Download lean/OAI/Combinatorics/KServer/Coarse.lean from roseking/openAI-math-dataset: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 63.2 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/roseking/openAI-math-dataset/resolve/main/lean/OAI/Combinatorics/KServer/Coarse.lean
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/roseking/openAI-math-dataset/lean/OAI/Combinatorics/KServer/Coarse.lean
-
curl -L -o Coarse.lean https://huggingface.co/datasets/roseking/openAI-math-dataset/resolve/main/lean/OAI/Combinatorics/KServer/Coarse.lean
63.2 kB
| import Mathlib | |
| import OAI.Combinatorics.KServer.RankProportions | |
| namespace OAI | |
| noncomputable section | |
| open scoped BigOperators | |
| open Finset | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseSchedule | |
| open Finset | |
| structure State where | |
| active : Bool | |
| value : ℝ | |
| def Valid (s : State) : Prop := 0 ≤ s.value ∧ (s.active = false → s.value = 0) | |
| noncomputable def update (c δ x : ℝ) (s : State) : State := | |
| if s.active then | |
| if x ≤ 2*c then ⟨false,0⟩ | |
| else if (1+δ)*s.value < x ∨ (1+δ)*x < s.value then ⟨true,x⟩ else s | |
| else if 5*c ≤ x then ⟨true,x⟩ else s | |
| noncomputable def charge (s t : State) : ℝ := if s.value = t.value then 0 else s.value+t.value | |
| noncomputable def factor (δ : ℝ) : ℝ := 1+2/δ | |
| noncomputable def potential (c δ x : ℝ) (s : State) : ℝ := | |
| factor δ * |x-s.value| + (if s.active then 2*(factor δ+1)*c else 0) | |
| lemma factor_ge_seven (δ : ℝ) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/3) : 7 ≤ factor δ := by | |
| have hh : 6 ≤ 2/δ := (le_div_iff₀ hδ).mpr (by linarith) | |
| exact by dsimp [factor]; linarith | |
| lemma update_valid {s : State} (hs : Valid s) {c δ x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : | |
| Valid (update c δ x s) := by | |
| unfold update | |
| split_ifs <;> simp_all [Valid] | |
| lemma charge_self (s : State) : charge s s = 0 := by simp [charge] | |
| lemma charge_le {s t : State} (hs : 0 ≤ s.value) (ht : 0 ≤ t.value) : | |
| charge s t ≤ s.value+t.value := by | |
| unfold charge | |
| split_ifs <;> linarith | |
| lemma update_credit {c δ x : ℝ} {s : State} (hc : 0 ≤ c) | |
| (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/3) (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hs : Valid s) : | |
| charge s (update c δ x s) + potential c δ x (update c δ x s) ≤ potential c δ x s := by | |
| have hC := factor_ge_seven δ hδ hδu | |
| have hC0 : 0 ≤ factor δ := by linarith | |
| have hC1 : 1 ≤ factor δ := by linarith | |
| have hCs : |x-s.value| ≤ factor δ*|x-s.value| := by nlinarith [abs_nonneg (x-s.value)] | |
| unfold update | |
| split_ifs with hon hoff href hon' | |
| · have hsx : s.value ≤ |x-s.value|+x := by | |
| have hh := le_abs_self (s.value-x) | |
| rw [abs_sub_comm s.value x] at hh | |
| linarith | |
| have hch := charge_le (s := s) (t := ⟨false,0⟩) hs.1 (by norm_num) | |
| simp only [potential, Bool.false_eq_true, ite_false, sub_zero, abs_of_nonneg hx] | |
| simp only [hon, ite_true] | |
| have hbound : (factor δ+1)*x ≤ 2*(factor δ+1)*c := by | |
| nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hoff (show 0 ≤ factor δ+1 by linarith)] | |
| linarith | |
| · have hch := charge_le (s := s) (t := ⟨true,x⟩) hs.1 hx | |
| have hfac := RankTracking.factor_change_charge hs.1 hx hδ href | |
| rw [abs_sub_comm] at hfac | |
| change s.value+x ≤ factor δ*|x-s.value| at hfac | |
| simp only [potential, sub_self, abs_zero, mul_zero, zero_add, hon, ite_true] | |
| linarith | |
| · simp [charge_self] | |
| · have hfalse : s.active = false := by simpa using hon | |
| have hz := hs.2 hfalse | |
| have hch := charge_le (s := s) (t := ⟨true,x⟩) hs.1 hx | |
| simp only [potential, sub_self, abs_zero, mul_zero, zero_add, hfalse, Bool.false_eq_true, ite_false, ite_true, | |
| hz, sub_zero, abs_of_nonneg hx] | |
| have hc1 : 2*(factor δ+1)*c ≤ (factor δ-1)*(5*c) := by nlinarith | |
| have hc2 : (factor δ-1)*(5*c) ≤ (factor δ-1)*x := | |
| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hon' (by linarith) | |
| simp only [hz] at hch | |
| linarith | |
| · simp [charge_self] | |
| lemma potential_nonneg {c δ x : ℝ} {s : State} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hδ : 0 < δ) : | |
| 0 ≤ potential c δ x s := by | |
| unfold potential factor | |
| split_ifs <;> positivity | |
| lemma potential_input {c δ x y : ℝ} (s : State) (hδ : 0 < δ) : | |
| potential c δ y s ≤ potential c δ x s + factor δ*|y-x| := by | |
| have h0 : 0 ≤ factor δ := by unfold factor; positivity | |
| have hh := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_sub_le y x s.value) h0 | |
| simpa only [potential, mul_add] using (show | |
| factor δ*|y-s.value|+(if s.active then 2*(factor δ+1)*c else 0) ≤ | |
| factor δ*|x-s.value|+(if s.active then 2*(factor δ+1)*c else 0)+factor δ*|y-x| by | |
| linarith) | |
| noncomputable def run (c δ : ℝ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (initial : State) : ℕ → State | |
| | 0 => initial | |
| | t+1 => update c δ (x (t+1)) (run c δ x initial t) | |
| lemma run_valid {c δ : ℝ} {x : ℕ → ℝ} {initial : State} | |
| (hx : ∀ t, 0 ≤ x t) (hi : Valid initial) : ∀ t, Valid (run c δ x initial t) | |
| | 0 => hi | |
| | t+1 => update_valid (run_valid hx hi t) (hx (t+1)) | |
| /-- Uniform-in-horizon amortization of the literal §03 active-size schedule. | |
| This pays genuine old-plus-new charges, not merely total variation. -/ | |
| theorem active_size_budget {c δ : ℝ} {x : ℕ → ℝ} {initial : State} | |
| (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/3) | |
| (hx : ∀ t, 0 ≤ x t) (hi : Valid initial) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, charge (run c δ x initial t) (run c δ x initial (t+1))) ≤ | |
| factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, |x (t+1)-x t|) + potential c δ (x 0) initial := by | |
| have hstrong : (∑ t ∈ range N, charge (run c δ x initial t) (run c δ x initial (t+1))) + | |
| potential c δ (x N) (run c δ x initial N) ≤ | |
| factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, |x (t+1)-x t|) + potential c δ (x 0) initial := by | |
| induction N with | |
| | zero => simp [run] | |
| | succ N ih => | |
| have hcredit := update_credit hc hδ hδu (hx (N+1)) (run_valid (c := c) (δ := δ) hx hi N) | |
| have hinput := potential_input (c := c) (δ := δ) (x := x N) (y := x (N+1)) | |
| (run c δ x initial N) hδ | |
| simp only [sum_range_succ, mul_add, run] at * | |
| linarith | |
| linarith [potential_nonneg (x := x N) (s := run c δ x initial N) hc hδ] | |
| end KServer.CoarseSchedule | |
| /-! The actual epoch/wholesale recurrence of §03. The old credit is discarded | |
| on a parent refresh, never spent twice. Empty transitions are forced by the | |
| same variation test. -/ | |
| noncomputable section | |
| open scoped BigOperators | |
| open Finset | |
| namespace KServer.EpochSchedule | |
| variable {J K : Type*} [Fintype J] | |
| def total (x : J → ℝ) : ℝ := ∑ i, x i | |
| def variation (x y : J → ℝ) : ℝ := ∑ i, |x i-y i| | |
| lemma variation_nonneg (x y : J → ℝ) : 0 ≤ variation x y := sum_nonneg fun _ _ => abs_nonneg _ | |
| lemma total_nonneg {x : J → ℝ} (hx : ∀ i, 0 ≤ x i) : 0 ≤ total x := sum_nonneg fun _ _ => hx _ | |
| lemma total_change (x y : J → ℝ) : |total x-total y| ≤ variation x y := by | |
| rw [total,total,←sum_sub_distrib] | |
| exact abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _ | |
| lemma coordinate_change (x y : J → ℝ) (i : J) : |x i-y i| ≤ variation x y := | |
| single_le_sum (fun j _ => abs_nonneg (x j-y j)) (mem_univ i) | |
| lemma variation_triangle (x y z : J → ℝ) : variation x z ≤ variation x y+variation y z := by | |
| rw [variation,variation,variation,←sum_add_distrib] | |
| exact sum_le_sum fun i _ => abs_sub_le _ _ _ | |
| structure State (J : Type*) where | |
| reference : J → ℝ | |
| credit : ℝ | |
| def Valid (x : J → ℝ) (s : State J) : Prop := | |
| (∀ i, 0 ≤ s.reference i) ∧ 0 ≤ s.credit ∧ s.credit ≤ total s.reference/100 ∧ | |
| variation x s.reference ≤ s.credit | |
| def reset (x y : J → ℝ) (a b : K) (s : State J) : Prop := | |
| a≠b ∨ total s.reference/100 < s.credit+variation y x | |
| instance (x y : J → ℝ) (a b : K) (s : State J) : Decidable (reset x y a b s) := Classical.propDecidable _ | |
| def update (x y : J → ℝ) (a b : K) (s : State J) : State J := | |
| if reset x y a b s then ⟨y,0⟩ else ⟨s.reference,s.credit+variation y x⟩ | |
| lemma update_valid {x y : J → ℝ} {a b : K} {s : State J} | |
