roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 17)
ddc84c5 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
39.6 kB
import OAI.Analysis.DiskMaximal.Marks
namespace OAI
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology ContDiff
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Set Filter
open scoped Topology ENNReal
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Set Filter
open scoped Topology RealInnerProductSpace ContDiff
open MeasureTheory Set Filter
open scoped Topology Interval NNReal
open MeasureTheory Set Filter
open scoped Topology NNReal Real
open MeasureTheory Set Metric
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory Set Metric
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open Finset
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Set Metric
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal RealInnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Set
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory Set Metric
open scoped ENNReal NNReal RealInnerProductSpace
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
open scoped ContDiff
open Finset
noncomputable section
namespace LabelSwitches
/-- Whether a switch has occurred since the most recent exceptional level. -/
def active (bad sw : ℕ → Bool) : ℕ → Bool
| 0 => false
| n+1 => if bad n then false else active bad sw n || sw n
def count (p : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := ∑ i ∈ range n, if p i then 1 else 0
lemma active_witness (bad sw : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ) (h : active bad sw n = true) :
∃ i < n, sw i = true ∧ ∀ j, i ≤ j → j < n → bad j = false := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [active] at h
| succ n ih =>
by_cases hb : bad n = true
· simp [active,hb] at h
· have hb' : bad n = false := by cases hbn : bad n <;> simp_all
simp only [active,hb',Bool.false_eq_true,↓reduceIte,Bool.or_eq_true] at h
rcases h with h | h
· obtain ⟨i,hi,hs,hn⟩ := ih h
refine ⟨i,Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hi,hs,?_⟩
intro j hij hj
by_cases hjn : j < n
· exact hn j hij hjn
· have : j = n := by omega
simpa [this] using hb'
· refine ⟨n,Nat.lt_succ_self n,h,?_⟩
intro j hj hj'
have : j=n := by omega
simpa [this] using hb'
theorem count_le (bad sw : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ)
(hsep : ∀ i j, i < j → j < n → sw i = true → sw j = true →
∃ k, i ≤ k ∧ k ≤ j ∧ bad k = true) :
count sw n ≤ 1+2*count bad n := by
have hns (j : ℕ) (hj : j < n) (ha : active bad sw j = true) (hb : bad j = false) :
sw j = false := by
obtain ⟨i,hi,hs,hb0⟩ := active_witness bad sw j ha
cases hv : sw j with
| false => rfl
| true =>
obtain ⟨k,hik,hkj,hbk⟩ := hsep i j hi hj hs hv
by_cases hkj' : k < j
· have := hb0 k hik hkj'
simp_all
· have : k=j := by omega
simp_all
have aux : ∀ m ≤ n, count sw m ≤ 2*count bad m + if active bad sw m then 1 else 0 := by
intro m hm
induction m with
| zero => simp [count,active]
| succ m ih =>
have ih' := ih (Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_succ m) hm)
have hstep := hns m (by omega)
simp only [count,sum_range_succ] at ih' ⊢
simp only [active]
by_cases hb : bad m = true <;> by_cases hs : sw m = true <;>
by_cases ha : active bad sw m = true <;> simp_all <;> omega
have h := aux n le_rfl
split_ifs at h <;> omega
/-- Quantitative energy version. The exceptional set is the union of marks
and levels with energy exceeding c. This includes an arbitrary birth offset. -/
theorem count_energy (mark sw : ℕ → Bool) (E : ℕ → ℝ) (n : ℕ) {c : ℝ}
(hc : 0 < c) (hE : ∀ i < n, 0 ≤ E i)
(hsep : ∀ i j, i < j → j < n → sw i = true → sw j = true →
∃ k, i ≤ k ∧ k ≤ j ∧ (mark k = true ∨ c < E k)) :
((count sw n : ℕ) : ℝ) ≤ 1+2*((count mark n : ℕ) : ℝ)+(2/c)*∑ i ∈ range n, E i := by
let bad : ℕ → Bool := fun i => decide (mark i = true ∨ c < E i)
have hb := count_le bad sw n (by
intro i j hij hj hi hj'
obtain ⟨k,hik,hkj,hk⟩ := hsep i j hij hj hi hj'
exact ⟨k,hik,hkj,by simpa [bad] using hk⟩)
have henergy : ((count bad n : ℕ) : ℝ) ≤ ((count mark n : ℕ) : ℝ)+(1/c)*∑ i ∈ range n, E i := by
simp only [count,Nat.cast_sum,Nat.cast_ite,Nat.cast_one,Nat.cast_zero,mul_sum,← sum_add_distrib]
apply sum_le_sum
intro i hi
have hi' : i < n := mem_range.mp hi
have he := hE i hi'
have hec : 0 ≤ (1/c)*E i := mul_nonneg (by positivity) he
by_cases hm : mark i = true
· simp only [bad,hm,true_or,decide_true,↓reduceIte]
linarith
· by_cases hce : c < E i
· have he1 : 1 ≤ (1/c)*E i := by
rw [one_div,mul_comm,← div_eq_mul_inv,le_div_iff₀ hc]
simpa using hce.le
simpa [bad,hm,hce] using he1
· simpa [bad,hm,hce] using hec
have hb' : ((count sw n : ℕ) : ℝ) ≤ 1+2*((count bad n : ℕ) : ℝ) := by exact_mod_cast hb
calc
_ ≤ 1+2*(((count mark n : ℕ) : ℝ)+(1/c)*∑ i ∈ range n, E i) := by linarith
_ = _ := by ring
end LabelSwitches
