File size: 12,264 Bytes
f205175 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 | import Mathlib
import OAI.Probability.CriticalPercolation.Entropy.BinarySupport
import OAI.Probability.CriticalPercolation.Exploration.AncestryForest
namespace OAI
section
section
namespace CriticalPercolation.BinaryLaw
open scoped Classical
open FiniteProduct BondGraph BinaryInterpolation InterpolationForest
variable {V E : Type*} (G : BondGraph V E)
noncomputable def nodeParent (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (ω : Set E) :
(n : ℕ) → History E n → ℕ → ℕ
| 0, _, i => if i=1 then 1 else 0
| n+1, h, i => if i=n+2 then
let j := parent G (anchors d x n h.1) (x (nextIndex d n h.1)) ω h.2.2
if j<n+2 then j else 0
else nodeParent d x ω n h.1 i
lemma nodeParent_lt (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (ω : Set E) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(i : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) : nodeParent G d x ω n h i < i := by
induction n with
| zero => simp only [nodeParent,ite_eq_right (by omega : i≠1)]; omega
| succ n ih =>
by_cases he : i = n+2
· subst i
simp only [nodeParent,ite_true]
split_ifs with hp
· exact hp
· omega
· rw [nodeParent,ite_eq_right he]
exact ih h.1
noncomputable def historyForest (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (ω : Set E)
(n : ℕ) (h : History E n) : Forest :=
⟨nodeParent G d x ω n h, nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h⟩
lemma nodeParent_old (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (ω : Set E) (n : ℕ) (h : History E (n+1))
(i : ℕ) (hi : i < n+2) : nodeParent G d x ω (n+1) h i = nodeParent G d x ω n h.1 i := by
rw [nodeParent,ite_eq_right (by omega : i≠n+2)]
def node (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (i : ℕ) : V × Bool :=
(anchors d x n h)[i]?.getD (x 0,true)
lemma node_old (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E (n+1))
(i : ℕ) (hi : i < n+2) : node d x (n+1) h i = node d x n h.1 i := by
change ((anchors d x n h.1 ++ [_])[i]?).getD _ = _
rw [List.getElem?_append_left (by simpa only [anchors_length] using hi)]
rfl
lemma node_current (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E (n+1)) :
node d x (n+1) h (n+2) = (x (nextIndex d n h.1),h.2.1) := by
unfold node anchors
rw [List.getElem?_append_right (by simp [anchors_length])]
simp only [anchors_length,Nat.sub_self,List.getElem?_cons_zero,Option.getD_some]
lemma node_getElem? (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n+2) :
(anchors d x n h)[i]? = some (node d x n h i) := by
have hil : i<(anchors d x n h).length := by simpa only [anchors_length] using hi
simp only [node,List.getElem?_eq_getElem hil,Option.getD_some]
lemma node_mem (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (i : ℕ) (hi : i < n+2) :
node d x n h i ∈ anchors d x n h := List.mem_of_getElem? (node_getElem? d x n h i hi)
lemma node_bases (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) :
node d x n h 0 = (x 0,true) ∧ node d x n h 1 = (x d,false) := by
induction n with
| zero => exact ⟨rfl,rfl⟩
| succ n ih =>
rw [node_old d x n h 0 (by omega),node_old d x n h 1 (by omega)]
exact ih h.1
section Support
variable [Fintype V] [Fintype E] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq E]
variable (order : List (LazyDFS.Dart V E)) (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V)
variable (p : ℝ) (w : E → Prop → ℝ) (r₀ : (E → Prop) → ℝ)
lemma nodeParent_current (n : ℕ) (h : History E (n+1)) (ω : E → Prop)
(hr : density G order d x p w r₀ (n+1) h ω ≠ 0) :
nodeParent G d x ω (n+1) h (n+2) =
parent G (anchors d x n h.1) (x (nextIndex d n h.1)) ω h.2.2 := by
have hk := (density_step_support G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr).2.1
have hp := parent_lt_of_exists G _ _ ω _
(kernel_parent_exists G order d x n h.1 _ p w ω _ hk)
rw [anchors_length] at hp
simp only [nodeParent,ite_true,ite_eq_left hp]
lemma node_colour_parent (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (ω : E → Prop)
