roseking's picture
Add lean source and binary files (part 47)
e5a97c6 verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
13.1 kB
import Mathlib
import OAI.Combinatorics.MatchingCount.Graphs.ThresholdGraph
namespace OAI
namespace MatchingFPRAS.Switching
section
open Finset
variable {V W : Type*}
def sumLiftMate (m : Mate V) : Mate (V ⊕ W) :=
⟨Sum.map m.val id,by intro x; cases x <;> simp⟩
@[simp] lemma sumLiftMate_inl (m : Mate V) (a : V) :
(sumLiftMate (W := W) m).val (Sum.inl a)=Sum.inl (m.val a) := rfl
@[simp] lemma sumLiftMate_inr (m : Mate V) (a : W) :
(sumLiftMate m).val (Sum.inr a)=(Sum.inr a : V ⊕ W) := rfl
def sumRetractMate (q : Mate (V ⊕ W)) (hfix : ∀ w, q.val (Sum.inr w)=Sum.inr w) : Mate V := by
let f : V → V := fun a => Sum.elim id (fun _ => a) (q.val (Sum.inl a))
have hf : ∀ a, Sum.inl (f a)=q.val (Sum.inl a) := by
intro a
cases he : q.val (Sum.inl a) with
| inl b => simp [f,he]
| inr w =>
have hh := q.property (Sum.inl a)
rw [he,hfix] at hh
contradiction
refine ⟨f,?_⟩
intro a
apply Sum.inl_injective (β := W)
rw [hf,hf,q.property]
lemma sumRetractMate_inl (q : Mate (V ⊕ W)) (hfix : ∀ w, q.val (Sum.inr w)=Sum.inr w) (a : V) :
Sum.inl ((sumRetractMate q hfix).val a)=q.val (Sum.inl a) := by
cases he : q.val (Sum.inl a) with
| inl b => simp [sumRetractMate,he]
| inr w =>
have hh := q.property (Sum.inl a)
rw [he,hfix] at hh
contradiction
lemma sumLift_retract (q : Mate (V ⊕ W)) (hfix : ∀ w, q.val (Sum.inr w)=Sum.inr w) :
sumLiftMate (sumRetractMate q hfix)=q := by
apply Subtype.ext; funext a
cases a with
| inl a => exact sumRetractMate_inl q hfix a
| inr w => exact (hfix w).symm
lemma sumLift_holes [Fintype V] [Fintype W] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq (V ⊕ W)]
(m : Mate V) (R : Finset V) :
HasHoles (sumLiftMate (W := W) m) (R.map ⟨Sum.inl,Sum.inl_injective⟩)ᶜ ↔ HasHoles m Rᶜ := by
constructor
· intro h a
simpa using h (Sum.inl a)
· intro h a
cases a with
| inl a => simpa using h a
| inr w => simp
lemma internal_fixed_of_terminal_holes [Fintype V] [Fintype W] [DecidableEq V] [DecidableEq (V ⊕ W)]
(q : Mate (V ⊕ W)) (R : Finset V)
(hq : HasHoles q (R.map ⟨Sum.inl,Sum.inl_injective⟩)ᶜ) (w : W) :
q.val (Sum.inr w)=Sum.inr w := (hq (Sum.inr w)).mpr (by simp)
lemma sumLift_weight [Fintype V] [Fintype W] [LinearOrder V] [LinearOrder (V ⊕ W)]
(hord : ∀ a b : V, ((Sum.inl a : V ⊕ W) < Sum.inl b) ↔ a < b)
(B : V → V → ℝ) (B' : (V ⊕ W) → (V ⊕ W) → ℝ)
(hB : ∀ a b, B' (Sum.inl a) (Sum.inl b)=B a b) (m : Mate V) :
weight B' (sumLiftMate m)=weight B m := by
simp [weight,Fintype.prod_sum_type,hord,hB]
theorem pairingCapacity_sum_inl [Fintype V] [Fintype W] [LinearOrder V] [LinearOrder (V ⊕ W)]
(hord : ∀ a b : V, ((Sum.inl a : V ⊕ W) < Sum.inl b) ↔ a < b)
(B : V → V → ℝ) (B' : (V ⊕ W) → (V ⊕ W) → ℝ)
(hB : ∀ a b, B' (Sum.inl a) (Sum.inl b)=B a b)
(R : Finset V) (hR : Even R.card)
(hR' : Even (R.map ⟨Sum.inl,Sum.inl_injective (β := W)⟩).card) :
pairingCapacity B' (R.map ⟨Sum.inl,Sum.inl_injective⟩) hR'=pairingCapacity B R hR := by
classical
apply le_antisymm
· apply Finset.sup'_le
intro q hq
have hholes := (mem_matchings q _).mp hq