open MeasureTheory Set Metric Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal RealInnerProductSpace ContDiff Topology
namespace PlanePotential
/-- The global segment kernel vanishes off the region on which the actual
finite density decomposition is valid. -/
lemma green_eq_zero_of_outside {ψ : ℂ → ℝ} {R X : ℝ}
(hs : ∀ z, ψ z ≠ 0 → ‖z‖ ≤ R) (hRX : R ≤ X) {x y : ℂ}
(hx : ‖x‖ ≤ X) (hy : X < ‖y‖) : green ψ x y = 0 := by
have hz (t : ℝ) (ht : t ∈ Ioc (0:ℝ) 1) : ψ (x+t⁻¹ • (y-x)) = 0 := by
by_contra hh
have hw := hs _ hh
have heq : y = (1-t) • x+t • (x+t⁻¹ • (y-x)) := by
rw [smul_add,smul_smul,mul_inv_cancel₀ ht.1.ne',one_smul]
module
have hn := norm_add_le ((1-t) • x) (t • (x+t⁻¹ • (y-x)))
rw [← heq,norm_smul,norm_smul,Real.norm_eq_abs,Real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr ht.2),abs_of_pos ht.1] at hn
have hle := add_le_add (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hx (sub_nonneg.mpr ht.2))
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hw.trans hRX) ht.1.le)
nlinarith
have hi : greenScalar ψ x y = 0 := by
unfold greenScalar
apply setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero
intro t ht
simp only [hz t ht,zero_mul]
simp only [green,hi,neg_zero,zero_smul]
lemma green_gradient_representation {ψ g : ℂ → ℝ} (hψ : Continuous ψ)
(hψc : HasCompactSupport ψ) (hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g) {D : ℝ}
(hD : ∀ y, ‖fderiv ℝ g y‖ ≤ D) (hψ1 : ∫ z, ψ z = 1) (x : ℂ) :
(∫ y, ⟪green ψ x y,gradient g y⟫) = g x-∫ z, ψ z*g z := by
simpa only [inner_gradient_right,RCLike.conj_to_real] using
green_representation hψ hψc hg hD hψ1 x
theorem green_finite_decomposition {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{ψ g : ℂ → ℝ} (hψ : Continuous ψ) (hψc : HasCompactSupport ψ)
(hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g) {D R X Y B : ℝ}
(hD : ∀ y, ‖fderiv ℝ g y‖ ≤ D) (hψ1 : ∫ z, ψ z = 1)
(hψs : ∀ z, ψ z ≠ 0 → ‖z‖ ≤ R) (hψB : ∀ z, |ψ z| ≤ B)
(hRX : R ≤ X) (hM : 0 < R+X) (hB : 0 ≤ B) (hXY : 0 < X+Y)
(β : ι → ℂ → ℂ) (hβ : ∀ i, Integrable (β i))
(hβs : ∀ i y, β i y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ Y)
(hdecomp : ∀ᵐ y, ‖y‖ ≤ X → gradient g y = ∑ i, β i y) :
∀ᵐ x ∂volume.restrict {x : ℂ | ‖x‖ ≤ X},
g x-∫ z, ψ z*g z = ∑ i, ∫ y, ⟪green ψ x y,β i y⟫ := by
have hall := ae_all_iff.mpr (fun i => green_ae_integrable hψ.measurable hψs hψB hM hB hXY
(hβ i) (hβs i))
filter_upwards [hall,ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_le measurable_norm measurable_const)] with x hi hx
rw [← green_gradient_representation hψ hψc hg hD hψ1 x,← integral_finsetSum _ (fun i _ => hi i)]
apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [hdecomp] with y hy
by_cases hyX : ‖y‖ ≤ X
· rw [hy hyX,inner_sum]
· rw [green_eq_zero_of_outside hψs hRX hx (lt_of_not_ge hyX)]
simp
/-- The complete finite Minkowski step, after genuine kernel insertion. -/
theorem green_decomposition_norm {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{ψ g : ℂ → ℝ} (hψ : Continuous ψ) (hψc : HasCompactSupport ψ)
(hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g) {D R X Y B : ℝ}
(hD : ∀ y, ‖fderiv ℝ g y‖ ≤ D) (hψ1 : ∫ z, ψ z = 1)
(hψs : ∀ z, ψ z ≠ 0 → ‖z‖ ≤ R) (hψB : ∀ z, |ψ z| ≤ B)
(hRX : R ≤ X) (hM : 0 < R+X) (hB : 0 ≤ B) (hXY : 0 < X+Y)
(β : ι → ℂ → ℂ) (hβ : ∀ i, Integrable (β i))
(hβs : ∀ i y, β i y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ Y)
(hdecomp : ∀ᵐ y, ‖y‖ ≤ X → gradient g y = ∑ i, β i y) :
eLpNorm (fun x => g x-∫ z, ψ z*g z) (3/2) (volume.restrict {x : ℂ | ‖x‖ ≤ X}) ≤
∑ i, eLpNorm (fun x => ∫ y, ⟪green ψ x y,β i y⟫) (3/2)
(volume.restrict {x : ℂ | ‖x‖ ≤ X}) := by
let μ := volume.restrict {x : ℂ | ‖x‖ ≤ X}
let F : ι → ℂ → ℝ := fun i x => ∫ y, ⟪green ψ x y,β i y⟫
have hmeas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (F i) μ := fun i =>
potential_aestronglyMeasurable _ (green_measurable ψ hψ.measurable) (hβ i)
have heq : (fun x => g x-∫ z, ψ z*g z) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => ∑ i, F i x :=
green_finite_decomposition hψ hψc hg hD hψ1 hψs hψB hRX hM hB hXY β hβ hβs hdecomp
have hsum : eLpNorm (∑ i, F i) (3/2) μ ≤ ∑ i, eLpNorm (F i) (3/2) μ :=
eLpNorm_sum_le (by
rw [ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (by norm_num) (by norm_num)]
norm_num)
rw [eLpNorm_congr_ae heq]
have hfun : (∑ i, F i) = fun x => ∑ i, F i x := by ext x; simp
rw [hfun] at hsum
exact hsum
end PlanePotential
namespace RadiusEnvelope
variable {E : Type*}
/-- The signed envelope over the entire compact real-radius interval. -/
def envelope (u : ℝ → E → ℝ) (a b : ℝ) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sSup ((fun r => u r x) '' Icc a b)
lemma attains {u : ℝ → E → ℝ} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) (x : E)
(hc : ContinuousOn (fun r => u r x) (Icc a b)) :
