roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 46)
5d5048e verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
18.9 kB
import Mathlib
import OAI.Combinatorics.KServer.Amplification
import OAI.Combinatorics.KServer.Ranks
namespace OAI
noncomputable section
open scoped BigOperators
open Finset
namespace KServer.FiniteExperiment
attribute [local instance] Classical.propDecidable
open Finset Episode PosteriorRanks
universe u v
variable {Y : Type u} [MetricSpace Y] [Fintype Y] {k H : ℕ} [NeZero k]
/-- A fixed minimizing labeled trajectory for each complete input. -/
def optimalTrace (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) : List (Y × Fin k) :=
serviceTrace (List.ofFn σ) (optimalCost_attained s (List.ofFn σ)).choose
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma optimalTrace_requests (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) :
(optimalTrace s σ).map Prod.fst=List.ofFn σ :=
serviceTrace_requests _ _
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma optimalTrace_cost (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) :
traceCost s (optimalTrace s σ)=optimalCost s (List.ofFn σ) := by
rw [optimalTrace,serviceTrace_cost]
exact (optimalCost_attained s (List.ofFn σ)).choose_spec
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma optimalTrace_length (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) :
(optimalTrace s σ).length=H := by
simpa only [List.length_map,List.length_ofFn] using
congrArg List.length (optimalTrace_requests s σ)
/-- The genuine hidden configuration, frozen when the finite input ends. -/
def hidden (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : ℕ) : Configuration k Y :=
configurationAfter s ((optimalTrace s σ).take t)
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma hidden_zero (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) : hidden s σ 0=s := by
simp [hidden,configurationAfter]
/-- Current designated occurrence in the selected optimum; it is not observed. -/
def mover (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : Fin H) : Fin k :=
((optimalTrace s σ)[t.val]'(by rw [optimalTrace_length]; exact t.isLt)).2
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma optimalTrace_get_request (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : Fin H) :
((optimalTrace s σ)[t.val]'(by rw [optimalTrace_length]; exact t.isLt)).1=σ t := by
have he := congrArg (fun l : List Y => l[t.val]?) (optimalTrace_requests s σ)
apply Option.some.inj
simpa only [List.getElem?_map,List.getElem?_eq_getElem
(show t.val<(optimalTrace s σ).length by rw [optimalTrace_length]; exact t.isLt),
Option.map_some,List.getElem?_ofFn,Fin.isLt,dite_eq_left] using he
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma hidden_step (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : Fin H) :
hidden s σ (t.val+1)=serve (hidden s σ t.val) (mover s σ t) (σ t) := by
have ht : t.val<(optimalTrace s σ).length := by rw [optimalTrace_length]; exact t.isLt
rw [hidden,List.take_succ_eq_append_getElem ht,configurationAfter_append]
simp only [configurationAfter]
rw [optimalTrace_get_request]
rfl
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma hidden_covers (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : Fin H) :
hidden s σ (t.val+1) (mover s σ t)=σ t := by
rw [hidden_step]
simp [serve]
/-- A finite observation sufficient for exactly the request requestPrefix. -/
def requestPrefix (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : ℕ) : Fin H → Option Y :=
fun i => if i.val<t then some (σ i) else none
omit [MetricSpace Y] [Fintype Y] in
lemma prefix_refines (σ ρ : Fin H → Y) (t : ℕ)
(h : requestPrefix σ (t+1)=requestPrefix ρ (t+1)) : requestPrefix σ t=requestPrefix ρ t := by
