File size: 14,309 Bytes
110f4f3 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 | import OAI.Analysis.BackwardIntertwiners.ConvolutionBounds
namespace OAI
namespace BackwardIntertwiners
open Filter
open scoped Topology
noncomputable section
def coefficientObstacle (d : ℕ → ℂ) : Set ℕ := {n | 0 < n ∧ d n ≠ 0}
def coefficientEnvelope (d : ℕ → ℂ) : ℕ → ℝ :=
convexEnvelope (coefficientObstacle d) (fun n => -Real.log ‖d n‖)
namespace CoefficientEnvelope
variable {d : ℕ → ℂ} {G : ℕ → ℝ}
variable (hu : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, n < k ∧ d k ≠ 0)
variable (hG : DiscreteConvex G) (hG0 : G 0 = 0)
variable (hb : ∀ n, ‖d n‖ ≤ Real.exp (-G n))
include hu in
lemma unbounded : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, n < k ∧ k ∈ coefficientObstacle d := by
intro n
obtain ⟨k, hk, hd⟩ := hu n
exact ⟨k, hk, by exact ⟨by omega, hd⟩⟩
include hG hG0 hb in
lemma minorant : G ∈ convexMinorants (coefficientObstacle d) (fun n => -Real.log ‖d n‖) := by
refine ⟨hG0, hG, ?_⟩
intro n hn
have hn0 : 0 < ‖d n‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr hn.2
have hh := Real.log_le_log hn0 (hb n)
rw [Real.log_exp] at hh
linarith
include hu hG hG0 hb in
lemma properties :
coefficientEnvelope d 0 = 0 ∧ DiscreteConvex (coefficientEnvelope d) ∧
(∀ n, G n ≤ coefficientEnvelope d n) ∧
(∀ n, ‖d n‖ ≤ Real.exp (-coefficientEnvelope d n)) ∧
(∀ n, 0 < coefficientEnvelope d (n+2) - 2*coefficientEnvelope d (n+1) +
coefficientEnvelope d n → ‖d (n+1)‖ = Real.exp (-coefficientEnvelope d (n+1))) := by
have hm := minorant hG hG0 hb
have he : (convexMinorants (coefficientObstacle d) (fun n => -Real.log ‖d n‖)).Nonempty := ⟨G, hm⟩
have hU := unbounded hu
refine ⟨ConvexEnvelope.zero hU he, ConvexEnvelope.convex hU he,
ConvexEnvelope.le_envelope hU hm, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst n
simpa only [coefficientEnvelope, ConvexEnvelope.zero hU he, hG0] using hb 0
· by_cases hd : d n = 0
· simp only [hd, norm_zero]; exact (Real.exp_pos _).le
· have hbelow := ConvexEnvelope.below he (show n ∈ coefficientObstacle d from ⟨by omega, hd⟩)
have hlog : Real.log ‖d n‖ ≤ -coefficientEnvelope d n := by
change coefficientEnvelope d n ≤ -Real.log ‖d n‖ at hbelow
linarith
simpa only [Real.exp_log (norm_pos_iff.mpr hd)] using Real.exp_le_exp.mpr hlog
· intro n hn
obtain ⟨hd, hc⟩ := ConvexEnvelope.contact hU he n hn
change coefficientEnvelope d (n+1) = -Real.log ‖d (n+1)‖ at hc
rw [hc, neg_neg, Real.exp_log (norm_pos_iff.mpr hd.2)]
end CoefficientEnvelope
theorem no_both_unbounded {P Q : ℕ → ℝ} {b c : ℤ → ℂ}
(hb : EnvelopeBounds P Q b c) (hP : DiscreteConvex P) (hQ : DiscreteConvex Q)
(hP0 : P 0 = 0) (hQ0 : Q 0 = 0) {lam δ : ℝ}