have hfix : ∀ w, q.val (Sum.inr w)=Sum.inr w := by
intro w
exact (hholes (Sum.inr w)).mpr (by simp)
let m := sumRetractMate q hfix
have hqm : sumLiftMate m=q := sumLift_retract q hfix
have hm : HasHoles m Rᶜ := by
intro a
have hh := hholes (Sum.inl a)
rw [← hqm] at hh
simpa using hh
rw [← hqm,sumLift_weight hord B B' hB]
exact weight_le_pairingCapacity B R hR m hm
· apply Finset.sup'_le
intro m hm
have hholes := (mem_matchings m _).mp hm
rw [← sumLift_weight hord B B' hB]
apply weight_le_pairingCapacity B' _ hR' (sumLiftMate m)
intro a
cases a with
| inl a => simpa using hholes a
| inr a => simp
theorem ChargeTrace.capacity_bound_decidable [Fintype V] [LinearOrder V]
(dec : DecidableEq V) {B : V → V → ℝ}
(hB : ∀ a b, B a b = B b a) (hB0 : ∀ a b, 0 ≤ B a b)
(htri : ∀ a b c, a ≠ b → a ≠ c → b ≠ c → min (B a c) (B c b) ≤ B a b)
{U W : Finset V} {F : ℝ} (h : @ChargeTrace V dec B U W F) (hU : Even U.card) :
∃ hW : Even W.card, pairingCapacity B U hU * F ≤ pairingCapacity B W hW := by
have he : dec = (inferInstance : LinearOrder V).toDecidableEq := Subsingleton.elim _ _
subst dec
exact h.capacity_bound hB hB0 htri hU
end
variable {V : Type*}
lemma ChargeTrace.factor_nonneg [DecidableEq V] {B : V → V → ℝ}
{U W : Finset V} {F : ℝ} (h : ChargeTrace B U W F) : 0 ≤ F := by
cases h with
| done => norm_num
| remove _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hF => exact mul_nonneg hf hF
| replace _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hF => exact mul_nonneg hf hF
end MatchingFPRAS.Switching
namespace MatchingFPRAS.Subdivision
open Finset
abbrev Selection (m : ℕ) := Fin (m+1) → Bool
def Valid {m : ℕ} (holes : Finset (Fin m)) (b : Selection m) : Prop :=
∀ i : Fin m, if i ∈ holes then b i.castSucc = false ∧ b i.succ = false
else b i.castSucc ≠ b i.succ
def alternating (a : Bool) (i : ℕ) : Bool := if i % 2 = 0 then a else !a
@[simp] theorem alternating_zero (a : Bool) : alternating a 0 = a := by
simp [alternating]
@[simp] theorem alternating_succ (a : Bool) (i : ℕ) :
alternating a (i+1) = !(alternating a i) := by
by_cases h : i % 2 = 0
· have hs : (i+1)%2 = 1 := by omega
simp [alternating,h,hs]
· have hs : i%2=1 := by omega
have ht : (i+1)%2=0 := by omega
simp [alternating,hs,ht]
@[simp] theorem alternating_add_two (a : Bool) (i : ℕ) :
alternating a (i+2) = alternating a i := by
rw [show i+2=(i+1)+1 by omega, alternating_succ, alternating_succ]
simp
lemma bool_ne_iff_eq_not (a b : Bool) : a ≠ b ↔ b = !a := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
theorem intact_iff {m : ℕ} (b : Selection m) :
Valid ∅ b ↔ ∀ i : Fin (m+1), b i = alternating (b 0) i.val := by
constructor
· intro h i
have hstep (j : Fin m) : b j.succ = !(b j.castSucc) := by
apply (bool_ne_iff_eq_not _ _).mp
simpa [Valid] using h j
have aux (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m+1) : b ⟨k,hk⟩ = alternating (b 0) k := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
rw [alternating_succ]
have hk' : k < m := by omega
have he := hstep ⟨k,hk'⟩
simpa only [Fin.succ_mk, Fin.castSucc_mk, ih (by omega)] using he
exact aux i.val i.isLt
· intro h i
simp only [Finset.notMem_empty, ↓reduceIte]