∃ r ∈ Icc a b, envelope u a b x = u r x ∧ ∀ t ∈ Icc a b, u t x ≤ u r x := by
obtain ⟨r,hr,hm⟩ := isCompact_Icc.exists_isMaxOn (Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr hab) hc
refine ⟨r,hr,?_,hm⟩
apply le_antisymm
· apply csSup_le ((Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr hab).image _)
rintro _ ⟨t,ht,rfl⟩
exact hm ht
· apply le_csSup (isCompact_Icc.image_of_continuousOn hc).bddAbove
exact mem_image_of_mem _ hr
lemma le_envelope {u : ℝ → E → ℝ} {a b r : ℝ} (hr : r ∈ Icc a b) (x : E)
(hc : ContinuousOn (fun r => u r x) (Icc a b)) : u r x ≤ envelope u a b x := by
obtain ⟨t,ht,he,hm⟩ := attains (hr.1.trans hr.2) x hc
rw [he]
exact hm r hr
lemma lipschitz [NormedAddCommGroup E] {u : ℝ → E → ℝ} {a b : ℝ} {L : ℝ≥0} (hab : a ≤ b)
(hc : ∀ x, ContinuousOn (fun r => u r x) (Icc a b))
(hL : ∀ r ∈ Icc a b, LipschitzWith L (u r)) :
LipschitzWith L (envelope u a b) := by
rw [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul]
intro x y
obtain ⟨r,hr,her,hmr⟩ := attains hab x (hc x)
obtain ⟨t,ht,het,hmt⟩ := attains hab y (hc y)
rw [Real.dist_eq,abs_le]
constructor
· have h := (hL t ht).dist_le_mul x y
rw [Real.dist_eq] at h
rw [het]
have hx := le_envelope ht x (hc x)
have ha := (abs_le.mp h).1
linarith
· have h := (hL r hr).dist_le_mul x y
rw [Real.dist_eq] at h
rw [her]
have hy := le_envelope hr y (hc y)
have ha := (abs_le.mp h).2
linarith
lemma zero_of_all_zero {u : ℝ → E → ℝ} {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) {x : E}
(hc : ContinuousOn (fun r => u r x) (Icc a b))
(hz : ∀ r ∈ Icc a b, u r x = 0) : envelope u a b x = 0 := by
obtain ⟨r,hr,he,_⟩ := attains hab x hc
exact he.trans (hz r hr)
/-- Differentiable touching holds for every attaining radius; no derivative of
an argmax selector is taken. -/
theorem fderiv_touching [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {u : ℝ → E → ℝ} {a b r : ℝ} {x : E}
(hr : r ∈ Icc a b) (hc : ∀ y, ContinuousOn (fun t => u t y) (Icc a b))
(he : envelope u a b x = u r x)
(hd : DifferentiableAt ℝ (envelope u a b) x) (hu : DifferentiableAt ℝ (u r) x) :
fderiv ℝ (envelope u a b) x = fderiv ℝ (u r) x := by
have hm : IsLocalMin (fun y => envelope u a b y-u r y) x := by
apply IsMinOn.isLocalMin (s := univ) _ univ_mem
intro y _
change envelope u a b x-u r x ≤ envelope u a b y-u r y
rw [he,sub_self]
exact sub_nonneg.mpr (le_envelope hr y (hc y))
have hz := hm.hasFDerivAt_eq_zero (hd.hasFDerivAt.sub hu.hasFDerivAt)
exact sub_eq_zero.mp hz
end RadiusEnvelope
namespace DiskMoments
lemma signedAverage_lipschitz {g : ℂ → ℝ} {L : ℝ≥0} (hg : LipschitzWith L g)
{t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) : LipschitzWith L (fun x => signedAverage g x t) := by
rw [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul]
intro x y
rw [signedAverage_fixedDomain g x ht,signedAverage_fixedDomain g y ht,Real.dist_eq,
← sub_div,abs_div,abs_of_pos Real.pi_pos]
have hxi : IntegrableOn (fun z : ℂ => g (x+t • z)) (Metric.ball 0 1) :=
(ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact (isCompact_closedBall 0 1)
(hg.continuous.comp (by fun_prop)).continuousOn).mono_set Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
have hyi : IntegrableOn (fun z : ℂ => g (y+t • z)) (Metric.ball 0 1) :=
(ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact (isCompact_closedBall 0 1)
(hg.continuous.comp (by fun_prop)).continuousOn).mono_set Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
rw [← integral_sub hxi hyi]
have : IsFiniteMeasure (volume.restrict (Metric.ball (0:ℂ) 1)) :=
⟨by simp⟩
have hi := norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const (μ := volume.restrict (Metric.ball (0:ℂ) 1))
(C := (L:ℝ)*dist x y) (f := fun z : ℂ => g (x+t • z)-g (y+t • z)) (by
filter_upwards with z
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs,← Real.dist_eq,dist_add_right] using hg.dist_le_mul (x+t • z) (y+t • z))
have hv : (volume.restrict (Metric.ball (0:ℂ) 1)).real univ = Real.pi := by
simp [measureReal_def,Complex.volume_ball]
rw [hv,Real.norm_eq_abs] at hi
exact (div_le_iff₀ Real.pi_pos).mpr hi
lemma signedAverage_radius_continuousOn {g : ℂ → ℝ} (hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g)
(x : ℂ) {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) :
ContinuousOn (fun t => signedAverage g x t) (Icc a b) := by
intro t ht
exact (hasDerivAt_signedAverage hg x (ha.trans_le ht.1)).continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
lemma hasFDerivAt_signedAverage {g : ℂ → ℝ} (hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g) {D : ℝ}
(hD : ∀ y, ‖fderiv ℝ g y‖ ≤ D) (x : ℂ) {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x => signedAverage g x t)
((1/Real.pi) • ∫ z in Metric.ball 0 1, fderiv ℝ g (x+t • z)) x := by
let F : ℂ → ℂ → ℝ := fun x z => g (x+t • z)
have hFi : IntegrableOn (F x) (Metric.ball 0 1) :=
