roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 46)
5d5048e verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
24.3 kB
import OAI.Combinatorics.ListHadwiger.BagContraction
namespace OAI
namespace LinearListHadwiger
open SimpleGraph PathPacking
open scoped Classical
namespace BagRouting
variable {V I J : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} {s : I → V} {B : J → Set V}
def used (D : BagRouting G s B) : Set V :=
{v | ∃ i, v ∈ (D.paths i).2.val.support}
def Minimal [Fintype I] (D : BagRouting G s B) : Prop :=
∀ E : BagRouting G s B, D.totalLength ≤ E.totalLength
lemma exists_minimal [Fintype I] (h : Nonempty (BagRouting G s B)) :
∃ D : BagRouting G s B, D.Minimal := by
classical
have hex : ∃ n : ℕ, ∃ D : BagRouting G s B, D.totalLength = n := by
obtain ⟨D⟩ := h
exact ⟨D.totalLength, D, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨D, hd⟩ := Nat.find_spec hex
refine ⟨D, fun E => ?_⟩
rw [hd]
exact Nat.find_min' hex ⟨E, rfl⟩
noncomputable def replace [DecidableEq I] (D : BagRouting G s B) (i : I)
(p : G.Path (s i) (D.paths i).1)
(hp : ∀ j, i ≠ j → ∀ v ∈ p.val.support,
v ∈ (D.paths j).2.val.support → v = s i ∧ v = s j) : BagRouting G s B := by
let paths : ∀ a, Σ w, G.Path (s a) w :=
fun a => if h : a = i then h.symm ▸ (⟨(D.paths i).1, p⟩ : Σ w, G.Path (s i) w) else D.paths a
refine ⟨paths, D.bag, D.bag_injective, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro a
by_cases ha : a = i
· subst a
have he : paths i = ⟨(D.paths i).1, p⟩ := dite_eq_left rfl
rw [he]
exact D.endpoint_mem i
· have he : paths a = D.paths a := dite_eq_right ha
rw [he]
exact D.endpoint_mem a
· intro a b hab v hva hvb
by_cases ha : a = i
· subst a
have he : paths i = ⟨(D.paths i).1, p⟩ := dite_eq_left rfl
have he' : paths b = D.paths b := dite_eq_right (Ne.symm hab)
rw [he] at hva
rw [he'] at hvb
exact hp b hab v hva hvb
· have he : paths a = D.paths a := dite_eq_right ha
rw [he] at hva
by_cases hb : b = i
· subst b
have he' : paths i = ⟨(D.paths i).1, p⟩ := dite_eq_left rfl
rw [he'] at hvb
exact (hp a (Ne.symm ha) v hvb hva).symm
· have he' : paths b = D.paths b := dite_eq_right hb
rw [he'] at hvb
exact D.overlap a b hab v hva hvb
lemma replace_shorter [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] (D : BagRouting G s B) (i : I)
(p : G.Path (s i) (D.paths i).1)
(hp : ∀ j, i ≠ j → ∀ v ∈ p.val.support,
v ∈ (D.paths j).2.val.support → v = s i ∧ v = s j)
(hlt : p.val.length < (D.paths i).2.val.length) :
(D.replace i p hp).totalLength < D.totalLength := by
have hi : (D.replace i p hp).paths i = ⟨(D.paths i).1, p⟩ := dite_eq_left rfl
have ha : ∀ a, a ≠ i → (D.replace i p hp).paths a = D.paths a := fun a h => dite_eq_right h
apply Finset.sum_lt_sum
· intro a _
by_cases h : a = i
· subst a
rw [hi]
exact hlt.le
· rw [ha a h]
· refine ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
rw [hi]
exact hlt
lemma Minimal.walk_length_le [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I]
{D : BagRouting G s B} (hD : D.Minimal) (i : I)
(p : G.Walk (s i) (D.paths i).1)
(hp : ∀ j, i ≠ j → ∀ v ∈ p.support,
v ∈ (D.paths j).2.val.support → v = s i ∧ v = s j) :
(D.paths i).2.val.length ≤ p.length := by
have hp' : ∀ j, i ≠ j → ∀ v ∈ p.toPath.val.support,
v ∈ (D.paths j).2.val.support → v = s i ∧ v = s j := by
intro j hij v hv hvj
exact hp j hij v (p.support_toPath_subset_support hv) hvj
