IMO-Steps / imo_proofs /imo_2022_p2.lean
roozbeh-yz's picture
Upload 42 files
1c3ffd8 verified
import Mathlib
set_option linter.unusedVariables.analyzeTactics true
theorem imo_2022_p2_simple
(g: ℝ → ℝ)
(h₀: ∀ x, 0 < x → ∃ y:ℝ , (0 < y ∧ g (x) + g (y) ≤ 2 * x * y
∧ (∀ z:ℝ, (0 < z ∧ z ≠ y) → ¬ g (x) + g (z) ≤ 2 * x * z) )) :
(∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → g x = x^2) := by
have h₁: ∀ x y:ℝ , 0 < x ∧ 0 < y → g x + g y ≤ 2 * x * y → x = y := by
intros x y hp h₁
by_contra! hc
have g₁: 2 * x * x < g x + g x := by
let ⟨p,h₁₁⟩ := h₀ x hp.1
cases' h₁₁ with h₁₁ h₁₂
cases' h₁₂ with h₁₂ h₁₃
by_cases hxp: x ≠ p
. have h₁₄: ¬ g x + g x ≤ 2 * x * x := by
refine h₁₃ x ?_
constructor
. exact hp.1
. exact hxp
exact not_le.mp h₁₄
. push_neg at hxp
exfalso
have hpy: y ≠ p := by exact Ne.trans_eq (id (Ne.symm hc)) hxp
have hcy: ¬g x + g y ≤ 2 * x * y := by
refine h₁₃ y ?_
constructor
. exact hp.2
. exact hpy
linarith
have g₂: 2 * y * y < g y + g y := by
let ⟨p,h₁₁⟩ := h₀ y hp.2
cases' h₁₁ with h₁₁ h₁₂
cases' h₁₂ with h₁₂ h₁₃
by_cases hyp: y ≠ p
. have h₁₄: ¬ g y + g y ≤ 2 * y * y := by
refine h₁₃ y ?_
constructor
. exact hp.2
. exact hyp
exact not_le.mp h₁₄
. push_neg at hyp
exfalso
have hpx: x ≠ p := by exact Ne.trans_eq hc hyp
have hcy: ¬g x + g y ≤ 2 * x * y := by
rw [add_comm, mul_right_comm]
refine h₁₃ x ?_
constructor
. exact hp.1
. exact hpx
linarith
ring_nf at gg
simp at gg
have g₃: x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 < g x + g y := by exact add_lt_add g₁ g₂
have g₄: x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 < 2 * x * y := by exact LT.lt.trans_le g₃ h₁
have g₅: (x - y) ^ 2 < 0 := by
rw [sub_sq, sub_add_eq_add_sub]
exact sub_neg.mpr g₄
have g₆: (x - y) ≠ 0 := by exact sub_ne_zero.mpr hc
have g₇: 0 < (x - y) ^ 2 := by exact (sq_pos_iff).mpr g₆
have g₈: (0:ℝ) ≠ 0 := by
refine ne_of_lt ?_
exact lt_trans g₇ g₅
refine false_of_ne g₈
have h₂: ∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → g x ≤ x ^ 2 := by
intros x hxp
let ⟨y,h₁₁⟩ := h₀ x hxp
cases' h₁₁ with h₁₁ h₁₂
cases' h₁₂ with h₁₂ h₁₃
have hxy: x = y := by
apply h₁ x y
. exact { left := hxp, right := h₁₁ }
. exact h₁₂
rw [← hxy] at h₁₂
linarith
have h₃: ∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → ¬ g x < x ^ 2 := by
simp
by_contra! hc
let ⟨x,hxp⟩ := hc
cases' hxp with hxp h₃
let d₁:ℝ := x ^ 2 - g x
have hd₁ : g x = x ^ 2 - d₁ := by exact (sub_sub_self (x ^ 2) (g x)).symm
let z:ℝ := x + Real.sqrt d₁
have hz: z = x + Real.sqrt d₁ := by exact rfl
have hzp: 0 < z := by
refine add_pos hxp ?_
refine Real.sqrt_pos_of_pos ?_
exact sub_pos.mpr h₃
have hxz: z ≠ x := by
rw [hz]
simp
push_neg
refine Real.sqrt_ne_zero'.mpr ?_
exact sub_pos.mpr h₃
have h₅: g x + g z ≤ 2 * x * z := by
rw [hd₁]
have h₅₁: - d₁ + Real.sqrt (x ^ 2 - (x ^ 2 - d₁)) ^ 20 := by
simp
rw [Real.sq_sqrt]
exact sub_nonneg_of_le (h₂ x hxp)
have h₅₂: x ^ 2 - d₁ + z ^ 22 * x * z := by
rw [hz, mul_add, add_sq]
ring_nf
repeat rw [add_assoc]
refine add_le_add_left ?_ (x * Real.sqrt (x ^ 2 - g x) * 2)
rw [hd₁]
linarith
exact add_le_of_add_le_left h₅₂ (h₂ z hzp)
let ⟨y,hyp⟩ := h₀ x hxp
cases' hyp with hyp h₆
cases' h₆ with h₆ h₇
have hxy: x = y := by
apply h₁
. exact { left := hxp, right := hyp }
. exact h₆
have h₈: ¬g x + g z ≤ 2 * x * z := by
refine h₇ z ?_
constructor
. exact hzp
. exact Ne.trans_eq hxz hxy
linarith[h₅,h₈]
intros x hxp
have g₂: g x ≤ x ^ 2 := by exact h₂ x hxp
have g₃: ¬ g x < x ^ 2 := by exact h₃ x hxp
linarith
theorem imo_2022_p2
(f: ℝ → ℝ)
(hfp: ∀ x:ℝ, 0 < x → 0 < f x)