(ContinuousOn.integrableOn_compact (isCompact_closedBall 0 1)
(hg.continuous.comp (by fun_prop)).continuousOn).mono_set Metric.ball_subset_closedBall
have hd := hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le
(μ := volume.restrict (Metric.ball (0:ℂ) 1)) (F := F)
(F' := fun x z => fderiv ℝ g (x+t • z)) (bound := fun _ => D)
(s := univ) (x₀ := x) univ_mem
(Eventually.of_forall (fun x => (hg.continuous.comp (by fun_prop)).aestronglyMeasurable))
hFi ((hg.continuous_fderiv one_ne_zero).comp (by fun_prop)).aestronglyMeasurable
(ae_of_all _ (fun z x _ => hD (x+t • z))) (integrableOn_const (by finiteness))
(ae_of_all _ (fun z x _ => by
simpa only [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id,Function.comp_def,id_eq,F] using
(hg.differentiable one_ne_zero (x+t • z)).hasFDerivAt.comp x ((hasFDerivAt_id x).add_const (t • z))))
convert! hd.const_mul (1/Real.pi) using 1
· funext y
simpa only [F,div_eq_mul_inv,one_div,mul_comm,mul_one] using signedAverage_fixedDomain g y ht
/-- Actual signed run envelopes: locally differentiable almost everywhere, over
all radii in their compact interval. -/
theorem run_envelope_lipschitz {g : ℂ → ℝ} (hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g)
(hgc : HasCompactSupport g) {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hab : a ≤ b) :
∃ L : ℝ≥0, LipschitzWith L (RadiusEnvelope.envelope (fun r x => signedAverage g x r) a b) := by
obtain ⟨L,hL⟩ := hg.lipschitzWith_of_hasCompactSupport hgc one_ne_zero
exact ⟨L,RadiusEnvelope.lipschitz hab (fun x => signedAverage_radius_continuousOn hg x ha)
(fun r hr => signedAverage_lipschitz hL (ha.trans_le hr.1))⟩
end DiskMoments
namespace DiskMoments
lemma signedAverage_eq_zero_of_outside {g : ℂ → ℝ} {R : ℝ}
(hs : ∀ y, g y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ R) {x : ℂ} {t : ℝ} (hx : R+t ≤ ‖x‖) :
signedAverage g x t = 0 := by
unfold signedAverage
have hz : (∫ y in Metric.ball x t, g y) = 0 := by
apply setIntegral_eq_zero_of_forall_eq_zero
intro y hy
by_contra hny
have hn := hs y hny
have hd : ‖x-y‖ < t := by simpa only [Metric.mem_ball,dist_eq_norm,norm_sub_rev] using hy
have hh : ‖x‖ ≤ ‖x-y‖+‖y‖ := by simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using norm_add_le (x-y) y
linarith
rw [hz,zero_div]
/-- Every radius in the run is retained, but a common compact spatial support
still exists. -/
theorem run_envelope_hasCompactSupport {g : ℂ → ℝ} (hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g)
(hgc : HasCompactSupport g) {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hab : a ≤ b) :
HasCompactSupport (RadiusEnvelope.envelope (fun r x => signedAverage g x r) a b) := by
obtain ⟨R,hR⟩ := hgc.isBounded.subset_closedBall (0:ℂ)
have hs : ∀ y, g y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ R := by
intro y hy
simpa only [Metric.mem_closedBall,dist_zero_right] using hR (subset_tsupport g hy)
apply IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (isCompact_closedBall (0:ℂ) (R+b)) isClosed_closure
apply closure_minimal _ Metric.isClosed_closedBall
intro x hx
rw [Metric.mem_closedBall,dist_zero_right]
by_contra hn
have hz : RadiusEnvelope.envelope (fun r x => signedAverage g x r) a b x = 0 := by
apply RadiusEnvelope.zero_of_all_zero hab (signedAverage_radius_continuousOn hg x ha)
intro r hr
exact signedAverage_eq_zero_of_outside hs (by linarith [hr.2])
exact hx hz
/-- AE differentiability and universal touching of actual run gradients. -/
theorem run_envelope_ae_touching {g : ℂ → ℝ} (hg : ContDiff ℝ 1 g)
(hgc : HasCompactSupport g) {a b : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hab : a ≤ b) :
∀ᵐ x, ∀ r ∈ Icc a b,
RadiusEnvelope.envelope (fun r x => signedAverage g x r) a b x = signedAverage g x r →
fderiv ℝ (RadiusEnvelope.envelope (fun r x => signedAverage g x r) a b) x =
(1/Real.pi) • ∫ z in Metric.ball 0 1, fderiv ℝ g (x+r • z) := by
obtain ⟨L,hL⟩ := run_envelope_lipschitz hg hgc ha hab
obtain ⟨K,hK⟩ := hg.lipschitzWith_of_hasCompactSupport hgc one_ne_zero
filter_upwards [hL.ae_differentiableAt] with x hx
intro r hr he
have hd := hasFDerivAt_signedAverage hg (fun y => norm_fderiv_le_of_lipschitz ℝ hK) x
(ha.trans_le hr.1)
exact (RadiusEnvelope.fderiv_touching hr (fun y => signedAverage_radius_continuousOn hg y ha)
he hx hd.differentiableAt).trans hd.fderiv
end DiskMoments
namespace DyadicHats
def point (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) : ℂ := ⟨r*p.1,r*p.2⟩
def boxNorm (x : ℂ) : ℝ := max |x.re| |x.im|
lemma boxNorm_nonneg (x : ℂ) : 0 ≤ boxNorm x := le_trans (abs_nonneg _) (le_max_left _ _)
lemma boxNorm_le_norm (x : ℂ) : boxNorm x ≤ ‖x‖ :=
max_le (Complex.abs_re_le_norm _) (Complex.abs_im_le_norm _)
lemma norm_le_two_boxNorm (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ ≤ 2*boxNorm x := by
have h := Complex.norm_le_abs_re_add_abs_im x
