roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 47)
e5a97c6 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
26.1 kB
import Mathlib
import OAI.Combinatorics.MatchingCount.Graphs.PathActivity
namespace OAI
namespace MatchingFPRAS.Enlargement
open MatchingFPRAS.Switching MatchingFPRAS.Subdivision MatchingFPRAS.RealGeometry
open Finset
variable {V E : Type*} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V] [Fintype E] [LinearOrder E]
lemma edge_activity_le_realBottleneck (u v : E → V) (huv : ∀ e, u e ≠ v e)
(p : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (B Hu Hv lam : E → ℝ) (e : E) (i : Fin (4*p+1)) :
pathActivity p B Hu Hv lam e i ≤ realBottleneck u v p B Hu Hv lam
(atVertex u v (4*p) e i.castSucc) (atVertex u v (4*p) e i.succ) := by
apply interval_le_bottleneck u v (4*p) (by omega) huv (pathActivity p B Hu Hv lam) e
i.castSucc i.succ (by simp)
intro k hk hk'
have he : k=i := Fin.ext (by simp only [Fin.val_castSucc,Fin.val_succ] at hk hk'; omega)
subst k
exact le_rfl
theorem realBottleneck_noncentral_edge (u v : E → V) (huv : ∀ e, u e ≠ v e)
(p : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (B Hu Hv lam : E → ℝ) (hB : ∀ e, 1 ≤ B e)
(hHu : ∀ e, 0 ≤ Hu e) (hHv : ∀ e, 0 ≤ Hv e) (hlam : ∀ e, lam e ≤ B e)
(e : E) (i : Fin (4*p+1)) (hi : i.val ≠ 2*p) :
realBottleneck u v p B Hu Hv lam (atVertex u v (4*p) e i.castSucc)
(atVertex u v (4*p) e i.succ) = pathActivity p B Hu Hv lam e i := by
apply le_antisymm _ (edge_activity_le_realBottleneck u v huv p hp B Hu Hv lam e i)
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hi with hi | hi
· let j : Fin (4*p) := ⟨i.val,by omega⟩
have hv : atVertex u v (4*p) e i.succ=Sum.inr (e,j) :=
(atVertex_eq_inr_iff u v (4*p) e e i.succ j).mpr ⟨rfl,rfl⟩
rw [hv,realBottleneck,bottleneck_comm]
have hc := realBottleneck_internal_cap u v p hp B Hu Hv lam hB hHu hHv hlam e j
(atVertex u v (4*p) e i.castSucc)
simpa [realBottleneck,pathActivity,internalStrength,show j.val<2*p from hi,
profile_left p (B e) (Hu e) (Hv e) (lam e) i hi,j] using hc
· let j : Fin (4*p) := ⟨i.val-1,by have := i.isLt; omega⟩
have hv : atVertex u v (4*p) e i.castSucc=Sum.inr (e,j) :=
(atVertex_eq_inr_iff u v (4*p) e e i.castSucc j).mpr ⟨rfl,by dsimp [j]; omega⟩
rw [hv]
have hc := realBottleneck_internal_cap u v p hp B Hu Hv lam hB hHu hHv hlam e j
(atVertex u v (4*p) e i.succ)
have hj : ¬ j.val < 2*p := by dsimp [j]; omega
have he : j.val+1=i.val := by dsimp [j]; omega
simpa only [pathActivity,profile_right p (B e) (Hu e) (Hv e) (lam e) i hi,
internalStrength,ite_eq_right hj,he] using hc
variable {V : Type*} [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
theorem realBottleneck_central_edge (w : V → V → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(Hu Hv : LogicalEdge V → ℝ) (hHu : ∀ e, 0 ≤ Hu e) (hHv : ∀ e, 0 ≤ Hv e)
(hinner : ∀ e, max (bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) (Hu e/2^(p-1)) =
bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) (e : LogicalEdge V) :
realBottleneck source target p (fun e => bottleneck w (source e) (target e))
Hu Hv (logicalActivity w)
(atVertex source target (4*p) e ⟨2*p,by omega⟩)