rw [h i.castSucc, h i.succ]
simp only [Fin.val_castSucc, Fin.val_succ, alternating_succ]
cases alternating (b 0) i.val <;> decide
theorem intact_terminals {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (b : Selection m)
(h : Valid ∅ b) : b (Fin.last m) = b 0 := by
rw [(intact_iff b).mp h]
simp [alternating, Nat.even_iff.mp hm]
theorem alternating_valid (m : ℕ) (a : Bool) :
Valid ∅ (fun i : Fin (m+1) => alternating a i.val) := by
apply (intact_iff _).mpr
intro i
simp
@[simp] theorem alternating_not (a : Bool) (i : ℕ) :
alternating (!a) i = !(alternating a i) := by
unfold alternating
split_ifs <;> simp
def wordWeight (a : Bool) : List ℝ → ℝ
| [] => 1
| x::xs => (if a then x else 1) * wordWeight (!a) xs
@[simp] theorem wordWeight_nil (a : Bool) : wordWeight a [] = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem wordWeight_pair (a : Bool) (x : ℝ) (xs : List ℝ) :
wordWeight a (x::x::xs) = x * wordWeight a xs := by
cases a <;> simp [wordWeight]
def duplicate (xs : List ℝ) : List ℝ := xs.flatMap (fun x => [x,x])
@[simp] theorem duplicate_nil : duplicate [] = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem duplicate_cons (x : ℝ) (xs : List ℝ) :
duplicate (x::xs) = x::x::duplicate xs := by simp [duplicate]
@[simp] theorem duplicate_length (xs : List ℝ) :
(duplicate xs).length = 2*xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih => simp [ih]; omega
theorem paired_prefix_weight (a : Bool) (xs ys : List ℝ) :
wordWeight a (duplicate xs ++ ys) = xs.prod * wordWeight a ys := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih => simp [ih, mul_assoc]
theorem profile_weight (a : Bool) (left right : List ℝ) (lam : ℝ) :
wordWeight a (duplicate left ++ [lam] ++ duplicate right) =
left.prod * right.prod * (if a then lam else 1) := by
rw [List.append_assoc, paired_prefix_weight]
simp only [List.singleton_append, wordWeight]
have h := paired_prefix_weight (!a) right []
simp only [List.append_nil, wordWeight_nil, mul_one] at h
rw [h]
ring
theorem wordWeight_ofFn (n : ℕ) (w : Fin n → ℝ) (a : Bool) :
wordWeight a (List.ofFn w) = ∏ i, (if alternating a i.val then w i else 1) := by
induction n generalizing a with
| zero => simp [List.ofFn_zero]
| succ n ih =>
rw [List.ofFn_succ, Fin.prod_univ_succ]
simp only [wordWeight, Fin.val_zero, alternating_zero]
rw [ih]
congr 1
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro i _
simp
noncomputable def selectedWeight {m : ℕ} (w : Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (b : Selection m) : ℝ :=
∏ i, if b i then w i else 1
theorem intact_weight {m : ℕ} (w : Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (b : Selection m)
(h : Valid ∅ b) : selectedWeight w b = wordWeight (b 0) (List.ofFn w) := by
rw [wordWeight_ofFn]
unfold selectedWeight
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro i _
rw [(intact_iff b).mp h]
variable {V E : Type*} [Fintype V] [Fintype E]
def LogicalPerfect (u v : E → V) (s : E → Bool) : Prop :=
∀ x, ∃! e, s e = true ∧ (u e = x ∨ v e = x)
def FamilyPerfect (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ) (b : E → Selection m) : Prop :=