have hr : |x.re| ≤ boxNorm x := le_max_left _ _
have hi : |x.im| ≤ boxNorm x := le_max_right _ _
linarith
lemma boxNorm_add_le (x y : ℂ) : boxNorm (x+y) ≤ boxNorm x+boxNorm y := by
apply max_le
· exact (abs_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (le_max_left _ _) (le_max_left _ _))
· exact (abs_add_le _ _).trans (add_le_add (le_max_right _ _) (le_max_right _ _))
lemma boxNorm_neg (x : ℂ) : boxNorm (-x) = boxNorm x := by simp [boxNorm]
lemma boxNorm_sub_comm (x y : ℂ) : boxNorm (x-y) = boxNorm (y-x) := by
rw [← neg_sub y x,boxNorm_neg]
lemma hat_pos_iff {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (p : ℤ × ℤ) (x : ℂ) :
0 < hat r p x ↔ boxNorm (x-point r p) < r := by
have hp : 0 < hat r p x ↔ 0 < tent (x.re/r-p.1) ∧ 0 < tent (x.im/r-p.2) := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨pos_of_mul_pos_left h (tent_nonneg _),pos_of_mul_pos_right h (tent_nonneg _)⟩
· intro h
exact mul_pos h.1 h.2
rw [hp,tent_pos_iff,tent_pos_iff]
have hr0 : r ≠ 0 := ne_of_gt hr
have h1 : x.re/r-p.1 = (x.re-r*p.1)/r := by field_simp
have h2 : x.im/r-p.2 = (x.im-r*p.2)/r := by field_simp
rw [h1,h2,abs_div,abs_div,abs_of_pos hr,div_lt_one hr,div_lt_one hr]
simp only [boxNorm,Complex.sub_re,Complex.sub_im,point,max_lt_iff]
lemma hat_ne_zero_iff {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (p : ℤ × ℤ) (x : ℂ) :
hat r p x ≠ 0 ↔ boxNorm (x-point r p) < r := by
constructor
· intro h
exact (hat_pos_iff hr p x).mp (lt_of_le_of_ne (hat_nonneg r p x) (Ne.symm h))
· intro h
exact ne_of_gt ((hat_pos_iff hr p x).mpr h)
lemma support_hat_subset {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
Function.support (hat r p) ⊆ Metric.closedBall (point r p) (2*r) := by
intro x hx
rw [Metric.mem_closedBall,dist_eq_norm]
exact (norm_le_two_boxNorm _).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((hat_ne_zero_iff hr p x).mp hx).le (by norm_num))
lemma hasCompactSupport_hat {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
HasCompactSupport (hat r p) := by
apply IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (isCompact_closedBall (point r p) (2*r)) isClosed_closure
exact closure_minimal (support_hat_subset hr p) Metric.isClosed_closedBall
/-- Globally uniform spatial Lipschitz bound for the literal bilinear hats. -/
lemma lipschitz_hat {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal (2/r)) (hat r p) := by
rw [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul]
intro x y
let a := tent (x.re/r-p.1)
let b := tent (x.im/r-p.2)
let c := tent (y.re/r-p.1)
let d := tent (y.im/r-p.2)
have h1 : |a-c| ≤ ‖x-y‖/r := by
have h := lipschitz_tent.dist_le_mul (x.re/r-p.1) (y.re/r-p.1)
simp only [Real.dist_eq,NNReal.coe_one,one_mul,sub_sub_sub_cancel_right,← sub_div,
abs_div,abs_of_pos hr] at h
exact h.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (Complex.abs_re_le_norm (x-y)) hr.le)
have h2 : |b-d| ≤ ‖x-y‖/r := by
have h := lipschitz_tent.dist_le_mul (x.im/r-p.2) (y.im/r-p.2)
simp only [Real.dist_eq,NNReal.coe_one,one_mul,sub_sub_sub_cancel_right,← sub_div,
abs_div,abs_of_pos hr] at h
exact h.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (Complex.abs_im_le_norm (x-y)) hr.le)
have hab : |a*b-c*d| ≤ |a-c|+|b-d| := by
calc
_ = |(a-c)*b+c*(b-d)| := by congr 1; ring
_ ≤ |(a-c)*b|+|c*(b-d)| := abs_add_le _ _
_ = |a-c| *b+c*|b-d| := by rw [abs_mul,abs_mul,abs_of_nonneg (tent_nonneg _),abs_of_nonneg (tent_nonneg _)]
_ ≤ |a-c| *1+1*|b-d| := add_le_add
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (tent_le_one _) (abs_nonneg _))
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (tent_le_one _) (abs_nonneg _))
_ = _ := by ring
change |a*b-c*d| ≤ _
rw [Real.coe_toNNReal (2/r) (by positivity),dist_eq_norm]
calc
_ ≤ ‖x-y‖/r+‖x-y‖/r := hab.trans (add_le_add h1 h2)
_ = _ := by ring
lemma step_locality {p q : ℤ × ℤ} (hpq : 0 < step p q) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
boxNorm (point (r/2) q-point r p) ≤ r/2 := by
have h1 : |(q.1:ℝ)/2-p.1| < 1 := (tent_pos_iff _).mp
(pos_of_mul_pos_left hpq (tent_nonneg _))
have h2 : |(q.2:ℝ)/2-p.2| < 1 := (tent_pos_iff _).mp
(pos_of_mul_pos_right hpq (tent_nonneg _))
have hbound (j k : ℤ) (h : |(j:ℝ)/2-k| < 1) : |(j:ℝ)/2-k| ≤ 1/2 := by
have habs := abs_lt.mp h
have hlow : 2*k-1 ≤ j := by
have : (2*k-2:ℝ) < j := by linarith
have : 2*k-2 < j := by exact_mod_cast this
omega
have hhigh : j ≤ 2*k+1 := by
have : (j:ℝ) < 2*k+2 := by linarith
have : j < 2*k+2 := by exact_mod_cast this
omega
have hlo : (2:ℝ)*k-1 ≤ j := by exact_mod_cast hlow
have hhi : (j:ℝ) ≤ 2*k+1 := by exact_mod_cast hhigh
rw [abs_le]
constructor <;> linarith
have h1' := hbound q.1 p.1 h1
have h2' := hbound q.2 p.2 h2
change max |r/2*q.1-r*p.1| |r/2*q.2-r*p.2| ≤ r/2
have hm (j k : ℤ) (h : |(j:ℝ)/2-k| ≤ 1/2) : |r/2*j-r*k| ≤ r/2 := by