(atVertex source target (4*p) e ⟨2*p+1,by omega⟩) =
bottleneck w (source e) (target e) := by
let B := fun e : LogicalEdge V => bottleneck w (source e) (target e)
let j : Fin (4*p) := ⟨2*p-1,by omega⟩
let k : Fin (4*p) := ⟨2*p,by omega⟩
have hj : j.val < 2*p := by dsimp [j]; omega
have hk : ¬ k.val < 2*p := by simp [k]
have hjk : j≠k := by intro h; have := congrArg Fin.val h; dsimp [j,k] at this; omega
have hjv : atVertex source target (4*p) e ⟨2*p,by omega⟩ = Sum.inr (e,j) :=
(atVertex_eq_inr_iff _ _ _ _ _ _ _).mpr ⟨rfl,by dsimp [j]; omega⟩
have hkv : atVertex source target (4*p) e ⟨2*p+1,by omega⟩ = Sum.inr (e,k) :=
(atVertex_eq_inr_iff _ _ _ _ _ _ _).mpr ⟨rfl,rfl⟩
rw [hjv,hkv]
have hsj : internalStrength p (B e) (Hu e) (Hv e) j=B e := by
rw [internalStrength,ite_eq_left hj]
have hdiv : j.val/2=p-1 := by dsimp [j]; omega
rw [hdiv]
exact hinner e
apply le_antisymm
· have hc := realBottleneck_internal_cap source target p hp B Hu Hv (logicalActivity w)
(fun e => one_le_bottleneck w _ _) hHu hHv
(fun e => edgeActivity_le_bottleneck w _ _ (source_ne_target e)) e j (Sum.inr (e,k))
exact (hc.trans_eq hsj)
· let t := activity source target (4*p) (pathActivity p B Hu Hv (logicalActivity w))
have hleft : B e ≤ bottleneck t (Sum.inr (e,j)) (Sum.inl (source e)) :=
(le_internalStrength p (B e) (Hu e) (Hv e) j).trans
(realBottleneck_left_home source target source_ne_target p hp B Hu Hv (logicalActivity w) hHu e j hj)
have hright : B e ≤ bottleneck t (Sum.inr (e,k)) (Sum.inl (target e)) :=
(le_internalStrength p (B e) (Hu e) (Hv e) k).trans
(realBottleneck_right_home source target source_ne_target p hp B Hu Hv (logicalActivity w) hHv e k hk)
have hterm : bottleneck t (Sum.inl (source e)) (Sum.inl (target e))=B e :=
terminal_bottleneck w p hp Hu Hv _ _
have hx : B e ≤ bottleneck t (Sum.inr (e,j)) (Sum.inl (target e)) := by
have ht := bottleneck_ultrametric t (Sum.inr (e,j)) (Sum.inl (target e)) (Sum.inl (source e))
(by simp) (by simp) (by simpa using (source_ne_target e).symm)
exact ((le_min hleft hterm.ge).trans ht)
have htri := bottleneck_ultrametric t (Sum.inr (e,j)) (Sum.inr (e,k)) (Sum.inl (target e))
(by simpa using hjk) (by simp) (by simp)
rw [bottleneck_comm t (Sum.inl (target e)) (Sum.inr (e,k))] at htri
exact (le_min hx hright).trans htri
theorem source_effective_profile (w : V → V → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (hp : 1≤p)
(Hu Hv : LogicalEdge V → ℝ) (hHu : ∀ e, 0≤Hu e) (hHv : ∀ e, 0≤Hv e)
(hinner : ∀ e, max (bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) (Hu e/2^(p-1)) =
bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) (e : LogicalEdge V) (i : Fin (4*p+1)) :
realBottleneck source target p (fun e => bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) Hu Hv
(logicalActivity w) (atVertex source target (4*p) e i.castSucc)
(atVertex source target (4*p) e i.succ) =
profileActivity p (bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) (Hu e) (Hv e)
(bottleneck w (source e) (target e)) i := by
by_cases hi : i.val=2*p
· have he : i=⟨2*p,by omega⟩ := Fin.ext hi
rw [he,profile_center]
exact realBottleneck_central_edge w p hp Hu Hv hHu hHv hinner e