have hle : (D.paths i).2.val.length ≤ p.toPath.val.length := by
by_contra hn
exact (not_lt_of_ge (hD (D.replace i p.toPath hp')))
(D.replace_shorter i p.toPath hp' (Nat.lt_of_not_ge hn))
exact hle.trans p.length_bypass_le_length
lemma Minimal.no_long_shortcut [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I]
{D : BagRouting G s B} (hD : D.Minimal) (i : I) (v : V) (hv : v ∉ D.used)
(a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≤ (D.paths i).2.val.length) (hb : b ≤ (D.paths i).2.val.length)
(hva : G.Adj ((D.paths i).2.val.getVert a) v)
(hvb : G.Adj v ((D.paths i).2.val.getVert b)) : b ≤ a + 2 := by
let p := (D.paths i).2.val
let q : G.Walk (s i) (D.paths i).1 := ((p.take a).concat hva).append (Walk.cons hvb (p.drop b))
change a ≤ p.length at ha
change b ≤ p.length at hb
have hq := hD.walk_length_le i q (by
intro j hij w hw hwj
have hw' : w ∈ p.support ∨ w = v := by
simp only [q, Walk.mem_support_append_iff, Walk.support_concat, Walk.support_cons,
List.mem_append, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hw
rcases hw with (hw | hw) | (hw | hw)
· left
rw [Walk.support_take] at hw
exact List.mem_of_mem_take hw
· exact Or.inr hw
· exact Or.inr hw
· left
rw [Walk.drop_support_eq_support_drop_min] at hw
exact List.mem_of_mem_drop hw
rcases hw' with hw | rfl
· exact D.overlap i j hij w hw hwj
· exact (hv ⟨j, hwj⟩).elim)
have hlen : q.length = a + 2 + (p.length - b) := by
simp [q, Walk.take_length, Nat.min_eq_left ha, Walk.drop_length]
omega
change p.length ≤ q.length at hq
rw [hlen] at hq
omega
lemma Minimal.path_neighbors_le_three [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I]
[DecidableRel G.Adj]
{D : BagRouting G s B} (hD : D.Minimal) (i : I) (v : V) (hv : v ∉ D.used) :
((D.paths i).2.val.support.toFinset.filter fun w => G.Adj v w).card ≤ 3 := by
classical
let p := (D.paths i).2.val
let R := (Finset.range (p.length + 1)).filter fun a => G.Adj v (p.getVert a)
have hR : R.card ≤ 3 := by
obtain he | hn := R.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [he]
let a := R.min' hn
have haR : a ∈ R := R.min'_mem hn
have ha : a ≤ p.length := by
have hh := (Finset.mem_filter.mp haR).1
simp only [Finset.mem_range] at hh
omega
have hsub : R ⊆ Finset.Icc a (a + 2) := by
intro b hbR
have hb : b ≤ p.length := by
have hh := (Finset.mem_filter.mp hbR).1
simp only [Finset.mem_range] at hh
omega
have hab := hD.no_long_shortcut i v hv a b ha hb
(Finset.mem_filter.mp haR).2.symm (Finset.mem_filter.mp hbR).2
exact Finset.mem_Icc.mpr ⟨R.min'_le b hbR, hab⟩
exact (Finset.card_le_card hsub).trans (by simp; omega)
have hsub : (p.support.toFinset.filter fun w => G.Adj v w) ⊆ R.image p.getVert := by
intro w hw
obtain ⟨hwp, hvw⟩ := Finset.mem_filter.mp hw
obtain ⟨a, ha, hlen⟩ := Walk.mem_support_iff_exists_getVert.mp (List.mem_toFinset.mp hwp)
refine Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨a, Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ha⟩
· exact Finset.mem_range.mpr (by omega)
· rwa [ha]
exact (Finset.card_le_card hsub).trans ((Finset.card_image_le).trans hR)
noncomputable def usedFinset [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] (D : BagRouting G s B) : Finset V :=
Finset.univ.biUnion fun i => (D.paths i).2.val.support.toFinset
lemma mem_usedFinset [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] (D : BagRouting G s B) (v : V) :
