openAI-math-dataset / lean /OAI /Analysis /ForestSpace /FiniteGeometry.lean
roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 18)
67aee1d verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
15 kB
import OAI.Analysis.ForestSpace.Segments
namespace OAI
open scoped BigOperators
open Finset
namespace ForestSpace
noncomputable section
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable
section FiniteGeometry
variable {V : Type} [Fintype V] [PartialOrder V]
/-- The ancestral interval [a,g), ending immediately before g along its path. -/
noncomputable def before (a g : V) : Finset V := by
classical
exact univ.filter (fun v => a ≤ v ∧ v < g)
@[simp] theorem mem_before {a g v : V} : v ∈ before a g ↔ a ≤ v ∧ v < g := by
classical
simp [before]
theorem isSegment_before (hF : ForestOrder V) (a g : V) : IsSegment (before a g) := by
constructor
· intro v hv w hw
exact hF v w g (mem_before.mp hv).2.le (mem_before.mp hw).2.le
· intro v hv w hw z hvz hzw
exact mem_before.mpr ⟨(mem_before.mp hv).1.trans hvz,
lt_of_le_of_lt hzw (mem_before.mp hw).2⟩
theorem before_mono {a b g : V} (hab : a ≤ b) : before b g ⊆ before a g := by
intro v hv
exact mem_before.mpr ⟨hab.trans (mem_before.mp hv).1, (mem_before.mp hv).2⟩
theorem before_subset_head {H : Set V} {g a : V} (hg : Gate H g) :
∀ v ∈ before a g, v ∈ H := by
intro v hv
exact hg.2 v (mem_before.mp hv).2
theorem IsSegment.head_eq_before {H : Set V} (hH : IsLowerSet H)
{S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S) {g : V} (hg : Gate H g) (hgs : g ∈ S)
(hp : ∃ a ∈ S, a ∈ H) :
∃ a, a < g ∧ S.filter (· ∈ H) = before a g := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hS.endpoints ⟨g, hgs⟩
have haH : a ∈ H := by
obtain ⟨w, hw, hwH⟩ := hp
exact hH ((hab w).mp hw).1 hwH
have hag : a < g := lt_of_le_of_ne ((hab g).mp hgs).1
(fun h => hg.1 (h ▸ haH))
refine ⟨a, hag, ?_⟩
ext v
simp only [mem_filter, mem_before]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hv, hvH⟩
refine ⟨((hab v).mp hv).1, ?_⟩
have hvg : v ≤ g := (hS.1 v hv g hgs).resolve_right (fun h => hg.1 (hH h hvH))
exact lt_of_le_of_ne hvg (fun he => hg.1 (he ▸ hvH))
· rintro ⟨hav, hvg⟩
exact ⟨hS.2 a ha g hgs v hav hvg.le, hg.2 v hvg⟩
/-- Removing a terminal suffix from any segment leaves a segment. -/
theorem IsSegment.sdiff_before {S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S) {a b g : V}
(hSa : S = before a g) : IsSegment (S \ before b g) := by
classical
subst S
constructor
· intro v hv w hw
exact hS.1 v (mem_sdiff.mp hv).1 w (mem_sdiff.mp hw).1
· intro v hv w hw z hvz hzw
have hz := hS.2 v (mem_sdiff.mp hv).1 w (mem_sdiff.mp hw).1 z hvz hzw
refine mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hz, ?_⟩
intro hzb
apply (mem_sdiff.mp hw).2
exact mem_before.mpr ⟨(mem_before.mp hzb).1.trans hzw,
(mem_before.mp (mem_sdiff.mp hw).1).2⟩
/-- The closed ancestral interval [g,w]. -/
noncomputable def along (g w : V) : Finset V :=