| (hy : ∀ i, 0 ≤ y i) (hs : Valid x s) : Valid y (update x y a b s) := by | |
| unfold update | |
| split_ifs with hr | |
| · refine ⟨hy,le_rfl,div_nonneg (total_nonneg hy) (by norm_num),?_⟩ | |
| simp [variation] | |
| · have hh := not_or.mp hr | |
| refine ⟨hs.1,add_nonneg hs.2.1 (variation_nonneg _ _),le_of_not_gt hh.2,?_⟩ | |
| exact (variation_triangle y x s.reference).trans (by linarith [hs.2.2.2]) | |
| lemma valid_total {x : J → ℝ} {s : State J} (hs : Valid x s) : | |
| (99/100:ℝ)*total s.reference ≤ total x ∧ total x ≤ (101/100:ℝ)*total s.reference := by | |
| have hd := (abs_le.mp ((total_change x s.reference).trans hs.2.2.2)) | |
| constructor <;> linarith [hs.2.2.1] | |
| lemma valid_coordinate {x : J → ℝ} {s : State J} (hs : Valid x s) (i : J) : | |
| s.reference i-total s.reference/100 ≤ x i ∧ x i ≤ s.reference i+total s.reference/100 := by | |
| have hd := abs_le.mp ((coordinate_change x s.reference i).trans hs.2.2.2) | |
| constructor <;> linarith [hs.2.2.1] | |
| lemma empty_transition {x y : J → ℝ} {a b : K} {s : State J} | |
| (hs : Valid x s) | |
| (he : (total x=0 ∧ 0 < total y) ∨ (0 < total x ∧ total y=0)) : reset x y a b s := by | |
| apply Or.inr | |
| have ha := total_nonneg hs.1 | |
| have ht := valid_total hs | |
| have hd := abs_le.mp (total_change y x) | |
| rcases he with he | he | |
| · have hz : total s.reference=0 := by linarith | |
| rw [hz] | |
| linarith [hs.2.1] | |
| · have hi := hs.2.2.1 | |
| have hn := variation_nonneg y x | |
| have hp : 0 < total s.reference := by linarith | |
| linarith [hs.2.1] | |
| def wholesale (x y : J → ℝ) (a b : K) (s : State J) : ℝ := | |
| if reset x y a b s then total x+total y else 0 | |
| def parentCharge (x y : J → ℝ) (a b : K) : ℝ := by | |
| classical | |
| exact if a≠b then total x+total y else 0 | |
| /-- Each volume-triggered wholesale consumes only its epoch's accumulated | |
| variation. The constant 203 is the literal bound used in the source. -/ | |
| lemma update_budget {x y : J → ℝ} {a b : K} {s : State J} | |
| (hs : Valid x s) : | |
| wholesale x y a b s+203*(update x y a b s).credit ≤ | |
| 203*s.credit+203*variation y x+parentCharge x y a b := by | |
| classical | |
| by_cases hk : a≠b | |
| · have hr : reset x y a b s := Or.inl hk | |
| simp only [wholesale,update,ite_eq_left hr,parentCharge,ite_eq_left hk] | |
| linarith [hs.2.1,variation_nonneg y x] | |
| · by_cases hv : total s.reference/100 < s.credit+variation y x | |
| · have hr : reset x y a b s := Or.inr hv | |
| simp only [wholesale,update,ite_eq_left hr,parentCharge,ite_eq_right hk] | |
| have ht := (valid_total hs).2 | |
| have hd := (abs_le.mp (total_change y x)).2 | |
| have hd' := variation_nonneg y x | |
| linarith [hs.2.1] | |
| · have hr : ¬reset x y a b s := not_or.mpr ⟨hk,hv⟩ | |
| simp only [wholesale,update,ite_eq_right hr,parentCharge,ite_eq_right hk] | |
| ring_nf | |
| exact le_rfl | |
| def run (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) (key : ℕ → K) : ℕ → State J | |
| | 0 => ⟨x 0,0⟩ | |
| | t+1 => update (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) (run x key t) | |
| lemma run_valid (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) (key : ℕ → K) (hx : ∀ t i, 0 ≤ x t i) : | |
| ∀ t, Valid (x t) (run x key t) := by | |
| intro t | |
| induction t with | |
| | zero => refine ⟨hx 0,le_rfl,by exact div_nonneg (total_nonneg (hx 0)) (by norm_num),?_⟩; simp [run,variation] | |
| | succ t ih => exact update_valid (hx (t+1)) ih | |
| /-- Deterministic finite-horizon wholesale budget, with no terminal charge and | |
| no dependence on the horizon in its constants. -/ | |
| theorem wholesale_budget (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) (key : ℕ → K) (hx : ∀ t i, 0 ≤ x t i) (n : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range n, wholesale (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) (run x key t)) ≤ | |
| 203*(∑ t ∈ range n, variation (x (t+1)) (x t))+ | |
| ∑ t ∈ range n, parentCharge (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) := by | |
| have hh : ∀ m, (∑ t ∈ range m, wholesale (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) (run x key t))+ | |
| 203*(run x key m).credit ≤ | |
| 203*(∑ t ∈ range m, variation (x (t+1)) (x t))+ | |
| ∑ t ∈ range m, parentCharge (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) := by | |
| intro m | |
| induction m with | |
| | zero => simp [run] | |
| | succ m ih => | |
| have hs := update_budget (a := key m) (b := key (m+1)) (y := x (m+1)) (run_valid x key hx m) | |
| change wholesale _ _ _ _ _+203*(run x key (m+1)).credit ≤ _ at hs | |
| simp only [sum_range_succ] | |
| linarith | |
| have hn := (run_valid x key hx n).2.1 | |
| linarith [hh n] | |
| /-- Exact dominant selection; the same reference, hence the same mark, is | |
| held until a wholesale event. -/ | |
| def dominant (s : State J) : Option J := | |
| if h : ∃ i, 0 < total s.reference ∧ (85/100:ℝ)*total s.reference ≤ s.reference i | |
| then some h.choose else none | |
| lemma dominant_large {x : J → ℝ} {s : State J} {o : J} (hs : Valid x s) | |
| (ho : dominant s=some o) : (84/100:ℝ)*total s.reference ≤ x o := by | |
| unfold dominant at ho | |
| split_ifs at ho with h | |
| · have he : h.choose=o := Option.some.inj ho | |
| have hh := h.choose_spec | |
| rw [he] at hh | |
| linarith [(valid_coordinate hs o).1] | |
| lemma regular_small {x : J → ℝ} {s : State J} {i : J} (hs : Valid x s) | |
| (hi : dominant s≠some i) : x i ≤ (86/100:ℝ)*total s.reference := by | |
| classical | |
| have ha := total_nonneg hs.1 | |
| have hh : s.reference i ≤ (85/100:ℝ)*total s.reference := by | |
| by_cases hp : 0 < total s.reference | |
| · by_contra hle | |
| have hbig : (85/100:ℝ)*total s.reference ≤ s.reference i := le_of_lt (lt_of_not_ge hle) | |
| have hex : ∃ j, 0 < total s.reference ∧ (85/100:ℝ)*total s.reference ≤ s.reference j := ⟨i,hp,hbig⟩ | |
| have heq : hex.choose=i := by | |
| by_contra hn | |
| have hsum := sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (show ({hex.choose,i} : Finset J) ⊆ univ by simp) | |
| (fun j _ _ => hs.1 j) | |
| simp only [sum_pair hn] at hsum | |
| change s.reference hex.choose+s.reference i ≤ total s.reference at hsum | |
| linarith [hex.choose_spec.2] | |
| exact hi (by simp [dominant,hex,heq]) | |
| · have hz : total s.reference=0 := le_antisymm (le_of_not_gt hp) ha | |
| have hb := single_le_sum (fun j _ => hs.1 j) (mem_univ i) | |
| change s.reference i ≤ total s.reference at hb | |
| rw [hz] at hb ⊢ | |
| simpa using hb | |
| linarith [(valid_coordinate hs i).2] | |
| lemma side_total [DecidableEq J] {x : J → ℝ} {s : State J} {o : J} (hs : Valid x s) | |
| (ho : dominant s=some o) : (∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, x i) ≤ (16/100:ℝ)*total s.reference := by | |
| classical | |
| have hr : (85/100:ℝ)*total s.reference ≤ s.reference o := by | |
| unfold dominant at ho | |
| split_ifs at ho with h | |
| · have he : h.choose=o := Option.some.inj ho | |
| simpa only [he] using h.choose_spec.2 | |
| have hd : (∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, x i) ≤ (∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, s.reference i)+variation x s.reference := by | |
| calc _ ≤ (∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, s.reference i)+(∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, |x i-s.reference i|) := by | |
| rw [←sum_add_distrib] | |
| exact sum_le_sum fun i _ => by linarith [le_abs_self (x i-s.reference i)] | |
| _ ≤ _ := by | |
| have hn : (∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, |x i-s.reference i|) ≤ variation x s.reference := | |
| sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg (erase_subset _ _) (fun i _ _ => abs_nonneg _) | |
| exact add_le_add le_rfl hn | |
| have he := sum_erase_add univ s.reference (mem_univ o) | |
| change (∑ i ∈ univ.erase o, s.reference i)+s.reference o=total s.reference at he | |
| linarith [hs.2.2.1,hs.2.2.2] | |
| end KServer.EpochSchedule | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseProcess | |
| open RankTracking RankFunctions CoarseSchedule | |
| variable {Ω J R : Type} [Fintype Ω] [Fintype J] [Fintype R] {w : Ω → ℝ} | |
| attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable Classical.decEq | |
| /-- Literal sum of the independently maintained size-rank references. -/ | |
| def estimate (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ := | |
