| [ | |
| { | |
| "file_id": "WfEQabCGAqI", | |
| "query_id": 3, | |
| "timestamp": 1684511496045.0, | |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ | |
| 196, | |
| 197 | |
| ], | |
| "names": [ | |
| "annotator1" | |
| ], | |
| "text": "Do maths/science/engineering students take this class or some other multivariable calculus course like 18.024?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "file_id": "WfEQabCGAqI", | |
| "query_id": 5, | |
| "timestamp": 1684511772657.0, | |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ | |
| 161 | |
| ], | |
| "names": [ | |
| "annotator1" | |
| ], | |
| "text": "18:09 why the range of r goes from 0 to 1? I think the definition of S in this problem needs further clarification. S should be a paraboloid of z = x^2 + y^2 between z=0 and z=1. It is a little confusing by justing saying \"above the unit disk\". " | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "file_id": "WfEQabCGAqI", | |
| "query_id": 7, | |
| "timestamp": 1684511834173.0, | |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ | |
| 359, | |
| 361 | |
| ], | |
| "names": [ | |
| "annotator1" | |
| ], | |
| "text": "Isn't this theorem called after Ostrogradsky, since he is the first one to prove it?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "file_id": "WfEQabCGAqI", | |
| "query_id": 8, | |
| "timestamp": 1684512043723.0, | |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ | |
| 226, | |
| 227, | |
| 264 | |
| ], | |
| "names": [ | |
| "annotator1" | |
| ], | |
| "text": "Wait, did he ever account for vector N not being a unit vector? He never required that the N vector represented the area of the delta slanted plane did he?" | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "file_id": "WfEQabCGAqI", | |
| "query_id": 1, | |
| "timestamp": 1684192120438.0, | |
| "annotatedSourceSentencesIndices": [ | |
| 331, | |
| 331 | |
| ], | |
| "names": [ | |
| "annotator1", | |
| "annotator2" | |
| ], | |
| "text": "I did not understand the last step replacing dA by dxdy. The proof contained slanted plane with an angle alpha to only one axis and not a general slant in both directions. Does this proof apply when we are considering a general slant to both x and y ? Will dA=dS Cos theta still be applicable?" | |
| } | |
| ] |