(hlam : Real.log 3 < lam) (hδ : lam < δ)
(hqp : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n : ℝ)^2 ≤ P n)
(hqq : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n : ℝ)^2 ≤ Q n)
(hbu : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, n < k ∧ b (k : ℤ) ≠ 0)
(hcu : ∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, n < k ∧ c (-(k : ℤ)) ≠ 0)
(hz : ∀ r : ℕ, 1 ≤ r → (∑' j : ℤ, b j * c (j-r)) = 0) : False := by
obtain ⟨hA0, hA, hPA, hcA, hcontactA⟩ :=
CoefficientEnvelope.properties hcu hP hP0 hb.c_neg
obtain ⟨hB0, hB, hQB, hbB, hcontactB⟩ :=
CoefficientEnvelope.properties hbu hQ hQ0 hb.b_pos
let A := coefficientEnvelope (fun n => c (-(n : ℤ)))
let B := coefficientEnvelope (fun n => b (n : ℤ))
apply no_correlation_of_envelopes (A := A) (B := B) (b := b) (c := c)
?_ hA hB hA0 hB0 hlam hδ ?_ ?_ hcontactA hcontactB hz
· refine ⟨hbB, ?_, ?_, hcA⟩
· intro n
exact (hb.b_neg n).trans (Real.exp_le_exp.mpr (hPA n))
· intro n
exact (hb.c_pos n).trans (Real.exp_le_exp.mpr (hQB n))
· filter_upwards [hqp] with n hn using hn.trans (hPA n)
· filter_upwards [hqq] with n hn using hn.trans (hQB n)
def boundedSideTail (B : ℕ → ℝ) (c : ℤ → ℂ) (h : ℤ) (p k : ℕ) : ℝ :=
Real.exp (B p - B (p+k+1)) * ‖c (h+(k:ℤ)+1)‖
lemma boundedSideTail_nonneg (B : ℕ → ℝ) (c : ℤ → ℂ) (h : ℤ) (p k : ℕ) :
0 ≤ boundedSideTail B c h p k := mul_nonneg (Real.exp_pos _).le (norm_nonneg _)
lemma boundedSideTail_mono {B : ℕ → ℝ} (hB : DiscreteConvex B)
(c : ℤ → ℂ) (h : ℤ) {p₀ p : ℕ} (hpp : p₀ ≤ p) (k : ℕ) :
boundedSideTail B c h p k ≤ boundedSideTail B c h p₀ k := by
have hh := hB.increment_mono hpp (k+1)
unfold boundedSideTail
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ (norm_nonneg _)
apply Real.exp_le_exp.mpr
simp only [← Nat.add_assoc] at hh
linarith
lemma boundedSideTail_tendsto {B : ℕ → ℝ} (hB : DiscreteConvex B)
(hs : Tendsto (fun n => B (n+1)-B n) atTop atTop)
(c : ℤ → ℂ) (h : ℤ) {p₀ : ℕ} (hsum : Summable (boundedSideTail B c h p₀)) :
Tendsto (fun p => ∑' k, boundedSideTail B c h p k) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have hpoint (k : ℕ) : Tendsto (fun p => boundedSideTail B c h p k) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have heq : (fun p => boundedSideTail B c h p k) =
(fun p => normalizedTailTerm B p k * (Real.exp (-B (k+1)) * ‖c (h+(k:ℤ)+1)‖)) := by
funext p
unfold boundedSideTail normalizedTailTerm
rw [← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
congr 2
ring
rw [heq]
simpa using (hB.tail_term_tendsto hs k).mul_const
(Real.exp (-B (k+1)) * ‖c (h+(k:ℤ)+1)‖)
have ht := tendsto_tsum_of_dominated_convergence hsum hpoint
(show ∀ᶠ p : ℕ in atTop, ∀ k,
‖boundedSideTail B c h p k‖ ≤ boundedSideTail B c h p₀ k from ?_)
· simpa using ht
· filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop p₀] with p hp k
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (boundedSideTail_nonneg _ _ _ _ _)]
exact boundedSideTail_mono hB c h hp k
theorem no_unbounded_against_min {B : ℕ → ℝ} {b c : ℤ → ℂ}
(hB : DiscreteConvex B) (hB0 : B 0 = 0) {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ)
(hquad : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n:ℝ)^2 ≤ B n)
(hb : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖b n‖ ≤ Real.exp (-B n))
(hc : ∀ n, 0 < B (n+2) - 2*B (n+1) + B n →
‖b ((n+1:ℕ):ℤ)‖ = Real.exp (-B (n+1)))
{h : ℤ} (hch : c h ≠ 0) (hcmin : ∀ j : ℤ, j < h → c j = 0)
{p₀ : ℕ} (hsum : Summable (boundedSideTail B c h p₀))
(hz : ∀ r : ℕ, 1 ≤ r → (∑' j : ℤ, b j * c (j-r)) = 0) : False := by
have hchpos := norm_pos_iff.mpr hch
have ht := boundedSideTail_tendsto hB (hB.slopes_tendsto hB0 hδ hquad) c h hsum
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.1 (ht (eventually_lt_nhds hchpos))
obtain ⟨n, hn, hcurv⟩ := large_curvature hδ hδ hquad (max N (max p₀ (h.toNat+1)))
let p := n+1
have hp₀ : p₀ ≤ p := by dsimp [p]; omega
have hpN : N ≤ p := by dsimp [p]; omega
have hph : h < (p : ℤ) := by dsimp [p]; omega
have hcontact : ‖b (p : ℤ)‖ = Real.exp (-B p) := hc n (by simpa using hcurv)
have htailsum : Summable (boundedSideTail B c h p) := by
apply hsum.of_norm_bounded
intro k
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (boundedSideTail_nonneg _ _ _ _ _)]
exact boundedSideTail_mono hB c h hp₀ k
let f := fun i : ℤ => b ((p:ℤ)+i) * c (h+i)
have hfneg : ∀ k : ℕ, f (-((k:ℤ)+1)) = 0 := by
intro k
dsimp [f]
rw [hcmin _ (by omega), mul_zero]
have hfbound (k : ℕ) : ‖f ((k:ℤ)+1)‖ ≤ Real.exp (-B p) * boundedSideTail B c h p k := by
dsimp [f, boundedSideTail]
rw [norm_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
have he : -B p + (B p - B (p+k+1)) = -B (p+k+1) := by ring
rw [he]
have hi : (p:ℤ)+((k:ℤ)+1) = ((p+k+1:ℕ):ℤ) := by omega
rw [hi]
simpa only [add_assoc] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hb (p+k+1)) (norm_nonneg (c (h+(k:ℤ)+1)))
have hfpos : Summable (fun k : ℕ => ‖f ((k:ℤ)+1)‖) := by
apply (htailsum.mul_left (Real.exp (-B p))).of_norm_bounded
intro k
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)] using hfbound k
have hfn : Summable (fun k : ℕ => ‖f (-((k:ℤ)+1))‖) := by
simp only [hfneg, norm_zero]
exact summable_zero
have hzcenter : (∑' i : ℤ, f i) = 0 := by
let r := ((p:ℤ)-h).toNat
have hr : 1 ≤ r := by dsimp [r]; omega
have hri : (r:ℤ) = (p:ℤ)-h := by dsimp [r]; omega
calc (∑' i : ℤ, f i) = ∑' i : ℤ, b ((p:ℤ)+i) * c (((p:ℤ)+i)-(r:ℤ)) := by
apply tsum_congr
intro i
dsimp [f]
congr 2
omega
_ = ∑' j : ℤ, b j * c (j-r) := by