funext i
by_cases hi : i.val<t
· have he := congrFun h i
simpa [requestPrefix,hi,show i.val<t+1 by omega] using he
· simp [requestPrefix,hi]
omit [MetricSpace Y] [Fintype Y] in
lemma prefix_request {σ ρ : Fin H → Y} (t : Fin H)
(h : requestPrefix σ (t.val+1)=requestPrefix ρ (t.val+1)) : σ t=ρ t := by
have he := congrFun h t
simpa [requestPrefix] using he
variable {T : Type v} [Fintype T]
/-- Histories include the independent partition tape from time zero. Coding a
finite observation by a natural number is injective, not a loss of information. -/
def history (t : ℕ) (ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) : ℕ :=
(Fintype.equivFin (T × (Fin H → Option Y)) (ω.2,requestPrefix ω.1 t)).val
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma history_eq_iff (t : ℕ) (ω z : (Fin H → Y) × T) :
history t ω=history t z ↔ ω.2=z.2 ∧ requestPrefix ω.1 t=requestPrefix z.1 t := by
unfold history
rw [Fin.val_inj,(Fintype.equivFin _).injective.eq_iff,Prod.mk.injEq]
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma history_refines (t : ℕ) (ω z : (Fin H → Y) × T)
(h : history (t+1) ω=history (t+1) z) : history t ω=history t z := by
rw [history_eq_iff] at h ⊢
exact ⟨h.1,prefix_refines _ _ _ h.2⟩
/-- Literal independent product weights, before any requestPrefix is revealed. -/
def weight (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y)) (tape : FiniteDistribution T)
(ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) : ℝ := law.val ω.1*tape.val ω.2
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma weight_nonneg (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y)) (tape : FiniteDistribution T)
(ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) : 0≤weight law tape ω :=
mul_nonneg (law.property.1 _) (tape.property.1 _)
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma weight_sum (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y)) (tape : FiniteDistribution T) :
∑ ω,weight law tape ω=1 := by
simp only [weight,Fintype.sum_prod_type,←mul_sum,tape.property.2,mul_one,law.property.2]
/-- All ranks queried by the allocation are actual conditional hidden counts.
The online map may depend on the partition tape and request requestPrefix; it never
changes how the old hidden quantity is filtered. -/
def count (s : Configuration k Y) {V : Type*} (map : ℕ → ((Fin H → Y) × T) → Y → V)
(under : V → V → Bool) (v : V) (t : ℕ) (ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) : ℕ :=
univ.sum fun i : Fin k => if under v (map t ω (hidden s ω.1 t i)) then 1 else 0
omit [Fintype Y] [Fintype T] in
lemma count_le (s : Configuration k Y) {V : Type*}
(map : ℕ → ((Fin H → Y) × T) → Y → V) (under : V → V → Bool)
(v : V) (t : ℕ) (ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) : count s map under v t ω≤k := by
calc
_ ≤ ∑ _i : Fin k,1 := sum_le_sum fun _ _ => by aesop
_ = k := by simp
/-- This concrete process discharges the signed all-step filtering premise. -/
def ranks (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(tape : FiniteDistribution T) {V : Type*}
(map : ℕ → ((Fin H → Y) × T) → Y → V) (under : V → V → Bool)
(v : V) (a : Fin k) : RankTracking.FilteredRanks (weight law tape) :=
rankProcess (weight_nonneg law tape) history history_refines (count s map under v) a.val
lemma ranks_drift (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(tape : FiniteDistribution T) {V : Type*}
(map : ℕ → ((Fin H → Y) × T) → Y → V) (under : V → V → Bool)
(v : V) (t : ℕ) :
(∑ a : Fin k,RankTracking.avg (weight law tape) (fun ω =>
|(ranks s law tape map under v a).p (t+1) ω-
(ranks s law tape map under v a).before (t+1) ω|)) ≤
RankTracking.avg (weight law tape) (fun ω =>
