File size: 7,309 Bytes
97c3405 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 | import OAI.Combinatorics.ContingencyTables.Counting.CompanionArithmeticProposal
import OAI.Combinatorics.ContingencyTables.Sampling.SmallPatternProgram
namespace OAI
/-! # Polynomial validation of paired binary states
The bounded-profile arithmetic test specializes to width one.
Thus the companion's state filter is a concrete list program on the two
coordinates of every labelled pair.
-/
namespace ContingencyTables.CompanionChainValidator
open CommonBasesFPRAS TwoLiftStates ProfilePrograms
open MatchingFPRAS.TreeTyped
open scoped BigOperators Classical
noncomputable section
variable {P : Type*} [Fintype P]
omit [Fintype P] in
lemma single_iff_occupancy (S : Set (P×Bool)) (p : P) :
PairSingle (pair p) S ↔ occupancy S p=1 := by
unfold PairSingle TwoLiftStates.pair occupancy
by_cases h0 : (p,false)∈S <;> by_cases h1 : (p,true)∈S <;> simp [h0,h1]
omit [Fintype P] in
lemma empty_iff_occupancy (S : Set (P×Bool)) (p : P) :
PairEmpty (pair p) S ↔ occupancy S p=0 := by
unfold PairEmpty TwoLiftStates.pair occupancy
by_cases h0 : (p,false)∈S <;> by_cases h1 : (p,true)∈S <;> simp [h0,h1]
omit [Fintype P] in
lemma full_iff_occupancy (S : Set (P×Bool)) (p : P) :
PairFull (pair p) S ↔ occupancy S p=2 := by
unfold PairFull TwoLiftStates.pair occupancy
by_cases h0 : (p,false)∈S <;> by_cases h1 : (p,true)∈S <;> simp [h0,h1]
lemma plain_iff_occupancy (S : Set (P×Bool)) :
PlainState pairs S ↔ ∀ p,occupancy S p=1 := by
constructor
· intro h p
exact (single_iff_occupancy S p).mp (h (pair p) (pair_mem p))
· intro h p hp
obtain ⟨q,_,rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp hp
exact (single_iff_occupancy S q).mpr (h q)
lemma defect_iff_occupancy (S : Set (P×Bool)) (p q : P) :
DefectState pairs (pair p) (pair q) S ↔ p≠q ∧
∀ i,occupancy S i+(if i=p then 1 else 0)=1+(if i=q then 1 else 0) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨fun he => h.2.2.1 (congrArg pair he),defect_occupancy S p q h⟩
· rintro ⟨hpq,h⟩
refine ⟨pair_mem p,pair_mem q,fun he => hpq (pair_injective he),?_,?_,?_⟩
· apply (empty_iff_occupancy S p).mpr
have hh := h p
simp only [ite_true,hpq,ite_false] at hh
omega
· apply (full_iff_occupancy S q).mpr
have hh := h q
simp only [ite_true,Ne.symm hpq,ite_false,Nat.add_zero] at hh
omega
· intro t ht htp htq
obtain ⟨i,_,rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp ht
apply (single_iff_occupancy S i).mpr
have hip : i≠p := fun he => htp (congrArg pair he)
have hiq : i≠q := fun he => htq (congrArg pair he)
simpa only [hip,hiq,ite_false,Nat.add_zero] using h i
lemma chain_iff_occupancy (S : Set (P×Bool)) :
ChainState pairs S ↔ (∀ i,occupancy S i=1) ∨
∃ p q : P,p≠q ∧ ∀ i,occupancy S i+(if i=p then 1 else 0)=1+(if i=q then 1 else 0) := by
constructor
· rintro (h|⟨p,q,h⟩)
· exact Or.inl ((plain_iff_occupancy S).mp h)
· obtain ⟨a,_,rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp h.1
obtain ⟨b,_,rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp h.2.1
exact Or.inr ⟨a,b,(defect_iff_occupancy S a b).mp h⟩
· rintro (h|⟨p,q,h⟩)
· exact Or.inl ((plain_iff_occupancy S).mpr h)
· exact Or.inr ⟨pair p,pair q,(defect_iff_occupancy S p q).mpr h⟩
/-- Width one is exactly the companion's labelled paired-state test. -/
theorem paired_pattern_iff {m : ℕ} (e : Fin m ≃ P) (S : Set (P×Bool)) :
patternTest ((List.ofFn (fun i => if (e i,false)∈S then 1 else 0),
List.ofFn (fun i => if (e i,true)∈S then 1 else 0)),1)=true ↔ ChainState pairs S := by