simpa only [Equiv.coe_addLeft] using
(Equiv.addLeft (p:ℤ)).tsum_eq (fun j : ℤ => b j * c (j-r))
_ = 0 := hz r hr
have hcentral := central_norm_le_of_correlation_zero f hfpos hfn hzcenter
simp only [hfneg, norm_zero, tsum_zero, add_zero] at hcentral
have hcentral' : Real.exp (-B p) * ‖c h‖ ≤
Real.exp (-B p) * ∑' k, boundedSideTail B c h p k := by
calc Real.exp (-B p) * ‖c h‖ = ‖f 0‖ := by simp [f, hcontact]
_ ≤ ∑' k : ℕ, ‖f ((k:ℤ)+1)‖ := hcentral
_ ≤ ∑' k, Real.exp (-B p) * boundedSideTail B c h p k :=
hfpos.tsum_le_tsum hfbound (htailsum.mul_left _)
_ = _ := tsum_mul_left
have hle := (mul_le_mul_iff_right₀ (Real.exp_pos (-B p))).mp hcentral'
exact (not_lt_of_ge hle) (hN p hpN)
def positiveLog (w : ℤ → ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ := -Real.log (w n)
def negativeLog (w : ℤ → ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ := Real.log (w (-(n:ℤ)))
def stepRatio (w : ℤ → ℝ) (j : ℤ) : ℝ := w (j+1) / w j
lemma stepRatio_summable {w : ℤ → ℝ} (hw : ∀ j, 0 < w j) (hw0 : w 0 = 1)
(hP : DiscreteConvex (negativeLog w)) (hQ : DiscreteConvex (positiveLog w))
{δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ)
(hqp : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n:ℝ)^2 ≤ negativeLog w n)
(hqq : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n:ℝ)^2 ≤ positiveLog w n) :
Summable (stepRatio w) := by
have hP0 : negativeLog w 0 = 0 := by simp [negativeLog, hw0]
have hQ0 : positiveLog w 0 = 0 := by simp [positiveLog, hw0]
have hsP := hP.summable_exp_neg_slope hP0 hδ hqp
have hsQ := hQ.summable_exp_neg_slope hQ0 hδ hqq
apply Summable.of_nat_of_neg_add_one
· apply hsQ.congr
intro n
unfold stepRatio positiveLog
have he : -(-Real.log (w (n+1)) - -Real.log (w n)) =
Real.log (w (n+1)) - Real.log (w n) := by ring
push_cast
rw [he, Real.exp_sub, Real.exp_log (hw _), Real.exp_log (hw _)]
· apply hsP.congr
intro n
unfold stepRatio negativeLog
have hi : -((n:ℤ)+1)+1 = -(n:ℤ) := by omega
rw [hi]
push_cast
rw [neg_sub, Real.exp_sub, Real.exp_log (hw _), Real.exp_log (hw _)]
lemma bounds_of_weight {w : ℤ → ℝ} (hw : ∀ j, 0 < w j) {b c : ℤ → ℂ}
(hb : ∀ j, ‖b j‖ ≤ w j) (hc : ∀ j, ‖c j‖ * w j ≤ 1) :
EnvelopeBounds (negativeLog w) (positiveLog w) b c := by
have hc' (j : ℤ) : ‖c j‖ ≤ (w j)⁻¹ := by
simpa only [one_div] using (le_div_iff₀ (hw j)).mpr (hc j)
constructor
· intro n
simpa [positiveLog, Real.exp_log (hw _)] using hb n
· intro n
simpa [negativeLog, Real.exp_log (hw _)] using hb (-(n:ℤ))
· intro n
simpa [positiveLog, Real.exp_neg, Real.exp_log (hw _)] using hc' n
· intro n
simpa [negativeLog, Real.exp_neg, Real.exp_log (hw _)] using hc' (-(n:ℤ))
lemma boundedSideTail_summable {w : ℤ → ℝ} (hw : ∀ j, 0 < w j)
(hdec : Antitone w) (hs : Summable (stepRatio w))