univ.filter (fun v => g ≤ v ∧ v ≤ w)
@[simp] theorem mem_along {g w v : V} : v ∈ along g w ↔ g ≤ v ∧ v ≤ w := by
simp [along]
theorem isSegment_along (hF : ForestOrder V) (g w : V) : IsSegment (along g w) := by
constructor
· intro a ha b hb
exact hF a b w (mem_along.mp ha).2 (mem_along.mp hb).2
· intro a ha b hb c hac hcb
exact mem_along.mpr ⟨(mem_along.mp ha).1.trans hac, hcb.trans (mem_along.mp hb).2⟩
theorem IsSegment.tail_eq_along {H : Set V} (hH : IsLowerSet H)
{S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S) {g : V} (hg : Gate H g) (hgs : g ∈ S) :
∃ b, S.filter (· ∉ H) = along g b := by
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hS.endpoints ⟨g, hgs⟩
refine ⟨b, ?_⟩
ext v
simp only [mem_filter, mem_along]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hv, hvH⟩
refine ⟨?_, ((hab v).mp hv).2⟩
rcases hS.1 g hgs v hv with hgv | hvg
· exact hgv
· by_contra hngv
exact hvH (hg.2 v (lt_of_le_not_ge hvg hngv))
· rintro ⟨hgv, hvb⟩
exact ⟨hS.2 g hgs b hb v hgv hvb, fun hv => hg.1 (hH hgv hv)⟩
/-- Maximal initial-segment mass of a test inside the cone at g. -/
noncomputable def mass (k : V → ℝ) (g : V) : ℝ :=
univ.sup' ⟨g, mem_univ g⟩ (fun w => |segSum k (along g w)|)
theorem abs_segSum_along_le (k : V → ℝ) (g w : V) :
|segSum k (along g w)| ≤ mass k g :=
le_sup' (fun w => |segSum k (along g w)|) (mem_univ w)
theorem mass_nonneg (k : V → ℝ) (g : V) : 0 ≤ mass k g :=
(abs_nonneg _).trans (abs_segSum_along_le k g g)
theorem mass_attained (k : V → ℝ) (g : V) :
∃ w, mass k g = |segSum k (along g w)| := by
obtain ⟨w, hw, he⟩ := exists_mem_eq_sup' (⟨g, mem_univ g⟩ : (univ : Finset V).Nonempty)
(fun w => |segSum k (along g w)|)
exact ⟨w, he⟩
theorem gate_mass_bound (hF : ForestOrder V) {k : V → ℝ} (hk : TestBound k 1)
(H : Set V) : ∑ g : {g // Gate H g}, mass k g ^ 2 ≤ 1 := by
choose w hw using (fun g : {g // Gate H g} => mass_attained k g)
have hd : Pairwise (fun g h : {g // Gate H g} => Disjoint (along (g : V) (w g)) (along (h : V) (w h))) := by
intro g h hne
apply disjoint_left.mpr
intro v hvg hvh
have hcomp := hF g h v (mem_along.mp hvg).1 (mem_along.mp hvh).1
apply hne
apply Subtype.ext
exact hcomp.elim (g.property.eq_of_le h.property) (fun hle => (h.property.eq_of_le g.property hle).symm)
have hh := hk {g // Gate H g} inferInstance (fun g => along (g : V) (w g))
(fun g => isSegment_along hF g (w g)) hd
simpa only [hw, sq_abs] using hh
/-- Square mass at gates, and zero elsewhere. -/
noncomputable def gateWeight (H : Set V) (k : V → ℝ) (g : V) : ℝ :=
if Gate H g then mass k g ^ 2 else 0
theorem gateWeight_nonneg (H : Set V) (k : V → ℝ) (g : V) : 0 ≤ gateWeight H k g := by
unfold gateWeight
split_ifs <;> positivity
theorem gateWeight_sum_le (hF : ForestOrder V) {k : V → ℝ} (hk : TestBound k 1)
(H : Set V) : ∑ g, gateWeight H k g ≤ 1 := by
have he : (∑ g, gateWeight H k g) = ∑ g : {g // Gate H g}, mass k g ^ 2 := by