(∀ e, Valid ∅ (b e)) ∧
∀ x, ∃! e, (b e 0 = true ∧ u e = x) ∨
(b e (Fin.last m) = true ∧ v e = x)
omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in
theorem family_iff [Fintype V] [Fintype E]
{u v : E → V} {m : ℕ} (hm : Even m) (b : E → Selection m) :
FamilyPerfect u v m b ↔
(∀ e, Valid ∅ (b e)) ∧ LogicalPerfect u v (fun e => b e 0) := by
unfold FamilyPerfect LogicalPerfect
constructor
· rintro ⟨hp,ht⟩
refine ⟨hp,?_⟩
have he (e) := intact_terminals hm (b e) (hp e)
simpa only [he, ← and_or_left] using ht
· rintro ⟨hp,ht⟩
refine ⟨hp,?_⟩
have he (e) := intact_terminals hm (b e) (hp e)
simpa only [he, ← and_or_left] using ht
def familyEquiv (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ) (hm : Even m) :
{b : E → Selection m // FamilyPerfect u v m b} ≃
{s : E → Bool // LogicalPerfect u v s} where
toFun b := ⟨fun e => b.val e 0, ((family_iff hm b.val).mp b.property).2⟩
invFun s := ⟨fun e i => alternating (s.val e) i.val,
(family_iff hm _).mpr ⟨fun e => alternating_valid m (s.val e), by
simpa only [Fin.val_zero, alternating_zero] using s.property⟩⟩
left_inv b := by
apply Subtype.ext
funext e i
exact ((intact_iff (b.val e)).mp (b.property.1 e) i).symm
right_inv s := by
apply Subtype.ext
funext e
simp
noncomputable def logicalPartition (u v : E → V) (lam : E → ℝ) : ℝ := by
classical
letI := Fintype.ofFinite {s : E → Bool // LogicalPerfect u v s}
exact ∑ s : {s : E → Bool // LogicalPerfect u v s},
∏ e, if s.val e then lam e else 1
noncomputable def realPartition (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ)
(w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) : ℝ := by
classical
letI := Fintype.ofFinite {b : E → Selection m // FamilyPerfect u v m b}
exact ∑ b : {b : E → Selection m // FamilyPerfect u v m b},
∏ e, selectedWeight (w e) (b.val e)
omit [Fintype V] [Fintype E] in
theorem family_weight [Fintype V] [Fintype E] (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ) (_hm : Even m)
(w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (left right : E → List ℝ) (lam : E → ℝ)
(hw : ∀ e, List.ofFn (w e) = duplicate (left e) ++ [lam e] ++ duplicate (right e))
(b : E → Selection m) (hb : FamilyPerfect u v m b) :
(∏ e, selectedWeight (w e) (b e)) =
(∏ e, (left e).prod * (right e).prod) *
∏ e, if b e 0 then lam e else 1 := by
classical
rw [← Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
intro e _
rw [intact_weight _ _ (hb.1 e), hw e, profile_weight]
theorem real_partition_identity (u v : E → V) (m : ℕ) (hm : Even m)
(w : E → Fin (m+1) → ℝ) (left right : E → List ℝ) (lam : E → ℝ)
(hw : ∀ e, List.ofFn (w e) = duplicate (left e) ++ [lam e] ++ duplicate (right e)) :
realPartition u v m w =
(∏ e, (left e).prod * (right e).prod) * logicalPartition u v lam := by
classical
let := Fintype.ofFinite {s : E → Bool // LogicalPerfect u v s}
let := Fintype.ofFinite {b : E → Selection m // FamilyPerfect u v m b}
unfold realPartition logicalPartition
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
apply Fintype.sum_equiv (familyEquiv u v m hm)
intro b
exact family_weight u v m hm w left right lam hw b.val b.property
end MatchingFPRAS.Subdivision
end OAI