
Federal agencies and the Executive branch engage in rulemaking, which specify the practical ways that legislation
|
| 70 |
+
can get turned into reality. Then, they will open a Public Comment period in which they will receive comments,
|
| 71 |
+
suggestions, and questions on the regulations they proposed. After taking in the feedback, the agency will modify their
|
| 72 |
+
regulation and post a final rule.
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
As an example, imagine that the legislative branch of the government passes a bill to increase the number of hospitals
|
| 75 |
+
nationwide. While the Congressman drafting the bill may have provided some general guidelines (e.g., there should be at
|
| 76 |
+
least one hospital in a zip code), there is oftentimes ambiguity on how the bill’s goals should be achieved.
|
| 77 |
+
The Department of Health and Human Services is tasked with implementing this new law, given its relevance to national
|
| 78 |
+
healthcare infrastructure. The agency would draft and publish a set of proposed rules, which might include criteria for
|
| 79 |
+
where new hospitals can be built, standards for hospital facilities, and the process for applying for federal funding.
|
| 80 |
+
During the Public Comment period, healthcare providers, local governments, and the public can provide feedback or express
|
| 81 |
+
concerns about the proposed rules. The agency will then read through these public comments, and modify their regulation
|
| 82 |
+
accordingly.
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
While this is a vital part of the United States regulatory process, there is little understanding of how agencies approach
|
| 85 |
+
public comments and modify their proposed regulations. Further, the data extracted from the API is often unclean and difficult
|
| 86 |
+
to navigate. This dataset seeks to offer some clarity through aggregating comments related to Opioid Use Disorders,
|
| 87 |
+
an issue that a diversity of stakeholders have investment in.
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
#### Data Collection and Processing
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
**Filtering Methods:**
|
| 92 |
+
For each docket, we retrieve relevant metadata such as docket ID,
|
| 93 |
+
title, context, purpose, and keywords. Additionally, the top 10 comments
|
| 94 |
+
for each docket are collected, including their metadata (comment ID, URL, date,
|
| 95 |
+
title, commenter's first and last name) and the comment text itself. The process
|
| 96 |
+
focuses on the first page of 25 comments for each docket, and the top 10 comments
|
| 97 |
+
are selected based on their order of appearance in the API response.
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
**Data Normalization:**
|
| 100 |
+
The collected data is normalized into a structured format. Each docket and
|
| 101 |
+
its associated comments are organized into a nested dictionary structure.
|
| 102 |
+
This structure includes key information about the docket and a list of comments,
|
| 103 |
+
each with its detailed metadata.
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
**Tools and Libraries Used:**
|
| 106 |
+
Requests Library: Used for making API calls to the Regulations.gov API to fetch dockets and comments data.
|
| 107 |
+
Datasets Library from HuggingFace: Employed for defining and managing the dataset's structure and generation process.
|
| 108 |
+
Python: The entire data collection and processing script is written in Python.
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
**Error Handling:**
|
| 111 |
+
In the event of a failed API request (indicated by a non-200 HTTP response status),
|
| 112 |
+
the data collection process for the current docket is halted, and the process moves to the next docket.
|