| ∑ a, sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a).p t ω) | |
| def size (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ := | |
| ∑ a, sizeRank ((P a).p t ω) | |
| lemma estimate_nonneg (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| 0 ≤ estimate δ P t ω := sum_nonneg fun _ _ => sizeRank_nonneg _ | |
| lemma size_nonneg (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| 0 ≤ size P t ω := sum_nonneg fun _ _ => sizeRank_nonneg _ | |
| lemma estimate_accuracy {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| size P t ω ≤ (1+δ)*estimate δ P t ω ∧ | |
| estimate δ P t ω ≤ (1+δ)*size P t ω := by | |
| constructor | |
| · rw [estimate,mul_sum] | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro a _ | |
| have hh := (factor_held_accurate sizeRank hδ (fun _ _ => sizeRank_nonneg _) (P a).range t ω).1 | |
| exact (inv_mul_le_iff₀ (by linarith : 0 < 1+δ)).mp hh | |
| · rw [size,mul_sum] | |
| exact sum_le_sum fun a _ => | |
| (factor_held_accurate sizeRank hδ (fun _ _ => sizeRank_nonneg _) (P a).range t ω).2 | |
| lemma estimate_bound (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| estimate δ P t ω ≤ Fintype.card R := by | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ _ : R, (1:ℝ) := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro a _ | |
| have hr := held_range (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a).range t ω | |
| exact (sizeRank_le_complement hr).trans (by linarith [hr.1]) | |
| _ = _ := by simp | |
| lemma term_variation {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ < 1/2) | |
| (hw : ∀ ω, 0 ≤ w ω) (hw1 : ∑ ω, w ω=1) (P : FilteredRanks w) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => | |
| |sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) P.p (t+1) ω)- | |
| sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) P.p t ω)|)) ≤ | |
| (5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)*((∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |P.p (t+1) ω-P.before (t+1) ω|))+1) := by | |
| have hlip (p q : ℝ) : |Real.sqrt (sizeRank p)-Real.sqrt (sizeRank q)| ≤ (4/3:ℝ)*|p-q| := by | |
| simpa only [Real.dist_eq,NNReal.coe_div,NNReal.coe_ofNat] using | |
| sqrt_sizeRank_lipschitz.dist_le_mul p q | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => (5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)*credit (factorTest sizeRank δ) P.p t ω) := | |
| sum_le_sum fun t _ => avg_mono hw (factor_movement_credit sizeRank hδ hδu (by norm_num) | |
| (fun _ _ => sizeRank_nonneg _) (fun p _ q _ => hlip p q) P.range t) | |
| _ = (5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)*(∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (credit (factorTest sizeRank δ) P.p t)) := by | |
| simp_rw [avg_mul]; rw [mul_sum] | |
| _ ≤ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (reset_credit_bound (factorTest sizeRank δ) hw hw1 P N) | |
| (by positivity) | |
| lemma estimate_variation {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ < 1/2) | |
| (hw : ∀ ω, 0 ≤ w ω) (hw1 : ∑ ω, w ω=1) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |estimate δ P (t+1) ω-estimate δ P t ω|)) ≤ | |
| (5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)* | |
| ((∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P a).p (t+1) ω-(P a).before (t+1) ω|))+ | |
| Fintype.card R) := by | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ t ∈ range N, ∑ a, avg w (fun ω => | |
| |sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a).p (t+1) ω)- | |
| sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a).p t ω)|) := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro t _ | |
| rw [←avg_sum] | |
| apply avg_mono hw | |
| intro ω | |
| simp only [estimate,←sum_sub_distrib] | |
| exact Finset.abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _ | |
| _ = ∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => | |
| |sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a).p (t+1) ω)- | |
| sizeRank (held (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a).p t ω)|) := by rw [sum_comm] | |
| _ ≤ ∑ a, (5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)* | |
| ((∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P a).p (t+1) ω-(P a).before (t+1) ω|))+1) := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro a _ | |
| exact term_variation hδ hδu hw hw1 (P a) N | |
| _ = _ := by simp only [mul_add,sum_add_distrib,←mul_sum,sum_const,card_univ,nsmul_eq_mul]; ring | |
| /-- All invariants are established after actually executing the hysteretic rule. -/ | |
| lemma update_accuracy {c δ x : ℝ} {s : CoarseSchedule.State} | |
| (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hs : CoarseSchedule.Valid s) : | |
| let a := CoarseSchedule.update c δ x s | |
| (a.active=true → 2*c < x ∧ x ≤ (1+δ)*a.value ∧ a.value ≤ (1+δ)*x) ∧ | |
| (a.active=false → x < 5*c ∧ a.value=0) := by | |
| have he : x ≤ (1+δ)*x := by nlinarith [mul_nonneg hδ.le hx] | |
| cases ha : s.active with | |
| | false => | |
| by_cases ht : 5*c ≤ x | |
| · simp only [CoarseSchedule.update,ha,Bool.false_eq_true,ite_false,ite_eq_left ht] | |
| simp only [Bool.true_eq_false, false_implies, and_true, true_implies] | |
| exact ⟨by linarith,he,he⟩ | |
| · simp [CoarseSchedule.update,ha,ht,hs.2 ha,lt_of_not_ge ht] | |
| | true => | |
| by_cases ht : x ≤ 2*c | |
| · simp [CoarseSchedule.update,ha,ht,show x < 5*c by linarith] | |
| · by_cases hf : (1+δ)*s.value < x ∨ (1+δ)*x < s.value | |
| · simp only [CoarseSchedule.update,ha,ite_true,ite_eq_right ht,ite_eq_left hf] | |
| simp only [Bool.true_eq_false,false_implies,and_true,true_implies] | |
| exact ⟨lt_of_not_ge ht,he,he⟩ | |
| · simp only [CoarseSchedule.update,ha,ite_true,ite_eq_right ht,ite_eq_right hf] | |
| simp only [Bool.true_eq_false,false_implies,and_true,true_implies] | |
| have hh := not_or.mp hf | |
| exact ⟨lt_of_not_ge ht,le_of_not_gt hh.1,le_of_not_gt hh.2⟩ | |
| /-- Trackers are not reinitialized; the active state alone is updated. -/ | |
| def active (c δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) : ℕ → CoarseSchedule.State := | |
| CoarseSchedule.run c δ (fun t => estimate δ P t ω) | |
| (CoarseSchedule.update c δ (estimate δ P 0 ω) ⟨false,0⟩) | |
| lemma active_valid (c δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| CoarseSchedule.Valid (active c δ P ω t) := | |
| run_valid (fun t => estimate_nonneg δ P t ω) | |
| (update_valid (by simp [CoarseSchedule.Valid]) (estimate_nonneg δ P 0 ω)) t | |
| lemma active_accuracy {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| let a := active c δ P ω t | |
| (a.active=true → (9/10)*size P t ω ≤ a.value ∧ a.value ≤ (11/10)*size P t ω ∧ c ≤ size P t ω) ∧ | |
| (10*c ≤ size P t ω → a.active=true) := by | |
| have hx := estimate_nonneg δ P t ω | |
| have hm := size_nonneg P t ω | |
| have hh : let a := active c δ P ω t | |
| (a.active=true → 2*c < estimate δ P t ω ∧ estimate δ P t ω ≤ (1+δ)*a.value ∧ | |
| a.value ≤ (1+δ)*estimate δ P t ω) ∧ | |
| (a.active=false → estimate δ P t ω < 5*c ∧ a.value=0) := by | |
| cases t with | |
| | zero => exact update_accuracy hc hδ hx (by simp [CoarseSchedule.Valid]) | |
| | succ t => exact update_accuracy hc hδ hx (active_valid c δ P ω t) | |
| have hrough : (1+δ)^2 ≤ 11/10 := by nlinarith [sq_nonneg (δ-1/1000)] | |
| have hs := estimate_accuracy hδ P t ω | |
| have hav : 0 ≤ (active c δ P ω t).value := (active_valid c δ P ω t).1 | |
| constructor | |
| · intro ha | |
| have h := hh.1 ha | |
| have hmul₁ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h.2.1 (by linarith : 0 ≤ 1+δ) | |
| have hmul₂ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hs.2 (by linarith : 0 ≤ 1+δ) | |
| have hbound := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hrough hav | |
| have hbound₂ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hrough hm | |
| constructor | |
| · nlinarith | |
| constructor | |
| · nlinarith | |
| · nlinarith [mul_nonneg (by linarith : 0 ≤ 1-δ) hm] | |
| · intro hM | |
| by_contra hn | |
| have hf : (active c δ P ω t).active=false := Bool.eq_false_of_not_eq_true hn | |
| have hhf := hh.2 hf | |
| have hmul := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (show 1+δ ≤ 2 by linarith) hx | |
| nlinarith | |
| lemma charge_nonneg {s t : CoarseSchedule.State} (hs : CoarseSchedule.Valid s) | |
| (ht : CoarseSchedule.Valid t) : 0 ≤ CoarseSchedule.charge s t := by | |
| unfold CoarseSchedule.charge | |
| split_ifs | |
| · rfl | |
| · exact add_nonneg hs.1 ht.1 | |