rw [← sum_subtype (p := Gate H) (univ.filter (Gate H)) (by simp)
(fun g => mass k g ^ 2)]
simp only [gateWeight, sum_filter]
rw [he]
exact gate_mass_bound hF hk H
omit [Fintype V] [PartialOrder V] in
theorem disjoint_sum_le [Fintype V] [PartialOrder V] {ι : Type} [Fintype ι] (S : ι → Finset V)
(hd : Pairwise (fun i j => Disjoint (S i) (S j))) (q : V → ℝ) (hq : ∀ v, 0 ≤ q v) :
(∑ i, ∑ v ∈ S i, q v) ≤ ∑ v, q v := by
rw [← sum_biUnion (s := univ) (t := S) (by intro i hi j hj hij; exact hd hij)]
exact sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (subset_univ _) (by intro v hv hv'; exact hq v)
theorem gateWeight_family_le (hF : ForestOrder V) {k : V → ℝ} (hk : TestBound k 1)
(H : Set V) {ι : Type} [Fintype ι] (S : ι → Finset V)
(hd : Pairwise (fun i j => Disjoint (S i) (S j))) :
(∑ i, ∑ v ∈ S i, gateWeight H k v) ≤ 1 :=
(disjoint_sum_le S hd _ (gateWeight_nonneg H k)).trans (gateWeight_sum_le hF hk H)
omit [Fintype V] [PartialOrder V] in
/-- A segment contains at most one coordinate of a gate-supported vector. -/
theorem sum_gate_supported [Fintype V] [PartialOrder V] {H : Set V} {c : V → ℝ}
(hc : ∀ v, ¬ Gate H v → c v = 0) {S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S)
{g : V} (hg : Gate H g) (hgs : g ∈ S) : segSum c S = c g := by
apply sum_eq_single g
· intro v hv hvg
apply hc v
intro hgate
exact hvg (hS.gate_unique hgate hg hv hgs)
· exact fun h => (h hgs).elim
noncomputable def correction (H : Set V) (k σ : V → ℝ) (g : V) : ℝ :=
if Gate H g then σ g * mass k g else 0
theorem correction_supported (H : Set V) (k σ : V → ℝ) :
SupportedOn (correction H k σ) Hᶜ := by
intro v hv
simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff, not_not] at hv
exact ite_eq_right (fun hg => hg.1 hv)
theorem correction_sum {H : Set V} {k σ : V → ℝ} {S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S)
{g : V} (hg : Gate H g) (hgs : g ∈ S) :
segSum (correction H k σ) S = σ g * mass k g := by
rw [sum_gate_supported (c := correction H k σ) (fun v hv => ite_eq_right hv) hS hg hgs]
exact ite_eq_left hg
theorem correction_segment_sq {H : Set V} {k σ : V → ℝ} (hσ : ∀ v, σ v ^ 2 = 1)
{S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S) :
segSum (correction H k σ) S ^ 2 = ∑ v ∈ S, gateWeight H k v := by
by_cases h : ∃ g ∈ S, Gate H g
· obtain ⟨g, hgs, hg⟩ := h
rw [correction_sum hS hg hgs, mul_pow, hσ, one_mul]
symm
calc
(∑ v ∈ S, gateWeight H k v) = gateWeight H k g := by
apply sum_eq_single g
· intro v hv hvg
exact ite_eq_right (fun hgate => hvg (hS.gate_unique hgate hg hv hgs))
· exact fun hn => (hn hgs).elim
_ = mass k g ^ 2 := ite_eq_left hg
· have hz : segSum (correction H k σ) S = 0 := by
apply sum_eq_zero
intro v hv
exact ite_eq_right (fun hg => h ⟨v, hv, hg⟩)
rw [hz, zero_pow (by decide : (2 : ℕ) ≠ 0)]
symm
apply sum_eq_zero
intro v hv
exact ite_eq_right (fun hg => h ⟨v, hv, hg⟩)
theorem correction_testBound (hF : ForestOrder V) {k σ : V → ℝ} (hk : TestBound k 1)