v ∈ D.usedFinset ↔ v ∈ D.used := by
simp [usedFinset, used]
lemma Minimal.used_neighbors_le [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I]
[DecidableRel G.Adj]
{D : BagRouting G s B} (hD : D.Minimal) (v : V) (hv : v ∉ D.used) :
(D.usedFinset.filter fun w => G.Adj v w).card ≤ 3 * Fintype.card I := by
classical
have he : D.usedFinset.filter (fun w => G.Adj v w) =
Finset.univ.biUnion (fun i => (D.paths i).2.val.support.toFinset.filter fun w => G.Adj v w) := by
ext w
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, usedFinset, Finset.mem_biUnion, Finset.mem_univ, true_and]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hw⟩
exact ⟨i, hi, hw⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi, hw⟩
exact ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hw⟩
rw [he]
calc
_ ≤ ∑ i : I, ((D.paths i).2.val.support.toFinset.filter fun w => G.Adj v w).card := Finset.card_biUnion_le
_ ≤ ∑ _i : I, 3 := Finset.sum_le_sum (fun i _ => hD.path_neighbors_le_three i v hv)
_ = 3 * Fintype.card I := by simp [Nat.mul_comm]
lemma mem_take_indices {u w : V} (p : G.Walk u w) (a : ℕ) {v : V}
(hv : v ∈ (p.take a).support) :
∃ n, n ≤ a ∧ n ≤ p.length ∧ p.getVert n = v := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, hlen⟩ := Walk.mem_support_iff_exists_getVert.mp hv
rw [Walk.take_length] at hlen
have hna := (Nat.le_min.mp hlen).1
have hnl := (Nat.le_min.mp hlen).2
rw [Walk.take_getVert, Nat.min_eq_right hna] at hn
exact ⟨n, hna, hnl, hn⟩
lemma mem_drop_indices {u w : V} (p : G.Walk u w) (b : ℕ) (hb : b ≤ p.length)
{v : V} (hv : v ∈ (p.drop b).support) :
∃ n, b ≤ n ∧ n ≤ p.length ∧ p.getVert n = v := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, hlen⟩ := Walk.mem_support_iff_exists_getVert.mp hv
rw [Walk.drop_length] at hlen
rw [Walk.drop_getVert] at hn
exact ⟨b + n, by omega, by omega, hn⟩
lemma take_drop_disjoint {u w : V} (p : G.Path u w) (a b : ℕ)
(hab : a < b) (hb : b ≤ p.val.length) :
Disjoint {v | v ∈ (p.val.take a).support} {v | v ∈ (p.val.drop b).support} := by
rw [Set.disjoint_left]
intro v hv ht
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcl, hc⟩ := mem_take_indices p.val a hv
obtain ⟨d, hbd, hdl, hd⟩ := mem_drop_indices p.val b hb ht
have he := p.property.getVert_injOn hcl hdl (hc.trans hd.symm)
omega
lemma source_not_mem_drop {u w : V} (p : G.Path u w) (b : ℕ)
(hpos : 0 < b) (hb : b ≤ p.val.length) : u ∉ (p.val.drop b).support := by
intro hu
obtain ⟨n, hbn, hnl, hn⟩ := mem_drop_indices p.val b hb hu
have h0 : p.val.getVert 0 = u := p.val.getVert_zero
have he := p.property.getVert_injOn (show 0 ≤ p.val.length by omega) hnl (h0.trans hn.symm)
omega
structure Exchange (D : BagRouting G s B) where
active : Finset I
e : Equiv.Perm I
fixed : ∀ i, i ∉ active → e i = i
stable : ∀ i, i ∈ active ↔ e i ∈ active
a : I → ℕ
b : I → ℕ
bounds : ∀ i ∈ active, a i + 2 ≤ b i ∧ b i ≤ (D.paths i).2.val.length
edge : ∀ i ∈ active,
G.Adj ((D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i)) ((D.paths (e i)).2.val.getVert (b (e i)))
namespace Exchange
variable [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I] {D : BagRouting G s B}
noncomputable def front (E : D.Exchange) (i : I) : Set V :=
if i ∈ E.active then {v | v ∈ ((D.paths i).2.val.take (E.a i)).support}
else {v | v ∈ (D.paths i).2.val.support}
noncomputable def tail (E : D.Exchange) (i : I) : Set V :=