| lemma initial_potential {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/3) | |
| (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) : | |
| potential c δ (estimate δ P 0 ω) (active c δ P ω 0) ≤ factor δ*Fintype.card R := by | |
| have hi : CoarseSchedule.Valid ⟨false,0⟩ := by simp [CoarseSchedule.Valid] | |
| have hx := estimate_nonneg δ P 0 ω | |
| have hh := update_credit hc.le hδ hδu hx hi | |
| have hn := charge_nonneg hi (update_valid hi hx (c:=c) (δ:=δ)) | |
| have hb := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (estimate_bound δ P 0 ω) | |
| (show 0 ≤ factor δ by unfold factor; positivity) | |
| have hp0 : CoarseSchedule.potential c δ (estimate δ P 0 ω) ⟨false,0⟩ = factor δ*estimate δ P 0 ω := by | |
| simp [CoarseSchedule.potential,abs_of_nonneg hx] | |
| change 0 ≤ charge ⟨false,0⟩ (active c δ P ω 0) at hn | |
| rw [hp0] at hh | |
| change CoarseSchedule.charge ⟨false,0⟩ (active c δ P ω 0)+ | |
| potential c δ (estimate δ P 0 ω) (active c δ P ω 0) ≤ factor δ*estimate δ P 0 ω at hh | |
| linarith | |
| lemma avg_range (w : Ω → ℝ) (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (f t))=avg w (fun ω => ∑ t ∈ range N,f t ω) := by | |
| simp only [avg,mul_sum] | |
| exact sum_comm | |
| /-- Actual old-plus-new active refresh budget, with a fixed-star endpoint. -/ | |
| theorem active_budget {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (hw : ∀ ω, 0 ≤ w ω) (hw1 : ∑ ω, w ω=1) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => | |
| charge (active c δ P ω t) (active c δ P ω (t+1)))) ≤ | |
| (factor δ*(5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)) * | |
| (∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P a).p (t+1) ω-(P a).before (t+1) ω|))+ | |
| (factor δ*(5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ+1))*Fintype.card R := by | |
| have hf : 0 ≤ factor δ := by unfold factor; positivity | |
| have hs (ω : Ω) := active_size_budget hc.le hδ (show δ ≤ 1/3 by linarith) | |
| (fun t => estimate_nonneg δ P t ω) | |
| (update_valid (show CoarseSchedule.Valid ⟨false,0⟩ by simp [CoarseSchedule.Valid]) | |
| (estimate_nonneg δ P 0 ω) (c:=c) (δ:=δ)) N | |
| have hb (ω : Ω) := initial_potential hc hδ (show δ ≤ 1/3 by linarith) P ω | |
| have hs' (ω : Ω) : (∑ t ∈ range N, charge (active c δ P ω t) (active c δ P ω (t+1))) ≤ | |
| factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, |estimate δ P (t+1) ω-estimate δ P t ω|)+ | |
| potential c δ (estimate δ P 0 ω) (active c δ P ω 0) := hs ω | |
| have hh := avg_mono hw (fun ω => hs' ω |>.trans (add_le_add_right (hb ω) _)) | |
| change avg w (fun ω => ∑ t ∈ range N, charge (active c δ P ω t) (active c δ P ω (t+1))) ≤ | |
| avg w (fun ω => factor δ * (∑ t ∈ range N, |estimate δ P (t+1) ω-estimate δ P t ω|)+ | |
| factor δ*Fintype.card R) at hh | |
| rw [avg_add,avg_mul,avg_const w hw1,←avg_range,←avg_range] at hh | |
| have hv := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (estimate_variation hδ (by linarith) hw hw1 P N) hf | |
| exact hh.trans (by nlinarith) | |
| lemma estimate_adapted (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (H : ℕ → Ω → ℕ) | |
| (hH : ∀ a t ω, (P a).history t ω=H t ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| Adapted (H t) (estimate δ P t) := by | |
| intro ω z he | |
| unfold estimate | |
| apply sum_congr rfl | |
| intro a _ | |
| rw [held_adapted (factorTest sizeRank δ) (P a) t ω z (by simpa only [hH] using he)] | |
| lemma active_adapted (c δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (H : ℕ → Ω → ℕ) | |
| (hH : ∀ a t ω, (P a).history t ω=H t ω) | |
| (href : ∀ t ω z, H (t+1) ω=H (t+1) z → H t ω=H t z) (t : ℕ) : | |
| ∀ ω z, H t ω=H t z → active c δ P ω t=active c δ P z t := by | |
| induction t with | |
| | zero => | |
| intro ω z he | |
| simp only [active,run] | |
| rw [estimate_adapted δ P H hH 0 ω z he] | |
| | succ t ih => | |
| intro ω z he | |
| change update c δ (estimate δ P (t+1) ω) (active c δ P ω t)= | |
| update c δ (estimate δ P (t+1) z) (active c δ P z t) | |
| rw [estimate_adapted δ P H hH (t+1) ω z he,ih ω z (href t ω z he)] | |
| /-- The parent's scalar relative reference, and later the side-total reference, | |
| use exactly the manuscript's two-sided factor test, including zero crossings. -/ | |
| def relative (δ : ℝ) (x : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) : ℕ → Ω → ℝ := held (factorTest id δ) x | |
| omit [Fintype Ω] in | |
| lemma relative_nonneg {δ : ℝ} (x : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (hx : ∀ t ω, 0 ≤ x t ω) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| 0 ≤ relative δ x t ω := by | |
| induction t with | |
| | zero => exact hx 0 ω | |
| | succ t ih => | |
| simp only [relative,held] | |
| split_ifs | |
| · exact hx (t+1) ω | |
| · exact ih | |
| omit [Fintype Ω] in | |
| lemma relative_accuracy {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) | |
| (hx : ∀ t ω, 0 ≤ x t ω) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| x t ω ≤ (1+δ)*relative δ x t ω ∧ relative δ x t ω ≤ (1+δ)*x t ω := by | |
| have he (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : y ≤ (1+δ)*y := by nlinarith [mul_nonneg hδ.le hy] | |
| cases t with | |
| | zero => exact ⟨he _ (hx _ _),he _ (hx _ _)⟩ | |
| | succ t => | |
| simp only [relative,held] | |
| split_ifs with ht | |
| · exact ⟨he _ (hx _ _),he _ (hx _ _)⟩ | |
| · simp only [factorTest,id_eq,not_or,not_lt] at ht | |
| exact ⟨ht.2,ht.1⟩ | |
| def relativeCharge (δ : ℝ) (x : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ := | |
| if relative δ x t ω=relative δ x (t+1) ω then 0 else | |
| relative δ x t ω+relative δ x (t+1) ω | |
| omit [Fintype Ω] in | |
| lemma relative_charge_bound {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) | |
| (hx : ∀ t ω, 0 ≤ x t ω) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| relativeCharge δ x t ω ≤ factor δ*|relative δ x (t+1) ω-relative δ x t ω| := by | |
| by_cases ht : factorTest id δ (x (t+1) ω) (relative δ x t ω) | |
| · have he : relative δ x (t+1) ω=x (t+1) ω := by | |
| change (if factorTest id δ (x (t+1) ω) (relative δ x t ω) then x (t+1) ω else relative δ x t ω)=_ | |
| exact ite_eq_left ht | |
| have hh := factor_change_charge (hx (t+1) ω) (relative_nonneg x hx t ω) hδ ht | |
| rw [relativeCharge,he] | |
| split_ifs | |
| · exact mul_nonneg (by unfold factor; positivity) (abs_nonneg _) | |
| · unfold factor; linarith | |
| · have he : relative δ x (t+1) ω=relative δ x t ω := by | |
| change (if factorTest id δ (x (t+1) ω) (relative δ x t ω) then x (t+1) ω else relative δ x t ω)=_ | |
| exact ite_eq_right ht | |
| simp [relativeCharge,he] | |
| omit [Fintype Ω] in | |
| lemma relative_budget {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) | |
| (hx : ∀ t ω, 0 ≤ x t ω) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, relativeCharge δ x t ω) ≤ | |
| factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, |x (t+1) ω-x t ω|) := by | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ t ∈ range N, factor δ*|relative δ x (t+1) ω-relative δ x t ω| := | |
| sum_le_sum fun t _ => relative_charge_bound hδ x hx t ω | |
| _ = factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, |relative δ x (t+1) ω-relative δ x t ω|) := (mul_sum _ _ _).symm | |
| _ ≤ _ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (held_variation (factorTest id δ) x N ω) | |
| (by unfold factor; positivity) | |
| end KServer.CoarseProcess | |
| end | |
| end | |
| noncomputable section | |
| open scoped BigOperators | |
| open Finset | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseEpoch | |
| open RankTracking CoarseSchedule CoarseProcess | |
| variable {Ω R J : Type} [Fintype Ω] [Fintype R] [Fintype J] | |
| variable {w : Ω → ℝ} | |
| def clipped (c δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ := | |
| max c (estimate δ P t ω) | |
| def parent (c δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) : ℕ → Ω → ℝ := | |
| relative δ (clipped c δ P) | |
| lemma clipped_nonneg {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| 0 ≤ clipped c δ P t ω := hc.trans (le_max_left _ _) | |
| lemma clipped_variation (c δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| |clipped c δ P (t+1) ω-clipped c δ P t ω| ≤ |estimate δ P (t+1) ω-estimate δ P t ω| := by | |
| unfold clipped | |
| simpa only [max_comm c] using abs_max_sub_max_le_abs (estimate δ P (t+1) ω) (estimate δ P t ω) c | |
| lemma clipped_accuracy {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hδ : 0 < δ) | |