rw [show r/2*j-r*k = r*((j:ℝ)/2-k) by ring,abs_mul,abs_of_pos hr]
nlinarith
exact max_le (hm _ _ h1') (hm _ _ h2')
end DyadicHats
namespace DyadicHats
open scoped BigOperators
/-- Literal nine-child support of an adjacent dyadic refinement row. -/
def children (p : ℤ × ℤ) : Finset (ℤ × ℤ) :=
(Finset.Icc (2*p.1-1) (2*p.1+1)).product (Finset.Icc (2*p.2-1) (2*p.2+1))
lemma tent_half_zero {j k : ℤ} (h : j ∉ Finset.Icc (2*k-1) (2*k+1)) :
tent ((j:ℝ)/2-k) = 0 := by
have ht : j-2*k ∉ Finset.Icc (-1) 1 := by
simp only [Finset.mem_Icc] at *
omega
convert tent_half_integer ht using 1
push_cast
congr 1
ring
lemma step_zero_of_not_child {p q : ℤ × ℤ} (hq : q ∉ children p) : step p q = 0 := by
have hq' : ¬(q.1 ∈ Finset.Icc (2*p.1-1) (2*p.1+1) ∧ q.2 ∈ Finset.Icc (2*p.2-1) (2*p.2+1)) := by
exact fun hn => hq (Finset.mem_product.mpr hn)
rw [not_and_or] at hq'
rcases hq' with hq | hq
· rw [step,tent_half_zero hq,zero_mul]
· rw [step,tent_half_zero hq,mul_zero]
lemma hat_refine_finite (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) (x : ℂ) :
hat (2*r) p x = ∑ q ∈ children p, step p q*hat r q x := by
rw [hat_refine,tsum_eq_sum (s := children p)]
intro q hq
rw [step_zero_of_not_child hq,zero_mul]
/-- The vector mass of the actual density, not an abstract additive tree. -/
def vectorMass (h : ℂ → ℂ) (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) : ℂ := ∫ y, hat r p y • h y
def scalarMass (h : ℂ → ℂ) (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) : ℝ := ‖vectorMass h r p‖
lemma integrable_hat_smul {h : ℂ → ℂ} (hh : Integrable h) (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
Integrable (fun y => hat r p y • h y) := by
apply hh.bdd_smul 1 (continuous_hat r p).aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards with y
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs,abs_of_nonneg (hat_nonneg r p y)] using hat_le_one r p y
lemma vectorMass_refine {h : ℂ → ℂ} (hh : Integrable h) (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
vectorMass h (2*r) p = ∑ q ∈ children p, step p q • vectorMass h r q := by
unfold vectorMass
simp_rw [hat_refine_finite,Finset.sum_smul,mul_smul]
rw [integral_finsetSum]
· apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro q hq
exact integral_smul _ _
· intro q hq
exact (integrable_hat_smul hh r q).smul _
lemma scalarMass_le_integral {h : ℂ → ℂ} (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
scalarMass h r p ≤ ∫ y, hat r p y * ‖h y‖ := by
unfold scalarMass vectorMass
simpa only [norm_smul,Real.norm_eq_abs,abs_of_nonneg (hat_nonneg _ _ _)] using
norm_integral_le_integral_norm (fun y => hat r p y • h y)
/-- Any finite set of roots carries at most the total L1 density, uniformly
in the scale. This proves the full-grid mass budget once finite support is used. -/
lemma sum_scalarMass_le {h : ℂ → ℂ} (hh : Integrable h) (r : ℝ) (S : Finset (ℤ × ℤ)) :
∑ p ∈ S, scalarMass h r p ≤ ∫ y, ‖h y‖ := by
have hi (p : ℤ × ℤ) : Integrable (fun y => hat r p y * ‖h y‖) := by
simpa only [norm_smul,Real.norm_eq_abs,abs_of_nonneg (hat_nonneg _ _ _)] using
(integrable_hat_smul hh r p).norm
calc
_ ≤ ∑ p ∈ S, ∫ y, hat r p y * ‖h y‖ := Finset.sum_le_sum (fun p _ => scalarMass_le_integral r p)
_ = ∫ y, ∑ p ∈ S, hat r p y * ‖h y‖ := (integral_finsetSum _ (fun p _ => hi p)).symm
_ ≤ ∫ y, ‖h y‖ := by
apply integral_mono (integrable_finsetSum _ (fun p _ => hi p)) hh.norm
intro y
change (∑ p ∈ S, hat r p y * ‖h y‖) ≤ ‖h y‖
rw [← Finset.sum_mul]
have hs := Summable.sum_le_tsum S (fun p _ => hat_nonneg r p y) (summable_hat r y)
rw [tsum_hat] at hs
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hs (norm_nonneg (h y))
lemma scalarMass_refine_le {h : ℂ → ℂ} (hh : Integrable h) (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
scalarMass h (2*r) p ≤ ∑ q ∈ children p, step p q*scalarMass h r q := by
unfold scalarMass
rw [vectorMass_refine hh]
simpa only [norm_smul,Real.norm_eq_abs,abs_of_nonneg (step_nonneg _ _)] using
norm_sum_le (children p) (fun q => step p q • vectorMass h r q)
/-- A finite index set that contains every hat meeting a fixed bounded region. -/
def boundedIndices (r R : ℝ) : Finset (ℤ × ℤ) :=
(Finset.Icc (-⌈R/r+1⌉) ⌈R/r+1⌉).product (Finset.Icc (-⌈R/r+1⌉) ⌈R/r+1⌉)
lemma mem_boundedIndices {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ R)
{p : ℤ × ℤ} (hp : hat r p x ≠ 0) : p ∈ boundedIndices r R := by
have hpos : 0 < hat r p x := lt_of_le_of_ne (hat_nonneg r p x) (Ne.symm hp)
have h1 := (tent_pos_iff _).mp (pos_of_mul_pos_left hpos (tent_nonneg _))
have h2 := (tent_pos_iff _).mp (pos_of_mul_pos_right hpos (tent_nonneg _))
have hbound (a : ℝ) (j : ℤ) (ha : |a| ≤ R) (hj : |a/r-j| < 1) :
j ∈ Finset.Icc (-⌈R/r+1⌉) ⌈R/r+1⌉ := by
have hq : |a/r| ≤ R/r := by rw [abs_div,abs_of_pos hr]; exact div_le_div_of_nonneg_right ha hr.le
have hja : |(j:ℝ)| ≤ R/r+1 := by
calc