|(count s map under v (t+1) ω:ℝ)-count s map under v t ω|) :=
rankProcess_drift (weight_nonneg law tape) history history_refines
(count s map under v) (count_le s map under v) t
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma hidden_movement (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) (t : Fin H) :
(∑ i,dist (hidden s σ t.val i) (hidden s σ (t.val+1) i))=
dist (hidden s σ t.val (mover s σ t)) (σ t) := by
classical
rw [hidden_step]
simp [serve,Function.update_apply,apply_ite]
omit [Fintype Y] in
lemma hidden_total_cost (s : Configuration k Y) (σ : Fin H → Y) :
(∑ t : Fin H,∑ i,dist (hidden s σ t.val i) (hidden s σ (t.val+1) i))=
optimalCost s (List.ofFn σ) := by
have he (n : ℕ) (hn : n≤H) :
traceCost s ((optimalTrace s σ).take n)=
∑ t ∈ range n,∑ i,dist (hidden s σ t i) (hidden s σ (t+1) i) := by
induction n with
| zero => simp [traceCost]
| succ n ih =>
have hlt : n<(optimalTrace s σ).length := by rw [optimalTrace_length]; omega
rw [List.take_succ_eq_append_getElem hlt,traceCost_append,ih (by omega),sum_range_succ]
congr 1
rw [hidden_movement s σ ⟨n,by omega⟩]
simp only [traceCost,add_zero]
rw [optimalTrace_get_request s σ ⟨n,by omega⟩]
rfl
have htake : (optimalTrace s σ).take H=optimalTrace s σ := by
apply List.take_of_length_le
exact (optimalTrace_length s σ).le
rw [←optimalTrace_cost,←htake,he H le_rfl]
exact (Finset.sum_range (fun t : ℕ => ∑ i,
dist (hidden s σ t i) (hidden s σ (t+1) i))).symm
lemma expected_hidden_cost (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(tape : FiniteDistribution T) :
(∑ ω,weight law tape ω*(∑ t : Fin H,∑ i,
dist (hidden s ω.1 t.val i) (hidden s ω.1 (t.val+1) i)))=
∑ σ,law.val σ*optimalCost s (List.ofFn σ) := by
simp only [hidden_total_cost,weight,Fintype.sum_prod_type]
simp_rw [mul_right_comm (law.val _) (tape.val _),←mul_sum,tape.property.2,mul_one]
/-- True request history alone, for computing the metric posterior independently
of the partition tape. -/
def requestHistory (t : ℕ) (σ : Fin H → Y) : ℕ :=
(Fintype.equivFin (Fin H → Option Y) (requestPrefix σ t)).val
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma requestHistory_eq_iff (t : ℕ) (σ ρ : Fin H → Y) :
requestHistory t σ=requestHistory t ρ ↔ requestPrefix σ t=requestPrefix ρ t := by
unfold requestHistory
rw [Fin.val_inj,(Fintype.equivFin _).injective.eq_iff]
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma mass_product (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y)) (tape : FiniteDistribution T)
(t : ℕ) (ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) :
mass (weight law tape) (history t) (history t ω)=
mass law.val (requestHistory t) (requestHistory t ω.1)*tape.val ω.2 := by
classical
simp only [mass,fiber,sum_filter,history_eq_iff,requestHistory_eq_iff,
Fintype.sum_prod_type,weight]
rw [sum_mul]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro σ _
by_cases hp : requestPrefix σ t=requestPrefix ω.1 t
· simp [hp]
· simp [hp]
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma numerator_product (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y)) (tape : FiniteDistribution T)
(t : ℕ) (ω : (Fin H → Y) × T) (f : (Fin H → Y) → ℝ) :
numerator (weight law tape) (history t) (fun z => f z.1) (history t ω)=
numerator law.val (requestHistory t) f (requestHistory t ω.1)*tape.val ω.2 := by
classical
simp only [numerator,fiber,sum_filter,history_eq_iff,requestHistory_eq_iff,
Fintype.sum_prod_type,weight]
rw [sum_mul]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro σ _
by_cases hp : requestPrefix σ t=requestPrefix ω.1 t
· simp [hp]; ring
· simp [hp]
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
/-- The precise independence statement legitimately used by the manuscript.