| (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| max c (size P t ω) ≤ (1+δ)*clipped c δ P t ω ∧ | |
| clipped c δ P t ω ≤ (1+δ)*max c (size P t ω) := by | |
| have h := estimate_accuracy hδ P t ω | |
| have he : 0 ≤ 1+δ := by linarith | |
| have hcc : c ≤ (1+δ)*c := by nlinarith [mul_nonneg hδ.le hc] | |
| constructor | |
| · apply max_le | |
| · exact hcc.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_left _ _) he) | |
| · exact h.1.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_right _ _) he) | |
| · apply max_le | |
| · exact (le_max_left _ _).trans (by nlinarith [mul_nonneg hδ.le (hc.trans (le_max_left c (size P t ω)))]) | |
| · exact h.2.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_max_right _ _) he) | |
| lemma parent_accuracy {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hδ : 0 < δ) | |
| (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| max c (size P t ω) ≤ (1+δ)^2*parent c δ P t ω ∧ | |
| parent c δ P t ω ≤ (1+δ)^2*max c (size P t ω) := by | |
| have ha := clipped_accuracy hc hδ P t ω | |
| have hb := relative_accuracy hδ (clipped c δ P) (clipped_nonneg hc δ P) t ω | |
| change clipped c δ P t ω ≤ (1+δ)*parent c δ P t ω ∧ parent c δ P t ω ≤ (1+δ)*clipped c δ P t ω at hb | |
| have he : 0 ≤ 1+δ := by linarith | |
| constructor | |
| · exact ha.1.trans (by nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hb.1 he]) | |
| · exact hb.2.trans (by nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ha.2 he]) | |
| lemma parent_nonneg {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| 0 ≤ parent c δ P t ω := relative_nonneg _ (clipped_nonneg hc δ P) t ω | |
| lemma parent_budget {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/3) | |
| (hw : ∀ ω, 0 ≤ w ω) (hw1 : ∑ ω,w ω=1) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (relativeCharge δ (clipped c δ P) t)) ≤ | |
| (factor δ*(5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ))* | |
| ((∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P a).p (t+1) ω-(P a).before (t+1) ω|))+Fintype.card R) := by | |
| have hf : 0 ≤ factor δ := by unfold factor; positivity | |
| rw [avg_range] | |
| calc _ ≤ avg w (fun ω => factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, |estimate δ P (t+1) ω-estimate δ P t ω|)) := by | |
| apply avg_mono hw | |
| intro ω | |
| exact (relative_budget hδ _ (clipped_nonneg hc δ P) N ω).trans | |
| (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_sum fun t _ => clipped_variation c δ P t ω) hf) | |
| _ = factor δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |estimate δ P (t+1) ω-estimate δ P t ω|)) := by | |
| rw [avg_mul,←avg_range] | |
| _ ≤ _ := by | |
| calc _ ≤ factor δ*((5*(4/3:ℝ)^2/δ)* | |
| ((∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P a).p (t+1) ω-(P a).before (t+1) ω|))+Fintype.card R)) := | |
| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (CoarseProcess.estimate_variation hδ (by linarith) hw hw1 P N) hf | |
| _ = _ := by ring | |
| def vector (c δ : ℝ) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : J → ℝ := | |
| fun i => (active c δ (P i) ω t).value | |
| omit [Fintype J] in | |
| lemma vector_nonneg (c δ : ℝ) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) (i : J) : | |
| 0 ≤ vector c δ P ω t i := (active_valid c δ (P i) ω t).1 | |
| lemma value_bound {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| (active c δ P ω t).value ≤ (11/10)*size P t ω := by | |
| cases ha : (active c δ P ω t).active with | |
| | true => exact ((active_accuracy hc hδ hδu P ω t).1 ha).2.1 | |
| | false => rw [(active_valid c δ P ω t).2 ha]; exact mul_nonneg (by norm_num) (size_nonneg P t ω) | |
| lemma total_parent {c δ ε : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (hε : 0 < ε) (hεu : ε ≤ 1/1000) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (V : R → FilteredRanks w) | |
| (htree : ∀ t ω, (∑ i,size (P i) t ω) ≤ size V t ω) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| EpochSchedule.total (vector c δ P ω t) ≤ 2*parent c ε V t ω := by | |
| have h := parent_accuracy hc.le hε V t ω | |
| have hp := parent_nonneg hc.le ε V t ω | |
| have hsq : (11/10:ℝ)*(1+ε)^2 ≤ 2 := by nlinarith [sq_nonneg (ε-1/1000)] | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ i, (11/10:ℝ)*size (P i) t ω := sum_le_sum fun i _ => value_bound hc hδ hδu (P i) ω t | |
| _ = (11/10:ℝ)*(∑ i,size (P i) t ω) := (mul_sum _ _ _).symm | |
| _ ≤ (11/10:ℝ)*size V t ω := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (htree t ω) (by norm_num) | |
| _ ≤ (11/10:ℝ)*((1+ε)^2*parent c ε V t ω) := | |
| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ((le_max_right _ _).trans h.1) (by norm_num) | |
| _ ≤ _ := by nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hsq hp] | |
| lemma value_variation {s t : CoarseSchedule.State} (hs : CoarseSchedule.Valid s) (ht : CoarseSchedule.Valid t) : | |
| |s.value-t.value| ≤ charge s t := by | |
| unfold charge | |
| split_ifs with he | |
| · simp [he] | |
| · exact abs_sub_le_iff.mpr ⟨by linarith [ht.1],by linarith [hs.1]⟩ | |
| lemma vector_variation (c δ : ℝ) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| EpochSchedule.variation (vector c δ P ω (t+1)) (vector c δ P ω t) ≤ | |
| ∑ i, charge (active c δ (P i) ω t) (active c δ (P i) ω (t+1)) := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro i _ | |
| rw [abs_sub_comm] | |
| exact value_variation (active_valid c δ (P i) ω t) (active_valid c δ (P i) ω (t+1)) | |
| lemma wholesale_parent {c δ ε : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (hε : 0 < ε) (hεu : ε ≤ 1/1000) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (V : R → FilteredRanks w) | |
| (htree : ∀ t ω, (∑ i,size (P i) t ω) ≤ size V t ω) (β : ℝ → ℝ) (ω : Ω) (t : ℕ) : | |
| EpochSchedule.parentCharge (vector c δ P ω t) (vector c δ P ω (t+1)) | |
| (β (parent c ε V t ω)) (β (parent c ε V (t+1) ω)) ≤ | |
| 2*relativeCharge ε (clipped c ε V) t ω := by | |
| classical | |
| unfold EpochSchedule.parentCharge | |
| split_ifs with he | |
| · have hn : parent c ε V t ω≠parent c ε V (t+1) ω := fun hh => he (congrArg β hh) | |
| change _ ≤ 2*(if parent c ε V t ω=parent c ε V (t+1) ω then 0 else parent c ε V t ω+parent c ε V (t+1) ω) | |
| rw [ite_eq_right hn] | |
| linarith [total_parent hc hδ hδu hε hεu P V htree ω t, | |
| total_parent hc hδ hδu hε hεu P V htree ω (t+1)] | |
| · unfold relativeCharge | |
| split_ifs | |
| · norm_num | |
| · exact mul_nonneg (by norm_num) (add_nonneg (parent_nonneg hc.le ε V t ω) (parent_nonneg hc.le ε V (t+1) ω)) | |
| /-- The literal epoch recurrence is paid by actual active-size and parent | |
| reference changes; the test does not assume its own amortized conclusion. -/ | |
| lemma wholesale_budget {c δ ε : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (hε : 0 < ε) (hεu : ε ≤ 1/1000) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (V : R → FilteredRanks w) | |
| (htree : ∀ t ω, (∑ i,size (P i) t ω) ≤ size V t ω) (β : ℝ → ℝ) (ω : Ω) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, EpochSchedule.wholesale (vector c δ P ω t) (vector c δ P ω (t+1)) | |
| (β (parent c ε V t ω)) (β (parent c ε V (t+1) ω)) | |
| (EpochSchedule.run (vector c δ P ω) (fun t => β (parent c ε V t ω)) t)) ≤ | |
| 203*(∑ t ∈ range N, ∑ i,charge (active c δ (P i) ω t) (active c δ (P i) ω (t+1)))+ | |
| 2*(∑ t ∈ range N, relativeCharge ε (clipped c ε V) t ω) := by | |
| have hb := EpochSchedule.wholesale_budget (vector c δ P ω) (fun t => β (parent c ε V t ω)) | |
| (vector_nonneg c δ P ω) N | |
| exact hb.trans (add_le_add | |
| (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_sum fun t _ => vector_variation c δ P ω t) (by norm_num)) | |
| (by rw [mul_sum]; exact sum_le_sum fun t _ => wholesale_parent hc hδ hδu hε hεu P V htree β ω t)) | |
| end KServer.CoarseEpoch | |
| end | |
| noncomputable section | |
| open scoped BigOperators | |
| open Finset | |
| local instance (p : Prop) : Decidable p := Classical.propDecidable p | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseSide | |
| open RankTracking CoarseSchedule EpochSchedule | |
| /-- Relative reference with genuine wholesale resets. Resetting discards, | |
| rather than spends, the unused scalar variation credit. -/ | |
| def held (δ : ℝ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) : ℕ → ℝ | |
| | 0 => x 0 | |
| | t+1 => if reset t ∨ factorTest id δ (x (t+1)) (held δ x reset t) | |
| then x (t+1) else held δ x reset t | |
| lemma held_nonneg (δ : ℝ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) (hx : ∀ t, 0 ≤ x t) (t : ℕ) : | |