_ = |a/r-(a/r-j)| := by congr 1; ring
_ ≤ |a/r|+|a/r-j| := abs_sub _ _
_ ≤ R/r+1 := add_le_add hq hj.le
have hlo := (abs_le.mp hja).1
have hhi := (abs_le.mp hja).2
have hc := Int.le_ceil (R/r+1)
simp only [Finset.mem_Icc]
constructor
· have : (-(⌈R/r+1⌉:ℝ)) ≤ j := by linarith
exact_mod_cast this
· have : (j:ℝ) ≤ ⌈R/r+1⌉ := hhi.trans hc
exact_mod_cast this
exact Finset.mem_product.mpr ⟨hbound x.re p.1 ((Complex.abs_re_le_norm x).trans hx) h1,
hbound x.im p.2 ((Complex.abs_im_le_norm x).trans hx) h2⟩
lemma vectorMass_zero_of_not_index {h : ℂ → ℂ} {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
(hs : ∀ y, h y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ R) {p : ℤ × ℤ} (hp : p ∉ boundedIndices r R) :
vectorMass h r p = 0 := by
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae
filter_upwards with y
by_cases hy : h y = 0
· simp only [hy,smul_zero,Pi.zero_apply]
· have hh : hat r p y = 0 := by
by_contra hn
exact hp (mem_boundedIndices hr (hs y hy) hn)
simp only [hh,zero_smul,Pi.zero_apply]
/-- Compactly supported actual densities have finitely many nonzero vector
masses at each positive scale. -/
lemma finite_vectorMass_support {h : ℂ → ℂ} (hc : HasCompactSupport h) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
(Function.support (vectorMass h r)).Finite := by
obtain ⟨R,hR⟩ := hc.isBounded.subset_closedBall (0:ℂ)
apply (boundedIndices r R).finite_toSet.subset
intro p hp
by_contra hn
exact hp (vectorMass_zero_of_not_index hr (fun y hy => by
simpa only [Metric.mem_closedBall,dist_zero_right] using hR (subset_tsupport h hy)) hn)
end DyadicHats
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Filter
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology RealInnerProductSpace ContDiff
noncomputable section
namespace LipschitzWith
open scoped _root_.LipschitzWith
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
[FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E]
{μ : Measure E} [IsAddHaarMeasure μ] {f g : E → ℝ} {L K : ℝ≥0}
/-- Genuine integration by parts for Lipschitz weights and compact Lipschitz
potentials. Differentiability is required only almost everywhere, and follows
from Rademacher rather than being a new premise. -/
theorem integral_fderiv_mul_eq_neg (hf : LipschitzWith L f) (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(hgc : HasCompactSupport g) (v : E) :
(∫ x, fderiv ℝ f x v * g x ∂μ) = -∫ x, fderiv ℝ g x v * f x ∂μ := by
have h1 : (fun x => fderiv ℝ f x v*g x) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => lineDeriv ℝ f x v*g x := by
filter_upwards [hf.ae_differentiableAt (μ := μ)] with x hx
rw [hx.lineDeriv_eq_fderiv]
have h2 : (fun x => lineDeriv ℝ g x (-v)*f x) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => -(fderiv ℝ g x v*f x) := by
filter_upwards [hg.ae_differentiableAt (μ := μ)] with x hx
rw [hx.lineDeriv_eq_fderiv,map_neg,neg_mul]
rw [integral_congr_ae h1,hf.integral_lineDeriv_mul_eq hg hgc v,integral_congr_ae h2,integral_neg]
/-- The total gradient version obtained from Riesz and measurable fderiv is
locally integrable, including on the nondifferentiability set. -/
theorem locallyIntegrable_gradient (hf : LipschitzWith L f) :
LocallyIntegrable (gradient f) μ := by
have hm : AEStronglyMeasurable (gradient f) μ :=
((InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E).symm.continuous.measurable.comp
(measurable_fderiv ℝ f)).aestronglyMeasurable
have hb : ∀ x, ‖gradient f x‖ ≤ (L:ℝ) := by
intro x
simpa only [gradient,(InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E).symm.norm_map] using
(norm_fderiv_le_of_lipschitz ℝ hf : ‖fderiv ℝ f x‖ ≤ (L:ℝ))
exact (memLp_top_of_bound hm (L:ℝ) (ae_of_all _ hb)).locallyIntegrable le_top
theorem integrable_gradient (hf : LipschitzWith L f) (hc : HasCompactSupport f) :
Integrable (gradient f) μ := by
have hs : HasCompactSupport (gradient f) :=
(hc.fderiv ℝ).comp_left (map_zero (InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E).symm)
exact (integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset (subset_tsupport (gradient f))).mp
((_root_.OAI.LipschitzWith.locallyIntegrable_gradient (μ := μ) hf).integrableOn_isCompact hs)
theorem integral_mul_fderiv_eq_neg (hf : LipschitzWith L f) (hg : LipschitzWith K g)
(hgc : HasCompactSupport g) (v : E) :
(∫ x, f x * fderiv ℝ g x v ∂μ) = -∫ x, inner ℝ (gradient f x) v * g x ∂μ := by
simp only [gradient,InnerProductSpace.toDual_symm_apply]
have h := _root_.OAI.LipschitzWith.integral_fderiv_mul_eq_neg (μ := μ) hf hg hgc v
rw [show (fun x => f x * fderiv ℝ g x v) = (fun x => fderiv ℝ g x v * f x) by
funext x; exact mul_comm _ _]
linarith
end LipschitzWith
open MeasureTheory Set Metric Filter Finset
open scoped ENNReal NNReal RealInnerProductSpace ContDiff Topology
namespace DyadicHats
def indexBox (N : ℕ) : Finset (ℤ × ℤ) :=
