File size: 14,223 Bytes
277287c |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 |
[
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 0,
"timestamp": 1684707989274.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
39,
428
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "How did transpose suddenly come into the picture?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 2,
"timestamp": 1684708398925.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
189,
279
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Can someone explain why A=LU is better than EA=U?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 3,
"timestamp": 1684708441242.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
10
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "In A=LU part, what do L and U stand for? (Like \"E\" for elimination )"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 4,
"timestamp": 1684708849693.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
341,
342,
343,
344,
353
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "at 32:35 => Should not the first cost be 99*2 instead of 100^2 because there are 99 rows below first one. For pivoting each row below, you need to multiply the first row by some constant then subtract from the row you are pivoting. So, essentially are we not ending up having 2 operations per row for those 99 rows, hence, 99*2 instead of 100^2 ???"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 5,
"timestamp": 1684708888995.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
341,
342,
343,
344
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "sorry i'm confused at 32:22, it is 100 ^2, but i think it is 100, why it isn't 100? could anyone explain that to me? thx alot"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 6,
"timestamp": 1684709130696.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
515,
516
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "How come 4x4 Matrix has 24 P's ?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 7,
"timestamp": 1684709988672.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
48
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "4:57 if i transpose these guys, that product, then again, ... : why did he jump suddenly to this theorem without any definition of transpose nor the logical derivation? Did I miss something?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 8,
"timestamp": 1684710001490.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
341,
342,
343,
344
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "33\uff1a06 why it's 100^2?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 9,
"timestamp": 1684710020923.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
341,
342,
343,
344,
353
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Can someone explain why the computatinal expense is roughly 100^2 for the first step? I thought it would be roughly proportional to n = 100"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 10,
"timestamp": 1684710094057.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
185
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Why is L always inverse of E? Like how can we see that geometrically?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 12,
"timestamp": 1684710326625.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
281,
282
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "My doubt is what were we trying to prove while calculating the cost of operation during elimination. And how EA is costlier than LU?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 13,
"timestamp": 1684719774461.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
419
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Can anyone explain to me why the answer for cost of B is $n^2$ around 40:00?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 14,
"timestamp": 1684719853045.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
9
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Hi. Is U the b in Ax = b?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 15,
"timestamp": 1684719893863.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
271
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "At 24:20 when he says that the multiplier goes directly into L, he means the negative right? If you keep a track of the operation on the left side, it inverts while bringing it to the right side."
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 16,
"timestamp": 1684719946478.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
162
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "It is the best linear algebra lecture ever!!! But I do not get where the Identity matrix E31 comes from (at 16:47) ? Could anyone pls help me with this?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 17,
"timestamp": 1684719965960.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
341,
342,
343,
344
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Can someone please explain how did he get 100^2 and not 100 x 2 (multiply+substract) operations at 33:22?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 18,
"timestamp": 1684720220360.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
341,
353,
355,
356,
360,
419
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "26:10\n\nI have a question about the cost of elimination.\nAx=b\n\nFor an nxn matrix A\nFor the 1st pivot, instead of 100^2, shouldn\u2019t it cost 100*99?\n2nd pivot, instead of 99^2, shouldn\u2019t it cost 99*98?\n3rd pivot, instead of 98^2, shouldn\u2019t it cost 98*87?\n\nSo, instead of n^2+(n-1)^2+(n-2)^2+...., shouldn\u2019t it be n(n-1)+(n-1)(n-2)+(n-2)(n-3)+.... instead?\n\n\nAlso, how did he get n^2 for the matrix b?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 20,
"timestamp": 1684720264277.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
91
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "8:55 Min why does he want to avoid A to be singular? don\u00b4t quite understand...the only reason i see (in hindsight), is that the step, he does at 12:30 Min (rewriting LU with a diagonal matrix in the middle) wouldn\u00b4t be unique. But i assume, there must be another reason."
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 21,
"timestamp": 1684720310343.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
102
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "At 10:27 how are we calculating E21( elimination matrix)?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 22,
"timestamp": 1684720431225.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
381,
386
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Great video! I love this series. In this lecture, Dr. Strang briefly mentions that the cost of operations for the det(A) will be (n!) He also shows us how the cost of getting A into upper triangular form U will be (1/3)n^3. But from Lecture 2 we know that one way of finding det(A) is to get A into U and then simply find the product of all n pivots. So it seems like the cost for finding det(A) would just be a bit more than (1/3)n^3, perhaps (1/3)n^3 + n. I must be missing something here; any thoughts?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 23,
"timestamp": 1684720563078.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
31,
94,
132
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "hmm is there a complementary book we must follow? I'm puzzled as I don't think we've introduced the elementary matrices in previous lectures, or Upper/lower matrices. I feel this is not beginner friendly."
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 24,
"timestamp": 1684720668792.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
220,
221,
222,
223
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "I'm a bit unsure as to why he doesn't like the 10 in the matrix E around 19:00? Are we assuming we already have A and U defined, and just need to find a matrix that relates them? Is it because the L parts, like the E parts (E21, E31, E32) can simply be stated, but to calculate the final L and E, final L can be stated (just like it's parts), where as E has to be calculated?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 28,
"timestamp": 1684720790293.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
185
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Can anyone tell me why can't we obtain the Lower triangular matrix L directly from the combined E which could just be derived from using gaussian elimination? Thanksss"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 30,
"timestamp": 1684721031176.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
235,
236,
237,
240
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "On 21 minute I don't understand where these matrices come from and why we need them. Anyone care to elaborate?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 31,
"timestamp": 1684721039024.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
516
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "can someone explain how he got 24P's at the end?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 32,
"timestamp": 1684721377675.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
142,
143
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "How did he work out at 12:50?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 34,
"timestamp": 1684721404907.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
417,
419
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Why the number of operation is equal to n^2 ? Can anyone ?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 36,
"timestamp": 1684722009555.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
10,
69,
111,
261,
270
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "I don't get the point of A = LU. You need to know U to solve for x in Ax=b. You need E to find U, you can't get U from L. Once you have U, you're basically done. What do you need L for?\n\nI understand the point that L is less costly than E -- but what use is L if you don't know U yet? What am I missing?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 39,
"timestamp": 1684722160238.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
236,
240
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "At 26:00 how did he find the inverses of E21 & E32 so easily? is he using some formula? I'm watching the videos in the MITs required order, but looks like I missed somewhere something"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 40,
"timestamp": 1684722350405.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
491,
516
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "Why does a 4x4 matrix have 24 Permutationmatrices when a 3x3 Matrix has 6? I don't get how they calculated it so quickly."
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 42,
"timestamp": 1684722535272.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
170,
171,
185
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "how do we know that E-1 will be a lower triangular matrix?"
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 43,
"timestamp": 1684722576236.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
318
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "can someone pls explain how n,n^2 , n^3....n! come ? ?? at 29:46 ."
},
{
"file_id": "MsIvs_6vC38",
"query_id": 44,
"timestamp": 1684722640153.0,
"annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [
384,
386,
389
],
"names": [
"annotator2"
],
"text": "The complexity of matrix multiplication is of the order O(n^3), that's fine. But in every step in the we are changing just one row...therefore, shouldn't the cost be n+ (n-1)+ (n-2) + ........+1, ie O(n^2), if we have a suitable algorithm?"
}
] |