| 0 ≤ held δ x reset t := by | |
| induction t with | |
| | zero => exact hx 0 | |
| | succ t ih => simp only [held]; split_ifs; exact hx (t+1); exact ih | |
| lemma held_accuracy {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) | |
| (hx : ∀ t, 0 ≤ x t) (t : ℕ) : | |
| x t ≤ (1+δ)*held δ x reset t ∧ held δ x reset t ≤ (1+δ)*x t := by | |
| have he (t : ℕ) : x t ≤ (1+δ)*x t := by nlinarith [mul_nonneg hδ.le (hx t)] | |
| cases t with | |
| | zero => exact ⟨he 0,he 0⟩ | |
| | succ t => | |
| simp only [held] | |
| split_ifs with hr | |
| · exact ⟨he (t+1),he (t+1)⟩ | |
| · have hf := (not_or.mp hr).2 | |
| simp only [factorTest,id_eq,not_or,not_lt] at hf | |
| exact ⟨hf.2,hf.1⟩ | |
| def charge (δ : ℝ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) (t : ℕ) : ℝ := | |
| if ¬reset t ∧ factorTest id δ (x (t+1)) (held δ x reset t) then x t+x (t+1) else 0 | |
| def stepVariation (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) (t : ℕ) : ℝ := | |
| if reset t then 0 else |x (t+1)-x t| | |
| def C (δ : ℝ) : ℝ := (1+δ)*factor δ | |
| lemma C_nonneg {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) : 0 ≤ C δ := by unfold C factor; positivity | |
| lemma update_budget {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) | |
| (hx : ∀ t, 0 ≤ x t) (t : ℕ) : | |
| charge δ x reset t+C δ*|x (t+1)-held δ x reset (t+1)| ≤ | |
| C δ*|x t-held δ x reset t|+C δ*stepVariation x reset t := by | |
| have hC := C_nonneg hδ | |
| have hU := held_nonneg δ x reset hx t | |
| have ha := held_accuracy hδ x reset hx t | |
| by_cases hr : reset t | |
| · simp only [held,charge,not_true_eq_false,hr,false_and,true_or,ite_false,sub_self,abs_zero,mul_zero,add_zero,stepVariation,ite_true] | |
| exact mul_nonneg hC (abs_nonneg _) | |
| · by_cases hf : factorTest id δ (x (t+1)) (held δ x reset t) | |
| · have hp := factor_change_charge (hx (t+1)) hU hδ hf | |
| have hp' : x t+x (t+1) ≤ C δ*|x (t+1)-held δ x reset t| := by | |
| have he := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hp (show 0 ≤ 1+δ by linarith) | |
| have hh : x (t+1) ≤ (1+δ)*x (t+1) := by nlinarith [mul_nonneg hδ.le (hx (t+1))] | |
| unfold C factor | |
| change x (t+1)+held δ x reset t ≤ (1+2/δ)*|x (t+1)-held δ x reset t| at hp | |
| nlinarith | |
| simp only [held,charge,hr,not_false_eq_true,hf,and_self,or_true,ite_true, | |
| sub_self,abs_zero,mul_zero,add_zero,stepVariation,ite_false] | |
| exact hp'.trans (by nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_sub_le (x (t+1)) (x t) (held δ x reset t)) hC]) | |
| · simp only [held,charge,hr,not_false_eq_true,hf,and_false,false_or,ite_false,zero_add,stepVariation] | |
| nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (abs_sub_le (x (t+1)) (x t) (held δ x reset t)) hC] | |
| lemma budget {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → ℝ) (reset : ℕ → Prop) | |
| (hx : ∀ t, 0 ≤ x t) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, charge δ x reset t) ≤ C δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, stepVariation x reset t) := by | |
| have hh : (∑ t ∈ range N, charge δ x reset t)+C δ*|x N-held δ x reset N| ≤ | |
| C δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, stepVariation x reset t) := by | |
| induction N with | |
| | zero => simp [held] | |
| | succ N ih => | |
| have h := update_budget hδ x reset hx N | |
| rw [sum_range_succ,sum_range_succ,mul_add] | |
| linarith | |
| linarith [mul_nonneg (C_nonneg hδ) (abs_nonneg (x N-held δ x reset N))] | |
| variable {J K : Type} [Fintype J] | |
| def side (x : J → ℝ) (s : EpochSchedule.State J) : ℝ := | |
| ∑ i, if dominant s=some i then 0 else if (dominant s).isSome then x i else 0 | |
| lemma side_nonneg {x : J → ℝ} (hx : ∀ i, 0 ≤ x i) (s : EpochSchedule.State J) : | |
| 0 ≤ side x s := by | |
| apply sum_nonneg; intro i _; split_ifs; rfl; exact hx i; rfl | |
| lemma side_le_total {x : J → ℝ} (hx : ∀ i, 0 ≤ x i) (s : EpochSchedule.State J) : | |
| side x s ≤ total x := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum; intro i _; split_ifs; exact hx i; rfl; exact hx i | |
| lemma mark_unchanged {x y : J → ℝ} {a b : K} {s : EpochSchedule.State J} | |
| (hr : ¬EpochSchedule.reset x y a b s) : | |
| dominant (EpochSchedule.update x y a b s)=dominant s := by | |
| simp only [EpochSchedule.update,ite_eq_right hr,dominant] | |
| lemma side_variation {x y : J → ℝ} {s t : EpochSchedule.State J} | |
| (he : dominant s=dominant t) : |side x s-side y t| ≤ variation x y := by | |
| unfold side | |
| rw [←sum_sub_distrib] | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ i, |(if dominant s=some i then 0 else if (dominant s).isSome then x i else 0)- | |
| (if dominant t=some i then 0 else if (dominant t).isSome then y i else 0)| := abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _ | |
| _ ≤ _ := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro i _ | |
| rw [he] | |
| split_ifs <;> simp [abs_nonneg] | |
| /-- Actual side totals and reset times are derived from the epoch recurrence. -/ | |
| def sideInput (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) (key : ℕ → K) (t : ℕ) : ℝ := side (x t) (run x key t) | |
| def epochReset (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) (key : ℕ → K) (t : ℕ) : Prop := | |
| EpochSchedule.reset (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) (run x key t) | |
| lemma side_stepVariation (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) (key : ℕ → K) (t : ℕ) : | |
| stepVariation (sideInput x key) (epochReset x key) t ≤ variation (x (t+1)) (x t) := by | |
| unfold stepVariation | |
| split_ifs with hr | |
| · exact variation_nonneg _ _ | |
| · apply side_variation | |
| exact mark_unchanged hr | |
| /-- Side-reference refreshes are paid independently of the number of epochs. -/ | |
| lemma side_budget {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (x : ℕ → J → ℝ) | |
| (key : ℕ → K) (hx : ∀ t i, 0 ≤ x t i) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, charge δ (sideInput x key) (epochReset x key) t) ≤ | |
| C δ*(∑ t ∈ range N, variation (x (t+1)) (x t)) := by | |
| exact (budget hδ _ _ (fun t => side_nonneg (hx t) _) N).trans | |
| (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (sum_le_sum fun t _ => side_stepVariation x key t) (C_nonneg hδ)) | |
| end KServer.CoarseSide | |
| end | |
| noncomputable section | |
| open scoped BigOperators | |
| open Finset | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseParameters | |
| lemma regular_log_comparison {x : ℝ} (hx : (50/43:ℝ) ≤ x) : | |
| (1/20:ℝ)*(1+Real.log x) ≤ Real.log ((81/100:ℝ)*x+2/11) := by | |
| have hx0 : 0 < x := by linarith | |
| have ha : 0 < (81/100:ℝ)*x+2/11 := by positivity | |
| have hs : x ≤ ((81/100:ℝ)*x+2/11)^2 := by nlinarith [sq_nonneg (x-50/43)] | |
| have hl := Real.log_le_log hx0 hs | |
| rw [Real.log_pow] at hl | |
| have hl₀ : (7/50:ℝ) ≤ Real.log x := by | |
| have h := Real.one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos (show 0 < (50/43:ℝ) by norm_num) | |
| norm_num at h | |
| exact h.trans (Real.log_le_log (by norm_num) hx) | |
| nlinarith | |
| lemma dominant_log_comparison {u m : ℝ} (hu : 0 ≤ u) (huu : u ≤ 1/4) | |
| (hm : 1+u/2 ≤ m) : u/3 ≤ Real.log m := by | |
| have hpos : 0 < 1+u/2 := by linarith | |
| have h := Real.one_sub_inv_le_log_of_pos hpos | |
| have hi : (1+u/2)⁻¹ ≤ 1-u/3 := by | |
| rw [inv_eq_one_div] | |
| apply (div_le_iff₀ hpos).mpr | |
| nlinarith | |
| have hl := Real.log_le_log hpos hm | |
| linarith | |
| variable {J : Type} [Fintype J] | |
| /-- Quantitative size-ratio estimate from the genuine superadditive parent | |
| size, without discarding the child's own true size. -/ | |
| lemma size_ratio {M a : J → ℝ} {V : ℝ} (hM : ∀ i, 0 ≤ M i) | |
| (_ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ a i) (hupper : ∀ i, a i ≤ (11/10)*M i) | |
| (hV : (∑ i,M i) ≤ V) (i : J) (hMi : 0 < M i) (hai : 0 < a i) | |
| (hlower : (9/10)*M i ≤ a i) : | |
| 1+(9/11)*((∑ j,a j)/a i-1) ≤ V/M i := by | |
| classical | |
| have hs : (∑ j,a j)-a i ≤ (11/10)*(V-M i) := by | |
| have h := sum_le_sum (s:=univ.erase i) (f:=a) (g:=fun j => (11/10:ℝ)*M j) (fun j _ => hupper j) | |
| rw [←mul_sum,sum_erase_eq_sub (mem_univ i),sum_erase_eq_sub (mem_univ i)] at h | |
| nlinarith | |
| have hVm : M i ≤ V := (single_le_sum (fun j _ => hM j) (mem_univ i)).trans hV | |
| have hx := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hlower (sub_nonneg.mpr hVm) | |
| apply (le_div_iff₀ hMi).mpr | |