if i ∈ E.active then {v | v ∈ ((D.paths i).2.val.drop (E.b i)).support} else ∅
lemma front_subset {V I J : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} {s : I → V} {B : J → Set V}
[DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I] {D : BagRouting G s B}
(E : D.Exchange) (i : I) : E.front i ⊆ {v | v ∈ (D.paths i).2.val.support} := by
intro v hv
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· rw [front, ite_eq_left hi] at hv
rw [Walk.support_take] at hv
exact List.mem_of_mem_take hv
· simpa [front, hi] using hv
lemma tail_subset {V I J : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} {s : I → V} {B : J → Set V}
[DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I] {D : BagRouting G s B}
(E : D.Exchange) (i : I) : E.tail i ⊆ {v | v ∈ (D.paths i).2.val.support} := by
intro v hv
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· rw [tail, ite_eq_left hi] at hv
rw [Walk.drop_support_eq_support_drop_min] at hv
exact List.mem_of_mem_drop hv
· simp [tail, hi] at hv
lemma not_source_tail {V I J : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} {s : I → V} {B : J → Set V}
[DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I] {D : BagRouting G s B}
(E : D.Exchange) (i : I) : s i ∉ E.tail i := by
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· rw [tail, ite_eq_left hi]
exact source_not_mem_drop _ _ (by have := (E.bounds i hi).1; omega) (E.bounds i hi).2
· simp [tail, hi]
lemma front_tail_disjoint {V I J : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} {s : I → V} {B : J → Set V}
[DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I] {D : BagRouting G s B}
(E : D.Exchange) (i : I) : Disjoint (E.front i) (E.tail i) := by
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· rw [front, tail, ite_eq_left hi, ite_eq_left hi]
exact take_drop_disjoint _ _ _ (by have := (E.bounds i hi).1; omega) (E.bounds i hi).2
· simp [tail, hi]
noncomputable def walk (E : D.Exchange) (i : I) (hi : i ∈ E.active) :
G.Walk (s i) (D.paths (E.e i)).1 :=
(((D.paths i).2.val.take (E.a i)).concat (E.edge i hi)).append
((D.paths (E.e i)).2.val.drop (E.b (E.e i)))
lemma walk_support {V I J : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} {s : I → V} {B : J → Set V}
[DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I] {D : BagRouting G s B}
(E : D.Exchange) (i : I) (hi : i ∈ E.active) {v : V}
(hv : v ∈ (E.walk i hi).support) : v ∈ E.front i ∪ E.tail (E.e i) := by
have hei := (E.stable i).mp hi
rw [front, tail, ite_eq_left hi, ite_eq_left hei]
simp only [walk, Walk.mem_support_append_iff, Walk.support_concat, List.mem_append,
List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hv
rcases hv with (hv | hv) | hv
· exact Or.inl hv
· subst v
exact Or.inr (Walk.start_mem_support _)
· exact Or.inr hv
lemma support_overlap (E : D.Exchange) (i j : I) (hij : i ≠ j) (v : V)
(hi : v ∈ E.front i ∪ E.tail (E.e i))
(hj : v ∈ E.front j ∪ E.tail (E.e j)) : v = s i ∧ v = s j := by
rcases hi with hi | hi <;> rcases hj with hj | hj
· exact D.overlap i j hij v (E.front_subset i hi) (E.front_subset j hj)
· by_cases he : i = E.e j
· subst i
exact (Set.disjoint_left.mp (E.front_tail_disjoint _) hi hj).elim
· have h := D.overlap i (E.e j) he v (E.front_subset i hi) (E.tail_subset _ hj)
exact (E.not_source_tail _ (h.2 ▸ hj)).elim
· by_cases he : j = E.e i