It does not assert independence of partition events after conditioning on the
tape, nor does it select reset events in a martingale estimate. -/
lemma posterior_tape_irrelevant (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(tape : FiniteDistribution T) (t : ℕ) (ω : (Fin H → Y) × T)
(ht : tape.val ω.2≠0) (f : (Fin H → Y) → ℝ) :
posterior (weight law tape) (history t) (fun z => f z.1) ω=
posterior law.val (requestHistory t) f ω.1 := by
simp only [posterior,numerator_product,mass_product]
exact mul_div_mul_right _ _ ht
/-- Counting measure of a labeled configuration; repetitions contribute separately. -/
def metricCount (c : Configuration k Y) (y : Y) : ℝ := by
classical
exact ∑ i : Fin k, if c i=y then 1 else 0
omit [MetricSpace Y] [Fintype Y] [NeZero k] in
lemma metricCount_nonneg (c : Configuration k Y) (y : Y) : 0 ≤ metricCount c y := by
classical
exact sum_nonneg fun i _ => by split_ifs <;> norm_num
omit [MetricSpace Y] [NeZero k] in
lemma metricCount_total (c : Configuration k Y) : ∑ y,metricCount c y=(k:ℝ) := by
classical
simp only [metricCount]
rw [sum_comm]
simp
omit [MetricSpace Y] [Fintype Y] [NeZero k] in
lemma metricCount_at (c : Configuration k Y) (y : Y) (h : ∃ i,c i=y) :
1 ≤ metricCount c y := by
classical
obtain ⟨i,hi⟩ := h
have hs := single_le_sum (s := (univ : Finset (Fin k))) (f := fun j =>
if c j=y then (1:ℝ) else 0) (fun j _ => by split_ifs <;> norm_num) (mem_univ i)
simpa [hi,metricCount] using hs
/-- The true-metric posterior after t requests, independent of algorithmic tapes. -/
def mu (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : ℕ) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : ℝ :=
posterior law.val (requestHistory t) (fun ρ => metricCount (hidden s ρ t) y) σ
lemma mu_nonneg (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : ℕ) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : 0 ≤ mu s law t σ y :=
posterior_nonneg law.property.1 _ (fun _ => metricCount_nonneg _ _) _
lemma mu_total (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : ℕ) (σ : Fin H → Y) (hσ : 0<law.val σ) : ∑ y,mu s law t σ y=(k:ℝ) := by
unfold mu
rw [←posterior_sum]
exact posterior_fiber_const σ (fun ρ _ => metricCount_total _) (mass_pos_of_weight law.property.1 _ σ hσ).ne'
omit [MetricSpace Y] in
lemma request_of_history (t : Fin H) (σ ρ : Fin H → Y)
(h : requestHistory (t.val+1) σ=requestHistory (t.val+1) ρ) : σ t=ρ t := by
have he := congrFun ((requestHistory_eq_iff _ _ _).mp h) t
simpa [requestPrefix,t.isLt] using he
lemma mu_served (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (hσ : 0<law.val σ) : 1 ≤ mu s law (t.val+1) σ (σ t) := by
have hc : posterior law.val (requestHistory (t.val+1)) (fun _ => (1:ℝ)) σ=1 :=
posterior_fiber_const σ (fun _ _ => rfl) (mass_pos_of_weight law.property.1 _ σ hσ).ne'
rw [←hc]
apply posterior_mono_fiber law.property.1
intro ρ hρ
apply metricCount_at
rw [←request_of_history t ρ σ hρ]
exact ⟨mover s ρ t,hidden_covers s ρ t⟩
lemma mu_adapted (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : ℕ) (y : Y) : RankTracking.Adapted (requestHistory t) (fun σ => mu s law t σ y) :=
posterior_adapted _ _ _
omit [MetricSpace Y] [Fintype Y] [NeZero k] in
lemma metricCount_move (c : Configuration k Y) (i : Fin k) (x y : Y) :
metricCount (serve c i x) y=metricCount c y-(if c i=y then 1 else 0)+
(if x=y then 1 else 0) := by
classical
unfold metricCount
rw [←add_sum_erase univ _ (mem_univ i),←add_sum_erase univ _ (mem_univ i)]
have he : (∑ j∈univ.erase i,if serve c i x j=y then (1:ℝ) else 0)=
∑ j∈univ.erase i,if c j=y then (1:ℝ) else 0 := by