· rw [realBottleneck_noncentral_edge source target source_ne_target p hp _ Hu Hv
(logicalActivity w) (fun _ => one_le_bottleneck _ _ _) hHu hHv
(fun e => edgeActivity_le_bottleneck w _ _ (source_ne_target e)) e i hi]
rcases lt_or_gt_of_ne hi with hi | hi
· simp only [pathActivity,profile_left _ _ _ _ _ _ hi]
· simp only [pathActivity,profile_right _ _ _ _ _ _ hi]
omit [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V] in
theorem effective_profile_incident_near {E : Type*} (u v : E → V)
(p : ℕ) (hp : 1≤p) (B : E → ℝ) (H : V → ℝ)
(hB : ∀ e, 0≤B e) (hH : ∀ x, 0≤H x)
(hdom : ∀ e, B e≤H (u e) ∧ B e≤H (v e))
(hinnerL : ∀ e, max (B e) (H (u e)/2^(p-1))=B e)
(hinnerR : ∀ e, max (B e) (H (v e)/2^(p-1))=B e)
(x : Vertex V E (4*p)) (e f : E) (i j : Fin (4*p+1))
(he : x=atVertex u v (4*p) e i.castSucc ∨ x=atVertex u v (4*p) e i.succ)
(hf : x=atVertex u v (4*p) f j.castSucc ∨ x=atVertex u v (4*p) f j.succ) :
profileActivity p (B e) (H (u e)) (H (v e)) (B e) i ≤
2*profileActivity p (B f) (H (u f)) (H (v f)) (B f) j := by
cases x with
| inl x =>
have ht (g : E) (k : Fin (4*p+1))
(hg : Sum.inl x=atVertex u v (4*p) g k.castSucc ∨ Sum.inl x=atVertex u v (4*p) g k.succ) :
profileActivity p (B g) (H (u g)) (H (v g)) (B g) k=H x := by
rcases hg with hg | hg
· obtain ⟨hk,hx⟩ := (first_vertex_terminal u v (4*p) g k x).mp hg.symm
rw [profile_left _ _ _ _ _ _ (by omega),hk]
simp only [Nat.zero_div,pow_zero,div_one,max_eq_right (hdom g).1]
exact congrArg H hx
· obtain ⟨hk,hx⟩ := (second_vertex_terminal u v (4*p) g k x).mp hg.symm
rw [profile_right _ _ _ _ _ _ (by omega),hk]
simp only [Nat.sub_self,Nat.zero_div,pow_zero,div_one,max_eq_right (hdom g).2]
exact congrArg H hx
rw [ht e i he,ht f j hf]
linarith [hH x]
| inr z =>
rcases z with ⟨g,k⟩
have hi : e=g ∧ (i.val=k.val ∨ i.val=k.val+1) := by
rcases he with he | he
· have hh := (atVertex_eq_inr_iff u v (4*p) e g i.castSucc k).mp he.symm
exact ⟨hh.1,Or.inr hh.2⟩
· have hh := (atVertex_eq_inr_iff u v (4*p) e g i.succ k).mp he.symm
exact ⟨hh.1,Or.inl (by simpa using hh.2)⟩
have hj : f=g ∧ (j.val=k.val ∨ j.val=k.val+1) := by
rcases hf with hf | hf
· have hh := (atVertex_eq_inr_iff u v (4*p) f g j.castSucc k).mp hf.symm
exact ⟨hh.1,Or.inr hh.2⟩
· have hh := (atVertex_eq_inr_iff u v (4*p) f g j.succ k).mp hf.symm
exact ⟨hh.1,Or.inl (by simpa using hh.2)⟩
obtain ⟨rfl,hi⟩ := hi
obtain ⟨rfl,hj⟩ := hj
have hnear := profile_adjacent_near p hp (B f) (H (u f)) (H (v f))
(hB f) (hH _) (hH _) (hinnerL f) (hinnerR f) k
rcases hi with hi | hi <;> rcases hj with hj | hj
· have heq : i=j := Fin.ext (hi.trans hj.symm)
rw [heq]
have hn := (hB f).trans (profile_lower p (B f) (H (u f)) (H (v f)) (B f) le_rfl j)
linarith
· have hi' : i=k.castSucc := Fin.ext hi
have hj' : j=k.succ := Fin.ext hj
simpa [hi',hj'] using hnear.1
· have hi' : i=k.succ := Fin.ext hi
have hj' : j=k.castSucc := Fin.ext hj
simpa [hi',hj'] using hnear.2
· have heq : i=j := Fin.ext (hi.trans hj.symm)
rw [heq]
have hn := (hB f).trans (profile_lower p (B f) (H (u f)) (H (v f)) (B f) le_rfl j)
linarith
end MatchingFPRAS.Enlargement
namespace MatchingFPRAS.Hierarchy
theorem acyclic_of_unique_lower {L : Type*} (G : SimpleGraph L) (rank : L → ℕ)