| apply (mul_le_mul_iff_left₀ hai).mp | |
| field_simp | |
| nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hs hMi.le] | |
| lemma regular_gap {M a : J → ℝ} {V A : ℝ} (hM : ∀ i, 0 ≤ M i) | |
| (ha : ∀ i, 0 ≤ a i) (hupper : ∀ i, a i ≤ (11/10)*M i) | |
| (hV : (∑ i,M i) ≤ V) (i : J) (hMi : 0 < M i) (hai : 0 < a i) | |
| (hlower : (9/10)*M i ≤ a i) (hA : (99/100)*A ≤ ∑ j,a j) | |
| (hreg : a i ≤ (86/100)*A) : | |
| (1/20:ℝ)*(1+Real.log (A/a i)) ≤ Real.log (V/M i) := by | |
| have hx : (50/43:ℝ) ≤ A/a i := (le_div_iff₀ hai).mpr (by linarith) | |
| have hr := size_ratio hM ha hupper hV i hMi hai hlower | |
| have hm : (81/100:ℝ)*(A/a i)+2/11 ≤ V/M i := by | |
| have h := div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hA hai.le | |
| rw [mul_div_assoc] at h | |
| nlinarith | |
| exact (regular_log_comparison hx).trans (Real.log_le_log (by positivity) hm) | |
| lemma dominant_gap {M a : J → ℝ} {V A U : ℝ} (hM : ∀ i, 0 ≤ M i) | |
| (ha : ∀ i, 0 ≤ a i) (hupper : ∀ i, a i ≤ (11/10)*M i) | |
| (hV : (∑ i,M i) ≤ V) (i : J) (hMi : 0 < M i) (hai : 0 < a i) | |
| (hlower : (9/10)*M i ≤ a i) (hA : 0 < A) (haA : a i ≤ (101/100)*A) | |
| (hU : 0 ≤ U) (hUs : U ≤ (1001/1000)*((∑ j,a j)-a i)) | |
| (hUu : U/A ≤ 1/4) : | |
| (1/20:ℝ)*(U/A) ≤ Real.log (V/M i) := by | |
| have hu : 0 ≤ U/A := div_nonneg hU hA.le | |
| have hr := size_ratio hM ha hupper hV i hMi hai hlower | |
| have hs : 0 ≤ (∑ j,a j)-a i := sub_nonneg.mpr (single_le_sum (fun j _ => ha j) (mem_univ i)) | |
| have hb : U*a i ≤ (18/11)*A*((∑ j,a j)-a i) := by | |
| have h₁ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hUs hai.le | |
| have h₂ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left haA hs | |
| nlinarith | |
| have hratio : U/A/2 ≤ (9/11)*((∑ j,a j)/a i-1) := by | |
| apply (mul_le_mul_iff_right₀ hA).mp | |
| apply (mul_le_mul_iff_right₀ hai).mp | |
| field_simp | |
| nlinarith | |
| have hl := dominant_log_comparison hu hUu (by linarith : 1+(U/A)/2 ≤ V/M i) | |
| linarith | |
| /-- Literal true and held beta parameters. Their coefficient is chosen only | |
| once; these functions do not depend on the horizon or posterior law. -/ | |
| def beta (k c cb ell M : ℝ) : ℝ := 3+cb/ell*Real.log (k/max M c) | |
| def lowerSize (c δ H : ℝ) : ℝ := max c (H/(1+δ)^2) | |
| def upperBeta (k c cb ell δ H : ℝ) : ℝ := 3+cb/ell*Real.log (k/lowerSize c δ H) | |
| lemma beta_difference {k c cb ell M V : ℝ} (hk : 0 < k) (hc : 0 < c) (hM : c ≤ M) (hMV : M ≤ V) : | |
| beta k c cb ell M-beta k c cb ell V=cb/ell*Real.log (V/M) := by | |
| have hM0 : 0 < M := hc.trans_le hM | |
| have hV0 : 0 < V := hM0.trans_le hMV | |
| simp only [beta,max_eq_left hM,max_eq_left (hM.trans hMV)] | |
| rw [Real.log_div hk.ne' hM0.ne',Real.log_div hk.ne' hV0.ne',Real.log_div hV0.ne' hM0.ne'] | |
| ring | |
| lemma lowerSize_accuracy {c δ X H : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hX : c ≤ X) | |
| (_ : 0 ≤ H) (hlo : X ≤ (1+δ)^2*H) (hhi : H ≤ (1+δ)^2*X) : | |
| 0 < lowerSize c δ H ∧ lowerSize c δ H ≤ X ∧ X ≤ (1+δ)^4*lowerSize c δ H := by | |
| have he : 0 < 1+δ := by linarith | |
| have he2 : 0 < (1+δ)^2 := sq_pos_of_pos he | |
| have hlow : H/(1+δ)^2 ≤ X := (div_le_iff₀ he2).mpr (by nlinarith) | |
| have hmax : H/(1+δ)^2 ≤ lowerSize c δ H := le_max_right _ _ | |
| have hm : H ≤ (1+δ)^2*lowerSize c δ H := by | |
| have h := (div_le_iff₀ he2).mp hmax | |
| nlinarith | |
| refine ⟨hc.trans_le (le_max_left _ _),max_le hX hlow,?_⟩ | |
| nlinarith [mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hm he2.le] | |
| lemma beta_upper_error {k c cb ell δ X H : ℝ} (hk : 0 < k) (hc : 0 < c) | |
| (hcb : 0 ≤ cb) (hell : 0 < ell) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hX : c ≤ X) | |
| (hH : 0 ≤ H) (hlo : X ≤ (1+δ)^2*H) (hhi : H ≤ (1+δ)^2*X) : | |
| beta k c cb ell X ≤ upperBeta k c cb ell δ H ∧ | |
| upperBeta k c cb ell δ H ≤ beta k c cb ell X+4*cb*δ/ell := by | |
| have h := lowerSize_accuracy hc hδ hX hH hlo hhi | |
| have hX0 : 0 < X := hc.trans_le hX | |
| have hfac : 0 ≤ cb/ell := div_nonneg hcb hell.le | |
| have he : 0 < 1+δ := by linarith | |
| have hlog : 0 ≤ Real.log (X/lowerSize c δ H) ∧ Real.log (X/lowerSize c δ H) ≤ 4*δ := by | |
| constructor | |
| · apply Real.log_nonneg | |
| exact (one_le_div h.1).mpr h.2.1 | |
| · have hb : X/lowerSize c δ H ≤ (1+δ)^4 := (div_le_iff₀ h.1).mpr (by nlinarith [h.2.2]) | |
| have hl := Real.log_le_log (div_pos hX0 h.1) hb | |
| rw [Real.log_pow] at hl | |
| have hh := Real.log_le_sub_one_of_pos he | |
| nlinarith | |
| have hd : upperBeta k c cb ell δ H-beta k c cb ell X=cb/ell*Real.log (X/lowerSize c δ H) := by | |
| simp only [beta,upperBeta,max_eq_left hX] | |
| rw [Real.log_div hk.ne' h.1.ne',Real.log_div hk.ne' hX0.ne',Real.log_div hX0.ne' h.1.ne'] | |
| ring | |
| constructor | |
| · nlinarith [mul_nonneg hfac hlog.1] | |
| · have hh := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hlog.2 hfac | |
| have heq : cb/ell*(4*δ)=4*cb*δ/ell := by ring | |
| rw [heq] at hh | |
| linarith | |
| end KServer.CoarseParameters | |
| end | |
| noncomputable section | |
| open scoped BigOperators | |
| open Finset | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseScale | |
| open RankTracking RankFunctions CoreFlags | |
| variable {Ω J R : Type} [Fintype Ω] [Fintype J] [Fintype R] {w : Ω → ℝ} | |
| lemma size_antitone : Antitone sizeRank := by | |
| apply antitone_of_hasDerivAt_nonpos sizeRank_derivative | |
| intro p | |
| exact mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg (by norm_num) (le_max_right _ _) | |
| lemma rank_size {z p : ℝ} (hz : z ∈ Set.Icc 0 (1/100:ℝ)) (hp : 0 ≤ p) : | |
| rank z p ≤ 36*sizeRank p := by | |
| by_cases hs : p ≤ sstar | |
| · have h := size_antitone hs | |
| have he : sizeRank sstar=1/36 := by norm_num [sizeRank,sstar] | |
| rw [he] at h | |
| linarith [(rank_range hz hp).2] | |
| · rw [rank_cutoff z (le_of_not_ge hs)] | |
| exact mul_nonneg (by norm_num) (sizeRank_nonneg p) | |
| def noncore (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ := | |
| ∑ a, if flag (P a) t ω then 0 else FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P a) t ω | |
| lemma noncore_nonneg (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| 0 ≤ noncore δ P t ω := by | |
| apply sum_nonneg | |
| intro a _ | |
| split_ifs | |
| · rfl | |
| · exact (FineCaps.estimate_range (by norm_num) (P a) t ω).1 | |
| lemma noncore_bound {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 < δ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| noncore δ P t ω ≤ 36*(1+δ)*CoarseProcess.size P t ω := by | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ a, FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P a) t ω := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro a _ | |
| split_ifs | |
| · exact (FineCaps.estimate_range (by norm_num) (P a) t ω).1 | |
| · rfl | |
| _ ≤ ∑ a, (1+δ)*(36*sizeRank ((P a).p t ω)) := by | |
| apply sum_le_sum | |
| intro a _ | |
| exact (FineCaps.estimate_accuracy hδ (by norm_num) (P a) t ω).2.trans | |
| (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (rank_size (by norm_num) ((P a).range t ω).1) (by linarith)) | |
| _ = _ := by unfold CoarseProcess.size; rw [←mul_sum,←mul_sum]; ring | |
| lemma term_variation {e e' : ℝ} (he : e ∈ Set.Icc 0 1) (he' : e' ∈ Set.Icc 0 1) | |
| (b b' : Bool) : | |
| |(if b' then 0 else e')-(if b then 0 else e)| ≤ |e'-e|+(if b'=b then (0:ℝ) else 1) := by | |
| cases b <;> cases b' <;> simp [abs_of_nonneg he.1,abs_of_nonneg he'.1] <;> | |
| linarith [he.2,he'.2,abs_nonneg (e'-e)] | |
| lemma noncore_variation (δ : ℝ) (P : R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : | |
| |noncore δ P (t+1) ω-noncore δ P t ω| ≤ | |
| (∑ a, |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P a) t ω|)+ | |
| ∑ a,change (P a) t ω := by | |
| unfold noncore | |
| rw [←sum_sub_distrib,←sum_add_distrib] | |
| exact (abs_sum_le_sum_abs _ _).trans (sum_le_sum fun a _ => | |
| term_variation (FineCaps.estimate_range (by norm_num) (P a) t ω) | |
| (FineCaps.estimate_range (by norm_num) (P a) (t+1) ω) _ _) | |
| lemma mark_positive {x : J → ℝ} {s : EpochSchedule.State J} {o : J} | |
| (hs : EpochSchedule.Valid x s) (ho : EpochSchedule.dominant s=some o) : 0 < x o := by | |
| have hp : 0 < EpochSchedule.total s.reference := by | |
| unfold EpochSchedule.dominant at ho | |
| split_ifs at ho with h | |
| exact h.choose_spec.1 | |
| have := EpochSchedule.dominant_large hs ho | |
| linarith | |
| def scale (δ : ℝ) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) | |