rw [patternTest_ofFn,chain_iff_occupancy]
change (∀ i,occupancy S (e i)=1) ∨
(∃ p q : Fin m,p≠q ∧ ∀ i,occupancy S (e i)+(if i=p then 1 else 0)=
1+(if i=q then 1 else 0)) ↔ _
constructor
· rintro (h|⟨p,q,hpq,h⟩)
· exact Or.inl (fun i => by simpa using h (e.symm i))
· refine Or.inr ⟨e p,e q,fun he => hpq (e.injective he),?_⟩
intro i
simpa only [Equiv.apply_symm_apply,e.symm_apply_eq] using h (e.symm i)
· rintro (h|⟨p,q,hpq,h⟩)
· exact Or.inl (fun i => h (e i))
· refine Or.inr ⟨e.symm p,e.symm q,fun he => hpq (e.symm.injective he),?_⟩
intro i
simpa only [←e.eq_symm_apply] using h (e i)
end
abbrev ValidatorInput := List (ℕ×ℕ)×List ℕ
def pairFirstLookup : Realizer (fun z : List ℕ×(ℕ×ℕ) => z.1.getD z.2.1 0) :=
composition (pair first (composition second first)) (getDFast 0)
def pairSecondLookup : Realizer (fun z : List ℕ×(ℕ×ℕ) => z.1.getD z.2.2 0) :=
composition (pair first (composition second second)) (getDFast 0)
lemma polynomial_pairFirstLookup : PolynomialTime pairFirstLookup :=
polynomial_composition (polynomial_pair polynomial_first
(polynomial_composition polynomial_second polynomial_first)) (polynomial_getDFast 0)
lemma polynomial_pairSecondLookup : PolynomialTime pairSecondLookup :=
polynomial_composition (polynomial_pair polynomial_first
(polynomial_composition polynomial_second polynomial_second)) (polynomial_getDFast 0)
def pairedStateTest (z : ValidatorInput) : Bool :=
patternTest (((z.1.map (fun ij => z.2.getD ij.1 0)),
(z.1.map (fun ij => z.2.getD ij.2 0))),1)
def pairedStateTestRealizer : Realizer pairedStateTest :=
composition (pair (pair
(composition (pair second first) (mapWith pairFirstLookup))
(composition (pair second first) (mapWith pairSecondLookup))) (constant 1)) patternTestRealizer
theorem polynomial_pairedStateTest : PolynomialTime pairedStateTestRealizer :=
polynomial_composition (polynomial_pair (polynomial_pair
(polynomial_composition (polynomial_pair polynomial_second polynomial_first)
(polynomial_mapWith polynomial_pairFirstLookup))
(polynomial_composition (polynomial_pair polynomial_second polynomial_first)
(polynomial_mapWith polynomial_pairSecondLookup))) (polynomial_constant 1)) polynomial_patternTest
noncomputable section
open CompanionFactorialApplication CompanionArithmeticProposal
variable {I J : Type} [Fintype I] [Fintype J]
def labelEquiv (A : Instance I J) : Fin (Fintype.card (Labels A)) ≃ Labels A :=
(Fintype.equivFin _).symm
def pairCatalog (A : Instance I J) : List (ℕ×ℕ) :=
List.ofFn (fun i => ((coordinateEquiv A (labelEquiv A i,false)).val,
(coordinateEquiv A (labelEquiv A i,true)).val))
/-- This list program checks the literal companion state, with no
feasibility oracle or whole-state enumeration. -/
theorem pairedStateTest_encode (A : Instance I J) (S : Set (Labels A×Bool)) :
pairedStateTest (pairCatalog A,encodeSet (coordinateEquiv A) S)=true ↔ ChainState pairs S := by
unfold pairedStateTest pairCatalog
simp only [List.map_ofFn]
change patternTest ((List.ofFn (fun i : Fin (Fintype.card (Labels A)) =>
(encodeSet (coordinateEquiv A) S).getD
(coordinateEquiv A (labelEquiv A i,false)).val 0),
List.ofFn (fun i : Fin (Fintype.card (Labels A)) =>
(encodeSet (coordinateEquiv A) S).getD
(coordinateEquiv A (labelEquiv A i,true)).val 0)),1)=true ↔ _
simp only [encodeSet,getD_setProfile,setProfile,coordinateSet,Set.mem_preimage,
Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
exact paired_pattern_iff (labelEquiv A) S
end
end ContingencyTables.CompanionChainValidator
end OAI
|