(Finset.Icc (-(N:ℤ)) N).product (Finset.Icc (-(N:ℤ)) N)
abbrev Grid (N : ℕ) := {p : ℤ × ℤ // p ∈ indexBox N}
lemma parent_in_box {N : ℕ} {p q : ℤ × ℤ} (hq : q ∈ indexBox N) (hpq : step p q ≠ 0) :
p ∈ indexBox N := by
have hq1 : -(N:ℤ) ≤ q.1 ∧ q.1 ≤ N := Finset.mem_Icc.mp (Finset.mem_product.mp hq).1
have hq2 : -(N:ℤ) ≤ q.2 ∧ q.2 ≤ N := Finset.mem_Icc.mp (Finset.mem_product.mp hq).2
have hh : 0 < step p q := lt_of_le_of_ne (step_nonneg p q) (Ne.symm hpq)
have h1 := (tent_pos_iff _).mp (pos_of_mul_pos_left hh (tent_nonneg _))
have h2 := (tent_pos_iff _).mp (pos_of_mul_pos_right hh (tent_nonneg _))
have hbound (j k : ℤ) (hk : -(N:ℤ) ≤ k ∧ k ≤ N) (ha : |(k:ℝ)/2-j| < 1) :
j ∈ Finset.Icc (-(N:ℤ)) N := by
have hlo : -(N:ℝ) ≤ k := by exact_mod_cast hk.1
have hhi : (k:ℝ) ≤ N := by exact_mod_cast hk.2
have hj := abs_lt.mp ha
simp only [Finset.mem_Icc]
constructor
· by_contra hn
have : j ≤ -(N:ℤ)-1 := by omega
have : (j:ℝ) ≤ -(N:ℝ)-1 := by exact_mod_cast this
nlinarith [Nat.cast_nonneg (α := ℝ) N]
· by_contra hn
have : (N:ℤ)+1 ≤ j := by omega
have : (N:ℝ)+1 ≤ j := by exact_mod_cast this
nlinarith [Nat.cast_nonneg (α := ℝ) N]
exact Finset.mem_product.mpr ⟨hbound _ _ hq1 h1,hbound _ _ hq2 h2⟩
/-- Restriction to a finite box retains the exact column normalization of the
positive dyadic refinement matrix; it does not normalize its rows. -/
lemma grid_step_column (N : ℕ) (q : Grid N) : (∑ p : Grid N, step p q) = 1 := by
have he := step_column q.val
rw [tsum_eq_sum (s := indexBox N)] at he
· exact (Finset.sum_coe_sort (indexBox N) (fun p => step p q)).trans he
· intro p hp
by_contra hn
exact hp (parent_in_box q.property hn)
lemma mem_indexBox_of_le {N : ℕ} {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
(hN : R/r+1 ≤ (N:ℝ)) {x : ℂ} (hx : ‖x‖ ≤ R) {p : ℤ × ℤ} (hp : hat r p x ≠ 0) :
p ∈ indexBox N := by
have hm := mem_boundedIndices hr hx hp
have hc : ⌈R/r+1⌉ ≤ (N:ℤ) := Int.ceil_le.mpr (by simpa only [Int.cast_natCast] using hN)
have h1 := Finset.mem_Icc.mp (Finset.mem_product.mp hm).1
have h2 := Finset.mem_Icc.mp (Finset.mem_product.mp hm).2
apply Finset.mem_product.mpr
constructor <;> apply Finset.mem_Icc.mpr <;> constructor <;> omega
lemma hat_mul_zero_outside {N : ℕ} {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
(hN : R/r+1 ≤ (N:ℝ)) {h : ℂ → ℝ} (hs : ∀ y, h y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ R)
{p : ℤ × ℤ} (hp : p ∉ indexBox N) (x : ℂ) : hat r p x*h x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : h x = 0
· rw [hx,mul_zero]
· have ht : hat r p x = 0 := by
by_contra hn
exact hp (mem_indexBox_of_le hr hN (hs x hx) hn)
rw [ht,zero_mul]
lemma density_partition_grid {N : ℕ} {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
(hN : R/r+1 ≤ (N:ℝ)) {h : ℂ → ℝ} (hs : ∀ y, h y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ R) (x : ℂ) :
(∑ p : Grid N, hat r p x*h x) = h x := by
have he : (∑' p : ℤ × ℤ, hat r p x*h x) = ∑ p ∈ indexBox N, hat r p x*h x :=
tsum_eq_sum (fun p hp => hat_mul_zero_outside hr hN hs hp x)
rw [Finset.sum_coe_sort (indexBox N) (fun p => hat r p x*h x),← he,
tsum_mul_right,tsum_hat,one_mul]
lemma density_refine_grid {N : ℕ} {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r)
(hN : R/r+1 ≤ (N:ℝ)) {h : ℂ → ℝ} (hs : ∀ y, h y ≠ 0 → ‖y‖ ≤ R)
(p : Grid N) (x : ℂ) :
hat (2*r) p x*h x = ∑ q : Grid N, step p q*(hat r q x*h x) := by
rw [hat_refine,← tsum_mul_right,tsum_eq_sum (s := indexBox N)]
· rw [Finset.sum_coe_sort (indexBox N) (fun q => step p q*(hat r q x*h x))]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro q hq
ring
· intro q hq
rw [mul_assoc,hat_mul_zero_outside hr hN hs hq x,mul_zero]
lemma integrable_hat_mul {h : ℂ → ℝ} (hh : Integrable h) (r : ℝ) (p : ℤ × ℤ) :
Integrable (fun y => hat r p y*h y) := by
exact hh.bdd_smul 1 (continuous_hat r p).aestronglyMeasurable
(ae_of_all _ (fun y => by
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs,abs_of_nonneg (hat_nonneg r p y)] using hat_le_one r p y))
def scale (r : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : ℝ := (2:ℝ)^k*r
lemma scale_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (k : ℕ) : 0 < scale r k := by unfold scale; positivity
lemma scale_succ (r : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : scale r (k+1) = 2*scale r k := by
unfold scale
rw [pow_succ]
ring
lemma le_scale {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) (k : ℕ) : r ≤ scale r k := by
have hp : (1:ℝ) ≤ 2^k := one_le_pow₀ (by norm_num)
simpa only [one_mul,scale] using mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hp hr
lemma scale_index_bound {N : ℕ} {r R : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (hR : 0 ≤ R)
(hN : R/r+1 ≤ (N:ℝ)) (k : ℕ) : R/scale r k+1 ≤ (N:ℝ) := by
have hd : R / scale r k ≤ R / r := div_le_div_of_nonneg_left hR hr (le_scale hr.le k)
linarith
end DyadicHats
end
end
end OAI