(hdiff : ∀ {a b}, G.Adj a b → rank a ≠ rank b)
(hparent : ∀ a b c, G.Adj a b → G.Adj a c → rank b < rank a → rank c < rank a → b=c) :
G.IsAcyclic := by
classical
intro a p hp
obtain ⟨b,hb,hmax⟩ := p.support.toFinset.exists_max_image rank
⟨a,by simp⟩
have hb' : b ∈ p.support := List.mem_toFinset.mp hb
let q := p.rotate b hb'
have hq : q.IsCycle := hp.rotate hb'
have hqs : q.snd ∈ p.support := (p.mem_support_rotate_iff b hb').mp (q.getVert_mem_support 1)
have hqt : q.penultimate ∈ p.support :=
(p.mem_support_rotate_iff b hb').mp (q.getVert_mem_support (q.length-1))
have hs : rank q.snd < rank b := lt_of_le_of_ne
(hmax q.snd (List.mem_toFinset.mpr hqs)) (hdiff (q.adj_snd hq.not_nil)).symm
have ht : rank q.penultimate < rank b := lt_of_le_of_ne
(hmax q.penultimate (List.mem_toFinset.mpr hqt)) (hdiff (q.adj_penultimate hq.not_nil))
exact hq.snd_ne_penultimate (hparent b q.snd q.penultimate (q.adj_snd hq.not_nil)
(q.adj_penultimate hq.not_nil).symm hs ht)
variable {V : Type*} [Fintype V]
variable (B : V → V → ℝ)
variable (hsym : ∀ a b, B a b = B b a)
variable (htri : ∀ a b c, a ≠ b → a ≠ c → b ≠ c → min (B a c) (B c b) ≤ B a b)
def Related (t : ℝ) (a b : V) : Prop := a=b ∨ t ≤ B a b
omit [Fintype V] in
include hsym in
lemma related_symm (t : ℝ) {a b : V} (h : Related B t a b) : Related B t b a := by
rcases h with h | h
· exact Or.inl h.symm
· exact Or.inr (by rwa [hsym])
omit [Fintype V] in
include htri in
lemma related_trans (t : ℝ) {a b c : V} (hab : Related B t a b) (hbc : Related B t b c) :
Related B t a c := by
rcases hab with rfl | hab
· exact hbc
rcases hbc with rfl | hbc
· exact Or.inr hab
by_cases hac : a=c
· exact Or.inl hac
by_cases hab' : a=b
· subst b; exact Or.inr hbc
by_cases hbc' : c=b
· subst c; exact Or.inr hab
exact Or.inr ((le_min hab hbc).trans (htri a c b hac hab' hbc'))
def thresholdSetoid (t : ℝ) : Setoid V where
r := Related B t
iseqv := ⟨fun _ => Or.inl rfl,related_symm B hsym t,related_trans B htri t⟩
abbrev Component (t : ℝ) := Quotient (thresholdSetoid B hsym htri t)
abbrev Label (H : ℕ) := (k : Fin (H+1)) × Component B hsym htri (2^k.val)
def labelAt {H : ℕ} (k : Fin (H+1)) (x : V) : Label B hsym htri H :=
⟨k,Quotient.mk _ x⟩
def Mem {H : ℕ} (l : Label B hsym htri H) (x : V) : Prop := Quotient.mk _ x = l.2
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma mem_labelAt {H : ℕ} (k : Fin (H+1)) (x : V) : Mem B hsym htri (labelAt B hsym htri k x) x := rfl
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma mem_class_iff {H : ℕ} (k : Fin (H+1)) (x y : V) :
Mem B hsym htri (labelAt B hsym htri k x) y ↔ Related B (2^k.val) y x :=
Quotient.eq
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma exists_mem {H : ℕ} (l : Label B hsym htri H) : ∃ x, Mem B hsym htri l x :=
Quotient.exists_rep l.2
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma eq_of_level_of_mem {H : ℕ} (a b : Label B hsym htri H) (hlev : a.1=b.1)
{x : V} (ha : Mem B hsym htri a x) (hb : Mem B hsym htri b x) : a=b := by
cases a with
| mk k a =>
cases b with
| mk j b =>
dsimp at hlev
subst j
exact congrArg (Sigma.mk k) (ha.symm.trans hb)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma related_of_mem {H : ℕ} (l : Label B hsym htri H) {x y : V}