{B : ℕ → ℝ} (hBw : ∀ n : ℕ, Real.exp (-B n) ≤ w n)
{c : ℤ → ℂ} (hc : ∀ j, ‖c j‖ * w j ≤ 1)
(h : ℤ) {p₀ : ℕ} (hp₀ : h+1 ≤ (p₀:ℤ)) :
Summable (boundedSideTail B c h p₀) := by
have hsm := hs.comp_injective (i := fun k : ℕ => h+(k:ℤ)+1) (by
intro a b hab; dsimp only at hab; omega)
apply (hsm.mul_left (Real.exp (B p₀))).of_norm_bounded
intro k
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (boundedSideTail_nonneg _ _ _ _ _)]
change boundedSideTail B c h p₀ k ≤ Real.exp (B p₀) * stepRatio w (h+(k:ℤ)+1)
have hwle : Real.exp (-B (p₀+k+1)) ≤ w (h+(k:ℤ)+1+1) := by
exact (hBw _).trans (hdec (by omega))
have hcw : ‖c (h+(k:ℤ)+1)‖ ≤ 1 / w (h+(k:ℤ)+1) :=
(le_div_iff₀ (hw _)).mpr (hc _)
unfold boundedSideTail stepRatio
rw [Real.exp_sub, div_eq_mul_inv, ← Real.exp_neg, mul_assoc]
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (Real.exp_pos _).le
calc Real.exp (-B (p₀+k+1)) * ‖c (h+(k:ℤ)+1)‖ ≤
w (h+(k:ℤ)+1+1) * (1 / w (h+(k:ℤ)+1)) :=
mul_le_mul hwle hcw (norm_nonneg _) (hw _).le
_ = _ := by ring
lemma nat_support_unbounded {d : ℤ → ℂ}
(hu : ¬∃ m : ℤ, ∀ j : ℤ, d j ≠ 0 → j ≤ m) :
∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k, n < k ∧ d (k:ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
push Not at hu
intro n
obtain ⟨j, hd, hj⟩ := hu n
refine ⟨j.toNat, by omega, ?_⟩
have he : (j.toNat:ℤ) = j := by omega
simpa only [he] using hd
lemma bounded_above_of_min {w : ℤ → ℝ} (hw : ∀ j, 0 < w j)
(hdec : Antitone w) (hw0 : w 0 = 1) (hs : Summable (stepRatio w))
(hQ : DiscreteConvex (positiveLog w)) {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ)
(hqq : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n:ℝ)^2 ≤ positiveLog w n)
{b c : ℤ → ℂ} (hb : ∀ j, ‖b j‖ ≤ w j) (hc : ∀ j, ‖c j‖*w j ≤ 1)
{h : ℤ} (hch : c h ≠ 0) (hcmin : ∀ j : ℤ, j < h → c j = 0)
(hz : ∀ r : ℕ, 1 ≤ r → (∑' j : ℤ, b j * c (j-r)) = 0) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ j : ℤ, b j ≠ 0 → j ≤ m := by
by_contra hu
have hbu := nat_support_unbounded hu
have hQ0 : positiveLog w 0 = 0 := by simp [positiveLog, hw0]
obtain ⟨hB0, hB, hQB, hbB, hcontactB⟩ :=
CoefficientEnvelope.properties hbu hQ hQ0 (bounds_of_weight hw hb hc).b_pos
let B := coefficientEnvelope (fun n => b (n:ℤ))
have hquad : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, δ*(n:ℝ)^2 ≤ B n := by
filter_upwards [hqq] with n hn using hn.trans (hQB n)
have hBw (n : ℕ) : Real.exp (-B n) ≤ w n := by
have hh := Real.exp_le_exp.mpr (neg_le_neg (hQB n))
simpa only [positiveLog, neg_neg, Real.exp_log (hw _)] using hh
exact no_unbounded_against_min hB hB0 hδ hquad hbB hcontactB hch hcmin
(boundedSideTail_summable hw hdec hs hBw hc h (p₀ := h.toNat+1) (by omega)) hz
end
end BackwardIntertwiners
end OAI
|