· subst j
exact (Set.disjoint_left.mp (E.front_tail_disjoint _) hj hi).elim
· have h := D.overlap j (E.e i) he v (E.front_subset j hj) (E.tail_subset _ hi)
exact (E.not_source_tail _ (h.2 ▸ hi)).elim
· have he : E.e i ≠ E.e j := fun h => hij (E.e.injective h)
have h := D.overlap _ _ he v (E.tail_subset _ hi) (E.tail_subset _ hj)
exact (E.not_source_tail _ (h.1 ▸ hi)).elim
noncomputable def routing (E : D.Exchange) : BagRouting G s B := by
let paths : ∀ i, Σ v, G.Path (s i) v := fun i =>
if hi : i ∈ E.active then ⟨(D.paths (E.e i)).1, (E.walk i hi).toPath⟩ else D.paths i
refine ⟨paths, D.bag ∘ E.e, D.bag_injective.comp E.e.injective, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· have he : paths i = ⟨(D.paths (E.e i)).1, (E.walk i hi).toPath⟩ := dite_eq_left hi
rw [he]
exact D.endpoint_mem _
· have he : paths i = D.paths i := dite_eq_right hi
rw [he]
simpa [E.fixed i hi] using D.endpoint_mem i
· intro i j hij v hvi hvj
apply E.support_overlap i j hij v
· by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· have he : paths i = ⟨(D.paths (E.e i)).1, (E.walk i hi).toPath⟩ := dite_eq_left hi
rw [he] at hvi
exact E.walk_support i hi ((E.walk i hi).support_toPath_subset_support hvi)
· have he : paths i = D.paths i := dite_eq_right hi
rw [he] at hvi
exact Or.inl (by simpa [front, hi] using hvi)
· by_cases hj : j ∈ E.active
· have he : paths j = ⟨(D.paths (E.e j)).1, (E.walk j hj).toPath⟩ := dite_eq_left hj
rw [he] at hvj
exact E.walk_support j hj ((E.walk j hj).support_toPath_subset_support hvj)
· have he : paths j = D.paths j := dite_eq_right hj
rw [he] at hvj
exact Or.inl (by simpa [front, hj] using hvj)
lemma length_inequality (E : D.Exchange) (i : I) :
(E.routing.paths i).2.val.length + (if E.e i ∈ E.active then E.b (E.e i) else 0) ≤
(D.paths (E.e i)).2.val.length + (if i ∈ E.active then E.a i + 1 else 0) := by
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· have he : E.routing.paths i = ⟨(D.paths (E.e i)).1, (E.walk i hi).toPath⟩ := dite_eq_left hi
rw [he, ite_eq_left hi, ite_eq_left ((E.stable i).mp hi)]
have hlen : (E.walk i hi).toPath.val.length ≤ (E.walk i hi).length :=
(E.walk i hi).length_bypass_le_length
have ha := (E.bounds i hi).1
have hb := E.bounds (E.e i) ((E.stable i).mp hi)
have hia := E.bounds i hi
have hleni : E.a i ≤ (D.paths i).2.val.length := by omega
have hwlen : (E.walk i hi).length = E.a i + 1 +
((D.paths (E.e i)).2.val.length - E.b (E.e i)) := by
simp only [walk, Walk.length_append, Walk.length_concat, Walk.take_length,
Nat.min_eq_left hleni, Walk.drop_length]
rw [hwlen] at hlen
change (E.walk i hi).toPath.val.length + E.b (E.e i) ≤ _
omega
· have he : E.routing.paths i = D.paths i := dite_eq_right hi
rw [he, E.fixed i hi]
simp only [ite_eq_right hi, le_refl]
lemma shorter [Fintype I] (E : D.Exchange) (hE : E.active.Nonempty) :
E.routing.totalLength < D.totalLength := by
let a : I → ℕ := fun i => if i ∈ E.active then E.a i + 1 else 0
let b : I → ℕ := fun i => if i ∈ E.active then E.b i else 0
have hlt : (∑ i, a i) < ∑ i, b i := by
apply Finset.sum_lt_sum
· intro i _
by_cases hi : i ∈ E.active
· have := (E.bounds i hi).1
simp only [a, b, ite_eq_left hi]
omega
· simp [a, b, hi]
· obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := hE
refine ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, ?_⟩
have := (E.bounds i hi).1