apply sum_congr rfl
intro j hj
simp [serve,Function.update_of_ne (mem_erase.mp hj).1]
rw [he]
simp only [serve,Function.update_self]
ring
/-- Old counting measure filtered through the new true request. -/
def muBefore (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : ℝ :=
posterior law.val (requestHistory (t.val+1)) (fun ρ => metricCount (hidden s ρ t.val) y) σ
/-- The conditional old-location law of the single designated optimum mover. -/
def nu (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : ℝ := by
classical
exact posterior law.val (requestHistory (t.val+1))
(fun ρ => if hidden s ρ t.val (mover s ρ t)=y then 1 else 0) σ
lemma muBefore_nonneg (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : 0 ≤ muBefore s law t σ y :=
posterior_nonneg law.property.1 _ (fun _ => metricCount_nonneg _ _) _
lemma nu_nonneg (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : 0 ≤ nu s law t σ y := by
apply posterior_nonneg law.property.1
intro ρ
split_ifs <;> norm_num
lemma nu_total (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (hσ : 0<law.val σ) : ∑ y,nu s law t σ y=1 := by
classical
unfold nu
rw [←posterior_sum]
apply posterior_fiber_const σ _ (mass_pos_of_weight law.property.1 _ σ hσ).ne'
intro ρ _
simp
lemma nu_le_muBefore (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (y : Y) : nu s law t σ y ≤ muBefore s law t σ y := by
apply posterior_mono_fiber law.property.1
intro ρ _
split_ifs with he
· exact metricCount_at _ _ ⟨mover s ρ t,he⟩
· exact metricCount_nonneg _ _
lemma muBefore_total (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (hσ : 0<law.val σ) : ∑ y,muBefore s law t σ y=(k:ℝ) := by
unfold muBefore
rw [←posterior_sum]
exact posterior_fiber_const σ (fun ρ _ => metricCount_total _) (mass_pos_of_weight law.property.1 _ σ hσ).ne'
/-- Exact one-mover decomposition used by the pilot potential. -/
lemma mu_move (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) (hσ : 0<law.val σ) (y : Y) :
mu s law (t.val+1) σ y=muBefore s law t σ y-nu s law t σ y+
(if σ t=y then 1 else 0) := by
classical
unfold mu muBefore nu
simp_rw [hidden_step,metricCount_move]
rw [posterior_add,posterior_sub]
congr 1
apply posterior_fiber_const σ _ (mass_pos_of_weight law.property.1 _ σ hσ).ne'
intro ρ hρ
rw [request_of_history t ρ σ hρ]
lemma conditional_moveCost (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y))
(t : Fin H) (σ : Fin H → Y) :
(∑ y,nu s law t σ y*dist y (σ t))=
posterior law.val (requestHistory (t.val+1))
(fun ρ => dist (hidden s ρ t.val (mover s ρ t)) (ρ t)) σ := by
classical
unfold nu
simp_rw [←posterior_mul]
rw [←posterior_sum]
unfold posterior numerator
congr 1
apply sum_congr rfl
intro ρ hρ
dsimp only
rw [request_of_history t ρ σ (mem_filter.mp hρ).2]
simp
/-- The entire physical-drift budget is the expectation of the attained optimum,
not a separate assumed bound or a policy-dependent comparator. -/
lemma expected_moveCost (s : Configuration k Y) (law : FiniteDistribution (Fin H → Y)) :
(∑ t : Fin H,∑ σ,law.val σ*(∑ y,nu s law t σ y*dist y (σ t)))=
∑ σ,law.val σ*optimalCost s (List.ofFn σ) := by
simp_rw [conditional_moveCost]
change (∑ t : Fin H,RankTracking.avg law.val
(posterior law.val (requestHistory (t.val+1))
(fun ρ => dist (hidden s ρ t.val (mover s ρ t)) (ρ t))))=_
simp_rw [posterior_avg law.property.1]
unfold RankTracking.avg
rw [sum_comm]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro σ _
rw [←mul_sum]
congr 1
simp_rw [←hidden_movement]
exact hidden_total_cost s σ
end KServer.FiniteExperiment
end
end OAI