(hx : Mem B hsym htri l x) (hy : Mem B hsym htri l y) : Related B (2^l.1.val) x y :=
Quotient.exact (hx.trans hy.symm)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma mem_of_related {H : ℕ} (l : Label B hsym htri H) {x y : V}
(hx : Mem B hsym htri l x) (hxy : Related B (2^l.1.val) y x) : Mem B hsym htri l y :=
(Quotient.sound hxy).trans hx
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma related_mono {s t : ℝ} (hst : s ≤ t) {a b : V} (h : Related B t a b) :
Related B s a b := h.imp id (fun hb => hst.trans hb)
def Parent {H : ℕ} (a b : Label B hsym htri H) : Prop :=
a.1.val+1=b.1.val ∧ ∃ x, Mem B hsym htri a x ∧ Mem B hsym htri b x
def tree {H : ℕ} : SimpleGraph (Label B hsym htri H) where
Adj a b := Parent B hsym htri a b ∨ Parent B hsym htri b a
symm := ⟨fun _ _ h => h.symm⟩
loopless := ⟨by intro a h; rcases h with h|h <;> have := h.1 <;> omega⟩
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma parent_mem {H : ℕ} {a b : Label B hsym htri H} (h : Parent B hsym htri a b)
{x : V} (hx : Mem B hsym htri b x) : Mem B hsym htri a x := by
obtain ⟨hlev,y,hy,hby⟩ := h
have hpow : (2:ℝ)^a.1.val ≤ 2^b.1.val := pow_le_pow_right₀ (by norm_num) (by omega)
exact mem_of_related B hsym htri a hy
(related_mono B hpow (related_of_mem B hsym htri b hx hby))
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma parent_unique {H : ℕ} {a b c : Label B hsym htri H}
(ha : Parent B hsym htri a c) (hb : Parent B hsym htri b c) : a=b := by
obtain ⟨x,hx⟩ := exists_mem B hsym htri c
apply eq_of_level_of_mem B hsym htri a b _
(parent_mem B hsym htri ha hx) (parent_mem B hsym htri hb hx)
apply Fin.ext
have := ha.1
have := hb.1
omega
omit [Fintype V] in
theorem tree_acyclic (H : ℕ) : (tree B hsym htri (H := H)).IsAcyclic := by
apply acyclic_of_unique_lower _ (fun l => l.1.val)
· intro a b hab
rcases hab with h | h <;> have := h.1 <;> omega
· intro a b c hab hac hb hc
have hp : Parent B hsym htri b a := by
rcases hab with h | h
· have := h.1; omega
· exact h
have hq : Parent B hsym htri c a := by
rcases hac with h | h
· have := h.1; omega
· exact h
exact parent_unique B hsym htri hp hq
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma parent_exists {H : ℕ} (a : Label B hsym htri H) (ha : 0<a.1.val) :
∃ b, Parent B hsym htri b a := by
obtain ⟨x,hx⟩ := exists_mem B hsym htri a
let k : Fin (H+1) := ⟨a.1.val-1,by have := a.1.isLt; omega⟩
exact ⟨labelAt B hsym htri k x,by dsimp [Parent,k,labelAt]; exact ⟨by omega,x,rfl,hx⟩⟩
variable (hfloor : ∀ a b, 1 ≤ B a b)
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor in
lemma level_zero_unique {H : ℕ} (a b : Label B hsym htri H)
(ha : a.1.val=0) (hb : b.1.val=0) : a=b := by
obtain ⟨x,hx⟩ := exists_mem B hsym htri a
obtain ⟨y,hy⟩ := exists_mem B hsym htri b
apply eq_of_level_of_mem B hsym htri a b (Fin.ext (ha.trans hb.symm)) hx
apply mem_of_related B hsym htri b hy
exact Or.inr (by simpa [hb] using hfloor x y)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma reaches_level_zero {H : ℕ} (a : Label B hsym htri H) :
∃ b, b.1.val=0 ∧ (tree B hsym htri).Reachable a b := by
induction h : a.1.val using Nat.strong_induction_on generalizing a with