simp only [a, b, ite_eq_left hi]
omega
have hs := Finset.sum_le_sum (s := Finset.univ) (fun i _ => E.length_inequality i)
change (∑ i, ((E.routing.paths i).2.val.length + b (E.e i))) ≤
∑ i, ((D.paths (E.e i)).2.val.length + a i) at hs
rw [Finset.sum_add_distrib, Finset.sum_add_distrib, Equiv.sum_comp E.e b,
Equiv.sum_comp E.e (fun i => (D.paths i).2.val.length)] at hs
change E.routing.totalLength + (∑ i, b i) ≤ D.totalLength + (∑ i, a i) at hs
omega
end Exchange
lemma Minimal.no_exchange [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I]
{D : BagRouting G s B} (hD : D.Minimal) (E : D.Exchange) : ¬ E.active.Nonempty := by
intro hE
exact (not_lt_of_ge (hD E.routing)) (E.shorter hE)
lemma cycle_permutation [Fintype I] [DecidableEq I] (Q : Finset I) (hQ : Q.Nonempty)
(f : I → I) (hf : ∀ i ∈ Q, f i ∈ Q) :
∃ T : Finset I, T ⊆ Q ∧ T.Nonempty ∧ ∃ e : Equiv.Perm I,
(∀ i, i ∉ T → e i = i) ∧ (∀ i, i ∈ T ↔ e i ∈ T) ∧
(∀ i ∈ T, e i = f i) := by
classical
let C := Q.powerset.filter fun T => T.Nonempty ∧ ∀ i ∈ T, f i ∈ T
have hQC : Q ∈ C := Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_powerset.mpr (by rfl), hQ, hf⟩
obtain ⟨T, hTC, hmin⟩ := C.exists_min_image Finset.card ⟨Q, hQC⟩
obtain ⟨hTQ, hn, hclosed⟩ := Finset.mem_filter.mp hTC
have hsub : T.image f ⊆ T := by
intro i hi
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hi
exact hclosed j hj
have hIC : T.image f ∈ C := by
refine Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_powerset.mpr (hsub.trans (Finset.mem_powerset.mp hTQ)),
hn.image f, ?_⟩
intro i hi
exact Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hsub hi, rfl⟩
have heq : T.image f = T := Finset.eq_of_subset_of_card_le hsub (hmin _ hIC)
let g : ↥T → ↥T := fun i => ⟨f i, hclosed i i.property⟩
have hsurj : Function.Surjective g := by
intro i
have hi : i.val ∈ T.image f := heq.symm ▸ i.property
obtain ⟨j, hj, he⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hi
exact ⟨⟨j, hj⟩, Subtype.ext he⟩
let e0 : Equiv.Perm ↥T := Equiv.ofBijective g (Finite.surjective_iff_bijective.mp hsurj)
let e := Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype e0
refine ⟨T, Finset.mem_powerset.mp hTQ, hn, e, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i hi
exact Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_apply_of_not_mem e0 hi
· intro i
exact (Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_apply_mem_iff_mem e0 i).symm
· intro i hi
exact Equiv.Perm.ofSubtype_apply_of_mem e0 hi
lemma Minimal.low_degree [Fintype I] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq I]
[DecidableRel G.Adj] {D : BagRouting G s B} (hD : D.Minimal)
(S : Finset V) (hS : S ⊆ D.usedFinset) (hne : S.Nonempty) :
∃ v ∈ S, (S.filter (G.Adj v)).card ≤ 2 * Fintype.card I := by
classical
by_contra hno
have hdeg : ∀ v ∈ S, 2 * Fintype.card I < (S.filter (G.Adj v)).card := by
intro v hv
exact Nat.lt_of_not_ge (fun hh => hno ⟨v, hv, hh⟩)
let R : I → Finset ℕ := fun i => (Finset.range ((D.paths i).2.val.length + 1)).filter
fun a => (D.paths i).2.val.getVert a ∈ S
let Q : Finset I := Finset.univ.filter fun i => (R i).Nonempty
let a : I → ℕ := fun i => if hi : (R i).Nonempty then (R i).min' hi else 0
have hQiff : ∀ i, i ∈ Q ↔ (R i).Nonempty := by simp [Q]
have hamin : ∀ i ∈ Q, a i ∈ R i := by
intro i hi
have hn := (hQiff i).mp hi
dsimp [a]
rw [dite_eq_left hn]
exact Finset.min'_mem _ _