| (s : EpochSchedule.State J) : ℝ := | |
| (EpochSchedule.dominant s).elim 0 (fun i => noncore δ (P i) t ω) | |
| lemma scale_nonneg (δ : ℝ) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) | |
| (s : EpochSchedule.State J) : 0 ≤ scale δ P t ω s := by | |
| unfold scale | |
| cases EpochSchedule.dominant s with | |
| | none => rfl | |
| | some i => exact noncore_nonneg δ (P i) t ω | |
| lemma scale_bound {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (s : EpochSchedule.State J) | |
| (hs : EpochSchedule.Valid (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω t) s) : | |
| scale δ P t ω s ≤ 41*EpochSchedule.total (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω t) := by | |
| classical | |
| unfold scale | |
| cases ho : EpochSchedule.dominant s with | |
| | none => exact mul_nonneg (by norm_num) (EpochSchedule.total_nonneg (CoarseEpoch.vector_nonneg c δ P ω t)) | |
| | some i => | |
| have hp := mark_positive hs ho | |
| have ha : (CoarseProcess.active c δ (P i) ω t).active=true := by | |
| cases he : (CoarseProcess.active c δ (P i) ω t).active with | |
| | true => rfl | |
| | false => | |
| have hz := (CoarseProcess.active_valid c δ (P i) ω t).2 he | |
| change 0 < (CoarseProcess.active c δ (P i) ω t).value at hp | |
| linarith | |
| have hlo := ((CoarseProcess.active_accuracy hc hδ hδu (P i) ω t).1 ha).1 | |
| have hv := single_le_sum (fun j _ => CoarseEpoch.vector_nonneg c δ P ω t j) (mem_univ i) | |
| change (CoarseProcess.active c δ (P i) ω t).value ≤ EpochSchedule.total (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω t) at hv | |
| have hb := noncore_bound hδ (P i) t ω | |
| have hm := CoarseProcess.size_nonneg (P i) t ω | |
| have hd := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right hδu hm | |
| change noncore δ (P i) t ω ≤ _ | |
| nlinarith | |
| lemma scale_unchanged_variation (δ : ℝ) (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) | |
| (t : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (s s' : EpochSchedule.State J) | |
| (he : EpochSchedule.dominant s'=EpochSchedule.dominant s) : | |
| |scale δ P (t+1) ω s'-scale δ P t ω s| ≤ | |
| ∑ i, ((∑ a, |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|)+ | |
| ∑ a,change (P i a) t ω) := by | |
| have hnonneg i : 0 ≤ (∑ a, |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|)+ | |
| ∑ a,change (P i a) t ω := by | |
| apply add_nonneg (sum_nonneg fun _ _ => abs_nonneg _) | |
| apply sum_nonneg; intro a _; unfold change; split_ifs <;> norm_num | |
| unfold scale | |
| rw [he] | |
| cases ho : EpochSchedule.dominant s with | |
| | none => simpa using sum_nonneg (fun i _ => hnonneg i) | |
| | some i => exact (noncore_variation δ (P i) t ω).trans (single_le_sum (fun i _ => hnonneg i) (mem_univ i)) | |
| end KServer.CoarseScale | |
| namespace KServer.CoarseScale | |
| open RankTracking RankFunctions CoreFlags | |
| variable {Ω J R K : Type} [Fintype Ω] [Fintype J] [Fintype R] {w : Ω → ℝ} | |
| lemma scale_step {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (ω : Ω) (key : ℕ → K) (t : ℕ) : | |
| let x := CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω | |
| let s := EpochSchedule.run x key | |
| |scale δ P (t+1) ω (s (t+1))-scale δ P t ω (s t)| ≤ | |
| (∑ i, ((∑ a, |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|)+ | |
| ∑ a,change (P i a) t ω))+ | |
| 41*EpochSchedule.wholesale (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) (s t) := by | |
| intro x s | |
| have hv n := EpochSchedule.run_valid x key (CoarseEpoch.vector_nonneg c δ P ω) n | |
| by_cases hr : EpochSchedule.reset (x t) (x (t+1)) (key t) (key (t+1)) (s t) | |
| · have hb₀ := scale_bound hc hδ hδu P t ω (s t) (hv t) | |
| have hb₁ := scale_bound hc hδ hδu P (t+1) ω (s (t+1)) (hv (t+1)) | |
| have hn₀ := scale_nonneg δ P t ω (s t) | |
| have hn₁ := scale_nonneg δ P (t+1) ω (s (t+1)) | |
| have hj : 0 ≤ ∑ i, ((∑ a, |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|)+ | |
| ∑ a,change (P i a) t ω) := by | |
| apply sum_nonneg | |
| intro i _ | |
| apply add_nonneg (sum_nonneg fun _ _ => abs_nonneg _) | |
| apply sum_nonneg; intro a _; unfold change; split_ifs <;> norm_num | |
| rw [EpochSchedule.wholesale,ite_eq_left hr] | |
| apply abs_le.mpr | |
| constructor <;> linarith | |
| · rw [EpochSchedule.wholesale,ite_eq_right hr,mul_zero,add_zero] | |
| apply scale_unchanged_variation | |
| exact CoarseSide.mark_unchanged hr | |
| /-- The change of dominant flex scale is paid by actual elementary trackers, | |
| core flips, and wholesale totals. This includes changes of dominant identity. -/ | |
| lemma scale_budget {c δ : ℝ} (hc : 0 < c) (hδ : 0 < δ) (hδu : δ ≤ 1/1000) | |
| (hw : ∀ ω, 0 ≤ w ω) (hw1 : ∑ ω,w ω=1) | |
| (P : J → R → FilteredRanks w) (key : Ω → ℕ → K) (N : ℕ) : | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => | |
| |scale δ P (t+1) ω (EpochSchedule.run (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω) (key ω) (t+1))- | |
| scale δ P t ω (EpochSchedule.run (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω) (key ω) t)|)) ≤ | |
| (80/δ+(CoreFlags.tolerance^2)⁻¹)* | |
| ((∑ i, ∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P i a).p (t+1) ω-(P i a).before (t+1) ω|))+ | |
| Fintype.card J*Fintype.card R)+ | |
| 41*(∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => EpochSchedule.wholesale | |
| (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω t) (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω (t+1)) | |
| (key ω t) (key ω (t+1)) (EpochSchedule.run (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω) (key ω) t))) := by | |
| let drift i a := ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => |(P i a).p (t+1) ω-(P i a).before (t+1) ω|) | |
| have he i a := FineCaps.estimate_variation_budget hw hw1 hδ (by linarith) (by norm_num : (0:ℝ) ∈ Set.Icc 0 (1/100)) (P i a) N | |
| have hf := CoreFlags.core_change_budget hw hw1 (fun ia : J × R => P ia.1 ia.2) N | |
| have hest : (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => ∑ i,∑ a, | |
| |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|)) ≤ | |
| (80/δ)*((∑ i,∑ a,drift i a)+Fintype.card J*Fintype.card R) := by | |
| simp_rw [avg_sum] | |
| rw [sum_comm] | |
| calc _ = ∑ i, ∑ a, ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => | |
| |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|) := by | |
| apply sum_congr rfl; intro i _; exact sum_comm | |
| _ ≤ ∑ i,∑ a,(80/δ)*(drift i a+1) := sum_le_sum fun i _ => sum_le_sum fun a _ => he i a | |
| _ = _ := by simp_rw [←mul_sum,sum_add_distrib,sum_const,nsmul_eq_mul,mul_one,card_univ] | |
| have hflags : (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => ∑ i,∑ a,change (P i a) t ω)) ≤ | |
| (CoreFlags.tolerance^2)⁻¹*((∑ i,∑ a,drift i a)+Fintype.card J*Fintype.card R) := by | |
| have hd : (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => ∑ i,∑ a, | |
| |(P i a).p (t+1) ω-(P i a).before (t+1) ω|)) = ∑ i,∑ a,drift i a := by | |
| simp_rw [avg_sum] | |
| rw [sum_comm] | |
| apply sum_congr rfl | |
| intro i _ | |
| exact sum_comm | |
| simpa only [Fintype.sum_prod_type,Fintype.card_prod,Nat.cast_mul,hd] using hf | |
| calc _ ≤ ∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => | |
| (∑ i, ((∑ a, |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|)+ | |
| ∑ a,change (P i a) t ω))+ | |
| 41*EpochSchedule.wholesale (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω t) (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω (t+1)) | |
| (key ω t) (key ω (t+1)) (EpochSchedule.run (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω) (key ω) t)) := by | |
| exact sum_le_sum fun t _ => avg_mono hw (fun ω => scale_step hc hδ hδu P ω (key ω) t) | |
| _ = (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => ∑ i,∑ a, | |
| |FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) (t+1) ω-FineCaps.estimate δ 0 (P i a) t ω|))+ | |
| (∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => ∑ i,∑ a,change (P i a) t ω))+ | |
| 41*(∑ t ∈ range N, avg w (fun ω => EpochSchedule.wholesale | |
| (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω t) (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω (t+1)) | |
| (key ω t) (key ω (t+1)) (EpochSchedule.run (CoarseEpoch.vector c δ P ω) (key ω) t))) := by | |
| simp_rw [sum_add_distrib,avg_add,avg_mul,sum_add_distrib,←mul_sum] | |
| _ ≤ _ := by dsimp only [drift] at hest hflags; nlinarith | |
| end KServer.CoarseScale | |
| end | |
| end OAI | |