(h₀: ∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → ∃! y:ℝ , 0 < y ∧ (x * f (y) + y * f (x) ≤ 2) ):
∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → f (x) = 1 / x := by
have h₁: ∀ x y:ℝ , (0 < x ∧ 0 < y) → (x * f (y) + y * f (x) ≤ 2) → x = y := by
intros x y hp h₁
by_contra! hc
have h₁₀: x * f x + x * f x > 2 := by
let ⟨z,h₁₁⟩ := h₀ x hp.1
cases' h₁₁ with h₁₁ h₁₂
have h₁₄: y = z := by
apply h₁₂ y
constructor
. exact hp.2
. exact h₁
have hxz: ¬ x = z := by exact Ne.trans_eq hc h₁₄
have h₁₆: ¬ (fun y => 0 < y ∧ x * f y + y * f x ≤ 2) x := by
exact mt (h₁₂ x) hxz
have h₁₇: ¬ (0 < x ∧ x * f x + x * f x ≤ 2) := by exact h₁₆
push_neg at h₁₇
exact h₁₇ hp.1
have h₁₁: y * f y + y * f y > 2 := by
let ⟨z,h₁₁⟩ := h₀ y hp.2
cases' h₁₁ with h₁₁ h₁₂
have h₁₄: x = z := by
apply h₁₂ x
constructor
. exact hp.1
. rw [add_comm]
exact h
have hxz: ¬ y = z := by exact Ne.trans_eq (id (Ne.symm hc)) h₁₄
have h₁₆: ¬ (fun y_2 => 0 < y_2 ∧ y * f y_2 + y_2 * f y ≤ 2) y := by
exact mt (h₁₂ y) hxz
have h₁₇: ¬ (0 < y ∧ y * f y + y * f y ≤ 2) := by exact h₁₆
push_neg at h₁₇
exact h₁₇ hp.2
ring_nf at h₁₀ h₁₁
simp at h₁₀ h₁₁
have h₁₅: 1 / x < f x := by exact (div_lt_iff₀' hp.1).mpr (h₁₀)
have h₁₆: 1 / y < f y := by exact (div_lt_iff₀' hp.2).mpr (h₁₁)
have h₁₂: x / y + y / x < 2 := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt' h₁ ?_
refine add_lt_add ?_ ?_
. rw [← mul_one_div]
exact (mul_lt_mul_left hp.1).mpr h₁₆
. rw [← mul_one_div]
exact (mul_lt_mul_left hp.2).mpr h₁₅
have h₁₃: 2 < x / y + y / x := by
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (le_of_lt hp.1)
refine lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right ?_ (le_of_lt hp.2)
repeat rw [add_mul, mul_assoc]
rw [mul_comm x y, ← mul_assoc (x/y)]
rw [div_mul_comm x y y, div_mul_comm y x x, div_self, div_self]
. ring_nf
refine lt_of_sub_pos ?_
rw [mul_comm _ 2, ← mul_assoc]
rw [← sub_sq']
refine sq_pos_of_ne_zero ?_
exact sub_ne_zero.mpr hc.symm
. exact ne_of_gt hp.1
. exact ne_of_gt hp.2
linarith
have h₂: ∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → x * f x ≤ 1 := by
intros x hxp
let ⟨y,h₂₁⟩ := h₀ x hxp
cases' h₂₁ with h₂₁ h₂₂
have hxy: x = y := by
apply h₁ x y
. constructor
. exact hxp
. exact h₂₁.1
. exact h₂₁.2
rw [← hxy] at h₂₁
linarith
have h₃: ∀ x:ℝ , 0 < x → ¬ x * f x < 1 := by
by_contra! hc
let ⟨x,hxp⟩ := hc
cases' hxp with hxp h₃
let d₁:ℝ := 1 - x * f x
have hd₁ : x * f x = 1 - d₁ := by exact (sub_sub_self 1 (x * f x)).symm
let z:ℝ := x + d₁ / f x
have hz: z = x + d₁ / f x := by exact rfl
have hzp: 0 < z := by
refine add_pos hxp ?_
refine div_pos ?_ ?_
. exact sub_pos.mpr h₃
. exact hfp x hxp
have hxz: ¬ x = z := by
by_contra! hcz₀
rw [← hcz₀] at hz
have hcz₁: 0 < d₁ / f x := by
refine div_pos ?_ (hfp x hxp)
exact sub_pos.mpr h₃
linarith
have h₄: ¬ (x * f z + z * f x ≤ 2) := by
have h₄₁: x * f z + z * f x ≤ 2 → x = z := by
exact h₁ x z { left := hxp, right := hzp }
exact mt h₄₁ hxz
have h₅: x * f z < 1 := by
suffices h₅₁: z * f z ≤ 1 by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ h₅₁
refine (mul_lt_mul_right (hfp z hzp)).mpr ?_
rw [hz]
refine lt_add_of_pos_right x ?_
refine div_pos ?_ (hfp x hxp)
exact sub_pos.mpr h₃
exact h₂ z hzp
have h₆: x * f z + z * f x < 2 := by
suffices h₇: z * f x ≤ 1 by
linarith
rw [hz, add_mul, hd₁]
rw [div_mul_comm d₁ (f x) (f x)]
rw [div_self]
. rw [one_mul, sub_add_cancel]
. exact Ne.symm (ne_of_lt (hfp x hxp))
linarith
intros x hxp
have h₄: x * f x ≤ 1 := by exact h₂ x hxp
have h₅: ¬ x * f x < 1 := by exact h₃ x hxp
refine eq_div_of_mul_eq ?_ ?_
. exact ne_of_gt hxp
. push_neg at h₅
linarith