| h n ih =>
by_cases hn : n=0
· exact ⟨a,h.trans hn,SimpleGraph.Reachable.refl a⟩
· obtain ⟨b,hb⟩ := parent_exists B hsym htri a (by omega)
obtain ⟨c,hc,hbc⟩ := ih b.1.val (by have := hb.1; omega) b rfl
exact ⟨c,hc,(SimpleGraph.Adj.reachable (show (tree B hsym htri).Adj a b from Or.inr hb)).trans hbc⟩
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor in
theorem tree_connected [Nonempty V] (H : ℕ) : (tree B hsym htri (H := H)).Connected := by
classical
let : Nonempty (Label B hsym htri H) := ⟨labelAt B hsym htri 0 (Classical.choice inferInstance)⟩
refine ⟨?_⟩
intro a b
obtain ⟨a₀,ha₀,ha⟩ := reaches_level_zero B hsym htri a
obtain ⟨b₀,hb₀,hb⟩ := reaches_level_zero B hsym htri b
have he := level_zero_unique B hsym htri hfloor a₀ b₀ ha₀ hb₀
subst b₀
exact ha.trans hb.symm
noncomputable instance labelFintype (H : ℕ) : Fintype (Label B hsym htri H) := Fintype.ofFinite _
theorem label_card_le (H : ℕ) : Fintype.card (Label B hsym htri H) ≤ (H+1)*Fintype.card V := by
classical
have hs : Function.Surjective (fun z : Fin (H+1) × V => labelAt B hsym htri z.1 z.2) := by
intro a
obtain ⟨x,hx⟩ := exists_mem B hsym htri a
exact ⟨(a.1,x),Sigma.ext rfl (heq_of_eq hx)⟩
simpa only [Fintype.card_prod,Fintype.card_fin] using Fintype.card_le_of_surjective _ hs
noncomputable def dyadicLevel (H : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : Fin (H+1) := by
classical
exact ⟨Nat.findGreatest (fun k => (2:ℝ)^k ≤ x) H,
Nat.lt_succ_of_le (Nat.findGreatest_le H)⟩
lemma dyadic_lower (H : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (hx : 1 ≤ x) :
(2:ℝ)^(dyadicLevel H x).val ≤ x := by
classical
exact Nat.findGreatest_spec (P := fun k => (2:ℝ)^k ≤ x) (Nat.zero_le H) (by simpa using hx)
lemma dyadic_upper (H : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (hx : x ≤ (2:ℝ)^H) :
x < (2:ℝ)^((dyadicLevel H x).val+1) := by
classical
by_cases he : (dyadicLevel H x).val=H
· rw [he,pow_succ]
have : 0 < (2:ℝ)^H := by positivity
linarith
· by_contra hn
have hle : (dyadicLevel H x).val+1 ≤ H := by have := (dyadicLevel H x).isLt; omega
have hg := Nat.le_findGreatest (P := fun k => (2:ℝ)^k ≤ x) hle (le_of_not_gt hn)
change (dyadicLevel H x).val+1 ≤ (dyadicLevel H x).val at hg
omega
lemma dyadic_near (H : ℕ) (x y : ℝ) (hxlo : 1 ≤ x) (hyhi : y ≤ (2:ℝ)^H)
(hxy : x ≤ 2*y) : (dyadicLevel H x).val ≤ (dyadicLevel H y).val+1 := by
by_contra hn
have hpow : (2:ℝ)^((dyadicLevel H y).val+2) ≤ 2^(dyadicLevel H x).val :=
pow_le_pow_right₀ (by norm_num) (by omega)
have hx := dyadic_lower H x hxlo
have hy := dyadic_upper H y hyhi
rw [show (dyadicLevel H y).val+2=((dyadicLevel H y).val+1)+1 by omega,pow_succ] at hpow
linarith
lemma dyadic_upper_of_lt (H : ℕ) (x : ℝ) (hx : x < (2:ℝ)^(H+1)) :
x < (2:ℝ)^((dyadicLevel H x).val+1) := by
classical
by_cases he : (dyadicLevel H x).val=H
· simpa [he] using hx
· by_contra hn
have hle : (dyadicLevel H x).val+1 ≤ H := by have := (dyadicLevel H x).isLt; omega
have hg := Nat.le_findGreatest (P := fun k => (2:ℝ)^k ≤ x) hle (le_of_not_gt hn)
change (dyadicLevel H x).val+1 ≤ (dyadicLevel H x).val at hg
omega
lemma dyadic_near_of_lt (H : ℕ) (x y : ℝ) (hxlo : 1≤x) (hyhi : y < (2:ℝ)^(H+1))