(hr : density G order d x p w r₀ n h ω ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hin : i < n+2) :
(node d x n h i).2 = (node d x n h (nodeParent G d x ω n h i)).2 := by
induction n with
| zero => omega
| succ n ih =>
obtain ⟨hprev,hk,hs⟩ := density_step_support G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr
by_cases he : i=n+2
· subst i
rw [node_current,nodeParent_current G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr]
have hp := parent_lt_of_exists G _ _ ω _
(kernel_parent_exists G order d x n h.1 _ p w ω _ hk)
rw [anchors_length] at hp
rw [node_old d x n h _ hp]
rw [← hs]
simp only [side,node_getElem? d x n h.1 _ hp,Option.getD_some]
· have hio : i < n+2 := by omega
rw [node_old d x n h i hio,nodeParent_old G d x ω n h i hio,
node_old d x n h _ ((nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h.1 i hi).trans hio)]
exact ih h.1 hprev hio
lemma node_root_colour (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (ω : E → Prop)
(hr : density G order d x p w r₀ n h ω ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) (hin : i < n+2) :
(node d x n h i).2 = if (historyForest G d x ω n h).root i = 0 then true else false := by
induction i using Nat.strong_induction_on with
| h i ih =>
by_cases hi : i < 2
· rw [Forest.root_base _ hi]
have hb := node_bases d x n h
interval_cases i <;> simp only [hb.1,hb.2,ite_true,one_ne_zero,ite_false]
· have hi2 : 2 ≤ i := by omega
rw [Forest.root_step _ hi2]
rw [node_colour_parent G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr i hi2 hin]
exact ih _ (nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h i hi2)
((nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h i hi2).trans hin)
end Support
def Canonical (L : List (V × Bool)) (ω : Set E) (i : ℕ) : Prop :=
∀ j z t, j < i → L[j]? = some z → L[i]? = some t →
¬(G.openGraph ω).Reachable z.1 t.1
lemma parent_canonical (L : List (V × Bool)) (a : V) (ω : Set E) (m : Option E)
(hex : ∃ i, parentPredicate G L a ω m i) : Canonical G L ω (parent G L a ω m) := by
intro j z t hj hz ht hr
have hs := firstIndex_spec hex
obtain ⟨v,hv,hpred⟩ := hs
have hvt : v=t := Option.some.inj (hv.symm.trans ht)
subst v
have hP : parentPredicate G L a ω m j := by
refine ⟨z,hz,?_⟩
cases m with
| none => exact hpred.trans hr.symm
| some e =>
obtain ⟨u,hu,htu⟩ := hpred
exact ⟨u,hu,hr.trans htu⟩
have hle := firstIndex_le hP
exact (Nat.not_le_of_gt hj) hle
lemma canonical_append (L M : List (V × Bool)) (ω : Set E) (i : ℕ) (hi : i < L.length)
(hC : Canonical G L ω i) : Canonical G (L++M) ω i := by
intro j z t hj hz ht
rw [List.getElem?_append_left (hj.trans hi)] at hz
rw [List.getElem?_append_left hi] at ht
exact hC j z t hj hz ht
lemma canonical_distinct (L : List (V × Bool)) (ω : Set E) (i j : ℕ)
(hi : Canonical G L ω i) (hj : Canonical G L ω j)
(z t : V × Bool) (hz : L[i]? = some z) (ht : L[j]? = some t)
(hr : (G.openGraph ω).Reachable z.1 t.1) : i=j := by
rcases lt_trichotomy i j with hij|hij|hij
· exact (hj i z t hij hz ht hr).elim
· exact hij
· exact (hi j t z hij ht hz hr.symm).elim
section CanonicalSupport
variable [Fintype V] [Fintype E] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq E]
variable (order : List (LazyDFS.Dart V E)) (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V)
variable (p : ℝ) (w : E → Prop → ℝ) (r₀ : (E → Prop) → ℝ)
lemma nodeParent_canonical (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (ω : E → Prop)
(hr : density G order d x p w r₀ n h ω ≠ 0)
(i : ℕ) (hi : 2 ≤ i) (hin : i < n+2) :
Canonical G (anchors d x n h) ω (nodeParent G d x ω n h i) := by
induction n with
| zero => omega
| succ n ih =>
obtain ⟨hprev,hk,hs⟩ := density_step_support G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr
by_cases he : i = n+2
· subst i
rw [nodeParent_current G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr]
have hex := kernel_parent_exists G order d x n h.1 _ p w ω _ hk
apply canonical_append
· exact parent_lt_of_exists G _ _ ω _ hex
· exact parent_canonical G _ _ ω _ hex
· have hio : i < n+2 := by omega