(hσ : ∀ v, σ v ^ 2 = 1) (H : Set V) : TestBound (correction H k σ) 1 := by
intro ι inst S hS hd
simp_rw [correction_segment_sq hσ (hS _)]
exact gateWeight_family_le hF hk H S hd
theorem tail_sum_le_mass {H : Set V} (hH : IsLowerSet H) {k : V → ℝ}
(hk : SupportedOn k Hᶜ) {S : Finset V} (hS : IsSegment S)
{g : V} (hg : Gate H g) (hgs : g ∈ S) : |segSum k S| ≤ mass k g := by
obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hS.tail_eq_along hH hg hgs
have he := hk.segSum_filter S
simp only [Set.mem_compl_iff] at he
rw [← he, hb]
exact abs_segSum_along_le k g b
/-- Candidate starts of suffixes whose head sum reaches the gate threshold. -/
noncomputable def largeStarts (f k : V → ℝ) (s : ℝ) (g : V) : Finset V :=
univ.filter (fun a => a < g ∧ 2 * s * mass k g ≤ |segSum f (before a g)|)
@[simp] theorem mem_largeStarts {f k : V → ℝ} {s : ℝ} {g a : V} :
a ∈ largeStarts f k s g ↔ a < g ∧ 2 * s * mass k g ≤ |segSum f (before a g)| := by
simp [largeStarts]
noncomputable def selectedStart (f k : V → ℝ) (s : ℝ) (g : V)
(h : (largeStarts f k s g).Nonempty) : V :=
Classical.choose ((largeStarts f k s g).exists_maximal h)
theorem selectedStart_spec (f k : V → ℝ) (s : ℝ) (g : V)
(h : (largeStarts f k s g).Nonempty) :
Maximal (· ∈ largeStarts f k s g) (selectedStart f k s g h) :=
Classical.choose_spec ((largeStarts f k s g).exists_maximal h)
noncomputable def selectedHead (f k : V → ℝ) (s : ℝ) (g : V) : Finset V :=
if h : (largeStarts f k s g).Nonempty then before (selectedStart f k s g h) g else ∅
theorem selectedHead_segment (hF : ForestOrder V) (f k : V → ℝ) (s : ℝ) (g : V) :
IsSegment (selectedHead f k s g) := by
unfold selectedHead
split_ifs
· exact isSegment_before hF _ _
· exact isSegment_empty
theorem selectedHead_subset (hF : ForestOrder V) {f k : V → ℝ} {s : ℝ} {a g : V}
(ha : a ∈ largeStarts f k s g) : selectedHead f k s g ⊆ before a g := by
have hne : (largeStarts f k s g).Nonempty := ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [selectedHead, dite_eq_left hne]
apply before_mono
have hb := selectedStart_spec f k s g hne
exact (hF a (selectedStart f k s g hne) g
(mem_largeStarts.mp ha).1.le (mem_largeStarts.mp hb.1).1.le).elim id (hb.2 ha)
theorem selectedHead_large {f k : V → ℝ} {s : ℝ} {a g : V}
(ha : a ∈ largeStarts f k s g) :
2 * s * mass k g ≤ |segSum f (selectedHead f k s g)| := by
have hne : (largeStarts f k s g).Nonempty := ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [selectedHead, dite_eq_left hne]
exact (mem_largeStarts.mp (selectedStart_spec f k s g hne).1).2
theorem sdiff_selectedHead_segment {f k : V → ℝ} {s : ℝ} {a g : V}
(hS : IsSegment (before a g)) : IsSegment (before a g \ selectedHead f k s g) := by
unfold selectedHead
split_ifs
· exact hS.sdiff_before rfl
· simpa using hS
end FiniteGeometry
section CrossTermAlgebra
/-- Opposite sign for the selected head sum; at zero either sign is harmless. -/
def oppositeSign (r : ℝ) : ℝ := if r < 0 then 1 else -1