(hxy : x≤2*y) : (dyadicLevel H x).val ≤ (dyadicLevel H y).val+1 := by
by_contra hn
have hpow : (2:ℝ)^((dyadicLevel H y).val+2) ≤ 2^(dyadicLevel H x).val :=
pow_le_pow_right₀ (by norm_num) (by omega)
have hx := dyadic_lower H x hxlo
have hy := dyadic_upper_of_lt H y hyhi
rw [show (dyadicLevel H y).val+2=((dyadicLevel H y).val+1)+1 by omega,pow_succ] at hpow
linarith
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma common_vertex_adjacent {H : ℕ} (a b : Label B hsym htri H) {x : V}
(ha : Mem B hsym htri a x) (hb : Mem B hsym htri b x)
(hab : a.1.val ≤ b.1.val+1) (hba : b.1.val ≤ a.1.val+1) :
a=b ∨ (tree B hsym htri).Adj a b := by
rcases lt_trichotomy a.1.val b.1.val with h | h | h
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl ⟨by omega,x,ha,hb⟩)
· exact Or.inl (eq_of_level_of_mem B hsym htri a b (Fin.ext h) ha hb)
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨by omega,x,hb,ha⟩)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma memberships_card_le_two {H : ℕ} (S : Finset (Label B hsym htri H)) (x : V)
(hmem : ∀ a ∈ S, Mem B hsym htri a x)
(hsep : ∀ a ∈ S, ∀ b ∈ S, a.1.val ≤ b.1.val+1) : S.card ≤ 2 := by
classical
by_cases hne : S.Nonempty
· obtain ⟨a,ha,hmin⟩ := S.exists_min_image (fun a => a.1.val) hne
have hinj : Set.InjOn (fun a : Label B hsym htri H => a.1.val) S := by
intro b hb c hc he
exact eq_of_level_of_mem B hsym htri b c (Fin.ext he) (hmem b hb) (hmem c hc)
have hsub : S.image (fun a => a.1.val) ⊆ {a.1.val,a.1.val+1} := by
intro k hk
obtain ⟨b,hb,rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hk
have h₁ := hmin b hb
have h₂ := hsep b hb a ha
simp only [Finset.mem_insert,Finset.mem_singleton]
omega
calc
S.card = (S.image (fun a => a.1.val)).card := (Finset.card_image_of_injOn hinj).symm
_ ≤ ({a.1.val,a.1.val+1} : Finset ℕ).card := Finset.card_le_card hsub
_ ≤ 2 := by simp
· simp [Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.mp hne]
variable {E : Type*} [Fintype E] (left right : E → V) (H : ℕ)
def Incident (e : E) (x : V) : Prop := x=left e ∨ x=right e
noncomputable def edgeLabel (e : E) : Label B hsym htri H :=
labelAt B hsym htri (dyadicLevel H (B (left e) (right e))) (left e)
noncomputable def memberships (x : V) : Finset (Label B hsym htri H) := by
classical
exact (Finset.univ.filter (fun e => Incident left right e x)).image
(edgeLabel B hsym htri left right H)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma mem_memberships (x : V) (l : Label B hsym htri H) :
l ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x ↔
∃ e, Incident left right e x ∧ edgeLabel B hsym htri left right H e=l := by
classical
simp [memberships]
omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in
include hfloor in
lemma incident_mem_label (e : E) {x : V} (hx : Incident left right e x) :
Mem B hsym htri (edgeLabel B hsym htri left right H e) x := by
rcases hx with rfl | rfl
· rfl
· apply (mem_class_iff B hsym htri _ _ _).mpr
exact Or.inr (by rw [hsym]; exact dyadic_lower H _ (hfloor _ _))
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor in
lemma membership_mem {x : V} {l : Label B hsym htri H}