rw [nodeParent_old G d x ω n h i hio]
apply canonical_append
· rw [anchors_length]
exact (nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h.1 i hi).trans hio
· exact ih h.1 hprev hio
lemma lineage_canonical (n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (ω : E → Prop)
(hr : density G order d x p w r₀ n h ω ≠ 0)
(j : ℕ) (hjn : j < n+2) (hj : Canonical G (anchors d x n h) ω j)
(i : ℕ) (hi : i ∈ (historyForest G d x ω n h).lineage j) :
Canonical G (anchors d x n h) ω i := by
induction j using Nat.strong_induction_on with
| h j ih =>
by_cases hj2 : j < 2
· have he : i=j := by simpa only [Forest.lineage_base _ hj2,List.mem_singleton] using hi
exact he ▸ hj
· have hj2' : 2 ≤ j := by omega
rw [Forest.lineage_step _ hj2',List.mem_cons] at hi
rcases hi with rfl|hi
· exact hj
· exact ih _ (nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h j hj2')
((nodeParent_lt G d x ω n h j hj2').trans hjn)
(nodeParent_canonical G order d x p w r₀ n h ω hr j hj2' hjn) hi
end CanonicalSupport
noncomputable def owner (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(ω : Set E) (a : V) : ℕ := parent G (anchors d x n h) a ω none
lemma owner_exists (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(ω : Set E) (a : V) (ha : ∃ b, (a,b) ∈ anchors d x n h) :
∃ i, parentPredicate G (anchors d x n h) a ω none i := by
obtain ⟨b,hb⟩ := ha
obtain ⟨i,hi⟩ := List.mem_iff_getElem?.mp hb
exact ⟨i,(a,b),hi,.refl _⟩
lemma owner_lt (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(ω : Set E) (a : V) (ha : ∃ b, (a,b) ∈ anchors d x n h) :
owner G d x n h ω a < n+2 := by
have hp := parent_lt_of_exists G _ _ ω none (owner_exists G d x n h ω a ha)
simpa only [anchors_length,owner] using hp
lemma owner_canonical (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(ω : Set E) (a : V) (ha : ∃ b, (a,b) ∈ anchors d x n h) :
Canonical G (anchors d x n h) ω (owner G d x n h ω a) :=
parent_canonical G _ _ ω none (owner_exists G d x n h ω a ha)
lemma owner_reachable (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(ω : Set E) (a : V) (ha : ∃ b, (a,b) ∈ anchors d x n h) :
(G.openGraph ω).Reachable a (node d x n h (owner G d x n h ω a)).1 := by
obtain ⟨z,hz,hr⟩ := firstIndex_spec (owner_exists G d x n h ω a ha)
have he : z = node d x n h (owner G d x n h ω a) := Option.some.inj
(hz.symm.trans (node_getElem? d x n h _ (owner_lt G d x n h ω a ha)))
exact he ▸ hr
lemma owner_colour (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V) (n : ℕ) (h : History E n)
(ω : Set E) (a : V) (b : Bool) (ha : (a,b) ∈ anchors d x n h)
(hL : Consistent G (anchors d x n h) ω) :
(node d x n h (owner G d x n h ω a)).2 = b :=
(hL (a,b) ha _ (node_mem d x n h _ (owner_lt G d x n h ω a ⟨b,ha⟩))
(owner_reachable G d x n h ω a ⟨b,ha⟩)).symm
section Owners
variable [Fintype V] [Fintype E] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq E]
lemma terminal_roots (order : List (LazyDFS.Dart V E)) (d : ℕ) (x : ℕ → V)
(p : ℝ) (w : E → Prop → ℝ) (s n : ℕ) (h : History E n) (ω : E → Prop)
(hr : density G order d x p w (seed G w (x 0) (x d) s) n h ω ≠ 0) :
(historyForest G d x ω n h).root (owner G d x n h ω (x (interval d n h).1)) = 0 ∧
(historyForest G d x ω n h).root (owner G d x n h ω (x (interval d n h).2)) = 1 := by
have hL := density_consistent G order d x p w s n h ω hr
have he := endpoint_labels d x n h
have hl := owner_colour G d x n h ω _ true he.1 hL
have hr' := owner_colour G d x n h ω _ false he.2 hL
rw [node_root_colour G order d x p w _ n h ω hr _
(owner_lt G d x n h ω _ ⟨true,he.1⟩)] at hl
rw [node_root_colour G order d x p w _ n h ω hr _
(owner_lt G d x n h ω _ ⟨false,he.2⟩)] at hr'
constructor
· by_contra hz
simp only [ite_eq_right hz] at hl
cases hl
· have hn := (historyForest G d x ω n h).root_lt_two
(owner G d x n h ω (x (interval d n h).2))
have hz : (historyForest G d x ω n h).root
(owner G d x n h ω (x (interval d n h).2)) ≠ 0 := by
intro hz
simp only [ite_eq_left hz] at hr'
cases hr'
omega
end Owners
end CriticalPercolation.BinaryLaw
end
end
end OAI
|