theorem oppositeSign_sq (r : ℝ) : oppositeSign r ^ 2 = 1 := by
unfold oppositeSign
split_ifs <;> norm_num
theorem abs_oppositeSign (r : ℝ) : |oppositeSign r| = 1 := by
unfold oppositeSign
split_ifs <;> norm_num
theorem oppositeSign_cross {r m d : ℝ} (hd : |d| ≤ m) :
r * (oppositeSign r * m + d) ≤ 0 := by
have hd' := abs_le.mp hd
unfold oppositeSign
split_ifs with hr
· exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hr.le (by linarith)
· exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos (le_of_not_gt hr) (by linarith)
theorem oppositeSign_tail_abs {r m d : ℝ} (hm : 0 ≤ m) (hd : |d| ≤ m) :
|oppositeSign r * m + d| ≤ 2 * m := by
calc
|oppositeSign r * m + d| ≤ |oppositeSign r * m| + |d| := abs_add_le _ _
_ ≤ m + m := by rw [abs_mul, abs_oppositeSign, abs_of_nonneg hm, one_mul]; linarith
_ = 2 * m := by ring
theorem small_cross_bound {a b s m q : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) (hm : 0 ≤ m)
(ha : |a| ≤ 2 * s * m) (hb : |b| ≤ 2 * m) (hq : m ^ 2 ≤ q) :
2 * s * a * b ≤ 8 * s ^ 2 * q := by
have hab : a * b ≤ (2 * s * m) * (2 * m) :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (by rw [abs_mul]; exact mul_le_mul ha hb (abs_nonneg _) (by positivity))
have h₁ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hab (show 0 ≤ 2 * s by positivity)
have h₂ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hq (show 0 ≤ 8 * s ^ 2 by positivity)
nlinarith
theorem cross_sign {a b r : ℝ} (hab : 0 < a * b) (hrb : r * b ≤ 0) : a * r ≤ 0 := by
rcases lt_or_ge b 0 with hb | hb
· have ha : a < 0 := (mul_pos_iff.mp hab).resolve_left (fun hh => not_lt_of_ge hb.le hh.2)
|>.1
have hr : 0 ≤ r := by nlinarith
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha.le hr
· have hb' : 0 < b := lt_of_le_of_ne hb (by intro h; subst b; simp at hab)
have ha : 0 < a := (mul_pos_iff.mp hab).resolve_right (fun hh => not_lt_of_ge hb hh.2)
|>.1
have hr : r ≤ 0 := by nlinarith
exact mul_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_nonpos ha.le hr
/-- A large positive cross term is paid for by splitting off the selected suffix. -/
theorem large_cross_bound {a b r s m : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) (hm : 0 ≤ m)
(hab : 0 < a * b) (hrb : r * b ≤ 0) (hr : 2 * s * m ≤ |r|)
(hb : |b| ≤ 2 * m) :
2 * s * a * b ≤ (a - r) ^ 2 + r ^ 2 - a ^ 2 := by
have har := cross_sign hab hrb
have h₁ : a * b ≤ |a| * (2 * m) :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (by
rw [abs_mul, mul_comm |a| |b|, mul_comm |a| (2 * m)]
exact mul_le_mul hb le_rfl (abs_nonneg a) (mul_nonneg (by norm_num) hm))
have h₂ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₁ (show 0 ≤ 2 * s by positivity)
have h₃ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hr (show 0 ≤ 2 * |a| by positivity)
have he : |a| * |r| = -(a * r) := by rw [← abs_mul, abs_of_nonpos har]
nlinarith [sq_nonneg r]
end CrossTermAlgebra
end
end ForestSpace
end OAI