have haS : ∀ i ∈ Q, (D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i) ∈ S := by
intro i hi
exact (Finset.mem_filter.mp (hamin i hi)).2
have hfind : ∀ v ∈ S, ∃ i ∈ Q, ∃ b, b ∈ R i ∧ (D.paths i).2.val.getVert b = v := by
intro v hv
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := (D.mem_usedFinset v).mp (hS hv)
obtain ⟨b, hb, hblen⟩ := Walk.mem_support_iff_exists_getVert.mp hi
have hbR : b ∈ R i := Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.mpr (by omega), hb ▸ hv⟩
exact ⟨i, (hQiff i).mpr ⟨b, hbR⟩, b, hbR, hb⟩
have hQ : Q.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hne
obtain ⟨i, hi, _⟩ := hfind v hv
exact ⟨i, hi⟩
let M := Finset.univ.biUnion fun i : I =>
{(D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i), (D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i + 1)}
have hM : M.card ≤ 2 * Fintype.card I := by
calc
_ ≤ ∑ i : I, ({(D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i),
(D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i + 1)} : Finset V).card := Finset.card_biUnion_le
_ ≤ ∑ i : I, 2 := Finset.sum_le_sum fun _ _ => Finset.card_le_two
_ = _ := by simp [Nat.mul_comm]
have hm0 : ∀ i, (D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i) ∈ M := by
intro i
exact Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, by simp⟩
have hm1 : ∀ i, (D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i + 1) ∈ M := by
intro i
exact Finset.mem_biUnion.mpr ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, by simp⟩
have hout : ∀ i, ∃ j b, i ∈ Q → j ∈ Q ∧ a j + 2 ≤ b ∧
b ≤ (D.paths j).2.val.length ∧
G.Adj ((D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i)) ((D.paths j).2.val.getVert b) := by
intro i
by_cases hi : i ∈ Q
· have hlarge := hdeg _ (haS i hi)
have hex : ∃ v ∈ S.filter (G.Adj ((D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i))), v ∉ M := by
by_contra hh
have hsub : S.filter (G.Adj ((D.paths i).2.val.getVert (a i))) ⊆ M := by
intro v hv
by_contra hvm
exact hh ⟨v, hv, hvm⟩
have hle := (Finset.card_le_card hsub).trans hM
omega
obtain ⟨v, hv, hvm⟩ := hex
obtain ⟨hvS, hvadj⟩ := Finset.mem_filter.mp hv
obtain ⟨j, hj, b, hbR, hb⟩ := hfind v hvS
have hbj : a j ≤ b := by
have hn := (hQiff j).mp hj
dsimp [a]
rw [dite_eq_left hn]
exact Finset.min'_le _ _ hbR
have hb0 : b ≠ a j := by
intro he
apply hvm
rw [he] at hb
exact hb ▸ hm0 j
have hb1 : b ≠ a j + 1 := by
intro he
apply hvm
rw [he] at hb
exact hb ▸ hm1 j
have hblen : b ≤ (D.paths j).2.val.length := by
have hh := (Finset.mem_filter.mp hbR).1
simp only [Finset.mem_range] at hh
omega
refine ⟨j, b, fun _ => ⟨hj, by omega, hblen, ?_⟩⟩
rwa [hb]
· exact ⟨i, 0, fun hh => (hi hh).elim⟩
choose f c hfc using hout
obtain ⟨T, hTQ, hT, e, hfix, hstable, heq⟩ :=
cycle_permutation Q hQ f (fun i hi => (hfc i hi).1)
let E : D.Exchange := {
active := T
e := e
fixed := hfix
stable := hstable
a := a
b := fun i => c (e.symm i)
bounds := by
intro i hi
have hpre : e.symm i ∈ T := (hstable _).mpr (by simpa using hi)
have he : f (e.symm i) = i := (heq _ hpre).symm.trans (e.apply_symm_apply i)
have hc := (hfc _ (hTQ hpre)).2
rw [he] at hc
exact ⟨hc.1, hc.2.1⟩
edge := by
intro i hi
have hc := (hfc i (hTQ hi)).2.2.2
rw [← heq i hi] at hc
simpa only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply] using hc
}
exact hD.no_exchange E hT
end BagRouting
end LinearListHadwiger
end OAI