(hl : l ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x) : Mem B hsym htri l x := by
obtain ⟨e,he,rfl⟩ := (mem_memberships B hsym htri left right H x l).mp hl
exact incident_mem_label B hsym htri hfloor left right H e he
variable (hupper : ∀ e, B (left e) (right e) < (2:ℝ)^(H+1))
variable (hnear : ∀ x e f, Incident left right e x → Incident left right f x →
B (left e) (right e) ≤ 2*B (left f) (right f))
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor hupper hnear in
lemma memberships_level_near {x : V} {a b : Label B hsym htri H}
(ha : a ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x)
(hb : b ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x) : a.1.val ≤ b.1.val+1 := by
obtain ⟨e,he,rfl⟩ := (mem_memberships B hsym htri left right H x a).mp ha
obtain ⟨f,hf,rfl⟩ := (mem_memberships B hsym htri left right H x b).mp hb
exact dyadic_near_of_lt H _ _ (hfloor _ _) (hupper f) (hnear x e f he hf)
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor hupper hnear in
theorem memberships_tree_bags (x : V) (a b : Label B hsym htri H)
(ha : a ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x)
(hb : b ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x) :
a=b ∨ (tree B hsym htri).Adj a b := by
exact common_vertex_adjacent B hsym htri a b
(membership_mem B hsym htri hfloor left right H ha)
(membership_mem B hsym htri hfloor left right H hb)
(memberships_level_near B hsym htri hfloor left right H hupper hnear ha hb)
(memberships_level_near B hsym htri hfloor left right H hupper hnear hb ha)
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor hupper hnear in
lemma membership_count (x : V) : (memberships B hsym htri left right H x).card ≤ 2 := by
apply memberships_card_le_two B hsym htri _ x
· intro a ha; exact membership_mem B hsym htri hfloor left right H ha
· intro a ha b hb
exact memberships_level_near B hsym htri hfloor left right H hupper hnear ha hb
omit [Fintype V] in
include hfloor in
lemma common_height_le {x y : V} {l : Label B hsym htri H} (hxy : x≠y)
(hx : l ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H x)
(hy : l ∈ memberships B hsym htri left right H y) : (2:ℝ)^l.1.val ≤ B x y := by
exact (related_of_mem B hsym htri l
(membership_mem B hsym htri hfloor left right H hx)
(membership_mem B hsym htri hfloor left right H hy)).resolve_left hxy
omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in
include hupper in
lemma edge_strength_lt_twice_height (e : E) :
B (left e) (right e) < 2*(2:ℝ)^(edgeLabel B hsym htri left right H e).1.val := by
simpa [edgeLabel,labelAt,pow_succ,mul_comm] using dyadic_upper_of_lt H _ (hupper e)
omit [Fintype V] in
lemma adjacent_heights {a b : Label B hsym htri H} (hab : (tree B hsym htri).Adj a b) :
(2:ℝ)^a.1.val ≤ 2*(2:ℝ)^b.1.val ∧ (2:ℝ)^b.1.val ≤ 2*(2:ℝ)^a.1.val := by
rcases hab with h | h <;> have he := h.1
· have hpow : (2:ℝ)^b.1.val=2*2^a.1.val := by rw [←he,pow_succ]; ring
rw [hpow]; constructor <;> nlinarith [pow_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ)<2) a.1.val]
· have hpow : (2:ℝ)^a.1.val=2*2^b.1.val := by rw [←he,pow_succ]; ring
rw [hpow]; constructor <;> nlinarith [pow_pos (by norm_num : (0:ℝ)<2) b.1.val]
end MatchingFPRAS.Hierarchy
end OAI